Ratcliffe, N. et al. A protocol for the aerial survey of penguin colonies using UAVs. J. Unmanned Veh. Syst. 3, 95–101 (2015).
Albores-Barajas, Y. V. et al. A new use of technology to solve an old problem: Estimating the population size of a burrow nesting seabird. PLoS ONE 13, 1–15 (2018).
Rush, G. P., Clarke, L. E., Stone, M. & Wood, M. J. Can drones count gulls? Minimal disturbance and semiautomated image processing with an unmanned aerial vehicle for colony-nesting seabirds. Ecol. Evol. 8, 12322–12334 (2018).
Google Scholar
Chabot, D., Craik, S. R. & Bird, D. M. Population census of a large Common tern colony with a small unmanned aircraft. PLoS ONE 10, 1–14 (2015).
McClelland, G. T. W., Bond, A. L., Sardana, A. & Glass, T. Rapid population estimate of a surface-nesting seabird on a remote island using a low-cost unmanned aerial vehicle. Mar. Ornithol. 44, 215–220 (2016).
Lynch, H. J., White, R., Black, A. D. & Naveen, R. Detection, differentiation, and abundance estimation of penguin species by high-resolution satellite imagery. Polar Biol. 35, 963–968 (2012).
Fretwell, P. T. et al. An Emperor penguin population estimate: The first global, synoptic survey of a species from space. PLoS ONE 7, e33751 (2012).
Google Scholar
Xue, Y., Wang, T. & Skidmore, A. K. Automatic counting of large mammals from very high resolution panchromatic satellite imagery. Remote Sens. 9, 1–16 (2017).
Laliberte, A. S. & Ripple, W. J. Automated wildlife counts from remotely sensed imagery. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 31, 362–371 (2003).
Lyons, M. B. et al. Monitoring large and complex wildlife aggregations with drones. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 1024–1035 (2019).
LaRue, M. A., Stapleton, S. & Anderson, M. Feasibility of using high-resolution satellite imagery to assess vertebrate wildlife populations. Conserv. Biol. 31, 213–220 (2017).
Google Scholar
Sardà-Palomera, F., Bota, G., Padilla, N., Brotons, L. & Sardà, F. Unmanned aircraft systems to unravel spatial and temporal factors affecting dynamics of colony formation and nesting success in birds. J. Avian Biol. 48, 1273–1280 (2017).
Schofield, G., Katselidis, K. A., Lilley, M. K. S., Reina, R. D. & Hays, G. C. Detecting elusive aspects of wildlife ecology using drones: New insights on the mating dynamics and operational sex ratios of sea turtles. Funct. Ecol. 31, 2310–2319 (2017).
Lachman, D., Conway, C., Vierling, K. & Matthews, T. Drones provide a better method to find nests and estimate nest survival for colonial waterbirds: A demonstration with Western grebes. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 28, 837–845 (2020).
Torres, L. G., Nieukirk, S. L., Lemos, L. & Chandler, T. E. Drone up! Quantifying whale behavior from a new perspective improves observational capacity. Front. Mar. Sci. 5, 1–14 (2018).
Jagielski, P. M., Dey, C. J., Gilchrist, H. G., Richardson, E. S. & Semeniuk, C. A. D. Polar bear foraging on common eider eggs: Estimating the energetic consequences of a climate-mediated behavioural shift. Anim. Behav. 171, 63–75 (2021).
Jagielski, P. M. et al. Polar bears are inefficient predators of seabird eggs. R. Soc. Open Sci. 8, 210391 (2021).
Google Scholar
Callaghan, C. T., Brandis, K. J., Lyons, M. B., Ryall, S. & Kingsford, R. T. A comment on the limitations of UAVS in wildlife research—The example of colonial nesting waterbirds. J. Avian Biol. 49, e01825 (2018).
Brisson-Curadeau, É. et al. Seabird species vary in behavioural response to drone census. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–9 (2017).
Nowak, M. M., Dziób, K. & Bogawski, P. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in environmental biology: A review. Eur. J. Ecol. 4, 56–74 (2019).
Watts, A. C. et al. Small unmanned aircraft systems for low-altitude aerial surveys. J. Wildl. Manag. 74, 1614–1619 (2010).
Sasse, D. B. Job-related mortality of wildlife workers in the United States, 1937–2000. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 31, 1015–1020 (2003).
Carey, M. J. The effects of investigator disturbance on procellariiform seabirds: A review. N. Z. J. Zool. 36, 367–377 (2009).
Carney, K. M. & Sydeman, W. J. A review of human disturbance effects on nesting colonial waterbirds. Int. J. Waterbird Biol. 22, 68–79 (1999).
Barber-Meyer, S. M., Kooyman, G. L. & Ponganis, P. J. Estimating the relative abundance of Emperor penguins at inaccessible colonies using satellite imagery. Polar Biol. 30, 1565–1570 (2007).
Lyons, M. et al. A protocol for using drones to assist monitoring of large breeding bird colonies. EcolEvol https://doi.org/10.32942/osf.io/p9j3f (2019).
Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. C. et al. Drones count wildlife more accurately and precisely than humans. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 1160–1167 (2018).
Hodgson, J. C., Baylis, S. M., Mott, R., Herrod, A. & Clarke, R. H. Precision wildlife monitoring using unmanned aerial vehicles. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–7 (2016).
Weston, M. A., O’Brien, C., Kostoglou, K. N. & Symonds, M. R. E. Escape responses of terrestrial and aquatic birds to drones: Towards a code of practice to minimize disturbance. J. Appl. Ecol. 57, 777–785 (2020).
Korczak-Abshire, M. et al. Preliminary study on nesting Adélie penguins disturbance by unmanned aerial vehicles. CCAMLR Sci. 23, 1–16 (2016).
Mesquita, G. P., Rodríguez-Teijeiro, J. D., Wich, S. A. & Mulero-Pázmány, M. Measuring disturbance at a swift breeding colonies due to the visual aspects of a drone: A quasi-experiment study. Curr. Zool. 41, 259–266 (2020).
Weimerskirch, H., Prudor, A. & Schull, Q. Flights of drones over sub-Antarctic seabirds show species- and status-specific behavioural and physiological responses. Polar Biol. 41, 259–266 (2018).
Mulero-Pázmány, M. et al. Unmanned aircraft systems as a new source of disturbance for wildlife: A systematic review. PLoS ONE 12, 1–14 (2017).
Barnas, A. et al. Evaluating behavioral responses of nesting Lesser snow geese to unmanned aircraft surveys. Ecol. Evol. 8, 1328–1338 (2018).
Google Scholar
Ellis-felege, S. N. et al. Nesting Common eiders (Somateria mollissima) show little behavioral response to fixed-wing drone surveys. J. Unmanned Veh. Syst. https://doi.org/10.1139/juvs-2021-0012 (2021).
Google Scholar
Wilson, R. P., Culik, B., Danfeld, R. & Adelung, D. People in Antarctica—how much do Adélie penguins Pygoscelis adeliae care?. Polar Biol. 11, 363–370 (1991).
Ricklefs, R. E. An analysis of nesting mortality in birds. Smithson. Contrib. Zool. 9, 1–48 (1969).
Ditmer, M. A. et al. Bears show a physiological but limited behavioral response to unmanned aerial vehicles. Curr. Biol. 25, 2278–2283 (2015).
Google Scholar
Ditmer, M. A. et al. Bears habituate to the repeated exposure of a novel stimulus, unmanned aircraft systems. Conserv. Physiol. 6, 1–7 (2018).
Jaatinen, K., Seltmann, M. W. & Öst, M. Context-dependent stress responses and their connections to fitness in a landscape of fear. J. Zool. 294, 147–153 (2014).
Seltmann, M. W. et al. Stress responsiveness, age and body condition interactively affect flight initiation distance in breeding female eiders. Anim. Behav. 84, 889–896 (2012).
Cockrem, J. F. Stress, corticosterone responses and avian personalities. J. Ornithol. 148, S169–S178 (2007).
Criscuolo, F. Does blood sampling during eider incubation induce nest desertion in the female Common eider Somateria mollissima?. Mar. Ornithol. 29, 47–50 (2001).
Ellenberg, U., Mattern, T. & Seddon, P. J. Heart rate responses provide an objective evaluation of human disturbance stimuli in breeding birds. Conserv. Physiol. 1, 1–11 (2013).
DeRose-Wilson, A., Fraser, J. D., Karpanty, S. M. & Hillman, M. D. Effects of overflights on incubating Wilson’s plover behavior and heart rate. J. Wildl. Manag. 79, 1246–1254 (2015).
de Villiers, M., Bause, M., Giese, M. & Fourie, A. Hardly hard-hearted: Heart rate responses of incubating Northern giant petrels (Macronectes halli) to human disturbance on sub-Antarctic Marion Island. Polar Biol. 29, 717–720 (2006).
Borneman, T. E., Rose, E. T. & Simons, T. R. Minimal changes in heart rate of incubating American oystercatchers (Haematopus palliatus) in response to human activity. Condor 116, 493–503 (2014).
Felton, S. K., Pollock, K. H. & Simons, T. R. Response of beach-nesting American oystercatchers to off-road vehicles: An experimental approach reveals physiological nuances and decreased nest attendance. Condor 120, 47–62 (2018).
Bolduc, F. & Guillemette, M. Human disturbance and nesting success of Common eiders: Interaction between visitors and gulls. Biol. Conserv. 110, 77–83 (2003).
Hennin, H. L. et al. Plasma mammalian leptin analogue predicts reproductive phenology, but not reproductive output in a capital-income breeding seaduck. Ecol. Evol. 9, 1512–1521 (2019).
Google Scholar
Culik, B., Adelung, D. & Woakes, A. J. The effect of disturbance on the heart rate and behaviour of Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) during the breeding season. In Antarctic Ecosystems. Ecological Change and Conservation (eds Kerry, K. R. & Hempel, G.) 177–182 (Springer, 1990).
Weimerskirch, H. et al. Heart rate and energy expenditure of incubating Wandering albatrosses: Basal levels, natural variation, and the effects of human disturbance. J. Exp. Biol. 205, 475–483 (2002).
Google Scholar
Egan, C. C., Blackwell, B. F., Fernández-Juricic, E. & Klug, P. E. Testing a key assumption of using drones as frightening devices: Do birds perceive drones as risky?. Condor 122, 1–15 (2020).
McEvoy, J. F., Hall, G. P. & McDonald, P. G. Evaluation of unmanned aerial vehicle shape, flight path and camera type for waterfowl surveys: Disturbance effects and species recognition. PeerJ 4, e1831 (2016).
Google Scholar
Goebel, M. E. et al. A small unmanned aerial system for estimating abundance and size of Antarctic predators. Polar Biol. 38, 619–630 (2015).
Bevan, E. et al. Measuring behavioral responses of sea turtles, saltwater crocodiles, and Crested terns to drone disturbance to define ethical operating thresholds. PLoS ONE 13, 4–6 (2018).
Rümmler, M. C., Mustafa, O., Maercker, J., Peter, H. U. & Esefeld, J. Measuring the influence of unmanned aerial vehicles on Adélie penguins. Polar Biol. 39, 1329–1334 (2016).
Vas, E., Lescroël, A., Duriez, O., Boguszewski, G. & Grémillet, D. Approaching birds with drones: First experiments and ethical guidelines. Biol. Lett. 11, 20140754 (2015).
Google Scholar
Frid, A. & Dill, L. Human-caused disturbance stimuli as a form of predation risk. Ecol. Soc. 6, 11 (2002).
Forbes, M. R. L., Clark, R. G., Weatherhead, P. J. & Armstrong, T. Risk-taking by female ducks: Intra-and interspecific tests of nest defense theory. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 34, 79–85 (1994).
Viblanc, V. A., Smith, A. D., Gineste, B., Kauffmann, M. & Groscolas, R. Modulation of heart rate response to acute stressors throughout the breeding season in the King penguin Aptenodytes patagonicus. J. Exp. Biol. 218, 1686–1692 (2015).
Google Scholar
Montgomerie, R. D. & Weatherhead, P. J. Risks and rewards of nest defence by parent birds. Q. Rev. Biol. 63, 167–187 (1988).
Criscuolo, F., Gabrielsen, G. W., Gendner, J.-P. & Maho, Y. L. Body mass regulation during incubation in female Common eiders Somateria mollissima. J. Avian Biol. 33, 83–88 (2002).
Cyr, N. E., Wikelski, M. & Romero, L. M. Increased energy expenditure but decreased stress responsiveness during molt. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. Ecol. Evol. Approaches 81, 452–462 (2008).
Kralj-Fišer, S., Scheiber, I. B. R., Kotrschal, K., Weiß, B. M. & Wascher, C. A. F. Glucocorticoids enhance and suppress heart rate and behaviour in time dependent manner in Greylag geese (Anser anser). Physiol. Behav. 100, 394–400 (2010).
Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. C. & Koh, L. P. Best practice for minimising unmanned aerial vehicle disturbance to wildlife in biological field research. Curr. Biol. 26, R404–R405 (2016).
Google Scholar
Parker, H. & Holm, H. Patterns of nutrient and energy expenditure in female Common eiders nesting in the high Arctic. Auk 107, 660–668 (1990).
Mehlum, F. Eider Studies in Svalbard Vol. 195 (Norsk Polarinstitutt Skrifter, 1991).
Markowitz, E. M., Nisbet, M. C., Danylchuk, A. J. & Engelbourg, S. I. What’s that buzzing noise? Public opinion on the use of drones for conservation science. Bioscience 67, 382–385 (2017).
Legagneux, P. et al. Unpredictable perturbation reduces breeding propensity regardless of pre-laying reproductive readiness in a partial capital breeder. J. Avian Biol. 47, 880–886 (2016).
Love, O. P., Gilchrist, H. G., Descamps, S., Semeniuk, C. A. D. & Bêty, J. Pre-laying climatic cues can time reproduction to optimally match offspring hatching and ice conditions in an Arctic marine bird. Oecologia 164, 277–286 (2010).
Google Scholar
Fast, P. L. F., Gilchrist, H. G. & Clark, R. G. Nest-site materials affect nest-bowl use by Common eiders (Somateria mollissima). Can. J. Zool. 88, 214–218 (2010).
McKinnon, L., Gilchrist, H. G. & Scribner, K. T. Genetic evidence for kin-based female social structure in Common eiders (Somateria mollissima). Behav. Ecol. 17, 614–621 (2006).
Descamps, S., Forbes, M. R., Gilchrist, H. G., Love, O. P. & Bêty, J. Avian cholera, post-hatching survival and selection on hatch characteristics in a long-lived bird, the Common eider Somateria mollissima. J. Avian Biol. 42, 39–48 (2011).
Buttler, E. I. Avian Cholera Among Arctic Breeding Common eiders Somateria mollissima: Temporal Dynamics and the Role of Handling Stress in Reproduction and Survival (Carleton University, 2009).
Descamps, S., Gilchrist, H. G., Bêty, J., Buttler, E. I. & Forbes, M. R. Costs of reproduction in a long-lived bird: large clutch size is associated with low survival in the presence of a highly virulent disease. Biol. Lett. 5, 278–281 (2009).
Google Scholar
Iverson, S. A., Gilchrist, H. G., Smith, P. A., Gaston, A. J. & Forbes, M. R. Longer ice-free seasons increase the risk of nest depredation by Polar bears for colonial breeding birds in the Canadian Arctic. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 281, 20133128 (2014).
Dey, C. J. et al. Increasing nest predation will be insufficient to maintain Polar bear body condition in the face of sea ice loss. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 1821–1831 (2017).
Google Scholar
Giese, M., Handsworth, R. & Stephenson, R. Measuring resting heart rates in penguins using an artificial egg. J. Field Ornithol. 70, 49–54 (1999).
Weller, M. W. A simple field candler for waterfowl eggs. J. Wildl. Manag. 20, 111–113 (1956).
Barnas, A. F. et al. A standardized protocol for reporting methods when using drones for wildlife research. J. Unmanned Veh. Syst. 8, 89–98 (2020).
Audacity Team. Audacity(R): Free Audio Editor and Recorder [Computer Application]. Version 2.3.2 retrieved Oct 10th 2019 from https://www.audacityteam.org/ (2019).
Nimon, A. J., Schroter, R. C. & Oxenham, R. K. C. Artificial eggs: Measuring heart rate and effects of disturbance in nesting penguins. Physiol. Behav. 60, 1019–1022 (1996).
Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. SAS® Studio 3.8: User’s Guide (SAS Institute Inc, 2018).
Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach (Springer, 2002).
Google Scholar
Akaike, H. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In Breakthroughs in Statistics, Volume I, Foundations and Basic Theory (eds Kotz, S. & Johnson, N. L.) 610–624 (Springer, New York, 1998).
Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L. & Müller, K. dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation. R package version 0.8.3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr (2015).
Grolemund, G. & Wickham, H. Dates and times made easy with lubridate. J. Stat. Softw. 40, 1–25 (2011).
Hijmans, R. J., Williams, E. & Vennes, C. Geosphere: Spherical Trigonometry. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=geosphere (2017).
Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer, 2016).
Google Scholar
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Found. Stat. Comput., Vienna, 2017).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
