in

Reproductive performance and sex ratio adjustment of the wild boar (Sus scrofa) in South Korea

  • Estes, J. A. Predators and ecosystem management. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 24, 390–396 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Licht, D. S., Millspaugh, J. J., Kunkel, K. E., Kochanny, C. O. & Peterson, R. O. Using small populations of wolves for ecosystem restoration and stewardship. Bioscience 60, 147–153 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, C. C., Swenson, J. E. & Miller, S. D. Large carnivores, moose, and humans: A changing paradigm of predator management in the 21st century. Alces J. Devot. Biol. Manag. Moose 39, 41–63 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Valente, A. M., Acevedo, P., Figueiredo, A. M., Fonseca, C. & Torres, R. T. Overabundant wild ungulate populations in Europe: Management with consideration of socio-ecological consequences. Mammal Rev. 50, 353–366 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. D. & Miller-Rushing, A. J. Degradation, urbanization, and restoration: A review of the challenges and future of conservation on the Korean Peninsula. Biol. Cons. 176, 262–276 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kodera, Y. Habitat selection of Japanese wild boar in Iwami district, Shimane Prefecture, western Japan. Wildl. Conserv. Jpn. 6, 119–129 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohashi, H. et al. Differences in the activity pattern of the wild boar Sus scrofa related to human disturbance. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 59, 167–177 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Environment Republic of Korea. Management Plan of Pest Wild Boars. (Sejong, 2010).

  • National Institute of Biological Resources. Analysis of Hunting Effect on Pest Animals and its Monitoring Techniques. (Incheon, 2017).

  • Lee, S. M. & Lee, E. J. Diet of the wild boar (Sus scrofa): Implications for management in forest-agricultural and urban environments in South Korea. PeerJ 7, e7835 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieber, C. & Ruf, T. Population dynamics in wild boar Sus scrofa: ecology, elasticity of growth rate and implications for the management of pulsed resource consumers. J. Appl. Ecol. 42, 1203–1213 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Brogi, R. et al. Capital-income breeding in wild boar: A comparison between two sexes. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–10 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Frauendorf, M., Gethöffer, F., Siebert, U. & Keuling, O. The influence of environmental and physiological factors on the litter size of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in an agriculture dominated area in Germany. Sci. Total Environ. 541, 877–882 (2016).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Massei, G., Genov, P. V. & Staines, B. W. Diet, food availability and reproduction of wild boar in a Mediterranean coastal area. Acta Theriol. 41, 307–320 (1996).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabrina, S., Jean-Michel, G., Carole, T., Serge, B. & Eric, B. Pulsed resources and climate-induced variation in the reproductive traits of wild boar under high hunting pressure. J. Anim. Ecol. 78, 1278–1290 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca, C. et al. Reproduction in the wild boar (Sus scrofa Linnaeus, 1758) populations of Portugal. Galemys 16, 53–65 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morreti, M. Birth distribution, structure and dynamics of a hunted mountain populatin of wild boars (Sus scrofa L.), Ticino, Switzerland. J. Mt. Ecol. 3, 192–196 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosell, C., Navas, F. & Romero, S. Reproduction of wild boar in a cropland and coastal wetland area: Implications for management. Anim. Biodivers. Conserv. 35, 209–217 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cellina, S. Effects of supplemental feeding on the body condition and reproductive state of wild boar Sus scrofa in Luxembourg PhD Dissertation thesis, University of Sussex, (2008).

  • Gamelon, M. et al. High hunting pressure selects for earlier birth date: Wild boar as a case study. Evol. Int. J. Org. Evol. 65, 3100–3112 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gethöffer, F., Sodeikat, G. & Pohlmeyer, K. Reproductive parameters of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in three different parts of Germany. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 53, 287–297 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca, C., Da Silva, A., Alves, J., Vingada, J. & Soares, A. Reproductive performance of wild boar females in Portugal. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 57, 363–371 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard, J.-M., Brandt, S. & Jullien, J.-M. Body weight effect on reproduction of young wild boar (Sus scrofa) females: A comparative analysis. Folia Zool. (Brno) 42, 204–212 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Poteaux, C. et al. Socio-genetic structure and mating system of a wild boar population. J. Zool. 278, 116–125 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitz, F., Valet, G. & Lehr Brisbin, I. Jr. Variation in body mass of wild boars from southern France. J. Mammal. 79, 251–259 (1998).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. & Willard, D. E. Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science 179, 90–92 (1973).

    Article 
    ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H., Albon, S. & Guinness, F. Parental investment in male and female offspring in polygynous mammals. Nature 289, 487–489 (1981).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewison, A. M. & Gaillard, J.-M. Successful sons or advantaged daughters? The Trivers-Willard model and sex-biased maternal investment in ungulates. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 229–234 (1999).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H. & Iason, G. R. Sex ratio variation in mammals. Q. Rev. Biol. 61, 339–374 (1986).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Llario, P. & Mateos-Quesada, P. Body size and reproductive parameters in the wild boar Sus scrofa. Acta Theriol. 43, 439–444 (1998).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Meikle, D. B., Drickamer, L. C., Vessey, S. H., Rosenthal, T. L. & Fitzgerald, K. S. Maternal dominance rank and secondary sex ratio in domestic swine. Anim. Behav. 46, 79–85 (1993).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Servanty, S., Gaillard, J.-M., Allainé, D., Brandt, S. & Baubet, E. Litter size and fetal sex ratio adjustment in a highly polytocous species: The wild boar. Behav. Ecol. 18, 427–432 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendl, M., Zanella, A. J., Broom, D. M. & Whittemore, C. T. Maternal social status and birth sex ratio in domestic pigs: An analysis of mechanisms. Anim. Behav. 50, 1361–1370 (1995).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, E. Z. Facultative adjustment of mammalian sex ratios in support of the Trivers-Willard hypothesis: Evidence for a mechanism. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 271, 1723–1728 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T., Albon, S. & Guinness, F. Maternal dominance, breeding success and birth sex ratios in red deer. Nature 308, 358–360 (1984).

    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Maillard, D. & Fournier, P. Timing and synchrony of births in the wild boar (Sus scrofa Linnaeus, 1758) in a Mediterranean habitat: The effect of food availability. Galemys 16, 67–74 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bywater, K. A., Apollonio, M., Cappai, N. & Stephens, P. A. Litter size and latitude in a large mammal: the wild boar Sus scrofa. Mammal Rev. 40, 212–220 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Orłowska, L., Rembacz, W. & Florek, C. Carcass weight, condition and reproduction of wild boars harvested in north-western Poland. Pest Manag. Sci. 69, 367–370 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Carranza, J. Sexual selection for male body mass and the evolution of litter size in mammals. Am. Nat. 148, 81–100 (1996).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • FernáNdez-Llario, P., Carranza, J. & Mateos-Quesada, P. Sex allocation in a polygynous mammal with large litters: The wild boar. Anim. Behav. 58, 1079–1084 (1999).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • McBride, G. The” teat order” and communication in young pigs. Animal Behaviour (1963).

  • McBride, G., James, J. & Hodgens, N. Social behaviour of domestic animals. IV. Growing pigs. Anim. Sci. 6, 129–139 (1964).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • McBride, G., James, J. & Wyeth, G. Social behaviour of domestic animals VII. Variation in weaning weight in pigs. Anim. Sci. 7, 67–74 (1965).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Geochang County. Geochang Statistical yearbook. (Geochang, 2015).

  • Seoul Metropolitan Government. Seoul Statistical Yearbook. (Seoul, 2017).

  • Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency and Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee Standard Operation Guideline. (Gimcheon, 2020).

  • Magnell, O. & Carter, R. The chronology of tooth development in wild boar – A guide to age determination of linear enamel hypoplasia in prehistoric and medieval pigs. Verterrinarija Ir Zootechnika. T. 40, 43–48 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oroian, T. E., Oroian, R. G., Pasca, I., Oroian, E. & Covrig, I. Methods of age estimation by dentition in Sus scrofa ferus sp. Bull. UASVM Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 67, 1–2 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vericad, R. Fetal age, conception and birth period estimation on wild boar (Sus scrofa) in West Pyrenees. in Actas del XV Congresso Int. Fauna Cinegética y Silvestre. (Trujillo, 1983).

  • Rosell, C., Fernández-Llario, P. & Herrero, J. The wild boar (Sus scrofa Linnaeus, 1758). Galemys 13, 1–25 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • R core team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing v. 3.6.0 (Austria, 2019).


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    Improving access to aquatic foods

    Biodiversity stabilizes plant communities through statistical-averaging effects rather than compensatory dynamics