Börger, L., Dalziel, B. D. & Fryxell, J. M. Are there general mechanisms of animal home range behaviour? A review and prospects for future research. Ecol. Lett. 11, 637–650 (2008).
Google Scholar
Burt, W. H. Territoriality and home range concepts as applied to mammals. J. Mammal. 24, 346 (1943).
Google Scholar
Darwin, C. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection (D. Appleton Co., 1859).
Merkle, J., Fortin, D. & Morales, J. M. A memory‐based foraging tactic reveals an adaptive mechanism for restricted space use. Ecol. Lett. 17, 924–931 (2014).
Google Scholar
Bordes, F., Morand, S., Kelt, D. A. & Van Vuren, D. H. Home range and parasite diversity in mammals. Am. Nat. 173, 467–474 (2009).
Google Scholar
Morales, J. M. et al. Building the bridge between animal movement and population dynamics. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 365, 2289–2301 (2010).
Google Scholar
Lewis, M. A. & Murray, J. D. Modelling territoriality and wolf-deer interactions. Nature 366, 738–740 (1993).
Google Scholar
Kelt, D. A. & Van Vuren, D. H. The ecology and macroecology of mammalian home range area. Am. Nat. 157, 637–645 (2001).
Google Scholar
Wang, M. & Grimm, V. Home range dynamics and population regulation: an individual-based model of the common shrew Sorex araneus. Ecol. Modell. 205, 397–409 (2007).
Google Scholar
Moorcroft, P. R., Lewis, M. A. & Crabtree, R. L. Mechanistic home range models capture spatial patterns and dynamics of coyote territories in Yellowstone. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 273, 1651–1659 (2006).
Google Scholar
Powell, R. A. in Research Techniques in Animal Ecology Vol. 65 (eds. Boitani, L. & Fuller, T. K.) 599 (Columbia Univ. Press, 2000).
Spencer, W. D. Home ranges and the value of spatial information. J. Mammal. 93, 929–947 (2012).
Google Scholar
Bracis, C., Gurarie, E., Van Moorter, B. & Goodwin, R. A. Memory effects on movement behavior in animal foraging. PLoS ONE 10, e0136057 (2015).
Google Scholar
Fagan, W. F. et al. Spatial memory and animal movement. Ecol. Lett. 16, 1316–1329 (2013).
Google Scholar
Powell, R. A. & Mitchell, M. S. What is a home range? J. Mammal. 93, 948–958 (2012).
Google Scholar
Stamps, J. Motor learning and the value of familiar space. Am. Nat. 146, 41–58 (1995).
Google Scholar
Gautestad, A. O. & Mysterud, I. Spatial memory, habitat auto-facilitation and the emergence of fractal home range patterns. Ecol. Modell. 221, 2741–2750 (2010).
Google Scholar
Gautestad, A. O. & Mysterud, I. Intrinsic scaling complexity in animal dispersion and abundance. Am. Nat. 165, 44–55 (2005).
Google Scholar
Merkle, J. A., Potts, J. R. & Fortin, D. Energy benefits and emergent space use patterns of an empirically parameterized model of memory‐based patch selection. Oikos 126, 185–196 (2017).
Schlägel, U. E. & Lewis, M. A. Detecting effects of spatial memory and dynamic information on animal movement decisions. Methods Ecol. Evolution 5, 1236–1246 (2014).
Google Scholar
Van Moorter, B. et al. Memory keeps you at home: a mechanistic model for home range emergence. Oikos 118, 641–652 (2009).
Google Scholar
Riotte-Lambert, L., Benhamou, S. & Chamaillé-Jammes, S. How memory-based movement leads to nonterritorial spatial segregation. Am. Naturalist 185, E103–E116 (2015).
Google Scholar
Marchand, P. et al. Combining familiarity and landscape features helps break down the barriers between movements and home ranges in a non‐territorial large herbivore. J. Anim. Ecol. 86, 371–383 (2017).
Google Scholar
Gautestad, A. O., Loe, L. E. & Mysterud, A. Inferring spatial memory and spatiotemporal scaling from GPS data: comparing red deer Cervus elaphus movements with simulation models. J. Anim. Ecol. 82, 572–586 (2013).
Google Scholar
Ranc, N., Cagnacci, F. & Moorcroft, P. R. Memory drives the formation of animal home ranges: evidence from a reintroduction. Ecol. Lett. 25, 716–728 (2022).
Google Scholar
Ranc, N., Moorcroft, P. R., Ossi, F. & Cagnacci, F. Experimental evidence of memory-based foraging decisions in a large wild mammal. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2014856118 (2021).
Google Scholar
Potts, J. R. & Lewis, M. A. A mathematical approach to territorial pattern formation. Am. Math. Monthly 121, 754–770 (2014).
Google Scholar
Shettleworth, S. J. Cognition, Evolution, and Behavior (Oxford Univ. Press, 2009).
van Asselen, M. et al. Brain areas involved in spatial working memory. Neuropsychologia 44, 1185–1194 (2006).
Google Scholar
Paul, C., Magda, G. & Abel, S. Spatial memory: theoretical basis and comparative review on experimental methods in rodents. Behav. Brain Res. 203, 151–164 (2009).
Google Scholar
Boratyński, Z. Energetic constraints on mammalian home-range size. Funct. Ecol. 34, 468–474 (2020).
Google Scholar
Tamburello, N., Côté, I. M. & Dulvy, N. K. Energy and the scaling of animal space use. Am. Naturalist 186, 196–211 (2015).
Google Scholar
McNab, B. K. Bioenergetics and the determination of home range size. Am. Naturalist 97, 133–140 (1963).
Google Scholar
McNab, B. K. Food habits, energetics, and the population biology of mammals. Am. Naturalist 116, 106–124 (1980).
Google Scholar
Fokidis, H. B., Risch, T. S. & Glenn, T. C. Reproductive and resource benefits to large female body size in a mammal with female-biased sexual size dimorphism. Anim. Behav. 73, 479–488 (2007).
Google Scholar
Saïd, S. et al. What shapes intra-specific variation in home range size? A case study of female roe deer. Oikos 118, 1299–1306 (2009).
Google Scholar
Schradin, C. et al. Female home range size is regulated by resource distribution and intraspecific competition: a long-term field study. Anim. Behav. 79, 195–203 (2010).
Google Scholar
Dröge, E., Creel, S., Becker, M. S. & M’soka, J. Risky times and risky places interact to affect prey behaviour. Nat. Ecol. Evolution 1, 1123–1128 (2017).
Google Scholar
Croston, R., Branch, C., Kozlovsky, D., Dukas, R. & Pravosudov, V. Heritability and the evolution of cognitive traits. Behav. Ecol. 26, 1447–1459 (2015).
Google Scholar
Ashton, B. J., Ridley, A. R., Edwards, E. K. & Thornton, A. Cognitive performance is linked to group size and affects fitness in Australian magpies. Nature 554, 364–367 (2018).
Google Scholar
Madden, J. R., Langley, E. J. G., Whiteside, M. A., Beardsworth, C. E. & Van Horik, J. O. The quick are the dead: pheasants that are slow to reverse a learned association survive for longer in the wild. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0297 (2018).
Sonnenberg, B. R., Branch, C. L., Pitera, A. M., Bridge, E. & Pravosudov, V. V. Natural selection and spatial cognition in wild food-caching mountain chickadees. Curr. Biol. 29, 670–676 (2019).
Google Scholar
Shaw, R. C., MacKinlay, R. D., Clayton, N. S. & Burns, K. C. Memory performance influences male reproductive success in a wild bird. Curr. Biol. 29, 1498–1502.e3 (2019).
Google Scholar
Gehr, B. et al. Stay home, stay safe—site familiarity reduces predation risk in a large herbivore in two contrasting study sites. J. Anim. Ecol. 89, 1329–1339 (2020).
Google Scholar
Palmer, M. S., Fieberg, J., Swanson, A., Kosmala, M. & Packer, C. A ‘dynamic’ landscape of fear: prey responses to spatiotemporal variations in predation risk across the lunar cycle. Ecol. Lett. 20, 1364–1373 (2017).
Google Scholar
Willems, E. P. & Hill, R. A. Predator-specific landscapes of fear and resource distribution: effects on spatial range use. Ecology 90, 546–555 (2009).
Google Scholar
Gaynor, K. M., Brown, J. S., Middleton, A. D., Power, M. E. & Brashares, J. S. Landscapes of fear: spatial patterns of risk perception and response. Trends Ecol. Evolution 34, 355–368 (2019).
Google Scholar
Bose, S. et al. Implications of fidelity and philopatry for the population structure of female black-tailed deer. Behav. Ecol. 28, 983–990 (2017).
Google Scholar
Forrester, T. D., Casady, D. S. & Wittmer, H. U. Home sweet home: fitness consequences of site familiarity in female black-tailed deer. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 69, 603–612 (2015).
Google Scholar
Magrath, R. D., Haff, T. M., Fallow, P. M. & Radford, A. N. Eavesdropping on heterospecific alarm calls: from mechanisms to consequences. Biol. Rev. 90, 560–586 (2015).
Google Scholar
Skelhorn, J. & Rowe, C. Cognition and the evolution of camouflage. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 283, 20152890 (2016).
Google Scholar
Dickinson, A. Associative learning and animal cognition. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 367, 2733–2742 (2012).
Google Scholar
Baddeley, A. D. & Lieberman, K. in Exploring Working Memory 206–223 (Routledge, 2017).
Olton, D. S. & Samuelson, R. J. Remembrance of places passed: spatial memory in rats. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 2, 97–116 (1976).
Google Scholar
Lashley, K. S. Brain Mechanisms and Intelligence: A Quantitative Study of Injuries to the Brain (Univ. Chicago Press, 1929).
O’keefe, J. & Nadel, L. The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map (Oxford Univ. Press, 1978).
Beardsworth, C. E. et al. Is habitat selection in the wild shaped by individual-level cognitive biases in orientation strategy? Ecol. Lett. 24, 751–760 (2021).
Google Scholar
Rowe, C. & Healy, S. D. Measuring variation in cognition. Behav. Ecol. 25, 1287–1292 (2014).
Google Scholar
Warner, R. E. Use of cover by pheasant broods in east-central Illinois. J. Wildl. Manag. 43, 334 (1979).
Google Scholar
Toledo, S. et al. Cognitive map-based navigation in wild bats revealed by a new high-throughput tracking system. Science 369, 188–193 (2020).
Google Scholar
Weiser, A. W. et al. Characterizing the accuracy of a self-synchronized reverse-GPS wildlife localization system. In Proc. 2016 15th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, IPSN 2016 1–12 (IEEE, 2016).
Nathan, R. et al. Big-data approaches lead to an increased understanding of the ecology of animal movement. Science 375, eabg1780 (2022).
Google Scholar
Beardsworth, C. E. et al. Validating ATLAS: a regional-scale high-throughput tracking system. Methods Ecol. Evolution 13, 1990–2004 (2022).
Google Scholar
Calabrese, J. M., Fleming, C. H. & Gurarie, E. ctmm: an r package for analyzing animal relocation data as a continuous-time stochastic process. Methods Ecol. Evolution 7, 1124–1132 (2016).
Google Scholar
Clutton‐Brock, T. H. & Harvey, P. H. Primates, brains and ecology. J. Zool. 190, 309–323 (1980).
Google Scholar
Avgar, T. et al. Space-use behaviour of woodland caribou based on a cognitive movement model. J. Anim. Ecol. 84, 1059–1070 (2015).
Google Scholar
Laundré, J. W., Hernández, L. & Ripple, W. J. The landscape of fear: ecological implications of being afraid. Open Ecol. J. 3, 1–7 (2010).
Google Scholar
Stephens, D. W. & Krebs, J. R. Foraging Theory (Princeton Univ. Press, 2019).
Beauchamp, G. Animal Vigilance: Monitoring Predators and Competitors. Animal Vigilance: Monitoring Predators and Competitors (Elsevier, 2015).
Langley, E. J. G. et al. Heritability and correlations among learning and inhibitory control traits. Behav. Ecol. 31, 798–806 (2020).
Google Scholar
Chen, J., Zou, Y., Sun, Y.-H. & Ten Cate, C. Problem-solving males become more attractive to female budgerigars. Science 363, 166–167 (2019).
Google Scholar
Vale, R., Evans, D. A. & Branco, T. Rapid spatial learning controls instinctive defensive behavior in mice. Curr. Biol. 27, 1342–1349 (2017).
Google Scholar
Burt de Perera, T. & Guilford, T. Rapid learning of shelter position in an intertidal fish, the shanny Lipophrys pholis L. J. Fish. Biol. 72, 1386–1392 (2008).
Google Scholar
Font, E. Rapid learning of a spatial memory task in a lacertid lizard (Podarcis liolepis). Behav. Procs. 169, 103963 (2019).
Google Scholar
Senar, J. & Pascual, J. Keel and tarsus length may provide a good predictor of avian body size. Ard.-Wageningen 85, 269–274 (1997).
Lavielle, M. Detection of multiple changes in a sequence of dependent variables. Stoch. Process. Appl. 83, 79–102 (1999).
Google Scholar
Calenge, C. The package ‘adehabitat’ for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecol. Modell. 197, 516–519 (2006).
Google Scholar
Millspaugh, J. J. A Manual for Wildlife Radio Tagging Robert E. Kenward. The Auk 118 (Academic Press, 2001).
Gupte, P. R. et al. A guide to pre-processing high-throughput animal tracking data. J. Anim. Ecol. 91, 287–307 (2022).
Google Scholar
R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2018).
Grahn, M., Göransson, G. & Von Schantz, T. Territory acquisition and mating success in pheasants, Phasianus colchicus: an experiment. Anim. Behav. 46, 721–730 (1993).
Google Scholar
Ridley, M. W. & Hill, D. A. Social organization in the pheasant (Phasianus colchicus): harem formation, mate selection and the role of mate guarding. J. Zool. 211, 619–630 (1987).
Google Scholar
Gompper, M. E. & Gittleman, J. L. Home range scaling: intraspecific and comparative trends. Oecologia 87, 343–348 (1991).
Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. in Breakthroughs in Statistics (eds Kotz, S. & Johnson, N. L.) 66–70 (Springer, 1992).
Barton, K. MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference (cran.r-project.org, 2022).
Nakagawa, S. A farewell to Bonferroni: the problems of low statistical power and publication bias. Behav. Ecol. 15, 1044–1045 (2004).
Google Scholar
Heathcote, R. Data for ‘Spatial memory predicts home range size and predation risk in pheasants’ nature ecology and evolution. Mendeley Data https://doi.org/10.17632/m89226xg6p.1 (2022).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
