Robertson, G. P. et al. Cellulosic biofuel contributions to a sustainable energy future: Choices and outcomes. Sci. (80-.) 356, 1–9 (2017).
Google Scholar
Ma, L. et al. The impact of stand age and fertilization on the soil microbiome of Miscanthus × giganteus. Phytobiomes J. 5, 51–59 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hestrin, R., Lee, M. R., Whitaker, B. K. & Pett-Ridge, J. The switchgrass microbiome: a review of structure, function, and taxonomic distribution. Phytobiomes J. 5, 14–28 (2021).
Google Scholar
Heaton, E. A., Dohleman, F. G. & Long, S. P. Meeting US biofuel goals with less land: The potential of Miscanthus. Glob. Chang. Biol. 14, 2000–2014 (2008).
Google Scholar
Langholtz, M., Stokes, B. & Eaton, L. 2016 billion-ton report: Advancing domestic resources for a thriving bioeconomy (Executive Summary). Ind. Biotechnol. 12, 282–289 (2016).
Google Scholar
Roley, S. S. et al. Associative nitrogen fixation (ANF) across a nitrogen input gradient. PLoS One 13, 1–19 (2018).
Google Scholar
Toju, H. et al. Core microbiomes for sustainable agroecosystems. Nat. Plants 4, 247–257 (2018).
Google Scholar
Busby, P. E. et al. Research priorities for harnessing plant microbiomes in sustainable agriculture. PLoS Biol. 15, 1–14 (2017).
Google Scholar
Wang, N. R. & Haney, C. H. Harnessing the genetic potential of the plant microbiome. Biochem. (Lond.) 42, 20–25 (2020).
Google Scholar
Haskett, T. L., Tkacz, A. & Poole, P. S. Engineering rhizobacteria for sustainable agriculture. ISME J. 15, 949–964 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hacquard, S. et al. Microbiota and host nutrition across plant and animal kingdoms. Cell Host Microbe 17, 603–616 (2015).
Google Scholar
Gopal, M. & Gupta, A. Microbiome selection could spur next-generation plant breeding strategies. Front. Microbiol. 7, 1971 (2016).
Google Scholar
Hardoim, P. R. et al. The hidden world within plants: Ecological and evolutionary considerations for defining functioning of microbial endophytes. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 79, 293–320 (2015).
Google Scholar
Andrews, J. H. & Harris, R. F. The ecology and biogeography of microorganisms on plant surfaces. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 38, 145–180 (2000).
Google Scholar
Bulgarelli, D., Schlaeppi, K., Spaepen, S., van Themaat, E. V. L. & Schulze-Lefert, P. Structure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 64, 807–838 (2013).
Google Scholar
Müller, D. B., Vogel, C., Bai, Y. & Vorholt, J. A. The Plant Microbiota: Systems-Level Insights and Perspectives. Annu. Rev. Genet. 50, 120215–034952 (2016).
Google Scholar
Kuzyakov, Y. & Razavi, B. S. Rhizosphere size and shape: Temporal dynamics and spatial stationarity. Soil Biol. Biochem. 135, 343–360 (2019).
Google Scholar
Bell, T. H. et al. Manipulating wild and tamed phytobiomes: Challenges and opportunities. Phytobiomes J. 3, 3–21 (2019).
Google Scholar
Chen, T. et al. A plant genetic network for preventing dysbiosis in the phyllosphere. Nature 580, 653–657 (2020).
Google Scholar
Vorholt, J. A. Microbial life in the phyllosphere. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 828–840 (2012).
Google Scholar
Koskella, B. The phyllosphere. Curr. Biol. 30, R1143–R1146 (2020).
Google Scholar
Lindow, S. E. & Brandl, M. T. Microbiology of the phyllosphere. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 1875–1883 (2003).
Google Scholar
Bringel, F. & Couée, I. Pivotal roles of phyllosphere microorganisms at the interface between plant functioning and atmospheric trace gas dynamics. Front. Microbiol. 6, 486 (2015).
Dorokhov, Y. L., Sheshukova, E. V. & Komarova, T. V. Methanol in plant life. Front. Plant Sci. 871, 1–6 (2018).
Cavicchioli, R. et al. Scientists’ warning to humanity: microorganisms and climate change. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 569–586 (2019).
Google Scholar
Peñuelas, J. & Terradas, J. The foliar microbiome. Trends Plant Sci. 19, 278–280 (2014).
Google Scholar
Edwards, J. et al. Structure, variation, and assembly of the root-associated microbiomes of rice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 112, E911–E920 (2015).
Google Scholar
Zhalnina, K. et al. Dynamic root exudate chemistry and microbial substrate preferences drive patterns in rhizosphere microbial community assembly. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 470 (2018).
Google Scholar
Xu, L. et al. Drought delays development of the sorghum root microbiome and enriches for monoderm bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 115, E4284–E4293 (2018).
Google Scholar
Shade, A. & Stopnisek, N. Abundance-occupancy distributions to prioritize plant core microbiome membership. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 49, 50–58 (2019).
Google Scholar
Stopnisek, N. & Shade, A. Persistent microbiome members in the common bean rhizosphere: an integrated analysis of space, time, and plant genotype. ISME J. 15, 2708–2722 (2021).
Grady, K. L., Sorensen, J. W., Stopnisek, N., Guittar, J. & Shade, A. Assembly and seasonality of core phyllosphere microbiota on perennial biofuel crops. Nat. Commun. 10, 4135 (2019).
Singer, E., Bonnette, J., Kenaley, S. C., Woyke, T. & Juenger, T. E. Plant compartment and genetic variation drive microbiome composition in switchgrass roots. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 11, 185–195 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lundberg, D. S. et al. Defining the core Arabidopsis thaliana root microbiome. Nature 488, 86–90 (2012).
Google Scholar
Bulgarelli, D. et al. Revealing structure and assembly cues for Arabidopsis root-inhabiting bacterial microbiota. Nature 488, 91–95 (2012).
Google Scholar
Bahulikar, R. A., Torres-Jerez, I., Worley, E., Craven, K. & Udvardi, M. K. Diversity of nitrogen-fixing bacteria associated with switchgrass in the native tallgrass prairie of Northern Oklahoma. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 5636–5643 (2014).
Google Scholar
Roley, S. S., Xue, C., Hamilton, S. K., Tiedje, J. M. & Robertson, G. P. Isotopic evidence for episodic nitrogen fixation in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.). Soil Biol. Biochem. 129, 90–98 (2019).
Google Scholar
Bowers, R. M. et al. Minimum information about a single amplified genome (MISAG) and a metagenome-assembled genome (MIMAG) of bacteria and archaea. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 725–731 (2017).
Google Scholar
Yoon, S. H., Ha, S. M., Lim, J., Kwon, S. & Chun, J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van. Leeuwenhoek, Int. J. Gen. Mol. Microbiol. 110, 1281–1286 (2017).
Google Scholar
Julsing, M. K., Rijpkema, M., Woerdenbag, H. J., Quax, W. J. & Kayser, O. Functional analysis of genes involved in the biosynthesis of isoprene in Bacillus subtilis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 75, 1377–1384 (2007).
Google Scholar
Carlström, C. I. et al. Synthetic microbiota reveal priority effects and keystone strains in the Arabidopsis phyllosphere. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1445–1454 (2019).
Google Scholar
Laskowska, E. & Kuczyńska-Wiśnik, D. New insight into the mechanisms protecting bacteria during desiccation. Curr. Genet. 66, 313–318 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zou, H. et al. The metabolism and biotechnological application of betaine in microorganism. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 100, 3865–3876 (2016).
Google Scholar
Rastogi, G., Coaker, G. L. & Leveau, J. H. J. New insights into the structure and function of phyllosphere microbiota through high-throughput molecular approaches. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 348, 1–10 (2013).
Google Scholar
Urrejola, C. et al. Genomic features for desiccation tolerance and sugar biosynthesis in the extremophile gloeocapsopsis sp. UTEX B3054. Front. Microbiol. 10, 1–11 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lacerda-Júnior, G. V. et al. Land use and seasonal effects on the soil microbiome of a Brazilian dry forest. Front. Microbiol. 10, 1–14 (2019).
Google Scholar
Dai, J. et al. Unraveling adaptation of Pontibacter korlensis to radiation and infertility in desert through complete genome and comparative transcriptomic analysis. Sci. Rep. 5, 1–9 (2015).
Google Scholar
Harty, C. E. et al. Ethanol stimulates trehalose production through a SpoT-DksA-AlgU-dependent pathway in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 201, 1–21 (2019).
Kimmerer, T. W. & MacDonald, R. C. Acetaldehyde and ethanol biosynthesis in leaves of plants. Plant Physiol. 84, 1204–1209 (1987).
Google Scholar
Ferner, E., Rennenberg, H. & Kreuzwieser, J. Effect of flooding on C metabolism of flood-tolerant (Quercus robur) and non-tolerant (Fagus sylvatica) tree species. Tree Physiol. 32, 135–145 (2012).
Google Scholar
Kimmerer, T. W. & Kozlowski, T. T. Ethylene, ethane, acetaldehyde, and ethanol production by plants under stress. Plant Physiol. 69, 840–847 (1982).
Google Scholar
Liu, Y. et al. Assessment of drought tolerance of 49 switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) genotypes using physiological and morphological parameters. Biotechnol. Biofuels 8, 1–18 (2015).
Google Scholar
Wingler, A. et al. Trehalose 6-phosphate is required for the onset of leaf senescence associated with high carbon availability. Plant Physiol. 158, 1241–1251 (2012).
Google Scholar
Gottschlich, L., Geiser, P., Bortfeld-Miller, M., Field, C. M. & Vorholt, J. A. Complex general stress response regulation in Sphingomonas melonis Fr1 revealed by transcriptional analyses. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–13 (2019).
Google Scholar
Chen, C., Li, S., McKeever, D. R. & Beattie, G. A. The widespread plant-colonizing bacterial species Pseudomonas syringae detects and exploits an extracellular pool of choline in hosts. Plant J. 75, 891–902 (2013).
Google Scholar
Valenzuela-Soto, E. M. & Figueroa-Soto, C. G. Biosynthesis and degradation of glycine betaine and its potential to control plant growth and development. in Osmoprotectant-Mediated Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants (eds. Anwar Hossain, M., Kumar, V., Burritt, D. J., Fujita, M. & Makela, P. S. A.) 241–256 (Springer, 2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27423-8_5.
Kerchev, P., De Smet, B., Waszczak, C., Messens, J. & Van Breusegem, F. Redox strategies for crop improvement. Antioxid. Redox Signal 23, 1186–1205 (2015).
Google Scholar
Considine, M. J. & Foyer, C. H. Redox regulation of plant development. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 21, 1305–1326 (2014).
Google Scholar
Spaepen, S., Vanderleyden, J. & Remans, R. Indole-3-acetic acid in microbial and microorganism-plant signaling. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 31, 425–448 (2007).
Google Scholar
Egamberdieva, D., Wirth, S. J., Alqarawi, A. A., Abd-Allah, E. F. & Hashem, A. Phytohormones and beneficial microbes: Essential components for plants to balance stress and fitness. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1–14 (2017).
Google Scholar
Lajoie, G., Maglione, R. & Kembel, S. W. Adaptive matching between phyllosphere bacteria and their tree hosts in a neotropical forest. Microbiome 8, 1–10 (2020).
Google Scholar
McGenity, T. J., Crombie, A. T. & Murrell, J. C. Microbial cycling of isoprene, the most abundantly produced biological volatile organic compound on Earth. ISME J. 12, 931–941 (2018).
Google Scholar
Sharkey, T. D., Wiberley, A. E. & Donohue, A. R. Isoprene emission from plants: Why and how. Ann. Bot. 101, 5–18 (2008).
Google Scholar
Zuo, Z. et al. Isoprene acts as a signaling molecule in gene networks important for stress responses and plant growth. Plant Physiol. 180, 124–152 (2019).
Google Scholar
Sharkey, T. D. & Yeh, S. Isoprene emission from plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 52, 407–436 (2001).
Google Scholar
Sharkey, T. D., Loreto, F. & Delwiche, C. High carbon dioxide and sun/shade effects on isoprene emission from oak and aspen tree leaves. Plant, Cell Environ. 14, 333–338 (1991).
Google Scholar
Eller, A. S. D. et al. Volatile organic compound emissions from switchgrass cultivars used as biofuel crops. Atmos. Environ. 45, 3333–3337 (2011).
Google Scholar
Morrison, E. C., Drewer, J. & Heal, M. R. A comparison of isoprene and monoterpene emission rates from the perennial bioenergy crops short-rotation coppice willow and Miscanthus and the annual arable crops wheat and oilseed rape. GCB Bioenergy 8, 211–225 (2016).
Google Scholar
Sivy, T. L., Shirk, M. C. & Fall, R. Isoprene synthase activity parallels fluctuations of isoprene release during growth of Bacillus subtilis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 294, 71–75 (2002).
Google Scholar
Crombie, A. T. et al. Poplar phyllosphere harbors disparate isoprene-degrading bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 115, 13081–13086 (2018).
Google Scholar
El Khawand, M. et al. Isolation of isoprene degrading bacteria from soils, development of isoA gene probes and identification of the active isoprene-degrading soil community using DNA-stable isotope probing. Environ. Microbiol. 18, 2743–2753 (2016).
Google Scholar
Nowicka, B. & Kruk, J. Occurrence, biosynthesis and function of isoprenoid quinones. Biochim. Biophys. Acta – Bioenerg. 1797, 1587–1605 (2010).
Google Scholar
Kałużna, M. et al. Pseudomonas cerasi sp. nov. (non Griffin, 1911) isolated from diseased tissue of cherry. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 39, 370–377 (2016).
Google Scholar
El-Tarabily, K. A., Nassar, A. H., Hardy, G. E. S. J. & Sivasithamparam, K. Plant growth promotion and biological control of Pythium aphanidermatum, a pathogen of cucumber, by endophytic actinomycetes. J. Appl. Microbiol 106, 13–26 (2009).
Google Scholar
Javed, Z., Tripathi, G. D., Mishra, M. & Dashora, K. Actinomycetes – the microbial machinery for the organic-cycling, plant growth, and sustainable soil health. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 31, 101893 (2021).
Google Scholar
Anwar, S., Ali, B. & Sajid, I. Screening of rhizospheric actinomycetes for various in-vitro and in-vivo plant growth promoting (PGP) traits and for agroactive compounds. Front. Microbiol. 7, 1–11 (2016).
Google Scholar
Bao, L. et al. Microbial community overlap between the phyllosphere and rhizosphere of three plants from Yongxing Island, South China Sea. Microbiologyopen 9, 1–18 (2020).
Google Scholar
Remus-Emsermann, M. N. P. & Schlechter, R. O. Phyllosphere microbiology: at the interface between microbial individuals and the plant host. N. Phytol. 218, 1327–1333 (2018).
Google Scholar
Beilsmith, K. et al. Genome-wide association studies on the phyllosphere microbiome: embracing complexity in host–microbe interactions. Plant J. 97, 164–181 (2019).
Google Scholar
Levy, A., Conway, J. M., Dangl, J. L. & Woyke, T. Elucidating bacterial gene functions in the plant microbiome. Cell Host Microbe 24, 475–485 (2018).
Google Scholar
Trivedi, P., Leach, J. E., Tringe, S. G., Sa, T. & Singh, B. K. Plant–microbiome interactions: from community assembly to plant health. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 607–621 (2020).
Google Scholar
Choi, H. et al. Identification of viruses and viroids infecting tomato and pepper plants in vietnam by metatranscriptomics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 1–16 (2020).
Google Scholar
Marzano, S. Y. L. & Domier, L. L. Novel mycoviruses discovered from metatranscriptomics survey of soybean phyllosphere phytobiomes. Virus Res 213, 332–342 (2016).
Google Scholar
Chao S, et al. Metatranscriptomic sequencing suggests the presence of novel RNA viruses in rice rransmitted by brown planthopper. Viruses. 13, 2464 (2021).
Delmotte, N. et al. Community proteogenomics reveals insights into the physiology of phyllosphere bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 106, 16428–16433 (2009).
Google Scholar
Suzuki, Y., Makino, A. & Mae, T. An efficient method for extraction of RNA from rice leaves at different ages using benzyl chloride. J. Exp. Bot. 52, 1575–1579 (2001).
Google Scholar
Caporaso, J. G. et al. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 108, 4516–4522 (2011).
Google Scholar
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).
Google Scholar
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).
Google Scholar
Li, H. et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).
Google Scholar
Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842 (2010).
Google Scholar
Druzhinina, I. S. et al. Massive lateral transfer of genes encoding plant cell wall-degrading enzymes to the mycoparasitic fungus Trichoderma from its plant-associated hosts. PLoS Genet. 14, e1007322 (2018).
Google Scholar
Haridas, S. et al. 101 Dothideomycetes genomes: A test case for predicting lifestyles and emergence of pathogens. Stud. Mycol. 96, 141–153 (2020).
Google Scholar
Gostinčar, C. et al. Genome sequencing of four Aureobasidium pullulans varieties: Biotechnological potential, stress tolerance, and description of new species. BMC Genomics 15, 549 (2014).
Google Scholar
Gill, U. S. et al. Draft genome sequence resource of switchgrass rust pathogen, puccinia novopanici isolate ard-01. Phytopathology 109, 1513–1515 (2019).
Google Scholar
Bowsher, A. W., Benucci, G. M. N., Bonito, G. & Shade, A. Seasonal dynamics of core fungi in the switchgrass phyllosphere, and co-occurrence with leaf bacteria. Phytobiomes J. 5, 60–68 (2021).
Li, D., Liu, C. M., Luo, R., Sadakane, K. & Lam, T. W. MEGAHIT: An ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 31, 1674–1676 (2015).
Google Scholar
Kang, D. D. et al. MetaBAT 2: An adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ 2019, 1–13 (2019).
Nayfach, S., Shi, Z. J., Seshadri, R., Pollard, K. S. & Kyrpides, N. C. New insights from uncultivated genomes of the global human gut microbiome. Nature 568, 505–510 (2019).
Google Scholar
Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P. & Tyson, G. W. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 25, 1043–1055 (2015).
Google Scholar
Swan, B. K. et al. Prevalent genome streamlining and latitudinal divergence of planktonic bacteria in the surface ocean. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 110, 11463–11468 (2013).
Google Scholar
Eren, A. M. et al. Anvi’o: an advanced analysis and visualization platform for’omics data. PeerJ. 2015, 1–29 (2015).
Lee, M. D. GToTree: a user-friendly workflow for phylogenomics. Bioinformatics 35, 4162–4164 (2019).
Google Scholar
Shaffer, M. et al. DRAM for distilling microbial metabolism to automate the curation of microbiome function. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 8883–8900 (2020).
Google Scholar
Parks, D. H. et al. A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 996 (2018).
Google Scholar
Suzuki, R. & Shimodaira, H. Pvclust: an R package for assessing the uncertainty in hierarchical clustering. Bioinformatics 22, 1540–1542 (2006).
Google Scholar
Blin, K. et al. AntiSMASH 6.0: improving cluster detection and comparison capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, W29–W35 (2021).
Google Scholar
Navarro-Muñoz, J. C. et al. A computational framework to explore large-scale biosynthetic diversity. Nat. Chem. Biol. 16, 60–68 (2020).
Google Scholar
Zimmermann, J., Kaleta, C. & Waschina, S. Gapseq: informed prediction of bacterial metabolic pathways and reconstruction of accurate metabolic models. Genome Biol. 22, 1–35 (2021).
Google Scholar
Tseng, T. T., Tyler, B. M. & Setubal, J. C. Protein secretion systems in bacterial-host associations, and their description in the Gene Ontology. BMC Microbiol 9, 1–9 (2009).
Google Scholar
Lucke, M., Correa, M. G. & Levy, A. The role of secretion systems, effectors, and secondary metabolites of beneficial rhizobia in interactions with plants and microbes. Front. Plant Sci. 11, 589416 (2020).
Google Scholar
Palmer, J. L., Hilton, S., Picot, E., Bending, G. D. & Schäfer, H. Tree phyllospheres are a habitat for diverse populations of CO-oxidizing bacteria. Environ. Microbiol. 23, 6309–6327 (2021).
Google Scholar
Bay, S. K. et al. Trace gas oxidizers are widespread and active members of soil microbial communities. Nat. Microbiol. 6, 246–256 (2021).
Google Scholar
Source: Ecology - nature.com
