in

Kinship and reproductive condition correlate with affiliation patterns in female southern Australian bottlenose dolphins

  • 1.

    Clutton-Brock, T. H., Albon, S. D. & Guinness, F. E. Fitness costs of gestation and lactation in wild mammals. Nature 337, 260–262 (1989).

  • 2.

    Whitehead, H. Babysitting, dive synchrony, and indications of alloparental care in sperm whales. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 38, 237–244 (1996).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 3.

    Whitehead, H. Sperm whales: social evolution in the ocean. (University of Chicago Press, 2003).

  • 4.

    Wrangham, R. W. An Ecological Model of Female-Bonded Primate Groups. Behaviour 75, 262–300 (1980).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 5.

    Clutton-Brock, T. H. Review Lecture: Mammalian Mating Systems. Proc. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci. 236, 339–372 (1989).

  • 6.

    Wittemyer, G., Douglas-Hamilton, I. & Getz, W. M. The socioecology of elephants: analysis of the processes creating multitiered social structures. Anim. Behav. 69, 1357–1371 (2005).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 7.

    Clutton‐Brock, T. H. & Lukas, D. The evolution of social philopatry and dispersal in female mammals. Mol. Ecol. 21, 472–492 (2012).

  • 8.

    Wrangham, R. W. & Rubenstein, D. I. Social evolution in birds and mammals. In Ecological Aspects of Social Evolution: Birds and Mammals (eds. Rubenstein, D. I. & Wrangham, R. W.) 452–470 (Princeton University Press, 1986).

  • 9.

    Smuts, B. B. & Smuts, R. W. Male-Aggression and Sexual Coercion of Females in Nonhuman-Primates and Other Mammals – Evidence and Theoretical Implications. Adv. Study Behav. 22, 1–63 (1993).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 10.

    Massen, J., Sterck, E. & de Vos, H. Close social associations in animals and humans: functions and mechanisms of friendship. Behaviour 147, 1379–1412 (2010).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 11.

    Frere, C. H. et al. Social and genetic interactions drive fitness variation in a free-living dolphin population. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107, 19949–19954 (2010).

  • 12.

    Kelley, J. L., Morrell, L. J., Inskip, C., Krause, J. & Croft, D. P. Predation risk shapes social networks in fission-fusion populations. PLoS One 6, e24280 (2011).

  • 13.

    Wallen, M. M., Patterson, E. M., Krzyszczyk, E. & Mann, J. The ecological costs to females in a system with allied sexual coercion. Anim. Behav. 115, 227–236 (2016).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 14.

    Silk, J. B., Alberts, S. C. & Altmann, J. Social bonds of female baboons enhance infant survival. Science 302, 1231–4 (2003).

  • 15.

    Silk, J. B. et al. The benefits of social capital: close social bonds among female baboons enhance offspring survival. Proceedings. Biol. Sci. 276, 3099–104 (2009).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 16.

    Connor, R., Mann, J. & Watson-Capps, J. A Sex-Specific Affiliative Contact Behavior in Indian Ocean Bottlenose Dolphins, Tursiops sp. Ethology 112, 631–638 (2006).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 17.

    Hamilton, W. D. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. J. Theor. Biol. 7, 1–52 (1964).

  • 18.

    Langergraber, K., Mitani, J. & Vigilant, L. Kinship and social bonds in female chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Am. J. Primatol. 71, 840–851 (2009).

  • 19.

    Archie, E. A., Moss, C. J. & Alberts, S. C. The ties that bind: genetic relatedness predicts the fission and fusion of social groups in wild African elephants. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 273, 513–22 (2006).

  • 20.

    Gero, S., Engelhaupt, D. & Whitehead, H. Heterogeneous social associations within a sperm whale, Physeter macrocephalus, unit reflect pairwise relatedness. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 63, 143–151 (2008).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 21.

    Carter, K. D., Seddon, J. M., Frère, C. H., Carter, J. K. & Goldizen, A. W. Fission-fusion dynamics in wild giraffes may be driven by kinship, spatial overlap and individual social preferences. Anim. Behav. 85, 385–394 (2013).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 22.

    Holekamp, K. E., Sakai, S. T. & Lundrigan, B. L. Social intelligence in the spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta). Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 362, 523–38 (2007).

  • 23.

    Widdig, A., Nürnberg, P., Krawczak, M., Streich, W. J. & Bercovitch, F. B. Paternal relatedness and age proximity regulate social relationships among adult female rhesus macaques. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 13769–73 (2001).

  • 24.

    Widdig, A., Nürnberg, P., Krawczak, M. & Streich, Wolf JürgenBercovitch, F. Affiliation and aggression among adult female rhesus macaques: a genetic analysis of paternal cohorts. Behaviour 139, 371–391 (2002).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 25.

    Olsén, K. H. & Järvi, T. Effects of kinship on aggression and RNA content in juvenile Arctic charr. J. Fish Biol. 51, 422–435 (1997).

    • Google Scholar
  • 26.

    Silk, J. B. Kin selection in primate groups. International Journal of Primatology 23, 849–875 (2002).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 27.

    Krützen, M., Barré, L. M., Connor, R. C., Mann, J. & Sherwin, W. B. ‘O father: Where art thou?’ – Paternity assessment in an open fission-fusion society of wild bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.) in Shark Bay, Western Australia. Mol. Ecol. 13, 1975–1990 (2004).

  • 28.

    Gerlach, G., Hodgins-Davis, A., MacDonald, B. & Hannah, R. C. Benefits of kin association: related and familiar zebrafish larvae (Danio rerio) show improved growth. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61, 1765–1770 (2007).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 29.

    Smith, J. E. Hamilton’s legacy: Kinship, cooperation and social tolerance inmammalian groups. Anim. Behav. 92, 291–304 (2014).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 30.

    Sterck, E. H. M. Determinants of female dispersal in Thomas langurs. Am. J. Primatol. 42, 179–198 (1997).

  • 31.

    Clutton-Brock, T. Structure and function in mammalian societies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 364, 3229–3242 (2009).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 32.

    Silk, J. B., Altmann, J. & Alberts, S. C. Social relationships among adult female baboons (papio cynocephalus) I. Variation in the strength of social bonds. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61, 183–195 (2006).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 33.

    Silk, J. B., Alberts, S. C. & Altmann, J. Social relationships among adult female baboons (Papio cynocephalus) II. Variation in the quality and stability of social bonds. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61, 197–204 (2006).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 34.

    Wey, T. W. & Blumstein, D. T. Social cohesion in yellow-bellied marmots is established through age and kin structuring. Anim. Behav. 79, 1343–1352 (2010).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 35.

    Cantor, M. & Farine, D. R. Simple foraging rules in competitive environments can generate socially structured populations. Ecol. Evol. 8, 4978–4991 (2018).

  • 36.

    Connor, R., Wells, R., Mann, J. & Read, A. The bottlenose dolphin: social relationships in a fission-fusion society. in Cetacean societies: field studies of dolphins and whales (eds. Mann, J., Connor, R. C., Tyack, P. L. & Whitehead, H.) 91–126 (The University of Chicago Press, 2000).

  • 37.

    Wells, R. S., Scott, M. D. & Irvine, A. B. The social structure of free-ranging bottlenose dolphins. in Current Mammalogy (ed. Genoways, H. H.) 247–305, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9909-5_7(Springer US, 1987).

  • 38.

    Smolker, R. A., Richards, A. F., Connor, R. C. & Pepper, J. W. Sex Differences in Patterns of Association Among Indian Ocean Bottlenose Dolphins. Behaviour 123, 38–69 (1992).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 39.

    Möller, L. M., Beheregaray, L. B., Allen, S. J. & Harcourt, R. G. Association patterns and kinship in female Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) of southeastern Australia. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61, 109–117 (2006).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 40.

    Frère, C. H. et al. Home range overlap, matrilineal and biparental kinship drive female associations in bottlenose dolphins. Anim. Behav. 80, 481–486 (2010).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 41.

    Wiszniewski, J., Lusseau, D. & Möller, L. M. Female bisexual kinship ties maintain social cohesion in a dolphin network. Anim. Behav. 80, 895–904 (2010).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 42.

    Möller, L. M. Social organization and genetic relationships of coastal bottlenose dolphins in southeastern Australia. (Macquaire, 2001).

  • 43.

    Möller, L. M. & Harcourt, R. G. Shared reproductive state enhances female associations in dolphins. Res. Lett. Ecol. 1, 1–5 (2008).

    • Google Scholar
  • 44.

    Gowans, S., Würsig, B. & Karczmarski, L. The social structure and strategies of delphinids: predictions based on an ecological framework. Adv. Mar. Biol. 53, 195–294 (2008).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 45.

    Möller, L. M. Sociogenetic structure, kin associations and bonding in delphinids. Mol. Ecol. 21, 745–764 (2012).

  • 46.

    Charlton-Robb, K. et al. A new dolphin species, the burrunan dolphin (Tursiops australis sp. nov.), endemic to Southern Australian coastal waters. PLoS One 6, e24047 (2011).

  • 47.

    Passadore, C., Möller, L., Diaz-Aguirre, F. & Parra, G. J. Demography of southern Australian bottlenose dolphins living in a protected inverse estuary. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 27, 1186–1197 (2017).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 48.

    Passadore, C., Möller, L., Diaz-Aguirre, F. & Parra, G. J. High site fidelity and restricted ranging patterns in southern Australian bottlenose dolphins. Ecol. Evol. 8, 242–256 (2018).

  • 49.

    Diaz-Aguirre, F., Parra, G. J., Passadore, C. & Möller, L. Genetic relatedness delineates the social structure of southern Australian bottlenose dolphins. Behav. Ecol. (2019).

  • 50.

    Diaz-Aguirre, F., Parra, G. J., Passadore, C. & Möller, L. M. Kinship influences social bonds among male southern Australian bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops cf. australis). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-018-2621-4 (2018).

  • 51.

    Whitehead, H. & James, R. Generalized affiliation indices extract affiliations from social network data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 836–844 (2015).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 52.

    Farine, D. R. & Strandburg-Peshkin, A. Estimating uncertainty and reliability of social network data using Bayesian inference. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2 (2015).

  • 53.

    Smith, J. E., Memenis, S. K. & Holekamp, K. E. Rank-related partner choice in the fission–fusion society of the spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61, 753–765 (2007).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 54.

    Best, E. C., Dwyer, R. G., Seddon, J. M. & Goldizen, A. W. Associations are more strongly correlated with space use than kinship in female eastern grey kangaroos. Anim. Behav. 89, 1–10 (2014).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 55.

    Sundaresan, S. R., Fischhoff, I. R., Dushoff, J. & Rubenstein, D. I. Network metrics reveal differences in social organization between two fission–fusion species, Grevy’s zebra and onager. Oecologia 151, 140–149 (2007).

  • 56.

    Wiszniewski, J., Allen, S. J. & Möller, L. M. Social cohesion in a hierarchically structured embayment population of Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins. Anim. Behav. 77, 1449–1457 (2009).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 57.

    Lusseau, D. & Newman, M. E. J. Identifying the role that animals play in their social networks. Proc. R. Soc. London. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 271, S477 LP–S481 (2004).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 58.

    Heithaus, M. R. & Dill, L. M. Food availability and tiger shark predation risk influence bottlenose dolphin habitat use. Ecology 83, 480–491 (2002).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 59.

    Mann, J. & Smuts, B. Behavioral development in wild bottlenose dolphin newborns (Tursiops sp.). Behaviour 136, 529–566 (1999).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 60.

    Gibson, Q. & Mann, J. Early social development in wild bottlenose dolphins: Sex differences, individual variation and maternal influence. Animal Behaviour 76 (2008).

  • 61.

    Bernard, H. J. & Hohn, A. A. Differences in Feeding Habits between Pregnant and Lactating Spotted Dolphins (Stenella attenuata). J. Mammal. 70, 211–215 (1989).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 62.

    Corkeron, P. J., Morris, R. J. & Bryden, M. M. Interactions between bottlenose dolphins and sharks in Moreton Bay, Queensland. Aquat. Mamm. 13, 109–113 (1987).

    • Google Scholar
  • 63.

    Mann, J. & Watson-Capps, J. J. Surviving at sea: ecological and behavioural predictors of calf mortality in Indian Ocean bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops sp. Anim. Behav. 69, 899–909 (2005).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 64.

    C, O. A comparison of maternal care by primiparous and multiparous bottlenose dolphins. Does parenting improve with experience? (University of California, Santa Cruz, USA., 2001).

  • 65.

    Packer, C., Gilbert, D. A., Pusey, A. E. & O’Brieni, S. J. A molecular genetic analysis of kinship and cooperation in African lions. Nature 351, 562–565 (1991).

  • 66.

    Perrin, N. & Lehmann, L. Is sociality driven by the costs of dispersal or the benefits of philopatry? A role for kin-discrimination mechanisms. Am. Nat. 158, 471–83 (2001).

  • 67.

    Rendell, L., Cantor, M., Gero, S., Whitehead, H. & Mann, J. Causes and consequences of female centrality in cetacean societies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 374 (2019).

  • 68.

    Australian National Guidelines for Whale and Dolphin Watching. Department of energy and environment (2017). Available at, http://www.environment.gov.au/marine/publications/australian-national-guidelines-whale-and-dolphin-watching-2017.

  • 69.

    Bilgmann, K., Griffiths, O. J., Allen, S. J. & Möller, L. M. A biopsy pole system for bow-riding dolphins: Sampling success, behavioral responses, and test for sampling bias. Mar. Mammal Sci. 23, 218–225 (2007).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 70.

    Krützen, M. et al. A biopsy system for small cetaceans: Darting success and wound healing in Tursiops SPP. Mar. Mammal Sci. 18, 863–878 (2002).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 71.

    Saunders, B. Shores and shallows of Coffin Bay. An identification guide. (Australian Printing Specialists, 2012).

  • 72.

    Kämpf, J. & Ellis, H. Hydrodynamics and flushing of Coffin Bay, South Australia: A small tidal inverse estuary of interconnected bays. J. Coast. Res. 447–456, https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-14-00046.1 (2014).

  • 73.

    Würsig, B. & Jefferson, T. A. Methods of photo-identification for small cetaceans. Individual recognition of cetaceans: Use of photo identification and other techniques to estimate population parameters (International Whaling Commission, 1990).

  • 74.

    Gailey, G. & Karczmarski, L. Discovery: photo-identification data-management system for individually recognizable animals (2013).

  • 75.

    Amos, B. & Hoelzel, A. Long-term preservation of whale skin for DNA analysis. Genetic ecology of whales and dolphins. Rep. Int. Whal. Commision, 99–103 (1991).

  • 76.

    Sunnucks, P. & Hales, D. F. Numerous transposed sequences of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I-II in aphids of the genus Sitobion (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Mol. Biol. Evol. 13, 510–524 (1996).

  • 77.

    Pratt, E. A. L. et al. Hierarchical metapopulation structure in a highly mobile marine predator: the southern Australian coastal bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops cf. australis). Conserv. Genet. 19, 1–18 (2018).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 78.

    Van Oosterhout, C., Hutchinson, W. F., Wills, D. P. M. & Shipley, P. MICRO-CHECKER: Software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol. Ecol. Notes 4, 535–538 (2004).

  • 79.

    Raymond, M. & Rousset, F. GENEPOP (Version 1.2): Population Genetics Software for Exact Tests and Ecumenicism. J. Hered. 86, 248–249 (1995).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 80.

    Baker, C. S. et al. Abundant mitochondrial DNA variation and world-wide population structure in humpback whales. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 8239–8243 (1993).

  • 81.

    Möller, L. M. & Beheregaray, L. B. Coastal bottlenose dolphins from south-eastern Australia are Tursiops aduncus according to sequences of the mitochondrial DNA control region. Mar. Mammal Sci. 17, 249–263 (2001).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 82.

    Gilson, A., Syvanen, M., Levine, K. & Banks, J. Deer gender determination by polymerase chain reaction: validation study and application to tissues, bloodstains, and hair forensic samples from California. Calif. Fish Game 84, 159–169 (1998).

    • Google Scholar
  • 83.

    Cairns, S. J. & Schwager, S. J. A comparison of association indices. Anim. Behav. 35, 1454–1469 (1987).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 84.

    Godde, S., Humbert, L., Côté, S. D., Réale, D. & Whitehead, H. Correcting for the impact of gregariousness in social network analyses. Anim. Behav. 85, 553–558 (2013).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 85.

    Calenge, C. The package ‘adehabitat’ for the R software: A tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecol. Modell. 197, 516–519 (2006).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 86.

    Team, R. C. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2013 (2014).

  • 87.

    Fieberg, J. & Kochanny, C. O. Quanitfying home-range overlap: the importance of the utilization distribution. J. Wildl. Manage. 69, 1346 (2005).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 88.

    Whitehead, H. SOCPROG programs: Analysing animal social structures. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 63, 765–778 (2009).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 89.

    Bejder, L., Fletcher, D. & Brager, S. A method for testing association patterns of social animals. Anim. Behav. 56, 719–725 (1998).

  • 90.

    Whitehead, H. Testing association patterns of social animals. Anim. Behav. 57, 26–29 (1999).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 91.

    Newman, M. E. J. & Girvan, M. Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys. Rev. E 69, 026113 (2004).

  • 92.

    Newman, M. E. J. Analysis of weighted networks. Phys. Rev. E 70, 056131 (2004).

  • 93.

    Newman, M. E. J. Modularity and community structure in networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 8577–82 (2006).

  • 94.

    Borgatti, S. NetDraw Software for Network Visualization (2002).

  • 95.

    Wang, J. Triadic IBD coefficients and applications to estimating pairwise relatedness. Genet. Res. 89, 135–153 (2007).

  • 96.

    Wang, J. COANCESTRY: A program for simulating, estimating and analysing relatedness and inbreeding coefficients. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 11, 141–145 (2011).

  • 97.

    Duchesne, P., Étienne, C. & Bernatchez, L. PERM: a computer program to detect structuring factors in social units. Mol. Ecol. Notes 6, 965–967 (2006).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar

  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    The scientists restoring a gold-mining disaster in the Peruvian Amazon

    Decarbonizing the making of consumer products