Seidl, R. et al. Forest disturbances under climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 395–402 (2017).
Zohner, C. M., Mo, L. & Renner, S. S. Global warming reduces leaf-out and flowering synchrony among individuals. eLife 7, e40214 (2018).
Bastin, J.-F. et al. The global tree restoration potential. Science 365, 76–79 (2019).
Luo, Y., McIntire, E. J. B., Boisvenue, C., Nikiema, P. P. & Chen, H. Y. H. Climatic change only stimulated growth for trees under weak competition in central boreal forests. J. Ecol. 108, 36–46 (2019).
Angert, A. L. et al. Do species’ traits predict recent shifts at expanding range edges? Ecol. Lett. 14, 677–689 (2011).
Koenig, W. D. et al. Is the relationship between mast-seeding and weather in oaks related to their life-history or phylogeny? Ecology 97, 2603–2615 (2016).
McKone, M. J., Kelly, D. & Lee, W. G. Effect of climate change on mast-seeding species: frequency of mass flowering and escape from specialist insect seed predators. Glob. Change Biol. 4, 591–596 (1998).
Vacchiano, G. et al. Spatial patterns and broad-scale weather cues of beech mast seeding in Europe. New Phytol. 215, 595–608 (2017).
Kelly, D. The evolutionary ecology of mast seeding. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9, 465–470 (1994).
Fernández-Martínez, M., Vicca, S., Janssens, I. A., Espelta, J. M. & Peñuelas, J. The role of nutrients, productivity and climate in determining tree fruit production in European forests. New Phytol. 213, 669–679 (2017).
Monks, A., Monks, J. M. & Tanentzap, A. J. Resource limitation underlying multiple masting models makes mast seeding sensitive to future climate change. New Phytol. 210, 419–430 (2016).
Pearse, I. S., Koenig, W. D. & Kelly, D. Mechanisms of mast seeding: resources, weather, cues, and selection. New Phytol. 212, 546–562 (2016).
Bogdziewicz, M., Crone, E. E., Steele, M. A. & Zwolak, R. Effects of nitrogen deposition on reproduction in a masting tree: benefits of higher seed production are trumped by negative biotic interactions. J. Ecol. 105, 310–320 (2017).
Kelly, D. et al. Of mast and mean: differential-temperature cue makes mast seeding insensitive to climate change. Ecol. Lett. 16, 90–98 (2013).
Koenig, W. D., Knops, J. M., Carmen, W. J. & Pearse, I. S. What drives masting? The phenological synchrony hypothesis. Ecology 96, 184–192 (2015).
Kelly, D., Hart, D. E. & Allen, R. B. Evaluating the wind pollination benefits of mast seeding. Ecology 82, 117–126 (2001).
Rees, M., Kelly, D. & Bjørnstad, O. N. Snow tussocks, chaos, and the evolution of mast seeding. Am. Nat. 160, 44–59 (2002).
Tachiki, Y. & Iwasa, Y. Both seedling banks and specialist seed predators promote the evolution of synchronized and intermittent reproduction (masting) in trees. J. Ecol. 98, 1398–1408 (2010).
Norton, D. A. & Kelly, D. Mast seeding over 33 years by Dacrydium cupressinum Lamb. (rimu) (Podocarpaceae) in New Zealand: the importance of economies of scale. Funct. Ecol. 2, 399–408 (1988).
Rapp, J. M., McIntire, E. J. & Crone, E. E. Sex allocation, pollen limitation and masting in whitebark pine. J. Ecol. 101, 1345–1352 (2013).
Moreira, X., Abdala-Roberts, L., Linhart, Y. B. & Mooney, K. A. Masting promotes individual- and population-level reproduction by increasing pollination efficiency. Ecology 95, 801–807 (2014).
Linhart, Y. B., Moreira, X., Snyder, M. A. & Mooney, K. A. Variability in seed cone production and functional response of seed predators to seed cone availability: support for the predator satiation hypothesis. J. Ecol. 102, 576–583 (2014).
Kelly, D. et al. Predator satiation and extreme mast seeding in 11 species of Chionochloa (Poaceae). Oikos 90, 477–488 (2000).
Espelta, J. M., Cortés, P., Molowny-Horas, R., Sánchez-Humanes, B. & Retana, J. Masting mediated by summer drought reduces acorn predation in Mediterranean oak forests. Ecology 89, 805–817 (2008).
Kelly, D. & Sork, V. L. Mast seeding in perennial plants: why, how, where? Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33, 427–447 (2002).
Bogdziewicz, M., Steele, M. A., Marino, S. & Crone, E. E. Correlated seed failure as an environmental veto to synchronize reproduction of masting plants. New Phytol. 219, 98–108 (2018).
Pearse, I. S., LaMontagne, J. M. & Koenig, W. D. Inter-annual variation in seed production has increased over time (1900–2014). Proc. R. Soc. B 284, 20171666 (2017).
Walther, G.-R. et al. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416, 389–395 (2002).
Chen, I.-C., Hill, J. K., Ohlemüller, R., Roy, D. B. & Thomas, C. D. Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming. Science 333, 1024–1026 (2011).
Koenig, W. D. et al. Dissecting components of population-level variation in seed production and the evolution of masting behavior. Oikos 102, 581–591 (2003).
Bogdziewicz, M. et al. Masting in wind-pollinated trees: system-specific roles of weather and pollination dynamics in driving seed production. Ecology 98, 2615–2625 (2017).
Peñuelas, J. & Filella, I. Responses to a warming world. Science 294, 793–795 (2001).
Richardson, S. J. et al. Climate and net carbon availability determine temporal patterns of seed production by Nothofagus. Ecology 86, 972–981 (2005).
Buechling, A., Martin, P. H., Canham, C. D., Shepperd, W. D. & Battaglia, M. A. Climate drivers of seed production in Picea engelmannii and response to warming temperatures in the southern Rocky Mountains. J. Ecol. 104, 1051–1062 (2016).
Satake, A. & Bjørnstad, O. N. Spatial dynamics of specialist seed predators on synchronized and intermittent seed production of host plants. Am. Nat. 163, 591–605 (2004).
Bogdziewicz, M., Shealyn, M., Bonal, R., Zwolak, R. & Steele, M. A. Rapid aggregative and reproductive responses of weevils to masting of North American oaks counteract predator satiation. Ecology 99, 2575–2582 (2018).
Verheyen, K. et al. Juniperus communis: victim of the combined action of climate warming and nitrogen deposition? Plant Biol. 11, 49–59 (2009).
Zwolak, R., Bogdziewicz, M., Wróbel, A. & Crone, E. E. Advantages of masting in European beech: timing of granivore satiation and benefits of seed caching support the predator dispersal hypothesis. Oecologia 180, 749–758 (2016).
Jensen, T. S. Seed–seed predator interactions of European beech, Fagus silvatica and forest rodents, Clethrionomys glareolus and Apodemus flavicollis. Oikos 44, 149–156 (1985).
Piovesan, G. & Adams, J. M. Masting behaviour in beech: linking reproduction and climatic variation. Can. J. Bot. 79, 1039–1047 (2001).
Satake, A. & Iwasa, Y. O. H. Pollen coupling of forest trees: forming synchronized and periodic reproduction out of chaos. J. Theor. Biol. 203, 63–84 (2000).
Crone, E. E. & Rapp, J. M. Resource depletion, pollen coupling, and the ecology of mast seeding. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1322, 21–34 (2014).
Satake, A. & Bjørnstad, O. N. A resource budget model to explain intraspecific variation in mast reproductive dynamics. Ecol. Res. 23, 3–10 (2008).
Sykes, M. T., Prentice, I. C. & Cramer, W. A bioclimatic model for the potential distributions of north European tree species under present and future climates. J. Biogeogr. 23, 203–233 (1996).
Vacchiano, G. et al. Reproducing reproduction: how to simulate mast seeding in forest models. Ecol. Modell. 376, 40–53 (2018).
Penuelas, J. & Boada A global change‐induced biome shift in the Montseny mountains (NE Spain). Glob. Change Biol. 9, 131–140 (2003).
Jump, A. S., Hunt, J. M. & Penuelas, J. Climate relationships of growth and establishment across the altitudinal range of Fagus sylvatica in the Montseny Mountains, northeast Spain. Ecoscience 14, 507–518 (2007).
Clement, J. et al. Relating increasing hantavirus incidences to the changing climate: the mast connection. Int. J. Health Geogr. 8, 1 (2009).
Bogdziewicz, M., Zwolak, R. & Crone, E. E. How do vertebrates respond to mast seeding? Oikos 125, 300–307 (2016).
Ostfeld, R. S. & Keesing, F. Pulsed resources and community dynamics of consumers in terrstrial ecosystems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15, 232–237 (2000).
Szymkowiak, J. & Thomson, R. L. Nest predator avoidance during habitat selection of a songbird varies with mast peaks and troughs. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 73, 91 (2019).
Schmidt, K. A. & Ostfeld, R. S. Numerical and behavioral effects within a pulse-driven system: consequences for shared prey. Ecology 89, 635–646 (2008).
Elliott, G. & Kemp, J. Large-scale pest control in New Zealand beech forests. Ecol. Manag. Restor. 17, 200–209 (2016).
Bogdziewicz, M. et al. From theory to experiments for testing the proximate mechanisms of mast seeding: an agenda for an experimental ecology. Ecol. Lett. 23, 210–220 (2020).
Nilsson, S. G. & Wastljung, U. Seed predation and cross-pollination in mast-seeding beech (Fagus sylvatica) patches. Ecology 68, 260–265 (1987).
Packham, J. R., Thomas, P. A., Lageard, J. G. A. & Hilton, G. M. The English beech masting survey 1980–2007: variation in the fruiting of the common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and its effects on woodland ecosystems. Arboric. J. 31, 189–214 (2008).
Dore, A. J. et al. The influence of model grid resolution on estimation of national scale nitrogen deposition and exceedance of critical loads. Biogeosciences 9, 1597–1609 (2012).
Tipping, E. et al. Long-term increases in soil carbon due to ecosystem fertilization by atmospheric nitrogen deposition demonstrated by regional-scale modelling and observations. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–11 (2017).
Cornes, R. C., van der Schrier, G., van den Besselaar, E. J. & Jones, P. D. An ensemble version of the E-OBS temperature and precipitation data sets. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 123, 9391–9409 (2018).
Fernández-Martínez, M. et al. Global trends in carbon sinks and their relationships with CO2 and temperature. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 73 (2019).
Fernández-Martínez, M. et al. Atmospheric deposition, CO2, and change in the land carbon sink. Sci. Rep. 7, 9632 (2017).
Hacket-Pain, A. J. et al. Climatically controlled reproduction drives interannual growth variability in a temperate tree species. Ecol. Lett. 21, 1833–1844 (2018).
Drobyshev, I. et al. Masting behaviour and dendrochronology of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in southern Sweden. For. Ecol. Manag. 259, 2160–2171 (2010).
Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach (Springer, 2003).
Brooks, M. E. et al. glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R J. 9, 378–400 (2017).
Hartig, F. DHARMa: Residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level/mixed) regression models. R package v.0.1.5 (CRAN, 2017).
Tavares, H. windowscanr: Apply functions using sliding windows. R package version v.0.1 (RDRR, 2019).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
