in

Invasive Wild Pigs as Primary Nest Predators for Wild Turkeys

  • 1.

    Vitense, K., Wirsing, A. J., Tyson, R. C. & Anderson, J. J. Theoretical impacts of habitat loss and generalist predation on predator–prey cycles. Ecological Modelling 327, 85–94 (2016).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 2.

    Mooney, H. A. & Cleland, E. E. The evolutionary impact of invasive species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98, 5446–5451 (2001).

  • 3.

    Keiter, D. A., Mayer, J. J. & Beasley, J. C. What is in a “common” name? A call for consistent terminology for nonnative Sus scrofa. Wildlife Society Bulletin 40, 384–387 (2016).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 4.

    Barrios-Garcia, M. N. & Ballari, S. A. Impact of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in its introduced and native range: a review. Biological Invasions 14, 2283–2300 (2012).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 5.

    Mayer, J. J. & Brisbin, I. L. Wild pigs in the United States: Their History, Comparative Morphology, and Current Status. (University of Georgia Press, 2008).

  • 6.

    Corn, J. L. & Jordan, T. R. Development of the national feral swine map, 1982–2016. Wildlife Society Bulletin 41, 758–763 (2017).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 7.

    Gipson, P. S., Hlavachick, B. & Berger, T. Range expansion by wild hogs across the central United States. Wildlife Society Bulletin 26, 279–286 (1998).

    • Google Scholar
  • 8.

    McClure, M. L. et al. Modeling and mapping the probability of occurrence of invasive wild pigs across the contiguous United States. PloS One 10, e0133771 (2015).

  • 9.

    Snow, N. P., Jarzyna, M. A. & VerCauteren, K. C. Interpreting and predicting the spread of invasive wild pigs. Journal of Applied Ecology 54, 2022–2032, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12866 (2017).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 10.

    Timmons, J. B. et al. Feral hog population growth, density and harvest in Texas. Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service Report.(Texas A&M University: College Station, TX.) Report no. SP-472 (2012).

  • 11.

    Ditchkoff, S. S. & Mayer, J. J. In Wild pigs: biology, damage, control techniques, and management. Savanna River National Laboratory, Aiken, SC, USA (eds Mayer, J. J. & Brisbin, I. L.) 105–143 (2009).

  • 12.

    Lacki, M. J. & Lancia, R. A. Effects of wild pigs on beech growth in Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Journal of Wildlife Management 50, 655–659 (1986).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 13.

    Singer, F. J., Swank, W. T. & Clebsch, E. E. Effects of wild pig rooting in a deciduous forest. Journal of Wildlife Management 48, 464–473 (1984).

  • 14.

    Taylor, R. B. & Hellgren, E. C. Diet of feral hogs in the western South Texas Plains. The Southwestern Naturalist 42, 33–39 (1997).

    • Google Scholar
  • 15.

    Challies, C. N. Feral pigs (Sus scrofa) on Auckland Island: status, and effects on vegetation and nesting sea birds. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 2, 479–490 (1975).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 16.

    Elsey, R. M., Mouton, E. C. & Kinler, N. Effects of feral swine (Sus scrofa) on alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) nests in Louisiana. Southeastern Naturalist 11, 205–218 (2012).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 17.

    Stegeman, L. C. The European wild boar in the Cherokee national forest, Tennessee. Journal of Mammalogy 19, 279–290 (1938).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 18.

    Tolleson, D., Rollins, D., Pinchak, W., Ivy, M. & Hierman, A. Impact of feral hogs on ground-nesting gamebirds. A compendium for resource managers (Hanselka, C. W. & Cadenhead, J. F., eds.). Texas Agricultural Extension Service, San Angel, USA, 76–83 (1993).

  • 19.

    Sherry, T. W., Wilson, S., Hunter, S. & Holmes, R. T. Impacts of nest predators and weather on reproductive success and population limitation in a long‐distance migratory songbird. Journal of Avian Biology 46, 559–569 (2015).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 20.

    Thogmartin, W. E. & Schaeffer, B. A. Landscape attributes associated with mortality events of wild turkeys in Arkansas. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28, 865–874 (2000).

    • Google Scholar
  • 21.

    Vangilder, L. D. & Kurzejeski, E. W. Population ecology of the eastern wild turkey in northern Missouri. Wildlife Monographs 130, 1–50 (1995).

    • Google Scholar
  • 22.

    Wood, G. W. & Barrett, R. H. Status of wild pigs in the United States. Wildlife Society Bulletin 7, 237–246 (1979).

    • Google Scholar
  • 23.

    Sanders, H. N., Hewitt, D. G., Perotto-Baldivieso, H. L., VerCauteren, K. C. & Snow, N. P. Opportunistic predation of wild turkey nests by wild pigs. Journal of WIldlife Management 84, 293–300 (2019).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 24.

    Dreibelbis, J. et al. Vol. 10 235–242 (Proceedings of the National Wild Turkey Symposium, 2011).

  • 25.

    Dickson, J. G. The wild turkey: biology and management. (Stackpole Books, 1992).

  • 26.

    Tapley, J. L., Kennamer, J. E. & Abernethy, R. K. Status and distribution of the wild turkey in 2004. Proceedings of the Ninth National Wild Turkey Symposium 9, 21–31 (2005).

    • Google Scholar
  • 27.

    National Wild Turkey Federation. The 2003 economic contributions of spring turkey hunting. Southwick Associates, Fernandina Beach, Florida, USA (2003).

  • 28.

    Dreibelbis, J. Z. et al. Predation of Rio Grande wild turkey nests on the Edwards Plateau, Texas. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 120, 906–911 (2008).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 29.

    Fletcher, K., Aebischer, N. J., Baines, D., Foster, R. & Hoodless, A. N. Changes in breeding success and abundance of ground‐nesting moorland birds in relation to the experimental deployment of legal predator control. Journal of Applied Ecology 47, 263–272 (2010).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 30.

    Schmidt, K. A. & Whelan, C. J. Nest predation on woodland songbirds: When is nest predation density dependent? Oikos 87, 65–74 (1999).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 31.

    Petty, B. D. et al. Effects of feral hog control on nest fate of eastern wild turkey in the post oak savannah of Texas. Proceedings of the National Wild Turkey Symposium 9, 169–172 (2005).

    • Google Scholar
  • 32.

    Mezquida, E. T. & Marone, L. Are results of artificial nest experiments a valid indicator of success of natural nests? The Wilson Bulletin 115, 270–276 (2003).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 33.

    Wilson, G. R., Brittingham, M. C. & Goodrich, L. J. How well do artificial nests estimate success of real nests? The Condor 100, 357–364 (1998).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 34.

    Hernandez, F., Henke, S. E., Silvy, N. J. & Rollins, D. Comparison of success between actual northern bobwhite and wild turkey nests and simulated nests. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29, 1212–1218 (2001).

    • Google Scholar
  • 35.

    Hewitt, D. G. & Kirkpatrick, R. L. Ground nest predation and ruffed grouse densities in southwest Virginia. The Wilson Bulletin 105, 521–524 (1993).

    • Google Scholar
  • 36.

    Gould, F. Texas plants-a checklist and ecological summary. MP-585/Revised. Tex. Agr. Exp. Sta. Texas A&M Univ., College Station (1975).

  • 37.

    Hudler, D. B. Modeling paleolandscapes in central Texas. Dissertation, University of Texas, Austin, USA (2000).

  • 38.

    Wills, F. H. Historic vegetation of Camp Bullis and Camp Stanley, southeastern Edwards Plateau, Texas. Texas Journal of science 58, 219–230 (2006).

    • Google Scholar
  • 39.

    Snow, N. P. et al. Exposure of a Population of Invasive Wild Pigs to Simulated Toxic Bait containing Biomarker: Implications for Population Reduction. Pest Management Science 75, 1140–1149 (2019).

  • 40.

    Sweitzer, R. A. et al. Immobilization and physiological parameters associated with chemical restraint of wild pigs with Telazol® and xylazine hydrochloride. Journal of wildlife diseases 33, 198–205 (1997).

  • 41.

    Calenge, C. The package adehabitat for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecological modelling 197, 516–519 (2006).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 42.

    Mohr, C. O. Table of equivalent populations of North American small mammals. The American Midland Naturalist 37, 223–249 (1947).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 43.

    Walter, W. & Fischer, J. Manual of applied spatial ecology. State College, PA: Pennsylvania State University (2016).

  • 44.

    Dreibelbis, J. Z. Nesting ecology of Rio Grande wild turkeys in the Edwards Plateau of Texas, MS Thesis, Texas A&M University, (2008).

  • 45.

    Perotto Baldiviezo, H. L. GIS-based multiple scale study of Rio Grande wild turkey habitat in the Edwards Plateau of Texas, PhD Dissertation, Texas A&M University (2005).

  • 46.

    McGarigal, K., Cushman, S. A. & Ene, E. FRAGSTATS v4: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical and continuous maps. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA (2012).

  • 47.

    Beasom, S. L. Turkey productivity in two vegetative communities in south Texas. Journal of Wildlife Management 34, 166–175 (1970).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 48.

    Collier, B. A. et al. Variation in brood sex ratios of Texas Rio Grande wild turkeys. Journal of Wildlife Management 71, 1793–1799 (2007).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 49.

    Keegan, T. W. & Crawford, J. A. Renesting by Rio Grande wild turkeys after brood loss. Journal of Wildlife Management 57, 801–804 (1993).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 50.

    Hernandez, F., Rollins, D. & Cantu, R. Evaluating evidence to identify ground-nest predators in west Texas. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25, 826–831 (1997).

    • Google Scholar
  • 51.

    Richardson, T. W., Gardali, T. & Jenkins, S. H. Review and meta-analysis of camera effects on avian nest success. The Journal of Wildlife Management 73, 287–293 (2009).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 52.

    Conner, L. M., Rutledge, J. C. & Smith, L. L. Effects of mesopredators on nest survival of shrub-nesting songbirds. The Journal of Wildlife Management 74, 73–80 (2010).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 53.

    Henry, V. G. Predation on dummy nests of ground-nesting birds in the southern Appalachians. Journal of Wildlife Management 33, 169–172 (1969).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 54.

    Vander Haegen, W. M., Dodge, W. E. & Sayre, M. W. Factors affecting productivity in a northern wild turkey population. Journal of Wildlife Management 52, 127–133 (1988).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 55.

    Vangilder, L. D., Kurzejeski, E. W., Kimmel-Truitt, V. L. & Lewis, J. B. Reproductive parameters of wild turkey hens in north Missouri. Journal of wildlife management 51, 535–540 (1987).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 56.

    Melville, H. I., Conway, W. C., Morrison, M. L., Comer, C. E. & Hardin, J. B. Artificial nests identify possible nest predators of eastern wild turkeys. Southeastern Naturalist 13, 80–92 (2014).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 57.

    Engeman, R. M., Addison, D. & Griffin, J. Defending against disparate marine turtle nest predators: nesting success benefits from eradicating invasive feral swine and caging nests from raccoons. Oryx 50, 289–295 (2016).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 58.

    Engeman, R. M. et al. Dramatic and immediate improvements in insular nesting success for threatened sea turtles and shorebirds following predator management. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 395, 147–152 (2010).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 59.

    Schley, L. & Roper, T. J. Diet of wild boar Sus scrofa in Western Europe, with particular reference to consumption of agricultural crops. Mammal review 33, 43–56 (2003).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 60.

    Ballari, S. A. & Barrios-García, M. N. A review of wild boar Sus scrofa diet and factors affecting food selection in native and introduced ranges. Mammal Review 44, 124–134 (2014).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 61.

    Lavelle, M. J. et al. Evaluation of movement behaviors to inform toxic baiting strategies for invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa). Pest Management Science 74, 2504–2510 (2018).

  • 62.

    Snow, N. P. & VerCauteren, K. C. Movement responses inform effectiveness and consequences of baiting wild pigs for population control. Crop Protection 124, 104835 (2019).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 63.

    Crome, F. H. & Moore, L. Cassowaries in North-Eastern Queensland-Report of a survey and a review and assessment of their status and conservation and management needs. Wildlife Research 17, 369–385 (1990).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 64.

    Norman, G. W. & Steffen, D. E. Effects of recruitment, oak mast, and fall-season format on wild turkey harvest rates in Virginia. Wildlife Society Bulletin 31, 553–559 (2003).

    • Google Scholar
  • 65.

    Aldridge, C. L. et al. Range-wide patterns of greater sage-grouse persistence. Diversity and Distributions 14, 983–994 (2008).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 66.

    Ivan, J. S. & Murphy, R. K. What preys on piping plover eggs and chicks? Wildlife Society Bulletin 33, 113–119 (2005).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 67.

    Rice, M. B., Haukos, D. A., Dubovsky, J. A. & Runge, M. C. Continental survival and recovery rates of northern pintails using band-recovery data. Journal of Wildlife Management 74, 778–787 (2010).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 68.

    Congdon, J. D., Dunham, A. E. & Sels, R. V. L. Demographics of common snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina): implications for conservation and management of long-lived organisms. American Zoologist 34, 397–408 (1994).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 69.

    Doroff, A. M. & Keith, L. B. Demography and ecology of an ornate box turtle (Terrapene ornata) population in south-central Wisconsin. Copeia 1990, 387–399 (1990).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 70.

    Atwood, T. C., Fry, T. L. & Leland, B. R. Partitioning of anthropogenic watering sites by desert carnivores. Journal of Wildlife Management 75, 1609–1615 (2011).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar

  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    Early high rates and disparity in the evolution of ichthyosaurs

    Oxygen lost and found