in

Lasting signature of planting year weather on restored grasslands

  • 1.

    Foley, J. A. et al. Global consequences of land use. Science 309, 570–574 (2005).

  • 2.

    Cardinale, B. J. et al. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486, 59–67 (2012).

  • 3.

    Dobson, A. P., Bradshaw, A. D. & Baker, A. J. M. Hopes for the future: Restoration ecology and conservation biology. Science 277, 515–522 (1997).

  • 4.

    Hobbs, R. J. & Harris, J. A. Restoration ecology: Repairing the Earth’s ecosystems in the new millennium. Restor. Ecol. 9, 239–246 (2001).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 5.

    Ruiz-Jaen, M. C. & Mitchell Aide, T. Restoration success: How is it being measured? Restor. Ecol. 13, 569–577 (2005).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 6.

    Jones, H. P. et al. Restoration and repair of Earth’s damaged ecosystems. Proc. R. Soc. B 285 (2018).

  • 7.

    Brudvig, L. A. et al. Interpreting variation to advance predictive restoration science. J. Appl. Ecol. 54, 1018–1027 (2017).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 8.

    Palmer, M. A., Ambrose, R. F. & Poff, N. L. Ecological theory and community restoration ecology. Restor. Ecol. 5, 291–300 (1997).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 9.

    Young, T. P., Chase, J. M. & Huddleston, R. T. Community succession and assembly. Ecol. Restor. 19, 5–18 (2001).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 10.

    Weiher, E. et al. Advances, challenges and a developing synthesis of ecological community assembly theory. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 366, 2403–13 (2011).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 11.

    Blumenthal, D. M., Jordan, N. R. & Russelle, M. P. Soil carbon addition controls weeds and facilitates prairie restoration. Ecol. Appl. 13, 605–615 (2003).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 12.

    Averett, J. M., Klips, R. A., Nave, L. E., Frey, S. D. & Curtis, P. S. Effects of soil carbon amendment on nitrogen availability and plant growth in an experimental tallgrass prairie restoration. Restor. Ecol. 12, 568–574 (2004).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 13.

    Baer, S. G. et al. Vulnerability of rehabilitated agricultural production systems to invasion by nontarget plant species. Environ. Manage. 43, 189–96 (2009).

  • 14.

    Rowe, H. I. Tricks of the trade: Techniques and opinions from 38 experts in tallgrass prairie restoration. Restor. Ecol. 18, 253–262 (2010).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 15.

    Suding, K. N. Toward an era of restoration in ecology: Successes, failures, and opportunities ahead. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 42, 465–487 (2011).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 16.

    Grman, E., Bassett, T., Zirbel, C. R. & Brudvig, L. A. Dispersal and establishment filters influence the assembly of restored prairie plant communities. Restor. Ecol. 23, 892–899 (2015).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 17.

    Fukami, T. Historical contingency in community assembly: Integrating niches, species pools, and priority effects. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 46, 1–23 (2015).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 18.

    Alford, R. A. & Wilbur, H. M. Priority effects in experimental pond communities: Competition between Bufo and Rana. Ecology 66, 1097–1105 (1985).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 19.

    Fukami, T., Mordecai, E. A. & Ostling, A. A framework for priority effects. J. Veg. Sci. 27, 655–657 (2016).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 20.

    Young, T. P., Stuble, K. L., Balachowski, J. A. & Werner, C. M. Using priority effects to manipulate competitive relationships in restoration. Restor. Ecol. 25, S114–123 (2017).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 21.

    Connell, J. H. & Slatyer, R. O. Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. Am. Nat. 111, 1119–1144 (1977).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 22.

    Grant, K., Kreyling, J., Heilmeier, H., Beierkuhnlein, C. & Jentsch, A. Extreme weather events and plant–plant interactions: shifts between competition and facilitation among grassland species in the face of drought and heavy rainfall. Ecol. Res. 29, 991–1001 (2014).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 23.

    Young, T. P., Petersen, D. A. & Clary, J. J. The ecology of restoration: historical links, emerging issues and unexplored realms. Ecol. Lett. 8, 662–673 (2005).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 24.

    Vellend, M. et al. Assessing the relative importance of neutral stochasticity in ecological communities. Oikos 123, 1420–1430 (2014).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 25.

    Grman, E., Bassett, T. & Brudvig, L. Confronting contingency in restoration: Management and site history determine outcomes of assembling prairies, but site characteristics and landscape context have little effect. J. Appl. Ecol. 50, 1234–1243 (2013).

    • Google Scholar
  • 26.

    Martin, L. M. & Wilsey, B. J. Assembly history alters alpha and beta diversity, exotic-native proportions and functioning of restored prairie plant communities. J. Appl. Ecol. 49 (2012).

  • 27.

    Vaughn, K. J. & Young, T. P. Contingent conclusions: Year of initiation influences ecological field experiments, but temporal replication is rare. Restor. Ecol. 18, 59–64 (2010).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 28.

    Groves, A. M. & Brudvig, L. A. Inter-annual variation in precipitation and other planting conditions impacts seedling establishment in sown plant communities. Restor. Ecol. 27, 128–137 (2019).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 29.

    Manning, G. C. & Baer, S. G. Interannual variability in climate effects on community assembly and ecosystem functioning in restored prairie. Ecosphere 9, e02327 (2018).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 30.

    Stuble, K. L., Fick, S. E. & Young, T. P. Every restoration is unique: Testing year effects and site effects as drivers of initial restoration trajectories. J. Appl. Ecol. 54, 1051–1057 (2017).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 31.

    Young, T. P., Zefferman, E. P., Vaughn, K. J. & Fick, S. Initial success of native grasses is contingent on multiple interactions among exotic grass competition, temporal priority, rainfall and site effects. AoB Plants 7, plu081 (2015).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 32.

    Robinson, T. M. P. & Gross, K. L. The impact of altered precipitation variability on annual weed species. Am. J. Bot. 97, 1625–9 (2010).

  • 33.

    Peters, K., Breitsameter, L. & Gerowitt, B. Impact of climate change on weeds in agriculture: A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 34, 707–721 (2014).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 34.

    Bakker, J. D. et al. Contingency of grassland restoration on year, site, and competition from introduced grasses. Ecol. Appl. 13, 137–153 (2003).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 35.

    MacDougall, A. S., Wilson, S. D. & Bakker, J. D. Climatic variability alters the outcome of long-term community assembly. J. Ecol. 96, 346–354 (2008).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 36.

    Suding, K. N. et al. Functional- and abundance-based mechanisms explain diversity loss due to N fertilization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 4387–92 (2005).

  • 37.

    Piper, J. K., Schmidt, E. S. & Janzen, A. J. Effects of species richness on resident and target species components in a prairie restoration. Restor. Ecol. 15, 189–198 (2007).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 38.

    Doll, J. E., Haubensak, Ka, Bouressa, E. L. & Jackson, R. D. Testing disturbance, seeding time, and soil amendments for establishing native warm-season grasses in non-native cool-season pasture. Restor. Ecol. 19, 1–8 (2011).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 39.

    Thompson, K. & Grime, J. P. Seasonal variation in the seed banks of herbaceous species in ten contrasting habitats. J. Ecol. 67, 893–921 (1979).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 40.

    Pakeman, R. J. & Small, J. A. The role of the seed bank, seed rain, and the timing of disturbance in gap regeneration. J. Veg. Sci. 16, 121–130 (2005).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 41.

    Dölle, M. & Schmidt, W. The relationship between soil seed bank, above-ground vegetation and disturbance intensity on old-field successional permanent plots. Appl. Veg. Sci. 12, 415–428 (2009).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 42.

    Buisson, E., Dutoit, T., Torre, F., Römermann, C. & Poschlod, P. The implications of seed rain and seed bank patterns for plant succession at the edges of abandoned fields in Mediterranean landscapes. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 115, 6–14 (2006).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 43.

    Vellend, M. The Theory of Ecological Communities. (Princeton University Press, 2016).

  • 44.

    Forrest, J. R. K. & James, D. T. An examination of synchrony between insect emergence and flowering in Rocky Mountain meadows. Ecol. Monogr. 81, 469–491 (2011).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 45.

    Wainwright, C. E. & Cleland, E. E. Exotic species display greater germination plasticity and higher germination rates than native species across multiple cues. Biol. Invasions 15, 2253–2264 (2013).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 46.

    Samson, F. & Knopf, F. Prairie conservation in North America. Bioscience 44, 418–421 (1994).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 47.

    Bakker, J. P., Poschlod, P., Strykstra, R. J., Bekker, R. M. & Thompson, K. Seed banks and seed dispersal: Important topics in restoration ecology. Acta Bot. Neerl. 45, 461–490 (1996).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 48.

    Cramer, V. A., Hobbs, R. J. & Standish, R. J. What’s new about old fields? Land abandonment and ecosystem assembly. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 104–12 (2008).

  • 49.

    Wilsey, B. J., Daneshgar, P. P. & Polley, H. W. Biodiversity, phenology and temporal niche differences between native- and novel exotic-dominated grasslands. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 13, 265–276 (2011).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 50.

    Dickson, T. L., Hopwood, J. L. & Wilsey, B. J. Do priority effects benefit invasive plants more than native plants? An experiment with six grassland species. Biol. Invasions 14, 2617–2624 (2012).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 51.

    Keddy, P. A. Assembly and response rules: Two goals for predictive community ecology. J. Veg. Sci. 3, 157–164 (1992).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 52.

    Copeland, S. M., Munson, S. M., Bradford, J. B. & Butterfield, B. J. Influence of climate, post-treatment weather extremes, and soil factors on vegetation recovery after restoration treatments in the southwestern US. Appl. Veg. Sci. 22, 85–95 (2019).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 53.

    Heisler-White, J. L., Blair, J. M., Kelly, E. F., Harmoney, K. & Knapp, A. K. Contingent productivity responses to more extreme rainfall regimes across a grassland biome. Glob. Chang. Biol. 15, 2894–2904 (2009).

  • 54.

    Bradford, J. B., Betancourt, J. L., Butterfield, B. J., Munson, S. M. & Wood, T. E. Anticipatory natural resource science and management for a changing future. Front. Ecol. Environ. 16, 295–303 (2018).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 55.

    Hardegree, S. P. et al. Weather-centric rangeland revegetation planning. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 71, 1–11 (2018).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 56.

    Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M. E., Rand, T. A., Resh, V. H. & Krauss, J. Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biol. 5, e18 (2007).

  • 57.

    Nafus, A. M., Svejcar, T. J. & Davies, K. W. Disturbance history, management, and seeding year precipitation influences vegetation characteristics of crested wheatgrass stands. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 69, 248–256 (2016).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 58.

    Shriver, R. K. et al. Adapting management to a changing world: Warm temperatures, dry soil, and interannual variability limit restoration success of a dominant woody shrub in temperate drylands. Glob. Chang. Biol. 24, 4972–4982 (2018).

  • 59.

    Wuebbles, D. J. & Hayhoe, K. Climate change projections for the United States Midwest. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 9, 335–363 (2004).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 60.

    Chase, J. M. Community assembly: When should history matter? Oecologia 136, 489–98 (2003).

  • 61.

    Werner, C. M., Vaughn, K. J., Stuble, K. L., Wolf, K. & Young, T. P. Persistent asymmetrical priority effects in a California grassland restoration experiment. Ecol. Appl. 26, 1624–1632 (2016).

  • 62.

    Plückers, C. et al. Sowing different mixtures in dry acidic grassland produced priority effects of varying strength. Acta Oecologica 53, 110–116 (2013).

  • 63.

    Helsen, K., Hermy, M. & Honnay, O. A test of priority effect persistence in semi-natural grasslands through the removal of plant functional groups during community assembly. BMC Ecol. 16, 22 (2016).

  • 64.

    Adler, P. B., Hillerislambers, J. & Levine, J. M. A niche for neutrality. Ecol. Lett. 10, 95–104 (2007).

  • 65.

    Chase, J. M. Drought mediates the importance of stochastic community assembly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 17430–4 (2007).

  • 66.

    Chase, J. M. & Myers, J. A. Disentangling the importance of ecological niches from stochastic processes across scales. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 366, 2351–2363 (2011).

  • 67.

    Myers, J. A. & Harms, K. E. Seed arrival and ecological filters interact to assemble high-diversity plant communities. Ecology 92, 676–86 (2011).

  • 68.

    Zirbel, C. R., Bassett, T., Grman, E. & Brudvig, L. A. Plant functional traits and environmental conditions shape community assembly and ecosystem functioning during restoration. J. Appl. Ecol. 54, 1070–1079 (2017).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 69.

    Group, P. C. PRISM climate data. (2018).

  • 70.

    Trudgill, D. L., Honek, A., Li, D. & Van Straalen, N. M. Thermal time – Concepts and utility. Ann. Appl. Biol. 146, 1–14 (2005).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 71.

    Thompson, K. & Grime, J. P. A comparative study of germination responses to diurnally-fluctuating temperatures. J. Appl. Ecol. 20, 141–156 (1983).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar
  • 72.

    Barber, N. A. et al. Grassland restoration characteristics influence phylogenetic and taxonomic structure of plant communities and suggest assembly mechanisms. J. Ecol. 107, 2105–2120 (2019).

    • Article
    • Google Scholar

  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    3 Questions: Greg Britten on how marine life can recover by 2050

    The river–groundwater interface as a hotspot for arsenic release