Elith, J. & Leathwick, J. R. Species distribution models: Ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst 40, 677–697, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120159 (2009).
Bosso, L. et al. Loss of potential bat habitat following a severe wildfire: a model-based rapid assessment. Int. J. Wildland Fire 27(11), 756–769, https://doi.org/10.1071/WF18072 (2018).
Guisan, A. & Thuiller, W. Predicting species distribution: Offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol. Lett. 8, 993–1009, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00792.x (2005).
Adhikari, D. et al. Ecological niche modeling as a cumulative environmental impact assessment tool for biodiversity assessment and conservation planning: A case study of critically endangered plant Lagerstroemia minuticarpa in the Indian Eastern Himalaya. J environ manage 243, 299–307, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.036 (2019).
Peterson, A. T. et al. Ecological niches and geographic distributions. Princeton: Princeton University Press (2011).
Meineri, E., Skarpaas, O. & Vandvik, V. Modeling alpine plant distributions at the landscape scale: Do biotic interactions matter? Ecol. Model. 231, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.01.021 (2012).
Soberón, J. & Peterson, A. T. Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species’ distributional areas. Biodiversity Informatics 2, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.17161/bi.v2i0.4 (2005).
Wisz, M. S. et al. The role of biotic interactions in shaping distributions and realised assemblages of species: Implications for species distribution modelling. Biol. Rev. 88, 15–30, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2012.00235.x (2013).
Heikkinen, R. K., Luoto, M., Virkkala, R., Pearson, R. G. & Körber, J. H. Biotic interactions improve prediction of boreal bird distributions at macro-scales. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 16, 754–763, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00345.x (2007).
Fay, M. F., Pailler, T. & Dixon, K. W. Orchid conservation: making the links. Ann. Bot. 116(3), 377–319, https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcv142 (2015).
Araújo, M. B. & Luoto, M. The importance of biotic interactions for modelling species distributions under climate change. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr 16, 743–753, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00359.x (2007).
Belmaker, J. et al. Empirical evidence for the scale dependence of biotic interactions. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr 24, 750–761, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12311 (2015).
Staniczenko, P. P. A., Sivasubramaniam, P., Suttle, K. B. & Pearson, R. G. Linking macroecology and community ecology: refining predictions of species distributions using biotic interaction networks. Ecol. Lett. 20, 693–707, https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12770 (2017).
Callaway, R. M., Reinhart, K. O., Moore, G. W., Moore, D. J. & Pennings, S. C. Epiphyte host preferences and host traits: Mechanisms for species-specific interactions. Oecologia 132, 221–230, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-0943-3 (2002).
Elith, J., Kearney, M. & Phillips, S. The art of modelling range-shifting species. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1, 330–342, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00036.x (2010).
Copenhaver-Parry, P. E. & Bell, D. M. Species interactions weakly modify climate-induced tree co-occurrence patterns. J. Veg. Sci. 29, 52–61, https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12597 (2018).
Araújo, M. B. In Spatial conservation prioritisation: quantitative methods and computational tools 172–184 (Oxford University Press, 2009).
García-Valdés, R., Zavala, M. A., Araújo, M. B. & Purves, D. W. Chasing a moving target: Projecting climate change-induced shifts in non-equilibrial tree species distributions. J. Ecol. 101, 441–453, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12049 (2013).
Kozlov, M. V. Losses of birch foliage due to insect herbivory along geographical gradients in Europe: A climate-driven pattern? Clim. Change 87, 107–117, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-007-9348-y (2008).
Thomas, C. D. et al. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427, 145–148 (2004).
Blois, J. L., Zarnetske, P. L., Fitzpatrick, M. C. & Finnegan, S. Climate change and the past, present, and future of biotic interactions. Science 341, 499–504, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1237184 (2013).
Olsen, S. L., Töpper, J. P., Skarpaas, O., Vandvik, V. & Klanderud, K. From facilitation to competition: Temperature‐driven shift in dominant plant interactions affects population dynamics in semi natural grasslands. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 1915–1926, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13241 (2016).
Tylianakis, J. M., Didham, R. K., Bascompte, J. & Wardle, D. A. Global change and species interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 11, 1351–1363, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01250.x (2008).
Bellard, C., Bertelsmeier, C., Leadley, P., Thuiller, W. & Courchamp, F. Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 15, 365–377, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01736.x (2012).
Balmford, A. & Bond, W. Trends in the state of nature and their implications for human well-being. Ecol. Lett. 8, 1218–1234, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00814.x (2005).
Wang, D., Hao, Y. U. & Wang, J. Impact of climate change on China’s rice production–an empirical estimation based on panel data (1979–2011) from China’s main rice-producing areas. Singapore Economic Review. World Scientific Publishing Co Pte Ltd (2018).
Davis, M. B. & Shaw, R. G. Range shifts and adaptive responses to Quaternary climate change. Science 292, 673–679, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.292.5517.673 (2001).
Suttle, K. B., Thomsen, M. A. & Power, M. E. Species interactions reverse grassland responses to changing climate. Science 315, 640–642, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136401 (2007).
Bascompte, J., Jordano, P. & Olesen, J. M. Asymmetric coevolutionary networks facilitate biodiversity maintenance. Science 312, 431–433, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1123412 (2006).
Ives, A. R. & Carpenter, S. R. Stability and diversity of ecosystems. Science 317, 58–62, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133258 (2007).
Ceja-Romero, J. et al. Las plantas epífitas, su diversidad e importancia. Ciencias 91, 35–41 (2008).
Stanton, D. E. et al. Epiphytes improve host plant water use by microenvironment modification. Funct. Ecol. 28, 1274–1283, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12249 (2014).
van der Putten, W. H., Macel, M. & Visser, M. E. Predicting species distribution and abundance responses to climate change: why it is essential to include biotic interactions across trophic levels. Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. B. 365, 2025–2034, https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0037 (2010).
Zotz, G. & Bader, M. Y. In Progress in Botany. (Springer, 2009).
Benzing, D. H. Vascular epiphytes. General biology and related biota. Cambridge University Press (1990).
Cach-Pérez, M. J. et al. Climatic and structural factors influencing epiphytic bromeliad community assemblage along a gradient of water-limited environments in the Yucatan. Trop. Conserv. Sci. 6, 283–302, https://doi.org/10.1177/194008291300600209 (2013).
Helliker, B. R. & Griffiths, H. Toward a plant-based proxy for the isotope ratio of atmospheric water vapor. Glob. Change Biol. 13, 723–733, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01325.x (2007).
Hágsater, E. et al. Orchids of Mexico. Instituto Chinoin, A.C, México D. F. (2005).
Ticktin, T., et al. Synthesis of wild orchid trade and demography provides new insight on conservation strategies. Conserv. Lett. e12697, https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12697 (2020).
Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM‐059‐ SEMARNAT‐2010, Protección ambiental‐Especies nativas de México de flora y fauna silvestres‐Categorías de riesgo y especificaciones para su inclusión, exclusión o cambio‐Lista de especies en riesgo. México, DF: Diario Oficial (2010).
Ávila-Díaz, I. & Oyama, K. Conservation genetics of an endemic and endangered epiphytic Laelia speciosa (Orchidaceae). Am. J. Bot. 94, 184–193, https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.94.2.184 (2007).
Halbinger, F. & Soto-Arenas, M. Laelias of Mexico. México City: Orquídea (Méx.) (1997).
IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature). IUCN red list categories and criteria. Version 3.1. 2nd edition. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland (2012).
Cruz-Cárdenas, G., López-Mata, L., Villaseñor, J. L. & Ortiz, E. Potential species distribution modeling and the use of principal component analysis as predictor variables. Rev. Mex. Biodiv. 85(1), 188–199, https://doi.org/10.7550/rmb.36723 (2014).
Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G. & Jarvis, A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 25, 1965–1978, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1276 (2005).
Wei, B. et al. Predicting the current and future cultivation regions of Carthamus tinctorius L. using MaxEnt model under climate change in China. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 16, e00477, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2018.e00477 (2018).
Phillips, S. J., Dudík, M. & Schapire, R. E. Maxent software for modeling species niches and distributions (2017).
Warren, D. L., Glor, R. E. & Turelli, M. ENMTools: A toolbox for comparative studies of environmental niche models. Ecography 33, 607–611. (2010).
Soberón, J., Osorio-Olvera, L. & Peterson, T. Conceptual differences between ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling. Rev. Mex. Biodivers. 88, 437–441, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmb.2017.03.011 (2017).
Gibson, L. M., Mychajliw, A. M., Leon, Y., Rupp, E. & Hadly, E. A. Using the past to contextualize anthropogenic impacts on the present and future distribution of an endemic Caribbean mammal. Conserv Biol 33(3), 500–510, https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13290 (2019).
Mohammadi, S., Ebrahimi, E., Shahriari Moghadam, M. & Bosso, L. Modelling current and future potential distributions of two desert jerboas under climate change in Iran. Ecological Informatics 52, 7–13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2019.04.003 (2019).
Elith, J. et al. Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29, 129–151, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x (2006).
Hijmans, R. J. & Graham, C. H. The ability of climate envelope models to predict the effect of climate change on species distributions. Glob. Change Biol. 12, 2272–2281, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01256.x (2006).
Kearney, M. R., Wintle, B. A. & Porter, W. P. Correlative and mechanistic models of species distribution provide congruent forecasts under climate change. Conserv. Lett. 3, 203–213, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00097.x (2010).
Phillips, S. J. & Dudík, M. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: New extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31, 161–175, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.5203.x (2008).
Jiménez-Valverde, A. & Lobo, J. M. Threshold criteria for conversion of probability of species presence to either-or presence-absence. Acta Oecologica 31, 361–369, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2007.02.001 (2007).
Liu, C., White, M. & Newell, G. Selecting thresholds for the prediction of species occurrence with presence only data. J. Biogeogr. 40(4), 778–789, https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12058 (2013).
Peterson, A. T., Papeş, M. & Soberón, J. Rethinking receiver operating characteristic analysis applications in ecological niche modeling. Ecol. Model. 213, 63–72, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.11.008 (2008).
Villaseñor, J. L., López-Mata, L., Cruz-Cárdenas, G., Ortiz, E. & Cadena-Rodríguez, J. Modelación de la riqueza y distribución potencial del bosque húmedo de montaña. Informe final SNIB-CONABIO, México D. F. (2015).
Barve, N. Tool for Partial-ROC. Biodiversity Institute, Lawrence (2008).
Girardello, M., Griggio, M., Whittingham, M. J. & Rushton, S. P. Identifying important areas for butterfly conservation in Italy. Anim. Conserv. 12, 20–28, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2008.00216.x (2009).
Osorio-Olvera, L., Barve, V., Barve, N., Soberón, J. & Falconi, M. ntbox: From getting biodiversity data to evaluating species distribution models in a friendly GUI environment. R package version 0.2.5.4. (2018).
Allouche, O., Tsoar, A. & Kadmon, R. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). J Appl Ecol 345, 1223–1232, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01214.x (2006).
Flato, G. et al. Evaluation of climate models. In Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change 741–866. Cambridge University Press (2013).
Elith, J., Kearney, M. & Phillips, S. The art of modelling range‐shifting species. Methods Ecol Evol 1, 330–342, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00036.x (2010).
ESRI. ArcGIS desktop. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute (2013).
Wyse, S. V. & Burns, B. R. Do host bark traits influence trunk epiphyte communities? New Zeal. J. Ecol. 35, 296–301 (2011).
Ávila-Díaz, I., Garibay-Orijel, R., Magaña-Lemus, R. E. & Oyama, K. Molecular evidence reveals fungi associated within the epiphytic orchid Laelia speciosa (HBK) Schltr. Bot. Sci. 91, 523–529, https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.429 (2013).
Kottke, I. & Suárez, C. J. P. Mutualistic, root-inhabiting fungi of orchids identification and functional types. Proceedings of the Second Scientific Conference on Andean Orchids 84–99 (2009).
Zettler, L. W., Sharma, J. & Rasmussen, F. N. Mycorrhizal diversity. In Orchid conservation 205–226 (Natural History Publications, 2003).
Martos, F. et al. The role of epiphytism in architecture and evolutionary constraint within mycorrhizal networks of tropical orchids. Mol. Ecol. 21, 5098–5109, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05692.x (2012).
Smith, S. E. & Read, D. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Academic Press (2008).
Hernández-Apolinar, M. Dinámica poblacional de Laelia speciosa (HBK) Schltr (Orchidaceae). Degree Thesis. (Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 1992).
Dormann, C. F. et al. Biotic interactions in species distribution modelling: 10 questions to guide interpretation and avoid false conclusions. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27, 1004–1016, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12759 (2018).
Giannini, T. C., Chapman, D. S., Saraiva, A. M., Alves-dos-Santos, I. & Biesmeijer, J. C. Improving species distribution models using biotic interactions: A case study of parasites, pollinators and plants. Ecography 36, 649–656, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07191.x (2013).
Meier, E. S. et al. Biotic and abiotic variables show little redundancy in explaining tree species distributions. Ecography 33, 1038–1048, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06229.x (2010).
Early, R. & Keith, S. A. Geographically variable biotic interactions and implications for species ranges. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 28, 42–53, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12861 (2019).
Jaeschke, A. et al. Biotic interactions in the face of climate change: A comparison of three modelling approaches. PLoS ONE 7(12), e51472, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051472 (2012).
Morales-Castilla, I., Matias, M. G., Gravel, D. & Araújo, M. B. Inferring biotic interactions from proxies. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30, 347–356, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.03.014 (2015).
Pearson, R. G., Dawson, T. E., Berry, P. M. & Harrison, P. A. SPECIES: a Spatial Evaluation of Climate Impact on the Envelope of Species. Ecol. Model. 154, 289–300, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00056-X (2002).
Araújo, M. B. & Rozenfeld, A. The geographic scaling of biotic interactions. Ecography 37, 406–415, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00643.x (2014).
Campbell, J., Donato, D., Azuma, D. & Law, B. Pyrogenic carbon emission from a large wildfire in Oregon, United States. J. Geophys. Res. 112, G04014, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JG000451 (2007).
Pyke, G. H., Thomson, J. D., Inouye, D. W. & Miller, T. J. Effects of climate change on phenologies and distribution of bumble bees and the plants they visit. Ecosphere 7(3), 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1267 (2016).
Gudiño, W., Ávila-Díaz, I., Oyama, K. & de la Barrera, E. High-temperature tolerance by the endangered Mexican Mayflower orchid, Laelia speciosa. Trop. Conserv. Sci. 8, 983–991, https://doi.org/10.1177/194008291500800408 (2015).
Rapp, J. M. & Silman, M. R. Epiphyte response to drought and experimental warming in an Andean cloud forest. F1000Research 3, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.3-7.v2 (2014).
Wagner, K. & Zotz, G. Epiphytic bromeliads in a changing world: the effect of elevated CO2 and varying water supply on growth and nutrient relations. Plant Biol. 20, 636–640, https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.12708 (2018).
Medina, N. D. Éxito reproductivo en dos poblaciones de Laelia speciosa (HBK) Schltr. (Orchidaceae), en Michoacán, México. Degree thesis. (Facultad de Biología, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, 2004).
Urban, M. C., Zarmetske, P. L. & Skelly, D. K. Moving forward: dispersal and species interactions determine biotic responses to climate change. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1297, 44–60, https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12184 (2013).
Svenning, J.-C. et al. The influence of interspecific interactions on species range expansion rates. Ecography 37, 1198–1209, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00574.x (2014).
Anderson, S. C. et al. Improving estimates of population status and trend with superensemble models. Fish Fish 18(4), 732–741, https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12200 (2017).
Hof, A. R., Jansson, R. & Nilsson, C. Future climate change will favour non-specialist mammals in the (sub)arctics. PLoS ONE 7, e52574, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052574 (2012).
Angert, A. L., LaDeau, S. L. & Ostfeld, R. S. Climate change and species interactions: ways forward. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1297, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12286 (2013).
Aguilar-Morales, M. A. & López-Escamilla, A. L. Germinación in vitro de Laelia speciosa (Kunth) Schltr., una herramienta para su conservación ex situ. Estudios científicos en el estado de Hidalgo y zonas aledañas 1, 17–24 (2013).
Menchaca, A. R. G. & Moreno, D. M. Conservación de orquídeas una tarea de todos. (Texcoco, Estado de México, Mex: Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, 2011).
Mas, J. et al. Evaluación de las tasas de deforestación en Michoacán a escala detallada mediante un método híbrido de clasificación de imágenes SPOT. Madera y Bosques 23, 119–131 (2017).
Masera, O., Bellon, M. R. & Segura, G. Forest management options for sequestering carbon in Mexico. Biomass Bioener. 8, 357–367, https://doi.org/10.1016/0961-9534(95)00028-3 (1995).
Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales. Informe de la Situación del Medio Ambiente en México, México (2012).
Smethurst, D. Mountain Geography. Geogr. Rev. 90, 35–56, https://doi.org/10.2307/216174 (2000).
Jansky, L., Ives, J. D., Furuyashiki, L. & Watanabe, T. Global mountain research for sustainable development. Glob. Environ. Chang. 12, 231–239, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(02)00015-8 (2002).
Velázquez, A., Bocco, G., Romero, F. J. & Vega, A. P. R. A landscape perspective on biodiversity conservation. Mt. Res. Dev. 23, 240–246 (2003). 10.1659/0276-4741(2003)023[0240:ALPOBC]2.0.CO;2.
Source: Ecology - nature.com
