Biesmeijer, J. C. et al. Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science 313, 351–354 (2006).
Hallmann, C. A. et al. More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas. PLoS ONE 12, e0185809 (2017).
Seibold, S. et al. Arthropod decline in grasslands and forests is associated with landscape-level drivers. Nature 574, 671–674 (2019).
Klein, A.-M. et al. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 274, 303–313 (2007).
Lavelle, P. et al. Soil invertebrates and ecosystem services. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 42, 3–15 (2006).
Stanley, D. A. et al. Neonicotinoid pesticide exposure impairs crop pollination services provided by bumblebees. Nature 528, 548 (2015).
Chagnon, M. et al. Risks of large-scale use of systemic insecticides to ecosystem functioning and services. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 22, 119–134 (2015).
Sánchez-Bayo, F. & Wyckhuys, K. A. Worldwide decline of the entomofauna: a review of its drivers. Biol. Conserv. 232, 8–27 (2019).
Pisa, L. W. et al. Effects of neonicotinoids and fipronil on non-target invertebrates. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 22, 68–102 (2015).
Wood, T. J. & Goulson, D. The environmental risks of neonicotinoid pesticides: a review of the evidence post 2013. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 24, 17285–17325 (2017).
Humann-Guilleminot, S. et al. A nation-wide survey of neonicotinoid insecticides in agricultural land with implications for agri-environment schemes. J. Appl. Ecol. 56, 1502–1514 (2019).
Gallai, N., Salles, J.-M., Settele, J. & Vaissière, B. E. Economic valuation of the vulnerability of world agriculture confronted with pollinator decline. Ecol. Econ. 68, 810–821 (2009).
Rundlöf, M. et al. Seed coating with a neonicotinoid insecticide negatively affects wild bees. Nature 521, 77–80 (2015).
Straub, L. et al. Neonicotinoid insecticides can serve as inadvertent insect contraceptives. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 283, 20160506 (2016).
Henry, M. et al. A common pesticide decreases foraging success and survival in honey bees. Science 336, 348–350 (2012).
Gill, R. J., Ramos-Rodriguez, O. & Raine, N. E. Combined pesticide exposure severely affects individual-and colony-level traits in bees. Nature 491, 105 (2012).
Sandrock, C. et al. Impact of chronic neonicotinoid exposure on honeybee colony performance and queen supersedure. PLoS ONE 9, e103592 (2014).
Costanza, R. et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387, 253 (1997).
Adhikari, K. & Hartemink, A. E. Linking soils to ecosystem services—a global review. Geoderma 262, 101–111 (2016).
Pisa, L. et al. An update of the Worldwide Integrated Assessment (WIA) on systemic insecticides. Part 2: impacts on organisms and ecosystems. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0341-3 (2017).
Rondeau, G. et al. Delayed and time-cumulative toxicity of imidacloprid in bees, ants and termites. Sci. Rep. 4, 5566 (2014).
Sánchez-Bayo, F. & Tennekes, H. A. Time-cumulative toxicity of neonicotinoids: experimental evidence and implications for environmental risk assessments. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17, 1629 (2020).
Rust, M. K., Reierson, D. A. & Klotz, J. H. Delayed toxicity as a critical factor in the efficacy of aqueous baits for controlling Argentine ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 97, 1017–1024 (2004).
Straub, L. et al. Neonicotinoids and ectoparasitic mites synergistically impact honeybees. Sci. Rep. 9, 8159 (2019).
Dively, G. P., Embrey, M. S., Kamel, A., Hawthorne, D. J. & Pettis, J. S. Assessment of chronic sublethal effects of imidacloprid on honey bee colony health. PLoS ONE 10, e0118748 (2015).
Keller, L. & Genoud, M. Extraordinary lifespans in ants: a test of evolutionary theories of ageing. Nature 389, 958 (1997).
Kutter, H. & Stumper R. Hermann Appel, ein leidgeadelter Entomologe (1892–1966). in Proceedings of the VI Congress of the International Union for the Study of Social Insects (eds Ernst, E., Frauchiger, L., Hauschteck-Jungen, E., Jungen, H., Leuthold, R., Maurizio, A., Ruppli, E. & Tschumi P.), 275–279 (Organizing Committee of the VI Congress IUSSI, Bern, 1969).
Krupke, C. H., Hunt, G. J., Eitzer, B. D., Andino, G. & Given, K. Multiple routes of pesticide exposure for honey bees living near agricultural fields. PLoS ONE 7, e29268 (2012).
Seifert, B. Die Ameisen Mittel- und Nordeuropas. (Lutra Verlags und Vertriebsgesellschaft, 2007).
Sandrock, C. et al. Sublethal neonicotinoid insecticide exposure reduces solitary bee reproductive success. Agr. For. Entomol. 16, 119–128 (2014).
Rust, M. K. et al. Laboratory and field evaluations of polyacrylamide hydrogel baits against Argentine ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 108, 1228–1236 (2015).
Jung, J.-K., Jung, C. & Koh, S.-H. Lethal and sublethal effects of thiacloprid on non-target carpenter ant, Camponotus japonicus Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 21, 1321–1325 (2018).
Thiel, S. & Köhler, H.-R. A sublethal imidacloprid concentration alters foraging and competition behaviour of ants. Ecotoxicology 25, 814–823 (2016).
Wang, L., Zeng, L. & Chen, J. Impact of imidacloprid on new queens of imported fire ants, Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sci. Rep. 5, 17938 (2015).
EFSA PPR Panel (EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues). Scientific Opinion addressing the state of the science on risk assessment of plant protection products for in-soil organisms. EFSA J. 15, 4690 (2017).
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 2 – Effects on Biotic Systems. (OECD Publishing, 2019).
European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Guidance document on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees (Apis mellifera, Bombus spp. and solitary bees). EFSA J. 11, 3295 (2013).
EFSA PPR Panel (EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues). Scientific Opinion addressing the state of the science on risk assessment of plant protection products for non‐target arthropods. EFSA J. 13, 3996 (2015).
Del Toro, I., Ribbons, R. R. & Pelini, S. L. The little things that run the world revisited: a review of ant-mediated ecosystem services and disservices (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol. N. 17, 133–146 (2012).
Jouquet, P., Dauber, J., Lagerlof, J., Lavelle, P. & Lepage, M. Soil invertebrates as ecosystem engineers: Intended and accidental effects on soil and feedback loops. Appl. Soil Ecol. 32, 153–164 (2006).
Cerdà, A. & Jurgensen, M. The influence of ants on soil and water losses from an orange orchard in eastern Spain. J. Appl. Entomol. 132, 306–314 (2008).
Frouz, J., Holec, M. & Kalcik, J. The effect of Lasius niger (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) ant nest on selected soil chemical properties. Pedobiologia 47, 205–212 (2003).
Dostal, P., Breznova, M., Kozlickova, V., Herben, T. & Kovar, P. Ant-induced soil modification and its effect on plant below-ground biomass. Pedobiologia 49, 127–137 (2005).
Wagner, D. & Jones, J. B. The impact of harvester ants on decomposition, N mineralization, litter quality, and the availability of N to plants in the Mojave Desert. Soil Biol. Biochem. 38, 2593–2601 (2006).
Wagner, D. & Nicklen, E. F. Ant nest location, soil nutrients and nutrient uptake by ant-associated plants: does extrafloral nectar attract ant nests and thereby enhance plant nutrition? J. Ecol. 98, 614–624 (2010).
Jilkova, V. & Frouz, J. Contribution of ant and microbial respiration to CO2 emission from wood ant (Formica polyctena) nests. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 60, 44–48 (2014).
Way, M. J. & Khoo, K. C. Role of ants in pest-management. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 37, 479–503 (1992).
Rostás, M. & Tautz, J. Ants as pollinators of plants and the role of floral scents. in All flesh is grass (eds Seckback, J. & Dubinsky Z.), 149–161 (Springer, 2010).
Nauen, R., Ebbinghaus-Kintscher, U., Salgado, V. L. & Kaussmann, M. Thiamethoxam is a neonicotinoid precursor converted to clothianidin in insects and plants. Pestic. Biochem. Phys. 76, 55–69 (2003).
Tomizawa, M. & Casida, J. E. Selective toxicity of neonicotinoids attributable to specificity of insect and mammalian nicotinic receptors. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 48, 339–364 (2003).
Wiesner, P. & Kayser, H. Characterization of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors from the insects Aphis craccivora, Myzus persicae, and Locusta migratoria by radioligand binding assays: relation to thiamethoxam action. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 14, 221–230 (2000).
Diez, L., Lejeune, P. & Detrain, C. Keep the nest clean: survival advantages of corpse removal in ants. Biol. Lett. 10, 20140306 (2014).
Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E. O. The ants. (Springer, 1990).
Liess, M. et al. Culmination of low-dose pesticide effects. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 8862–8868 (2013).
Cerda, X., Arnan, X. & Retana, J. Is competition a significant hallmark of ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) ecology. Myrmecol. N. 18, 131–147 (2013).
Dornhaus, A. & Franks, N. R. Colony size affects collective decision-making in the ant Temnothorax albipennis. Insect Soc. 53, 420–427 (2006).
Ruel, C., Cerda, X. & Boulay, R. Behaviour-mediated group size effect constrains reproductive decisions in a social insect. Anim. Behav. 84, 853–860 (2012).
Palmer, T. M. Wars of attrition: colony size determines competitive outcomes in a guild of African acacia ants. Anim. Behav. 68, 993–1004 (2004).
Sommer, K. & Hölldobler, B. Colony founding by queen association and determinants of reduction in queen number in the ant Lasius niger. Anim. Behav. 50, 287–294 (1995).
Boulay, R. et al. Production of sexuals in a fission-performing ant: dual effects of queen pheromones and colony size. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61, 1531–1541 (2007).
Boomsma, J., Van der Lee, G. & Van der Have, T. On the production ecology of Lasius niger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in successive coastal dune valleys. J. Anim. Ecol. 51, 975–991 (1982).
T O’Neal, S., Anderson, T. D. & Wu-Smart, J. Y. Interactions between pesticides and pathogen susceptibility in honey bees. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 26, 57–62 (2018).
Tosi, S., Nieh, J. C., Sgolastra, F., Cabbri, R. & Medrzycki, P. Neonicotinoid pesticides and nutritional stress synergistically reduce survival in honey bees. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 284, 20171711 (2017).
LeBoeuf, A. C. et al. Oral transfer of chemical cues, growth proteins and hormones in social insects. Elife 5, e20375 (2016).
Lucchetti, M. A., Kilchenmann, V., Glauser, G., Praz, C. & Kast, C. Nursing protects honeybee larvae from secondary metabolites of pollen. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 285, 20172849 (2018).
Dahlgren, L., Johnson, R. M., Siegfried, B. D. & Ellis, M. D. Comparative toxicity of acaricides to honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) workers and queens. J. Econ. Entomol. 105, 1895–1902 (2012).
European Food Safety Authority. Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment for bees for the active substance thiamethoxam considering the uses as seed treatments and granules. EFSA J. 16, e05179 (2018).
Whitehorn, P. R., Norville, G., Gilburn, A. & Goulson, D. Larval exposure to the neonicotinoid imidacloprid impacts adult size in the farmland butterfly Pieris brassicae. PeerJ 6, e4772 (2018).
Blanckenhorn, W. U. The evolution of body size: what keeps organisms small? Q. Rev. Biol. 75, 385–407 (2000).
Wilson, E. O. The insect societies. (Harvard University Press, 1971).
Sorensen, A. A. & Vinson, S. Quantitative food distribution studies within laboratory colonies of the imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta Buren. Insect Soc. 28, 129–160 (1981).
Li, X., Schuler, M. A. & Berenbaum, M. R. Molecular mechanisms of metabolic resistance to synthetic and natural xenobiotics. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 52, 231–253 (2007).
Matsuda, K., Ihara, M. & Sattelle, D. B. Neonicotinoid insecticides: molecular targets, resistance, and toxicity. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 60, 241–255 (2020).
Gong, Y. & Diao, Q. Current knowledge of detoxification mechanisms of xenobiotic in honey bees. Ecotoxicology 26, 1–12 (2017).
Arrese, E. L. & Soulages, J. L. Insect fat body: energy, metabolism, and regulation. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 55, 207–225 (2010).
Straub, L., Williams, G. R., Pettis, J., Fries, I. & Neumann, P. Superorganism resilience: eusociality and susceptibility of ecosystem service providing insects to stressors. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 12, 109–112 (2015).
Rodrigues, M. A. & Flatt, T. Endocrine uncoupling of the trade-off between reproduction and somatic maintenance in eusocial insects. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 16, 1–8 (2016).
Jemielity, S., Chapuisat, M., Parker, J. D. & Keller, L. Long live the queen: studying aging in social insects. Age 27, 241–248 (2005).
Schwenke, R. A., Lazzaro, B. P. & Wolfner, M. F. Reproduction–immunity trade-offs in insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 61, 239–256 (2016).
Harshman, L. G. & Zera, A. J. The cost of reproduction: the devil in the details. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 80–86 (2007).
Limay‐Rios, V. et al. Neonicotinoid insecticide residues in soil dust and associated parent soil in fields with a history of seed treatment use on crops in southwestern Ontario. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 35, 303–310 (2016).
Schaafsma, A., Limay-Rios, V., Xue, Y., Smith, J. & Baute, T. Field-scale examination of neonicotinoid insecticide persistence in soil as a result of seed treatment use in commercial maize (corn) fields in southwestern Ontario. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 35, 295–302 (2016).
Lachat, L. & Glauser, G. Development and Validation of an Ultra-Sensitive UHPLC–MS/MS Method for Neonicotinoid Analysis in Milk. J. Agr. Food Chem. 66, 8639–8646 (2018).
R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Version 3.5.1. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. (Vienna, 2018). http://cran.r-project.org.
Therneau, T. A Package for Survival Analysis in S. Version 2.38. http://cran.r-project.org/package=survival (2015).
Dinno, A. dunn.test: Dunn’s test of multiple comparisons using rank sums. Version 1.3.5. http://cran.r-project.org/package=dunn.test (2017).
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
