Goulson, D., Lye, G. C. & Darvill, B. Decline and conservation of bumble bees. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 53, 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093454 (2008).
Williams, P. H. & Osborne, J. L. Bumblebee vulnerability and conservation world-wide. Apidologie 40, 367–387. https://doi.org/10.1051/apido/2009025 (2009).
Goulson, D., Hanley, M. E., Darvill, B., Ellis, J. & Knight, M. E. Causes of rarity in bumblebees. Biol. Cons. 122, 1–8 (2005).
Potts, S. G., Vulliamy, B., Dafni, A., Ne’eman, G. & Willmer, P. Linking bees and flowers: How do floral communities structure pollinator communities?. Ecology 84, 2628–2642. https://doi.org/10.1890/02-0136 (2003).
Lázaro, A., Fuster, F., Alomar, D. & Totland, Ø. Disentangling direct and indirect effects of habitat fragmentation on wild plants’ pollinator visits and seed production. Ecol. Appl. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2099 (2020).
Svensson, B., Lagerlof, J. & Svensson, B. G. Habitat preferences of nest-seeking bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in an agricultural landscape. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 77, 247–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-8809(99)00106-1 (2000).
Fahrig, L. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34, 487–515. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419 (2003).
Tscharntke, T., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Kruess, A. & Thies, C. Characteristics of insect populations on habitat fragments: A mini review. Ecol. Res. 17, 229–239. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.2002.00482.x (2002).
Dupont, Y. L., Damgaard, C. & Simonsen, V. Quantitative historical change in Bumblebee (Bombus spp.) assemblages of red clover fields. PLoS One 6, 7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025172 (2011).
Bommarco, R., Lundin, O., Smith, H. G. & Rundlof, M. Drastic historic shifts in bumble–bee community composition in Sweden. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 279, 309–315. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.0647 (2012).
Persson, A. S., Rundlof, M., Clough, Y. & Smith, H. G. Bumble bees show trait-dependent vulnerability to landscape simplification. Biodivers. Conserv. 24, 3469–3489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-1008-3 (2015).
Brosi, B. J., Daily, G. C., Shih, T. M., Oviedo, F. & Duran, G. The effects of forest fragmentation on bee communities in tropical countryside. J. Appl. Ecol. 45, 773–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01412.x (2008).
Jauker, B., Krauss, J., Jauker, F. & Steffan-Dewenter, I. Linking life history traits to pollinator loss in fragmented calcareous grasslands. Landsc. Ecol. 28, 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9820-6 (2013).
Walther-Hellwig, K. & Frankl, R. Foraging habitats and foraging distances of bumblebees, Bombus spp. (Hym., apidae), in an agricultural landscape. J. Appl. Entomol. 124, 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0418.2000.00484.x (2000).
Westphal, C., Steffan-Dewenter, I. & Tscharntke, T. Bumblebees experience landscapes at different spatial scales: Possible implications for coexistence. Oecologia 149, 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0448-6 (2006).
Greenleaf, S. S., Williams, N. M., Winfree, R. & Kremen, C. Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size. Oecologia 153, 589–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0752-9 (2007).
Hegland, S. J. & Totland, O. Relationships between species’ floral traits and pollinator visitation in a temperate grassland. Oecologia 145, 586–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0165-6 (2005).
Hersch, E. I. & Roy, B. A. Context-dependent pollinator behavior: An explanation for patterns of hybridization among three species of indian paintbrush. Evolution 61, 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00009.x (2007).
Inouye, D. W. Resource partitioning in bumblebees—experimental studies of foraging behavior. Ecology 59, 672–678. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938769 (1978).
Lazaro, A., Lene, A., Aase, A. & Totland, O. Relationships between densities of previous and simultaneous foragers and the foraging behaviour of three bumblebee species. Ecol. Entomol. 36, 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.2011.01263.x (2011).
Lazaro, A. & Piazzon, M. Influence of number of flowers and number of previous and simultaneous foragers on bumblebees’ local foraging decisions. Acta Ethol. 18, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-014-0180-x (2015).
Spiesman, B. J. & Inouye, B. D. Habitat loss alters the architecture of plant–pollinator interaction networks. Ecology 94, 2688–2696 (2013).
Marrero, H. J., Torretta, J. P. & Medan, D. Effect of land use intensification on specialization in plant–floral visitor interaction networks in the Pampas of Argentina. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 188, 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.02.017 (2014).
Revilla, T. A., Encinas-Viso, F. & Loreau, M. Robustness of mutualistic networks under phenological change and habitat destruction. Oikos 124, 22–32 (2015).
Traveset, A., Castro-Urgal, R., Rotllàn-Puig, X. & Lázaro, A. Effects of habitat loss on the plant–flower visitor network structure of a dune community. Oikos 127, 45–55 (2018).
Jauker, F., Jauker, B., Grass, I., Steffan-Dewenter, I. & Wolters, V. Partitioning wild bee and hoverfly contributions to plant–pollinator network structure in fragmented habitats. Ecology 100, e02569 (2019).
Bommarco, R. et al. Dispersal capacity and diet breadth modify the response of wild bees to habitat loss. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 277, 2075–2082 (2010).
Aizen, M. A., Sabatino, M. & Tylianakis, J. M. Specialization and rarity predict nonrandom loss of interactions from mutualist networks. Science 335, 1486–1489 (2012).
Hagen, M. et al. Advances in Ecological Research, vol. 46 89–210 (Elsevier, New York, 2012).
Devoto, M., Bailey, S., Craze, P. & Memmott, J. Understanding and planning ecological restoration of plant–pollinator networks. Ecol. Lett. 15, 319–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01740.x (2012).
Weiner, C. N., Werner, M., Linsenmair, K. E. & Bluthgen, N. Land use intensity in grasslands: Changes in biodiversity, species composition and specialisation in flower visitor networks. Basic Appl. Ecol. 12, 292–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2010.08.006 (2011).
Burkle, L. A. & Knight, T. M. Shifts in pollinator composition and behavior cause slow interaction accumulation with area in plant–pollinator networks. Ecology 93, 2329–2335 (2012).
Carman, K. & Jenkins, D. G. Comparing diversity to flower–bee interaction networks reveals unsuccessful foraging of native bees in disturbed habitats. Biol. Conserv. 202, 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.08.030 (2016).
Fahrig, L. in Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, Vol 48 Vol. 48 Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics (ed D. J. Futuyma) 1–23 (Annual Reviews, 2017).
Goulson, D. & Sparrow, K. Evidence for competition between honeybees and bumblebees; effects on bumblebee worker size. J. Insect Conserv. 13, 177–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-008-9140-y (2009).
Bowers, M. A. Experimental analyses of competition between two species of bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Oecologia 67, 224–230 (1985).
Brian, A. D. Differences in the flowers visited by four species of bumble–bees and their causes. J. Anim. Ecol. 26, 71–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/1782 (1957).
Walther-Hellwig, K. et al. Increased density of honeybee colonies affects foraging bumblebees. Apidologie 37, 517–532. https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:2006035 (2006).
Fontaine, C., Collin, C. L. & Dajoz, I. Generalist foraging of pollinators: Diet expansion at high density. J. Ecol. 96, 1002–1010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01405.x (2008).
Herbertsson, L., Lindstrom, S. A. M., Rundlof, M., Bornmarco, R. & Smith, H. G. Competition between managed honeybees and wild bumblebees depends on landscape context. Basic Appl. Ecol. 17, 609–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2016.05.001 (2016).
Kudo, G. Vulnerability of phenological synchrony between plants and pollinators in an alpine ecosystem. Ecol. Res. 29, 571–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-013-1108-z (2014).
Persson, A. S. & Smith, H. G. Seasonal persistence of bumblebee populations is affected by landscape context. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 165, 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.12.008 (2013).
Loken, A. Studies on Scandinavian bumble bees (Hymenoptera; Apidae). Norsk Entomol. Tidsskrift 20, 1–218 (1973).
Dramstad, W. & Fry, G. Foraging activity of bumblebees (Bombus) in relation to flower resources on arable land. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 53, 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8809(94)00561-r (1995).
Aizen, M. A. & Feinsinger, P. Forest fragmentation, pollination, and plant reproduction in a Chaco dry forest, Argentina. Ecology 75, 330–351. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939538 (1994).
Steffan-Dewenter, I. & Tscharntke, T. Effects of habitat isolation on pollinator communities and seed set. Oecologia 121, 432–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050949 (1999).
Farwig, N. et al. Isolation from forest reduces pollination, seed predation and insect scavenging in Swiss farmland. Landsc. Ecol. 24, 919–927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-009-9376-2 (2009).
Ricketts, T. H. et al. Landscape effects on crop pollination services: Are there general patterns?. Ecol. Lett. 11, 499–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01157.x (2008).
Garibaldi, L. A. et al. Stability of pollination services decreases with isolation from natural areas despite honey bee visits. Ecol. Lett. 14, 1062–1072. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01669.x (2011).
Saville, N. M., Dramstad, W. E., Fry, G. L. A. & Corbet, S. A. Bumblebee movement in a fragmented agricultural landscape. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 61, 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-8809(96)01100-0 (1997).
Osborne, J. L. et al. Bumblebee flight distances in relation to the forage landscape. J. Anim. Ecol. 77, 406–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01333.x (2008).
Hagen, M., Wikelski, M. & Kissling, W. D. Space use of bumblebees (Bombus spp.) revealed by radio-tracking. PLoS One 6, 10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019997 (2011).
Goverde, M., Schweizer, K., Baur, B. & Erhardt, A. Small-scale habitat fragmentation effects on pollinator behaviour: Experimental evidence from the bumblebee Bombus veteranus on calcareous grasslands. Biol. Cons. 104, 293–299 (2002).
Ockinger, E. & Smith, H. G. Semi-natural grasslands as population sources for pollinating insects in agricultural landscapes. J. Appl. Ecol. 44, 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01250.x (2007).
Crowther, L. The Tree Bumblebee, bombus hypnorum: Ecology and Genetics of a Naturally Colonising Pollinator (University of East Anglia, East Anglia, 2017).
Knight, M. E. et al. An interspecific comparison of foraging range and nest density of four bumblebee (Bombus) species. Mol. Ecol. 14, 1811–1820. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02540.x (2005).
Goulson, D. Bumblebees: Behaviour, Ecology, and Conservation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010).
Hegland, S. J. & Boeke, L. Relationships between the density and diversity of floral resources and flower visitor activity in a temperate grassland community. Ecol. Entomol. 31, 532–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.2006.00812.x (2006).
Diekotter, T., Kadoya, T., Peter, F., Wolters, V. & Jauker, F. Oilseed rape crops distort plant–pollinator interactions. J. Appl. Ecol. 47, 209–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01759.x (2010).
Huntley, B. Species-richness in north-temperate zone forests. J. Biogeogr. 20, 163–180. https://doi.org/10.2307/2845669 (1993).
Williams, P. H. The bumble bees of the Kashmir Himalaya (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Bombini). Bull. Brit. Museum (Nat. Hist.) Entomol. 60, 1–204 (1991).
Anasiewicz, A. Observations on the bumble-bees in Lublin. Ekol. Polska 19, 401–417 (1971).
Cueva del Castillo, R., Sanabria-Urbán, S. & Serrano-Meneses, M. A. Trade-offs in the evolution of bumblebee colony and body size: A comparative analysis. Ecol. Evol. 5, 3914–3926 (2015).
Sladen, F. The Humble-Bee, Its Life History and How to Domesticate It 283 (Mac Millan, London, 1912).
Peat, J., Darvill, B., Ellis, J. & Goulson, D. Effects of climate on intra- and interspecific size variation in bumble–bees. Funct. Ecol. 19, 145–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0269-8463.2005.00946.x (2005).
Kells, A. R. & Goulson, D. Preferred nesting sites of bumblebee queens (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in agroecosystems in the UK. Biol. Conserv. 109, 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3207(02)00131-3 (2003).
Darvill, B., Knight, M. E. & Goulson, D. Use of genetic markers to quantify bumblebee foraging range and nest density. Oikos 107, 471–478 (2004).
Goulson, D., Lye, G. C. & Darvill, B. Diet breadth, coexistence and rarity in bumblebees. Biodivers. Conserv. 17, 3269–3288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-008-9428-y (2008).
Brittain, C. A., Vighi, M., Bommarco, R., Settele, J. & Potts, S. G. Impacts of a pesticide on pollinator species richness at different spatial scales. Basic Appl. Ecol. 11, 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2009.11.007 (2010).
Schoener, T. W. Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185, 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4145.27 (1974).
Heinrich, B. Resource partitioning among some eusocial insects—bumblebees. Ecology 57, 874–889. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941054 (1976).
Ewers, R. M. & Didham, R. K. The effect of fragment shape and species’ sensitivity to habitat edges on animal population size. Conserv. Biol. 21, 926–936. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00720.x (2007).
Gonzalez, E., Salvo, A., Defago, M. T. & Valladares, G. A moveable feast: insects moving at the forest-crop interface are affected by crop phenology and the amount of forest in the landscape. PLoS One 11, 19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158836 (2016).
Miller-Struttmann, N. E. et al. Functional mismatch in a bumble bee pollination mutualism under climate change. Science 349, 1541–1544 (2015).
Dupont, Y. L., Padron, B., Olesen, J. M. & Petanidou, T. Spatio-temporal variation in the structure of pollination networks. Oikos 118, 1261–1269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17594.x (2009).
Petanidou, T., Kallimanis, A. S., Tzanopoulos, J., Sgardelis, S. P. & Pantis, J. D. Long-term observation of a pollination network: Fluctuation in species and interactions, relative invariance of network structure and implications for estimates of specialization. Ecol. Lett. 11, 564–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01170.x (2008).
Goulson, D. & Darvill, B. Niche overlap and diet breadth in bumblebees; are rare species more specialized in their choice of flowers?. Apidologie 35, 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:2003062 (2004).
Rodríguez-Gironés, M. A. & Santamaría, L. Models of optimal foraging and resource partitioning: Deep corollas for long tongues. Behav. Ecol. 17, 905–910 (2006).
Carvalheiro, L. G. et al. The potential for indirect effects between co-flowering plants via shared pollinators depends on resource abundance, accessibility and relatedness. Ecol. Lett. 17, 1389–1399. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12342 (2014).
Statens kartverk Geovekst og kommunene. Norge I Bilder. https://www.norgeibilder.no/ (2007).
ESRI. ArcGIS Desktop Release 10.5 (Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, 2016).
Norwegian Mapping Authority. SOSI Standard—Generell Objektkatalog Versjon 40 (Markslag, Fagområde, 2006).
Carolan, J. C. et al. Colour patterns do not diagnose species: Quantitative evaluation of a DNA barcoded cryptic bumblebee complex. PLoS One 7, 10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029251 (2012).
Ballantyne, G., Baldock, K. C. R. & Willmer, P. G. Constructing more informative plant–pollinator networks: visitation and pollen deposition networks in a heathland plant community. Proc. R. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 282, 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1130 (2015).
Lid, J. & Lid, D. T. J. O. Norsk flora–Det Norske Samlaget (1994).
Gotelli, N. J. & Colwell, R. K. Quantifying biodiversity: Procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecol. Lett. 4, 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00230.x (2001).
Dormann, C. F., Gruber, B. & Fründ, J. Introducing the bipartite package: Analysing ecological networks. R news 8(2), 8–11 (2008).
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/ (2018).
Bluthgen, N., Menzel, F. & Bluthgen, N. Measuring specialization in species interaction networks. BMC Ecol. 6, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-6-9 (2006).
Muller, C. B., Adriaanse, I. C. T., Belshaw, R. & Godfray, H. C. J. The structure of an aphid-parasitoid community. J. Anim. Ecol. 68, 346–370. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00288.x (1999).
Frost, C. M. et al. Apparent competition drives community-wide parasitism rates and changes in host abundance across ecosystem boundaries. Nat. Commun. 7, 1–12 (2016).
Bergamo, P. J. et al. The potential indirect effects among plants via shared hummingbird pollinators are structured by phenotypic similarity. Ecology 98, 1849–1858. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.1859 (2017).
Magrach, A., González-Varo, J. P., Boiffier, M., Vilà, M. & Bartomeus, I. Honeybee spillover reshuffles pollinator diets and affects plant reproductive success. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1299–1307 (2017).
Bates, D., Machler, M., Bolker, B. M. & Walker, S. C. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).
Zuur, A., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N., Saveliev, A. A. & Smith, G. M. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R (Springer, Berlin, 2009).
Gross, J. & Ligges, U. nortest: Tests for Normality. R package version 1.0-4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nortest (2015).
Barton, K. MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. R package version 1.43.17. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn (2019).
Leps, J., Smilauer, P., Leps, J. & Smilauer, P. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data Using CANOCO (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
