Pellegrini, S., Condat, L., Caliva, J. M., Marin, R. H. & Guzman, D. A. Can Japanese quail male aggressions toward a female cagemate predict aggressiveness toward unknown conspecifics? Livest. Sci. 222, 65–70 (2019).
Fairbanks, L. A. Individual differences in response to a stranger: Social impulsivity as a dimension of temperament in vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops sabaeus). J. Comp. Psychol.115, 22–28 (2001).
D’Eath, R. B. Consistency of aggressive temperament in domestic pigs: The effects of social experience and social disruption. Aggress. Behav.30, 435–448 (2004).
Cain, K. E., Rich, M. S., Ainsworth, K. & Ketterson, E. D. Two sides of the same coin? Consistency in aggression to conspecifics and predators in a female songbird. Ethology117, 786–795 (2011).
Clark, C. C. A. & D’Eath, R. B. Age over experience: Consistency of aggression and mounting behaviour in male and female pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.147, 81–93 (2013).
D’Eath, R. B., Ormandy, E., Lawrence, A. B., Sumner, B. E. H. & Meddle, S. L. Resident−intruder trait aggression is associated with differences in lysine vasopressin and serotonin receptor 1A (5-HT 1A ) mRNA expression in the brain of pre-pubertal female domestic pigs (Sus scrofa). J. Neuroendocrinol.17, 679–686 (2005).
Turner, S. P. et al. Bayesian analysis of genetic associations of skin lesions and behavioural traits to identify genetic components of individual aggressiveness in pigs. Behav. Genet.38, 67–75 (2008).
Réale, D., Reader, S. M., Sol, D., McDougall, P. T. & Dingemanse, N. J. Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. Biol. Rev.82, 291–318 (2007).
Arnott, G. & Elwood, R. W. Information gathering and decision making about resource value in animal contests. Anim. Behav.76, 529–542 (2008).
Pinto, N. S., Palaoro, A. V. & Peixoto, P. E. C. All by myself? Meta-analysis of animal contests shows stronger support for self than for mutual assessment models. Rev. Biol. 94, 1430–1442 (2019).
Arnott, G. & Elwood, R. W. Assessment of fighting ability in animal contests. Anim. Behav.77, 991–1004 (2009).
Drummond, H. & Garcia Chavelas, C. Food shortage influences sibling aggression in the blue-footed booby. Anim. Behav.37, 806–819 (1989).
Hsu, Y., Earley, R. L. & Wolf, L. L. Modulating aggression through experience. In Fish Cognition and Behavior (eds Brown, C. et al.) 96–118 (Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Hoboken, 2007).
Rushen, J. Assessment of fighting ability or simple habituation: What causes young pigs (Sus scrofa) to stop fighting?. Aggress. Behav.14, 155–167 (1988).
Benus, R. F., Bohus, B., Koolhaas, J. M. & van Oortmerssen, G. A. Behavioural strategies of aggressive and non-aggressive male mice in response to inescapable shock. Behav. Processes21, 127–141 (1990).
Bolhuis, J. E., Schouten, W. G. P., Schrama, J. W. & Wiegant, V. M. Individual coping characteristics, aggressiveness and fighting strategies in pigs. Anim. Behav.69, 1085–1091 (2005).
Hsu, Y. & Wolf, L. L. The winner and loser effect: Integrating multiple experiences. Anim. Behav.57, 903–910 (1999).
Van Doorn, G. S., Weissing, F. & Hengeveld, G. The evolution of social dominance II: Multi-player models. Behaviour140, 1333–1358 (2003).
Hsu, Y., Lee, I. H. & Lu, C. K. Prior contest information: Mechanisms underlying winner and loser effects. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.63, 1247–1257 (2009).
Oyegbile, T. O. & Marler, C. A. Winning fights elevates testosterone levels in California mice and enhances future ability to win fights. Horm. Behav.48, 259–267 (2005).
Camerlink, I., Turner, S. P., Farish, M. & Arnott, G. Aggressiveness as a component of fighting ability in pigs using a game-theoretical framework. Anim. Behav.108, 183–191 (2015).
Camerlink, I., Arnott, G., Farish, M. & Turner, S. P. Complex contests and the influence of aggressiveness in pigs. Anim. Behav.121, 71–78 (2016).
D’Eath, R. B. & Pickup, H. E. Behaviour of young growing pigs in a resident−intruder test designed to measure aggressiveness. Aggress. Behav.28, 401–415 (2002).
Graves, H. B., Graves, K. L. & Sherritt, G. W. Social behavior and growth of pigs following mixing during the growing—Finishing period. Appl. Anim. Ethol.4, 169–180 (1978).
Turner, S. P. et al. The accumulation of skin lesions and their use as a predictor of individual aggressiveness in pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.96, 245–259 (2006).
Camerlink, I., Peijnenburg, M., Wemelsfelder, F. & Turner, S. P. Emotions after victory or defeat assessed through qualitative behavioural assessment, skin lesions and blood parameters in pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.183, 28–34 (2016).
Death, R. B. & Lawrence, A. B. Early life predictors of the development of aggressive behaviour in the domestic pig. Anim. Behav.67, 501–509 (2004).
Favati, A., Løvlie, H. & Leimar, O. Individual aggression, but not winner–loser effects, predicts social rank in male domestic fowl. Behav. Ecol.28, 874–882 (2017).
Kar, F., Whiting, M. J. & Noble, D. W. A. Influence of prior contest experience and level of escalation on contest outcome. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.70, 1679–1687 (2016).
Bolhuis, J. E., Schouten, W. G. P., Leeuw, J. A. D., Schrama, J. W. & Wiegant, V. M. Individual coping characteristics, rearing conditions and behavioural flexibility in pigs. Behav. Brain Res.152, 351–360 (2004).
Melotti, L., Oostindjer, M., Bolhuis, J. E., Held, S. & Mendl, M. Coping personality type and environmental enrichment affect aggression at weaning in pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.133, 144–153 (2011).
Ruis, M. A. W. et al. Personalities in female domesticated pigs: Behavioural and physiological indications. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 66, 31–47 (2000).
Meese, G. B. & Ewbank, R. The establishment and nature of the dominance hierarchy in the domesticated pig. Anim. Behav.21, 326–334 (1973).
Camerlink, I., Turner, S. P., Farish, M. & Arnott, G. The influence of experience on contest assessment strategies. Sci. Rep.7, 1–10 (2017).
D’Eath, R. B. Individual aggressiveness measured in a resident−intruder test predicts the persistence of aggressive behaviour and weight gain of young pigs after mixing. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.77, 267–283 (2002).
Kuo, J. H., Chang, Y. T., Chen, Y. J. & Hsu, Y. Influence of previous agonistic interactions with conspecifics on contest decisions. Ethology https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12919 (2019).
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org. (2017).
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B. & Christensen, R. H. B. lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J. Stat. Softw.82, 1–26 (2017).
Fox, J. et al. car: Companion to applied regression. In R Package Version 2.0-21 (2018).
Kafadar, K., Koehler, J. R., Venables, W. N. & Ripley, B. D. Modern Applied Statistics with S-Plus. Am. Stat.53, 86 (1999).
Bates, D., Sarkar, D., Bates, M. D. & Matrix, L. The lme4 Package. October (2007).
Fraser, D. The behaviour of growing pigs during experimental social encounters. J. Agric. Sci.82, 147–163 (1974).
Ruis, M. A. W. et al. Behavioural and physiological consequences of acute social defeat in growing gilts: Effects of the social environment. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.70, 201–225 (2001).
Losey, G. S. & Sevenster, P. Can three-spined sticklebacks learn when to display? Rewarded displays. Anim. Behav.49, 137–150 (1995).
Losey, G. S. & Sevenster, P. Can threespine sticklebacks learn when to display? I. Punished displays. Ethology87, 45–58 (1991).
Earley, R. L., Lu, C. K., Lee, I. H., Wong, S. C. & Hsu, Y. Winner and loser effects are modulated by hormonal states. Front. Zool.10, 1–13 (2013).
Muráni, E. et al. Association of HPA axis-related genetic variation with stress reactivity and aggressive behaviour in pigs. BMC Genet.11, 74 (2010).
Taborsky, B., Arnold, C., Junker, J. & Tschopp, A. The early social environment affects social competence in a cooperative breeder. Anim. Behav.83, 1067–1074 (2012).
Tulogdi, Á et al. Effects of resocialization on post-weaning social isolation-induced abnormal aggression and social deficits in rats. Dev. Psychobiol.56, 49–57 (2014).
Dorfman, H. M., Meyer-Lindenberg, A. & Buckholtz, J. W. Neuroscience of Aggression. Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences Vol. 17 (Springer, Berlin, 2014).
Trannoy, S., Penn, J., Lucey, K., Popovic, D. & Kravitz, E. A. Short and long-lasting behavioral consequences of agonistic encounters between male Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.113, 4818–4823 (2016).
Carere, C., Welink, D., Drent, P. J., Koolhaas, J. M. & Groothuis, T. G. G. Effect of social defeat in a territorial bird (Parus major) selected for different coping styles. Physiol. Behav.73, 427–433 (2001).
Rutherford, K. M. D., Haskell, M. J., Glasbey, C. & Lawrence, A. B. The responses of growing pigs to a chronic-intermittent stress treatment. Physiol. Behav. 89, 670–680 (2006).
Laskowski, K. L., Wolf, M. & Bierbach, D. The making of winners (And losers): How early dominance interactions determine adult social structure in a clonal fish. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci.283, 20160183 (2016).
Lan, Y. T. & Hsu, Y. Prior contest experience exerts a long-term influence on subsequent winner and loser effects. Front. Zool.8, 1–12 (2011).
Meerlo, P., Overkamp, G. J. F. & Koolhaas, J. M. Behavioural and physiological consequences of a single social defeat in Roman high- and low-avoidance rats. Psychoneuroendocrinology22, 155–168 (1997).
Meerlo, P., Overkamp, G. J. F., Benning, M. A., Koolhaas, J. M. & Van Den Hoofdakker, R. H. Long-term changes in open field behaviour following a single social defeat in rats can be reversed by sleep deprivation. Physiol. Behav.60, 115–119 (1996).
Fuxjager, M. J. et al. Winning territorial disputes selectively enhances androgen sensitivity in neural pathways related to motivation and social aggression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.107, 12393–12398 (2010).
Reaney, L. T., Drayton, J. M. & Jennions, M. D. The role of body size and fighting experience in predicting contest behaviour in the black field cricket, Teleogryllus commodus. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.65, 217–225 (2011).
Büttner, K., Scheffler, K., Czycholl, I. & Krieter, J. Social network analysis – centrality parameters and individual network positions of agonistic behavior in pigs over three different age levels. Springerplus4, 185 (2015).
Arey, D. S. & Franklin, M. F. Effects of straw and unfamiliarity on fighting between newly mixed growing pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.45, 23–30 (1995).
Moore, A. S., Gonyou, H. W. & Ghent, A. W. Integration of newly introduced and resident sows following grouping. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci.38, 257–267 (1993).
Martin, F., Beaugrand, J. P. & Laguë, P. C. The role of recent experience and weight on hen’s agonistic behaviour during dyadic conflict resolution. Behav. Processes41, 159–170 (1997).
Chen, Y. J. & Hsu, Y. Contest experience and body size affect different types of contest decisions. Anim. Cogn.19, 1183–1193 (2016).
Camerlink, I., Turner, S. P., Farish, M. & Arnott, G. Advantages of social skills for contest resolution. R. Soc. Open Sci.6, 181456 (2019).
Bubak, A. N. et al. Assessment strategies and fighting patterns in animal contests: A role for serotonin?. Curr. Zool.62, 257–263 (2016).
Fradrich, H. A comparison of behaviour in the Suidae. In The behaviour of ungulates and its relation to management 133–143 (IUCN Publication, 1974).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
