Netting and pan traps fail to identify the pollinator guild of an agricultural crop

Ollerton, J., Winfree, R. & Tarrant, S. How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals?. Oikos 120, 321–326 (2011).

Article  Google Scholar 

Klein, A. M. et al. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 274, 303–313 (2007).

Article  Google Scholar 

Aizen, M., Garibaldi, L. A., Cunningham, S. & Klein, A. M. Long-term global trends in crop yield and production reveal no current pollination shortage but increasing pollinator dependency. Curr. Biol. 18, 1572–1575 (2008).

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Aizen, M., Garibaldi, L. A., Cunningham, S. & Klein, A. M. How much does agriculture depend on pollinators? Lessons from long-term trends in crop production. Ann. Bot. 103, 1579–1588 (2009).

Article  Google Scholar 

Kremen, C., Williams, N. M. & Thorp, R. W. Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99, 16812–16816 (2002).

ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Klein, A. M., Steffan-Dewenter, I. & Tscharntke, T. Fruit set of highland coffee increases with the diversity of pollinating bees. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 270, 955–961 (2003).

Article  Google Scholar 

Hoehn, P., Tscharntke, T., Tylianakis, J. M. & Steffan-Dewenter, I. Functional group diversity of bee pollinators increases crop yield. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 275, 2283–2291 (2008).

Article  Google Scholar 

Garibaldi, L. A. et al. Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance. Science 339, 1608–1611 (2013).

ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Potts, S., Imperatriz-Fonseca, V. & Ngo, H. The assessment report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services on pollinators, pollination and food production. (Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, 2016). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3402856

Leong, J. M. & Thorp, R. W. Colour-coded sampling: the pan trap colour preferences of oligolectic and nonoligolectic bees associated with a vernal pool plant. Ecol. Entomol. 24, 329–335 (1999).

Article  Google Scholar 

Westphal, C. et al. Measuring bee diversity in different European habitats and biogeographical regions. Ecol. Monogr. 78, 653–671 (2008).

Article  Google Scholar 

Wilson, J. S., Griswold, T. & Messinger, O. J. Sampling bee communities (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) in a desert landscape: are pan traps sufficient?. J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 81, 288–300 (2008).

Article  Google Scholar 

Toler, T. R., Evans, E. W. & Tepedino, V. J. Pan-trapping for bees (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) in Utah’s west desert: The importance of color diversity. Pan-Pac. Entomol. 81, 103–113 (2005).

Google Scholar 

Nielsen, A. et al. Assessing bee species richness in two Mediterranean communities: importance of habitat type and sampling techniques. Ecol. Res. 26, 969–983 (2011).

Article  Google Scholar 

Saunders, M. E. & Luck, G. W. Pan trap catches of pollinator insects vary with habitat. Aust. J. Entomol. 52, 106–113 (2013).

Article  Google Scholar 

Allen-Wardell, G. et al. The potential consequences of pollinator declines on the conservation of biodiversity and stability of food crop yields. Conserv. Biol. 12, 8–17 (1998).

Article  Google Scholar 

Kearns, C., Inouye, D. & Waser, N. Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant-pollinator interactions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29, 83–112 (1998).

Article  Google Scholar 

Brunet, J. Pollinator decline: implications for food security and environment. Sci. Glob. https://doi.org/10.33548/scientia371 (2019).

Article  Google Scholar 

Popic, T. J., Davila, Y. C. & Wardle, G. M. Evaluation of common methods for sampling invertebrate pollinator assemblages: net sampling out-perform pan traps. PLoS ONE 8, e66665 (2013).

ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Bauer, A. A., Clayton, M. K. & Brunet, J. Floral traits influencing plant attractiveness to three bee species: consequences for plant reproductive success. Am. J. Bot. 104, 1–10 (2017).

Article  Google Scholar 

Brunet, J. & Stewart, C. M. Impact of bee species and plant density on alfalfa pollination and potential for gene flow. Psyche A J. Entomol. 2010, 1–7 (2010).

Article  Google Scholar 

Wang, X. et al. Biodiversity of wild alfalfa pollinators and their temporal foraging characters in Hexi Corridor Northwest China. Entomol. Fenn. 23, 4–12 (2012).

Article  Google Scholar 

Chen, M., Zhao, X. Y. & Zuo, X. A. Pollinator activity and pollination success of Medicago sativa L. in a natural and a managed population. Ecol. Evol. 8, 9007–9016 (2018).

Article  Google Scholar 

Cane, J. H. Pollinating bees (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) of U.S. alfalfa compared for rates of pod and seed set. J. Econ. Entomol. 95, 22–27 (2002).

Article  Google Scholar 

Bohart, G. E. Alfalfa pollinators with special reference to species other than honey bees. In Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Entomology, Vol. 4, pp. 929–937 (1958).

Brookes, B., Small, E., Lefkovitch, L. P., Damman, H. & Fairey, D. T. Attractiveness of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) to wild pollinators in relation to wildflowers. Can. J. Plant Sci. 74, 779–783 (1994).

Article  Google Scholar 

Bohart, G. E. Pollination of alfalfa and red clover. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2, 355–380 (1957).

Article  Google Scholar 

Chao, A. et al. Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: a framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies. Ecol. Monogr. 84, 45–67 (2014).

Article  Google Scholar 

Hall, H. G. Color preferences of bees captured in pan traps. J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 89, 273–276 (2016).

Article  Google Scholar 

Campbell, J. W. & Hanula, J. L. Efficiency of Malaise traps and colored pan traps for collecting flower visiting insects from three forested ecosystems. J. Insect Conserv. 11, 399–408 (2007).

Article  Google Scholar 

Heneberg, P. & Bogusch, P. To enrich or not to enrich? Are there any benefits of using multiple colors of pan traps when sampling aculeate Hymenoptera?. J. Insect Conserv. 18, 1123–1136 (2014).

Article  Google Scholar 

Moreira, E. F. et al. Are pan traps colors complementary to sample community of potential pollinator insects?. J. Insect Conserv. 20, 583–596 (2016).

Article  Google Scholar 

Burd, M. Bateman’s principle and plant reproduction: the role of pollen limitation in fruit and seed set. Bot. Rev. 60, 83–139 (1994).

MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

Herrera, C. M. Pollinator abundance, morphology, and flower visitation rate: analysis of the ‘quantity’ component in a plant-pollinator system. Oecologia 80, 241–248 (1989).

ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Riday, H., Reisen, P., Raasch, J. A., Santa-Martinez, E. & Brunet, J. Selfing rate in an alfalfa seed production field pollinated with leafcutter bees. Crop Sci. 55, 1087–1095 (2015).

Article  Google Scholar 

McGregor, S. Insect Pollination of Cultivated Crop Plants. (USDA, 1976). https://doi.org/10.1093/besa/23.1.104

Grundel, R., Frohnapple, K. J., Jean, R. P. & Pavlovic, N. B. Effectiveness of bowl trapping and netting for inventory of a bee community. Environ. Entomol. 40, 374–380 (2011).

Article  Google Scholar 

Oksanen, J. et al. Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.5–5. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan (2019).

R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019).

Jost, L. Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113, 363–375 (2006).

Article  Google Scholar 

Hsieh, T. C., Ma, K. H. & Chao, A. iNEXT: an R package for rarefaction and extrapolation of species diversity (Hill numbers). Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 1451–1456 (2016).

Article  Google Scholar 

Signorell, A. & Al, E. DescTools: tools for descriptive statistics. R package version 0.99.28. (2019).