LX3 enhances larval pathogen eradication by antibiotics
Prophylactic administration of OTC to honey bees is a common practice in beekeeping for the prevention of AFB. To evaluate the efficacy of this long-standing apiculture management strategy, we monitored a 2-week treatment regimen with OTC under natural field conditions in honey bee hives experiencing low-grade chronic infection with P. larvae (Fig. 1a). Using a qPCR-based approach to enumerate pathogen load, P. larvae abundance was found to be significantly lower in honey bee larvae (primary target of AFB) at week 1 and week 2 of OTC treatment (Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparisons, P = 0.0071 and P = 0.0005, respectively) compared to baseline levels at day 0 (Fig. 1b). In contrast, no observable differences in P. larvae abundance were found in adult honey bees (active vector of AFB) at any time point during this treatment (Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparisons, P = 0.9999, P = 0.6367, respectively; Fig. 1c).
Experimental hives were subjected to standard antibiotic treatment with oxytetracycline (OTC) for 2 weeks and then supplemented for 4 weeks with either pollen patties containing LX3 (LX3) or pollen patties containing vehicle (VEH). No treatment control (NTC) hives received no further treatment after OTC. a Schematic diagram outlining the experimental design. b, c Molecular-based quantification of P. larvae in honey bee larvae (whole body) and adults (dissected abdomen) collected just prior to the start of OTC exposure (A.0), and then after 1 (A.1) and 2 (A.2) weeks of exposure. Data are depicted as median ± 95% confidence intervals (Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparisons) at different time points. Each data point represents either one individual (adults) or three pooled individuals (larvae) sampled equally from a total of n = 6 hives. d, e Molecular-based quantification of P. larvae in larvae (whole body) and adults (dissected whole abdomens) at the start of the supplementation period (S.0; corresponding to 3 days post A.2 time point), and then after 2 (S.2) and 4 (S.4) weeks. Data are depicted as mean ± standard deviation (two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons) at different time points with each data point representing either one individual (adults) or three pooled individuals (larvae) sampled equally from n = 4 hives per treatment group. f, g Capped brood counts during OTC treatment (n = 6 hives) and subsequent supplementation period (n = 4 hives per treatment group). Data represents the median (line in box), IQR (box), and minimum/maximum (whiskers) of relative change in brood counts normalized by hive. Statistics shown for one-way and two-way ANOVA, respectively, with Sidak’s multiple comparisons for both. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, ns not significant.
A robust body of scientific evidence shows that supplementation with probiotic Lactobacillus spp. can augment the effects of certain antibiotics and attenuate antibiotic-induced dysbiosis in humans and other animals26,27,28,29. Testing this in honey bees, it was found that larval samples from LX3-treated hives exhibited significantly lower levels of P. larvae at week 2 and week 4 compared to both no treatment control (NTC; P < 0.0001 for both) and vehicle-treated (P = 0.0011 and P = 0.0014) hives, respectively (two-way analysis of variance [ANOVA] with Sidak’s multiple comparisons; Fig. 1d). The NTC group also demonstrated a trend towards higher P. larvae loads in larval samples compared to the vehicle group at week 4 (two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons, P = 0.0568). Similar results were observed in adults with samples from LX3-supplemented hives demonstrating a significantly lower P. larvae load compared to both the NTC group (P = 0.0002 and P = 0.0003) and vehicle-treated group (P < 0.0001 for both) at 2 and 4 weeks, respectively (two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons; Fig. 1e).
To compare the effects of OTC and LX3 treatments on overall hive health, the coverage of capped brood on hive frames (an established metric for assessing colony strength and reproduction30) was measured weekly during experimentation. No observable differences were found in capped brood counts following 1 week of OTC treatment, whereas a significant reduction was found after 2 weeks (one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons, P < 0.9999 and P = 0.0041, respectively) compared to pretreatment baseline measurements (Fig. 1f). In contrast, capped brood counts were significantly higher in LX3-treated hives at week 3 and 4 of the supplementation period (two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons, P = 0.0071 and P = 0.0055, respectively), while no differences were found in NTC and vehicle-treated hives at comparable time points (Fig. 1g).
Antibiotics reduce key immune regulators in the adult gut microbiota
Given the broad-spectrum activity of tetracyclines, we evaluated how OTC exposure might influence the symbiotic bacterial communities associated with honey bees. Total bacterial loads, as determined by qPCR-based molecular quantification, were significantly reduced in adult bees following 1 week of OTC treatment (P < 0.0001) and in larvae (P = 0.0421) after 2 weeks of treatment (Kruskal–Wallis tests with Dunn’s multiple comparisons; Supplementary Fig. 2). The nurse-aged adult bees sampled at the experimental start point (pre-OTC exposure) and on the final day of OTC treatment (post-OTC exposure) were chosen for 16S rRNA gene sequencing-based microbiota analysis due to their close physical proximity with brood, passive carriage of P. larvae, and well-balanced representation of overall hive microbial diversity31.
Bar plots shown in Fig. 2a, b visually represent the relative proportion and absolute abundance (adjusted according to qPCR-based quantification of total bacteria) of taxa in samples from pre- and post-OTC exposure, respectively. Adult gut samples collected post-OTC exposure revealed a significant reduction in a single amplicon sequence variant (SV) of Frischella perrera (SV19; Wilcoxon test with Benjamini–Hochberg [BH] multiple comparisons, P = 0.0043) and three unique SVs of Lactobacillus Firm-5 (SV01, SV08, and SV10; Wilcoxon tests with BH multiple comparisons, P = 0.0151, P = 0.0295, and P = 0.04217, respectively) compared to samples collected pre-OTC exposure (absolute effect >0.5; Fig. 2c). SV74 (Lactobacillus Firm-4), SV63 (Bartonella apis), and SV54 (Lactobacillus Firm-4) showed a trend towards decreased relative abundance following OTC exposure (absolute effect <0.5; Fig. 2c).
The gut microbiota of adult honey bees was analyzed before (Pre-OTC) and after (Post-OTC) hive administration with oxytetracycline. a, b Bar plots illustrating the relative and absolute abundance of bacterial species in the gut microbiota of adult honey bee samples as determined by V4 region 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Each bar represents a pooled sample of three adult guts collected from n = 6 hives, with two replicates performed for each hive. Absolute abundance of bacterial taxa was estimated by quantifying total 16S rRNA gene copy number via qPCR. c Strip chart showing differentially abundant taxa in the gut microbiota of OTC-exposed adult honey bees. Positive values indicate an increased relative abundance in response to OTC and negative values indicate a decreased relative abundance. Statistical inference was performed on centered log-ratio transformed read counts of sequence variants using ALDEx2 software in R. Features exceeding absolute effect size (>0.5) and P value (<0.05) thresholds are shown as red. d, e Alpha diversity (measured via Shannon’s H Index) and Beta diversity (measured via Aitchison’s distance between samples at different time points) of adult gut microbiota samples. Data represents the median (line in box), IQR (box), and minimum/maximum (whiskers) of respective microbiota diversity metrics with statistical comparisons shown for separate Wilcoxon tests. f Abundance of seven tetracycline-resistance loci in adult gut samples relative to the total number of 16S rRNA gene copies present. **P < 0.01 and ****P < 0.0001.
The compositional 16S rRNA gene sequencing dataset also demonstrated differences in alpha diversity (intraindividual) and beta diversity (interindividual) metrics of the adult gut microbiota following OTC exposure (Fig. 2d, e). Specifically, Shannon’s H index (balanced alpha diversity metric taking species abundance and evenness into account) was determined to be significantly lower following 2 weeks of OTC treatment (Wilcoxon test, P = 0.0273; Fig. 2d). These findings also corresponded with a decrease in microbiota stability as demonstrated by a significant increase in Aitchison distance (i.e. Euclidean distance after center log-ratio transforming SV read counts) between adults within the same treatment group (Wilcoxon test, P < 0.0001; Fig. 2e).
Next, to determine how the standard practice of treating hives with OTC may influence accumulation of antibiotic-resistance genes in the honey bee gut microbiota, we screened seven tetracycline-resistance loci that have been repeatedly detected in honey bee guts6. These loci included five tetracycline efflux pump genes (tetB, tetC, tetD, tetH, and tetY) and two ribosomal protection protein-encoding genes (tetM and tetW). The abundance of tetB was significantly higher (two-tailed t test, P = 0.0092) whereas tetY showed a trend towards increased abundance (two-tailed Mann–Whitney test, P = 0.0887) in post-OTC adult gut samples (two-tailed Mann–Whitney tests; Fig. 2f). No observable change in abundance were found for any of the remaining five tetracycline-resistance genes examined in this study (Fig. 2f). A positive association was identified between total Gammaproteobacteria (Pearson correlation, r = 0.888, P = 9.25 × 10−17) and Gilliamella apicola (Pearson correlation, r = 0.719, P = 1.23 × 10−08), but not Frischella perrera (Pearson correlation, r = −0.228, P = 0.124), and the presence of tetB (Supplementary Fig. 3).
LX3 improves adult microbiota recovery post-OTC exposure
In humans, probiotic therapy helps to encourage healthy remodeling of the microbiota and can improve recovery following antibiotics32. Here, we tested the ability of LX3 supplementation in honey bees to reduce P. larvae levels and restore microbiota homeostasis in adults and larvae following OTC exposure. As expected, principal component analysis showed clear separation between the microbiota composition of adult and larval samples (Fig. 3a). The largest influencers of separation that were positively associated with adult samples included core microbiota members such as G. apicola, Snodgrassella alvi, F. perrara, Commensalibacter, Lactobacillus Firm-4, and Lactobacillus Firm-5. In contrast, larval samples showed a positive association with mostly opportunistic bacteria including Escherichia/Shigella, Staphylococcus, Enterococcus, Pseudomonas, and P. larvae (Fig. 3a).
a Principle component analysis (PCA) plot of the honey bee microbiota from adult and larval samples before (Pre-supp) and after (Post-supp) the supplementation period. Sequence variants were collapsed at species-level identification, with clr-transformed Aitchison distances used as input values for PCA analysis. Distance between individual samples (points) represent the difference in microbiota composition between samples, with 40.8% of variance explained by the first two principle components shown. Strength of association for taxa are depicted by length of corresponding arrows. b, c ALDEx2 effect plots comparing differences in relative abundance of SVs between groups (ΔA) plotted against the variance, or within-group difference, in relative abundance for each SV (Δw). Low variance SVs that cluster tightly together in adult microbiota samples largely represent well-established core microbiota members (see Supplementary Data 1 for list of corresponding SVs). d Alpha diversity determined by Shannon’s H Index (accounting for abundance and evenness), e Beta diversity measured via Aitchison’s distance (representing within-group microbiota differences), f species dominance (or unevenness) measured via Strong’s Dw Index, and g species richness as determined using the abundance-based coverage estimator (ACE) metric in QIIME2. h, i Differential abundance analysis on adult gut samples between the relative abundance of all core cluster SVs grouped together compared to all noncore SVs grouped together. Data represents median (line in box), IQR(box), and minimum/maximum (whiskers) of clr-transformed relative abundances with statistical comparisons performed by Kruskal–Wallis test with Benjamini–Hochberg multiple comparisons. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ns not significant.
Using ALDEx233 software, Bland–Altmann-like effect plots were generated to investigate the relationship between differences in relative abundance for each SV between treatment groups and the within-group variance of each SV. While no discernible differences were observed within larval samples with an underdeveloped microbiota composition, a tightly clustered group of 13 SVs with low variance were identified in adult samples (Fig. 3b, c). Notably, 12 out of 13 of these SVs trended towards increased abundance in the microbiota of LX3-supplemented adults (Fig. 3b) and consisted of several well-characterized honey bee core microbiota members including five SVs of Lactobacillus Firm-5, two SVs of S. alvi, two SVs of G. apicola, one SV of Lactobacillus Firm-4, one SV of F. perrara, and one SV of Bifidobacterium (see Supplementary Data 1 for full list of SVs). Corroborating these results, LX3 supplementation demonstrated a rescuing effect on microbiota stability as demonstrated by a significant decrease in compositional differences between adult microbiota samples (measured via Aitchison distance; P = 0.0012), whereas no changes were observed in vehicle-treated adults (Kruskal–Wallis test with BH multiple comparisons, P = 0.7570; Fig. 3e).
No differences in overall alpha diversity, as determined by Shannon’s H Index (accounting for species abundance and evenness), were detectable in either vehicle or LX3 treatment groups (Kruskal–Wallis test with BH multiple comparisons, P = 0.2985 and P = 0.2348, respectively; Fig. 3d). However, further investigation demonstrated that species richness alone (determined using the abundance-based coverage estimator [ACE] algorithm in QIIME2) was significantly lower (P = 0.0428) and that compositional dominance (or unevenness, as determined by Strong’s Dw Index) trended towards being higher (P = 0.0535) in LX3-treated adults compared to vehicle-treated adults (Kruskal–Wallis test with BH multiple comparisons; Fig. 3f, g). Since these data did not provide conclusive evidence as to whether core SVs (dominant microbiota members) or noncore SVs (rare species and transient opportunists) were responsible for the observed differences in diversity indices, a nested compositional analysis was performed on total relative abundance for each group. LX3-treated adults demonstrated a significant enrichment in core SVs (effect size = 1.3631) and a reduction in noncore SVs (effect size = −1.3860; Kruskal–Wallis test with BH multiple comparisons, P = 0.0225; Fig. 3h). In contrast, no change was seen in the total relative abundance of core SVs (effect size = 0.1579) or noncore SVs (effect size = −0.1654) in the vehicle-treated controls (Kruskal–Wallis test with BH multiple comparisons, P = 0.2046; Fig. 3i).
LX3 strains are detectable in-hive members post-supplementation
Since 16S rRNA gene sequencing is unable to resolve bacterial taxonomy at the species level, we performed qPCR-based quantification of Lp39, GR-1, and BR-1 using established primer sets25 to confirm that LX3 strains were being effectively dispersed throughout the hive as intended. LX3-supplemented adults and larvae were found to contain significantly higher levels of L. plantarum (multiple t tests, P = 0.0087 and P = 0.0035, respectively) and L. rhamnosus (multiple t tests, P = 0.0002 for both) compared to vehicle-treated control groups (Fig. 4a). In addition, evaluation of bacterial compositions in honey bee larval samples showed that abundance of P. larvae correlated inversely with L. plantarum (r = −0.442, P = 0.006) and L. rhamnosus (r = −0.456, P = 0.006), but not with L. kunkeei (r = 0.060, P = 0.724, Pearson correlations; Fig. 4b).
a Quantification of LX3 lactobacilli strains in honey bee adults and larvae before and after supplementation period. Data are depicted as mean ± standard deviation (two-tailed t tests) of bacterial abundances (determined via qPCR with species-specific primers) at different time points with each data point representing a single individual (n = 18 adult guts per treatment group at each time point) or a pooled sample of three larvae (n = 12 pooled samples for each treatment group at each time point). b Pearson correlation analysis between P. larvae and LX3 lactobacilli strains (quantified via qPCR) in honey bee larval samples. VEH = Pollen patty supplementation with vehicle, LX3 = Pollen patty supplementation with LX3. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ****P < 0.0001.
LX3 upregulates both head and gut immunity in adult bees
Repeated exposure to antibiotics can weaken immune defenses in honey bees—a phenomenon thought to be facilitated through the reduction of bacterial species important to immunoregulation34. Using an established zone-of-inhibition (ZOI) assay as a crude measure of immune function35, we assessed the inhibitory potential of honey bee-derived hemolymph against Arthrobacter globiformis. The antimicrobial capacity of adult hemolymph was found to be reduced by 31.27% (95% CI = 8.19–54.34%, one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons, P = 0.0150) following 2 weeks of OTC treatment (Fig. 5a). In contrast, the antimicrobial capacity of hemolymph from LX3-supplemented adults was significantly increased by 121.30% (95% CI = 22.34–220.30%, two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons, P = 0.0443) after 2 weeks in comparison to vehicle supplemented controls (Fig. 5b).
Adult hemolymph killing capacity against A. globiformis during a antibiotic treatment and b supplementation periods. Data represents the median (line in box), IQR (box), and minimum/maximum (whiskers) of hemolymph killing capacity for n = 6 hives (during antibiotic treatment) and n = 4 hives per treatment group (during supplementation period), respectively. Representative measurements for each hive at each time point were derived from a total of five randomly sampled adult nurse bees. Statistical analysis shown for one-way and two-way ANOVAs, respectively, with Sidak’s multiple comparisons. c Intraindividual head-to-gut gene expression ratios of nine innate immune- or antioxidant-related genes in adult honey bees. Gene expression was quantified by RT-qPCR with gut gene expression shown as relative to head gene expression. Data shown represents the mean ± standard deviation (one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons) for n = 24 adults. PCA plots and heatmaps demonstrating innate immune- or antioxidant-related gene expression in d, e head and f, g gut samples of adult honey bees before (Pre-supp) and after (Post-supp) the supplementation period. Log2-transformed relative gene expression estimates (determined via qPCR) were used as input values for PCA analyses. Distance between individual samples (points) represent the difference in gene expression profiles for the nine immune or antioxidant genes shown, with 61.6% (heads) and 65.3% (guts) of variance explained by the first two principle components. Strengths of association for each gene are depicted by the length of corresponding arrows. Ellipses indicate 95% confidence intervals for each treatment group. NTC = no treatment control, VEH = pollen patty supplementation with vehicle, LX3 = pollen patty supplementation with LX3. *P < 0.05, ****P < 0.0001, ns not significant. Capped brood counts during OTC treatment (n = 6 hives) and subsequent supplementation period (n = 4 hives per treatment group). Data represents the median (line in box), IQR (box), and minimum/maximum (whiskers) of relative change in brood counts normalized by hive. Statistics shown for one-way and two-way ANOVA, respectively, with Sidak’s multiple comparisons for both. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001, ns not significant.
Previous work has shown that ex situ supplementation of LX3 to honey bee larvae can increase innate immune gene expression of several antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) that control susceptibility to P. larvae infection25. Here, we tested how LX3 supplemented directly to the hive impacted adult bee immunity. Expression of nine well-characterized innate immune- and antioxidant-related genes (defensin-1, defensin-2, hymenoptaecin, apismin, apidaecin, VgMC, catalase, and lysozyme-1) were measured in adult head and gut tissue as their respective anatomical sites are known to play a major role in social and individual immunity36. Exploratory analysis showed that basal gene expression levels in pre-supplemented adult bees demonstrated a vast enrichment of defensin-1 (900.0 ± 163.6-fold higher) and apismin (297,292 ± 63,498-fold higher) in adults heads relative to gut expression, as compared to the other AMP genes examined (one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons, P < 0.0001 for both; Fig. 5c)—suggesting that changes to the expression of these genes in the head, as opposed to the gut, might produce a more potent immune response and protective benefit at the colony level.
During the supplementation period, head expression of defensin-1, apismin, and apidaecin showed a significant increase over time in only the LX3-supplemented group (two-way ANOVAs with Sidak’s multiple comparisons, P = 0.0406, P < 0.0001, and P = 0.0004, respectively) whereas expression of hymenoptaecin increased in both LX3 and vehicle supplemented groups (two-way ANOVAs with Sidak’s multiple comparisons, P = 0.0240 and P = 0.0365, respectively; Supplementary Fig. 4A, C–E). All experimental groups showed an increase in head expression level of catalase (two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons, P = 0.0050, P < 0.0001, and P < 0.0001, respectively) over time with no changes in expression of defensin-2 or lysozyme-1 (Supplementary Fig. 4B, H, I). Gut expression of defensin-1, hymenoptaecin, apidaecin, and VgMC were exclusively increased by LX3 supplementation (two-way ANOVAs with Sidak’s multiple comparisons, P = 0.0004, P = 0.0201, P < 0.0001, and P < 0.0001, respectively), whereas lysozyme-1 and catalase expression increased in both vehicle (P = 0.0013 and P < 0.0001, respectively) and LX3 (P < 0.0001 for both) treatment groups (two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparisons; Supplementary Fig. 4J, M, N, P–R and Supplementary Data 2). Relative expression of immune- and antioxidant genes in head and gut samples are visually summarized by the PCA plots and heatmaps in Fig. 5d–g.
Correlations between host gene expression and bacterial loads
It has been known for decades now that probiotic bacteria can induce an immune response in honey bees37. In addition, recent evidence shows that host bacterial communities are selectively regulated by the innate immune system of honey bees, and that core microbiota members demonstrate a higher level of resistance to host AMPs than opportunistic bacterial pathogens38. Here, we examine the simultaneous relationship between bacterial abundances and immune- and antioxidant-related gene expression by using a dual extraction-based method to derive RNA and DNA from adult heads and guts. Experimental end point measurements at week 4 of the supplemental period demonstrated a negative Pearson correlation between total abundance of P. larvae and expression of apidaecin (r = −0.589, P = 0.004), apismin (r = −0.483, P = 0.023), hymenoptaecin (r = −0.460, P = 0.036), defensin-1 (r = −0.599, P = 0.004), and catalase (r = −0.650, P = 0.001) in head samples, and with apidaecin (r = −0.559, P = 0.007), hymenoptaecin (r = −0.467, P = 0.029), and catalase (r = −0.589, P = 0.004) in gut samples (Fig. 6).
At the end of the 6-week experimental period, bacterial abundances in the guts of adult honey bees were compared with head and gut expression of nine immune- or antioxidant-related genes. Scale shown represents Pearson correlation coefficient, r, for n = 20–24 individual adults for each comparison. (G) = Gut gene expression, (H) = Head gene expression. The horizontal dendrogram acts to group host genes that covary in their expression patterns while the vertical dendrogram groups bacteria based on their co-occurring abundance relative to host gene expression. Both dendrograms were calculated using Euclidean distance and the complete ‘hclust’ function in R.
Assessment between the supplemented strains of lactobacilli and immune or antioxidant gene expression showed a positive relationship (Pearson correlations) between L. plantarum abundance and head expression of apidaecin (r = 0.653, P = 0.001), defensin-1 (r = 0.526, P = 0.014), and catalase (r = 0.435, P = 0.043), as well as gut expression of defensin-2 (r = 0.401, P = 0.008) catalase (r = 0.591, P = 0.004), and VgMC (r = 0.468, P = 0.028; Fig. 6). For L. rhamnosus, bacterial abundance was associated with increased head expression of apidaecin (r = 0.454, P = 0.039) and a trend towards increased gut expression of defensin-2 (r = 0.401, P = 0.072). No correlations were observed between gene expression and abundance of L. kunkeei. Core microbiota members demonstrated varying relationships with head and gut expression of immune- and antioxidant-related genes in adult honey bees. Total abundance of Alphaproteobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Bifidobacterium, and F. perrara clustered together (based on Euclidean distance of Pearson correlation coefficients) and were found to be mostly associated with increased AMP gene expression (Fig. 6). Oppositely, total abundance of Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and G. apicola clustered together and were mostly associated with an overall decrease in immune- and antioxidant-related gene expression irrespective of body site. A notable exception to these trends was the gut expression of apismin and defensin-1 as well as the head expression of defensin-2 and lysozyme-1, which clustered together (Euclidean distance matrix) based on similarities in gene expression patterns relative to bacterial abundances (Fig. 6). Pearson correlation coefficients (and associated statistics) for all relationships between bacterial abundances and host gene expression are provided in Supplementary Data 3.
Source: Ecology - nature.com