Kyba, C. C. M. et al. Artificially lit surface of Earth at night increasing in radiance and extent. Sci. Adv. 3, 1–8 (2017).
Gaston, K. J., Davies, T. W., Nedelec, S. L. & Holt, L. A. Impacts of artificial light at night on biological timings. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 48, 49–68 (2017).
Bennie, J., Davies, T. W., Cruse, D. & Gaston, K. J. Ecological effects of artificial light at night on wild plants. J. Ecol. 104, 611–620 (2016).
Grenis, K. & Murphy, S. M. Direct and indirect effects of light pollution on the performance of an herbivorous insect. Insect Sci. 26, 770–776 (2019).
Bennie, J., Davies, T. W., Cruse, D., Inger, R. & Gaston, K. J. Cascading effects of artificial light at night: Resource-mediated control of herbivores in a grassland ecosystem. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 370, 1–9 (2015).
Bennie, J., Gaston, K. J., Davies, T. W., Cruse, D. & Inger, R. Artificial light at night causes top-down and bottom-up trophic effects on invertebrate populations. J. Appl. Ecol. 55, 2698–2706 (2018).
Eisenbeis, G. & Hänel, A. Light pollution and the impact of artificial night lighting on insects. Ecol. Cities Towns Comp. Approach https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609763.016 (2009).
Knop, E. et al. Artificial light at night as a new threat to pollination. Nature 548, 206–209 (2017).
Costanza, R. et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387, 253–260 (1997).
Ollerton, J., Winfree, R. & Tarrant, S. How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals?. Oikos 120, 321–326 (2011).
Banza, P., Belo, A. D. F. & Evans, D. M. The structure and robustness of nocturnal Lepidopteran pollen-transfer networks in a Biodiversity Hotspot. Insect Conserv. Divers. 8, 538–546 (2015).
Hahn, M. & Bruhl, C. A. The secret pollinators: An overview of moth pollination with a focus on Europe and North America. Arthropod. Plant. Interact. 10, 21–28 (2016).
Macgregor, C. J., Pocock, M. J. O., Fox, R. & Evans, D. M. Pollination by nocturnal Lepidoptera, and the effects of light pollution: A review. Ecol. Entomol. 40, 187–198 (2015).
van Langevelde, F., Ettema, J. A., Donners, M., WallisDeVries, M. F. & Groenendijk, D. Effect of spectral composition of artificial light on the attraction of moths. Biol. Conserv. 144, 2274–2281 (2011).
Van Grunsven, R. H. A., Lham, D., Van Geffen, K. G. & Veenendaal, E. M. Range of attraction of a 6-W moth light trap. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 152, 87–90 (2014).
Longcore, T. & Rich, C. Ecological light pollution. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2, 191–198 (2004).
Frank, K. D. Impact of outdoor lighting on moths. Int. Astron. Union Colloq. 112, 51 (2016).
Van Grunsven, R. H. A. et al. Experimental light at night has a negative long-term impact on macro-moth. Curr. Biol. 30, R694–R695 (2020).
Van Langevelde, F., Van Grunsven, R. H. A., Veenendaal, E. M. & Fijen, T. P. M. Artificial night lighting inhibits feeding in moths. Biol. Lett. 13, 2–5 (2017).
van Geffen, K. G. et al. Artificial light at night inhibits mating in a Geometrid moth. Insect Conserv. Divers. 8, 282–287 (2015).
Giavi, S., Blösch, S., Schuster, G. & Knop, E. The darkness defeated: artificial light at night modifies ecosystem functioning beyond the lit area. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–11 (2020).
Fatzinger, C. W. Circadian rhythmicity of sex pheromone release by Dioryctria abietella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae (Phycitinae)) and the effect of a diel light cycle on its precopulatory behavior. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 66, 1147–1153 (1973).
Sower, L. L., Shorey, H. H. & Gaston, L. K. Sex pheromones of noctuid moths. XXI. Light:dark cycle regulation and light inhibition of sex pheromone release by females of Trichoplusia ni. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 63, 1090–1092 (1970).
Shorey, H. H. & Gaston, L. K. Sex pheromones of noctuid moths. III. Inhibition of male responses to the sex pheromone in Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 57, 775–779 (1964).
Donners, M. et al. Colors of attraction: Modeling insect flight to light behavior. J. Exp. Zool. Part A Ecol. Integr. Physiol. 329, 434–440 (2018).
Bernasconi, G. et al. Silene as a model system in ecology and evolution. Heredity (Edinb). 103, 5–14 (2009).
Labouche, A. M. & Bernasconi, G. Male moths provide pollination benefits in the Silene latifolia–Hadena bicruris nursery pollination system. Funct. Ecol. 24, 534–544 (2010).
Biere, A. & Honders, S. C. Coping with third parties in a nursery pollination mutualism: Hadena bicruris avoids oviposition on pathogen-infected, less rewarding Silene latifolia. New Phytol. 169, 719–727 (2006).
Spoelstra, K. et al. Experimental illumination of natural habitat—An experimental set-up to assess the direct and indirect ecological consequences of artificial light of different spectral composition. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 370, 20140129 (2015).
Poot, H. et al. Green light for nocturnally migrating birds. Ecol. Soc. 13, 1–14 (2008).
Jalas, J. & Suominen, J. Atlas Florae Europaeae: Distribution of Vascular Plants in Europe Vol. 3 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988).
Karrenberg, S. & Favre, A. Genetic and ecological differentiation in the hybridizing campions Silene dioica and S. latifolia. Evolution N. Y. 62, 763–773 (2008).
Elzinga, J. A., Turin, H., van Damme, J. M. M. & Biere, A. Plant population size and isolation affect herbivory of Silene latifolia by the specialist herbivore Hadena bicruris and parasitism of the herbivore by parasitoids. Oecologia 144, 416–426 (2005).
WinSEEDLE Pro 2019a (Regent Instruments Inc., 2018).
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2020).
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2014).
Lenth, R. emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package version 1.1.3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans (2019).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
