Global δ15Nw-NO3− observations
Publications of δ15Nw-NO3− studies were obtained through the databases of the Web of Science (http://isiknowledge.com), Google Scholar (http://scholar.google.com.hk), and Baidu Scholar (http://xueshu.baidu.com) by searching keywords of “nitrogen isotope”, “nitrate”, “rainfall”, and “precipitation”. By the end of December 2018, a total of 128 publications were available (Supplementary Text 1), spanning the sampling time of 1956–2017 (Supplementary Fig. 11). We extracted δ15Nw-NO3− values of individual precipitation samples by using the software of Web Plot Digitizer37.
There are totally 3483 individual δ15Nw-NO3− data and 222 sampling sites when multiple observations in different sampling years at the same site were counted once only (Fig. 1). There are 56 urban sites, 158 non-urban sites, and eight arctic sites (Fig. 1), in which non-urban sites are mainly situated in rural, mountain, forest, and lake areas. Due to the sparsity of available data before 2000 (Supplementary Fig. 11), we analyzed δ15Nw-NO3− data at major urban and non-urban sites in East Asia, Europe, and North America during 2000–2017 to ensure a better site representation and to reduce the uncertainty caused by inconsistency in sampling time (Fig. 1). To describe spatial differences in δ15Nw-NO3− values between urban and non-urban sites among three regions (totally 214 sites), only site-based mean values during the period of 2000–2017 (totally 169 sites) were used (detailed in Fig. 2). To describe temporal variations of δ15Nw-NO3− values in urban and non-urban areas of each region, respectively (Fig. 3), we counted observation sites by different sampling years, given that δ15Nw-NO3− observations at few sites have been conducted in different sampling years. In this way, there were a total of 206 sites during 2000–2017 (detailed in Fig. 3). In addition, 35%, 29%, and 36% of the δ15Nw-NO3− observations were conducted in warmer, cooler, and the whole year, respectively. The seasonal effects of NOx emissions may not substantially influence the patterns of regional δ15Nw-NO3− variations.
Differences between δ15Nw-NO3− and δ15Ni-NOx values
NO is normally insoluble in water, and w-NO3− is scavenged only from the ambient NO2 and the oxidized NOx (i.e., HNO3 and p-NO3−) (Supplementary Fig. 1)32,38,39. Moreover, isotopic effects during the NOx cycles lead to differences between δ15NNOx and δ15NNO2. Therefore, substantial differences exist between the δ15Nw-NO3− and δ15Ni-NOx values in the atmosphere (hereafter denoted as 15∆i-NOx→w-NO3−). In this study, we calculated 15∆i-NOx→w-NO3− values by using the following equation (Eq. (2)):
$${,}^{15}{Delta}_{{mathrm{i}} – {mathrm{NO}x} to {mathrm{w}} – {mathrm{NO3}} – } = delta ^{15}{mathrm{N}}_{{mathrm{w}} – {mathrm{NO3}} – } – delta ^{15}{mathrm{N}}_{{mathrm{i}} – {mathrm{NO}x}}.$$
(2)
Combined Eq. (1) with Eq. (2), we get Eq. (3) to calculate the 15∆i-NOx→w-NO3− values.
$$ {,}^{15}{Delta}_{{mathrm{i}} – {mathrm{NO}x} to {mathrm{w}} – {mathrm{NO3}}} = delta ^{15}{mathrm{N}}_{{mathrm{w}} – {mathrm{NO3}} – } quad- left({delta}^{15}{mathrm{N}}_{{mathrm{NO}x}} times {mathrm{C}}_{{mathrm{NO2}}}/f_{{mathrm{NO2}}} + delta ^{15}{mathrm{N}}_{{mathrm{HNO3}}} times {mathrm{C}}_{{mathrm{HNO3}}} + delta ^{15}{mathrm{N}}_{{mathrm{p}} – {mathrm{NO3}} – } times {mathrm{C}}_{{mathrm{p}} – {mathrm{NO3}}}right)/ quad left({mathrm{C}}_{{mathrm{NO2}}}/f_{{mathrm{NO2}}} + {mathrm{C}}_{{mathrm{HNO3}}} + {mathrm{C}}_{{mathrm{p}} – {mathrm{NO3}} – }right).$$
(3)
To obtain more accurate 15∆i-NOx→w-NO3− values, we estimated the 15∆i-NOx→w-NO3− values in two independent scenarios. In Scenario 1, mean values of global δ15NNOx and fNO2 values, simultaneously observed values of ambient CNO2, CHNO3, Cp-NO3−, δ15NHNO3, δ15Np-NO3−, and δ15Nw-NO3− were used for the calculation in Eq. (3). In Scenario 2, non-synchronously observed values of ambient fNO2, CNO2, CHNO3, Cp-NO3−, δ15NNOx, δ15NHNO3, δ15Np-NO3−, and δ15Nw-NO3− were used for the calculation in Eq. (3). The values and data sources of parameters used for estimating ambient 15∆i-NOx→w-NO3− values are included in Supplementary Table 1. Because data of fNO2 and δ15NNOx are very sparse globally, we used global mean values and considered their SD values into the uncertainty analysis by the Monte Carlo method. Furthermore, because of no significant difference between 15∆i-NOx→w-NO3− values obtained in Scenario 1 (2.1 ± 1.7‰) and Scenario 2 (5.7 ± 3.2‰) (Supplementary Fig. 2), we used a mean value of them (3.9 ± 1.8‰; Supplementary Fig. 2) in the calculations of source contributions (Eqs. (4) and (5)).
Contributions of dominant fossil fuel and non-fossil fuel NOx sources
Based on δ15Nw-NO3−, 15∆i-NOx→w-NO3−, and δ15N values of NOx sources, we estimated relative contributions of dominant fossil fuel and non-fossil fuel NOx sources to total NOx emissions by using the isotope mass-balance method. We considered coal combustion (denoted as S1) and vehicle exhausts (S2) as dominant fossil fuel NOx sources, and biomass burning (S3), and microbial N cycles (S4) as dominant non-fossil fuel NOx sources. The major reasons include: (1) these four sources have been considered as dominant sources of total NOx emissions in studies of both emission inventory and deposition modeling2,9,11,13,14,15,19,20,21; (2) they are also the dominant sources influencing δ15N variations of NOx and NO3− in the atmosphere;26,27 (3) their mean δ15N values of NOx emission sources differ significantly (P < 0.05, Supplementary Fig. 3) and therefore can be used to differentiate their relative contributions.
The S1–S4 are considered as dominant NOx sources at urban sites but S2 cannot be considered as a dominant NOx source at non-urban sites. First of all, studies of roadside NOx emissions have evidenced that vehicle exhausts contribute little to atmospheric NOx at non-urban sites due to limited amounts of long-range transport40,41,42. Statistical data also show 76%, 82%, and 78% of vehicles distributed in urban areas of East Asia, North America, and Europe, respectively while their urban areas account for only 1.7%, 1.4%, and 16.6% of total land area, respectively (Supplementary Tables 2, 3, Supplementary Fig. 12). Secondly, 76% and 91% of δ15Nw-NO3− values at urban and non-urban sites fall in the δ15N range of NOx from vehicle exhausts (Supplementary Figs. 3, 13). Consequently, when the NOx from vehicle exhausts is considered into the calculations of relative contributions of different NOx sources at non-urban sites, its contributions at non-urban sites (25 ± 12%) are similar to urban sites (28 ± 8%), which is unlikely. Besides, because mutual NOx transportations always occur between urban and non-urban areas, δ15N values of NO3− in precipitation at a given urban or non-urban site integrate δ15N values of NOx from both local emissions and regional transportations. However, physical NOx transportation might have no substantial isotope effects, and thus likely will not influence the site-specific evaluations of fossil and non-fossil fuel NOx contributions.
According to isotope mass-balance theory, we calculated relative contributions of S1–S4 (fS1, fS2, fS3, and fS4, respectively) at urban sites by using Eq. (4):
$$delta ^{15}{mathrm{N}}_{{mathrm{w}} – {mathrm{NO3}} – } = (f_{{mathrm{S1}}} times delta ^{15}{mathrm{N}}_{{mathrm{S1}}} + f_{{mathrm{S2}}} times delta ^{15}{mathrm{N}}_{{mathrm{S2}}} + f_{{mathrm{S3}}} times delta ^{15}{mathrm{N}}_{{mathrm{S3}}} + f_{{mathrm{S4}}} times delta ^{15}{mathrm{N}}_{{mathrm{S4}}}) + {,}^{15}{Delta}_{{mathrm{i}} – {mathrm{NOX}} to {mathrm{w}} – {mathrm{NO3}} – },$$
(4)
where we assumed that fS1 + fS2 + fS3 + fS4 = 1.
Then, we calculated their relative contributions at non-urban sites by Eq. (5):
$$delta ^{15}{mathrm{N}}_{{mathrm{w}} – {mathrm{NO3}} – } = {,,} (f_{{mathrm{S1}}} times delta ^{15}{mathrm{N}}_{{mathrm{S1}}} + f_{{mathrm{S3}}} times delta ^{15}{mathrm{N}}_{{mathrm{S3}}} + f_{{mathrm{S4}}} times delta ^{15}{mathrm{N}}_{{mathrm{S4}}}) + {,}^{15}{Delta}_{{mathrm{i}} – {mathrm{NO}X} to {mathrm{w}} – {mathrm{NO3}} – },$$
(5)
where we assumed that fS1 + fS3 + fS4 = 1. δ15NS1, δ15NS2, δ15NS3, and δ15NS4 represent δ15N values of NOx from coal combustion (S1), vehicle exhausts (S2), biomass burning (S3), and microbial N cycles (S4), respectively (Supplementary Fig. 3).
The fS1, fS2, fS3, and fS4 values were calculated by using a Bayesian isotope-mixing model (named Stable Isotope Analysis in R, SIAR). The SIAR model43 uses a Bayesian framework to establish a logical prior distribution based on Dirichlet distribution44 for estimating source contributions (fS1–fS4). It has the potential to provide reliable estimations of source contributions because the isotope effect (i.e., 15∆i-NOx→w-NO3− values in this study), the variability in δ15N values of both sources (i.e., δ15N values of NOx from S1–S4 in this study), and the mixture (i.e., δ15Nw-NO3− values in this study)45,46 are considered. The SIAR model has been widely used to quantify the relative contributions of multiple NOx emission sources to p-NO3− and w-NO3−26,27,31,47. In each run of the SIAR model, the mean ± SD of δ15NNOx values (Supplementary Fig. 3), the mean ± SD of 15∆ w-NO3−→i-NOx values (Supplementary Fig. 2), and replicate δ15Nw-NO3− values at each urban or non-urban site in each sampling year (Fig. 3) were input into the model. In addition, the percentage data of each source (n = 10,000) output from each run of the SIAR model were used to calculate mean ± SD values of corresponding source contributions (Supplementary Figs. 5–8).
We calculated the total contribution of each NOx source in each region (F; Eq. (6)) by using its annual mean relative contributions at urban and non-urban sites during 2000–2017 (n = 28, 9, 13 for urban sites and n = 47, 21, 88 for non-urban sites in East Asia, Europe, and North America, respectively) (furban and fnon-urban, respectively; Supplementary Fig. 9) and annual mean proportions of urban and non-urban populations in the total population of each region during 2000–2017 (Purban and Pnon-urban, respectively; Supplementary Fig. 14).
$${{F}} = f_{{mathrm{urban}}} times P_{{mathrm{urban}}} times f_{{mathrm{non – urban}}} times P_{{mathrm{non – urban}}}.$$
(6)
Then, we calculated annual mean relative contributions of dominant fossil fuel and non-fossil fuel NOx sources in each region (Ffossil and Fnon-fossil, respectively) by using Eq. (7) and Eq. (8), respectively.
$$F_{{mathrm{fossil}}} = F_{{mathrm{S1}}} + F_{{mathrm{S2}}},$$
(7)
$$F_{{mathrm{non – fossil}}} = F_{{mathrm{S3}}} + F_{{mathrm{S4}}}.$$
(8)
Finally, based on the annual mean amounts of fossil fuel NOx emissions (Afossil) in East Asia during 2000–2010, in Europe during 2000–2015, and in North America during 2000–2016, respectively (Fig. 4b, Supplementary Fig. 10), the annual mean amounts of total NOx emissions (Atotal) and non-fossil fuel NOx emissions (Anon-fossil) in each region during 2000–2017 were calculated by using Eq. (9) and Eq. (10), respectively:
$${{A}}_{{mathrm{total}}} = {{A}}_{{mathrm{fossil}}}/F_{{mathrm{fossil}}},$$
(9)
$${{A}}_{{mathrm{non – fossil}}} = {{A}}_{{mathrm{total}}} – {{A}}_{{mathrm{fossil}}}.$$
(10)
We estimated the SD values of calculated values in Eqs. (6)–(10) and finally propagated into the uncertainties of the Anon-fossil values by using the Monte Carlo method.
Statistical analyses
The one-way analyses of variance (Fig. 2) and Pearson correlation analyses (Fig. 3) were performed by using the Origin 2016 statistical package (OriginLab Corporation, USA) and SPSS 16.0 statistical package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Because of regionally limiting observation sites and inherently high variability of δ15Nw-NO3−, spatial differences are significant only at the level of P < 0.1 (Fig. 2). Mean values and standard deviation (SD) were reported.
Source: Ecology - nature.com