Tollrian, R. & Harvell, C. D. The Ecology and Evolution of Inducible Defenses (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1998).
Ohgushi, T., Schmitz, O. J. & Holt, R. D. Trait-Mediated Indirect Interactions: Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013).
Ellers, J. & Stuefer, J. F. Frontiers in phenotypic plasticity research: new questions about mechanisms, induced responses, and ecological impacts. Evol. Ecol. 24, 523–526 (2010).
Mitchell, M. D., Bairos-Novak, K. R. & Ferrari, M. C. Mechanisms underlying the control of responses to predator odours in aquatic prey. J. Exp. Biol. 220, 1937–1946 (2017).
Stankowich, T. & Blumstein, D. T. Fear in animals: a meta-analysis and review of risk assessment. Proc. Roy. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 272, 2627–2634 (2005).
Brönmark, C. & Hansson, L.-A. Chemical Ecology in Aquatic Systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012).
Middlemis Maher, J., Werner, E. E. & Denver, R. J. Stress hormones mediate predator-induced phenotypic plasticity in amphibian tadpoles. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 280, 20123075 (2013).
Dennis, S. R., LeBlanc, G. A. & Beckerman, A. P. Endocrine regulation of predator-induced phenotypic plasticity. Oecologia 176, 625–635 (2014).
Matsunami, M. et al. Transcriptome analysis of predator- and prey-induced phenotypic plasticity in the Hokkaido salamander (Hynobius retardatus). Mol. Ecol. 24, 3064–3076 (2015).
Weiss, L. C. Sensory ecology of predator-induced phenotypic plasticity. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 12, 330 (2019).
Hawlena, D. & Schmitz, O. J. Physiological stress as a fundamental mechanism linking predation to ecosystem functioning. Am. Nat. 176, 537–556 (2010).
Auld, J. R. & Relyea, R. A. Adaptive plasticity in predator-induced defenses in a common freshwater snail: altered selection and mode of predation due to prey phenotype. Evol. Ecol. 25, 189–202 (2011).
Meuthen, D., Baldauf, S. A., Bakker, T. C. & Thünken, T. Neglected patterns of variation in phenotypic plasticity: age-and sex-specific antipredator plasticity in a cichlid fish. Am. Nat. 191, 475–490 (2018).
Schoeppner, N. M. & Relyea, R. A. Interpreting the smells of predation: how alarm cues and kairomones induce different prey defenses. Func. Ecol. 23, 1114–1121 (2009).
Hettyey, A. et al. The relative importance of prey-borne and predator-borne chemical cues for inducible antipredator responses in tadpoles. Oecologia 179, 699–710 (2015).
Fraker, M. E. et al. Characterization of an alarm pheromone secreted by amphibian tadpoles that induces behavioral inhibition and suppression of the neuroendocrine stress axis. Horm. Behav. 55, 520–529 (2009).
Hossie, T. J., Ferland-Raymond, B., Burness, G. & Murray, D. L. Morphological and behavioural responses of frog tadpoles to perceived predation risk: a possible role for corticosterone mediation?. Écoscience 17, 100–108 (2010).
McDiarmid, R. W. & Altig, R. Tadpoles: the Biology of Anuran Larvae (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1999).
Relyea, R. A. Fine-tuned phenotypes: tadpole plasticity under 16 combinations of predators and competitors. Ecology 85, 172–179 (2004).
Wilson, R. S., Kraft, P. G. & Van Damme, R. Predator-specific changes in the morphology and swimming performance of larval Rana lessonae. Func. Ecol. 19, 238–244 (2005).
Van Buskirk, J. & McCollum, S. A. Influence of tail shape on tadpole swimming performance. J. Exp. Biol. 203, 2149–2158 (2000).
Eidietis, L. Size-related performance variation in the wood frog (Rana sylvatica) tadpole tactile-stimulated startle response. Can. J. Zool. 83, 1117–1127 (2005).
Perotti, M. G., Pueta, M., Jara, F. G., Úbeda, C. A. & Moreno Azocar, D. L. Lack of functional link in the tadpole morphology induced by predators. Curr. Zool. 62, 227–235 (2016).
Mori, T. et al. The constant threat from a non-native predator increases tail muscle and fast-start swimming performance in Xenopus tadpoles. Biol. Open 6, 1726–1733 (2017).
Lindgren, B., Orizaola, G. & Laurila, A. Interacting effects of predation risk and resource level on escape speed of amphibian larvae along a latitudinal gradient. J. Evol. Biol. 31, 1216–1226 (2018).
Van Buskirk, J., Anderwald, P., Lüpold, S., Reinhardt, L. & Schuler, H. The lure effect, tadpole tail shape, and the target of dragonfly strikes. J. Herp. 37, 420–424 (2003).
Dijk, B., Laurila, A., Orizaola, G. & Johansson, F. Is one defence enough? Disentangling the relative importance of morphological and behavioural predator-induced defences. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 70, 237–246 (2016).
Glennemeier, K. A. & Denver, R. J. Moderate elevation of corticosterone content affects fitness components in northern leopard frog (Rana pipiens) tadpoles. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 127, 16–25 (2002).
Glennemeier, K. A. & Denver, R. J. Role for corticoids in mediating the response of Rana pipiens tadpoles to intraspecific competition. J. Exp. Zool. 292, 32–40 (2002).
Muir, A. M., Vecsei, P. & Krueger, C. C. A perspective on perspectives: methods to reduce variation in shape analysis of digital images. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 141, 1161–1170 (2012).
Fraker, M. E. & Luttbeg, B. Predator-prey space use and the spatial distribution of predation events. Behaviour 149, 555–574 (2012).
Denver, R. J. Hormonal correlates of environmentally induced metamorphosis in the western spadefoot toad, Scaphiopus hammondii. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 110, 326–336 (1998).
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Soft. 67, 1–48 (2015).
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing, version 3.6.1. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019).
Lenth, R. V. Least-squares means: the R package lsmeans. J. Stat. Soft. 69, 1–33 (2016).
Therneau, T. M. & Lumley, T. R Package ‘survival’ version 3.1-8 (2019).
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675 (2012).
Relyea, R. A. Morphological and behavioral plasticity of larval anurans in response to different predators. Ecology 82, 541–554 (2001).
Berner, D. Size correction in biology: how reliable are approaches based on (common) principal component analysis?. Oecologia 166, 961–971 (2011).
Humphreys, R. K. & Ruxton, G. D. What is known and what is not yet known about deflection of the point of a predator’s attack. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 123, 483–495 (2018).
Blair, J. & Wassersug, R. J. Variation in the pattern of predator-induced damage to tadpole tails. Copeia 2000, 390–401 (2000).
Van Buskirk, J., Ferrari, M., Kueng, D., Näpflin, K. & Ritter, N. Prey risk assessment depends on conspecific density. Oikos 120, 1235–1239 (2011).
McCoy, M. W. Conspecific density determines the magnitude and character of predator-induced phenotype. Oecologia 153, 871–878 (2007).
Van Buskirk, J. & McCollum, S. A. Functional mechanisms of an inducible defence in tadpoles: morphology and behaviour influence mortality risk from predation. J. Evol. Biol 13, 336–347 (2000).
Van Buskirk, J. Phenotypic lability and the evolution of predator-induced plasticity in tadpoles. Evolution 56, 361–370 (2002).
Hossie, T., Landolt, K. & Murray, D. L. Determinants and co-expression of anti-predator responses in amphibian tadpoles: a meta-analysis. Oikos 126, 173–184 (2017).
Laughlin, D. C. & Messier, J. Fitness of multidimensional phenotypes in dynamic adaptive landscapes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30, 487–496 (2015).
Steiner, U. K. & Van Buskirk, J. Predator-induced changes in metabolism cannot explain the growth/predation risk tradeoff. PLoS ONE 4, e6160 (2009).
Ferrari, M. C., Wisenden, B. D. & Chivers, D. P. Chemical ecology of predator–prey interactions in aquatic ecosystems: a review and prospectus. Can. J. Zool. 88, 698–724 (2010).
Luttbeg, B., Ferrari, M. C., Blumstein, D. T. & Chivers, D. P. Safety cues can give prey more valuable information than danger cues. Am. Nat. 195, 636–648 (2020).
Schmitz, O. J. Predator and prey functional traits: understanding the adaptive machinery driving predator–prey interactions. F1000Research 6, 1767 (2017).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
