Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript. More
1.
Painter, T. H. et al. The Airborne Snow Observatory: Fusion of scanning lidar, imaging spectrometer, and physically-based modeling for mapping snow water equivalent and snow albedo. Remote Sens. Environ. 184, 139–152 (2016).
ADS Article Google Scholar
2.
Guan, B. et al. Snow water equivalent in the Sierra Nevada: Blending snow sensor observations with snowmelt model simulations. Water Resour. Res. 49, 5029–5046 (2013).
ADS Article Google Scholar
3.
Entekhabi, D. et al. The Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission. Proc. IEEE 98, 704–716 (2010).
Article Google Scholar
4.
Chiang, Y.-M., Hsu, K.-L., Chang, F.-J., Hong, Y. & Sorooshian, S. Merging multiple precipitation sources for flash flood forecasting. J. Hydrol. 340, 183–196 (2007).
ADS Article Google Scholar
5.
Dalrymple, T. Flood-frequency analyses. Manual of hydrology: Part 3. Flood-flow techniques. https://pubs.usgs.gov/wsp/1543a/report.pdf (1960).
6.
Luke, A., Vrugt, J. A., AghaKouchak, A., Matthew, R. & Sanders, B. F. Predicting nonstationary flood frequencies: Evidence supports an updated stationarity thesis in the United States. Water Resour. Res. 53, 5469–5494 (2017).
ADS Article Google Scholar
7.
Dozier, J., Bair, E. H. & Davis, R. E. Estimating the spatial distribution of snow water equivalent in the world’s mountains. WIREs Water 3, 461–474 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
8.
Painter, T. H. et al. Retrieval of subpixel snow covered area, grain size, and albedo from MODIS. Remote Sens. Environ. 113, 868–879 (2009).
ADS Article Google Scholar
9.
Margulis, S. A., Cortés, G., Girotto, M. & Durand, M. A Landsat-era Sierra Nevada snow reanalysis (1985–2015). J. Hydrometeorol 17, 1203–1221 (2016).
ADS Article Google Scholar
10.
Fayad, A. et al. Snow hydrology in Mediterranean mountain regions: A review. J. Hydrol. 551, 374–396 (2017).
ADS Article Google Scholar
11.
Nolin, A. W. Recent advances in remote sensing of seasonal snow. J. Glaciol. 56, 1141–1150 (2010).
ADS Article Google Scholar
12.
Hall, D. K., Riggs, G. A., Salomonson, V. V., DiGirolamo, N. E. & Bayr, K. J. MODIS snow-cover products. Remote Sens. Environ. 83, 181–194 (2002).
ADS Article Google Scholar
13.
Frei, A. & Robinson, D. A. Northern Hemisphere snow extent: regional variability 1972-1994. Int. J. Climatol. 26 (1999).
14.
CADWR. California’s three traditionally wettest months end with statewide snowpack water content less than average. https://water.ca.gov/LegacyFiles/news/newsreleases/2016/030116d.pdf (2016).
15.
Waliser, D. et al. Simulating cold season snowpack: Impacts of snow albedo and multi-layer snow physics. Clim. Change 109, 95–117 (2011).
Article Google Scholar
16.
Scott, D. & McBoyle, G. Climate change adaptation in the ski industry. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change 12, 1411–1431 (2007).
Article Google Scholar
17.
Rittger, K., Bair, E. H., Kahl, A. & Dozier, J. Spatial estimates of snow water equivalent from reconstruction. Adv. Water Resour. 94, 345–363 (2016).
ADS Article Google Scholar
18.
Zeng, X., Broxton, P. & Dawson, N. Snowpack change from 1982 to 2016 over conterminous United States. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 12940–12947 (2018).
ADS Google Scholar
19.
Carroll, T. et al. NOHRSC Operations and the simulation of snow cover properties for the coterminous U.S. In Proceedings of the 69th Annual Meeting of the Western Snow Conference 14 https://westernsnowconference.org/sites/westernsnowconference.org/PDFs/2001Carroll.pdf (2001).
20.
Huning, L. S. & Margulis, S. A. Climatology of seasonal snowfall accumulation across the Sierra Nevada (USA): Accumulation rates, distributions, and variability. Water Resour. Res. 53, 6033–6049 (2017).
ADS Article Google Scholar
21.
Huning, L. S. & AghaKouchak, A. Mountain snowpack response to different levels of warming. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115, 10932–10937 (2018).
ADS CAS Article Google Scholar
22.
Wrzesien, M. L. et al. Comparison of methods to estimate snow water equivalent at the mountain range scale: A case study of the California Sierra Nevada. J. Hydrometeorol 18, 1101–1119 (2017).
ADS Article Google Scholar
23.
Mote, P. W., Hamlet, A. F., Clark, M. P. & Lettenmaier, D. P. Declining mountain snowpack in western North American. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 86, 39–50 (2005).
ADS Article Google Scholar
24.
Rice, R., Bales, R. C., Painter, T. H. & Dozier, J. Snow water equivalent along elevation gradients in the Merced and Tuolumne river basins of the Sierra Nevada. Water Resour. Res. 47, W08515 (2011).
ADS Article Google Scholar
25.
Dettinger, M., Redmond, K. & Cayan, D. Winter orographic precipitation ratios in the Sierra Nevada—Large-scale atmospheric circulations and hydrologic consequences. J. Hydrometeorol 5, 1102–1116 (2004).
ADS Article Google Scholar
26.
Lundquist, J. D., Minder, J. R., Neiman, P. J. & Sukovich, E. Relationships between barrier jet heights, orographic precipitation gradients, and streamflow in the northern Sierra Nevada. J. Hydrometeorol 11, 1141–1156 (2010).
ADS Article Google Scholar
27.
Huning, L. S. & Margulis, S. A. Investigating the variability of high-elevation seasonal orographic snowfall enhancement and its drivers across Sierra Nevada, California. J. Hydrometeorol 19, 47–67 (2018).
ADS Article Google Scholar
28.
Huning, L. S., Margulis, S. A., Guan, B., Waliser, D. E. & Neiman, P. J. Implications of detection methods on characterizing atmospheric river contribution to seasonal snowfall across Sierra Nevada, USA. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 10445–10453 (2017).
ADS Article Google Scholar
29.
Huning, L. S., Guan, B., Waliser, D. E. & Lettenmaier, D. P. Sensitivity of seasonal snowfall attribution to atmospheric rivers and their reanalysis-based detection. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 794–803 (2019).
ADS Article Google Scholar
30.
Harpold, A., Dettinger, M. & Rajagopal, S. Defining snow drought and why it matters. Eos 98, (2017).
31.
Guan, B., Molotch, N. P., Waliser, D. E., Fetzer, E. J. & Neiman, P. J. Extreme snowfall events linked to atmospheric rivers and surface air temperature via satellite measurements. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, 12514–12535 (2010).
Article Google Scholar
32.
Guan, B., Waliser, D. E., Ralph, F. M., Fetzer, E. J. & Neiman, P. J. Hydrometeorological characteristics of rain-on-snow events associated with atmospheric rivers. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 2964–2973 (2016).
ADS Article Google Scholar
33.
Hu, J. M. & Nolin, A. W. Snowpack contributions and temperature characterization of landfalling atmospheric rivers in the western cordillera of the United States. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 6663–6672 (2019).
ADS Article Google Scholar
34.
Hu, J. M. & Nolin, A. W. Widespread warming trends in storm temperatures and snowpack fate across the Western United States. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 034059 (2020).
ADS Article Google Scholar
35.
Margulis, S. A. et al. Characterizing the extreme 2015 snowpack deficit in the Sierra Nevada (USA) and the implications for drought recovery. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 6341–6349 (2016).
ADS Article Google Scholar
36.
Mann, H. B. Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica 13, 245–259 (1945).
MathSciNet Article Google Scholar
37.
Mote, P. W., Li, S., Lettenmaier, D. P., Xiao, M. & Engel, R. Dramatic declines in snowpack in the western US. Npj Clim. Atmospheric Sci 1, 2 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
38.
Ragno, E., AghaKouchak, A., Cheng, L. & Sadegh, M. A generalized framework for process-informed nonstationary extreme value analysis. Adv. Water Resour. 130, 270–282 (2019).
ADS Article Google Scholar
39.
Huning, L. S. & AghaKouchak, A. Sierra Nevada (USA) snow water equivalent (SWE) volume time series. Figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5055518 (2020).
40.
Nash, J. E. & Sutcliffe, J. V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 10, 282–290 (1970).
ADS Article Google Scholar
41.
Moriasi, D. N. et al. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans. ASABE 50, 885–900 (2007).
Article Google Scholar
42.
Mao, Y., Nijssen, B. & Lettenmaier, D. P. Is climate change implicated in the 2013-2014 California drought? A hydrologic perspective. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 2805–2813 (2015).
ADS Article Google Scholar
43.
Wang, K. J., Williams, A. P. & Lettenmaier, D. P. How much have California winters warmed over the last century? Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 8893–8900 (2017).
ADS Article Google Scholar
44.
Belmecheri, S., Babst, F., Wahl, E. R., Stahle, D. W. & Trouet, V. Multi-century evaluation of Sierra Nevada snowpack. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 2–3 (2016).
ADS Article Google Scholar
45.
Liang, X., Lettenmaier, D. P., Wood, E. F. & Burges, S. J. A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models. J. Geophys. Res. 99, 14415–14428 (1994).
ADS Article Google Scholar
46.
Holdren, G. C. & Turner, K. Characteristics of Lake Mead, Arizona–Nevada. Lake Reserv. Manag. 26, 230–239 (2010).
CAS Article Google Scholar More
1.
Yao, T. et al. Recent third pole’s rapid warming accompanies cryospheric melt and water cycle intensification and interactions between monsoon and environment: multidisciplinary approach with observations, modeling, and analysis. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 100, 423–444 (2018).
Google Scholar
2.
Armstrong, R. L. et al. Runoff from glacier ice and seasonal snow in High Asia: separating melt water sources in river flow. Reg. Environ. Chang. 19, 1249–1261 (2019).
Google Scholar
3.
Guo, J. et al. Linking atmospheric pollution to cryospheric change in the third pole region: current progresses and future prospects. Natl Sci. Rev. 6, 796–809 (2019).
Google Scholar
4.
Bolch, T. et al. in The Hindu Kush Himalaya Assessment: Mountains, Climate Change, Sustainability and People (eds Wester, P. et al.) 209–255 (Springer, 2019).
5.
Smith, T. & Bookhagen, B. Changes in seasonal snow water equivalent distribution in high mountain Asia (1987 to 2009). Sci. Adv. 4, e1701550 (2018).
Google Scholar
6.
IPCC Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 33 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
7.
Painter, T. H., Seidel, F. C., Bryant, A. C., McKenzie Skiles, S. & Rittger, K. Imaging spectroscopy of albedo and radiative forcing by light-absorbing impurities in mountain snow. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118, 9511–9523 (2013).
Google Scholar
8.
Qian, Y. et al. Light-absorbing particles in snow and ice: measurement and modeling of climatic and hydrological impact. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 32, 64–91 (2015).
CAS Google Scholar
9.
McKenzie Skiles, S. & Painter, T. H. Assessment of radiative forcing by light-absorbing particles in snow from in situ observations with radiative transfer modeling. J. Hydrometeorol. 19, 1397–1409 (2018).
Google Scholar
10.
Qian, Y., Flanner, M. G., Leung, L. R. & Wang, W. Sensitivity studies on the impacts of Tibetan Plateau snowpack pollution on the Asian hydrological cycle and monsoon climate. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 1929–1948 (2011).
CAS Google Scholar
11.
Gautam, R., Hsu, N. C., Lau, W. K. M. & Yasunari, T. J. Satellite observations of desert dust-induced Himalayan snow darkening. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 988–993 (2013).
Google Scholar
12.
Yasunari, T. J. et al. Estimated range of black carbon dry deposition and the related snow albedo reduction over Himalayan glaciers during dry pre-monsoon periods. Atmos. Environ. 78, 259–267 (2013).
CAS Google Scholar
13.
Nair, V. S. et al. Black carbon aerosols over the Himalayas: direct and surface albedo forcing. Tellus B Chem. Phys. Meteorol. 65, 19738 (2013).
Google Scholar
14.
Ménégoz, M. et al. Snow cover sensitivity to black carbon deposition in the Himalayas: from atmospheric and ice core measurements to regional climate simulations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 4237–4249 (2014).
Google Scholar
15.
Ming, J. et al. Black carbon record based on a shallow Himalayan ice core and its climatic implications. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8, 1343–1352 (2008).
CAS Google Scholar
16.
Usha, K. H., Nair, V. S. & Babu, S. S. Modeling of aerosol induced snow albedo feedbacks over the Himalayas and its implications on regional climate. Clim. Dyn. 54, 4191–4210 (2020).
Google Scholar
17.
Sarangi, C. et al. Impact of light-absorbing particles on snow albedo darkening and associated radiative forcing over high-mountain Asia: high-resolution WRF-Chem modeling and new satellite observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 7105–7128 (2019).
CAS Google Scholar
18.
Svensson, J. et al. Light-absorption of dust and elemental carbon in snow in the Indian Himalayas and the Finnish Arctic. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 11, 1403–1416 (2018).
CAS Google Scholar
19.
Kaspari, S., Painter, T. H., Gysel, M., Skiles, S. M. & Schwikowski, M. Seasonal and elevational variations of black carbon and dust in snow and ice in the Solu-Khumbu, Nepal and estimated radiative forcings. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 8089–8103 (2014).
Google Scholar
20.
Bonasoni, P. et al. Atmospheric brown clouds in the Himalayas: first two years of continuous observations at the Nepal Climate Observatory-Pyramid (5079 m). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 7515–7531 (2010).
CAS Google Scholar
21.
Vaishya, A. et al. Large contrast in the vertical distribution of aerosol optical properties and radiative effects across the Indo-Gangetic Plain during the SWAAMI–RAWEX campaign. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18, 17669–17685 (2018).
CAS Google Scholar
22.
Sarangi, C., Tripathi, S. N., Mishra, A. K., Goel, A. & Welton, E. J. Elevated aerosol layers and their radiative impact over Kanpur during monsoon onset period. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 121, 7936-7957 (2016).
23.
Gautam, R., Hsu, N. C. & Lau, K.-M. Premonsoon aerosol characterization and radiative effects over the Indo-Gangetic Plains: implications for regional climate warming. J. Geophys. Res.—Atmos. 115, D17208 (2010).
Google Scholar
24.
Mishra, A. K. & Shibata, T. Climatological aspects of seasonal variation of aerosol vertical distribution over central Indo-Gangetic belt (IGB) inferred by the space-borne lidar CALIOP. Atmos. Environ. 46, 365–375 (2012).
CAS Google Scholar
25.
Liu, Z. et al. Airborne dust distributions over the Tibetan Plateau and surrounding areas derived from the first year of CALIPSO lidar observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8, 5045–5060 (2008).
CAS Google Scholar
26.
Das, S., Dey, S., Dash, S. K. & Basil, G. Examining mineral dust transport over the Indian subcontinent using the regional climate model, RegCM4.1. Atmos. Res. 134, 64–76 (2013).
CAS Google Scholar
27.
Warren, S. G. & Wiscombe, W. J. A model for the spectral albedo of snow. II: snow containing atmospheric aerosols. J. Atmos. Sci. 37, 2734–2745 (1980).
Google Scholar
28.
Warren, S. G. Optical properties of snow. Rev. Geophys. 20, 67–89 (1982).
Google Scholar
29.
Dang, C., Fu, Q. & Warren, S. G. Effect of snow grain shape on snow albedo. J. Atmos. Sci. 73, 3573–3583 (2016).
Google Scholar
30.
Hansen, J. & Nazarenko, L. Soot climate forcing via snow and ice albedos. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 423–428 (2004).
CAS Google Scholar
31.
Painter, T. H. et al. Response of Colorado River runoff to dust radiative forcing in snow. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 17125–17130 (2010).
CAS Google Scholar
32.
Skiles, S. M., Painter, T. H., Deems, J. S., Bryant, A. C. & Landry, C. C. Dust radiative forcing in snow of the Upper Colorado River Basin: 2. Interannual variability in radiative forcing and snowmelt rates. Water Resour. Res. 48, W07522 (2012).
Google Scholar
33.
Skiles, S. M. K. & Painter, T. Daily evolution in dust and black carbon content, snow grain size, and snow albedo during snowmelt, Rocky Mountains, Colorado. J. Glaciol. 63, 118–132 (2017).
Google Scholar
34.
Di Mauro, B. et al. Mineral dust impact on snow radiative properties in the European Alps combining ground, UAV, and satellite observations. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 120, 6080–6097 (2015).
Google Scholar
35.
Dumont, M. et al. In situ continuous visible and near-infrared spectroscopy of an alpine snowpack. Cryosph. 11, 1091–1110 (2017).
Google Scholar
36.
Huang, J. et al. Dust and black carbon in seasonal snow across northern China. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 92, 175–181 (2010).
Google Scholar
37.
Wang, X. et al. Observations and model simulations of snow albedo reduction in seasonal snow due to insoluble light-absorbing particles during 2014 Chinese survey. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17, 2279–2296 (2017).
CAS Google Scholar
38.
Zhang, Y. et al. Black carbon and mineral dust in snow cover on the Tibetan Plateau. Cryosph. 12, 413–431 (2018).
Google Scholar
39.
Warren, S. G. Can black carbon in snow be detected by remote sensing? J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118, 779–786 (2013).
CAS Google Scholar
40.
Flanner, M. G., Zender, C. S., Randerson, J. T. & Rasch, P. J. Present-day climate forcing and response from black carbon in snow. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 112, D11202 (2007).
Google Scholar
41.
Doherty, S. J. et al. Observed vertical redistribution of black carbon and other insoluble light-absorbing particles in melting snow. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118, 5553–5569 (2013).
Google Scholar
42.
Painter, T. H., Bryant, A. C. & McKenzie Skiles, S. Radiative forcing by light absorbing impurities in snow from MODIS surface reflectance data. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L17502 (2012).
Google Scholar
43.
Hadley, O. L. & Kirchstetter, T. W. Black-carbon reduction of snow albedo. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2, 437–440 (2012).
CAS Google Scholar
44.
Brun, F., Berthier, E., Wagnon, P., Kääb, A. & Treichler, D. A spatially resolved estimate of High Mountain Asia glacier mass balances from 2000 to 2016. Nat. Geosci. 10, 668 (2017).
CAS Google Scholar
45.
Zhao, H., Yang, W., Yao, T., Tian, L. & Xu, B. Dramatic mass loss in extreme high-elevation areas of a western Himalayan glacier: observations and modeling. Sci. Rep. 6, 30706 (2016).
CAS Google Scholar
46.
Ji, Z. M. Modeling black carbon and its potential radiative effects over the Tibetan Plateau. Adv. Clim. Chang. Res. 7, 139–144 (2016).
Google Scholar
47.
Xu, J. et al. The melting Himalayas: cascading effects of climate change on water, biodiversity, and livelihoods. Conserv. Biol. 23, 520–530 (2009).
CAS Google Scholar
48.
Ghatak, D., Sinsky, E. & Miller, J. Role of snow-albedo feedback in higher elevation warming over the Himalayas, Tibetan Plateau and Central Asia. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 114008 (2014).
49.
Bormann, K. J., Brown, R. D., Derksen, C. & Painter, T. H. Estimating snow-cover trends from space. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 924–928 (2018).
Google Scholar
50.
Ming, J., Xiao, C., Du, Z. & Yang, X. An overview of black carbon deposition in High Asia glaciers and its impacts on radiation balance. Adv. Water Resour. 55, 80–87 (2013).
CAS Google Scholar
51.
Painter, T. H. et al. Retrieval of subpixel snow covered area, grain size, and albedo from MODIS. Remote Sens. Environ. 113, 868–879 (2009).
Google Scholar
52.
Rittger, K., Painter, T. H. & Dozier, J. Assessment of methods for mapping snow cover from MODIS. Adv. Water Resour. 51, 367–380 (2013).
Google Scholar
53.
Dozier, J., Painter, T. H., Rittger, K. & Frew, J. E. Time–space continuity of daily maps of fractional snow cover and albedo from MODIS. Adv. Water Resour. 31, 1515–1526 (2008).
Google Scholar
54.
Rittger, K., Bair, E. H., Kahl, A. & Dozier, J. Spatial estimates of snow water equivalent from reconstruction. Adv. Water Resour. 94, 345–363 (2016).
Google Scholar
55.
Chand, D. et al. Quantifying above-cloud aerosol using spaceborne lidar for improved understanding of cloudy-sky direct climate forcing. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 113, D13206 (2008).
Google Scholar
56.
Winker, D. M. et al. The CALIPSO mission. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 91, 1211–1230 (2010).
Google Scholar
57.
Gelaro, R. et al. The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, version 2 (MERRA-2). J. Clim. 30, 5419–5454 (2017).
Google Scholar
58.
Molod, A., Takacs, L., Suarez, M. & Bacmeister, J. Development of the GEOS-5 atmospheric general circulation model: evolution from MERRA to MERRA2. Geosci. Model Dev. 8, 1339–1356 (2015).
Google Scholar
59.
Buchard, V. et al. Using the OMI aerosol index and absorption aerosol optical depth to evaluate the NASA MERRA Aerosol Reanalysis. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15, 5743–5760 (2015).
CAS Google Scholar
60.
Derber, J. C., Parrish, D. F. & Lord, S. J. The New Global Operational Analysis System at the National Meteorological Center. Weather Forecast. 6, 538–547 (1991).
Google Scholar
61.
Herman, J. R. et al. Global distribution of UV-absorbing aerosols from Nimbus 7/TOMS data. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 102, 16911–16922 (1997).
CAS Google Scholar
62.
Huang, J., Ge, J. & Weng, F. Detection of Asia dust storms using multisensor satellite measurements. Remote Sens. Environ. 110, 186–191 (2007).
Google Scholar
63.
Sun, H., Liu, X. & Pan, Z. Direct radiative effects of dust aerosols emitted from the Tibetan Plateau on the East Asian summer monsoon—a regional climate model simulation. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17, 13731–13745 (2017).
CAS Google Scholar
64.
Zaveri, R. A., Easter, R. C., Fast, J. D. & Peters, L. K. Model for simulating aerosol interactions and chemistry (MOSAIC). J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 113, D13204 (2008).
Google Scholar
65.
Flanner, M. G., Liu, X., Zhou, C., Penner, J. E. & Jiao, C. Enhanced solar energy absorption by internally-mixed black carbon in snow grains. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 4699–4721 (2012).
CAS Google Scholar
66.
Zhao, C. et al. Simulating black carbon and dust and their radiative forcing in seasonal snow: a case study over North China with field campaign measurements. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 11475–11491 (2014).
Google Scholar More
1.
Phillip, W. A. & Elimelech, M. The future of seawater desalination: energy, technology, and the environment. Science 333, 712–717 (2011).
Article Google Scholar
2.
Mauter, M. S. et al. The role of nanotechnology in tackling global water challenges. Nat. Sustain. 1, 166–175 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
3.
Stevens, D. M., Shu, J. Y., Reichert, M. & Roy, A. Next-generation nanoporous materials: progress and prospects for reverse osmosis and nanofiltration. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 56, 10526–10551 (2017).
CAS Article Google Scholar
4.
Werber, J. R., Osuji, C. O. & Elimelech, M. Materials for next-generation desalination and water purification membranes. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16018–16025 (2016).
CAS Article Google Scholar
5.
Qasim, M., Badrelzaman, M., Darwish, N. N., Darwish, N. A. & Hilal, N. Reverse osmosis desalination: a state-of-the-art review. Desalination 459, 59–104 (2019).
CAS Article Google Scholar
6.
Chowdhury, M. R., Steffes, J., Huey, B. D. & McCutcheon, J. R. 3D printed polyamide membranes for desalination. Science 361, 682–686 (2018).
CAS Article Google Scholar
7.
Gohil, J. M. & Suresh, A. K. Chlorine attack on reverse osmosis membranes: mechanisms and mitigation strategies. J. Membr. Sci. 541, 108–126 (2017).
CAS Article Google Scholar
8.
Verbeke, R., Gómez, V. & Vankelecom, I. F. J. Chlorine-resistance of reverse osmosis (RO) polyamide membranes. Prog. Polym. Sci. 72, 1–15 (2017).
CAS Article Google Scholar
9.
Stolov, M. & Freger, V. Degradation of polyamide membranes exposed to chlorine: an impedance spectroscopy study. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 2618–2625 (2019).
CAS Article Google Scholar
10.
Do, V. T., Tang, C. Y., Reinhard, M. & Leckie, J. O. Effects of chlorine exposure conditions on physiochemical properties and performance of a polyamide membrane-mechanisms and implications. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 13184–13192 (2012).
CAS Article Google Scholar
11.
Glater, J., Hong, N. & Elimelech, M. The search for a chlorine-resistant reverse osmosis membrane. Desalination 95, 325–345 (1994).
CAS Article Google Scholar
12.
Werber, J. R., Deshmukh, A. & Elimelech, M. The critical need for increased selectivity, not increased water permeability, for desalination membranes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 3, 112–120 (2016).
CAS Article Google Scholar
13.
Tanugi, D. C., McGovern, R. K., Dave, S. H., Lienhard, J. H. & Grossman, J. C. Quantifying the potential of ultra-permeable membranes for water desalination. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 1134–1141 (2014).
Article Google Scholar
14.
Yao, Y. et al. Toward enhancing the chlorine resistance of reverse osmosis membranes: an effective strategy via an end-capping technology. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 1296–1304 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
15.
Hu, J., Pu, Y., Ueda, M., Zhang, X. & Wang, L. Charge-aggregate induced (CAI) reverse osmosis membrane for seawater desalination and boron removal. J. Membr. Sci. 520, 1–7 (2016).
CAS Article Google Scholar
16.
Yao, Y. et al. A novel sulfonated reverse osmosis membrane for seawater desalination: Experimental and molecular dynamics studies. J. Membr. Sci. 550, 470–479 (2018).
CAS Article Google Scholar
17.
Zheng, J. et al. Reverse osmosis membrane with enhanced permselectivity for brackish water desalination. J. Membr. Sci. 565, 104–111 (2018).
CAS Article Google Scholar
18.
Cheremisinoff, N. P. Condensed Encyclopedia of Polymer Engineering Terms (Butterworth–Heinemann, 2001).
19.
Wu, D., Chen, F., Li, R. & Shi, Y. Reaction kinetics and simulations for solid-state polymerization of poly(ethylene terephthalate). Macromolecules 30, 6737–6742 (1997).
CAS Article Google Scholar
20.
Krevelen, D. W. V. & Nijenhuis, K. T. in Properties of Polymers: Their Correlation with Chemical Structure; their Numerical Estimation and Prediction from Additive Group Contributions Ch. 7 (Elsevier, 2009).
21.
Lide, D. R. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (CRC Press, 2010).
22.
Kuang, J. et al. Ozonation of trimethoprim in aqueous solution: identification of reaction products and their toxicity. Water Res. 47, 2863–2872 (2013).
CAS Google Scholar
23.
Miao, H. F. et al. Degradation of phenazone in aqueous solution with ozone: influencing factors and degradation pathways. Chemosphere 119, 326–333 (2015).
CAS Google Scholar
24.
Park, H., Vecitis, C. D. & Hoffmann, M. R. Electrochemical water splitting coupled with organic compound oxidation: the role of active chlorine species. J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 7935–7945 (2009).
CAS Google Scholar
25.
Jimenez-Solomon, M., Song, Q., Jelfs, K., Munoz-Ibanez, M. & Livingston, A. G. Polymer nanofilms with enhanced microporosity by interfacial polymerization. Nat. Mater. 15, 760–767 (2016).
CAS Google Scholar
26.
Antony, A., Fudianto, R. & Cox, S. Assessing the oxidative degradation of polyamide reverse osmosis membrane—accelerated ageing with hypochlorite exposure. J. Membr. Sci. 347, 159–164 (2010).
CAS Google Scholar
27.
Huang, K. et al. Reactivity of the polyamide membrane monomer with free chlorine: reaction kinetics, mechanisms, and the role of chloride. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 8167–8176 (2019).
CAS Article Google Scholar
28.
Do, V. T., Tang, C. Y., Reinhard, M. & Leckie, J. O. Degradation of polyamide nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes by hypochlorite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 852–859 (2012).
CAS Article Google Scholar
29.
Xu, G. R., Wang, J. N. & Li, C. J. Strategies for improving the performance of the polyamide thin film composite (PA-TFC) reverse osmosis (RO) membranes: surface modifications and nanoparticles incorporations. Desalination 328, 83–100 (2013).
CAS Article Google Scholar
30.
Asadollahi, M., Bastani, D. & Musavi, S. A. Enhancement of surface properties and performance of reverse osmosis membranes after surface modification: a review. Desalination 420, 330–383 (2017).
CAS Article Google Scholar
31.
Park, H., Freeman, B. D., Zhang, Z., Sankir, M. & McGrath, J. E. Highly chlorine-tolerant polymers for desalination. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 6019–6024 (2008).
CAS Article Google Scholar
32.
Law, S. K. A., Minich, T. M. & Levine, R. P. Covalent binding efficiency of the third and fourth complement proteins in relation to pH, nucleophilicity, and availability of hydroxyl groups. Biochemistry 23, 3267–3272 (1984).
CAS Article Google Scholar
33.
FILMTECTMReverse Osmosis Membranes Technical Manual Form No.45-D01696-en, Rev. 4, 2020; Cleaning procedures for FilmTec™ FT30 Elements (Dow, 2020); https://www.dupont.com/products/filmtecsw302514.html
34.
She, Q., Wang, R., Fane, A. G. & Tang, C. Y. Membrane fouling in osmotically driven membrane processes: a review. J. Membr. Sci. 499, 201–233 (2016).
CAS Article Google Scholar More
These authors contributed equally: Delphis F. Levia, Irena F. Creed.
Department of Geography and Spatial Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA
Delphis F. Levia, Janice E. Hudson & Sean A. Hudson
School of Environment and Sustainability, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Irena F. Creed
School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
David M. Hannah
Department of Disaster Prevention, Meteorology and Hydrology, Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, Tsukuba, Japan
Kazuki Nanko & Shin’ichi Iida
Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
Elizabeth W. Boyer
Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, British Columbia, Canada
Darryl E. Carlyle-Moses
Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
Nick van de Giesen
Office of the Chancellor, University of Michigan- Dearborn, Dearborn, MI, USA
Domenico Grasso
Picker Engineering Program, Smith College, Northampton, MA, USA
Andrew J. Guswa
Department of Earth System Science, Woods Institute for the Environment, and Precourt Institute for Energy, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Robert B. Jackson
Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
Gabriel G. Katul
Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Tomo’omi Kumagai
Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research (IDAEA-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
Pilar Llorens
Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA
Flavio Lopes Ribeiro
School of Biological Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Diane E. Pataki
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
Catherine A. Peters
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA
Daniel Sanchez Carretero
Department of Biological and Ecological Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA
John S. Selker
Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Berlin, Germany
Doerthe Tetzlaff
European Regional Center for Ecohydrology, UNESCO and Department of Applied Ecology, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
Maciej Zalewski
UCD School of Civil Engineering, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Michael Bruen More
1.
Díaz, S. et al. Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science 366, eaax3100 (2019).
Google Scholar
2.
At the human-forest interface. Nat. Commun. 9, 1153 (2018).
3.
Melo, F. P. L., Arroyo-Rodríguez, V., Fahrig, L., Martínez-Ramos, M. & Tabarelli, M. On the hope for biodiversity-friendly tropical landscapes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 462–468 (2013).
Google Scholar
4.
Arroyo‐Rodríguez, V. et al. Designing optimal human-modified landscapes for forest biodiversity conservation. Ecol. Lett. 23, 1404–1420 (2020).
Google Scholar
5.
Castañeda, A. et al. A new profile of the global poor. World Dev. 101, 250–267 (2018).
Google Scholar
6.
DeFries, R. & Nagendra, H. Ecosystem management as a wicked problem. Science 356, 265–270 (2017).
CAS Google Scholar
7.
Brancalion, P. H. S. et al. Global restoration opportunities in tropical rainforest landscapes. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav3223 (2019).
Google Scholar
8.
Meli, P. et al. Four approaches to guide ecological restoration in Latin America. Restor. Ecol. 25, 156–163 (2017).
Google Scholar
9.
Robertson, M., Nichols, P., Horwitz, P., Bradby, K. & MacKintosh, D. Environmental narratives and the need for multiple perspectives to restore degraded landscapes in Australia. Ecosyst. Health 6, 119–133 (2000).
CAS Google Scholar
10.
Banks-Leite, C. et al. Using ecological thresholds to evaluate the costs and benefits of set-asides in a biodiversity hotspot. Science 345, 1041–1045 (2014).
CAS Google Scholar
11.
Strassburg, B. B. N. et al. Strategic approaches to restoring ecosystems can triple conservation gains and halve costs. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 62–70 (2019).
Google Scholar
12.
Brancalion, P. H. S. et al. What makes ecosystem restoration expensive? A systematic cost assessment of projects in Brazil. Biol. Conserv. 240, 108274 (2019).
Google Scholar
13.
Simpson, G. B. & Jewitt, G. P. W. The development of the water-energy-food nexus as a framework for achieving resource security: a review. Front. Environ. Sci. 7, 8 (2019).
Google Scholar
14.
Biggs, E. M. et al. Sustainable development and the water–energy–food nexus: a perspective on livelihoods. Environ. Sci. Policy 54, 389–397 (2015).
Google Scholar
15.
Hoff, H. Understanding the Nexus: Background Paper for the Bonn2011 Nexus Conference (Stockholm Environment Institute, 2011).
16.
Bazilian, M. et al. Considering the energy, water and food nexus: towards an integrated modelling approach. Energy Policy 39, 7896–7906 (2011).
Google Scholar
17.
Liu, J. et al. Nexus approaches to global sustainable development. Nat. Sustain. 1, 466–476 (2018).
Google Scholar
18.
Ibisch, R. B., Bogardi, J. J. & Borchardt, D. in Integrated Water Resources Management: Concept, Research and Implementation (eds Borchardt, D. et al.) 3–32 (Springer, 2016).
19.
Díaz, S. et al. Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science 359, 270–272 (2018).
Google Scholar
20.
Ribot, J. C. & Peluso, N. L. A Theory of Access*. Rural Sociol. 68, 153–181 (2003).
Google Scholar
21.
Voluntary Guidelines for Agro-Environmental Policies in Latin Amrica and The Caribbean (FAO, 2018).
22.
Pradhan, P., Costa, L., Rybski, D., Lucht, W. & Kropp, J. P. A systematic study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) interactions. Earth’s Future 5, 1169–1179 (2017).
Google Scholar
23.
Cole, L. E. S., Bhagwat, S. A. & Willis, K. J. Recovery and resilience of tropical forests after disturbance. Nat. Commun. 5, 3906 (2014).
CAS Google Scholar
24.
Chazdon, R. & Brancalion, P. Restoring forests as a means to many ends. Science 365, 24–25 (2019).
CAS Google Scholar
25.
Protecting and Restoring Forests: A Story of Large Commitments yet Limited Progress. New York Declaration on Forests Five-Year Assessment Report (NYDF Assessment Partners, 2019).
26.
Holl, K. D. & Brancalion, P. H. S. Tree planting is not a simple solution. Science 368, 580–581 (2020).
CAS Google Scholar
27.
Albrecht, T. R., Crootof, A. & Scott, C. A. The water-energy-food nexus: a systematic review of methods for nexus assessment. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 043002 (2018).
Google Scholar
28.
Townsend, P. V. et al. Multiple environmental services as an opportunity for watershed restoration. For. Policy Econ. 17, 45–58 (2012).
Google Scholar
29.
Vörösmarty, C. J. et al. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467, 555–561 (2010).
Google Scholar
30.
van Noordwijk, M. Integrated natural resource management as pathway to poverty reduction: innovating practices, institutions and policies. Agric. Syst. 172, 60–71 (2019).
Google Scholar
31.
Moreno-Mateos, D. et al. Anthropogenic ecosystem disturbance and the recovery debt. Nat. Commun. 8, 14163 (2017).
CAS Google Scholar
32.
Brancalion, P. H. S. et al. A critical analysis of the Native Vegetation Protection Law of Brazil (2012): updates and ongoing initiatives. Nat. Conserv. 14, 1–15 (2016).
Google Scholar
33.
Soares-Filho, B. et al. Cracking Brazil’s Forest Code. Science 344, 363–364 (2014).
CAS Google Scholar
34.
Pires, A. P. F., Rezende, C. L., Assad, E. D., Loyola, R. & Scarano, F. R. Forest restoration can increase the Rio Doce watershed resilience. Perspect. Ecol. Conserv. 15, 187–193 (2017).
Google Scholar
35.
Filoso, S., Bezerra, M. O., Weiss, K. C. B. & Palmer, M. A. Impacts of forest restoration on water yield: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 12, e0183210 (2017).
Google Scholar
36.
Ellison, D. et al. Trees, forests and water: cool insights for a hot world. Glob. Environ. Change 43, 51–61 (2017).
Google Scholar
37.
van der Ent, R. J., Savenije, H. H. G., Schaefli, B. & Steele‐Dunne, S. C. Origin and fate of atmospheric moisture over continents. Water Resour. Res. 46, W09525 (2010).
Google Scholar
38.
Sheil, D. Forests, atmospheric water and an uncertain future: the new biology of the global water cycle. For. Ecosyst. 5, 19 (2018).
Google Scholar
39.
Karabulut, A. et al. Mapping water provisioning services to support the ecosystem-water-food-energy nexus in the Danube river basin. Ecosyst. Serv. 17, 278–292 (2016).
Google Scholar
40.
Richards, R. C. et al. Governing a pioneer program on payment for watershed services: stakeholder involvement, legal frameworks and early lessons from the Atlantic forest of Brazil. Ecosyst. Serv. 16, 23–32 (2015).
Google Scholar
41.
Vincent, J. R. et al. Valuing water purification by forests: an analysis of Malaysian panel data. Environ. Resour. Econ. 64, 59–80 (2016).
Google Scholar
42.
Brancalion, P., Viani, R., Strassburg, B. & Rodrigues, R. Finding the money for tropical forest restoration. Unasylva 239, 41–50 (2012).
Google Scholar
43.
Zemp, D. C. et al. On the importance of cascading moisture recycling in South America. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 13337–13359 (2014).
CAS Google Scholar
44.
Energy Access Outlook: From Poverty to Prosperity (International Energy Agency, 2017).
45.
Specht, M. J., Pinto, S. R. R., Albuquerque, U. P., Tabarelli, M. & Melo, F. P. L. Burning biodiversity: fuelwood harvesting causes forest degradation in human-dominated tropical landscapes. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 3, 200–209 (2015).
Google Scholar
46.
The State of the World’s Forests 2018 – Forest Pathways to Sustainable Development (FAO, 2018).
47.
Review of Woodfuel Biomass Production and Utilization in Africa: A Desk Study (United Nations Environment Programme, 2019).
48.
Forests and Energy (FAO, 2017); https://go.nature.com/3aI4LYZ
49.
Arias, M. E., Cochrane, T. A., Lawrence, K. S., Killeen, T. J. & Farrell, T. A. Paying the forest for electricity: a modelling framework to market forest conservation as payment for ecosystem services benefiting hydropower generation. Environ. Conserv. 38, 473–484 (2011).
Google Scholar
50.
Moomaw, W. R., Law, B. E. & Goetz, S. J. Focus on the role of forests and soils in meeting climate change mitigation goals: summary. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 045009 (2020).
Google Scholar
51.
Tesfaye, M. A. et al. Selection of tree species and soil management for simultaneous fuelwood production and soil rehabilitation in the Ethiopian Central highlands. Land Degrad. Dev. 26, 665–679 (2015).
Google Scholar
52.
Beddington, J. Food security: contributions from science to a new and greener revolution. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 365, 61–71 (2010).
Google Scholar
53.
van Noordwijk, M. et al. SDG synergy between agriculture and forestry in the food, energy, water and income nexus: reinventing agroforestry? Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 34, 33–42 (2018).
Google Scholar
54.
Vieira, D. L. M., Holl, K. D. & Peneireiro, F. M. Agro-successional restoration as a strategy to facilitate Tropical Forest recovery. Restor. Ecol 17, 451–459 (2009).
Google Scholar
55.
Dainese, M. et al. A global synthesis reveals biodiversity-mediated benefits for crop production. Sci. Adv. 5, eaax0121 (2019).
Google Scholar
56.
Biggs, R. et al. Toward principles for enhancing the resilience of ecosystem services. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 37, 421–448 (2012).
Google Scholar
57.
Munang, R. T., Thiaw, I. & Rivington, M. Ecosystem management: tomorrow’s approach to enhancing food security under a changing climate. Sustainability 3, 937–954 (2011).
Google Scholar
58.
de Souza, S. E. X. F., Vidal, E., Chagas, Gd. F., Elgar, A. T. & Brancalion, P. H. S. Ecological outcomes and livelihood benefits of community-managed agroforests and second growth forests in Southeast Brazil. Biotropica 48, 868–881 (2016).
Google Scholar
59.
Cawthorn, D. M. & Hoffman, L. C. The bushmeat and food security nexus: a global account of the contributions, conundrums and ethical collisions. Food Res. Int. 76, 906–925 (2015).
Google Scholar
60.
Parry, L., Barlow, J. & Peres, C. A. Hunting for sustainability in tropical secondary forests. Conserv. Biol. 23, 1270–1280 (2009).
Google Scholar
61.
Mbiba, M., Muvengwi, J. & Ndaimani, H. Environmental correlates of livestock depredation by spotted hyaenas and livestock herding practices in a semi-arid communal landscape. Afr. J. Ecol. 56, 984–992 (2018).
Google Scholar
62.
Calle, A. Partnering with cattle ranchers for forest landscape restoration. Ambio 49, 593–604 (2020).
Google Scholar
63.
Woolf, D., Solomon, D. & Lehmann, J. Land restoration in food security programmes: synergies with climate change mitigation. Clim. Policy 18, 1260–1270 (2018).
Google Scholar
64.
Miccolis, A., Peneireiro, F. M., Vieira, D. L. M., Marques, H. R. & Hoffmann, M. R. M. Restoration through agroforestry: options for reconciling livelihoods with onservation in the Cerrado and Caatinga biomes in Brazil. Exp. Agric. 55, 208–225 (2019).
Google Scholar
65.
Araujo, M. et al. The socio-ecological Nexus+ approach used by the Brazilian Research Network on Global Climate Change. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 39, 62–70 (2019).
Google Scholar
66.
Bastin, J.-F. et al. The global tree restoration potential. Science 365, 76–79 (2019).
CAS Google Scholar
67.
Latawiec, A. E., Strassburg, B. B., Brancalion, P. H., Rodrigues, R. R. & Gardner, T. Creating space for large-scale restoration in tropical agricultural landscapes. Front. Ecol. Environ. 13, 211–218 (2015).
Google Scholar
68.
Chazdon, R. L. et al. A policy-driven knowledge agenda for global forest and landscape restoration. Conserv. Lett. 10, 125–132 (2017).
Google Scholar
69.
Possingham, H. P., Bode, M. & Klein, C. J. Optimal conservation outcomes require both restoration and protection. PLoS Biol. 13, e1002052 (2015).
Google Scholar
70.
Suding, K. et al. Committing to ecological restoration. Science 348, 638–640 (2015).
CAS Google Scholar
71.
Calmon, M. et al. Emerging threats and opportunities for large-scale ecological restoration in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Restor. Ecol. 19, 154–158 (2011).
Google Scholar
72.
Adams, C., Rodrigues, S. T., Calmon, M. & Kumar, C. Impacts of large-scale forest restoration on socioeconomic status and local livelihoods: what we know and do not know. Biotropica 48, 731–744 (2016).
Google Scholar
73.
Andersson, K. & Agrawal, A. Inequalities, institutions, and forest commons. Glob. Environ. Change 21, 866–875 (2011).
Google Scholar
74.
Galabuzi, C. et al. Strategies for empowering the local people to participate in forest restoration. Agrofor. Syst. 88, 719–734 (2014).
Google Scholar
75.
Terrapon-Pfaff, J., Ortiz, W., Dienst, C. & Groene, M.-C. Energising the WEF nexus to enhance sustainable development at local level It. J. Environ. Manag. 223, 409–416 (2018).
Google Scholar
76.
Van Laerhoven, F. Governing community forests and the challenge of solving two-level collective action dilemmas: a large-N perspective. Glob. Environ. Change 20, 539–546 (2010).
Google Scholar
77.
Rizvi, A. R. Nature Based Solutions for Human Resilience (IUCN, 2014).
78.
Cohen-Shacham, E., Janzen, C., Maginnis, S. & Walters, G. Nature-Based Solutions to Address Global Societal Challenges (IUCN, 2016); https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2016.13.en
79.
Keesstra, S. et al. The superior effect of nature based solutions in land management for enhancing ecosystem services. Sci.Total Environ. 610–611, 997–1009 (2018).
Google Scholar
80.
Peluso, N. L. & Vandergeest, P. Writing political forests. Antipode 52, 1083–1103 (2020).
Google Scholar
81.
Chazdon, R. L., Gutierrez, V., Brancalion, P. H. S., Laestadius, L. & Guariguata, M. R. Co-creating conceptual and working frameworks for implementing forest and landscape restoration based on core principles. Forests 11, 706 (2020).
Google Scholar
82.
Barrow, E. 300,000 hectares restored in Shinyanga, Tanzania — but what did it really take to achieve this restoration? SAPIENS 7, 1–8 (2014).
Google Scholar
83.
Reij, C. & Garrity, D. Scaling up farmer-managed natural regeneration in Africa to restore degraded landscapes. Biotropica 48, 834–843 (2016).
Google Scholar
84.
Paudyal, K., Baral, H., Lowell, K. & Keenan, R. J. Ecosystem services from community-based forestry in Nepal: realising local and global benefits. Land Use Policy 63, 342–355 (2017).
Google Scholar
85.
Viani, R. A. G., Braga, D. P. P., Ribeiro, M. C., Pereira, P. H. & Brancalion, P. H. S. Synergism between payments for water-related ecosystem services, ecological restoration, and Landscape Connectivity Within the Atlantic Forest hotspot. Trop. Conserv. Sci. 11, https://doi.org/10.1177/1940082918790222 (2018). More
This research was supported by a Global Water Futures grant to G.F. and J.C.M. and an NSERC Discovery Grant to G.F. J.C.M acknowledges funding received as a Fellow of the CIFAR Earth4D Subsurface Science and Exploration Program. M.O.C. acknowledges support under an Independent Research Fellowship from the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC; NE/P017819/1). This commentary benefitted from discussions with P. Döll, J. Famiglietti, G. Fogg, X. Huggins, A. Manning, K. Markovich and M. Rohde. More
A few missing months (March to July 2013) in the Santa river record in Peru were infilled using the corresponding long-term monthly means. If necessary, missing months in the Chilean and Argentinean river records were infilled with a weighted average of monthly values from highly correlated stations within the same river basin (for details see Masiokas et al. 2019).”
In Supplementary Table 3, there were errors in the data for the Baker basin; the gauging station used should have been Bajo Ñadis instead of Desagüe Lago Bertrand, which affected the values of the annual mean river runoff, sub-period runoff change and the glacier imbalance contribution. For the annual mean river runoff (m3 s−1), 649.2 and 568.7 should have been 922.8 and 975.9, respectively; for the sub-period runoff change (%), −12 should have been 6; and for the glacier imbalance contribution (%), 3 and 5 should have been 2 and 3, respectively. Related to this, in the sentence beginning “The two Patagonian basins…” in the final paragraph of the section “Influence of glacier mass loss on river runoff” in the main text of the Article, “3 to 5%” should have been “2 to 3%”. Furthermore, in Supplementary Table 3, “Condorecerro” should have read “Condorcerro”.
The online versions of the Article have been amended and the Supplementary Information file replaced. More
