Philippa Kaur

Cairney, J. W. G. & Bastias, B. A. Influences of fire on forest soil fungal communities. Can. J. For. Res. 37, 207–215 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fernández, C., Vega, J. A. & Fonturbel, T. The effects of fuel reduction treatments on runoff, infiltration and erosion in two shrubland areas in the north of Spain. J. Environ. Manage. 105, 96–102 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Reazin, C., Morris, S., Smith, J. E., Cowan, A. D. & Jumpponen, A. Fires of differing intensities rapidly select distinct soil fungal communities in a Northwest US ponderosa pine forest ecosystem. For. Ecol. Manage. 377, 118–127 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Durán-Manual, F. et al. Prescribed burning in Pinus cubensis-dominated tropical natural forests: A myco-friendly fire-prevention tool. For. Syst. 31, e012 (2022).
Google Scholar 
Busse, M. D., Hubbert, K. R., Fiddler, G. O., Shestak, C. J. & Powers, R. F. Lethal soil temperatures during burning of masticated forest residues. Int. J. Wildl. Fire 14, 267–276 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Frazão, D. F. et al. Cistus ladanifer (Cistaceae): A natural resource in Mediterranean-type ecosystems. Planta 247, 289–300 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Keeley, J. E., Bond, W. J., Bradstock, R. A., Pausas, J. G. & Rundel, P. W. Fire in mediterranean ecosystems. Fire Medit. Ecosyst. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139033091 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Louro, R., Peixe, A. & Santos-silva, C. New insights on Cistus salviifolius L. micropropagation. J. Bot. Sci. 6, 10–14 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Valbuena, L., Tarrega, R. & Luis, E. Influence of heat on seed germination of Cistus laurifolius and Cistus ladanifer. J. Wildl. Fire 2, 15–20 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
Martín-Pinto, P., Vaquerizo, H., Peñalver, F., Olaizola, J. & Oria-De-Rueda, J. A. Early effects of a wildfire on the diversity and production of fungal communities in Mediterranean vegetation types dominated by Cistus ladanifer and Pinus pinaster in Spain. For. Ecol. Manage. 225, 296–305 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Comandini, O., Contu, M. & Rinaldi, A. C. An overview of Cistus ectomycorrhizal fungi. Mycorrhiza 16, 381–395 (2006).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zuzunegui, M. et al. Growth response of Halimium halimifolium at four sites with different soil water availability regimes in two contrasted hydrological cycles. Plant Soil 247, 271–281 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Civeyrel, L. et al. Molecular systematics, character evolution, and pollen morphology of Cistus and Halimium (Cistaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 295, 23–54 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Leonardi, M., Furtado, A. N. M., Comandini, O., Geml, J. & Rinaldi, A. C. Halimium as an ectomycorrhizal symbiont: New records and an appreciation of known fungal diversity. Mycol. Prog. 19, 1495–1509 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Oria-De-Rueda, J. A., Martín-Pinto, P. & Olaizola, J. Bolete productivity of cistaceous scrublands in northwestern Spain. Econ. Bot. 62, 323–330 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fernández, C., Vega, J. A. & Fonturbel, T. Does shrub recovery differ after prescribed burning, clearing and mastication in a Spanish heathland?. Plant Ecol. 216, 429–437 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ponte, E. D., Costafreda-Aumedes, S. & Vega-Garcia, C. Lessons learned from arson wildfire incidence in reforestations and natural stands in Spain. Forests 10, 1–18 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Franco-Manchón, I., Salo, K., Oria-de-Rueda, J. A., Bonet, J. A. & Martín-Pinto, P. Are wildfires a threat to fungi in European Pinus forests? A case study of boreal and Mediterranean forests. Forests 10, 309 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mediavilla, O., Oria-de-Rueda, J. A. & Martin-Pinto, P. Changes in sporocarp production and vegetation following wildfire in a Mediterranean Forest Ecosystem dominated by Pinus nigra in Northern Spain. For. Ecol. Manage. 331, 85–92 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tomao, A., Antonio Bonet, J., Castaño, C. & De-Miguel, S. How does forest management affect fungal diversity and community composition? Current knowledge and future perspectives for the conservation of forest fungi. For. Ecol. Manage. 457, 117678 (2020).
Article 

Google Scholar 
Espinosa, J., Rodríguez de Rivera, O., Madrigal, J., Guijarro, M. & Hernando, C. Predicting potential cambium damage and fire resistance in Pinus nigra Arn. ssp. salzmannii. For. Ecol. Manage. 474, 118372 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Potts, J. B. & Stephens, S. L. Invasive and native plant responses to shrubland fuel reduction: Comparing prescribed fire, mastication and treatment season. Biol. Conserv. 142, 1657–1664 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Agee, J. K. & Skinner, C. N. Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments. For. Ecol. Manage. 211, 83–96 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fernández, C., Vega, J. A. & Fonturbel, T. Fuel reduction at a Spanish heathland by prescribed fire and mechanical shredding: Effects on seedling emergence. J. Environ. Manage. 129, 621–627 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Huggett, R. J., Abt, K. L. & Shepperd, W. Efficacy of mechanical fuel treatments for reducing wildfire hazard. For. Policy Econ. 10, 408–414 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fernández, C. & Vega, J. A. Shrub recovery after fuel reduction treatments and a subsequent fire in a Spanish heathland. Plant Ecol. 215, 1233–1243 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fernández, C., Vega, J. A. & Fonturbel, T. Does fire severity influence shrub resprouting after spring prescribed burning?. Acta Oecologica 48, 30–36 (2013).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Ellsworth, J. W., Harrington, R. A. & Fownes, J. H. Seedling emergence, growth, and allocation of Oriental bittersweet: Effects of seed input, seed bank, and forest floor litter. For. Ecol. Manage. 190, 255–264 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Castaño, C. et al. Resistance of the soil fungal communities to medium-intensity fire prevention treatments in a Mediterranean scrubland. For. Ecol. Manage. 472, 118217 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Anderson, I. C., Bastias, B. A., Genney, D. R., Parkin, P. I. & Cairney, J. W. G. Basidiomycete fungal communities in Australian sclerophyll forest soil are altered by repeated prescribed burning. Mycol. Res. 111, 482–486 (2007).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hernández-Rodríguez, M. et al. Soil fungal community composition in a Mediterranean shrubland is primarily shaped by history of major disturbance, less so by current fire fuel reduction treatments. Unpublished (2015).Oria de Rueda, J. A., Martín-Pinto, P. & Olaizola, J. Boletus edulis PRODUCTION IN XEROPHILIC AND PIROPHITIC SCHRUBS OF Cistus ladanifer AND Halimium lasianthum IN WESTERN SPAIN. in IV International Workshop on Edible Mycorrhizal Mushrooms (2005).Hart, B. T. N., Smith, J. E., Luoma, D. L. & Hatten, J. A. Recovery of ectomycorrhizal fungus communities fifteen years after fuels reduction treatments in ponderosa pine forests of the Blue Mountains. Oregon. For. Ecol. Manage. 422, 11–22 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hernández-Rodríguez, M., Oria-de-Rueda, J. A., Pando, V. & Martín-Pinto, P. Impact of fuel reduction treatments on fungal sporocarp production and diversity associated with Cistus ladanifer L. ecosystems. For. Ecol. Manage. 353, 10–20 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fernandes, P. M. Scientific support to prescribed underburning in southern Europe: What do we know?. Sci. Total Environ. 630, 340–348 (2018).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Day, N. J. et al. Wildfire severity reduces richness and alters composition of soil fungal communities in boreal forests of western Canada. Glob. Chang. Biol. 25, 2310–2324 (2019).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Salo, K., Domisch, T. & Kouki, J. Forest wildfire and 12 years of post-disturbance succession of saprotrophic macrofungi (Basidiomycota, Ascomycota). For. Ecol. Manage. 451, 117454 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zakaria, A. J. & Boddy, L. Mycelial foraging by Resinicium bicolor: Interactive effects of resource quantity, quality and soil composition. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 40, 135–142 (2002).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hul, S. et al. Fungal community shifts in structure and function across a boreal forest fire chronosequence. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81, 7869–7880 (2015).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Vázquez-Veloso, A. et al. Prescribed burning in spring or autumn did not affect the soil fungal community in Mediterranean Pinus nigra natural forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 512, 120161 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lindahl, B. D. et al. Spatial separation of litter decomposition and mycorrhizal nitrogen uptake in a boreal forest. New Phytol. 173, 611–620 (2007).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Salomón, R., Rodríguez-Calcerrada, J., González-Doncel, I., Gil, L. & Valbuena-Carabaña, M. On the general failure of coppice conversion into high forest in Quercus pyrenaica stands: A genetic and physiological approach. Folia Geobot. 52, 101–112 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Williams, R. J., Hallgren, S. W. & Wilson, G. W. T. Frequency of prescribed burning in an upland oak forest determines soil and litter properties and alters the soil microbial community. For. Ecol. Manage. 265, 241–247 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Semenova-Nelsen, T. A., Platt, W. J., Patterson, T. R., Huffman, J. & Sikes, B. A. Frequent fire reorganizes fungal communities and slows decomposition across a heterogeneous pine savanna landscape. New Phytol. 224, 916–927 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Oliver, A. K., Callaham, M. A. & Jumpponen, A. Soil fungal communities respond compositionally to recurring frequent prescribed burning in a managed southeastern US forest ecosystem. For. Ecol. Manage. 345, 1–9 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sanz-Benito, I., Mediavilla, O., Casas, A., Oria-de-Rueda, J. A. & Martín-Pinto, P. Effects of fuel reduction treatments on the sporocarp production and richness of a Quercus/Cistus mixed system. For. Ecol. Manage. 503, 119798 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Santos-Silva, C., Gonçalves, A. & Louro, R. Canopy cover influence on macrofungal richness and sporocarp production in montado ecosystems. Agrofor. Syst. 82, 149–159 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lin, W. R. et al. The impacts of thinning on the fruiting of saprophytic fungi in Cryptomeria japonica plantations in central Taiwan. For. Ecol. Manage. 336, 183–193 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Aragón, G., López, R. & Martínez, I. Effects of Mediterranean dehesa management on epiphytic lichens. Sci. Total Environ. 409, 116–122 (2010).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Hämäläinen, A., Kouki, J. & Lohmus, P. The value of retained Scots pines and their dead wood legacies for lichen diversity in clear-cut forests: The effects of retention level and prescribed burning. For. Ecol. Manage. 324, 89–100 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schimmel, J. & Granstrom, A. Fire severity and vegetation response in the boreal Swedish. Ecol. Soc. Am. 77, 1436–1450 (1996).
Google Scholar 
Hinojosa, M. B., Albert-Belda, E., Gómez-Muñoz, B. & Moreno, J. M. High fire frequency reduces soil fertility underneath woody plant canopies of Mediterranean ecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 752, 141877 (2021).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Clemmensen, K. E. et al. Carbon sequestration is related to mycorrhizal fungal community shifts during long-term succession in boreal forests. New Phytol. 205, 1525–1536 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Tedersoo, L. et al. Disentangling global soil fungal diversity. Science 346, 1052–1053 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Adamo, I. et al. Sampling forest soils to describe fungal diversity and composition. Which is the optimal sampling size in Mediterranean pure and mixed pine oak forests?. Fungal Biol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2021.01.005 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tedersoo, L. et al. Regional-scale in-depth analysis of soil fungal diversity reveals strong pH and plant species effects in northern Europe. Front. Microbiol. 11, 1953 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Peay, K., Garbelotto, M. & Bruns, T. Evidence of dispersal limitation in soil microorganisms: Isolation reduces species richness on mycorrhizal tree islands. Ecology 91, 3631–3640 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Koivula, M. & Vanha-Majamaa, I. Experimental evidence on biodiversity impacts of variable retention forestry, prescribed burning, and deadwood manipulation in Fennoscandia. Ecol. Process. 9, 1–22 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fox, S. et al. Fire as a driver of fungal diversity—A synthesis of current knowledge. Mycologia 00, 1–27 (2022).
Google Scholar 
Raudabaugh, D. B. et al. Where are they hiding? Testing the body snatchers hypothesis in pyrophilous fungi. Fungal Ecol. 43, 100870 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Izzo, A., Canright, M. & Bruns, T. D. The effects of heat treatments on ectomycorrhizal resistant propagules and their ability to colonize bioassay seedlings. Mycol. Res. 110, 196–202 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kipfer, T., Moser, B., Egli, S., Wohlgemuth, T. & Ghazoul, J. Ectomycorrhiza succession patterns in Pinus sylvestris forests after stand-replacing fire in the Central Alps. Oecologia 167, 219–228 (2011).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Glassman, S. I., Levine, C. R., Dirocco, A. M., Battles, J. J. & Bruns, T. D. Ectomycorrhizal fungal spore bank recovery after a severe forest fire: Some like it hot. ISME J. 10, 1228–1239 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Buscardo, E. et al. Impact of wildfire return interval on the ectomycorrhizal resistant propagules communities of a Mediterranean open forest. Fungal Biol. 114, 628–636 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pringle, A., Vellinga, E. & Peay, K. The shape of fungal ecology: Does spore morphology give clues to a species’ niche?. Fungal Ecol. 17, 213–216 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, K., Cheng, X., Shu, X., Liu, Y. & Zhang, Q. Linking soil bacterial and fungal communities to vegetation succession following agricultural abandonment. Plant Soil 431, 19–36 (2018).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Xiang, X. et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities show low resistance and high resilience to wildfire disturbance. Plant Soil 397, 347–356 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Dove, N. C., Klingeman, D. M., Carrell, A. A., Cregger, M. A. & Schadt, C. W. Fire alters plant microbiome assembly patterns: Integrating the plant and soil microbial response to disturbance. New Phytol. 230, 2433–2446 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Fernandes, P. M. Fire-smart management of forest landscapes in the Mediterranean basin under global change. Landsc. Urban Plan. 110, 175–182 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fontúrbel, M. T., Fernández, C. & Vega, J. A. Prescribed burning versus mechanical treatments as shrubland management options in NW Spain: Mid-term soil microbial response. Appl. Soil Ecol. 107, 334–346 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Geml, J. et al. Large-scale fungal diversity assessment in the Andean Yungas forests reveals strong community turnover among forest types along an altitudinal gradient. Mol. Ecol. 23, 2452–2472 (2014).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Chu, H. et al. Effects of slope aspects on soil bacterial and arbuscular fungal communities in a boreal forest in China. Pedosphere 26, 226–234 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Geml, J. Soil fungal communities reflect aspect-driven environmental structuring and vegetation types in a Pannonian forest landscape. Fungal Ecol. 39, 63–79 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Castaño, C. et al. Soil microclimate changes affect soil fungal communities in a Mediterranean pine forest. New Phytol. 220, 1211–1221 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Collado, E. et al. Mushroom productivity trends in relation to tree growth and climate across different European forest biomes. Sci. Total Environ. 689, 602–615 (2019).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ihrmark, K., Bödeker, I. & Cruz-Martinez, K. New primers to amplify the fungal ITS2 region—Evaluation by 454-sequencing of artificial and natural communities. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 82, 666–677 (2012).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
White, T., Bruns, S., Lee, S. & Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications (eds Innis, M. A. et al.) 315–322 (Academic Press, 1990).
Google Scholar 
Kent, M. Vegetation Description and Data Analysis: A Practical Approach (Wiley, 2011).

Google Scholar 
Edgar, R. C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26, 2460–2461 (2010).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kõljalg, U. et al. Towards a unified paradigm for sequence-based identification of fungi. Mol. Ecol. 22, 5271–5277 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Abarenkov, K. et al. Plutof-a web based workbench for ecological and taxonomic research, with an online implementation for fungal its sequences. Evol. Bioinforma. 2010, 189–196 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Põlme, S. et al. FungalTraits: A user-friendly traits database of fungi and fungus-like stramenopiles. Fungal Divers. 105, 1–16 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Agerer, R. Fungal relationships and structural identity of their ectomycorrhizae. Mycol. Prog. 5, 67–107 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tedersoo, L. & Smith, M. E. Lineages of ectomycorrhizal fungi revisited: Foraging strategies and novel lineages revealed by sequences from belowground. Fungal Biol. Rev. 27, 83–99 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D. & Team, R. C. Nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R Package Version 3.1–128. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme (2016).Chao, A. & Chiu, C. Species richness: Estimation and comparison. Wiley StatsRef https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445112.stat03432.pub2 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chiu, C. H., Wang, Y. T., Walther, B. A. & Chao, A. An improved nonparametric lower bound of species richness via a modified good-turing frequency formula. Biometrics 70, 671–682 (2014).Article 
MathSciNet 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Oksanen, J. et al. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.4–2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan. (2017).Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F., Kindt, R. & Al, E. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.3–0. (2015). More

Mace, G. M. et al. Aiming higher to bend the curve of biodiversity loss. Nat. Sustain. 1, 448–451 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Díaz, S., et al. Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science 366, eaax3100 (2019).Díaz, S. et al. Set ambitious goals for biodiversity and sustainability. Science 370, 411 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Locke, H., et al. A Nature-Positive World: The Global Goal for Nature (Wildlife Conservation Society, 2020); https://library.wcs.org/doi/ctl/view/mid/33065/pubid/DMX3974900000.aspxOpen-ended Working Group on the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. First Draft of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework CBD/WG2020/3/3 (Convention on Biological Diversity, 2021).Open-Ended Working Group on the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. Draft Recommendation Submitted by the Co-Chairs CBD/WG2020/4/L.2-ANNEX (Convention on Biological Diversity, 2022).Environment Act 2021 (UK) (HM Government, 2021); https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2021/30/contents/enactedBull, J. W. & Strange, N. The global extent of biodiversity offset implementation under no net loss policies. Nat. Sustain. 1, 790–798 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Prendeville, S., Cherim, E. & Bocken, N. Circular cities: mapping six cities in transition. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 26, 171–194 (2018).de Silva, G. C., Regan, E. C., Pollard, E. H. B. & Addison, P. F. E. The evolution of corporate no net loss and net positive impact biodiversity commitments: understanding appetite and addressing challenges. Bus. Strategy Environ. 28, 1481–1495 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
zu Ermgassen, S. O. S. E. et al. Exploring the ecological outcomes of mandatory biodiversity net gain using evidence from early‐adopter jurisdictions in England. Conserv. Lett. 14, e12820 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
McGlyn, J., et al. Science-Based Targets for Nature: Initial Guidance for Business (Science Based Targets Network, 2020); https://sciencebasedtargetsnetwork.org/resource-repository/zu Ermgassen, S. O. S. E. et al. Are corporate biodiversity commitments consistent with delivering ‘nature-positive’ outcomes? A review of ‘nature-positive’ definitions, company progress and challenges. J. Clean. Prod. 379, 134798 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Addison, P. F. E., Bull, J. W. & Milner‐Gulland, E. J. Using conservation science to advance corporate biodiversity accountability. Conserv. Biol. 33, 307–318 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Smith, T. et al. Biodiversity means business: reframing global biodiversity goals for the private sector. Conserv. Lett. 13, e12690 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Maron, M. et al. Setting robust biodiversity goals. Conserv. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12816 (2021).Newing, H. & Perram, A. What do you know about conservation and human rights? Oryx 53, 595–596 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Standard on Biodiversity Offsets (The Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme, 2012).Arlidge, W. N. S., et al. A mitigation hierarchy approach for managing sea turtle captures in small-scale fisheries. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 49 (2020).Squires, D. & Garcia, S. The least-cost biodiversity impact mitigation hierarchy with a focus on marine fisheries and bycatch issues. Conserv. Biol. 32, 989–997 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Booth, H., Squires, D. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. The mitigation hierarchy for sharks: a risk-based framework for reconciling trade-offs between shark conservation and fisheries objectives. Fish Fish. 21, 269–289 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gupta, T. et al. Mitigation of elasmobranch bycatch in trawlers: a case study in Indian fisheries. Front. Mari. Sci. 7, 571 (2020).Budiharta, S. et al. Restoration to offset the impacts of developments at a landscape scale reveals opportunities, challenges and tough choices. Global Environ. Change 52, 152–161 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bull, J. W. et al. Net positive outcomes for nature. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 4–7 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Arlidge, W. N. S. et al. A global mitigation hierarchy for nature conservation. BioScience 68, 336–347 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Milner-Gulland, E. J. et al. Four steps for the Earth: mainstreaming the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. One Earth 4, 75–87 (2021).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Wolff, A., Gondran, N. & Brodhag, C. Detecting unsustainable pressures exerted on biodiversity by a company. Application to the food portfolio of a retailer. J. Clean. Prod. 166, 784–797 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
FAOSTAT Analytical Brief 15 Land Use and Land Cover Statistics: Global, Regional and Country Trends, 1990–2018 (FAO, 2020).Williams, D. R. et al. Proactive conservation to prevent habitat losses to agricultural expansion. Nat. Sustain. 4, 314–322 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Leclère, D. et al. Bending the curve of terrestrial biodiversity needs an integrated strategy. Nature 585, 551–556 (2020).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Springmann, M. et al. Health and nutritional aspects of sustainable diet strategies and their association with environmental impacts: a global modelling analysis with country-level detail. Lancet Planet. Health 2, e451–e461 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Clark, M. A., Springmann, M., Hill, J. & Tilman, D. Multiple health and environmental impacts of foods. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 23357 (2019).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Willett, W. et al. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet 393, 447–492 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Poore, J. & Nemecek, T. Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science 360, 987 (2018).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., Keyßer, L. T. & Steinberger, J. K. Scientists’ warning on affluence. Nat. Commun. 11, 3107 (2020).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Benton, T. G. et al. A ‘net zero’ equivalent target is needed to transform food systems. Nat. Food 2, 905–906 (2021). 2021.Article 

Google Scholar 
Crenna, E., Sinkko, T. & Sala, S. Biodiversity impacts due to food consumption in Europe. J. Clean. Prod. 227, 378–391 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bull, J. W., et al. Analysis: the biodiversity footprint of the University of Oxford. Nature 604, 420–424 (2022).Harrington, R. A., Adhikari, V., Rayner, M. & Scarborough, P. Nutrient composition databases in the age of big data: foodDB, a comprehensive, real-time database infrastructure. BMJ Open 9, e026652 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chaudhary, A., Verones, F., De Baan, L. & Hellweg, S. Quantifying land use impacts on biodiversity: combining species–area models and vulnerability indicators. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 9987–9995 (2015).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Winter, L., Lehmann, A., Finogenova, N. & Finkbeiner, M. Including biodiversity in life cycle assessment—state of the art, gaps and research needs. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 67, 88–100 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chaudhary, A. & Kastner, T. Land use biodiversity impacts embodied in international food trade. Global Environ. Change 38, 195–204 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lenzen, M. et al. International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations. Nature 486, 109–112 (2012).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bates, B., et al. National Diet and Nutrition Survey Years 1 to 9 of the Rolling Programme (2008/2009–2016/2017): Time Trend and Income Analyses (Public Health England & Food Standards Agency, 2019).Stewart, C., Piernas, C., Cook, B. & Jebb, S. A. Trends in UK meat consumption: analysis of data from years 1–11 (2008–09 to 2018–19) of the National Diet and Nutrition Survey rolling programme. Lancet Planet. Health 5, e699–e708 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nielsen, K. S. et al. Improving climate change mitigation analysis: a framework for examining feasibility. One Earth 3, 325–336 (2020).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Selinske, M. J. et al. We have a steak in it: eliciting interventions to reduce beef consumption and its impact on biodiversity. Conserv. Lett. 13, e12721 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hollands, G. J. et al. The TIPPME intervention typology for changing environments to change behaviour. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, 1–9 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Marteau, T. M., Hollands, G. J. & Fletcher, P. C. Changing human behavior to prevent disease: the importance of targeting automatic processes. Science 337, 1492–1495 (2012).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M. & West, R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement. Sci. 6, 42 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Moran, D., Giljum, S., Kanemoto, K. & Godar, J. From satellite to supply chain: new approaches connect earth observation to economic decisions. One Earth 3, 5–8 (2020).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Godar, J., Suavet, C., Gardner, T. A., Dawkins, E. & Meyfroidt, P. Balancing detail and scale in assessing transparency to improve the governance of agricultural commodity supply chains. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 035015 (2016).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
DeFries, R. S., Fanzo, J., Mondal, P., Remans, R. & Wood, S. A. Is voluntary certification of tropical agricultural commodities achieving sustainability goals for small-scale producers? A review of the evidence. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 033001 (2017).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Bull, J. W., Suttle, K. B., Gordon, A., Singh, N. J. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. Biodiversity offsets in theory and practice. Oryx 47, 369–380 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
zu Ermgassen, S. O. S. E. et al. The ecological outcomes of biodiversity offsets under “no net loss” policies: a global review. Conserv. Lett. 12, e12664 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Waddock, S. Achieving sustainability requires systemic business transformation. Glob. Sustain. 3, e12 (2020).Travers, H., Walsh, J., Vogt, S., Clements, T. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. Delivering behavioural change at scale: what conservation can learn from other fields. Biol. Conserv. 257, 109092 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gaupp, F. et al. Food system development pathways for healthy, nature-positive and inclusive food systems. Nat. Food 2, 928–934 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Astill, J. et al. Transparency in food supply chains: a review of enabling technology solutions. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 91, 240–247 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Poore, J & Nemecek, T. Full Excel model: life-cycle environmental impacts of food drink products. Oxford University Research Archive https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:a63fb28c-98f8-4313-add6-e9eca99320a5 (2018).Clark, M., et al. Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2120584119 (2022).Clark, M., et al. Supplemental Data for ‘Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products’. Oxford University Research Archive https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:4ad0b594-3e81-4e61-aefc-5d869c799a87 (2022).Bianchi, F., Dorsel, C., Garnett, E., Aveyard, P. & Jebb, S. A. Interventions targeting conscious determinants of human behaviour to reduce the demand for meat: a systematic review with qualitative comparative analysis. IJBNPA 15, 102 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Bianchi, F., Garnett, E., Dorsel, C., Aveyard, P. & Jebb, S. A. Restructuring physical micro-environments to reduce the demand for meat: a systematic review and qualitative comparative analysis. Lancet Planet. Health 2, e384–e397 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hillier-Brown, F. C. et al. The impact of interventions to promote healthier ready-to-eat meals (to eat in, to take away or to be delivered) sold by specific food outlets open to the general public: a systematic review. Obes. Rev. 18, 227–246 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
von Philipsborn, P. et al. Environmental interventions to reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and their effects on health. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 6, Cd012292 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Attwood, S., Voorheis, P., Mercer, C., Davies, K. & Vennard, D. Playbook for Guiding Diners toward Plant-Rich Dishes in Food Service (World Resources Institute, 2020); https://www.wri.org/research/playbook-guiding-diners-toward-plant-rich-dishes-food-serviceGarnett, E. E., Balmford, A., Sandbrook, C., Pilling, M. A. & Marteau, T. M. Impact of increasing vegetarian availability on meal selection and sales in cafeterias. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 20923 (2019).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Reinders, M. J., Huitink, M., Dijkstra, S. C., Maaskant, A. J. & Heijnen, J. Menu-engineering in restaurants—adapting portion sizes on plates to enhance vegetable consumption: a real-life experiment. IJBNPA 14, 41 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Brunner, F., Kurz, V., Bryngelsson, D. & Hedenus, F. Carbon label at a university restaurant—label implementation and evaluation. Ecol. Econ. 146, 658–667 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
McClain, A. D., Hekler, E. B. & Gardner, C. D. Incorporating prototyping and iteration into intervention development: a case study of a dining hall-based intervention. J. Am. Coll. Health 61, 122–131 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
de Vaan, J. Eating Less Meat: How to Stimulate the Choice for a Vegetarian Option without Inducing Reactance. MSc thesis, Radboud Univ. (2018). More

ParticipantsIn total, 80, 63, and 56 participants in the EM, CM, and control groups, respectively, initially agreed to participate in this study. Nevertheless, 28, 12, and 13 individuals in the EM, CM, and control groups, respectively, withdrew their participation and did not bring any fecal samples to the study site. After providing fecal samples, 10 and 6 individuals with EM and CM, respectively, reported intake of probiotics and were excluded from the analysis. No participant in the control group consumed probiotics during the study period. Eventually, 42, 45, and 43 participants in the EM, CM, and control groups, respectively, were enrolled (Fig. 1). The demographic and clinical characteristics of participants are summarized in Table 1. All participants with EM and CM used acute treatments for migraine. Moreover, 25 (59.5%) and 27 (60.0%) participants with EM and CM, respectively, received prophylactic treatment for migraine. Of the 42 participants with EM, 20 used anti-epileptic medications, 11 used beta blockers, 2 used an anti-depressant, and 1 used a calcium-channel blocker for prophylactic treatment. Of the 45 participants with CM, 23 used anti-epileptic medications, 8 used beta blockers, 1 used an anti-depressant, and no participant used calcium-channel blockers for prophylactic treatment. No participant in the EM, CM, and control groups was infected with SARS-CoV-2 before or during participation in the study.Figure 1Flow of participants in a study on the composition of gut microbiota in participants with episodic or chronic migraine.Full size imageTable 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants with episodic and chronic migraine and the control.Full size tableCollection of 16 s RNA sequencing dataWe obtained 7,802,425 read sequences, accounting for 99.8% of the valid sequences from the fecal samples of 130 participants. According to barcode and primer sequence filtering, an average of 59,305 (range, 3716–90,832) observed sequences per sample was recovered for downstream analysis. Thus, 2,242,325 sequences were obtained from the controls for phylogenetic analysis, whereas 2,747,952 and 2,812,148 sequences were obtained from the EM and CM groups, respectively.Microbial diversityAlpha diversity was defined as microbial community richness and evenness. Alpha diversities in the genus richness, as evaluated by Chao1 (Fig. 2A), Shannon (Fig. 2B), and Simpson (Fig. 2C) indices, did not differ significantly among the EM, CM, and control groups. Beta diversity represented the community composition dissimilarity between samples. PCoA with the weighted UniFrac distance (Fig. 3A and Supplementary Fig. S1A, p = 0.176, permutational multivariate analysis of variance [PERMANOVA]), the unweighted UniFrac distance (Fig. 3B and Supplementary Fig. S1B, p = 0.132, PERMANOVA), and the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity index (Fig. 3C and Supplementary Fig. S1C, p = 0.220, PERMANOVA) for beta diversity at the genus level among the EM, CM, and control groups revealed that these three groups could not be separated.Figure 2Alpha diversity at the genus level using Chao1 (A), Shannon (B), and Simpson (C) indices*,†. *Controls (green) and participants with episodic migraine (blue) and chronic migraine (yellow). †In the box plots, the lower boundary of the box indicates the 25th percentile; a blue line within the box marks the median, and the upper boundary of the box indicates the 75th percentile. Whiskers above (red) and below the box (green) indicate the highest and the lowest values, respectively.Full size imageFigure 3Beta diversity of microbiota in principal coordinate analysis plot with the weighted UniFrac distance (A), the unweighted UniFrac distance (B) and the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity index (C)*. *Controls (green) and participants with episodic migraine (blue) and chronic migraine (yellow).Full size imageRelative abundance of fecal microbes between participants with EM and the controlRelative abundance of fecal microbes at the phylum level did not differ significantly among participants in the control, EM, and CM groups (Supplementary Fig. S2). Moreover, Tissierellales (p = 0.001) and Tissierellia (p = 0.001) were more abundant in the EM group than that in the control group at the order and class levels, respectively (Fig. 4A). At the family level, Peptoniphilaceae (p = 0.001) and Eubacteriaceae (p = 0.045) occurred at a significantly higher proportion in the EM group than that in the control group. Furthermore, at the genus level, the abundance of 11 genera differed significantly between the two groups, including one more abundant and 10 less abundant genera in the EM group. Catenibacterium (p = 0.031) and Olsenella (p = 0.038) had the highest relative abundance in the control and EM groups, respectively.Figure 4Taxonomic differences in fecal microbiota among participants. The fold change (log2) denotes the difference in relative abundance between participants with episodic migraine and the control (A), between those with chronic migraine and the control (B), and between those with episodic and chronic migraine (C). CM chronic migraine; EM episodic migraine.Full size imageRelative abundance of fecal microbes between participants with CM and the controlThe analysis results at the class, order, family, genus, and species levels between CM and control groups are illustrated in Fig. 4B. Tissierellia (p = 0.001), Tissierellales (p = 0.001), and Peptoniphilaceae (p = 0.001) were more abundant in the CM group than that in the control group at the class, order, and family levels, respectively; however, at the genus level, the abundances of 18 genera differed significantly, including four more abundant and 14 less abundant genera in the CM group than in the control group.Relative abundance of fecal microbes between participants with EM and CMThe analysis results at the class, order, family, and genus levels between CM and EM groups are summarized in Fig. 4C. At the class level, Bacilli (p = 0.033) were less abundant in the CM group than that in the EM group; however, at the order level, Selenomonadales (p = 0.016) and Lactobacillales (p = 0.034) were less abundant in the CM group than that in the EM group. Moreover, at the class level, Selenomonadaceae (p = 0.016) and Prevotellaceae (p = 0.012) were less abundant in the CM group than that in the EM group. Furthermore, at the genus level, PAC001212_g (p = 0.019) revealed relative positive predominancy in the CM groups, whereas Prevotella (p = 0.019), Holdemanella (p = 0.009), Olsenella (p = 0.033), Adlercreutzia (p = 0.018), and Coprococcus (p = 0.040) revealed relative positive predominancy in the EM group.Association among fecal microbiota and clinical characteristics and comorbidities of migraineAmong the five genera (Roseburia, Eubacterium_g4, Agathobacter, PAC000195_g, and Catenibacterium) depicting predominance or less-predominance both in EM and CM groups, we conducted additional analyses for clinical characteristics and migraine comorbidities.Combining the results of the 42 and 45 participants with EM and CM, respectively, the Poisson regression analysis for relative abundance of microbiota revealed that a higher composition of PAC000195_g (p = 0.040) was significantly associated with lower headache frequency (Table 2). Furthermore, Agathobacter (p = 0.009) had a negative association with severe headache intensity (Table 3). Anxiety was associated with Catenibacterium (p = 0.027); however, depression did not reveal any association with the five genera (Table 3).Table 2 The association between headache frequency and the relative abundance of microbiota.*Full size tableTable 3 The association of severe headache intensity and comorbidities with the relative abundance of microbiota*.Full size tableRelative abundance of fecal microbes in participants with EM based on prophylactic treatmentAlpha and beta diversities in participants with EM did not differ significantly based on their prophylactic treatment (Supplementary Figs S3A–C, S4A–C, and S5A–C). At the genus level, Klebsiella (p = 0.009), Enterobacteriaceae_g (p = 0.006), and Faecalibacterium (p = 0.046) were more abundant in the prophylactic group than the non-prophylactic group (Supplementary Fig. S6A).Relative abundance of fecal microbes in participants with CM based on prophylactic treatmentAlpha and beta diversities in participants with CM did not differ significantly based on prophylactic treatment (Supplementary Figs S7A–C, S8A–C, and S9A–C). Emergencia (p = 0.043), Ruthenibacterium (p = 0.005), Eggerthella (p = 0.003), PAC000743_g (p = 0.034), and Anaerostipes (p = 0.039) were more abundant in the prophylactic group, whereas PAC000196_g (p = 0.049), Fusicatenibacter (p = 0.028), and Faecalibacterium (p = 0.021) were more abundant in the non-prophylactic group at the genus level (Supplementary Fig. S6B). More

Galperin, M. Y. Environ. Microbiol. 6, 552–567 (2004).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Higgins, D. & Dworkin, J. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 36, 131–148 (2012).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Maamar, H., Raj, A. & Dubnau, D. Science 317, 526–529 (2007).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ackermann, M. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13, 497–508 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Robinson, R. W. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 52, 17–27 (1986).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
McIlroy, S. J. et al. Nat. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-022-01292-9 (2023).Article 

Google Scholar 
Leu, A. O. et al. ISME J. 14, 1030–1041 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Cui, M., Ma, A., Qi, H., Zhuang, X. & Zhuang, G. Microbiologyopen 4, 1–11 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Haroon, M. F. et al. Nature 500, 567–570 (2013).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Fritts, R. K., McCully, A. L. & McKinlay, J. B. Microbiol. Molec. Biol. Rev. 85, e00135-20 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Peaucelle, M. et al. Spatial variance of spring phenology in temperate deciduous forests is constrained by background climatic conditions. Nat. Commun. 10, 5388 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hopkins, A. D. The bioclimatic law. Mon. Weather Rev. 48, 355–355 (1920).Article 

Google Scholar 
Piao, S. et al. Plant phenology and global climate change: current progresses and challenges. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 1922–1940 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ge, Q., Wang, H., Rutishauser, T. & Dai, J. Phenological response to climate change in China: a meta-analysis. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 265–274 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Templ, B. et al. Pan European Phenological database (PEP725): a single point of access for European data. Int. J. Biometeorol. 62, 1109–1113 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Richardson, A. D. et al. Climate change, phenology, and phenological control of vegetation feedbacks to the climate system. Agric. For. Meteorol. 169, 156–173 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Morisette, J. T. et al. Tracking the rhythm of the seasons in the face of global change: phenological research in the 21st century. Front. Ecol. Environ. 7, 253–260 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Flynn, D. F. B. & Wolkovich, E. M. Temperature and photoperiod drive spring phenology across all species in a temperate forest community. New Phytol. 219, 1353–1362 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Peñuelas, J., Rutishauser, T. & Filella, I. Phenology feedbacks on climate change. Science 324, 887–888 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Körner, C. & Basler, D. Plant science. Phenol. Glob. Warm. Sci. 327, 1461–1462 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Delpierre, N. et al. Temperate and boreal forest tree phenology: from organ-scale processes to terrestrial ecosystem models. Ann. For. Sci. 73, 5–25 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Klosterman, S. T. et al. Evaluating remote sensing of deciduous forest phenology at multiple spatial scales using PhenoCam imagery. Biogeosciences 11, 4305–4320 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hufkens, K. et al. Linking near-surface and satellite remote sensing measurements of deciduous broadleaf forest phenology. Remote Sens. Environ. 117, 307–321 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Garrity, S. R. et al. A comparison of multiple phenology data sources for estimating seasonal transitions in deciduous forest carbon exchange. Agric. For. Meteorol. 151, 1741–1752 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fracheboud, Y. et al. The control of autumn senescence in European aspen. Plant Physiol. 149, 1982–1991 (2009).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Mariën, B. et al. Does drought advance the onset of autumn leaf senescence in temperate deciduous forest trees? Biogeosciences 18, 3309–3330 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fu, Y. H. et al. Larger temperature response of autumn leaf senescence than spring leaf-out phenology. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 2159–2168 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Menzel, A., Sparks, T. H., Estrella, N. & Roy, D. B. Altered geographic and temporal variability in phenology in response to climate change. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 15, 498–504 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gordo, O. & Sanz, J. J. Long-term temporal changes of plant phenology in the Western Mediterranean. Glob. Change Biol. 15, 1930–1948 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Meier, M., Vitasse, Y., Bugmann, H. & Bigler, C. Phenological shifts induced by climate change amplify drought for broad-leaved trees at low elevations in Switzerland. Agric. For. Meteorol. 307, 108485 (2021).Basler, D. Evaluating phenological models for the prediction of leaf-out dates in six temperate tree species across central Europe. Agric. For. Meteorol. 217, 10–21 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Keenan, T. F. et al. Terrestrial biosphere model performance for inter-annual variability of land–atmosphere CO2 exchange. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 1971–1987 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, G., Chen, X., Fu, Y. & Delpierre, N. Modelling leaf coloration dates over temperate China by considering effects of leafy season climate. Ecol. Modell. 394, 34–43 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Keenan, T. F. & Richardson, A. D. The timing of autumn senescence is affected by the timing of spring phenology: implications for predictive models. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 2634–2641 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wu, C., Hou, X., Peng, D., Gonsamo, A. & Xu, S. Land surface phenology of China’s temperate ecosystems over 1999–2013: spatial–temporal patterns, interaction effects, covariation with climate and implications for productivity. Agric. For. Meteorol. 216, 177–187 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fu, Y. S. H. et al. Variation in leaf flushing date influences autumnal senescence and next year’s flushing date in two temperate tree species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 7355–7360 (2014).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zani, D., Crowther, T. W., Mo, L., Renner, S. S. & Zohner, C. M. Increased growing-season productivity drives earlier autumn leaf senescence in temperate trees. Science 370, 1066–1071 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Paul, M. J. & Foyer, C. H. Sink regulation of photosynthesis. J. Exp. Bot. 52, 1383–1400 (2001).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Herold, A. Regulation of photosynthesis by sink activity—the missing link. New Phytol. 86, 131–144 (1980).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Keenan, T. F. et al. Recent pause in the growth rate of atmospheric CO2 due to enhanced terrestrial carbon uptake. Nat. Commun. 7, 13428 (2016).Campbell, J. E. et al. Large historical growth in global terrestrial gross primary production. Nature 544, 84–87 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Schimel, D., Stephens, B. B. & Fisher, J. B. Effect of increasing CO2 on the terrestrial carbon cycle. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci.USA 112, 436–441 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Walker, A. P. et al. Integrating the evidence for a terrestrial carbon sink caused by increasing atmospheric CO. New Phytol. 229, 2413–2445 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Liu, Q. et al. Modeling leaf senescence of deciduous tree species in Europe. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 4104–4118 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Friedl, M., Gray, J. & Sulla-Menashe, D. MCD12Q2 MODIS/Terra+Aqua Land Cover Dynamics Yearly L3 Global 500m SIN Grid V006 (NASA, 2019).Zhang, X. et al. Monitoring vegetation phenology using MODIS. Remote Sens. Environ. 84, 471–475 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stocker, B. D. et al. P-model v1.0: an optimality-based light use efficiency model for simulating ecosystem gross primary production. Geosci. Model Dev. 13, 1545–1581 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pastorello, G. et al. The FLUXNET2015 dataset and the ONEFlux processing pipeline for eddy covariance data. Sci. Data 7, 225 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sitch, S. et al. Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model. Glob. Change Biol. 9, 161–185 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hänninen, H. & Tanino, K. Tree seasonality in a warming climate. Trends Plant Sci. 16, 412–416 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kikuzawa, K. & Lechowicz, M. J. Ecology of Leaf Longevity (Springer, 2011).Fu, Y. H. et al. Nutrient availability alters the correlation between spring leaf-out and autumn leaf senescence dates. Tree Physiol. 39, 1277–1284 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lim, P. O., Kim, H. J. & Nam, H. G. Leaf senescence. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 58, 115–136 (2007).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Piao, S., Friedlingstein, P., Ciais, P., Viovy, N. & Demarty, J. Growing season extension and its impact on terrestrial carbon cycle in the Northern Hemisphere over the past 2 decades. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 21, GB3018 (2007).Jeong, S.-J., Ho, C.-H., Gim, H.-J. & Brown, M. E. Phenology shifts at start vs. end of growing season in temperate vegetation over the Northern Hemisphere for the period 1982–2008. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 2385–2399 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cong, N. et al. Changes in satellite-derived spring vegetation green-up date and its linkage to climate in China from 1982 to 2010: a multimethod analysis. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 881–891 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Keenan, T. F. et al. Net carbon uptake has increased through warming-induced changes in temperate forest phenology. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 598–604 (2014).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Garonna, I., de Jong, R. & Schaepman, M. E. Variability and evolution of global land surface phenology over the past three decades (1982–2012). Glob. Change Biol. 22, 1456–1468 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Smith, N. G. & Dukes, J. S. Plant respiration and photosynthesis in global-scale models: incorporating acclimation to temperature and CO2. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 45–63 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Estiarte, M. & Peñuelas, J. Alteration of the phenology of leaf senescence and fall in winter deciduous species by climate change: effects on nutrient proficiency. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 1005–1017 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Delpierre, N. et al. Modelling interannual and spatial variability of leaf senescence for three deciduous tree species in France. Agric. For. Meteorol. 149, 938–948 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chung, H. et al. Experimental warming studies on tree species and forest ecosystems: a literature review. J. Plant Res. 126, 447–460 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schaaf, C. B. et al. First operational BRDF, albedo nadir reflectance products from MODIS. Remote Sens. Environ. 83, 135–148 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tuck, S. L. et al. MODISTools—downloading and processing MODIS remotely sensed data in R. Ecol. Evol. 4, 4658–4668 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Farquhar, G. D., von Caemmerer, S. & Berry, J. A. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149, 78–90 (1980).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Medlyn, B. E. et al. Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal conductance. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 2134–2144 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stocker, B. rsofun: A modelling framework that implements the P-model for leaf-level acclimation of photosynthesis. R package version 4.3 https://github.com/computationales/rsofun (2020).Weedon, G. P. et al. The WFDEI meteorological forcing data set: WATCH Forcing Data methodology applied to ERA-Interim reanalysis data. Water Resour. Res. 50, 7505–7514 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Meek, D. W., Hatfield, J. L., Howell, T. A., Idso, S. B. & Reginato, R. J. A generalized relationship between photosynthetically active radiation and solar radiation 1. Agron. J. 76, 939–945 (1984).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fick, S. E. & Hijmans, R. J. WorldClim 2: new 1‐km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 37, 4302–4315 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stocker, B. ingestr: A tool to extract environmental point data from large global files or remote data servers. R package version 1.4 https://github.com/computationales/ingestr (2020).Wang, H. et al. Towards a universal model for carbon dioxide uptake by plants. Nat. Plants 3, 734–741 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021).Myneni, R., Knyazikhin, Y. & Park, T. MCD15A3H MODIS/Terra+Aqua Leaf Area Index/FPAR 4-day L4 Global 500m SIN Grid V006 (NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC, 2015). More

Tilman, D. et al. Future threats to biodiversity and pathways to their prevention. Nature 546, 73. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22900 (2017).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Laurance, W. F., Sayer, J. & Cassman, K. G. Agricultural expansion and its impacts on tropical nature. Trends Ecol. Evol. 29, 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.12.001 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ceballos, G. et al. Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction. J. Sci. Adv. 1, e1400253. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1400253 (2015).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Cardillo, M. et al. Human population density and extinction risk in the world’s carnivores. PLoS Biol. 2, e197. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020197 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Estes, J. A. et al. Trophic downgrading of planet earth. Science 333, 301–306 (2011).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ripple, W. J. et al. Status and ecological effects of the world’s largest carnivores. Science 343, 124–148 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bauer, H. et al. Lion (Panthera leo) populations are declining rapidly across Africa, except in intensively managed areas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, 14895–14899 (2015).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Bauer, H., Page-Nicholson, S., Hinks, A. & Dickman, A. Guidelines for the Conservation of lion in Africa 17–24 (IUCN SSC Cat Specialist Group, 2018).
Google Scholar 
Lindsey, P. A., Roulet, P. A. & Romanach, S. S. Economic and conservation significance of the trophy hunting industry in sub-Saharan Africa. Biol. Conserv. 134, 455–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.09.005 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vucetich, J. A. et al. The value of argument analysis for understanding ethical considerations pertaining to trophy hunting and lion conservation. Biol. Conserv. 235, 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.04.012 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dube, N. Voices from the village on trophy hunting in Hwange district, Zimbabwe. Ecol. Econ. 159, 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.02.006 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Murombedzi, J. African wildlife and livelihoods. In The Promise and Performance of Community Conservation (eds Hulme, D. & Murphree, M.) 244–255 (James Currey, 2001).
Google Scholar 
Leader-Williams, N., Baldus, R. D. & Smith, R. J. Recreational hunting. In Conservation and Rural Livelihoods (eds Dickson, B. et al.) 296–316 (Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2009).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
DiMinin, E., Leader-Williams, N. & Bradshaw, C. J. A. Banning trophy hunting will exacerbate biodiversity loss. Trends Ecol. Evol. 31, 99–102 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Whitman, K., Starfield, A. M., Quadling, H. S. & Packer, C. Sustainable trophy hunting of African lions. Nature 428, 175–178 (2004).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Packer, C. et al. Sport hunting, predator control and conservation of large carnivores. PLoS ONE 4, e5941. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005941 (2009).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Mweetwa, T. et al. Quantifying lion (Panthera leo) demographic response following a three-year moratorium on trophy hunting. PLoS ONE 13, e0197030. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197030 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Loveridge, A. J. et al. Conservation of large predator populations: Demographic and spatial responses of African lions to the intensity of trophy hunting. Biol. Conserv. 204, 247–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.024 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Starfield, A. M., Shiell, J. D. & Smuts, G. L. Simulation of lion control strategies in a large game reserve. Ecol. Model. 13, 17–28 (1981).Article 

Google Scholar 
Venter, J. & Hopkins, M. E. Use of a simulation model in the management of a lion population. S. Afr. J. Wildl. Res. 18, 126–130 (1988).
Google Scholar 
Starfield, A. M. & Bleloch, A. L. Modelling the effect of contraception on part of the lion population in Etosha National Park. Applied Mathematic Dept. Report R3/82, Witwaterstrand University, South Africa. 7 (1982).Dickman, A., Becker, M., Begg, C., Loveridge, A. J. & Macdonald, D. W. Guidelines for the Conservation of Lions in Africa, Ch. 6 69–75 (IUCN SSC Cat Specialist Group, 2018).
Google Scholar 
Creel, S. et al. Assessing the sustainability of lion trophy hunting with recomendations for policy. Ecol. Appl. 26, 2347–2357. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1377 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Barthold, J., Loveridge, A. J., Macdonald, D. W., Packer, C. & Colchero, F. Bayesian estimates of male and female African lion mortality for future use in population management. J. Appl. Ecol. 53, 295–304 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Loveridge, A. J., Valeix, M., Elliot, N. B. & Macdonald, D. W. The landscape of anthropogenic mortality: How African lions respond to spatial variation in risk. J. Appl. Ecol. 54, 815–825. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12794 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Loveridge, A. J. et al. Evaluating the spatial intensity and demographic impacts of wire-snare bush-meat poaching on large carnivores. Biol. Conserv. 244, 108504 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Becker, M. S. et al. Estimating past and future male loss in three Zambian lion populations. J. Wildl. Manag. 77, 128–142 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kiffner, C., Meyer, B., Muhlenberg, M. & Waltert, M. Plenty of prey, few predators: What limits lions Panthera leo in Katavi National park, western Tanzania?. Oryx 43, 52–59 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Loveridge, A. J., Searle, A. W., Murindagomo, F. & Macdonald, D. W. The impact of sport hunting on the population dynamics of an African lion population in a protected area. Biol. Conserv. 134, 548–558 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Miller, J. R. B. et al. Aging traits and sustainable trophy hunting of African lions. Biol. Conserv. 201, 160–168 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Woodroffe, R. & Ginsberg, J. R. Edge effects and the extinction of populations inside protected areas. Science 280, 2126–2128 (1998).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Gervasi, V., Linnell, J. D. C., Brøseth, H. & Gimenez, O. Failure to coordinate management in transboundary populations hinders the achievement of national management goals: The case of wolverines in Scandinavia. J. Appl. Ecol. 56, 1905–1915. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13379 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Breitenmoser, U. & Nobbe, C. Guidelines for the Conservation of Lions in Africa (ed IUCN CSG/SSC) 29–30 (IUCN, 2018).du Preez, B. & Lopez-Bao, J. V. Guidelines for the Conservation of the Lion in Africa (ed IUCN CSG/SSC) 76–78 (IUCN, 2018).Loveridge, A. J., Hemson, G., Davidson, Z. & Macdonald, D. W. African lions on the edge: reserve boundaries as ‘attractive sinks’ In Biology and Conservation of Wild Felids, Ch. 11 (eds Macdonald, D. W. & Loveridge, A. J.) 283–304 (Oxford University Press, London, 2010).

Google Scholar 
Borrego, N., Ozgul, A., Slotow, R. & Packer, C. Lion population dynamics: Do nomadic males matter?. Behav. Ecol. 29, 660–666. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary018%JBehavioralEcology (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Packer, C. et al. The case for fencing remains intact. Ecol. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12171 (2013).Balme, G. et al. Big cats at large: Density, structure, and spatio-temporal patterns of a leopard population free of anthropogenic mortality. Popul. Ecol. 61, 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1002/1438-390x.1023 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Grünewald, C., Schleuning, M. & Böhning-Gaese, K. Biodiversity, scenery and infrastructure: Factors driving wildlife tourism in an African savannah national park. Biol. Conserv. 201, 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.036 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pulliam, H. R. Sources, sinks, and population. Regulation 132, 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1086/284880 (1988).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lamb, C. T. et al. The ecology of human–carnivore coexistence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117, 17876–17883. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1922097117 (2020).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Robinson, H. S., Weilgus, R. B., Cooley, H. & Cooley, S. Source—sink populations in carnivore management: cougar demography and immigration in a hunted population. Ecol. Appl. 18, 1028–1037 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Creel, S. et al. Questionable policy for large carnivore hunting. Science 350, 1473–1475 (2015).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Cushman, S. A. et al. Prioritizing core areas, corridors and conflict hotspots for lion conservation in southern Africa. PLoS ONE 13, e0196213. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196213 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kelly, M. J. & Durant, S. M. Viability of the Serengeti cheetah population. Conserv. Biol. 14, 786–797 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Skalski, J. R., Ryding, K. & Millspaug, J. J. Wildlife Demography: Analysis of Sex, Age, and Count Data (Elsevier Academic Press, 2005).
Google Scholar 
Hamlin, K. L., Pac, D. F., Sime, C. A., DeSimone, R. M. & Dusek, G. L. Evaluating the accuracy of ages obtained by two methods for montana ungulates. J. Wildl. Manag. 64, 441–449. https://doi.org/10.2307/3803242 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Storm, D. J. et al. Estimating ages of white-tailed deer: Age and sex patterns of error using tooth wear-and-replacement and consistency of cementum annuli. Wildl Soc Bull 38, 849–856. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.457 (2014).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Balme, G. A., Hunter, L. & Braczkowski, A. R. Applicability of age-based hunting regulations for African Leopards. PLoS ONE 7, e35209. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035209 (2012).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Gipson, P. S., Ballard, W. B., Nowak, R. M. & Mech, L. D. Accuracy and precision of estimating age of gray wolves by tooth wear. J. Wildl. Manag. 64, 752–758. https://doi.org/10.2307/3802745 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hiller, T. L. Comparison of two age-estimation techniques for cougars. J. Northwest. Nat. 77–82, 76 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Begg, C. M., Miller, J. R. B. & Begg, K. S. Effective implementation of age restrictions increases selectivity of sport hunting of the African lion. J. Appl. Ecol. 55, 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12951 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mandisodza-Chikerema, R., Jooste, D. & Funston, P. J. Lion aging and adaptive quota management report: Ages of lions hunted and recommended quotas for 2019 in Zimbabwe. 12 (Unpublished report, Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Management and Panthera, Harare, Zimbabwe, 2019).Smuts, G. L., Anderson, J. L. & Austin, J. C. Age determination of the African lion (Panthera leo). J. Zool. Lond. 185, 115–146 (1978).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lindsey, P. A. et al. The trophy hunting of African lions: Scale, current management practices and factors undermining sustainability. PLoS ONE 8, 1–11 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/ (2022).Packer, C. et al. Effects of trophy hunting on lion and leopard populations in Tanzania. Conserv. Biol. 25, 142–153 (2011).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Mace, G. M. & Reynolds, J. Exploitation as a conservation issue. In Conservation of Exploited Species, Ch. 1 (eds Reynolds, J. et al.) 3–15 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001).
Google Scholar 
Struhsaker, T. T. A biologists perspective on the role of sustainable harvest in conservation. Conserv. Biol. 12, 930–932 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Parmesan, C. & Yohe, G. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421, 37–42 (2003).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Sandel, B. et al. The influence of late Quaternary climate-change velocity on species endemism. Science 334(6056), 660–664 (2011).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Scheffers, B. R. et al. The broad footprint of climate change from genes to biomes to people. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf7671 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Davis, M. B. & Shaw, R. G. Range shifts and adaptive responses to quaternary climate change. Science 292(5517), 673–679 (2001).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lane, J. E., Kruuk, L. E. B., Charmantier, A., Murie, J. O. & Dobson, F. S. Delayed phenology and reduced fitness associated with climate change in a wild hibernator. Nature 489, 554–557 (2012).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Pecl, G. T. et al. Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: Impacts on ecosystems and human well-being. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aai9214 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dawson, T. P., Jackson, S. T., House, J. I., Prentice, I. C. & Mace, G. M. Beyond predictions: Biodiversity conservation in a changing climate. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200303 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pacifici, M. et al. Species’ traits influenced their response to recent climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 205–208 (2017).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Schloss, C. A., Nuñez, T. A. & Lawler, J. J. Dispersal will limit ability of mammals to track climate change in the Western Hemisphere. PNAS 109(22), 8606–8611 (2012).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Perry, A. L., Low, P. J., Ellis, J. R. & Reynolds, J. D. Climate change and distribution shifts in marine fishes. Science 308(5730), 1912–1915 (2005).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bradshaw, W. E., Zani, P. A. & Holzapfel, C. M. Adaptation to temperate climates. Evolution 58(8), 1748–1762 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Thomas, C. D. et al. Ecological and evolutionary processes at expanding range margins. Nature 411(6837), 577–581 (2001).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Urban, M. C. Accelerating extinction risk from climate change. Science 348(6234), 571–573 (2015).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Waller, N. L., Gynther, I. C., Freeman, A. B., Lavery, T. H. & Leung, L. K. P. The bramble cay melomys Melomys rubicola (Rodentia:Muridae): A first mammalian extinction caused by human-induced climate change?. Wildl. Res. 44(1), 9–21 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Murray, K. A., Rosauer, D., McCallum, H. & Skerratt, L. F. Integrating species traits with extrinsic threats: Closing the gap between predicting and preventing species declines. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 278(1711), 1515–1523 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stevens, G. C. The latitudinal gradient in geographical range: How so many species coexist in the Tropics. Am. Nat. 133(2), 240–256 (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hickling, R., Roy, D. B., Hill, J. K., Fox, R. & Thomas, C. D. The distributions of a wide range of taxonomic groups are expanding polewards. Glob. Change Biol. 12(3), 450–455 (2006).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Virkkala, R., Heikkinen, R. K., Leikola, N. & Luoto, M. Projected large-scale range reductions of northern-boreal land bird species due to climate change. Biol. Conserv. 141(5), 1343–1353 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sales, L. P. et al. Niche conservatism and the invasive potential of the wild boar. J. Anim. Ecol. 86(5), 1214–1223 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gouveia, S. F. et al. Climate and land use changes will degrade the configuration of the landscape for titi monkeys in eastern Brazil. Glob. Change Biol. 22(6), 2003–2012 (2016).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Pearson, R. G. & Dawson, T. P. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: Are bioclimate envelope models useful?. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 12(5), 361–371 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Engler, R. et al. Predicting future distributions of mountain plants under climate change: does dispersal capacity matter?. Ecography 32(1), 34–45 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ozinga, W. A. et al. Predictability of plant species composition from environmental conditions is constrained by dispersal limitation. Oikos 108(3), 555–561 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Takahashi, K. & Kamitani, T. Effect of dispersal capacity on forest plant migration at a landscape scale. J. Ecol. 92(5), 778–785 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Koo, K. A. & Park, S. U. The effect of interplays among climate change, land-use change, and dispersal capacity on plant redistribution. Ecol. Indic. 142, 109192 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, I. C., Hill, J. K., Ohlemüller, R., Roy, D. B. & Thomas, C. D. Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming. Science 333(6045), 1024–1026 (2011).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Poloczanska, E. S. et al. Global imprint of climate change on marine life. Nat. Clim. Change 3(10), 919–925 (2013).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Vanderwal, J. et al. Focus on poleward shifts in species’ distribution underestimates the fingerprint of climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 239–243 (2013).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Lira, A. F. de A., Badillo-Montaño, R., Lira-Noriega, A. & de Albuquerque, C. M. R. Potential distribution patterns of scorpions in north-eastern Brazil under scenarios of future climate change. Austral Ecol. 45(2), 215–228 (2020).Castro, M. B. et al. Will the emblematic southern conifer Araucaria angustifolia survive to climate change in Brazil?. Biodivers. Conserv. 29(2), 591–607 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wilson, O. J., Walters, R. J., Mayle, F. E., Lingner, D. V. & Vibrans, A. C. Cold spot microrefugia hold the key to survival for Brazil’s Critically Endangered Araucaria tree. Glob. Change Biol. 25(12), 4339–4351 (2019).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Esser, L. F. et al. Future uncertainties for the distribution and conservation of Paubrasilia echinata under climate change. Acta Bot. Bras. 33(4), 770–776 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cabanne, G. S. et al. Effects of Pleistocene climate changes on species ranges and evolutionary processes in the Neotropical Atlantic Forest. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 119(4), 856–872 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Iturralde-Pólit, P., Dangles, O., Burneo, S. F. & Meynard, C. N. The effects of climate change on a mega-diverse country: predicted shifts in mammalian species richness and turnover in continental Ecuador. Biotropica 49(6), 821–831 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vu, T. T. et al. An assessment of the impact of climate change on the distribution of the grey-shanked douc Pygathrix cinerea using an ecological niche model. Primates 61(2), 267–275 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sales, L. P., Ribeiro, B. R., Pires, M. M., Chapman, C. A. & Loyola, R. Recalculating route: dispersal constraints will drive the redistribution of Amazon primates in the Anthropocene. Ecography 42(10), 1789–1801 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hill, S. E. & Winder, I. C. Predicting the impacts of climate change on Papio baboon biogeography: Are widespread, generalist primates ‘safe’?. J. Biogeogr. 46(7), 1380–1405 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Gillings, S., Balmer, D. E. & Fuller, R. J. Directionality of recent bird distribution shifts and climate change in Great Britain. Glob. Change Biol. 21(6), 2155–2168 (2015).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Fernández, D. et al. The current status of the world’s primates: Mapping threats to understand priorities for primate conservation. Int. J. Primatol. 43, 15–39 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stewart, B. M., Turner, S. E. & Matthews, H. D. Climate change impacts on potential future ranges of non-human primate species. Clim. Change 162, 2301–2318 (2020).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Estrada, A. et al. Primates in peril: The significance of Brazil, Madagascar, Indonesia and the Democratic Republic of the Congo for global primate conservation. PeerJ 6, e4869; https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4869 (2018).Estrada, A. et al. Impending extinction crisis of the world’s primates: Why primates matter. Sci. Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600946 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Graham, T. L., Matthews, H. D. & Turner, S. E. A global-scale evaluation of primate exposure and vulnerability to climate change. Int. J. Primatol. 37(2), 158–174 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Meyer, A. L. S., Pie, M. R. & Passos, F. C. Assessing the exposure of lion tamarins (Leontopithecus spp.) to future climate change. Am. J. Primatol. 76(6), 551–562 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Braz, A. G., Lorini, M. L. & Vale, M. M. Climate change is likely to affect the distribution but not parapatry of the Brazilian marmoset monkeys (Callithrix spp.). Divers. Distrib. 25(4), 536–550 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lima, A. A. de, Ribeiro, M. C., Grelle, C. E. de V. & Pinto, M. P. Impacts of climate changes on spatio-temporal diversity patterns of Atlantic Forest primates. Perspect. Ecol. Conserv. 17(2), 50–56 (2019).Colombo, A. F. & Joly, C. A. Brazilian Atlantic Forest lato sensu: the most ancient Brazilian forest, and a biodiversity hotspot, is highly threatened by climate change. Braz. J. Biol. 70(3), 697–708 (2010).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zwiener, V. P., Lira-Noriega, A., Grady, C. J., Padial, A. A. & Vitule, J. R. Climate change as a driver of biotic homogenization of woody plants in the Atlantic Forest. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27(3), 298–309 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lemes, P., Melo, A. S. & Loyola, R. D. Climate change threatens protected areas of the Atlantic Forest. Biodivers. Conserv. 23(2), 357–368 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rezende, G. C., Sobral-Souza, T. & Culot, L. Integrating climate and landscape models to prioritize areas and conservation strategies for an endangered arboreal primate. Am. J. Primatol. 82(12), e23202. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.23202 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Silva, L. B. et al. How future climate change and deforestation can drastically affect the species of monkeys endemic to the eastern Amazon, and priorities for conservation. Biodivers. Conserv. 31, 971–988 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sales, L., Ribeiro, B. R., Chapman, C. A. & Loyola, R. Multiple dimensions of climate change on the distribution of Amazon primates. Perspect. Ecol. Conserv. 18(2), 83–90 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Moraes, B., Razgour, O., Souza-Alves, J., Boubli, J. & Bezerra, B. Habitat suitability for primate conservation in north-east Brazil. Oryx 54(6), 803–813 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hanson, J. O. et al. Global conservation of species’ niches. Nature 580, 232–234 (2020).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hanson, J. O., Rhodes, J. R., Riginos, C. & Fuller, R. A. Environmental and geographic variables are effective surrogates for genetic variation in conservation planning. PNAS 114(48), 12755–12760 (2017).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Scheele, B. C., Foster, C. N., Banks, S. C. & Lindenmayer, D. B. Niche contractions in declining species: Mechanisms and consequences. Trends Ecol. Evol. 32(5), 346–355 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Travis, J. M. J. et al. Dispersal and species’ responses to climate change. Oikos 122, 1532–1540 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lenoir, J. & Svenning, J.-C. Climate-related range shifts – a global multidimensional synthesis and new research directions. Ecography 38, 15–28 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Raghunathan, N., François, L., Huynen, M. C., Oliveira, L. C. & Hambuckers, A. Modelling the distribution of key tree species used by lion tamarins in the Brazilian Atlantic forest under a scenario of future climate change. Reg. Environ. Change 15, 683–693 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lawler, J. J., Ruesch, A. S., Olden, J. D. & McRae, B. H. Projected climate-driven faunal movement routes. Ecol. Lett. 16(8), 1014–1022 (2013).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Årevall, J., Early, R., Estrada, A., Wennergren, U. & Eklöf, A. C. Conditions for successful range shifts under climate change: The role of species dispersal and landscape configuration. Divers. Distrib. 24, 1598–1611 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Carroll, C., Lawler, J. J., Roberts, D. R. & Hamann, A. Biotic and climatic velocity identify contrasting areas of vulnerability to climate change. PLoS ONE 10(10), e0142024. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140486 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Davies, T. J., Purvis, A. & Gittleman, J. L. Quaternary climate change and the geographic ranges of mammals. Am. Nat. 174(3), 297–307 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gaston, K.J. The structure and dynamics of geographic ranges (Oxford University Press, 2003).Meyer, A. L. S. & Pie, M. R. Climate change estimates surpass rates of climatic niche evolution in primates. Int. J. Primatol. 43, 40–56 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zeigler, S. L., Fagan, W. F., DeFries, R. & Raboy, B. E. Identifying important forest patches for the long-term persistence of the endangered golden-headed lion tamarin (Leontopithecus chrysomelas). Trop. Conserv. Sci. 3(1), 63–77 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dosen, J., Fortin, M. J. & Raboy, B. E. Restoration strategies to improve connectivity for golden-headed lion tamarins (Leontopithecus chrysomelas) in the Bahian Atlantic Forest. Brazil. Int. J. Primatol. 38(5), 962–983 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Piffer, P. R., Rosa, M. R., Tambosi, L. R., Metzger, J. P. & Uriarte, M. Turnover rates of regenerated forests challenge restoration efforts in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Environ. Res. Lett. 17(4), 045009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac5ae1 (2022).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Estrada, A., Raboy, B. E. & Oliveira, L. C. Agroecosystems and primate conservation in the tropics: A review. Am. J. Primatol. 74, 696–711 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Galea, B., Humle, T. Identifying and mitigating the impacts on primates of transportation and service corridors. Conserv. Biol. 36, e13836; https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13836 (2022).Gouveia, S. F. et al. Functional planning units for the management of an endangered Brazilian titi monkey. Am. J. Primatol. 79(5), e22637; https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.22637 (2017).Rezende, G. et al. Leontopithecus chrysopygus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, e.T11505A17935400; https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2020-2.RLTS.T11505A17935400.en (2020).Culot, L. et al. ATLANTIC-PRIMATES: A dataset of communities and occurrences of primates in the Atlantic Forests of South America. Ecology 100(1), e02525; https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2525 (2018).Fick, S. E. & Hijmans, R. J. WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 37(12), 4302–4315 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Quinn, G. P. & Keough, M. J. Experimental design and data analysis for biologists (Cambridge University Press, 2002).Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N. & Elphick, C. S. A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1(1), 3–14 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Elith, J. et al. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Divers. Distrib. 17(1), 43–57 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P. & Schapire, R. E. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Modell. 190(3–4), 231–259 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Elith, J. et al. Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29(2), 129–151 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Muscarella, R. et al. ENMeval: An R package for conducting spatially independent evaluations and estimating optimal model complexity for ecological niche models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 5(11), 1198–1205 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pearson, R. G., Raxworthy, C. J., Nakamura, M. & Townsend Peterson, A. Predicting species distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: A test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar. J. Biogeogr. 34(1), 102–117 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shcheglovitova, M. & Anderson, R. P. Estimating optimal complexity for ecological niche models: A jackknife approach for species with small sample sizes. Ecol. Modell. 269, 9–17 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wenger, S. J. & Olden, J. D. Assessing transferability of ecological models: An underappreciated aspect of statistical validation. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3(2), 260–267 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hidasi-Neto, J. et al. Climate change will drive mammal species loss and biotic homogenization in the Cerrado Biodiversity Hotspot. Perspect. Ecol. Conserv. 17(2), 57–63 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Bowman, J., Jaeger, J. A. G. & Fahrig, L. Dispersal distance of mammals is proportional to home range size. Ecology 83(7), 2049–2055 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Galán-Acedo, C., Arroyo-Rodríguez, V., Andresen, E. & Arasa-Gisbert, R. Ecological traits of the world’s primates. Sci. Data 6, 55. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0059-9 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pacifici, M. et al. Generation length for mammals. Nat. Conserv. 5, 89–94 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing Vienna Austria (2017).QGIS Development Team. QGIS Geographic Information System (2016). More

Reeburgh, W. S. Oceanic methane biogeochemistry. Chem. Rev. 107, 486–513 (2007).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Chadwick, G. L. et al. Comparative genomics reveals electron transfer and syntrophic mechanisms differentiating methanotrophic and methanogenic archaea. PLoS Biol. 20, e3001508 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Haroon, M. F. et al. Anaerobic oxidation of methane coupled to nitrate reduction in a novel archaeal lineage. Nature 500, 567–570 (2013).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hallam, S. J. et al. Reverse methanogenesis: testing the hypothesis with environmental genomics. Science 305, 1457–1462 (2004).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
McGlynn, S. E. Energy metabolism during anaerobic methane oxidation in ANME Archaea. Microbes Environ. 32, 5–13 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Beal, E. J., House, C. H. & Orphan, V. J. Manganese- and iron-dependent marine methane oxidation. Science 325, 184–187 (2009).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
McGlynn, S. E., Chadwick, G. L., Kempes, C. P. & Orphan, V. J. Single cell activity reveals direct electron transfer in methanotrophic consortia. Nature 526, 531–535 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wegener, G., Krukenberg, V., Riedel, D., Tegetmeyer, H. E. & Boetius, A. Intercellular wiring enables electron transfer between methanotrophic archaea and bacteria. Nature 526, 587–590 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Cai, C. et al. A methanotrophic archaeon couples anaerobic oxidation of methane to Fe(III) reduction. ISME J. 12, 1929–1939 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ettwig, K. F. et al. Archaea catalyze iron-dependent anaerobic oxidation of methane. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 12792–12796 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Leu, A. O. et al. Anaerobic methane oxidation coupled to manganese reduction by members of the Methanoperedenaceae. ISME J. 14, 1030–1041 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Leu, A. O. et al. Lateral gene transfer drives metabolic flexibility in the anaerobic methane-oxidizing archaeal family Methanoperedenaceae. mBio 11, e01325-20 (2020).Cai, C. et al. Response of the anaerobic methanotrophic archaeon Candidatus ‘Methanoperedens nitroreducens’ to the long-term ferrihydrite amendment. Front. Microbiol. 13, 799859 (2022).Arshad, A. et al. A metagenomics-based metabolic model of nitrate-dependent anaerobic oxidation of methane by Methanoperedens-like Archaea. Front. Microbiol. 6, 1423 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Raghoebarsing, A. A. et al. A microbial consortium couples anaerobic methane oxidation to denitrification. Nature 440, 918–921 (2006).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Walker, D. J. F. et al. The archaellum of Methanospirillum hungatei is electrically conductive. mBio 10, e00579-19 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Krukenberg, V. et al. Gene expression and ultrastructure of meso- and thermophilic methanotrophic consortia. Environ. Microbiol. 20, 1651–1666 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Schubert, C. J. et al. Evidence for anaerobic oxidation of methane in sediments of a freshwater system (Lago di Cadagno). FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 76, 26–38 (2011).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Stahl, D. A. & Amann, R. in Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics (eds Stackebrandt, E. & Goodfellow, M.) 205–248 (Wiley, 1991).Wallner, G., Amann, R. & Beisker, W. Optimizing fluorescent in situ hybridization with rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes for flow cytometric identification of microorganisms. Cytometry 14, 136–143 (1993).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bowers, R. M. et al. Minimum information about a single amplified genome (MISAG) and a metagenome- assembled genome (MIMAG) of Bacteria and Archaea. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 660 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Vo, C. H., Goyal, N., Karimi, I. A. & Kraft, M. First observation of an acetate switch in a methanogenic autotroph (Methanococcus maripaludis S2). Microbiol. Insights 13, 1178636120945300 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cai, C. et al. Acetate production from anaerobic oxidation of methane via intracellular storage compounds. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 7371–7379 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ratcliff, W. C. & Denison, R. F. Bacterial persistence and bet hedging in Sinorhizobium meliloti. Commun. Integr. Biol. 4, 98–100 (2011).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ma, K., Schicho, R. N., Kelly, R. M. & Adams, M. W. Hydrogenase of the hyperthermophile Pyrococcus furiosus is an elemental sulfur reductase or sulfhydrogenase: evidence for a sulfur-reducing hydrogenase ancestor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 5341–5344 (1993).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Simon, G.-C. et al. Response of the anaerobic methanotroph “Candidatus Methanoperedens nitroreducens” to oxygen stress. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 84, e01832-18 (2018).
Google Scholar 
van der Star, W. R. L. et al. The membrane bioreactor: a novel tool to grow anammox bacteria as free cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 101, 286–294 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Duggin, I. G. et al. CetZ tubulin-like proteins control archaeal cell shape. Nature 519, 362–365 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Schwarzer, S., Rodriguez-Franco, M., Oksanen, H. M. & Quax, T. E. F. Growth phase dependent cell shape of Haloarcula. Microorganisms 9, 231 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Dang, H. Y. & Lovell, C. R. Microbial surface colonization and biofilm development in marine environments. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 80, 91–138 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Howard-Varona, C., Hargreaves, K. R., Abedon, S. T. & Sullivan, M. B. Lysogeny in nature: mechanisms, impact and ecology of temperate phages. ISME J. 11, 1511–1520 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pires, D. P., Melo, L. D. R. & Azeredo, J. Understanding the complex phage–host interactions in biofilm communities. Annu. Rev. Virol. 8, 73–94 (2021).Canchaya, C., Proux, C., Fournous, G., Bruttin, A. & Brüssow, H. Prophage genomics. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 67, 238–276 (2003).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, X. et al. Polyhydroxyalkanoate-driven current generation via acetate by an anaerobic methanotrophic consortium. Water Res. 221, 118743 (2022).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Knittel, K., Lösekann, T., Boetius, A., Kort, R. & Amann, R. Diversity and distribution of methanotrophic Archaea at cold seeps. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 467–479 (2005).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Orphan, V. J., House, C. H., Hinrichs, K.-U., McKeegan, K. D. & DeLong, E. F. Multiple archaeal groups mediate methane oxidation in anoxic cold seep sediments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 7663–7668 (2002).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Orphan, V. J. et al. Geological, geochemical, and microbiological heterogeneity of the seafloor around methane vents in the Eel River Basin, offshore California. Chem. Geol. 205, 265–289 (2004).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ackermann, M. A functional perspective on phenotypic heterogeneity in microorganisms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13, 497–508 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Robinson, R. W. Life cycles in the methanogenic archaebacterium Methanosarcina mazei. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 52, 17–27 (1986).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Daims, H., Stoecker, K. & Wagner, M. in Molecular Microbial Ecology (eds Osborn, A. M. & Smith, C. J.) 213–239 (Taylor & Francis, 2005).Ludwig, W. et al. ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1363–1371 (2004).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–D596 (2013).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Yilmaz, L. S., Parnerkar, S. & Noguera, D. R. mathFISH, a web tool that uses thermodynamics-based mathematical models for in silico evaluation of oligonucleotide probes for fluorescence in situ hybridization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 1118–1122 (2011).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Stoecker, K., Dorninger, C., Daims, H. & Wagner, M. Double labeling of oligonucleotide probes for fluorescence in situ hybridization (DOPE-FISH) improves signal intensity and increases rRNA accessibility. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76, 922–926 (2010).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Fuchs, B. M., Glockner, F. O., Wulf, J. & Amann, R. Unlabeled helper oligonucleotides increase the in situ accessibility to 16S rRNA of fluorescently labeled oligonucleotide probes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 3603–3607 (2000).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Manz, W., Amann, R., Ludwig, W., Wagner, M. & Schleifer, K.-H. Phylogenetic oligodeoxynucleotide probes for the major subclasses of Proteobacteria: problems and solutions. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 15, 593–600 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ostle, A. G. & Holt, J. G. Nile blue A as a fluorescent stain for poly-beta-hydroxybutyrate. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 44, 238–241 (1982).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Klindworth, A. et al. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e1 (2013).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 17, 10–12 (2011).Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bolyen, E. et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1091 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Callahan, B. J. et al. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Eren, A. M., Vineis, J. H., Morrison, H. G. & Sogin, M. L. A filtering method to generate high quality short reads using Illumina paired-end technology. PLoS ONE 8, e66643 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Minoche, A. E., Dohm, J. C. & Himmelbauer, H. Evaluation of genomic high-throughput sequencing data generated on Illumina HiSeq and genome analyzer systems. Genome Biol. 12, R112 (2011).Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P. & Tyson, G. W. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 25, 1043–1055 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Warren, R. L. et al. LINKS: scalable, alignment-free scaffolding of draft genomes with long reads. GigaScience 4, 35 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Walker, B. J. et al. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS ONE 9, e112963 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wick, R. R., Schultz, M. B., Zobel, J. & Holt, K. E. Bandage: interactive visualization of de novo genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 31, 3350–3352 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wick, R. R. et al. Trycycler: consensus long-read assemblies for bacterial genomes. Genome Biol. 22, 266 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kolmogorov, M., Yuan, J., Lin, Y. & Pevzner, P. A. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 540–546 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wick, R. R. & Holt, K. E. Benchmarking of long-read assemblers for prokaryote whole genome sequencing. F1000Res. 8, 2138 (2021).Vaser, R. & Šikić, M. Time- and memory-efficient genome assembly with Raven. Nat. Comput. Sci. 1, 332–336 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wick, R. R. & Holt, K. E. Polypolish: short-read polishing of long-read bacterial genome assemblies. PLoS Comput. Biol. 18, e1009802 (2022).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Chaumeil, P.-A., Mussig, A. J., Hugenholtz, P. & Parks, D. H. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics 36, 1925–1927 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Li, H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 34, 3094–3100 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Poplin, R. et al. Scaling accurate genetic variant discovery to tens of thousands of samples. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/201178 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Heller, D. & Vingron, M. SVIM: structural variant identification using mapped long reads. Bioinformatics 35, 2907–2915 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Seemann, T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30, 2068–2069 (2014).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Buchfink, B., Xie, C. & Huson, D. H. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods 12, 59–60 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Suzek, B. E., Huang, H., McGarvey, P., Mazumder, R. & Wu, C. H. UniRef: comprehensive and non-redundant UniProt reference clusters. Bioinformatics 23, 1282–1288 (2007).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Tatusov, R. L. et al. The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics 4, 41 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Finn, R. D. et al. The Pfam protein families database: towards a more sustainable future. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D279–D285 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Haft, D. H. et al. TIGRFAMs and genome properties in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D387–D395 (2013).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zhou, Z. et al. METABOLIC: high-throughput profiling of microbial genomes for functional traits, metabolism, biogeochemistry, and community-scale functional networks. Microbiome 10, 33 (2022).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Eddy, S. R. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002195 (2011).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bateman, A. et al. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, D138–D141 (2004).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Amann, R. I. et al. Combination of 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes with flow cytometry for analyzing mixed microbial populations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56, 1919–1925 (1990).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Daims, H., Brühl, A., Amann, R., Schleifer, K. H. & Wagner, M. The domain-specific probe EUB338 is insufficient for the detection of all Bacteria: development and evaluation of a more comprehensive probe set. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 22, 434–444 (1999).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Schmid, M. C. et al. Biomarkers for in situ detection of anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing (anammox) bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 1677–1684 (2005).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Yu, N. Y. et al. PSORTb 3.0: improved protein subcellular localization prediction with refined localization subcategories and predictive capabilities for all prokaryotes. Bioinformatics 26, 1608–1615 (2010).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bendtsen, J. D., Nielsen, H., von Heijne, G. & Brunak, S. Improved prediction of signal peptides: SignalP 3.0. J. Mol. Biol. 340, 783–795 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar  More