Philippa Kaur

IPCC (ed.). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, 2021).Lionello, P. & Scarascia, L. The relation between climate change in the Mediterranean region and global warming. Reg. Environ. Change 18, 1481–1493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1290-1 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tuel, A. & Eltahir, E. A. B. Why is the Mediterranean a climate change hot spot?. J. Clim. 33, 5829–5843. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0910.1 (2020).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Newbold, T., Oppenheimer, P., Etard, A. & Williams, J. J. Tropical and Mediterranean biodiversity is disproportionately sensitive to land-use and climate change. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1630–1638. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01303-0 (2020).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ruffault, J. et al. Increased likelihood of heat-induced large wildfires in the Mediterranean Basin. Sci. Rep. 10, 13790. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70069-z (2020).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Tramblay, Y. et al. Challenges for drought assessment in the Mediterranean region under future climate scenarios. Earth Sci. Rev. 210, 103348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103348 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nistor, M.-M. & Mîndrescu, M. Climate change effect on groundwater resources in Emilia-Romagna region: an improved assessment through NISTOR-CEGW method. Quatern. Int. 504, 214–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2017.11.018 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Paoletti, E. Impact of ozone on Mediterranean forests: a review. Environ. Pollut. (Barking Essex: 1987) 144, 463–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2005.12.051 (2006).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bellard, C., Bertelsmeier, C., Leadley, P., Thuiller, W. & Courchamp, F. Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 15, 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01736.x (2012).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wagner, D. L., Fox, R., Salcido, D. M. & Dyer, L. A. A window to the world of global insect declines: Moth biodiversity trends are complex and heterogeneous. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2002549117 (2021).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Outhwaite, C. L., McCann, P. & Newbold, T. Agriculture and climate change are reshaping insect biodiversity worldwide. Nature 605, 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04644-x (2022).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Uhler, J. et al. Relationship of insect biomass and richness with land use along a climate gradient. Nat. Commun. 12, 5946. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26181-3 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Welti, E. A. R. et al. Temperature drives variation in flying insect biomass across a German malaise trap network. Insect Conserv. Divers. 15, 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12555 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hoshika, Y. et al. Species-specific variation of photosynthesis and mesophyll conductance to ozone and drought in three Mediterranean oaks. Physiol. Plant. 174, e13639. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13639 (2022).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Haberstroh, S. et al. Terpenoid emissions of two Mediterranean woody species in response to drought stress. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 1071. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01071 (2018).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Toscano, S., Ferrante, A. & Romano, D. Response of Mediterranean ornamental plants to drought stress. Horticulturae 5, 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae5010006 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gely, C., Laurance, S. G. W. & Stork, N. E. How do herbivorous insects respond to drought stress in trees?. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 95, 434–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12571 (2020).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Teixeira, N. C., Valim, J. O. S., Oliveira, M. G. A. & Campos, W. G. Combined effects of soil silicon and drought stress on host plant chemical and ultrastructural quality for leaf-chewing and sap-sucking insects. J. Agro. Crop Sci. 206, 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12386 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Herrando, S. et al. Contrasting impacts of precipitation on Mediterranean birds and butterflies. Sci. Rep. 9, 5680. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42171-4 (2019).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Haeler, E., Fiedler, K. & Grill, A. What prolongs a butterfly’s life?: Trade-offs between dormancy, fecundity and body size. PLoS ONE 9, e111955. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111955 (2014).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Yela, J. L. & Herrera, C. M. Seasonality and life cycles of woody plant-feeding noctuid moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Mediterranean habitats. Ecol. Entomol. 18, 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1993.tb01099.x (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
Uhl, B., Wölfling, M. & Fiedler, K. Local, forest stand and landscape-scale correlates of plant communities in isolated coastal forest reserves. Plant Biosyst. 155, 457–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2020.1762776 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Andreatta, G. Proposal for the establishment of a “silvio-museum” in the Ravenna historical pinewoods. Forest@-J. Silvicult. For. Ecol. 7, 237–246 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Wölfling, M., Uhl, B. & Fiedler, K. Multi-decadal surveys in a Mediterranean forest reserve: Do succession and isolation drive moth species richness?. Nat. Conserv. 35, 25–40. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.35.32934 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Uhl, B., Wölfling, M. & Fiedler, K. Understanding small-scale insect diversity patterns inside two nature reserves: the role of local and landscape factors. Biodivers Conserv 29, 2399–2418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-020-01981-z (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Uhl, B., Wölfling, M., Fiala, B. & Fiedler, K. Micro-moth communities mirror environmental stress gradients within a Mediterranean nature reserve. Basic Appl. Ecol. 17, 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2015.10.002 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Axmacher, J. C. & Fiedler, K. Manual versus automatic moth sampling at equal light sources: a comparison of catches from Mt. Kilimanjaro. J. Lepidopterists’ Soc. 58, 196–202 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Brehm, G. & Axmacher, J. C. A comparison of manual and automatic moth sampling methods (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae, Geometridae) in a rain forest in Costa Rica. Environ. Entomol. 35, 757–764. https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-35.3.757 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
van Langevelde, F., Ettema, J. A., Donners, M., WallisDeVries, M. F. & Groenendijk, D. Effect of spectral composition of artificial light on the attraction of moths. Biol. Conserv. 144, 2274–2281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.06.004 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Niermann, J. & Brehm, G. The number of moths caught by light traps is affected more by microhabitat than the type of UV lamp used in grassland habitat. Eur. J. Entomol. 119, 36–42 ; https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2022.004 (2022).Potocky, P. et al. Life-history traits of Central European moths: gradients of variation and their association with rarity and threats. Insect Conserv. Divers. 11, 493–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12291 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R package version 2.5–7 https://www.r-project.org/ (2021).McLeod, A. I. Kendall: Kendall rank correlation and Mann-Kendall trend test https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Kendall (2011).Chao, A. et al. Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: a framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies. Ecol. Monogr. 84, 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-0133.1 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pike, N. Using false discovery rates for multiple comparisons in ecology and evolution. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2, 278–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00061.x (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Oksanen, J. et al. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5–7. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/index.html (2020).De Luca, P., Messori, G., Faranda, D., Ward, P. J. & Coumou, D. Compound warm–dry and cold–wet events over the Mediterranean. Earth System Dynamics 11(3), 793–805 (2020).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Manning, C. et al. Increased probability of compound long-duration dry and hot events in Europe during summer (1950–2013). Environ. Res. Lett. 14(9), 094006 (2019).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Macgregor, C. J. & Scott-Brown, A. S. Nocturnal pollination: an overlooked ecosystem service vulnerable to environmental change. Emerg. Top. Life Sci. 4, 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1042/ETLS20190134 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Seress, G. et al. Impact of urbanization on abundance and phenology of caterpillars and consequences for breeding in an insectivorous bird. Ecol. Appl. 28, 1143–1156. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1730 (2018).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Radchuk, V., Turlure, C. & Schtickzelle, N. Each life stage matters: the importance of assessing the response to climate change over the complete life cycle in butterflies. J. Anim. Ecol. 82, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.02029.x (2013).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Conrad, K. F., Woiwod, I. P. & Perry, J. N. Long-term decline in abundance and distribution of the garden tiger moth (Arctia caja) in Great Britain. Biol. Conserv. 106, 329–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00258-0 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mathbout, S., Lopez-Bustins, J. A., Royé, D., Martin-Vide, J. & Benhamrouche, A. Spatiotemporal variability of daily precipitation concentration and its relationship to teleconnection patterns over the Mediterranean during 1975–2015. Int. J. Climatol. 40, 1435–1455. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6278 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hillebrand, H. et al. Biodiversity change is uncoupled from species richness trends: Consequences for conservation and monitoring. J. Appl. Ecol. 55, 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12959 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Thomsen, P. F. et al. Resource specialists lead local insect community turnover associated with temperature – analysis of an 18-year full-seasonal record of moths and beetles. J. Anim. Ecol. 85, 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12452 (2016).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Forrest, J. R. Complex responses of insect phenology to climate change. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 17, 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2016.07.002 (2016).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Du Plessis, H., Schlemmer, M.-L. & van den Berg, J. The effect of temperature on the development of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Insects https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11040228 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Jallow, M. F. A. & Matsumura, M. Influence of temperature on the rate of development of Helicoverpa armigera (Huebner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 36, 427–430. https://doi.org/10.1303/aez.2001.427 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mironidis, G. K. & Savopoulou-Soultani, M. Development, survivorship, and reproduction of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) under constant and alternating temperatures. Environ. Entomol. 37, 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/37.1.16 (2008).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sokame, B. M. et al. Influence of temperature on the interaction for resource utilization between Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), and a community of Lepidopteran maize stemborers larvae. Insects https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11020073 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Johansson, F., Orizaola, G. & Nilsson-Örtman, V. Temperate insects with narrow seasonal activity periods can be as vulnerable to climate change as tropical insect species. Sci. Rep. 10, 8822. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65608-7 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
White, T. C. R. The abundance of invertebrate herbivores in relation to the availability of nitrogen in stressed food plants. Oecologia 63, 90–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379790 (1984).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Price, P. W. The plant vigor hypothesis and herbivore attack. Oikos 62, 244. https://doi.org/10.2307/3545270 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sarfraz, R. M., Dosdall, L. M. & Keddie, A. B. Bottom-up effects of host plant nutritional quality on Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) and top-down effects of herbivore attack on plant compensatory ability. Eur. J. Entomol. 106, 583–594. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2009.073 (2009).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

Beer, C. et al. Terrestrial gross carbon dioxide uptake: global distribution and covariation with climate. Science 329, 834–838 (2010).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Luyssaert, S. et al. CO2 balance of boreal, temperate, and tropical forests derived from a global database. Glob. Change Biol. 13, 2509–2537 (2007).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pan, Y. D. et al. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333, 988–993 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Quesada, C. A. et al. Variations in chemical and physical properties of Amazon forest soils in relation to their genesis. Biogeosciences 7, 1515–1541 (2010).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, W. L. et al. Variations in atmospheric CO2 growth rates coupled with tropical temperature. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 13061–13066 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Clark, D. A. et al. Reviews and syntheses: Field data to benchmark the carbon cycle models for tropical forests. Biogeosciences 14, 4663–4690 (2017).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Huntingford, C. et al. Simulated resilience of tropical rainforests to CO2-induced climate change. Nat. Geosci. 6, 268–273 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fleischer, K. et al. Amazon forest response to CO2 fertilization dependent on plant phosphorus acquisition. Nat. Geosci. 12, 736–741 (2019).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Reed, S. C. et al. Incorporating phosphorus cycling into global modeling efforts: a worthwhile, tractable endeavor. N. Phytologist 208, 324–329 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Vitousek, P. M. & Howarth, R. W. Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea – how can it occur? Biogeochemistry 13, 87–115 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kattge, J. et al. Quantifying photosynthetic capacity and its relationship to leaf nitrogen content for global-scale terrestrial biosphere models. Glob. Change Biol. 15, 976–991 (2009).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rogers, A. The use and misuse of Vc,max in Earth System Models. Photosynthesis Res. 119, 15–29 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Field, C. B. & Mooney, H. A. in On the economy of plant form and function. (ed T. J. Givnish) 25-55. (Cambridge University Press, 1986).Cramer, W. et al. Global response of terrestrial ecosystem structure and function to CO2 and climate change: results from six dynamic global vegetation models. Glob. Change Biol. 7, 357–373 (2001).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Goll, D. S. et al. Nutrient limitation reduces land carbon uptake in simulations with a model of combined carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycling. Biogeosciences 9, 3547–3569 (2012).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Raven, J. A. Rubisco: still the most abundant protein of Earth? N. Phytologist 198, 1–3 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Evans, J. R. Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C3 plants. Oecologia 78, 9–19 (1989).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Thornton, P. E. et al. Influence of carbon-nitrogen cycle coupling on land model response to CO2 fertilization and climate variability. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 21, GB4018 (2007).ADS 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Reich, P. B. et al. Leaf phosphorus influences the photosynthesis-nitrogen relation: a cross-biome analysis of 314 species. Oecologia 160, 207–212 (2009).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Achat, D. L. et al. Future challenges in coupled C-N-P cycle models for terrestrial ecosystems under global change: a review. Biogeochemistry 131, 173–202 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Arora, V. K. et al. Carbon–concentration and carbon–climate feedbacks in CMIP6 models and their comparison to CMIP5 models. Biogeosciences 17, 4173–4222 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Vitousek, P. M. et al. Terrestrial phosphorus limitation: mechanisms, implications, and nitrogen-phosphorus interactions. Ecol. Appl. 20, 5–15 (2010).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Du, E. et al. Global patterns of terrestrial nitrogen and phosphorus limitation. Nat. Geosci. 13, 221–226 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Carstensen, A. et al. The impacts of phosphorus deficiency on the photosynthetic electron transport chain. Plant Physiol. 177, 271–284 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ellsworth, D. S. et al. Phosphorus recycling in photorespiration maintains high photosynthetic capacity in woody species. Plant Cell Environ. 38, 1142–1156 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
von Caemmerer, S. Biochemical Models of Leaf Photosynthesis. (CSIRO Publishing, 2000).Brooks, A. et al. Effects of phosphorus nutrition on the response of photosynthesis to CO2 and O2, activation of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase and amounts of ribulose bisphosphate and 3-phosphoglycerate in spinach leaves. Photosynthesis Res. 15, 133–141 (1988).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, J. L. et al. Coordination theory of leaf nitrogen distribution in a canopy. Oecologia 93, 63–69 (1993).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Domingues, T. F. et al. Co-limitation of photosynthetic capacity by nitrogen and phosphorus in West Africa woodlands. Plant Cell Environ. 33, 959–980 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Farquhar, G. D. et al. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149, 78–90 (1980).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Soong, J. L. et al. Soil properties explain tree growth and mortality, but not biomass, across phosphorus-depleted tropical forests. Sci. Rep. 10, 2302 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Norby, R. J. et al. Informing models through empirical relationships between foliar phosphorus, nitrogen and photosynthesis across diverse woody species in tropical forests of Panama. N. Phytologist 215, 1425–1437 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Crous, K. Y. et al. Nitrogen and phosphorus availabilities interact to modulate leaf trait scaling relationships across six plant functional types in a controlled-environment study. N. Phytologist 215, 992–1008 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Domingues, T. F. et al. Parameterization of canopy structure and leaf-level gas exchange for an eastern Amazonian tropical rain forest (Tapajos National Forest, Para, Brazil). Earth Interactions 9, 17 (2005).Augusto, L. et al. Soil parent material-A major driver of plant nutrient limitations in terrestrial ecosystems. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 3808–3824 (2017).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lambers, H. et al. Plant mineral nutrition in ancient landscapes: high plant species diversity on infertile soils is linked to functional diversity for nutritional strategies. Plant Soil 347, 7–27 (2011).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Yan, L. et al. Responses of foliar phosphorus fractions to soil age are diverse along a 2 Myr dune chronosequence. N. Phytologist 223, 1621–1633 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yang, X. & Post, W. M. Phosphorus transformations as a function of pedogenesis: A synthesis of soil phosphorus data using Hedley fractionation method. Biogeosciences 8, 2907–2916 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Duursma, R. A. Plantecophys – An R package for analysing and modelling leaf gas exchange data. Plos One 10, e0143346 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Goll, D. S. et al. A representation of the phosphorus cycle for ORCHIDEE. Geoscientific Model Dev. 10, 3745–3770 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Walker, A. P. et al. The impact of alternative trait-scaling hypotheses for the maximum photosynthetic carboxylation rate (V-cmax) on global gross primary production. N. Phytologist 215, 1370–1386 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hou, E. et al. Global meta-analysis shows pervasive phosphorus limitation of aboveground plant production in natural terrestrial ecosystems. Nat. Commun. 11, 637–645 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kattge, J. et al. TRY plant trait database – enhanced coverage and open access. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 119–188 (2020).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Neter, J. et al. Applied Linear Statistical Models, 4th ed., (McGraw-Hill, 1996).Tagesson, T. et al. Recent divergence in the contributions of tropical and boreal forests to the terrestrial carbon sink. Nat. Ecol. Evolution 4, 202–209 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Turner, B. L. et al. Pervasive phosphorus limitation of tree species but not communities in tropical forests. Nature 490, 123–456 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Thornton, P. E. et al. Biospheric feedback effects in a synchronously coupled model of human and Earth systems. Nat. Clim. Chang. 7, 496-+ (2017).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wieder, W. R. et al. Future productivity and carbon storage limited by terrestrial nutrient availability. Nat. Geosci. 8, 441–444 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Walker, A. P. et al. The relationship of leaf photosynthetic traits – Vcmax and Jmax – to leaf nitrogen, leaf phosphorus, and specific leaf area: a meta-analysis and modeling study. Ecol. Evolution 4, 3218–3235 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lambers, H. et al. Proteaceae from severely phosphorus-impoverished soils extensively replace phospholipids with galactolipids and sulfolipids during leaf development to achieve a high photosynthetic phosphorus-use-efficiency. N. Phytologist 196, 1098–1108 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jiang, M. K. et al. Towards a more physiological representation of vegetation phosphorus processes in land surface models. N. Phytologist 222, 1223–1229 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Leuning, R. Scaling to a common temperature improves the correlation between the photosynthesis parameters Jmax and Vcmax. J. Exp. Bot. 48, 345–347 (1997).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bonardi, V. et al. Photosystem II core phosphorylation and photosynthetic acclimation require two different protein kinases. Nature 437, 1179–1182 (2005).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Seiler, C. et al. Are terrestrial biosphere models fit for simulating the global land carbon sink? J. Adv. Model Earth Syst. 14, e2021MS002946 (2022).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Goll, D. S. et al. Low phosphorus availability decreases susceptibility of tropical primary productivity to droughts. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 8231–8240 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sitch, S. et al. Recent trends and drivers of regional sources and sinks of carbon dioxide. Biogeosciences 12, 653–679 (2015).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, Y. P. et al. A global model of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycles for the terrestrial biosphere. Biogeosciences 7, 2261–2282 (2010).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yang, X. J. et al. Phosphorus feedbacks constraining tropical ecosystem responses to changes in atmospheric CO2 and climate. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 7205–7214 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Butler, E. E. et al. Mapping local and global variability in plant trait distributions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E10937–E10946 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ellsworth, D. S. et al. Photosynthesis, carboxylation and leaf nitrogen responses of 16 species to elevated pCO2 across four free-air CO2 enrichment experiments in forest, grassland and desert. Glob. Change Biol. 10, 2121–2138 (2004).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bloomfield, K. J. et al. Contrasting photosynthetic characteristics of forest vs. savanna species (Far North Queensland, Australia). Biogeosciences 11, 7331–7347 (2014).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cernusak, L. A. et al. Photosynthetic physiology of eucalypts along a sub-continental rainfall gradient in northern Australia. Agric. For. Meteorol. 151, 1462–1470 (2011).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bahar, N. H. A. et al. Leaf-level photosynthetic capacity in lowland Amazonian and high-elevation Andean tropical moist forests of Peru. N. Phytologist 214, 1002–1018 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rowland, L. et al. After more than a decade of soil moisture deficit, tropical rainforest trees maintain photosynthetic capacity, despite increased leaf respiration. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 4662–4672 (2015).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Domingues, T. F. et al. Seasonal patterns of leaf-level photosynthetic gas exchange in an eastern Amazonian rain forest. Plant Ecol. Diversity 7, 189–203 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kenzo, T. et al. Changes in photosynthesis and leaf characteristics with tree height in five dipterocarp species in a tropical rain forest. Tree Physiol. 26, 865–873 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
van de Weg, M. J. et al. Photosynthetic parameters, dark respiration and leaf traits in the canopy of a Peruvian tropical montane cloud forest. Oecologia 168, 23–34 (2012).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kenzo, T. et al. Variations in leaf photosynthetic and morphological traits with tree height in various tree species in a Cambodian tropical dry evergreen forest. Jpn. Agriculture Res. Q. 46, 167–180 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Domingues, T. F. et al. Biome-specific effects of nitrogen and phosphorus on the photosynthetic characteristics of trees at a forest-savanna boundary in Cameroon. Oecologia 178, 659–672 (2015).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Verryckt, L. T. et al. Vertical profiles of leaf photosynthesis and leaf traits and soil nutrients in two tropical rainforests in French Guiana before and after a 3-year nitrogen and phosphorus addition experiment. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 14, 5–18 (2022).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Santiago, L. S. & Mulkey, S. S. A test of gas exchange measurements on excised canopy branches of ten tropical tree species. Photosynthetica 41, 343–347 (2003).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Medlyn, B. E. et al. Linking leaf and tree water use with an individual-tree model. Tree Physiol. 27, 1687–1699 (2007).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fick, S. E. & Hijmans, R. J. Worldclim 2: New 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 37, 4302–4315 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Townsend, A. R. et al. Controls over foliar N:P ratios in tropical rain forests. Ecology 88, 107–118 (2007).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wright, I. J. et al. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428, 821–827 (2004).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Reich, P. B. et al. Leaf structure (specific leaf area) modulates photosynthesis- nitrogen relations: evidence from within and across species and functional groups. Funct. Ecol. 12, 948–958 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rogers, A. et al. Improving representation of photosynthesis in Earth System Models. N. Phytologist 204, 12–14 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kumarathunge, D. P. et al. Acclimation and adaptation components of the temperature dependence of plant photosynthesis at the global scale. N. Phytologist 222, 768–784 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Warton, D. I. et al. Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry. Biol. Rev. 81, 259–291 (2006).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Krinner, G. et al. A dynamic global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere-biosphere system. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 19, GB1015 (2005).ADS 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Koerselman, W. & Meuleman, A. F. M. The vegetation N: P ratio: a new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation. J. Appl. Ecol. 33, 1441–1450 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tian, H. Q. et al. Global soil nitrous oxide emissions since the preindustrial era estimated by an ensemble of terrestrial biosphere models: Magnitude, attribution, and uncertainty. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 640–659 (2019).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

Study subjectsWe conducted foraging experiments on strepsirrhines (Nindividuals = 18) at the Duke Lemur Center (DLC), North Carolina, from February to November 201513. Our sample includes six fat-tailed dwarf lemurs (3–16 years of age, 3 males, 3 females), six gray mouse lemurs (3–7 years of age, all female), and six aye-ayes (17–32 years of age, 2 males, 4 females). Because these species are solitary and nocturnal, most animals were housed singly and were kept on a reversed light cycle such that they were active and could be tested during the day. Housing conditions were similar for all individuals, and they were all fed daily in a similar manner with a diet that included fruits, vegetables, meal worms, and monkey chow (details in13).All vervet data were collected on wild animals (Nindividuals = 12) at Lake Nabugabo, Uganda (0°22′–12° S and 31°54′ E) during four separate field seasons (April-June 2013, Double Trapezoid array, M group15; June–September 2013, Pentagon array, M group24; August–September 2015, Z-array, M group12; July–August 2017, Pentagon array, KS group25). M group was composed of between 21–28 individuals, containing 2–3 adult males, 7–9 adult females, 2 subadult males, 1–3 subadult females, and 9–12 juveniles and infants. KS group was composed of 39–40 individuals including 5 adult males, 11 adult females, 3 sub-adult males, 5 sub-adult females, and 15–16 juveniles and infants. All individuals were reliably identified based on natural features (details in12,15,24,25). Outside of foraging experiments, wild vervets were not provision fed.All Japanese macaque data (Nindividuals = 10) were collected at the Awajishima Monkey Centre (AMC), Awaji Island, Japan (34°14′43.6″ N and 134°52′59.9″ E) between July and August 2019 (Z-array26). AMC is a privately-run tourist and conservation center visited by a large group of free-ranging Japanese macaques (~ 400 individuals) called the “Awajishima group”47. The group is composed of different-aged individuals of both sexes, with bachelor males and bachelor male groups living around the periphery48. The Awajishima group forages on wild foods for much of their dietary requirements but is also provision-fed a combination of wheat and soybeans, supplemented with peanuts, fruits, and vegetables twice daily for ~ 10 months of the year (details in47,49,50).Study designNavigation arraysThe strepsirrhines and vervets were tested on a “double-trapezoid” shaped multi-destination array with six feeding platforms13,15, modified from17 (Fig. 1a), where there were 720 possible routes (6!). Three different double-trapezoid arrays were built to account for differences in body size: one for the smaller dwarf and mouse lemurs, one for the mid-sized aye-ayes, and one for the larger, wild vervets. Arrays were scaled such that the distance from platform 1–2 (the shortest distance between targets) was approximately twice the body length of the subject species. Vervets were additionally tested on a Z-shaped array with six feeding platforms (720 possible routes, Fig. 1b12), and a pentagon-shaped array with five feeding platforms (120 possible routes, Fig. 1c24,25,46). Japanese macaques were tested on an identically sized Z-array26.Figure 1Design of the navigational arrays used, with (a) the Double Trapezoid array used for Cheirogaleus medius, Microcebus murinus, Daubentonia madagascariensis, and Chlorocebus pygerythrus. Three different arrays were built and scaled to the body size of animals (see “Methods”). (b) The Z-array used for C. pygerythrus and Macaca fuscata. The same size array was used for both species because they are similar in adult body lengths (vervet mean range from four sites: 34.5–42.6 cm51, Japanese macaque mean range from six sites: 48.9–59.7 cm52. (c) The Pentagon used for C. pygerythrus. Distances here are unitless but roughly proportional to the body size of each species tested. Created in R version 4.0.4 and ProCreate.Full size imageFor strepsirrhine trials, DLC staff captured individuals in their enclosures and transported them in padded crates to the testing room. The dwarf and mouse lemur array was set up in a specially designed box (0.91 × 1.83 m) with a small compartment to contain strepsirrhines for rebaiting between trials. The aye-aye array was set up on the ground in a room measuring 2.44 × 4.27 m, where subjects stayed during the duration of their daily trials13. Vervet and macaque trials occurred when individual monkeys voluntarily left their group to participate in foraging experiments alone. Vervet arrays were set up using wooden feeding platforms (0.75 m long, 0.75 m wide × 0.75 m high) placed in an outdoor clearing measuring roughly 10 × 14 m in the home range of the study group. Japanese macaque arrays were also set up using small wooden feeding tables (0.40 m long, 0.30 m wide, 0.21 m high), covered in green plastic labeled with the platform number. Two identical arrays were built in neighbouring provision-feeding fields at the AMC (Near Lower Field: ~ 10 × 35 m, and Far Lower Field: ~ 15 × 45 m).In these studies, all platforms were baited with a single food item. The reward used varied by species (strepsirrhines: grape piece, apple piece, honey, agave nectar, or nut butters, vervets: slice of banana, piece of popcorn; macaques: single peanut or piece of sweet potato). Strepsirrhines have sensory adaptations for using olfaction to locate food53, while the cercopithecoids are heavily reliant on vision to locate resources54, so we ensured that each platform was baited with identical food items within a trial that smelled and looked the same to avoid biasing where the animals chose to go. Platforms for the wild monkeys were not rebaited between trials until all animals were ≥ 20 m away and the entire sequence could be rebaited before their return15,24,25,26.For all species, we started a trial when the tested individual entered the array and took the reward at a platform. We then recorded each successive platform visit (including revisits to empty platforms) until all rewards had been collected ending the trial. In our analyses, we included a total of 852 trials collected over six navigational experiments, completed by 40 unique individuals (18 lemurs, 12 vervets, 10 macaques) (Table 2).Table 2 Individuals and trial sample size included in the analysis.Full size tableData simulationsIn addition to empirically collected data, we simulated agents learning to travel efficiently in the same set of arrays using a simple iterative-reinforcement learning model based on the one used by Reynolds et al.6 to test for traplining behavior in bumblebees. In this model, agents move randomly between locations in an array until they visit all locations, then reset for another trial. If the agent completed a trial by travelling less distance than on previous trials, the probability of the agent repeating location-to-location transitions that occurred in that trial increased for future trials by a reinforcement factor. Initial transition probabilities were inversely proportional to the distance between two locations. Unlike Reynolds et al.6 our simulated agents started at a random location and were not required to return to that location to complete the trial. This matches the trial structure used in our experiments (open-TSP), and reflects multiple central place foraging patterns in primates55. Finally, agents could not return to the location they had just come from, using an “avoid the last location” behavioral heuristic observed in nectivores56,57, which prevented agents from getting stuck in “loops” between two locations (S1 Simulation Validation).Within each of the arrays used to collect empirical data, we ran simulations with reinforcement factors of 1 (no reinforcement), 1.2 (mild reinforcement), and 2 (strong reinforcement). For each array and reinforcement factor combination, we ran 100 agents that each completed 120 trials, where there was an equal probability of starting each trial at any location. Then, for each array and reinforcement factor combination, we ran 100 additional simulations per species tested in the given array, where the probability of starting a trial at any location was equal to the empirically observed location-starting probabilities of the respective species.These simulations were designed to help us test predictions of our two hypotheses regarding primate learning and decision making within the arrays. If primates learn to solve navigational arrays efficiently by reinforcing movements between platform pairs, they should exhibit overall greater receptiveness in their sequences of location visits than reinforcement factor 1 simulations, and a greater decrease over time in total distance travelled to complete the arrays. If primates are pre-disposed to navigate arrays using heuristics, they should exhibit shorter distances travelled on initial trials than in simulations.Data analysisFrom the raw sequences of locations visited in each trial, we calculated two metrics: minimum distance traveled, and the proportion of platform revisits that occurred within identical 3-platform visit sequences (determinism-DET)18. All calculations were done using R version 4.0.458 and packages rstan59 and tidyverse60. A fully reproducible data notebook containing this work, as well as all analyzed data, is available at https://github.com/aqvining/Do-Primates-Trapline. All figures were created by AQV in R version 4.0.4 and ProCreate.Distance traveledTo calculate minimum distance traveled, we created a distance matrix for each resource array containing the relative linear distance between any two resource locations. These minimum linear distances approximate the distances traveled by the animals, which may not necessarily be linear. We then summed the linear distances for all transitions made in a trial. Because resource arrays were scaled to the subject species’ body size, these relative distances were standardized.DeterminismGiven a sequence of observations, Ayers et al.63 defines determinism (DET) as the proportion of all matching observation-pairs (recurrences) that occur within matching sub-sequences of observations (repeats) of a given length (minL). This metric has been previously used to distinguish sequences of resource visitation generated by traplining behaviour from sequences generated by known processes of random movement within a given resource array18,61,62. It has several advantages in the analysis of foraging patterns, including the ability to detect repeated sequences between non-consecutive foraging bouts, imperfect repeats in sequences (i.e., omission or addition of a particular site), and distinguishing between forward- and reverse-order sequence repeats63.We adapted the methods of63 to calculate the number of recurrences and repeats generated by the sequence of location visits in each trial of our experiments and simulations. Based on an analysis of the sensitivity of DET scores to the parameterization of minL, we set minL to three for our calculations (S2 Sensitivity Analysis).Statistical analysesLearning ratesWe modelled distance travelled as a function of trial number, species, and individual. Metrics of animal performance on learned tasks are known to follow power functions over time and experience64, so we a priori applied log transformations to distance travelled and trial number, then fit a linear model. Thus, in the resulting model, the intercept can be interpreted as an estimated distance travelled on the first trial and the slope can be interpreted as the exponent of a learning curve. We modelled species and individual effects on the intercept by summing an estimated grand mean (µ0), species level deviation (µsp,j), and individual level deviation (µid,i). We treated species and individual level effects on the learning rate parameter (slope) the same way, summing a grand mean (b0), species level deviation (bsp,j), and individual level deviation (bid,i). We estimated additional parameters for the variance of individual level deviations in intercept and slope (σµID and σbID, respectively). Finally, after finding residuals in an initial analysis to have variances predicted by trial number and species, we estimated a separate error variance for each species (σε,sp) and weighted the standard deviations of the resulting error distributions by dividing them by the square root of one plus the trial number.We set regularizing priors on the model parameters, assuming distances travelled would remain within one order of magnitude of the most efficient route, but not setting any strict boundaries. For the grand mean of the intercept, we used a normal distribution centered around twice the minimum possible distance required to visit all platforms in the array, with a variance of one. For the grand mean of the slope and all species and individual level deviations to the slope and intercept, we used normal distributions centered at zero with variance of one. For all error terms, we used half-cauchy priors with a location parameter of zero and a scale parameter of one. The full, hierarchical definition of the model is given in Eq. (1).$$Distance sim {mu }_{0}+ {mu }_{sp,j}+ {mu }_{id, i}+left({b}_{0}+ {b}_{sp, j}+ {b}_{id,i}right)Trial+ epsilon$$$${mu }_{0} sim mathrm{N}(4.78, 1)$$$${mu }_{sp}, {b}_{0}, {b}_{sp} sim mathrm{N}(mathrm{0,1})$$$${mu }_{id} sim mathrm{N}(0, {sigma }_{mu ID})$$$${b}_{id} sim mathrm{N}(0, {sigma }_{bID})$$$$epsilon sim mathrm{N}(0, {sigma }_{epsilon ,sp}/sqrt[2]{1+Trial})$$$${sigma }_{mu ID}, {sigma }_{bID}, {sigma }_{epsilon } sim mathrm{Half Cauchy}(mathrm{0,1})$$DeterminismTo compare DET between species, and between empirical and simulated data, we created a binomial model of expected repeats generated in a trial given the number of recurrences (Eq. 2).$$Repeats sim binom(Recursions, DET)$$$$DET= {logit}^{-1}(alpha)$$$$alpha={a}_{0}+Sp+Src+ Int+ID$$$${a}_{0}, Sp, Src, Int sim mathrm{N}(0, 1)$$$$ID sim mathrm{N}(0, {sigma }_{ID})$$$${sigma }_{ID}sim mathrm{Half Cauchy}(mathrm{0,1})$$where a0 is the mean intercept, Sp is one of four coefficients determined by the species (simulations are of the “species” which was used to assign its starting-location probabilities), Src is one of four coefficients determined by the source (empirical data and each level of reinforcement factor), Int is one of 16 interaction coefficients (each possible combination of Sp and Src), and ID is a varying effect of the individual. Because the length of a sequence affects DET, we limit our analysis of DET to the sequences generated by a subject’s or an agent’s first ten trials. Subjects that completed fewer than ten trials were excluded from this portion of the analysis. More

Dennison, P. E., Brewer, S. C., Arnold, J. D. & Moritz, M. A. Large wildfire trends in the western United States, 1984–2011. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 2928–2933 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Higuera, P. E. & Abatzoglou, J. T. Record‐setting climate enabled the extraordinary 2020 fire season in the western United States. Glob. Change Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15388 (2020).Parks, S. A. & Abatzoglou, J. T. Warmer and drier fire seasons contribute to increases in area burned at high severity in western US forests from 1985 to 2017. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2020GL089858 (2020).Benavides-Solorio, J. D. D. & MacDonald, L. H. Measurement and prediction of post-fire erosion at the hillslope scale, Colorado Front Range. Int. J. Wildl. Fire 14, 457–474 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Pierson, D. N., Robichaud, P. R., Rhoades, C. C. & Brown, R. E. Soil carbon and nitrogen eroded after severe wildfire and erosion mitigation treatments. Int. J. Wildl. Fire 28, 814–821 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Rhoades, C. C., Entwistles, D. & Butler, D. The influence of wildfire extent and severity on streamwater chemistry, sediment and temperature following the Hayman Fire, Colorado. Int. J. Wildl. Fire 20, 430–442 (2011).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Chambers, M. E., Fornwalt, P. J., Malone, S. L. & Battaglia, M. A. Patterns of conifer regeneration following high severity wildfire in ponderosa pine – dominated forests of the Colorado Front Range. For. Ecol. Manage. 378, 57–67 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Rhoades, C. C. et al. The legacy of a severe wildfire on stream nitrogen and carbon in headwater catchments. Ecosystems 22, 643–657 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Strickland, M. S., Lauber, C., Fierer, N. & Bradford, M. A. Testing the functional significance of microbial community composition. Ecology 90, 441–451 (2009).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
van der Heijden, M. G. A., Bardgett, R. D. & van Straalen, N. M. The unseen majority: soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 11, 296–310 (2008).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Mendes, R. et al. Deciphering the rhizosphere microbiome for disease-suppressive bacteria. Science 332, 1097–1100 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hart, S. C., DeLuca, T. H., Newman, G. S., MacKenzie, M. D. & Boyle, S. I. Post-fire vegetative dynamics as drivers of microbial community structure and function in forest soils. For. Ecol. Manage. 220, 166–184 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Pressler, Y., Moore, J. C. & Cotrufo, M. F. Belowground community responses to fire: meta-analysis reveals contrasting responses of soil microorganisms and mesofauna. Oikos 128, 309–327 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Pulido-Chavez, M. F., Alvarado, E. C., DeLuca, T. H., Edmonds, R. L. & Glassman, S. I. High-severity wildfire reduces richness and alters composition of ectomycorrhizal fungi in low-severity adapted ponderosa pine forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 485, 118923 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Villadas, P. J. et al. The soil microbiome of the Laurel Forest in Garajonay National Park (La Gomera, Canary Islands): comparing unburned and burned habitats after a wildfire. Forests 10, 1051 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Dove, N. C. & Hart, S. C. Fire reduces fungal species richness and in situ mycorrhizal colonization: a meta-analysis. Fire Ecol. 13, 37–65 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Ibáñez, T. S., Wardle, D. A., Gundale, M. J. & Nilsson, M.-C. Effects of soil abiotic and biotic factors on tree seedling regeneration following a boreal forest wildfire. Ecosystems https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-021-00666-0 (2021).Whitman, T. et al. Soil bacterial and fungal response to wildfires in the Canadian boreal forest across a burn severity gradient. Soil Biol. Biochem. 138, 107571 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Brown, S. P. et al. Context dependent fungal and bacterial soil community shifts in response to recent wildfires in the Southern Appalachian Mountains. For. Ecol. Manage. 451, 117520 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Ferrenberg, S. et al. Changes in assembly processes in soil bacterial communities following a wildfire disturbance. ISME J. 7, 1102–1111 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Knelman, J. E., Schmidt, S. K., Garayburu-Caruso, V., Kumar, S. & Graham, E. B. Multiple, compounding disturbances in a forest ecosystem: fire increases susceptibility of soil edaphic properties, bacterial community structure, and function to change with extreme precipitation event. Soil Syst. 3, 1–1, 40 (2019).Zhang, L. et al. Habitat heterogeneity induced by pyrogenic organic matter in wildfire-perturbed soils mediates bacterial community assembly processes. ISME J. 5, 1943–1955 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Tas, N. et al. Impact of fire on active layer and permafrost microbial communities and metagenomes in an upland Alaskan boreal forest. ISME J. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.36 (2014).Yang, S. et al. Fire affects the taxonomic and functional composition of soil microbial communities, with cascading effects on grassland ecosystem functioning. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 431–442 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Dove, N. C., Safford, H. D., Bohlman, G. N., Estes, B. L. & Hart, S. C. High‐severity wildfire leads to multi‐decadal impacts on soil biogeochemistry in mixed‐conifer forests. Ecol. Appl. 30, eap.2072 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Pérez-Valera, E., Goberna, M. & Verdú, M. Fire modulates ecosystem functioning through the phylogenetic structure of soil bacterial communities. Soil Biol. Biochem. 129, 80–89 (2019).
Google Scholar 
SantaCruz-Calvo, L., González-López, J. & Manzanera, M. Arthrobacter siccitolerans sp. nov., a highly desiccation-tolerant, xeroprotectant-producing strain isolated from dry soil. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 63, 4174–4180 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Mongodin, E. F. et al. Secrets of soil survival revealed by the genome sequence of Arthrobacter aurescens TC1. PLoS Genet. 2, 2094–2106 (2006).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bourguignon, N., Isaac, P., Alvarez, H., Amoroso, M. J. & Ferrero, M. A. Enhanced polyaromatic hydrocarbon degradation by adapted cultures of actinomycete strains. J. Basic Microbiol. 54, 1288–1294 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Fischer, M. S. et al. Pyrolyzed substrates induce aromatic compound metabolism in the post-fire fungus, Pyronema domesticum. Front. Microbiol. 12, 729289 (2021).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Arora, P. K. & Sharma, A. New metabolic pathway for degradation of 2-nitrobenzoate by Arthrobacter sp. SPG. Front. Microbiol. 6:551, 1–6 (2015).Ren, L. et al. Insight into metabolic versatility of an aromatic compounds-degrading Arthrobacter sp. YC-RL1. Front. Microbiol. 9:2438, 1–15 (2018).Cobo-Díaz, J. F. et al. Metagenomic assessment of the potential microbial nitrogen pathways in the rhizosphere of a mediterranean forest after a wildfire. Microb. Ecol. 69, 895–904 (2015).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Dove, N. C., Taş, N. & Hart, S. C. Ecological and genomic responses of soil microbiomes to high-severity wildfire: linking community assembly to functional potential. ISME J. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-022-01232-9 (2022).Adkins, J., Docherty, K. M., Gutknecht, J. L. M. & Miesel, J. R. How do soil microbial communities respond to fire in the intermediate term? Investigating direct and indirect effects associated with fire occurrence and burn severity. Sci. Total Environ. 745, 140957 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Newton, G. L., Buchmeier, N. & Fahey, R. C. Biosynthesis and functions of mycothiol, the unique protective thiol of Actinobacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 72, 471–494 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Reina-Bueno, M. et al. Role of trehalose in heat and desiccation tolerance in the soil bacterium Rhizobium etli. BMC Microbiol. 12, 207 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Schimel, J. P. Life in dry soils: effects of drought on soil microbial communities and processes. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 49, 409–432 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Musto, H. et al. Correlations between genomic GC levels and optimal growth temperatures in prokaryotes. FEBS Lett. 573, 73–77 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Yakovchuk, P. Base-stacking and base-pairing contributions into thermal stability of the DNA double helix. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 564–574 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Mooshammer, M. et al. Decoupling of microbial carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycling in response to extreme temperature events. Sci. Adv. 3, e1602781 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Weissman, J. L., Hou, S. & Fuhrman, J. A. Estimating maximal microbial growth rates from cultures, metagenomes, and single cells via codon usage patterns. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, 1–10 e2016810118 (2020).Long, A. M., Hou, S., Ignacio-Espinoza, J. C. & Fuhrman, J. A. Benchmarking microbial growth rate predictions from metagenomes. ISME J. 15, 183–195 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Karlin, S., Mrázek, J., Campbell, A. & Kaiser, D. Characterizations of highly expressed genes of four fast-growing bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 183, 5025–5040 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Scott, M., Gunderson, C. W., Mateescu, E. M., Zhang, Z. & Hwa, T. Interdependence of cell growth and gene expression: origins and consequences. Science 330, 1099–1102 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Faria, S. R. et al. Wildfire-induced alterations of topsoil organic matter and their recovery in Mediterranean eucalypt stands detected with biogeochemical markers. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 66, 699–713 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Chen, H., Rhoades, C. C. & Chow, A. T. Characteristics of soil organic matter 14 years after a wildfire: a pyrolysis-gas-chromatography mass spectrometry (Py-GC-MS) study. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 152, 104922 (2020).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Knicker, H. Pyrogenic organic matter in soil: its origin and occurrence, its chemistry and survival in soil environments. Quat. Int. 243, 251–263 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Bahureksa, W. et al. Nitrogen enrichment during soil organic matter burning and molecular evidence of Maillard reactions. Environ. Sci. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c06745 (2022).Boye, K. et al. Thermodynamically controlled preservation of organic carbon in floodplains. Nat. Geosci. 10, 415–419 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
LaRowe, D. E. & Van Cappellen, P. Degradation of natural organic matter: a thermodynamic analysis. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 75, 2030–2042 (2011).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Fuchs, G., Boll, M. & Heider, J. Microbial degradation of aromatic compounds – from one strategy to four. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9, 803–816 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Pingree, M. R. A. & DeLuca, T. H. Function of wildfire-deposited pyrogenic carbon in terrestrial ecosystems. Front. Environ. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2017.00053 (2017).Trubl, G. et al. Soil viruses are underexplored players in ecosystem carbon processing. mSystems 3, 1–21 e00076-18 (2018).Ahlgren, N. A., Ren, J., Lu, Y. Y., Fuhrman, J. A. & Sun, F. Alignment-free (d_2^ast) oligonucleotide frequency dissimilarity measure improves prediction of hosts from metagenomically-derived viral sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 39–53 (2017).Kuzyakov, Y. & Mason-Jones, K. Viruses in soil: nano-scale undead drivers of microbial life, biogeochemical turnover and ecosystem functions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 127, 305–317 (2018).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Knowles, B. et al. Lytic to temperate switching of viral communities. Nature 531, 466–470 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hewelke, E. et al. Soil functional responses to natural ecosystem restoration of a pine forest peucedano-pinetum after a fire. Forests 11, 286 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Mahoney, D. P. & LaFavre, J. S. Coniochaeta extramundana, with a synopsis of other Coniochaeta species. Mycologia 73, 931–952 (1981).
Google Scholar 
Yang, T. et al. Distinct fungal successional trajectories following wildfire between soil horizons in a cold‐temperate forest. New Phytol. 227, 572–587 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Steindorff, A. S. et al. Comparative genomics of pyrophilous fungi reveals a link between fire events and developmental genes. Environ. Microbiol. 23, 99–109 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Viswanath, B., Rajesh, B., Janardhan, A., Kumar, A. P. & Narasimha, G. Fungal laccases and their applications in bioremediation. Enzyme Res. 2014, 1–21 163242 (2014).Bouskill, N. J., Mekonnen, Z., Zhu, Q., Grant, R. & Riley, W. J. Microbial contribution to post-fire tundra ecosystem recovery over the 21st century. Commun. Earth Environ. 3, 26 (2022).
Google Scholar 
Yeager, C. M., Northup, D. E., Grow, C. C., Barns, S. M. & Kuske, C. R. Changes in nitrogen-fixing and ammonia-oxidizing bacterial communities in soil of a mixed conifer forest after wildfire. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 2713–2722 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ward, N. L. et al. Three genomes from the Phylum Acidobacteria provide insight into the lifestyles of these microorganisms in soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 2046–2056 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
García-Fraile, P., Benada, O., Cajthaml, T., Baldrian, P. & Lladó, S. Terracidiphilus gabretensis gen. nov., sp. nov., an abundant and active forest soil acidobacterium important in organic matter transformation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 560–569 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Eichorst, S. A., Kuske, C. R. & Schmidt, T. M. Influence of plant polymers on the distribution and cultivation of bacteria in the Phylum Acidobacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 586–596 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Banerjee, S. et al. Network analysis reveals functional redundancy and keystone taxa amongst bacterial and fungal communities during organic matter decomposition in an arable soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 97, 188–198 (2016).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Costa, O. Y. A., Raaijmakers, J. M. & Kuramae, E. E. Microbial extracellular polymeric substances: ecological function and impact on soil aggregation. Front. Microbiol. 9, 1–14 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Smith, S. E. & Read, D. Mycorrhizal symbiosis. Soil Sci. 137, 204 (1984).
Google Scholar 
Douglas, R. B., Parker, V. T. & Cullings, K. W. Belowground ectomycorrhizal community structure of mature lodgepole pine and mixed conifer stands in Yellowstone National Park. For. Ecol. Manage. 208, 303–317 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Anthony, M. A. et al. Forest tree growth is linked to mycorrhizal fungal composition and function across Europe. ISME J. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-021-01159-7 (2022).Marx, D. H., Bryan, W. C. & Cordell, C. E. Survival and growth of pine seedlings with Pisolithus ectomycorrhizae after two years on reforestation sites in North Carolina and Florida. For. Science. 23, 363–373 (1977).
Google Scholar 
Franco, A. R., Sousa, N. R., Ramos, M. A., Oliveira, R. S. & Castro, P. M. L. Diversity and persistence of ectomycorrhizal fungi and their effect on nursery-inoculated Pinus pinaster in a post-fire plantation in Northern Portugal. Microb. Ecol. 68, 761–772 (2014).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kipfmueller, K. F. & Baker, W. L. A fire history of a subalpine forest in south-eastern Wyoming, USA. J. Biogeogr. 27, 71–85 (2000).
Google Scholar 
Key, C. H. & Benson, N. C. Landscape Assessment (LA) Sampling and Analysis Methods General Techical Report (USDA Forest Service, 2006).Parson, A., Robichaud, P. R., Lewis, S. A., Napper, C. & Clark, J. T. Field Guide for Mapping Post-fire Soil Burn Severity General Technical Report (USDA Forest Service, 2010); https://doi.org/10.2737/RMRS-GTR-243Miesel, J. R., Hockaday, W. C., Kolka, R. K. & Townsend, P. A. Soil organic matter composition and quality across fire severity gradients in coniferous and deciduous forests of the southern boreal region. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 120, 1124–1141 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bundy, L. G. & Meisinger, J. J., Weaver, R. W., Angle, S., Bottomley, P., Bezdicek, D., Smith, S., Tabatabai, A., Wollum, A. (Eds.) in Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2 Microbiological and Biochemical Properties 951–984 (Macmillan, 2018). https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.2.c41McDowell, W. H. et al. A comparison of methods to determine the biodegradable dissolved organic carbon from different terrestrial sources. Soil Biol. Biochem. 38, 1933–1942 (2006).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Thomas, G. W., Sparks, D. L., Page, A. L., Helmke, P. A., Loeppert, R. H., Soltanpour, P. N., Tabatabai, M. A., Johnston, C. T., Sumner, M. E. (Eds.) in Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 3 Chemical Methods, 5.3 475–490 (1996).Dittmar, T., Koch, B., Hertkorn, N. & Kattner, G. A simple and efficient method for the solid-phase extraction of dissolved organic matter (SPE-DOM) from seawater. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 6, 230–235 (2008).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Tolić, N. et al. Formularity: software for automated formula assignment of natural and other organic matter from ultrahigh-resolution mass spectra. Anal. Chem. 89, 12659–12665 (2017).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bramer, L. M. et al. ftmsRanalysis: an R package for exploratory data analysis and interactive visualization of FT-MS data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 16, e1007654 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Caporaso, J. G. et al. Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J. 6, 1621–1624 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–D596 (2012).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kõljalg, U. et al. UNITE: a database providing web‐based methods for the molecular identification of ectomycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 166, 1063–1068 (2005).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bolyen, E. et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 852–857 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Callahan, B. J. et al. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Nguyen, N. H. et al. FUNGuild: an open annotation tool for parsing fungal community datasets by ecological guild. Fungal Ecol. 20, 241–248 (2016).
Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021).Oksanen, J. et al. (2020). vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.5-7. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=veganMcMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE 8, e61217 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Segata, N. et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 12, R60 (2011).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Joshi, N. & Fass, J. Sickle: A Sliding-window, Adaptive, Quality-based Trimming Tool for Fastq Files, v1.33 (2011).Li, D., Liu, C.-M., Luo, R., Sadakane, K. & Lam, T.-W. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 31, 1674–1676 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kang, D. D. et al. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ 7, e7359 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P. & Tyson, G. W. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 25, 1043–1055 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Chaumeil, P.-A., Mussig, A. J., Hugenholtz, P. & Parks, D. H. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics 36, 1925–1927 (2019).PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Olm, M. R., Brown, C. T., Brooks, B. & Banfield, J. F. dRep: a tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication. ISME J. 11, 2864–2868 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bowers, R. M. et al. Minimum information about a single amplified genome (MISAG) and a metagenome-assembled genome (MIMAG) of bacteria and archaea. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 725–731 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Emms, D. M. & Kelly, S. OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol. 20, 238 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Katoh, K. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 3059–3066 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Capella-Gutierrez, S., Silla-Martinez, J. M. & Gabaldon, T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25, 1972–1973 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Nguyen, L. T., Schmidt, H. A., Von Haeseler, A. & Minh, B. Q. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 268–274 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Seppey, M., Manni, M. & Zdobnov, E. M., Walker, J. M. (Ed.) BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness. Gene prediction 227–245 (Humana Press, 2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9173-0_14Parra, G., Bradnam, K. & Korf, I. CEGMA: a pipeline to accurately annotate core genes in eukaryotic genomes. Bioinformatics 23, 1061–1067 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bushmanova, E., Antipov, D., Lapidus, A. & Prjibelski, A. D. RnaSPAdes: a de novo transcriptome assembler and its application to RNA-Seq data. Gigascience 8, 1–13 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Grigoriev, I. V. et al. MycoCosm portal: gearing up for 1000 fungal genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 699–704 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Shaffer, M. et al. DRAM for distilling microbial metabolism to automate the curation of microbiome function. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 8883–8900 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Eddy, S. R. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002195 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Aramaki, T. et al. KofamKOALA: KEGG ortholog assignment based on profile HMM and adaptive score threshold. Bioinformatics 36, 2251–2252 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Anders, S., Pyl, P. T. & Huber, W. HTSeq–a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31, 166–169 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Smid, M. et al. Gene length corrected trimmed mean of M-values (GeTMM) processing of RNA-seq data performs similarly in intersample analyses while improving intrasample comparisons. BMC Bioinformatics 19, 236 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Guo, J. et al. VirSorter2: a multi-classifier, expert-guided approach to detect diverse DNA and RNA viruses. Microbiome 9, 37 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Nayfach, S. et al. CheckV assesses the quality and completeness of metagenome-assembled viral genomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 578–585 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Guo, J., Vik, D., Pratama, A. A., Roux, S. & Sullivan, M. B. Viral Sequence Identification SOP with VirSorter2 (2021); protocols.io. https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.btv8nn9wBland, C. et al. CRISPR recognition tool (CRT): a tool for automatic detection of clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats. BMC Bioinformatics 8, 209 (2007).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Skennerton, C. T., Imelfort, M. & Tyson, G. W. Crass: identification and reconstruction of CRISPR from unassembled metagenomic data. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e105 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar  More

To derive the relationship among macro-level ecological variables, which would constitute an ecological analog of the thermodynamic equation of state, we introduce a fourth state variable, B, the total biomass in the community. The ecological analog of the thermodynamic equation of state, an expression for biomass, B, in terms of S, N, and E, arises if we combine METE with a scaling result from the metabolic theory of ecology (MTE)18,21. In particular, we assume the MTE scaling relationship between the metabolic rate, (varepsilon ,) of an individual organism and its mass, m: (varepsilon sim {m}^{3/4}). Without loss of generality22, units are normalized such that the smallest mass and the smallest metabolic rate within a censused plot are each assigned a value of 1. With this units convention, the proportionality constant in this scaling relationship can be assigned a value of 1. From the definition of the structure-function, it follows23 that averaging the biomass of individuals times the abundance of species, nε4/3, over the distribution R and multiplying by the number of species gives the total ecosystem biomass as a function of S, N, and E. Explicitly:$$B=Smathop{sum}limits_{n}nint dvarepsilon ,{varepsilon }^{4/3}R(n,varepsilon {{{{{rm{|}}}}}}S,N,E)$$
(1)
Both the sum and integral in the above equation can be calculated numerically, and Python code to do so for a given set of state variables S, N, and E, is available at github.com/micbru/equation of_ state/.We can also approximate the solution to Eq. 1 analytically (Supplementary Note 2) to reveal the predicted functional relationship among the four state variables. If E > > N > > S > > 1:$$B=cfrac{{E}^{4/3}}{{S}^{1/3}{{{{{rm{ln}}}}}}(1/beta )}$$
(2)
where (capprox (7/2)Gamma (7/3)) ≈ 4.17 and (beta) = ({lambda }_{1}+{lambda }_{2}) is estimated13,22 from the relationship (beta {{{{{rm{ln}}}}}}(1/beta )approx S/N). Equation 2 approximates the numerical result to within 10% for 5 of the 42 datasets analyzed here, corresponding to N/S greater than ~100 and E/N greater than ~25. Multiplying the right-hand side of Eq. 2 by (1-1.16{beta }^{1/3}) approximates the numerical result to within 10% for 33 of the 42 datasets analyzed here, corresponding to N/S greater than ~3 and E/N greater than ~5. The inequality requirements are not necessary for the numerical solution of Eq. 1, which is what is used below to test the prediction.Empirical values of E and B can be estimated from the same data. In particular, if measured metabolic rates of the individuals are denoted by ({varepsilon }_{i},) where i runs from 1 to N, then E is given by the sum over the ({varepsilon }_{i}) and B is given by the sum over the ({{varepsilon }_{i}}^{4/3}.) Similarly, if the mass, mi, of each individual is measured, then B is the sum over the mi and E is the sum over the mi3/4. In practice, for animal data, metabolic rate is often estimated by measuring mass and then using metabolic scaling, while for tree data, metabolic rate is estimated from measurements of individual tree basal areas, which are estimators5 of the ({varepsilon }_{i}).With E and B estimated from the same measurements, the question naturally arises as to whether a simple mathematical relationship holds between them, such as E = B3/4. If all the measured m’s, are identical, then all the calculated individual (varepsilon {{hbox{‘}}}s) are identical, and with our units convention we would have E = B. More generally, with variation in masses and metabolic rates, the only purely mathematical relationship we can write is inequality between E and B3/4: (E=sum {varepsilon }_{i}ge (sum {{{varepsilon }_{i}}^{4/3}})^{3/4}={B}^{3/4}). Our derived equation of state (Eq. 2) can be interpreted as expressing the theoretical prediction for the quantitative degree of inequality between E and B3/4 as a function of S and N.A test of Eq. 1 that compares observed and predicted values of biomass with data from 42 censused plots across a variety of habitats, spatial scales, and taxa is shown in Fig. 1. The 42 plots are listed and described in Table S2 and Supplementary Note 3. The communities censused include arthropods and plants, the habitats include both temperate and tropical, and the census plots range in area from 0.0064 to 50 ha. As seen in the figure, 99.4% of the variance in the observed values of B is explained by the predicted values of B.Fig. 1: A test of the ecological equation of state.Observed biomass is determined by either summing empirical masses of individuals or summing empirical metabolic rates raised to the ¾ power of each individual. Predicted biomass is determined from Eq. 1 using observed values of S, N, and E. The quantity ln(predicted biomass) explains 99.4% of the variance in observed biomass. Units of mass and metabolism are chosen such that the masses of the smallest individuals in each dataset are set to 1 and those individuals are also assigned a metabolic rate of 1. The shape of the marker indicates the type of data, and the lighter color corresponds to higher species richness. Data for all analyses come from tropical trees39,40,41,42,43,44,45, temperate trees30,31,32,33,46,47,48, temperate forest communities27,49, subalpine meadow flora28, and tropical island arthropods50.Full size imageFigure 2 addresses the possible concern that the success of Eq. 1 shown in Fig. 1 might simply reflect an approximate constancy, across all the datasets, of the ratio of E to B3/4. If that ratio were constant, then S and N would play no effective role in the equation of state. Equation 1 predicts that variation in the ratio depends on S and N in the approximate combination S1/4ln3/4(1/(beta (N/S))). In Fig. 2, the observed and predicted values of E/B3/4 calculated from Eq. 1, are compared, showing a nearly fourfold variation in that ratio across the datasets. The equation of state predicts 60% of the variance in the ratio.Fig. 2: The explanatory power of diversity and abundance.The observed ratio E/B3/4 is plotted against the ratio predicted by Eq. 1. Of the fourfold variability across ecosystems in that ratio, 60% is explained by the variability in the predicted combination of diversity and abundance. The shape of the marker indicates the type of data, and the lighter color corresponds to higher species richness. Data for all analyses come from tropical trees39,40,41,42,43,44,45, temperate trees30,31,32,33,46,47,48, temperate forest communities27,49, subalpine meadow flora28, and tropical island arthropods50.Full size imageFigure 3 shows the dependence on S and N of the predicted ratio E/B3/4 over empirically observed values of S, N, and E. We examined the case in which S is varied for two different fixed values of each of N and E (Fig. 3a) and N is varied for two different fixed values of S and E (Fig. 3b). The value of E does not have a large impact on the predicted ratio, particularly when E > > N. On the other hand, the predicted ratio depends more strongly on N and S.Fig. 3: The theoretical prediction for the ratio E/B3/4 as a function of S and N.The biomass B is predicted by holding E fixed along with one other state variable. In a N is fixed and S is varied, and in b S is fixed and N is varied. The fixed values are chosen to be roughly consistent within a range of the data considered. The color of the lines represents the corresponding fixed value of N or S, while the solid and dashed lines represent different fixed values of E.Full size imageThe total productivity of an ecological community is a focus of interest in ecology1, as a possible predictor of species diversity24 and more generally as a measure of ecosystem functioning25. By combining the METE and MTE frameworks, we can now generate explicit predictions for certain debated ecological relationships, including one between productivity and diversity. Interpreting total metabolic rate E in our theory as gross productivity, then in the limit 1 More

Different proxies for changes in structure and/or function of microbiomes have been developed, allowing assessing microbiome dynamics at multiple levels. However, the lack and differences in understanding the microbiome dynamics are due to the differences in the choice of proxies in different studies and the limitations of proxies themselves. Here, using both amplicon and metatranscriptomic sequencings, we compared four different proxies (16/18S rRNA genes, 16/18S rRNA transcripts, mRNA taxonomy and mRNA function) to reveal the impact of a severe summer drought in 2018 on prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbiome structures and functions in two rewetted fen peatlands in northern Germany. We found that both prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbiome compositions were significantly different between dry and wet months. Interestingly, mRNA proxies showed stronger and more significant impacts of drought for prokaryotes, while 18S rRNA transcript and mRNA taxonomy showed stronger drought impacts for eukaryotes. Accordingly, by comparing the accuracy of microbiome changes in predicting dry and wet months under different proxies, we found that mRNA proxies performed better for prokaryotes, while 18S rRNA transcript and mRNA taxonomy performed better for eukaryotes. In both cases, rRNA gene proxies showed much lower to the lowest accuracy, suggesting the drawback of DNA based approaches. To our knowledge, this is the first study comparing all these proxies to reveal the dynamics of both prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbiomes in soils. This study shows that microbiomes are sensitive to (extreme) weather changes in rewetted fens, and the associated microbial changes might contribute to ecological consequences. More

Here we provide a unified analysis of predator-prey biomass scaling in complex food webs. Doing so reveals a consistent sub-linear scaling pattern across levels of organization – from populations within webs to whole ecosystems – for freshwater, marine and terrestrial systems. This regularity in sub-linear predator-prey scaling among complex food webs from diverse ecosystem types has important implications for understanding energy flows in natural systems across large spatial gradients.Within food webs, predator-prey biomass scaling was characterised by a near three-quarter power scaling relationship ((bar{k}) = 0.71 across ecosystem types), revealing an approximately three-fold increase in predator biomass for every five-fold increase in prey biomass. When summing all predator and prey biomasses within a food web (Fig. 4), predator-prey scaling across webs followed a similar sub-linear scaling regime, with k ranging from 0.65 to 0.67 between ecosystem types. That is, biomass pyramids became systematically more bottom-heavy as pyramid size increased along a biomass gradient (Fig. 1a). These ecosystem-level patterns are quantitatively consistent with previous analysis of predator-prey biomass scaling among distinct trophic groups, which also found sub-linear scaling with k values between 0.66 to about 0.768,17,18. The approach we introduce here permits expanding these analyses to more complex omnivorous feeding relations both among populations within webs and across webs in diverse ecosystems. The similarity in the scaling exponents (and overlap in confidence intervals) of within- and across-web scaling suggest the existence of a general sub-linear scaling pattern, possibly signifying that fundamental constraints apply across levels of biological organization.These results beg the question: where do these sub-linear scaling patterns originate? We are not aware of any ecological theory that is sufficiently general to encompass the diversity of community types in which sub-linear biomass scaling is observed (Appendix S2). Size spectrum theory, which aims to explain the observation that, for whole ecosystems, biomass is approximately evenly distributed across logarithmic body size classes19,20 would appear to be particularity relevant. However, static size spectrum models typically assume that the predator-prey body mass ratio (PPmR) and trophic transfer efficiency (ratio of predator to prey production), whilst inherently variable21,22, do not vary systematically with prey biomass19,23. These measures indicate from which size class energy is obtained relative to predator body mass, and how efficiently that energy is utilized by any given predator to maintain its biomass. While these variables are thought to drive size spectra scaling3, they do not appear to be consistent with predator-prey biomass scaling observed in natural communities. Assuming both an even distribution of biomass across size classes, and a constant PPmR or transfer efficiency across a prey biomass gradient suggests an unchanging trophic biomass pyramid (all else being equal; Appendix S2), Therefore it is not clear how current size-spectrum models might account for sub-linear predator-prey biomass scaling.Predator-prey theory, on the other hand, which models the dynamics of feeding interactions, has traditionally focused on two distinct trophic levels, rather than on networks of highly omnivorous food webs24. Equilibrium predictions from a range of simple predator-prey models are also not consistent with sub-linear predator-prey scaling without additional and likely questionable assumptions (Appendix S2). Although predator-prey theory can be made to accord with our observed patterns, it requires tuning the scaling of prey growth or other terms of the model. Furthermore, questions remain about how best to simulate a biomass gradient as well as how models should be generalized to multi-trophic food webs (Appendix S2).Despite the lack of any general mechanism, it is reasonable to assume that predator biomass, at steady state, is maintained in proportion to prey production8,10. This would suggest that as prey biomass increases, their total production should scale near ~¾ to match the predator biomass they support. Density-dependent processes, such as competition for resources and other negative interactions among prey species, could thus cause per capita growth to decline sub-exponentially. We observed that changes in prey biomass were primarily driven by changes in prey density, rather than average prey body size, consistent with density dependent effects driving the sub-linear nature of predator-prey biomass relations, rather than allometric body mass effects. Clearly, however, ecological theory has further work yet to knit together the various patterns and processes to explain the consistency and generality of predator-prey scaling patterns.Addressing predator-prey biomass scaling from a food web perspective allowed us to assess which node properties were associated with greater predator-prey biomass ratios. Our results go beyond prior theoretical studies6,7 to provide empirical evidence that populations of highly omnivorous predators, as well as predator populations that feed down the food web on smaller, more productive, prey (i.e. a high predator-to-prey body mass ratio), tend to attain higher biomass stocks than predicted by their prey biomass alone. Interestingly, the role of these variables in driving predator biomass deviations appear to vary between ecosystem types: predator biomass increases more strongly with PPmR in rock pool webs, whereas predator omnivory only proved to correlate with predator biomass residuals in soil webs (Fig. 3). Further research would be instructive to understand if these are general patterns across different types of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. For instance, whilst rock pool webs display very similar network topology and PPmR scaling as open marine webs25,26, we might expect different scaling patterns in pelagic marine webs where trophic interactions take place in three dimensions21, where ontogenetic diet shifts are common27, and where food chains are long13. Adapting our food-web approach to quantify biomass scaling among size classes would likely be informative for tackling these additional complexities. Whilst predator biomass was associated with PPmR and omnivory (in soil webs), the consistent sub-linear predator-prey scaling regime within ecosystem types and across levels of organization, suggests that density dependent population growth might be the overriding driver of predator-prey biomass scaling.The regularity in predator-prey scaling we observed could provide insight into baselines for the biomass structure of natural communities, which could be informative for assessing the effects of environmental impacts within ecological communities and ecological status. For instance within webs, deviations away from these baselines in the form of smaller power-law exponents (shallower slopes) could reflect local perturbations (e.g. acidification, warming, over-exploitation) which have a disproportionate impact among larger organisms at higher trophic levels28. Predator-prey biomass scaling could therefore offer a complementary approach to body size distributions and size spectra for evaluating ecosystem health29. A similar approach could be applied for scaling relations within species, where the same species occur in multiple webs. Doing so could reveal how the biomass of a given predator species responds to variation in prey availability. For instance, among the stream food webs studied here, two common fish species displayed the characteristic near ¾-power scaling pattern, whilst the biomass of salmonids, and particularly brown trout (Salmo trutta), was invariant with prey biomass across webs (Fig. S4). These results are consistent with previous work in these sites which has highlighted the importance of terrestrial prey for subsidizing the biomass production of these apex predators30,31. Deviations from the expected general scaling pattern could therefore be valuable for identifying the importance of environmental factors that permit some species an ‘escape’ from the predator-prey power law (see also32), and offers promising avenues for future research.Our study, which takes a first step towards investigating predator-prey biomass scaling in complex food webs, has some notable limitations. First, information on the weighting of feeding links was not available for the food webs studied here, and a more comprehensive investigation should require specific interactions strengths and vulnerabilities of each species, data that is, as yet, unavailable. Although our results are robust to alternative assumptions in how these factors are treated (Table S5), any systematic variation in feeding interactions could play an important role. Second, information on the biomass of all basal resources was also not generally available, so our analysis focused on higher trophic predators feeding on (animal) prey. While our approach may equally apply more generally to consumers and resources (e.g. aquatic snails feeding on biofilm), further work is required to test the generality of the empirical patterns we observed using more detailed datasets where this information, and data on interaction strengths, is widely available.Overall, our study reveals a consistent sub-linear predator-prey scaling regime in complex food webs and makes a strong case for the existence of a systematic form of density-dependent population growth that governs the biomass structure of freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems. The highly conserved predator-prey scaling we observed within and across food webs implies a relatively simple scaling-up of predator and prey population biomasses across levels of biological organization. These general patterns in energy flow between predator and prey could facilitate improvements in modelling trophic structure and community dynamics, as well as the corresponding ecosystem functions4,5. Our findings suggest sub-linear predator-prey biomass scaling holds within complex omnivorous food webs, urging ecologists to understand the origin of this large scale, cross-system pattern. More

Bond, W. Open Ecosystems (Oxford Univ. Press, 2019).Beerling, D. J. & Osborne, C. P. The origin of the savanna biome. Glob. Change Biol. 12, 2023–2031 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Haverd, V. et al. Coupling carbon allocation with leaf and root phenology predicts tree–grass partitioning along a savanna rainfall gradient. Biogeosciences 13, 761–779 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kgope, B. S., Bond, W. J. & Midgley, G. F. Growth responses of African savanna trees implicate atmospheric [CO2] as a driver of past and current changes in savanna tree cover. Austral Ecol. 35, 451–463 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kulmatiski, A. & Beard, K. H. Woody plant encroachment facilitated by increased precipitation intensity. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 833–837 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mitchell, P. J. et al. Drought response strategies define the relative contributions of hydraulic dysfunction and carbohydrate depletion during tree mortality. N. Phytol. 197, 862–872 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Schutz, A. E. N., Bond, W. J. & Cramer, M. D. Juggling carbon: allocation patterns of a dominant tree in a fire-prone savanna. Oecologia 160, 235–246 (2009).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wigley, B., Cramer, M. & Bond, W. Sapling survival in a frequently burnt savanna: mobilisation of carbon reserves in Acacia karroo. Plant Ecol. 203, 1 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Edwards, E. J., Osborne, C. P., Strömberg, C. A. E., Smith, S. A. & Consortium, C. G. The origins of C4 grasslands: integrating evolutionary and ecosystem science. Science 328, 587–591 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Spriggs, E. L., Christin, P.-A. & Edwards, E. J. C4 photosynthesis promoted species diversification during the Miocene grassland expansion. PLoS ONE 9, e97722 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
McKay, R. M. et al. Antarctic Cenozoic climate history from sedimentary records: ANDRILL and beyond. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 374, 20140301 (2016).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Beerling, D. J. & Royer, D. L. Convergent Cenozoic CO2 history. Nat. Geosci. 4, 418–420 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pagani, M. et al. The role of carbon dioxide during the onset of Antarctic glaciation. Science 334, 1261–1264 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zachos, J., Pagani, M., Sloan, L., Thomas, E. & Billups, K. Trends, rhythms, and aberrations in global climate 65 Ma to present. Science 292, 686–693 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhisheng, A., Kutzbach, J. E., Prell, W. L. & Porter, S. C. Evolution of Asian monsoons and phased uplift of the Himalaya–Tibetan plateau since Late Miocene times. Nature 411, 62–66 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Charles-Dominique, T. et al. Spiny plants, mammal browsers, and the origin of African savannas. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E5572–E5579 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bellasio, C. & Farquhar, G. D. A leaf-level biochemical model simulating the introduction of C2 and C4 photosynthesis in C3 rice: gains, losses and metabolite fluxes. N. Phytol. 223, 150–166 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sage, R. F. & Coleman, J. R. Effects of low atmospheric CO(2) on plants: more than a thing of the past. Trends Plant Sci. 6, 18–24 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Reich, P. B., Hobbie, S. E. & Lee, T. D. Plant growth enhancement by elevated CO2 eliminated by joint water and nitrogen limitation. Nat. Geosci. 7, 920–924 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ward, J. K., Tissue, D. T., Thomas, R. B. & Strain, B. R. Comparative responses of model C3 and C4 plants to drought in low and elevated CO2. Glob. Change Biol. 5, 857–867 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Scholes, R. J. & Archer, S. R. Tree–grass interactions in savannas. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28, 517–544 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
February, E. C. & Higgins, S. I. The distribution of tree and grass roots in savannas in relation to soil nitrogen and water. S. Afr. J. Bot. 76, 517–523 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
February, E. C., Higgins, S. I., Bond, W. J. & Swemmer, L. Influence of competition and rainfall manipulation on the growth responses of savanna trees and grasses. Ecology 94, 1155–1164 (2013).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fynn, R. W. S. & Naiken, J. Different responses of Eragrostis curvula and Themeda triandra to rapid- and slow-release fertilisers: insights into their ecology and implications for fertiliser selection in pot experiments. Afr. J. Range Forage Sci. 26, 43–46 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Osmolovskaya, N. et al. Methodology of drought stress research: experimental setup and physiological characterization. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 4089 (2018).PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Quirk, J., Bellasio, C., Johnson, D. A., Osborne, C. P. & Beerling, D. J. C4 savanna grasses fail to maintain assimilation in drying soil under low CO2 compared with C3 trees despite lower leaf water demand. Funct. Ecol. 33, 388–398 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Taylor, S. H. et al. Physiological advantages of C4 grasses in the field: a comparative experiment demonstrating the importance of drought. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 1992–2003 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bellasio, C., Quirk, J. & Beerling, D. J. Stomatal and non-stomatal limitations in savanna trees and C4 grasses grown at low, ambient and high atmospheric CO2. Plant Sci. 274, 181–192 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kipchirchir, K. O., Ngugi, K. R., Mwangi, M. S., Njomo, K. G. & Raphael, W. Water stress tolerance of six rangeland grasses in the Kenyan semi-arid rangelands. Am. J. Agric. For. 3, 222–229 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Kadioglu, A. & Terzi, R. A dehydration avoidance mechanism: leaf rolling. Bot. Rev. 73, 290–302 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bittman, S. & Simpson, G. M. Drought effect on leaf conductance and leaf rolling in forage grasses. Crop Sci. 29, 338–344 (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
O’Toole, J. C. & Cruz, R. T. Response of leaf water potential, stomatal resistance, and leaf rolling to water stress. Plant Physiol. 65, 428–432 (1980).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Redmann, R. E. Adaptation of grasses to water stress—leaf rolling and stomate distribution. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 72, 833–842 (1985).Article 

Google Scholar 
Volder, A., Tjoelker, M. G. & Briske, D. D. Contrasting physiological responsiveness of establishing trees and a C4 grass to rainfall events, intensified summer drought, and warming in oak savanna. Glob. Change Biol. 16, 3349–3362 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Medeiros, J. S. & Ward, J. K. Increasing atmospheric [CO2] from glacial to future concentrations affects drought tolerance via impacts on leaves, xylem and their integrated function. N. Phytol. 199, 738–748 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Quirk, J., McDowell, N. G., Leake, J. R., Hudson, P. J. & Beerling, D. J. Increased susceptibility to drought-induced mortality in Sequoia sempervirens (Cupressaceae) trees under Cenozoic atmospheric carbon dioxide starvation. Am. J. Bot. 100, 582–591 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nackley, L. L. et al. CO2 enrichment does not entirely ameliorate Vachellia karroo drought inhibition: a missing mechanism explaining savanna bush encroachment. Environ. Exp. Bot. 155, 98–106 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Apgaua, D. M. et al. Elevated temperature and CO2 cause differential growth stimulation and drought survival responses in eucalypt species from contrasting habitats. Tree Physiol. 39, 1806–1820 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bond, W. J. What limits trees in C4 grasslands and savannas? Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 39, 641–659 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Valladares, F. & Niinemets, Ü. Shade tolerance, a key plant feature of complex nature and consequences. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 39, 237–257 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dohn, J. et al. Tree effects on grass growth in savannas: competition, facilitation and the stress-gradient hypothesis. J. Ecol. 101, 202–209 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jacobsen, J. V., Hanson, A. D. & Chandler, P. C. Water stress enhances expression of an α-amylase gene in barley leaves. Plant Physiol. 80, 350–359 (1986).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Brodersen, C. & McElrone, A. Maintenance of xylem network transport capacity: a review of embolism repair in vascular plants. Front. Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00108 (2013).Chitarra, W. et al. Gene expression in vessel-associated cells upon xylem embolism repair in Vitis vinifera L. petioles. Planta 239, 887–899 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hasibeder, R., Fuchslueger, L., Richter, A. & Bahn, M. Summer drought alters carbon allocation to roots and root respiration in mountain grassland. N. Phytol. 205, 1117–1127 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bradford, K. J. & Hsiao, T. C. in Physiological Plant Ecology II: Water Relations and Carbon Assimilation (eds Lange, O. L. et al.) 263–324 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1982).Knox, K. J. E. & Clarke, P. J. Nutrient availability induces contrasting allocation and starch formation in resprouting and obligate seeding shrubs. Funct. Ecol. 19, 690–698 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hoffmann, W. A., Orthen, B. & Franco, A. C. Constraints to seedling success of savanna and forest trees across the savanna–forest boundary. Oecologia 140, 252–260 (2004).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Palacio, S., Maestro, M. & Montserrat-Martí, G. Seasonal dynamics of non-structural carbohydrates in two species of Mediterranean sub-shrubs with different leaf phenology. Environ. Exp. Bot. 59, 34–42 (2007).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hoffmann, W. A., Bazzaz, F. A., Chatterton, N. J., Harrison, P. A. & Jackson, R. B. Elevated CO2 enhances resprouting of a tropical savanna tree. Oecologia 123, 312–317 (2000).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Galvez, D. A., Landhausser, S. M. & Tyree, M. T. Root carbon reserve dynamics in aspen seedlings: does simulated drought induce reserve limitation? Tree Physiol. 31, 250–257 (2011).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Poorter, H. et al. A meta-analysis of responses of C3 plants to atmospheric CO2: dose–response curves for 85 traits ranging from the molecular to the whole-plant level. N. Phytol. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17802 (2022).Sevanto, S., Mcdowell, N. G., Dickman, L. T., Pangle, R. & Pockman, W. T. How do trees die? A test of the hydraulic failure and carbon starvation hypotheses. Plant Cell Environ. 37, 153–161 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Scheiter, S. et al. Fire and fire-adapted vegetation promoted C4 expansion in the late Miocene. N. Phytol. 195, 653–666 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Quirk, J., Bellasio, C., Johnson, D. A. & Beerling, D. J. Response of photosynthesis, growth and water relations of a savannah-adapted tree and grass grown across high to low CO2. Ann. Bot. Lond. 124, 77–90 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Davies, J. et al. in AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts EP41D-2374. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019AGUFMEP41D2374D/abstractMills, A. J., Rogers, K. H., Stalmans, M. & Witkowski, E. T. F. A framework for exploring the determinants of savanna and grassland distribution. BioScience 56, 579–589 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Staver, A. C., Botha, J. & Hedin, L. Soils and fire jointly determine vegetation structure in an African savanna. N. Phytol. 216, 1151–1160 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cardoso, A. W. et al. Winners and losers: tropical forest tree seedling survival across a West African forest–savanna transition. Ecol. Evol. 6, 3417–3429 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mitchard, E. T. A. & Flintrop, C. M. Woody encroachment and forest degradation in sub-Saharan Africa’s woodlands and savannas 1982–2006. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0406 (2013).Midgley, G. F. & Bond, W. J. Future of African terrestrial biodiversity and ecosystems under anthropogenic climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 823–829 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bond, W. J. & Midgley, G. F. Carbon dioxide and the uneasy interactions of trees and savannah grasses. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 367, 601–612 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ripley, B. S., Gilbert, M. E., Ibrahim, D. G. & Osborne, C. P. Drought constraints on C4 photosynthesis: stomatal and metabolic limitations in C3 and C4 subspecies of Alloteropsis semialata. J. Exp. Bot. 58, 1351–1363 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
McAusland, L. et al. Effects of kinetics of light-induced stomatal responses on photosynthesis and water-use efficiency. N. Phytol. 211, 1209–1220 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Osborne, C. P. & Sack, L. Evolution of C4 plants: a new hypothesis for an interaction of CO2 and water relations mediated by plant hydraulics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 367, 583–600 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pearcy, R. W. & Ehleringer, J. Comparative ecophysiology of C3 and C4 plants. Plant Cell Environ. 7, 1–13 (1984).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Moncrieff, G. R., Scheiter, S., Bond, W. J. & Higgins, S. I. Increasing atmospheric CO2 overrides the historical legacy of multiple stable biome states in Africa. N. Phytol. 201, 908–915 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bond, W. J. & Midgley, G. F. A proposed CO2-controlled mechanism of woody plant invasion in grasslands and savannas. Glob. Change Biol. 6, 865–869 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Polley, H. W., Johnson, H. B., Marino, B. D. & Mayeux, H. S. Increase in C3 plant water-use efficiency and biomass over glacial to present CO2 concentrations. Nature 361, 61–64 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stevens, N., Lehmann, C. E., Murphy, B. P. & Durigan, G. Savanna woody encroachment is widespread across three continents. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 235–244 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Charles-Dominique, T., Midgley, G. F., Tomlinson, K. W. & Bond, W. J. Steal the light: shade vs fire adapted vegetation in forest–savanna mosaics. N. Phytol. 218, 1419–1429 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Higgins, S. I. & Scheiter, S. Atmospheric CO2 forces abrupt vegetation shifts locally, but not globally. Nature 488, 209–212 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bellasio, C., Fini, A. & Ferrini, F. Evaluation of a high throughput starch analysis optimised for wood. PLoS ONE 9, e86645 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kozloski, G. V., Rocha, J. B., Ribeiro Filho, H. M. N. & Perottoni, J. Comparison of acid and amyloglucosidase hydrolysis for estimation of non‐structural polysaccharides in feed samples. J. Sci. Food Agric. 79, 1112–1116 (1999).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bellasio, C., Beerling, D. J. & Griffiths, H. An Excel tool for deriving key photosynthetic parameters from combined gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence: theory and practice. Plant Cell Environ. 39, 1180–1197 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bellasio, C., Beerling, D. J. & Griffiths, H. Deriving C4 photosynthetic parameters from combined gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence using an Excel tool: theory and practice. Plant Cell Environ. 39, 1164–1179 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ethier, G. J. & Livingston, N. J. On the need to incorporate sensitivity to CO2 transfer conductance into the Farquhar–von Caemmerer–Berry leaf photosynthesis model. Plant Cell Environ. 27, 137–153 (2004).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
von Caemmerer, S. Biochemical Models of Leaf Photosynthesis (CSIRO, 2000).Bellasio, C. & Griffiths, H. Acclimation to low light by C4 maize: implications for bundle sheath leakiness. Plant Cell Environ. 37, 1046–1058 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fini, A., Bellasio, C., Pollastri, S., Tattini, M. & Ferrini, F. Water relations, growth, and leaf gas exchange as affected by water stress in Jatropha curcas. J. Arid Environ. 89, 21–29 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ghannoum, O., Caemmerer, S. V. & Conroy, J. P. The effect of drought on plant water use efficiency of nine NAD-ME and nine NADP-ME Australian C4 grasses. Funct. Plant Biol. 29, 1337–1348 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar  More