Philippa Kaur

Larson, D. W., Matthes, U. & Kelly, P. E. Cliff Ecology (Cambridge University Press, 2000).Book 

Google Scholar 
Cooper, A. Plant species coexistence in cliff habitats. J. Biogeogr. 24, 483–494 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
Davis, P. H. Cliff vegetation in the eastern Mediterranean. J. Ecol. 39, 63–93 (1951).Article 

Google Scholar 
Snogerup, S. Evolutionary and plant geographical aspects of chasmophytic communities. In Plant life of South-West Asia (eds Davis, P. H. et al.) 157–170 (Bot. Soc. Edinb, 1971).
Google Scholar 
Baskin, J. M. & Baskin, C. C. Endemism in rock outcrop plant communities of unglaciated eastern United States: An evaluation of the roles of the edaphic, genetic and light factors. J. Biogeogr. 15, 829–840 (1988).Article 

Google Scholar 
Medina, B. M. O. & Fernandes, G. W. The potential of natural regeneration of rocky outcrop vegetation on rupestrian field soils in Serra do Cipo, Brazil. Braz. J. Bot. 30, 665–678 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Alves, R. J. V., Cardin, L. & Kropf, M. S. Angiosperm disjunction “Campos Rupestres-Restingas”: Are-evaluation. Acta Bot. Bras. 2, 675–685 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Harley, R. M. Introduction. In Flora of the Pico das Almas, Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, Brazil (eds Stannard, B. L., Harvey, Y. B. & Harley, R. M) 1–42 (Royal Botanic Gardens, 1995).Hubbell, S. P. Neutral theory in ecology and the evolution of ecological equivalence. Ecology 87, 1387–1398 (2006).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Conceição, A. A., Pirani, J. R. & Meirelles, S. T. Floristics, structure and soil of insular vegetation in four quartzite-sandstone outcrops of “Chapada Diamantina”, Northeast Brazil. Rev. Bras. Bot. 30, 641–656 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Le Stradic, S., Buisson, E. & Wilson, F. G. Vegetation composition and structure of some Neotropical mountain grasslands in Brazil. J Mt Sci 12:864–77. An. Acad. Bras. Ciênc. 87(4), 2097–2110 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Nunes, J. A. et al. Soil–vegetation relationships on a banded ironstone ‘island’, Carajás Plateau, Brazilian Eastern Amazonia. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 87(4), 2097–2110 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Silva, W. A. Gradiente vegetacional e pedológico em complexo rupestre de quartzito no Quadrilátero Ferrífero, Minas Gerais, Brasil. MSc Thesis. (Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 2013).Vincent, R. C. & Meguro, M. Influence of soil properties on the abundance of plant species in ferruginous rocky soils vegetation, southeastern Brazil. Braz. J. Bot. 31, 377–388 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Porembski, S. Tropical inselbergs: Habitat types, adaptive strategies and diversity patterns. Rev. Bras. de Bot. 30, 579–586 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
De Paula, L. F. A., Forzza, R. C., Neri, A. V., Bueno, M. L. & Porembski, S. Sugar Loaf Land in south-eastern Brazil: A center of diversity for mat-forming bromeliads on inselbergs. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 181, 459–476 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rezende, M. G., Elias, R. C. L., Salimena, F. R. G. & Neto, L. M. Flora vascular da Serra da Pedra Branca, Caldas, Minas Gerais e relações florísticas com áreas de altitude da Região Sudeste do Brasil. Biota Neotrop. 13, 201–224 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sarthou, C., Villiers, J. F. & Ponge, J. F. Shrub vegetation on tropical granitic inselbergs in French Guiana. J. Veg. Sci. 14, 645–652 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tinti, B. V. et al. Plant diversity on granite/gneiss rock outcrop at Pedra do Pato, Serra do Brigadeiro State Park, Brazil. Check List 11, 1780 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Barbara, T., Martinelli, G., Fay, M. F., Mayo, S. J. & Lexer, C. Population differentiation and species cohesion in two closely related plants adapted to neotropical high-altitude “inselbergs”, Alcantarea imperialis and Alcantarea geniculata (Bromeliaceae). Mol. Ecol. 16, 1981–1992 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Boisselier-Dubayle, M. C., Leblois, R., Samadi, S., Lambourdière, J. & Sarthou, C. Genetic structure of the xerophilous bromeliad Pitcairnia geyskesii on inselbergs in French Guiana—A test of the forest refuge hypothesis. Ecography 33, 175–184 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Domingues, R. et al. Genetic variability of an endangered Bromeliaceae species (Pitcairnia albiflos) from the Brazilian Atlantic rainforest. Genet. Mol. Res. 10, 2482–2491 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hmeljevski, K. V. et al. Conservation assessment of an extremely restricted bromeliad highlights the need for population-based conservation on granitic inselbergs of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Flora Morpho. Distribut. Funct. Ecolo. Plants. 209, 250–259 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Palma-Silva, C. et al. Sympatric bromeliad species (Pitcairnia spp.) facilitate tests of mechanisms involved in species cohesion and reproductive isolation in Neotropical inselbergs. Mol. Ecol. 20, 3185–3201 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gomes, P. & Alves, M. Floristic diversity of two crystalline rocky outcrops in the Brazilian northeast semi-arid region. Rev. Bras. Bot. 33(4), 661–676 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nunes, J. A., Villa, P. M., Neri, A. V., Silva, W. A. & Schaefer, C. E. G. R. Seasonality drives herbaceous community beta diversity in lithologically different rocky outcrops in Brazil. Plant. Ecol. Evol. 153(2), 208–218 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Speziale, K. L. & Ezcurra, C. The role of outcrops in the diversity of Patagonian vegetation: Relicts of glacial palaeofloras?. Flora Morphol. Distrib. Funct. Ecol. Plant. 207, 141–149 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Speziale, K. L., Ruggiero, A. & Ezcurra, C. Plant species richness–environment relationships across the Subantarctic-Patagonian transition zone. J. Biogeogr. 37, 449–464 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yates, C. J. et al. High species diversity and turnover in granite inselberg floras highlight the need for a conservation strategy protecting many outcrops. Ecol. Evol. 9, 7660–7675 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gaston, K. J. Geographic range limits: Achieving synthesis. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 276, 1395–1406 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
McGann, T. D. How insular are ecological ‘islands’? An example from the granitic outcrops of the New England Batholith of Australia. Proc. R. Soc. Queensland. 110, 1–13 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Parmentier, I., Stévart, T. & Hardy, O. J. The inselberg flora of Atlantic Central Africa. I. Determinants of species assemblages. J. Biogeogr. 32, 685–696 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Changwe, K. & Balkwill, K. Floristics of the Dunbar Valley serpentinite site, Songimvelo Game Reserve, South Africa. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 143, 271–285 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Clarke, P. J. Habitat islands in fire-prone vegetation: Do landscape features influence community composition?. J. Biogeogr. 29, 677–684 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
De Bello, F., Leps, J. & Sebastia, M. T. Variations in species and functional plant diversity along climatic and grazing gradients. Ecography 29(6), 801–810 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Porembski, S., Martinelli, G., Ohlemüller, R. & Barthlott, W. Diversity and ecology of saxicolous vegetation mats on inselbergs in the Brazilian Atlantic rainforest. Divers. Distrib. 4, 107–119 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Porembski, S., Szarzynski, J., Mund, J. P. & Barthlott, W. Biodiversity and vegetation of small-sized inselbergs in a West African rain forest (Taï, Ivory Coast). J. Biogeogr. 23, 47–55 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rahmanian, S. et al. Effects of livestock grazing on soil, plant functional diversity, and ecological traits vary between regions with different climates in northeastern Iran. Ecol. Evol. 9, 8225–8237 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Speziale, K. L. & Ezcurra, C. Patterns of alien plant invasions in northwestern Patagonia, Argentina. J. Arid Environ. 75, 890–897 (2011).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Qian, H., Chen, S. H. & Zhang, J. L. Disentangling environmental and spatial effects on phylogenetic structure of angiosperm tree communities in China. Sci. Rep. 7, 5864 (2017).ADS 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Farzam, M. & Ejtehadi, H. Effects of drought and canopy facilitation on plant diversity and abundance in a semiarid mountainous rangeland. J. Plant. Ecol. 10(4), 626–633 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Heino, J. & Tolonen, K. T. Ecological drivers of multiple facets of beta diversity in a lentic macroinvertebrate metacommunity. Limnol. Oceanogr. 62, 2431–2444. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10577 (2017).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Miranda, J. D., Armas, C., Padilla, F. M. & Pugnaire, F. I. Climatic change and rainfall patterns: Effects on semi-arid plant communities of the Iberian Southeast. J. Arid. Environ. 75, 1302–1309 (2011).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pashirzad, M., Ejtehadi, H., Vaezi, J. & Shefferson, R. P. Multiple processes at different spatial scales determine beta diversity patterns in a mountainous semi-arid rangeland of Khorassan-Kopet Dagh floristic province, NE Iran. Plant. Ecol. 220(9), 829–844 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Victorero, L., Robert, K., Robinson, L. F., Taylor, M. L. & Huvenne, V. A. I. Species replacement dominates megabenthos beta diversity in a remote seamount setting. Sci. Rep. 8, 4152 (2018).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Deil, U. Rock communities in tropical Arabia. Flora et Vegetation Mundi 9, 175–187 (1991).
Google Scholar 
Dimopoulos, P., Sýkora, K. V., Mucina, L. & Georgiadis, T. The high-rank syntaxa of the rock-cliff and scree vegetation of the mainland Greece and Crete. Folia Geobot. 32, 313–334 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hein, P., Kürschner, H. & Parolly, G. Phytosociological studies on high mountain plant communities of the Taurus Mountains (Turkey) 2. Rock communities. Phytocoenologia 28, 465–563 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nowak, A., Nowak, S., Nobis, M. & Nobis, A. Vegetation of rock clefts and ledges in the Pamir Alai Mts, Tajikistan (Middle Asia). Cent. Eur. J. Biol. 9, 444–460 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Urbis, A. & Blazyca, B. Rock vascular plant species of the Kraków-Częstochowa, Uplands. Thaiszia J. Bot. 21, 207–214 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Wiser, S. K., Peet, R. K. & White, P. S. High-elevation rock outcrop vegetation of the Southern Appalachian Mountains. J. Veg. Sci. 7, 703–722 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cadotte, M. W. Experimental evidence that evolutionarily diverse assemblages result in higher productivity. PNAS 110(22), 8996–9000 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Swenson, G.N. Functional and Phylogenetic Ecology in R (Use R!) Kindle Edition (2014).Cadotte, M. W. & Davies, P. R. Why phylogenies do not always predict ecological differences. Ecol. Monogr. 87(4), 535–551 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
De Bello, F., LepŠ, J. A. N. & Sebastià, M. T. Predictive value of plant traits to grazing along a climatic gradient in the Mediterranean. J. Appl. Ecol. 42(5), 824–833 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Funk, J. et al. Revisiting the Holy Grail: Using plant functional traits to understand ecologica processes. Biol. Rev. 92(2), 1156–1173 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lavorel, S. & Garnier, É. Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: Revisiting the Holy Grail. Funct. Ecol. 16(5), 545–556 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Violle, C. et al. Let the concept of trait be functional!. Oikos 116, 882–892 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zheng, S., Li, W., Lan, Z., Ren, H. & Wang, K. Functional trait responses to grazing are mediated by soil moisture and plant functional group identity. Sci. Rep. 5, 18163 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gillison, A. N. Plant functional types and traits at the community, ecosystem and world level. In Vegetation Ecology (eds van der Maarel, E. & Franklin, J.) 347–386 (Wiley, 2013).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Loreau, M. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: Recent theoretical advances. Oikos 91, 3–17 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Akhani, H., Djamali, M., Ghorbanalizadeh, A. & Ramezani, E. Plant biodiversity of Hyrcanian relict forests, N Iran: An overview of the flora, vegetation, paleoecology and conservation. Pak. J. Bot. 42, 231–258 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Hamzehee, B. et al. Phytosociological survey of remnant Alnus glutinosa ssp. barbata communities in the lowland Caspian forests of northern Iran. Pytocoenologia. 38, 117–132 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Moradi, H. et al. Elevational gradient and vegetation-environmental relationships in the central Hyrcanian forests of northern Iran. Nord. J. Bot. 34, 1–14 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Naqinezhad, A., Esmailpoor, A. & Jafari, N. A new record of Pyrola minor (Pyrolaceae) for the flora of Iran as well as a description of its surrounding habitats. Taxon. Biosyst. 22, 71–80 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Naqinezhad, A., Zare-Maivan, H. & Gholizadeh, H. A floristic survey of the Hyrcanian forests in Northern Iran, using two lowland-mountain transects. J. For. Res. 26, 187–199 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sagheb-Talebi, K., Sajedi, T. & Pourhashemi, M. Forests of Iran (Springer Sci, 2014).Book 

Google Scholar 
Siadati, S. et al. Botanical diversity of Hyrcanian forests; a case study of a transect in the Kheyrud protected lowland mountain forests in northern Iran. Phytotaxa 7, 1–18 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Akhani, H. & Ziegler, H. Photosynthetic pathways and habitats of grasses in Golestan National Park (NE Iran), with an emphasis on the C 4-grass dominated rock communities. Phytocoenologia 32, 455–501 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Akhani, H., Mahdavi, P., Noroozi, J. & Zarrinpour, V. Vegetation patterns of the Irano-Turanian steppe along a 3,000 m altitudinal gradient in the Alborz Mountains of Northern Iran. Folia Geobot. 48, 229–255 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Klein, J. C. The altitudinal vegetation Alborez The Central (Iran) between the Iranian-Turanian and Euro-Siberian regions (French) (Institut Français de Recherche en Iran, 2001).
Google Scholar 
Noroozi, J. Case study: High Mountain Regions in Iran 255–260. of Chapter 7 (Endemism in mainland regions-case studies). In Endemism in Vascular plants. Plant. Veg. (ed Hobohm, C.) 9. (Springer, 2014).Noroozi, J., Akhani, H. & Willner, W. Phytosociological and ecological study of the high alpine vegetation of Tuchal Mountains (Central Alborz, Iran). Phytocoenologia 40, 293–321 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Do Carmo, F. F. & Jacobi, C. M. Diversity and plant trait-soil relationships among rock outcrops in the Brazilian Atlantic rainforest. Plant Soil. 403, 7–20 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Cavender-Bares, J., Kozak, K. H., Fine, P. V. A. & Kembel, S. The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. Ecol Lett. 12, 693–715 (2009).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Heydari, M., Poorbabaei, H., Esmailzadeh, O., Salehi, A. & EshaghiRad, J. Indicator plant species in monitoring forest soil conditions using logistic regression model in Zagros Oak (Quercus brantii var. persica) forest ecosystems. Ilam city. J. Plant Res. 27(5), 811–828 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Speziale, K. L. & Ezcurra, C. Rock outcrops as potential biodiversity refugia under climate change in North Patagonia. Plant Ecol. Diver. 8, 353–361 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rahmanian, S. et al. Effects of livestock grazing on plant species diversity vary along a climatic gradient in northeastern Iran. Appl. Veg. Sci. 23, 551–561 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Huston, M. A. Biological Diversity: The Coexistence of Species in Changing Landscape (Cambridge University, 1994).
Google Scholar 
Mason, N. W., Mouillot, D. & Lee, W. G. Functional richness, functional evenness and functional divergence: The primary components of functional diversity. Oikos 111, 112–118 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stubbs, W. J. & Wilson, J. B. Evidence for limiting similarity in a sand dune community. J. Ecol. 92, 557567 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stanisci, A. et al. Functional composition and diversity of leaf traits in subalpine versus alpine vegetation in the Apennines. Ann. Bot. Comp. plants. 12, plaa004 (2020).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Chesson, P. et al. Resource pulses, species interactions, and diversity maintenance in arid and semi-arid environments. Oecologia 141, 236–253 (2004).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rosbakh, S. et al. Contrasting effects of extreme drought and snowmelt patterns on mountain plants along an elevation gradient. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 1478 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Korner, C. Alpine Treelines: Functional Ecology of the Global High Elevation tree Limits (Springer Sci. & Business Media, 2012).Book 

Google Scholar 
Reich, P. B. et al. Generality of leaf trait relationships: A test across six biomes. Ecology 80, 1955–1969 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Westoby, M., Falster, D. S., Moles, A. T., Vesk, P. A. & Wright, I. J. Plant ecological strategies: Some leading dimensions of variation between species. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33, 125–159 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hautier, Y., Niklaus, P. A. & Hector, A. Competition for light causes plant biodiversity loss after eutrophication. Science 324, 636–638 (2009).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
De Bello, F. D. et al. Hierarchical effects of environmental filters on the functional structure of plant communities: A case study in the French Alps. Ecography 36, 393–402 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Korner, C., Neumayer, M., Menendez-Riedl, S. P. & Smeets-Scheel, A. Functional morphology of mountain plants. Flora 182, 353–383 (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rosbakh, S., Römermann, C. & Poschlod, P. Specific leaf area correlates with temperature new evidence of trait variation at the population, species and community levels. Alp. Bot. 125, 79–86 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ordonez, J. C. et al. Global study of relationships between leaf traits, climate and soil measures of nutrient fertility. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 18, 137–149 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, W. et al. Community-weighted mean traits but not functional diversity determine the changes in soil properties during wetland drying on the Tibetan Plateau. Solid Earth. 8, 137–147 (2017).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bardgett, R. D., Mommer, L. & De Vries, F. T. Going underground: Root traits as drivers of ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 29, 692–699 (2014).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lane, D. R., Coffin, D. P. & Lauenroth, W. K. Effects of soil texture and precipitation on above-ground net primary productivity and vegetation structure across the Central Grassland region of the United States. J. Veg. Sci. 9, 239–250 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Noy-Meir, I. Multivariate analysis of the semi-arid vegetation of southern Australia. II. Vegetation catenae an environmental gradients. Aust. J. Bot. 22, 40–115 (1973).
Google Scholar 
Moura, M. R., Villalobos, F., Costa, G. C. & Garcia, P. C. A. Disentangling the role of climate, topography and vegetation in species richness gradients. PLoS ONE 11(3), 0152468 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Neri, A. V. et al. Soil and altitude drives diversity and functioning of Brazilian Páramos (Campo de Altitude). J. plant. Ecol. 10(5), 771–779 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Benites, V. M., Schaefer, C. E. G. R., Simas, F. N. B., Santos, H. G. & Mendonca, B. A. F. Soils associated to rock outcrops in the Brazilian mountain ranges Mantiqueira and Espinhaço. Rev. Bras. Bot. 30, 569–577 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Flynn, D. F. B. et al. Loss of functional diversity under land use intensification across multiple taxa. Ecol. Lett. 12, 22–33 (2009).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zuo, X. A. et al. Testing associations of plant functional diversity with along a restoration gradient of sandy grassland. Front. Plant. Sci. 7, 1–11 (2016).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Myers-Smith, I. H. et al. Shrub expansion in tundra ecosystems: Dynamics, impacts and research priorities. Environ. Res. Lett. 6, 045509 (2011).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Vankoughnett, M. R. & Grogan, P. Nitrogen isotope tracer acquisition in low and tall birch tundra plant communities: A 2-year test of the snow–shrub hypothesis. Biogeochemistry 118, 291–306 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pescador, D. S., de Bello, F., Valladares, F. & Escudero, A. Plant trait variation along an altitudinal gradient in Mediterranean high mountain grasslands: Controlling the species turnover effect. PLoS ONE 10, e0118876 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Pescador, D. S., Sierra-Almeida, A., Torres, P. J. & Escudero, A. Summer freezing resistance: A critical filter for plant community assemblies in Mediterranean high mountains. Front. Plant. Sci. 7, 194 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Heydarnejad, S. & Ranjbar, A. Investigation of the effect of salinity stress on growth characteristic and ion accumulation in plants. J. Desert Ecos. Eng. 3(4), 1–10 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Perez-Harguindeguy, N. et al. New handbook for standardized measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust. J. Bot. 61, 167–234 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cornelissen, J. H. C. et al. A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust. J. Bot. 51, 335–380 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Raunkiaer, C. The Life Forms of Plants and Statistical Plant Geography (Oxford University Press, 1934).
Google Scholar 
Gee, G. W. & Bauder, J. W. Particle size analysis. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1, 2nd ed. (ed Klute, A.) Agronomy Monographs, Vol. 9, 383–409 (Am. Soc. Agr., 1986).Bremner, J. M. In Nitrogen-Total Methods of Soil Analysis. (eds Sparks, D. L.) Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1085–1122 (Am Soc Agr. Inc, 1996).Walkley, A. & Black, I. A. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 37, 29–38 (1934).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nelson, D. W. & Sommers, L. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter 1. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbi‐ological properties, (methodsofsoilan2), 539–579 (1982).Miller, R. H. & Keeney, D. R. Methods of soil analysis, 2nd ed. In Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties (eds Page, A. L. et al.) 1–129 (ASA, SSSA, 1982).
Google Scholar 
Food and Agriculture Organization-FAO. Management of gypsiferous soils. Soil Bulletin, 62, (FAO, 1990).Chao, A. et al. Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: A framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies. Ecol. Monogr. 84, 45–67 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shipley, B., Vile, D. & Garnier, É. from plant traits to plant communities: A statistica mechanistic approach to biodiversity. Science 314(5800), 812–814 (2006).ADS 
MathSciNet 
CAS 
PubMed 
MATH 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhu, J., Jiang, L. & Zhang, Y. Relationships between functional diversity and aboveground biomass production in the Northern Tibetan alpine grasslands. Sci. Rep. 6, 34105 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Laliberte, E. & Legendre, P. A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. Ecology 91(1), 299–305 (2010).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wheeler, D. & Tiefelsdorf, M. Multicollinearity and correlation among local regression coefficients in geographically weighted regression. J. Geogr. Syst. 7, 161–187 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fox, J. & Weisberg, S. A review of: an R companion to applied regression, second edition. J. Biopharm. Stat. 22, 418–419 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Brien, R. M. A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Qual. Quant. 41, 673–690 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dray, S., Legendre, P. & Blanchet, F. G. packfor: forward selection with permutation (Canoco p. 46). (2011) http://R-Forge.R-project.org/projects/sedar (Accessed 7 Nov 2016).Blanchet, F. G., Legendre, P. & Borcard, D. Forward selection of explanatory variables. Ecology 89, 2623–2632 (2008).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Oksanen, J. et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package (2017).Wickham, H. et al. Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis 2nd edn. (Springer International Publishing, 2016).MATH 
Book 

Google Scholar  More

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain
the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in
Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles
and JavaScript. More

Murray, C. J. et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet 399, 629–655 (2022).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nelson, R. E. et al. National estimates of healthcare costs associated with multidrug-resistant bacterial infections among hospitalized patients in the United States. Clin. Infect. Dis. 72, S17–S26 (2021).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ludden, C. et al. One Health genomic surveillance of Escherichia coli demonstrates distinct lineages and mobile genetic elements in isolates from humans versus livestock. mBio 10, e02693-18 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gouliouris, T. et al. Genomic surveillance of Enterococcus faecium reveals limited sharing of strains and resistance genes between livestock and humans in the United Kingdom. mBio 9, e01780-18 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Labar, A. S. et al. Regional dissemination of a trimethoprim-resistance gene cassette via a successful transposable element. PLoS ONE 7, e38142 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lamikanra, A. et al. Rapid evolution of fluoroquinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in Nigeria is temporally associated with fluoroquinolone use. BMC Infect. Dis. 11, 312 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kunhikannan, S. et al. Environmental hotspots for antibiotic resistance genes. MicrobiologyOpen 10, e1197 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sulis, G., Sayood, S. & Gandra, S. Antimicrobial resistance in low- and middle-income countries: current status and future directions. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther. 20, 147–160 (2022).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Okeke, I. N. & Nwoko, E. in Urban Crisis and Management in Africa: A Festschrift (eds Albert, I. O. & Mabogunje, A.) 125–148 (Pan-African Univ. Press, 2019).Doron, A. & Jeffrey, R. Waste of a Nation: Garbage and Growth in India (Harvard Univ. Press, 2018).Nadimpalli, M. L. et al. Urban informal settlements as hotspots of antimicrobial resistance and the need to curb environmental transmission. Nat. Microbiol. 5, 787–795 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Okeke, I. & Lamikanra, A. A study of the effect of the urban/rural divide on the incidence of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli. Biomed. Lett. 55, 91–97 (1997).
Google Scholar 
Aijuka, M., Charimba, G., Hugo, C. J. & Buys, E. M. Characterization of bacterial pathogens in rural and urban irrigation water. J. Water Health 13, 103–117 (2015).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hendriksen, R. S. et al. Global monitoring of antimicrobial resistance based on metagenomics analyses of urban sewage. Nat. Commun. 10, 1124 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Mahmud, Z. H. et al. Presence of virulence factors and antibiotic resistance among Escherichia coli strains isolated from human pit sludge. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries 13, 195–203 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Beukes, L. S., King, T. L. B. & Schmidt, S. Assessment of pit latrines in a peri-urban community in KwaZulu-Natal (South Africa) as a source of antibiotic resistant E. coli strains. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 220, 1279–1284 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, H., Gao, Y. & Chang, W. Comparison of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli isolates from drinking well water and pit latrine wastewater in a rural area of China. Biomed. Res. Int. 2016, 4343564 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Nji, E. et al. High prevalence of antibiotic resistance in commensal Escherichia coli from healthy human sources in community settings. Sci. Rep. 11, 3372 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ramblière, L., Guillemot, D., Delarocque-Astagneau, E. & Huynh, B. T. Impact of mass and systematic antibiotic administration on antibiotic resistance in low- and middle-income countries? A systematic review. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 58, 106396 (2021).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hlashwayo, D. F. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis reveal that Campylobacter spp. and antibiotic resistance are widespread in humans in sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS ONE 16, e0245951 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Van Boeckel, T. P. et al. Global trends in antimicrobial resistance in animals in low- and middle-income countries. Science 365, eaaw1944 (2019).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Argudín, M. A. et al. Genotypes, exotoxin gene content, and antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus aureus strains recovered from foods and food handlers. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 2930–2935 (2012).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Sivagami, K., Vignesh, V. J., Srinivasan, R., Divyapriya, G. & Nambi, I. M. Antibiotic usage, residues and resistance genes from food animals to human and environment: an Indian scenario. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 8, 102221 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wall, B. A. et al. Drivers, Dynamics and Epidemiology of Antimicrobial Resistance in Animal Production (FAO, 2016).Hassani, A. & Khan, G. Human–animal interaction and the emergence of SARS-CoV-2. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 6, e22117 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Madoshi, B. P. et al. Characterisation of commensal Escherichia coli isolated from apparently healthy cattle and their attendants in Tanzania. PLoS ONE 11, e0168160 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Guetiya Wadoum, R. E. et al. Abusive use of antibiotics in poultry farming in Cameroon and the public health implications. Br. Poult. Sci. 57, 483–493 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rousham, E. K., Unicomb, L. & Islam, M. A. Human, animal and environmental contributors to antibiotic resistance in low-resource settings: integrating behavioural, epidemiological and One Health approaches. Proc. Biol. Sci. 285, 20180332 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Jibril, A. H., Okeke, I. N., Dalsgaard, A. & Olsen, J. E. Association between antimicrobial usage and resistance in Salmonella from poultry farms in Nigeria. BMC Vet. Res. 17, 234 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tiseo, K., Huber, L., Gilbert, M., Robinson, T. P. & Van Boeckel, T. P. Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals from 2017 to 2030. Antibiotics 9, 918 (2020).PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Schar, D., Sommanustweechai, A., Laxminarayan, R. & Tangcharoensathien, V. Surveillance of antimicrobial consumption in animal production sectors of low- and middle-income countries: optimizing use and addressing antimicrobial resistance. PLoS Med. 15, e1002521 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Liu, Y. Y. et al. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: a microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 16, 161–168 (2016).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Sun, J., Zhang, H., Liu, Y. H. & Feng, Y. Towards understanding MCR-like colistin resistance. Trends Microbiol. 26, 794–808 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, C. et al. Identification of novel mobile colistin resistance gene mcr-10. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 9, 508–516 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
He, T. et al. Emergence of plasmid-mediated high-level tigecycline resistance genes in animals and humans. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 1450–1456 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sun, C. et al. Plasmid-mediated tigecycline-resistant gene tet(X4) in Escherichia coli from food-producing animals, China, 2008–2018. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 8, 1524–1527 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lowder, B. V. et al. Recent human-to-poultry host jump, adaptation, and pandemic spread of Staphylococcus aureus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 19545–19550 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bachiri, T. et al. First report of the plasmid-mediated colistin resistance gene mcr-1 in Escherichia coli ST405 isolated from wildlife in Bejaia, Algeria. Microb. Drug Resist. 24, 890–895 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Roberts, M. C. et al. The human clone ST22 SCCmec IV methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from swine herds and wild primates in Nepal: is man the common source? FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 94, fiy052 (2018).PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Aliyu, A. B., Saleha, A. A., Jalila, A. & Zunita, Z. Risk factors and spatial distribution of extended spectrum β-lactamase-producing-Escherichia coli at retail poultry meat markets in Malaysia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 16, 699 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Alam, M. U. et al. Human exposure to antimicrobial resistance from poultry production: assessing hygiene and waste-disposal practices in Bangladesh. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 222, 1068–1076 (2019).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Donado-Godoy, P. et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Salmonella from commercial broiler farms in two important poultry-producing regions of Colombia. J. Food Prot. 75, 874–883 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Moser, K. A. et al. The role of mobile genetic elements in the spread of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli from chickens to humans in small-scale production poultry operations in rural Ecuador. Am. J. Epidemiol. 187, 558–567 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Songe, M. M., Hang’ombe, B. M., Knight-Jones, T. J. D. & Grace, D. Antimicrobial resistant enteropathogenic Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. in houseflies infesting fish in food markets in Zambia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14, (2017).Alves, T. S., Lara, G. H. B., Maluta, R. P., Ribeiro, M. G. & Leite, D. S. Carrier flies of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli as potential dissemination agent in dairy farm environment. Sci. Total Environ. 633, 1345–1351 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Allen, H. K. et al. Call of the wild: antibiotic resistance genes in natural environments. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8, 251–259 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hasan, B. et al. Antimicrobial drug–resistant Escherichia coli in wild birds and free-range poultry, Bangladesh. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 18, 2055–2058 (2012).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Blanco, G. Supplementary feeding as a source of multiresistant Salmonella in endangered Egyptian vultures. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 65, 806–816 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Matias, C. A. R. et al. Frequency of zoonotic bacteria among illegally traded wild birds in Rio de Janeiro. Braz. J. Microbiol. 47, 882–888 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Brealey, J. C., Leitão, H. G., Hofstede, T., Kalthoff, D. C. & Guschanski, K. The oral microbiota of wild bears in Sweden reflects the history of antibiotic use by humans. Curr. Biol. 31, 4650–4658.e6 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, C. M. et al. Escherichia coli ST131-H22 as a foodborne uropathogen. mBio 9, e00470-18 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Randad, P. R. et al. Transmission of antimicrobial-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clonal complex 9 between pigs and humans, United States. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 27, 740–748 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jørgensen, S. L. et al. Diversity and population overlap between avian and human Escherichia coli belonging to sequence type 95. mSphere 4, e00333-18 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ludden, C. et al. A One Health study of the genetic relatedness of Klebsiella pneumoniae and their mobile elements in the east of England. Clin. Infect. Dis. 70, 219–226 (2020).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Thorpe, H. et al. One Health or Three? Transmission modelling of Klebsiella isolates reveals ecological barriers to transmission between humans, animals and the environment. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.05.455249 (2021).Ingham, A. C. et al. Dynamics of the human nasal microbiota and Staphylococcus aureus cc398 carriage in pig truck drivers across one workweek. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 87, e0122521 (2021).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hickman, R. A. et al. Exploring the antibiotic resistance burden in livestock, livestock handlers and their non-livestock handling contacts: a One Health perspective. Front. Microbiol. 12, 65161 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Okeke, I. N. African biomedical scientists and the promises of ‘big science’. Can J. Afr. Stud. https://doi.org/10.1080/00083968.2016.1266677 (2017).Nadimpalli, M. L. & Pickering, A. J. A call for global monitoring of WASH in wet markets. Lancet Planet. Health 4, e439–e440 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Grace, D. & Little, P. Informal trade in livestock and livestock products. Rev. Sci. Tech. 39, 183–192 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Caudell, M. A. et al. Towards a bottom-up understanding of antimicrobial use and resistance on the farm: a knowledge, attitudes, and practices survey across livestock systems in five African countries. PLoS ONE 15, e0220274 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Adekanye, U. O. et al. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of veterinarians towards antimicrobial resistance and stewardship in Nigeria. Antibiotics 9, 453 (2020).CAS 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mangesho, P. E. et al. ‘We are doctors’: drivers of animal health practices among Maasai pastoralists and implications for antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance. Prev. Vet. Med. 188, 105266 (2021).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Essack, S. Water, sanitation and hygiene in national action plans for antimicrobial resistance. Bull. World Health Organ. 99, 606–608 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Aarestrup, F. M. et al. Effect of abolishment of the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion on occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in fecal enterococci from food animals in Denmark. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 45, 2054–2059 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Funtowicz, S. & Ravetz, J. in Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research (eds Hadorn, G. H. et al.) 361–368 (Springer, 2008); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6699-3Theuretzbacher, U., Outterson, K., Engel, A. & Karlén, A. The global preclinical antibacterial pipeline. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 185, 275–285 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Lacotte, Y., Årdal, C. & Ploy, M. C. Infection prevention and control research priorities: what do we need to combat healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance? Results of a narrative literature review and survey analysis. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 9, 142 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kennedy, D. A. & Read, A. F. Why the evolution of vaccine resistance is less of a concern than the evolution of drug resistance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 12878 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Vekemans, J. et al. Leveraging vaccines to reduce antibiotic use and prevent antimicrobial resistance: a World Health Organization action framework. Clin. Infect. Dis. 73, E1011–E1017 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Micoli, F., Bagnoli, F., Rappuoli, R. & Serruto, D. The role of vaccines in combatting antimicrobial resistance. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 195, 287–302 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Massella, E. et al. Antimicrobial resistance profile and ExPEC virulence potential in commensal Escherichia coli of multiple sources. Antibiotics 10, 351 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Huttner, A. et al. Safety, immunogenicity, and preliminary clinical efficacy of a vaccine against extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli in women with a history of recurrent urinary tract infection: a randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1b trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 17, 528–537 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Frenck, R. W. et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a vaccine for extra-intestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli (ESTELLA): a phase 2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 19, 631–640 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Patel, R. & Fang, F. C. Diagnostic stewardship: opportunity for a laboratory-infectious diseases partnership. Clin. Infect. Dis. 67, 799–801 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Okeke, I. N. Divining Without Seeds: The Case for Strengthening Laboratory Medicine in Africa (Cornell Univ. Press, 2011).Loosli, K., Davis, A., Muwonge, A. & Lembo, T. Addressing antimicrobial resistance by improving access and quality of care—a review of the literature from East Africa. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 15, e0009529 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chokshi, A., Sifri, Z., Cennimo, D. & Horng, H. Global contributors to antibiotic resistance. J. Glob. Infect. Dis. 11, 36–42 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Adedapo, A. D. & Akunne, O. O. Patterns of antimicrobials prescribed to patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital: a prescription quality audit. Cureus 13, e15896 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kumarasamy, K. K. et al. Emergence of a new antibiotic resistance mechanism in India, Pakistan, and the UK: a molecular, biological, and epidemiological study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 10, 597–602 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Davenport, M. et al. New and developing diagnostic technologies for urinary tract infections. Nat. Rev. Urol. 14, 298–310 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
van Dongen, J. E. et al. Point-of-care CRISPR/Cas nucleic acid detection: recent advances, challenges and opportunities. Biosens. Bioelectron. 166, 112445 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Nielsen, T. B. et al. Monoclonal antibody therapy against Acinetobacter baumannii. Infect. Immun. 89, e0016221 (2021).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dwivedi, P., Narvi, S. S. & Tewari, R. P. Application of polymer nanocomposites in the nanomedicine landscape: envisaging strategies to combat implant associated infections. J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater. 11, 129–142 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Song, M., Wu, D., Hu, Y., Luo, H. & Li, G. Characterization of an Enterococcus faecalis bacteriophage vB_EfaM_LG1 and its synergistic effect with antibiotic. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 11, 636 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Dhama, K. et al. Growth promoters and novel feed additives improving poultry production and health, bioactive principles and beneficial applications: the trends and advances—a review. Int. J. Pharmacol. 10, 129–159 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Vieco-Saiz, N. et al. Benefits and inputs from lactic acid bacteria and their bacteriocins as alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters during food-animal production. Front. Microbiol. 10, 57 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ng, W. K. & Koh, C. B. The utilization and mode of action of organic acids in the feeds of cultured aquatic animals. Rev. Aquac. 9, 342–368 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mattioli, G. A. et al. Effects of parenteral supplementation with minerals and vitamins on oxidative stress and humoral immune response of weaning calves. Animals 10, 1298 (2020).PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mwangi, S., Timmons, J., Fitz-Coy, S. & Parveen, S. Characterization of Clostridium perfringens recovered from broiler chicken affected by necrotic enteritis. Poult. Sci. 98, 128–135 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Prendergast, A. J. et al. Putting the ‘A’ into WaSH: a call for integrated management of water, animals, sanitation, and hygiene. Lancet Planet. Health 3, e336–e337 (2019).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Martinelli, M. et al. Probiotics’ efficacy in paediatric diseases: which is the evidence? A critical review on behalf of the Italian Society of Pediatrics. Ital. J. Pediatr. 46, 104 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rasko, D. A. & Sperandio, V. Anti-virulence strategies to combat bacteria-mediated disease. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 9, 117–128 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rodrigues, M., McBride, S. W., Hullahalli, K., Palmer, K. L. & Duerkop, B. A. Conjugative delivery of CRISPR–Cas9 for the selective depletion of antibiotic-resistant enterococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 63, e01454-19 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Casu, B., Arya, T., Bessette, B. & Baron, C. Fragment-based screening identifies novel targets for inhibitors of conjugative transfer of antimicrobial resistance by plasmid pKM101. Sci. Rep. 7, 14907 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Denyer Willis, L. & Chandler, C. Quick fix for care, productivity, hygiene and inequality: reframing the entrenched problem of antibiotic overuse. BMJ Glob. Health 4, e001590 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wilkinson, A., Ebata, A. & Macgregor, H. Interventions to reduce antibiotic prescribing in LMICs: a scoping review of evidence from human and animal health systems. Antibiotics 8, 2 (2018).Torres, N. F., Chibi, B., Middleton, L. E., Solomon, V. P. & Mashamba-Thompson, T. P. Evidence of factors influencing self-medication with antibiotics in low and middle-income countries: a systematic scoping review. Public Health 168, 92–101 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Potgieter, N., Banda, N. T., Becker, P. J. & Traore-Hoffman, A. N. WASH infrastructure and practices in primary health care clinics in the rural Vhembe District municipality in South Africa. BMC Fam. Pract. 22, 8 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Humphreys, G. Reinventing the toilet for 2.5 billion in need. Bull. World Health Organ. 92, 470–471 (2014).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yam, P., Fales, D., Jemison, J., Gillum, M. & Bernstein, M. Implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship program in a rural hospital. Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm. 69, 1142–1148 (2012).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sartelli, M. et al. Antibiotic use in low and middle-income countries and the challenges of antimicrobial resistance in surgery. Antibiotics 9, 497 (2020).PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Büdel, T. et al. On the island of Zanzibar people in the community are frequently colonized with the same MDR Enterobacterales found in poultry and retailed chicken meat. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 75, 2432–2441 (2020).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Finch, M. J., Morris, J. G., Kaviti, J., Kagwanja, W. & Levine, M. M. Epidemiology of antimicrobial resistant cholera in Kenya and East Africa. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 39, 484–490 (1988).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mutreja, A. et al. Evidence for several waves of global transmission in the seventh cholera pandemic. Nature 477, 462–465 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Weill, F. X. et al. Genomic history of the seventh pandemic of cholera in Africa. Science 358, 785–789 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Opintan, J. A., Newman, M. J., Nsiah-Poodoh, O. A. & Okeke, I. N. Vibrio cholerae O1 from Accra, Ghana carrying a class 2 integron and the SXT element. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 62, 929–933 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Garbern, S. C. et al. Clinical and socio-environmental determinants of multidrug-resistant Vibrio cholerae 01 in older children and adults in Bangladesh. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 105, 436–441 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mintz, E. D. & Guerrant, R. L. A lion in our village—the unconscionable tragedy of cholera in Africa. N. Engl. J. Med. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp0810559 (2009).Gibani, M. M. et al. The impact of vaccination and prior exposure on stool shedding of Salmonella typhi and Salmonella paratyphi in 6 controlled human infection studies. Clin. Infect. Dis. 68, 1265–1273 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

Speijer, D., Lukeš, J. & Eliáš, M. Sex is a ubiquitous, ancient, and inherent attribute of eukaryotic life. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 112, 8827–8834 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bachtrog, D. et al. Sex determination: why so many ways of doing it? PLoS Biol. 12, e1001899 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ah-King, M. & Nylin, S. Sex in an evolutionary perspective: just another reaction norm. Evolut. Biol. 37, 234–246 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Leonard, J. L. The evolution of sexual systems in animals. In: Leonard, J.L. (ed.). Transitions between sexual systems: understanding the mechanisms of, and pathways between, dioecy, hermaphroditism and other sexual systems, 1–58 Springer (2019).Weeks, S. C., Benvenuto, C. & Reed, S. K. When males and hermaphrodites coexist: a review of androdioecy in animals. Integr. Comp. Biol. 46, 449–464 (2006).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Goldberg, E. E. et al. Macroevolutionary synthesis of flowering plant sexual systems. Evolution 71, 898–912 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Waples, R. S., Mariani, S. & Benvenuto, C. Consequences of sex change for effective population size. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 285, 20181702 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Benvenuto, C. & Weeks, S. C. Hermaphroditism and gonochorism. The Natural History of the Crustacea: Reproductive Biology VI, 197–241 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Mariani, S., Sala-Bozano, M., Chopelet, J. & Benvenuto, C. Spatial and temporal patterns of size-at-sex-change in two exploited coastal fish. Environ. Biol. Fishes 96, 535–541 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Käfer, J., Marais, G. A. & Pannell, J. R. On the rarity of dioecy in flowering plants. Mol. Ecol. 26, 1225–1241 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Atz, J. Intersexuality in Fishes. In C.N. Amstrong and A.J. Marshall (eds). Intersexuality in vertebrates including man, 145–232 Academic Press, London (1964).Jarne, P. & Auld, J. R. Animals mix it up too: the distribution of self-fertilization among hermaphroditic animals. Evolution 60, 1816–1824 (2006).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Leonard, J. L. Williams’ paradox and the role of phenotypic plasticity in sexual systems. Integr. Comp. Biol. 53, 671–688 (2013).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Weeks, S. C. The role of androdioecy and gynodioecy in mediating evolutionary transitions between dioecy and hermaphroditism in the animalia. Evolution 66, 3670–3686 (2012).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Renner, S. S. The relative and absolute frequencies of angiosperm sexual systems: dioecy, monoecy, gynodioecy, and an updated online database. Am. J. Bot. 101, 1588–1596 (2014).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bawa, K. S. Evolution of dioecy in flowering plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11, 15–39 (1980).Article 

Google Scholar 
Charlesworth, B. & Charlesworth, D. A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. Am. Nat. 112, 975–997 (1978).Article 

Google Scholar 
Charlesworth, D. Androdioecy and the evolution of dioecy. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 22, 333–348 (1984).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pannell, J. R. The evolution and maintenance of androdioecy. In: Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 397–425 (2002).Bull, J. & Charnov, E. On irreversible evolution. Evolution 39, 1149–1155 (1985).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Barrett, S. C. The evolution of plant reproductive systems: how often are transitions irreversible? Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 280, 20130913 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Oyarzún, P. A., Nuñez, J. J., Toro, J. E. & Gardner, J. P. Trioecy in the marine mussel Semimytilus algosus (Mollusca, Bivalvia): stable sex ratios across 22 degrees of a latitudinal gradient. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 348 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dani, K. & Kodandaramaiah, U. Plant and animal reproductive strategies: lessons from offspring size and number tradeoffs. Front. Ecol. Evol. 5, 38 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Avise, J. & Mank, J. Evolutionary perspectives on hermaphroditism in fishes. Sex. Dev. 3, 152–163 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dornburg, A. & Near, T. J. The Emerging phylogenetic perspective on the evolution of Actinopterygian fishes. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 52, 427–452 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Costa, W. J., Lima, S. M. & Bartolette, R. Androdioecy in Kryptolebias killifish and the evolution of self-fertilizing hermaphroditism. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 99, 344–349 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Costa, W. Colouration, taxonomy and geographical distribution of mangrove killifishes, the Kryptolebias marmoratus species group, in southern Atlantic coastal plains of Brazil (Cyprinodontiformes: Rivulidae). Ichthyol. Explor. Freshw. 27, 183–192 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Powell, M. L., Kavanaugh, S. I. & Sower, S. A. Seasonal concentrations of reproductive steroids in the gonads of the Atlantic hagfish, Myxine glutinosa. J. Exp. Zool. Part A Comp. Exp. Biol. 301, 352–360 (2004).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Pennell, M. W., Mank, J. E. & Peichel, C. L. Transitions in sex determination and sex chromosomes across vertebrate species. Mol. Ecol. 27, 3950–3963 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ghiselin, M. T. The evolution of hermaphroditism among animals. Q. Rev. Biol. 44, 189–208 (1969).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Eppley, S. M. & Jesson, L. K. Moving to mate: the evolution of separate and combined sexes in multicellular organisms. J. Evol. Biol. 21, 727–736 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Warner, R. R. The adaptive significance of sequential hermaphroditism in animals. Am. Nat. 109, 61–82 (1975).Article 

Google Scholar 
Warner, R. R., Robertson, D. R. & Leigh, E. G. Sex change and sexual selection. Science 190, 633–638 (1975).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Charnov, E. L. The Theory of Sex Allocation. Princeton University Press, USA (1982).Policansky, D. Sex change in plants and animals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 13, 471–495 (1982).Article 

Google Scholar 
Benvenuto, C., Coscia, I., Chopelet, J., Sala-Bozano, M. & Mariani, S. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of alternative sex-change pathways in fish. Sci. Rep. 7, 9084 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Charnov, E. L. Natural selection and sex change in pandalid shrimp: test of a life-history theory. Am. Nat. 113, 715–734 (1979).MathSciNet 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Broquet, T. et al. The size advantage model of sex allocation in the protandrous sex-changer Crepidula fornicata: role of the mating system, sperm storage, and male mobility. Am. Nat. 186, 404–420 (2015).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Erisman, B. E., Craig, M. T. & Hastings, P. A. A phylogenetic test of the size-advantage model: evolutionary changes in mating behavior influence the loss of sex change in a fish lineage. Am. Nat. 174, E83–E99 (2009).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Buxton, C. D. & Garratt, P. A. Alternative reproductive styles in seabreams (Pisces: Sparidae). Environ. Biol. Fishes 28, 113–124 (1990).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shapiro, D. Y. Social behavior, group structure, and the control of sex reversal in hermaphroditic fish. Adv. Study Behav. 10, 43–102 (1979).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stearns, S. C. Life history evolution: successes, limitations, and prospects. Naturwissenschaften 87, 476–486 (2000).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Waples, R. S., Luikart, G., Faulkner, J. R. & Tallmon, D. A. Simple life-history traits explain key effective population size ratios across diverse taxa. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 280, 20131339 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Martinez, A. S., Willoughby, J. R. & Christie, M. R. Genetic diversity in fishes is influenced by habitat type and life-history variation. Ecol. Evolution 8, 12022–12031 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Harvey, P. H. & Pagel, M. D. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. (Oxford University Press, USA, 1991).Barneche, D. R., Robertson, D. R., White, C. R. & Marshall, D. J. Fish reproductive-energy output increases disproportionately with body size. Science 360, 642–645 (2018).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Brandl, S. J. & Bellwood, D. R. Pair-formation in coral reef fishes: an ecological perspective. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol.: Annu. Rev. 52, 1–80 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Fitzpatrick, J. L. Sperm competition and fertilization mode in fishes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 375, 20200074 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Parker, G. A. Conceptual developments in sperm competition: a very brief synopsis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 375, 20200061 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Warner, R. R. Sex change in fishes: hypotheses, evidence, and objections. Environ. Biol. Fishes 22, 81–90 (1988).Article 

Google Scholar 
Molloy, P. P., Goodwin, N. B., Côté, I. M., Reynolds, J. D. & Gage, M. J. Sperm competition and sex change: a comparative analysis across fishes. Evolution 61, 640–652 (2007).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Erisman, B. E., Petersen, C. W., Hastings, P. A. & Warner, R. R. Phylogenetic perspectives on the evolution of functional hermaphroditism in teleost fishes. Integr. Comp. Biol. 53, 736–754 (2013).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sadovy, Y., Colin, P. & Domeier, M. Aggregation and spawning in the tiger grouper, Mycteroperca tigris (Pisces: Serranidae). Copeia 1994, 511–516 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
Muñoz, R. C. & Warner, R. R. A new version of the size-advantage hypothesis for sex change: incorporating sperm competition and size-fecundity skew. Am. Nat. 161, 749–761 (2003).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Horne, C. R., Hirst, A. G. & Atkinson, D. Selection for increased male size predicts variation in sexual size dimorphism among fish species. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 287, 20192640 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Parker, G. The evolution of expenditure on testes. J. Zool. 298, 3–19 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stockley, P., Gage, M., Parker, G. & Møller, A. Sperm competition in fishes: the evolution of testis size and ejaculate characteristics. Am. Nat. 149, 933–954 (1997).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pla, S., Benvenuto, C., Capellini, I. & Piferrer, F. A phylogenetic comparative analysis on the evolution of sequential hermaphroditism in seabreams (Teleostei: Sparidae). Sci. Rep. 10, 3606 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Vrijenhoek, R. C. Unisexual fish: model systems for studying ecology and evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25, 71–96 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sadovy de Mitcheson, Y. & Liu, M. Functional hermaphroditism in teleosts. Fish. Fish. 9, 1–43 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rabosky, D. L. et al. An inverse latitudinal gradient in speciation rate for marine fishes. Nature 559, 392 (2018).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Froese, R., Pauly, D. & Editors. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. www.fishbase.org (2018).Moore, W. S. Evolutionary ecology of unisexual fishes. In: Evolutionary genetics of fishes, 329–398 (Springer, 1984).Collin, R. & Miglietta, M. P. Reversing opinions on Dollo’s Law. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 602–609 (2008).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Domes, K., Norton, R. A., Maraun, M. & Scheu, S. Re-evolution of sexuality breaks Dollo’s law. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 104, 7139–7144 (2007).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dollo, L. Les lois de l’évolution. Bull. Soc. Belge Géol. Paléont. Hydrol. 7, 164–166 (1893).
Google Scholar 
King, B. & Lee, M. S. Ancestral state reconstruction, rate heterogeneity, and the evolution of reptile viviparity. Syst. Biol. 64, 532–544 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Uller, T. & Helanterä, H. From the origin of sex-determining factors to the evolution of sex-determining systems. Q. Rev. Biol. 86, 163–180 (2011).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Devlin, R. H. & Nagahama, Y. Sex determination and sex differentiation in fish: an overview of genetic, physiological, and environmental influences. Aquaculture 208, 191–364 (2002).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Volff, J.-N., Nanda, I., Schmid, M. & Schartl, M. Governing sex determination in fish: regulatory putsches and ephemeral dictators. Sex. Dev. 1, 85–99 (2007).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nagahama, Y., Chakraborty, T., Paul-Prasanth, B., Ohta, K. & Nakamura, M. Sex determination, gonadal sex differentiation and plasticity in vertebrate species. Physiol. Rev. 101, 1237–1308 (2020).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Penman, D. J. & Piferrer, F. Fish gonadogenesis. Part I: genetic and environmental mechanisms of sex determination. Rev. Fish. Sci. 16(S1), 16–34 (2008).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mank, J. E., Promislow, D. E. L. & Avise, J. C. Evolution of alternative sex-determining mechanisms in teleost fishes. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 87, 83–93 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Galetti, P. M., Aguilar, C. T. & Molina, W. F. An overview of marine fish cytogenetics. Hydrobiologia 420, 55–62 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yoshida, K. et al. Sex chromosome turnover contributes to genomic divergence between incipient stickleback species. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004223 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ross, J. A., Urton, J. R., Boland, J., Shapiro, M. D. & Peichel, C. L. Turnover of sex chromosomes in the stickleback fishes (Gasterosteidae). PLoS Genet. 5, e1000391 (2009).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Vicoso, B. Molecular and evolutionary dynamics of animal sex-chromosome turnover. Nature Ecology & Evolution 1–10 (2019).Gamble, T. et al. Restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RAD-seq) reveals an extraordinary number of transitions among gecko sex-determining systems. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 1296–1309 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pokorná, M. & Kratochvíl, L. Phylogeny of sex-determining mechanisms in squamate reptiles: are sex chromosomes an evolutionary trap? Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 156, 168–183 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Furman, B. L. et al. Sex chromosome evolution: sso many exceptions to the rules. Genome Biol. Evol. 12, 750–763 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Carvalho, N. D. M. et al. Cytogenetics of Synbranchiformes: a comparative analysis of two Synbranchus Bloch, 1795 species from the Amazon. Genetica 140, 149–158 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Piferrer, F. Epigenetic mechanisms in sex determination and in the evolutionary transitions between sexual systems. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 376, 20200110 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Grant, S. et al. Genetics of sex determination in flowering plants. Dev. Genet. 15, 214–230 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
Harrington Jr, R. W. How ecological and genetic factors interact to determine when self-fertilizing hermaphrodites of Rivulus marmoratus change into functional secondary males, with a reappraisal of the modes of intersexuality among fishes. Copeia 389–432 (1971).Adolfi, M. C., Nakajima, R. T., Nóbrega, R. H. & Schartl, M. Intersex, Hermaphroditism, and gonadal plasticity in vertebrates: Evolution of the Müllerian duct and Amh/Amhr2 signalling. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences (2018).Adkins-Regan, E. Early organizational effects of hormones: an evolutionary perspective. In Adler, N.T. (ed.) Neuroendocrinology of reproduction: physiology and behavior, 159–228 (Springer, USA, 1981).Navara, K. J. The truth about Nemo’s dad: sex-changing behaviors in fishes. In Choosing Sexes 183–212 (Springer, Cham, 2018).Orban, L., Sreenivasan, R. & Olsson, P. E. Long and winding roads: testis differentiation in zebrafish. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 312, 35–41 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zohar, Y., Abraham, M. & Gordin, H. The gonadal cycle of the captivity-reared hermaphroditic teleost Sparus aurata (L.) during the first two years of life. Annales de. Biologie Anim. Biochim. Biophys. 18, 877–882 (1978).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chang, C.-F. & Yueh, W.-S. Annual cycle of gonadal histology and steroid profiles in the juvenile males and adult females of the protandrous black porgy, Acanthopagrus schlegelii. Aquaculture 91, 179–196 (1990).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Miura, S., Nakamura, S., Kobayashi, Y., Piferrer, F. & Nakamura, M. Differentiation of ambisexual gonads and immunohistochemical localization of P450 cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme during gonadal sex differentiation in the protandrous anemonefish, Amphiprion clarkii. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B: Biochem. Mol. Biol. 149, 29–37 (2008).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Yamaguchi, S. & Iwasa, Y. Advantage for the sex changer who retains the gonad of the nonfunctional sex. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 71, 39 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Munday, P. L., Kuwamura, T. & Kroon, F. J. Bi-directional sex change in marine fishes. In: Cole, K.S. (ed.) Reproduction and sexuality in marine fishes: Patterns and processes. 241–271 (University of California Press, Berkeley, USA, 2010).Uller, T., Feiner, N., Radersma, R., Jackson, I. S. & Rago, A. Developmental plasticity and evolutionary explanations. Evol. Dev. 22, 47–55 (2020).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pla, S., Maynou, F. & Piferrer, F. Hermaphroditism in fish: incidence, distribution and associations with abiotic environmental factors. Rev. Fish. Biol. Fish. 31, 935–955 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Boettiger, C., Lang, D. T. & Wainwright, P. C. rfishbase: exploring, manipulating and visualizing FishBase data from R. J. Fish. Biol. 81, 2030–2039 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pagel, M., Meade, A. & Barker, D. Bayesian estimation of ancestral character states on phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 53, 673–684 (2004).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pagel, M. & Meade, A. Bayesian analysis of correlated evolution of discrete characters by reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo. Am. Nat. 167, 808–825 (2006).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pagel, M. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 255, 37–45 (1994).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Currie, T. E. & Meade, A. In Modern phylogenetic comparative methods and their application in evolutionary biology, 263–286 (Springer, 2014).Furness, A. I. & Capellini, I. The evolution of parental care diversity in amphibians. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–12 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rambaut, A., Drummond, A. J., Xie, D., Baele, G. & Suchard, M. A. Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Syst. Biol. 67, 901 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Paradis, E. & Schliep, K. ape 5.0: an environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R. Bioinformatics 35, 526–528 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Freckleton, R. P., Harvey, P. H. & Pagel, M. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am. Nat. 160, 712–726 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pagel, M. Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies. Zool. Scr. 26, 331–348 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pagel, M. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401, 877–884 (1999).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Orme, D. The caper package: comparative analysis of phylogenetics and evolution in R. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/caper/vignettes/caper.pdf (2018).Schiettekatte, N., Brandl, S. & Casey, J. Fishualize: Color palettes based on fish species. R package v0.2.2 (2021). More

OverviewIn this study, we used VIIRS active fire detections to track the dynamic evolution of all fires in California from 2012 to 2020 (Fig. 1). We developed an approach that has the following steps. First, after reading the satellite fire pixel data at each 12-hour time step, the new fire pixels are aggregated into multiple clusters using the fire pixel locations and an automatic clustering algorithm. These clusters are then spatially compared to existing fire objects. If a cluster is not close to any existing active fire object, we use all fire pixels within the cluster to form a new fire object. If a cluster is located near an existing fire object which is still active, we view the cluster as an extension of the existing fire. In this case, we append all pixels within the cluster to the corresponding existing fire object, allowing the existing object to grow. When a fire expands and gets close enough (within a pre-defined distance threshold) to an existing active fire object, we merge the two objects. For each time step (12 hours in this case for the two overpasses), we derive or update a suite of attributes and status indicators associated with each fire event, including pixel-level attributes of fire and surface properties, vector geometries related to the fire shape, and meta-attributes characterizing the entire fire object.Data inputSatellite remote sensing instruments provide active fire detections with accurate geographical location and broad spatial coverage. The primary data for this fire tracking system are active fire locations and the fire radiative power (FRP) recorded by the VIIRS instrument aboard the Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership (Suomi-NPP) satellite24. VIIRS observes Earth’s surface twice each day in low and mid latitude regions, with local overpass times of approximately 1:30 am and 1:30 pm. Compared to its predecessor, the MODIS sensors on the Terra and Aqua satellites, VIIRS has a higher spatial resolution and can detect smaller and cooler fires24. Also, the VIIRS instrument provides a more consistent pixel area across the image swath25, resulting in more accurate estimates of active fire location. Therefore, compared with MODIS, the VIIRS active fire products can be used to map fire event progression with higher accuracy21. Two streams of VIIRS active fire data are operationally produced using a contextual fire detection algorithm24, drawing upon VIIRS moderate resolution band (M-band) and imaging band (I-band) reflectance and radiance data layers. In this fire tracking system, we used the Suomi-NPP VIIRS I-band fire location data product (VNP14IMGML, Collection 1 Version 4) that contains the centre location, FRP, scan angle, and other attribute fields associated with each pixel. The I-band fire detection product has a 375-m spatial resolution at nadir (the sub-satellite point) and an average resolution across the full swath of about 470 m. Theoretical estimates of fire detection efficiency for the VIIRS sensor indicate that during the day, VIIRS can detect 700 K fires with 50% probability that have a size of about 200 m2 (a 15 m × 15 m fire area)24. During night, the detection efficiency increases, and VIIRS can detect 700 K fires as small as 40 m2. From a fire spread tracking perspective, these detection efficiencies imply that in many instances, the area of a fire pixel that is covered with flaming fire combustion is several orders of magnitude smaller than the overall pixel size. The VNP14IMGML data, available from 2012 onwards, were downloaded from the University of Maryland VIIRS Active Fire website (https://viirsfire.geog.umd.edu/).Land cover data are an additional input in the system required to classify different fire types and determine the spatial connectivity threshold. Here we use the U.S. National Land Cover Database (NLCD 2016)26 that is available from the Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics (MRLC) Consortium website (https://www.mrlc.gov/national-land-cover-database-nlcd-2016). We aggregated the original 30-m data to match the spatial resolution of VIIRS active fire data, and merged the original 16 classes into several groups: ‘Water’, ‘Urban’, ‘Barren’, ‘Forest’, ‘Shrub’, ‘Grassland’, and ‘Agriculture’. We used the 1000-hour dead fuel moisture from the high-resolution (4 km) gridMET product27 for the purpose of separating wildfires and management fires. This gridMET dataset was computed from 7–day average conditions composed of day length, hours of rain, and daily temperature and humidity ranges. Regularly updated gridMET data are available from the Climatology Lab website (http://www.climatologylab.org/gridmet.html).Other ancillary and validation datasets used in this study included a shapefile of California borders and fire perimeters from the California Forestry and Fire Protection’s Fire and Resource Assessment Program (FRAP) dataset (https://frap.fire.ca.gov/mapping/maps/).Fire object hierarchyFire detections from VIIRS are dynamically tracked within the framework of a three-level object hierarchy (Fig. 1). The lowest level is the fire pixel object, which includes the geographical location (latitude and longitude), the FRP value, and the origin (first assigned fire object id). The second level is the fire object, which includes all attributes associated with each individual fire event at a particular time step (Table 2). Each fire object includes one or more fire pixel objects, a unique identification number (id), and a set of attributes associated with the whole fire. Two types of fire attributes are derived and recorded for each fire object. The first type encompasses temporal (e.g., ignition time, duration) and spatial (e.g., centroid, ignition location) characteristics of the object as well as general properties (e.g., size, type, active status). The second type is the geometric information related to the fire object, including the fire perimeter, the active fire front line, and the newly detected fire pixel locations (stored as vectors). All fire objects in the State of California are combined to form an allfires object, to characterize the whole-region fire situation at a specific time step. The allfires object comprises a list of fire objects, and also contains meta information representing the statistics of all fires and the records describing fire evolution. A full list of the attributes associated with the pixel object, the fire object, and the allfires object is presented in Table 2.Table 2 List of main attributes associated with pixel, fire and allfires objects.Full size tableFire event trackingThe fire records (locations and FRPs) from the monthly VIIRS active fire location products (VNP14IMGML) are read into the system at each half-daily time step (roughly 1:30 am and 1:30 pm local time). We apply spatial and temporal filters to the data to extract active fire pixels recorded in California during each 12-hour time interval. We also apply quality flag filters (thermal anomaly type of ‘0: presumed vegetation fire’ in VNP14IMGML)) to ensure the use of only pixels likely associated with vegetation fires. The fire location and FRP values are used to create fire pixel objects. To speed up the calculation, the newly detected active fire pixels after filtering are first aggregated to specific clusters using the distances between them and an automatic clustering algorithm. In this initial aggregation algorithm, a ball tree28 is created to partition all newly detected active fire pixels into a nested set of hyperspheres in a 2-D space (latitude and longitude). This space partitioning data structure can be used to expedite nearest neighbours search29 and allow for quick cluster grouping. Here we refer to a cluster as a collection of pixel objects that are recorded at the same time step and are also spatially nearby. In the following steps, all pixels within a cluster are considered as a whole for fire merging and creation.We define an extended area for every existing fire object as the fire vector perimeter (see the section of Calculating and recording fire attributes for detail) plus a radial buffer that depends on the fire type property of the object. The buffer is set to 5 km for forest fires and 1 km for other fire types (shrub, crop, urban), considering that the fire spread rate can differ across biomes13. We then evaluate the spatial distance between the perimeters of a newly classified cluster and all existing active fire objects (a fire object keeps an active status if one or more active fire pixels associated with it are detected during the past 5 days), and calculate the shortest distance. If the shortest distance is smaller than the buffer of the associated existing active fire (i.e., new cluster overlaps with the extended area of an existing fire object), we assume all fire pixels in the new cluster are associated with the growth of the existing fire object at the current time step (Fig. 2). The existing fire object is updated by appending all fire pixel objects within the new cluster. If a newly classified cluster does not overlap with the extended area of any existing active fire object, we assume this is a new fire. A new fire object (by assigning a new fire id) is created using all fire pixel objects in the cluster.With the addition of new fire pixels, an existing fire object may expand and touch the extended area of another existing active fire object. If this happens, we assume that these two existing fire objects merge into a single object at this time step. All fire pixels in the fire object with a higher id number (a later start date, termed as the ‘source fire’) are appended to the fire object with lower id number (earlier start date, termed as the ‘target fire’) in this case. We record the id of the target fire in a list of fire mergers, and update all attributes associated with this fire (Fig. 3). In order to avoid double counting, the source fire object (with all pixels being transferred to the target fire object) is flagged as invalid, and is excluded from statistical analysis of fire events.Fig. 3The time series of growth for the SCU Lightning Complex fire (2020). Panel (b) shows the fire size of the SCU fire (total area within the fire object perimeter) at half-daily time steps. A fraction of the fire growth (shown in orange) was due to the addition of newly detected fire pixels. Panel (a) shows the number of new fire pixels (associated with the SCU fire object) detected at each time step. The other part of the fire growth (shown in red) was due to the merging with existing fire objects. Panel (c) shows the number of fire pixels in the existing objects that were merged to the SCU fire object.Full size imageCalculating and recording fire attributesOther than individual fire pixels contained in a fire object, several core attributes (properties and geometries) are also dynamically updated at each time step and are used for fire tracking and characterization.Important time-related attributes include the fire ignition time (the time step at which the first fire pixel within the fire object was detected), the fire end time (the latest time step with an active fire observation), and the fire duration (the time difference between the ignition time and end time). If a fire object does not have new active fire pixels appended during 5 consecutive days (i.e., the fire end time is more than 5 days before the present time step), its status is set to inactive. Once inactive, a fire object is no longer evaluated for use in future clustering (i.e., new active fire detections later will form new fire objects, even if they are spatially close to the inactive fire object).Each fire object is assigned to a specific fire type. The fire type is identified using the major land cover type within the fire perimeter (Table 3). In an initial analysis, we found that prescribed fires, on average, have higher coarse fuel moisture levels than wildfires. Therefore, we also record the 1000-hour fuel moisture (fm1000) from the gridMET dataset27 for each fire object (corresponding to the ignition time step) and use this value to divide forest and shrub fires further to wildfire and prescribed types.Table 3 Classification of fire types based on dominant land cover type (from the US National Land Cover Database) within each fire perimeter and the 1000-hr fuel moisture (FM-1000, from gridMET dataset) at the time of ignition.Full size tableAn essential step in this object-based fire tracking system is to determine the vector shape of the fire perimeter. In this system, we use an alpha shape30 algorithm to derive bounding polygons containing fire pixels in a fire object. For an alpha shape, the radius of the disks forming the curves in the polygon is determined by the alpha parameter α. Compared with the commonly used convex hull, the alpha shape hull is able to capture the irregular shapes around the fire perimeter more accurately22.To identify the optimal values for the α parameter, we performed the following analysis. First, we derived the final fire perimeters for all large fires that occurred in California during the 2018 wildfire season using a set of α values ranging from 500 m to 10 km and compared the results with more refined fire perimeters from the Fire and Resource Assessment Program (FRAP) dataset (Fig. 4). Large magnitude α values tended to overestimate the total burned area, while small α values often fragmented a large fire event. We found that a value of α = 1 km was optimal in terms of balancing the ability of the hull to catch the boundary shape and to keep the integrity of a fire object. For each time step, we applied the alpha shape algorithm to all fire pixel locations associated with a fire object since the time of ignition. This processing step resulted in a concave hull with the shape of polygon or multipolygon. To account for the pixel size, we expanded the concave hull to the fire perimeter using a buffer size equal to half of the VIIRS nadir cross-track pixel width (187.5 m). The alpha shape algorithm does not work when the total number of fire pixels (npix) is less than 4. If npix equals 3, we used a convex hull algorithm and the same 187.5 m buffer to determine a polygon perimeter. If npix is 1 or 2, circles centered on the fire pixel location with radius of 187.5 m were used.Fig. 4Optimization of the alpha shape parameter (α). For all large fires (final size  > 4 km2) in California during 2018, fire perimeters were estimated using VIIRS active fires and different alpha parameters. By comparing (a) the burned area (BA) and (b) the number of fire objects with the FRAP data, an optimal alpha parameter of 1 km was identified for use in this study (shown in red). The vertical bars and lines show the mean and 1-std variability from all fires. The dashed blue lines indicate the ideal values when compared to FRAP. Panels (c)–(h) show the fire perimeters derived using different alpha shape parameters for two sample fires in 2018. The shapes with pink color are final FEDS fire perimeters derived from VIIRS active fires using the alpha shape algorithm. The blue shapes represent the corresponding fire perimeters from the FRAP dataset. Overlap between FRAP and FEDS is shown in purple.Full size imageWe also calculate the active front line for each fire object at each time step. The active fire front consists of the segments of the fire perimeter that are actively burning and releasing energy and emissions. The position of the active fire line is critical in evaluating the fire risk, estimating the fire emissions, and predicting fire spread. We derive the active portion of the fire perimeter as segments that are within a 500 m radius of newly detected fire pixel locations. We found that this threshold allowed for a continuous projection of the active fire front in rapidly expanding areas of large wildfires during the 2018 fire season; this threshold may be optimized in future work to maximize performance metrics for fire model forecasts. The resulting active line for each fire at each time step has the shape of a linestring (object representing a sequence of points and the line segments connecting them), a multi-linestring (a collection of multiple linestrings), or a linear ring (closed linestring). Figure 5 shows an example map of the fire perimeters and active fire front lines on September 8 during the 2020 wildfire season.Fig. 5An example map of fire perimeters and fire active fronts in California. The map was created using the fire event data suite (FEDS) as of the Suomi-NPP afternoon overpass (~1:30 pm local time) of Sep 8, 2020. The background is the Aqua MODIS Corrected Reflectance Imagery (true color) recorded at the same day (provided by the NASA Global Imagery Browse Services). The active front line of a fire is shown in yellow, active fire areas are shown in red, and the area of inactive (extinguished) fires are shown in dark red.Full size imageAdditional fire properties, such as the fire area and active fire line length, are also derived using these geometries of the fire object (see Table 2). Note this list can be easily expanded to include more user-defined properties with the help of the fire object core vector data.The allfires object contains a list of all existing fire objects at a time step. This object also records the ids of fire objects that have been modified (including fires newly formed, fires that expanded with new pixel additions, fires with pixels addition due to merging, and fires that just became invalid) at the current time step.Creating the fire event data suite (FEDS)By tracking the spatiotemporal evolution of all fire objects in California, we derived a complete dataset of fire events for each calendar year (Jan 1 am – Dec 31 pm) during the Suomi-NPP VIIRS era (2012–2020). The dataset contains four products that represent the fire information in California at multiple spatial scales and from different perspectives (Fig. 1 and Table 4), ranging from the most detailed and memory-intensive data format (Pickle) to the most high-level format (CSV).Table 4 Data structure of the FEDS.Full size tableThe first product is the direct serialization result of the allfires object at each time step (twice per day). The product is stored as a Pickle file31 which allows for analysis of the complex allfires object structure (including all attributes associated with all fire objects it contains). This file also serves as the restart file for continued fire tracking at any time step, which is essential for the operational mode using the near-real-time fire data. By restoring an exact copy of the previously pickled allfires object, any attribute in the allfires object can be deserialized from the saved files. The Pickle file is the most basic data product in the dataset, and is created at each half-day time step.The second product (Snapshot) represents a more accessible and self-explanatory variant of the Pickle serialization product. In this product, we tabulated important diagnostic attributes for each fire and saved them in GeoPackage32 data files. Each GeoPackage file includes three data layers: one contains the properties and the fire perimeter geometry, another contains the active fire line geometry, and a third contains the new fire pixel location geometry. This product, created at a half-daily time step, allows for a more straightforward interpretation of regional fire status at a particular time step. We also created a GeoPackage file that summarizes the final fire perimeters and attributes for all fires during the whole study period (2012–2020).The third product (Largefire) focuses on the temporal evolution of individual large fires with an area greater than 4 km2. At each time step, the time series of properties and geometries (fire perimeter, active fire line, and new fire pixel locations) for each of the large fires are extracted and saved to GeoPackage files. This product facilitates the visualization and analysis for an individual targeted fire (Fig. 6) and is particularly useful in the near-real-time evaluation, forecasting, and policy making.Fig. 6The spatiotemporal evolution of the Creek fire (2020). Contours and dots reflect the fire perimeters and newly detected fire pixels at each 12-hour time step. Data for the period of Sep 5 am–Nov 6 am, 2020 are shown.Full size imageThe fourth product (Summary), which is stored as NetCDF and CSV files and created at the end of a fire season, records the all-year time series of fire statistics (including major fire attributes such as number, size, duration, fire line length, etc.) over the whole State of California. This product provides a feasible regional summary of the temporal evolution of fires.Potential for near-real-time (NRT) fire event trackingWhile the main objective of this paper is to apply the object-based fire tracking system to historical VIIRS fire detections and create a retrospective multi-year FEDS, we note that this system has the potential to be used for tracking fire events in near-real-time, providing rich and valuable information for fire management and short-term risk assessment. We have experimented with the use of this system for NRT fire event tracking in California using the daily NRT Suomi-NPP VIIRS active fire detection product (VNP14IMGTDL, collection 6) as the main data source. The VNP14IMGTDL product is routinely produced and is publicly available at the NASA Fire Information for Resource Management System (FIRMS). Since the NRT product undergoes less rigorous quality assurance, we use only fires with ‘nominal’ or ‘high’ confidence levels from the NRT product for fire tracking. Some active fire detections from the NRT data are potentially associated with static non-vegetation fires (e.g., fires from gas flaring in oil and gas or landfill industries or false detections due to reflection from solar panels) and are not the main interest for vegetation fire studies. To avoid the unnecessary computation associated with these static fires, we record and evaluate the fire pixel density for each fire object at each time step. When a small fire ( 20 per km2), it is considered to be a static fire and subsequently labelled as invalid.Similar to the retrospective FEDS, we use the active fire detections to create an object serialization product, a regional snapshot GIS product, and a time series product of large fire evolution twice daily. This experimental NRT data will be available upon publication through a university hosted server. More

Jones, J. W. et al. The DSSAT cropping system model. Eur. J. Agron. 18, 235–265 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
van Diepen, C. A., Wolf, J., van Keulen, H. & Rappoldt, C. WOFOST: a simulation model of crop production. Soil Use Manag. 5, 16–24 (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cao, J. et al. Integrating multi-source data for rice yield prediction across China using machine learning and deep learning approaches. Agric. For. Meteorol. 297, 108275 (2021).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Khanal, S., Kushal, K. C., Fulton, J. P., Shearer, S. & Ozkan, E. Remote sensing in agriculture—accomplishments, limitations, and opportunities. Remote Sens. 12, 3783 (2020).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Maas, S. J. Parameterised model of gramineous crop growth: II. within-season simulation calibration. Agron. J. 85, 354–358 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nguyen, V., Jeong, S., Ko, J., Ng, C. & Yeom, J. Mathematical integration of remotely-sensed information into a crop modelling process for mapping crop productivity. Remote Sens. 11, 2131 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Huang, J. et al. Assimilation of remote sensing into crop growth models: current status and perspectives. Agric. For. Meteorol. 276–277, 107609 (2019).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jin, X. et al. A review of data assimilation of remote sensing and crop models. Eur. J. Agron. 92, 141–152 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shawon, A. R. et al. Assessment of a proximal sensing-integrated crop model for simulation of soybean growth and yield. Remote Sens. 12, 410 (2020).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Shawon, A. R. et al. Two-dimensional simulation of barley growth and yield using a model integrated with remote-controlled aerial imagery. Remote Sens. 12, 3766 (2020).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Shin, T. et al. Simulation of wheat productivity using a model integrated with proximal and remotely controlled aerial sensing information. Front. Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.649660 (2021).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Huang, J. et al. Assimilating a synthetic Kalman filter leaf area index series into the WOFOST model to improve regional winter wheat yield estimation. Agric. For. Meteorol. 216, 188–202 (2016).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Khaki, S., Wang, L. & Archontoulis, S. V. A CNN-RNN framework for crop yield prediction. Front. Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01750 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kim, N. et al. An artificial intelligence approach to prediction of corn yields under extreme weather conditions using satellite and meteorological data. Appl. Sci. 10, 3785 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kumar, P. et al. Comprehensive evaluation of soil moisture retrieval models under different crop cover types using C-band synthetic aperture radar data. Geocarto Int. 34, 1022–1041 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Everingham, Y., Sexton, J., Skocaj, D. & Inman-Bamber, G. Accurate prediction of sugarcane yield using a random forest algorithm. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 36, 27 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Feng, P., Wang, B., Li Liu, D., Waters, C. & Yu, Q. Incorporating machine learning with biophysical model can improve the evaluation of climate extremes impacts on wheat yield in south-eastern Australia. Agric. For. Meteorol. 275, 100–113 (2019).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Shahhosseini, M., Hu, G., Huber, I. & Archontoulis, S. V. Coupling machine learning and crop modeling improves crop yield prediction in the US Corn Belt. Sci. Rep. 11, 1606 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cai, Y. et al. Detecting in-season crop nitrogen stress of corn for field trials using UAV- and CubeSat-based multispectral sensing. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 12, 5153–5166 (2019).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
van Klompenburg, T., Kassahun, A. & Catal, C. Crop yield prediction using machine learning: a systematic literature review. Comput. Electron. Agric. 177, 105709 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kamilaris, A. & Prenafeta-Boldú, F. X. Deep learning in agriculture: a survey. Comput. Electron. Agric. 147, 70–90 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bui, D. T., Tsangaratos, P., Nguyen, V.-T., Liem, N. V. & Trinh, P. T. Comparing the prediction performance of a deep learning neural network model with conventional machine learning models in landslide susceptibility assessment. CATENA 188, 104426 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sahoo, A. K., Pradhan, C. & Das, H. Performance evaluation of different machine learning methods and deep-learning based convolutional neural network for health decision making. In Nature Inspired Computing for Data Science (eds Rout, M. et al.) (Springer International Publishing, 2020).
Google Scholar 
Jeong, S. et al. Development of Variable Threshold Models for detection of irrigated paddy rice fields and irrigation timing in heterogeneous land cover. Agric. Water Manag. 115, 83–91 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Peng, D., Huete, A. R., Huang, J., Wang, F. & Sun, H. Detection and estimation of mixed paddy rice cropping patterns with MODIS data. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 13, 13–23 (2011).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Jeong, S., Ko, J. & Yeom, J.-M. Nationwide projection of rice yield using a crop model integrated with geostationary satellite imagery: a case study in South Korea. Remote Sens. 10, 1665 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Xiao, X. et al. Mapping paddy rice agriculture in South and Southeast Asia using multi-temporal MODIS images. Remote Sens. Environ. 100, 95–113 (2006).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ozdogan, M. & Gutman, G. A new methodology to map irrigated areas using multi-temporal MODIS and ancillary data: an application example in the continental US. Remote Sens. Environ. 112, 3520–3537 (2008).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yeom, J.-M., Jeong, S., Deo, R. C. & Ko, J. Mapping rice area and yield in northeastern Asia by incorporating a crop model with dense vegetation index profiles from a geostationary satellite. GISci. Remote Sens. 58, 1–27 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yeom, J.-M. et al. Monitoring paddy productivity in North Korea employing geostationary satellite images integrated with GRAMI-rice model. Sci. Rep. 8, 16121 (2018).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Jeong, S., Ko, J., Choi, J., Xue, W. & Yeom, J.-M. Application of an unmanned aerial system for monitoring paddy productivity using the GRAMI-rice model. Int. J. Remote Sens. 39, 2441–2462 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jeong, S. et al. Geographical variations in gross primary production and evapotranspiration of paddy rice in the Korean Peninsula. Sci. Total Environ. 714, 136632 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Roger, P., Vermote, E. & Ray, J. MODIS Surface Reflectance User’s Guide. Collection 6 (2015).Scharlemann, J. P. W. et al. Global data for ecology and epidemiology: a novel algorithm for temporal Fourier processing MODIS data. PLoS ONE 3, e1408 (2008).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pede, T. & Mountrakis, G. An empirical comparison of interpolation methods for MODIS 8-day land surface temperature composites across the conterminous Unites States. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 142, 137–150 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kilibarda, M. et al. Spatio-temporal interpolation of daily temperatures for global land areas at 1 km resolution. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 119, 2294–2313 (2014).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nunez, M. The development of a satellite-based insolation model for the tropical western Pacific Ocean. Int. J. Climatol. 13, 607–627 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
Otkin, J. A., Anderson, M. C., Mecikalski, J. R. & Diak, G. R. Validation of GOES-based insolation estimates using data from the U.S. Climate reference network. J. Hydrometeorol. 6, 460–475 (2005).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pinker, R. & Laszlo, I. Modeling surface solar irradiance for satellite applications on a global scale. J. Appl. Meteorol. 31, 194–211 (1992).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kawamura, H., Tanahashi, S. & Takahashi, T. Estimation of insolation over the Pacific Ocean off the Sanriku coast. J. Oceanogr. 54, 457–464 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yeom, J.-M., Seo, Y.-K., Kim, D.-S. & Han, K.-S. Solar radiation received by slopes using COMS imagery, a physically based radiation model, and GLOBE. J. Sens. 2016, 1–15 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yeom, J.-M., Han, K.-S. & Kim, J.-J. Evaluation on penetration rate of cloud for incoming solar radiation using geostationary satellite data. Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci. 48, 115–123 (2012).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kawai, Y. & Kawamura, H. Validation and improvement of satellite-derived surface solar radiation over the Northwestern Pacific Ocean. J. Oceanogr. 61, 79–89 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tanahashi, S., Kawamura, H., Matsuura, T., Takahashi, T. & Yusa, H. A system to distribute satellite incident solar radiation in real-time. Remote Sens. Environ. 75, 412–422 (2001).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Elbern, H., Schmidt, H., Talagrand, O. & Ebel, A. 4D-variational data assimilation with an adjoint air quality model for emission analysis. Environ. Model. Softw. 15, 539–548 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T. & Flannery, B. P. Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing (Cambridge University Press, 1992).MATH 

Google Scholar 
Ko, J. et al. Simulation and mapping of rice growth and yield based on remote sensing. J. Appl. Remote Sens. 9, 096067 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Emami Javanmard, M., Ghaderi, S. F. & Hoseinzadeh, M. Data mining with 12 machine learning algorithms for predict costs and carbon dioxide emission in integrated energy-water optimization model in buildings. Energy Convers. Manag. 238, 114153 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Diebold, F. X. & Shin, M. Machine learning for regularized survey forecast combination: partially-egalitarian LASSO and its derivatives. Int. J. Forecast. 35, 1679–1691 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Khosla, E., Dharavath, R. & Priya, R. Crop yield prediction using aggregated rainfall-based modular artificial neural networks and support vector regression. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 22, 5687–5708 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, S., Azzari, G. & Lobell, D. B. Crop type mapping without field-level labels: random forest transfer and unsupervised clustering techniques. Remote Sens. Environ. 222, 303–317 (2019).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ustuner, M. & Balik, S. F. Polarimetric target decompositions and light gradient boosting machine for crop classification: a comparative evaluation. ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf. 8, 97 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jeong, S., Ko, J. & Yeom, J.-M. Predicting rice yield at pixel scale through synthetic use of crop and deep learning models with satellite data in South and North Korea. Sci. Total Environ. 802, 149726 (2022).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nash, J. E. & Sutcliffe, J. V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I: a discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 10, 282–290 (1970).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

Choice of biowaste treatment plants and sample identifiersCompost samples were collected from four central municipal biowaste treatment plants (denominated as #1 to #4) in Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany (Table 1). All plants used a state-of-the-art two-stage biowaste treatment process comprising of (a) anaerobic digestion/biogas production and (b) subsequent composting of the solid digestate to produce a high-quality mature compost sold for direct use as fertilizer in agriculture. The composts were regularly analyzed by an independent laboratory for quality and residual contamination and consistently fulfilled the quality requirements of the label RAL-GZ 251 Gütezeichen Kompost of the German Bundesgütegemeinschaft Kompost e.V. (www.gz-kompost.de). Plants #1 and #3 produce in addition a liquid fertilizer, which is separated from the solid digestate at the end of stage a) by press filtration and which is also intended for direct use on agricultural soil (replacement of liquid manure). In case of plants #1, #3, and #4 up to 25 wt% of shrub/tree cuttings were added to the solid digestate for composting. All plants used sieving (typically with a 12 or a 20 mm mesh) at the end of the process to assure the necessary purity of their finished composts. Whenever technically possible, we as well took samples of the pre-compost immediately before this final sieving step to evaluate its contribution to the removal of residual BPD fragments. For analysis, composts were passed consecutively through two sieves with mesh sizes of 5 mm and 1 mm, yielding two fragment preparations for IR-analysis namely a > 5 mm fraction corresponding to the contamination by residual “macroplastic” (5 mm is a commonly used upper size limit for “microplastic”, anything larger is macroplastic) and a 1–5 mm fraction corresponding to the regulatory relevant residual contamination by microplastic. The lower limit of 1 mm rather than 2 mm was chosen in anticipation of the expected changes in regulation, where the replacement of the 2 mm limit by a 1 mm limit is imminent.Table 1 Technical data of the investigated plants and incidence of BDP fragments in the sampled composts.Full size tableOccurrence of plastic fragments  > 1 mm in the sampled compostsComposting times of 5–9 weeks were used in the investigated plants (Table 1), which is shorter than the 12 weeks indicated in EN 13432 for the 90% disintegration of a compostable plastic material, but a realistic time span for state-of-the-art technical waste treatment. Since we were not in a position to estimate the quantity of BDP entering the plants, since for technical reasons we were unable to obtain a representative sample, we cannot say, whether any residual BDP detected by us in the finished composts was due to a yet incomplete disintegration process or whether it corresponds to the 10% material still permissible by EN 13432 even after the full composting step. However, in 7 out of the 12 sampled composts and pre-composts fragments with chemical signatures corresponding to the BDPs poly (lactic acid) (PLA) and poly (butylene-adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT) were identified in the > 5 mm and/or the 1–5 mm sieving fractions using FTIR analysis3 (Fig. 1; Table 1). All recovered fragments appeared to stem from foils, bags or packaging, since they were thin compared to their length and width (see Suppl Figure S1 for typical examples). Fragments with overlapping signatures, most likely PBAT/PLA mixtures or blends, were also found (see Suppl Figure S2 for the interpretation of the spectra). In addition, the recorded BDP fragment spectra (Fig. 1A) showed high similarity to the FTIR spectra of commercial compostable bags sold in the vicinity of the biowaste treatment plants (Fig. 1B), which together with the geometry of the recovered fragments led us to assuming that the majority of the BDP entered the biowaste in the form of such bags.Figure 1FTIR spectra of BDP fragments from composts and commercial bags. (A) BDP fragments recovered from the composts and (B) the commercial compostable bags. Fragments were coded as follows: p or f for pre-compost or finished compost, followed by the plant number (#1 to #4), an indication of the size fraction ( > 5 mm or 1–5 mm) in which the fragment was found, and finally, the fragment number. Fragment F#1_5mm_4 therefore represents the 4th fragment collected in the  > 5 mm size fraction from the finished compost of plant number 1. Bags were arbitrarily numbered 1–10, see Suppl Table S1 for supplier information. The spectra (in grey) of the reference materials for PLA and PBAT are given as basis for the interpretation. Spectra in red refer to test samples consisting only of PBAT, while those in blue indicate samples composed of PBAT/PLA mixtures.Full size imageThe BDP fragments were found alongside fragments of commodity plastics (mostly PE) in all cases. Finished composts tended to contain fewer and smaller fragments than the corresponding pre-composts. The final sieving of the pre-composts to prepare the finished composts hence appears to be quite effective in removing such fragments, in particular those from the > 5 mm size fraction (Table 1) and for that reason has become state-of-the-art in preparing quality composts (contamination by plastic fragments > 2 mm of less than 0.1 wt%). Given that the size of the fragments is a crucial factor regarding ecological risk, we analyzed the sizes (length Î width) of the BDP fragments in comparison to that of the plastic fragments with signatures of commodity plastics such as PE (Fig. 2). BDP fragments found in a given compost sample tended to be smaller than the fragments stemming from non-BDP materials, which may indicate that BDPs degrade faster or tend to disintegrate into tinier particles than commodity plastics. This may also explain why in the compost from plant #2, no BDP fragments were found in the particle fraction retained by the 5 mm sieve ( > 5 mm fraction), while 19 such particles were found in the fraction then retained by the 1 mm sieve (1–5 mm fraction). Interestingly, plant #2 is the only one included in our study that uses no mechanical breakdown of the incoming biowaste. This reduces the mechanical stress on the incoming material. Mechanical stress can alter the properties of plastic foils such as the crystallinity whereby crystallinity has been shown to influence the biological degradation of BDP such as PLA7.Figure 2Size distribution of plastic fragments  > 1 mm. (A) Fragments found in the finished compost from plant #1, (B) in the finished compost from plant #2, and (C) in the pre-compost from plant #3. For reasons of statistical relevance, only samples containing more than 20 BDP fragments per kg of compost were included in the analysis.Full size imageMaterial characteristics of BDP fragments in comparison to those of commercial biodegradable bagsIn order to verify whether the BDP fragments recovered from the composts differed from the compostable bags in any parameter with possible relevance for biodegradation and environmental impact16, the physico-chemical properties of bags and fragments were studied in detail. Since we wanted to have a maximum of information of the BDP fragments, size/weight was a limiting factor in selecting fragments for analysis. Fragments of at least 1 mg were required for the FT-IR analysis. 5 mg-fragments could be analyzed in addition by 1H-NMR, while the full set of analytics (FT-IR, 1H-NMR, and DSC) required at least 10 mg of sample.For insight into the chemical composition, 1H-NMR spectra of the commercial bags and all suitable BDP fragments were compared (Fig. 3). In case of material mixtures and blends, the 1H-NMR analysis allows quantification of the PBAT/PLA weight ratio in the materials and also of the ratio of the butylene terephthalate (BT) and butylene adipate (BA) units in the involved PBAT polyesters.Figure 31H NMR spectra of BDP fragments from composts and commercial bags. (A) BDP fragments recovered from the composts and (B) the commercial compostable bags. Fragments were coded as follows: p or f for pre-compost or finished compost, followed by the plant number (#1 to #4), an indication of the size fraction ( > 5 mm or 1–5 mm) in which the fragment was found, and finally, the fragment number. Bags were arbitrarily numbered 1–10, see Suppl Table S1 for supplier information. The spectra (in grey) of the reference materials for PLA and PBAT are given as basis for the interpretation. Spectra in red refer to test samples consisting only of PBAT, while those in blue indicate samples composed of PBAT/PLA mixtures. (C) Chemical structures of PLA and PBAT, chemical shifts of the protons are assigned as indicated in the reference spectra in (B).Full size imageThe 1H-NMR spectra corroborate the FTIR measurements in that all investigated commercial bags were made from PBAT/PLA mixtures of varied composition (Table 2). By comparison, some of the fragments, for instance, f#1_5mm_4, appeared to consist of only PBAT. Other fragments, e.g., f#1_1mm_9, were mixtures of PLA and PBAT (Table 2). However, even in the case of PBAT/PLA mixtures, the average PBAT content tended to be higher in the fragments than in the bags, while the BT/BA monomer ratio in the respective PBATs, was also significantly higher in the fragments than in the bags. If we assume the fragments to stem from similar compostable bags as the ones included in our comparison, this would mean that during composting of such a bag, the PLA degrades more quickly than the PBAT, whereas within a given PBAT polyester, the BA unit is more easily degraded than the BT unit. Evidence can indeed be found in the pertinent literature that PLA has faster biodegradation kinetics than PBAT, while BT is more resistant to mineralization than BA17,18.Table 2 Composition of commercial compostable bags and BDP fragments recovered from the composts as analyzed by 1H-NMR.Full size tableNext, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used to analyze fragments compared to commercial bags in regard to the presence of amorphous vs. crystalline domains, a parameter expected to affect biodegradation kinetics and therefore the putative environmental impact of the produced microplastic16 upon release into the environment with the composts. Whereas amorphous domains show glass transition, crystalline domains show melting, both of which can be discerned by the respective phase transition enthalpy in the DSC curves (Fig. 4).Figure 4DSC curves of BDP fragments and compostable bags #1 and #7. Curves for the reference materials (in grey) for PLA and PBAT are given for comparison. Curves were recorded during the first heating run (temperature range: − 50 °C to 200 °C, heating rate: 10 °C min−1). (A) and (B) curves in red refer to test samples consisting only of PBAT, while those in blue indicate samples composed of PBAT/PLA mixtures. Fragments were coded as follows: p or f for pre-compost or finished compost, followed by the plant number (#1 to #4), an indication of the size fraction ( > 5 mm or 1–5 mm) in which the fragment was found, and finally, the fragment number.Full size imageThe curve for the reference PBAT shows a glass transition temperature (Tg) of − 29 °C and a broad melting range between 100 and 140 °C for the crystalline domains, while that of the PLA reference shows a glass transition temperature of 58 °C and a narrower melting peak between 144 °C and 162 °C. The curve for commercial bag #1, which had a comparatively high PLA content, shows a pronounced melting peak in the expected range; the same is the case for fragment p#3_5mm_1 and to a lesser extent for fragment p#3_5mm_9, two fragments, which also have high PLA contents. The DSC curves of the other fragments and bag #1 are undefined in comparison, which is due to their high PBAT content. According to the DSC curves, most of the investigated materials are semicrystalline, i.e., contain both amorphous (glass transition) and crystalline (melting) domains. However, the DCS data alone allow only a qualitative discussion of the differences between fragments and bags.To obtain quantitative data on the crystallinity differences, wide angle X-ray scattering (WAXS) spectra were recorded. WAXS requires fragments at least 3 cm long, which restricted the number of fragment samples to three, all of which were found in pre-compost samples. The corresponding curves are shown in Fig. 5A–C. The spectra of the commercial biodegradable bags are shown in Suppl Figure S3. Foils were in addition prepared by heat pressing from the reference materials for PLA and PBAT in order to include them into the WAXS measurements (Fig. 5D). While the foils produced from the PBAT reference material produced crystallinity peaks at 16.2°, 17.3°, 20.4°, 23.2°, and 24.8°, the foil prepared from the PLA reference material showed only an amorphous halo at 15.5° and 31.5°, which is in accordance with values published in the literature19. A more pronounced crystallinity peak was obtained in the case of an additionally annealed PLA foil.Figure 5WAXS curves with Lorenz fitting for (A) fragment p#3_5mm_1, (B) fragment p#3_5mm_9, and (C) fragment p#4_5mm_2. (D) WAXS curves for foils produced from the PBAT and PLA reference materials; the percent values indicate the crystallinity. The dash lines are the fitting peak curves for the XRD spectrum. Crystallinity can be obtained by dividing the integration area of the fitted peaks by the integration area of the entire spectrum. Fragments were coded as follows: p or f for pre-compost or finished compost, followed by the plant number (#1 to #4), an indication of the size fraction ( > 5 mm or 1–5 mm) in which the fragment was found, and finally, the fragment number.Full size imageIn case of the fragments and bags, the peaks of PLA and PBAT overlapped to some extent in the WAXS spectra, but by conducting Lorenz fitting using Origin software, the overall crystallinity could be calculated as follows:$$chi = { 1}00% , *{text{ Aa}}/left( {{text{Aa }} + {text{ Ac}}} right)$$where χ is the crystallinity and Aa and Ac represent the areas of the amorphous and crystalline peaks.Using this equation, crystallinities of 55% (fragments p#3_5mm_1), 34% (p#3_5mm_9), and 34% (p#4_5mm_2) were calculated for the fragments. The foils prepared in house for the reference materials had similar crystallinities (43% in case of the annealed PLA foil and 26% of the PBAT foil), while the simple PLA foil was amorphous. By comparison, for eight of the commercial bags, crystallinities in the range from 1% to 7% were calculated, whereas these values were 14% and 15% for the remaining two bag types (Suppl Figure S3).The high crystallinity of the larger fragments recovered from the pre-compost samples suggests that crystalline domains of BDP materials may indeed disintegrate more slowly than the amorphous ones, as prior studies on microbial biodegradation have suggested7,8. Admittedly, such large fragments per se would not enter the environment, since the final sieving step used to prepare the finished composts is quite efficient at removing them. However, it is tempting to extrapolate that residual BDP in general are remnants of the more crystal domains of the original material, even though experimental proof of this assumption is at present not possible. 10 wt% of a BDP bag is allowed to remain after standard composting. It is usually assumed that any such residues continue to degrade with comparable speed. However, should these residues correspond to the more crystalline domains, rather than degrading with similar speed as the bulk material, the more crystalline fragments can be expected to persist for a much longer and at present unpredictable length of time in the environment, e.g. when applied to the soil with the composts; in particular, when they are also enriched in PBAT and BT units as suggested by our analysis of the chemical composition. Data from the use of biodegradable foils in agriculture show that the degradation in the environment may take years20. Altogether this may have unforeseen economic and environmental consequences, especially when considering the high fraction of BDP fragments < 5 mm. Putative consequences include changes in soil properties, the soil microbiome and therefore in plant performance21, a factor indispensable for worldwide nutrition.Residues of BDP fragments  1 mm were found in the collected LF samples. This is hardly surprising, given that the LF is produced by press filtration of the digestate after the anaerobic stage. Such a filtration step can be expected to retain fragments > 1 mm in the produced filter cake, which goes into the composting step, leaving the filtrate, i.e. the LF, essentially free of such particles. Anaerobic digestion is currently not assumed to contribute significantly to the degradation of BDP17,22, but the process conditions (mixing, pumping) may promote breakdown of larger fragments, particularly when additives such as plasticizers23 leach out of the material.Since the residual solids content of the LF is low (plant #1: 8.6 wt%, plant #3: 5.8 wt%), a combination of enzymatic-oxidative treatment and µFTIR imaging originally developed for environmental samples from aqueous systems24,25 could be adapted for the analysis (size and chemical signature) of particles in the LF down to a size of 10 µm. The corresponding data are compiled in Table 3. In all cases, residual fragments from PBAT-based polymers represented the dominant plastic fraction in the investigated samples; i.e. approximately 53% of all plastic particles in the LF from plant #1 (11,520 BDP particles per liter) and 65% in the case of plant #3 (12,480 BDP particles per liter). Liquid manure is applied several times a year to fields at a concentration of 2–3 L m−2. According to our analysis > 20,000 BDP microparticles of a size ranging from 10 µm to 500 µm enter each m2 of agricultural soil whenever LF is applied on agricultural surfaces.Table 3 Microplastic fragments (BDP/all) found per liter of liquid fertilizer.Full size tableDue to the complexity of the matrix, a similar analysis of individual plastic fragments  1 mm. Six compost samples representing the more contaminated ones based on the content of fragments > 1 mm, namely, f#1, f#2, p#3, f#3, p#4 and f#4 (nomenclature: f or p for finished or pre-compost, followed by plant number), were extracted with a 90/10 vol% chloroform/methanol mixture. The amounts of PBAT and PLA in the obtained extracts were then quantified via 1H-NMR (Table 4). Briefly, the intensity of characteristic signals in the extract spectra of the compost samples (see Suppl Figure S4) were compared to peak intensities produced by calibration standards of the pure polymer dissolved at a known concentration in the chloroform/methanol. All samples and standards were normalized using the 1,2-dichloroethan signal at 3.73 ppm as internal standard. See also Suppl Figure S5 for an exemplification of the quantification of the PBAT/PLA ratios. Based on the amounts of PBAT and PLA extracted from a known amount of compost, the total mass concentration (wt% dry weight) of these polymers in the composts was calculated.Table 4 Evidence of PBAT and PLA residues caused by fragments  2 mm. Moreover, residues of PBAT and PLA were found in all investigated compost samples, including the finished compost from plant #4, which had shown no contamination by larger BPD fragments (Table 1). The pre-compost from that plant had shown a few contaminating BDP fragments in the > 5 mm fraction. However, in regard to the fragments More

Illustration of the compound event indicesBuilding on earlier studies24,25, we develop two univariate indices to model concurrent climate conditions, i.e., a CWD index that varies from compound cold-wet conditions to CWD conditions, and a CCD index that varies from compound warm-wet conditions to CCD conditions (see “Methods”). The two indices incorporate the dependence between temperature and precipitation and are a measure of how warm/cold and dry a point is relative to the distribution of climate conditions at a given location. We illustrate the two indices on two grid points that have strong but opposite temperature-precipitation correlation. In the case where temperature and precipitation are strongly negatively correlated, the CWD index is well aligned with the primary axis of the bivariate distribution (Fig. 1a). In the case where temperature and precipitation are strongly positively correlated, the same holds for the CCD index (Fig. 1d). As illustrated for several concurrent hot-dry and cold-dry events that occurred around the globe, the two indices well capture these events (Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2).Fig. 1: The relationship between precipitation and temperature and compound indices.a Scatter plot of summer precipitation and temperature anomalies (z-score) with corresponding CWD index in color (see “Methods”). The location is at 97.25°W and 33.75°N from 1901 to 2018. b The same as a but for spring at 84.75°E and 66.75°N. c Same distribution as in a but colored based on the CCD index. d Same distribution as in b but colored based on the CCD index.Full size imageNotably, in the case where precipitation and temperature are strongly positively correlated, the CWD index indicates the relative anomalies of bivariate joint distribution, and some counterintuitive situations might occur relative to the univariate marginals (Fig. 1b). For instance, points might be labeled as strong CWD events (CWD index > 1.5) even though temperature is anomalously cold (temperature anomalies < 0, red dots in lower left quadrant of Fig. 1b). The CCD index exhibits similar behavior (Fig. 1c). This indicates an interesting property of the compound indices to identify strong compound conditions relative to bivariate distribution that are not necessarily extreme from a univariate perspective3,24,26,27.Widespread direct and lagged impacts of springtime compound climate conditionsTo evaluate the lagged summer vegetation responses to spring compound climate conditions, we compute partial correlation between CWD (CCD) spring and subsequent summer vegetation variation by controlling for the influence of summer compound climate conditions on these correlations (see “Methods”). Results show widespread negative associations between CWD spring and subsequent summer vegetation in the mid-latitudes (50°N).a–c The average standardized anomalies (z-score) of GPP during CWD spring but subsequent non-CWD summer (a), non-CWD spring but subsequent CWD summer (b), and consecutive CWD spring and summer (c) for areas in Fig. 2a where summer vegetation responds positively (r ≥ 0.22) to spring CWD climate conditions. d–f The same as a–c, but for soil moisture. g–i The same as a–c, but for runoff. The bar plots with dash lines (without dash line) indicate the average anomalies of multiple observation-based (model-based) products, and the circles indicate the average anomalies of each product. GLASS, LUE, NIRv, Flux-CRU, and Flux-ERA5 are observation-based GPP products, while model simulations are taken from TRENDYv6. GLEAM is observation-based soil moisture. GRUN represents observation-based runoff. GLDAS-VIC, GLDAS-Noah, GLDAS-Catchment, and FLDAS indicate assimilatory soil moisture and runoff that incorporate satellite- and ground-based observational products.Full size imageFig. 4: The responses of vegetation productivity and hydrological variables to CWD events in mid-latitudes (23.5–50°N/S).a–c The average standardized anomalies (z-score) of GPP during CWD spring but subsequent non-CWD summer (a), non-CWD spring but subsequent CWD summer (b), and consecutive CWD spring and summer (c) for areas in Fig. 2a where summer vegetation responds negatively (r ≤ −0.22) to spring CWD climate conditions. d–f The same as a–c, but for soil moisture. g–i The same as a–c, but for runoff. The bar plots with dash lines (without dash line) indicate the average anomalies of multiple observation-based (model-based) products, and the circles indicate the average anomalies of each product. For details on data see Fig. 3.Full size imageFig. 5: The effects of CCD events on vegetation productivity and hydrological variables in mid-to-high latitudes.a–c The average standardized anomalies (z-score) of GPP during CCD spring but subsequent non-CCD summer (a), non-CCD spring but subsequent CCD summer (b), and consecutive CCD spring and summer (c) for areas in Fig. 2b where summer vegetation responds negatively (r ≤ −0.22) to spring CCD climate conditions. d–f The same as a–c, but for soil moisture. g–i The same as a–c, but for runoff. The bar plots with dash lines (without dash line) indicate the average anomalies of multiple observation-based (model-based) products, and the circles indicate the average anomalies of each product. For details on data see Fig. 3.Full size imageCWD events increase vegetation productivity in high latitudesWe first analyze the direct responses of productivity to springtime and summertime CWD events across high latitudes ( >50°N, Fig. 3). Productivity increases during CWD spring and summer (Fig. 3a–c), which is consistent with vegetation responses (Supplementary Fig. 8a–c). Despite elevated spring greenness, spring water overall shows positive anomalies during CWD spring (Fig. 3d, f, g, i). This result indicates that spring greenness during CWD conditions is not associated with dry spring across high latitudes, which is further confirmed by similar anomalies in springtime TWS (Supplementary Fig. 8d, f). In contrast, severe water reduction is found in CWD summer (Fig. 3e, f, h, i). This suggests that despite the beneficial effects of CWD events on productivity in summer, they are associated with summer water deficit.Next, to analyze the lagged effects of springtime CWD events, we investigate the productivity anomalies in summer under three cases, namely CWD spring but non-CWD summer, non-CWD spring but CWD summer, and consecutive CWD spring and summer. Our results indicate that springtime CWD events have positive lagged effects on summer productivity across high latitudes (Fig. 3). Specifically, we find that during non-CWD summer (that is not favorable for summer vegetation growth) preceded by CWD spring, positive anomalies are still found in summer productivity (Fig. 3a). In contrast, during CWD summer (preceded by non-CWD spring), some models and observation-based products exhibit a reduction in summer productivity (Fig. 3b). We further find that summer productivity highly increases during consecutive events (Fig. 3c). Vegetation anomalies show similar behaviors (Supplementary Fig. 8a–c). Regarding the lagged responses of hydrological variables, CWD springs followed by non-CWD summers do not lead to water dryness, despite increased vegetation greenness (Fig. 3d, g). The magnitude of summer water deficit is similar for both cases that include CWD summer (Fig. 3e, f, h, i) and is consistent with summer TWS anomalies (Supplementary Fig. 8e, f). These results imply that in high latitudes, summer water reductions characterized by TWS, soil moisture, and runoff are not associated with increased spring greenness but are primarily caused by summer precipitation deficit.The productivity responses to compound climate conditions may be stronger than that to individual events through the synergistic effects of temperature and precipitation28. To investigate this, we compute the average anomalies in GPP and soil moisture associated with univariate events across the focus areas, which are then compared with the effects of CWD and CCD events in high latitudes (see “Methods”). Warm events can not only directly increase productivity but also show positive lagged effects (Supplementary Fig. 9a, b). In contrast, dry events reduce productivity (Supplementary Fig. 9e, f). This indicates that the direct and lagged positive effects of CWD events across high latitudes are mainly dominated by the warm component, while dry conditions have negative effects. Therefore, the warm-induced increase in productivity slightly exceeds that associated with CWD events (Supplementary Fig. 9b). Soil moisture under warm springs shows positive anomalies (Supplementary Fig. 9c, d), while they slightly decline during dry spring (Supplementary Fig. 9g, h). This suggests that the positive anomalies in soil water during CWD spring are driven by the warm component.CWD events reduce vegetation productivity in mid-latitudesHere, we first investigate the direct effects of springtime and summertime CWD events across mid-latitudes (23.5–50°N/S). Springtime productivity exhibits little changes during CWD spring (Fig. 4a, c), despite dry spring (Fig. 4d, f, g, i). When considering the direct effects of CWD events in summer, the results are similar, whereas the negative magnitude of productivity in summer is larger than that in spring (Fig. 4b, c). This difference suggests CWD conditions in summer show more adverse effects on productivity than that in spring in mid-latitudes. The anomalies in vegetation and TWS are consistent (Supplementary Fig. 10).Next, the lagged effects of springtime CWD events in mid-latitudes are assessed. In cases with CWD spring but non-CWD summer, summer productivity exhibits slight anomalies (Fig. 4a), with slightly decreased summer water (Fig. 4d, g). Summer productivity and water show much higher reductions in case with consecutive events (Fig. 4c, f, i) than for the case with only CWD summer (Fig. 4b, e, h). These results are supported by the responses of vegetation indices and TWS (Supplementary Fig. 10), revealing that springtime CWD events in mid-latitudes have negative lagged effects on summer productivity and water availability.The direct and lagged effects of individual events are finally compared with that of CWD events in mid-latitudes. Dry conditions in spring and summer directly decrease productivity and cause soil water dryness (Supplementary Fig. 11a–d). Moreover, dry spring depletes soil moisture earlier, which, in turn, causes dry summer and reduction in productivity during non-dry summer (Supplementary Fig. 11a, c). This indicates that dry springs have negative lagged effects on summer productivity. In contrast, productivity and soil water show positive anomalies during warm springs, while they show negative anomalies in summer (Supplementary Fig. 11e–h). These results suggest that the direct and lagged negative effects of CWD springs are dominated by the dry component in mid-latitudes, while the warm component mitigates the negative effects of the dry component in spring. Accordingly, the decline in productivity due to dry conditions thus exceeds that triggered by CWD events (Supplementary Fig. 11b).Decreased vegetation productivity due to the negative synergistic effects of CCD eventsHere, we first investigate the direct effects of CCD events across mid-to-high latitudes. Productivity reductions are found during springtime and summertime CCD events (Fig. 5a–c) concurrent with water reductions (Fig. 5). Vegetation and TWS show similar behaviors during CCD spring and summer (Supplementary Fig. 12). These results reveal that CCD events in spring and summer can impose direct adverse impacts on productivity and soil water across mid-to-high latitudes. The productivity reductions in spring and summer are similar in magnitude (Fig. 5a, b), indicating that CCD events between spring and summer can cause similar damage to productivity.We then analyze the lagged effects of springtime CCD events. Our results indicate that springtime CCD events show negative lagged effects on summer productivity and cause summer water reductions in mid-to-high latitudes (Fig. 5). Specifically, we find that in cases with CCD spring but non-CCD summer, summer productivity and water exhibit strongly negative anomalies (Fig. 5a, d, g). Moreover, summer anomalies are higher during consecutive events (Fig. 5c, f, i) than the cases including only CCD summer (Fig. 5b, e, h). Vegetation indices and TWS show similar responses (Supplementary Fig. 12). Our results further indicate that CCD spring has more severe negative lagged effects on productivity than CWD spring. That is, we find that in comparison to cases with preceding CWD spring and consecutive CWD events, summer productivity shows higher reduction in cases with preceding CCD spring and consecutive CCD events (Fig. 4a, c versus Fig. 5a, c). Moreover, in cases with CCD spring but non-CCD summer (Fig. 5a, d, g), summer anomalies are close to those in scenarios with non-CCD spring but CCD summer (Fig. 5b, e, h). The vegetation and TWS anomalies further confirm this situation (Supplementary Fig. 12a, b, d, e). These results suggest that the lagged effects of CCD spring can be of similar magnitude as their direct adverse effects.We finally compare the direct and lagged effects of individual events with that of CCD events in mid-to-high latitudes. Cold conditions in spring and summer directly reduce productivity but show weak effects on soil moisture (Supplementary Fig. 13a–d), and cold spring shows negative lagged effects on summer productivity (Supplementary Fig. 13a). Dry events show direct and lagged negative effects on productivity and soil moisture (Supplementary Fig. 13e–h). These results imply that the negative lagged effects of CCD springs are dominated by both cold and dry components. The effects of CCD events on productivity mostly exceeds the individual dry or cold impacts (Supplementary Fig. 13a, b, e, f). More