Philippa Kaur

Brown, W. L. Jr. & Wilson, E. O. Character displacement. Syst. Biol. 5, 49–64 (1956).
Google Scholar 
Stuart, Y. E. & Losos, J. B. Ecological character displacement: glass half full or half empty? Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 402–408 (2013).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Schluter, D. & McPhail, J. D. Ecological character displacement and speciation in sticklebacks. Am. Nat. 140, 85–108 (1992).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tilman, D., May, R. M., Lehman, C. L. & Nowak, M. A. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371, 65–66 (1994).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ghoul, M. & Mitri, S. The ecology and evolution of microbial competition. Trends Microbiol. 24, 833–845 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pfennig, D. W., Rice, A. M. & Martin, R. A. Ecological opportunity and phenotypic plasticity interact to promote character displacement and species coexistence. Ecology 87, 769–779 (2006).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bruno, J. F., Stachowicz, J. J. & Bertness, M. D. Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 119–125 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Day, T. & Young, K. A. Competitive and facilitative evolutionary diversification. Bioscience 54, 101–109 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stachowicz, J. J. Mutualism, facilitation, and the structure of ecological communities. Bioscience 51, 235–246 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stuart, Y. E., Inkpen, S. A., Hopkins, R. & Bolnick, D. I. Character displacement is a pattern: so, what causes it? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 121, 711–715 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brockhurst, M. A., Hochberg, M. E., Bell, T. & Buckling, A. Character displacement promotes cooperation in bacterial biofilms. Curr. Biol. 16, 2030–2034 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ellis, C. N., Traverse, C. C., Mayo-Smith, L., Buskirk, S. W. & Cooper, V. S. Character displacement and the evolution of niche complementarity in a model biofilm community. Evolution 69, 283–293 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rainey, P. B., Buckling, A., Kassen, R. & Travisano, M. The emergence and maintenance of diversity: insights from experimental bacterial populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15, 243–247 (2000).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Turner, P. E., Souza, V. & Lenski, R. E. Tests of ecological mechanisms promoting the stable coexistence of two bacterial genotypes. Ecology 77, 2119–2129 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
Xavier, J. B. & Foster, K. R. Cooperation and conflict in microbial biofilms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 876–881 (2007).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Westeberhard, M. J. Phenotypic plasticity and the origins of diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 20, 249–278 (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
Turcotte, M. M. & Levine, J. M. Phenotypic plasticity and species coexistence. Trends Ecol. Evol. 31, 803–813 (2016).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pfennig, D. W. & Pfennig, K. S. Development and evolution of character displacement. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1256, 89–107 (2012).ADS 
PubMed 
MATH 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Finkel, O. M., Castrillo, G., Herrera Paredes, S., Salas Gonzalez, I. & Dangl, J. L. Understanding and exploiting plant beneficial microbes. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 38, 155–163 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Muller, D. B., Vogel, C., Bai, Y. & Vorholt, J. A. The plant microbiota: systems-level insights and perspectives. Annu. Rev. Genet. 50, 211–234 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Schlaeppi, K. & Bulgarelli, D. The plant microbiome at work. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 28, 212–217 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Leveau, J. H. & Lindow, S. E. Appetite of an epiphyte: quantitative monitoring of bacterial sugar consumption in the phyllosphere. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 3446–3453 (2001).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lindow, S. E. & Leveau, J. H. Phyllosphere microbiology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 13, 238–243 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Meyer, K. M. & Leveau, J. H. Microbiology of the phyllosphere: a playground for testing ecological concepts. Oecologia 168, 621–629 (2012).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Delmotte, N. et al. Community proteogenomics reveals insights into the physiology of phyllosphere bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 16428–16433 (2009).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Vorholt, J. A. Microbial life in the phyllosphere. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 828–840 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Carlstrom, C. I. et al. Synthetic microbiota reveal priority effects and keystone strains in the Arabidopsis phyllosphere. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1445–1454 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Vorholt, J. A., Vogel, C., Carlstrom, C. I. & Müller, D. B. Establishing causality: opportunities of synthetic communities for plant microbiome research. Cell Host Microbe. 22, 142–155 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bai, Y. et al. Functional overlap of the Arabidopsis leaf and root microbiota. Nature 528, 364–369 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bodenhausen, N., Horton, M. W. & Bergelson, J. Bacterial communities associated with the leaves and the roots of Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE 8, e56329 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Horton, M. W. et al. Genome-wide association study of Arabidopsis thaliana leaf microbial community. Nat. Commun. 5, 5320 (2014).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Roman-Reyna, V. et al. Characterization of the leaf microbiome from whole-genome sequencing data of the 3000 rice genomes project. Rice (NY) 13, 72 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zarraonaindia, I. et al. The soil microbiome influences grapevine-associated microbiota. mBio. 6, e02527–14 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Laforest-Lapointe, I. & Whitaker, B. K. Decrypting the phyllosphere microbiota: progress and challenges. Am. J. Bot. 106, 171–173 (2019).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Baldotto, L. E. B. & Olivares, F. L. Phylloepiphytic interaction between bacteria and different plant species in a tropical agricultural system. Can. J. Microbiol. 54, 918–931 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lindow, S. E. & Brandl, M. T. Microbiology of the phyllosphere. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 1875–1883 (2003).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Monier, J. M. & Lindow, S. E. Differential survival of solitary and aggregated bacterial cells promotes aggregate formation on leaf surfaces. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 15977–15982 (2003).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Monier, J. M. & Lindow, S. E. Frequency, size, and localization of bacterial aggregates on bean leaf surfaces. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 346–355 (2004).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Morris, C. E., Monier, J. M. & Jacques, M. A. A technique To quantify the population size and composition of the biofilm component in communities of bacteria in the phyllosphere. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64, 4789–4795 (1998).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Remus-Emsermann, M. N. P. et al. Spatial distribution analyses of natural phyllosphere-colonizing bacteria on Arabidopsis thaliana revealed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Environ. Microbiol. 16, 2329–2340 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Remus-Emsermann, M. N. P. & Schlechter, R. O. Phyllosphere microbiology: at the interface between microbial individuals and the plant host. New Phytol. 218, 1327–1333 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gourion, B., Rossignol, M. & Vorholt, J. A. A proteomic study of Methylobacterium extorquens reveals a response regulator essential for epiphytic growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 13186–13191 (2006).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jacobs, J. L., Carroll, T. L. & Sundin, G. W. The role of pigmentation, ultraviolet radiation tolerance, and leaf colonization strategies in the epiphytic survival of phyllosphere bacteria. Microb. Ecol. 49, 104–113 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Müller, D. B., Schubert, O. T., Rost, H., Aebersold, R. & Vorholt, J. A. Systems-level proteomics of two ubiquitous leaf commensals reveals complementary adaptive traits for phyllosphere colonization. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 15, 3256–3269 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ochsner, A. M. et al. Use of rare-earth elements in the phyllosphere colonizer Methylobacterium extorquens PA1. Mol. Microbiol. 111, 1152–1166 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Helmann, T. C., Deutschbauer, A. M. & Lindow, S. E. Genome-wide identification of Pseudomonas syringae genes required for fitness during colonization of the leaf surface and apoplast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 18900–18910 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nobori, T. et al. Transcriptome landscape of a bacterial pathogen under plant immunity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, E3055–E3064 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pulawska, J. et al. Transcriptome analysis of Xanthomonas fragariae in strawberry leaves. Sci. Rep. 10, 20582 (2020).Knief, C. et al. Metaproteogenomic analysis of microbial communities in the phyllosphere and rhizosphere of rice. ISME J. 6, 1378–1390 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Innerebner, G., Knief, C. & Vorholt, J. A. Protection of Arabidopsis thaliana against leaf-pathogenic Pseudomonas syringae by Sphingomonas strains in a controlled model system. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 3202–3210 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Vogel, C., Innerebner, G., Zingg, J., Guder, J. & Vorholt, J. A. Forward genetic in planta screen for identification of plant-protective traits of Sphingomonas sp Strain Fr1 against Pseudomonas syringae DC3000. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 5529–5535 (2012).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ryffel, F. et al. Metabolic footprint of epiphytic bacteria on Arabidopsis thaliana leaves. ISME J. 10, 632–643 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Vogel, C. M., Potthoff, D. B., Schafer, M., Barandun, N. & Vorholt, J. A. Protective role of the Arabidopsis leaf microbiota against a bacterial pathogen. Nat. Microbiol. 6, 1537–1548 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pfeilmeier, S. et al. The plant NADPH oxidase RBOHD is required for microbiota homeostasis in leaves. Nat. Microbiol. 6, 852–864 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Maier, B. A. et al. A general non-self response as part of plant immunity. Nat. Plants 7, 696–705 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Breton, C., Snajdrova, L., Jeanneau, C., Koca, J. & Imberty, A. Structures and mechanisms of glycosyltransferases. Glycobiology 16, 29r–37r (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tao, F., Swarup, S. & Zhang, L. H. Quorum sensing modulation of a putative glycosyltransferase gene cluster essential for Xanthomonas campestris biofilm formation. Environ. Microbiol. 12, 3159–3170 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhou, M. X., Zhu, F., Dong, S. L., Pritchard, D. G. & Wu, H. A novel glucosyltransferase is required for glycosylation of a serine-rich adhesin and biofilm formation by Streptococcus parasanguinis. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 12140–12148 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Becker, A. et al. Regulation of succinoglycan and galactoglucan biosynthesis in Sinorhizobium meliloti. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 4, 187–190 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Halder, U., Banerjee, A. & Bandopadhyay, R. Structural and functional properties, biosynthesis, and patenting trends of bacterial succinoglycan: a review. Indian J. Microbiol. 57, 278–284 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Niehaus, K. & Becker, A. The role of microbial surface polysaccharides in the Rhizobium-legume interaction. Sub-Cell. Biochem. 29, 73–116 (1998).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ellis, H. R. Mechanism for sulfur acquisition by the alkanesulfonate monooxygenase system. Bioorg. Chem. 39, 178–184 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Marco, M. L., Legac, J. & Lindow, S. E. Pseudomonas syringae genes induced during colonization of leaf surfaces. Environ. Microbiol. 7, 1379–1391 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yu, X. L. et al. Transcriptional responses of Pseudomonas syringae to growth in epiphytic versus apoplastic leaf sites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, E425–E434 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cai, S. J. & Inouye, M. EnvZ-OmpR interaction and osmoregulation in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 24155–24161 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Freeman, B. C. et al. Physiological and transcriptional responses to osmotic stress of two Pseudomonas syringae strains that differ in epiphytic fitness and osmotolerance. J. Bacteriol. 195, 4742–4752 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Scheublin, T. R. et al. Transcriptional profiling of gram-positive Arthrobacter in the phyllosphere: induction of pollutant degradation genes by natural plant phenolic compounds. Environ. Microbiol. 16, 2212–2225 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Felix, G., Duran, J. D., Volko, S. & Boller, T. Plants have a sensitive perception system for the most conserved domain of bacterial flagellin. Plant J. 18, 265–276 (1999).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Macho, A. P. & Zipfel, C. Plant PRRs and the activation of innate immune signaling. Mol. Cell 54, 263–272 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hopsu-Havu, V. K. & Glenner, G. G. A new dipeptide naphthylamidase hydrolyzing glycyl-prolyl-beta-naphthylamide. Histochemie 7, 197–201 (1966).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kavi Kishor, P. B., Hima Kumari, P., Sunita, M. S. & Sreenivasulu, N. Role of proline in cell wall synthesis and plant development and its implications in plant ontogeny. Front. Plant Sci. 6, 544 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chipperfield, J. R. & Ratledge, C. Salicylic acid is not a bacterial siderophore: a theoretical study. Biometals 13, 165–168 (2000).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Visca, P., Ciervo, A., Sanfilippo, V. & Orsi, N. Iron-regulated salicylate synthesis by Pseudomonas Spp. J. Gen. Microbiol. 139, 1995–2001 (1993).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Seifert, G. J., Barber, C., Wells, B., Dolan, L. & Roberts, K. Galactose biosynthesis in Arabidopsis: genetic evidence for substrate channeling from UDP-D-galactose into cell wall polymers. Curr. Biol. 12, 1840–1845 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zablackis, E., Huang, J., Muller, B., Darvill, A. G. & Albersheim, P. Characterization of the cell-wall polysaccharides of Arabidopsis thaliana leaves. Plant Physiol. 107, 1129–1138 (1995).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Santos-Beneit, F. The Pho regulon: a huge regulatory network in bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 6, 402 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mortimer, J. C. et al. An unusual xylan in Arabidopsis primary cell walls is synthesised by GUX3, IRX9L, IRX10L and IRX14. Plant J. 83, 413–426 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Honer Zu Bentrup, K., Miczak, A., Swenson, D. L. & Russell, D. G. Characterization of activity and expression of isocitrate lyase in Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Bacteriol. 181, 7161–7167 (1999).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Reinscheid, D. J., Eikmanns, B. J. & Sahm, H. Characterization of the isocitrate lyase gene from Corynebacterium glutamicum and biochemical analysis of the enzyme. J. Bacteriol. 176, 3474–3483 (1994).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Groisman, E. A., Chiao, E., Lipps, C. J. & Heffron, F. Salmonella typhimurium phoP virulence gene is a transcriptional regulator. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86, 7077–7081 (1989).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lamarche, M. G., Wanner, B. L., Crepin, S. & Harel, J. The phosphate regulon and bacterial virulence: a regulatory network connecting phosphate homeostasis and pathogenesis. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 32, 461–473 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jameson, G. N., Cosper, M. M., Hernandez, H. L., Johnson, M. K. & Huynh, B. H. Role of the [2Fe-2S] cluster in recombinant Escherichia coli biotin synthase. Biochemistry 43, 2022–2031 (2004).Sirithanakorn, C. & Cronan, J. E. Biotin, a universal and essential cofactor: synthesis, ligation and regulation. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 45, fuab003 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Choi-Rhee, E. & Cronan, J. E. Biotin synthase is catalytic in vivo, but catalysis engenders destruction of the protein. Chem. Biol. 12, 461–468 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wilmes, P. et al. Community proteogenomics highlights microbial strain-variant protein expression within activated sludge performing enhanced biological phosphorus removal. ISME J. 2, 853–864 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Beier, S., Rivers, A. R., Moran, M. A. & Obernosterer, I. Phenotypic plasticity in heterotrophic marine microbial communities in continuous cultures. ISME J. 9, 1141–1151 (2015).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kim, H. et al. High population of Sphingomonas species on plant surface. J. Appl. Microbiol. 85, 731–736 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Singh, P., Santoni, S., Weber, A., This, P. & Peros, J. P. Understanding the phyllosphere microbiome assemblage in grape species (Vitaceae) with amplicon sequence data structures. Sci. Rep. 9, 14294 (2019).Kosma, D. K. et al. The impact of water deficiency on leaf cuticle lipids of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 151, 1918–1929 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Piffeteau, A. & Gaudry, M. Biotin uptake: influx, efflux and countertransport in Escherichia coli K12. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 816, 77–82 (1985).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
D’Souza, G. et al. Less is more: selective advantages can explain the prevalent loss of biosynthetic genes in bacteria. Evolution 68, 2559–2570 (2014).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hassani, M. A., Duran, P. & Hacquard, S. Microbial interactions within the plant holobiont. Microbiome 6, 58 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mas, A., Jamshidi, S., Lagadeuc, Y., Eveillard, D. & Vandenkoornhuyse, P. Beyond the black queen hypothesis. ISME J. 10, 2085–2091 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Morris, B. E., Henneberger, R., Huber, H. & Moissl-Eichinger, C. Microbial syntrophy: interaction for the common good. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 37, 384–406 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pacheco, A. R., Moel, M. & Segre, D. Costless metabolic secretions as drivers of interspecies interactions in microbial ecosystems. Nat. Commun. 10, 103 (2019).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Pande, S. et al. Fitness and stability of obligate cross-feeding interactions that emerge upon gene loss in bacteria. ISME J. 8, 953–962 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Joyner, D. C. & Lindow, S. E. Heterogeneity of iron bioavailability on plants assessed with a whole-cell GFP-based bacterial biosensor. Microbiol. 146, 2435–2445 (2000).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Remus-Emsermann, M. N., de Oliveira, S., Schreiber, L. & Leveau, J. H. Quantification of lateral heterogeneity in carbohydrate permeability of isolated plant leaf cuticles. Front. Microbiol. 2, 197 (2011).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Remus-Emsermann, M. N. P., Tecon, R., Kowalchuk, G. A. & Leveau, J. H. J. Variation in local carrying capacity and the individual fate of bacterial colonizers in the phyllosphere. ISME J. 6, 756–765 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Peredo, E. L. & Simmons, S. L. Leaf-FISH: microscale imaging of bacterial taxa on phyllosphere. Front. Microbiol. 8, 2669 (2018).Dar, D., Dar, N., Cai, L. & Newman, D. K. Spatial transcriptomics of planktonic and sessile bacterial populations at single-cell resolution. Science 373, eabi4882 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ledermann, R., Strebel, S., Kampik, C. & Fischer, H. M. Versatile vectors for efficient mutagenesis of Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens and other alphaproteobacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 2791–2799 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Roux, M. et al. The Arabidopsis leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinases BAK1/SERK3 and BKK1/SERK4 are required for innate immunity to hemibiotrophic and biotrophic pathogens. Plant Cell 23, 2440–2455 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Staswick, P. E., Tiryaki, I. & Rowe, M. L. Jasmonate response locus JAR1 and several related Arabidopsis genes encode enzymes of the firefly luciferase superfamily that show activity on jasmonic, salicylic, and indole-3-acetic acids in an assay for adenylation. Plant Cell 14, 1405–1415 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Torres, M. A., Dangl, J. L. & Jones, J. D. Arabidopsis gp91phox homologues AtrbohD and AtrbohF are required for accumulation of reactive oxygen intermediates in the plant defense response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 517–522 (2002).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cao, H., Glazebrook, J., Clarke, J. D., Volko, S. & Dong, X. The Arabidopsis NPR1 gene that controls systemic acquired resistance encodes a novel protein containing ankyrin repeats. Cell 88, 57–63 (1997).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Schlesier, B., Breton, F. & Mock, H. P. A hydroponic culture system for growing Arabidopsis thaliana plantlets under sterile conditions. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 21, 449–456 (2003).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hemmerle, L., Ochsner, A. M., Vonderach, T., Hattendorf, B. & Vorholt, J. A. Mass spectrometry-based approaches to study lanthanides and lanthanide-dependent proteins in the phyllosphere. Methods Enzymol. 650, 215–236 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Uhrig, R. G. et al. Diurnal dynamics of the Arabidopsis rosette proteome and phosphoproteome. Plant Cell Environ. 44, 821–841 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Davis, J. J. et al. The PATRIC bioinformatics resource center: expanding data and analysis capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, D606–D612 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Huerta-Cepas, J. et al. eggNOG 4.5: a hierarchical orthology framework with improved functional annotations for eukaryotic, prokaryotic and viral sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D286–D293 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Perez-Riverol, Y. et al. The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: improving support for quantification data. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D442–D450 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

Giesecke, T. et al. Towards mapping the late Quaternary vegetation change of Europe. Veg. Hist. Archaeobot. 23, 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-012-0390-y (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fyfe, R. M., Woodbridge, J. & Roberts, N. From forest to farmland: pollen-inferred land cover change across Europe using the pseudobiomization approach. Glob. Chang. Biol. 21, 1197–1212. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12776 (2015).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gilliam, F. S. Forest ecosystems of temperate climatic regions: From ancient use to climate change. New Phytol. 212, 871–887. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14255 (2016).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Jamrichová, E. et al. Human impact on open temperate woodlands during the middle Holocene in Central Europe. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 245, 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2017.06.002 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kaplan, J. O., Krumhardt, K. M. & Zimmermann, N. The prehistoric and preindustrial deforestation of Europe. Quatern. Sci. Rev. 28, 3016–3034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.09.028 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kalis, A. J., Merkt, J. & Wunderlich, J. Environmental changes during the Holocene climatic optimum in central Europe—human impact and natural causes. Quatern. Sci. Rev. 22, 33–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-3791(02)00181-6 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Molinari, C. et al. Exploring potential drivers of European biomass burning over the Holocene: A data-model analysis. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 22, 1248–1260. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12090 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Roberts, N. et al. Europe’s lost forests: A pollen-based synthesis for the last 11,000 years. Sci. Rep. 8, 716. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18646-7 (2018).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ellis, E. C. et al. People have shaped most of terrestrial nature for at least 12,000 years. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023483118 (2021).Ellis, E. C. Anthropogenic transformation of the terrestrial biosphere. Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 369, 1010–1035. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0331 (2011).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Drake, B. L. Changes in North Atlantic Oscillation drove Population Migrations and the Collapse of the Western Roman Empire. Sci. Rep. 7, 1227. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01289-z (2017).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Enters, D., Dörfler, W. & Zolitschka, B. Historical soil erosion and land-use change during the last two millennia recorded in lake sediments of Frickenhauser See, northern Bavaria, central Germany. The Holocene 18, 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683607086762 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Haldon, J. et al. History meets palaeoscience: Consilience and collaboration in studying past societal responses to environmental change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 3210–3218. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1716912115 (2018).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Yeloff, D. & van Geel, B. Abandonment of farmland and vegetation succession following the Eurasian plague pandemic of ad 1347?52. J. Biogeogr. 34, 575–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01674.x (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Alt, K. W. et al. Lombards on the Move—An Integrative Study of the Migration Period Cemetery at Szólád Hungary. PLoS ONE 9, e110793. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110793 (2014).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pohl, W. in Ethnicity as a Political Resource Conceptualizations across Disciplines, Regions, and Periods (ed Resource« University of Cologne Forum »Ethnicity as a Political) 201–208 (Transcript Verlag, 2015).Dreibrodt, S. & Wiethold, J. Lake Belau and its catchment (northern Germany): A key archive of environmental history in northern central Europe since the onset of agriculture. The Holocene 25, 296–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683614558648 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dreßler, M. et al. Environmental changes and the Migration Period in northern Germany as reflected in the sediments of Lake Dudinghausen. Quatern. Res. 66, 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yqres.2006.02.007 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Leuschner, C. & Ellenberg, H. in Ecology of Central European Forests: Vegetation Ecology of Central Europe, Volume I (eds Christoph Leuschner & Heinz Ellenberg) 31–116 (Springer International Publishing, 2017).Pędziszewska, A. et al. in The Migration Period between the Oder and the Vistula (2 vols) (eds A. Bursche, H. John, & A. Zapolska) 137–198 (Brill, 2020).Mączyńska, M. in The Migration Period between the Oder and the Vistula (2 vols) (eds A. Bursche, H. John, & A. Zapolska) 201–224 (Brill, 2020).Lamentowicz, M. et al. Reconstructing climate change and ombrotrophic bog development during the last 4000years in northern Poland using biotic proxies, stable isotopes and trait-based approach. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 418, 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2014.11.015 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Makohonienko, M. in Late Glacial and Holocene history of vegetation in Poland based on isopollen maps (eds M. Ralska-Jasiewiczowa et al.) 411–416 (W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, 2004).Ralska-Jasiewiczowa, M., Nalepka, D. & Goslar, T. Some problems of forest transformation at the transition to the oligocratic/ Homo sapiens phase of the Holocene interglacial in northern lowlands of central Europe. Veg. Hist. Archaeobot. 12, 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-003-0021-8 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Moździoch, M. in The Past Societies. Polish lands from the first evidence of human presence to the Early Middle Ages Vol. 5: 500–1000 AD (eds P. Urbańczyk & M. Trzeciecki) 123–167 (The Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 2016).Wołoszyn, M. in The Migration Period between the Oder and the Vistula (2 vols) (eds A. Bursche, H. John, & A. Zapolska) 84–136 (Brill, 2020).Karczewski, M. Archeologia środowiska zachodniobałtyjskiego kręgu kulturowego na pojezierzach. (Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 2011).Nowakiewicz, T. in The Past Societies. Polish lands from the first evidence of human presence to the Early Middle Ages (eds P. Urbańczyk & M. Trzeciecki) 170–217 (The Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 2016).Okulicz-Kozaryn, Ł. Dzieje Prusów (Wydawnictwo Monografie FNP, 1997).Okulicz, J. Osadnictwo ziem pruskich od czasów najdawniejszych do XIII wieku. Dzieje Warmii i Mazur w zarysie (Polskie Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1981).Ralska-Jasiewiczowa, M. Correlation between the Holocene history of the Carpinus betulus and prehistoric settlement in North Poland. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 33, 461–468 (1964).Article 

Google Scholar 
Noryśkiewicz, A. M. Historia roślinności i osadnictwa ziemi chełmińskiej w późnym holocenie. Studium palinologiczne. (Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika, 2013).Ralska-Jasiewiczowa, M. L., M. et al. Late Glacial and Holocene history of vegetation in Poland based on isopollen maps. (W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, 2004).Brown, A., Poska, A. & Pluskowski, A. The environmental impact of cultural change: Palynological and quantitative land cover reconstructions for the last two millennia in northern Poland. Quatern. Int. 522, 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2019.05.014 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wacnik, A., Goslar, T. & Czernik, J. Vegetation changes caused by agricultural societies in the Great Mazurian Lake District. Acta Palaeobotanica 52, 59–104 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Pędziszewska, A. et al. Holocene environmental changes reflected by pollen, diatoms, and geochemistry of annually laminated sediments of Lake Suminko in the Kashubian Lake District (N Poland). Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 216, 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2015.01.008 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Słowiński, M. et al. The role of Medieval road operation on cultural landscape transformation. Sci. Rep. 11, 20876. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00090-3 (2021).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Gałka, M., Tobolski, K., Zawisza, E. & Goslar, T. Postglacial history of vegetation, human activity and lake-level changes at Jezioro Linówek in northeast Poland, based on multi-proxy data. Veg. Hist. Archaeobotany 23, 123–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-013-0401-7 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Marks, L. Timing of the Late Vistulian (Weichselian) glacial phases in Poland. Quatern. Sci. Rev. 44, 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2010.08.008 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Woś, A. Klimat Polski. (Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 1999).Matuszkiewicz, W. et al. Potential natural vegetation of Poland. General map 1:300 000. (IGiPZ PAN, 1995).Zając, A. & Zając, M. Atlas rozmieszczenia roślin naczyniowych w Polsce. Distribution Atlas of Vascular Plants in Poland. (Nakładem Pracowni Chorologii Komputerowej Instytutu Botaniki UJ, 2001).Matuszkiewicz, J. M. & Solon, J. Przestrzenne zróżnicowanie i cechy charakterystyczne krajobrazów Polski w ujęciu geobotanicznym. Problemy Ekologii Krajobrazu XL, 85–101 (2015).Broda, J. Historia leśnictwa w Polsce. (Wydaw. Akademii Rolniczej im. Augusta Cieszkowskiego, 2000).Rozkrut, D. et al. Statistical Yearbook of Forestry. (Główny Urząd Statystyczny, 2020).Lamentowicz, M. et al. Climate and human induced hydrological change since AD 800 in an ombrotrophic mire in Pomerania (N Poland) tracked by testate amoebae, macro-fossils, pollen and tree rings of pine. Boreas 38, 214–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1502-3885.2008.00047.x (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lamentowicz, M. et al. How Joannites’ economy eradicated primeval forest and created anthroecosystems in medieval Central Europe. Sci. Rep. 10, 18775. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75692-4 (2020).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Czerwiński, S. et al. Environmental implications of past socioeconomic events in Greater Poland during the last 1200 years. Synthesis of paleoecological and historical data. Quatern. Sci. Rev. 259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2021.106902 (2021).Ralska-Jasiewiczowa, M., van Geel, B. & Demsk, D. in Lake Gościąż, central Poland: a monographic study. Part 1 (eds M. Ralska-Jasiewiczowa, T. Goslar, T. Madeyska, & L. Starkel) (W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, 1998).Lamentowicz, M. et al. Multiproxy study of anthropogenic and climatic changes in the last two millennia from a small mire in central Poland. Hydrobiologia 631, 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-009-9812-y (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pędziszewska, A. & Latałowa, M. Stand-scale reconstruction of late Holocene forest succession on the Gdańsk Upland (N. Poland) based on integrated palynological and macrofossil data from paired sites. Veget. History Archaeobot. 25, 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-015-0546-7 (2016).Lamentowicz, M., Gałka, M., Pawlyta, J., Lamentowicz, Ł. G., Tomasz & Miotk-Szpiganowicz, G. Climate change and human impact in the southern Baltic during the last millennium reconstructed from an ombrotrophic bog archive. Studia Quaternaria 28, 3–16 (2011).Cywa, K. Trees and shrubs used in medieval Poland for making everyday objects. Veg. Hist. Archaeobotany 27, 111–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-017-0644-9 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dzieduszycki, W. Wykorzystywanie surowca drzewnego we wczesnośredniowiecznej i średniowiecznej Kruszwicy. Kwartalnik Historii Kultury Materialnej, 35–54 (1976).Kara, M. & Przybył, M. Wczesnośredniowieczne grodzisko wklęsłe w Bninie koło Poznania w świetle dotychczasowych ustaleń dendrochronologicznych. Folia Prahistorica Posnaniensia 10, 255–268 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gałka, M. et al. Unveiling exceptional Baltic bog ecohydrology, autogenic succession and climate change during the last 2000 years in CE Europe using replicate cores, multi-proxy data and functional traits of testate amoebae. Quatern. Sci. Rev. 156, 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.11.034 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kinder, M. et al. Holocene history of human impacts inferred from annually laminated sediments in Lake Szurpiły, northeast Poland. J. Paleolimnol. 61, 419–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10933-019-00068-2 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Marcisz, K., Kołaczek, P., Gałka, M., Diaconu, A.-C. & Lamentowicz, M. Exceptional hydrological stability of a Sphagnum-dominated peatland over the late Holocene. Quatern. Sci. Rev. 231, 106180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106180 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wacnik, A. et al. Determining the responses of vegetation to natural processes and human impacts in north-eastern Poland during the last millennium: Combined pollen, geochemical and historical data. Veg. Hist. Archaeobotany 25, 479–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-016-0565-z (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Szal, M., Kupryjanowicz, M., Tylmann, W. & Piotrowska, N. Was it ‘terra desolata’? Conquering and colonizing the medieval Prussian wilderness in the context of climate change. The Holocene 27, 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683616660167 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Szal, M., Kupryjanowicz, M., Wyczółkowski, M. & Tylmann, W. The Iron Age in the Mrągowo Lake District, Masuria, NE Poland: the Salęt settlement microregion as an example of long-lasting human impact on vegetation. Veg. Hist. Archaeobotany 23, 419–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-014-0465-z (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brown, A. et al. The ecological impact of conquest and colonization on a medieval frontier landscape: Combined Palynological and geochemical analysis of lake sediments from Radzyń Chełminski Northern Poland. Geoarchaeology 30, 511–527. https://doi.org/10.1002/gea.21525 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Williams, J. W. et al. The Neotoma Paleoecology Database, a multiproxy, international, community-curated data resource. Quatern. Res. 89, 156–177. https://doi.org/10.1017/qua.2017.105 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Marcisz, K. et al. Long-term hydrological dynamics and fire history over the last 2000 years in CE Europe reconstructed from a high-resolution peat archive. Quatern. Sci. Rev. 112, 138–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.01.019 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Milecka, K., Gałka, M. & Lamentowicz, M. Regionalna i lokalna sukcesja roślinności w Dolinie Stążki na podstawie analizy pyłkowej. Stud. Limnol. Telmatol. 6, 61–69 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Lamentowicz, M. et al. A 1300-year multi-proxy, high-resolution record from a rich fen in northern Poland: reconstructing hydrology, land use and climate change. J. Quat. Sci. 28, 582–594. https://doi.org/10.1002/jqs.2650 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lamentowicz, M. et al. Always on the tipping point—A search for signals of past societies and related peatland ecosystem critical transitions during the last 6500 years in N Poland. Quat. Sci. Rev. 225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.105954 (2019).Wacnik, A., Kupryjanowicz, M., Mueller-Bieniek, A., Karczewski, M. & Cywa, K. The environmental and cultural contexts of the late Iron Age and medieval settlement in the Mazurian Lake District, NE Poland: combined palaeobotanical and archaeological data. Veg. Hist. Archaeobotany 23, 439–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-014-0458-y (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gałka, M. et al. Palaeoenvironmental changes in Central Europe (NE Poland) during the last 6200 years reconstructed from a high-resolution multi-proxy peat archive. The Holocene 25, 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683614561887 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Latałowa, M., Zimny, M., Jędrzejewska, B. & Samojlik, T. in Europe’s Changing Woods and Forests: From Wildwood to Managed Landscapes (eds K.J. Kirby & C. Watkins) Ch. 17, 243–263 (CAB International, 2015).Słowiński, M. et al. Paleoecological and historical data as an important tool in ecosystem management. J. Environ. Manage. 236, 755–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.002 (2019).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Żarczyński, M., Wacnik, A. & Tylmann, W. Tracing lake mixing and oxygenation regime using the Fe/Mn ratio in varved sediments: 2000 year-long record of human-induced changes from Lake Żabińskie (NE Poland). Sci. Total Environ. 657, 585–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.078 (2019).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wirth, C., Messier, C., Bergeron, Y., Frank, D. & Fankhänel, A. Old-Growth Forest Definitions: a Pragmatic View. 11–33 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009).Kołaczek, P. M., K. et al. in 20th Congress of the International Union for Quaternary Research (INQUA) (Dublin, Ireland, 2019).Szmoniewski, B. S. in The Past Societies. Polish lands from the first evidence of human presence to the Early Middle Ages. Vol. 5: 500–1000 AD (eds P. Urbańczyk & M. Trzeciecki) 21–74 (The Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 2016).Moździoch, M., Chudziak, W. & Poleski, J. Atlas grodzisk wczesnośredniowiecznych z obszaru Polski, 2015).Trzeciecki, M. in The Past Societies. Polish lands from the first evidence of human presence to the Early Middle Ages. Vol. 5: 500–1000 AD (eds P. Urbańczyk & M. Trzeciecki) 277–341 (The Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 2016).Faliński, J. B. & Pawlaczyk, P. in Grab zwyczajny – Carpinus betulus L. Nasze drzewa leśne, monografie popularnonaukowe Vol. 9 (ed W. Bugała) 157–264 (Polska Akademia Nauk, Instytut Dendrologii, „Sorus”,, 1993).Sikkema, R., Caudullo, G. & de Rigo, D. in European Atlas of Forest Tree Species (eds J. San-Miguel-Ayanz et al.) (Publ. Off. EU, 2016).Hensel, W. Słowiańszczyzna Wczesnośredniowieczna. Zarys kultury materialnej. (Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1987).Jørgensen, D. Pigs and Pollards: Medieval insights for UK wood pasture restoration. Sustainability 5, 387–399. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5020387 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Plieninger, T. et al. Wood-pastures of Europe: Geographic coverage, social–ecological values, conservation management, and policy implications. Biol. Cons. 190, 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.05.014 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Watkins, A. Cattle grazing in the forest of arden in the later middle ages. Agric. Hist. Rev. 37, 12–25 (1989).
Google Scholar 
Ładowski, S. Dykcyonarz służący do poznania historyi naturalney y rożnych osobliwszych starożytności, ktore ciekawi w gabinetach znayduią Vol. 2 (1783).Tobolski, K. in Wstęp do paleoekologii Lednickiego Parku Krajobrazowego (ed K. Tobolski) (Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu, 1991).Litt, T. & Tobolski, K. in Wstęp do paleoekologii Lednickiego Parku Krajobrazowego (ed K. Tobolski) (1991).Makohonienko, M. Przyrodnicza historia Gniezna. (Homini, 2000).Makohonienko, M. in Wstęp do paleoekologii Lednickiego Parku Krajobrazowego (ed K. Tobolski) (Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu, 1991).Filbrandt, A. in Wstęp do paleoekologii Lednickiego Parku Krajobrazowego (ed K. Tobolski) (Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu, 1991).Pidek, I. A. Carpinus betulus pollen accumulation rates in Roztocze (SE Poland) in relation to presence of Carpinus in Ferdynandovian pollen diagrams. Ecol. Quest. 26, 95–101 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Wiśniewski, J. in Studia I Materiały Do Dziejów Suwalszczyzny (ed J. Antoniewicz) 51–138 (Prace Białostockiego Towarzystwa Naukowego Nr 4, Białostockie Towarzystwo Naukowe,, 1965).Biskup, M. et al. Państwo zakonu krzyżackiego w Prusach. Władza i społeczeństwo. (Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 2008).Pluskowski, A. The archaeology of the Prussian Crusade: Holy War and colonisation. (2012).Marcisz, K. et al. Seasonal changes in Sphagnum peatland testate amoeba communities along a hydrological gradient. Eur. J. Protistol. 50, 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejop.2014.07.001 (2014).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Marcisz, K. et al. Fire activity and hydrological dynamics in the past 5700 years reconstructed from Sphagnum peatlands along the oceanic–continental climatic gradient in northern Poland. Quatern. Sci. Rev. 177, 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.10.018 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Boratyńska, K. in Biology and Ecology of Norway Spruce (eds Mark G. Tjoelker, Adam Boratyński, & Władysław Bugała) 23–36 (Springer Netherlands, 2007).Jaroszewicz, B. et al. Białowieża forest—a relic of the high naturalness of European forests. Forests 10, 849. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10100849 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zimny, M., Latałowa, M. & Pędziszewska, A. The Late-Holocene history of forests in the Strict Reserve of Białowieża National Park. 29–59 (Białowieski Park Narodowy, 2017).Blaauw, M., Christen, J. A., Bennett, K. D. & Reimer, P. J. Double the dates and go for Bayes—Impacts of model choice, dating density and quality on chronologies. Quatern. Sci. Rev. 188, 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2018.03.032 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lisitsyna, O. V., Giesecke, T. & Hicks, S. Exploring pollen percentage threshold values as an indication for the regional presence of major European trees. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 166, 311–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2011.06.004 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Huntley, B. & Birks, H. J. B. An Atlas of past and present pollen maps for Europe: 0–13000 years ago. (Cambridge University Press, 1983). More

Haas, M., Schreiber, M. & Mascher, M. Domestication and crop evolution of wheat and barley: Genes, genomics, and future directions. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 61(3), 204–225 (2019).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hebelstrup, K. H. Differences in nutritional quality between wild and domesticated forms of barley and emmer wheat. Plant Sci. 256, 1–4 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Borisjuk, N. et al. Genetic modification for wheat improvement: From transgenesis to genome editing. Biomed. Res. Int. 2019, 6216304 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Maccaferri, M. et al. Durum wheat genome highlights past domestication signatures and future improvement targets. Nat. Genet. 51(5), 885–895 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Brenchley, R. et al. Analysis of the bread wheat genome using whole-genome shotgun sequencing. Nature 491(7426), 705–710 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Zimin, A. V. et al. The first near-complete assembly of the hexaploid bread wheat genome, Triticum aestivum. Gigascience 6(11), 1–7 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Avni, R. et al. Wild emmer genome architecture and diversity elucidate wheat evolution and domestication. Science 357(6346), 93–97 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Luo, M. C. et al. Genome sequence of the progenitor of the wheat D genome Aegilops tauschii. Nature 551(7681), 498–502 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Jia, J. et al. Aegilops tauschii draft genome sequence reveals a gene repertoire for wheat adaptation. Nature 496(7443), 91–95 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Peng, J. et al. Domestication quantitative trait loci in Triticum dicoccoides, the progenitor of wheat. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100(5), 2489–2494 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Allen, A. M. et al. Discovery and development of exome-based, co-dominant single nucleotide polymorphism markers in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Biotechnol. J. 11(3), 279–295 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Merchuk-Ovnat, L., Fahima, T., Krugman, T. & Saranga, Y. Ancestral QTL alleles from wild emmer wheat improve grain yield, biomass and photosynthesis across enviroinments in modern wheat. Plant Sci. 251, 23–34 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bhalla, P. L., Sharma, A. & Singh, M. B. Enabling molecular technologies for trait improvement in wheat. Methods Mol. Biol. 1679, 3–24 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hong, J., Yang, L., Zhang, D., & Shi, J. Plant metabolomics: An indispensable system biology tool for plant science. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17(6), 1–16 (2016).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Batyrshina, Z. S., Yaakov, B., Shavit, R., Singh, A. & Tzin, V. Comparative transcriptomic and metabolic analysis of wild and domesticated wheat genotypes reveals differences in chemical and physical defense responses against aphids. BMC Plant Biol. 20(1), 19 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zorb, C., Langenkamper, G., Betsche, T., Niehaus, K. & Barsch, A. Metabolite profiling of wheat grains (Triticum aestivum L.) from organic and conventional agriculture. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54(21), 8301–8306 (2006).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Matthews, S. B. et al. Metabolite profiling of a diverse collection of wheat lines using ultraperformance liquid chromatography coupled with time-of-flight mass spectrometry. PLoS ONE 7(8), e44179 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
de Leonardis, A. M. et al. Effects of heat stress on metabolite accumulation and composition, and nutritional properties of durum wheat grain. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16(12), 30382–30404 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Allwood, J. W. et al. Profiling of spatial metabolite distributions in wheat leaves under normal and nitrate limiting conditions. Phytochemistry 115, 99–111 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Ullah, N., Yuce, M., Neslihan Ozturk Gokce, Z. & Budak, H. Comparative metabolite profiling of drought stress in roots and leaves of seven Triticeae species. BMC Genom. 18(1), 969 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lannucci, A., Fragasso, M., Beleggia, R., Nigro, F. & Papa, R. Evolution of the crop rhizosphere: Impact of domestication on root exudates in tetraploid wheat (Triticum turgidum L.). Front Plant Sci. 8, 2124 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Beleggia, R. et al. Evolutionary metabolomics reveals domestication-associated changes in tetraploid wheat kernels. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33(7), 1740–1753 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Poudel, R., Bhinderwala, F., Morton, M., Powers, R. & Rose, D. J. Metabolic profiling of historical and modern wheat cultivars using proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Sci. Rep. 11(1), 3080 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Hanhineva, K. et al. Non-targeted analysis of spatial metabolite composition in strawberry (Fragariaxananassa) flowers. Phytochemistry 69(13), 2463–2481 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ben-Abu, Y. & Itsko, M. “Changes in “natural antibiotic” metabolite composition during tetraploid wheat domestication. Sci. Rep. 11(1), 20340. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98764-5 (2021).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Salamini, F., Ozkan, H., Brandolini, A., Schäfer-Pregl, R. & Martin, W. Genetics and geography of wild cereal domestication in the near east. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3(6), 429–441. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg817 (2002).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zörb, C., Langenkämper, G., Betsche, T., Niehaus, K. & Barsch, A. Metabolite profiling of wheat grains (Triticum aestivum L.) from organic and conventional agriculture. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54(21), 8301–8306 (2006).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ben-Abu, Y., Beiles, A., Flom, D. & Nevo, E. Adaptive evolution of benzoxazinoids in wild emmer wheat, Triticum dicoccoides, at “Evolution Canyon”, Mount Carmel, Israel. PLoS ONE. 13(2), e0190424 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ben-Abu, Y., et al., Durum wheat evolution—a genomic analysis. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Genetics and Breeding of Durum Wheat, Vol. 110 29–44 (2014).Zaynab, M. et al. Role of secondary metabolites in plant defense against pathogens. Microb. Pathog. 124, 198–202 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
de Bruijn, W. J. C., Gruppen, H. & Vincken, J. P. Structure and biosynthesis of benzoxazinoids: Plant defence metabolites with potential as antimicrobial scaffolds. Phytochemistry 155, 233–243 (2018).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Arbona, V. & Gomez-Cadenas, A. Metabolomics of Disease resistance in crops. Mol. Biol. 19, 13–30 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Okada, K., Abe, H. & Arimura, G. Jasmonates induce both defense responses and communication in monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 56(1), 16–27 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Belz, R. G. Allelopathy in crop/weed interactions–an update. Pest. Manag. Sci. 63(4), 308–326 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mondal, S. et al. Harnessing diversity in wheat to enhance grain yield, climate resilience, disease and insect pest resistance and nutrition through conventional and modern breeding approaches. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 991 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Huang, L. et al. Evolution and adaptation of wild emmer wheat populations to biotic and abiotic stresses. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 54, 279–301 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ben-David, R., Dinoor, A., Peleg, Z. & Fahima, T. Reciprocal hosts’ responses to powdery mildew isolates originating from domesticated wheats and their wild progenitor. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 75 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yahiaoui, N., Brunner, S. & Keller, B. Rapid generation of new powdery mildew resistance genes after wheat domestication. Plant J. 47(1), 85–98 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Parween, T., Jan, S., Mahmooduzzafar, S., Fatma, T. & Siddiqui, Z. H. Selective effect of pesticides on plant—a review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 56(1), 160–179 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mou, Y., et al. Genome-wide identification and characterization of the OPR gene family in wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20(8), 85–97 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kage, U., Karre, S., Kushalappa, A. C. & McCartney, C. Identification and characterization of a fusarium head blight resistance gene TaACT in wheat QTL-2DL. Plant Biotechnol. J. 15(4), 447–457 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dutartre, L., Hilliou, F. & Feyereisen, R. Phylogenomics of the benzoxazinoid biosynthetic pathway of Poaceae: Gene duplications and origin of the Bx cluster. BMC Evol. Biol. 12, 64 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gill, S. S. & Tuteja, N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 48(12), 909–930 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dhokane, D., Karre, S., Kushalappa, A. C. & McCartney, C. Integrated metabolo-transcriptomics reveals fusarium head blight candidate resistance genes in wheat QTL-Fhb2. PLoS ONE 11(5), e0155851 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kage, U., Yogendra, K. N. & Kushalappa, A. C. TaWRKY70 transcription factor in wheat QTL-2DL regulates downstream metabolite biosynthetic genes to resist Fusarium graminearum infection spread within spike. Sci. Rep. 7, 42596 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Masisi, K., Beta, T. & Moghadasian, M. H. Antioxidant properties of diverse cereal grains: A review on in vitro and in vivo studies. Food Chem. 196, 90–97 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sova, M. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of cinnamic acid derivatives. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 12(8), 749–767 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Perez-Vizcaino, F. & Fraga, C. G. Research trends in flavonoids and health. Arch Biochem. Biophys. 646, 107–112 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kong, L., Guo, H. & Sun, M. Signal transduction during wheat grain development. Planta 241(4), 789–801 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nadolska-Orczyk, A., Rajchel, I. K., Orczyk, W. & Gasparis, S. Major genes determining yield-related traits in wheat and barley. Theor Appl Genet 130(6), 1081–1098 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, W. & Yang, B. Translational genomics of grain size regulation in wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 130(9), 1765–1771 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Qi, P. F. et al. Transcriptional reference map of hormone responses in wheat spikes. BMC Genom. 20(1), 390 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hill, C. B. & Li, C. Genetic architecture of flowering phenology in cereals and opportunities for crop improvement. Front .Plant Sci. 7, 1906 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jiang, Y., Schmidt, R. H., Zhao, Y. & Reif, J. C. A quantitative genetic framework highlights the role of epistatic effects for grain-yield heterosis in bread wheat. Nat. Genet. 49(12), 1741–1746 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

Komarek, A. M., Thierfelder, C. & Steward, P. R. Conservation agriculture improves adaptive capacity of cropping systems to climate stress in Malawi. Agric. Syst. 190, 103117 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Charles, H., Godfray, H. & Garnett, T. Food security and sustainable intensification. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 369, 1 (2014).Challinor, A. J. et al. A meta-analysis of crop yield under climate change and adaptation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 4, 287–291 (2014).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Challinor, A. J., Koehler, A. K., Ramirez-Villegas, J., Whitfield, S. & Das, B. Current warming will reduce yields unless maize breeding and seed systems adapt immediately. Nat. Clim. Chang. 6, 954–958 (2016).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Savari, M. & Shokati Amghani, M. SWOT-FAHP-TOWS analysis for adaptation strategies development among small-scale farmers in drought conditions. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 67, 1 (2022).
Google Scholar 
Savari, M. & Shokati Amghani, M. Factors influencing farmers’ adaptation strategies in confronting the drought in Iran. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 23, 4949–4972 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Savari, M., Eskandari Damaneh, H. & Eskandari Damaneh, H. Drought vulnerability assessment: Solution for risk alleviation and drought management among Iranian farmers. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 67, (2022).Savari, M. & Zhoolideh, M. The role of climate change adaptation of small-scale farmers on the households food security level in the west of Iran. Dev. Pract. 31, 650–664 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Eder, A., Salhofer, K. & Scheichel, E. Land tenure, soil conservation, and farm performance: An eco-efficiency analysis of Austrian crop farms. Ecol. Econ. 180, 106861 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Keesstra, S. et al. Soil-related sustainable development goals: Four concepts to make land degradation neutrality and restoration work. 7, 133 (2018).Savari, M., Naghibeiranvand, F. & Asadi, Z. Modeling environmentally responsible behaviors among rural women in the forested regions in Iran. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 35, e02102 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Savari, M., Damaneh, H. E. & Damaneh, H. E. Factors involved in the degradation of mangrove forests in Iran: A mixed study for the management of this ecosystem. J. Nat. Conserv. 66, 1 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bhan, S. & Behera, U. K. Conservation agriculture in India—Problems, prospects and policy issues. Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res. 2, 1–12 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Savari, M., Ebrahimi-Maymand, R. & Mohammadi-Kanigolzar, F. The factors influencing the application of organic farming operations by farmers in iran. Agris On-line Pap. Econ. Informatics 5, 179–187 (2013).
Google Scholar 
FAO. Conservation agriculture in Central Asia: Status, Policy, Institutional Support, and Strategic Framework for its Promotion. 57 pp (2013).Eskandari Damaneh, H., Khosravi, H., Habashi, K., Eskandari Damaneh, H. & Tiefenbacher, J. P. The impact of land use and land cover changes on soil erosion in western Iran. Nat. Hazards 110, 2185–2205 (2022).Dougill, A. J. et al. Mainstreaming conservation agriculture in Malawi: Knowledge gaps and institutional barriers. J. Environ. Manage. 195, 25–34 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pannell, D. J., Llewellyn, R. S. & Corbeels, M. The farm-level economics of conservation agriculture for resource-poor farmers. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 187, 52–64 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bajwa, A. A. Sustainable weed management in conservation agriculture. Crop Prot. 65, 105–113 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lalani, B., Dorward, P., Holloway, G. & Wauters, E. Smallholder farmers’ motivations for using Conservation Agriculture and the roles of yield, labour and soil fertility in decision making. Agric. Syst. 146, 80–90 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Faridi, A. A., Kavoosi-Kalashami, M. & Bilali, H. E. Attitude components affecting adoption of soil and water conservation measures by paddy farmers in Rasht County. Northern Iran. Land Use Policy 99, 1 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Thierfelder, C. et al. Conservation agriculture in Southern Africa: Advances in knowledge. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 30, 328–348 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Eskandari Damaneh, H. et al. Testing possible scenario-based responses of vegetation under expected climatic changes in Khuzestan Province https://doi.org/10.1177/1178622121101333214 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ataei, P., Sadighi, H., Chizari, M. & Abbasi, E. Discriminant analysis of the participated farmers’ characteristics in the conservation agriculture project based on the learning transfer system. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 23, 291–307 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Izadi, N., Ataei, P., Karimi-Gougheri, H. & Norouzi, A. Environmental impact assessment of construction of water pumping station in Bacheh Bazar Plain: A case from Iran. EQA – Int. J. Environ. Qual. 35, 13–32 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Mesgaran, M. B., Madani, K., Hashemi, H. & Azadi, P. Iran’s Land Suitability for Agriculture. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–12 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jia, L. et al. Regional differences in the soil and water conservation efficiency of conservation tillage in China. CATENA 175, 18–26 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kuyvenhoven, A., Ruben, R. & Pender, J. Development strategies for less-favoured areas. Food Policy 29, 295–302 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hoque, R. & Sorwar, G. Understanding factors influencing the adoption of mHealth by the elderly: An extension of the UTAUT model. Int. J. Med. Inform. 101, 75–84 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gupta, K. P., Manrai, R. & Goel, U. Factors influencing adoption of payments banks by Indian customers: extending UTAUT with perceived credibility. J. Asia Bus. Stud. 13, 173–195 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Solís, D., Bravo-Ureta, B. E. & Quiroga, R. E. Technical efficiency among peasant farmers participating in natural resource management programmes in Central America. J. Agric. Econ. 60, 202–219 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Amsalu, A. & de Graaff, J. Determinants of adoption and continued use of stone terraces for soil and water conservation in an Ethiopian highland watershed. Ecol. Econ. 61, 294–302 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Solís, D. & Bravo-Ureta, B. E. Economic and Financial Sustainability of Private Agricultural Extension in El Salvador. https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v26n02_0726,81-102 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bagheri, A. & Teymouri, A. Farmers’ intended and actual adoption of soil and water conservation practices. Agric. Water Manag. 259, 1 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rodrigo-Comino, J. et al. The potential of straw mulch as a nature-based solution for soil erosion in olive plantation treated with glyphosate: A biophysical and socioeconomic assessment. L. Degrad. Dev. 31, 1877–1889 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Klik, A. & Rosner, J. Long-term experience with conservation tillage practices in Austria: Impacts on soil erosion processes. Soil Tillage Res. 203, 1 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Singh, R. K., Singh, A. & Pandey, C. B. Agro-biodiversity in rice–wheat-based agroecosystems of eastern Uttar Pradesh, India: implications for conservation and sustainable management. 21, 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2013.869272 (2014).Bijani, M., Ghazani, E., Valizadeh, N. & Fallah Haghighi, N. Pro-environmental analysis of farmers’ concerns and behaviors towards soil conservation in central district of Sari County, Iran. Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res. 5, 43–49 (2017).Raeisi, A., Bijani, M. & Chizari, M. The mediating role of environmental emotions in transition from knowledge to sustainable use of groundwater resources in Iran’s agriculture. Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res. 6, 143–152 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Valizadeh, N., Bijani, M., Hayati, D. & Fallah Haghighi, N. Social-cognitive conceptualization of Iranian farmers’ water conservation behavior. Hydrogeol. J. 27, 1131–1142 (2019).Kassie, M., Jaleta, M., Shiferaw, B., Mmbando, F. & Mekuria, M. Adoption of interrelated sustainable agricultural practices in smallholder systems: Evidence from rural Tanzania. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 80, 525–540 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Teklewold, H., Kassie, M. & Shiferaw, B. Adoption of Multiple Sustainable Agricultural Practices in Rural Ethiopia. J. Agric. Econ. 64, 597–623 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Savari, M., Zhoolideh, M. & Khosravipour, B. Explaining pro-environmental behavior of farmers: A case of rural Iran. Curr. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12144-021-02093-9 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tey, Y. S. & Brindal, M. Factors influencing the adoption of precision agricultural technologies: A review for policy implications. Precis. Agric. 13, 713–730 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Savari, M., Abdeshahi, A., Gharechaee, H. & Nasrollahian, O. Explaining farmers’ response to water crisis through theory of the norm activation model: Evidence from Iran. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 60, 1 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50, 179–211 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
Davis, F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst. 13, 319–339 (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rogers W., R. Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: a revised theory of protection motivation. in Social Psychophysiology: A Sourcebook 153–177 (1983).Bandura, A. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Heal. Educ. Behav. 31, 143–164 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ratten, V. & Ratten, H. Technological innovations and m-Commerce applications. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Manag. 4, 1–14 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shahangian, S. A., Tabesh, M. & Yazdanpanah, M. Psychosocial determinants of household adoption of water-efficiency behaviors in Tehran capital, Iran: Application of the social cognitive theory. Urban Clim. 39, 1009 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yazdanpanah, M., Feyzabad, F. R., Forouzani, M., Mohammadzadeh, S. & Burton, R. J. F. Predicting farmers’ water conservation goals and behavior in Iran: A test of social cognitive theory. Land Use Policy 47, 401–407 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rahimi-Feyzabad, F., Yazdanpanah, M., Burton, R. J. F., Forouzani, M. & Mohammadzadeh, S. The use of a bourdieusian “capitals” model for understanding farmer’s irrigation behavior in Iran. J. Hydrol. 591, 1 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schwarzer, R. & Luszczynska, A. Predicting and changing health behavior. Heal. action Process approach 252–278 (2015).Gothe, N. P. Correlates of physical activity in urban African American adults and older adults: Testing the social cognitive theory. Ann. Behav. Med. 52, 743–751 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Murphy, D. A., Stein, J. A., Schlenger, W. & Maibach, E. Conceptualizing the multidimensional nature of self-efficacy: Assessment of situational context and level of behavioral challenge to maintain safer sex. Heal. Psychol. 20, 281–290 (2001).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Valois, R. F., Zullig, K. J. & Revels, A. A. Aggressive and violent behavior and emotional self-efficacy: Is there a relationship for adolescents?. J. Sch. Health 87, 269–277 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ramirez, E., Kulinna, P. H. & Cothran, D. Constructs of physical activity behaviour in children: The usefulness of Social Cognitive Theory. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 13, 303–310 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schunk, D. H. & DiBenedetto, M. K. Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 60, 101832 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Raskauskas, J., Rubiano, S., Offen, I. & Wayland, A. K. Do social self-efficacy and self-esteem moderate the relationship between peer victimization and academic performance?. Soc. Psychol. Educ. 18, 297–314 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, S., Hung, K. & Huang, W.-J. Motivations for entrepreneurship in the tourism and hospitality sector: A social cognitive theory perspective. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.11.018 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zimmerman, B. J. Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. Am. Educ. Res. J. 45, 166–183 (2008).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Steese, S. et al. Understanding Girls’ Circle as an intervention on perceived social support, body image, self-efficacy, locus of control, and self-esteem. Adolescence 41, 55–74 (2006).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Komendantova, N. et al. Studying young people’ views on deployment of renewable energy sources in Iran through the lenses of Social Cognitive Theory. AIMS Energy 6, 216–228 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Burton, R. J. F. Reconceptualising the ‘behavioural approach’ in agricultural studies: A socio-psychological perspective. J. Rural Stud. 20, 359–371 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Plotnikoff, R. C., Lippke, S., Courneya, K. S., Birkett, N. & Sigal, R. J. Physical activity and social cognitive theory: A test in a population sample of adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Appl. Psychol. AN Int. Rev. 57, 628–643 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Thøgersen, J. & Grønhøj, A. Electricity saving in households-A social cognitive approach. Energy Policy 38, 7732–7743 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kaye, S. A., Lewis, I., Forward, S. & Delhomme, P. A priori acceptance of highly automated cars in Australia, France, and Sweden: A theoretically-informed investigation guided by the TPB and UTAUT. Accid. Anal. Prev. 137, 5441 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Savari, M. & Gharechaee, H. Application of the extended theory of planned behavior to predict Iranian farmers’ intention for safe use of chemical fertilizers. J. Clean. Prod. 263, 1 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Koohizadeh, M., Mohammad Akhoond-Ali, A. & Arsham, A. The Effect of Soil Moisture Levels on the Threshold Velocity of Wind Erosion in Dust Centers of South and Southeast of Khuzestan Province-Ahwaz. Iran. J. Soil Water Res. 52, 869–885 (2021).Keshavarz, M. & Karami, E. Farmers’ decision-making process under drought. J. Arid Environ. 108, 43–56 (2014).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Wu, J. Urban sustainability: an inevitable goal of landscape research. Landsc. Ecol. 25, 1–4 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ullman, J. B. & Bentler, P. M. Structural equation modeling. Handb. Psychol. Second Ed. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118133880.HOP202023 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Serda, M. Synteza i aktywność biologiczna nowych analogów tiosemikarbazonowych chelatorów żelaza. Uniw. śląski 343–354 (2013).Khoshmaram, M., Shiri, N., Shinnar, R. S. & Savari, M. Environmental support and entrepreneurial behavior among Iranian farmers: The mediating roles of social and human capital. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.1250158,1064-1088 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kim, T. K. T test as a parametric statistic. Korean J. Anesthesiol. 68, 540–546 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
-The T-test. Source: Adapted from Semenick, (96), p. 37. | Download Scientific Diagram. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-T-test-Source-Adapted-from-Semenick-96-p-37_fig2_274192999.Yadav, R. & Pathak, G. S. Intention to purchase organic food among young consumers: Evidences from a developing nation. Appetite 96, 122–128 (2016).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Akey, J. E., Rintamaki, L. S. & Kane, T. L. Health Belief Model deterrents of social support seeking among people coping with eating disorders. J. Affect. Disord. 145, 246–252 (2013).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ahmmadi, P., Rahimian, M. & Movahed, R. G. Theory of planned behavior to predict consumer behavior in using products irrigated with purified wastewater in Iran consumer. J. Clean. Prod. 296, 6359 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bagheri, A., Bondori, A., Allahyari, M. S. & Damalas, C. A. Modeling farmers’ intention to use pesticides: An expanded version of the theory of planned behavior. J. Environ. Manage. 248, 1 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M. & Hair, J. F. Partial least squares structural equation modeling. Handb. Mark. Res. 1, 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05542-8_15-2 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mogaka, B. O., Bett, H. K. & Nganga, S. K. Socioeconomic factors influencing the choice of climate-smart soil practices among farmers in western Kenya. J. Agric. Food Res. 5, 1 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Afshan, S., Sharif, A., Waseem, N. & Farooghi, R. Internet banking in Pakistan: An extended technology acceptance perspective. Int. J. Bus. Inf. Syst. 27, 383–410 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Pai, F. Y. & Huang, K. I. Applying the Technology Acceptance Model to the introduction of healthcare information systems. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 78, 650–660 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L. & Xu, X. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q. Manag. Inf. Syst. 36, 157–178 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nguru, W. M., Gachene, C. K., Onyango, C. M., Nganga, S. K. & Girvetz, E. H. Factors constraining the adoption of soil organic carbon enhancing technologies among small-scale farmers in Ethiopia. Heliyon 7, 1 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Warner, L. A. Who conserves and who approves? Predicting water conservation intentions in urban landscapes with referent groups beyond the traditional ‘important others’. Urban For. Urban Green. 60, 1 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Dewey-Mattia D, Manikonda K, Hall AJ, Wise ME, Crowe SJ. Surveillance for foodborne disease outbreaks—United States, 2009–2015. MMWR Surveillance Summaries. 2018;67:1.PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
CDC. Ongoing Multistate Outbreak of Escherichia coli serotype O157:H7 Infections Associated With Consumption of Fresh Spinach – United States. JAMA. 2006;296:2195–6.Article 

Google Scholar 
Jay MT, Cooley M, Carychao D, Wiscomb GW, Sweitzer RA, Crawford-Miksza L, et al. Escherichia coli O157: H7 in feral swine near spinach fields and cattle, central California coast. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:1908.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cooley M, Carychao D, Crawford-Miksza L, Jay MT, Myers C, Rose C, et al. Incidence and tracking of Escherichia coli O157: H7 in a major produce production region in California. PLoS One. 2007;2:e1159.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mukherjee A, Mammel MK, LeClerc JE, Cebula TA. Altered Utilization of N-Acetyl-d-Galactosamine by Escherichia coli O157:H7 from the 2006 Spinach Outbreak. J Bacteriol. 2008;190:1710–7.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Macarisin D, Patel J, Bauchan G, Giron JA, Sharma VK. Role of Curli and Cellulose Expression in Adherence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 to Spinach Leaves. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2012;9:160–7.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Carter MQ, Louie JW, Huynh S, Parker CT. Natural rpoS mutations contribute to population heterogeneity in Escherichia coli O157:H7 strains linked to the 2006 US spinach-associated outbreak. Food Microbiol. 2014;44:108–18.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Park S, Navratil S, Gregory A, Bauer A, Srinath I, Szonyi B, et al. Farm management, environment, and weather factors jointly affect the probability of spinach contamination by generic Escherichia coli at the preharvest stage. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80:2504–15.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
CDC. Investigation Details. 2021 [updated 2021; cited]; Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/ecoli/2021/o157h7-02-21/details.html.Karp DS, Gennet S, Kilonzo C, Partyka M, Chaumont N, Atwill ER, et al. Comanaging fresh produce for nature conservation and food safety. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015;112:11126–31.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jones MS, Fu Z, Reganold JP, Karp DS, Besser TE, Tylianakis JM, et al. Organic farming promotes biotic resistance to foodborne human pathogens. J Appl Ecol. 2019;56:1117–27.Article 

Google Scholar 
Holden N, Pritchard L, Toth I. Colonization outwith the colon: plants as an alternative environmental reservoir for human pathogenic enterobacteria. FEMs Microbiol Rev. 2009;33:689–703.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Holden N. You are what you can find to eat: bacterial metabolism in the rhizosphere. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2019;30:1–16.Coulthurst S. The Type VI secretion system: a versatile bacterial weapon. Microbiology. 2019;165:503–15.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Liao H, Li X, Bai Y, Cui P, Wen C, Liu C, et al. Herbicide selection promotes antibiotic resistance in soil microbiomes. Mol Biol Evolut. 2021;38:2337–50.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yaron S, Römling U. Biofilm formation by enteric pathogens and its role in plant colonization and persistence. Microb Biotechnol. 2014;7:496–516.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wright KM, Chapman S, McGeachy K, Humphris S, Campbell E, Toth IK, et al. The endophytic lifestyle of Escherichia coli O157:H7: quantification and internal localization in roots. Phytopathology. 2013;103:333–40.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dinu L-D, Bach S. Induction of viable but nonculturable Escherichia coli O157:H7 in the phyllosphere of lettuce: a food safety risk factor. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:8295–302.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Crozier L, Marshall J, Holmes A, Wright KM, Rossez Y, Merget B, et al. The role of l-arabinose metabolism for Escherichia coli O157:H7 in edible plants. Microbiology. 2021;167:1–12.Franz E, Semenov AV, Van Bruggen AHC. Modelling the contamination of lettuce with Escherichia coli O157:H7 from manure-amended soil and the effect of intervention strategies. J Appl Microbiol. 2008;105:1569–84.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gu G, Hu J, Cevallos-Cevallos JM, Richardson SM, Bartz JA, van Bruggen AHC. Internal colonization of salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium in tomato plants. PLoS One. 2011;6:e27340.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Crozier L, Hedley PE, Morris J, Wagstaff C, Andrews SC, Toth I, et al. Whole-transcriptome analysis of verocytotoxigenic Escherichia coli O157:H7 (Sakai) suggests plant-species-specific metabolic responses on exposure to spinach and lettuce extracts. Front Microbiol. 2016;12:1088. 7
Google Scholar 
Jacob C, Melotto M. Human pathogen colonization of lettuce dependent upon plant genotype and defense response activation. Front Plant Sci. 2020;30:10.
Google Scholar 
Launders N, Locking ME, Hanson M, Willshaw G, Charlett A, Salmon R, et al. A large Great Britain-wide outbreak of STEC O157 phage type 8 linked to handling of raw leeks and potatoes. Epidemiol Infect. 2016;144:171–81.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Berendsen RL, Pieterse CMJ, Bakker PAHM. The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health. Trends Plant Sci. 2012;17:478–86.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Schenkel D, Deveau A, Niimi J, Mariotte P, Vitra A, Meisser M, et al. Linking soil’s volatilome to microbes and plant roots highlights the importance of microbes as emitters of belowground volatile signals. Environ Microbiol. 2019;21:3313–27.Article 

Google Scholar 
Teixeira PJPL, Colaianni NR, Fitzpatrick CR, Dangl JL. Beyond pathogens: microbiota interactions with the plant immune system. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2019;49:7–17.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Darlison J, Mogren L, Rosberg A-K, Grudén M, Minet A, Liné C, et al. Leaf mineral content govern microbial community structure in the phyllosphere of spinach (Spinacia oleracea) and rocket (Diplotaxis tenuifolia). Sci Total Environ. 2019;675:501–12.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lopez-Velasco G, Carder PA, Welbaum GE, Ponder MA. Diversity of the spinach (Spinacia oleracea) spermosphere and phyllosphere bacterial communities. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2013;346:146–54.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Daniel S, Goldlust K, Quebre V, Shen M, Lesterlin C, Bouet J-Y, et al. Vertical and Horizontal Transmission of ESBL Plasmid from Escherichia coli O104:H4. Genes. 2020;11:1207.CAS 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Orgiazzi A, Bardgett RD, Barrios E, Behan-Pelletier V, Briones MJI, Chotte J-L, et al. Global soil biodiversity atlas. European Commission; 2016.Vorholt JA, Vogel C, Carlström CI, Müller DB. Establishing causality: opportunities of synthetic communities for plant microbiome research. Cell Host Microbe. 2017;22:142–55.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fierer N. Embracing the unknown: disentangling the complexities of the soil microbiome. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017;15:579–90.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Latz E, Eisenhauer N, Rall BC, Scheu S, Jousset A. Unravelling linkages between plant community composition and the pathogen-suppressive potential of soils. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:23584.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lapsansky ER, Milroy AM, Andales MJ, Vivanco JM. Soil memory as a potential mechanism for encouraging sustainable plant health and productivity. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2016;38:137–42.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chapelle E, Mendes R, Bakker PAHM, Raaijmakers JM. Fungal invasion of the rhizosphere microbiome. ISME Journal. 2016;10:265–8.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Schikora A, Jackson RW, Van Overbeek L, Holden N. Editorial: plants as alternative hosts for human and animal pathogens – second edition. Front Microbiol. [Editorial] 2020;14:11.
Google Scholar 
Lebeis SL. Greater than the sum of their parts: characterizing plant microbiomes at the community-level. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2015;24:82–6.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kinnunen M, Dechesne A, Proctor C, Hammes F, Johnson D, Quintela-Baluja M, et al. A conceptual framework for invasion in microbial communities. ISME J. 2016;10:2773–9.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Uyttendaele M, Jaykus LA, Amoah P, Chiodini A, Cunliffe D, Jacxsens L, et al. Microbial hazards in irrigation water: standards, norms, and testing to manage use of water in fresh produce primary production. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2015;14:336–56.Article 

Google Scholar 
Litchman E. Invisible invaders: non‐pathogenic invasive microbes in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol Lett. 2010;13:1560–72.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Blackburn TM, Lockwood JL, Cassey P. The influence of numbers on invasion success. Mol Ecol. 2015;24:1942–53.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hawkes CV, Connor EW. Translating Phytobiomes from Theory to Practice: Ecological and Evolutionary Considerations. Phytobiomes. Journal. 2017;1:57–69.
Google Scholar 
Meyer KM, Leveau JH. Microbiology of the phyllosphere: a playground for testing ecological concepts. Oecologia. 2012;168:621–9.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jousset A, Schulz W, Scheu S, Eisenhauer N. Intraspecific genotypic richness and relatedness predict the invasibility of microbial communities. ISME J. 2011;5:1108–14.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Martínez-Vaz BM, Fink RC, Diez-Gonzalez F, Sadowsky MJ. Enteric pathogen-plant interactions: molecular connections leading to colonization and growth and implications for food safety. Microbes Environ. 2014;29:123–35.Alegbeleye OO, Singleton I, Sant’Ana AS. Sources and contamination routes of microbial pathogens to fresh produce during field cultivation: a review. Food Microbiol. 2018;73:177–208.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Johannessen GS, Bengtsson GB, Heier BT, Bredholt S, Wasteson Y, Rørvik LM. Potential uptake of Escherichia coli O157: H7 from organic manure into crisphead lettuce. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:2221–5.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fett WF. Inhibition of Salmonella enterica by plant-associated pseudomonads in vitro and on sprouting alfalfa seed. J Food Prot. 2006;69:719–28.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Brandl MT, Cox CE, Teplitski M. Salmonella interactions with plants and their associated microbiota. Phytopathology. 2013;103:316–25.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Thao S, Brandl MT, Carter MQ. Enhanced formation of shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli persister variants in environments relevant to leafy greens production. Food Microbiol. 2019;84:103241.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Devarajan N, McGarvey JA, Scow K, Jones MS, Lee S, Samaddar S, et al. Cascading effects of composts and cover crops on soil chemistry, bacterial communities and the survival of foodborne pathogens. J Appl Microbiol. 2021;131:1564–77.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Williams TR, Moyne A-L, Harris LJ, Marco ML. Season, irrigation, leaf age, and Escherichia coli inoculation influence the bacterial diversity in the lettuce phyllosphere. PLoS One. 2013;8:e68642.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang Y, Jewett C, Gilley J, Bartelt-Hunt SL, Snow DD, Hodges L, et al. Microbial communities in the rhizosphere and the root of lettuce as affected by Salmonella-contaminated irrigation water. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2018;94:fiy135.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jarvis KG, White JR, Grim CJ, Ewing L, Ottesen AR, Beaubrun JJ-G, et al. Cilantro microbiome before and after nonselective pre-enrichment for Salmonella using 16S rRNA and metagenomic sequencing. BMC Microbiol. 2015;15:1–13.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Allard SM, Callahan MT, Bui A, Ferelli AMC, Chopyk J, Chattopadhyay S, et al. Creek to rable: tracking fecal indicator bacteria, bacterial pathogens, and total bacterial communities from irrigation water to kale and radish crops. Sci Total Environ. 2019;666:461–71.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gu G, Yin H-B, Ottesen A, Bolten S, Patel J, Rideout S, et al. Microbiomes in ground water and alternative irrigation water, and spinach microbiomes impacted by irrigation with different types of water. Phytobiomes J. 2019;3:137–47.Article 

Google Scholar 
Obayomi O, Edelstein M, Safi J, Mihiret M, Ghazaryan L, Vonshak A, et al. The combined effects of treated wastewater irrigation and plastic mulch cover on soil and crop microbial communities. Biology Fertility Soils. 2020;56:729–42.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Truchado P, Gil MI, Suslow T, Allende A. Impact of chlorine dioxide disinfection of irrigation water on the epiphytic bacterial community of baby spinach and underlying soil. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0199291.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

Alvarez-Filip, L., Dulvy, N. K., Gill, J. A., Côté, I. M. & Watkinson, A. R. Flattening of Caribbean coral reefs: region-wide declines in architectural complexity. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 276, 3019–3025 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hughes, T. P. et al. Global warming transforms coral reef assemblages. Nature 556, 492 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Drury, C. & Lirman, D. Genotype by environment interactions in coral bleaching. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.0177 (2021).Kenkel, C. D., Almanza, A. T. & Matz, M. V. Fine-scale environmental specialization of reef-building corals might be limiting reef recovery in the Florida Keys. Ecology 96, 3197–3212 (2015).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Howells, E. J., Abrego, D., Meyer, E., Kirk, N. L. & Burt, J. A. Host adaptation and unexpected symbiont partners enable reef‐building corals to tolerate extreme temperatures. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 2702–2714 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Thomas, L. et al. Mechanisms of thermal tolerance in reef-building corals across a fine-grained environmental mosaic: lessons from Ofu, American Samoa. Front. Mar. Sci., https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00434 (2018).Thomas, L., López, E. H., Morikawa, M. K. & Palumbi, S. R. Transcriptomic resilience, symbiont shuffling, and vulnerability to recurrent bleaching in reef‐building corals. Mol. Ecol. 28, 3371–3382 (2019).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Barshis, D. J. et al. Genomic basis for coral resilience to climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 1387–1392 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Guest, J. R. et al. Contrasting patterns of coral bleaching susceptibility in 2010 suggest an adaptive response to thermal stress. PLoS ONE 7, e33353 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Matz, M. V., Treml, E. A. & Haller, B. C. Estimating the potential for coral adaptation to global warming across the Indo‐West Pacific. Glob. Chang. Biol. 26, 3473–3481 (2020).Bay, R. A., Rose, N. H., Logan, C. A. & Palumbi, S. R. Genomic models predict successful coral adaptation if future ocean warming rates are reduced. Sci. Adv. 3, e1701413 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Quigley, K. M., Bay, L. K. & van Oppen, M. J. Genome‐wide SNP analysis reveals an increase in adaptive genetic variation through selective breeding of coral. Mol. Ecol. 29, 2176–2188 (2020).Howells, E. J. et al. Enhancing the heat tolerance of reef-building corals to future warming. Sci. Adv. 7, eabg6070 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
LaJeunesse, T. C. et al. Systematic revision of symbiodiniaceae highlights the antiquity and diversity of coral endosymbionts. Curr. Biol. 28, 2570–2580 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rowan, R. Coral bleaching: thermal adaptation in reef coral symbionts. Nature 430, 742 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sampayo, E. M., Ridgway, T., Bongaerts, P. & Hoegh-Guldberg, O. Bleaching susceptibility and mortality of corals are determined by fine-scale differences in symbiont type. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 10444–10449 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Maire, J. et al. Intracellular bacteria are common and taxonomically diverse in cultured and in hospite algal endosymbionts of coral reefs. ISME J., 15, 2028–2042 (2021).Ziegler, M., Seneca, F. O., Yum, L. K., Palumbi, S. R. & Voolstra, C. R. Bacterial community dynamics are linked to patterns of coral heat tolerance. Nat. Commun. 8, 14213 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
van Oppen, M. J. & Blackall, L. L. Coral microbiome dynamics, functions and design in a changing world. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 557–567 (2019).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Fuller, Z. L. et al. Population genetics of the coral Acropora millepora: Toward genomic prediction of bleaching. Science 369 (2020).Dixon, G. B. et al. Genomic determinants of coral heat tolerance across latitudes. Science 348, 1460–1462 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jin, Y. K. et al. Genetic markers for antioxidant capacity in a reef-building coral. Sci. Adv. 2, e1500842 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Cooke, I. et al. Genomic signatures in the coral holobiont reveal host adaptations driven by Holocene climate change and reef specific symbionts. Sci. Adv. 6, eabc6318 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bay, R. A. & Palumbi, S. R. Multilocus adaptation associated with heat resistance in reef-building corals. Curr. Biol. 24, 2952–2956 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Drury, C. Resilience in reef-building corals: the ecological and evolutionary importance of the host response to thermal stress. Mol. Ecol. 00, 1–18 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Quigley, K. M., Willis, B. L. & Bay, L. K. Heritability of the Symbiodinium community in vertically-and horizontally-transmitting broadcast spawning corals. Sci. Rep. 7, 8219 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Van Hooidonk, R., Maynard, J. & Planes, S. Temporary refugia for coral reefs in a warming world. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 508 (2013).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Quigley, K. M., Warner, P. A., Bay, L. K. & Willis, B. L. Unexpected mixed-mode transmission and moderate genetic regulation of Symbiodinium communities in a brooding coral. Heredity, 121, 524–536 (2018).Cunning, R., Ritson-Williams, R. & Gates, R. D. Patterns of bleaching and recovery of Montipora capitata in Kāne’ohe Bay, Hawai’i, USA. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 551, 131–139 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dilworth, J., Caruso, C., Kahkejian, V. A., Baker, A. C. & Drury, C. Host genotype and stable differences in algal symbiont communities explain patterns of thermal stress response of Montipora capitata following thermal pre-exposure and across multiple bleaching events. Coral Reefs, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-020-02024-3 (2020).Rocha de Souza, M. et al. Community composition of coral-associated Symbiodiniaceae is driven by fine-scale environmental gradients. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.10.468165 (2021).Innis, T., Cunning, R., Ritson-Williams, R., Wall, C. & Gates, R. Coral color and depth drive symbiosis ecology of Montipora capitata in Kāne’ohe Bay, O’ahu, Hawai’i. Coral Reefs 37, 423–430 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shore-Maggio, A., Runyon, C. M., Ushijima, B., Aeby, G. S. & Callahan, S. M. Differences in bacterial community structure in two color morphs of the Hawaiian reef coral Montipora capitata. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81, 7312–7318 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Roach, T. N., Dilworth, J., Jones, A. D., Quinn, R. A. & Drury, C. Metabolomic signatures of coral bleaching history. Nat. Ecol. Evol., 5, 495–503 (2021).Baird, A. H., Guest, J. R. & Willis, B. L. Systematic and biogeographical patterns in the reproductive biology of scleractinian corals. Annu. Rev. Ecol., Evolution, Syst. 40, 551–571 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Caruso, C. et al. Genetic patterns in Montipora capitata across an environmental mosaic in Kāne’ohe Bay. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.07.463582 (2021).Rose, N. H., Bay, R. A., Morikawa, M. K. & Palumbi, S. R. Polygenic evolution drives species divergence and climate adaptation in corals. Evolution 72, 82–94 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rose, N. H. et al. Genomic analysis of distinct bleaching tolerances among cryptic coral species. Proc. R. Soc. B 288, 20210678 (2021).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Forsman, Z. H. et al. Ecomorph or endangered coral? DNA and microstructure reveal Hawaiian species complexes: Montipora dilatata/flabellata/turgescens & M. patula/verrilli. PLoS ONE 5, e15021 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dixon, G., Abbott, E. & Matz, M. Meta‐analysis of the coral environmental stress response: Acropora corals show opposing responses depending on stress intensity. Mol. Ecol. 29, 2855–2870 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lim, S., Kim, D. G. & Kim, S. ERK-dependent phosphorylation of the linker and substrate-binding domain of HSP70 increases folding activity and cell proliferation. Exp. Mol. Med. 51, 1–14 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yancey, P. H. et al. Betaines and dimethylsulfoniopropionate as major osmolytes in cnidaria with endosymbiotic dinoflagellates. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 83, 167–173 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hill, R., Li, C., Jones, A., Gunn, J. & Frade, P. Abundant betaines in reef-building corals and ecological indicators of a photoprotective role. Coral Reefs 29, 869–880 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ngugi, D. K., Ziegler, M., Duarte, C. M. & Voolstra, C. R. Genomic blueprint of glycine betaine metabolism in coral metaorganisms and their contribution to reef nitrogen budgets. iScience 23, 101120 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Williams, A. et al. Metabolome shift associated with thermal stress in coral holobionts. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.04.134619 (2021).Sakamoto, A. & Murata, N. The role of glycine betaine in the protection of plants from stress: clues from transgenic plants. Plant, Cell Environ. 25, 163–171 (2002).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Burg, M. B. & Ferraris, J. D. Intracellular organic osmolytes: function and regulation. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 7309–7313 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, T. H. & Murata, N. Glycinebetaine protects plants against abiotic stress: mechanisms and biotechnological applications. Plant Cell Environ. 34, 1–20 (2011).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Petronini, P., De Angelis, E., Borghetti, A. & Wheeler, K. Effect of betaine on HSP70 expression and cell survival during adaptation to osmotic stress. Biochem. J. 293, 553–558 (1993).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Padilla-Gamiño, J. L., Pochon, X., Bird, C., Concepcion, G. T. & Gates, R. D. From parent to gamete: vertical transmission of Symbiodinium (Dinophyceae) ITS2 sequence assemblages in the reef building coral Montipora capitata. PLoS ONE 7, e38440 (2012).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Cunning, R. & Baker, A. C. Thermotolerant coral symbionts modulate heat stress‐responsive genes in their hosts. Mol. Ecol. 29, 2940–2950 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Buerger, P. et al. Heat-evolved microalgal symbionts increase coral bleaching tolerance. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba2498 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mayfield, A. B. & Gates, R. D. Osmoregulation in anthozoan–dinoflagellate symbiosis. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 147, 1–10 (2007).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Chan, W. Y., Peplow, L. M., Menéndez, P., Hoffmann, A. A. & van Oppen, M. J. Interspecific hybridization may provide novel opportunities for coral reef restoration. Front. Mar. Sci. 5, 160 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rose, N. H., Seneca, F. O. & Palumbi, S. R. Gene networks in the wild: identifying transcriptional modules that mediate coral resistance to experimental heat stress. Genome Biol. Evolution 8, 243–252 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ruiz-Jones, L. J. & Palumbi, S. R. Tidal heat pulses on a reef trigger a fine-tuned transcriptional response in corals to maintain homeostasis. Sci. Adv. 3, e1601298 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Chakravarti, L. J., Beltran, V. H. & van Oppen, M. J. Rapid thermal adaptation in photosymbionts of reef‐building corals. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 4675–4688 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Little, A. F., Van Oppen, M. J. & Willis, B. L. Flexibility in algal endosymbioses shapes growth in reef corals. Science 304, 1492–1494 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Quigley, K., Randall, C., van Oppen, M. & Bay, L. Assessing the role of historical temperature regime and algal symbionts on the heat tolerance of coral juveniles. Biol. Open 9, bio047316 (2020).Matsuda, S. et al. Coral bleaching susceptibility is predictive of subsequent mortality within but not between coral species. Front. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.00178 (2020).Ritson-Williams, R. & Gates, R. D. Coral community resilience to successive years of bleaching in Kane ‘ohe Bay, Hawai ‘i. Coral Reefs. 39, 757–769 (2020).Hancock, J. et al. Coral husbandry for ocean futures: leveraging abiotic factors to increase survivorship, growth and resilience in juvenile Montipora capitata. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., https://doi.org/10.3354/meps13534 (2020).Falconer, D. S. Introduction To Quantitative Genetics (Pearson, 1960).Cunning, R. & Baker, A. C. Excess algal symbionts increase the susceptibility of reef corals to bleaching. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 259–262 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cunning, R., Gillette, P., Capo, T., Galvez, K. & Baker, A. Growth tradeoffs associated with thermotolerant symbionts in the coral Pocillopora damicornis are lost in warmer oceans. Coral Reefs 34, 155–160 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Alonge, M. et al. RaGOO: fast and accurate reference-guided scaffolding of draft genomes. Genome Biol. 20, 1–17 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shumaker, A. et al. Genome analysis of the rice coral Montipora capitata. Sci. Rep. 9, 2571 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet. J. 17, 10–12 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Korneliussen, T. S., Albrechtsen, A. & Nielsen, R. ANGSD: analysis of next generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinforma. 15, 356 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Skotte, L., Korneliussen, T. S. & Albrechtsen, A. Estimating individual admixture proportions from next generation sequencing data. Genetics 195, 693–702 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Oksanen, J. et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 1.17-2. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2010).
Google Scholar 
Wright, R. M., Aglyamova, G. V., Meyer, E. & Matz, M. V. Gene expression associated with white syndromes in a reef building coral, Acropora hyacinthus. BMC Genomics 16, 371 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Li, H. et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hivert, V., Leblois, R., Petit, E. J., Gautier, M. & Vitalis, R. Measuring genetic differentiation from Pool-seq data. Genetics 210, 315–330 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yi, X. et al. Sequencing of 50 human exomes reveals adaptation to high altitude. Science 329, 75–78 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pluskal, T., Castillo, S., Villar-Briones, A. & Orešič, M. MZmine 2: modular framework for processing, visualizing, and analyzing mass spectrometry-based molecular profile data. BMC Bioinforma. 11, 1–11 (2010).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wang, M. et al. Sharing and community curation of mass spectrometry data with Global Natural Products Social Molecular Networking. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 828–837 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nothias, L.-F. et al. Feature-based molecular networking in the GNPS analysis environment. Nat. Methods 17, 905–908 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dührkop, K. et al. SIRIUS 4: a rapid tool for turning tandem mass spectra into metabolite structure information. Nat. methods 16, 299–302 (2019).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ludwig, M., Fleischauer, M., Dührkop, K., Hoffmann, M. A. & Böcker, S. in Computational Methods and Data Analysis for Metabolomics 185–207 (Springer, 2020).Langfelder, P. & Horvath, S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinforma. 9, 1–13 (2008).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Pedersen, H. K. et al. A computational framework to integrate high-throughput ‘-omics’ datasets for the identification of potential mechanistic links. Nat. Protoc. 13, 2781–2800 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pei, G., Chen, L. & Zhang, W. in Methods in enzymology 585 135–158 (Elsevier, 2017).Sumner, L. W. et al. Proposed minimum reporting standards for chemical analysis. Metabolomics 3, 211–221 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

Our online sampling methods largely follow protocols detailed in3,4, though we limited our online searches to online shops and did not extend to social media. Large portions of code are directly re-used from those papers, although we provide modified code with this paper additionally. For keyword searches and data review we used R v.4.1.149 via RStudio v.1.4.110350, and made wide use of functions supplied by the anytime v.0.3.951, assertthat v.0.2.152, dplyr v.1.0.753, glue v.1.4.254, lazyeval v.0.2.255, lubridate v.1.7.1056, magrittr v.2.0.157, 17urr v.0.3.458, reshape2 v.1.4.459, stringr v.1.4.060, and tidyr v.1.1.361 other specific package uses are listed during the methods description. We used the grateful v.0.0.362 package to generate citations for all R packages. Code and data used to produce figures and summary data are also available at: 10.5281/zenodo.5758541.Website sampling and searchWe searched for contemporary arachnid selling websites using the Google search engine and targeted nine languages (English, French, Spanish, German, Portuguese, Japanese, Czech, Polish, Russian). Terms were created to be inclusive, so only spiders and scorpions were on the initial search string as specialist groups may exist for either, but are unlikely for smaller arachnid groups, which were often listed under “other” in online shops. Terms were selected to be encompassing so that any sites listing variants of “spider” or mentioning arachnid in the chosen language were selected. Whilst some groups such as tarantulas are more popular as pets such sites will not omit translations of spider and should also be captured in the search, hence Terraristika (as was shown in previous analysis of amphibians and reptiles) listed the greatest number of species, despite not being a specialist site. We used the localised versions of each of these languages with the following Boolean search strings:

English: (Spider OR scorpion OR arachnid) AND for sale

French: (Araignée OR scorpion OR arachnide) AND à vendre

Spanish: (Araña OR escorpión OR arácnido) AND en venta

German: (Arachnoid OR Spinne OR Skorpion OR Spinnentier) AND zum Verkauf

Portuguese: (Aranha OR escorpião OR aracnídeo) AND à venda

Japanese: (クモ OR サソリ OR クモ型類) AND (中村彰宏 OR 販売)

Czech: (Pavouk OR Štír OR pavoukovec) AND prodej

Polish: (Pająk OR Skorpion OR pajęczak) AND sprzedaż

Russian: Продажа пауков OR скорпионов

We undertook these searches in a private window in the Firefox v.92.0.1 browser63 to limit the impacts of search history. These keywords were used to identify sites which may be selling arachnids, which could then be checked before a comprehensive scrape.For each language, we downloaded the first 15 pages of results between 2021-06-06 and 2021-07-07 (or fewer in the result that the search returned fewer than 15 pages: German 8 pages and Spanish 14 pages). This resulted in ~1270 sites that could potentially be selling arachnids. After removing duplicates and simplifying the URLs (so all ended in.com,.org,. co.uk etc.; Code S1), we reviewed each site for the following criteria (2021-07-31 to 2021-08-02): whether they sell arachnids, the type of site (trade or classified ads), the order arachnids were listed in (e.g., date or alphabetical), the best search method for gather species appearances (see below for hierarchical search methods), a refined target URL listing species inventory, the number of pages within the website potentially required to cycle through, and if the search method required a crawl, whether the site explicitly forbade crawling data collection and whether we could limit the crawl’s scope with a filter on downstream URLs. Finally, we assigned all suitable sites with a unique ID. We have made a censored version of the website review results available in Data S1. In addition to the systematic search for arachnid trade, we added 43 websites discovered ad hoc from links on previously discovered sites (many listed online shops), those listed in other journal articles on invertebrate trade (i.e.,6) or from discussion with informed colleagues (between 2021-08-07 and 2021-09-15). After reviewing these ad hoc sites (2021-08-07 to 2021-09-15), we had a combined total of 111 sites to attempt to search for the appearance of arachnid species.Our searches of websites took one of five forms (Code S2), designed to minimise server load and limit the number of irrelevant pages searched, while ensuring we captured the pages listing species. We prioritised using the lowest/simplest search method possible for each site.Single page or PDFFor websites that listed their entire arachnid stock on a single page, we retrieved that single page using the downloader v.0.4 package64. In cases where the inventory was listed in a PDF, we manually downloaded the PDF and used pdftools v.3.0.165 to assess the text.CycleSome websites had large stocklists split across multiple pages that could be accessed sequentially. In these cases, we used the downloader v.0.4 package64 to retrieve each page, as we cycled from page 1 to the terminal page identified during the website review stage. Two sites required a slight modification to the page cycling process: as the sequential pages were not defined by pages, but by the number of adverts displayed. In these instances, we cycled through all adverts 20 adverts at a time (i.e., matching the default number displayed at a time by the site). For all cycling we implemented a 10 s cooldown between requests to limit server load.Level 1 crawlFor websites that split their stock between multiple pages, but with no sequential ordering, we used a level 1 crawl, via the Rcrawler v.0.1.9.1 package66 to access them all. For example, where a site had an “arachnid for sale” page, but full species names existed only in linked pages (e.g., “tarantulas”, “scorpions”).Cycle and level 1 crawlSome websites required a combined approach, where stock was split sequentially across pages, and the species identities (i.e., scientific names) required accessing the pages linked to from the sequential pages. In these cases, we ran the initial sequential sampling followed by a level 1 crawl.Level 2 crawlWhere level 1 crawls were insufficient to cover all species sold on a site, we used a level 2 crawl to reach all pages listing species. This tended to be the case on websites with multiple categories to classify and split their stock (e.g., “arachnid”—“spider”—“tarantula”).For all crawls, we used a cooldown of 20 s between requests to limit server load, and where possible we limited the scope of the crawl (i.e., linked pages to be retrieved) using a key phrase common to all stock listing pages (e.g., “/category=arachnid/”).In addition to the sampling of contemporary sites, we explored the archived pages available for https://www.terraristik.com via the Internet Archive (2002–201967). Terraristika had been previously shown as a major contributor to traded species lists4, and the website’s age and accessibility via the internet archive meant it was one of the few websites where temporal sampling was feasible. We used pages retrieved via the Internet Archive’s Wayback machine API68, via code created for3,4. The code used was based on the wayback v.0.4.0 package69, but additionally made httr v.1.4.270, jsonlite v.1.7.271, downloader v.0.464, lubridate v.1.7.1056, and tibble v.3.1.3 packages72 (Code S3).Keyword generationWe relied on multiple sources to build a list of arachnid species (spiders, scorpions and uropygi). For spiders we used the WSC (ref. 18; https://wsc.nmbe.ch/dataresources; accessed 2021-09-18). We filtered the WSC dataset to remove subspecies, then used a combination of rvest v.1.0.173, dplyr v.1.0.753, and stringr v.1.4.0 packages60 (see Code S4) to query the online version of the WSC database to retrieve all synonyms for each species. Where the synonyms were listed with an abbreviated genus, we replace the abbreviation with the first instance of a genus that matched the first letter of the abbreviation.We combined the WSC data with a list manually retrieved from the Scorpion Files74 (https://www.ntnu.no/ub/scorpion-files/index.php; accessed 2021-09-19). For the uropygi species, we combined species listings from Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS75; https://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/RefRpt?search_type=source&search_id=source_id&search_id_value=1209 and https://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&anchorLocation=SubordinateTaxa&credibilitySort=TWG%20standards%20met&rankName=ALL&search_value=82710&print_version=SCR&source=from_print#SubordinateTaxa; accessed 2021-09-19) and the Western Australian Museum76 (http://www.museum.wa.gov.au/catalogues-beta/browse/uropygi; accessed 2021-09-19). We were unable to source reliable data on all scorpion and uropygi synonyms; therefore, we used all names listed from all sources, but made note of those names considered nomen dubium. Our final keyword list contained 52,111 species, 94,184 different species names, with mean of 1.81 SE ± 0.01 terms per species (range 1–61). For summaries of total species, we relied on the species classed as accepted by the species databases (WSC, Scorpion Files, ITIS and the Western Australian Museum).Keyword searchWe successfully retrieved 3020 pages from 103 websites (mean = 28.78 SE ± 11.42, range: 1–1077), and used a further 4668 previously archived pages. To prepare each of the retrieved web pages for keyword searching, we removed all double spaces, html elements, and non-alpha-numeric characters, replacing them with single spaces (Code S5). For this process we used rvest v.1.0.173, XML v.3.99.0.877, and xml2 v.1.3.278 packages. This process increased the chances that genus and species epithets would appear in a compatible format when compared to our keyword list. The process was not able to repair abbreviated genera, or aid detection where genus and species epithet were not reported side-by-side.Due to the large number of species we were forced to adapt previous searching methods, instead implementing a hierarchical genus-species search (Code S6). We searched each retrieved page for any mention of genera, then only searched for species that were contained within that genus. We did not differentiate whether the genus was currently accepted or old, so if a species had ever belonged to a genus it was included in the second stage of the search. The specifics of the keyword search used case-insensitive fixed string matching (via the stringr v.1.4.0 package60). While collation string matching would have helped detect species with differently coded ligatures or diacritic marks, the occurrence of ligature and diacritic marks are infrequent in scientific names and did not warrant the considerably increased computational costs.Via the keyword search we recorded all instances of genus matches, species matches, the website ID, and the page number. We also collected the words surrounding a genus match (3 prior and four after) as a means of exploring common terms that may be used to describe the genera.We provide the compiled outputs from searching contemporary and historic pages in Data S2–S4. Prior to combining these two datasets into a final list of traded species, and summarising the overall patterns, we cleaned out instances of spurious genera and species detections. Predominantly this included short genera names that could appear at the start of longer words (e.g., terms such as: “rufus”, “Dia”, “Diana”, “Mala”, “Inca”, “Pero”, “May”, “Janus”, “Yukon”, “Lucia”, “Zora”, “Beata”, “Neon”, “Prima”, “Meta”, “Patri”, “Enna”, “Maso”, “Mica”, “Perro”; we already implemented a filter that required genera to be preceded by a space and thus these were not part of the species name). We are confident these genera should be excluded, as none had species detected within them.Trade database and third-party dataWe downloaded United States Fish and Wildlife Service’s LEMIS data compiled by79,80 from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3565869 (Data S5). We filtered the LEMIS data to records where the class was listed as Arachnida (Code S6).We downloaded the Gross imports data from the CITES trade database from the website and filtered to Class Arachnid, years 1975–202181 (accessed 2021-09-15; Data S6), and downloaded the CITES appendices filtered to arachnids82 (Data S7).We downloaded the IUCN Redlist assessments for arachnids from https://www.iucnredlist.org83 (accessed 2021-09-15; Data S8).Species summary and visualisationWe compiled all sources of trade data (online, LEMIS, CITES) into a single dataset detailing which genera/species had been detected in each source (Data S9 and Code S7). We used two criteria to determine detection, whether there was an exact match with an accepted genus/species or whether there was a match to any historically used genera/species name. Because of splits in genera, the “ANY genera” matching is likely overly generous. For broad summaries we rely on the “ANY species” name matching.We used cowplot v.1.1.184, ggplot2 v.3.3.585, ggpubr v.0.4.086, ggtext v.0.1.187, scales v.1.1.188, scico v.1.2.089, and UpSetR v.1.4.090 to generate summary visuals (Code S8; Code S9). We added additional details to the upset plot and modified the position of plot labels using Affinity Designer v.1.10.391. We also used Affinity Designer to create the Uropygid silhouette for Fig. 1. We obtained public domain licensed spider and scorpion silhouettes from http://phylopic.org/ (https://phylopic.org/image/d7a80fdc0-311f-4bc5-b4fc-1a45f4206d27/; http://phylopic.org/image/4133ae32-753e-49eb-bd31-50c67634aca1/).Descriptions and coloursWe explored the lag time between species descriptions, and their detection in LEMIS or online trade (Code S10). We relied on the description dates provided alongside the lists of species names. Unlike the broader summaries, we restricted explorations of lag times to species detected only via exact matches (operating under the assumption that newly described species traded swiftly after description would be using the modern accepted name). We distinguished between those species detected only in the complementary data, as the earliest trade date was not known; therefore, our summaries of lag time are based on those species detected in a particular year either via LEMIS or temporal online trade.Following a visual inspection of sites where we often noticed listings with either colour or localities (e.g., “Chilobrachys spp. “Electric Blue” 0.1.3. Chilobrachys sp. “Kaeng Krachan” 0.1.0. Chilobrachys spp. “Prachuap Khiri Khan”: Data S9). We explored the words that surrounded detected genera. After using the forcats v.0.5.192, stringr v.1.4.060, and tidytext v.0.3.193 package to compile common terms and remove English stop words, we determine colour was frequently mentioned (Code S11). To filter out non-colour words, we used wikipedia’s list of colours (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_colors:_N%E2%80%93Z). Once cleaned, we further removed terms that are ambiguously colour related (e.g., “space”, “racing”, “photo”, “boy”, “bean”, “blaze”, “jungle”, “mountain”, “dune”, “web”, “colour”, “rainforest”, “tree”, “sea”). We then summarised this data as the counts of instances where a genus appeared alongside a given colour term (n.b., counts are therefore impacted by any underlying imbalances in how many times a site mentioned a genus). We plotted all colours using the same hex codes listed on the wikipedia page, with the exception of “cobalt”, “grey”, “metallic”, “slate”, “electric”, “dark”, “sheen”, and “chocolate” that required manual linking to a hex code.Summary of trade numbersWe summarised LEMIS data using a number of filters (Code S12). Following3,4,94, we limited our summaries to items that feasibly can be considered to represent whole individuals (LEMIS code = Dead animal BOD, live eggs (EGL), dead specimen (DEA), live specimen (LIV), specimen (SPE), whole skin (SKI), entire animal trophy (TRO)). We describe the portion of trade that is prevented (i.e., seized, where disposition == “S”). We classed non-commercial trade as anything listed as for Biomedical research (M), Scientific (S), or Reintroduction/introduction into the wild (Y). For captive vs. wild summaries, we treated all Animals bred in captivity (C and F), Commercially bred (D), and Specimens originating from a ranching operation (R) as originating from captivity. We only included animals listed as Specimens taken from the wild (W) in wild counts. The few instances that fell outside of our defined captive vs. wild categorisation are treated as other. For summaries of wild capture per genus, we relied entirely on LEMIS’s listings of genera, making no effort to determine synonymisations. We did filter out those listed only as “Non-CITES entry” or NA. We used the countrycode v.1.3.095 package to help plot the LEMIS countries of origin. Taxonomy represents an ongoing challenge, we were limited to recognising the species listed in the aforementioned databases, generating synonym lists from these sources, and attempting to reconcile these lists. Rapid rates of species description means that compiling comprehensive lists can be challenging, and species may be traded under junior synonyms or old names, and newer descriptions may not have been added to sites96. We were also limited to platforms that advertised using text not images, as images can be challenging to identify accurately.MappingMapping species is challenging due to the lack of standardised data on species distributions. Spider distributions were mapped based on the data in the World Spider Catalogue (Data S12). Firstly, the localities associated with each species were collated into four spreadsheets based on the data provided in the WSC (WSC18; https://wsc.nmbe.ch/dataresources; accessed 2021-09-18), these listed (1) country, (2) region, (3) “to” (where the range was given as one country to another) and (4) Island.Before processing any “introduced” localities were removed, the four sheets were then checked for any simple spelling errors (in islands file) or mislistings (i.e., regions in the islands file). Country data were cross-referenced with the names of country provided by Thematic Mapper to standardise them (https://thematicmapping.org/; Data S11). This was done by uploading data into Arcmap and using joins and connects to connect it to the standard country name file, and any which could not be paired were corrected to ensure all could be successfully digitised.Regions were digitised based on accepted names of different regions and included 33 different regions (see supplements) for each of these the standard accepted area within each of these regions was searched online to determine the accepted boundaries. These were then selected from the Thematic mapper, exported and labelled with the corresponding region. Once this was completed for all 33 regions they were merged and exported to a geodatabase. The spreadsheet listing regional preferences of each species was also uploaded to Arcmap 10.3, then exported into the geodatabase, then connected to a regional map using joins and relates to connect the regional preferences from the spreadsheet to the shapefiles. The new dbf was then exported to provide a listing of each species and each country in the region it was connected to, and then copied into the same csv as the corrected country listings.For preferences listed as “to” we first separated each country listed in the “to” listings into a separate column, then developed a list of species and each of the countries listed in the “to” list (which was frequently between 5–6). These were then corrected to the standard names from thematic mapper for both countries and the regions used in the previous section. We then merged the countries and regions file and added fields of geometry in ArcMap to provide a centroid for each designated area. This table was then exported and joined and connected to the species in the “to” file. This data was then converted to point form and turned to a point file, then a minimum convex polygon (convex hulls) developed for each species to connect the regions between all those listed. These species specific minimum convex polygons were then intersected with the countries from Thematic mapper, and then dissolve was used to form a shapefile that just listed species and all the countries between those ranges. This was then exported and merged with the listings from countries and regions.The islands file included both independent islands (which needed names corrected, or archipelago names given) and those that fall within a national designation. For those islands we replaced the island name with that of the country, as listings of species may be particularly poor, and tiny non-independent islands are not visible in the global-scale analysis.This forth database table was then merged with the former three, and remove duplicates used to remove any duplicate entries, as species often had individual countries listed in additions to regions or “to”. This was then uploaded into Arcmap and exported to a geodatabase file then connected to the original Thematic mapper file and exported to the geodatabase to yield 134,187 connections between species and countries. This was then connected to our main analysis to include the trade status, and CITES and IUCN Redlist status for each species for further analysis.Scorpion data was considerably messier than that on the world spider catalogue. Firstly, we downloaded all scorpion data from iNaturalist and GBIF97,98 (search; scorpions), removed duplicates, then cross-referenced these with the thematic mapper file within Quantum GIS. Species listed in regions where they were clearly not native (i.e., a species listed in the UK when the rest of that species or genus were in Australia) were removed, and all extinct species were excluded.In addition, all the “update files” were downloaded from the “Scorpion files”, the PDFs collated then using smallpdf tools the tables were extracted into excel form and cleaned to include just species and country listing. This was added to the countries listed for species within99 and100 though this was restricted to a subset of species. The data were all collated into an excel file with the species name, and country listing. This was then added to all the data from https://scorpiones.pl/maps/. These maps have a good coverage of species countries, but are apparently no longer being updated (Jan Ove Rein pers comm 2021) hence the need for further data to provide complete and updated and comprehensive coverage for all species. Country names were then standardised based on the Thematic Mapper standards (Data S13 and Data S11). Species names were then cross-referenced to those listed in the Scorpion files, any not matching were checked as synonyms and converted to the accepted name (though the only collated data for Scorpion synonyms was on French-language Wikipedia, i.e., see https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bothriurus). Once all country and species names were corrected this provided a listing of 4059 species-country associations. These were then associated with country files in the same way as spiders. We plotted spider and scorpion species/genera, as well as LEMIS origins, using ggplot285, combining Thematic world border data (https://thematicmapping.org/) with summaries of species/genera/and trade levels. Species listed in a single-country (and thus more likely to be country endemic) were also counted using summary statistics, so that species most vulnerable to trade could be noted separately.Reporting summaryFurther information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article. More

PreliminariesTo unify all the five classes of two-by-two games, Yamamoto et al.35 introduced the weightlifting game. In this game, each player either cooperates or defects in carrying a weight. Players who carry the weight pay a cost, (cge 0). The weight is successfully lifted with probability ({p}_{i}), where (i=mathrm{0,1},2) is the total number of cooperators and ({p}_{i}) increases with the number of cooperators (i). If the cooperators succeed, both players receive a benefit (b >0). However, in case of failure, both players gain nothing. The pay-off of the cooperators is (b{p}_{i}-c), and the pay-off of the defectors is (b{p}_{i}) (Table 2). In terms of the parameters (Delta {p}_{1}={p}_{1}-{p}_{0}) and (Delta {p}_{2}={p}_{2}-{p}_{1}), which represents the increase in the probability of success due to an additional cooperator, the following inequalities are obtained for the pay-offs (R, T, S), and (P) (Table 1):

(i)

(Delta {p}_{1} >c/b) for (S >P),

(ii)

(Delta {p}_{2} >c/b) for (R >T), and

(iii)

(Delta {p}_{1}+Delta {p}_{2} >c/b) for (R >P).

Table 2 Pay-off table of two-person weightlifting game.Full size tablePD satisfies only (iii), CH satisfies (i) and (iii), SH satisfies (ii) and (iii), DT satisfies none of the three conditions, and CT satisfies all three. In 2021, Chiba et al.1 studied the evolution of cooperation in society by incorporating environmental value in the weightlifting game. They found that the evolution of cooperation seems to follow a DT to DT trajectory, which can explain the rise and fall of human societies.The ({varvec{n}})-player weightlifting gameIn this study, we generalize the weightlifting game to (n)-players. Suppose (n) self-interested and rational individuals selected from a population of infinite size. The (n) players are asked to lift a weight. Each individual (or player) can decide to either carry the weight (cooperate, (C)) or not carry/pretend to carry the weight (defect, (D)). Players who decide to carry the weight can either succeed or fail. The probability of successful weightlifting is denoted by ({p}_{i}), (i=mathrm{0,1},dots ,n), where (i) indicates the number of cooperators (henceforth, (i) always represents the number of cooperators). The probability of success increases with the number of individuals cooperating, and it may remain less than unity even if all (n) individuals cooperate. Players who decide to carry the weight pay a cost, (cge 0), regardless of the outcome, while those who defect need not pay anything. If the cooperators succeed, all (n) individuals receive a benefit (bge 0). There is no penalty for failure. We use the expected gains/losses of the players as the pay-off. If there are (i-1) cooperative players, then the pay-off of (j) is ({B}_{C}left(iright)=b{p}_{i}-c) when (j) cooperates and ({B}_{D}left(i-1right)=b{p}_{i-1}) when (j) defects. The number of cooperators differs by one, since in ({B}_{C}left(iright)), there is an additional cooperator, which is (j) him- or herself. To decide whether to cooperate or defect, all players weigh their expected gain and rationally choose the option with the highest expected gain. The graphical outline of this game is illustrated in Fig. 1 (see also Supplementary Figure S1 for the flow of the game). The pay-off table for a four-player game is shown as an example in Table 3. Here, player (1) is the innermost row (strategies are listed in the second column of the table), player (2) is the innermost column (strategies are listed in the second row of the table), and the succeeding players take the succeeding rows or columns (we enter the first player as a row player and the following player as a column player and continue in this order). Each cell represents players’ pay-offs, with the first component being the pay-off for the first player, the second for the second player, and so on. For instance, consider the entry in the first row and third column, where players (1, 2) and (3) cooperate but player (4) defects. The pay-offs of players (1) to (3) are ({B}_{C}(3)), while the pay-off of player (4) is ({B}_{D}left(3right)). In the above example, there are as many row players as column players because the number of players is even. However, we can have one more player in the rows than in the columns if there is an odd number of players.Figure 1A schematic diagram of the n-player weightlifting game. In this game, players decide whether to cooperate or defect in carrying the weight. Cooperators need to pay a cost. The weightlifting can either succeed or fail. In case of success, all players receive a benefit. In case of failure, all players receive nothing. The player’s pay-off depends on the benefit, cost and probability of success. Each player decides whether to cooperate or defect so as to maximize the expected gain.Full size imageTable 3 Pay-off table of four-player weightlifting game.Full size tableNash equilibrium and pareto optimal strategiesHere we present the Nash equilibrium and Pareto optimal strategies of the (n)-player weightlifting game in terms of the cost-to-benefit ratio (c/b) and probability of success ({p}_{i}). The Nash equilibrium consists of the best responses of each player. Players have no incentive to deviate from this strategy profile since deviation will not increase an individual’s pay-off if the other players maintain the same strategy. If ({B}_{C}(i)ge {B}_{D}(i-1)), the best response of player (j) is to cooperate, but if ({B}_{C}(i)le {B}_{D}(i-1)), the best response is to defect.We have (Delta {p}_{i}={p}_{i}-{p}_{i-1}ge 0) for the increase in the probability of success because the probability ({p}_{i}) increases with the number of cooperators (i). It is convenient to divide cases depending on whether (Delta {p}_{i} >c/b) or (Delta {p}_{i} More