Guerra, C. A. et al. Tracking, targeting, and conserving soil biodiversity. Science 371, 239â241 (2021).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Orgiazzi, A. et al. Global Soil Biodiversity Atlas (European Commission, Publications Office of the European Union, 2016).Tecon, R. & Or, D. Biophysical processes supporting the diversity of microbial life in soil. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 41, 599â623 (2017).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Williamson, K. E., Fuhrmann, J. J., Wommack, K. E. & Radosevich, M. Viruses in soil ecosystems: an unknown quantity within an unexplored territory. Annu. Rev. Virol. 4, 201â219 (2017). This Review provides a comprehensive overview of methods and technologies used to study soil viruses alongside a guide of metrics describing soil viruses across diverse soil ecosystems.CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Stefan, G., Cornelia, B., Jörg, R. & Michael, B. Soil water availability strongly alters the community composition of soil protists. Pedobiologia 57, 205â213 (2014).
Google ScholarÂ
Leake, J. et al. Networks of power and influence: the role of mycorrhizal mycelium in controlling plant communities and agroecosystem functioning. Can. J. Bot. 82, 1016â1045 (2004).
Google ScholarÂ
Bahram, M. et al. Structure and function of the global topsoil microbiome. Nature 560, 233â237 (2018). This study compiled metagenomic and metabarcoding data from 189 sites to demonstrate global patterns in the structure and function of soil microbial communities as well as the widespread prevalence of bacterialâfungal antagonism as an important structuring force of microbial communities.CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
He, L. et al. Global biogeography of fungal and bacterial biomass carbon in topsoil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 151, 108024 (2020).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Bach, E. M., Williams, R. J., Hargreaves, S. K., Yang, F. & Hofmockel, K. S. Greatest soil microbial diversity found in micro-habitats. Soil Biol. Biochem. 118, 217â226 (2018).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Bardgett, R. D. & van der Putten, W. H. Belowground biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Nature 515, 505â511 (2014).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Fierer, N. Embracing the unknown: disentangling the complexities of the soil microbiome. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 15, 579â590 (2017).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Delgado-Baquerizo, M. et al. Multiple elements of soil biodiversity drive ecosystem functions across biomes. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 210â220 (2020).PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Crowther, T. W. et al. The global soil community and its influence on biogeochemistry. Science 365, eaav0550 (2019).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Liang, C., Amelung, W., Lehmann, J. & KĂ€stner, M. Quantitative assessment of microbial necromass contribution to soil organic matter. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 3578â3590 (2019). This article estimates that more than 50% of SOM may be derived from microbial necromass in grassland and agricultural ecosystems based on extrapolations from amino sugar biomarker data.
Google ScholarÂ
Angst, G., Mueller, K. E., Nierop, K. G. J. & Simpson, M. J. Plant- or microbial-derived? A review on the molecular composition of stabilized soil organic matter. Soil Biol. Biochem. 156, 108189 (2021).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ludwig, M. et al. Microbial contribution to SOM quantity and quality in density fractions of temperate arable soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 81, 311â322 (2015). This study uses lipid biomarkers to estimate that at least 50% of SOM may be derived from microbial necromass.CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Simpson, A. J., Simpson, M. J., Smith, E. & Kelleher, B. P. Microbially derived inputs to soil organic matter: are current estimates too low? Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 8070â8076 (2007).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Blazewicz, S. J. et al. Taxon-specific microbial growth and mortality patterns reveal distinct temporal population responses to rewetting in a California grassland soil. ISME J. 14, 1520â1532 (2020). This study used quantitative stable isotope probing to calculate growth and mortality rates of bacteria following the rewetting of a dry Mediterranean soil, and demonstrated that bacterial growth was density independent whereas bacterial mortality was density dependent.PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Vieira, S. et al. Drivers of the composition of active rhizosphere bacterial communities in temperate grasslands. ISME J. 14, 463â475 (2020).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Nuccio, E. E. et al. Niche differentiation is spatially and temporally regulated in the rhizosphere. ISME J. 14, 999â1014 (2020).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Shi, S. et al. Successional trajectories of rhizosphere bacterial communities over consecutive seasons. mBio 6, e00746 (2015).PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Bastian, F., Bouziri, L., Nicolardot, B. & Ranjard, L. Impact of wheat straw decomposition on successional patterns of soil microbial community structure. Soil Biol. Biochem. 41, 262â275 (2009).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Whitman, T. et al. Microbial community assembly differs across minerals in a rhizosphere microcosm. Environ. Microbiol. 20, 4444â4460 (2018).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Maynard, D. S., Crowther, T. W. & Bradford, M. A. Fungal interactions reduce carbon use efficiency. Ecol. Lett. 20, 1034â1042 (2017). This study demonstrated that antagonistic interactions between wood-decay fungi can reduce CUE of the fungal community.PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Crowther, T. W. et al. Environmental stress response limits microbial necromass contributions to soil organic carbon. Soil Biol. Biochem. 85, 153â161 (2015).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hu, Y., Zheng, Q., Noll, L., Zhang, S. & Wanek, W. Direct measurement of the in situ decomposition of microbial-derived soil organic matter. Soil Biol. Biochem. 141, 107660 (2020).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Fernandez, C. W., Langley, J. A., Chapman, S., McCormack, M. L. & Koide, R. T. The decomposition of ectomycorrhizal fungal necromass. Soil Biol. Biochem. 93, 38â49 (2016). This review article summarizes how the stoichiometry, morphology and chemistry of microbial necromass affects its decomposition rate in soil.CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Buckeridge, K. M. et al. Sticky dead microbes: rapid abiotic retention of microbial necromass in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 149, 107929 (2020).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Creamer, C. A. et al. Mineralogy dictates the initial mechanism of microbial necromass association. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 260, 161â176 (2019). This study used Raman microspectroscopy and 13C-labelled necromass to demonstrate that different mineral types retained microbial necromass through different mechanisms and with different strengths.CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Schurig, C. et al. Microbial cell-envelope fragments and the formation of soil organic matter: a case study from a glacier forefield. Biogeochemistry 113, 595â612 (2013).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kopittke, P. M. et al. Nitrogen-rich microbial products provide new organo-mineral associations for the stabilization of soil organic matter. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 1762â1770 (2018).
Google ScholarÂ
Miltner, A., Bombach, P., Schmidt-BrĂŒcken, B. & KĂ€stner, M. SOM genesis: microbial biomass as a significant source. Biogeochemistry 111, 41â55 (2012).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kleber, M. et al. Dynamic interactions at the mineralâorganic matter interface. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2, 402â421 (2021).
Google ScholarÂ
Blagodatskaya, E. & Kuzyakov, Y. Active microorganisms in soil: critical review of estimation criteria and approaches. Soil Biol. Biochem. 67, 192â211 (2013).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Or, D., Smets, B. F., Wraith, J. M., Dechesne, A. & Friedman, S. P. Physical constraints affecting bacterial habitats and activity in unsaturated porous mediaâa review. Adv. Water Resour. 30, 1505â1527 (2007).
Google ScholarÂ
Kuzyakov, Y. & Blagodatskaya, E. Microbial hotspots and hot moments in soil: concept & review. Soil Biol. Biochem. 83, 184â199 (2015).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Finzi, A. C. et al. Rhizosphere processes are quantitatively important components of terrestrial carbon and nutrient cycles. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 2082â2094 (2015).
Google ScholarÂ
Yuan, M. M. et al. Fungal-bacterial cooccurrence patterns differ between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and nonmycorrhizal fungi across soil niches. mBio 12, e03509-20 (2015).
Google ScholarÂ
Zhang, L. & Lueders, T. Micropredator niche differentiation between bulk soil and rhizosphere of an agricultural soil depends on bacterial prey. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 93, fix103 (2017).
Google ScholarÂ
Sokol, N. W. & Bradford, M. A. Microbial formation of stable soil carbon is more efficient from belowground than aboveground input. Nat. Geosci. 12, 46â53 (2019).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kallenbach, C. M., Frey, S. D. & Grandy, A. S. Direct evidence for microbial-derived soil organic matter formation and its ecophysiological controls. Nat. Commun. 7, 13630 (2016). This study used artificial soils to provide empirical evidence that SOM can be entirely microbially derived, and also demonstrated a positive relationship between CUE and SOM formation.CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wood, J. L., Tang, C. & Franks, A. E. Competitive traits are more important than stress-tolerance traits in a cadmium-contaminated rhizosphere: a role for trait theory in microbial ecology. Front. Microbiol. 9, 121 (2018).PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Violle, C. et al. Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos 116, 882â892 (2007).
Google ScholarÂ
Madin, J. S. et al. A synthesis of bacterial and archaeal phenotypic trait data. Sci. Data 7, 170 (2020).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Shaffer, M. et al. DRAM for distilling microbial metabolism to automate the curation of microbiome function. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 8883â8900 (2020).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Brown, C. T., Olm, M. R., Thomas, B. C. & Banfield, J. F. Measurement of bacterial replication rates in microbial communities. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 1256â1263 (2016). This study developed an algorithm, iRep, that uses draft-quality genome sequences and single time-point metagenome sequencing to infer microbial population replication rates.CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Nayfach, S. & Pollard, K. S. Average genome size estimation improves comparative metagenomics and sheds light on the functional ecology of the human microbiome. Genome Biol. 16, 51 (2015).PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Leff, J. W. et al. Consistent responses of soil microbial communities to elevated nutrient inputs in grasslands across the globe. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 10967â10972 (2015).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Vieira-Silva, S. & Rocha, E. P. C. The systemic imprint of growth and its uses in ecological (meta)genomics. PLoS Genet. 6, e1000808 (2010).PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hasby, F. A., Barbi, F., Manzoni, S. & Lindahl, B. D. Transcriptomic markers of fungal growth, respiration and carbon-use efficiency. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 368, fnab100 (2021).PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Maillard, F., Schilling, J., Andrews, E., Schreiner, K. M. & Kennedy, P. Functional convergence in the decomposition of fungal necromass in soil and wood. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 96, fiz209 (2020).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Clemmensen, K. E. et al. Carbon sequestration is related to mycorrhizal fungal community shifts during long-term succession in boreal forests. N. Phytol. 205, 1525â1536 (2015).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Olivelli, M. S. et al. Unraveling mechanisms behind biomassâclay interactions using comprehensive multiphase nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) Spectroscopy. ACS Earth Space Chem. 4, 2061â2072 (2020).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Achtenhagen, J., Goebel, M.-O., Miltner, A., Woche, S. K. & KĂ€stner, M. Bacterial impact on the wetting properties of soil minerals. Biogeochemistry 122, 269â280 (2015).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lehmann, J. et al. Persistence of soil organic carbon caused by functional complexity. Nat. Geosci. 13, 529â534 (2020).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ahmed, E. & Holmström, S. J. M. Microbeâmineral interactions: The impact of surface attachment on mineral weathering and element selectivity by microorganisms. Chem. Geol. 403, 13â23 (2015).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Chenu, C. Clay- or sand-polysaccharide associations as models for the interface between micro-organisms and soil: water related properties and microstructure. Geoderma 56, 143â156 (1993).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sher, Y. et al. Microbial extracellular polysaccharide production and aggregate stability controlled by switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) root biomass and soil water potential. Soil Biol. Biochem. 143, 107742 (2020).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lybrand, R. A. et al. A coupled microscopy approach to assess the nano-landscape of weathering. Sci. Rep. 9, 5377 (2019).PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Prommer, J. et al. Increased microbial growth, biomass, and turnover drive soil organic carbon accumulation at higher plant diversity. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 669â681 (2020).
Google ScholarÂ
Cotrufo, M. F., Wallenstein, M. D., Boot, C. M., Denef, K. & Paul, E. The Microbial Efficiency-Matrix Stabilization (MEMS) framework integrates plant litter decomposition with soil organic matter stabilization: do labile plant inputs form stable soil organic matter? Glob. Change Biol. 19, 988â995 (2013).
Google ScholarÂ
Liang, C., Schimel, J. P. & Jastrow, J. D. The importance of anabolism in microbial control over soil carbon storage. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 17105 (2017).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Geyer, K. M., Kyker-Snowman, E., Grandy, A. S. & Frey, S. D. Microbial carbon use efficiency: accounting for population, community, and ecosystem-scale controls over the fate of metabolized organic matter. Biogeochemistry 127, 173â188 (2016).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kallenbach, C. M., Grandy, A. S., Frey, S. D. & Diefendorf, A. F. Microbial physiology and necromass regulate agricultural soil carbon accumulation. Soil Biol. Biochem. 91, 279â290 (2015).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Buckeridge, K. M. et al. Environmental and microbial controls on microbial necromass recycling, an important precursor for soil carbon stabilization. Commun. Earth Env. 1, 36 (2020).
Google ScholarÂ
Saifuddin, M., Bhatnagar, J. M., SegrĂš, D. & Finzi, A. C. Microbial carbon use efficiency predicted from genome-scale metabolic models. Nat. Commun. 10, 3568 (2019).PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Schimel, J., Balser, T. C. & Wallenstein, M. Microbial stress-response physiology and its implications for ecosystem function. Ecology 88, 1386â1394 (2007).PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
MasonâJones, K., Banfield, C. C. & Dippold, M. A. Compound-specific 13C stable isotope probing confirms synthesis of polyhydroxybutyrate by soil bacteria. Rapid Commun. Mass. Spectrom. 33, 795â802 (2019).PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
BÄÄth, E. The use of neutral lipid fatty acids to indicate the physiological conditions of soil fungi. Microb. Ecol. 45, 373â383 (2003).PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Slessarev, E. W. et al. Cellular and extracellular C contributions to respiration after wetting dry soil. Biogeochemistry 147, 307â324 (2020).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Slessarev, E. W. & Schimel, J. P. Partitioning sources of CO2 emission after soil wetting using high-resolution observations and minimal models. Soil Biol. Biochem. 143, 107753 (2020).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lennon, J. T. & Jones, S. E. Microbial seed banks: the ecological and evolutionary implications of dormancy. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9, 119â130 (2011).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
BrangarĂ, A. C., Manzoni, S. & Rousk, J. A soil microbial model to analyze decoupled microbial growth and respiration during soil drying and rewetting. Soil Biol. Biochem. 148, 107871 (2020).
Google ScholarÂ
Zha, J. & Zhuang, Q. Microbial dormancy and its impacts on northern temperate and boreal terrestrial ecosystem carbon budget. Biogeosciences 17, 4591â4610 (2020).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Anderson, T.-H. Microbial eco-physiological indicators to asses soil quality. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 98, 285â293 (2003).
Google ScholarÂ
Geyer, K., Schnecker, J., Grandy, A. S., Richter, A. & Frey, S. Assessing microbial residues in soil as a potential carbon sink and moderator of carbon use efficiency. Biogeochemistry 151, 237â249 (2020).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sepehrnia, N. et al. Transport, retention, and release of Escherichia coli and Rhodococcus erythropolis through dry natural soils as affected by water repellency. Sci. Total Environ. 694, 133666 (2019).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Boeddinghaus, R. S. et al. The mineralosphere â interactive zone of microbial colonization and carbon use in grassland soils. Biol. Fertil. Soils 57, 587â601 (2021).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Vieira, S. et al. Bacterial colonization of minerals in grassland soils is selective and highly dynamic. Environ. Microbiol. 22, 917â933 (2020).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ma, T. et al. Divergent accumulation of microbial necromass and plant lignin components in grassland soils. Nat. Commun. 9, 3480 (2018).PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Blazewicz, S. J., Schwartz, E. & Firestone, M. K. Growth and death of bacteria and fungi underlie rainfall-induced carbon dioxide pulses from seasonally dried soil. Ecology 95, 1162â1172 (2014).PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ceja-Navarro, J. A. et al. Protist diversity and community complexity in the rhizosphere of switchgrass are dynamic as plants develop. Microbiome 9, 96 (2021).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Starr, E. P., Nuccio, E. E., Pett-Ridge, J., Banfield, J. F. & Firestone, M. K. Metatranscriptomic reconstruction reveals RNA viruses with the potential to shape carbon cycling in soil. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 25900â25908 (2019). This comprehensive study of RNA viruses detectable in a grassland soil showed how these viruses are shaped by the presence of plant roots and litter.CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Shi, S. et al. The interconnected rhizosphere: high network complexity dominates rhizosphere assemblages. Ecol. Lett. 19, 926â936 (2016).PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Yan, Y., Kuramae, E. E., de Hollander, M., Klinkhamer, P. G. L. & van Veen, J. A. Functional traits dominate the diversity-related selection of bacterial communities in the rhizosphere. ISME J. 11, 56â66 (2017).PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zhalnina, K. et al. Dynamic root exudate chemistry and microbial substrate preferences drive patterns in rhizosphere microbial community assembly. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 470 (2018).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Pett-Ridge, J. et al. in Rhizosphere Biology: Interactions Between Microbes and Plants (eds Gupta, V. V. S. R. & Sharma, A. K.) 51â73 (Springer, 2021).Poll, C., Marhan, S., Ingwersen, J. & Kandeler, E. Dynamics of litter carbon turnover and microbial abundance in a rye detritusphere. Soil Biol. Biochem. 40, 1306â1321 (2008).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Buchkowski, R. W., Bradford, M. A., Grandy, A. S., Schmitz, O. J. & Wieder, W. R. Applying population and community ecology theory to advance understanding of belowground biogeochemistry. Ecol. Lett. 20, 231â245 (2017).PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Erktan, A., Or, D. & Scheu, S. The physical structure of soil: determinant and consequence of trophic interactions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 148, 107876 (2020).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Roesch, L. F. W. et al. Pyrosequencing enumerates and contrasts soil microbial diversity. ISME J. 1, 283â290 (2007).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Carson, J. K. et al. Low pore connectivity increases bacterial diversity in soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76, 3936â3942 (2010).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Raynaud, X. & Nunan, N. Spatial ecology of bacteria at the microscale in soil. PLoS ONE 9, e87217 (2014).PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ekelund, F., RĂžnn, R. & Christensen, S. Distribution with depth of protozoa, bacteria and fungi in soil profiles from three Danish forest sites. Soil Biol. Biochem. 33, 475â481 (2001).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sharrar, A. M. et al. Bacterial secondary metabolite biosynthetic potential in soil varies with phylum, depth, and vegetation type. mBio 11, e00416-20 (2020).PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Georgiou, K., Abramoff, R. Z., Harte, J., Riley, W. J. & Torn, M. S. Microbial community-level regulation explains soil carbon responses to long-term litter manipulations. Nat. Commun. 8, 1223 (2017). This modelling study demonstrated that including a density-dependent microbial mortality term can reduce the oscillatory behaviour of soil carbon models.PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Thakur, M. P. & Geisen, S. Trophic regulations of the soil microbiome. Trends Microbiol. 27, 771â780 (2019).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Fanin, N. et al. The ratio of Gram-positive to Gram-negative bacterial PLFA markers as an indicator of carbon availability in organic soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 128, 111â114 (2019).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wang, W. et al. Predatory Myxococcales are widely distributed in and closely correlated with the bacterial community structure of agricultural land. Appl. Soil Ecol. 146, 103365 (2020).
Google ScholarÂ
Hungate, B. A. et al. The functional significance of bacterial predators. mBio 12, e00466-21 (2021).PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Jover, L. F., Effler, T. C., Buchan, A., Wilhelm, S. W. & Weitz, J. S. The elemental composition of virus particles: implications for marine biogeochemical cycles. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12, 519â528 (2014).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Emerson, J. B. et al. Host-linked soil viral ecology along a permafrost thaw gradient. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 870â880 (2018). This study identified novel viral genomes from metagenomes and linked many of these viruses in silico to bacterial hosts and carbon metabolisms across the spatial gradient of permafrost thaw.CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ren, D., Madsen, J. S., SĂžrensen, S. J. & BurmĂžlle, M. High prevalence of biofilm synergy among bacterial soil isolates in cocultures indicates bacterial interspecific cooperation. ISME J. 9, 81â89 (2015).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lee, K. W. K. et al. Biofilm development and enhanced stress resistance of a model, mixed-species community biofilm. ISME J. 8, 894â907 (2014).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Witzgall, K. et al. Particulate organic matter as a functional soil component for persistent soil organic carbon. Nat. Commun. 12, 4115 (2021).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Frey, S. D. Mycorrhizal fungi as mediators of soil organic matter dynamics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 50, 237â259 (2019).
Google ScholarÂ
Drigo, B. et al. Shifting carbon flow from roots into associated microbial communities in response to elevated atmospheric CO2. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 10938â10942 (2010).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kaiser, C. et al. Exploring the transfer of recent plant photosynthates to soil microbes: mycorrhizal pathway vs direct root exudation. N. Phytol. 205, 1537â1551 (2015).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Shah, F. et al. Ectomycorrhizal fungi decompose soil organic matter using oxidative mechanisms adapted from saprotrophic ancestors. N. Phytol. 209, 1705â1719 (2016).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Tisserant, E. et al. Genome of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus provides insight into the oldest plant symbiosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 20117â20122 (2013).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hestrin, R., Hammer, E. C., Mueller, C. W. & Lehmann, J. Synergies between mycorrhizal fungi and soil microbial communities increase plant nitrogen acquisition. Commun. Biol. 2, 233 (2019).PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Averill, C., Turner, B. L. & Finzi, A. C. Mycorrhiza-mediated competition between plants and decomposers drives soil carbon storage. Nature 505, 543â545 (2014).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Averill, C. & Hawkes, C. V. Ectomycorrhizal fungi slow soil carbon cycling. Ecol. Lett. 19, 937â947 (2016).PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Craig, M. E. et al. Tree mycorrhizal type predicts within-site variability in the storage and distribution of soil organic matter. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 3317â3330 (2018).
Google ScholarÂ
See, C. R. et al. Hyphae move matter and microbes to mineral microsites: Integrating the hyphosphere into conceptual models of soil organic matter stabilization. Glob. Change Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16073 (2022).ArticleÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Adamczyk, B., Sietiö, O.-M., Biasi, C. & Heinonsalo, J. Interaction between tannins and fungal necromass stabilizes fungal residues in boreal forest soils. N. Phytol. 223, 16â21 (2019).
Google ScholarÂ
Vidal, A. et al. Visualizing the transfer of organic matter from decaying plant residues to soil mineral surfaces controlled by microorganisms. Soil Biol. Biochem. 160, 108347 (2021).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kallenbach, C. M., Wallenstein, M. D., Schipanksi, M. E. & Grandy, A. S. Managing agroecosystems for soil microbial carbon use efficiency: ecological unknowns, potential outcomes, and a path forward. Front. Microbiol. 10, 1146 (2019).PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Blagodatskaya, E., Blagodatsky, S., Anderson, T.-H. & Kuzyakov, Y. microbial growth and carbon use efficiency in the rhizosphere and root-free soil. PLoS ONE 9, e93282 (2014).PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Domeignoz-Horta, L. A. et al. Microbial diversity drives carbon use efficiency in a model soil. Nat. Commun. 11, 3684 (2020).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Fernandez, C. W. & Kennedy, P. G. Revisiting the âGadgil effectâ: do interguild fungal interactions control carbon cycling in forest soils? N. Phytol. 209, 1382â1394 (2016).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Nicolas, A. M. et al. Soil candidate phyla radiation bacteria encode components of aerobic metabolism and co-occur with nanoarchaea in the rare biosphere of rhizosphere grassland communities. mSystems 6, e0120520 (2021).PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Starr, E. P. et al. Stable isotope informed genome-resolved metagenomics reveals that Saccharibacteria utilize microbially-processed plant-derived carbon. Microbiome 6, 122 (2018).PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Pace, M. L. Bacterial mortality and the fate of bacterial production. Hydrobiologia 159, 41â49 (1988).
Google ScholarÂ
Cram, J. A., Parada, A. E. & Fuhrman, J. A. Dilution reveals how viral lysis and grazing shape microbial communities. Limnol. Oceanogr. 61, 889â905 (2016).
Google ScholarÂ
Ankrah, N. Y. D. et al. Phage infection of an environmentally relevant marine bacterium alters host metabolism and lysate composition. ISME J. 8, 1089â1100 (2014). This study demonstrated that in a marine environment, the mechanism of death (that is, phage infection) altered the biochemistry of microbial necromass relative to uninfected cells.CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lindeman, R. L. The trophic-dynamic aspect of ecology. Ecology 23, 399â417 (1942).
Google ScholarÂ
Clarholm, M. Interactions of bacteria, protozoa and plants leading to mineralization of soil nitrogen. Soil Biol. Biochem. 17, 181â187 (1985).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Pasternak, Z. et al. In and out: an analysis of epibiotic vs periplasmic bacterial predators. ISME J. 8, 625â635 (2014).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lee, X., Wu, H.-J., Sigler, J., Oishi, C. & Siccama, T. Rapid and transient response of soil respiration to rain. Glob. Change Biol. 10, 1017â1026 (2004).
Google ScholarÂ
Schimel, J. P. Life in dry soils: effects of drought on soil microbial communities and processes. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 49, 409â432 (2018).
Google ScholarÂ
Granato, E. T., Meiller-Legrand, T. A. & Foster, K. R. The evolution and ecology of bacterial warfare. Curr. Biol. 29, R521âR537 (2019).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Bradford, M. A. et al. Managing uncertainty in soil carbon feedbacks to climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 751â758 (2016).
Google ScholarÂ
Sierra, C. A. & MĂŒller, M. A general mathematical framework for representing soil organic matter dynamics. Ecol. Monogr. 85, 505â524 (2015).
Google ScholarÂ
Wang, G. et al. Microbial dormancy improves development and experimental validation of ecosystem model. ISME J. 9, 226â237 (2015).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wieder, W., Grandy, S., Kallenbach, M. & Bonan, B. Integrating microbial physiology and physio-chemical principles in soils with the MIcrobial-MIneral Carbon Stabilization (MIMICS) model. Biogeosciences 11, 3899â3917 (2014).
Google ScholarÂ
Allison, S. D. A trait-based approach for modelling microbial litter decomposition. Ecol. Lett. 15, 1058â1070 (2012). This paper described one of the first trait-based modelling approaches to link microbial community composition with physiological and enzymatic traits to predict litter decomposition in soil.CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kaiser, C., Franklin, O., Dieckmann, U. & Richter, A. Microbial community dynamics alleviate stoichiometric constraints during litter decay. Ecol. Lett. 17, 680â690 (2014).PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ebrahimi, A. & Or, D. Microbial community dynamics in soil aggregates shape biogeochemical gas fluxes from soil profiles â upscaling an aggregate biophysical model. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 3141â3156 (2016). This paper presented a demonstration of how to upscale results from a mechanistic model of microbial activity in soil aggregates to scales of practical interest for hydrological and climate models.
Google ScholarÂ
Lajoie, G. & Kembel, S. W. Making the most of trait-based approaches for microbial ecology. Trends Microbiol. 27, 814â823 (2019). This opinion article discussed trait-based approaches in microbial ecology with a focus on utilization of large-scale datasets for improved ecological understanding.CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wang, G., Post, W. M. & Mayes, M. A. Development of microbial-enzyme-mediated decomposition model parameters through steady-state and dynamic analyses. Ecol. Appl. 23, 255â272 (2013).PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Moorhead, D. L. & Sinsabaugh, R. L. A theoretical model of litter decay and microbial interaction. Ecol. Monogr. 76, 151â174 (2006).
Google ScholarÂ
Kooijman, S. A. L. M., Muller, E. B. & Stouthamer, A. H. Microbial growth dynamics on the basis of individual budgets. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 60, 159â174 (1991).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Evans, S., Dieckmann, U., Franklin, O. & Kaiser, C. Synergistic effects of diffusion and microbial physiology reproduce the Birch effect in a micro-scale model. Soil Biol. Biochem. 93, 28â37 (2016).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Allison, S. D. Modeling adaptation of carbon use efficiency in microbial communities. Front. Microbiol. 5, 571 (2014).PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hawkes, C. V. & Keitt, T. H. Resilience vs. historical contingency in microbial responses to environmental change. Ecol. Lett. 18, 612â625 (2015).PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Tang, J. & Riley, W. J. Weaker soil carbonâclimate feedbacks resulting from microbial and abiotic interactions. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 56â60 (2015).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Zhang, Y. et al. Simulating measurable ecosystem carbon and nitrogen dynamics with the mechanistically-defined MEMS 2.0 model. Biogeosciences 18, 3147â3171 (2021).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Blankinship, J. C. et al. Improving understanding of soil organic matter dynamics by triangulating theories, measurements, and models. Biogeochemistry 140, 1â13 (2018).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ebrahimi, A. N. & Or, D. Microbial dispersal in unsaturated porous media: Characteristics of motile bacterial cell motions in unsaturated angular pore networks. Water Resour. Res. 50, 7406â7429 (2014).
Google ScholarÂ
Tang, J. & Riley, W. J. A theory of effective microbial substrate affinity parameters in variably saturated soils and an example application to aerobic soil heterotrophic respiration. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 124, 918â940 (2019).
Google ScholarÂ
Manzoni, S., Schaeffer, S. M., Katul, G., Porporato, A. & Schimel, J. P. A theoretical analysis of microbial eco-physiological and diffusion limitations to carbon cycling in drying soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 73, 69â83 (2014).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
BrangarĂ, A. C., FernĂ ndez-Garcia, D., Sanchez-Vila, X. & Manzoni, S. Ecological and soil hydraulic implications of microbial responses to stress â a modeling analysis. Adv. Water Resour. 116, 178â194 (2018).
Google ScholarÂ
Alster, C. J., Weller, Z. D. & von Fischer, J. C. A meta-analysis of temperature sensitivity as a microbial trait. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 4211â4224 (2018).
Google ScholarÂ
Wang, G., Li, W., Wang, K. & Huang, W. Uncertainty quantification of the soil moisture response functions for microbial dormancy and resuscitation. Soil Biol. Biochem. 160, 108337 (2021).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sierra, C. A., Trumbore, S. E., Davidson, E. A., Vicca, S. & Janssens, I. Sensitivity of decomposition rates of soil organic matter with respect to simultaneous changes in temperature and moisture. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 7, 335â356 (2015).
Google ScholarÂ
Nunan, N., Schmidt, H. & Raynaud, X. The ecology of heterogeneity: soil bacterial communities and C dynamics. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 375, 20190249 (2020).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kaiser, C., Franklin, O., Richter, A. & Dieckmann, U. Social dynamics within decomposer communities lead to nitrogen retention and organic matter build-up in soils. Nat. Commun. 6, 8960 (2015).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Craig, M. E., Mayes, M. A., Sulman, B. N. & Walker, A. P. Biological mechanisms may contribute to soil carbon saturation patterns. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 2633â2644 (2021).
Google ScholarÂ
Fan, X. et al. Improved model simulation of soil carbon cycling by representing the microbially derived organic carbon pool. ISME J. 15, 2248â2263 (2021).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sulman, B. N. et al. Multiple models and experiments underscore large uncertainty in soil carbon dynamics. Biogeochemistry 141, 109â123 (2018). This paper addressed key uncertainties in the representation of microbial degradation and mineral stabilization in five microbially explicit soil carbon models.CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Marschmann, G. L., Pagel, H., KĂŒgler, P. & Streck, T. Equifinality, sloppiness, and emergent structures of mechanistic soil biogeochemical models. Environ. Model. Softw. 122, 104518 (2019).
Google ScholarÂ
Martiny, J. B. H., Jones, S. E., Lennon, J. T. & Martiny, A. C. Microbiomes in light of traits: a phylogenetic perspective. Science 350, aac9323 (2015).PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Malik, A. A., Thomson, B. C., Whiteley, A. S., Bailey, M. & Griffiths, R. I. Bacterial physiological adaptations to contrasting edaphic conditions identified using landscape scale metagenomics. mBio 8, e00799-17 (2017).PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Westoby, M. et al. Trait dimensions in bacteria and archaea compared to vascular plants. Ecol. Lett. 24, 1487â1504 (2021).PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Jung, M.-Y. et al. Ammonia-oxidizing archaea possess a wide range of cellular ammonia affinities. ISME J. 16, 272â283 (2022).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Kempes, C. P., Wang, L., Amend, J. P., Doyle, J. & Hoehler, T. Evolutionary tradeoffs in cellular composition across diverse bacteria. ISME J. 10, 2145â2157 (2016).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Dethlefsen, L. & Schmidt, T. M. Performance of the translational apparatus varies with the ecological strategies of bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 189, 3237â3245 (2007).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Andersen, K. H. et al. Characteristic sizes of life in the oceans, from bacteria to whales. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 8, 217â241 (2016).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Malik, A. A. et al. Defining trait-based microbial strategies with consequences for soil carbon cycling under climate change. ISME J. 14, 1â9 (2020).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Weissman, J. L., Hou, S. & Fuhrman, J. A. Estimating maximal microbial growth rates from cultures, metagenomes, and single cells via codon usage patterns. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2016810118 (2021).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Li, G., Rabe, K. S., Nielsen, J. & Engqvist, M. K. M. Machine learning applied to predicting microorganism growth temperatures and enzyme catalytic optima. ACS Synth. Biol. 8, 1411â1420 (2019).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Hungate, B. A. et al. Quantitative microbial ecology through stable isotope probing. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81, 7570â7581 (2015).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Couradeau, E. et al. Probing the active fraction of soil microbiomes using BONCAT-FACS. Nat. Commun. 10, 2770 (2019).PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Starr, E. P. et al. Stable-isotope-informed, genome-resolved metagenomics uncovers potential cross-kingdom interactions in rhizosphere soil. mSphere 6, e0008521 (2021).PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Rousk, J. & BÄÄth, E. Fungal and bacterial growth in soil with plant materials of different C/N ratios. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 62, 258â267 (2007).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Koechli, C., Campbell, A. N., Pepe-Ranney, C. & Buckley, D. H. Assessing fungal contributions to cellulose degradation in soil by using high-throughput stable isotope probing. Soil Biol. Biochem. 130, 150â158 (2019).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Wilhelm, R. C., Singh, R., Eltis, L. D. & Mohn, W. W. Bacterial contributions to delignification and lignocellulose degradation in forest soils with metagenomic and quantitative stable isotope probing. ISME J. 13, 413â429 (2019).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Neurath, R. A. et al. Root carbon interaction with soil minerals is dynamic, leaving a legacy of microbially derived residues. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 13345â13355 (2021).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Luo, Y. et al. Rice rhizodeposition promotes the build-up of organic carbon in soil via fungal necromass. Soil Biol. Biochem. 160, 108345 (2021).CASÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Carini, P. et al. Relic DNA is abundant in soil and obscures estimates of soil microbial diversity. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 16242 (2016).PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sharma, K., Palatinszky, M., Nikolov, G., Berry, D. & Shank, E. A. Transparent soil microcosms for live-cell imaging and non-destructive stable isotope probing of soil microorganisms. eLife 9, e56275 (2020).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Arellano-Caicedo, C., Ohlsson, P., Bengtsson, M., Beech, J. P. & Hammer, E. C. Habitat geometry in artificial microstructure affects bacterial and fungal growth, interactions, and substrate degradation. Commun. Biol. 4, 1226 (2021).PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Jansson, J. K. & Hofmockel, K. S. Soil microbiomes and climate change. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 35â46 (2020).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
GarcĂa-Palacios, P. et al. Evidence for large microbial-mediated losses of soil carbon under anthropogenic warming. Nat. Rev. Earth Env. 2, 507â517 (2021).
Google ScholarÂ
Schulz, F. et al. Hidden diversity of soil giant viruses. Nat. Commun. 9, 4881 (2018).PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Trubl, G. et al. Towards optimized viral metagenomes for double-stranded and single-stranded DNA viruses from challenging soils. PeerJ 7, e7265 (2019).PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Guo, J. et al. VirSorter2: a multi-classifier, expert-guided approach to detect diverse DNA and RNA viruses. Microbiome 9, 37 (2021).PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Sommers, P., Chatterjee, A., Varsani, A. & Trubl, G. Integrating viral metagenomics into an ecological framework. Annu. Rev. Virol. 8, 133â158 (2021).PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Pratama, A. A. & van Elsas, J. D. The âneglectedâ soil viromeâpotential role and impact. Trends Microbiol. 26, 649â662 (2018).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Ghosh, D. et al. Prevalence of lysogeny among soil bacteria and presence of 16S rRNA and trzN genes in viral-community DNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 495â502 (2008).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Roux, S. et al. Ecogenomics and potential biogeochemical impacts of globally abundant ocean viruses. Nature 537, 689â693 (2016).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Howard-Varona, C. et al. Phage-specific metabolic reprogramming of virocells. ISME J. 14, 881â895 (2020).PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Howard-Varona, C. et al. Multiple mechanisms drive phage infection efficiency in nearly identical hosts. ISME J. 12, 1605â1618 (2018).PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Van Goethem, M. Characteristics of wetting-induced bacteriophage blooms in biological soil crust. mBio 10, e02287-19 (2019).PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Trubl, G. et al. Active virus-host interactions at sub-freezing temperatures in Arctic peat soil. Microbiome 9, 208 (2021).CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Lee, S. et al. Methane-derived carbon flows into hostâvirus networks at different trophic levels in soil. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2105124118 (2021). This study used stable isotope probing metagenomics to connect, in situ, active virusâhost infections with the biogeochemical process of methane oxidation in soil.CASÂ
PubMedÂ
PubMed CentralÂ
Google ScholarÂ
Bolduc, B., Youens-Clark, K., Roux, S., Hurwitz, B. L. & Sullivan, M. B. iVirus: facilitating new insights in viral ecology with software and community data sets imbedded in a cyberinfrastructure. ISME J. 11, 7â14 (2017).PubMedÂ
Google Scholar More