Philippa Kaur

1.Pennington, R. T., Lehmann, C. E. R. & Rowland, L. M. Tropical savannas and dry forests. Curr. Biol. 28, R541–R545 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
2.Piao, S. et al. Interannual variation of terrestrial carbon cycle: Issues and perspectives. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 300–318 (2019).ADS 

Google Scholar 
3.Fan, L. et al. Satellite-observed pantropical carbon dynamics. Nat. Plants. 5, 944–951 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
4.Humphrey, V. et al. Sensitivity of atmospheric CO2 growth rate to observed changes in terrestrial water storage. Nature 560, 628–631 (2018).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
5.Moro, M. F., Nic Lughadha, E., de Araújo, F. S. & Martins, F. R. A phytogeographical metaanalysis of the semiarid caatinga domain in Brazil. Bot. Rev. 82, 91–148 (2016).6.Terra, M., et al. Water availability drives gradients of tree diversity, structure and functional traits in the Atlantic–Cerrado–Caatinga transition, Brazil. J. Plant Ecol. 11, 803–814 (2018).7.Leite, M. B., Xavier, R. O., Oliveira, P. T. S., Silva, F. K. G. & Silva Matos, D. M. Groundwater depth as a constraint on the woody cover in a Neotropical Savanna. Plant Soil. 426, 1–15 (2018).8.Silvertown, J., Araya, Y. & Gowing, D. Hydrological niches in terrestrial plant communities: a review. J. Ecol. 103, 93–108 (2014).
Google Scholar 
9.Poulter, B. et al. Plant functional type classification for earth system models: results from the European Space Agency’s Land Cover Climate Change Initiative. Geosci. Model Dev. 8, 2315–2328 (2015).ADS 

Google Scholar 
10.Congalton, R. G., Gu, J., Yadav, K., Thenkabail, P. & Ozdogan, M. Global land cover mapping: A review and uncertainty analysis. Remote Sens. 6(12), 12070–12093 (2014).ADS 

Google Scholar 
11.Phiri, D. & Morgenroth, J. Developments in Landsat land cover classification methods: A review. Remote Sens. 9(9), 967 (2017).
Google Scholar 
12.Joshi, N. et al. A review of the application of optical and radar remote sensing data fusion to land use mapping and monitoring. Remote Sens. 8(1), 70 (2016).ADS 

Google Scholar 
13.Xiao, J. et al. Remote sensing of the terrestrial carbon cycle: A review of advances over 50 years. Remote Sens. Environ. 233, 111383 (2019).ADS 

Google Scholar 
14.Françoso, R. D. et al. Delimiting floristic biogeographic districts in the Cerrado and assessing their conservation status. Biodivers. Conserv. 29, 1477–1500 (2019).
Google Scholar 
15.Eiten, G. Delimitation of the cerrado concept. Plant Ecol. 36, 169–178 (1978).
Google Scholar 
16.Ribeiro, J.F. & Walter, B.M.T. As principais fitofisionomias do bioma Cerrado in Cerrado: ecologia e flora (ed. Sano, S.M., Almeida, S.P. & Ribeiro, J.F.) 151–212 (EMBRAPA, 2008).17.Oliveria, P.S. & Marquis, R.J. The Cerrados of Brazil: ecology and natural history of a neotropical savanna. (Columbia University Press, 2002).18.Buchhorn, M. et al. Copernicus Global Land Cover Layers—Collection 2. Remote Sens. 12, 1044 (2020).ADS 

Google Scholar 
19.European Space Agency. Data. https://climate.esa.int/en/projects/land-cover/data/ (2021).20.Pellegrini, A. F. A. Nutrient limitation in tropical savannas across multiple scales and mechanisms. Ecology 97, 313–324 (2016).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
21.Vourlitis, G. L. et al. Variations in stand structure and diversity along a soil fertility gradient in a Brazilian savanna (Cerrado) in Southern Mato Grosso. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 77, 1370–1379 (2013).ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
22.Abrahão, A. et al. Soil types select for plants with matching nutrient-acquisition and use traits in hyperdiverse and severely nutrient-impoverished campos rupestres and cerrado in Central Brazil. J. Ecol. 107, 1302–1316 (2018).
Google Scholar 
23.de Assis, A. C. C., Coelho, R. M., da Silva Pinheiro, E. & Durigan, G. Water availability determines physiognomic gradient in an area of low-fertility soils under Cerrado vegetation. Plant Ecol. 212, 1135–1147 (2011).24.Oliveira, P. T. S. et al. Groundwater recharge decrease with increased vegetation density in the Brazilian cerrado. Ecohydrology. 10, e1759 (2016).25.de Oliveira Xavier, R., Leite, M. B., Dexter, K. & da Silva Matos, D. M. Differential effects of soil waterlogging on herbaceous and woody plant communities in a Neotropical savanna. Oecologia. 190, 471–483 (2019).26.Zappi, D. C., Moro, M. F., Meagher, T. R. & Nic Lughadha, E. Plant biodiversity drivers in Brazilian campos rupestres: insights from phylogenetic structure. Front. Plant Sci. 8, (2017).27.Neri, A. V., Schaefer, C. E. G. R., Souza, A. L., Ferreira-Junior, W. G. & Meira-Neto, J. A. A. Pedology and plant physiognomies in the cerrado, Brazil. An. Acad. Bras. Ciênc. 85, 87–102 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
28.Simon, M. F. & Pennington, T. Evidence for Adaptation to Fire Regimes in the Tropical Savannas of the Brazilian Cerrado. Int. J. Plant Sci. 173, 711–723 (2012).
Google Scholar 
29.de Castro, E. A. & Kauffman, J. B. Ecosystem structure in the Brazilian Cerrado: a vegetation gradient of aboveground biomass, root mass and consumption by fire. J. Trop. Ecol. 14, 263–283 (1998).
Google Scholar 
30.da Silva, D. M. & Batalha, M. A. Soil–vegetation relationships in cerrados under different fire frequencies. Plant Soil 311, 87–96 (2008).CAS 

Google Scholar 
31.Durigan, G. Zero-fire: Not possible nor desirable in the Cerrado of Brazil. Flora. 268, 151612 (2020).32.Lloyd, J. & Veenendaal, E. M. Are fire mediated feedbacks burning out of control? (2016)33.Bueno, M. L. et al. The environmental triangle of the Cerrado Domain: Ecological factors driving shifts in tree species composition between forests and savannas. J. Ecol. 106, 2109–2120 (2018).
Google Scholar 
34.Alencar, A. et al. Mapping Three Decades of Changes in the Brazilian Savanna Native Vegetation Using Landsat Data Processed in the Google Earth Engine Platform. Remote Sens. 12, 924 (2020).ADS 

Google Scholar 
35.INPE. Projeto TerraClass Cerrado Mapeamento do Uso e Cobertura Vegetal do Cerrado. http://www.inpe.br/cra/projetos_pesquisas/dados_terraclass.php (2019)36.Sano, E. E., Rosa, R., Brito, J. L. S. & Ferreira, L. G. Land cover mapping of the tropical savanna region in Brazil. Environ. Monit. Assess. 166, 113–124 (2009).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
37.Sano, E. E. et al. Cerrado ecoregions: A spatial framework to assess and prioritize Brazilian savanna environmental diversity for conservation. J. Environ. Manag. 232, 818–828 (2019).
Google Scholar 
38.Monteiro, L. M. et al. Evaluating the impact of future actions in minimizing vegetation loss from land conversion in the Brazilian Cerrado under climate change. Biodivers. Conserv. 29, 1701–1722 (2018).
Google Scholar 
39.Silva, J. F., Farinas, M. R., Felfili, J. M. & Klink, C. A. Spatial heterogeneity, land use and conservation in the cerrado region of Brazil. J. Biogeogr. 33, 536–548 (2006).
Google Scholar 
40.Strassburg, B. B. N. et al. Moment of truth for the Cerrado hotspot. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0099 (2017).
Google Scholar 
41.Soares-Filho, B. et al. Cracking Brazil’s Forest Code. Science 344, 363–364 (2014).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
42.Gomes, L., Miranda, H. S. & Bustamante, M. M. C. How can we advance the knowledge on the behavior and effects of fire in the Cerrado biome? For. Ecol. Manag. 417, 281–290 (2018).43.Hartley, A. J., MacBean, N., Georgievski, G. & Bontemps, S. Uncertainty in plant functional type distributions and its impact on land surface models. Remote Sens. Environ. 203, 71–89 (2017).ADS 

Google Scholar 
44.Cava, M. G. B., Pilon, N. A. L., Ribeiro, M. C. & Durigan, G. Abandoned pastures cannot spontaneously recover the attributes of old-growth savannas. J. Appl. Ecol. 55, 1164–1172 (2017).
Google Scholar 
45.Brancalion, P. H. S. et al. Governance innovations from a multi-stakeholder coalition to implement large-scale Forest Restoration in Brazil. World Dev. Perspect. 3, 15–17 (2016).
Google Scholar 
46.Seddon, N. et al. Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 375, 20190120 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
47.MMA. Plano de Manejo Parque Nacional Chapada dos Veadeiros. Ministro de Estado do Meio Ambiente. Brasília. (2009).48.Hunke, P., Roller, R., Zeilhofer, P., Schröder, B. & Mueller, E. N. Soil changes under different land-uses in the Cerrado of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Geoderma Reg. 4, 31–43 (2015).
Google Scholar 
49.Sampaio, A.B. et. al. Guia de restauração do Cerrado: volume 1: semeadura direta. Embrapa Cerrados-Livro técnico (INFOTECA-E, 2015).50.Schmidt, I. B. et al. Tailoring restoration interventions to the grassland-savanna-forest complex in central Brazil. Restor. Ecol. 27, 942–948 (2019).
Google Scholar 
51.Schmidt, I. B. et al. Community-based native seed production for restoration in Brazil: the role of science and policy. Plant Biol. J. 21, 389–397 (2018).
Google Scholar 
52.Strassburg, B. B. N. et al. Author Correction: Strategic approaches to restoring ecosystems can triple conservation gains and halve costs. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 765–765 (2020).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
53.Assis, G. B., Pilon, N. A. L., Siqueira, M. F. & Durigan, G. Effectiveness and costs of invasive species control using different techniques to restore cerrado grasslands. Restor. Ecol. 29, (2020).54.Torello-Raventos, M. et al. On the delineation of tropical vegetation types with an emphasis on forest/savanna transitions. Plant Ecol. Divers. 6, 101–137 (2013).
Google Scholar 
55.da Silva, D. P., Amaral, A. G., Bijos, N. R. & Munhoz, C. B. R. Is the herb-shrub composition of veredas (Brazilian palm swamps) distinguishable?. Acta Bot. Bras. 32, 47–54 (2017).
Google Scholar 
56.Munhoz, C. B. R. & Felfili, J. M. Florística do estrato herbáceo-subarbustivo de um campo limpo úmido em Brasília, Brasil. Biota. Neotrop. 7, 205–215 (2007).
Google Scholar 
57.Franco, A. C. et al. Leaf functional traits of Neotropical savanna trees in relation to seasonal water deficit. Trees 19, 326–335 (2004).
Google Scholar 
58.Oliveras, I. & Malhi, Y. Many shades of green: the dynamic tropical forest–savannah transition zones. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 371, 20150308 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
59.Cianciaruso, MV. & Batalha, MA. A year in a Cerrado wet grassland: a non-seasonal island in a seasonal savanna environment. Braz. J. Biol. 68, 495–501 (2008).60.MapBiomas. MapBiomas v5.0. https://mapbiomas.org (2021).61.Souza, C. M. Jr. et al. Reconstructing three decades of land use and land cover changes in Brazilian biomes with landsat archive and earth engine. Remote Sens. 12, 2735 (2020).ADS 

Google Scholar 
62.Gorelick, N. et al. Google earth engine: planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sens. Environ. 202, 18–27 (2017).ADS 

Google Scholar 
63.Crouzeilles, R. et al. There is hope for achieving ambitious Atlantic Forest restoration commitments. Perspect. Ecol. Conserv. 17, 80–83 (2019).
Google Scholar 
64.Smith, C. C. et al. Secondary forests offset less than 10% of deforestation-mediated carbon emissions in the Brazilian Amazon. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 7006–7020 (2020).ADS 

Google Scholar 
65.Rosan, T. M. et al. Extensive 21st-Century Woody Encroachment in South America’s Savanna. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 6594–6603 (2019).ADS 

Google Scholar 
66.Schwieder, M. et al. Mapping Brazilian savanna vegetation gradients with Landsat time series. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 52, 361–370 (2016).ADS 

Google Scholar 
67.Ribeiro, F. F. et al. Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis Framework for Mapping Vegetation Physiognomic Types at Fine Scales in Neotropical Savannas. Remote Sens. 12, 1721 (2020).ADS 

Google Scholar 
68.Jacon, A. D., Galvão, L. S., dos Santos, J. R. & Sano, E. E. Seasonal characterization and discrimination of savannah physiognomies in Brazil using hyperspectral metrics from Hyperion/EO-1. Int. J. Remote Sens. 38, 4494–4516 (2017).
Google Scholar 
69.Neves, A. K. et al. Hierarchical mapping of Brazilian Savanna (Cerrado) physiognomies based on deep learning. J. App. Remote Sens. 15, 044504–1–044504–23 (2021).70.de Souza Mendes, F., Baron, D., Gerold, G., Liesenberg, V. & Erasmi, S. Optical and SAR remote sensing synergism for mapping vegetation types in the endangered cerrado/amazon ecotone of nova mutum—mato grosso. Remote Sens. 11, 1161 (2019).ADS 

Google Scholar 
71.Sano, E. E., Ferreira, L. G., Asner, G. P. & Steinke, E. T. Spatial and temporal probabilities of obtaining cloud-free Landsat images over the Brazilian tropical savanna. Int. J. Remote Sens. 28, 2739–2752 (2007).
Google Scholar 
72.Flores-Anderson, A.I., Herndon, K.E., Thapa, R.B. & Cherrington, E. The SAR handbook: comprehensive methodologies for forest monitoring and biomass estimation. (SERVIR, 2019).73.Bendini, H. N. et al. Detailed agricultural land classification in the Brazilian cerrado based on phenological information from dense satellite image time series. Int. J. Appl. Earth. Obs. Geoinf. 82, 101872 (2019).74.Bendini, H. N. et al. Combining environmental and Landsat analysis ready data for vegetation mapping: a case study in the Brazilian savanna biome. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. XLIII-B3–2020, 953–960 (2020).75.ECMWF. Climate reanalysis. https://climate.copernicus.eu/climate-reanalysis (2021).76.UNESCO. MINOR MODIFICATIONS PROPOSAL TO THE BOUNDARIES of Cerrado Protected Areas World Heritage: Chapada dos Veadeiros and Emas National Parks. (UNESCO Brasília, 2019)77.ICUN. Advisory mission to Cerrado Protected Areas World Heritage Property (Chapada Dos Veadeiros component) (Brazil). (International Union for Conservation of Nature, 2016)78.EMBRAPA. Sistema brasileiro de classificação dos solos. (EMBRAPA, 2006)79.IBGE. Mapa de Solos do Brasil do IBGE escala 1:250.000 https://www.ibge.gov.br/geociencias/downloads-geociencias.html (IBGE, 2020).80.Rodrigues, J. A. et al. How well do global burned area products represent fire patterns in the Brazilian Savannas biome? An accuracy assessment of the MCD64 collections. Int. J. Appl. Earth. Obs. Geoinf. 78, 318–331 (2019).ADS 

Google Scholar 
81.NASA, MCD64A1 v6. https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/products/mcd64a1v006/ (2021)82.GEE. Earth Engine Data Catalog. https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets (2021)83.Vreugdenhil, M. et al. Sensitivity of sentinel-1 backscatter to vegetation dynamics: an Austrian case study. Remote Sens. 10, 1396 (2018).ADS 

Google Scholar 
84.Harfenmeister, K., Spengler, D. & Weltzien, C. Analyzing temporal and spatial characteristics of crop parameters using sentinel-1 backscatter data. Remote Sens. 11, 1569 (2019).ADS 

Google Scholar 
85.European Space Agency. Level-2A Algorithm Overview https://sentinel.esa.int/web/sentinel/technical-guides/sentinel-2-msi/level-2a/algorithm (2021)86.GEE. Sentinel-2 MSI: MultiSpectral Instrument, Level-2A. https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/COPERNICUS_S2_SR (2021).87.GEE. USGS Landsat 8 Level 2, Collection 2, Tier 1. https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/LANDSAT_LC08_C02_T1_L2 (2021)88.Xue, J. & Su, B. Significant remote sensing vegetation indices: a review of developments and applications. J. Sens. 2017, 1353691 (2017).
Google Scholar 
89.Parente, L. & Ferreira, L. Assessing the spatial and occupation dynamics of the Brazilian pasturelands based on the automated classification of MODIS images from 2000 to 2016. Remote Sens. 10, 606 (2018).ADS 

Google Scholar 
90.Hill, M. J., Zhou, Q., Sun, Q., Schaaf, C. B. & Palace, M. Relationships between vegetation indices, fractional cover retrievals and the structure and composition of Brazilian Cerrado natural vegetation. Int. J. Remote Sens. 38, 874–905 (2017).
Google Scholar 
91.Nomura, K. & Mitchard, E. More than meets the eye: using sentinel-2 to map small plantations in complex forest landscapes. Remote Sens. 10, 1693 (2018).ADS 

Google Scholar 
92.Hagen-Zanker, A. A computational framework for generalized moving windows and its application to landscape pattern analysis. Int. J. Appl. Earth. Obs. Geoinf. 44, 205–216 (2016).ADS 

Google Scholar 
93.Wantzen, K. M. et al. Soil carbon stocks in stream-valley-ecosystems in the Brazilian Cerrado agroscape. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 151, 70–79 (2012).CAS 

Google Scholar 
94.ESA. Copernicus DEM: Global and European Digital Elevation Model (COP-DEM). https://spacedata.copernicus.eu/web/cscda/dataset-details?articleId=394198 (2021)95.Breiman, L. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001).96.Chen, D. & Wei, H. The effect of spatial autocorrelation and class proportion on the accuracy measures from different sampling designs. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 64, 140–150 (2009).ADS 

Google Scholar 
97.Olofsson, P., Foody, G. M., Stehman, S. V. & Woodcock, C. E. Making better use of accuracy data in land change studies: Estimating accuracy and area and quantifying uncertainty using stratified estimation. Remote Sens. Environ. 129, 122–131 (2013).ADS 

Google Scholar 
98.Foody, G. M. Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sens. Environ. 80, 185–201 (2002).ADS 

Google Scholar 
99.Jank, L., Barrios, S. C., do Valle, C. B., Simeão, R. M. & Alves, G. F. The value of improved pastures to Brazilian beef production. Crop Pasture Sci. 65, 1132 (2014).100.Oliveira, J. et al. Choosing pasture maps: An assessment of pasture land classification definitions and a case study of Brazil. Int. J. Appl. Earth. Obs. Geoinf. 93, 102205 (2020).101.Pereira, O., Ferreira, L., Pinto, F. & Baumgarten, L. Assessing pasture degradation in the Brazilian cerrado based on the analysis of MODIS NDVI time-series. Remote Sens. 10, 1761 (2018).ADS 

Google Scholar 
102.Meirelles, M.L., Ferreira, E.A.B. and Franco, A.C. Dinâmica sazonal do carbono em campo úmido do cerrado. Embrapa Cerrados-Documentos (INFOTECA-E, 2006).103.França, A. M. S., Paiva, R. J. O., Sano, E. E. & Carvalho, A. M. Estimates for carbon stocks in soil under humid grassland areas in the federal district of Brazil. OJE 04, 777–787 (2014).
Google Scholar 
104.Silveira, F. A. O. et al. Ecology and evolution of plant diversity in the endangered campo rupestre: a neglected conservation priority. Plant Soil. 403, 129–152 (2015).
Google Scholar 
105.Pereira, E. G., Siqueira-Silva, A. I., de Souza, A. E., Melo, N. M. J. & Souza, J. P. Distinct ecophysiological strategies of widespread and endemic species from the megadiverse campo rupestre. Flora 238, 79–86 (2018).
Google Scholar 
106.Moreira, S. N., Pott, V. J., Pott, A., da Silva, R. H. & Júnior, G. A. D. Flora and vegetation structure of Vereda in southwestern Cerrado. Oecol. Aust. 23, 776–798 (2019).
Google Scholar 
107.Pinto, J. R. R., Lenza, E. & Pinto, A. de S. Composição florística e estrutura da vegetação arbustivo-arbórea em um cerrado rupestre, Cocalzinho de Goiás, Goiás. Rev. Bras. Bot. 32, (2009).108.Gomes, L., Lenza, E., Maracahipes, L., Marimon, B. S. & Oliveira, E. A. de. Comparações florísticas e estruturais entre duas comunidades lenhosas de cerrado típico e cerrado rupestre, Mato Grosso, Brasil. Acta Bot. Bras. 25, 865–875 (2011).109.Gomes, D.L. Classificação fitofisionômica do cerrado no Parque Nacional da Chapada dos Veadeiros, GO, com a aplicação de uma análise combinatória com filtros adaptativos em imagens TM Landsat. (Dissertação de Mestrado, Brasília, 2008).110.Neyret, M. et al. Examining variation in the leaf mass per area of dominant species across two contrasting tropical gradients in light of community assembly. Ecol. Evol. 6, 5674–5689 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
111.Abreu, R. C. R. et al. The biodiversity cost of carbon sequestration in tropical savanna. Sci. Adv. 3, e1701284 (2017).112.Morais, V. A. et al. Carbon and biomass stocks in a fragment of cerradão in Minas Gerais state, Brazil. Cerne 19, 237–245 (2013).
Google Scholar 
113.Bispo, P. da C. et al. Woody aboveground biomass mapping of the Brazilian savanna with a multi-sensor and machine learning approach. Remote Sens. 12, 2685 (2020).114.Taberelli, M. & Gascon, C. Lessons from fragmentation research: improving management and policy guidelines for biodiversity conservation. Conserv. Biol. 19, 734–739 (2005).
Google Scholar 
115.Holder, D. N. H., Dockary, M. & Barber, J. The red edge of plant leaf reflectance. Int. J. Remote Sens. 4, 273–288 (1983).
Google Scholar 
116.Li, J. & Roy, D. A global analysis of sentinel-2A, sentinel-2B and landsat-8 data revisit intervals and implications for terrestrial monitoring. Remote Sens. 9, 902 (2017).ADS 

Google Scholar 
117.Hunter, F. D. L., Mitchard, E. T. A., Tyrrell, P. & Russell, S. Inter-seasonal time series imagery enhances classification accuracy of grazing resource and land degradation maps in a savanna ecosystem. Remote Sens. 12, 198 (2020).ADS 

Google Scholar 
118.Ramos, D. M., Diniz, P., Ooi, M. K. J., Borghetti, F. & Valls, J. F. M. Avoiding the dry season: dispersal time and syndrome mediate seed dormancy in grasses in Neotropical savanna and wet grasslands. J. Veg. Sci. 28, 798–807 (2017).
Google Scholar 
119.de Camargo, M. G. G., de Carvalho, G. H., Alberton, B. de C., Reys, P. & Morellato, L. P. C. Leafing patterns and leaf exchange strategies of a cerrado woody community. Biotropica. 50, 442–454 (2018).120.Rüetschi, M., Schaepman, M. & Small, D. Using multitemporal sentinel-1 C-band backscatter to monitor phenology and classify deciduous and coniferous forests in Northern Switzerland. Remote Sens. 10, 55 (2017).ADS 

Google Scholar 
121.Sano, E. E., Ferreira, L. G. & Huete, A. R. Synthetic aperture radar (L band) and optical vegetation indices for discriminating the Brazilian savanna physiognomies: a comparative analysis. Earth Interact. 9, 1–15 (2005).
Google Scholar 
122.Joshi, N. et al. A review of the application of optical and radar remote sensing data fusion to land use mapping and monitoring. Remote Sens. 8, 70 (2016).ADS 

Google Scholar 
123.Nicolau, A. P., Flores-Anderson, A., Griffin, R., Herndon, K. & Meyer, F. J. Assessing SAR C-band data to effectively distinguish modified land uses in a heavily disturbed Amazon forest. Int. J. Appl. Earth. Obs. Geoinf. 94, 102214 (2021).124.Notarnicola, C. & Posa, F. Inferring vegetation water content from C- and L-band SAR images. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 45, 3165–3171 (2007).ADS 

Google Scholar 
125.El Hajj, M., Baghdadi, N., Bazzi, H. & Zribi, M. Penetration analysis of SAR signals in the C and L bands for wheat, maize, and grasslands. Remote Sens. 11, 31 (2018).ADS 

Google Scholar 
126.JAXA. Global PALSAR-2/PALSAR/JERS-1 Mosaic and Forest/Non-Forest map. https://www.eorc.jaxa.jp/ALOS/en/palsar_fnf/fnf_index.htm (JAXA, 2021).127.Zimbres, B. et al. Mapping the stock and spatial distribution of aboveground woody biomass in the native vegetation of the Brazilian Cerrado biome. For. Ecol. Manag. 499, 119615 (2021).128.Ryan, C. M. et al. Quantifying small-scale deforestation and forest degradation in African woodlands using radar imagery. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 243–257 (2011).ADS 

Google Scholar 
129.Yu, Y. & Saatchi, S. Sensitivity of L-Band SAR backscatter to aboveground biomass of global forests. Remote Sens. 8, 522 (2016).ADS 

Google Scholar 
130.Pilon, N. A. L. et al. The diversity of post-fire regeneration strategies in the cerrado ground layer. J. Ecol. 109, 154–166 (2020).
Google Scholar 
131.Schmidt, I. B. & Eloy, L. Fire regime in the Brazilian Savanna: Recent changes, policy and management. Flora. 268, 151613 (2020).132.Boschetti, L. et al. Global validation of the collection 6 MODIS burned area product. Remote Sens. Environ. 235, 111490 (2019).133.Humber, M. L., Boschetti, L., Giglio, L. & Justice, C. O. Spatial and temporal intercomparison of four global burned area products. Int. J. Digit. Earth. 12, 460–484 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
134.Arruda, V. L. S., Piontekowski, V. J., Alencar, A., Pereira, R. S. & Matricardi, E. A. T. An alternative approach for mapping burn scars using Landsat imagery, Google Earth Engine, and Deep Learning in the Brazilian Savanna. Remote Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ. 22, 100472 (2021).135.Santos, F. L. M. et al. Assessing VIIRS capabilities to improve burned area mapping over the Brazilian Cerrado. Int. J. Remote Sens. 41, 8300–8327 (2020).
Google Scholar 
136.Marques, E. Q. et al. Redefining the Cerrado-Amazonia transition: implications for conservation. Biodivers. Conserv. 29, 1501–1517 (2019).
Google Scholar 
137.Marimon, B. S. et al. Disequilibrium and hyperdynamic tree turnover at the forest–cerrado transition zone in southern Amazonia. Plant Ecol. Divers. 7, 281–292 (2013).
Google Scholar 
138.Mellor, A., Boukir, S., Haywood, A. & Jones, S. Exploring issues of training data imbalance and mislabelling on random forest performance for large area land cover classification using the ensemble margin. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 105, 155–168 (2015).ADS 

Google Scholar 
139.DRYFLOR. Plant diversity patterns in neotropical dry forests and their conservation implications. Science. 353, 1383–1387 (2016). More

Species composition of stone wall treesFamilies and genera of stone wall treesThere were 96 stone wall trees belonging to 6 genera and 5 families in Macao. Among them, Moraceae and Ficus appeared the most frequently, both reaching 85 times, accounting for 88.5% (Table 1). It showed that Moraceae, a kind of tropical distribution family, was dominant in the stone wall trees communities, which meant that stone wall trees species in Macao appeared distinctly tropical nature18.Table 1 Frequency of occurrence of stone wall Trees in different families and genera.Full size tableSpecies of stone wall treesThere were 16 species of the stone wall trees in Macao including Bridelia tomentosa, Celtis sinensis, Eriobotrya japonica, Ficus altissima, F. benjamina, F. elastica, F. hispida, F. microcarpa, F. pandurata, F. subpisocarpa, F. tinctoria subsp. gibbosa, F. rumphii, F. variegata, F. virens, Leucaena leucocephala, and Trema cannabina (Fig. 2).Figure 216 species of stone wall trees in Macao (photo was taken by Professor Qin Xingsheng).Full size imageBased on the frequency of occurrence of various tree species, the frequency was concentrated in the range of 1–5%. Among them, Ficus microcarpa had the highest frequency, reaching 58 times, with a frequency of 60.4% (Fig. 3). This tree species is robust, adaptable and fast growing, which is the main population of Ficus19.Figure 3Frequency distribution of stone wall tree species in Macao.Full size imageStone wall trees in the historic center of MacaoThe historic center of Macao, covering an area of about 2.8 km2, is the heartland of Macao’s historical and cultural heritage, which plays a significant role in the cultural heritage around the world18. The historic center of Macao provides valuable historical and cultural resources that enable Macao to transform into a world tourism center20.A total of 14 plots were located in the historic Center of Macao (Fig. 4), with 45 stone wall trees, accounting for 47.9% of the total number of trees in the survey. Among them, Jardim Luís de Camões has the largest number of 9 stone wall trees. The park, built in the mid-eighteenth century, is one of the oldest gardens in Macao and has the largest number of old trees in Macao. The park had provided good time and environmental conditions for the growth of stone wall trees.Figure 4(a) Schematic diagram of distribution and number of stone wall trees in the historic Center of Macao. (b) Schematic diagram of historic center of Macao. (URL of the Macao map: https://www.d-maps.com/m/asia/china/macau/macau02.gif).Full size imageAccording to Decree No. 56/84/M of the Macao Special Administrative Region Government Printing Department, immovable property that represents the creation of man, or the development of nature or technology and has cultural significance is considered tangible cultural property. The occurrence of the stone wall tree was inextricably linked to ancient wall-building techniques of that time, which was of great significance for the study of the technological development and ecological landscape of the historic center of Macao. The concept of “historic urban landscape” was proposed by Zhang Song20, who argued that cities were organisms in continuous evolution, emphasizing respect for the interrelationship between natural and man-made environments. The stone wall trees in the historic center of Macao have been associated with the local culture and ecology tightly and should be preserved as important urban landscape.Symbiotic relationship between tree and stone wallsAs shown in the table below (Table 2), it was found that most of the stone wall trees had root systems that were not only superficially attached to the wall but also extended to the top or bottom of the wall. In particular, Ficus spp. whose strong root system could closely mosaic with the wall, thus forming a strong symbiosis.Table 2 The relationship between the root system of the stone wall tree and the wall.Full size tableStone walls can imitate the traditional nature-accommodating features to permit spontaneous establishment of a diverse plant assemblage. Besides vegetative diversities in terms of species composition, growth form and biomass structure, stone walls can support a mass collection of urban wildlife and provide various ecosystem service. It is highly recommended that modern urban design be created to embrace stone wall landscape as an integral part of naturalistic or ecological design.Vision for the establishment of the stone wall tree trail system in the historic of MacaoThe traditional street environment in the Macao Peninsula is a kind of distinctive urban landscape, which can highlight the specificity and value of the urban context. The combination of the stone wall trees and walls, together with the traditional streets, form a spatial urban landscape. Starting from the location of the stone wall tree landscape, the dots and lines are prospective to promote the establishment of a comprehensive stone wall tree landscape trail system (Fig. 5), so that the public can make use of the existing biological resources to have a better understanding of the land on which they live.Figure 5Schematic diagram of the stone wall trees trail system on the Macao Peninsula (URL of the Macao map: https://www.d-maps.com/m/asia/china/macau/macau02.gif and the finished map is created by Meisi Chen through the Photoshop CS6 and Arc GIS 10.2).Full size imageSince 2012, the Macao Government has been implementing the “Strolling along Macao Street” project, which aims at studying and exploring the history and culture of the streets of Macao through an in-depth cultural tourism route and promoting it to different levels of society. The establishment of the stone wall tree trail system can rely on this project to raise the public’s awareness of the protection and cultural identity of the stone wall tree landscape through a variety of ways. For example, route design competition, photography competition and exhibition, recruitment of “Stonewall Tree Protection Ambassadors” and other forms of participation, so that the public could complete the “role change” in the high degree of such participation—from “onlookers” to “bystanders”.Survey results of associated plant speciesSpecies composition and occurrence of frequencyThe survey showed that there were 101 species of stone wall tree associated plants in Macao, under 88 genera and 51 families. Most associated plants belonged to Euphorbiaceae, Compositae, and Araceae.There were 85 species with a frequency of 1–5 times, accounting for 84.2% of total species. A total of 11 species appeared 11–15 times, accounting for 4.0% (Fig. 6). There were a total of 4 species that appeared more than 15 times. They were Cocculus orbiculatus, Pteris cretica, Paederia scandens, and Pyrrosia adnascens. Most of the associated species appeared only 1–5 times, indicating that most plants were selective and accidental for the growth conditions of stone wall sites.Figure 6Occurrence frequency in various species of associated plants.Full size imageLife form compositionHerbaceous plants with 37 species, accounting the percentage of 52.3% (Fig. 7), were dominant in the associated plant species because the seeds of herbaceous plants are lighter and can be propagated to the wall surface by wind force.Figure 7Life form of associated plants with stone wall trees in Macao.Full size imageSimilarity analysis of the associated plants in MacaoIn order to compare the similarity of associated plant species in different environment, the surveyed sample sites for this study were divided into three categories: motorized lanes, non-motorized lanes, and park habitats (Table 3). According to Jaccard’s similarity principle, Sj is extremely dissimilar when it is 0.00–0.25, and the analysis showed that the similarity of companion plant species in all three habitats was extremely dissimilar. Therefore, it indicated that the companion plants in different habitats had obvious diversity and uniqueness.Table 3 Jaccard similarity index for companion plant species composition among three habitats.Full size table More

ALAN advances timing of activity and BMAL1 expressionDaily cycles of activity were strongly affected by the ALAN treatment (GAMM, p = 0.001, Fig. 2A and Fig. S2; Table S4). In the 5 lux group birds were generally active 6–7 h before lights-on, whereas birds in the other two light treatments (0.5 and 1.5 lux) advanced morning activity to a much lesser extent. Because of the advanced onset of activity, 40% of the overall diel activity in the 5 lux group occurred during the night, compared to 11 and 14% in the 0.5 and 1.5 lux groups, and less than 1% in the control dark group. Thus, with increasing ALAN, nocturnal activity also increased (LMM, treatment p  0.1 for pairwise comparison), and thereafter their timing remained stable. The group exposed to 5 lux showed a much larger instantaneous phase advance of almost five hours (mean ± SEM = 289 ± 21 min), and thereafter continued to gradually phase-advance until reaching a stable phase after 10 days (interaction treatment × day, p  More

OBITUARY
28 January 2022

Richard Leakey (1944–2022)

Palaeontologist of human origins, conservationist and politician.

Marta Mirazón Lahr

0

Marta Mirazón Lahr

Marta Mirazón Lahr is professor of human evolutionary biology and prehistory at the University of Cambridge, UK. Leakey was a friend, colleague and supporter of her work in Turkana, where she directs research in human origins.

View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMed
 Google Scholar

Twitter

Facebook

Email

Download PDF

Credit: William Campbell/Sygma/Getty

Richard Leakey made palaeontological discoveries of lasting significance, and brought animal poaching to the world’s attention. His fossil finds at Koobi Fora on the shores of Lake Turkana, Kenya, transformed our understanding of the diversity of human ancestors. He directed Kenya’s national museum, reorganized the country’s wildlife services and headed Kenya’s civil service. He died aged 77, at home in the Ngong Hills, Kenya.In science, he liked exploration, big-picture problems and building institutions. He made huge strides in conservation, empowering organizations and deploying shock tactics. He entered politics, creating an opposition party, then worked in government, finally becoming its corruption watchdog. He mentored young Kenyan scholars, conservationists and artists who are now leaders in their field.Born in Nairobi, Richard was the middle child of pioneers in African palaeontology and archaeology Louis and Mary Leakey. He abandoned school at 16 to open an animal-trapping and safari business, earning enough to pay for flying lessons and his own small plane. In 1963, a mix of interest in his parents’ world and a wish to prove himself to them lured him into the study of the past, and he found his first important hominin fossil — a 1.5 million-year-old mandible of Paranthropus boisei — in 1964.
Fifty years after Homo habilis
In 1967, Leakey’s father asked him to direct an expedition to the Omo Valley of southern Ethiopia. There, Leakey found two Homo sapiens fossils now known to be 230,000 years old (C. M. Vidal et al. Nature https://doi.org/gn3794; 2022), key evidence of our species’ African origins. Flying over the eastern shore of Lake Turkana, he recognized the potential of sediments at Koobi Fora, which proved to be a trove of hominin fossils. The discovery of different hominin species living at the same time between 2 million and 1.5 million years ago (P. boisei, Homo habilis, Homo rudolfensis and Homo erectus) changed views of how humans evolved.In 1968, Leakey became director of the National Museums of Kenya, which became a hub of thriving research. Soon afterwards, he met the young British zoologist Meave Epps. They married after his first marriage ended, and became life-long personal and scientific partners. Their work with researchers dubbed the Hominid Gang, led by Kamoya Kimeu, resulted in the discovery of dozens of hominin fossils, including a new genus and four new species (Paranthropus aethiopicus, Australopithecus anamensis and Kenyanthropus platyops, as well as H. rudolfensis). A 1.6-million-year-old skeleton of a juvenile H. erectus proved to have grown more slowly than apes and faster than humans, giving insights into the evolution of human life-history.Leakey became involved in acrimonious scientific arguments — sometimes he was right, sometimes not — which, during the 1970s, gave an antagonistic tone to human-origins research. His health deteriorated, and he had his first kidney transplant (donated by his brother Philip) in 1980. In 1989, Kenya’s president, Daniel arap Moi, asked him to run the Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS). Leakey declared war on poachers, burnt the stockpile of Kenyan ivory and massively reduced elephant deaths. His controversial tactics had an impact on a web of corrupt practices and created serious enemies. In 1993, the plane he was piloting crashed; both his legs had to be amputated below the knee. Sabotage was rumoured.
Human evolution’s ties to tectonics
The relationship with Moi became increasingly hostile. In 1995, Leakey left KWS to create an opposition party, Safina, becoming a member of the Kenyan parliament in 1998. His time in opposition was tense. Leakey was beaten and received death threats. But Kenya needed large investments, and funders demanded assurances. Capitalizing on Leakey’s reputation for integrity, in 1998 Moi asked him to direct KWS again, and in 1999 to head the civil service. Over three years, Leakey raised hundreds of millions of dollars for Kenya and fought corruption.In 2002, he accepted a position at Stony Brook University, New York, that allowed him to live in Kenya and create the Turkana Basin Institute (TBI), which he chaired from 2005 until his death. TBI fostered a burst of discoveries: Miocene primates, hominins, the oldest stone tools in the world at 3.3 million years, evidence of prehistoric warfare, and the earliest monumental architecture in sub-Saharan Africa. In 2004, Leakey founded WildlifeDirect, a non-governmental conservation body, serving on its board for 10 years. In 2007, he became chair of Transparency International Kenya, continuing his battle against corruption.By this time, Leakey had skin cancer and progressively worse health. He underwent a second kidney transplant in 2006, with Meave as the donor, and a liver transplant in 2013. Yet, in 2015, he accepted President Uhuru Kenyatta’s request to return to KWS as chair until 2018. For the past six years, he worked to create a new Kenyan museum, called Ngaren — of which I am a board member — to celebrate science, evolution and humanity’s African origins.Richard was special — fun, insightful, generous, with a sharp sense of humour, and a fabulous cook and sommelier. He embraced life, good and bad, and imbued those around him with the sheer excitement of what could be done, discovered, resolved and enjoyed.

Nature 602, 29 (2022)
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-00211-6

Competing Interests
M.M.L. is a member of the board of directors of Ngaren, a non-governmental organization founded by Richard Leakey to support the creation of a museum of evolution in Kenya.

Related Articles

Human evolution’s ties to tectonics

The past, present and future of human evolution

Fifty years after Homo habilis

Obituary: Louis Leakey

Collection: Human evolution

Subjects

History

Evolution

Conservation biology

Politics

Latest on:

History

From the archive
News & Views 25 JAN 22

Nobel nominators — which women will you suggest?
Correspondence 18 JAN 22

From the archive
News & Views 18 JAN 22

Evolution

Where did Omicron come from? Three key theories
News Feature 28 JAN 22

The foreign trees that now reign over Asia’s jungles
Research Highlight 27 JAN 22

Evolution of inner ear neuroanatomy of bats and implications for echolocation
Article 26 JAN 22

Jobs

Post-doc in Mathematics (Geometry and Mathematical Quantization)

University of Luxembourg
Luxembourg, Luxembourg

Post-Doctoral Fellow in Mathematics (Statistics)

University of Luxembourg
Luxembourg, Luxembourg

Doctoral (PhD) student position in autism and ADHD

Karolinska Institutet, doctoral positions
Stockholm, Sweden

Proteomics Platform Scientist (m/f/d)

Research Center for Molecular Medicine (CeMM), ÖAW
Vienna, Austria More

1.GESAMP. Global pollution trends: coastal ecosystem assessment for the past century. 101 (2018).2.Andrady, A. L. Microplastics in the marine environment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 62, 1596–1605 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
3.Hartmann, N. B. et al. Microplastics as vectors for environmental contaminants: Exploring sorption, desorption, and transfer to biota. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 13, 488–493 (2017).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
4.Bour, A., Avio, C. G., Gorbi, S., Regoli, F. & Hylland, K. Presence of microplastics in benthic and epibenthic organisms: Influence of habitat, feeding mode and trophic level. Environ. Pollut. 243, 1217–1225 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
5.Jambeck, J. R. et al. Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science (80-) 47, 768–770 (2015).ADS 

Google Scholar 
6.PlasticsEurope. Plastics—The Facts 2020. PlasticsEurope (2020).7.Sweet, M., Steifox, M. & Lamb, J. Plastics and Shallow Water Coral Reefs. Synthesis of the Science for Policy-Makers (2019).8.Stafford, R. & Jones, P. J. S. Viewpoint—Ocean plastic pollution: A convenient but distracting truth? Mar. Policy 19, 0–1 (2019).9.Backhaus, T. & Wagner, M. Microplastics in the environment: Much ado about nothing? A debate. Glob. Challenges 1900022, 1900022 (2019).
Google Scholar 
10.Browne, M. A., Niven, S. J., Galloway, T. S., Rowland, S. J. & Thompson, R. C. Microplastic moves pollutants and additives to worms, reducing functions linked to health and biodiversity. Curr. Biol. 23, 2388–2392 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
11.Lebreton, L. C. M. et al. River plastic emissions to the world’s oceans. Nat. Commun. 8, 15611 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
12.Donovan, M. K. et al. Nitrogen pollution interacts with heat stress to increase coral bleaching across the seascape. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 117, 5351–5357 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
13.Lamb, J. B. et al. Plastic waste associated with disease on coral reefs. Science (80-) 359, 460–462 (2018).CAS 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
14.Burke, L., Reytar, K., Spalding, M. & Perry, A. Reefs at Risk Revisited (2011).15.Tan, F. et al. Microplastic pollution around remote uninhabited coral reefs of Nansha Islands, South China Sea. Sci. Total Environ. 725, 138383 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
16.Bucol, L. A. et al. Microplastics in marine sediments and rabbitfish (Siganus fuscescens) from selected coastal areas of Negros Oriental, Philippines. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 150, 110685 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
17.Galloway, T. S., Cole, M. & Lewis, C. Interactions of microplastic debris throughout the marine ecosystem. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1–8 (2017).
Google Scholar 
18.Lagarde, F. et al. Microplastic interactions with freshwater microalgae: Hetero-aggregation and changes in plastic density appear strongly dependent on polymer type. Environ. Pollut. 215, 331–339 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
19.Cordova, M. R., Hadi, T. A. & Prayudha, B. Occurrence and abundance of microplastics in coral reef sediment: A case study in Sekotong, Lombok-Indonesia. AES Bioflux 10, 23–29 (2018).
Google Scholar 
20.Ogston, A. S., Storlazzi, C. D., Field, M. E. & Presto, M. K. Sediment resuspension and transport patterns on a fringing reef flat, Molokai, Hawaii. Coral Reefs 23, 559–569 (2004).
Google Scholar 
21.Bellwood, D. R. Direct estimate of bioerosion by two parrotfish species, Chlorurus gibbus and C. sordidus on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Mar. Biol. 121, 419–429 (1995).
Google Scholar 
22.Rosenfeld, M., Bresler, V. & Abelson, A. Sediment as a possible food source for corals. Ecol. Lett. 2, 345–348 (1999).
Google Scholar 
23.Rogers, C. S. Responses of coral reefs and reef organisms to sedimentation. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 62, 185–202 (1990).ADS 

Google Scholar 
24.Bastidas, C., Bone, D. & Garcia, E. M. Sedimentation rates and metal content of sediments in a Venezuelan coral reef. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 38, 16–24 (1999).CAS 

Google Scholar 
25.Smith, L. D., Negri, A. P., Philipp, E., Webster, N. S. & Heyward, A. J. The effects of antifoulant-paint-contaminated sediments on coral recruits and branchlets. Mar. Biol. 143, 651–657 (2003).CAS 

Google Scholar 
26.Stafford-Smith, M. Sediment rejection efficiency of 22 species of Australian scleractinian corals. Mar. Biol. 115, 229–243 (1993).
Google Scholar 
27.Junjie, R. K., Browne, N. K., Erftemeijer, P. L. A. & Todd, P. A. Impacts of sediments on coral energetics: Partitioning the effects of turbidity and settling particles. PLoS ONE 9, e107195 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
28.Hall, N. M., Berry, K. L. E., Rintoul, L. & Hoogenboom, M. O. Microplastic ingestion by scleractinian corals. Mar. Biol. 162, 725–732 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
29.Allen, A. S., Seymour, A. C. & Rittschof, D. Chemoreception drives plastic consumption in a hard coral. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 124, 198–205 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
30.Mouchi, V. et al. Long-term aquaria study suggests species-specific responses of two cold-water corals to macro-and microplastics exposure. Environ. Pollut. 253, 322–329 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
31.Tang, J., Ni, X., Zhou, Z., Wang, L. & Lin, S. Acute microplastic exposure raises stress response and suppresses detoxification and immune capacities in the scleractinian coral Pocillopora damicornis. Environ. Pollut. 243, 66–74 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
32.Chapron, L. et al. Macro- and microplastics affect cold-water corals growth, feeding and behaviour. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–8 (2018).CAS 

Google Scholar 
33.Hankins, C., Moso, E. & Lasseigne, D. Microplastics impair growth in two atlantic scleractinian coral species, Pseudodiploria clivosa and Acropora cervicornis. Environ. Pollut. 275, 116649 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
34.Rocha, R. J. M. et al. Do microplastics affect the zoanthid Zoanthus sociatus?. Sci. Total Environ. 713, 136659 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
35.Reichert, J. et al. Interactive effects of microplastic pollution and heat stress on reef-building corals. Environ. Pollut. 290, 118010 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
36.Rotjan, R. D. et al. Patterns, dynamics and consequences of microplastic ingestion by the temperate coral, Astrangia poculata. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 286, 20190726 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
37.Reichert, J., Schellenberg, J., Schubert, P. & Wilke, T. Responses of reef building corals to microplastic exposure. Environ. Pollut. 237, 955–960 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
38.Hankins, C., Duffy, A. & Drisco, K. Scleractinian coral microplastic ingestion: Potential calcification effects, size limits, and retention. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 135, 587–593 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
39.Reichert, J., Arnold, A. L., Hoogenboom, M. O., Schubert, P. & Wilke, T. Impacts of microplastics on growth and health of hermatypic corals are species-specific. Environ. Pollut. 254, 113074 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
40.Mendrik, F. M. et al. Species-specific impact of microplastics on coral physiology. Environ. Pollut. 269, 116238 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
41.Corona, E., Martin, C., Marasco, R. & Duarte, C. M. Passive and active removal of marine microplastics by a mushroom Coral (Danafungia scruposa). Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 1–9 (2020).ADS 

Google Scholar 
42.Martin, C., Corona, E., Mahadik, G. A. & Duarte, C. M. Adhesion to coral surface as a potential sink for marine microplastics. Environ. Pollut. 255, 113281 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
43.Oldenburg, K. S., Urban-Rich, J., Castillo, K. D. & Baumann, J. H. Microfiber abundance associated with coral tissue varies geographically on the Belize Mesoamerican Barrier Reef System. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 163, 111938 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
44.Axworthy, J. B. & Padilla-Gamiño, J. L. Microplastics ingestion and heterotrophy in thermally stressed corals. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–8 (2019).
Google Scholar 
45.Houlbrèque, F. & Ferrier-Pagès, C. Heterotrophy in tropical scleractinian corals. Biol. Rev. 84, 1–17 (2009).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
46.Borja, A. et al. Past and future grand challenges in marine ecosystem ecology. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 362 (2020).
Google Scholar 
47.Rochman, C. M., Hentschel, B. T. & The, S. J. Long-term sorption of metals is similar among plastic types: Implications for plastic debris in aquatic environments. PLoS ONE 9, e85433 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
48.Niu, Y., Ying, D., Li, K., Wang, Y. & Jia, J. Adsorption of heavy-metal ions from aqueous solution onto chitosan-modified polyethylene terephthalate (PET). Res. Chem. Intermed. 43, 4213–4245 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
49.Frias, J., Sobral, P. & Ferreira, A. Organic pollutants in microplastics from two beaches of the Portuguese coast. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 60, 1988–1992 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
50.Wright, S. L., Thompson, R. C. & Galloway, T. S. The physical impacts of microplastics on marine organisms: A review. Environ. Pollut. 178, 483–492 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
51.Botterell, Z. L. R. et al. Bioavailability of microplastics to marine zooplankton: Effect of shape and infochemicals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 12024–12033 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
52.Wild, C. et al. Coral mucus functions as an energy carrier and particle trap in the ecosystem. Nature 428, 66–70 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
53.Benson, A. & Muscatine, L. Wax in coral mucus: Energy transfer from corals to reef fishes. Limnol. Oceanogr. 19, 810–814 (1974).ADS 

Google Scholar 
54.Verla, A. W., Enyoh, C. E., Verla, E. N. & Nwarnorh, K. O. Microplastic–toxic chemical interaction: A review study on quantified levels, mechanism and implication. SN Appl. Sci. 1, 1–30 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
55.Brown, B. E. & Bythell, J. C. Perspectives on mucus secretion in reef corals. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 296, 291–309 (2005).CAS 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
56.Weber, M., Lott, C. & Fabricius, K. E. Sedimentation stress in a scleractinian coral exposed to terrestrial and marine sediments with contrasting physical, organic and geochemical properties. J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 336, 18–32 (2006).CAS 

Google Scholar 
57.Riegl, B. & Branch, G. Effects of sediment on the energy budgets of four scleractinian (Bourne 1900) and five alcyonacean (Lamoroux 1816) corals. J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 186, 259–275 (1995).
Google Scholar 
58.Felsing, S. et al. A new approach in separating microplastics from environmental samples based on their electrostatic behavior. Environ. Pollut. 234, 20–28 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
59.Bessell-Browne, P., Negri, A. P., Fisher, R., Clode, P. L. & Jones, R. Cumulative impacts: Thermally bleached corals have reduced capacity to clear deposited sediment. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–14 (2017).
Google Scholar 
60.Fitt, W. K. et al. Response of two species of Indo-Pacific corals, Porites cylindrica and Stylophora pistillata, to short-term thermal stress: The host does matter in determining the tolerance of corals to bleaching. J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 373, 102–110 (2009).
Google Scholar 
61.Weber, M. et al. Mechanisms of damage to corals exposed to sedimentation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 109, E1558 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
62.Lear, G. et al. Plastics and the microbiome: Impacts and solutions. Environ. Microbiomes 16, 1–19 (2021).
Google Scholar 
63.Palardy, J., Rodrigues, L. & Grottolli, A. The importance of zooplankton to the daily metabolic carbon requirements of healthy and bleached corals at two depths. J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 367, 180–188 (2008).CAS 

Google Scholar 
64.Jennings, H. Modifiability in behaviour, 1: Behavior of sea anemones. J. Exp. Zool. 4, 447–632 (1905).
Google Scholar 
65.Boschma, H. On the feeding reactions and digestion in the coral polyp Astrangia danae, with notes on its symbiosis with zooxanthellae. Biol. Bull. 49, 407–439 (1925).CAS 

Google Scholar 
66.Anthony, K. R. N. Coral suspension feeding on fine particulate matter. J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 232, 85–106 (1999).
Google Scholar 
67.Schlekat, C., McGee, B. & Reinharz, E. Testing sediment toxicity in chesapeake bay with the amphipod Leptocheirus plumulosus: An evaluation. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 11, 225–236 (1992).CAS 

Google Scholar 
68.Nie, H., Wang, J., Xu, K., Huang, Y. & Yan, M. Microplastic pollution in water and fish samples around Nanxun Reef in Nansha Islands, South China Sea. Sci. Total Environ. 696, 134022 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
69.Cai, M. et al. Lost but can’t be neglected: Huge quantities of small microplastics hide in the South China Sea. Sci. Total Environ. 633, 1206–1216 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
70.Zhu, L. et al. Microplastic pollution in North Yellow Sea, China: Observations on occurrence, distribution and identification. Sci. Total Environ. 636, 20–29 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
71.Saliu, F. et al. Microplastic and charred microplastic in the Faafu Atoll, Maldives. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 136, 464–471 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
72.Saliu, F., Montano, S., Leoni, B., Lasagni, M. & Galli, P. Microplastics as a threat to coral reef environments: Detection of phthalate esters in neuston and scleractinian corals from the Faafu Atoll, Maldives. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 142, 234–241 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
73.Bessa, F. et al. Occurrence of microplastics in commercial fish from a natural estuarine environment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 128, 575–584 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
74.Ivar Do Sul, J. A. & Costa, M. F. The present and future of microplastic pollution in the marine environment. Environ. Pollut. 185, 352–364 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
75.Chubarenko, I., Bagaev, A., Zobkov, M. & Esiukova, E. On some physical and dynamical properties of microplastic particles in marine environment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 108, 105–112 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
76.Tang, J. et al. Differential enrichment and physiological impacts of ingested microplastics in scleractinian corals in situ. J. Hazard. Mater. 404, 124205 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
77.Harrison, J. P., Schratzberger, M., Sapp, M. & Osborn, A. M. Rapid bacterial colonization of low-density polyethylene microplastics in coastal sediment microcosms. BMC Microbiol. 14, 1–15 (2014).
Google Scholar 
78.Veron, J. Corals of the World (2000).79.Benavides, M. et al. Diazotrophs: A non-negligible source of nitrogen for the tropical coral Stylophora pistillata. J. Exp. Biol. 219, 2608–2612 (2016).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
80.Einbinder, S. et al. Changes in morphology and diet of the coral Stylophora pistillata along a depth gradient. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 381, 167–174 (2009).ADS 

Google Scholar 
81.Erni-Cassola, G., Gibson, M. I., Thompson, R. C. & Christie-Oleza, J. A. Lost, but found with Nile red: A novel method for detecting and quantifying small microplastics (1 mm to 20 μm) in environmental samples. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 13641–13648 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
82.Swain, T. D., Schellinger, J. L., Strimaitis, A. M. & Reuter, K. E. Evolution of anthozoan polyp retraction mechanisms: Convergent functional morphology and evolutionary allometry of the marginal musculature in order Zoanthidea (Cnidaria: Anthozoa: Hexacorallia). BMC Evol. Biol. 15, 1–19 (2015).
Google Scholar 
83.Laissue, P. P., Gu, Y., Qian, C. & Smith, D. J. Light-induced polyp retraction and tissue rupture in the photosensitive, reef-building coral Acropora muricata. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/862045 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
84.Renegar, D. A. & Turner, N. R. Species sensitivity assessment of five Atlantic scleractinian coral species to 1-methylnaphthalene. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–17 (2021).
Google Scholar 
85.Armoza-Zvuloni, R., Schneider, A., Sher, D. & Shaked, Y. Rapid Hydrogen Peroxide release from the coral Stylophora pistillata during feeding and in response to chemical and physical stimuli. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–10 (2016).
Google Scholar 
86.Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
87.Meijering, E., Dzyubachyck, O. & Smal, I. Methods for cell and particle tracking. In Methods in Enzymology (Elsevier, 2012).88.Sorgeloos, P., Dhert, P. & Candrevab, P. Use of the brine shrimp, Artemia spp., in marine fish larviculture. Aquaculture 200, 147–159 (2001).
Google Scholar 
89.R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing (2019).90.Wood, A. S., Scheipl, F. & Wood, M. S. Package ‘gamm4’. (2020).91.Zuur, A., Saveliev, A. & Ieno, E. A Beginner’s Guide to Generalized Additive Mixed Models with R. (Highland Statistics Ltd, 2014).92.Zuur, A. F., Hilbe, J. M. & Ieno, E. N. A Beginner’s Guide to GLM and GLMM with R (Highland Statistics Ltd, 2013).93.Pyke, A. & Thompson, J. Statistical analysis of survival and removal rate experiments. Ecology 67, 240–245 (1986).
Google Scholar 
94.Therneau, T. M. Mixed effects cox models. R-Package Description. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.01149 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
95.Katki, H. A. & Mark, S. D. Survival analysis of studies nested within cohorts using the NestedCohort Package. 1–16 (2013).96.Bürkner, P. C. Advanced Bayesian multilevel modeling with the R package BRMS. R J. 10, 395–411 (2018).
Google Scholar 
97.Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N. J., Saveliev, A. A. & Smith, G. M. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R. (Springer, 2009).98.Manly, B. F. J. Measuring selectivity from multiple choice feeding-preference experiments. Biometrics 51, 709 (1995).
Google Scholar 
99.Richardson, J. Package ‘ selectapref ’. Anal. F. Lab. Foraging 8–11 (2020). More

1.Mittermeier, R. A., Coimbra-Filho, A. F., Constable, I. D., Rylands, A. B. & Valle, C. Conservation of primates in the Atlantic forest region of eastern Brazil. Int. Zoo Yearb. 22, 2–17 (1982).
Google Scholar 
2.Mittermeier, R. A., Rylands, A. B. & Wilson, D. E. W. Handbook of the Mammals of the World, vol. 3, Primates. Lynx, Barcelona (2013).3.Rylands, A. B., Kierulff, M. C. M., Mendes, S. L. & Oliveira, M. M. Callithrix aurita. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2008. IUCN Red List Threat. Species 8235, 1–7 (2008).
Google Scholar 
4.IUCN. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2020–2, Vol. 8235 (2020).5.Coimbra-Filho, A., Pissinatti, A. & Rylands, A. B. Experimental mutiple hybridism and natural hybrids among Callithrix species from easterna Brazil. In Marmosets and Tamarins Systematics Behaviour and Ecology (ed. Rylands, A. B.) 93–120 (Oxford University Press, 1993).
Google Scholar 
6.Mittermeier, R. A., Coimbra-Filho, A. F., Rylands, A. B. & Constable, I. D. Atlantic Forest region of eastern Brazil a top primate of conservation priority. IUCN / SSC Primate Spec. Gr. Newsl. 1, 9–11 (1981).
Google Scholar 
7.Carvalho, R. S. et al. Buffy-tufted-year marmoset Callithrix aurita É. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, 1812 Brazil. In Primates in Peril: The World’s 25 Most Endangered Primates 2018–2020 (eds. Schwitzer, C. et al.) 136 (IUCN SSC Primate Specialist Group, International Primatological Society, Global Wildlife Conservation, Bristol Zoological Society, 2019).8.ICMBio. Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade. Livro Vermelho da Fauna Brasileira Ameaçada de Extinção. (2018).9.SMA-SP. Decreto no63.853, de 27 de novembro de 2018. (2018).10.Rylands, A. B. et al. An assessment of the diversity of New World Primates. Neotrop. Primates 8, 61–93 (2000).
Google Scholar 
11.Brandão, L. D. & Develey, P. F. Distribution and conservation of the buffy-tufted-ear marmoset, Callithrix aurita, in lowland coastal, Atlantic Forest, Southeast Brazil. Neotrop. Primates 6, 86–88 (1998).
Google Scholar 
12.Carvalho, R. S. et al. Callithrix aurita: a marmoset species on its way to extinctionin the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Neotrop. Primates 24, 1–8 (2018).
Google Scholar 
13.Malukiewicz, J. et al. Natural and anthropogenic hybridization in two species of eastern Brazilian marmosets (Callithrix jacchus and C. penicillata). PLoS ONE 10, 1–22 (2015).
Google Scholar 
14.Ruiz-Miranda, C. R., Affonso, A. G., Martins, A. & Beck, B. Distribuição do sagui (Callithrix jacchus) nas áreas de ocorrência do mico-leão-dourado (Leontopithecus rosalia) no Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Neotrop. Primates 8, 98–101 (2000).
Google Scholar 
15.Mendes, S. L. Hybridization in free-ranging Callithrix flaviceps and the taxonomy of the Atlantic forest marmosets. Neotrop. Primates 5, 6–8 (1997).
Google Scholar 
16.Santos, C. V. et al. Ecologia, comportamento e manejo de primatas invasores e populações-problema. A Primatologia no Brasil 10, 101–118 (2007).
Google Scholar 
17.Rhymer, J. M. & Simberloff, D. Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Annu. Rev. Ecolology Evol. Syst. 27, 83–109 (1996).
Google Scholar 
18.Zinner, D., Arnold, M. L. & Roos, C. The strange blood: Natural hybridization in primates. Evol. Anthropol. 20, 96–103 (2011).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
19.Brumfield, R. T. Speciation genetics of biological invasions with hybridization. Mol. Ecol. 19, 5079–5083 (2010).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
20.Steeves, T. E., Maloney, R. F., Hale, M. L., Tylianakis, J. M. & Gemmell, N. J. Genetic analyses reveal hybridization but no hybrid swarm in one of the world’s rarest birds. Mol. Ecol. 19, 5090–5100 (2010).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
21.Allendorf, F. W., Leary, R. F., Spruell, P. & Wenburg, J. K. The problems with hybrids: Setting conservation guidelines. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 613–622 (2001).
Google Scholar 
22.Bechara, I. M. Abordagens metodológicas em Biogeografia da Conservação para avaliar risco de extinção de espécies: um estudo de caso com Callithrix aurita (Primates: Callitrichidae). (UFRJ, 2012).23.Braz, A. G., Lorini, M. L. & Vale, M. M. Climate change is likely to affect the distribution but not parapatry of the Brazilian marmoset monkeys (Callithrix spp.). Divers. Distrib. 25, 536–550 (2019).
Google Scholar 
24.Malukiewicz, J. A review of experimental, natural, and anthropogenic hybridization in Callithrix marmosets. Int. J. Primatol. 40, 72–98 (2019).
Google Scholar 
25.Pinto, L. F. G. & Voivodic, M. Reverse the tipping point of the Atlantic Forest for mitigation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 364–365 (2021).ADS 

Google Scholar 
26.Seehausen, O., Takimoto, G., Roy, D. & Jokela, J. Speciation reversal and biodiversity dynamics with hybridization in changing environments. Mol. Ecol. 17, 30–44 (2008).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
27.Pereira, D. G., De Oliveira, M. E. A. & Ruiz-Miranda, C. R. Interações entre calitriquídeos exóticos e nativos no Parque Nacional da Serra dos Órgãos – RJ. Espaço e Geogr. 11, 87–114 (2008).
Google Scholar 
28.Aximoff, I., Soares, H. M., Pissinatti, A. & Bueno, C. Registros de Callithrix aurita (Primates, Callitrichidae) e seus híbridos no Parque Nacional do Itatiaia. Oecologia Aust. 20, 520–525 (2016).
Google Scholar 
29.Detogne, N. et al. Spatial distribution of buffy-tufted-ear (Callithrix aurita) and invasive marmosets (Callithrix spp.) in a tropical rainforest reserve in southeastern Brazil. Am. J. Primatol. 79, 1–11 (2017).
Google Scholar 
30.Carvalho, R. S. et al. Molecular identification of a buffy-tufted-ear marmoset (Callithrix aurita) incorporated in a group of invasive marmosets in the Serra dos Órgãos National Park, Rio de Janeiro – Brazil. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. Suppl. Ser. 4, e230–e231 (2013).
Google Scholar 
31.Novaes, C. M. et al. Karyotypic characteristics of hybrid marmosets of the genus Callithrix (Erxeleben, 1777) suggest the participation of three parental species. Bol. do Mus. Biol. Mello Leitão 39, 11–21 (2017).
Google Scholar 
32.Pereira, D. G. Densidade, genética e saúde populacional como ferramentas para propor um plano de controle e erradicação de invasão biológica: o caso de Callithrix aurita (Primates) no Parque Nacional da Serra dos Órgãos, RJ, Brasil (Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, 2010).
Google Scholar 
33.Veracini, C., Galeni, L. & Forti, M. The concept of species and the foundations of biology, a case study: The Callithrix jacchus group (Primates-Platyrrhini). Riv. Biol. 95, 75–100 (2002).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
34.Campton, D. E. Natural hybridization and introgression in fishes: methods of detection and genetic interpretations. In Population Genetics and Fishery Management (eds Ryman, N. & Utter, F.) 16–192 (University of Washington Press, 1987).
Google Scholar 
35.Nagamachi, C. Y., Pieczarka, J. C., Schwarz, M., Barros, R. M. S. & Mattevi, M. S. Comparative chromosomal study of five taxa of genus Callithrix, group jacchus (Platyrrhini, Primates). Am. J. Primatol. 41, 53–60 (1997).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
36.Mallet, J. Hybridization as an invasion of the genome. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 229–237 (2005).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
37.Ardito, G., Lamberti, L., Bigatti, P., Stanyon, R. & Govone, D. NOR distribution and satellite associations in Callithrix jacchus. Caryologia 40, 185–194 (1987).
Google Scholar 
38.Nagamashi, C. & Ferrari, I. Cytogenetic studies of Callithrix jacchus (Callitrichidae, Platyrrhini) from two different sites in Brazil. I. Morphological variability of Y chromosome. Rev. Bras. Genética 7, 497–507 (1984).
Google Scholar 
39.Nogueira, D. M. et al. Cytogenetic study in natural hybrids of Callithrix (Callitrichidae: Primates) in the Atlantic forest of the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Iheringia, Série Zool. 101, 156–160 (2011).
Google Scholar 
40.Moreira, M. A. M. SRY evolution in Cebidae (Platyrrhini: Primates). J. Mol. Evol. 55, 92–103 (2002).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
41.de Morais, M. M. OS SAGUIS (Callithrix spp., ERXLEBEN, 1777) Exóticos Invasores na bacia do Rio São João, Rio de Janeiro: Biologia populacional e padrão de distribuição em uma paisagem fragmentada. Uenf.Br (2010).42.Sweeney, C. G., Curran, E., Westmoreland, S. V., Mansfield, K. G. & Vallender, E. J. Quantitative molecular assessment of chimerism across tissues in marmosets and tamarins. BMC Genomics 13, 98. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-98 (2012).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
43.Buckner, J. C., Lynch Alfaro, J. W., Rylands, A. B. & Alfaro, M. E. Biogeography of the marmosets and tamarins (Callitrichidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 82, 413–425 (2015).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
44.Schneider, H. et al. A molecular analysis of the evolutionary relationships in the Callitrichinae, with emphasis on the position of the dwarf marmoset. Zool. Scr. 41, 1–10 (2012).
Google Scholar 
45.Perelman, P. et al. A molecular phylogeny of living primates. PLoS Genet. 7, 1–17 (2011).
Google Scholar 
46.Price, T. D. & Bouvier, M. M. The evolution of F1 postzygotic incompatibilities in birds. Evolution (N. Y). 56, 2083–2089 (2002).
Google Scholar 
47.Nievergelt, C. M., Mundy, N. I. & Woodruff, D. S. Microsatellite primers for genotyping common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) and other callitrichids. Mol. Ecol. 7, 1432–1434 (1998).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
48.Raveendran, M. et al. Polymorphic microsatellite loci for the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) designed using a cost- and time-efficient method. Am. J. Primatol. 70, 906–910 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
49.Takabayashi, S. & Katoh, H. Noninvasive genotyping of common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) by fingernail PCR. Primates 56, 235–240 (2015).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
50.Malukiewicz, J. et al. Mitogenomic phylogeny of Callithrix with special focus on human transferred taxa. BMC Genomics 22, 1–14 (2021).
Google Scholar 
51.Rozhnov, V. V. Extinction of the European mink: ecological catastrophe or a natural process?. Lutreola 1, 10–16 (1993).
Google Scholar 
52.Rosenthal, G. G. Individual mating decisions and hybridization. J. Evol. Biol. 26, 252–255 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
53.Fundação SOS Mata Atlântica. Notícias. www.sosma.org.br/noticias/desmatamento-da-mata-atlantica-cresce-em-dez-estados/ (2021).54.Banks-Leite, C. et al. Using ecological thresholds to evaluate the costs and benefits of set-asides in a biodiversity hotspot. Science 345, 1041–1045 (2014).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
55.Oliveira, A. B. L. Presença ou Ausência do Callithrix aurita em Fragmentos de Mata Atlântica (Instituto Superior de Agronomia – Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, 2012).
Google Scholar 
56.Allendorf, F. W. et al. Intercrosses and the U.S. endangered species act: Should hybridized populations be included as westslope cutthroat trout?. Conserv. Biol. 18, 1203–1213 (2004).
Google Scholar 
57.Wayne, R. K. & Shaffer, H. B. Hybridization and endangered species protection in the molecular era. Mol. Ecol. 25, 2680–2689 (2016).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
58.U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: Proposed policy and proposed rule on the treatment of intercrosses and intercross progeny (the issue of “hybridization”). Fed. Regist. 67, 4710–4713 (1996).
Google Scholar 
59.Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., Fonseca, G. A. B. & Kent, J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853–858 (2000).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
60.Malukiewicz, J., Hepp, C. M., Guschanski, K. & Stone, A. C. Phylogeny of the jacchus group of Callithrix marmosets based on complete mitochondrial genomes. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 162, 157–169 (2016).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
61.Sambrook, J., Maniatis, T. & Fritsch, E. F. Molecular Cloning. A Laboratory Manual. Vol. 1 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2001).
Google Scholar 
62.Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C. & Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1547–1549 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
63.Rozas, J. et al. DnaSP6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large data sets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34, 3299–3302 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
64.Ronquist, F., van der Mark, P. & Huelsenbeck, J. P. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis using MRBAYES. Phylogenetic Handb. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511819049.009 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Data descriptionIn Indian cities, cases of falciparum malaria rise after the monsoon rains and peak in October–November. To address the question of whether humidity influences the seasonality and inter-annual variability of urban malaria we focus on 2 cities, Ahmedabad and Surat, with over 3 million people in the semi-arid state of Gujarat, India. These cities exhibit a rising population where sustained, extensive, and consistent surveillance programs have been conducted for over two decades. Despite their close proximity, these cities also exhibit distinct environments. While Ahmedabad is semi-arid, Surat is coastal with a maritime influence on its climate and is prone to flooding from the Tapi river.The malaria data consists of monthly cases collected from 1997 to 2014 by the respective Municipal Corporations of the cities of Ahmedabad and Surat (Fig. 1A, B). The epidemiological data result from two kinds of surveillance: (a) the collection of blood slides from fever patients by house-to-house visits by a health worker and examination of these slides for positive malaria parasites at the Primary/Community Health Center (active surveillance); (b) examination of blood slides from fever patients reporting directly to the Primary/Community Health Center (passive surveillance). Both types of data are pooled into a temporal record for each city. We used climate data of monthly RH, rainfall, and temperature for the same 18 years recorded at a local weather station within each city, supplied by the Indian Meteorological Department in Pune (India) and verified in the GHCN network of climate data (https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/ghcn-daily-description). Since station data sometimes exhibit biases and can fail to represent the climate of the whole area of interest, here the whole city, we used gridded climate products (https://www.chc.ucsb.edu/data/chirps for precipitation and https://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/dataprod/mod11.php for temperature) and constructed an average of grid cells to verify if climate covariates from the station data coincide with the satellite-based products (Supplementary Fig. 14). Time series for total population size were obtained through estimates by the respective municipal corporation.Data analysesThe temporal lagged correlation between monthly malaria cases and monthly meteorological factors from 1997 to 2014 was explored first for the two cities, by defining an interannual association based on maximum lagged correlations between the mean of the cases in the peak months (Aug–Nov) and the climate covariates. For humidity, we defined a three months window preceding the case epidemic season. This period was determined to fall between April and July for Surat and from May to July for Ahmedabad (Supplementary Table 2). The windows defined for the other covariates are shown in Supplementary Fig. 2.In addition, the temporal and possibly transient association of variability at different periods between the times series for malaria and humidity was also examined using wavelet coherence analysis3,42. In contrast to the Fourier spectral approaches, wavelet analyses are well suited for the study of signals whose frequency composition changes in time. The wavelet spectrum specifically provides a time-frequency decomposition of the total variance that is local in time42. The wavelet coherence analysis indicates the co-occurrence of a particular frequency at a given time in the number of cases and in the climate covariate.The wavelet cross-spectrum is given by ({W}_{x,y}(f,tau )={W}_{x,y}(f,tau ){W}_{x,y}^{* }(f,tau )) where x and y represent the two-time series, f is the scale parameter and (tau), the time parameter, with * denoting the complex conjugate. As in the Fourier spectral approaches, the wavelet coherence is defined as the cross-spectrum normalized by the spectrum of each signal$${R}_{x,y}(f,tau )=frac{|langle {W}_{x,y}(f,tau )rangle |}{{|langle {W}_{x,x}(f,tau )rangle |}^{1/2}{|langle {W}_{y,y}(f,tau )rangle |}^{1/2}}$$
(1)
where (langle rangle) denotes a smoothing operator in both time and scale. Using this definition, ({R}_{x,y}(f,tau )) is bounded by (0 , < , {R}_{x,y}(f,tau ), < , 1). The smoothing is performed, as in Fourier spectral approaches, by a convolution with a constant length window function both in the time and frequency directions42. We have chosen to use a procedure based on resampling the observed data with a Markov process scheme that preserves only the short temporal correlations. Our aim is to test whether the wavelet-based quantities (the coherence) observed at a particular position on the time-scale plane are not due to a random process with the same Markov transitions (time order) as the original time series42. In our wavelet coherence spectrum, the white lines indicate the α = 5% significant level computed on the basis of 1000 bootstrapped series, and the shaded area, known as the cone of influence, indicates the influence of edge effects.Transmission modelWith a stochastic transmission model (Supplementary Fig. 5), we test the hypothesis that humidity is important in driving the temporal dynamics of malaria. The model subdivides the total population P into two classes of infectious and susceptible individuals respectively, to allow for heterogeneity in the degree of clinical symptoms and protection conferred by the previous infection. Specifically, the number of individuals in those classes is denoted by S1 for those susceptible to infection, E, for those exposed to infection, I1, for those infected, symptomatic and infectious, I2, for those that are infected but are asymptomatic and still infectious, and S2, for those recovering from initial infection with partial protection. In the equation for S1, the flow of newborns combined with the death rate of each class results in population numbers equal to those observed for the overall demographic growth of the city. The system of stochastic differential equations is given by the following equations:$$d{S}_{1}/{dt}=left(delta P+{dP}/{dt}right)+{mu }_{{S}_{2}{S}_{1}}{S}_{2}-{mu }_{{SE}}(t){S}_{1}-delta {S}_{1,}$$ (2) $${dE}/{dt}={mu }_{{SE}}(t){S}_{1}-{mu }_{E{I}_{1}}E-delta E,$$ (3) $$d{I}_{1}/{dt}={mu }_{E{I}_{1}}E+{mu }_{{I}_{1}{S}_{2}}{I}_{1}-delta {I}_{1},$$ (4) $$d{S}_{2}/{dt}={mu }_{{I}_{1}{S}_{2}}{I}_{1}+{mu }_{{I}_{1}{S}_{2}}{I}_{2}-{mu }_{{S}_{2}{S}_{1}}{S}_{2}-{mu }_{{SE}}(t){S}_{2}-delta {S}_{2},$$ (5) $$d{I}_{2}/{dt}={mu }_{{SE}}(t){S}_{2}+{mu }_{{I}_{2}{S}_{2}}{I}_{2}-delta {I}_{2},$$ (6) We rely on a model that represents vector dynamics implicitly by implementing a Gamma-distributed time delay with mean in the force of infection (the rate of transmission per susceptible individual)9,16,43. This distributed lag is meant to account for the developmental delay of P. falciparum parasites within surviving mosquitoes. For this purpose, we follow the phenomenological representation of transmission via a mosquito vector introduced in refs. 16,43,44, which includes a distributed delay in the transmission from infected to susceptible humans. That is, the force of infection generated by the number of infections at any given time is not experienced at that same time by susceptible individuals, as would be the case in a directly transmitted disease. Under vector transmission, susceptible individuals experience it with a delay, which we consider Gamma distributed, to avoid the unrealistic assumption of a perfectly fixed delay, and to use a positive distribution with a flexible shape and a well-defined mode.Specifically, the development of the parasite within the mosquito introduces a distributed delay in the “latent” force of infection λ (s) resulting in the realized rate of infection of susceptible individuals$${mu }_{{SE}}left(tright)={int }_{{{{{{rm{infty }}}}}}}^{t}gamma (t-s)lambda (s){ds},$$ (7) where the delay probability function follows a gamma distribution. In this expression, λ(s) corresponds to the “latent” force of infection$$lambda (t)=left(frac{{I}_{1}+{I}_{2}}{Pleft(tright)}right)beta (t)$$ (8) where parameter β denotes the transmission rate. The transmission rate is specified to include the effects of seasonality, (interannual) climate variability, and environmental noise with the following expression$$beta left(tright)={{exp }}left[{sum }_{k=1}^{6}{b}_{k}{S}_{k}+{b}_{{RH}}{S}_{4}Cright]left[frac{dGamma }{{dt}}right]$$ (9) where seasonality is represented nonparametrically as the sum of six terms with a basis of periodic b-splines (t) (k = 1…, 6), and the coefficients (({b}_{k})) are parameters to be fitted determining the temporal (seasonal) shape. The b-splines are shown in Supplementary Fig. 6. The first term in Eq. (9) (the exponential of the weighted sum of these six splines) provides the basic, seasonal shape of the transmission rate (Supplementary Fig. 12). We superimpose this seasonality variability in the transmission rate across years through explicit consideration of a specific covariate (temperature, rainfall or humidity, depending on the model). We explain first how the covariate C is defined and second, how its effect is introduced in Eq. (9). C represents respectively in the different models, the mean of monthly humidity, the mean of monthly temperature, and the accumulated monthly rainfall, for a defined temporal window. That is, the covariate is defined here to represent yearly effects in a given window of time that is critical for the way a specific climate factor affects transmission. This window was chosen as the one with the highest correlation to the total cases aggregated for the epidemic season. We examined windows of all possible sizes within the previous six months which precede the epidemic season, as climate factors influence the abundance of the vector and the fraction of vectors infected, and these effects on the vector are manifested in the human cases with a delay. The resulting windows chosen to calculate C are shown in Supplementary Fig. 4. The effect of the covariate on the transmission rate was then localized in time in Eq. (9), by multiplying C to spline S4, which corresponds to the time of the year preceding the epidemic season (and including the window during which C was obtained) (Supplementary Fig. 6). Parameter ({b}_{{{{{rm{RH}}}}}}) then quantifies the strength of the climate effect by modulating the seasonal component of the transmission rate corresponding to this time of the year. Finally, environmental noise is introduced in the transmission rate with a Gamma distribution Γ to represent additional fluctuations absent in the climate covariate (details are provided in ref. 46).In practice and for ease of implementation (including parameter inference), we transform the integral in Eq. (7) into a Markovian chain of differential equations going from the equation for ({lambda }_{1}) to that for ({lambda }_{j}) (Eqs. 10–11) following16,44:$${dlambda }_{1}/{dt}=(lambda -{k}_{1})k{tau }^{-1}$$ (10) $${dlambda }_{j}/{dt}=left({k}_{j-1}-{k}_{j}right)k{tau }^{-1},{for; j}=2$$ (11) Parameter estimationWe estimated parameters with an iterated filtering approach to maximize the likelihood for partially observed, nonlinear and stochastic dynamical models. Specifically, the estimation of parameters and initial conditions for all state variables was carried out with the iterated filtering algorithm known as MIF, for maximum likelihood iterated filtering, implemented in the R package “pomp” (partially observed Markov processes44,45,46. This “plug-and-play” method45,47 is simulation-based, meaning that parameter search relies on a large number of stochastic simulations from initial conditions to the end of the time series.For details on the method, see46 and for other applications to malaria and climate forcing, see refs. 9,16,43,48. This algorithm allows for consideration of both measurement and process noise, in addition to hidden variables, which are a typical limitation of surveillance records providing a single observed variable for the incidence. It consists of two loops, with the external loop essentially iterating an internal, “filtering” loop, and in so doing generating a new, improved estimate of the parameter values at each iteration. The filtering loop implements a selection process for a large number of “particles” over time. For each time step, a particle can be seen as a simulation characterized by its own set of parameter values. Particles can survive or die as the result of a resampling process, with probabilities determined by their likelihood given the data. From this selection process over the whole extent of the data, a new estimate of the parameters is generated, and from this estimate, a cloud of new particles is reinitialized using a given noise intensity adjusted by a cooling factor. The initial search in parameter space was performed with a grid of 10,000 random parameter combinations, and the output of this search was used as the initial conditions of a more local search46,49.The fitting algorithm provides an estimate of the likelihood itself. On the basis of the likelihood, we can then implement model comparisons (i.e., model selection) on the basis of the likelihood ratio test and DIC (Table 1). We further compared the ability of the different models to explain the temporal patterns of the data with different comparisons of the observed cases and the predicted ones via model simulation. Namely, we simulated 1000 runs from the respective stochastic MLE models from the estimated initial conditions. We obtained the median of monthly cases from these simulations as well as the uncertainty as to the 10–90% quantiles of the monthly cases. We considered visually whether this interval includes the observation and how close the median simulated cases are to the observed cases. We also considered whether the interannual cycles (in particular, their highs and lows) in the data and the simulations are in phase. We further compared the simulated predictions and observations by aggregating cases for the epidemic season. In a scatter plot of predictions against observations, we can assess how close the points fall to the diagonal, and whether the uncertainty of predictions contains the diagonal (where predictions equal observations). We more formally implemented this comparison with a criterion for evaluating stochastic predictions known as the CRPS, which is a commonly used measure of performance for probabilistic prediction of a scalar observation. It is a quadratic measure of the difference between the prediction cumulative distribution function (CDF) and the empirical CDF of the observation.Permutation testWe used a permutation procedure to test whether the association between humidity and malaria transmission might be confounded by season. In this procedure, we selected the humidity data for each of the 12-months and randomized these humidity data across years, rerunning the analysis with the randomized explanatory variables. Then, we correlated the predicted cases in a year with the humidity in the random window selected. We conducted 10,000 permutations, and sampling was done with replacement. For each permutation, we then calculated how well the humidity correlated with the time series of malaria. If the correlation between humidity and malaria incidence in the actual time series was significantly stronger than the correlations we observed in the randomized samples, we concluded that confounding by season was an unlikely explanation for this correlation.Out-of-fit predictionTo examine the ability of the process-based model to predict malaria incidence, we compared the total number of malaria cases observed for each city to those predicted by model simulations in a window of time not used to estimate the parameters. That is, monthly cases from January 1997 to only December 2008 were used as a training set for parameter estimation. We chose this length of the data set, to place ourselves in the position of having about two characteristic multiannual cycles (of 4–5 years) of the reported cases inform inference, while still leaving a sufficient number of seasons to test prediction on at least one such full cycle. The resulting MLE model relies on estimated state variables at the end of the training period as the initial conditions for predicting the first “out-of-fit” year. The estimated initial states are then obtained for January of each predicted year (between 2009 and 2014) by extending sequential filtering and assimilating the new data for the past 12 months. That is, because the inference method provides filtered values of the hidden variables, we can use these estimates and their distribution at a given time as initial conditions from which to simulate the following year. Parameter estimates are also continuously updated with the addition of one more year of data. Predictions are obtained by simulating the model forward over the next 12 months. To consider the uncertainty arising from both dynamic and measurement noise, the distribution of predicted observed cases is obtained for each month from 1000 simulations with initial conditions resampled from their estimated values. Departures between the yearly projections and the out-of-fit data can be used to evaluate the impact of humidity variability on the predictability of the upcoming season.Reporting summaryFurther information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article. More

1.Packer, C. et al. Sport hunting, predator control and conservation of large carnivores. PLoS ONE 4, e5941 (2009).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
2.Whitman, K., Starfield, A. M., Quadling, H. S. & Packer, C. Sustainable trophy hunting of African lions. Nature 428, 175–178 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
3.Treves, A. Hunting for large carnivore conservation. J. Appl. Ecol. 46, 1350–1356 (2009).
Google Scholar 
4.Milner-Gulland, E. J. et al. Reproductive collapse in saiga antelope harems. Nature 422, 135 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
5.Bischof, R. et al. Implementation uncertainty when using recreational hunting to manage carnivores. J. Appl. Ecol. 49, 824–832 (2012).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
6.Booth, V. R., Masonde, J., Simukonda, C. & Cumming, D. H. M. Managing hunting quotas of African lions (Panthera leo): a case study from Zambia. J. Nat. Conserv. 55, 125817 (2020).
Google Scholar 
7.Potapov, A., Merrill, E. & Lewis, M. A. Wildlife disease elimination and density dependence. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 3139–3145 (2012).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
8.Lloyd-Smith, J. O. et al. Should we expect population thresholds for wildlife disease? Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 511–519 (2005).
Google Scholar 
9.Beeton, N. & McCallum, H. Models predict that culling is not a feasible strategy to prevent extinction of Tasmanian devils from facial tumour disease. J. Appl. Ecol. 48, 1315–1323 (2011).
Google Scholar 
10.Choisy, M. & Rohani, P. Harvesting can increase severity of wildlife disease epidemics. Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 2025–2034 (2006).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
11.Allendorf, F. W. & Hard, J. J. Human-induced evolution caused by unnatural selection through harvest of wild animals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 9987–9994 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
12.Hamede, R. K., Bashford, J., McCallum, H. & Jones, M. Contact networks in a wild Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii) population: using social network analysis to reveal seasonal variability in social behaviour and its implications for transmission of devil facial tumour disease. Ecol. Lett. 12, 1147–1157 (2009).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
13.Woodroffe, R. et al. Culling and cattle controls influence tuberculosis risk for badgers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 14713–14717 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
14.Carr, A. N. et al. Wildlife Management Practices Associated with Pathogen Exposure in Non-native Wild Pigs in Florida, U.S. (USDA National Wildlife Research Center, 2019).15.Woodroffe, R., Cleaveland, S., Courtenay, O., Laurenson, M. K. & Artois, M. in The Biology and Conservation of Wild Canids 123–142 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2004).16.Carter, S. P. et al. Culling-induced social perturbation in Eurasian badgers Meles meles and the management of TB in cattle: an analysis of a critical problem in applied ecology. Proc. R. Soc. B 274, 2769–2777 (2007).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
17.Silk, M. J. et al. Contact networks structured by sex underpin sex-specific epidemiology of infection. Ecol. Lett. 21, 309–318 (2018).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
18.Silk, M. J. et al. The application of statistical network models in disease research. Methods Ecol. Evol. 8, 1026–1041 (2017).
Google Scholar 
19.Morters, M. K. et al. Evidence-based control of canine rabies: a critical review of population density reduction. J. Anim. Ecol. 82, 6–14 (2013).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
20.Lachish, S., McCallum, H., Mann, D., Pukk, C. E. & Jones, M. E. Evaluation of selective culling of infected individuals to control Tasmanian Devil facial tumor disease. Conserv. Biol. 24, 841–851 (2010).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
21.Grubaugh, N. D. et al. Tracking virus outbreaks in the twenty-first century. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 10–19 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
22.Didelot, X., Fraser, C., Gardy, J. & Colijn, C. Genomic infectious disease epidemiology in partially sampled and ongoing outbreaks. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34, msw075 (2017).
Google Scholar 
23.Smith, M. D. et al. Less is more: an adaptive branch-site random effects model for efficient detection of episodic diversifying selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 1342–1353 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
24.Logan, K. A. & Runge, J. P. et al. Effects of hunting on a puma population in Colorado. Wildl. Monogr. 209, 1–35 (2020).
Google Scholar 
25.Biek, R., Pybus, O. G., Lloyd-Smith, J. O. & Didelot, X. Measurably evolving pathogens in the genomic era. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30, 306–313 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
26.Pybus, O. G., Tatem, A. J. & Lemey, P. Virus evolution and transmission in an ever more connected world. Proc. R. Soc. B 282, 20142878 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
27.Woolhouse, M. E. J., Adair, K. & Brierley, L. RNA viruses: a case study of the biology of emerging infectious diseases. Microbiol. Spectr. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.oh-0001-2012 (2021).28.Pybus, O. G. & Rambaut, A. Evolutionary analysis of the dynamics of viral infectious disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 540–550 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
29.Fountain-Jones, N. M. et al. Towards an eco-phylogenetic framework for infectious disease ecology. Biol. Rev. 93, 950–970 (2018).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
30.Webb, C. O. Exploring the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities: an example for rain forest trees. Am. Nat. 156, 145–155 (2000).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
31.Biek, R. et al. Epidemiology, genetic diversity, and evolution of endemic feline immunodeficiency virus in a population of wild cougars. J. Virol. 77, 9578–9589 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
32.Pedersen, N. C., Yamamoto, J. K., Ishida, T. & Hansen, H. Feline immunodeficiency virus infection. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 21, 111–129 (1989).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
33.Malmberg, J. L. et al. Altered lentiviral infection dynamics follow genetic rescue of the Florida panther. Proc. R. Soc. B 286, 20191689 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
34.Elbroch, L. M., Levy, M., Lubell, M., Quigley, H. & Caragiulo, A. Adaptive social strategies in a solitary carnivore. Sci. Adv. 3, e1701218 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
35.Sweanor, L. L., Logan, K. A. & Hornocker, M. G. Cougar dispersal patterns, metapopulation dynamics, and conservation. Conserv. Biol. 14, 798–808 (2000).
Google Scholar 
36.Fountain-Jones, N. M. et al. Linking social and spatial networks to viral community phylogenetics reveals subtype-specific transmission dynamics in African lions. J. Anim. Ecol. 86, 1469–1482 (2017).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
37.Gilbertson, M. L. J. et al. Transmission of one predicts another: apathogenic proxies for transmission dynamics of a fatal virus. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.09.426055 (2021).38.Fountain-Jones, N. M. et al. Host relatedness and landscape connectivity shape pathogen spread in a large secretive carnivore. Commun. Biol. 4, 12 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
39.Hornocker, M. G. & Negri, S. Cougar: Ecology and Conservation (Univ. Chicago Press, 2010).40.Moss, W. E., Alldredge, M. W. & Pauli, J. N. Quantifying risk and resource use for a large carnivore in an expanding urban-wildland interface. J. Appl. Ecol. 53, 371–378 (2016).
Google Scholar 
41.Trumbo, D. et al. Urbanization impacts apex predator gene flow but not genetic diversity across an urban-rural divide. Mol. Ecol. 28, 4926–4940 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
42.VandeWoude, S. & Apetrei, C. Going wild: lessons from naturally occurring T-lymphotropic lentiviruses. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 19, 728–762 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
43.Logan, K. A. & Sweanor, L. L. Desert Puma: Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation of an Enduring Carnivore (Island Press, 2001).44.Krakoff, E., Gagne, R. B., VandeWoude, S. & Carver, S. Variation in intra-individual lentiviral evolution rates: a systematic review of human, nonhuman primate, and felid species. J. Virol. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00538-19 (2019).45.Volz, E. M. & Didelot, X. Modeling the growth and decline of pathogen effective population size provides insight into epidemic dynamics and drivers of antimicrobial resistance. Syst. Biol. 67, 719–728 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
46.Murrell, B. et al. Detecting individual sites subject to episodic diversifying selection. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002764 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
47.Kenyon, J. C. & Lever, A. M. L. The molecular biology of feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV). Viruses 3, 2192–2213 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
48.Tamuri, A. U., dos Reis, M., Hay, A. J. & Goldstein, R. A. Identifying changes in selective constraints: host shifts in influenza. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5, e1000564 (2009).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
49.Forni, D., Cagliani, R., Clerici, M. & Sironi, M. Molecular evolution of human coronavirus genomes. Trends Microbiol. 25, 35–48 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
50.Fountain-Jones, N. M. et al. Urban landscapes can change virus gene flow and evolution in a fragmentation-sensitive carnivore. Mol. Ecol. 26, 6487–6498 (2017).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
51.Kozakiewicz, C. P. et al. Pathogens in space: advancing understanding of pathogen dynamics and disease ecology through landscape genetics. Evol. Appl. 11, 1763–1778 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
52.McDonald, J. L., Smith, G. C., McDonald, R. A., Delahay, R. J. & Hodgson, D. Mortality trajectory analysis reveals the drivers of sex-specific epidemiology in natural wildlife–disease interactions. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20140526 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
53.Gilbertson, M. L. J., Fountain-Jones, N. M. & Craft, M. E. Incorporating genomic methods into contact networks to reveal new insights into animal behaviour and infectious disease dynamics. Behaviour 155, 759–791 (2018).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
54.Alldredge, M. W., Blecha, T. & Lewis, J. H. Less invasive monitoring of cougars in Colorado’s front range. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 43, 222–230 (2019).
Google Scholar 
55.Lewis, J. S. et al. The effects of urbanization on population density, occupancy, and detection probability of wild felids. Ecol. Appl. 25, 1880–1895 (2015).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
56.Csárdi, G. & Nepusz, T. The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal Complex Syst. 1695, 1–9 (2006).57.Didelot, X., Kendall, M., Xu, Y., White, P. J. & McCarthy, N. Genomic epidemiology analysis of infectious disease outbreaks using TransPhylo. Curr. Protoc. 1, e60 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
58.Handcock, M. S., Hunter, D. R., Butts, C. T., Goodreau, S. M. & Morris, M. statnet: software tools for the representation, visualization, analysis and simulation of network data. J. Stat. Softw. 24, 1548 (2008).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
59.Wertheim, J. O., Murrell, B., Smith, M. D., Pond, S. L. K. & Scheffler, K. RELAX: detecting relaxed selection in a phylogenetic framework. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 820–832 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
60.Kosakovsky Pond, S. L. et al. A random effects branch-site model for detecting episodic diversifying selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 3033–3043 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
61.Weaver, S. et al. Datamonkey 2.0: a modern web application for characterizing selective and other evolutionary processes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 773–777 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
62.Gill, M. S., Lemey, P., Bennett, S. N., Biek, R. & Suchard, M. A. Understanding past population dynamics: Bayesian coalescent-based modeling with covariates. Syst. Biol. 65, 1041–1056 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
63.Faith, D. P. Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol. Conserv. 61, 1–10 (1992).
Google Scholar 
64.Tsirogiannis, C. & Sandel, B. PhyloMeasures: a package for computing phylogenetic biodiversity measures and their statistical moments. Ecography 39, 709–714 (2016).
Google Scholar 
65.Fountain-Jones, N. nfj1380/Transmission-dynamics_huntingPumaFIV: (Puma-FIV_transmissionDynamics) (Zenodo, 2021); https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.560216266.Fountain-Jones, N. et al. Emerging phylogenetic structure of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Virus Evol. 6, veaa082 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
67.Karcher, M. D., Palacios, J. A., Bedford, T., Suchard, M. A. & Minin, V. N. Quantifying and mitigating the effect of preferential sampling on phylodynamic inference. PLoS Comput. Biol. 12, e1004789 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar  More