Philippa Kaur

The Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Summary for Policy-Makers (IPBES, 2019)DeFries, R. & Nagendra, H. Ecosystem management as a wicked problem. Science 356, 265–270 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Turkelboom, F. et al. When we cannot have it all: ecosystem services trade-offs in the context of spatial planning. Ecosyst. Serv. 29, 566–578 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lee, H. & Lautenbach, S. A quantitative review of relationships between ecosystem services. Ecol. Indic. 66, 340–351 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bennett, E. M., Peterson, G. D. & Gordon, L. J. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol. Lett. 12, 1394–1404 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Goldstein, J. H. et al. Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 7565–7570 (2012).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Vallet, A., Locatelli, B. & Pramova, E. Ecosystem Services and Social Equity: Who Controls, Who Benefits and Who Loses? (CIFOR, 2020); https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/007849Neyret, M. et al. Assessing the impact of grassland management on landscape multifunctionality. Ecosyst. Serv. 52, 101366 (2021).Linders, T. E. W. et al. Stakeholder priorities determine the impact of an alien tree invasion on ecosystem multifunctionality. People Nat. 3, 658–672 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Herzig, A., Ausseil, A.-G. & Dymond, J. in Ecosystem Services in New Zealand—Conditions and Trends (ed. Dymond, J. R.) 511–523 (Manaaki Whenua Press, 2014).Chan, K. M. A., Shaw, M. R., Cameron, D. R., Underwood, E. C. & Daily, G. C. Conservation planning for ecosystem services. PLoS Biol. 4, e379 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pennington, D. N. et al. Cost-effective land use planning: optimizing land use and land management patterns to maximize social benefits. Ecol. Econ. 139, 75–90 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hölting, L. et al. Including stakeholders’ perspectives on ecosystem services in multifunctionality assessments. Ecosyst. People 16, 354–368 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Plieninger, T. et al. Exploring futures of ecosystem services in cultural landscapes through participatory scenario development in the Swabian Alb, Germany. Ecol. Soc. 18, 39 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tasser, E., Schirpke, U., Zoderer, B. M. & Tappeiner, U. Towards an integrative assessment of land-use type values from the perspective of ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 42, 101082 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sayer, J. et al. Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 8349–8356 (2013).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Vallet, A. et al. Linking equity, power, and stakeholders: roles in relation to ecosystem services. Ecol. Soc. 24, 14 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Allan, E. et al. Land use intensification alters ecosystem multifunctionality via loss of biodiversity and changes to functional composition. Ecol. Lett. 18, 834–843 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hector, A. & Bagchi, R. Biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality. Nature 448, 188–190 (2007).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Manning, P. et al. Redefining ecosystem multifunctionality. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 427–436 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Peterson, G. D. & Bennett, E. M. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 5242–5247 (2010).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Daniel, T. C. et al. Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 8812–8819 (2012).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Gunton, R. M. et al. Beyond ecosystem services: valuing the invaluable. Trends Ecol. Evol. 32, 249–257 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Peter, S., Le Provost, G., Mehring, M., Müller, T. & Manning, P. Cultural worldviews consistently explain bundles of ecosystem service prioritisation across rural Germany. People Nat. 4, 218–230 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Haines-Young, R. & Potschin, M. in Ecosystem Ecology (eds Raffaelli, D. G. & Frid, C. L. J.) 110–139 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010).Fischer, M. et al. Implementing large-scale and long-term functional biodiversity research: the Biodiversity Exploratories. Basic Appl. Ecol. 11, 473–485 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wilson, E. O. Half-Earth: Our Planet’s Fight for Life (Norton, 2017).Bastin, J.-F. et al. The global tree restoration potential. Science 365, 76–79 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Clapp, J. & Moseley, W. G. This food crisis is different: COVID-19 and the fragility of the neoliberal food security order. J. Peasant Stud. 47, 1393–1417 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kirwan, J. & Maye, D. Food security framings within the UK and the integration of local food systems. J. Rural Stud. 29, 91–100 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ellis, E. C. To conserve nature in the Anthropocene, half Earth is not nearly enough. One Earth 1, 163–167 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Boetzl, F. A. et al. A multitaxa assessment of the effectiveness of agri-environmental schemes for biodiversity management. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2016038118 (2021).Tyllianakis, E. & Martin-Ortega, J. Agri-environmental schemes for biodiversity and environmental protection: how we are not yet ‘hitting the right keys’. Land Use Policy 109, 105620 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Arroyo-Rodríguez, V. et al. Designing optimal human-modified landscapes for forest biodiversity conservation. Ecol. Lett. 23, 1404–1420 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gilroy, J. J. et al. Cheap carbon and biodiversity co-benefits from forest regeneration in a hotspot of endemism. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 503–507 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lindenmayer, D. B. et al. Avoiding bio-perversity from carbon sequestration solutions: avoiding bio-perversity in carbon markets. Conserv. Lett. 5, 28–36 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stoll-Kleemann, S. & O’Riordan, T. in The Encyclopedia of the Anthropocene Vol. 3 (eds DellaSala, D. A. & Goldstein, M. I.) 347–353 (Elsevier, 2018).Schaich, H., Bieling, C. & Plieninger, T. Linking ecosystem services with cultural landscape research. GAIA 19, 269–277 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
O’Connor, L. M. J. et al. Balancing conservation priorities for nature and for people in Europe. Science 372, 856–860 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Büscher, B. et al. Half-Earth or Whole Earth? Radical ideas for conservation, and their implications. Oryx 51, 407–410 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
van der Plas, F. et al. Towards the development of general rules describing landscape heterogeneity–multifunctionality relationships. J. Appl. Ecol. 56, 168–179 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Almeida, I., Rösch, C. & Saha, S. Converting monospecific into mixed forests: stakeholders’ views on ecosystem services in the Black Forest Region. Ecol. Soc. 26, 28 (2021).Meyer, M. A. & Früh-Müller, A. Patterns and drivers of recent agricultural land-use change in southern Germany. Land Use Policy 99, 104959 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kastner, T. et al. Global agricultural trade and land system sustainability: implications for ecosystem carbon storage, biodiversity, and human nutrition. One Earth 4, 1425–1443 (2021).Rasmussen, L. V. et al. Social–ecological outcomes of agricultural intensification. Nat. Sustain. 1, 275–282 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lindborg, R. et al. How spatial scale shapes the generation and management of multiple ecosystem services. Ecosphere 8, e01741 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Duarte, G. T., Santos, P. M., Cornelissen, T. G., Ribeiro, M. C. & Paglia, A. P. The effects of landscape patterns on ecosystem services: meta-analyses of landscape services. Landsc. Ecol. 33, 1247–1257 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Le Provost, G. et al. The supply of multiple ecosystem services requires biodiversity across spatial scales. Nat. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01918-5 (2022).Martin, D. A. et al. Land-use trajectories for sustainable land system transformations: identifying leverage points in a global biodiversity hotspot. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2107747119 (2022).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Seabloom, E. W., Borer, E. T. & Tilman, D. Grassland ecosystem recovery after soil disturbance depends on nutrient supply rate. Ecol. Lett. 23, 1756–1765 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Messinger, J. & Winterbottom, B. African forest landscape restoration initiative (AFR100): restoring 100 million hectares of degraded and deforested land in Africa. Nat. Faune 30, 14–17 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Whittingham, M. J. The future of agri-environment schemes: biodiversity gains and ecosystem service delivery? J. Appl. Ecol. 48, 509–513 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Le Clec’h, S. et al. Assessment of spatial variability of multiple ecosystem services in grasslands of different intensities. J. Environ. Manage. 251, 109372 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Forschungsethische Grundsätze und Prüfverfahren in den Sozial‐ und Wirtschaftswissenschaften Output 9, Berufungsperiode 5 (German Data Forum, 2017).Strukturdaten Reutlingen—Statistisches Bundesamt (Bundeswahlleiter, 2020); https://www.bundeswahlleiter.de/europawahlen/2019/strukturdaten/bund-99/land-8/kreis-8415.htmlStrukturdaten Uckermark—Statistisches Bundesamt (Bundeswahlleiter, 2020); https://www.bundeswahlleiter.de/europawahlen/2019/strukturdaten/bund-99/land-12/kreis-12073.htmlStrukturdaten Unstrut-Hainich-Kreis—Statistisches Bundesamt (Bundeswahlleiter, 2020); https://www.bundeswahlleiter.de/europawahlen/2019/strukturdaten/bund-99/land-16/kreis-16064.htmlBlüthgen, N. et al. A quantitative index of land-use intensity in grasslands: integrating mowing, grazing and fertilization. Basic Appl. Ecol. 13, 207–220 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ostrowski, A., Lorenzen, K., Petzold, E. & Schindler, S. Land use intensity index (LUI) calculation tool of the Biodiversity Exploratories project for grassland survey data from three different regions in Germany since 2006, BEXIS 2 module. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3865579 (2020).Schall, P. et al. The impact of even‐aged and uneven‐aged forest management on regional biodiversity of multiple taxa in European beech forests. J. Ecol. 55, 267–278 (2018).Statistisches Jahrbuch über Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten der Bundesrepublik Deutschland Vol. 63 (Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft, 2019).Simons, N. K. & Weisser, W. W. Agricultural intensification without biodiversity loss is possible in grassland landscapes. Nat. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0227-2 (2017).Zinke, O. Heupreise steigen: Futter für die Bauern knapp und teuer. Agrarheute https://www.agrarheute.com/markt/futtermittel/heupreise-steigen-futter-fuer-bauern-knapp-teuer-571946 (2020).Bois de Chez Nous (Lignum, 2021); https://www.lignum.ch/files/images/Downloads_francais/Shop/20010_Bois_de_chez_nous.pdfGerman Timber Company—Internationaler Holzhandel (German Timber Company, 2021); https://www.germantimber.company/. Accessed 2021-11-24Holzeinschlag nach Holzartengruppen, Holzsorten, ausgewählten Besitzarten (Statistisches Bundesamt, 2022); https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Branchen-Unternehmen/Landwirtschaft-Forstwirtschaft-Fischerei/Wald-Holz/Tabellen/holzeinschlag-deutschland.htmlJahresjagdstrecke Bundesrepublik Deutschland, 2019–2020 (Deutsche Jagdverband, 2020); https://www.jagdverband.de/sites/default/files/2021-01/2021-01_Infografik_Jahresjagdstrecke_Bundesrepublik_Deutschland_2019_2020.jpgHeinze, E. et al. Habitat use of large ungulates in northeastern Germany in relation to forest management. For. Ecol. Manage. 261, 288–296 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Conant, R. T., Cerri, C. E. P., Osborne, B. B. & Paustian, K. Grassland management impacts on soil carbon stocks: a new synthesis. Ecol. Appl. 27, 662–668 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hermes, J., Albert, C. & von Haaren, C. Mapping and Assessing Local Recreation as a Cultural Ecosystem Service in Germany. UVP-Report https://doi.org/10.17442/uvp-report.034.08 (2020).Hermes, J., Albert, C. & von Haaren, C. Assessing the aesthetic quality of landscapes in Germany. Ecosyst. Serv. 31, 296–307 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ehrhart, S. & Schraml, U. Perception and evaluation of natural forest dynamics. Allg. Forst Jagdztg. 185, 166–183 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Villanueva-Rivera, L. J. & Pijanowski, B. C. soundecology: Soundscape ecology. R package version 1.3.3 (2018).Meyer, S., Wesche, K., Krause, B. & Leuschner, C. Dramatic losses of specialist arable plants in central Germany since the 1950s/60s—a cross-regional analysis. Divers. Distrib. 19, 1175–1187 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sasaki, K., Hotes, S., Kadoya, T., Yoshioka, A. & Wolters, V. Landscape associations of farmland bird diversity in Germany and Japan. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 21, e00891 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Peña, L., Casado-Arzuaga, I. & Onaindia, M. Mapping recreation supply and demand using an ecological and a social evaluation approach. Ecosyst. Serv. 13, 108–118 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schägner, J. P., Brander, L., Paracchini, M.-L., Hartje, V. & Maes, J. Mapping recreational ecosystem services and its values across Europe: a combination of GIS and meta-analysis. In European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 22nd Annual Conference (2016).R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing v.4.2.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2022).Rust Programming Language https://www.rust-lang.org/ v 1.44Le Provost, G. et al. Contrasting responses of above- and belowground diversity to multiple components of land-use intensity. Nat. Commun. 12, 3918 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gini, C. On the measurement of concentration and variability of characters (English translation from Italian by Fulvio de Santis in 2005). Metron 63, 1–38 (1914). More

West-Eberhard, M. J. Developmental Plasticity and Evolution (Oxford University Press, 2003).Book 

Google Scholar 
Piersma, T. & Van Gils, J. A. The Flexible Phenotype: A Body-Centred Integration of Ecology, Physiology, and Behaviour (Oxford University Press, 2011).
Google Scholar 
Piersma, T. & Drent, J. Phenotypic flexibility and the evolution of organismal design. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 228–233 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tabari, H. Climate change impact on flood and extreme precipitation increases with water availability. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–10 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Beck, H. E. et al. Present and future Köppen–Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. Sci. Data 5, 180214 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bogert, C. M. Thermoregulation in reptiles, a factor in evolution. Evolution 3, 195–211 (1949).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Rensch, B. Das Prinzip geographischer Rassenkreise und das Problem der Artbildung (Gebrueder Borntraeger, 1929).
Google Scholar 
Clusella Trullas, S., van Wyk, J. H. & Spotila, J. R. Thermal melanism in ectotherms. J. Therm. Biol. 32, 235–245 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Delhey, K. A review of Gloger’s rule, an ecogeographical rule of colour: Definitions, interpretations and evidence. Biol. Rev. 94, 1294–1316 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Stuart-Fox, D., Newton, E. & Clusella-Trullas, S. Thermal consequences of colour and near-infrared reflectance. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 372, 20160345 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Friedman, N. R. & Remês, V. Ecogeographical gradients in plumage coloration among Australasian songbird clades. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 26, 261–274 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Delhey, K. Darker where cold and wet: Australian birds follow their own version of Gloger’s rule. Ecography 41, 673–683 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Galván, I., Rodríguez-Martínez, S. & Carrascal, L. M. Dark pigmentation limits thermal niche position in birds. Funct. Ecol. 32, 1531–1540 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Medina, I. et al. Reflection of near-infrared light confers thermal protection in birds. Nat. Commun 9, 3610 (2018).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Aldrich, J. W. & James, F. C. Ecogeographic variation in the American Robin (Turdus migratorius). Auk 108, 230–249 (1991).
Google Scholar 
Morales, H. E. et al. Neutral and selective drivers of colour evolution in a widespread Australian passerine. J. Biogeogr. 44, 522–536 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Griffith, S. C., Owens, I. P. & Burke, T. Environmental determination of a sexually selected trait. Nature 400, 358–360 (1999).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Fargallo, J. A., Laaksonen, T., Korpimäki, E. & Wakamatsu, K. A melanin-based trait reflects environmental growth conditions of nestling male Eurasian kestrels. Evol. Ecol. 21, 157–171 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fargallo, J. A., Martínez, F., Wakamatsu, K., Serrano, D. & Blanco, G. Sex-dependent expression and fitness consequences of sunlight derived color phenotypes. Am. Nat. 191, 726–743 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Beebe, W. Geographic variation in birds, with especial reference to the effects of humidity. Zoologica 1, 3–41 (1907).
Google Scholar 
Bieber, H. Fellverdunklung beim hauskaninchen nach kälteeinwirkung. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde 38, 33–38 (1972).
Google Scholar 
Johnston, R. F. & Selander, R. K. House sparrows: Rapid evolution of races in North America. Science 144, 548–550 (1964).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Galván, I., Wakamatsu, K. & Alonso-Álvarez, C. Black bib size is associated with feather content of pheomelanin in male house sparrows. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 27, 1159–1161 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Endler, J. A. On the measurement and classification of colour in studies of animal colour patterns. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 41, 315–352 (1990).Article 

Google Scholar 
Montgomerie, R. Analyzing colors. In Bird Colouration I. Mechanisms and Measurements (eds Hill, E. G. & McGraw, K. J.) (Harvard University Press, 2006).
Google Scholar 
McGraw, K. J., Dale, J. & Mackillop, E. A. Social environment during molt and the expression of melanin-based plumage pigmentation in male house sparrows (Passer domesticus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 53, 116–122 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lessells, C. M. & Boag, P. T. Unrepeatable repeatabilities a common mistake. Auk 104, 116–121 (1987).Article 

Google Scholar 
Anderson, T. R. Biology of the Ubiquitous House Sparrow (Oxford University Press, 2006).Book 

Google Scholar 
Gelman, A. & Hill, J. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models (Cambridge University Press, 2006).Book 

Google Scholar 
Nakagawa, S., Ockendon, N., Gillespie, D. O., Hatchwell, B. J. & Burke, T. Assessing the function of house sparrows’ bib size using a flexible meta-analysis method. Behav. Ecol. 18, 831–840 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hill, G. E. & McGraw, K. J. Bird Coloration, Volume I: Mechanisms and Measurements (Harvard University Press, 2006).Book 

Google Scholar 
D’Alba, L. & Shawkey, M. D. Melanosomes: Biogenesis, properties, and evolution of an ancient organelle. Physiol. Rev. 99, 1–19 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Delhey, K., Burger, C., Fiedler, W. & Peters, A. Seasonal changes in colour: A comparison of structural, melanin- and carotenoid-based plumage colours. PLoS ONE 5, e11582 (2010).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Galván, I., Mousseau, T. A. & Møller, A. P. Bird population declines due to radiation exposure at Chernobyl are stronger in species with pheomelanin-based coloration. Oecologia 165, 827–835 (2011).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Meunier, J., Pinto, S. F., Burri, R. & Roulin, A. Eumelanin-based coloration and fitness parameters in birds: A meta-analysis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65, 559–567 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Roulin, A., Almasi, B., Meichtry-Stier, K. S. & Jenni, L. Eumelanin- and pheomelanin-based colour advertise resistance to oxidative stress in opposite ways. J. Evol. Biol. 24, 2241–2247 (2011).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Gasparini, J. et al. Strength and cost of an induced immune response are associated with a heritable melanin-based colour trait in female tawny owls. J. Anim. Ecol. 78, 608–616 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fargallo, J. A. et al. Sex-specific phenotypic integration: Endocrine profiles, coloration, and behavior in fledgling boobies. Behav. Ecol. 25, 76–87 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wittkopp, P. J. & Beldade, P. Development and evolution of insect pigmentation: Genetic mechanisms and the potential consequences of pleiotropy. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 20, 65–71 (2009).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hubbard, J. K., Uy, J. A. C., Hauber, M. E., Hoekstra, H. E. & Safran, R. J. Vertebrate pigmentation: From underlying genes to adaptive function. Trends Genet. 26, 231–239 (2010).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
McKinnon, J. S. & Pierotti, M. E. Colour polymorphism and correlated characters: Genetic mechanisms and evolution. Mol. Ecol. 19, 5101–5125 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Poston, J. P., Hasselquist, D., Stewart, I. R. & Westneat, D. F. Dietary amino acids influence plumage traits and immune responses of male house sparrows, Passer domesticus, but not as expected. Anim. Behav. 70, 1171–1181 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
McGraw, K. J. Dietary mineral content influences the expression of melanin-based ornamental coloration. Behav. Ecol. 18, 137–142 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fargallo, J. A., Martínez-Padilla, J., Toledano-Díaz, A., Santiago-Moreno, J. & Dávila, J. A. Sex and testosterone effects on growth, immunity and melanin coloration of nestling Eurasian kestrels. J. Anim. Ecol. 76, 201–209 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fitze, P. S. & Richner, H. Differential effects of a parasite on ornamental structures based on melanins and carotenoids. Behav. Ecol. 13, 401–407 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Roulin, A., Altwegg, R., Jensen, H., Steinsland, I. & Schaub, M. Sex-dependent selection on an autosomal melanic female ornament promotes the evolution of sex ratio bias. Ecol. Lett. 13, 616–626 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sharma, A. Effect of ambient humidity on UV/visible photodegradation of melanin thin films. Photochem. Photobiol. 86, 852–855 (2010).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Burtt, E. H. The adaptiveness of animal colors. Bioscience 31, 723–729 (1981).Article 

Google Scholar 
Heppner, F. The metabolic significance of differential absorption of radiant energy by black and white birds. Condor 72, 50–59 (1970).Article 

Google Scholar 
Clusella-Trullas, S., Terblanche, J. S., Blackburn, T. M. & Chown, S. L. Testing the thermal melanism hypothesis: A macrophysiological approach. Funct. Ecol. 22, 232–238 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zink, R. M. & Remsen, J. V. Evolutionary processes and patterns of geographic variation in birds. Curr. Ornithol. 4, 1–69 (1986).
Google Scholar 
Burtt, E. H. & Ichida, J. M. Gloger’s rule, feather-degrading bacteria, and color variation among song sparrows. Condor 106, 681–686 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ruiz-De-Castaneda, R., Burtt, E. H. Jr., Gonzalez-Braojos, S. & Moreno, J. Bacterial degradability of an intrafeather unmelanized ornament: A role for feather-degrading bacteria in sexual selection?. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 105, 409–419 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Goldstein, G. et al. Bacterial degradation of black and white feathers. Auk 121, 656–659 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ducrest, A. L., Keller, L. & Roulin, A. Pleiotropy in the melanocortin system, coloration and behavioural syndromes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 502–510 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kim, S. Y., Fargallo, J. A., Vergara, P. & Martínez-Padilla, J. Multivariate heredity of melanin-based coloration, body mass and immunity. Heredity 111, 139–146 (2013).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Horrocks, N. P. C. et al. Environmental proxies of antigen exposure explain variation in immune investment better than indices of pace of life. Oecologia 177, 281–290 (2015).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
McLean, N., Van Der Jeugd, H. P. & van de Pol, M. High intra-specific variation in avian body condition responses to climate limits generalisation across species. PLoS ONE 13, e0192401 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gardner, J. L. et al. Spatial variation in avian bill size is associated with humidity in summer among Australian passerines. Clim. Change Responses 3, 11 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gerson, A. R. et al. Flight at low ambient humidity increases protein catabolism in migratory birds. Science 333, 1434–1436 (2011).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar  More

We acknowledge members of the EDGE lab at the University of Gothenburg for stimulating discussions that inspired this comment. Special thanks to A. Bjorkman and R. Bjork for their feedback on the manuscript and to K. Happonen for help with data collection. More

Jepson, P. R. et al. Protected area asset stewardship. Biol. Conserv. 212, 183–190 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Joppa, L. N., Loarie, S. R. & Pimm, S. L. On the protection of “protected areas”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 6673–6678 (2008).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Rija, A. A., Critchlow, R., Thomas, C. D. & Beale, C. M. Global extent and drivers of mammal population declines in protected areas under illegal hunting pressure. PLoS ONE 15, e0227163 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Tyrrell, P., du Toit, J. T. & Macdonald, D. W. Conservation beyond protected areas: Using vertebrate species ranges and biodiversity importance scores to inform policy for an East African country in transition. Conserv. Sci. Pract. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.136 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gaveau, D. L. A. et al. Evaluating whether protected areas reduce tropical deforestation in Sumatra. J. Biogeogr. 36, 2165–2175 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Grantham, H. S. et al. Spatial priorities for conserving the most intact biodiverse forests within Central Africa. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 222 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Setyawati, T. et al. Planning to remove UNESCO World Heritage Sites in Sumatra from being ‘In Danger’. Anim. Conserv. 24, 149–152 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Naidoo, R. et al. Evaluating the impacts of protected areas on human well-being across the developing world. Sci. Adv. 5, 1–8 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Adams, V. M., Visconti, P., Graham, V. & Possingham, H. P. Indicators keep progress honest: A call to track both the quantity and quality of protected areas. One Earth 4, 901–906 (2021).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Banks-Leite, C., Larrosa, C., Carrasco, L. R., Tambosi, L. R. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. The suggestion that landscapes should contain 40% of forest cover lacks evidence and is problematic. Ecol. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13668 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
CBD. Key Elements of the Strategic Plan 2011–2020, including Aichi Biodiversity Targets. (2011). https://www.cbd.int/sp/elements/default.shtml.CBD. First Draft of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. Angewandte Chemie Int. Edn. 6(11), 1–12 (2021).Hannah, L. et al. 30% land conservation and climate action reduces tropical extinction risk by more than 50%. Ecography (Cop.) 43, 943–953 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Waldron, A. et al. Protecting 30% of the planet for nature: Costs, benefits and economic implications. In Working paper analysing the economic implications of the proposed 30% target for areal protection in the draft post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. (2020).Dinerstein, E. et al. An ecoregion-based approach to protecting half the terrestrial realm. Bioscience 67, 534–545 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wilson, E. O. Half-Earth: Our Planet’s Fight for Life (Liveright Publishing Corporation, 2016).
Google Scholar 
Dwiyahreni, A. A. et al. Changes in the human footprint in and around Indonesia’s terrestrial national parks between 2012 and 2017. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–14 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
KSDAE, M. D. Statistik Direktorat Jenderal KSDAE 2017. (Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Direktorat Jenderal Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam dan Ekosistem, 2018).Wallace, A. R. Natural History of Celebes. In The Malay Archipelago 424–447 (Cambridge University Press, 1869).MacKinnon, J. R. & MacKinnon, K. Review of the protected areas system in the Indo-Malayan Realm. (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN), 1986).Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B. & Kent, J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853–858 (2000).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Olson, D. M. & Dinerstein, E. The Global 200: Priority ecoregions for global conservation. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 89, 199–224 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hunowu, I. et al. New insights into Sulawesi’s apex predator: The Sulawesi civet Macrogalidia musschenbroekii. Oryx 54, 878–881 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Johnson, C. L. et al. Camera traps clarify the distribution boundary between the crested black Macaque (Macaca nigra) and Gorontalo Macaque (Macaca nigrescens) in North Sulawesi. Int. J. Primatol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-019-00082-1 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Joyce, E., Thiele, K., Slik, F. & Crayn, D. Checklist of the vascular flora of the Sunda-Sahul Convergence Zone. Biodivers. Data J. 8, e51094 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Middleton, D. J. et al. Progress on Southeast Asia’s Flora projects. Gard. Bull. Singapore 71, 267–319 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Trethowan, L. A. et al. An enigmatic genus on an enigmatic island: The re-discovery of Kalappia on Sulawesi. Ecology 100, e02793 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Junaid, A. R., Jihad & Hasudungan, F. Burung-burung di Indonesia: Daftar dan Status 2021. (Burung Indonesia, 2021).Whitten, T., Henderson, G. S. & Mustafa, M. The Ecology of Sulawesi. 4, (Gajah Mada University Press, 1987).Maryanto, I. et al. Checklist of The Mammals of Indonesia 3rd edn, (2019).Chen, S. et al. Ecosystem carbon stock of a tropical mangrove forest in North Sulawesi, Indonesia. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 37, 85–91 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Culmsee, H., Leuschner, C., Moser, G. & Pitopang, R. Forest aboveground biomass along an elevational transect in Sulawesi, Indonesia, and the role of Fagaceae in tropical montane rain forests. J. Biogeogr. 37, 960–974 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Van der Ent, A., Baker, A. J. M., van Balgooy, M. M. J. & Tjoa, A. Ultramafic nickel laterites in Indonesia (Sulawesi, Halmahera): Mining, nickel hyperaccumulators and opportunities for phytomining. J. Geochemical Explor. 128, 72–79 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pandyaswargo, A. H., Wibowo, A. D., Maghfiroh, M. F. N., Rezqita, A. & Onoda, H. The emerging electric vehicle and battery industry in Indonesia: Actions around the nickel ore export ban and a SWOT analysis. Batter. 7, 80 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zhu, L. et al. Regional scalable priorities for national biodiversity and carbon conservation planning in Asia. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe4261 (2021).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Smith, R. J. et al. Synergies between the key biodiversity area and systematic conservation planning approaches. Conserv. Lett. 12, 1–10 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Ball, I. R., Possingham, H. P. & Watts, M. E. Marxan and relatives: Software for spatial conservation prioritization. In Spatial Conservation Prioritization: Quantitative Methods and Computational Tools (eds Moilanen, A. et al.) 185–195 (Oxford University Press, 2009).
Google Scholar 
Game, E. T. & Grantham, H. S. Marxan User Manual: For Marxan version 1.8.10. University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia, and Pacific Marine Analysis and Research Association 127 (2008).BPS. Hasil Sensus Penduduk 2020. Berita Resmi Statistik 1–22 (2021).BPS. Data dan Informasi Kemiskinan Kabupaten/Kota Tahun 2020. 3205014, (Badan Pusat Statistik, 2020).Voigt, M. et al. Emerging threats from deforestation and forest fragmentation in the Wallacea centre of endemism. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 094048 (2021).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
KLHK. Deforestasi Indonesia Tahun 2017–2018. Direktorat Inventarisasi dan Pemantauan Sumber Daya Hutan. Direktorat Jenderal Planologi Kehutanan dan Tata Lingkungan. 64, (Direktorat Inventarisasi dan Pemantauan Sumber Daya Hutan, Direktorat Jenderal Planologi Kehutanan dan Tata Lingkungan, Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan, 2019).Supriatna, J. et al. Deforestation on the Indonesian island of Sulawesi and the loss of primate habitat. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 24, e01205 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kadir, A., Suaib, E. & Zuada, L. H. Mining in Southeast Sulawesi and Central Sulawesi: Shadow economy and environmental damage regional autonomy Era in Indonesia. Adv. Soc. Sci. Educ. Hum. Res. 404, 20–27 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Clements, R., Sodhi, N. S., Schilthuizen, M. & Ng, P. K. L. Limestone karsts of southeast Asia: Imperiled arks of biodiversity. Bioscience 56, 733–742 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Albani, A. et al. Activity budget, home range, and habitat use of moor macaques (Macaca maura) in the karst forest of South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Primates https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-020-00811-8 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Coleman, J. L. et al. Top 100 research questions for biodiversity conservation in Southeast Asia. Biol. Conserv. 234, 211–220 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Thomas, D. C., Bour, A. & Ardi, W. H. Begonia of the Matarombeo karst, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia, including two new species. Gard. Bull. Singapore 70, 163–176 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Galey, M. L., van der Ent, A., Iqbal, M. C. M. & Rajakaruna, N. Ultramafic geoecology of South and Southeast Asia. Bot. Stud. 58, 1–28 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rahbek, C. et al. Building mountain biodiversity: Geological and evolutionary processes. Science (80-.). 365, 1114–1119 (2019).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Atmadja, R. S., J P Golightly & B N Wahju. View of Mafic and Ultramafic Rock Association in the East Arc of Sulawesi. In Proceedings ITB (1974).CBD. First Draft of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. (2021).Noss, R. F. et al. Bolder thinking for conservation. Conserv. Biol. 26, 1–4 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Soto-Navarro, C. et al. Mapping co-benefits for carbon storage and biodiversity to inform conservation policy and action. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 375, 128 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
MoEF (Ministry of Environment and Forestry of Indonesia). Rekalkulasi Penutupan Lahan (Land Cover Recalculation) Indonesia Tahun 2018. (2019).Grantham, H. S. et al. Anthropogenic modification of forests means only 40% of remaining forests have high ecosystem integrity. Nat. Commun. 11, 5978 (2020).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ardron, J. A., Possingham, H. P. & Klein, C. J. Marxan Good Practices Handbook, Version 2. Pacific Marine Analysis and Research Association 165 (2010).Zhang, X. & Vincent, A. C. J. Conservation prioritization for seahorses (Hippocampus spp.) at broad spatial scales considering socioeconomic costs. Biol. Conserv. 235, 79–88 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bingham, H. C. et al. User Manual for the World Database on Protected Areas and world database on other effective area- based conservation measures: 1 . 6 User Manual for the World Database on Protected Areas and world database on other effective area-. (2019).McHugh, M. L. Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochem. Med. 22, 276–282 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
CEPF. Wallacea Biodiversity Hotspot-Ecosystem profile. (CEPF, 2014).Johnson, C. L. et al. Using occupancy-based camera-trap surveys to assess the critically endangered primate Macaca Nigra across its range in North Sulawesi, Indonesia. Oryx https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605319000851 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Darbyshire, I. et al. Important Plant Areas: Revised selection criteria for a global approach to plant conservation. Biodivers. Conserv. 26, 1767–1800 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Trethowan, L. A. et al. Metal-rich soils increase tropical tree stoichiometric distinctiveness. Plant Soil 461, 579–589 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Trethowan, L. A. et al. Floristics of forests across low nutrient soils in Sulawesi, Indonesia. Biotropica 52, 1309–1318 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rustiami, H. & Henderson, A. A Synopsis of Calamus (Arecaceae) in Sulawesi. Reinwardtia 16, 49–63 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
MoEF Ditjen KSDAE. Statistik Direktorat Jenderal KSDAE 2017. (2018).Gunawan, H. & Sugiarti. Mekongga: Hidden Paradise of Sulawesi’s Biodiversity. (LIPI Press, 2014).Gunawan, H. & Sugiarti. Perlunya Penunjukan Kawasan Konservasi Baru Untuk Mengantisipasi Degradasi Keanekaragaman Hayati Akibat Perubahan RTWT dKawasan Wallacea (Lesson Learnt Inisiasi Pengusulan Taman Nasional Mekongga, Sulawesi Tenggara). BioWallacea J. Ilm. Ilmu Biol. 1, 122–133 (2015).Milner-Gulland, E. J. et al. Four steps for the earth: Mainstreaming the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. One Earth 2050, 75–87 (2021).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
IUCN-WCPA. Recognising and reporting other effective area-based conservation measures. (IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, 2019). https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2019.PATRS.3.enAlvard, M. The potential for sustainable harvests by traditional wana hunters in morowali nature reserve, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Hum. Organ. 59, 428–440 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hilser, H. Collective stewardship and pathways to change: Understanding pro-social values, connectedness to nature and empathic capacity to cultivate ecocentrism in rural communities of North Sulawesi, Indonesia Harry Hilser, Ph.D. Human Geography. (University of Exeter, 2021).Hariandja, R. Pemetaan Wilayah Adat Lebih 20 Juta Hektar tetapi Pengakuan Minim, Mengapa? Mongabay (2022). https://www.mongabay.co.id/2022/09/03/peta-partisipatif-wilayah-adat-lebih-20-juta-tetapi-pengakuan-minim-mengapa/. (Accessed 23 Sep 2022)BRWA. Infografis Status Pengakuan Wilayah Adat di Indonesia. 6 (2022).BRWA. GIS-BRWA: Peta Wilayah Adat. Peta Interaktif (2022). https://www.brwa.or.id/sig/. (Accessed 23 Sep 2022)Carver, S. et al. Guiding principles for rewilding. Conserv. Biol. 35, 1882–1893 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jepson, P. & Blythe, C. Rewilding [electronic resource] / the radical new science of ecological recovery. (2020).Sheherazade, O. H. K. & Tsang, S. M. Contributions of bats to the local economy through durian pollination in Sulawesi, Indonesia. Biotropica 2, 1–10 (2019).
Google Scholar  More

Disturbance detectionWe used a well-established spectral-temporal segmentation method, Landsat-based Detection of Trends in Disturbance and Recovery (LandTrendr), to detect disturbances within the Google Earth Engine (GEE) cloud-computing platform57,58. The core of the LandTrendr is to extract a set of disturbance-related metrics by breaking pixel-level annual time-series spectral trajectories into linear features using Landsat observations. The LandTrendr has been widely used for change detection in various forest settings, and details about the algorithms can be found in previous publications57. Here we briefly described the key steps in generating the year and type of disturbances in China’s forests using the LandTrendr within the GEE platform. The overall analytic flow can be found in Supplementary Fig. 10.First, we generated annual spectrally consistent time-series data by using all available, good quality (cloud cover ≤ 20) Tier 1 Landsat 5 (Thematic Mapper), Landsat 7 (Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus), and Landsat 8 (Operational Land Imager) images acquired during the peak growing seasons (June 1—September 30) from 1986 to 2020. The peak growing seasons were selected to exclude compounding influences from ice, snow, and soil, and to maximize the spectral changes after forest disturbances. To tackle the spectral inconsistency among Landsat sensors, we harmonized spectral values via linear transformations according to band-respective coefficients presented in59. Clouds, cloud shadows, snow, and water were masked out using the Fmask algorithm60. The annual band composites at 30-meter spatial resolution during 1986–2020 were computed using the Medoid method61.Secondly, we ran the LandTrendr using five spectral indices, including two spectral bands (shortwave infrared I and II that were B5 and B7), tasseled cap wetness (TCW), normalized burn ratio (NBR), and normalized difference vegetation index. These five indices were effective indictors to represent vegetation greenness and structures, and were commonly used for detecting changes in forest disturbance and recovery62. For each spectral index, the LandTrendr produced a set of parameters to describe a possible disturbance event at the pixel level, including spectral values at pre-disturbance level (preval), magnitude of change (mag), duration (dur) and rate of change (rate), and the signal-to-noise ratio (dsnr) (n = 5). Using these five spectral indices, we generated a stack of disturbance-related parameter layers (n = 25, 5 spectral indices × 5 parameters), which were later used to detect and classify disturbances using machine learning models derived from reference data (described below).Disturbance classificationReference dataHigh-quality consistent reference data is key to train and classify disturbance types. To do so, we generated a total of 31225 reference points using a hierarchical approach. We first generated a large number of potential disturbance points using forest loss data from 2001 to 20203. Then we separated fire disturbances from non-fire disturbances by overlaying MODIS burned area (BA) with potential disturbance points following the procedure used by63. Specifically, fire disturbances were determined if the MODIS BA data coincided with the Landsat-derived forest loss for the fire year and 2 years postfire (i.e., t + 0, t + 1, t + 2) to account for delayed post-fire tree mortality. Following this step, we derived points as potential disturbances that consisted of fires and non-fire disturbances (including forest conversion to other land use types and silvicultural practices at various intensities). We also generated roughly the same number of points that experienced no disturbances (e.g., persistent forests), which were determined by selecting pixels with very few changes in spectral indices. These reference points, including fire, non-fire disturbances, and persistent forests, were then used to sample the time-series spectral data from 1986 to 2020. Finally, time-series spectral data from each reference point were visually checked to make sure they accurately represented disturbance events. This process resulted into a total of 31225 reference data points, including 2356 fire disturbance points, 13,242 non-fire disturbance points, and 15,627 no disturbance points (persistent forests) (Supplementary Fig. 2).Random forest classificationWe used machine learning modeling to classify each pixel into fire disturbance, non-fire disturbance, or no disturbance. The reference data points were used to sample the LandTrendr-derived disturbance-related parameter layers described above, which resulted into a dataset consisting of disturbance types. We divided the dataset into 70% of training data, and 30% as validation data. Using the training data, a Random Forest (RF) model was trained to classify each reference point into fire, non-fire disturbance, or no disturbance. Our RF approach showed that short-wave infrared (SWIR)-based moisture indices (e.g., B7, TCW) were strong predictors for detecting forest disturbances (Supplementary Fig. 11) likely because of their sensitivity to vegetation water content and canopy structure64. Finally, we applied the trained RF model to the full classification stack to consistently map the disturbance types from 1986 to 2020 across China’s forests, assuming that the spectral trajectories derived from reference data period 2001–2020 can be extrapolated to the whole mapping period 1986–2020. However, note that our approach was meant to detect relatively acuate and discrete disturbances that caused canopy opening, rather than subtle changes of forest structure or composition resulted from low intensive silvicultural practices and chronic disturbances.Year of disturbanceWe used the LandTrendr to determine the year of disturbance as the onset of magnitude of spectral change. Since we ran LandTrendr on five spectral indices, there were five possible years of disturbance for each pixel. Thus, we determined the year of disturbance using the median value from at least three different indices (i.e., NDVI, NBR, TCW, B5, B7). In this way, we only kept pixels that were detected as disturbances using at least three indices, thus reducing commission errors. The year with the greatest spectral changes generated by the LandTrendr often had an accuracy within 3 years11. A confidence level was also assigned to each disturbed pixel based on numbers of indices which showed possible disturbance events. Specially, low, medium, and high confidence were assigned if the disturbance was detected by three, four, or five spectral indices, respectively.ValidationsWe validated the disturbance map at the pixel and national levels. At the pixel level, we validated the final map using the validation sub-sample described in the previous section. We derived a confusion matrix to report user’s and producer’s accuracy (Supplementary Table 1) as the main accuracy assessment metrics. At the national level, we compared forest disturbance detected in this study to available existing dataset. Specifically, we compared the area of forest fire disturbance between our study and the national fire records during 2003–2009 (Supplementary Fig. 5). We compared the disturbance rates between our study and Landsat-derived global forest cover changes from 2001 to 20193 (Supplementary Fig. 4).Post-processingWe applied a series of spatial filters to minimize the unrealistic outliers from two potential sources of uncertainty, including speckle in time-series spectral trajectories or misregistration among images. This may lead to individual pixel or small patches including only a few pixels, which were (a) detected as disturbances, thus increasing the commission errors, or (b) not detected as disturbances, while their surrounding pixels were mostly disturbed, thereby increasing the omission errors. To address the issue (a), we removed all single-pixel disturbance patches through setting the minimum mapping unit as two 30 × 30 m2 pixels (0.18 ha). To address the issue (b), we applied a 3 by 3 moving window to fill holes through assigning the year of disturbance based on the years in the surrounding pixels. Finally, we smoothed the year of disturbance by assigning the center pixel using majority rules from surrounding pixels within the 3 by 3 windows, thus accounting for artefacts associated with uncertainties in the correct identification of the disturbance year.Characterizing disturbance regimes and their trendsWe characterized the disturbance regime using five indicators within each 0.5° grid cell (n = 1946) across China’s forests based on annual forest disturbance maps generated from the previous step. Within each grid cell, we calculated (1) total annually disturbed forest area (km2 yr−1), (2) percentage of forest disturbed annually (% yr−1), as annual disturbed forest area divided by the total forested area, (3) disturbance size (ha), as the number of disturbed pixels for each individual patch using an eight-neighbor rule, (4) disturbance frequency (# of patches per 1000 km2 forested area each year), as the number of disturbance patches per year divided by the total forested area, (5) disturbance severity (ΔNDVI = NDVIt−1 − NDVIt+1), as magnitude of NDVI change 1 year before and 1 year after disturbance, obtained from the LandTrendr analysis. We used (1) and (2) to characterize the disturbance rate, and (3)–(5) to describe the patch characteristics. The (2) and (4) were normalized by forest area within each grid cell, thus making them comparable among grid cells. For (3)–(5), we only calculated the patch size >0.45 ha (five 30 × 30-m2 pixels), because patches  TC2000), and the expansion of forested area from 1986 to 2000 (e.g., TC1986  20% following Liu et al., (2019). We should note that our study area did not include the newly afforested area after 2000. All analyses were performed within the forest mask, thus excluding the potential confounding factors from other land cover types. The description of TC1986 and TC2000 can be found in3,32. More

Here, we examine infection dynamics in the four regions of focus to learn more about how various control interventions performed in each region. Since the first documented cases emerged in these regions, the virus was able to spread freely across much of the first and second phases with a gradual increase in the control interventions. In the four regions of Makkah, Madinah, Eastern, and Riyadh, cases peaked on 12th May (6397 cases; 95% CI 5960–9697), 15th May (1967 cases; 95% CI 1625–2308), 23rd June (10367; 95% CI 8948–11785) and 11th June (11273 cases; 95% CI 11068–12491) respectively according to the fitted model shown in Fig. 2. As the epidemic progressed, more measures were adopted to contain the disease, and the disease’s infectiousness sharply decreased after the third period. There are a few factors responsible for the sudden declining trend: first our model is dependent on official data on cases that have been documented, and these data will only ever reflect a portion of the overall number of cases. Second, different regions developed different testing strategies, and some locations altered their approach to testing during the course of the time period that was investigated. It is possible that the beginning of the Hajj term (period 4) was a contributing factor in the decrease in the number of documented cases. Additionally, previous to this time period, the government indicated that it would be increasing the size of its local testing in order to detect new cases. It is possible that the efficacy of interventions would be reduced if increases are found to be occurring during the falling phase of an epidemic. This may result in measures being kept in place for a longer period of time than they would have been had more accurate data been provided.Figure 2With the use of the Delay Rejection Adaptive Metropolis method, the relevant parameters were estimated for each of the four areas of interest by fitting the data from 13th March until 25th September.Full size imageWe estimate the effective reproduction number (R_t) as an indicator of SARS-CoV-2 transmission before and after the interventions. Figure 3 depicts the dramatic shift in the rate of SARS-CoV-2 transmission as a result of decreased social contact and other control measures. At the beginning of the pandemic, (R_t) for SARS-CoV-2 in Saudi regions was between 4 and 6 as illustrated in Tables 6 and 7. In other words, on average each case spread to between four and six others. Considering that each new generation of SARS-CoV-2 cases occurs every five days, it is evident that this pandemic was rapidly expanding out of control. Moreover, we assumed that the transmission rate and the documented infection rate did not change during the first two periods since interventions were carried out gradually until a complete lockdown took place. As more measures were introduced, the spread of the disease began to decrease. Therefore, our data were based on the weekly reported number of documented SARS-CoV-2 cases broken down by region. As a result, it became clear that the reliability of the (R_t) value was relatively high for transmission.Figure 3Distribution of Rt estimates derived from 10000 MCMC samples for Makkah, Madinah, Eastern, and Riyadh, respectively. The black dot in the centre of each violin plot denotes the median, the thick bar in the plot denotes the interquartile range, and the thin bar in the plot denotes the lowest and maximum values. The mean and the credible interval for 95%, which is shown in parentheses, are labelled below or above, respectively.Full size imageThe effects of the events and interventions on the dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 in the regions of interest are considered. First, if the controls remained in phase four in Makkah, our model projects that the total number of documented cases would increase to 81047 (95% CI 79421–82672). In Al-Madinah, the cumulative number of documented cases would have increased to 22997 (95% CI 19578–26415). The number of cumulative documented cases may have reached 80520 (95% CI 78335–82704) if controls stayed steady in the Eastern region at the level they were at in phase four. If the pattern shown during the fourth period is taken into account, we estimate that there would have been 67150 (95% CI 63731–70568) documented infections in the Riyadh region. Figure 4 illustrates these findings.Figure 4The relevant parameters were estimated for each of the four regions of interest by first fitting the data of each region, and then predicting using the parameters from period 4. This was done with each of the four regions of interest separately.Full size imageWe now explore the impact of controls remaining in place at the same level as that implemented in phase three. In that case, the number of documented cases in Makkah would have increased to 116641 (95% CI 105015–128266). Similarly, the total number of documented cases in Al-Madinah would have increased to 53877 (95% CI 50458-57295) if the outbreak had been allowed to continue at the same level. If the controls had remained unchanged from how they were in phase three in the Eastern region, the total number of documented cases would have been 310459 (95% CI 298362–334981). Finally, in Riyadh this would have resulted in 665241 documented cases (95% CI 651822 to 678659). Figure 5 highlights these findings.Figure 5For each of the four areas of interest, the relevant parameters were estimated by first fitting the data of each region and then predicting using the parameters from period 3. This was carried out for each of the four areas of interest independently.Full size imageWe now investigate the impact of second-period controls remaining in place. In that case, the number of documented cases would increase to 1236642 (95% 1218314–1251626), 442865 (95% CI 439446–456283), 454031 (95% CI 441846–466215), and 2322624 (95% CI 1919206-3026042) in the regions of Makkah, Madinah, Eastern, and Riyadh, respectively (see Fig. 6).Figure 6For each of the four regions of interest, the relevant variables were identified by first fitting the data from each area and then making predictions using the parameters from period 2. Each of the four regions of interest was done separately.Full size imageThe efficacy of NPIs is dependent on when they are adopted, with earlier adoption resulting in greater success in lowering transmission rates of infectious diseases. In the early stages of COVID-19, Saudi regions made the decision to gradually implement measures in order to understand the severity of the disease and reduce the economic and social costs of lockdowns, as well as the political costs. In Fig. 6, if the government were to rely on the interventions of the second phase, then the number of cases of infection would considerably rise owing to the ineffectiveness of the measures. In the third period as in Fig. 5, the government made it possible to relax some of the control measures, but it is ultimately up to each area to decide whether they will maintain the same level of control or whether they will increase or decrease it. In comparison to the control measures carried out during the third and fourth periods, this led to significantly improved outcomes. The reason that these time periods were chosen is that there was no stiffening of the NPI response in most Saudi regions during the first two periods and control interventions were improved later on.Significant undetected infections resulted in the fast spread of new coronaviruses (SARS-CoV-2) which is illustrated in Fig. 7. The proportion of undocumented infections, including asymptomatic cases and undocumented symptomatic individuals who did not seek medical treatment or be tested for mild symptoms, was greater than that of Wuhan at the onset of the pandemic26, which may be a result of the following factors: first, the medical configuration was not optimal and public awareness was limited during the onset of the pandemic while the undocumented rate progressively increased; Second, contact tracing procedures employed in Saudi regions may have become overwhelmed if the number of early-stage cases in Saudi regions rises substantially. The discrepancy between the predicted proportions of asymptomatic (undocumented) cases may be attributable to the difficulty in the un-identifiability of parameters in epidemiological models. There were a substantial number of asymptomatic infected individuals with high infectivity in Saudi regions, where the epidemic situation escalated rapidly. Our research emphasises the frequency of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 cases and their role in transmission in order to increase people’s knowledge of asymptomatic cases and to serve as a guide for the prevention and control of SARS-CoV-2.Table 3 Estimated transmission rate in Saudi Regions.Full size tableTable 4 Estimated ascertainable infection rate.Full size tableIn this model, we fitted dynamic transmission rates because of varied preventable measures by the Saudi government at the level of the country or region. After a series of actions taken by the government, regions and cities went into lockdown, resulting in a decrease in the transmission rate as in Table 3. Before the interventions were introduced, in the first two periods of our study, we assumed the transmission rate did not change since individual and community responses had not effectively taken place. After severe interventions were implemented, the transmission rates were allowed to vary in later periods and reduced gradually due to the control measures that reduced the spread of disease27. Estimates of documented infection rates are presented in Table 4. Our model estimates show the documented infection rate has continued to decrease in the last two periods. Thus, the parameters we fit across periods are a measure of how effective the lockdown was in bringing down the documented infection rate28.Risk of resurgenceThe risk of resurgence in Saudi Arabia’s four regions has been examined in this section after the relaxation of intervention measures. There will be a rise in disease activity if control measures are relaxed without taking into account increases in the number of cases being detected, isolated, and/or traced. We predict the first week of no new cases of infection and the week when all current infections in Saudi Arabia will be eradicated.In the Makkah region, had the trend continued into the fourth period, the number of documented infections would have dropped to zero on average by the 6th September (23rd August to 27th September), and all infections would have been eradicated by the 26th of October (7th October to 14th November). On the 28th June, the number of weekly active infections (including presymptomatic, symptomatic, and asymptomatic cases) reached its highest point of 230,230 (95% CI 226811–234364), and on 8th September, that number dropped to 44023 (95% CI 40604–47441).Therefore, the number of documented infections would have reached zero in Al-Madinah region on average on 6th November (23rd October to 22nd November), and all infections would have been eliminated by 1st December (27th November to 14th December). On 23rd June, weekly active infections (including presymptomatic, symptomatic, and asymptomatic cases) peaked at 130,134 (95% CI 126715–133552) and then declined to 60023 (95% CI 58604–63441) on 25th September.If the trend had continued as it did in the fourth period in the Eastern region, the average number of documented infections would have reached zero on 2nd November (from 23rd October to 18th November), and the total eradication of infections would have happened on 1st December (26th November to 22nd December). The number of weekly active infections (including presymptomatic, symptomatic, and asymptomatic cases) peaked at 65000 (95% CI 61581–68418) during the week of July 23rd and subsequently decreased to 800 (95% CI 765–834) on 8th of September.Lastly, the model predicted that the number of weekly active infections in the Riyadh region (including presymptomatic, symptomatic, and asymptomatic infections) peaked on 28th June at 562332 (95% CI 513379–619542) and then decreased to 188215 (95% CI 174796–191633) on 18th September. On average, we expected that the number of documented infections would have decreased to zero on 18th October (7th October to 14th November) and that the total number of infections would have been eliminated on 1st December if the trend continued as it did in the fourth period (20th November to 23rd December). Figure 7 illustrates these findings. We found that if control measures were lifted 30 days following the first day of zero documented cases.Figure 7The estimated number of infected cases that were active (presymptomatic, symptomatic, and asymptomatic) during the research period in the areas of Makkah, Madinah, Eastern, and Riyadh respectively.Full size imageThe probability of resurgence, which we define as the number of active documented cases greater than 100 could be as high as 0.96 in Eastern, 0.95 in Madinah, 0.97 in Makkah, and 0.96 in Riyadh. If we adopt more stringent conditions of lifting controls after observing no confirmed cases for a continuous period of 30 days, the probability of resurgence decreases to 0.31, 0.28, 0.30, and 0.30, with probable resurgence occurring on 13th February, 7th February, 2nd January, and 8th January for Eastern, Makkah, Madinah and Riyadh, respectively (Fig. 8). Despite the use of a simplified model, these results emphasize the hazards of ignoring undetermined occurrences when modifying intervention techniques.Figure 8Figure demonstrating the effect of relaxing all control measures in all four regions 30 days following the first day without confirmed cases.Full size imageSensitivity analysisFor the purpose of testing the robustness of our research results, we conducted a series of sensitivity analyses by varying the durations of the latent and infectious periods, the ratio of transmissibility in asymptomatic (undocumented) cases to symptomatic (documented) cases, and the initial documented infection rate. We conduct eight sensitivity analyses (S1 to S8) within each model for each region of Saudi Arabia to assess the robustness of our model results. For instance, the sensitivity analysis performed for S1 was based on the changes of the latent period and pre-symptomatic infectious period, respectively, and other parameters remain the same. These modifications were carried out with the help of reference15,29, and the same approaches were used for the other parts of the sensitivity analysis, which is summarised in Table 5.Table 5 Description of essential model parameters that were not fitted in the MCMC, where (D_e) refers to the latent period, (D_p) refers to the pre-symptomatic infectious period, (D_i) refers to the symptomatic infectious period, (gamma _0) refers to the initial ascertain rate and (alpha) refers to the ratio of the transmission rate for P and A to I.Full size tableIn particular, for (S1), we raised the incubation period to 7 days (upper 95% CI based on ref15) and the pre-symptomatic infectious period to 3 days (upper 95% CI based on ref29). Therefore we set (D_e = 4) and (D_p=3), and modified (E_0) and (P_0) as needed. The transmissibility of the undocumented cases was assumed to be 0.46 (lower 95 % CI according to ref.31) of the infection cases for (S2); for (S3), the transmissibility of the asymptomatic (undocumented) cases was assumed to be 0.62 (upper 95 % CI according to ref31). We assumed that in (S4), the initial documented infection rate was (gamma _0) = 0.14 (lower 95 % CI according to ref13) and adjusted (A_0), (P_0) and E(0) accordingly. Similarly for (S5) we assumed the initial documented infection rate was (gamma _0) = 0.42 (upper 95 % CI according to ref13) and adjusted (P_0), (A_0), and (E_0) accordingly. In (S6) we set the variables (D_ e=3) and (D_p=1.1), and altered the values of (P_0) and (E_ 0) as necessary in accordance with13. In (S7) we assumed that the transmission rate of asymptomatic (undocumented) cases was half that of documented cases by setting 0.5. Finally, in (S8) we assumed that the infectious period ((D_i)) was double that of symptomatic cases by setting 6 days. Both (S7) and (S8) were based on30. The results of our sensitivity analysis are summarised in Tables 6 and 7. We note that the variation in the model predictions of (R_t) varies from setting to setting. However, these variations appear to be fairly small, proposing the robustness of the results to the specification of associated values in fairly realistic ranges13,13. Our sensitivity analysis provides information about the importance of each parameter to the model representing the transmission of SARS-CoV-2. An increase (or decrease) in parameter values, while other parameters’ values remain the same, contributes to an increase (or decrease) in effective reproduction numbers. For example, an increase in infectious period would result in a higher effective reproduction number at the beginning of the epidemic and a longer time required to clear all infections in Saudi regions32. Our sensitivity analysis indicates that almost all model parameters may have an important role in spreading this virus among susceptible people. In particular, the contact rate from person-to-person and the transition rate of asymptomatic (undetected) individuals play a significant role in disease spread. Our important findings, of a significant decrease in (R_t) after interventions and the existence of a substantial number of presymptomatic and asymptomatic cases, were found to be robust. This highlights that Saudi authorities should pay attention to intervention strategies in the event of a resurgence of cases and quarantining those who were in contact with active cases can effectively reduce the disease33. In Tables 6 and 7 we show the estimated effective reproduction number (R_t) associated with 95% CIs obtained from those eight sensitivity analyses for all four regions and all five time periods.Table 6 Sensitivity analysis of the effective reproduction number (R_t) for Eastern and Madinah.Full size tableTable 7 Sensitivity analysis of estimated effective reproduction number (R_t) for Makkah and Riyadh.Full size table More

Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the NetherlandsFons van der Plas & Liesje MommerSystematic Botany and Functional Biodiversity, Life Science, Leipzig University, Leipzig, GermanyThomas Schröder-Georgi, Alexandra Weigelt, Kathryn Barry & Christian WirthGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, GermanyAlexandra Weigelt, Kathryn Barry, Adriana Alzate, Nico Eisenhauer, Anke Hildebrandt, Christiane Roscher & Christian WirthTerrestrial Ecology Research Group, School of Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technical University of Munich, Munich, GermanySebastian Meyer & Wolfgang WeisserAquaculture and Fisheries Group, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Wageningen, the NetherlandsAdriana AlzateAgroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Université de Bourgogne, Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, FranceRomain L. BarnardEidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Zurich, SwitzerlandNina BuchmannDepartment of Experimental Plant Ecology, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the NetherlandsHans de KroonInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University Jena, Jena, GermanyAnne Ebeling & Winfried VoigtInstitute of Biology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, GermanyNico EisenhauerHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, GermanyChristof EngelsInstitute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, SwitzerlandMarkus FischerMax Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, GermanyGerd Gleixner, Ernst-Detlef Schulze & Christian WirthHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, GermanyAnke HildebrandtFriedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, GermanyAnke HildebrandtGeoecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, GermanyEva Koller-France & Yvonne OelmannInstitute of Geography and Geoecology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, GermanySophia Leimer & Wolfgang WilckeEcotron Européen de Montpellier, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Montferrier-sur-Lez, FranceAlexandru MilcuCentre d’Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5175 (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique-Université de Montpellier-Université Paul-Valéry Montpellier-Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes), Montpellier, FranceAlexandru MilcuDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandPascal A. NiklausUFZ, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department Physiological Diversity, Leipzig, GermanyChristiane RoscherInstitute of Landscape Ecology, University of Münster, Münster, GermanyChristoph ScherberCentre for Biodiversity Monitoring, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, GermanyChristoph ScherberGeobotany, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, GermanyMichael Scherer-LorenzenCentre of Biodiversity and Sustainable Land Use, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, GermanyStefan ScheuJ.F. Blumenbach Institute of Zoology and Anthropology, Animal Ecology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, GermanyStefan ScheuDepartment of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandBernhard SchmidInstitute of Ecology, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, ChinaBernhard SchmidLeuphana University Lüneburg, Institute of Ecology, Lüneburg, GermanyVicky TempertonAgroecology, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, GermanyTeja TscharntkeF.v.d.P. wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. T.S.-G., A.W., K.B., S.M., A.A., R.L.B., N.B., H.d.K., A.E., N.E., C.E., M.F., G.G., A.H., E.K.-F., S.L., A.M., L.M., P.A.N., Y.O., C.R., C.S., M.S.-L., S.S., B.S., E.-D.S., V.T., T.T., W.V., W. Weisser, W. Wilcke and C.W. helped edit the manuscript. More

Wilkinson, D. M. Dispersal biogeography. Encyclopedia of Life Science. (Nature Publishing Group, 2001).Jan, P.L. et al. Range expansion is associated with increased survival and fecundity in a long-lived bat species. Proc. R. Soc. B. 286, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.0384 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
IUCN. IUCN Guidelines for the Prevention of Biodiversity Loss Caused by Alien Invasive Species. https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/12413(2000).McKinney, M. L. Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biological Conservation 127, 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.005 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Galko, J. et al. Invázne a nepôvodné druhy v lesoch Slovenska: hmyz—huby—rastliny. (Národné lesnícke centrum, 2018).Lockwood, J. L., Hoopes, M. F. & Marchetti, M. P. Invasion ecology_draft_2ed. (John Wiley & Sons, 2013).Colautti, R. I. & MacIsaac, H. J. A neutral terminology to define ‘invasive’ species: Defining invasive species. Divers. Distrib. 10, 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2004.00061.x (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ambros, M., Dudich, A., MIKLÓS, P., Stollmann, A. & Žiak, D. Ryšavka tmavopása (Apodemus agrarius)–novỳ druh cicavca Podunajskej roviny (Rodentia: Muridae). Lynx, series nova 41, (2010).Bradley, B. A. et al. Disentangling the abundance—impact relationship for invasive species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116, 9919–9924. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2605254 (2019).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Nackley, L. L., West, A. G., Skowno, A. L. & Bond, W. J. The nebulous ecology of native invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 32, 814–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2017.08.003 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Archer, S. Tree-grass dynamics in a Prosopis-thornscrub savanna parkland: reconstructing the past and predicting the future. Ecoscience 2, 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/11956860.1995.11682272 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wigley, B. J., Bond, W. J. & Hoffman, M. T. Thicket expansion in a South African savanna under divergent land use: local vs. global drivers? Global Change Biol. 16, 964–976. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02030.x (2010).Spiegel, C. S., Hart, P. J., Woodworth, B. L., Tweed, E. J. & LeBrun, J. J. Distribution and abundance of forest birds in low-altitude habitat on Hawai’i Island: Evidence for range expansion of native species. Bird Conserv. Int. 16, 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959270906000244 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Livezey, K. B. Range expansion of Barred Owls, part II: facilitating ecological changes. Am. Midland Nat. 323–349 (2009).Veech, J. A., Small, M. F. & Baccus, J. T. The effect of habitat on the range expansion of a native and an introduced bird species. J. Biogeogr. 38, 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02397.x (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Krupa, J. J. & Haskins, K. E. Invasion of the meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus) in southeastern Kentucky and its possible impact on the southern bog lemming (Synaptomys cooperi). American Midland Naturalist 14–22 (1996).Jareño, D. et al. Factors associated with the colonization of agricultural areas by common voles Microtus arvalis in NW Spain. Biol. Invasions 17, 2315–2327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-015-08774 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Malygin, V. M., Baskevich, M. I. & Khlyap, L. A. Invasions of the common vole sibling species. Russ. J. Biol. Invas. 11, 47–65 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tong, X., Wang, R. & Chen, X.-Y. Expansion or invasion? A Response to Nackley et al. Trends Ecol. Evol. 33, 234–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.01.008 (2018).Thompson, K. & Davis, M. A. Why research on traits of invasive plants tell us very little. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24,115–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.01.007 (2011).Davis, M. A. & Thompson, K. Eight ways to be a colonizer; two ways to be an invader: A proposed nomenclature scheme for invasion ecology. Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am. 81, 226–230 (2000).
Google Scholar 
Davis, M. A., Thompson, K., Grime, J. P. & Charles, S. Elton and the dissociation of invasion ecology from the rest of ecology. Diversity and Distribution 7, 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-4642.2001.00099.x (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Davis, M. A. Invasion biology. (Oxford University Press on Demand, 2009).Davis, M. A. et al. Don’t judge species on their origins. Nature 474, 153–154 (2011).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Klempa, B. et al. Complex evolution and epidemiology of Dobrava-Belgrade hantavirus: Definition of genotypes and their characteristics. Adv. Virol. 158, 521–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-012-1514-5 (2013).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kraljik, J. et al. Genetic diversity of Bartonella genotypes found in the striped field mouse (Apodemus agrarius) in Central Europe. Parasitology 143, 1437–1442. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182016000962 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Latinne, A. et al. Phylogeography of the striped field mouse, Apodemus agrarius (Rodentia: Muridae), throughout its distribution range in the Palaearctic region. Mamm. Biol. 100, 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42991-019-00001-0 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dudich, A. & Szabó, I. Über die Verbreitung der Hystrichopsylla Taschenberg, 1880 (Siphonaptera) in Ungarn. Folia Entomol. Hung 45, 27–32 (1984).
Google Scholar 
Dudich, A. Dynamika areálu ryšavky tmavopásej (Apodemus agrarius Pall.)–expanzia či invázia. Pp.: 53–62. Invázie a invázne organizmy. SEKOS pre SNK SCOPE, Nitra (1997).Karaseva, E. V., Tikhonova, G. N. & Bogomolov, P. L. Distribution of the Striped field mouse (Apodemus agrarius) and peculiarities of its ecology in different parts of its range. Zoologičeskij žurnal 71, 106–115 (1992).
Google Scholar 
Polechová, J. & Graciasová, R. Návrat myšice temnopásé, Apodemus agrarius (Rodentia: Muridae) na jižní Moravu. Lynx (Praha), ns 31, 153–155 (2000).Bryja, J. & Řehák, Z. Další doklady současné expanze areálu myšice temnopásé (Apodemus agrarius) na Moravě. Lynx (Praha), ns (2002).Herzig-Straschil, B., Bihari, Z. & Spitzenberger, F. Recent changes in the distribution of the field mouse (Apodemus agrarius) in the western part of the Carpathian basin. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien. Serie B für Botanik und Zoologie 421–428 (2003).Dudich, A., Ambros, M., Stollmann, A., Uhrin, M. & Urban, P. Ryšavka tmavopása Apodemus agrarius (Pallas) v Novohrade. Príroda okresu Veľký Krtíš – 15 rokov od celoslovenského tábora ochrancov prírody 110–115 (2003).Horáček, I. & Ložek, V. Biostratigraphic investigation in the Hámorská cave (Slovak karst). Pp.: 49–60. Krasové sedimenty. Fosilní záznam klimatickỳch oscilací a změn prostředí. Knihovna České speleologické společnosti, Svazek 21, (1993).Pazonyi, P. & Kordos, L. Late Eemian (Late Pleistocene) vertebrate fauna from the Horváti-lik (Uppony, NE Hungary). Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica 22, 107–117 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Obuch, J., Danko, S. & Noga, M. Recent and subrecent diet of the barn owl (Tyto alba) in Slovakia. Slovak Raptor J. 10, 1–50 . https://doi.org/10.1515/srj-2016-0003 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Obuch, J. Temporal changes in proportions of small mammals in the diet of the mammalian and avian predators in Slovakia. Lynx, n. s 55, 86–106. https://doi.org/10.37520/lynx.2021.007 (2022).Niethammer, J. Die Verbreitung der Brandmaus (Apodemus agrarius) in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Acta Sc. Nat. Brno 10, 43–55 (1976).
Google Scholar 
von Lehmann, E. Die Brandmaus in Hessen als Beispiel für die Problematik der Verbreitungsgrenzen vieler Säugetierarten. Natur und Museum 106, 112–117.Farský, O. Úlovky myšice temnopásé, Apodemus agrarius (Pallas), na Moravě a ve Slezsku v letech 1920 až 1940 [Caughts of the striped field mouse, Apodemus agrarius (Pallas), in Moravia and Silesia in the years 1920–1940]. Lynx, n. s 5, 11–18 (1965).Heroldová, M., Homolka, M. & Zejda, J. Některé nepublikované nálezy Apodemus agrarius v Čechách a na Moravě v návaznosti na současnỳ stav znalostí o jejím rozšíření (Rodentia: Muridae). Lynx, series nova 44, (2013).Ambros, M., Dudich, A. & Stollmann, A. Fauna drobných hmyzožravcov a hlodavcov (Insectivora, Rodentia) vybraných mokraďných biotopov južného Slovenska. Rosalia (Nitra) 14, 195–202 (1999).
Google Scholar 
Balát, F. Potrava sovy pálené na jižní Moravě a na jižním Slovensku [Food of Barn owl on the south Moravia and south Slovakia]. Zoologické listy 5, 237–256 (1956).
Google Scholar 
Baláž, I., Stollmann, A., Ambros, M. & Dudich, A. Drobné cicavce rezervácie Lohótsky močiar. Chránené územia Slovenska 58, 27–29 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Bridišová, Z., Baláž, I. & Ambros, M. Drobné cicavce prírodnej rezervácie Alúvium Žitavy [Small mammals of Alúvium Žitavy natural reservation]. Chránené územia Slovenska 69, 7–9 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Dudich, A., Lysỳ, J. & Štollmann, A. Súčasné poznatky o rozšírení drobnỳch zemnỳch cicavcov (Insectivora, Rodentia) južnej časti Podunajskej nížiny. Spravodaj Oblastného múzea v Komárne, Prírodné vedy 5, 157–186 (1985).
Google Scholar 
Kristofik, J. Small mammals in floodplain forests. Folia Zoologica (Czech Republic) (1999).Méhely, L. Két új poczokfaj a magyar faunában. Állattani közlemények 7, 3–14 (1908).
Google Scholar 
Noga, M. The wintering and food ecology of Long-eared Owl in South-Western part of Slovakia (Comenius University in Bratislava, 2007).
Google Scholar 
Pachinger, K., Novackỳ, M., Facuna, V. & Ambruš, B. Dynamika a zloženie synúzií mikromammálií na izolovanỳch ostrovoch vnútozemskej delty Dunaja v oblasti vodného diela Gabčíkovo. Acta Environ. Universitatis Comenianae 9, 71–77 (1997).
Google Scholar 
Poláčiková, Z. Small terrestrial mammals’ (Eulipotyphla, Rodentia) synusia of selected localities in western Slovakia. Ekológia (Bratislava) 29, 131–139. https://doi.org/10.4149/ekol_2010_02_131 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Reiterová, K. et al. Úloha drobnỳch cicavcov–dôležitỳch rezervoárov v cirkulácii larválnej toxoplazmózy. Slovenskỳ Veterinárny Časopis 4, 217–222 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Stanko, M., Mošanský, L. & Fričová, J. Small mammal communities (Eulipotyphla, Rodentia) of the middle part of alluvium Ipeľ river (Lučenská and Ipeľská basins). Ochrana prírody 26, 43–52 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Spitzenberger, F. & Engelberg, S. A new look at the dynamic western distribution border of Apodemus agrarius in Central Europe (Rodentia: Muridae). Lynx, series nova 45, (2014).Sládkovičová, V. H., Žiak, D. & Miklós, P. Synúzie drobných zemných cicavccov mokradných biotopov Podunajskej roviny. Folia faunistica Slovaca 18, 13–19 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Tulis, F. et al. Expansion of the Striped field mouse (Apodemus agrarius) in the south-western Slovakia during 2010–2015. Folia Oecologica 43, 64–73 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Ambros, M. et al. Zmeny v rozšírení ryšavky tmavopásej (Apodemus agrarius) na Slovensku. in Zborník príspevkov z vedeckého kongresu ‘Zoológia 2022’ 10 (2022).Dudich, A. Ektoparazitofauna cicavcov a vtákov južnej časti Podunajskej nížiny so zreteľom na Žitný ostrov. 1. Siphonaptera. Žitnoostrovské múzeum Dunajská Streda—Spravodaj múzea 9, 61–96 (1986).Dudich, A. Príspevok k poznaniu drobných zemných cicavcov (Insectivora, Rodentia) a ich ektoparazitov (Acarina, Anoplura, Siphonaptera) okolia ŠPR Čenkovská lesostep (Podunajská nížina). Iuxta Danubium (Komárno) 10, 186–191 (1993).
Google Scholar 
Cyprich, D., Krumpál, M. & Dúha, J. Blchy (Siphonaptera) cicavcov (Mammalia) Štátnej prírodnej rezervácii Šúr. Ochrana prírody 8, 241–289 (1987).
Google Scholar 
Lapin, M., Faško, P., Melo, M., Štastný, P. & Tomlain, J. Climate zones. in Landscape Atlas of the Slovak Republic (Harmanec: VKÚ, 2002).Faško, P. & Štastný, P. Average annual precipitation. in Landscape Atlas of the Slovak Republic (2002).Russell, J. C., Stjernman, M., Lindström, Å. & Smith, H. G. Community occupancy before-after-control-impact (CO-BACI) analysis of Hurricane Gudrun on Swedish forest birds. Ecol. Appl. 25, 685–694.  https://doi.org/10.1890/14-0645.1 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Desrosiers, M., Planas, D. & Mucci, A. Short-term responses to watershed logging on biomass mercury and methylmercury accumulation by periphyton in boreal lakes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 63, 1734–1745. https://doi.org/10.1139/f06-077 (2006).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hanisch, J. R., Tonn, W. M., Paszkoswki, C. A. & Scrimgeour, G. J. Stocked trout have minimal effects on littoral invertebrate assemblages of productive fish-bearing lakes: A whole-lake BACI study: Stocked trout have minimal effects on littoral invertebrates. Freshw. Biol. 58, 895–907. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.12095 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Louhi, P., Mäki-Petäys, A., Erkinaro, J., Paasivaara, A. & Muotka, T. Impacts of forest drainage improvement on stream biota: A multisite BACI-experiment. For. Ecol. Manage. 260, 1315–1323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.07.024 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Conner, M. M., Saunders, W. C., Bouwes, N. & Jordan, C. Evaluating impacts using a BACI design, ratios, and a Bayesian approach with a focus on restoration. Environ Monit Assess 188, 555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5526-6
(2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Popescu, V. D., de Valpine, P., Tempel, D. & Peery, M. Z. Estimating population impacts via dynamic occupancy analysis of Before-After Control–Impact studies. Ecol. Appl. 22, 1389–1404. https://doi.org/10.1890/11-1669.1 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Horváth, G. F. & Herczeg, R. Site occupancy response to natural and anthropogenic disturbances of root vole: Conservation problem of a vulnerable relict subspecies. J. Nat. Conserv. 21, 350–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2013.03.004 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pounder, K. C. et al. Novel Hantavirus in Wildlife, United Kingdom. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 19, 673–675. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1904.121057 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kreisinger, J., Bastien, G., Hauffe, H. C., Marchesi, J. & Perkins, S. E. Interactions between multiple helminths and the gut microbiota in wild rodents. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 370, 20140295. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0295 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kim, H.-C. et al. Hantavirus surveillance and genetic diversity targeting small mammals at Camp Humphreys, a US military installation and new expansion site Republic of Korea. PLoS ONE 12, e0176514. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176514 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Burnham, K. P., Anderson, D. R. & Burnham, K. P. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. (Springer, 2002).Sugiura, N. Further analysis of the data by Akaike’s information criterion and the finite corrections: Further analysis of the data by akaike’ s. Commun. Stat. Theory Methods 7, 13–26 (1978).Article 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Hurvich, C. M. & Tsai, C.-L. Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika 76, 297–307 (1989).Article 
MathSciNet 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Morris, E. K. et al. Choosing and using diversity indices: insights for ecological applications from the German Biodiversity Exploratories. Ecol. Evol. 4, 3514–3524. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1155 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ingram, J. C. Berger–Parker Index. in Encyclopedia of Ecology 332–334 (Elsevier, 2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008045405-4.00091-4.Bürkner, P.-C. brms : An R package for bayesian multilevel models using Stan. J. Stat. Soft. 80, (2017).Wang, Y., Naumann, U., Eddelbuettel, D., Wilshire, J. & Warton, D. mvabund: Statistical Methods for Analysing Multivariate Abundance Data. (2022).Warton, D. I., Thibaut, L. & Wang, Y. A. The PIT-trap—A “model-free” bootstrap procedure for inference about regression models with discrete, multivariate responses. PLoS ONE 12, e0181790. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181790 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Oksanen, J. et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package. (2022).R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2022).Percie du Sert, N. et al. Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0. PLoS Biol. 18, e3000411. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000411 (2020).Szacki, J. & Liro, A. Movements of small mammals in the heterogeneous landscape. Landsc. Ecol. 5, 219–224 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
Szacki, J., Babinska-Werka, J. & Liro, A. The influence of landscape spatial structure on small mammal movements. Acta Theriol. 2, (1993).Pimentel, D., Pimentel, M. & Wilson, A. Plant, animal, and microbe invasive species in the United States and World. Biol. Invasions 193 (2007).Valéry, L., Hervé, F., Lefeuvre, J. C. & Simberloff, D. Invasive species can also be native. Trends Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.07.003 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Deinet, S. et al. Wildlife comeback in Europe: The recovery of selected mammal and bird species. (2013).Gompper, M. Top Carnivores in the Suburbs? Ecological and Conservation Issues Raised by Colonization of North-eastern North America by Coyotes: The expansion of the coyote’s geographical range may broadly influence community structure, and rising coyote densities in the suburbs may alter how the general public views wildlife. BioScience 52, 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568 (2002).Dalecky, A. et al. Range expansion of the invasive house mouse Mus musculus domesticus in Senegal, West Africa: A synthesis of trapping data over three decades, 1983–2014. Mammal. Rev. 45, 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12043 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Konečnỳ, A. et al. Invasion genetics of the introduced black rat (Rattus rattus) in Senegal West Africa. Mol. Ecol. 22, 286–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12112 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bramley, G. N. Home ranges and interactions of kiore (Rattus exulans) and Norway rats (R. norvegicus) on Kapiti Island, New Zealand. New Zeal. J. Ecol. 328–334 (2014).O’Rourke, R. L., Anson, J. R., Saul, A. M. & Banks, P. B. Limits to alien black rats (Rattus rattus) acting as equivalent pollinators to extinct native small mammals: The influence of stem width on mammal activity at native Banksia ericifolia inflorescences. Biol. Invasions 22, 329–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-019-02090-x (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
White, T. A. et al. Range expansion in an invasive small mammal: influence of life-history and habitat quality. Biol. Invasions 14, 2203–2215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0225-x (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
McDevitt, A. D. et al. Invading and expanding: Range dynamics and ecological consequences of the greater white-toothed shrew (Crocidura russula) invasion in Ireland. PLoS ONE 9, e100403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100403 (2014).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Aguilar, J.-P., Pélissié, T., Sigé, B. & Michaux, J. Occurrence of the stripe field mouse lineage (Apodemus agrarius Pallas 1771; Rodentia; Mammalia) in the Late Pleistocene of southwestern France. C.R. Palevol 7, 217–225 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kordos, L. Historico-zoogeographical and ecological investigation of the subfossil vertebrate fauna of the Aggtelek Karst. Vert. Hung. 18, 85–100 (1978).
Google Scholar 
Hairston, N. G., Smith, F. E. & Slobodkin, L. B. Community structure, population control, and competition. Am. Nat. 94, 421–425 (1960).Article 

Google Scholar 
Agnew, P., Hide, M., Sidobre, C. & Michalakis, Y. A minimalist approach to the effects of density-dependent competition on insect life-history traits. Ecol. Entomol. 27, 396–402 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Krebs, C. J. Beyond population regulation and limitation. Wildl. Res. 29, 1–10 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Huitu, O., Norrdahl, K. & Korpimäki, E. Competition, predation and interspecific synchrony in cyclic small mammal communities. Ecography 27, 197–206.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2003.03684.x (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lofgren, O. Niche expansion and increased maturation rate of Clethrionomys glareolus in the absence of competitors. J. Mammal. 76, 1100–1112 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hansson, L. Competition between Rodents in Successional Stages of Taiga Forests: Microtus agrestis vs. Clethrionomys glareolus. Oikos 40, 258 (1983).Article 

Google Scholar 
Eccard, J. A. & Ylönen, H. Direct interference or indirect exploitation? An experimental study of fitness costs of interspecific competition in voles. Oikos 99, 580–590. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.11833.x (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gliwicz, J. Competition among forest rodents: Effects of Apodemus flavicollis and Clethrionomys glareolus on A. agrarius. Acta Zool. Fennica 1984. (1984).Neet, C. R. & Hausser, J. Habitat selection in zones of parapatric contact between the common shrew Sorex araneus and Millet’s shrew S. coronatus. J. Anim. Ecol. 235–250 (1990).Zub, K., Jędrzejewska, B., Jędrzejewski, W. & Bartoń, K. A. Cyclic voles and shrews and non-cyclic mice in a marginal grassland within European temperate forest. Acta Theriol. 57, 205–216 (2012).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Henttonen, H. et al. Long-term population dynamics of the common shrew Sorex araneus in Finland. in Annales Zoologici Fennici 349–355 (JSTOR, 1989).Gębczyńska, Z., Gębczyński, M., Morzuch, K. & Zielińska, D. M. Food eaten by four species of rodents in polluted forests. Acta Theriol. 34, 465–477 (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
Babinska-Werka, J. Response of rodents to an increased and quantitatively diverse food base. Acta theriologica 35, (1990).Margaletic, J., Glavaš, M. & Bäumler, W. The development of mice and voles in an oak forest with a surplus of acorns. J. Pest Sci. 75, 95–98 (2002).Holisova, V. The food of Apodemus agrarius (Pall.). Zoologické listy 16, 1–14 (1967).Obrtel, R. & Hološová, V. The trophic niche of Apodemus agrarius in northern Moravia. Folia Zool. 30, 125–138 (1981).
Google Scholar 
Grant, P. R. Interspecific competition among rodents. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 3, 79–106 (1972).Article 

Google Scholar 
Redfield, J. A., Krebs, C. J. & Taitt, M. J. Competition between Peromyscus maniculatus and Microtus townsendii in grasslands of coastal British Columbia. J. Anim. Ecol. 607–616 (1977).Kincaid, W. B. & Cameron, G. N. Effects of species removal on resource utilization in a Texas rodent community. J. Mammal. 63, 229–235 (1982).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yurkonis, K. A., Meiners, S. J. & Wachholder, B. E. Invasion impacts diversity through altered community dynamics. J. Ecol. 93, 1053–1061 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Powell, K. I., Chase, J. M. & Knight, T. M. A synthesis of plant invasion effects on biodiversity across spatial scales. Am. J. Bot. 98, 539–548. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1000402 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jaksic, F. M. Vertebrate invaders and their ecological impacts in Chile. Biodivers. Conserv. 7, 1427–1445 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Richter-Boix, A. et al. Effects of the non-native amphibian species Discoglossus pictus on the recipient amphibian community: Niche overlap, competition and community organization. Biol. Invasions 15, 799–815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0328-4 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kumschick, S., Bacher, S. & Blackburn, T. M. What determines the impact of alien birds and mammals in Europe? Biol. Invasions 15, 785–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0326-6 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tedeschi, L., Biancolini, D., Capinha, C., Rondinini, C. & Essl, F. Introduction, spread, and impacts of invasive alien mammal species in Europe. Mam. Rev. Mam. 12277. https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12277 (2021).Harris, D. B. Review of negative effects of introduced rodents on small mammals on islands. Biol. Invasions 11, 1611–1630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-008-9393-0 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Traveset, A. et al. A review on the effects of alien rodents in the Balearic (Western Mediterranean Sea) and Canary Islands (Eastern Atlantic Ocean). Biol. Invasions 11, 1653–1670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-008-9395-y (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jung, T. S., Nagorsen, D. W., Kukka, P. M. & Barker, O. E. Alien invaders: recent establishment of an urban population of house mice (Mus musculus) in the Yukon. Northwest. Nat. 93, 240–242 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
McKinney, M. L. & Lockwood, J. L. Biotic homogenization: A few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 450–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01679-1 (1999).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
MacGregor-Fors, I., Morales-Pérez, L., Quesada, J. & Schondube, J. E. Relationship between the presence of House Sparrows (Passer domesticus) and Neotropical bird community structure and diversity. Biol. Invasions 12, 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9432-5 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Phillips, B. L. Behaviour on Invasion Fronts, and the Behaviour of Invasion Fronts. in Biological Invasions and Animal Behaviour (eds. Weis, J. S. & Sol, D.) 82–95 (Cambridge University Press, 2016). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139939492.007.Pietrek, A. G., Goheen, J. R., Riginos, C., Maiyo, N. J. & Palmer, T. M. Density dependence and the spread of invasive big-headed ants (Pheidole megacephala) in an East African savanna. Oecologia 195, 667–676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-021-04859-1 (2021).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Stanko, M. Ryšavka tmavopása (Apodemus agrarius, Rodentia) na Slovensku. (Parazitologický ústav SAV, 2014).Thompson, K., Hodgson, J. G. & Rich, T. C. Native and alien invasive plants: more of the same?. Ecography 18, 390–402 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar  More