Siberian carbon sink reduced by forest disturbances
Keenan, R. J. et al. Dynamics of global forest area: results from the FAO Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015. For. Ecol. Manage. 352, 9–20 (2015).Article
Google Scholar
Arneth, A. et al. in Special Report on Climate Change and Land (eds Shukla, P. R. et al.) Ch. 1 (IPCC, 2019).Piao, S. et al. Growing season extension and its impact on terrestrial carbon cycle in the Northern Hemisphere over the past 2 decades. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 21, GB3018 (2007).Article
Google Scholar
Chen, C. et al. China and India lead in greening of the world through land-use management. Nat. Sustain. 2, 122–129 (2019).Article
Google Scholar
Piao, S. et al. Characteristics, drivers and feedbacks of global greening. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 1, 14–27 (2020).Article
Google Scholar
Liu, Y. Y. et al. Recent reversal in loss of global terrestrial biomass. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 470–474 (2015).Article
Google Scholar
Chen, J. M. et al. Vegetation structural change since 1981 significantly enhanced the terrestrial carbon sink. Nat. Commun. 10, 4259 (2019).Article
Google Scholar
Myneni, R. B. et al. Increased plant growth in the northern high latitudes from 1981 to 1991. Nature 386, 698–702 (1997).Article
Google Scholar
Filipchuk, A. et al. Russian forests: a new approach to the assessment of carbon stocks and sequestration capacity. Environ. Dev. 26, 68–75 (2018).Article
Google Scholar
Goodale, C. L. et al. Forest carbon sinks in the Northern Hemisphere. Ecol. Appl. 12, 891–899 (2002).Article
Google Scholar
Tchebakova, N. M. et al. Energy and mass exchange and the productivity of main Siberian ecosystems (from eddy covariance measurements). 2. Carbon exchange and productivity. Biol. Bull. 42, 579–588 (2015).Article
Google Scholar
Vaganov, E. A. et al. Forests and swamps of Siberia in the global carbon cycle. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 1, 168–182 (2008).Article
Google Scholar
Schepaschenko, D. et al. Russian forest sequesters substantially more carbon than previously reported. Sci. Rep. 11, 12825 (2021).Article
Google Scholar
Shvidenko, A. & Schepaschenko, D. Climate change and wildfires in Russia. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 6, 683–692 (2013).Article
Google Scholar
Bradshaw, C. J. A. & Warkentin, I. G. Global estimates of boreal forest carbon stocks and flux. Glob. Planet. Change 128, 24–30 (2015).Article
Google Scholar
Curtis, P. G. et al. Classifying drivers of global forest loss. Science 361, 1108–1111 (2018).Article
Google Scholar
Sukhinin, A. I. et al. AVHRR-based mapping of fires in Russia: new products for fire management and carbon cycle studies. Remote Sens. Environ. 93, 546–564 (2004).Article
Google Scholar
Soja, A. J. et al. Climate-induced boreal forest change: predictions versus current observations. Glob. Planet. Change 56, 274–296 (2007).Article
Google Scholar
Dolman, A. J. et al. An estimate of the terrestrial carbon budget of Russia using inventory-based, eddy covariance and inversion methods. Biogeosciences 9, 5323–5340 (2012).Article
Google Scholar
Schaphoff, S. et al. Tamm review: Observed and projected climate change impacts on Russia’s forests and its carbon balance. For. Ecol. Manage. 361, 432–444 (2016).Article
Google Scholar
de Jong, R. et al. Trend changes in global greening and browning: contribution of short-term trends to longer-term change. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 642–655 (2012).Article
Google Scholar
Buermann, W. et al. Recent shift in Eurasian boreal forest greening response may be associated with warmer and drier summers. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 1995–2002 (2014).Article
Google Scholar
Rödig, E. et al. Spatial heterogeneity of biomass and forest structure of the Amazon rain forest: Linking remote sensing, forest modelling and field inventory. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 26, 1292–1302 (2017).Article
Google Scholar
Quegan, S. et al. Estimating the carbon balance of central Siberia using a landscape-ecosystem approach, atmospheric inversion and dynamic global vegetation models. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 351–365 (2011).Article
Google Scholar
Gurney, K. R. et al. Interannual variations in continental-scale net carbon exchange and sensitivity to observing networks estimated from atmospheric CO2 inversions for the period 1980 to 2005. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 22, GB3025 (2008).Article
Google Scholar
Stephens, B. B. et al. Weak northern and strong tropical land carbon uptake from vertical profiles of atmospheric CO2. Science 316, 1732–1735 (2007).Article
Google Scholar
Leskinen, P. et al. Russian Forests and Climate Change: What Science Can Tell Us 11 (EFI, 2020); https://doi.org/10.36333/wsctu11Myers-Smith, I. H. et al. Complexity revealed in the greening of the Arctic. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 106–117 (2020).Article
Google Scholar
Stow, D. A. et al. Remote sensing of vegetation and land-cover change in Arctic tundra ecosystems. Remote Sens. Environ. 89, 281–308 (2004).Article
Google Scholar
Karlsen, S. R. et al. A new NDVI measure that overcomes data sparsity in cloud-covered regions predicts annual variation in ground-based estimates of high Arctic plant productivity. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 025011 (2018).Article
Google Scholar
Ding, Z. et al. Nearly half of global vegetated area experienced inconsistent vegetation growth in terms of greenness, cover, and productivity. Earths Future 8, e2020EF001618 (2020).Article
Google Scholar
Fan, L. et al. Satellite-observed pantropical carbon dynamics. Nat. Plants 5, 944–951 (2019).Article
Google Scholar
Hansen, M. C. et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342, 850–853 (2013).Article
Google Scholar
Giglio, L. et al. The collection 6 MODIS active fire detection algorithm and fire products. Remote Sens. Environ. 178, 31–41 (2016).Article
Google Scholar
Blunden, J. & Arndt, D. S. State of the climate in 2015. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 97, Si–S275 (2016).Article
Google Scholar
Bastos, A. et al. Was the extreme Northern Hemisphere greening in 2015 predictable? Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 044016 (2017).Article
Google Scholar
Pan, Y. et al. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333, 988–993 (2011).Article
Google Scholar
Kukavskaya, E. A. et al. Biomass dynamics of central Siberian Scots pine forests following surface fires of varying severity. Int. J. Wildland Fire 23, 872–886 (2014).Article
Google Scholar
Gauthier, S. et al. Boreal forest health and global change. Science 349, 819 (2015).Article
Google Scholar
Harris, N. L. et al. Baseline map of carbon emissions from deforestation in tropical regions. Science 336, 1573 (2012).Article
Google Scholar
Qin, Y. et al. Carbon loss from forest degradation exceeds that from deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 442–448 (2021).Article
Google Scholar
Rogers, B. M. et al. Influence of tree species on continental differences in boreal fires and climate feedbacks. Nat. Geosci. 8, 228–234 (2015).Article
Google Scholar
Shvetsov, E. G. et al. Assessment of post-fire vegetation recovery in southern Siberia using remote sensing observations. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 055001 (2019).Article
Google Scholar
Wang, J. A. et al. Disturbance suppresses the aboveground carbon sink in North American boreal forests. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 435–441 (2021).Article
Google Scholar
Xu, L. et al. Changes in global terrestrial live biomass over the 21st century. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe9829 (2021).Article
Google Scholar
Shuman, J. K. et al. Forest forecasting with vegetation models across Russia. Can. J. For. Res. 45, 175–184 (2014).Article
Google Scholar
Flannigan, M. et al. Impacts of climate change on fire activity and fire management in the circumboreal forest. Glob. Change Biol. 15, 549–560 (2009).Article
Google Scholar
Yuan, W. et al. Differentiating moss from higher plants is critical in studying the carbon cycle of the boreal biome. Nat. Commun. 5, 4270 (2014).Article
Google Scholar
Harris, N. L. et al. Global maps of twenty-first century forest carbon fluxes. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 234–240 (2021).Article
Google Scholar
Larjavaara, M. et al. Post-fire carbon and nitrogen accumulation and succession in Central Siberia. Sci. Rep. 7, 12776 (2017).Article
Google Scholar
Berner, L. T. et al. Cajander larch (Larix cajanderi) biomass distribution, fire regime and post-fire recovery in northeastern Siberia. Biogeosciences 9, 3943–3959 (2012).Article
Google Scholar
Myneni, R. et al. MOD15A2H MODIS/Terra Leaf Area Index/FPAR 8-Day L4 Global 500 m SIN Grid v.006 (LAADS DAAC, 2015).Houghton, R. A. et al. Mapping Russian forest biomass with data from satellites and forest inventories. Environ. Res. Lett. 2, 045032 (2007).Article
Google Scholar
DiMiceli, C. et al. Annual Global Automated MODIS Vegetation Continuous Fields (MOD44B) at 250 m Spatial Resolution for Data Years Beginning Day 65, 2000–2014, Collection 5 Percent Tree Cover v.6 (University of Maryland, 2017).Simard, M. et al. Mapping forest canopy height globally with spaceborne lidar. J. Geophys. Res. 116, G04021 (2011).
Google Scholar
Broxton, P. et al. A global land cover climatology using MODIS data. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 53, 1593–1605 (2014).Article
Google Scholar
Saatchi, S. S. et al. Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 9899–9904 (2011).Article
Google Scholar
Santoro, M. et al. The global forest above-ground biomass pool for 2010 estimated from high-resolution satellite observations. Earth Syst. Sci. Data. 13, 3927–3950 (2021).Article
Google Scholar
Carreiras, J. M. B. et al. Coverage of high biomass forests by the ESA BIOMASS mission under defense restrictions. Remote Sens. Environ. 196, 154–162 (2017).Article
Google Scholar
Penman, J. et al. Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (IGES, 2013).Avitabile, V. et al. An integrated pan-tropical biomass map using multiple reference datasets. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 1406–1420 (2016).Article
Google Scholar
Baccini, A. et al. Estimated carbon dioxide emissions from tropical deforestation improved by carbon-density maps. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 182–185 (2012).Article
Google Scholar
Fernandez-Moran, R. et al. SMOS-IC: an alternative SMOS soil moisture and vegetation optical depth product. Remote Sens. 9, 457 (2017).Article
Google Scholar
Wigneron, J.-P. et al. SMOS-IC data record of soil moisture and L-VOD: historical development, applications and perspectives. Remote Sens. Environ. 254, 112238 (2021).Article
Google Scholar
Mitchard, E. T. A. et al. Markedly divergent estimates of Amazon forest carbon density from ground plots and satellites. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 23, 935–946 (2014).Article
Google Scholar
Mitchard, E. T. A. et al. Uncertainty in the spatial distribution of tropical forest biomass: a comparison of pan-tropical maps. Carbon Balance Manage. 8, 10 (2013).Article
Google Scholar
Harmon, M. E. et al. Release of coarse woody detritus-related carbon: a synthesis across forest biomes. Carbon Balance Manage. 15, 1 (2020).Article
Google Scholar
Bartalev, S. A. & Stytsenko, F. V. Assessment of forest-stand destruction by fires based on remote-sensing data on the seasonal distribution of burned areas. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 14, 711–716 (2021).Article
Google Scholar
van Wees, D. et al. The role of fire in global forest loss dynamics. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 2377–2391 (2021).Article
Google Scholar
Vicente‐Serrano, S. M. et al. A multiscalar drought index sensitive to global warming: the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index. J. Clim. 23, 1696–1718 (2010).Article
Google Scholar
Schepaschenko, D. et al. A new hybrid land cover dataset for Russia: a methodology for integrating statistics, remote sensing and in situ information. J. Land Use Sci. 6, 245–259 (2011).Article
Google Scholar
Du, J. et al. A global satellite environmental data record derived from AMSR-E and AMSR2 microwave Earth observations. Earth Syst. Sci. Data. 9, 791–808 (2017).Article
Google Scholar
Brandt, M. et al. Satellite passive microwaves reveal recent climate-induced carbon losses in African drylands. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 827–835 (2018).Article
Google Scholar
De Grandpré, L. et al. Long-term post-fire changes in the northeastern boreal forest of Quebec. J. Veg. Sci. 11, 791–800 (2000).Article
Google Scholar More