Ecology

Clemente, J. C., Ursell, L. K., Parfrey, L. W. & Knight, R. The impact of the gut microbiota on human health: An integrative view. Cell 148, 1258–1270 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cryan, J. F. et al. The microbiota-gut-brain axis. Physiol. Rev. 99, 1877–2013 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Parfrey, L. W., Walters, W. A. & Knight, R. Microbial eukaryotes in the human microbiome: Ecology, evolution, and future directions. Front. Microbiol. 2, 1–6 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Caporaso, J. G. et al. Moving pictures of the human microbiome. Genome Biol. 12, R50 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Björk, J. R., Dasari, M., Grieneisen, L. & Archie, E. A. Primate microbiomes over time: Longitudinal answers to standing questions in microbiome research. Am. J. Primatol. 81, 1–23 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Costello, E. K., Stagaman, K., Dethlefsen, L., Bohannan, B. J. M. & Relman, D. A. The application of ecological theory toward an understanding of the human microbiome. Science 336, 1255–1262 (2012).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Miller, E. T., Svanbäck, R. & Bohannan, B. J. M. Microbiomes as metacommunities: Understanding host-associated microbes through metacommunity ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 33, 926–935 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
McKenney, E. A., Koelle, K., Dunn, R. R. & Yoder, A. D. The ecosystem services of animal microbiomes. Mol. Ecol. 27, 2164–2172 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Koskella, B., Hall, L. J. & Metcalf, C. J. E. The microbiome beyond the horizon of ecological and evolutionary theory. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1606–1615 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sarkar, A. et al. Microbial transmission in animal social networks and the social microbiome. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1020–1035 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rothschild, D. et al. Environment dominates over host genetics in shaping human gut microbiota. Nature 555, 210–215 (2018).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Degnan, P. H. et al. Factors associated with the diversification of the gut microbial communities within chimpanzees from Gombe National Park. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 13034–13039 (2012).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Bennett, G. et al. Host age, social group, and habitat type influence the gut microbiota of wild ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur catta). Am. J. Primatol. 78, 883–892 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Amato, K. R. et al. Patterns in gut microbiota similarity associated with degree of sociality among sex classes of a neotropical primate. Microb. Ecol. 74, 250–258 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Raulo, A. et al. Social behaviour and gut microbiota in red-bellied lemurs (Eulemur rubriventer): In search of the role of immunity in the evolution of sociality. J. Anim. Ecol. 87, 388–399 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Springer, A. et al. Patterns of seasonality and group membership characterize the gut microbiota in a longitudinal study of wild Verreaux’s sifakas (Propithecus verreauxi). Ecol. Evol. 7, 5732–5745 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tung, J. et al. Social networks predict gut microbiome composition in wild baboons. Elife 2015, 1–18 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Moeller, A. H. et al. Social behavior shapes the chimpanzee pan-microbiome. Sci. Adv. 2, e1500997 (2016).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Perofsky, A. C., Lewis, R. J., Abondano, L. A., Di Fiore, A. & Meyers, L. A. Hierarchical social networks shape gut microbial composition in wild Verreaux’s sifaka. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 284, 20172274 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Raulo, A. et al. Social networks strongly predict the gut microbiota of wild mice. ISME J. 15, 2601–2613 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Arrieta, M. C., Stiemsma, L. T., Amenyogbe, N., Brown, E. & Finlay, B. The intestinal microbiome in early life: Health and disease. Front. Immunol. 5, 1–18 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ren, T., Grieneisen, L. E., Alberts, S. C., Archie, E. A. & Wu, M. Development, diet and dynamism: Longitudinal and cross-sectional predictors of gut microbial communities in wild baboons. Environ. Microbiol. 18, 1312–1325 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jagsi, R. et al. Seasonal cycling in the gut microbiome of the Hadza Hunter-Gatherers of Tanzania. Science 357, 802–806 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hicks, A. L. et al. Gut microbiomes of wild great apes fluctuate seasonally in response to diet. Nat. Commun. 9, 1786 (2018).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Murillo, T., Schneider, D., Fichtel, C. & Daniel, R. Dietary shifts and social interactions drive temporal fluctuations of the gut microbiome from wild redfronted lemurs. ISME Commun. 2, 3 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Laforest-Lapointe, I. & Arrieta, M.-C. Microbial eukaryotes: A missing link in gut microbiome studies. mSystems 3, e00201-17 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mann, A. E. et al. Biodiversity of protists and nematodes in the wild nonhuman primate gut. ISME J. 14, 609–622 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vlčková, K. et al. Relationships between gastrointestinal parasite infections and the fecal microbiome in free-ranging western lowland gorillas. Front. Microbiol. 9, 1–12 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Renelies-Hamilton, J. et al. Exploring interactions between Blastocystis sp., Strongyloides spp. and the gut microbiomes of wild chimpanzees in Senegal. Infect. Genet. Evol. 74, 104010 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Martínez-Mota, R., Righini, N., Mallott, E. K., Gillespie, T. R. & Amato, K. R. The relationship between pinworm (Trypanoxyuris) infection and gut bacteria in wild black howler monkeys (Alouatta pigra). Am. J. Primatol. 83, e23330 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pereira, M. E., Kaufman, R., Kappeler, P. M. & Overdoff, D. J. Female dominance does not characterize all of the lemuridae. Folia Primatol. 55, 96–103 (1990).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ostner, J. & Kappeler, P. M. Central males instead of multiple pairs in redfronted lemurs, Eulemur fulvus rufus (Primates, Lemuridae)?. Anim. Behav. 58, 1069–1078 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kappeler, P. M. & Fichtel, C. A 15-year perspective on the social organization and life history of sifaka in Kirindy Forest. In Long-Term Field Studies of Primates 101–121 (Springer, 2012).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Koch, F., Ganzhorn, J. U., Rothman, J. M., Chapman, C. A. & Fichtel, C. Sex and seasonal differences in diet and nutrient intake in Verreaux’s sifakas (Propithecus verreauxi). Am. J. Primatol. 79, 1–10 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Scholz, F. & Kappeler, P. M. Effects of seasonal water scarcity on the ranging behavior of Eulemur fulvus rufus. Int. J. Primatol. 25, 599–613 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Amoroso, C. R., Kappeler, P. M., Fichtel, C. & Nunn, C. L. Water availability impacts habitat use by red-fronted lemurs (Eulemur rufifrons): An experimental and observational study. Int. J. Primatol. 41, 61–80 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Clough, D., Heistermann, M. & Kappeler, P. M. Host intrinsic determinants and potential consequences of parasite infection in free-ranging red-fronted lemurs (Eulemur fulvus rufus). Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 142, 441–452 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ostner, J., Kappeler, P. & Heistermann, M. Androgen and glucocorticoid levels reflect seasonally occurring social challenges in male redfronted lemurs (Eulemur fulvus rufus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62, 627–638 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Heistermann, M., Palme, R. & Ganswindt, A. Comparison of different enzymeimmunoassays for assessment of adrenocortical activity in primates based on fecal analysis. Am. J. Primatol. 68, 257–273 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kappeler, P. M. & Fichtel, C. Female reproductive competition in Eulemur rufifrons: Eviction and reproductive restraint in a plurally breeding Malagasy primate. Mol. Ecol. 21, 685–698 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ostner, J., Kappeler, P. M. & Heistermann, M. Seasonal variation and social correlates of androgen excretion in male redfronted lemurs (Eulemur fulvus rufus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 52, 485–495 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Clough, D. Gastro-intestinal parasites of red-fronted lemurs in Kirindy Forest, western Madagascar. J. Parasitol. 96, 245–251 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gogarten, J. F. et al. Metabarcoding of eukaryotic parasite communities describes diverse parasite assemblages spanning the primate phylogeny. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 20, 204–215 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Barton, R. A. Allogrooming as mutualism in diurnal lemurs. Primates 28, 539–542 (1987).Article 

Google Scholar 
Noguera, J. C., Aira, M., Pérez-Losada, M., Domínguez, J. & Velando, A. Glucocorticoids modulate gastrointestinal microbiome in a wild bird. R. Soc. Open Sci. 5, 171743 (2018).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Klindworth, A. et al. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 1–11 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stoeck, T. et al. Multiple marker parallel tag environmental DNA sequencing reveals a highly complex eukaryotic community in marine anoxic water. Mol. Ecol. 19, 21–31 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 590–596 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yarza, P. et al. Uniting the classification of cultured and uncultured bacteria and archaea using 16S rRNA gene sequences. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12, 635–645 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Guillou, L. et al. The Protist Ribosomal Reference database (PR2): A catalog of unicellular eukaryote small sub-unit rRNA sequences with curated taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 597–604 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gao, X., Lin, H., Revanna, K. & Dong, Q. A Bayesian taxonomic classification method for 16S rRNA gene sequences with improved species-level accuracy. BMC Bioinform. 18, 1–10 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Reitmeier, S. et al. Handling of spurious sequences affects the outcome of high-throughput 16S rRNA gene amplicon profiling. ISME Commun. 1, 1–12 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shutt, K., Setchell, J. M. & Heistermann, M. Non-invasive monitoring of physiological stress in the Western lowland gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla): Validation of a fecal glucocorticoid assay and methods for practical application in the field. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 179, 167–177 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hämäläinen, A., Heistermann, M., Fenosoa, Z. S. E. & Kraus, C. Evaluating capture stress in wild gray mouse lemurs via repeated fecal sampling: Method validation and the influence of prior experience and handling protocols on stress responses. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 195, 68–79 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rudolph, K., Fichtel, C., Heistermann, M. & Kappeler, P. M. Dynamics and determinants of glucocorticoid metabolite concentrations in wild Verreaux’s sifakas. Horm. Behav. 124, 104760 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Heitlinger, E., Ferreira, S. C. M., Thierer, D., Hofer, H. & East, M. L. The intestinal eukaryotic and bacterial biome of spotted hyenas: The impact of social status and age on diversity and composition. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 7, 262 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C. & Tily, H. J. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. J. Mem. Lang. 68, 255–278 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mallick, H. et al. Multivariable association discovery in population-scale meta-omics studies. PLoS Comput. Biol. 17, 1–27 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
De Cáceres, M., Legendre, P. & Moretti, M. Improving indicator species analysis by combining groups of sites. Oikos 119, 1674–1684 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Silk, J., Cheney, D. & Seyfarth, R. A practical guide to the study of social relationships. Evol. Anthropol. 22, 213–225 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ostner, J., Nunn, C. L. & Schülke, O. Female reproductive synchrony predicts skewed paternity across primates. Behav. Ecol. 19, 1150–1158 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bailey, M. T. et al. Exposure to a social stressor alters the structure of the intestinal microbiota: Implications for stressor-induced immunomodulation. Brain Behav. Immun. 25, 397–407 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bailey, M. T. et al. Stressor exposure disrupts commensal microbial populations in the intestines and leads to increased colonization by Citrobacter rodentium. Infect. Immun. 78, 1509–1519 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stothart, M. R. et al. Stress and the microbiome: Linking glucocorticoids to bacterial community dynamics in wild red squirrels. Biol. Lett. 12, 20150875 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vlčková, K. et al. Impact of stress on the gut microbiome of free-ranging western lowland gorillas. Microbiol 164, 40–44 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chu, H. & Mazmanian, S. K. Innate immune recognition of the microbiota promotes host-microbial symbiosis. Nat. Immunol. 14, 668–675 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zheng, D., Liwinski, T. & Elinav, E. Interaction between microbiota and immunity in health and disease. Cell Res. 30, 492–506 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ley, R. E. Prevotella in the gut: Choose carefully. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 13, 69–70 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Manara, S. et al. Microbial genomes from non-human primate gut metagenomes expand the primate-associated bacterial tree of life with over 1000 novel species. Genome Biol. 20, 299 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Round, J. L. & Mazmanian, S. K. The gut microbiota shapes intestinal immune responses during health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 9, 313–323 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Maltz, R. M. et al. Prolonged restraint stressor exposure in outbred CD-1 mice impacts microbiota, colonic inflammation, and short chain fatty acids. PLoS ONE 13, 1–19 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ostner, J. & Heistermann, M. Endocrine characterization of female reproductive status in wild redfronted lemurs (Eulemur fulvus rufus). Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 131, 274–283 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Peckre, L. R., Defolie, C., Kappeler, P. M. & Fichtel, C. Potential self-medication using millipede secretions in red-fronted lemurs: Combining anointment and ingestion for a joint action against gastrointestinal parasites?. Primates 59, 483–494 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jenkins, T. P. et al. Infections by human gastrointestinal helminths are associated with changes in faecal microbiota diversity and composition. PLoS ONE 12, 1–18 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rosa, B. A. et al. Differential human gut microbiome assemblages during soil-transmitted helminth infections in Indonesia and Liberia. Microbiome 6, 1–19 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Reynolds, L. A., Finlay, B. B. & Maizels, R. M. Cohabitation in the intestine: Interactions among helminth parasites, bacterial microbiota, and host immunity. J. Immunol. 195, 4059–4066 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Toro-Londono, M. A., Bedoya-Urrego, K., Garcia-Montoya, G. M., Galvan-Diaz, A. L. & Alzate, J. F. Intestinal parasitic infection alters bacterial gut microbiota in children. PeerJ 2019, 1–24 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Vacca, M. et al. The controversial role of human gut Lachnospiraceae. Microorganisms 8, 1–25 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wei, Z. et al. The effects of non-fiber carbohydrate content and forage type on rumen microbiome of dairy cows. Animals 11, 1–17 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kaakoush, N. O. Insights into the role of Erysipelotrichaceae in the human host. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 5, 1–4 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ricaboni, D. et al. ‘Colidextribacter massiliensis’ gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from human right colon. New Microbes New Infect. 17, 27–29 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Qin, P. et al. Characterization a novel butyric acid-producing bacterium Collinsella aerofaciens subsp. shenzhenensis subsp. nov. Microorganisms 7, 78 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wei, Y. et al. Commensal bacteria impact a protozoan’s integration into the murine gut microbiota in a dietary nutrient-dependent manner. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 86, e00303-20 (2020).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Perofsky, A. C., Ancel Meyers, L., Abondano, L. A., Di Fiore, A. & Lewis, R. J. Social groups constrain the spatiotemporal dynamics of wild sifaka gut microbiomes. Mol. Ecol. 30, 6759–6775 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pyritz, L., Kappeler, P. M. & Fichtel, C. Coordination of group movements in wild red-fronted lemurs (Eulemur rufifrons): Processes and influence of ecological and reproductive seasonality. Int. J. Primatol. 32, 1325–1347 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Amato, K. R. et al. Habitat degradation impacts black howler monkey (Alouatta pigra) gastrointestinal microbiomes. ISME J. 7, 1344–1353 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hippe, H., Hagelstein, A., Kramer, I., Swiderski, J. & Stackebrandt, E. Phylogenetic analysis of Formivibrio citricus, Propionivibrio dicarboxylicus, Anaerobiospirillum thomasii, Succinirnonas amylolytica and Succinivibrio dextrinosolvens and proposal of Succinivibrionaceae fam. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 49, 779–782 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Grieneisen, L. E., Livermore, J., Alberts, S., Tung, J. & Archie, E. A. Group living and male dispersal predict the core gut microbiome in wild baboons. Integr. Comp. Biol. 57, 770–785 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Amoroso, C. R., Kappeler, P. M., Fichtel, C. & Nunn, C. L. Fecal contamination, parasite risk, and waterhole use by wild animals in a dry deciduous forest. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 73, 1–11 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vandeputte, D. et al. Stool consistency is strongly associated with gut microbiota richness and composition, enterotypes and bacterial growth rates. Gut 65, 57–62 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Falony, G. et al. Population-level analysis of gut microbiome variation. Science 352, 560–564 (2016).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Sonnenburg, J. L. & Bäckhed, F. Diet-microbiota interactions as moderators of human metabolism. Nature 535, 56–64 (2016).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Zmora, N., Suez, J. & Elinav, E. You are what you eat: Diet, health and the gut microbiota. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 16, 25–56 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Ortmann, S., Bradley, B. J., Stolter, C. & Ganzhorn, J. U. Estimating the quality and composition of wild animal diets—a critical survey of methods. In Feeding Ecology in Apes and Other Primates. Ecological, Physical, and Behavioral Aspects (eds Hohmann, G. et al.) 395–418 (Cambridge University Press, 2006).
Google Scholar  More

Bhatt, S. et al. The effect of malaria control on Plasmodium falciparum in Africa between 2000 and 2015. Nature 526, 207–211 (2015).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
WHO. Test procedures for insecticide resistance monitoring in malaria vector mosquitoes (2016).WHO. Guidelines for malaria vector control (2019).Gnankiné, O. et al. Insecticide resistance in Bemisia tabaci Gennadius (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) and Anopheles gambiae Giles (Diptera: Culicidae) could compromise the sustainability of malaria vector control strategies in West Africa. Acta Trop. 128, 7–17 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ranson, H. & Lissenden, N. Insecticide resistance in African Anopheles mosquitoes: A worsening situation that needs urgent action to maintain malaria control. Trends Parasitol. 32, 187–196 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Reid, M. C. & McKenzie, F. E. The contribution of agricultural insecticide use to increasing insecticide resistance in African malaria vectors. Malar. J. 15, 1–8 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Huijben, S. & Paaijmans, K. P. Putting evolution in elimination: Winning our ongoing battle with evolving malaria mosquitoes and parasites. Spec. Issue Rev. Synth. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12530 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
WHO. Global technical strategy for malaria 2016–2030, 2021 update (2021).Ranson, H. et al. Identification of a point mutation in the voltage-gated sodium channel gene of Kenyan Anopheles gambiae associated with resistance to DDT and pyrethroids. Insect Mol. Biol. 9, 491–497 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Weill, M. et al. The unique mutation in ace-1 giving high insecticide resistance is easily detectable in mosquito vectors. Insect Mol. Biol. 13, 1–7 (2004).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Ranson, H. et al. Pyrethroid resistance in African anopheline mosquitoes: What are the implications for malaria control?. Trends Parasitol. 27, 91–98 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hemingway, J., Hawkes, N. J., McCarroll, L. & Ranson, H. The molecular basis of insecticide resistance in mosquitoes. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 34, 653–665 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Martinez-Torres, D. et al. Molecular characterization of pyrethroid knockdown resistance (kdr) in the major malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s.s.. Insect Mol. Biol. 7, 179–184 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jones, C. et al. Footprints of positive selection associated with a mutation (N1575Y) in the voltage-gated sodium channel of Anopheles gambiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109, 6614–6619 (2012).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Hunt, R. H., Brooke, B. D., Pillay, C., Koekemoer, L. L. & Coetzee, M. Laboratory selection for and characteristics of pyrethroid resistance in the malaria vector Anopheles funestus. Med. Vet. Entomol. 19, 271–275 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Glunt, K. D., Thomas, M. B. & Read, A. F. The effects of age, exposure history and malaria infection on the susceptibility of Anopheles mosquitoes to low concentrations of pyrethroid. PLoS One 6, e24968 (2011).
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Rajatileka, S., Burhani, J. & Ranson, H. Mosquito age and susceptibility to insecticides. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 105, 247–253 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chouaibou, M. S. et al. Increase in susceptibility to insecticides with aging of wild Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes from Côte d’Ivoire. BMC Infect. Dis. 12, 1–7 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jones, C. M. et al. Aging partially restores the efficacy of malaria vector control in insecticide-resistant populations of Anopheles gambiae s.l. from Burkina Faso. Malar. J. 11, 1–11 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kulma, K., Saddler, A. & Koella, J. C. Effects of age and larval nutrition on phenotypic expression of insecticide-resistance in Anopheles Mosquitoes. PLoS ONE 8, 8–11 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Aïzoun, N., Aïkpon, R., Azondekon, R., Asidi, A. & Akogbéto, M. Comparative susceptibility to permethrin of two Anopheles gambiae s.l. populations from Southern Benin, regarding mosquito sex, physiological status and mosquito age. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 4, 312–317 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Collins, E. et al. The relationship between insecticide resistance, mosquito age and malaria prevalence in Anopheles gambiae s.l. from Guinea. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–12 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Oliver, S. & Brooke, B. The effect of larval nutritional deprivation on the life history and DDT resistance phenotype in laboratory strains of the malaria vector Anopheles arabiensis. Malar. J. 12, 1–9 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Owusu, H. F., Chitnis, N. & Müller, P. Insecticide susceptibility of Anopheles mosquitoes changes in response to variations in the larval environment. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–9 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sovegnon, P. M., Fanou, M. J., Akoton, R. & Djihinto, O. Y. Effects of larval diet on the life-history traits and phenotypic expression of pyrethroid resistance in the major malaria vector Anopheles gambiae s.s. Preprint at bioRxiv http://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.11.475801 (2022).Halliday, W. R. & Feyereisen, R. Why does DDT toxicity change after a blood meal in adult female Culex pipiens?. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 28, 172–181 (1987).Article 

Google Scholar 
Oliver, S. V., Lyons, C. L. & Brooke, B. D. The effect of blood feeding on insecticide resistance intensity and adult longevity in the major malaria vector Anopheles funestus (Diptera: Culicidae). Sci. Rep. 12, 1–9 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Farenhorst, M. et al. Fungal infection counters insecticide resistance in African malaria mosquitoes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106, 17443–17447 (2009).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Koella, J. C., Saddler, A. & Karacs, T. P. S. Blocking the evolution of insecticide-resistant malaria vectors with a microsporidian. Evol. Appl. 5, 283–292 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Alout, H. et al. Interplay between Plasmodium infection and resistance to insecticides in vector mosquitoes. J. Infect. Dis. 210, 1464–1470 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Glunt, K. D., Oliver, S. V., Hunt, R. H. & Paaijmans, K. P. The impact of temperature on insecticide toxicity against the malaria vectors Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles funestus. Malar. J. 17, 1–8 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Oliver, S. & Brooke, B. The effect of commercial herbicide exposure on the life history and insecticide resistance phenotypes of the major malaria vector Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: culicidae). Acta Trop. 188, 152–160 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Oliver, S. & Brooke, B. The effect of metal pollution on the life history and insecticide resistance phenotype of the major malaria vector Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae). PLoS ONE 13, 1–17 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Foster, W. A. Mosquito sugar feeding and reproductive energetics. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 40, 443–474 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nyasembe, V. O., Tchouassi, D. P., Pirk, C. W. W., Sole, C. L. & Torto, B. Host plant forensics and olfactory-based detection in Afro-tropical mosquito disease vectors. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 12, 1–21 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Barredo, E. & DeGennaro, M. Not just from blood: Mosquito nutrient acquisition from nectar sources. Trends Parasitol. 36, 473–484 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stone, C. M. & Foster, W. A. Plant-sugar feeding and vectorial capacity. In Ecology of Parasite-Vector Interactions (eds Takken, W. & Koenraadt, C.) 35–79 (Wageningen Academic, 2013). https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-744-8_3.Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Hien, D. F. D. S. et al. Plant-mediated effects on mosquito capacity to transmit human malaria. PLoS Pathog. 12, e1005773 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stone, C., Witt, A., Walsh, G., Foster, W. & Murphy, S. Would the control of invasive alien plants reduce malaria transmission? A review. Parasites Vectors 11, 1–18 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ebrahimi, B. et al. Alteration of plant species assemblages can decrease the transmission potential of malaria mosquitoes. J. Appl. Ecol. 55, 841–851 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Manda, H. et al. Discriminative feeding behaviour of Anopheles gambiae s.s. on endemic plants in western Kenya. Med. Vet. Entomol. 21, 103–111 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nyasembe, V. O. et al. Plasmodium falciparum infection increases Anopheles gambiae attraction to nectar sources and sugar uptake. Curr. Biol. 24, 217–221 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Després, L., David, J. P. & Gallet, C. The evolutionary ecology of insect resistance to plant chemicals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 298–307 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nkya, T. E., Akhouayri, I., Kisinza, W. & David, J. P. Impact of environment on mosquito response to pyrethroid insecticides: Facts, evidences and prospects. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 43, 407–416 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, X., Schuler, M. A. & Berenbaum, M. R. Molecular mechanisms of metabolic resistance to synthetic and natural xenobiotics. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 52, 231–253 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bationo, C. S. et al. Spatio-temporal analysis and prediction of malaria cases using remote sensing meteorological data in Diébougou health district, Burkina Faso, 2016–2017. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–12 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Namountougou, M. et al. First report of the L1014S kdr mutation in wild populations of Anopheles gambiae M and S molecular forms in Burkina Faso (West Africa). Acta Trop. 125, 123–127 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Service, M. W. A critical review of procedures for sampling populations of adult mosquitoes. Bull. Entomol. Res. 67, 343–382 (1977).Article 

Google Scholar 
Thiombiano, A. et al. Catalogue des plantes vasculaires du Burkina Faso. In Boissiera Vol. 65 (ed Cyrille Chatelain) (Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques, 2012).Morlais, I., Ponçon, N., Simard, F., Cohuet, A. & Fontenille, D. Intraspecific nucleotide variation in Anopheles gambiae: New insights into the biology of malaria vectors. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 71, 795–802 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Santolamazza, F. et al. Insertion polymorphisms of SINE200 retrotransposons within speciation islands of Anopheles gambiae molecular forms. Malar. J. 7, 163 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. A language and environment for statistical computing (2021).Crawley, M. J. The R Book (Wiley, 2007).Book 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Lenth, R. V. emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means (2021).Hien, A. et al. Evidence supporting deployment of next generation insecticide treated nets in Burkina Faso: Bioassays with either chlorfenapyr or piperonyl butoxide increase mortality of pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles gambiae. Malar. J. 20, 1–13 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nicolson, S. W., Nepi, M. & Pacini, E. Nectaries and Nectar (Springer, Dordrecht, 2007).Book 

Google Scholar 
Abdu-Allah, G. et al. Dietary antioxidants impact DDT resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS ONE 15, 1–12 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gnankiné, O. & Bassolé, I. L. H. N. Essential oils as an alternative to pyrethroids’ resistance against Anopheles species complex giles (Diptera: Culicidae). Molecules 22, 1321 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gendrin, M. & Christophides, G. K. The Anopheles mosquito microbiota and their impact on pathogen transmission. In Anopheles Mosquitoes—New Insights into Malar. Vectors (ed. Manguin, S.) (IntechOpen, 2013).Saab, S. A. et al. The environment and species affect gut bacteria composition in laboratory co-cultured Anopheles gambiae and Aedes albopictus mosquitoes. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–13 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dada, N., Sheth, M., Liebman, K., Pinto, J. & Lenhart, A. Whole metagenome sequencing reveals links between mosquito microbiota and insecticide resistance in malaria vectors. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–13 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Barnard, K., Jeanrenaud, A. C. S. N., Brooke, B. D. & Oliver, S. V. The contribution of gut bacteria to insecticide resistance and the life histories of the major malaria vector Anopheles arabiensis (Diptera: Culicidae). Sci. Rep. 9, 1–11 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Omoke, D. et al. Western Kenyan Anopheles gambiae showing intense permethrin resistance harbour distinct microbiota. Malar. J. 20, 1–14 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pelloquin, B. et al. Overabundance of Asaia and Serratia Bacteria is associated with deltamethrin insecticide susceptibility in Anopheles coluzzii from Agboville, Côte d’Ivoire. Microbiol. Spectr. 9, e00157-21 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
WHO. Test procedures for insecticide resistance monitoring in malaria vector mosquitoes (2013).Owusu, H. F., Jančáryová, D., Malone, D. & Müller, P. Comparability between insecticide resistance bioassays for mosquito vectors: Time to review current methodology?. Parasites Vectors 8, 1–11 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Keenan, R. J. et al. Dynamics of global forest area: results from the FAO Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015. For. Ecol. Manage. 352, 9–20 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Arneth, A. et al. in Special Report on Climate Change and Land (eds Shukla, P. R. et al.) Ch. 1 (IPCC, 2019).Piao, S. et al. Growing season extension and its impact on terrestrial carbon cycle in the Northern Hemisphere over the past 2 decades. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 21, GB3018 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, C. et al. China and India lead in greening of the world through land-use management. Nat. Sustain. 2, 122–129 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Piao, S. et al. Characteristics, drivers and feedbacks of global greening. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 1, 14–27 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, Y. Y. et al. Recent reversal in loss of global terrestrial biomass. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 470–474 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, J. M. et al. Vegetation structural change since 1981 significantly enhanced the terrestrial carbon sink. Nat. Commun. 10, 4259 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Myneni, R. B. et al. Increased plant growth in the northern high latitudes from 1981 to 1991. Nature 386, 698–702 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
Filipchuk, A. et al. Russian forests: a new approach to the assessment of carbon stocks and sequestration capacity. Environ. Dev. 26, 68–75 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Goodale, C. L. et al. Forest carbon sinks in the Northern Hemisphere. Ecol. Appl. 12, 891–899 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tchebakova, N. M. et al. Energy and mass exchange and the productivity of main Siberian ecosystems (from eddy covariance measurements). 2. Carbon exchange and productivity. Biol. Bull. 42, 579–588 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vaganov, E. A. et al. Forests and swamps of Siberia in the global carbon cycle. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 1, 168–182 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schepaschenko, D. et al. Russian forest sequesters substantially more carbon than previously reported. Sci. Rep. 11, 12825 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shvidenko, A. & Schepaschenko, D. Climate change and wildfires in Russia. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 6, 683–692 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bradshaw, C. J. A. & Warkentin, I. G. Global estimates of boreal forest carbon stocks and flux. Glob. Planet. Change 128, 24–30 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Curtis, P. G. et al. Classifying drivers of global forest loss. Science 361, 1108–1111 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sukhinin, A. I. et al. AVHRR-based mapping of fires in Russia: new products for fire management and carbon cycle studies. Remote Sens. Environ. 93, 546–564 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Soja, A. J. et al. Climate-induced boreal forest change: predictions versus current observations. Glob. Planet. Change 56, 274–296 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dolman, A. J. et al. An estimate of the terrestrial carbon budget of Russia using inventory-based, eddy covariance and inversion methods. Biogeosciences 9, 5323–5340 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schaphoff, S. et al. Tamm review: Observed and projected climate change impacts on Russia’s forests and its carbon balance. For. Ecol. Manage. 361, 432–444 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
de Jong, R. et al. Trend changes in global greening and browning: contribution of short-term trends to longer-term change. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 642–655 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Buermann, W. et al. Recent shift in Eurasian boreal forest greening response may be associated with warmer and drier summers. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 1995–2002 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rödig, E. et al. Spatial heterogeneity of biomass and forest structure of the Amazon rain forest: Linking remote sensing, forest modelling and field inventory. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 26, 1292–1302 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Quegan, S. et al. Estimating the carbon balance of central Siberia using a landscape-ecosystem approach, atmospheric inversion and dynamic global vegetation models. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 351–365 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gurney, K. R. et al. Interannual variations in continental-scale net carbon exchange and sensitivity to observing networks estimated from atmospheric CO2 inversions for the period 1980 to 2005. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 22, GB3025 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stephens, B. B. et al. Weak northern and strong tropical land carbon uptake from vertical profiles of atmospheric CO2. Science 316, 1732–1735 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Leskinen, P. et al. Russian Forests and Climate Change: What Science Can Tell Us 11 (EFI, 2020); https://doi.org/10.36333/wsctu11Myers-Smith, I. H. et al. Complexity revealed in the greening of the Arctic. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 106–117 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stow, D. A. et al. Remote sensing of vegetation and land-cover change in Arctic tundra ecosystems. Remote Sens. Environ. 89, 281–308 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Karlsen, S. R. et al. A new NDVI measure that overcomes data sparsity in cloud-covered regions predicts annual variation in ground-based estimates of high Arctic plant productivity. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 025011 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ding, Z. et al. Nearly half of global vegetated area experienced inconsistent vegetation growth in terms of greenness, cover, and productivity. Earths Future 8, e2020EF001618 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fan, L. et al. Satellite-observed pantropical carbon dynamics. Nat. Plants 5, 944–951 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hansen, M. C. et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342, 850–853 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Giglio, L. et al. The collection 6 MODIS active fire detection algorithm and fire products. Remote Sens. Environ. 178, 31–41 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Blunden, J. & Arndt, D. S. State of the climate in 2015. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 97, Si–S275 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bastos, A. et al. Was the extreme Northern Hemisphere greening in 2015 predictable? Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 044016 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pan, Y. et al. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333, 988–993 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kukavskaya, E. A. et al. Biomass dynamics of central Siberian Scots pine forests following surface fires of varying severity. Int. J. Wildland Fire 23, 872–886 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gauthier, S. et al. Boreal forest health and global change. Science 349, 819 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Harris, N. L. et al. Baseline map of carbon emissions from deforestation in tropical regions. Science 336, 1573 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Qin, Y. et al. Carbon loss from forest degradation exceeds that from deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 442–448 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rogers, B. M. et al. Influence of tree species on continental differences in boreal fires and climate feedbacks. Nat. Geosci. 8, 228–234 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shvetsov, E. G. et al. Assessment of post-fire vegetation recovery in southern Siberia using remote sensing observations. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 055001 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, J. A. et al. Disturbance suppresses the aboveground carbon sink in North American boreal forests. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 435–441 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Xu, L. et al. Changes in global terrestrial live biomass over the 21st century. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe9829 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shuman, J. K. et al. Forest forecasting with vegetation models across Russia. Can. J. For. Res. 45, 175–184 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Flannigan, M. et al. Impacts of climate change on fire activity and fire management in the circumboreal forest. Glob. Change Biol. 15, 549–560 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yuan, W. et al. Differentiating moss from higher plants is critical in studying the carbon cycle of the boreal biome. Nat. Commun. 5, 4270 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Harris, N. L. et al. Global maps of twenty-first century forest carbon fluxes. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 234–240 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Larjavaara, M. et al. Post-fire carbon and nitrogen accumulation and succession in Central Siberia. Sci. Rep. 7, 12776 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Berner, L. T. et al. Cajander larch (Larix cajanderi) biomass distribution, fire regime and post-fire recovery in northeastern Siberia. Biogeosciences 9, 3943–3959 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Myneni, R. et al. MOD15A2H MODIS/Terra Leaf Area Index/FPAR 8-Day L4 Global 500 m SIN Grid v.006 (LAADS DAAC, 2015).Houghton, R. A. et al. Mapping Russian forest biomass with data from satellites and forest inventories. Environ. Res. Lett. 2, 045032 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
DiMiceli, C. et al. Annual Global Automated MODIS Vegetation Continuous Fields (MOD44B) at 250 m Spatial Resolution for Data Years Beginning Day 65, 2000–2014, Collection 5 Percent Tree Cover v.6 (University of Maryland, 2017).Simard, M. et al. Mapping forest canopy height globally with spaceborne lidar. J. Geophys. Res. 116, G04021 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Broxton, P. et al. A global land cover climatology using MODIS data. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 53, 1593–1605 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Saatchi, S. S. et al. Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 9899–9904 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Santoro, M. et al. The global forest above-ground biomass pool for 2010 estimated from high-resolution satellite observations. Earth Syst. Sci. Data. 13, 3927–3950 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Carreiras, J. M. B. et al. Coverage of high biomass forests by the ESA BIOMASS mission under defense restrictions. Remote Sens. Environ. 196, 154–162 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Penman, J. et al. Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (IGES, 2013).Avitabile, V. et al. An integrated pan-tropical biomass map using multiple reference datasets. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 1406–1420 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Baccini, A. et al. Estimated carbon dioxide emissions from tropical deforestation improved by carbon-density maps. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 182–185 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fernandez-Moran, R. et al. SMOS-IC: an alternative SMOS soil moisture and vegetation optical depth product. Remote Sens. 9, 457 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wigneron, J.-P. et al. SMOS-IC data record of soil moisture and L-VOD: historical development, applications and perspectives. Remote Sens. Environ. 254, 112238 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mitchard, E. T. A. et al. Markedly divergent estimates of Amazon forest carbon density from ground plots and satellites. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 23, 935–946 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mitchard, E. T. A. et al. Uncertainty in the spatial distribution of tropical forest biomass: a comparison of pan-tropical maps. Carbon Balance Manage. 8, 10 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Harmon, M. E. et al. Release of coarse woody detritus-related carbon: a synthesis across forest biomes. Carbon Balance Manage. 15, 1 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bartalev, S. A. & Stytsenko, F. V. Assessment of forest-stand destruction by fires based on remote-sensing data on the seasonal distribution of burned areas. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 14, 711–716 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
van Wees, D. et al. The role of fire in global forest loss dynamics. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 2377–2391 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vicente‐Serrano, S. M. et al. A multiscalar drought index sensitive to global warming: the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index. J. Clim. 23, 1696–1718 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schepaschenko, D. et al. A new hybrid land cover dataset for Russia: a methodology for integrating statistics, remote sensing and in situ information. J. Land Use Sci. 6, 245–259 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Du, J. et al. A global satellite environmental data record derived from AMSR-E and AMSR2 microwave Earth observations. Earth Syst. Sci. Data. 9, 791–808 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brandt, M. et al. Satellite passive microwaves reveal recent climate-induced carbon losses in African drylands. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 827–835 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
De Grandpré, L. et al. Long-term post-fire changes in the northeastern boreal forest of Quebec. J. Veg. Sci. 11, 791–800 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Wang, Z. & Yuan, J. Typhoon numerical simulation and visualization for disaster risk assessment. Bull. Surv. Mapp. 108–110, 132 (2015).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Tang, J., Xu, L., Li, Y., He, Y. & Cui, S. Assessing the damage caused by typhoon on urban green space ecosystme service based on UAV remote sensing. J. Nat. Disasters 27, 153–161 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Tian, Y., Zhou, W., Qian, Y., Zheng, Z. & Pan, X. The influence of Typhoon Mangkhut on urban green space and biomass in Shenzhen, China. Acta Ecol. Sin. 40, 2589–2598 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Lin, G. Major anti-wind and alkali-resisting landscape plants of south China’s seaside region. For. Invertory Plan. 29, 78–81 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Lin, T. C., Hogan, J. A. & Chang, C. T. Tropical cyclone ecology: a scale-link perspective. Trends Ecol. Evol. 35, 594–604 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lin, H. et al. Risk assessments of trees and urban spaces under attacks of typhoons: a survey and statistical study in Guangzhou, China. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 588, 032055 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Loehle, C. Biomechanical constraints on tree architecture. Trees Struct. Funct. 30, 2061–2070 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhu, J., Matsuzaki, T. & Sakioka, K. Wind speeds within a single crown of Japanese black pine (Pinus thunbergii Parl.). For. Ecol. Manag. 135, 19–31 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ver Planck, N. R. & MacFarlane, D. W. Branch mass allocation increases wind throw risk for Fagus grandifolia. For. Int. J. For. Res. 92, 490–499 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Dunham, R. A. & Cameron, A. D. Crown, stem and wood properties of wind-damaged and undamaged Sitka spruce. For. Ecol. Manag. 135, 73–81 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Burcham, D. C., Autio, W. R., Modarres-Sadeghi, Y. & Kane, B. After pruning, wind-induced bending moments and vibration decrease more on reduced than raised Senegal mahogany (Khaya senegalensis). Urban For. Urban Green. 61, 127100 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gilman, E. F., Masters, F. & Grabosky, J. C. Pruning affects tree movement in hurricane force wind. Arboric. Urban For. 34, 20–28 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Päätalo, M. L., Peltola, H. & Kellomäki, S. Modelling the risk of snow damage to forests under short-term snow loading. For. Ecol. Manag. 116, 51–70 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
North, E., Johnson, G., Murphy, R., Giblin, C. & Rendahl, A. Boulevard tree failures during wind loading events. Arboric. Urban For. 45, 259–269 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Angelou, N., Dellwik, E. & Mann, J. Wind load estimation on an open-grown European oak tree. For. Int. J. For. Res. 92, 381–392 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Kontogianni, A., Tsitsoni, T. & Goudelis, G. An index based on silvicultural knowledge for tree stability assessment and improved ecological function in urban ecosystems. Ecol. Eng. 37, 914–919 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
He, D. & Li, Z. Wind tunnel test on wind- induced responses of roadside trees. J. Nat. Disasters 28, 44–53 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Cao, J., Tamura, Y. & Yoshida, A. Wind tunnel study on aerodynamic characteristics of shrubby specimens of three tree species. Urban For. Urban Green. 11, 465–476 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, W., Kang, L., Zhang, Q., Li, C. & Zou, X. Speed upwind and downwind of a single plant. J. Beijing Norm. Univ. Nat. Sci. 56, 573–581 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Cheng, H. et al. Wind tunnel study of airflow recovery on the lee side of single plants. Agric. For. Meteorol. 263, 362–372 (2018).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Ma, S. et al. Experimental research of viscous flow around a Nitraria tangutorum boscage. Res. Soil Water Conserv. 13, 147–149 (2006).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Rahman, M. et al. Disentangling the role of competition, light interception, and functional traits in tree growth rate variation in South Asian tropical moist forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 483, 118908 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Forrester, D. I., Benneter, A., Bouriaud, O. & Bauhus, J. Diversity and competition influence tree allometric relationships—Developing functions for mixed-species forests. J. Ecol. 105, 761–774 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Coombes, A., Martin, J. & Slater, D. Defining the allometry of stem and crown diameter of urban trees. Urban For. Urban Green. 44, 1–15 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stoffel, M. Mechanical stability and growth performance of trees. (2009).Lento, M., Thijs, D., Jonas, A., Dominique, D. & Jan, C. Comparative study of flow field and drag coefficient of model and small natural trees in a wind tunnel. Urban For. Urban Green. 35, 230–239 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
West, G. B., Brown, J. H. & Enquist, B. J. A general model for the structure and allometry of plant vascular systems. Nature 400, 664–667 (1999).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Enquist, B. J. Cope’s rule and the evolution of long-distance transport in vascular plants: Allometric scaling, biomass partitioning and optimization. Plant Cell Environ. 26, 151–161 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bentley, L. P. et al. An empirical assessment of tree branching networks and implications for plant allometric scaling models. Ecol. Lett. 16, 1069–1078 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Eloy, C., Fournier, M., Lacointe, A. & Moulia, B. Wind loads and competition for light sculpt trees into self-similar structures. Nat. Commun. 8, 1–11 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lin, M. Y. & Khlystov, A. Investigation of ultrafine particle deposition to vegetation branches in a wind tunnel. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 46, 465–472 (2012).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ji, W. & Zhao, B. A wind tunnel study on the effect of trees on PM2.5 distribution around buildings. J. Hazard. Mater. 346, 36–41 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hui, K. K. W. et al. Unveiling falling urban trees before and during Typhoon Higos (2020): Empirical case study of potential structural failure using tilt sensor. Forests 13, 359 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liao, S., Huang, M., Lou, W., Lin, W. & Xiao, Z. Numerical simulation of a urban wind field under the influence of typhoon “Mangkhut”. Acta Aerodyn. Sin. 39, 107–116 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Gardiner, B., Berry, P. & Moulia, B. Review: Wind impacts on plant growth, mechanics and damage. Plant Sci. 245, 94–118 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lüttge, U. & Buckeridge, M. Trees: structure and function and the challenges of urbanization. Trees Struct. Funct. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-020-01964-1 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hwang, H. M., Fiala, M. J., Park, D. & Wade, T. L. Review of pollutants in urban road dust and stormwater runoff: part 1. Heavy metals released from vehicles. Int. J. Urban Sci. 20, 334–360 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kuitert, W. The nature of urban Seoul: Potential vegetation derived from the soil map. Int. J. Urban Sci. 17, 95–108 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stubbs, C. J., Cook, D. D. & Niklas, K. J. A general review of the biomechanics of root anchorage. J. Exp. Bot. 70, 3439–3451 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Sterck, F. J. & Bongers, F. Ontogenetic changes in size, allometry, and mechanical design of tropical rain forest trees. Am. J. Bot. 85, 266–272 (1998).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Sim, V. & Jung, W. Wind fragility for urban street tree in Korea. J. Wetl. Res. 21, 298–304 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Ueda, M. & Shibata, E. Why do trees decline or dieback after a strong wind? Water status of Hinoki cypress standing after a typhoon. Tree Physiol. 24, 701–706 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jalkanen, A. & Mattila, U. Logistic regression models for wind and snow damage in northern Finland based on the National Forest Inventory data. For. Ecol. Manag. 135, 315–330 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hale, S. E., Gardiner, B. A., Wellpott, A., Nicoll, B. C. & Achim, A. Wind loading of trees: Influence of tree size and competition. Eur. J. For. Res. 131, 203–217 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Olson, M. E., Aguirre-Hernández, R. & Rosell, J. A. Universal foliage-stem scaling across environments and species in dicot trees: Plasticity, biomechanics and Corner’s Rules. Ecol. Lett. 12, 210–219 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Blanchard, E. et al. Contrasted allometries between stem diameter, crown area, and tree height in five tropical biogeographic areas. Trees Struct. Funct. 30, 1953–1968 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
King, D. A., Davies, S. J., Tan, S. & Noor, N. S. M. The role of wood density and stem support costs in the growth and mortality of tropical trees. J. Ecol. 94, 670–680 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Petty, J. A. & Worrell, R. Stability of coniferous tree stems in relation to damage by snow. Forestry 54, 115–128 (1981).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gilman, E. F. & Lilly, S. Tree pruning (International Society of Arboriculture, 2002).
Google Scholar 
Zhang, J., Gou, Z., Zhang, F. & Shutter, L. A study of tree crown characteristics and their cooling effects in a subtropical city of Australia. Ecol. Eng. 158, 106027 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Marchi, L. et al. State of the art on the use of trees as supports and anchors in forest operations. Forests 9, 467 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar  More

According to the information that exists so far regarding reproduction in echinoderms, this is the first work in which the occurrence of trioecy in sea urchins is reported. This is also the first report of trioecy among members of the phylum Echinodermata, one of the most widespread taxa, both latitudinally and bathymetrically. Our results show that trioecy in this population of T. roseus is temporally stable, since the three sexes were observed together throughout the year in each month of sampling. Hermaphroditic individuals also presented the same gametogenic developmental pattern as females and males. Finally, during the spawning period of the population they contributed to the reproductive process by releasing mature gametes, which evidenced their full functionality within the studied population.We were unable to obtain evidence of self-fertilization in the studied hermaphrodites; but self- fertilization in the gonads and gonadal ducts of a hermaphrodite individual of Echinocardium cordatum was recorded in 193543. However, the embryos produced did not complete development successfully, probably due to the premature fertilization within the gonad43. Also, the cases of fully functional hermaphrodites of Arbacia punctulata have been reported44,45. The gametes of the hermaphrodites were fertilized as soon as they were released into seawater and the development of self-fertilized eggs was absolutely normal in time and morphology. After nine days, typical pluteus larvae were obtained and both the eggs and sperm of the hermaphrodites functioned ordinarily with gametes from other males and females.Therefore, we consider that there are no reasons to think that in the case of Toxopneustes roseus hermaphrodites cannot carry out self-fertilization. According to the analysis of the gonad developmental stages, their gametes were released into seawater. Theoretically, those gametes would be able to follow the normal course of fertilization, interacting among them and with gametes of females and males.The trioecic condition has been recorded so far only in some animals, such as a few nematode species and a hydra9,10,14,46,47,48. In marine invertebrates, it has been reported in one anemone under laboratory conditions and in one bivalve mollusk15,16. The coexistence of males, females and hermaphrodites has been considered an evolutionarily transitory state; for example, androdioecy (male / hermaphrodite) in nematodes such as Caenorhabditis elegans is believed to have evolved from dioecy (male / female) through a trioic intermediate. Consequently, it is very difficult to find the ecological or evolutionary causes that lead a species or population to present three sexes simultaneously49.In the species in which trioecy has been studied and monitored, it is noticeable that their populations are subjected to strong environmental stress in situ or under laboratory manipulation50,51,52. For example, some nematodes of the genus Tokorhabditis are extremophilic species that live in the Californian Mono Lake, which is characterized by being hypersaline and exhibiting high levels of arsenic10,50. In the case of Auanema freiburgensis the flexible sex determination and mating system and, consequently, its trioecy can be critical for resilience at the population level in patchy, resource-limited environments49. These results thus demonstrate that life-history, ecology and environment can play defining roles in the development of sexual systems and determine the continued presence of trioecy in the nematode. In the case of Hydra viridissima, it unlike most European species, is a “warm crisis” hydra, since it usually reproduces asexually, but when the temperatures rise to, or are maintained at high levels (≥ 20 °C), it reproduces sexually14,53. In experimental conditions, the population studied essentially behaved as androdioecic and only at the end of the research period, when the temperature was the highest (~ 25 °C), a few females appeared and joined the other existing sexes, thus generating the condition of trioecy14. Trioecy has been identified in another non-described species (e.g., Rhabditis sp. JU1783) isolated from star fruit, although it is closely related to A. rhodensis and A. freiburgensis and likely to belong to the same genus11,12. Little is known about the ecology of Auanema, as A. rhodensis has been isolated from a tick and a beetle, and A. freiburgensis from dung and a rotting plant of the genus Petasites12,47,51.Regarding the sea anemone Aiptasia diaphana, it is mainly found in isolated fouling communities, and no hermaphrodites exist in natural populations that could reproduce asexually or sexually54. However, under laboratory conditions, a single founder individual (asexual clone) produced not only males and females, but also hermaphroditic individuals. In addition, A. diaphana can fertilize within and between cloning lines, producing larval-swimming planules, which could explain the success of the species as an invader of artificial marine substrates. The condition of trioecy was also identified in individuals of this anemone manipulated in the laboratory, to create age-homogeneous populations of asexual propagules (pedal lacerations) and ontogenetic patterns of sexual differentiation were documented15.In the case of the marine bivalve Semimytilus algosus, there was not an obvious explanation for the occurrence of its trioecy, despite the intense analyses of factors such as motility versus a sessile way of life or reproductive density within a population, which could have relevance for gamete interactions16. In many respects, S. algosus is a “typical” marine intertidal mussel, since it is sessile in adulthood, occurs at high densities in wild populations, and has a very large population. S. algosus also co-occurs with other species that are close relatives within the Mytilidae family and have evolved and conserved their dioecy16.Toxopneustes roseus is another typical species of sea urchin, which has a wide latitudinal distribution throughout the tropical eastern Pacific and co-inhabits with other species of sea urchins and echinoderms that have a similar distribution and in which hermaphroditism has not been reported40,55,56,57. Regarding its population density, T. roseus is not considered among the most abundant species in the study area and its densities are relatively low (between 0.04 and 1.2 ind.m2). However, it cannot be considered a rare species in terms of abundance58,59.All of the above makes it difficult to clearly explain the reasons for the occurrence of trioecy in this species; however, certain aspects of its early development are known that could indicate the factors behind the development of this reproductive mating system in the pink sea urchin. In recent experiments carried out with gametes, larvae, and embryos of a population of T. roseus from the same area as our study, it was found that the increase in temperature above the normal values of its habitat has a deleterious effect on the success of early development60. There exists experimental evidence that at an increase of temperature to 32 °C, which is 2 °C above the maximum values registered in the study area, fertilization occurred at a very low percentage. There was also a deleterious effect on embryos, resulting in abnormal development and the lowest percentage of larval survival also occurred at 32 °C60. The same kind of experiments has been performed on other species from the study area, such as the irregular sea urchin Ryncholampas pacificus and the intertidal Echinometra vanbrunti. The deleterious effects on these species were observed only at 34 °C, which was the highest temperature tested (unpublished data). At 32 °C, however, there was no evidence of negative effects in the case on E. vanbrunti, and there was just arrested development, but no abnormalities in the case of R. pacificus. These results indicate that T. roseus is much more sensitive to the rise in temperature than other cohabiting sea urchins, and probably lives near its upper thermal limit. In that context, the continuous ocean warming could threaten the permanence of the species in the study area, since the early stages of development constitute a bottleneck for successful recruitment and later population maintenance in populations that carry out reproduction by means of external fertilization.Within the phylum Echinodermata, when stressful conditions appear in the habitat or the environment becomes hostile, the species can generally resort to asexual reproduction by fission (ophiuroids) or fission and autotomy (holothuroids and asteroids) to increase the abundance of populations in a relatively short time or counteract a threat with numbers61. This does not apply to sea urchins since they are unable to reproduce asexually. The only way for sea urchins to reproduce asexually would be by cloning larvae, but this process would also require that sexual reproduction occurs first62. Therefore, any reproductive strategy that a sea urchin population could develop to respond to drastic changes in their area must involve sexual reproduction. In this regard, in an experimental evolution study with the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, in which partial selfing, exclusive selfing, and predominant outcrossing were compared, it was evidenced that monoecious populations only have hermaphrodites and, therefore, reproduction is carried out exclusively by self-fertilization. However, in trioic populations that have males, females, and a small number of hermaphrodites, reproduction is predominantly carried out by external crossing49. Also populations that underwent some degree of interbreeding during the evolutionary experiments (trioic and androdioic populations), maintained more genetic diversity than expected solely under genetic drift or under genetic drift and directional selection49. In this sense, it is possible that high levels of interbreeding, such as that which occurs in trioic populations, develop with populations that have sufficient deleterious recessive alleles to avoid extinction, since selection is less efficient to purge them. Trioecy, therefore, becomes an efficient system to select characteristics of the genome that allows a population that only reproduces sexually to adequately cope with significant changes in the environment that could threaten the permanence of the species in that habitat. Interbreeding (gonochorism, self-incompatible hermaphroditism) also favors genetic diversity and offers greater potential to adapt to changing environments63. The costs and advantages of crossing over selfing depend on environmental factors and, therefore, selection may favor transitions between mating systems. Androdioecy, gynodioecy, and trioecy are evolutionarily unstable intermediate strategies, but they offer important systems for testing models of the causes and consequences of the mating system in the evolution of populations63.However, the question remains why T. roseus has developed trioecy, when in the same habitat there are other sea urchins with very similar life-histories that only maintain dioecy. In the case of the bivalve Semimytilus algosus; which presents the same situation as we have with T. roseus, it was proposed that the trioecy of the species may be related to the sex determination mechanism, considering what it is known about the nematodes of the genus Auanema10,16,46. In Auanema, the male versus non-male (hermaphrodite or female) decision is determined genetically (XO for males, and XX for females and hermaphrodites)9,64. The hermaphrodite versus female decision, however, is determined by the environment of the mother. For A. freiburgensis the maternal social environment is determinant, whereas for A. rhodensis it is the age of the mother9,12,51,65. Therefore, in Auanema, environmental sex determination and genetic sex determination interact to produce trioecy.Although there is apparently no clear cause of strong, stressful conditions in the habitat of T. roseus that could threaten the survival of this species, according to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA, 2021), sea surface temperature increased during the twentieth century and continues to rise. From 1901 to 2020, the global temperature rose at an average rate of 0.004 °C per decade, resulting in a total increase of 0.5 °C to date. Additionally, regional studies based on continuous monitoring, which have not yet been published, have shown that between 2002 and 2020 there has been an increase of approximately 1 °C above the historical average of the sea surface temperature in the study area.The foregoing discussion leads us to speculate that the studied population of T. roseus lives at the limit of its thermal tolerance, and the constant increase in ocean temperature due to global warming constitutes a threat to its survival and a constant source of stress for the population. This is because its early-development stages are more vulnerable to high temperature than other sea urchins that live in the same area and its population density is also significantly lower58.Phylogenetically T. roseus belongs to Family Toxopneustidae and although no other species within the genus Toxopneustes has shown hermaphroditism, this condition was reported in Tripneustes gratilla, which belongs to the same family36. Toxopneustids belong to the Order Camarodonta, and almost all the species of sea urchins in which hermaphroditism has been reported belong to this Order except for a couple that belong to the Arbacioida. At the same time, this order is contained in the Superorder Echinacea along with Camarodonta, according to the last exhaustive analysis resolving the position of the clades within Echinoidea66. In this context, theoretically T. roseus at some point underwent the environmental pressure of its early stage living under constantly rising temperatures, along with its low population densities in the study area. Consequently, it was able to develop hermaphroditism and, therefore, trioecy, similarly to what occurred to Hydra viridissima under conditions of extreme high temperature14. We hypothesize that these permanent conditions generate a constant source of strong environmental stress, which is the determining factor that keeps trioecy stable in the species in which it has been studied, and, thus, trioecy remains stable in this population of T. roseus.The mechanism of sex determination in echinoids, as well as in other echinoderms, is still unknown, although the sex ratio, which is generally close to 1:1, suggests that it occurs through sex chromosomes67. It is known that in mammals, sex determination is dictated by the presence or absence of the Y-chromosomal gene SRY. SRY functions as the primary sex-determining gene by activating testis formation, and in its absence, the embryo will form ovaries. SRY only exists in mammals; however it evolved as a duplication of the Sox gene family, which exists in all metazoans68.In vertebrates, Sox genes are involved in sex determination, neurogenesis, skeletonogenesis, eye development, pituitary development, pancreas formation, and neural crest and notochord formation69. In invertebrates, they are involved in processes such as metamorphosis, eye development, neural crest formation, and ectoderm formation70. In the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus, SoxB1 was determined to be expressed in the primordial gut during development and is closely related in sequence to Sox genes of the mouse embryo71. An investigation of sex determination was carried out in the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus using RNA-seq and quantitative mRNA measurements, but the mechanisms that govern sexual determination of the species could not be clearly established72. However; the results show that the male fate factors Dmrt and SoxH are expressed early and meiosis initiates early. Also, gonad-specific transcripts involved in egg and sperm biology, are first activated before rudiment formation in the larvae of this sea urchin. The study provided additional evidence for the hypothesis that in sea urchins, sex determination occurs genetically72. Another research with the sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus, which integrated genome-wide association study and analyzes of sex-specific variations evidenced that the species exhibits genetic sexual determination73. Furthermore, analysis of homozygous and heterozygous genotypes of abundant sex-specific SNPs in females and males, confirmed that A.japonicus might have a XX/XY sex determination system73.On the other hand, it has been proposed that a deviation from the 1:1 sex ratio in echinoids could reflect environmental conditions that influence sex determination67. For example, a relatively large proportion of Lytechinus variegatus and Tripneustes ventricosus (as Tripneustes esculentus) hermaphrodites was recorded in southern Florida during an unusually cold winter, suggesting that adverse winter conditions in some way affected sex determination in juveniles74,75. Also relatively large number of Strongylocentrotus purpuratus hermaphrodites was reported in Bahía de Todos los Santos, Mexico, where extreme seasonal fluctuations in temperature (from about 12–24 °C) are recorded76. However, posterior studies did not find a single hermaphrodite of Strongylocentrotus purpuratus in more than 500 individuals analyzed77,78.Considering that sex determination in sea urchins is highly probable to occur genetically and the possibility that the environment may also influence sex determination, we think that in the case of Toxopneustes roseus, genetic sex determination and environmental sex determination are interacting to maintain the condition of trioecy stable. We propose that, especially because the cases in which environmental conditions have assumed to influence sex determination, extreme temperatures are invoked as the main affecting factor. However, more detailed studies are needed in terms of sexual determination and experimental evolution to be able to verify our assumption.In general, the efforts that have been made to explain the evolution of the sexes and the origin of hermaphroditism and trioecy are still scarce, and critical questions remain to be answered. The case of trioecy detected in T. roseus may constitute an important model to seek these answers about the evolution of sexual systems and the environmental mechanisms that trigger trioecy in marine macroinvertebrates and, in particular, in echinoderms. More

Savenije, H. H. G. The importance of interception and why we should delete the term evapotranspiration from our vocabulary. Hydrol. Process. 18, 1507–1511 (2004).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Gerrits, A. M. J., Pfister, L. & Savenije, H. H. G. Spatial and temporal variability of canopy and forest floor interception in a beech forest. Hydrol. Process. 24, 3011–3025 (2010).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Porada, P., Van Stan, J. T. & Kleidon, A. Significant contribution of non-vascular vegetation to global rainfall interception. Nat. Geosci. 11, 563–567 (2018).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
van der Ent, R. J., Wang-Erlandsson, L., Keys, P. W. & Savenije, H. H. G. Contrasting roles of interception and transpiration in the hydrological cycle – Part 2: moisture recycling. Earth Syst. Dyn. 5, 471–489 (2014).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Lian, X. et al. Partitioning global land evapotranspiration using CMIP5 models constrained by observations. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 640–646 (2018).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Coenders-Gerrits, A. M. et al. Uncertainties in transpiration estimates. Nature 506, E1–E2 (2014).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Chang, L.-L. et al. Why do large-scale land surface models produce a low ratio of transpiration to evapotranspiration? J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 123, 9109–9130 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zwieback, S., Chang, Q., Marsh, P. & Berg, A. Shrub tundra ecohydrology: rainfall interception is a major component of the water balance. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 055005 (2019).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Cuartas, L. A. et al. Interception water-partitioning dynamics for a pristine rainforest in Central Amazonia: Marked differences between normal and dry years. Agric. For. Meteorol. 145, 69–83 (2007).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Yue, K. et al. Global patterns and drivers of rainfall partitioning by trees and shrubs. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 3350–3357 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pastorello, G. et al. The FLUXNET2015 dataset and the ONEFlux processing pipeline for eddy covariance data. Sci. Data 7, 225 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tramontana, G. et al. Predicting carbon dioxide and energy fluxes across global FLUXNET sites with regression algorithms. Biogeosciences 13, 4291–4313 (2016).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Jung, M., Reichstein, M. & Bondeau, A. Towards global empirical upscaling of FLUXNET eddy covariance observations: validation of a model tree ensemble approach using a biosphere model. Biogeosciences 6, 2001–2013 (2009).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Li, X. et al. Spatiotemporal pattern of terrestrial evapotranspiration in China during the past thirty years. Agric. For. Meteorol. 259, 131–140 (2018).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Koppa, A., Rains, D., Hulsman, P., Poyatos, R. & Miralles, D. G. A deep learning-based hybrid model of global terrestrial evaporation. Nat. Commun. 13, 1912 (2022).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zheng, C. & Jia, L. Global canopy rainfall interception loss derived from satellite Earth observations. Ecohydrology 13, e2186 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Muzylo, A. et al. A review of rainfall interception modelling. J. Hydrol. 370, 191–206 (2009).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Miralles, D. G., Gash, J. H., Holmes, T. R. H., de Jeu, R. A. M., & Dolman, A. J. Global canopy interception from satellite observations. J. Geophys. Res. 115, D16122 (2010).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Martens, B. et al. GLEAM v3: satellite-based land evaporation and root-zone soil moisture. Geosci. Model Dev. 10, 1903–1925 (2017).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Oleson, K. et al. Technical Description of Version 4.5 of the Community Land Model (CLM) Report NCAR/TN-503+STR, https://doi.org/10.5065/D6RR1W7M (2013).Gash, J. An analytical model of rainfall interception by forests. Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc. 105, 43–55 (1979).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Fan, Y. et al. Reconciling canopy interception parameterization and rainfall forcing frequency in the Community Land Model for simulating evapotranspiration of rainforests and oil palm plantations in Indonesia. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 11, 732–751 (2019).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Návar, J. Modeling rainfall interception loss components of forests. J. Hydrol. 584, 124449 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kang, M., Kwon, H., Cheon, J. H. & Kim, J. On estimating wet canopy evaporation from deciduous and coniferous forests in the Asian monsoon climate. J. Hydrometeorol. 13, 950–965 (2012).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Llorens, P., Domingo, F., Garcia-Estringana, P., Muzylo, A. & Gallart, F. Canopy wetness patterns in a Mediterranean deciduous stand. J. Hydrol. 512, 254–262 (2014).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Czikowsky, M. J. & Fitzjarrald, D. R. Detecting rainfall interception in an Amazonian rain forest with eddy flux measurements. J. Hydrol. 377, 92–105 (2009).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Renninger, H. J., Phillips, N. & Salvucci, G. D. Wet- vs. dry-season transpiration in an Amazonian rain forest palm iriartea deltoidea. Biotropica 42, 470–478 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhao, W. et al. Physics-constrained machine learning of evapotranspiration. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 14496–14507 (2019).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Zabret, K. & Šraj, M. How characteristics of a rainfall event and the meteorological conditions determine the development of stemflow: A case study of a birch tree. Front. Glob. Change 4, 663100 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Calder, I. R. Dependence of rainfall interception on drop size: 1. Development of the two-layer stochastic model. J. Hydrol. 185, 363–378 (1996).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Niinemets, Ü. A review of light interception in plant stands from leaf to canopy in different plant functional types and in species with varying shade tolerance. Ecol. Res. 25, 693–714 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gordon, D. A. R., Coenders-Gerrits, M., Sellers, B. A., Sadeghi, S., & Van Stan II, J. T. Rainfall interception and redistribution by a common North American understory and pasture forb, Eupatorium capillifolium (Lam. dogfennel). Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 24, 4587–4599 (2020).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Ciruzzi, D. M. & Loheide, S. P. II Monitoring tree sway as an indicator of interception dynamics before, during, and following a storm. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2021GL094980 (2021).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Karimi, P., Bastiaanssen, W. G. & Molden, D. Water Accounting Plus (WA+)–a water accounting procedure for complex river basins based on satellite measurements. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 17, 2459–2472 (2013).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
del Campo, A. D., González-Sanchis, M., Lidón, A., Ceacero, C. J. & García-Prats, A. Rainfall partitioning after thinning in two low-biomass semiarid forests: Impact of meteorological variables and forest structure on the effectiveness of water-oriented treatments. J. Hydrol. 565, 74–86 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lian, X. et al. Multifaceted characteristics of dryland aridity changes in a warming world. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2, 232–250 (2021).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Piao, S. et al. Characteristics, drivers and feedbacks of global greening. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 1, 14–27 (2020).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Feng, X. et al. Revegetation in China’s Loess Plateau is approaching sustainable water resource limits. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 1019–1022 (2016).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Dawson, T. E. & Goldsmith, G. R. The value of wet leaves. N. Phytol. 219, 1156–1169 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Aparecido, L. M. T., Miller, G. R., Cahill, A. T. & Moore, G. W. Comparison of tree transpiration under wet and dry canopy conditions in a Costa Rican premontane tropical forest. Hydrol. Process. 30, 5000–5011 (2016).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Huang, L. & Zhang, Z. Effect of rainfall pulses on plant growth and transpiration of two xerophytic shrubs in a revegetated desert area: Tengger Desert, China. CATENA 137, 269–276 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fathizadeh, O., Hosseini, S., Zimmermann, A., Keim, R. & Boloorani, A. D. Estimating linkages between forest structural variables and rainfall interception parameters in semi-arid deciduous oak forest stands. Sci. Total Environ. 601, 1824–1837 (2017).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, Z.-S., Zhao, Y., Li, X.-R., Huang, L. & Tan, H.-J. Gross rainfall amount and maximum rainfall intensity in 60-minute influence on interception loss of shrubs: a 10-year observation in the Tengger Desert. Sci. Rep. 6, 26030 (2016).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
de Groen, M. M. & Savenije, H. H. G. A monthly interception equation based on the statistical characteristics of daily rainfall. Water Resour. Res. 42, W12417 (2006).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Chinita, M. J., Richardson, M., Teixeira, J. & Miranda, P. M. A. Global mean frequency increases of daily and sub-daily heavy precipitation in ERA5. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 074035 (2021).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Donat, M. G., Lowry, A. L., Alexander, L. V., O’Gorman, P. A. & Maher, N. More extreme precipitation in the world’s dry and wet regions. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 508–513 (2016).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
IPCC. The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).Ficklin, D. L., Null, S. E., Abatzoglou, J. T., Novick, K. A. & Myers, D. T. Hydrological intensification will increase the complexity of water resource management. Earth’s Futur. 10, e2021EF002487 (2022).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Haslwanter, A., Hammerle, A. & Wohlfahrt, G. Open-path vs. closed-path eddy covariance measurements of the net ecosystem carbon dioxide and water vapour exchange: a long-term perspective. Agric. For. Meteorol. 149, 291–302 (2009).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Migliavacca, M. et al. The three major axes of terrestrial ecosystem function. Nature 598, 468–472 (2021).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, W. et al. The effect of relative humidity on eddy covariance latent heat flux measurements and its implication for partitioning into transpiration and evaporation. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4106267 (2022).van Dijk, A. I. J. M. et al. Rainfall interception and the coupled surface water and energy balance. Agric. For. Meteorol. 214–215, 402–415 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Barr, A. G., Morgenstern, K., Black, T. A., McCaughey, J. H. & Nesic, Z. Surface energy balance closure by the eddy-covariance method above three boreal forest stands and implications for the measurement of the CO2 flux. Agric. Meteorol. 140, 322–337 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Reichstein, M. et al. Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science. Nature 566, 195–204 (2019).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zhi, W. et al. From hydrometeorology to river water quality: can a deep learning model predict dissolved oxygen at the continental scale? Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 2357–2368 (2021).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kraft, B., Jung, M., Körner, M. & Reichstein, M. Hybrid modeling: fusion of a deep approach and physics-based model for global hydrological modeling. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 43, 1537–1544 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hoffmann, L. et al. From ERA-Interim to ERA5: the considerable impact of ECMWF’s next-generation reanalysis on Lagrangian transport simulations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 3097–3124 (2019).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wang, D., Wang, G. & Anagnostou, E. N. Evaluation of canopy interception schemes in land surface models. J. Hydrol. 347, 308–318 (2007).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Wang, G. & Eltahir, E. A. Modeling the biosphere–atmosphere system: The impact of the subgrid variability in rainfall interception. J. Clim. 13, 2887–2899 (2000).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Sitch, S. et al. Recent trends and drivers of regional sources and sinks of carbon dioxide. Biogeosciences 12, 653–679 (2015).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Le Quéré, C. et al. Global carbon budget 2018. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 10, 2141–2194 (2018).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar  More

Ravindran, S. Coral reefs at a tipping point. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 113, 5140–5141 (2016).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lenton, T. M. et al. Climate tipping points—too risky to bet against. Nature 575, 592–595 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Veron, J. E. N. et al. Delineating the Coral Triangle. Galaxea J. Coral Reef. Stud. 11, 91–100 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Hoegh-Guldberg, O. et al. Coral Reefs Under Rapid Climate Change and Ocean Acidification. Science 318, 1737–1742 (2007).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Brown, C., Corcoran, E. & Herkenrath, P. Marine and coastal ecosystems and human well-being: a synthesis report based on the findings of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2006).Heinze, C. et al. The quiet crossing of ocean tipping points. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 118, e2008478118 (2021).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Barber, P. H. The challenge of understanding the Coral Triangle biodiversity hotspot. J. Biogeogr. 36, 1845–1846 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Ekman, S. Zoogeography of the Sea. (Sidgwick & Jackson, 1953).Ladd, H. S. Origin of the Pacific island molluscan fauna. Am. J. Sci. 256, 137–150 (1960).
Google Scholar 
Woodland, D. J. Zoogeography of the Siganidae (Pisces): an interpretation of distribution and richness patterns. Bull. Mar. Sci. 33, 713–717 (1983).
Google Scholar 
Loveland, T. R. & Merchant, J. M. Ecoregions and ecoregionalization: geographical and ecological perspectives. Environ. Manag. 34, S1–S13 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Levins, R. Some Demographic and Genetic Consequences of Environmental Heterogeneity for Biological Control. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 15, 237–240 (1969).
Google Scholar 
Obura, D. The Diversity and Biogeography of Western Indian Ocean Reef-Building Corals. PLoS One. 7, e45013 (2012).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Fontoura, L. et al. Protecting connectivity promotes successful biodiversity and fisheries conservation. Science 375, 336–340 (2022).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Roberts, C. M. Connectivity and Management of Caribbean Coral Reefs. Science 278, 1454–1457 (1997).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ayre, D. J. & Hughes, T. P. Climate change, genotypic diversity and gene flow in reef-building corals: Gene flow in reef building corals. Ecol. Lett. 7, 273–278 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Graham, N. A. et al. Dynamic fragility of oceanic coral reef ecosystems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 103, 8425–8429 (2006).CAS 

Google Scholar 
McClanahan, T. R. et al. Prioritizing Key Resilience Indicators to Support Coral Reef Management in a Changing Climate. PLoS One. 7, e42884 (2012).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Gilmour, J. P., Smith, L. D., Heyward, A. J., Baird, A. H. & Pratchett, M. S. Recovery of an Isolated Coral Reef System Following Severe Disturbance. Science 340, 69–71 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Grayson, N., Clements, C. S., Towner, A. A., Beatty, D. S. & Hay, M. E. Did the historic overharvesting of sea cucumbers make coral more susceptible to pathogens? Coral Reefs. 41, 447–453 (2022).
Google Scholar 
Spalding, M. D. et al. Marine Ecoregions of the World: A Bioregionalization of Coastal and Shelf Areas. BioScience 57, 573–583 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Berline, L., Rammou, A.-M., Doglioli, A., Molcard, A. & Petrenko, A. A Connectivity-Based Eco-Regionalization Method of the Mediterranean Sea. PLoS ONE. 9, e111978 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Ser-Giacomi, E., Rossi, V., López, C. & Hernández-García, E. Flow networks: A characterization of geophysical fluid transport. Chaos Interdiscip. J. Nonlinear Sci. 25, 036404 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Thompson, D. M. et al. Variability in oceanographic barriers to coral larval dispersal: Do currents shape biodiversity? Prog. Oceanogr. 165, 110–122 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Treml, E. A., Halpin, P. N., Urban, D. L. & Pratson, L. F. Modeling population connectivity by ocean currents, a graph-theoretic approach for marine conservation. Landsc. Ecol. 23, 19–36 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Liu, G., Bracco, A., Quattrini, A. M. & Herrera, S. Kilometer-Scale Larval Dispersal Processes Predict Metapopulation Connectivity Pathways for Paramuricea biscaya in the Northern Gulf of Mexico. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 790927 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Fountalis, I., Dovrolis, C., Bracco, A., Dilkina, B. & Keilholz, S. δ-MAPS: from spatio-temporal data to a weighted and lagged network between functional domains. Appl. Netw. Sci. 3, 21 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Falasca, F., Bracco, A., Nenes, A. & Fountalis, I. Dimensionality Reduction and Network Inference for Climate Data Using δ‐MAPS: Application to the CESM Large Ensemble Sea Surface Temperature. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 11, 1479–1515 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Novi, L., Bracco, A. & Falasca, F. Uncovering marine connectivity through sea surface temperature. Sci. Rep. 11, 8839 (2021).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kleypas, J. A., Castruccio, F. S., Curchitser, E. N. & Mcleod, F. The impact of ENSO on coral heat stress in the western equatorial Pacific. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 2525–2539 (2015).
Google Scholar 
GLOBAL_REANALYSIS_001_030. Global Ocean Physics Reanalysis GLORYS12V1 1/12° product. MERCATOR GLORYS12V1 (global-reanalysis-001-030-monthly). E.U. Copernicus Marine Service Information (CMEMS). https://doi.org/10.48670/moi-00021.Lellouche, J.-M. et al. The Copernicus Global 1/12° Oceanic and Sea Ice GLORYS12 Reanalysis. Front. Earth Sci. 9, 698876 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Treml, E. A. & Halpin, P. N. Marine population connectivity identifies ecological neighbors for conservation planning in the Coral Triangle: Ecological neighbors in conservation. Conserv. Lett. 5, 441–449 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Meyers, G. Variation of Indonesian throughflow and the El Niño-Southern Oscillation. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 101, 12255–12263 (1996).
Google Scholar 
Wolfram Research (2012), FindGraphCommunities, Wolfram Language function. https://reference.wolfram.com/language/ref/FindGraphCommunities.html (updated 2015).MacArthur, R. H. & Wilson, E. O. The theory of island biogeography. In The Theory of Island Biogeography (Princeton university press, 2016).Brin, S. & Page, L. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Comput. Netw. ISDN Syst. 30, 107–117 (1998).
Google Scholar 
Wolfram Research (2010), PageRankCentrality, Wolfram Language function. https://reference.wolfram.com/language/ref/PageRankCentrality.html (Updated 2015).NOAA Coral Reef Watch program, 20180813, NOAA Coral Reef Watch Version 3.1 Daily Global 5km Satellite Coral Bleaching Heat Stress Monitoring Product Suite: NOAA Coral Reef Watch program, College Park, Maryland, USA. https://coralreefwatch.noaa.gov/product/5km/.Liu, G. et al. Reef-Scale Thermal Stress Monitoring of Coral Ecosystems: New 5-km Global Products from NOAA Coral Reef Watch. Remote Sens. 6, 11579–11606 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Liu, G. et al. NOAA Coral Reef Watch’s 5km Satellite Coral Bleaching Heat Stress Monitoring Product Suite Version 3 and Four-Month Outlook Version 4. 32, 7 (2017).Claar, D. C., Szostek, L., McDevitt-Irwin, J. M., Schanze, J. J. & Baum, J. K. Global patterns and impacts of El Niño events on coral reefs: A meta-analysis. PLOS ONE 13, e0190957 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Sully, S., Burkepile, D. E., Donovan, M. K., Hodgson, G. & van Woesik, R. A global analysis of coral bleaching over the past two decades. Nat. Commun. 10, 1264 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Darling, E. S. et al. Social–environmental drivers inform strategic management of coral reefs in the Anthropocene. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1341–1350 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Dance, A. These corals could survive climate change—and help save the world’s reefs. Nature 575, 580–582 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Renema, W. et al. Hopping Hotspots: Global Shifts in Marine Biodiversity. Science 321, 654–657 (2008).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Weiss, T. L., Denniston, R. F., Wanamaker, A. D., Villarini, G. & von der Heydt, A. S. El Niño–Southern Oscillation–like variability in a late Miocene Caribbean coral. Geology 45, 643–646 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Watanabe, T. et al. Permanent El Niño during the Pliocene warm period not supported by coral evidence. Nature 471, 209–211 (2011).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Von Der Heydt, A. S. & Dijkstra, H. A. The impact of ocean gateways on ENSO variability in the Miocene. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 355, 305–318 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Yasuhara, M. et al. Past and future decline of tropical pelagic biodiversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 117, 12891–12896 (2020).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Falasca, F., Crétat, J., Bracco, A., Braconnot, P. & Marti, O. Climate change in the Indo-Pacific basin from mid- to late Holocene. Clim. Dyn. 59, 753–766 (2022).
Google Scholar 
Treml, E. A., Ford, J. R., Black, K. P. & Swearer, S. E. Identifying the key biophysical drivers, connectivity outcomes, and metapopulation consequences of larval dispersal in the sea. Mov. Ecol. 3, 17 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Hackerott, S., Martell, H. A. & Eirin-Lopez, J. M. Coral environmental memory: causes, mechanisms, and consequences for future reefs. Trends Ecol. Evol. 36, 1011–1023 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Ogle, K. et al. Quantifying ecological memory in plant and ecosystem processes. Ecol. Lett. 18, 221–235 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Peterson, G. D. Contagious Disturbance, Ecological Memory, and the Emergence of Landscape Pattern. Ecosystems 5, 329–338 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Thomas, L., López, E. H., Morikawa, M. K. & Palumbi, S. R. Transcriptomic resilience, symbiont shuffling, and vulnerability to recurrent bleaching in reef‐building corals. Mol. Ecol. 28, 3371–3382 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Dziedzic, K. E., Elder, H., Tavalire, H. & Meyer, E. Heritable variation in bleaching responses and its functional genomic basis in reef‐building corals (Orbicella faveolata). Mol. Ecol. 28, 2238–2253 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Ainsworth, T. D. et al. Climate change disables coral bleaching protection on the Great Barrier Reef. Science 352, 338–342 (2016).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Harrison, H. B., Bode, M., Williamson, D. H., Berumen, M. L. & Jones, G. P. A connectivity portfolio effect stabilizes marine reserve performance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 117, 25595–25600 (2020).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Leeuwenburgh, O. & Stammer, D. The Effect of Ocean Currents on Sea Surface Temperature Anomalies. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 31, 2340–2358 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Box, G. E., Jenkins, G. M. & Reinsel, G. C. Time series analysis: forecasting and control. (Wiley, 2011).Falasca, F. & Bracco, A. Exploring the tropical Pacific manifold in models and observations. Phys. Rev. X 12, 021054 (2022).CAS 

Google Scholar 
NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), (2019a). Nino regions. https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/ensostuff/nino_regions.shtml.NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), (2019b). Cold and warm episodes by season. https://origin.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/ensostuff/ONI_v5.php.Baird, A. et al. Coral Spawning Database. 10552719 Bytes https://doi.org/10.25405/DATA.NCL.13082333.V1 (2020).UNEP-WCMC, WorldFish Centre, WRI, TNC (2021). Global distribution of warm-water coral reefs, compiled from multiple sources including the Millennium Coral Reef Mapping Project. Version 4.1. Includes contributions from IMaRS-USF and IRD (2005), IMaRS-USF (2005) and Spalding et al. (2001). Cambridge (UK): UN Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre. Data https://doi.org/10.34892/t2wk-5t34.IMaRS-USF, IRD (Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement) (2005). Millennium Coral Reef Mapping Project. Validated maps. Cambridge (UK): UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre.IMaRS-USF (Institute for Marine Remote Sensing-University of South Florida) (2005). Millennium Coral Reef Mapping Project. Unvalidated maps. These maps are unendorsed by IRD, but were further interpreted by UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre. Cambridge (UK): UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre.Spalding, M., Ravilious, C. & Green, E. World atlas of coral reefs. Choice Rev. Online. 39, 39-2540–39–2540 (2002).
Google Scholar  More

Yu, Z., Loisel, J., Brosseau, D. P., Beilman, D. W. & Hunt, S. J. Global peatland dynamics since the Last Glacial Maximum. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L13402 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Joosten, H., Tapio-BiströmM, L. & Susanna, T. Peatlands: guidance for climate change mitigation through conservation, rehabilitation and sustainable use. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Wetlands International. FAO (2012).IUCN. Issues brief: peatlands and climate change. www.icun.org (2017).Joosten, H. Peatlands, Climate Change Mitigation and Biodiversity Conservation. An Issue Brief on the Importance of Peatlands for Carbon and Biodiversity Conservation and the Role of Drained Peatlands as Greenhouse Gas Emission Hotspots (Nordic Council of Ministers, 2015).Moore, T. R. & Knowles, R. The influence of water table levels on methane and carbon dioxide emissions from peatland soils. Can. J. Soil Sci. 69, 33–38 (1989).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Tfaily, M. M. et al. Organic matter transformation in the peat column at Marcell Experimental Forest: humification and vertical stratification. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 119, 661–675 (2014).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Clymo, R. S. & Bryant, C. L. Diffusion and mass flow of dissolved carbon dioxide, methane, and dissolved organic carbon in a 7-m deep raised peat bog. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 72, 2048–2066 (2008).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Clymo, R. S. The limits to peat bog growth. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 303, 605–654 (1984).
Google Scholar 
Qin, S. et al. Temperature sensitivity of SOM decomposition governed by aggregate protection and microbial communities. Sci. Adv. 5, eaau1218. 1211–1219 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Dorrepaal, E. et al. Carbon respiration from subsurface peat accelerated by climate warming in the subarctic. Nature 460, 616–619 (2009).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Luo, Z. K., Wang, G. C. & Wang, E. L. Global subsoil organic carbon turnover times dominantly controlled by soil properties rather than climate. Nat. Commun. 10, 3688 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Wilson, R. M. et al. Stability of peatland carbon to rising temperatures. Nat. Commun. 7, 13723 (2016).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Sihi, D., Inglett, P. W. & Inglett, K. S. Carbon quality and nutrient status drive the temperature sensitivity of organic matter decomposition in subtropical peat soils. Biogeochemistry 131, 103–119 (2016).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wang, Q., Liu, S. & Tian, P. Carbon quality and soil microbial property control the latitudinal pattern in temperature sensitivity of soil microbial respiration across Chinese forest ecosystems. Glob. Chang. Biol. 24, 2841–2849 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Cheng, L. et al. Warming enhances old organic carbon decomposition through altering functional microbial communities. ISME J. 11, 1825–1835 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Luan, J., Wu, J., Liu, S., Roulet, N. & Wang, M. Soil nitrogen determines greenhouse gas emissions from northern peatlands under concurrent warming and vegetation shifting. Commun. Biol. 2, 132 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Meyer, N. et al. Nitrogen and phosphorus supply controls soil organic carbon mineralization in tropical topsoil and subsoil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 119, 152–161 (2018).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Fontaine, S. et al. Stability of organic carbon in deep soil layers controlled by fresh carbon supply. Nature 450, 277–280 (2007).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Moni, C. et al. Temperature response of soil organic matter mineralisation in arctic soil profiles. Soil Biol. Biochem. 88, 236–246 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Xu, X., Sherry, R. A., Niu, S., Zhou, J. & Luo, Y. Long-term experimental warming decreased labile soil organic carbon in a tallgrass prairie. Plant Soil 361, 307–315 (2012).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Broder, T., Blodau, C., Biester, H. & Knorr, K. H. Peat decomposition records in three pristine ombrotrophic bogs in southern Patagonia. Biogeosciences 9, 1479–1491 (2012).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Adamczyk, M., Perez-Mon, C., Gunz, S. & Frey, B. Strong shifts in microbial community structure are associated with increased litter input rather than temperature in High Arctic soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 151, 108054 (2020).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hug, L. A. et al. Community genomic analyses constrain the distribution of metabolic traits across the Chloroflexi phylum and indicate roles in sediment carbon cycling. Microbiome 1, 22 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Yun, J. L., Ju, Y. W., Deng, Y. C. & Zhang, H. X. Bacterial community structure in two permafrost wetlands on the Tibetan Plateau and Sanjiang Plain, China. Microb. Ecol. 68, 360–369 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Zhong, Q. et al. Water table drawdown shapes the depth-dependent variations in prokaryotic diversity and structure in Zoige peatlands. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fix049 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Karhu, K. et al. Temperature sensitivity of soil respiration rates enhanced by microbial community response. Nature 513, 81–84 (2014).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Thiessen, S., Gleixner, G., Wutzler, T. & Reichstein, M. Both priming and temperature sensitivity of soil organic matter decomposition depend on microbial biomass – An incubation study. Soil Biol. Biochem. 57, 739–748 (2013).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Walker, T. W. N. et al. Microbial temperature sensitivity and biomass change explain soil carbon loss with warming. Nat. Clim. Chang. 8, 885–899 (2018).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Dungait, J. A. J., Hopkins, D. W., Gregory, A. S. & Whitmore, A. P. Soil organic matter turnover is governed by accessibility not recalcitrance. Glob. Chang. Biol. 18, 1781–1796 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Conant, R. T. et al. Temperature and soil organic matter decomposition rates – synthesis of current knowledge and a way forward. Global Chang. Biol. 17, 3392–3404 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Hietz, P. et al. Long-term change in the nitrogen cycle of tropical forests. Science 4, 334 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Manzoni, S., Taylor, P., Richter, A., Porporato, A. & Agren, G. I. Environmental and stoichiometric controls on microbial carbon-use efficiency in soils. New Phytol. 196, 79–91 (2012).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Sistla, S. A., Asao, S. & Schimel, J. P. Detecting microbial N-limitation in tussock tundra soil: Implications for Arctic soil organic carbon cycling. Soil Biol. Biochem. 55, 78–84 (2012).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Chen, L. et al. Nitrogen availability regulates topsoil carbon dynamics after permafrost thaw by altering microbial metabolic efficiency. Nat. Commun. 9, 3951 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Soong, J. L. et al. Five years of whole-soil warming led to loss of subsoil carbon stocks and increased CO2 efflux. Sci. Adv. 7, eabd1343 (2021).Chen, L. et al. Determinants of carbon release from the active layer and permafrost deposits on the Tibetan Plateau. Nat. Commun. 7, 13046 (2016).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Girkin, N. T. et al. Interactions between labile carbon, temperature and land use regulate carbon dioxide and methane production in tropical peat. Biogeochemistry 147, 87–97 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Swails, E. et al. Will CO2 emissions from drained tropical peatlands decline over time? Links between soil organic matter quality, nutrients, and C mineralization rates. Ecosystems 21, 868–885 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Ismawi, S., Gandaseca, S. & Ahmed, O. Effects of deforestation on soil major macro-nutrient and other selected chemical properties of secondary tropical peat swamp forest. Int. J. Phys. Sci. 7, 2225–2228 (2012).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kimura, S., Melling, L. & Goh, K. Influence of soil aggregate size on greenhouse gas emission and uptake rate from tropical peat soil in forest and different oil palm development years. Geoderma 185, 1–5 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Takakai, F. et al. Effects of agricultural land-use change and forest fire on N2O emission from tropical peatlands, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 52, 662–674 (2006).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Knoblauch, C., Beer, C., Sosnin, A., Wagner, D. & Pfeiffer, E. M. Predicting long-term carbon mineralization and trace gas production from thawing permafrost of Northeast Siberia. Glob. Chang. Biol. 19, 1160–1172 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Treat, C. C. et al. Temperature and peat type control CO2 and CH4 production in Alaskan permafrost peats. Glob. Chang. Biol. 20, 2674–2686 (2014).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hobbie, S. E., Schimel, J. P., Trumbore, S. E. & Randerson, J. Controls over carbon storage and tureover in high-latitude soils. Glob. Chang. Biol. 6, 196–210 (2000).
Google Scholar 
Keller, J. K., Bauers, A. K., Bridgham, S. D., Kellogg, L. E. & Iversen, C. M. Nutrient control of microbial carbon cycling along an ombrotrophic-minerotrophic peatland gradient. J. Geophys. Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jg000152 (2006).Chen, H. et al. A historical overview about basic issues and studies of mires (in Chinese). Sci. Sin. 51, 15–26 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Ridl, J. et al. Plants rather than mineral fertilization shape microbial community structure and functional potential in legacy contaminated soil. Front. Microbiol. 7, 1–10 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Kane, E. S. et al. Response of anaerobic carbon cycling to water table manipulation in an Alaskan rich fen. Soil Biol. Biochem. 58, 50–60 (2013).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Carrell, A. A. et al. Experimental warming alters the community composition, diversity, and N2 fixation activity of peat moss (Sphagnum fallax) microbiomes. Glob. Chang. Biol. 25, 2993–3004 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Lamit, L. J. et al. Patterns and drivers of fungal community depth stratification in Sphagnum peat. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 93, fix082 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Harrison, R. B., Footen, P. W. & Strahm, B. D. Deep soil horizons: contribution and importance to soil carbon pools and in assessing whole-ecosystem response to management and global change. Forest Sci. 57, 67–76 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Krüger, J. P., Leifeld, J., Glatzel, S., Szidat, S. & Alewell, C. Biogeochemical indicators of peatland degradation – a case study of a temperate bog in northern Germany. Biogeosciences 12, 2861–2871 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Franzén, L. G. Increased decomposition of subsurface peat in Swedish raised bogs: are temperate peatlands still net sinks of carbon? Mires Peat 1, 3 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Eilers, K. G., Lauber, C. L., Knight, R. & Fierer, N. Shifts in bacterial community structure associated with inputs of low molecular weight carbon compounds to soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 42, 896–903 (2010).CAS 

Google Scholar 
de Graaff, M. A., Jastrow, J. D., Gillette, S., Johns, A. & Wullschleger, S. D. Differential priming of soil carbon driven by soil depth and root impacts on carbon availability. Soil Biol. Biochem. 69, 147–156 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Peay, K. G., Kennedy, P. G. & Brun, T. D. Fungal community ecology: a hybrid beast with a molecular master. BioScience 58, 799–810 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Gillabel, J., Cebrian, B., Six, J. & Merckx, R. Experimental evidence for the attenuating effect of SOM protection on temperature sensitivity of SOM decomposition. Glob. Chang. Biol. 16, 2789–2798 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Pries, C. E. H., Castanha, C., Porras, R. C. & Torn, M. S. The whole-soil carbon flux in response to warming. Science 355, 1420–1423 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Hicks Pries, C. E., Schuur, E. A. G. & Crummer, K. G. Thawing permafrost increases old soil and autotrophic respiration in tundra: partitioning ecosystem respiration using δ13C and ∆14C. Global Chang. Biol. 19, 649–661 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Tian, J. et al. Aerobic environments in combination with substrate additions to soil significantly reshape depth-dependent microbial distribution patterns in Zoige peatlands, China. Appl.Soil Ecol. 170, 104252 (2022).
Google Scholar 
Feng, W. et al. Enhanced decomposition of stable soil organic carbon and microbial catabolic potentials by long-term field warming. Glob. Chang. Biol. 00, 1–12 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Feng, W. et al. Methodological uncertainty in estimating carbon turnover times of soil fractions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 100, 118–124 (2016).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Liang, J. et al. Methods for estimating temperature sensitivity of soil organic matter based on incubation data: A comparative evaluation. Soil Biol. Biochem. 80, 127–135 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Cai, A., Feng, W., Zhang, W. & Xu, M. Climate, soil texture, and soil types affect the contributions of fine-fraction-stabilized carbon to total soil organic carbon in different land uses across China. J. Environ. Manag. 172, 2–9 (2016).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Liu, L. et al. Response of anaerobic mineralization of different depths peat carbon to warming on Zoige plateau. Geoderma 337, 1218–1226 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Waldrop, M. et al. Molecular investigations into a globally important carbon pool: permafrost protected carbon in Alaskan soils. Glob. Chang. Biol. 16, 2543–2554 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Mooshammer, M., Wanek, W., Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S. & Richter, A. Stoichiometric imbalances between terrestrial decomposer communities and their resources: mechanisms and implications of microbial adaptations to their resources. Front. Microbiol. 5, 22 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Blagodatskaya, E. & Kuzyakov, Y. Mechanisms of real and apparent priming effects and their dependence on soil microbial biomass and community structure: critical review. Biol. Fertil. Soils 45, 115–131 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Chen, H. et al. The carbon stock of alpine peatlands on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau during the Holocene and their future fate. Quat. Sci. Rev. 95, 151–158 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Sun, G. A study on the mineral formation law, classifictation and reserves of the peat in the Rouergai Plateau. J. Nat. Res. 7, 334–345 (1992).
Google Scholar 
Liu, L. et al. Responses of peat carbon at different depths to simulated warming and oxidizing. Sci. Total Environ. 548-549, 429–440 (2016).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Liu, L. et al. Water table drawdown reshapes soil physicochemical characteristics in Zoige peatlands. Catena 170, 119–128 (2018).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Liu, L. et al. Carbon stock stability in drained peatland after simulated plant carbon addition: Strong dependence on deeper soil. Sci. Total Environ. 848, 157539 (2022).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Yang, Z. et al. Soil properties and species composition under different grazing intensity in an alpine meadow on the eastern Tibetan Plateau, China. Environ. Monit. Assess 188, 678 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Simpson, M. J. & Simpson, A. J. The chemical ecology of soil organic matter molecular constituents. J. Chem. Ecol. 38, 768–784 (2012).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lalonde, K., Mucci, A., Ouellet, A. & Gelinas, Y. Preservation of organic matter in sediments promoted by iron. Nature 483, 198–200 (2012).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Deforest, J. L., zak, D. R., Pregitzer, K. S. & Burtonf, A. J. Atomspheric nitrate deposition and enhanced dissolved organic carbon leaching: test of a potential mechanism. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 69, 1233–1237 (2005).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Schadel, C. et al. Circumpolar assessment of permafrost C quality and its vulnerability over time using long-term incubation data. Glob. Chang. Biol. 20, 641–652 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Bell, M. & Lawrence, D. Soil carbon sequestration – myths and mysteries. Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Queensland Government (2009).Schadel, C., Luo, Y., David Evans, R., Fei, S. & Schaeffer, S. M. Separating soil CO2 efflux into C-pool-specific decay rates via inverse analysis of soil incubation data. Oecologia 171, 721–732 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Caporaso, J. G. et al. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 4516–4522 (2011).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Gardes, M. & Bruns, T. D. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes – application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol. Ecol. 2, 113–118 (1993).CAS 

Google Scholar 
White, T. J. in PCR-Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications (Academic Press, 1990).Bell, C. et al. High-throughput fluorometric measurement of potential soil extracellular enzyme activities. J. Vis. Exp. 81, e50961 (2013).
Google Scholar 
DeForest, J. L. The influence of time, storage temperature, and substrate age on potential soil enzyme activity in acidic forest soils using MUB-linked substrates and L-DOPA. Soil Biol. Biochem. 41, 1180–1186 (2009).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Amundson, R. The carbon budget in soils. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 29, 535–562 (2001).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Trumbore, S. E. Potential responses of soil organic carbon to global environmental change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 8284–8291 (1997).CAS 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org (2017).Oksanen, J. et al. vegan: community ecology package. R Packag version 24-1 (2016).Asshauer, K. P., Wemheuer, B., Daniel, R. & Meinicke, P. Tax4Fun: predicting functional profiles from metagenomic 16S rRNA data. Bioinformatics 31, 2882–2884 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar  More