Ecology

Building from this background the NAM took on these issues as its first-ever grand challenge, as a critical issue of import and urgency for us all. In 2018, the NAM empaneled an international, independent and multidisciplinary commission to create a global roadmap for healthy longevity, complete with evidence-based, targeted and actionable recommendations to move societies forward from an almost-exclusive focus on ‘coping with aging populations’ toward enabling individuals and societies to age successfully, and to reap the economic and societal benefits of longevity. The commission offers a way forward for governments and societies by beginning with recommendations for the next five years, and how these solutions can be financially sustainable through the creation of a virtuous cycle.To support these goals, the commission was to “(1) comprehensively address the challenges and opportunities presented by global aging population; (2) catalyze breakthrough ideas and research that will extend the human healthspan; and (3) generate transformative and scalable innovations world wide”8. The resulting comprehensive report, which was delayed in good measure by the COVID-19 pandemic, was released in June 2022 (ref. 8). We report here a summary of the high-level vision, goals, findings and recommendations of this global roadmap.The evidence for opportunities of longevity and the costs of inactionWe are seeing longer lives with increasing years spent in ill health (that is, the decompression of morbidity)9. The implications of longevity without health are costly ones for the individual, their families and for society. By contrast, scientific evidence shows that the majority of chronic diseases are preventable, and that prevention works at every age and stage of life. Further, the subset of individuals who are the beneficiaries of cumulative health-promoting conditions across the life course are demonstrating healthy longevity, defined as “the state in which years in good health approach the biological lifespan, with physical, cognitive and social functioning, enabling well-being across populations”8. However, only a minority of people in any country have the benefit of the necessary investments that promote health, and disparities in access to these investments across the life course are a major cause of unhealthy longevity. The costs of inaction in the face of widening disparities include the high risk of young people aging with more ill health, and the attendant costs to them and society.Further, the commission reports that when people have health and function in older age, the considerable cognitive and socioemotional capabilities and expertise that accrue with aging, and the prosocial goals of older age, constitute human and social capital assets that are unprecedented in both nature and scale. Contrary to disproven myths, workforce participation not only brings these valuable capabilities (such that intergenerational teams in the workplace are more productive and innovative than single-age-group teams), but older people working is also associated with more jobs for younger individuals10. In the USA and EU, it has been shown that older adults contribute 7% of gross domestic product (GDP) through paid work and the economic value of volunteering and caregiving11, even before opportunities are specifically expanded for the increasing older population. Societies that recognize this potential and invest to create both healthy longevity and the societal organizations and policies through which older adults can contribute to societal good will develop the opportunity for all ages to thrive. The return on investment will be to create older ages with health, function, dignity, meaning, purpose and opportunities — for those who desire it — to work longer, care for others or contribute in ways that they value to their community and future generations.The definition, principles and vision of ‘Vision 2050’ for healthy longevityThe global roadmap builds on the WHO ‘Decade of Healthy Ageing’, the UN Sustainable Development Goals for 2030 and other reports. It sets out principles for achieving healthy longevity using data and meaningful metrics to track achievement of outcomes and guide decision making. The report offers a vision empowered by the evidence: that, by 2050, societies will value the capabilities and assets of older people; all people will have the opportunity to live long lives with health and function; barriers to full participation by older people in society will have been solved; and that older people, with such health, will have the opportunity to engage in meaningful and productive activities. In turn, this societal engagement will create unprecedented social, human and economic capital, contributing to intergenerational well-being and cohesion, and to GDP.Implementing Vision 2050Accomplishing this vision demands ‘all-of-society’ intent — with aligned goals for healthy longevity and transformative action across public, private and academic sectors, and all of civil society and communities — and the implementation of evidence across the full and extending life course. Transforming only one component or sector (for example, health systems) will not be sufficient to create healthy longevity or its full opportunities. Rather, given that nations are complex systems, this vision for our future requires governmental leadership and transformation of all sectors of our complex societal system (Fig. 1).Fig. 1: Relevant actors for an all-of-society approach to healthy longevity.Healthy longevity requires government leadership and cooperation across all sectors. Adapted with permission from figure S-2 of ref. 8.Full size imageInvestment for healthy longevity — across the enabling sectors of health systems, social infrastructure and protections, the physical environment, and work and volunteering contributions — will require intentional planning and leadership to transform those components in tandem, and to resolve disrupters such as ageism, the social determinants of health and inequity, and pollution. These investments across all sectors will create the conditions for achieving healthy longevity and build new capital (human, social and economic) that will benefit all of society. As a result of these investments, society will see younger people thrive and move into a position to age with healthy longevity; those individuals who are already older will be recognized as valuable contributors to society in a ‘pay-it-forward’ stage of life. The underpinning social compact between citizens and government will support valuing each age group’s capabilities and goals, and the building of a society of well-being and cohesion across generations. This is at the center of the virtuous cycle for healthy longevity (Fig. 2)Fig. 2: The virtuous cycle of healthy longevity.Healthy longevity (top) is an outcome of a virtuous cycle, itself contributing to capital development (bottom left). Bottom right, capital (human, financial and social) supports enablers (work, physical environment, health systems and social infrastructure). The enablers propel the cycle, contributing to healthy longevity. Intentional investment for healthy longevity across all enabling sectors will create new capital that will benefit all of society. Adapted with permission from figure 1-4 of ref. 8.Full size imageGoals for initiating the transformation to healthy longevityThe commission identified the following changes that should occur from now to 2027 to start transformation of all of society, towards Vision 2050 and the creation of healthy longevity for all:

Creating social cohesion, social engagement and addressing the social determinants of health through social infrastructure are among the most effective determinants of slowed aging and the prevention of chronic conditions across the life course. Financial security in older age is essential for all.

Governments, the private sector and civil society should partner to design physical environments and infrastructure that are user-centered, and function as cohesion-enabling intergenerational communities for healthy longevity. Initiatives should focus on the inclusion of older people in the design, creating public spaces that promote social cohesion and intergenerational connection as well as mobility, physical activity and access to food, transportation, social services and engagement.

By 2027, governments should develop strategies and plans to arrive at adequately sized, geriatrically knowledgeable public health, clinical and long-term care workforces, and an integration of the pillars of the health system and social services. Together, these dimensions would foster and extend years of good health and support the diverse health needs and well-being of older people.

Governments should work to build the dividend of health longevity in collaboration with the business sector and civil society, to develop policies, incentives, and supportive systems that enable and encourage lifelong learning, and greater opportunities and necessary skills to engage in meaningful work or community volunteering across the lifespan.

We summarize the commission’s recommended goals for each of these sectors in brief in Box 1. Across all sectors, the key first steps that the commission identified are ones that can resolve obstacles to change and plan the change needed to shift multiple complex systems through both top-down and bottom-up approaches, in ways appropriate to each country and context. These initiatives should create enough momentum to foster early returns on investment and optimism to propel sustained investment for subsequent stages. This would need to begin for all governments by 2023, establishing calls to action to develop and implement data-driven, all-of-society plans to build the systems, policies, organizations and infrastructure needed, and for tracking change.Box 1 Goals for 2022–2027 to initiate the transformation to healthy longevityThese goals are reproduced from Global Roadmap for Healthy Longevity8.
Social infrastructure

Develop evidence-based multipronged strategies to reduce ageism against all groups.

Develop plans for ensuring basic financial security for all older people.

Develop strategies to increase financial literacy and mechanisms for promoting working longer, pension options and savings over the life course.

Plan opportunities for purposeful and meaningful engagement by older people at the family, community and societal levels.

Physical environment

At the societal level, improve broadband accessibility to reduce the digital divide and develop public transportation solutions that address first- and last-mile transportation.

At the city level, implement mitigation strategies to reduce the negative effects of the physical environment and related emergencies on older people (for example, air pollution and climate-induced events, including extreme heat and flooding) and design environments for connection and cohesion.

At the neighborhood level, promote and measure innovative policy solutions for healthy longevity, including affordable housing and intergenerational living, zoning and design for connection and cohesion, and the enabling of social capital.

At the home level, update physical infrastructure and policies to address affordability, provide coliving arrangements that match people’s goals and needs, and resolve insufficiencies and inefficiencies in housing stock.

Health systems

Establish healthy longevity as a major goal.

Increase investments in public health systems, which are needed to promote health and prevent disease, disability and injury at the population level, across the full life course. This may require rebalancing investments between this type of public health and medical care, recognizing that such public health is a public good and, as such, tends to be underinvested in.

Provide adequate primary care that includes preventive screening, addresses risk factors for chronic conditions and promotes positive health behaviors, and offers a continuum of medical care, including geriatrically knowledgeable care for older adults.

Make culturally sensitive, person-centered and equitable long-term care systems available, which (to the degree possible) offer dignity and honor people’s preferences about care settings.

Building the healthy longevity dividend

Governments, in collaboration with the business sector and civil society, should design (1) work environments and develop new policies that enable and encourage older adults who want or need to remain in the work force longer, and (2) engagement opportunities that strengthen communities at every stage of life.

Governments, employers and educational institutions should prioritize redesigning education systems to support lifelong learning and training, and invest in the science of learning and training for middle-aged and older adults.

Pilot innovations that incentivize and allow middle-aged and older adults to retool for multiple careers and/or participate as volunteers across their lifespan in roles with meaning and purpose. More

Knight, H. et al. Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Self-Isolation on Students and Staff in Higher Education: A Qualitative Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18, 10675 (2021).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Higham, J. E., Ramírez, C. A., Green, M. A. & Morse, A. P. UK COVID-19 lockdown: 100 days of air pollution reduction? Air Quality. Atmosphere & Health https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-020-00937-0 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Office, P. M. s. Slides and datasets to accompany coronavirus press conference. (2020).Organization, W. H. WHO global air quality guidelines: particulate matter (PM2. 5 and PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide: executive summary. (2021).Singh, A. et al. Impacts of emergency health protection measures upon air quality, traffic and public health: evidence from Oxford UK. Environ. Pollut. 293, 118584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118584 (2022).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Shi, Z. et al. Abrupt but smaller than expected changes in surface air quality attributable to COVID-19 lockdowns. Science Advances 7, eabd6696, doi:doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd6696 (2021).Lee, J. D., Drysdale, W. S., Finch, D. P., Wilde, S. E. & Palmer, P. I. UK surface NO2 levels dropped by 42% during the COVID-19 lockdown: impact on surface O3. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20, 15743–15759. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-15743-2020 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Shi, Z. et al. Abrupt but smaller than expected changes in surface air quality attributable to COVID-19 lockdowns. Science Advances 7, eabd6696, doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd6696 (2021).Ropkins, K. & Tate, J. E. Early observations on the impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on air quality trends across the UK. Sci. Total Environ. 754, 142374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142374 (2021).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Nwanaji-Enwerem, J. C., Allen, J. G. & Beamer, P. I. Another invisible enemy indoors: COVID-19, human health, the home, and United States indoor air policy. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 30, 773–775. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-020-0247-x (2020).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Rasha, A., Karan Jetly, J. & Shqran, S. Indoor Air Quality Monitoring Systems: A Comprehensive Review of Different IAQM Systems. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Organizations (IJKBO) 11, 1–14, doi:https://doi.org/10.4018/ijkbo.2021070101 (2021).World Health Organization. Regional Office for, E. WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: selected pollutants. xxv, 454 p. (World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe, 2010).Stafoggia, M. et al. Long-term exposure to ambient air pollution and incidence of cerebrovascular events: Results from 11 European cohorts within the ESCAPE project. Environ. Health Perspect 122, 919–925. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1307301 (2014).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Brook, R. D. et al. Particulate matter air pollution and cardiovascular disease: An update to the scientific statement from the American heart association. Circulation 121, 2331–2378. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181dbece1 (2010).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Raaschou-Nielsen, O. et al. Air pollution and lung cancer incidence in 17 European cohorts: prospective analyses from the European study of cohorts for air pollution effects (ESCAPE). Lancet Oncol. 14, 813–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70279-1 (2013).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Guan, W. J., Zheng, X. Y., Chung, K. F. & Zhong, N. S. Impact of air pollution on the burden of chronic respiratory diseases in China: Time for urgent action. Lancet 388, 1939–1951. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31597-5 (2016).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Atkinson, R. W. et al. Acute effects of particulate air pollution on respiratory admissions: Results from APHEA 2 project. Air pollution and health: A European approach. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 164, 1860–1866. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.164.10.2010138 (2001).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Stapleton, F. et al. TFOS DEWS II epidemiology report. Ocular Surf. 15, 334–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.003 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Starr, C. E. et al. Dry eye disease flares: A rapid evidence assessment. Ocul. Surf. 22, 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2021.07.001 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Torricelli, A. A. et al. Correlation between signs and symptoms of ocular surface dysfunction and tear osmolarity with ambient levels of air pollution in a large metropolitan area. Cornea 32, e11-15. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e31825e845d (2013).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hwang, S. H. et al. Potential importance of ozone in the association between outdoor air pollution and dry eye disease in South Korea. JAMA Ophthalmol. 134, 503–510. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.0139 (2016).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wiwatanadate, P. Acute air pollution-related symptoms among residents in Chiang Mai Thailand. J. Environ. Health 76, 76–84 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Alves, M., Novaes, P., Morraye Mde, A., Reinach, P. S. & Rocha, E. M. Is dry eye an environmental disease? Arq. Bras. Oftalmol. 77, 193–200 https://doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.20140050 (2014).Bourcier, T. et al. Effects of air pollution and climatic conditions on the frequency of ophthalmological emergency examinations. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 87, 809–811. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.87.7.809 (2003).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hao, R. et al. Impact of air pollution on the ocular surface and tear cytokine levels: A multicenter prospective cohort study. Front. Med. (Lausanne) 9, 909330. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.909330 (2022).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Vehof, J., Snieder, H., Jansonius, N. & Hammond, C. J. Prevalence and risk factors of dry eye in 79,866 participants of the population-based lifelines cohort study in the Netherlands. Ocul. Surf. 19, 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2020.04.005 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wolffsohn, J. S. et al. Demographic and lifestyle risk factors of dry eye disease subtypes: A cross-sectional study. Ocul. Surf. 21, 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2021.05.001 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Núñez-Álvarez, C. & Osborne, N. N. Enhancement of corneal epithelium cell survival, proliferation and migration by red light: Relevance to corneal wound healing. Exp. Eye Res. 180, 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2019.01.003 (2019).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Marek, V. et al. Blue light phototoxicity toward human corneal and conjunctival epithelial cells in basal and hyperosmolar conditions. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 126, 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.07.012 (2018).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Talens-Estarelles, C., García-Marqués, J. V., Cerviño, A. & García-Lázaro, S. Determining the best management strategy for preventing short-term effects of digital display use on dry eyes. Eye Contact Lens 48, 416–423. https://doi.org/10.1097/icl.0000000000000921 (2022).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
GOV.UK. COVID-19: guidance on protecting people defined on medical grounds as extremely vulnerable, (2020).Joy, M. et al. Reorganisation of primary care for older adults during COVID-19: A cross-sectional database study in the UK. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 70, e540–e547. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp20X710933 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Schiffman, R. M., Christianson, M. D., Jacobsen, G., Hirsch, J. D. & Reis, B. L. Reliability and validity of the ocular surface disease index. Arch. Ophthalmol. 118, 615–621. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.118.5.615 (2000).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Amparo, F. & Dana, R. Web-based longitudinal remote assessment of dry eye symptoms. Ocul. Surf. 16, 249–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2018.01.002 (2018).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Inomata, T. et al. Characteristics and risk factors associated with diagnosed and undiagnosed symptomatic dry eye using a smartphone application. JAMA Ophthalmol. 138, 58–68. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.4815 (2020).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Toth, M. & Jokić-Begić, N. Psychological contribution to understanding the nature of dry eye disease: A cross-sectional study of anxiety sensitivity and dry eyes. Health Psychol. Behav. Med. 8, 202–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2020.1770093 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Mehra, D. & Galor, A. Digital screen use and dry eye: A review. Asia-Pacific J. Ophthalmol. 9, 491–497. https://doi.org/10.1097/apo.0000000000000328 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Galor, A., Kumar, N., Feuer, W. & Lee, D. J. Environmental factors affect the risk of dry eye syndrome in a United States veteran population. Ophthalmology 121, 972–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.11.036 (2014).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Courtin, R. et al. Prevalence of dry eye disease in visual display terminal workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 6, e009675. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009675 (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Torricelli, A. A. et al. Effects of ambient levels of traffic-derived air pollution on the ocular surface: Analysis of symptoms, conjunctival goblet cell count and mucin 5AC gene expression. Environ. Res. 131, 59–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2014.02.014 (2014).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gupta, S. K., Gupta, V., Joshi, S. & Tandon, R. Subclinically dry eyes in urban Delhi: An impact of air pollution?. Ophthalmologica 216, 368–371. https://doi.org/10.1159/000066183 (2002).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Berg, E. J. et al. Climatic and environmental correlates of dry eye disease severity: A report from the dry eye assessment and management (DREAM) study. Trans. Vision Sci. Technol. 9, 25–25. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.5.25 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lang, S.-J., Abel, G. A., Mant, J. & Mullis, R. Impact of socioeconomic deprivation on screening for cardiovascular disease risk in a primary prevention population: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 6, e009984. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009984 (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Denniston, A. K. et al. United Kingdom diabetic retinopathy electronic medical record (UK DR EMR) users group: Report 4, real-world data on the impact of deprivation on the presentation of diabetic eye disease at hospital services. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 103, 837–843. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312568 (2019).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Nessim, M., Denniston, A. K., Nolan, W., Holder, R. & Shah, P. Research into Glaucoma and Ethnicity (ReGAE) 8: Is there a relationship between social deprivation and acute primary angle closure?. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 94, 1304–1306. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2009.160721 (2010).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sharma, H. E. et al. The role of social deprivation in severe neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 98, 1625–1628. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-304959 (2014).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bo, M., Salizzoni, P., Clerico, M. & Buccolieri, R. Assessment of indoor-outdoor particulate matter air pollution: A review. Atmosphere 8, 136 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Strøm-Tejsen, P., Zukowska, D., Fang, L., Space, D. R. & Wyon, D. P. Advantages for passengers and cabin crew of operating a gas-phase adsorption air purifier in 11-h simulated flights. Indoor Air 18, 172–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2007.00511.x (2008).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Mandell, J. T., Idarraga, M., Kumar, N. & Galor, A. Impact of air pollution and weather on dry eye. J. Clin. Med. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9113740 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Navarro, D. Learning Statistics with R. (Daniel Joseph Navarro, 2015). More

Versluys, J. Die Kaubewegungen von Trachodon. Palaontol. Z. 4, 80–87 (1922).
Google Scholar 
Kripp, D. Die Kaubewegung und Lebensweise von Edmontosaurus spec. auf Grund der mechanischkonstruktiven analyse. Palaeobiologica 5, 409–422 (1933).
Google Scholar 
Ostrom, J. H. Cranial morphology of the hadrosaurian dinosaurs of North America. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 122, 39–186 (1961).
Google Scholar 
Ostrom, J. H. A functional analysis of jaw mechanics in the dinosaur. Triceratops. Postilla. 88, 1–35 (1964).MathSciNet 

Google Scholar 
Galton, P. M. The cheeks of ornithischian dinosaurs. Lethaia 6, 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1502-3931.1973.tb00873.x (1973).Article 

Google Scholar 
Galton, P. M. Herbivorous adaptations of Late Triassic and Early Jurassic dinosaurs. In The Beginning of the Age of Dinosaurs (ed. Padian, K.) 203–221 (Cambridge University Press, 1986).
Google Scholar 
Weishampel, D. B. Hadrosaurid jaw mechanics. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 28, 271–280 (1983).
Google Scholar 
Weishampel, D. B. The evolution of jaw mechanisms in ornithopod dinosaurs. Adv. Anat. Embryol. Cell. Biol. 87, 1–2 (1984).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Weishampel, D. B. Interactions between Mesozoic plants and vertebrates: fructifications and seed predation. Neues Jahrb. Geol. Paläontol. Abh. 167, 224–250 (1984).
Google Scholar 
Weishampel, D. B. & Norman, D. B. Vertebrate herbivory in the Mesozoic: Jaws, plants, and evolutionary metrics. In Paleobiology of the Dinosaurs Special Papers 238 (ed. Farlow, J. O.) 87–100 (Geological Society of America, 1989).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Norman, D. B. & Weishampel, D. B. Feeding mechanisms in some small herbivorous dinosaurs: processes and patterns. In Biomechanics and Evolution (eds Rayner, J. M. V. & Wooton, R. J.) 161–181 (Cambridge University Press, 1991).
Google Scholar 
Sereno, P., Zijin, Z. & Lin, T. A new psittacosaur from Inner Mongolia and the parrot-like structure and function of the psittacosaur skull. Proc. Roy. Soc. B. 277, 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.0691 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Barrett, P. M. Paleobiology of herbivorous dinosaurs. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 42(1), 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-042711-105515 (2014).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Erickson, G. M. et al. Wear biomechanics in the slicing dentition of the giant horned dinosaur Triceratops. Sci. Adv. 1(5), e1500055. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500055 (2015).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Nabavizadeh, A. Hadrosauroid jaw mechanics and the functionalsignificance of the predentary bone. In The hadrosaurs: Proceedings of the International Hadrosaur Symposium (eds Evans, D. & Eberth, D.) 467–482 (Indiana University Press, 2014).
Google Scholar 
Nabavizadeh, A. Evolutionary trends in the jaw adductor mechanics of ornithischian dinosaurs. Anat. Rec. 299(3), 271–294. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.23306 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nabavizadeh, A. new reconstruction of cranial musculature in ceratopsian dinosaurs: Implications for jaw mechanics and ‘cheek’anatomy. FASEB J. 30, lb27–lb27. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.30.1_supplement.lb27 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nabavizadeh, A. new reconstruction of cranial musculature in ornithischian dinosaurs: Implications for feeding mechanismsand buccal anatomy. Anat. Rec. 303, 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.23988 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Varriale, F. J. Dental microwear reveals mammal-like chewing in the neoceratopsian dinosaur Leptoceratops gracilis. PeerJ 4, e2132. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2132 (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Melstrom, K. M., Chiappe, L. M. & Smith, N. D. Exceptionally simple, rapidly replaced teeth in sauropod dinosaurs demonstrate a novel evolutionary strategy for herbivory in Late Jurassic ecosystems. BMC Evol. Biol. 21(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-021-01932-4 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Norman, D. B. On the cranial morphology and evolution of ornithopod dinosaurs. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 52, 521–547 (1984).
Google Scholar 
Norman, D. B. & Weishampel, D. B. Ornithopod feeding mechanisms: Their bearing on the evolution of herbivory. Am. Nat. 126, 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1086/284406 (1985).Article 

Google Scholar 
Norman, D. B. & Weishampel, D. B. Vegetarian dinosaurs chew it differently-living mammals can chew plants for more effectively than reptiles. Yet some dinosaurs were surprisingly adept chewers. This unexpected ability may have been crucial in their evolution. New Sci. 114(1559), 42–45 (1987).
Google Scholar 
Rybczynski, N., Tirabasso, A., Bloskie, P., Cuthbertson, R. & Holliday, C. A three-dimensional animation model of Edmontosaurus (Hadrosauridae) for testing chewing hypotheses. Palaeontol. Electron. 11(2), 9A (2008).
Google Scholar 
Williams, V. S., Barrett, P. M. & Purnell, M. A. Quantitative analysis of dental microwear in hadrosaurid dinosaurs, and the implications for hypotheses of jaw mechanics and feeding. PNAS 106(27), 11194–11199. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812631106 (2009).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Cuthbertson, R. S., Tirabasso, A., Rybczynski, N. & Holmes, R. B. Kinetic limitations of intracranial joints in Brachylophosaurus canadensis and Edmontosaurus regalis (Dinosauria: Hadrosauridae), and their implications for the chewing mechanics of hadrosaurids. Anat. Rec. 295, 968–979. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.22458 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Erickson, G. M. & Zelenitsky, D. K. Osteohistology and occlusal morphology of Hypacrosaurus stebengeri teeth throughout ontogeny with comments on wear-induced form and function. In Hadrosaurs (eds Eberth, D. A. & Evans, D. C.) 422–432 (Indiana University Press, 2014).
Google Scholar 
Barrett, P. M. Tooth wear and possible jaw action of Scelidosaurus harrisonii Owen and a review of feeding mechanisms in other thyreophoran dinosaurs. In The Armored Dinosaurs (ed. Carpenter, K.) 25–52 (Indiana University Press, 2001).
Google Scholar 
Rybczynski, N. & Vickaryous, M. K. Evidence of complex jaw movement in the Late Cretaceous ankylosaurid Euoplocephalus tutus (Dinosauria: Thyreophora). In The Armored Dinosaurs (ed. Carpenter, K.) 299–317 (Indiana University Press, 2001).
Google Scholar 
Mallon, J. C. & Anderson, J. S. The functional and palaeoecological implications of tooth morphology and wear for the megaherbivorous dinosaurs from the Dinosaur Park Formation (Upper Campanian) of Alberta, Canada. PLoS ONE 9(6), e98605. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098605 (2014).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Mallon, J. C. & Anderson, J. S. Implications of beak morphology for the evolutionary paleoecology of the megaherbivorous dinosaurs from the Dinosaur Park Formation (upper Campanian) of Alberta, Canada. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 394, 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2013.11.014 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ősi, A., Barrett, P. M., Földes, T. & Tokai, R. Wear pattern, dental function, and jaw mechanism in the Late Cretaceous ankylosaur Hungarosaurus. Anat. Rec. 297(7), 1165–1180. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.22910 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ősi, A., Prondvai, E., Mallon, J. & Bodor, E. R. Diversity and convergences in the evolution of feeding adaptations in ankylosaurs (Dinosauria: Ornithischia). Hist. Biol. 29(4), 539–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2016.1208194 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hill, R. V., D’Emic, M. D., Bever, G. S. & Norell, M. A. A complex hyobranchial apparatus in a Cretaceous dinosaur and the antiquity of avian paraglossalia. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 175(4), 892–909. https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12293 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lautenschlager, S., Brassey, C. A., Button, D. J. & Barrett, P. M. Decoupled form and function in disparate herbivorous dinosaur clades. Sci. Rep. 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26495 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Skutschas, P. P. et al. Wear patterns and dental functioning in an Early Cretaceous stegosaur from Yakutia, Eastern Russia. PLoS ONE 16(3), e0248163. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248163 (2021).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Strickson, E., Prieto-Márquez, A., Benton, M. J. & Stubbs, T. L. Dynamics of dental evolution in ornithopod dinosaurs. Sci. Rep. 6, 28904. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28904 (2016).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Virág, A. & Ősi, A. Morphometry, microstructure, and wear pattern of neornithischian dinosaur teeth from the Upper Cretaceous Iharkút locality (Hungary). Anat. Rec. 300(8), 1439–1463. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.23592 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mallon, J. C. & Anderson, J. S. Skull ecomorphology of megaherbivorous dinosaurs from the Dinosaur Park Formation (Upper Campanian) of Alberta, Canada. PLoS ONE 8(7), e67182. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067182 (2013).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Botfalvai, G., Ősi, A. & Mindszenty, A. Taphonomic and paleoecologic investigations of the Late Cretaceous (Santonian) Iharkút vertebrate assemblage (Bakony Mts, northwestern Hungary). Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 417, 379–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2014.09.032 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Botfalvai, G., Haas, J., Bodor, E. R., Mindszenty, A. & Ősi, A. Facies architecture and palaeoenvironmental implications of the upper Cretaceous (Santonian) Csehbánya formation at the Iharkút vertebrate locality (Bakony Mountains, Northwestern Hungary). Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 441, 659–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.10.018 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ősi, A. et al. The Late Cretaceous continental vertebrate fauna from Iharkút, western Hungary: A review. In Bernissart Dinosaurs and Early Cretaceous Terrestrial Ecosystems (ed. Godefroit, P.) 532–569 (Indiana University Press, 2012).
Google Scholar 
Wells, N. A. Making thin sections. In Paleotechniques (eds Feldmann, R. M. et al.) 120–129 (University of Tennessee, 1989).
Google Scholar 
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9(7), 671–675. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089 (2012).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Evans, A. R. Surfer Manipulator. http://evomorph.org/surfermanipulator (2011).Evans, A. R., Wilson, G. P., Fortelius, M. & Jernvall, J. High-level similarity of dentitions in carnivorans and rodents. Nature 445, 78–81. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05433 (2007).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wilson, G. P. et al. Adaptive radiation of multituberculate mammals before the extinction of dinosaurs. Nature 483, 457–460. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10880 (2012).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ungar, P. S. Dental microwear of European Miocene catarrhines: Evidence for diets and tooth use. J. Hum. Evol. 31, 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1006/jhev.1996.0065 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ungar, P. S. A semiautomated image analysis procedure for the quantification of dental microwear II. Scanning. 17, 57–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.4950170108 (1995).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ungar, P. S., Brown, C. A., Bergstrom, T. S. & Walker, A. Quantification of dental microwear by tandem scanning confocal microscopy and scale-sSensitive fractal analyses. Scanning 25, 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.4950250405 (2003).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ungar, P. S., Merceron, G. & Scott, R. S. Dental microwear texture analysis of Varswater bovids and Early Pliocene paleoenvironments of langebaanweg, Western Cape Province, South Africa. J. Mammal. Evol. 14, 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10914-007-9050-x (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Scott, J. R. Dental microwear texture analysis of extant African Bovidae. Mammalia 76, 157–217. https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2011-0083 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Merceron, G., Hofman-Kaminska, E. & Kowalczyk, R. 3D dental microwear texture analysis of feeding habits of sympatric ruminants in the Białowieza Primeval Forest, Poland. For. Ecol. Manag. 328, 262–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.05.041 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Caporale, S. S. & Ungar, P. S. Rodent incisor microwear as a proxy for ecological reconstruction. Palaeogeog. Palaeocl. Palaeoecol. 446, 225–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.01.013 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing https://www.R-project.org/ (2021).Erickson, G. M. Incremental lines of von Ebner in dinosaurs and the assessment of tooth replacement rates using growth line counts. PNAS 93(25), 14623–14627. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.25.14623 (1996).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Godefroit, P. et al. Extreme tooth enlargement in a new Late Cretaceous rhabdodontid dinosaur from Southern France. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13160-2 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Edmund, G. Tooth replacement phenomena in the lower vertebrates. Life. Sci. Contrib. R. Ont. Mus. 52, 1–190 (1960).
Google Scholar 
D’Emic, M. D., Whitlock, J. A., Smith, K. M., Fisher, D. C. & Wilson, J. A. Evolution of high tooth replacement rates in sauropod dinosaurs. PLoS ONE 8(7), e69235. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069235 (2013).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ősi, A., Prondvai, E., Butler, R. & Weishampel, D. B. Phylogeny, histology and inferred body size evolution in a new rhabdodontid dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous of Hungary. PLoS ONE 7(9), e44318. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044318 (2012).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Weishampel, D. B., Jianu, C. M., Csiki, Z. & Norman, D. B. Osteology and phylogeny of Zalmoxes (ng), an unusual euornithopod dinosaur from the latest Cretaceous of Romania. J. Syst. Palaeontol. 1(2), 65–123. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1477201903001032 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Melstrom, K. M. The relationship between diet and tooth complexity in living dentigerous saurians. J. Morphol. 278, 500–522 (2017).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
LeBlanc, A. R. H., Reisz, R. R., Evans, D. C. & Bailleul, A. M. Ontogeny reveals function and evolution of the hadrosaurid dinosaur dental battery. BMC Evol. Biol. 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-016-0721-1 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Erickson, G. M. et al. Complex dental structure and wear biomechanics in hadrosaurid dinosaurs. Science 338(6103), 98–101. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1224495 (2012).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Norman, D. B. & Weishampel, D. B. Iguanodontidae and related Ornithopoda. In The Dinosauria (eds Weishampel, D. B. et al.) 510–533 (University of California Press, 1990).
Google Scholar 
Hulke, J. W. An attempt at a complete osteology of Hypsilophodon foxii, a British Wealden dinosaur. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 172, 1035–1062. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1882.0025 (1882).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sternberg, C. H. Thescelosaurus edmontonensis, n. sp., and classification of the Hypsilophodontidae. J. Paleontol. 14, 481–494 (1940).
Google Scholar 
Galton, P. M. The ornithischian dinosaur Hypsilophodon from the Wealden of the Isle of Wight. Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. 25(1), 1–152 (1974).
Google Scholar 
Norman, D. B. On the anatomy of Iguanodon atherfieldensis (Ornithischia: Ornithopoda). Bull. Inst. Roy. Sci. Nat. Belgique 56, 281–372 (1986).
Google Scholar 
Norman, D. B. & Barrett, P. M. Ornithischian dinosaurs from the lower Cretaceous (Berriasian) of England. Spec. Pap. Palaeontol. 68, 161–190 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Kosch, J. C. & Zanno, L. E. Sampling impacts the assessment of tooth growth and replacement rates in archosaurs: Implications for paleontological studies. PeerJ 8, e9918. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9918 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Janis, C. M. & Fortelius, M. On the means whereby mammals achieve increased functional durability of their dentitions with special reference to limiting factors. Biol. Rev. 63, 197–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1988.tb00630.x (1988).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
You, H., Ji, Q. & Li, D. Lanzhousaurus magnidens gen. et sp. nov. from Gansu Province, China: The largest-toothed herbivorous dinosaur in the world. Geol. Bull. Chi 24(9), 785–794 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Suarez, C. A., You, H. L., Suarez, M. B., Li, D. Q. & Trieschmann, J. B. Stable isotopes reveal rapid enamel elongation (amelogenesis) rates for the Early Cretaceous iguanodontian dinosaur Lanzhousaurus magnidens. Sci. Rep. 7, 15319. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15653-6 (2017).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Upchurch, P. & Barrett, P. M. The evolution of sauropod feeding mechanisms. In Evolution of Herbivory in Terrestrial Vertebrates: Perspectives from the Fossil Record (ed. Sues, H. D.) 79–122 (Cambridge University Press, 2000).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Sereno, P. C. & Wilson, J. A. Structure and evolution of a sauropod tooth battery in Curry. In The Sauropods: Evolution and Paleobiology (eds Rogers, K. A. & Wilson, J. A.) 157–177 (University of California Press, 2005).
Google Scholar 
Brown, B. & Schlaikjer, E. M. The structure and relationships of Protoceratops. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 40(3), 133–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1940.tb57047.x (1940).Article 

Google Scholar 
Solounias, N., Teaford, M. & Walker, A. Interpreting the diet of extinct ruminants-the case of a non-browsing giraffid. Paleobiology 14, 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1017/S009483730001201X (1988).Article 

Google Scholar 
Walker, A. & Teaford, M. Inferences from quantitative analysis of dental microwear. Folia Primatol. 53, 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1159/000156415 (1989).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ungar, P. S. Mammalian dental function and wear: A review. Biosurf. Biotribol. 1(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bsbt.2014.12.001 (2015).Article 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar 
Janis, C. M. An estimation of tooth volume and hypsodonty indices in ungulate mammals, and the correlation of these factors with dietary preferences. Mém. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. Sér. C Géol. 53, 367–387 (1988).
Google Scholar 
Lucas, P. W. et al. The role of dust, grit and phytoliths in tooth wear. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 51(1–2), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.5735/086.051.0215 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Winkler, D. E. et al. Shape, size, and quantity of ingested external abrasives influence dental microwear texture formation in guinea pigs. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 117, 22264–22273. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2008149117 (2020).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kaiser, T. M. et al. Nano-indentation of native phytoliths and dental tissues: Implications for herbivore-plant combat and dental wear proxies. Evol. Syst. 2, 55–63. https://doi.org/10.3897/evolsyst.2.22678 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Winkler, D. E. et al. Forage silica and water content control dental surface texture in guinea pigs and provide implications for dietary reconstruction. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 116, 1325–1330. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814081116 (2019).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ősi, A. & Makádi, L. New remains of Hungarosaurus tormai (Ankylosauria, Dinosauria) from the Upper Cretaceous of Hungary: Skeletal reconstruction and body mass estimation. Palaontol. Z. 83(2), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12542-009-0017-5 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Winkler, D. E., Schulz-Kornas, E., Kaiser, T. M. & Tütken, T. Dental microwear texture reflects dietary tendencies in extant Lepidosauria despite their limited use of oral food processing. Proc. R. Soc. B 286, 20190544. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.0544 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bestwick, J., Unwin, D. M., Butler, R. J. & Purnell, M. A. Dietary diversity and evolution of the earliest flying vertebrates revealed by dental microwear texture analysis. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19022-2 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Sakaki, H. et al. Non-occlusal dental microwear texture analysis of a titanosauriform sauropod dinosaur from the Upper Cretaceous (Turonian) Tamagawa Formation, northeastern Japan. Cret. Res. 136, 105218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2022.105218 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fiorillo, A. R. Dental microwear on the teeth of Camarasaurus and Diplodocus; implications for sauropod paleoecology. In Fifth Symposium on Mesozoic Terrestrial Ecosystems and Biota (eds Kielan-Jaworowska, Z. et al.) 23–24 (Paleontologisk Museum, 1991).
Google Scholar 
Mallon, J. C., Cuthbertson, R. S. & Tirabasso, A. Hadrosaurid jaw mechanics as revealed by cranial joint limitations and dental microwear analysis. In Hadrosaur Symposium Abstract Volume (eds Braman, D. R. et al.) 87–90 (Royal Tyrrell Museum of Palaeontology, 2011).
Google Scholar 
Fiorillo, A. R. Dental microwear patterns of the sauropod dinosaurs Camarasaurus and Diplodocus: Evidence for resource partitioning in the Late Jurassic of North America. Hist. Biol. 13, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/08912969809386568 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sereno, P. C. et al. Structural extremes in a Cretaceous dinosaur. PLoS ONE 2(11), e1230. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001230 (2007).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Whitlock, J. A. Inferences of diplodocoid (Sauropoda: Dinosauria) feeding behavior from snout shape and microwear analyses. PLoS ONE 6(4), e18304. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018304 (2011).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Fiorillo, A. R. Microwear patterns on the teeth of northern high latitude hadrosaurs with comments on microwear patterns in hadrosaurs as a function of latitude and seasonal ecological constraints. Palaeontol. Electron. 14(3), 20A (2011).
Google Scholar 
Bell, P. R., Snively, E. & Shychoski, L. A comparison of the jaw mechanics in hadrosaurid and ceratopsid dinosaurs using finite element analysis. Anat. Rec. 292(9), 1338–1351. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.20978 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chin, K. & Gill, B. D. Dinosaurs, dung beetles, and conifers: Participants in a Cretaceous food web. Palaios 11, 280–285. https://doi.org/10.2307/3515235 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brown, C. M. et al. Dietary palaeoecology of an early Cretaceous armoured dinosaur (Ornithischia; Nodosauridae) based on floral analysis of stomach contents. Roy. Soc. Open Sci. 7(6), 200305. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200305 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Crane, P. C., Friis, E. M. & Pedersen, K. R. The origin and early diversification of angiosperms. Nature 374, 27–33 (1995).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Friis, E. M., Crane, P. R. & Pedersen, K. R. Early Flowers and Angiosperm Evolution 1–596 (Cambridge University Press, 2011). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511980206.Book 

Google Scholar 
Benson, R. B., Hunt, G., Carrano, M. T. & Campione, N. Cope’s rule and the adaptive landscape of dinosaur body size evolution. Palaeontology 61, 13–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/pala.12329 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hummel, J. et al. In vitro digestibility of fern and gymnosperm foliage: Implications for sauropod feeing ecology and diet selection. Proc. Royal Soc. B 275, 1015–1021. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.1728 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gee, C. T. Dietary options for the sauropod dinosaurs from an integrated botanical and paleobotanical perspective. In Biology of the Sauropod Dinosaurs: Understanding the Life of Giants (eds Klein, K. et al.) 34–56 (Indiana University Press, 2011).
Google Scholar 
Peters, R. H. The Ecological Implications of Body Size 1–329 (Cambridge University Press, 1983).Book 

Google Scholar 
Jarman, P. J. The social organisation of antelope in relation to their ecology. Behaviour 48, 215–267 (1974).Article 

Google Scholar  More

UPRLIMET is our response to a need for a consistent method for predicting the upper extent of trout in all streams across land ownerships within our region. By developing and implementing the model using LiDAR-derived flowline hydrography, we offer a standardized, spatially explicit, spatially contiguous (where LiDAR hydrography is available), and high-quality fish-distribution layer based on the probability of fish presence. UPRLIMET maps both the probability of trout and the upper limit of trout across landscapes, ownerships, and jurisdictions, and better captures the upper extent of fish in headwater reaches relative to previous approaches allowing for a cross-boundary distribution map on which decision-makers and managers can base policies and regulations.This work provides a transferable prediction modeling framework for systematically and comprehensively estimating the upper distribution limit of fish, which could be calibrated and implemented in watersheds and for fish species around the globe. Although the dependency on LiDAR-derived data here may be seen as a limitation to broader implementation of this method, the method is scalable to any resolution, and LiDAR is becoming increasingly ubiquitous in the United States through the U.S. Geological Survey 3D Elevation Program, which is funding LiDAR acquisitions across the United States. Furthermore, LiDAR data is available globally via data from GEDI and ICESAT-2 satellites that offer coarser resolution (~ 25-m) data that are still superior to either ASTER or SRTM derived-DEMs26, 27.Minimizing prediction errors for the upper limit of trout is important to decision support and management planning because it ensures that forest-harvest regulations and management prescriptions are aligned. It is important to note that the prediction error estimates from this study are derived from the NSpCV process, except for models using 20% slope thresholds or unaltered parameterization of Fransen’s model13, because it is likely that the NSpCV estimates are conservative. They tended to overestimate error, as evidenced by the fact that the Refit model (i.e. Fransen’s optimal model13 refit to our data) exhibited a larger MAE than the unchanged optimal Fransen model13. This unexpected result was likely due to applying the NSpCV routine on the Refit model, resulting in the use of many intermediate models to characterize predictive performance using randomized subsets of independent training and test data. In contrast, the optimal Fransen model13 was developed independently using the data in this study and thus error could be evaluated directly without subsampling imposed by NSpCV.The relatively low error for the two-stage model that becomes UPRLIMET suggests that it more accurately characterizes the upper limit of fish than all other models considered in this study, including the Fransen model13, which has been used for estimating upper limit of fish regionally. Although some of the models exhibited relatively small differences in error relative to the model that became UPRLIMET, small differences in predicted upper limit locations when considered in aggregate across multiple watersheds can potentially alter management decisions and expected outcomes. Differences in predictive performance and error between UPRLIMET and the optimal Fransen model13 are likely attributed to high-accuracy hydrography and hydro-topographic data (as LiDAR-derived DEMs were not available in western Washington in 2006), which allowed a finer-scale of analysis (i.e., 5-m vs 10-m reaches). Additionally, the fact that UPRLIMET was fit to data solely from western Oregon likely offers predictive performance gains when applied to western Oregon when compared to the Fransen model13 that was fit to data from western Washington.Quantifying the predicted accuracy associated with applying UPRLIMET to western Washington will require new data and is outside the intended scope of this study. However, we think it is reasonable to infer findings from UPRLIMET across regions with similar climatic and hydro-topographic conditions including northwestern California, western Oregon, western Washington, and southwestern British Columbia, especially given the broad availability of LiDAR-derived DEMs. This conclusion is supported the fact that both the Fransen13 and Refit models produced similar logistic regression coefficients (Data S5) and similar Matthews Correlation Coefficients (Data S6), suggesting that feature space of the two models is similar. This evidence is further corroborated by the high degree of overlap observed among the distributions of each of the four predictor variables for both western Oregon and Washington. We acknowledge that UPRLIMET does not contain identical predictor variables to Fransen’s model13 but maintain that they are similar enough in purpose that it is reasonable to assume that the feature space similarities are retained.When we undertook this study, we hypothesized that a prediction model based on RF would offer superior predictive performance over those based on LR, given the availability of 67 predictor variables and RF’s demonstrated superior predictive performance in ecological applications23,24,25. However, our results suggests no improvement is offered by including more than four of the 67 environmental predictors examined, and that no clear advantage is offered by employing the more complex RF model, as evidenced by the top three of the top five prediction models being four-variable LR model algorithms (Fig. 3; Data S3.) The general importance of these variables to so many models is likely due to the strong linear relationships in the response of fish or no fish in logit space given the slopes of the curves in the partial dependence profiles (Fig. 4). This finding is congruent with the fundamental premise of LR, which is to explain and predict a response with a functional relationship, whereas RF deliberately focuses only on maximizing prediction accuracy with many decision trees28. Additional advantages to prediction models based on LR include the following: relatively better extrapolation performance over RF29, the simplicity of transferring a LR model to another processing platform using the model coefficients (versus the black box of RF decisions), and the immensely reduced computational processing times associated with LR model fitting and prediction. These advantages are especially key to this work, where there may be a desire to implement the model on other landscapes without the requisite expertise in doing so using the R software30. However, there are tradeoffs, as LR is more sensitive to the influence of outliers and multi-collinearity among variables, and overfitting is an increasing concern as the number of predictor variables increase, whereas RF tends to be robust to these concerns, but is more likely to produce a high-variance, low-bias prediction model31.Although there is no single, general explanation for distribution limits of species32, the intersection of stream size, slope, and elevation together locate the upper limit of fish. Stream size corresponds to major ecosystem changes along a stream continuum including for energy sources, ecosystem metabolism, habitat characteristics, and biodiversity33, as well as the upper distribution limit of fish, as shown here. As expected, stream size accounts for the top two variables in the model suggesting that it is the major driver of the upper distribution limit of fish with the probability of trout increasing with increasing upstream stream length and upstream drainage area. Our finding proposes that downstream stream reaches are more likely to have fish. Although the underlying mechanisms have multiple influences, factors related to increasing stream size, such as increasing habitat size, habitat complexity, stability, or temperature variability34 have been shown to be important. Similarly, stream size is the most sensitive factor in intrinsic potential models for Chinook Salmon (O. tshawytscha35). Slope, the next variable of importance influencing the upper extent of fish, exerts control on physical habitats in streams, including channel morphology, hydraulics, sediment transport, substrate, and habitat36. Steep slopes drastically prevent trout from reaching areas above waterfalls or impassable chutes of over 25% slope, but trout can be found in streams channels without barriers at slopes as high as 28%7, 14, 37. Other fishes, such as Coho Salmon (O. kisutch) and steelhead (O. mykiss) are generally not found above 12% slope38. Interestingly, survival of fishes that make it upstream or are introduced above barriers may be facilitated by a geomorphic setting that is less prone to debris flows and other episodic sediment fluxes and has a greater resilience to flooding resulting from wider valley and greater floodplain connectivity39. Elevation or vertical topographic position may indirectly integrate broad influences of other landscape-scale or climate factors or also indirectly capture stream size, influencing the likelihood of fish presence. Frequently, species richness increases at lower elevations40, and we suggest that elevation also contributes to species distribution limits, as is the case for the Endangered Species Act listed Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus)41. The multiple factors associated with elevation correspond to the relationship found for stream size that smaller streams are less likely to have fish. Ultimately, the intersection of stream size, slope, and elevation guide us to finding the upper extent of fish in streams.Physical influences have been proposed to be more limiting to fish distributions upstream, such as near the upper extent of fish, whereas biological factors are probably more important downstream33. Although 67 environmental predictor variables representing geologic, soil, climatic, and hydro-topographic conditions at local and patch scales are evaluated (Data S1), only the hydro-topographic variables of stream size, slope, and elevation are important to predicting the upper limit of fish in UPRLIMET. In fact, the top 9 models (Fig. 3; Data S3) relied on just four to five hydro-topographic variables, most of which were patch-scale variables or elevation at 1000 m, all of which incorporate a broader extent of influence. This suggests that local scale variables that contribute to fish limits, including slope or riparian influences may need to be further explored. In addition, some of the remaining 63 variables present in UPRLIMET, such as precipitation and air temperature, are important drivers of within-network trout distributions and contribute to their connectivity. Some of these predictor variables appear in the 10th ranked 26-variable RF-O-SR1 model (Data S2; Data S4; Data S8), but the influence appears to be dubious for isolating the upper limit and explaining variation in fish occurrence because MAE of upper limit was substantially higher than the 9 models with lower MAEs (Fig. 3; Data S3), and the lower MCC of the associated RF-O sub-model (Data S6). It is likely that other combinations of the 67 predictor variables, including precipitation, may be more important when this model development and evaluation framework is applied elsewhere, especially if those areas contain fishes or are places that are vulnerable to changing water temperatures and streamflow regimes. In addition, biological factors may be a concern in other watersheds, including invasive species and fish stocking which can limit the longitudinal distribution and the upstream extent of fishes.Given the large geographic extent of this study, we expected other variables such as precipitation to be more important drivers, however due to a combination of a wet water year, a lack of precipitation gradient in the study area, coarse grain data, and location of fish in streams this was not the case. For example, 2017 was a wetter than normal water year53, and it may be that the gradient of precipitation variation in western Oregon was not strong enough to explain the variation in the spatial distribution of trout occurrence. All climate data, including the precipitation data were sourced from relatively coarse-scale (800 m) PRISM data. The inability to adequately downscale precipitation to characterize how precipitation truly varies within and between patches, especially along elevational gradients, likely confounded how the model interprets the influence of precipitation. Trout occurrence was on perennial streams, which is likely far enough downstream of locations where variation in precipitation was the dominant influence on streamflow permanence and consequently would not have been a factor.Stream network structure plays a key role in the upper limits of fish. Upper limits for fish can occur at either lateral or terminal points13 and when mapping these points, differences were seen for UPRLIMET relative to other datasets. Lateral limits end in the tributary stream just above where it connects with a mainstem stream. Terminal limits include both mid-stream terminal limits where fish drop out in the middle of a stream channel owing to a soft (i.e., transient barrier or puttering out) or hard (i.e., waterfall) edge, and confluence terminal limits where the upper limit of fish ends at the confluence. For example, when closely examining the 14 watersheds where we have overlapping information across various datasets and models, UPRLIMET and the Fransen optimal model13 exhibit substantial agreement in their lateral limits. However, the largest differences are in their terminal ends, especially terminal mid-stream limits, probably owing to hydro-topographic changes that contribute to fish occurrence at confluences, which are more pronounced than mid-stream. Accordingly, the logic in the stopping rule is likely important in identifying specific upper extent of fish distributions in reaches that end mid-stream.Differences among databases for the upper distribution limits of fish come from both the upper limit points and depiction of fish-bearing reaches, underscoring the importance of having a shared map with common coverage of the fish extent across landscapes and ownerships. Differences among mapped distributions can result from source information, relating to whether it is modeled or occurrence data. Models, such as UPRLIMET, can be applied across a broad extent based on model parameters and training data, thereby offering broad coverage for distributions (and quantifiable error) across the landscape, ownerships, and jurisdictions. However, models are limited by accuracy and fit. As such, they can incorrectly predict distributions in some areas, especially if there are prediction features not yet trained with the model data where prediction would require extrapolation of the model. This makes both the training dataset and modeled extent important considerations, as models are only as good as the data used to develop them. Updating UPRLIMET with new data as it becomes available will help to expand the prediction domain, improve accuracy, and allow the model to do more interpolation than extrapolation.Distributions based on occurrence information depend heavily on data availability, data quality, and access. Differences in data availability can lead to inconsistent coverage across landscapes and ownerships, with high coverage in some watersheds and low to no coverage in others. Inconsistent coverage can lead to errors that are difficult to quantify across landscapes, ownerships, and survey crews. Occurrence information also depends on the ability to survey watersheds and gain access across ownership types, including on private lands that do not have the same assurances of access as public lands, resulting in information asymmetry42, 43. Data quality also depends on the spatial accuracy of the points of uppermost fish, which are a function of GPS quality and error, and can drastically change the modeled results, as these points are used in the training dataset. Differences among mapped distribution limits also result from differences in field protocols on designating last fish. For example, some crews note fish distribution limits where they visually see the last fish, whereas others note it upstream of where they saw last fish, based on habitat features that would limit fish. With the advent of LiDAR-derived DEMs and associated LiDAR-derived stream hydrography, like those available in much of western Oregon, have revealed additional flowlines in watersheds compared to previous topographic maps, which adds more potential tributaries to survey for fish-distribution assessments. When these new previously unmapped tributaries are paired with a model, such as UPRLIMET, a common information set is available across landowners, managers, and agencies for the upper extent of fish. This helps policymakers determine where to apply regulations that support fisheries and forest management, based on the upper fish limit.Next steps for applying and expanding the model include addressing current data gaps. More information and observations about the upper distribution limits of fish beyond western Oregon would be needed to properly expand the spatial scope of the model. The upper extent of fish is at the detection limit of many current technologies, including global nativation satellite system (GNSS), geographic information systems (GIS), and LiDAR, especially in forested landscapes. Better precision of GNSS coordinates from observations would help greatly. From an ecological perspective, we could focus on fish distribution limits that vary seasonally or interannually to better understand which stream features and hydrologic parameters influence those endpoints. We also need information related to locations of barriers, including culverts, waterfalls, and knickpoints to understand their influence on contemporary distributions. Incorporating variables representing riparian conditions as well as leveraging higher-resolution DEMs ( More

Time-course observations on 43 flowers of Causonis japonica revealed changes in flower disc colour and sexual expression (Table 1). Temporal changes in floral features showed no difference between diploid (19 flowers) and triploid (24 flowers) individuals. For example, flowering onset times did not differ substantially between ploidy level (diploid: from 07:07 to 13:27, triploid: from 06:58 to 14:49). However, the flowering duration varied significantly from flower to flower, ranging from a minimum of one day to a maximum of six days. Regardless of the ploidy level, all flowers with damaged styles (14 flowers) exhibited brown stigmas after the male phase, then ceased floral development prior to the female phase.Table 1 Characteristics of 43 flowers of Causonis japonica.Full size tableFigure 1 shows the typical time-course changes of C. japonica flower features (flower ID 35 in Table 1) according to the RGB values (representing the activities of nectar secretion: see below). As in the other 42 examined cases shown in Table 1, the initial colour of this flower disc immediately after anthesis (male phase) was orange (Stage 1, Fig. 1a, RGB: 255, 88, 16), as reported earlier7. Immediately after the petals and stamens fell off, the flower disc colour changed to pink (Stage 2, Fig. 1b, RGB: 255, 82, 102). The styles were not yet elongated at this stage, and the flowers were asexual. In 12 cases with damaged styles and brown stigmas, the flower discs remained pink until the flowers fell off (shown as “O–P” in Table 1).Figure 1Colour change process of a flower disc in Causonis japonica (flower ID 35 in Table 1). Disc colour changed from orange (a, RGB: 255, 88, 16) to pink (b, RGB: 255, 82, 102) before recovering to orange (c, RGB: 255, 88, 16) again, then pink (d, RGB: 255, 120, 94) again. In the last stage, the flower disc turned brownish pink (e, RGB: 232, 162, 169) then fell off. The two orange colour stages were synchronised with flower sexual activity. (a) First orange stage shows stamen activity (male phase); (c) second orange stage indicates stigma maturation (female phase). Nectar secretion was active only in the orange stages and more active in the female phase; the same tendency was observed in the other cases shown in Table 1.Full size imageHowever, in the remaining 31 flowers with normally elongated styles, maturation of the styles (female phase) coincided with the flower discs again exhibiting a distinct orange colour (Stage 3, Fig. 1c, RGB: 255, 88, 16). After the female phase, the flower discs turned pink again (Stage 4, shown as “O–P–O–P” in Table 1), and brownish colouration appeared in the stigmas (Fig. 1d, RGB: 255, 120, 94). Finally, the flower discs turned to a faded pink (Fig. 1e, RGB: 232, 162, 169) just before the flowers fell off. Therefore, the above observations imply that colour-change has a strict correlation with sexual phase.The timings of the disc colour change to the second orange stage (female phase) varied depending on the onset time of each flower. Most flowers that opened before 10:00 reached the second orange stage (female phase) on the afternoon of the same day (except for two flowers, ID 1 and 2 in Table 1). Conversely, flowers that bloomed after 10:00 reached the second orange stage (female phase) at approximately noon the following day. These flowering processes were not fully synchronised in the same inflorescence; therefore, pink and orange discs often coexisted in the same inflorescence. Indeed, we can collect various stages of flowers at a time point from one population as shown in Fig. 2a.Figure 2Histology of floral discs of C. japonica. (a) Floral disc colour change observed in a triploid individual. Flowers were hand-sectioned along the longitudinal axis to show inside colouration of floral disc. Floral phase was judged from the stigma length and colour of the stigma tip; from left, initial stage with orange floral disc and short style, first pink stage with short style, second orange stage with elongated style with matured stigma, and second orange stage with elongated style. Unit of scale bar = 1 mm. (b–e) Longitudinal sections of floral discs in the initial orange stage (b, d) and pink stage (c, e). Scale bar = 500 µm. (b, c) Hand sections of living floral discs showing pigmentation of vacuoles in some scattered cells. (d, e) Resin-embedded sections of floral discs showing histology.Full size imageFigure 1 also shows the typical time-course changes of nectar activities (flower ID 35 in Table 1), which indicates active nectar secretions during both orange colour stages. That is, the flower discs secreted nectar in both male and female phases, with no visible nectar secretion in the pink stages. Moreover, nectar secretion in the female phase of this flower was higher than that in the male phase, a tendency that was also observed in other flowers; however, the total volume of nectar varied among the flowers shown in Table 1. During anthesis, we confirmed that bees, wasps, ants and other insects visited the flowers as previously described7 (Supplementary Fig. 1).Longitudinal sections of flowers in the pink-coloured and orange-coloured stages (Fig. 2a) revealed that pigmentation occurred only in a subset of parenchymatous cells in both cases (Fig. 2b, c). No structural or cytological changes were observed between the initial orange stage and the pink stages (Fig. 2d, e), suggesting that the observed oscillating colour change depends on the degradation and biosynthesis of orange pigments.To understand what pigments are involved in the dual colour change of the C. japonica flower disc, we extracted carotenoids and chlorophyll with Acetone. Anthocyanin was also extracted with Methanol-HCl. As a result, while anthocyanin content was not significantly altered throughout the stages examined, we found that carotenoid level strongly correlated with the colour change detected by naked eye. More specifically, in stages 1 and 3 the carotenoid content was high (63.8 and 65.3 µg/g dry weight, respectively), but significantly decreased in stages 2 and 4 (14.3 and 36.5 µg/g dry weight, respectively) (Table 2). Interestingly, an increase in chlorophyll content was confined to stage 4 (Table 2). Together, the observed dual colour change was ascribed to the decrease (stage 2) and the increase (stage 3) of carotenoid contents in the flower discs.Table 2 Chlorophyll and Carotenoid contents in the flower discs of C. japonica.Full size table More

Rosenzweig, M. L. Habitat selection and population interactions: the search for mechanism. Am. Nat. 137, S5–S28 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
Binckley, C. A. & Resetarits, W. J. Habitat selection determines abundance, richness and species composition of beetles in aquatic communities. Biol. Lett. 1, 370–374 (2005).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Foltz, S. J. & Dodson, S. I. Aquatic Hemiptera community structure in stormwater retention ponds: A watershed land cover approach. Hydrobiologia 621, 49–62 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Resetarits, W. J. Habitat selection behaviour links local and regional scales in aquatic systems: Habitat selection at multiple spatial scales. Ecol. Lett. 8, 480–486 (2005).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Leclerc, M. et al. Quantifying consistent individual differences in habitat selection. Oecologia 180, 697–705 (2016).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Morris, D. W. Adaptation and habitat selection in the eco-evolutionary process. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 278, 2401–2411 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Resetarits, W. J. Colonization under threat of predation: avoidance of fish by an aquatic beetle, Tropisternus lateralis (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Oecologia 129, 155–160 (2001).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wellborn, G. A., Skelly, D. K. & Werner, E. E. Mechanisms creating community structure across a freshwater habitat gradient. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 27, 337–363 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
Klečka, J. & Boukal, D. S. Who eats whom in a pool? A comparative study of prey selectivity by predatory aquatic insects. PLoS ONE 7, e37741 (2012).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Nilsson, P. A. & Brönmark, C. Prey vulnerability to a gape-size limited predator: behavioural and morphological impacts on northern pike piscivory. Oikos 88, 539–546 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Šigutová, H. et al. Specialization directs habitat selection responses to a top predator in semiaquatic but not aquatic taxa. Sci. Rep. 11, 18928 (2021).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pintar, M. R. & Resetarits, W. J. Match and mismatch: integrating consumptive effects of predators, prey traits, and habitat selection in colonizing aquatic insects. Ecol. Evol. 11, 1902–1917 (2021).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pintar, M. R. & Resetarits, W. J. Jr. Out with the old, in with the new: oviposition preference matches larval success in cope’s gray treefrog Hyla chrysoscelis. J. Herpetol. 51, 186–189 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wildermuth, H. Habitat selection and oviposition site recognition by the dragonfly Aeshna juncea (L.): an experimental approach in natural habitats (Anisoptera: Aeshnidae). Odonatologica 22, 27–44 (1993).Fortin, D., Morris, D. W. & McLoughlin, P. D. Habitat selection and the evolution of specialists in heterogeneous environments. Isr. J. Ecol. Evol. 54, 311–328 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
McLoughlin, P. D., Boyce, M. S., Coulson, T. & Clutton-Brock, T. Lifetime reproductive success and density-dependent, multi-variable resource selection. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 273, 1449–1454 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Morris, D. W. Scales and costs of habitat selection in heterogeneous landscapes. Evol. Ecol. 6, 412–432 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
McLoughlin, P. D., Morris, D. W., Fortin, D., Wal, E. V. & Contasti, A. L. Considering ecological dynamics in resource selection functions. J. Anim. Ecol. 79, 4–12 (2010).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Leclerc, M., Dussault, C. & St-Laurent, M.-H. Behavioural strategies towards human disturbances explain individual performance in woodland caribou. Oecologia 176, 297–306 (2014).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bolnick, D. I. et al. The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization. Am. Nat. 161, 1–28 (2003).Article 
MathSciNet 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sheppard, C. E. et al. Intragroup competition predicts individual foraging specialisation in a group-living mammal. Ecol. Lett. 21, 665–673 (2018).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Forstmeier, W. & Birkhead, T. R. Repeatability of mate choice in the zebra finch: consistency within and between females. Anim. Behav. 68, 1017–1028 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gómez-Laplaza, L. M. The influence of social status on shoaling preferences in the freshwater angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare). Behaviour 142, 827–844 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gillingham, M. P. & Parker, K. L. The importance of individual variation in defining habitat selection by moose in northern British Columbia. Alces 44, 7–20 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Lesmerises, R. & St-Laurent, M.-H. Not accounting for interindividual variability can mask habitat selection patterns: a case study on black bears. Oecologia 185, 415–425 (2017).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
van Beest, F. M. et al. Increasing density leads to generalization in both coarse-grained habitat selection and fine-grained resource selection in a large mammal. J. Anim. Ecol. 83, 147–156 (2014).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Fretwell, S. D. & Lucas, H. L. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds I. Theoretical development. Biotheoretica 19, 16–36 (1970).Article 

Google Scholar 
Binckley, C. A. & Resetarits, W. J. Functional equivalence of non-lethal effects: generalized fish avoidance determines distribution of gray treefrog, Hyla chrysoscelis, larvae. Oikos 102, 623–629 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kraus, J. M. & Vonesh, J. R. Feedbacks between community assembly and habitat selection shape variation in local colonization. J. Anim. Ecol. 79, 795–802 (2010).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Pollard, C. J. et al. Removal of an exotic fish influences amphibian breeding site selection: Exotic fish removal. J. Wildl. Manag. 81, 720–727 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Calenge, C., Dufour, A. B. & Maillard, D. K-select analysis: a new method to analyse habitat selection in radio-tracking studies. Ecol. Model. 186, 143–153 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Freitas, C., Kovacs, K. M., Lydersen, C. & Ims, R. A. A novel method for quantifying habitat selection and predicting habitat use. J. Appl. Ecol. 45, 1213–1220 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Mitchell, L. J., Kohler, T., White, P. C. L. & Arnold, K. E. High interindividual variability in habitat selection and functional habitat relationships in European nightjars over a period of habitat change. Ecol. Evol. 10, 5932–5945 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Richter, L. et al. So close and yet so different: the importance of considering temporal dynamics to understand habitat selection. Basic Appl. Ecol. 43, 99–109 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tyler, J. A. & Rose, K. A. Individual variability and spatial heterogeneity in fish population models. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 4, 91–123 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
Córdoba-Aguilar, A. Dragonflies and Damselflies: Model Organisms for Ecological and Evolutionary Research. (Oxford University Press, 2008).Sandall, E. L. & Fischer, B. Be a professional: attend to the insects. Am. Entomol. 65, 176–179 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Blaustein, L. Oviposition site selection in response to risk of predation: evidence from aquatic habitats and consequences for population dynamics and community. in Evolutionary theory and processes: modern perspectives (ed. Wasser, S. P.) 441–456 (Kluwer, 1999).Helebrandová, J. B., Pyszko, P. & Dolný, A. Behavioural phenotypic plasticity of submerged oviposition in damselflies (Insecta: Odonata). Insects 10, 124 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hollis, K. & Guillette, L. What associative learning in insects tells us about the evolution of learning and fixed behavior. Int. J. Comp. Psychol. 28, 25706 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Papaj, D. R. & Lewis, A. C. Insect Learning: Ecological and Evolutinary Perspectives. (Chapman & Hall, 1993).Simons, M. & Tibbetts, E. Insects as models for studying the evolution of animal cognition. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 34, 117–122 (2019).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Benard, M. F. Predator-induced phenotypic plasticity in organisms with complex life histories. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35, 651–673 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cook, W. L. & Streams, F. A. Fish predation on Notonecta (Hemiptera): relationship between prey risk and habitat utilization. Oecologia 64, 177–183 (1984).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Larson, D. J. The predaceous water beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) of Alberta: Systematics, natural history and distribution. Quaest. Entomol. 11, 245–498 (1985).
Google Scholar 
Svensson, B. G., Tallmark, B. & Petersson, E. Habitat heterogeneity, coexistence and habitat utilization in five backswimmer species (Notonecta spp.; Hemiptera, Notonectidae). Aquat. Insects 22, 81–98 (2000).Lock, K., Adriaens, T., Meutter, F. V. D. & Goethals, P. Effect of water quality on waterbugs (Hemiptera: Gerromorpha & Nepomorpha) in Flanders (Belgium): results from a large-scale field survey. Ann. Limnol. Int. J. Limnol. 49, 121–128 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Macan, T. T. A twenty-one-year study of the water-bugs in a Moorland Fishpond. J. Anim. Ecol. 45, 913–922 (1976).Article 

Google Scholar 
Boukal, D. S. et al. Catalogue of water beetles of the Czech Republic. Klapalekiana 43 (Suppl.), 1–289 (2007).Åbjörnsson, K., Wagner, B. M. A., Axelsson, A., Bjerselius, R. & Olsén, K. H. Responses of Acilius sulcatus (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) to chemical cues from perch (Perca fluviatilis). Oecologia 111, 166–171 (1997).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gioria, M., Schaffers, A., Bacaro, G. & Feehan, J. The conservation value of farmland ponds: Predicting water beetle assemblages using vascular plants as a surrogate group. Biol. Conserv. 143, 1125–1133 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bergsten, J. & Miller, K. B. Taxonomic revision of the Holarctic diving beetle genus Acilius Leach (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae): Acilius taxonomic revision. Syst. Entomol. 31, 145–197 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Everard, M. Britain’s Freshwater Fishes. (Princeton University Press, 2013).Miller, K. B. & Bergsten, J. Predaceous diving beetle sexual systems. in Ecology, systematics, and the natural history of predaceous diving beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) (ed. Yee, D. A.) 199–234 (Springer Netherlands, 2014).Culler, L. E., Ohba, S. & Crumrine, P. Predator-prey interactions of dytiscids. in Ecology, Systematics, and the Natural History of Predaceous Diving Beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) (ed. Yee, D. A.) 363–379 (Springer, 2014).Baines, C. B., McCauley, S. J. & Rowe, L. Dispersal depends on body condition and predation risk in the semi-aquatic insect Notonecta undulata. Ecol. Evol. 5, 2307–2316 (2015).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Baines, C. B., Ferzoco, I. M. & McCauley, S. J. Sex-biased dispersal is independent of sex ratio in a semiaquatic insect. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 71, 119 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hungerford, H. B. The biology and ecology of aquatic and semiaquatic Hemiptera. Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull. 11, 3–334 (1919).
Google Scholar 
Streams, F. A. Intrageneric predation by Notonecta (Hemiptera: Notonectidae) in the laboratory and in nature. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 85, 265–273 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
Halekoh, U., Højsgaard, S. & Yan, J. The R Package geepack for generalized estimating equations. J. Stat. Softw. 15, 1–11 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lenth, R. V. Least-squares means: the R package lsmeans. J. Stat. Softw. 69, 1–33 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bates, A., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stoffel, M. A., Nakagawa, S. & Schielzeth, H. rptR: repeatability estimation and variance decomposition by generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 8, 1639–1644 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (2021).Harvill, M. L. The antipredatory behavior of the aquatic diving beetle, Coptotomus venustus (Say)(Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) in response to fish predation. (Texas A&M University, 1994).McCauley, S. J. & Rowe, L. Notonecta exhibit threat-sensitive, predator-induced dispersal. Biol. Lett. 6, 449–452 (2010).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Schoeppner, N. M. & Relyea, R. A. Damage, digestion, and defence: the roles of alarm cues and kairomones for inducing prey defences. Ecol. Lett. 8, 505–512 (2005).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Roberts, G. Why individual vigilance declines as group size increases. Anim. Behav. 51, 1077–1086 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
Giller, P. S. Locomotory efficiency in the predation strategies of the British Notonecta (Hempitera, Heteroptera). Oecologia 52, 273–277 (1982).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gittelman, S. H. Locomotion and predatory strategy in backswimmers (Hemiptera: Notonectidae). Am. Midl. Nat. 92, 496–500 (1974).Article 

Google Scholar 
Morris, D. W. Density-dependent habitat selection: testing the theory with fitness data. Evol. Ecol. 3, 80–94 (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
Holt, R. D. Population dynamics in two-patch environments: Some anomalous consequences of an optimal habitat distribution. Theor. Popul. Biol. 28, 181–208 (1985).Article 
MathSciNet 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Briers, R. A. Metapopulation ecology of Notonecta in small ponds. Doctoral dissertation. (1999).Popham, E. J. The migration of aquatic bugs with special reference to the Corixidae (Hemiptera Heteroptera). Arch. Für Hydrobiol. 60, 450–496 (1964).
Google Scholar 
Doligez, B., Cadet, C., Danchin, E. & Boulinier, T. When to use public information for breeding habitat selection? The role of environmental predictability and density dependence. Anim. Behav. 66, 973–988 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pintar, M. R. & Resetarits, W. J. Aquatic beetles influence colonization of disparate taxa in small lentic systems. Ecol. Evol. 10, 12170–12182 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Sebastián-González, E., Sánchez-Zapata, J. A., Botella, F. & Ovaskainen, O. Testing the heterospecific attraction hypothesis with time-series data on species co-occurrence. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 277, 2983–2990 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Giller, P. S. & McNeill, S. Predation strategies, resource partitioning and habitat selection in Notonecta (Hemiptera/Heteroptera). J. Anim. Ecol. 50, 789–808 (1981).Article 

Google Scholar 
Buxton, V. L., Enos, J. K., Sperry, J. H. & Ward, M. P. A review of conspecific attraction for habitat selection across taxa. Ecol. Evol. 10, 12690–12699 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ferzoco, I. M. C., Baines, C. B. & McCauley, S. J. Co-occurring Notonecta (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Notonectidae) species differ in their behavioral response to cues of Belostoma (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Belostomatidae) predation risk. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 112, 402–408 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Roughgarden, J. Evolution of niche width. Am. Nat. 106, 683–718 (1972).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ruckstuhl, K. E. Sexual segregation in vertebrates: proximate and ultimate causes. Integr. Comp. Biol. 47, 245–257 (2007).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hochkirch, A., Gröning, J. & Krause, S. Intersexual niche segregation in Cepero’s ground-hopper Tetrix ceperoi. Evol. Ecol. 21, 727–738 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Romey, W. L. & Wallace, A. C. Sex and the selfish herd: sexual segregation within nonmating whirligig groups. Behav. Ecol. 18, 910–915 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Main, M. B., Weckerly, F. W. & Bleich, V. C. Sexual segregation in ungulates: new directions for research. J. Mammal. 77, 449–461 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
Trivers, R. L. Parental investment and sexual selection. in Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man 1871–1971 (ed. Campbell, B.) (Aldine Publishing Company, 1972).Bonduriansky, R. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 76, 305–339 (2001).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Foster, S. E. & Soluk, D. A. Protecting more than the wetland: The importance of biased sex ratios and habitat segregation for conservation of the Hine’s emerald dragonfly Somatochlora hineana Williamson. Biol. Conserv. 127, 158–166 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Miller, K. B. The phylogeny of diving beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) and the evolution of sexual conflict. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 79, 359–388 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Watson, P. J., Stallmann, R. R. & Arnqvist, G. Sexual conflict and the energetic costs of mating and mate choice in water striders. Am. Nat. 151, 46–58 (1998).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Rowe, L., Krupa, J. J. & Sih, A. An experimental test of condition-dependent mating behavior and habitat choice by water striders in the wild. Behav. Ecol. 7, 474–479 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
McLain, D. K. & Pratt, A. E. The cost of sexual coercion and heterospecific sexual harassment on the fecundity of a host-specific, seed-eating insect (Neacoryphus bicrucis). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 46, 164–170 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stone, G. N. Female foraging responses to sexual harassment in the solitary bee Anthophora plumipes. Anim. Behav. 50, 405–412 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
Martens, A. & Rehfeldt, G. Female aggregation in Platycypha caligata (Odonata: Chlorocyphidae): A tactic to evade male interference during oviposition. Anim. Behav. 38, 369–374 (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kolar, V. & Boukal, D. S. Habitat preferences of the endangered diving beetle Graphoderus bilineatus: implications for conservation management. Insect Conserv. Divers. 13, 480–494 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wilcox, C. Habitat size and isolation affect colonization of seasonal wetlands by predatory aquatic insects. Isr. J. Zool. 47, 459–475 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Baines, C. B., Ferzoco, I. M. C. & McCauley, S. J. Phenotype-by-environment interactions influence dispersal. J. Anim. Ecol. 88, 1263–1274 (2019).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Liao, W., Venn, S. & Niemelä, J. Diving beetle (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) community dissimilarity reveals how low landscape connectivity restricts the ecological value of urban ponds. Landsc. Ecol. 37, 1049–1058 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Stocks, G., Seales, L., Paniagua, F., Maehr, E. & Bruna, E. M. The geographical and institutional distribution of ecological research in the tropics. Biotropica 40, 397–404 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bernstein, J. M., Murphy, J. C., Voris, H. K., Brown, R. M. & Ruane, S. Phylogenetics of mud snakes (Squamata: Serpentes: Homalopsidae): A paradox of both undescribed diversity and taxonomic inflation. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 160, 107109 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Murphy, J. C., Voris, H. K. & Karns, D. R. The dog-faced water snakes, a revision of the genus Cerberus Cuvier, (Squamata, Serpentes, Homalopsidae), with the description of a new species. Zootaxa 3484, 1–34 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stuart, B. L. The harvest and trade of reptiles at U Minh Thuong National Park, southern Viet Nam. Traffic Bull. 20, 25–34 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Brooks, S. E., Allison, E. H. & Reynolds, J. D. Vulnerability of Cambodian water snakes: Initial assessment of the impact of hunting at Tonle Sap Lake. Biol. Conserv. 139, 401–414 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Murphy, J. C. Homalopsid Snakes (Evolution in the Mud (Krieger Publishing, Malabar, 2007).
Google Scholar 
Karns, D. R., Murphy, J. C. & Voris, H. K. Semi-aquatic snake communities of the central plain region of Thailand. Trop. Nat. Hist. 10, 1–25 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Jayne, B. C., Voris, H. K. & Heang, K. B. Diet, feeding behavior, growth, and numbers of a population of Cerberus rynchops (Serpentes: Homalopsinae) in Malaysia: a contribution in celebration of the distinguished scholarship of Robert F. Inger on the occasion of his sixty-fifth birthday. Fieldiana Zoology, Series 50 (Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL, 1988).Chim, C. K. & Diong, C. H. A mark-recapture study of a dog-faced water snake Cerberus schneiderii (Colubridae: Homalopsidae) population in Sungei Buloh Wetland Reserve Singapore. Raffles Bull. Zool. 61, 811–825 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Shine, R., Ambariyanto, Harlow, P. S. & Mumpuni. Ecological attributes of two commercially-harvested python species in northern Sumatra. J. Herpet. 33, 249–257 (1999).Natusch, D. J., Lyons, J. A., Riyanto, A., Khadiejah, S. & Shine, R. Detailed biological data are informative, but robust trends are needed for informing sustainability of wildlife harvesting: A case study of reptile offtake in Southeast Asia. Biol. Conserv. 233, 83–92 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Natusch, D. J., Lyons, J. A., Riyanto, A. & Shine, R. Harvest effects on blood pythons in North Sumatra. J. Wildl. Manage. 84, 249–255 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shine, R., Harlow, P. S. & Keogh, J. S. The influence of sex and body size on food habits of a giant tropical snake, Python reticulatus. Funct. Ecol. 12, 248–258 (1988).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shine, R., Harlow, P. S. & Keogh, J. S. The allometry of life-history traits: Insights from a study of giant snakes (Python reticulatus). J. Zool. 244, 405–414 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shine, R. & Harlow, P. S. Reticulated pythons in Sumatra: biology, harvesting and sustainability. Biol. Conserv. 87, 349–357 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hoesel, J. K. P. Ophidia Javanica (Museum Zoologicum Bogoriense, Kebun Raya, Indonesia, 1959).Voris, H. K. & Murphy, J. C. The prey and predators of homalopsine snakes. J. Nat. Hist. 36, 1621–1632 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wall, F. A popular treatise on the common Indian Snakes. Part 26. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 26, 89–97 (1918).Gorman, G. C., Licht, P. & McCollum, F. Annual reproductive patterns in three species of marine snakes from the central Philippines. J. Herpetol. 15, 335–354 (1981).Article 

Google Scholar 
Auffenberg, W. The herpetofauna of Komodo, with notes on adjacent areas. Bull. Florida State Mus. Biol. Sci. 25, 39–156 (1980).
Google Scholar 
Alcala, A. C. Guide to Philippine Flora and Fauna. Vol. X. Amphibians and Reptiles (Natural Resource Management Center, Ministry of Natural Resources and the University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines, 1986).Harlow, P. S. & Taylor, J. E. Reproductive ecology of the jacky dragon (Amphibolurus muricatus): An agamid lizard with temperature-dependent sex determination. Austral. Ecol. 25, 640–652 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Saint Girons, H. & Pfeffer, P. Notes sur l’ecologie des serpents du Cambodge. Zool. Mededelingen 47, 65–87 (1972).Kusrini, M. D. et al. Abundance, demography, and harvesting of water snakes from agricultural landscapes in West Java, Indonesia. Wildl. Res. In review (2022).Shine, R. Sexual differences in morphology and niche utilization in an aquatic snake Acrochordus arafurae. Oecologia 69, 260–267 (1986).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Houston, D. & Shine, R. Sexual dimorphism and niche divergence: Feeding habits of the Arafura filesnake. J. Anim. Ecol. 62, 737–748 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shine, R., Reed, R., Shetty, S. & Cogger, H. Relationships between sexual dimorphism and niche partitioning within a clade of sea-snakes (Laticaudinae). Oecologia 133, 45–53 (2002).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Vincent, S. E., Herrel, A. & Irschick, D. J. Sexual dimorphism in head shape and diet in the cottonmouth snake (Agkistrodon piscivorus). J. Zool. 264, 53–59 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Perkins, M. W., Cloyed, C. S. & Eason, P. K. Intraspecific dietary variation in niche partitioning within a community of ecologically similar snakes. Evol. Ecol. 34, 1017–1035 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shine, R. & Goiran, C. Sexual dimorphism in size and shape of the head in the sea snake Emydocephalus annulatus (Hydrophiinae, Elapidae). Sci. Rep. 11, 20026 (2021).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Shine, R. Intersexual dietary divergence and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in snakes. Am. Nat. 138, 103–122 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bonnet, X., Shine, R., Naulleau, G. & Vacher-Vallas, M. Sexual dimorphism in snakes: Different reproductive roles favour different body plans. Proc. R. Soc. B 265, 179–183 (1998).Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Shine, R., Olsson, M. M., Moore, I. T., LeMaster, M. P. & Mason, R. T. Why do male snakes have longer tails than females?. Proc. R. Soc. B 266, 2147–2151 (1999).Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar  More

Pablo Ignacio Plaza and Sergio Agustín Lambertucci from the National University of Comahue and the Argentine Research Council in Argentina quantified the contribution of vultures to reducing greenhouse gas emissions by developing two contrasting scenarios. The first assumes that all the dead animals that the vultures can consume are disposed of, whereas in the second scenario, the dead animals are left to decompose in the environment without scavengers. The results show that the current vulture population can reduce emissions by up to 60.7 teragrams CO2 equivalent per year. A decline in vulture populations decreases their mitigation capacity by 30%. The study highlights that vultures are essential to keep our climate cool. More