Ecology

Differences in environmental factorsEnvironmental factors showed value differences between forest types, while the significance of differences differed among variables, which were both found with corrected values and original measurements (Fig. 1).Figure 1The differences in environmental factors between naturally regenerating forests (NF) and planted forests (PF) in China. The environmental factors include three annual climatic factors (a–c), three seasonal temperature factors (d–f), three seasonal precipitation factors (g–i), three biotic factors (j–l), and two soil factors (m,n). Three annual climatic factors include mean annual air temperature (MAT, a), mean annual precipitation (MAP, b), and aridity index (AI, c) defined as the ratio of MAP to annual potential evapotranspiration. Three seasonal temperature factors include the temperature of the warmest month (Tw, d), the temperature of the coldest month (Tc, e), temperature annual range (TR, f). Three seasonal precipitation factors include precipitation of the wettest month (Pw, g), precipitation of the driest month (Pd, h), and precipitation seasonality (Ps, i) defined as the standard deviation of monthly precipitation during the measuring year. Three biological factors include the mean annual leaf area index (LAI, j), the maximum leaf area index (MLAI, k), and stand age (SA, l). Two soil factors include soil organic carbon content (SOC, m) and soil total nitrogen content (STN, n). The differences are tested for each variable with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), where * and ** indicate significant differences between forest types at significance levels of α = 0.05 and α = 0.01, respectively. The corrected values are mean values during 2003–2019 after correcting the original measurements with the interannual trend (See methods), which are listed in each panel, while original measurements are mean values during the measuring period of each ecosystem, which are not shown in each panel.Full size imageFor annual climatic factors, the significant difference between NF and PF only appeared in MAT (Fig. 1a). The mean MAT of NF was 10.50 ± 7.81 °C, which was significantly lower than that of PF (15.65 ± 6.23 °C) (p  0.05) (Fig. 2c). Even considering the significant effects of MAT on ER, ANCOVA results obtained by fixing MAT as a covariant also suggested that ER values did not significantly differ between forest types (F = 0.01, p  > 0.05). Fixing other variables as a covariant also drew a similar result.Therefore, NF showed a lower NEP resulting from the lower GPP than PF, while their differences were not statistically significant (Fig. 2).Differences in NEP latitudinal patternsCarbon fluxes showed divergent latitudinal patterns between NF and PF, while their latitudinal patterns varied among carbon fluxes, which were both found with corrected values and original measurements (Fig. 3).Figure 3The latitudinal patterns of carbon fluxes over Chinese naturally regenerating forests (NF) and planted forests (PF). The carbon fluxes include net ecosystem productivity (NEP, a,b), gross primary productivity (GPP, c,d), and ecosystem respiration (ER, e,f). Each panel is drawn with the corrected values (blue points) and original measurements (grey points), respectively. The blue and black lines represent the regression lines calculated from the corrected values and original measurements, respectively, with their regression statistics listed in blue and black letters. Only the regression slope (Sl) and R2 of each regression are listed. The grey lines represent the regressions between carbon fluxes added by random errors and latitude. Only significant (p  0.05).The ER of NF showed a significant decreasing latitudinal pattern (Fig. 3e), while that of PF exhibited no significant latitudinal pattern (Fig. 3f). The increasing latitude caused the ER of NF to significantly decrease. Each unit increase in latitude led to a 28.71 gC m−2 year−1 decrease in ER, with an R2 of 0.31. However, the increasing latitude contributed little to the ER spatial variation of PF (p  > 0.05).In addition, the latitudinal patterns of carbon fluxes and their differences between forest types were also obtained with the original measurements (Fig. 3, grey points). The latitudinal patterns of random error adding carbon fluxes were comparable to those of our corrected carbon fluxes (Fig. 3), which confirmed that the latitudinal patterns of carbon fluxes and their differences between forest types would not be affected by the uncertainties in generating the corrected carbon fluxes.Therefore, among NFs, the similar decreasing latitudinal patterns of GPP and ER meant that NEP showed no significant latitudinal pattern, while the significant decreasing latitudinal pattern of GPP and no significant latitudinal pattern of ER caused NEP to show a decreasing latitudinal pattern among PFs.Differences in the environmental effects on NEP spatial variationsEnvironmental factors, including the annual climatic factors, seasonal temperature factors, seasonal precipitation factors, biological factors, and soil factors, exerted divergent effects on the spatial variations of NEP and its components, which also differed between forest types (Table 1). No factor was found to affect that the spatial variation of NEP among NFs, while most annual and seasonal climatic factors were found to affect that among PFs. The spatial variations of GPP and ER among NFs were both affected by most annual and seasonal climatic factors and LAI, while those among PFs were primarily shaped by most annual and seasonal climatic factors. Though LAI showed no significant effect on GPP and ER spatial variations among PFs, SA exerted a significant negative effect. In addition, the spatial variations of soil variables contributed little to the spatial variations of carbon fluxes. Therefore, among NFs, most annual and seasonal climatic factors and LAI were found to affect GPP and ER spatial variations, while no factor was found to significantly influent the NEP spatial variation. However, among PFs, most annual and seasonal climatic factors were found to affect the spatial variations of NEP and its components, while LAI showed no significant effect. Using the original measurements also generated the similar correlation coefficients (Supplementary Table S1).Table 1 Correlation coefficients between carbon fluxes and environmental factors in naturally regenerating forests (NF) and planted forests (PF).Full size tableGiven the high correlations among annual climatic factors and seasonal climatic factors (Supplementary Table S2), the partial correlation analysis was applied to determine which factors should be employed to reveal the mechanisms underlying the spatial variations of NEP. Partial correlation analysis showed that MAT and MAP exerted the most important roles in spatial variations of NEP and its components (Table 2). After controlling MAT (or MAP), other factors seldom showed significant correlation with carbon fluxes, especially fixing MAT (Table 2). In addition, MAT and MAP exerted similar effects on the spatial variations of NEP and its components (Table 1). Using the original measurements also generated the similar partial correlation coefficients (Supplementary Table S3). Therefore, we only presented the effects of MAT on carbon flux spatial variations and their differences between forest types in detail.Table 2 Partial correlation coefficients between carbon fluxes and environmental factors in naturally regenerating forests (NF) and planted forests (PF) with fixing mean annual air temperature (MAT) or mean annual precipitation (MAP).Full size tableThe increasing MAT increased carbon fluxes, while the increasing rates differed between forest types (Fig. 4). The increasing MAT contributed little to the NEP spatial variation of NF but raised the NEP of PF (Fig. 4a,b). Each unit increase in MAT caused the NEP of PF to increase at a rate of 27.77 gC m−2 year−1, with an R2 of 0.31 (Fig. 4b). The increasing MAT significantly raised GPP in NF and PF (Fig. 4c,d). For NF, each unit increase in MAT increased GPP at a rate of 43.76 gC m−2 year−1, with an R2 of 0.49 (Fig. 4c), while each unit increase in MAT increased the GPP of PF at a rate of 69.18 gC m−2 year−1, with an R2 of 0.57 (Fig. 4d). The GPP increasing rates did not significantly differ between NF and PF (F = 1.52, p  > 0.05). The increasing MAT also raised ER in both NF and PF (Fig. 4e,f), whose increasing rates were 38.97 gC m−2 year−1 (Fig. 4e) and 36.79 gC m−2 year−1 (Fig. 4f), respectively, while their differences were not statistically significant (F = 0.01, p  > 0.05). In addition, using the original measurements also generated the similar spatial variations and their differences between forest types (Fig. 4). Furthermore, the random error adding carbon fluxes responded similarly to those of our correcting carbon fluxes (Fig. 4), indicating that the effects of MAT on carbon fluxes would not be affected by the uncertainties in our correcting carbon fluxes. Therefore, the similar responses of GPP and ER to MAT made MAT contribute little to NEP spatial variations among NFs, while GPP and ER showed divergent response rates to MAT, which made NEP increase with MAT among PFs.Figure 4The effects of mean annual air temperature (MAT) on the spatial variations of carbon fluxes over Chinese naturally regenerating forests (NF) and planted forests (PF). The carbon fluxes include net ecosystem productivity (NEP, a,b), gross primary productivity (GPP, c,d), and ecosystem respiration (ER, e,f). Each panel is drawn with the corrected values (blue points) and original measurements (grey points), respectively. The blue and black lines represent the regression lines calculated from the corrected values and original measurements, respectively, with their regression statistics listed in blue and black letters. Only the regression slope (Sl) and R2 of each regression are listed. The grey lines represent the regressions between carbon fluxes added by random errors and latitude. Only significant (p  More

Alpha diversity differences among communitiesNematode gut microbiomes were assigned into their respective species categories of E. antarcticus and P. murrayi based on 18S host data that was consistent with morphology (see Methods “Microinvertebrate haplotypes”). In contrast, due to recovery of three undiscernible 18S tardigrade haplotypes, the gut microbiomes were assigned to Tardigrada. Mat bacterial communities were significantly (Tukey’s HSD, P  0.65, χ2(1)  0.38, χ2(3)  More

As humans warm the planet, biodiversity is plummeting. These two global crises are connected in multiple ways. But the details of the intricate feedback loops between biodiversity decline and climate change are astonishingly under-studied.It is well known that climate extremes such as droughts and heatwaves can have devastating impacts on ecosystems and, in turn, that degraded ecosystems have a reduced capacity to protect humanity against the social and physical impacts of such events. Yet only a few such relationships have been probed in detail. Even less well known is whether biodiversity-depleted ecosystems will also have a negative effect on climate, provoking or exacerbating weather extremes.For us, a group of researchers living and working mainly in Central Europe, the wake-up call was the sequence of heatwaves of 2018, 2019 and 2022. It felt unreal to watch a floodplain forest suffer drought stress in Leipzig, Germany. Across Germany, more than 380,000 hectares of trees have now been damaged (see go.nature.com/3etrrnp; in German), and the forestry sector is struggling with how to plan restoration activities over the coming decades1. What could have protected these ecosystems against such extremes? And how will the resultant damage further impact our climate?
Nature-based solutions can help cool the planet — if we act now
In June 2021, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) published their first joint report2, acknowledging the need for more collaborative work between these two domains. And some good policy moves are afoot: the new EU Forest Strategy for 2030, released in July 2021, and other high-level policy initiatives by the European Commission, formally recognize the multifunctional value of forests, including their role in regulating atmospheric processes and climate. But much more remains to be done.To thoroughly quantify the risk that lies ahead, ecologists, climate scientists, remote-sensing experts, modellers and data scientists need to work together. The upcoming meeting of the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity in Montreal, Canada, in December is a good opportunity to catalyse such collaboration.Buffers and responsesWhen lamenting the decline in biodiversity, most people think first about the tragedy of species driven to extinction. There are more subtle changes under way, too.For instance, a study across Germany showed that over the past century, most plant species have declined in cover, with only a few increasing in abundance3. Also affected is species functionality4 — genetic diversity, and the diversity of form and structure that can make communities more or less efficient at taking up nutrients, resisting heat or surviving pathogen attacks.When entire ecosystems are transformed, their functionality is often degraded. They are left with less capacity to absorb pollution, store carbon dioxide, soak up water, regulate temperature and support vital functions for other organisms, including humans5. Conversely, higher levels of functional biodiversity increase the odds of an ecosystem coping with unexpected events, including climate extremes. This is known as the insurance effect6.The effect is well documented in field experiments and modelling studies. And there is mounting evidence of it in ecosystem responses to natural events. A global synthesis of various drought conditions showed, for instance, that forests were more resilient when trees with a greater diversity of strategies for using and transporting water lived together7.

Dead trees near Iserlohn, Germany, in April 2020 (left) and after felling in June 2021 (right).Credit: Ina Fassbender/AFP via Getty

However, biodiversity cannot protect all ecosystems against all kinds of impacts. In a study this year across plots in the United States and Canada, for example, mortality was shown to be higher in diverse forest ecosystems8. The proposed explanation for this unexpected result was that greater biodiversity could also foster more competition for resources. When extreme events induce stress, resources can become scarce in areas with high biomass and competition can suddenly drive mortality, overwhelming the benefits of cohabitation. Whether or not higher biodiversity protects an ecosystem from an extreme is highly site-specific.Some plants respond to drought by reducing photosynthesis and transpiration immediately; others can maintain business as usual for much longer, stabilizing the response of the ecosystem as a whole. So the exact response of ecosystems to extremes depends on interactions between the type of event, plant strategies, vegetation composition and structure.Which plant strategies will prevail is hard to predict and highly dependent on the duration and severity of the climatic extreme, and on previous extremes9. Researchers cannot fully explain why some forests, tree species or individual plants survive in certain regions hit by extreme climate conditions, whereas entire stands disappear elsewhere10. One study of beech trees in Germany showed that survival chances had a genomic basis11, yet it is not clear whether the genetic variability present in forests will be sufficient to cope with future conditions.And it can take years for ecosystem impacts to play out. The effects of the two consecutive hot drought years, 2018 and 2019, were an eye-opener for many of us. In Leipzig, tree growth declined, pathogens proliferated and ash and maple trees died. The double blow, interrupted by a mild winter, on top of the long-term loss of soil moisture, led to trees dying at 4–20 times the usual rate throughout Germany, depending on the species (see go.nature.com/3etrrnp; in German). The devastation peaked in 2020.Ecosystem changes can also affect atmospheric conditions and climate. Notably, land-use change can alter the brightness (albedo) of the planet’s surface and its capacity for heat exchange. But there are more-complex mechanisms of influence.Vegetation can be a source or sink for atmospheric substances. A study published in 2020 showed that vegetation under stress is less capable of removing ozone than are unstressed plants, leading to higher levels of air pollution12. Pollen and other biogenic particles emitted from certain plants can induce the freezing of supercooled cloud droplets, allowing ice in clouds to form at much warmer temperatures13, with consequences for rainfall14. Changes to species composition and stress can alter the dynamics of these particle emissions. Plant stress also modifies the emission of biogenic volatile organic gases, which can form secondary particles. Wildfires — enhanced by drought and monocultures — affect clouds, weather and climate through the emission of greenhouse gases and smoke particles. Satellite data show that afforestation can boost the formation of low-level, cooling cloud cover15 by enhancing the supply of water to the atmosphere.Research prioritiesAn important question is whether there is a feedback loop: will more intense, and more frequent, extremes accelerate the degradation and homogenization of ecosystems, which then, in turn, promote further climate extremes? So far, we don’t know.One reason for this lack of knowledge is that research has so far been selective: most studies have focused on the impacts of droughts and heatwaves on ecosystems. Relatively little is known about the impacts of other kinds of extremes, such as a ‘false spring’ caused by an early-season bout of warm weather, a late spring frost, heavy rainfall events, ozone maxima, or exposure to high levels of solar radiation during dry, cloudless weather.Researchers have no overview, much less a global catalogue, of how each dimension of biodiversity interacts with the full breadth of climate extremes in different combinations and at multiple scales. In an ideal world, scientists would know, for example, how the variation in canopy density, vegetation age, and species diversity protects against storm damage; and whether and how the diversity of canopy structures controls atmospheric processes such as cloud formation in the wake of extremes. Researchers need to link spatiotemporal patterns of biodiversity with the responses of ecosystem processes to climate extremes.
Biodiversity needs every tool in the box: use OECMs
Creating such a catalogue is a huge challenge, particularly given the more frequent occurrence of extremes with little or no precedent16. Scientists will also need to account for the increasing likelihood of pile-ups of climate stressors. The ways in which ecosystems respond to compound events17 could be quite different. Researchers will have to study which facets of biodiversity (genetic, physiological, structural) are required to stabilize ecosystems and their functions against these onslaughts.There is at least one piece of good news: tools for data collection and analysis are improving fast, with huge advances over the past decade in satellite-based observations for both climate and biodiversity monitoring. The European Copernicus Earth-observation programme, for example — which includes the Sentinel 1 and 2 satellite fleet, and other recently launched missions that cover the most important wavelengths of the electromagnetic spectrum — offer metre-scale resolution observations of the biochemical status of plants and canopy structure. Atmospheric states are recorded in unprecedented detail, vertically and in time.Scientists must now make these data interoperable and integrate them with in situ observations. The latter is challenging. On the ground, a new generation of data are being collected by researchers and by citizen scientists18. For example, unique insights into plant responses to stress are coming from time-lapse photography of leaf orientation; accelerometer measures of movement patterns of stems have been shown to provide proxies for the drought stress of trees19.High-quality models are needed to turn these data into predictions. The development of functional ‘digital twins’ of the climate system is now in reach. These models replicate hydrometeorological processes at the metre scale, and are fast enough to allow for rapid scenario development and testing20. The analogous models for ecosystems are still in a more conceptual phase. Artificial-intelligence methods will be key here, to study links between climate extremes and biodiversity.Researchers can no longer afford to track global transformations of the Earth system in disciplinary silos. Instead, ecologists and climate scientists need to establish a joint agenda, so that humanity is properly forewarned: of the risks of removing biodiversity buffers against climate extremes, and of the risk of thereby amplifying these extremes. More

Zimmer, H. D. et al. Memory for Action: A Distinct Form of Episodic Memory? (Oxford University Press, 2001).
Google Scholar 
Goswami, U. The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development (Wiley, 2013).
Google Scholar 
Fujita, K., Morisaki, A., Takaoka, A., Maeda, T. & Hori, Y. Incidental memory in dogs (Canis familiaris): Adaptive behavioral solution at an unexpected memory test. Anim. Cogn. 15, 1055–1063 (2012).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lind, J., Enquist, M. & Ghirlanda, S. Animal memory: A review of delayed matching-to-sample data. Behav. Processes 117, 52–58 (2015).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kuczaj, S. A. II. & Eskelinen, H. C. (2014) The “creative dolphin” revisited: What do dolphins do when asked to vary their behavior. Anim. Behav. Cogn. 1, 66–77 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tulving, E. Episodic and semantic memory. Organ. Mem. 1, 381–403 (1972).
Google Scholar 
Tulving, E. How many memory systems are there?. Am. Psychol. 40, 385 (1985).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fugazza, C., Pongrácz, P., Pogány, Á., Lenkei, R. & Miklósi, Á. Mental representation and episodic-like memory of own actions in dogs. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–8 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N. & Fitch, W. T. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?. Science 298, 1569–1579 (2002).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Conway, M. A. Memory and the self. J. Mem. Lang. 53, 594–628 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Scagel, A. & Mercado, E. III. Do that again! Memory for self-performed actions in dogs (Canis familiaris). J. Comp. Psychol. 20, 25 (2022).
Google Scholar 
Mercado, E., Murray, S. O., Uyeyama, R. K., Pack, A. A. & Herman, L. M. Memory for recent actions in the bottlenosed dolphin (Tursiops truncatus): Repetition of arbitrary behaviors using an abstract rule. Learn. Behav. 26, 210–218 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Paukner, A., Anderson, J. R., Donaldson, D. I. & Ferrari, P. F. Cued repetition of self-directed behaviors in macaques (Macaca nemestrina). J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 33, 139 (2007).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Smeele, S. Q. et al. Memory for own behaviour in pinnipeds. Anim. Cogn. 20, 1–12 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Clayton, N. S. Episodic-like memory and mental time travel in animals. (2017).Clayton, N. S., Griffiths, D. P. & Dickinson, A. Declarative and episodic-like memory in animals: Personal musings of a Scrub Jay (2000).Clayton, N. S. & Dickinson, A. Episodic-like memory during cache recovery by scrub jays. Nature 395, 272–274 (1998).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Tulving, E. Episodic memory and autonoesis: Uniquely human. Missing Link Cogn. Orig. Self-Reflect. Conscious 20, 3–56 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Suddendorf, T. & Corballis, M. C. Mental time travel and the evolution of the human mind. Genet. Soc. Gen. Psychol. Monogr. 123, 133–167 (1997).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Suddendorf, T. & Corballis, M. C. The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans?. Behav. Brain Sci. 30, 299–313 (2007).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Crystal, J. D. Evaluating evidence from animal models of episodic memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Learn. Cogn. 47, 337 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Mercado, E. III., Uyeyama, R. K., Pack, A. A. & Herman, L. M. Memory for action events in the bottlenosed dolphin. Anim. Cogn. 2, 17–25 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zentall, T. R. Coding of stimuli by animals: Retrospection, prospection, episodic memory and future planning. Learn. Motiv. 41, 225–240 (2010).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Fugazza, C., Pogány, Á. & Miklósi, Á. Recall of others’ actions after incidental encoding reveals episodic-like memory in dogs. Curr. Biol. 26, 3209–3213 (2016).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lambert, M. L., Jacobs, I., Osvath, M. & von Bayern, A. M. Birds of a feather? Parrot and corvid cognition compared. Behaviour 156, 505–594 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Emery, N. J. Cognitive ornithology: The evolution of avian intelligence. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 361, 23–43 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Olkowicz, S. et al. Birds have primate-like numbers of neurons in the forebrain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113, 7255–7260 (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Emery, N. J. & Clayton, N. S. Evolution of the avian brain and intelligence. Curr. Biol. 15, R946–R950 (2005).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bradbury, J. W. & Balsby, T. J. The functions of vocal learning in parrots. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 70, 293–312 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Baciadonna, L., Cornero, F. M., Emery, N. J. & Clayton, N. S. Convergent evolution of complex cognition: Insights from the field of avian cognition into the study of self-awareness. Learn. Behav. 49, 9–22 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Osvath, M., Kabadayi, C. & Jacobs, I. Independent evolution of similar complex cognitive skills (2014).Zentall, T. R., Clement, T. S., Bhatt, R. S. & Allen, J. Episodic-like memory in pigeons. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 8, 685–690 (2001).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zentall, T. R., Singer, R. A. & Stagner, J. P. Episodic-like memory: Pigeons can report location pecked when unexpectedly asked. Behav. Processes 79, 93–98 (2008).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Healy, S. D. & Hurly, T. A. Spatial learning and memory in birds. Brain. Behav. Evol. 63, 211–220 (2004).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Taylor, A. H. Corvid cognition. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Cogn. Sci. 5, 361–372 (2014).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Boeckle, M. & Bugnyar, T. Long-term memory for affiliates in ravens. Curr. Biol. 22, 801–806 (2012).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Marzluff, J. M., Walls, J., Cornell, H. N., Withey, J. C. & Craig, D. P. Lasting recognition of threatening people by wild American crows. Anim. Behav. 79, 699–707 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pepperberg, I. M. & Pepperberg, I. M. The Alex Studies: Cognitive and Communicative Abilities of Grey Parrots (Harvard University Press, 2009).Book 

Google Scholar 
Emery, N. J. & Clayton, N. S. Effects of experience and social context on prospective caching strategies by scrub jays. Nature 414, 443–446 (2001).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Herzog, S. K. et al. First systematic sampling approach to estimating the global population size of the Critically Endangered Blue-throated Macaw Ara glaucogularis. Bird Conserv. Int. 31, 293–311 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Auersperg, A. M. & von Bayern, A. M. Who’sa clever bird—now? A brief history of parrot cognition. Behaviour 156, 391–407 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tassin de Montaigu, C., Durdevic, K., Brucks, D., Krasheninnikova, A. & von Bayern, A. Blue-throated macaws (Ara glaucogularis) succeed in a cooperative task without coordinating their actions. Ethology 126, 267–277 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Auersperg, A. M. et al. Social transmission of tool use and tool manufacture in Goffin cockatoos (Cacatua goffini). Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 281, 20140972 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brucks, D. & von Bayern, A. M. Parrots voluntarily help each other to obtain food rewards. Curr. Biol. 30, 292–297 (2020).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Krasheninnikova, A., Höner, F., O’Neill, L., Penna, E. & von Bayern, A. M. Economic decision-making in parrots. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–10 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jarvis, E. D. et al. Avian brains and a new understanding of vertebrate brain evolution. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 151–159 (2005).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gutiérrez-Ibáñez, C., Iwaniuk, A. N. & Wylie, D. R. Parrots have evolved a primate-like telencephalic-midbrain-cerebellar circuit. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–11 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Smeele, S. Q. et al. Coevolution of relative brain size and life expectancy in parrots. Proc. R. Soc. B 289, 20212397 (2022).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kirsch, J. A., Güntürkün, O. & Rose, J. Insight without cortex: Lessons from the avian brain. Conscious. Cogn. 17, 475–483 (2008).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Dunbar, R. I. & Shultz, S. Evolution in the social brain. Science 317, 1344–1347 (2007).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wright, A. A. & Katz, J. S. Mechanisms of same/different concept learning in primates and avians. Behav. Processes 72, 234–254 (2006).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Smirnova, A. A., Obozova, T. A., Zorina, Z. A. & Wasserman, E. A. How do crows and parrots come to spontaneously perceive relations-between-relations?. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 37, 109–117 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schusterman, R. J. & Kastak, D. A California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) is capable of forming equivalence relations. Psychol. Rec. 43, 823–839 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kastak, D. & Schusterman, R. J. Transfer of visual identity matching-to-sample in two California sea lions (Zalophus californianus). Anim. Learn. Behav. 22, 427–435 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zentall, T. R., Wasserman, E. A., Lazareva, O. F., Thompson, R. K. & Rattermann, M. J. Concept learning in animals. Comp. Cogn. Behav. Rev. 20, 25 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Marino, L. Convergence of complex cognitive abilities in cetaceans and primates. Brain. Behav. Evol. 59, 21–32 (2002).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Huber, L., Range, F. & Virányi, Z. Dog imitation and its possible origins. In Domestic dog Cognition and Behavior 79–100 (Springer, 2014).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Schmidjell, T., Range, F., Huber, L. & Virányi, Z. Do owners have a Clever Hans effect on dogs? Results of a pointing study. Front. Psychol. 3, 558 (2012).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hare, B., Brown, M., Williamson, C. & Tomasello, M. The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science 298, 1634–1636 (2002).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lindqvist, C. & Jensen, P. Domestication and stress effects on contrafreeloading and spatial learning performance in red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus) and White Leghorn layers. Behav. Processes 81, 80–84 (2009).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Pack, A. A., Herman, L. M. & Roitblat, H. L. Generalization of visual matching and delayed matching by a California sea lion (Zalophus californianus). Anim. Learn. Behav. 19, 37–48 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bennett, M. S. Five breakthroughs: A first approximation of brain evolution from early bilaterians to humans. Front. Neuroanat. 15, 25 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cisek, P. Resynthesizing behavior through phylogenetic refinement. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 81, 2265–2287 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Toft, C. A. & Wright, T. F. Parrots of the wild. Nat. Hist. World’s Most Captiv. Birds 20, 25 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Merkle, J. A., Sigaud, M. & Fortin, D. To follow or not? How animals in fusion–fission societies handle conflicting information during group decision-making. Ecol. Lett. 18, 799–806 (2015).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Stevens, J. R. & Gilby, I. C. A conceptual framework for nonkin food sharing: Timing and currency of benefits. Anim. Behav. 67, 603–614 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kamil, A. C. & Roitblat, H. L. The ecology of foraging behavior—Implications for animal learning and memory. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 36, 141–169 (1985).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ortiz, S. T., Castro, A. C., Balsby, T. J. S. & Larsen, O. N. Problem-solving in a cooperative task in peach-fronted conures (Eupsittula aurea). Anim. Cogn. 23, 265–275 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Krasheninnikova, A., Brucks, D., Blanc, S. & von Bayern, A. M. Assessing African grey parrots’ prosocial tendencies in a token choice paradigm. R. Soc. Open Sci. 6, 190696 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Krasheninnikova, A. et al. Parrots do not show inequity aversion. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–12 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Clayton, N. S., Griffiths, D. P., Emery, N. J. & Dickinson, A. Elements of episodic–like memory in animals. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 356, 1483–1491 (2001).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
McElreath, R. Statistical Rethinking: A Bayesian Course with Examples in R and Stan (Chapman and Hall, 2020).Book 

Google Scholar  More

Aristegui, J., Gasol, J. M., Duarte, C. M. & Herndl, G. J. Microbial oceanography of the dark ocean’s pelagic realm. Limnol. Oceanogr. 54, 1501–1529 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jannasch, H. W., Eimhjellen, K., Wirsen, C. O. & Farmanfarmaian, A. Microbial degradation of organic matter in the deep sea. Science 171, 672–675 (1971).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tamburini, C., Boutrif, M., Garel, M., Colwell, R. R. & Deming, J. W. Prokaryotic responses to hydrostatic pressure in the ocean – a review. Environ. Microbiol. 15, 1262–1274 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yayanos, A. A. Microbiology to 10,500 meters in the deep-sea. Annu. Rev. Microb. 49, 777–805 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jebbar, M., Franzetti, B., Girard, E. & Oger, P. Microbial diversity and adaptation to high hydrostatic pressure in deep-sea hydrothermal vents prokaryotes. Extremophiles 19, 721–740 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yayanos, A. A. Evolutional and ecological implications of the properties of deep-sea barophilic bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 83, 9542–9546 (1986).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nagata, T. et al. Emerging concepts on microbial processes in the bathypelagic ocean – ecology, biogeochemistry, and genomics. Deep-Sea Res. II 57, 1519–1536 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Picard, A. & Daniel, I. Pressure as an environmental parameter for microbial life – a review. Biophys. Chem. 183, 30–41 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Herndl, G. J. & Reinthaler, T. Microbial control of the dark end of the biological pump. Nat. Geosci. 6, 718–724 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Marietou, A. & Bartlett, D. H. Effects of high hydrostatic pressure on coastal bacterial community abundance and diversity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 5992–6003 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lauro, F. M. & Bartlett, D. H. Prokaryotic lifestyles in deep sea habitats. Extremophiles 12, 15–25 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Peoples, L. M. et al. Distinctive gene and protein characteristics of extremely piezophilic Colwellia. BMC Genom. 21, 692 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Reinthaler, T. et al. Prokaryotic respiration and production in the meso- and bathypelagic realm of the eastern and western North Atlantic basin. Limnol. Oceanogr. 51, 1262–1273 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Steinberg, D. K. et al. Bacterial vs. zooplankton control of sinking particle flux in the ocean’s twilight zone. Limnol. Oceanogr. 53, 1327–1338 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Burd, A. B. et al. Assessing the apparent imbalance between geochemical and biochemical indicators of meso- and bathypelagic biological activity: what the @$#! is wrong with present calculations of carbon budgets? Deep-Sea Res. II 57, 1557–1571 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Boyd, P. W., Claustre, H., Levy, M., Siegel, D. A. & Weber, T. Multi-faceted particle pumps drive carbon sequestration in the ocean. Nature 568, 327–335 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kirchman, D., Knees, E. & Hodson, R. Leucine incorporation and its potential as a measure of protein-synthesis by bacteria in natural aquatic systems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 49, 599–607 (1985).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nielsen, J. L., Christensen, D., Kloppenborg, M. & Nielsen, P. H. Quantification of cell-specific substrate uptake by probe-defined bacteria under in situ conditions by microautoradiography and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Environ. Microbiol. 5, 202–211 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sintes, E. & Herndl, G. J. Quantifying substrate uptake by individual cells of marine bacterioplankton by catalyzed reporter deposition fluorescence in situ hybridization combined with micro autoradiography. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 7022–7028 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Garel, M. et al. Pressure-retaining sampler and high-pressure systems to study deep-sea microbes under in situ conditions. Front. Microbiol 10, 453 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Peoples, L. M. et al. A full-ocean-depth rated modular lander and pressure-retaining sampler capable of collecting hadal-endemic microbes under in situ conditions. Deep-Sea Res. I 143, 50–57 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gross, M. & Jaenicke, R. Proteins under pressure – the influence of high hydrostatic pressure on structure, function and assembly of proteins and protein complexes. Eur. J. Biochem. 221, 617–630 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kirchman, D. L. Growth rates of microbes in the oceans. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 8, 285–309 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ashburner, M. et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 25, 25–29 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Xie, Z., Jian, H., Jin, Z. & Xiao, X. Enhancing the adaptability of the deep-sea bacterium Shewanella piezotolerans WP3 to high pressure and low temperature by experimental evolution under H2O2 stress. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 84, e02342–02317 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tamburini, C. et al. Effects of hydrostatic pressure on microbial alteration of sinking fecal pellets. Deep-Sea Res. II 56, 1533–1546 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ivars-Martinez, E. et al. Comparative genomics of two ecotypes of the marine planktonic copiotroph Alteromonas macleodii suggests alternative lifestyles associated with different kinds of particulate organic matter. ISME J. 2, 1194–1212 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhao, Z., Baltar, F. & Herndl, G. J. Linking extracellular enzymes to phylogeny indicates a predominantly particle-associated lifestyle of deep-sea prokaryotes. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz4354 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bochdansky, A. B., van Aken, H. M. & Herndl, G. J. Role of macroscopic particles in deep-sea oxygen consumption. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 8287–8291 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chikuma, S., Kasahara, R., Kato, C. & Tamegai, H. Bacterial adaptation to high pressure: a respiratory system in the deep-sea bacterium Shewanella violacea DSS12. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 267, 108–112 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Qin, Q. L. et al. Oxidation of trimethylamine to trimethylamine N-oxide facilitates high hydrostatic pressure tolerance in a generalist bacterial lineage. Sci. Adv. 7, eabf9941 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mestre, M. et al. Sinking particles promote vertical connectivity in the ocean microbiome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E6799–E6807 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Thiele, S., Fuchs, B. M., Amann, R. & Iversen, M. H. Colonization in the photic zone and subsequent changes during sinking determine bacterial community composition in marine snow. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81, 1463–1471 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tada, Y. et al. Differing growth responses of major phylogenetic groups of marine bacteria to natural phytoplankton blooms in the western North Pacific Ocean. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 4055–4065 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cottrell, M. T. & Kirchman, D. L. Natural assemblages of marine proteobacteria and members of the Cytophaga-Flavobacter cluster consuming low- and high-molecular-weight dissolved organic matter. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 1692–1697 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Poff, K. E., Leu, A. O., Eppley, J. M., Karl, D. M. & DeLong, E. F. Microbial dynamics of elevated carbon flux in the open ocean’s abyss. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2018269118 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ducklow, H. in Microbial Ecology of the Oceans (ed. Kirchman, D. L.) Ch. 4, 85–120 (Wiley-Liss, 2000).Herndl, G. J. et al. Contribution of archaea to total prokaryotic production in the deep Atlantic Ocean. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 2303–2309 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Baltar, F., Aristegui, J., Gasol, J. M. & Herndl, G. J. Prokaryotic carbon utilization in the dark ocean: growth efficiency, leucine-to-carbon conversion factors, and their relation. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 60, 227–232 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Edgcomb, V. P. et al. Comparison of Niskin vs. in situ approaches for analysis of gene expression in deep Mediterranean Sea water samples. Deep-Sea Res. II 129, 213–222 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cario, A., Oliver, G. C. & Rogers, K. L. Exploring the deep marine biosphere: challenges, innovations, and opportunities. Front. Earth Sci. 7, 225 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Giering, S. L. C. et al. Reconciliation of the carbon budget in the ocean’s twilight zone. Nature 507, 480–483 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Simon, M. & Azam, F. Protein content and protein synthesis rates of planktonic marine bacteria. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 51, 201–213 (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gasol, J. M. et al. Mesopelagic prokaryotic bulk and single-cell heterotrophic activity and community composition in the NW Africa-Canary Islands coastal-transition zone. Prog. Oceanogr. 83, 189–196 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
DeLong, E. F. et al. Community genomics among stratified microbial assemblages in the ocean’s interior. Science 311, 496–503 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Teira, E., Reinthaler, T., Pernthaler, A., Pernthaler, J. & Herndl, G. J. Combining catalyzed reporter deposition-fluorescence in situ hybridization and microautoradiography to detect substrate utilization by bacteria and archaea in the deep ocean. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 4411–4414 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Woebken, D., Fuchs, B. M., Kuypers, M. M. M. & Amann, R. Potential interactions of particle-associated anammox bacteria with bacterial and archaeal partners in the Namibian upwelling system. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 4648–4657 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wand, M. P. Data-based choice of histogram bin width. Am. Stat. 51, 59–64 (1997).
Google Scholar 
Acinas, S. G. et al. Deep ocean metagenomes provide insight into the metabolic architecture of bathypelagic microbial communities. Commun. Biol. 4, 604 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sunagawa, S. et al. Structure and function of the global ocean microbiome. Science 348, 1261359 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Delmont, T. O. et al. Nitrogen-fixing populations of Planctomycetes and Proteobacteria are abundant in surface ocean metagenomes. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 804–813 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, D., Liu, C. M., Luo, R., Sadakane, K. & Lam, T. W. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 31, 1674–1676 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wu, Y. W., Tang, Y. H., Tringe, S. G., Simmons, B. A. & Singer, S. W. MaxBin: an automated binning method to recover individual genomes from metagenomes using an expectation-maximization algorithm. Microbiome 2, 26 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kang, D. D. et al. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. Peerj 7, e7359 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Olm, M. R., Brown, C. T., Brooks, B. & Banfield, J. F. dRep: a tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication. ISME J. 11, 2864–2868 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chaumeil, P. A., Mussig, A. J., Hugenholtz, P. & Parks, D. H. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics 36, 1925–1927 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Hyatt, D. et al. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinf. 11, 119 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, W. & Godzik, A. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 22, 1658–1659 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Eng, J. K., McCormack, A. L. & Yates, J. R. An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J. Am. Soc. Mass. Spectrom. 5, 976–989 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
Elias, J. E. & Gygi, S. P. Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 4, 207–214 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Riffle, M. et al. MetaGOmics: a web-based tool for peptide-centric functional and taxonomic analysis of metaproteomics data. Proteomes 6, 2 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Reinthaler, T., van Aken, H. M. & Herndl, G. J. Major contribution of autotrophy to microbial carbon cycling in the deep North Atlantic’s interior. Deep-Sea Res. II 57, 1572–1580 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yokokawa, T., Yang, Y. H., Motegi, C. & Nagata, T. Large-scale geographical variation in prokaryotic abundance and production in meso- and bathypelagic zones of the central Pacific and Southern Ocean. Limnol. Oceanogr. 58, 61–73 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Frank, A. H., Garcia, J. A., Herndl, G. J. & Reinthaler, T. Connectivity between surface and deep waters determines prokaryotic diversity in the North Atlantic Deep Water. Environ. Microbiol. 18, 2052–2063 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Herndl, G. J., Bayer, B., Baltar, F. & Reinthaler, T. Prokaryotic life in the deep ocean’s water column. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. (in the press).Uchimiya, M., Ogawa, H. & Nagata, T. Effects of temperature elevation and glucose addition on prokaryotic production and respiration in the mesopelagic layer of the western North Pacific. J. Oceanogr. 72, 419–426 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Antia, A. N. et al. Basin-wide particulate carbon flux in the Atlantic Ocean: regional export patterns and potential for atmospheric CO2 sequestration. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 15, 845–862 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Behrenfeld, M. J. & Falkowski, P. G. Photosynthetic rates derived from satellite-based chlorophyll concentration. Limnol. Oceanogr. 42, 1–20 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Austin, K. G. et al. Land Use Policy 69, 41–48 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Busch, J. et al. Environ. Res. Lett. 17, 014035 (2022).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Fleiss, S. et al. Nat. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01941-6 (2022).Qaim, M. et al. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 12, 321–344 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Haupt, F. et al. Progress on Corporate Commitments and their Implementation (Tropical Forest Alliance, 2018).Brooks, T. et al. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0099 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Buisson, E. et al. Biol. Rev. 94, 590–609 (2019).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
López-Ricaurte, L. et al. Biol. Conserv. 213, 225–233 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Furumo, P. R. & Aide, T. M. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 024008 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
RTRS Standard for Responsible Soy Production Version 3.1 (RTRS, 2017). More

United Nations. [World population prospects 2019]. United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. World Population Prospects 2019. (2019).Consortium, I. & Commission, E. The circular Bio-society in 2050. (2018).Ramaswami, A., Russell, A. G., Culligan, P. J., Rahul Sharma, K. & Kumar, E. Meta-principles for developing smart, sustainable, and healthy cities. Science (1979) 352, 940–943 (2016).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Cooper, C. M., Troutman, J. P., Awal, R., Habibi, H. & Fares, A. Climate change-induced variations in blue and green water usage in U.S. urban agriculture. J. Clean. Prod. 348, 567–579 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Crippa, M. et al. Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions. Nat. Food 2, 198–209 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Paul, S., Dutta, A., Defersha, F. & Dubey, B. Municipal food waste to biomethane and biofertilizer: A circular economy concept. Waste Biomass Valorizat. 9, 601–611 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, X. et al. Managing nitrogen for sustainable development. Nature 528, 51–59 (2015).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bergstrand, K. J. Organic fertilizers in greenhouse production systems—A review. Sci. Hortic. 295, 1–8 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chiaregato, C. G., França, D., Messa, L. L., dos Santos Pereira, T. & Faez, R. A review of advances over 20 years on polysaccharide-based polymers applied as enhanced efficiency fertilizers. Carbohydr. Polym. 279, 1–10 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Timilsena, Y. P. et al. Enhanced efficiency fertilisers: A review of formulation and nutrient release patterns. J. Sci. Food Agric. 95, 1131–1142 (2015).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Chen, J. et al. Environmentally friendly fertilizers: A review of materials used and their effects on the environment. Sci. Total Environ. 613–614, 829–839 (2018).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Aguilera, E., Lassaletta, L., Sanz-Cobena, A., Garnier, J. & Vallejo, A. The potential of organic fertilizers and water management to reduce N2O emissions in Mediterranean climate cropping systems. A review. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 164, 32–52 (2013).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lv, G. et al. Biochar-based fertilizer enhanced Cd immobilization and soil quality in soil-rice system. Ecol. Eng. 171, 1–12 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Clark, M. J. & Zheng, Y. Fertilizer rate influences production scheduling of sedum-vegetated green roof mats. Ecol. Eng. 71, 644–650 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Samoraj, M. et al. Biochar in environmental friendly fertilizers—Prospects of development products and technologies. Chemosphere 296, 1–7 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dimkpa, C. O., Fugice, J., Singh, U. & Lewis, T. D. Development of fertilizers for enhanced nitrogen use efficiency—Trends and perspectives. Sci. Total Environ. 731, 1–9 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fertahi, S., Ilsouk, M., Zeroual, Y., Oukarroum, A. & Barakat, A. Recent trends in organic coating based on biopolymers and biomass for controlled and slow release fertilizers. J. Control. Release 330, 341–361 (2021).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
García-Garizábal, I., Causapé, J. & Abrahao, R. Nitrate contamination and its relationship with flood irrigation management. J. Hydrol. (AMST) 442–443, 15–22 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Adu-Poku, D., Ackerson, N. O. B., Devine, R. N. O. A. & Addo, A. G. Climate mitigation efficiency of nitrification and urease inhibitors: Impact on N2O emission—A review. Sci. Afr. 16, 1–7 (2022).
Google Scholar 
Ding, W., Qin, H., Yu, S. & Yu, S. L. The overall and phased nitrogen leaching from a field bioretention during rainfall runoff events. Ecol. Eng. 179, 1–9 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, X. et al. Loss of nitrogen and phosphorus from farmland runoff and the interception effect of an ecological drainage ditch in the North China Plain—A field study in a modern agricultural park. Ecol. Eng. 169, 1–10 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Michalsky, R. & Pfromm, P. H. Thermodynamics of metal reactants for ammonia synthesis from steam, nitrogen and biomass at atmospheric pressure. AIChE J. 58, 3203–3213 (2012).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Pleissner, D. Decentralized utilization of wasted organic material in urban areas: A case study in Hong Kong. Ecol. Eng. 86, 120–125 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Masullo, A. Organic wastes management in a circular economy approach: Rebuilding the link between urban and rural areas. Ecol. Eng. 101, 84–90 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zeng, Y., de Guardia, A., Ziebal, C., de Macedo, F. J. & Dabert, P. Nitrogen dynamic and microbiological evolution during aerobic treatment of digested sludge. Waste Biomass Valorizat. 5, 441–450 (2014).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Nagarajan, S., Eswaran, P., Masilamani, R. P. & Natarajan, H. Chicken feather compost to promote the plant growth activity by using Keratinolytic Bacteria. Waste Biomass Valorizat. 9, 531–538 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bhat, S. A., Singh, J. & Vig, A. P. Earthworms as organic waste managers and biofertilizer producers. Waste Biomass Valorizat. 9, 1073–1086 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Mekki, A., Arous, F., Aloui, F. & Sayadi, S. Treatment and valorization of agro-wastes as biofertilizers. Waste Biomass Valorizat. 8, 611–619 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Liu, T. et al. Black soldier fly larvae for organic manure recycling and its potential for a circular bioeconomy: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 833, 1–10 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Siddiqui, S. A. et al. Black soldier fly larvae (BSFL) and their affinity for organic waste processing. Waste Manag. 140, 1–13 (2022).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bortolini, S. et al. Hermetia illucens (L.) larvae as chicken manure management tool for circular economy. J. Clean. Prod. 262, 1–10 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Diener, S., Studt Solano, N. M., Roa Gutiérrez, F., Zurbrügg, C. & Tockner, K. Biological treatment of municipal organic waste using black soldier fly larvae. Waste Biomass Valorizat. 2, 357–363 (2011).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Cai, M. et al. Rapidly mitigating antibiotic resistant risks in chicken manure by Hermetia illucens bioconversion with intestinal microflora. Environ. Microbiol. 20, 4051–4062 (2018).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Yang, C. et al. Characteristics and mechanisms of ciprofloxacin degradation by black soldier fly larvae combined with associated intestinal microorganisms. Sci. Total Environ. 811, 1–8 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pang, W. et al. The influence on carbon, nitrogen recycling, and greenhouse gas emissions under different C/N ratios by black soldier fly. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27, 42767–42777 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Beskin, K. v. et al. Larval digestion of different manure types by the black soldier fly (Diptera: Stratiomyidae) impacts associated volatile emissions. Waste Manag. 74, 213–220 (2018).Gligorescu, A. et al. Pilot scale production of Hermetia illucens (L.) larvae and frass using former foodstuffs. Clean Eng. Technol. 10, 1–10 (2022).Rosa, R. et al. Life cycle assessment of chemical vs enzymatic-assisted extraction of proteins from black soldier fly prepupae for the preparation of biomaterials for potential agricultural use. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 8, 14752–14764 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Surendra, K. C. et al. Rethinking organic wastes bioconversion: Evaluating the potential of the black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens (L.)) (Diptera: Stratiomyidae) (BSF). Waste Manag. 117, 58–80 (2020).Hasnol, S. et al. A review on insights for green production of unconventional protein and energy sources derived from the larval biomass of black soldier fly. Processes 8, 1–13 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wong, C. Y. et al. Rhizopus oligosporus-assisted valorization of coconut endosperm waste by black soldier fly larvae for simultaneous protein and lipid to biodiesel production. Processes 9, 1–14 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Raksasat, R. et al. Blended sewage sludge–palm kernel expeller to enhance the palatability of black soldier fly larvae for biodiesel production. Processes 9, 1–13 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dortmans B.M.A., Diener S. & Verstappen B.M. Black Soldier Fly Biowaste Processing A Step-by-Step Guide. (2017).European Parliament. Regulation (EC) No 767/2009 of the European Parliament and of the council. (2009).Italian Government. Norme in materia ambientale. (Dlgs, 2006).European Parliament. Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official Journal of the European Communities (2002).Palma, L., Fernandez-Bayo, J., Niemeier, D., Pitesky, M. & VanderGheynst, J. S. Managing high fiber food waste for the cultivation of black soldier fly larvae. NPJ Sci. Food 3, 1–7 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Righi, C. et al. Suitability of porous inorganic materials from industrial residues and bioproducts for use in horticulture: A multidisciplinary approach. Appl. Sci. 12, 5437 (2022).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Barbi, S. et al. Preliminary study on sustainable NPK slow-release fertilizers based on byproducts and leftovers: A design-of-experiment approach. ACS Omega 5, 27154–27163 (2020).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Macavei, L. I., Benassi, G., Stoian, V. & Maistrello, L. Optimization of Hermetia illucens (L.) egg laying under different nutrition and light conditions. PLoS ONE 15, 1–12 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Leni, G., Maistrello, L., Pinotti, G., Sforza, S. & Caligiani, A. Production of carotenoid-rich Hermetia illucens larvae using specific agri-food by-products. J. Insects Food Feed 1, 1–12 (2022).
Google Scholar 
Caligiani, A. et al. Composition of black soldier fly prepupae and systematic approaches for extraction and fractionation of proteins, lipids and chitin. Food Res. Int. 105, 812–820 (2018).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Montgomery, D. C. Design and Analysis of Experiments Eighth Edition. Design vol. 2 (2012).Barbi, S., Messori, M., Manfredini, T., Pini, M. & Montorsi, M. Rational design and characterization of bioplastics from Hermetia illucens prepupae proteins. Biopolymers 110–118, (2019).Eriksson, L., Johansson, E., Kettaneh-Wold, N., WikstrÄom, C. & Wold, S. Design of Experiments: Principles and Applications. (2008).Morris, P. & John, P. W. M. Statistical Design and Analysis of Experiments. Math. Gaz. 83, 189–200 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kros, J. F. & Mastrangelo, C. M. Comparing multi-response design methods with mixed responses. Qual Reliab Eng Int 20, 527–539 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fernandez Pulido, C. R., Caballero, J., Bruns, M. A. & Brennan, R. A. Recovery of waste nutrients by duckweed for reuse in sustainable agriculture: Second-year results of a field pilot study with sorghum. Ecol Eng 168, 1–8 (2021).Kaya, M. et al. Biological, mechanical, optical and physicochemical properties of natural chitin films obtained from the dorsal pronotum and the wing of cockroach. Carbohydr. Polym. 163, 162–169 (2017).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kaya, M. et al. On chemistry of γ-chitin. Carbohydr. Polym. 176, 177–186 (2017).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Poerio, A. et al. Extraction and physicochemical characterization of chitin from cicada orni sloughs of the south-eastern French mediterranean basin. Molecules 25, 1–12 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sagheer, F. A. A., Al-Sughayer, M. A., Muslim, S. & Elsabee, M. Z. Extraction and characterization of chitin and chitosan from marine sources in Arabian Gulf. Carbohydr. Polym. 77, 410–419 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Waśko, A. et al. The first report of the physicochemical structure of chitin isolated from Hermetia illucens. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 92, 316–320 (2016).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wang, K. et al. Preparation of bacterial cellulose/silk fibroin double-network hydrogel with high mechanical strength and biocompatibility for artificial cartilage. Cellulose 27, 1845–1852 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Morin, A. & Dufresne, A. Nanocomposites of Chitin Whiskers from Riftia Tubes and Poly(caprolactone). Macromolecules 35, 2190–2199 (2002).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
George Socrates. Infrared and Raman Characteristic Group Frequencies: Tables and Charts. (John Wiley & Sons, 2004).Chen, P. & Zhang, L. New evidences of glass transitions and microstructures of soy protein plasticized with glycerol. Macromol. Biosci. 5, 237–245 (2005).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Robertson, N.-L.M., Nychka, J. A., Alemaskin, K. & Wolodko, J. D. Mechanical performance and moisture absorption of various natural fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 130, 969–980 (2013).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Chavez, M. The sustainability of industrial insect mass rearing for food and feed production: Zero waste goals through by-product utilization. Curr. Opin. Insect. Sci. 48, 44–49 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Fisher, H. J. et al. Black soldier fly larvae meal as a protein source in low fish meal diets for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Aquaculture 521, 1–12 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Figueiredo, L. R. F., Nepomuceno, N. C., Melo, J. D. D. & Medeiros, E. S. Glycerol-based polymer adhesives reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 110, (2021). More

Simulation experimental set upLaboratory monitoring of leakage migration process can provide an important basis for field tests. The designed and improved ERT device can better describe the migration range of leakage in soil41. In this experiment, a parallel potential monitoring device was used to improve the monitoring of leakage fluid migration. The simulation experiment in the laboratory is carried out in a (100 cm*100 cm*50 cm) plexiglass tank. Sand and clay shall be screened with a 2.36 mm square sieve, watered and compacted with a board to ensure that the soil layer is in close contact with the measuring electrode.Electrode arrangementThe ground wire of high-density electrical method instrument is connected to the electrodes arranged around the bottom of the tank as the power electrode C2, as shown in Fig. 2a. The host is connected to the electrode system. The electrode system consists of 47 electrode grids with a spacing of 0.08 m. The measuring electrode P1 is connected to the mainframe through a wire 0.05 m below the grid center. The geomembrane is located 0.03 m above the measuring electrode P1. The collection device is used as a monitoring system for various leachate. The arrangement of electrodes is shown in Fig. 2b. The power supply electrode C1 is placed at a certain depth in the middle of the saturated sand to provide a constant current. The location of electrode C1 and leakage point is shown in Fig. 2c. The layers from the bottom of the tank are silty clay, geomembrane, silty clay and saturated sand, as shown in Fig. 2d.Figure 2Set-up of leachate migration simulation experiment: (a) Schematic diagram of electrode C2 layout; (b) Schematic diagram of electrical system laying; (c) Position of electrode C1 and leakage point; (d) Schematic diagram of simulated experimental soil layer.Full size imageComposition of monitoring systemThe electrode system is used to monitor the background electric field and artificial electric field of the landfill site. In the experiment, the electrode system is laid in the clay layer under the geomembrane. It is composed of detection electrodes distributed in a grid at a certain distance.The electrical signal conversion system adjusts the measurement mode, sampling accuracy, acquisition frequency and other parameters of the electrode in the field according to the instructions of the mainframe, and transmits the collected electrical signal to the mainframe.The mainframe can control the operation of the monitoring system. The possible leachate points and their pollution range are determined by collecting data. The system mainly includes mainframe and its software system, power supply, etc., as shown in Fig. 3.Figure 3Se2432 parallel electric method instrument.Full size imageLeachate devicePlace 4 leakage bottles above the tank. No.1 and No.4 bottled water are used to simulate the leakage liquid formed by the direct infiltration of rainwater in slag through geomembrane and as a reference. Because Cl-1 is a typical pollutant in the landfill. No. 2 bottle containing 20 g/L NaCl solution is used to simulate inorganic salt leakage in urban life. No. 3 bottle containing 20 ml/L ethanol solution is used to simulate the leakage liquid containing a large amount of organic matter in municipal solid waste. The characteristics of leachate have been summarized in Table1.Table 1 The characteristics of leachate.Full size tableBefore the experiment, configure four solutions, close the injection, use an electric meter to check the conductivity of each measuring point. After each measuring point has no open circuit, supply power to the soil layer through the mainframe to measure the background electric field of the soil. Then open the injection, adjust the flow rate, release the solution at a fixed flow rate, record the soil electric field in the process of leakage every half an hour, collect the potential values of each measuring point, process the data through the potentiometry and potential difference method, and form the relevant potential horizontal profile and longitudinal section of the soil.Principle of potentiometric detection technologyWhen there are leakage points in the landfill, power is supplied to the landfill, and the current forms a current loop through the geomembrane. If there are n (n = 1,2,3…) leakage points in the geomembrane, the power supply current is I, and the artificial electric field will form a leakage electric field at the leakage point, which can be used as a point power supply.$$I = int dI = int j cdot dS$$
(1)
where I is the current intensity, j is the current density vector, and S is the area passing through the current.When there are n leakage points, I will be shunted. If a leakage point is regarded as a finite surface, the current intensity I as:$$I = {I_1} + {I_2} + cdot cdot cdot + {I_{text{n}}} = sumlimits_{i = 1}^n {int_{S_i} {jdS} }$$
(2)
Generally, the power supply current field of landfill site will be affected by the formation medium structure. It is assumed that the formation medium structure is composed of three layers, each layer has uniform properties and stable conductivity, and the layers from top to bottom are: landfill layer, with resistivity of ρ1. The saturated leakage liquid layer above the geomembrane has a resistivity of ρ2. The clay layer under the geomembrane has a resistivity of ρ3. The electrode C1 is arranged in the garbage layer for power supply, and the electrode C2 is arranged at the lower part of the geomembrane away from the electrode system area. The electrode C2 can be regarded as a far pole.Because of the ρ1  > ρ2, the conductivity of the saturated leakage liquid layer at the upper part of the geomembrane is better than that of the landfill layer, so that there is almost no reflected current between the ρ1 layer and the ρ2 layer, that is, the current generated by the power supply electrode C1 is all transmitted to the ρ2 layer. Because of the ρ3  > ρ2, it can be considered that the interface between ρ2 layer and ρ3 layer has both a reflection current, and a transmission current through the leakage point. The potential generated at the detection electrode P1 under the geomembrane is formed by the action of transmission current. The total potential of point P1 is obtained by the superposition of the potential of point power supply passing through n leakage points at P1.$${U_{P1}} = sumlimits_{i = 1}^n {frac{{{I_i}{rho_3}}}{{2pi {{text{r}}_{iP1}}}}}$$
(3)
Parallel potential difference methodThe test adopts pole–pole arrangement, and the calculation formula of apparent resistivity is as follows:$$rho = 2pi {text{aR}}$$
(4)
where ρ is apparent resistivity; a is the distance between electrodes C1 and P1; R is measuring resistivity.When there are loopholes in the geomembrane of the landfill, the leakage liquid will gradually penetrate into the soil layer under the geomembrane through the loopholes, resulting in the change of the conductivity of the soil layer under the geomembrane. The pole-pole acquisition mode of Se2432 parallel electrical instrument is used to obtain the original data (potential difference) of each measuring point on the grid. After current normalization, the apparent resistivity of the soil layer is obtained. The electrical properties of different depths of the soil layer can be obtained by inversion of the apparent resistivity data of the soil layer, so as to determine the occurrence point and distribution range of leakage.The monitoring grid is 5 × 5. The spacing between measuring points is 0.08 m. The measurement method adopted by Se2432 parallel electric method instrument is cross diagonal measurement method. Figure 4 shows that it only needs to measure the potential values on the measuring points on the horizontal, vertical and 45° diagonal lines.Figure 4Schematic diagram of cross-diagonal measurement method.Full size imageTheoretical calculation of test modelTheoretical results of 10 × 10 grid monitoringAccording to the experimental model and statistical data, the resistivity of the clay layer under the geomembrane is assumed ρ = 10 Ω· m, the resistivity ratio of tap water, NaCl solution and ethanol solution after penetrating into the soil layer ρNo.1:ρNo.2:ρNo.3 = 5:3:10. If the four leakage points set by the model are regarded as four conductive resistors, the ratio of the current passing through the four leakage points is INo. 1:INo. 2:INo. 3:INo. 4 = 6:10:3:6.The calculation model is 10 × 10 grid, and the spacing of measuring points is 0.05 m. The potential value on each measuring point is calculated according to Eq. 3, and the obtained data is processed with surfer software to obtain the potential contour map, as shown in Fig. 5. Among them, points 1, 2, 3 and 4 are the leakage positions of water, NaCl solution, ethanol solution and water respectively, and the spacing between leakage points is 0.15 m.Figure 510 × 10 Grid theory detection potential contour map.Full size imageFigure 5 shows that the leakage fields formed by the four kinds of leaking liquids interfere with each other from the theoretical calculation results. The leachate current at point 2 is larger, the high potential closed loop is obvious, and its center corresponds to the leakage center. The reason for this is that the NaCl solution contains conductive particles that increase the conductivity of the leak point. Point 1 and 4 are the same as water, and the leakage electric field is almost the same. Its closed loop is obvious, and the high potential center also corresponds to their leakage position. There is almost no closed loop effect at point 3 under the influence of 1, 2 and 4. The results show that the leakage field formed by high resistance leakage liquid is not easy to be detected by potentiometric detection, and low resistance leakage is suitable to be detected by potentiometric detection.Theoretical results of 12 × 12 grid monitoringThe resistivity of the clay layer under the geomembrane is assumed ρ = 10Ω·m. In consideration of the mutual influence between the leachate and appropriately reduce its influence effect, the resistivity ratio of water, NaCl solution, and ethanol solution after penetrating into the soil layer is set as ρNo.1:ρNo.2:ρNo.3 = 20:15:24, the ratio of the current passing through the four leakage points is INo.1:INo.2:INo.3:INo.4 = 6:8:5:6. And adjust the distance between the two points to 0.28 m. 12 × 12 grid was used for detection, and the spacing of detection points is 0.04 m. Calculate the potential value of each detection point according to Eq. 3, and use Surfer to obtain the detection contour map of four kinds of leakage, as shown in Fig. 6.Figure 612 × 12 Grid theory detection potential contour map.Full size imageTheoretical calculation results show that when the distance between the leakage points is large and the distance between the detection points is small, the potentiometric method can detect the leakage position of various leachates well. At the same time, the diffusion range of different leachates in the same plane is roughly the same, and they all gradually diffuse outward from the center of the leakage point, and the potential value gradually decrease. Point 2 has the largest potential closed loop range, which also has a certain impact on the leakage points of adjacent points 1 and 3. Point 1 and point 4 are water leakage. Affected by different leakage liquids, the leakage electric field of the two same leakage liquids is obviously different. The potential closed loop range of point 1 is larger than that of point 4. Point 3 is the leakage of ethanol solution. Because its resistance is the largest, the range of potential closed loop is the smallest.Figure 7 shows that the leakage fields around the leachates are funnel-shaped, and its size is related to the type of leachate. Therefore, different network density should be designed for different types of leakage liquid, so as to use the most economical scheme to detect the leakage point.Figure 712 × 12 Grid theory detects potential 3d view.Full size imageInterpretation and discussion of resultsLaboratory simulation experiment researchFigure 8a shows the background electric field potential of soil layer. The four injection pipes are opened at the same time and adjusted to the same flow rate. Under the condition of continuous leakage, monitor the leakage field potential at an interval of 1 h. Figure 8b shows the leakage electric field potential value for 1 h. Reduce the injection pipes flow rate to 1/2 of the initial value. Figure 8c shows the monitoring results of 2 h soil layer leakage field potential. Figure 8d shows the soil leakage field potential monitored after 30 min of sealing the injection pipes.Figure 8Leakage field potential diagram of soil layer: (a) Background electric field of soil layer; (b) Potential distribution of soil layer after 1 h of leakage; (c) Potential distribution of soil layer after 2 h of leakage; (d) Potential distribution of soil layer after closing the injection tube for 30 min.Full size imageFigure 8a shows that the background potential contour of the experimental soil layer is at a lower value. Few current lines pass through the monitoring area. A dense closed potential circle of high potential value is formed at point 2. The current flow at point 2 is greater than the other points 1, 3 and 4. The analysis result may be that in the process of watering and compaction, the clay layer under the geomembrane is not uniform, and the compaction degree of the soil layer is different, resulting in different potential values ​​obtained by monitoring. The permeability at point 2 is better than other points, so when the flow rate of the leakage liquid is large, the leakage liquid under the geomembrane gathers near point 2 and spreads out around. After the clay is watered and compacted, the soil compaction is small and the pore water content is large, resulting in a high potential abnormal area in the lower left corner of point 3.Point 2 forms a closed loop of anomaly potential contour much higher than the background electric field, while the value of potential contour coil at leakage point 3 is lower than the surrounding value. It can be analyzed that positions 2 and 3 are leakage points. The leachate at point 2 is a high concentration NaCl solution containing more conductive particles, which will reduce the resistivity of the soil layer under the geomembrane at point 2. Thus, the passing current is increased to form a high potential closed loop. The leachate at point 3 is ethanol solution, which will increase the resistivity of the soil layer under the geomembrane at point 3. So as to reduce the passing current and form a low potential closed loop. Figure 8b shows that the potential contour is consistent with the influence of NaCl solution and ethanol solution on the soil layer under the geomembrane. It can be concluded that point 2 and point 3 are leakage points. The electric field formed after water leakage at point 1 and point 4 cannot clearly distinguish the leakage points.During the monitoring process, the leachate was continuously released from the injection pipe, and the results reflected the dynamic characteristics. Figure 8b shows the phenomenon that the leachate from point 1 and point 4 aggregates around point 2, which is consistent with the inference of better permeability at point 2. Figure 8b,c show that when the flow rate of the leachate is changed and the flow rate of the injection pipe is reduced, the high-potential region of the entire electric field is reduced. Under the influence of gravity, the leachate will migrate longitudinally, and the closed-loop abnormally high-potential regions and abnormally low-potential regions at points 2 and 3 also decrease.Compared with the surrounding potential contours, the difference is more obvious. Figure 8d shows that when the injection pipe stops leaking for a period of time, the leachate migrates longitudinally along the leakage point. At this time, the electric field of the soil layer is similar to the original background electric field, but the potential value is higher than the background electric field, indicating that the leachate is stagnant in the pores of the soil layer, it is the result of changing the electrical properties of the soil layer. The parallel potential method can collect the potential value of each point in the field at one time, which provides a basis for real-time monitoring of landfill leachate.Figure 9 shows the inversion results of the horizontal section of the experimental model. The blue area corresponds to the distribution range of the low resistance anomaly. There are no jump or distortion points in the profile. The resistivity in the longitudinal direction basically shows a change from low to high. The upper layer seepage liquid migrates, and the bottom soil layer is characterized by low humidity and high resistivity. The low-resistance areas formed by the leakage of NaCl solution are widely distributed in the horizontal section. The distribution range is 0–0.28 m, and the migration scale of the leakage liquid can be clearly seen. The morphological characteristics of water leakage in different parts are basically the same. The distribution range is 0–0.18 m. The leakage of ethanol solution is only reflected at 0–0.06 m, and the distribution range is the smallest at the same depth. The ethanol solution also had the slowest migration rate.Figure 9Inversion map of plane section at different depths.Full size imageFigure 10 shows the inversion results of the X–Z longitudinal section of the test model. The two apparent resistivity profiles at Y = 0.24 m and Y = 0.32 m show that there is no low-resistance area in the shallow layer on the soil layer, indicating that the geomembrane in this area is not damaged. The low resistance zone in the middle is caused by the lateral migration of leakage fluid. The low-resistance anomaly area at the top of the profile can be judged as a leak point or formed by the migration of nearby leachate. Combined with the horizontal section, the leakage depth is similar, and the lateral migration speed of leachate is faster than the longitudinal migration speed. Four leak points can be distinguished, delineating the general location of the leak.Figure 10X–Z longitudinal section on different Y axes.Full size imagePhysical model experimentThe potential value of each electrode was monitored after 2 h of leakage, and the resistivity profiles at different positions were obtained by the potential difference method.It can be seen from Fig. 11 that the potential difference method can monitor the leakage of leachate in different directions. The morphological features of the plume formed by the downward migration of the leak point are approximately funnel-shaped in longitudinal section. The affected area of ​​the soil layer can be obtained in time. Figure 11b shows that the potential difference at the monitoring point is very different on both sides. After 2 h of leakage, a large amount of leakage liquid exists in the soil layer. When the water content in the soil layer increases, the diffusion rate of the ethanol solution increases, showing high resistance characteristics. At the same time, due to the action of gravity, there is a lot of vertical migration, and the potential value changes greatly. The profile clearly shows that the distribution area of ​​high potential difference is large, and the distribution of low potential is small. Figure 11c shows that since the migration rate of leachate in the horizontal direction is greater than that in the vertical direction, the potential difference of the monitoring point in the middle region is smaller, and a closed region of a high-potential circle is formed in the middle. The difference between the two results in a smaller potential difference area. Figure 11d shows that almost all the low-potential areas on the monitoring point are on the left side, because the leakage rate of NaCl solution in the horizontal direction is similar to that in the vertical direction under the condition of good soil compaction. At this time, a large number of conductive particles are contained, resulting in a large high-potential region. The difference between the two forms a large area of ​​low potential difference on the left. This is in good agreement with the lower resistance characteristics of the NaCl solution. Figure 11e shows that the two low-resistance regions correspond to the two leakage centers. The low potential difference region is formed by migration around the leak point. The migration speed in the horizontal direction is similar to that in the vertical direction, and the water migration speed on the left is slower than that of the sodium chloride solution on the right. Figure 11e,f show that the monitoring results are the same, but the resulting potential difference is also increased. This is affected by the distance between the monitoring point and the leak point. When the monitored point and the leakage point are located on the same section, the soil layer is the most severely affected area by leakage. Through the change of the potential difference, the leakage range and the location of the leakage point can be better judged.Figure 11Electrical resistivity tomograms of profile: (a) Resistivity of the slitting profile Y = 0; (b) Resistivity of the slitting profile Y = 0.08; (c) Resistivity of the slitting profile Y = 0.16; (d) Resistivity of the slitting profile Y = 0.24; (e) Resistivity of the slitting profile Y = 0.32; (f) Resistivity of the slitting profile Y = 0.4.Full size image More