Ecology

Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UKYucheng Wang, Bianca De Sanctis, Ruairidh Macleod, Daniel Money & Eske WillerslevLundbeck Foundation GeoGenetics Centre, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkYucheng Wang, Ana Prohaska, Jialu Cao, Antonio Fernandez-Guerra, James Haile, Kurt H. Kjær, Thorfinn Sand Korneliussen, Nicolaj Krog Larsen, Ruairidh Macleod, Hugh McColl, Mikkel Winther Pedersen, Fernando Racimo, Alexandra Rouillard, Anthony H. Ruter, Lasse Vinner, David J. Meltzer & Eske WillerslevALPHA, State Key Laboratory of Tibetan Plateau Earth System, Environment and Resources (TPESER), Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research (ITPCAS), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing, ChinaYucheng WangKey Laboratory of Western China’s Environmental Systems (Ministry of Education), College of Earth and Environmental Science, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, ChinaHaoran DongGénomique Métabolique, Genoscope, Institut François Jacob, CEA, CNRS, Univ Evry, Université Paris-Saclay, Evry, FranceAdriana Alberti, France Denoeud & Patrick WinckerInstitute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette, FranceAdriana AlbertiThe Arctic University Museum of Norway, UiT—The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, NorwayInger Greve Alsos, Eric Coissac, Galina Gusarova, Youri Lammers & Marie Kristine Føreid MerkelDepartment of Geography and Environment, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USADavid W. BeilmanDepartment of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkAnders A. BjørkInstitute of Earth Sciences, St Petersburg State University, St Petersburg, RussiaAnna A. Cherezova & Grigory B. FedorovArctic and Antarctic Research Institute, St Petersburg, RussiaAnna A. Cherezova & Grigory B. FedorovUniversité Grenoble-Alpes, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, CNRS, LECA, Grenoble, FranceEric CoissacDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UKBianca De Sanctis & Richard DurbinCarlsberg Research Laboratory, Copenhagen V, DenmarkChristoph Dockter & Birgitte SkadhaugeSchool of Geography and Environmental Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UKMary E. EdwardsAlaska Quaternary Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, USAMary E. EdwardsSchool of Environment, Earth and Ecosystem Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UKNeil R. Edwards & Philip B. HoldenCenter for the Environmental Management of Military Lands, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USAJulie EsdaleDepartment of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaDuane G. FroeseFaculty of Biology, St Petersburg State University, St Petersburg, RussiaGalina GusarovaDepartment of Glaciology and Climate, Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, Copenhagen K, DenmarkKristian K. KjeldsenDepartment of Earth Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, NorwayJan Mangerud & John Inge SvendsenBjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Bergen, NorwayJan Mangerud & John Inge SvendsenDepartment of Geology, Quaternary Sciences, Lund University, Lund, SwedenPer MöllerCenter for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen Ø, DenmarkDavid Nogués-Bravo, Hannah Lois Owens & Carsten RahbekCentre d’Anthropobiologie et de Génomique de Toulouse, Faculté de Médecine Purpane, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, FranceLudovic OrlandoCenter for Global Mountain Biodiversity, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkHannah Lois Owens & Carsten RahbekGates of the Arctic National Park and Preserve, US National Park Service, Fairbanks, AK, USAJeffrey T. RasicDepartment of Geosciences, UiT—The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, NorwayAlexandra RouillardZoological Institute, Russian academy of sciences, St Petersburg, RussiaAlexei TikhonovResource and Environmental Research Center, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Beijing, ChinaYingchun XingCollege of Plant Science, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, ChinaYubin ZhangDepartment of Anthropology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, USADavid J. MeltzerWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, UKEske WillerslevMARUM, University of Bremen, Bremen, GermanyEske WillerslevAll authors contributed to the conception of the presented ideas. Y.W. and H.D. analysed the data. Y.W., D.J.M., A.P. and E.W. wrote the paper with inputs from all authors. More

Rearing O. biroi pupae in social isolation and collecting pupal fluidIn O. biroi colonies, larvae and pupae develop in discrete and synchronized cohorts26. Ten days after the first larvae had entered pupation in a large stock colony, the entire colony was anaesthetized using a CO2 pad, and white pupae were separated using a paintbrush. Pupae were individually placed in 0.2 ml PCR tubes with open lid. These tubes were then placed inside 1.5 ml Eppendorf tubes with 5 µl sterile water at the bottom to provide 100% relative humidity. The outer tubes were closed and kept in a climate room at 25 °C. The inner tube in this design prevents the pupa from drowning in the water reservoir. The outer tubes were kept closed throughout the experiment, except for once a day when the tubes were opened to remove pupal social fluid. Pulled glass capillaries were prepared as described elsewhere29, and used to remove and/or collect secretion droplets. We were careful to leave no remains of the secretion behind on the pupae or the inside of the tubes. To ensure that all secretion had been removed, pupae were taken out of the tube after fluid collection and briefly placed on a tissue paper to absorb any excess liquid. The inner tubes were replaced if needed—for example, if fluid traces were visible on the old tube after collection. Each pupa was checked daily for secretion (absent or present), onset of melanization and eclosion, and whether the pupa was alive (responding to touch). Control groups of 30 pupae and 30 adult ants from the same stock colony and cohort as the isolated pupae were placed in Petri dishes with a plaster of Paris floor, and the same parameters as for the isolated pupae were scored daily. Experiments ended when all pupae had either eclosed or died. Newly eclosed (callow) workers moved freely inside the tube and showed no abnormalities when put in a colony. A pupa was declared dead if it did not shed its pupal skin and did not respond to touch three days after all pupae in the control group had eclosed.To calculate the average secretion volume per secreting pupa (Fig. 1d), the total volume collected daily from a group of isolated pupae (142–166 pupae) was divided by the number of pupae from which fluid had been collected that day. The total volume was determined by multiplying the height of the fluid’s meniscus in the capillary by πr², where r is the inner radius of the capillary (0.29 mm). While pupae were secreting, pupal whole-body wash samples were collected daily. The pupae were removed from colonies with adults and washed promptly with 1500 µl LC–MS grade water. Whole-body wash samples were lyophilized and reconstituted in 15 µl LC–MS grade water.Collecting additional ant species and honeybees, rearing pupae in social isolation, and collecting pupal fluidsColonies of the ants N. flavipes, T. sessile, P. pennsylvanica and Lasius neoniger were collected in NY state, USA (Central Park, Manhattan; Pelham Bay Park, Bronx; Prospect Park, Brooklyn; and Woodstock). Solenopsis invicta colonies were collected in Athens, GA, USA. M. mexicanus colonies were collected in Piñon Hills, CA, USA. Colonies comprised of queens, workers and brood were maintained in the laboratory in airtight acrylic boxes with plaster of Paris floors. Colonies were fed a diet of insects (flies, crickets and mealworms). White pupae were socially isolated, cocoons were removed in the case of P. pennsylvanica, and secretion droplets were collected from melanized pupae as described for O. biroi. A. mellifera pupae of unknown age were socially isolated from hive fragments (A&Z Apiaries, USA) and reared as described for O biroi, except that the rearing temperature was set to 32 °C. Relative humidity was set to either 100% to replicate conditions used for the different ant species, or to 75% as recommended in the literature30.Injecting dye and tracking pupal fluidInjection needles were prepared as in previous studies31. Injections were performed using an Eppendorf Femtojet with a Narishige micromanipulator. The Femtojet was set to Pi 1000 hPa and Pc 60 hPa. Needles were broken by gently touching the capillary tip to the side of a glass slide. To inject, melanized pupae were placed on ‘Sticky note’ tape (Post-it), with the abdomen tip forward and the ventral side upward. Pupae were injected with blue food colouring (McCormick) into the exuvium for 1–2 s by gently piercing the pupal case at the abdominal tip with the needle. During successful injections, no fluid was discharged from the pupa when the needle was removed, and the moulting fluid inside the exuvium was immediately stained. Pupae were washed in water three times to remove any excess dye. Following injections, 10 pupae were reared in social isolation to confirm the secretion of dyed droplets. For experiments, injected pupae were transferred to colonies with adult ants (Figs. 1f and  4c) or to colonies with adult ants and larvae (Figs. 3b and  4c) to track the distribution of the pupal social fluid.After spending 24 h with dye-injected pupae, adults were taken out of the colony, briefly immersed in 95% ethanol, and transferred to PBS. Digestive systems were dissected in cold PBS and mounted in DAKO mounting medium. Crop and stomach images (Fig. 1f, inset and Fig. 4c, inset) were acquired with a Revolve microscope (Echo). Larvae are translucent, and the presence of dye in the digestive system can be assayed without dissection. Whole-body images of larvae were acquired with a Leica Z16 APO microscope equipped with a Leica DFC450 camera and Leica Application Suite version 4.12.0 (Leica Microsystems). In the experiment on larval growth (Fig. 3c), larval length was measured from images using ImageJ32.Occluding pupaeTen pupae were placed on double-sided tape on a glass coverslip with the ventral side up. The area between the pupae was covered with laser-cut filter paper to prevent adults from sticking to the tape. The pupae were then placed in a 5 cm diameter Petri dish with a moist plaster of Paris floor. To block pupal secretion, the tip of the gaster was occluded with a drop of oil-paint (Uni Paint Markers PX-20), which has no discernible toxic effect7. Secreting pupae received a drop of the same paint on their head to control for putative differences resulting from the paint. Pupae were left in isolation for one day before adults were added to the assay chamber.Behavioural tracking of adult preference assayVideos were recorded using BFS-U3-50S5C-C: 5.0 MP, 35 FPS, Sony IMX264, Colour cameras (FLIR) and the Motif Video Recording System (Loopbio). To assess adult preference (Fig. 1g), physical contact of adults with pupae was manually annotated for the first 10 min after the first adult had encountered (physically contacted) a pupa.Protein profilingWe extracted 30 µl of pupal social fluid and whole-body wash samples with 75:25:0.2 acetonitrile: methanol: formic acid. Extracts were vortexed for 10 min, centrifuged at 16,000g and 4 °C for 10 min, dried in a SpeedVac, and stored at −80 °C until they were analysed by LC–MS/MS.Protein pellets were dissolved in 8 M urea, 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate, and 10 mM dithiothreitol, and disulfide bonds were reduced for 1 h at room temperature. Alkylation was performed by adding iodoacetamide to a final concentration of 20 mM and incubating for 1 h at room temperature in the dark. Samples were diluted using 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate until the concentration of urea had reached 3.5 M, and proteins were digested with endopeptidase LysC overnight at room temperature. Samples were further diluted to bring the urea concentration to 1.5 M before sequencing-grade modified trypsin was added. Digestion proceeded for 6 h at room temperature before being halted by acidification with TFA and samples were purified using in-house constructed C18 micropurification tips.LC–MS/MS analysis was performed using a Dionex3000 nanoflow HPLC and a Q-Exactive HF mass spectrometer (both Thermo Scientific). Solvent A was 0.1% formic acid in water and solvent B was 80% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid in water. Peptides were separated on a 90-minute linear gradient at 300 nl min−1 across a 75 µm × 100 mm fused-silica column packed with 3 µm Reprosil C18 material (Dr. Maisch). The mass spectrometer operated in positive ion Top20 DDA mode at resolution 60 k/30 k (MS1/MS2) and AGC targets were 3 × 106/2 × 105 (MS1/MS2).Raw files were searched through Proteome Discoverer v.1.4 (Thermo Scientific) and spectra were queried against the O. biroi proteome using MASCOT with a 1% FDR applied. Oxidation of M and acetylation of protein N termini were applied as a variable modification and carbamidomethylation of C was applied as a static modification. The average area of the three most abundant peptides for a matched protein33 was used to gauge protein amounts within and between samples.Functional annotation and gene ontology enrichmentTo supplement the current functional annotation of the O. biroi genome34, the full proteome for canonical transcripts was retrieved from UniProtKB (UniProt release 2020_04) in FASTA format. We then applied the EggNog-Mapper tool35,36 (http://eggnog-mapper.embl.de, emapper version 1.0.3-35-g63c274b, EggNogDB version 2) using standard parameters (m diamond -d none –tax_scope auto –go_evidence non-electronic –target_orthologs all –seed_ortholog_evalue 0.001 –seed_ortholog_score 60 –query-cover 20 –subject-cover 0) to produce an expanded annotation for all GO trees (Molecular Function, Biological Process, Cellular Components). The list of proteins identified in the pupal fluid was evaluated for functional enrichment in these GO terms, P-values were adjusted with an FDR cut-off of 0.05, and the network plots were visualized using the clusterProfiler package37.Metabolite profilingFor bulk polar metabolite profiling, we used 10 µl aliquots of pupal social fluid and whole-body wash (pooled samples). For the time-series metabolite profiling, 1 µl of pupal social fluid and whole-body wash was used. Samples were extracted in 180 µl cold LC–MS grade methanol containing 1 μM of uniformly labelled 15N- and 13C-amino acid internal standards (MSK-A2-1.2, Cambridge Isotope Laboratories) and consecutive addition of 390 µl LC–MS grade chloroform followed by 120 µl of LC–MS grade water.The samples were vortexed vigorously for 10 min followed by centrifugation (10 min at 16,000g and 4 °C). The upper polar metabolite-containing layer was collected, flash frozen and SpeedVac-dried. Dried extracts were stored at −80 °C until LC–MS analysis.LC–MS was conducted on a Q-Exactive benchtop Orbitrap mass spectrometer equipped with an Ion Max source and a HESI II probe, which was coupled to a Vanquish UPLC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). External mass calibration was performed using the standard calibration mixture every three days.Dried polar samples were resuspended in 60 µl 50% acetonitrile, and 5 µl were injected into a ZIC-pHILIC 150 × 2.1 mm (5 µm particle size) column (EMD Millipore). Chromatographic separation was achieved using the following conditions: buffer A was 20 mM ammonium carbonate, 0.1% (v/v) ammonium hydroxide (adjusted to pH 9.3); buffer B was acetonitrile. The column oven and autosampler tray were held at 40 °C and 4 °C, respectively. The chromatographic gradient was run at a flow rate of 0.150 ml min−1 as follows: 0–22 min: linear gradient from 90% to 40% B; 22–24 min: held at 40% B; 24–24.1 min: returned to 90% B; 24.1 −30 min: held at 90% B. The mass spectrometer was operated in full-scan, polarity switching mode with the spray voltage set to 3.0 kV, the heated capillary held at 275 °C, and the HESI probe held at 250 °C. The sheath gas flow was set to 40 units, the auxiliary gas flow was set to 15 units. The MS data acquisition was performed in a range of 55–825 m/z, with the resolution set at 70,000, the AGC target at 10 × 106, and the maximum injection time at 80 ms. Relative quantification of metabolite abundances was performed using Skyline Daily v 20.1 (MacCoss Lab) with a 2 ppm mass tolerance and a pooled library of metabolite standards to confirm metabolite identity (via data-dependent acquisition). Metabolite levels were normalized by the mean signal of 8 heavy 13C,15N-labelled amino acid internal standards (technical normalization).The raw data were searched for a targeted list of ~230 polar metabolites and the corresponding peaks were integrated manually using Skyline Daily software. We were able to assign peaks to 107 compounds based on high mass accuracy ( More

arising from Y. Wang et al. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04016-x (2021)A unique challenge for environmental DNA (eDNA)-based palaeoecological reconstructions and extinction estimates is that organisms can contribute DNA to sediments long after their death. Recently, Wang et al.1 discovered mammoth eDNA in sediments that are between approximately 4.6 and 7 thousand years (kyr) younger than the most recent mammoth fossils in North America and Eurasia, which they interpreted as mammoths surviving on both continents into the Middle Holocene epoch. Here we present an alternative explanation for these offsets: the slow decomposition of mammoth tissues on cold Arctic landscapes is responsible for the release of DNA into sediments for thousands of years after mammoths went extinct. eDNA records are important palaeobiological archives, but the mixing of undatable DNA from long-dead organisms into younger sediments complicates the interpretation of eDNA, particularly from cold and high-latitude systems.All animal tissues, including faeces, contribute DNA to eDNA records2, but the durations across which tissues can contribute genetic information must vary depending on tissue type and local rates of destruction and decomposition. On high-latitude landscapes, soft tissues and skeletal remains of large mammals may persist, unburied, for millennia3,4,5. For example, unburied antlers of caribou (Rangifer tarandus) from Svalbard (Norway) and Ellesmere Island (Canada) have been dated3,4 to between 1 and 2 cal kyr bp (calibrated kyr before present). Elephant seal (Mirounga leonina) remains near the Antarctic coastline5,6 can persist for more than 5,000 years. This is in contrast to bones in warmer settings, which persist for only centuries or decades7,8. Because bones are particularly resistant to decay, quantifying how their persistence changes across environments enables us to constrain the durations that dead individuals generally contribute to eDNA archives. To do this, we consolidated data on the oldest radiocarbon-dated surface-collected bones from different ecosystems. We included bones that we are reasonably confident persisted without being completely buried (‘never buried’), and bones for which exhumation cannot be confidently excluded (‘potentially never buried’). Pairing bone persistence with mean annual temperatures (MAT) from their sample localities, we find a strong link between the local temperature and the logged duration of bone persistence (Fig. 1, never buried bones: R2 = 0.94, P  More

Kirilova, E. P., Cremer, H., Heiri, O. & Lotter, A. F. Eutrophication of moderately deep Dutch lakes during the past century: Flaws in the expectations of water management? Hydrobiologia 637, 157–171 (2010).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Scharf, B. & Viehberg, F. A. Living Ostracoda (Crustacea) from the town moat of Bremen, Germany. Crustaceana 87(8–9), 1124–1135 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rees, S. E. The historical and cultural importance of ponds and small lakes in Wales, UK. Aquat. Conserv. 7(2), 133–139 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brown, A. et al. The ecological impact of conquest and colonisation on a medieval frontier landscape: Combined palynological and geochemical analysis of lake sediments from Radzyń Chełmiński, northern Poland. Geoarchaeology 30, 511–527 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kittel, P. et al. The palaeoecological development of the Late Medieval moat—Multiproxy research at Rozprza Central Poland. Quat. Int. 482, 131–156 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hildebrandt-Radke, I. Geoarchaeological aspects in the studies of prehistoric and early historic settlement complexes. In Studia interdyscyplinarne nad środowiskiem i kulturą w Polsce. Tom 1. Środowisko-Człowiek-Cywilizacja (eds Makohonienko, M. et al.) 57–70 (Bogucki Wyd Naukowe, 2007).
Google Scholar 
Łyskowski, M. & Wardas-Lasoń, M. Georadar investigations and geochemical analysis in contemporary archaeological studies. Geol. Geophys. Environ. 38(3), 307–315 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Korhola, A. & Rautio, M. Cladocera and other branchiopod crustaceans. In Tracking Environmental Change Using Lake Sediments, Vol. 4: Zoological Indicators (eds Smol, J. P. et al.) 5–41 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Birks, H. H. Plant macrofossils. In Tracking Environmental Change Using Lake Sediments, 3: Terrestrial, Algal, and Siliceous Indicators (eds Smol, J. P. et al.) 49–74 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001).
Google Scholar 
Battarbee, R. W. Diatom analysis. In Handbook of Holocene Palaeoecology and Palaeohydrology (ed. Berglund, B. E.) 527–570 (Wiley, 1986).
Google Scholar 
Luoto, T. P., Nevalainen, L., Kultti, S. & Sarmaja-Korjonen, K. An evaluation of the influence of water depth and river inflow on quantitative Cladocera-based temperature and lake level inferences in a shallow boreal lake. Hydrobiologia 676, 143–154 (2011).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Luoto, T. P. Intra-lake patterns of aquatic insect and mite remains. J. Paleolimnol. 47, 141–157 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hann, B. J. Methods in Quaternary ecology. Cladocera. Geosci. Canada 16, 17–26 (1989).
Google Scholar 
Dimbleby, G. W. The Palynology of Archaeological Sites (Academic Press. Inc., 1985).
Google Scholar 
Edwards, K. J. Using space in cultural palynology: The value of the off-site pollen record. In Modelling Ecological Change: Perspectives from Neoecology, Palaeoecology and Environmental Archaeology (eds Harris, D. R. & Thomas, K. D.) 61–74 (Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2016).
Google Scholar 
Kittel, P., Sikora, J. & Wroniecki, P. A Late Medieval motte-and-bailey settlement in a lowland river valley landscape of central Poland. Geoarchaeology 33(5), 558–578 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Antczak-Orlewska, O. et al. The environmental history of the oxbow in the Luciąża River valley—Study on the specific microclimate during Allerød and Younger Dryas in central Poland. Quat. Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2021.08.011 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dearing, J. A. Core correlation and total sediment influx. In Handbook of Holocene Palaeoecology and Palaeohydrology (ed. Berglund, B. E.) 247–270 (Wiley, 1986).
Google Scholar 
O’Brien, C. et al. A sediment-based multiproxy palaeoecological approach to the environmental archaeology of lake dwellings (crannogs), central Ireland. Holocene 15, 707–719 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ruiz, Z., Brown, A. G. & Langdon, P. G. The potential of chironomid (Insecta: Diptera) larvae in archaeological investigations of floodplain and lake settlements. J. Archaeol. Sci. 33, 14–33 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kittel, P. et al. A multi-proxy reconstruction from Lutomiersk-Koziówki, Central Poland, in the context of early modern hemp and flax processing. J. Archaeol. Sci. 50, 318–337 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kittel, P. et al. On the border between land and water: the environmental conditions of the Neolithic occupation from 4.3 until 1.6 ka BC at Serteya, Western Russia. Geoarchaeology 36, 173–202 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Makohonienko, M. et al. Environmental changes during Mesolithic-Neolithic transition in Kuyavia Lakeland, Central Poland. Quat. Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2021.11.020 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Porinchu, D. F. & MacDonald, G. M. The use and application of freshwater midges (Chironomidae: Insecta: Diptera) in geographical research. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 27, 378–422 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brooks, S. J., Langdon, P. G. & Heiri, O. The Identification and Use of Palaearctic Chironomidae Larvae in Palaeoecology. QRA Technical guide no. 10 (Quaternary Research Association, 2007).Heiri, O., Birks, H. J. B., Brooks, S. J., Velle, G. & Willassen, E. Effects of within-lake variability of fossil assemblages on quantitative chironomid-inferred temperature reconstruction. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 199, 95–106 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kittel, P., Sikora, J. & Wroniecki, P. The morphology of the Luciąża River valley floor in the vicinity of the Rozprza medieval ring-fort in light of geophysical survey. Bull. Geogr. Phys. Geogr. Ser. 8, 95–106 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hingham, R. & Barker, P. Timber Castles (University of Exeter Press, 2002).
Google Scholar 
Marciniak-Kajzer, A. Archaeology on Medieval Knights’ Manor Houses in Poland (Wyd. Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Wyd. Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 2016).Book 

Google Scholar 
Moller Pillot, H. K. M. Chironomidae Larvae of the Netherlands and Adjacent Lowlands. Biology and Ecology of the Aquatic Orthocladiinae, Prodiamesinae, Diamesinae, Buchonomyiinae, Podonominae, Telmatogetoninae (KNNV Publishing, 2013).Book 

Google Scholar 
Luoto, T. P. An assessment of lentic ceratopogonids, ephemeropterans, trichopterans and oribatid mites as indicators of past environmental change in Finland. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 46, 259–270 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cierniewski, J. Spatial complexity of the Cybina river valley organic soils against the background of physiographic conditions. Soil Sci. Annu. 32(4), 3–51 (1981).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Rydelek, P. Origin and composition of mineral constituents of fen peats from Eastern Poland. J. Plant Nutr. 36(6), 911–928 (2013).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wachecka-Kotkowska, L. Rozwój rzeźby obszaru między Piotrkowem Trybunalskim, Radomskiem a Przedborzem w czwartorzędzie (Wyd. Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, 2015).Book 

Google Scholar 
Kittel, P. et al. Lacustrine, fluvial and slope deposits in the wetland shore area in Serteya, Western Russia. Acta Geogr. Lodz 110, 103–124 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Ciszewski, D. Pollution of Mała Panew River sediments by heavy metals: Part I. Effect of changes in river bed morphology. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 13(6), 589–595 (2004).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Borówka, R. Late Vistulian and Holocene denudation magnitude in morainic plateaux: Case studies in the zone of maximum extent of the last ice sheet. Quat. Stud. Pol. 9, 5–31 (1990).
Google Scholar 
Prusinkiewicz, Z., Bednarek, R., Kośko, A. & Szmyt, M. Palaeopedological studies of the age and properties of illuvial bands at an archaeological site. Quat. Int. 51(52), 195–201 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kühtreiber, T. The medieval castle Lanzenkirchen in Lower Austria: reconstruction of economical and ecological development of an average-sized manor (12th–15th century). Archaeol. Pol. 37, 135–144 (1999).
Google Scholar 
Kočár, P., Čech, P., Kozáková, R. & Kočárová, R. Environment and economy of the early medieval settlement in Žatec. Interdiscip. Archaeol. 1, 45–60 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Brown, A. D. & Pluskowski, A. G. Detecting the environmental impact of the Baltic Crusades on a late medieval (13th-15th century) frontier landscape: Palynological analysis from Malbork Castle and hinterland, Northern Poland. J. Archaeol. Sci. 38, 1957–1966 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Beneš, J. et al. Archaeobotany of the Old Prague Town defence system, Czech Republic: Archaeology, macro-remains, pollen, and diatoms. Veg. Hist. Archaeobot. 11(1/2), 107–119 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Badura, M. & Latałowa, M. Szczątki makroskopowe roślin z obiektów archeologicznych Zespołu Przedbramia w Gdańsku. In Zespół Przedbramia ul. Długiej w Gdańsku. Studium archeologiczne (ed. Pudło, A.) 231–247 (Muzeum Historii Miasta Gdańska, 2016).
Google Scholar 
Dobrowolski, R. et al. Environmental conditions of settlement in the vicinity of the mediaeval capital of the Cherven Towns (Czermno site, Hrubieszów Basin, Eastern Poland). Quat. Int. 493, 258–273 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Makohonienko, M. Środowisko przyrodnicze i gospodarka w otoczeniu średniowiecznego grodu w Łęczycy w świetle analizy palinologicznej. In Początki Łęczycy. Tom I—Archeologia środowiskowa średniowiecznej Łęczycy. Przyroda–Gospodarka–Społeczeństwo (eds Grygiel, R. & Jurek, T.) 95–190 (MAiE w Łodzi, 2014).
Google Scholar 
Koszałka, J. Źródła archeobotaniczne do rekonstrukcji uwarunkowań przyrodniczych oraz gospodarczych grodu w Łęczycy. In Początki Łęczycy. Tom I – Archeologia środowiskowa średniowiecznej Łęczycy. Przyroda–Gospodarka–Społeczeństwo (eds Grygiel, R. & Jurek, T.) 191–241 (MAiE w Łodzi, 2014).
Google Scholar 
Digerfeldt, G. Studies on past lake-level fluctuations. In Handbook of Holocene Palaeoecology and Palaeohydrology (ed. Berglund, B. E.) 127–143 (Wiley, 1986).
Google Scholar 
Magny, M. Palaeoclimatology and archaeology in the wetlands. In The Oxford Handbook of Wetland Archaeology (eds Menotti, F. & O’Sullivan, A.) 585–597 (Oxford University Press, 2013).
Google Scholar 
Płóciennik, M. et al. Summer temperature drives the lake ecosystem during the Late Weichselian and Holocene in Eastern Europe: A case study from East European Plain. CATENA 214, 106206 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Święta-Musznicka, J., Badura, M., Pędziszewska, A. & Latałowa, M. Environmental changes and plant use during the 5th–14th centuries in medieval Gdańsk, northern Poland. Veget. Hist. Archaeobot. 30, 363–381 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rackham, J. & Sidell, J. London’s landscapes: The changing environment. In The Archaeology of Greater London. An Assessment of Archaeological Evidence for Human Presence in the Area Now Covered by Greater London (ed. Kendall, M.) 12–27 (Museum of London, 2000).
Google Scholar 
Ledger, P., Edwards, K. & Schofield, J. A multiple profile approach to the palynological reconstruction of Norse landscapes in Greenland’s Eastern Settlement. Quat. Res. 82(1), 22–37 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Albert, B. & Innes, J. Multi-profile fine-resolution palynological and micro-charcoal analyses at Esklets, North York Moors, UK, with special reference to the Mesolithic-Neolithic transition. Veget. Hist. Archaeobot. 24, 357–375 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sikora, J., Kittel, P. & Wroniecki, P. From a point on the map to a shape in the landscape. Non-invasive verification of medieval ring-forts in Central Poland: Rozprza case study. Archaeol. Pol. 53, 510–514 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Sikora, J. et al. A palaeoenvironmental reconstruction of the rampart construction of the medieval ring-fort in Rozprza, Central Poland. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci. 11(8), 4187–4219 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tolksdorf, J. F., Turner, F., Nelle, O., Peters, S. & Bruckner, H. Environmental development and local human impact in the Jeetzel valley (N Germany) since 10 ka BP as detected by geoarchaeological analyses in a coupled aeolian and lacustrine sediment archive at Soven. E&G Quat. Sci. J. 64, 95–110 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Oonk S., Slomp C. P. & Huisman D. J. Geochemistry as an aid in archaeological prospection and site interpretation: Current issues and research directions. Archaeol. Prospect. 16, 35–51 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zieliński, T. & Pisarska-Jamroży, M. Which features of deposits should be included in a code and which not? Przegl. Geol. 60, 387–397 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Clift, P. D. et al. Grain-size variability within a mega-scale point-bar system, False River, Louisiana. Sedimentology 66, 408–434 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Blott, S. J. & Pye, K. GRADISTAT: A grain size distribution and statistics package for the analysis of unconsolidated sediments. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 26, 1237–1248 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rolland, N. & Larocque, I. The efficiency of kerosene flotation for extraction of chironomid head capsules from lake sediments samples. J. Paleolimnol. 37, 565–572 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schmid, P. E. A Key to the Chironomidae and Their Instars from Austrian Danube Region Streams and Rivers. Part I. Diamesinae Prodiamesinae and Orthocladiinae (Federal Institute for Water Quality of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, 1993).
Google Scholar 
Andersen, T., Cranston, P. S. & Epler, J. H. Chironomidae of the Holarctic Region: Keys and Diagnoses. Part 1. Larvae. Insect Systematics and Evolution. Supplement 66 (Scandinavian Entomology, 2013).
Google Scholar 
Walker, I. R. Midges: Chironomidae and related Diptera. In Tracking Environmental Change Using Lake Sediments, Volume 4: Zoological Indicators (eds Smol, J. P. et al.) 43–66 (Kluwer Academic Press, 2001).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Vallenduuk, H. J. & Moller Pillot, H. K. M. Chironomidae Larvae of the Netherlands and Adjacent Lowlands. General Ecology and Tanypodinae (KNNV Publishing, 2007).
Google Scholar 
Moller Pillot, H. K. M. Chironomidae Larvae Biology and Ecology of the Chironomini (KNNV Publishing, 2009).Book 

Google Scholar 
Juggins, S. C2 Version 1.5 User Guide. Software for Ecological and Palaeoecological Data Analysis and Visualisation (Newcastle University, 2007).
Google Scholar 
Schweingruber, F. H. Tree Rings. Basics and Applications of Dendrochronology (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988).
Google Scholar 
Skripkin, V. V. & Kovaliukh, N. N. Recent developments in the procedures used at the SSCER Laboratory for the routine preparation of lithium carbide. Radiocarbon 40(1), 211–214 (1998).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Krąpiec, M., Rakowski, A. Z., Huels, M., Wiktorowski, D. & Hamann, C. A new graphitization system for radiocarbon dating with AMS on the dendrochronological laboratory at AGH-UST Kraków. Radiocarbon 60(4), 1091–1100 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zoppi, U., Crye, J., Song, Q. & Arjomand, A. Performance evaluation of the new AMS system at Accium BioSciences. Radiocarbon 49, 173–182 (2007).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Reimer, P. et al. The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere radiocarbon age calibration curve (0–55 cal kBP). Radiocarbon 62(4), 725–757 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bronk Ramsey, C. OxCal Version 4.4.2. Available at: https://c14.arch.ox.ac.uk (2020).Bronk Ramsey, C. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51(1), 337–360 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bronk Ramsey, C. Deposition models for chronological records. Quat. Sci. Rev. 27(1–2), 42–60 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kohonen, T. Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biol. Cybern. 43, 59–69 (1982).Article 
MathSciNet 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Kohonen, T. Self-Organizing Maps (Springer, 2001).Book 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Park, Y.-S. et al. Application of a self-organizing map to select representative species in multivariate analysis: A case study determining diatom distribution patterns across France. Ecol. Inform. 1, 247–257 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, Q. et al. Self-organizing feature map classification and ordination of Larix principis-rupprechtii forest in Pangquangou Nature Reserve. Acta Ecol. Sin. 31, 2990–2998 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Ney, J. J. Practical use of biological statistics. In Inland Fisheries Management in North America (eds Kohler, C. C. et al.) 137–158 (American Fisheries Society, 1993).
Google Scholar 
Płóciennik, M. et al. Fen ecosystem responses to water-level fluctuations during the early and middle Holocene in central Europe: A case study from Wilczków, Poland. Boreas 44(4), 721–740 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brosse, S., Giraudel, J. L. & Lek, S. Utilisation of non-supervised neural networks and principal component analysis to study fish assemblages. Ecol. Model. 146(1), 159–166 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lek, S., Scardi, M., Verdonschot, P. F. M., Descy, J. P. & Park, Y. S. Modelling Community Structure in Freshwater Ecosystems (Springer, 2005).Book 

Google Scholar 
Quinn, G. P. & Keough, M. Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists (University of Cambridge, 2002).Book 

Google Scholar 
Płóciennik, M., Kruk, A., Michczyńska, D. J. & Birks, H. J. B. Kohonen artificial neural networks and the IndVal index as supplementary tools for the quantitative analysis of palaeoecological data. Geochronometria 42, 189–201 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vesanto, J. & Alhoniemi, E. Clustering of the self-organizing map. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 11, 586–600 (2000).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ward, J. H. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 58, 236–244 (1963).Article 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar 
Alhoniemi, E., Hollmén, J., Simula, O. & Vesanto, J. Process monitoring and modeling using the self-organizing map. Integr. Comput. Aided Eng. 6(1), 3–14 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dufrêne, M. & Legendre, P. Species assemblages and indicator species: The need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol. Monogr. 67, 345–366 (1997).
Google Scholar 
McCune, B. & Mefford, M. S. PcOrd Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data. Version 6.06 (MjM Software, 2011).
Google Scholar 
Hadfield, J. D., Krasnov, B. R., Poulin, R. & Nakagawa, S. A tale of two phylogenies: Comparative analyses of ecological interactions. Am. Nat. 183(2), 174–187 (2014).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021).
Google Scholar 
Brooks, M. E. et al. glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R Journal 9(2), 378–400 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hartig, F. DHARMa: Residual Diagnostics for Hierarchical (Multi-level/Mixed) Regression Models. R Package Version 0.4.5. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=DHARMa (2022).Bartoń, K. MuMIn: Multi-model Inference. R Package Version 1.43.17. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn (2020).de Rosario-Martinez, H. phia: Post-Hoc Interaction Analysis. R Package Version 0.2-1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=phia (2015). More

Olszewska-Guizzo, A., Fogel, A., Benjumea, D. & Tahsin, N. Sustainable Policies and Practices in Energy, Environment and Health Research 223–243 (Springer, 2022).Book 

Google Scholar 
Gascon, M. et al. Mental health benefits of long-term exposure to residential green and blue spaces: A systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 12, 4354–4379. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120404354 (2015).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Houlden, V., Weich, S., Porto-de-Albuquerque, J., Jarvis, S. & Rees, K. The relationship between greenspace and the mental wellbeing of adults: A systematic review. PLoS ONE 13, 3000 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hung, S.-H. & Chang, C.-Y. Health benefits of evidence-based biophilic-designed environments: A review. J. People Plants Env. 24, 1–16 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Berman, M. G., Jonides, J. & Kaplan, S. The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature. Psychol. Sci. 19, 1207–1212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225.x (2008).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kaplan, S. Meditation, restoration, and the management of mental fatigue. Environ. Behav. 33, 480–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973106 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ulrich, R. S. et al. Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. J. Environ. Psychol. 11, 201–230 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kellert, S. R. & Wilson, E. O. The Biophilia Hypothesis (Island Press, 1993).
Google Scholar 
Stack, K. & Shultis, J. Implications of attention restoration theory for leisure planners and managers. Leisure/Loisir 37, 1–16 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Steel, Z. et al. The global prevalence of common mental disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis 1980–2013. Int. J. Epidemiol. 43, 476–493. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyu038 (2014).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Mueller, D. P. The current status of urban-rural differences in psychiatric disorder. An emerging trend for depression. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 169, 18–27 (1981).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Peen, J., Schoevers, R. A., Beekman, A. T. & Dekker, J. The current status of urban-rural differences in psychiatric disorders. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 121, 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01438.x (2010).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Taylor, L. & Hochuli, D. F. Defining greenspace: Multiple uses across multiple disciplines. Landsc. Urban Plan. 158, 25–38 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
en K Staats, H. Restorative Environments The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology 445th edn. (Oxford University Press, 2012).
Google Scholar 
Wood, L., Hooper, P., Foster, S. & Bull, F. Public green spaces and positive mental health–investigating the relationship between access, quantity and types of parks and mental wellbeing. Health Place 48, 63–71 (2017).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Tsunetsugu, Y. et al. Physiological and psychological effects of viewing urban forest landscapes assessed by multiple measurements. Landsc. Urban Plan. 113, 90–93 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gidlow, C. J. et al. Where to put your best foot forward: Psycho-physiological responses to walking in natural and urban environments. J. Environ. Psychol. 45, 22–29 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lee, J. Experimental study on the health benefits of garden landscape. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14, 829 (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Fuller, R. A., Irvine, K. N., Devine-Wright, P., Warren, P. H. & Gaston, K. J. Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biol. Lett. 3, 390–394 (2007).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Thompson, C. W., Aspinall, P. & Bell, S. Innovative Approaches to Researching Landscape and Health: Open Space: People Space 2 (Routledge, 2010).Book 

Google Scholar 
Tsutsumi, M., Nogaki, H., Shimizu, Y., Stone, T. E. & Kobayashi, T. Individual reactions to viewing preferred video representations of the natural environment: A comparison of mental and physical reactions. Jpn. J. Nurs. Sci. 14, 3–12 (2017).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Grazuleviciene, R. et al. Tracking restoration of park and urban street settings in coronary artery disease patients. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 13, 550 (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bostancı, S. H. In New Approaches to Spatial Planning and Design (ed Murat Özyavuz) Ch. 32, 435–451 (Peter Lang, 2019).Daniel, T. C. Measuring Landscape Esthetics: The Scenic Beauty Estimation Method, vol. 167 (Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range…, 1976).Bacon, W. R. In (eds Elsner G. H. et al) Technical Coordinators. Proceedings of our national landscape: A conference on applied techniques for analysis and management of the visual resource [Incline Village, Nev., April 23–25, 1979]. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-35. Berkeley, CA. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Exp. Stn., Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture 660–665 (1979).Gavrilidis, A. A., Ciocănea, C. M., Niţă, M. R., Onose, D. A. & Năstase, I. I. Urban landscape quality index—planning tool for evaluating urban landscapes and improving the quality of life. Procedia Environ. Sci. 32, 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2016.03.020 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Knobel, P. et al. Development of the urban green space quality assessment tool (RECITAL). Urban For. Urban Green. 57, 126895 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bacon, W. R. & Dell, J. National Forest Landscape Management (Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture, 1973).Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S. & Ryan, R. With People in Mind: Design and Management of Everyday Nature (Island Press, 1998).
Google Scholar 
Smardon, R., Palmer, J. & Felleman, J. P. Foundations for Visual Project Analysis (Wiley, 1986).
Google Scholar 
Jung, C. G. Man and His Symbols Garden City (Doubleday and Co, 1964).
Google Scholar 
Olszewska, A., Marques, P. F., Ryan, R. L. & Barbosa, F. What makes a landscape contemplative?. Env. Plan. B Urban Anal. City Sci. 45, 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813516660716 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tarkka, I. M. & Hallett, M. Cortical topography of premotor and motor potentials preceding self-paced, voluntary movement of dominant and non-dominant hands. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 75, 36–43 (1990).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Olszewska-Guizzo, A., Paiva, T. O. & Barbosa, F. Effects of 3D contemplative landscape videos on brain activity in a passive exposure EEG experiment. Front. Psychiatry 9, 317. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00317 (2018).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bradley, M. M. & Lang, P. J. Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 25, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9 (1994).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A. & Brown, G. K. Beck depression inventory-II. San Antonio 78, 490–498 (1996).
Google Scholar 
Ferree, T. C., Luu, P., Russell, G. S. & Tucker, D. M. Scalp electrode impedance, infection risk, and EEG data quality. Clin. Neurophysiol. 112, 536–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00533-2 (2001).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Stroganova, T. A. & Orekhova, E. V. EEG and infant states. Infant EEG Event-Relat. Potentials 251, 280 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Cacioppo, J. T., Tassinary, L. G. & Berntson, G. Handbook of Psychophysiology (Cambridge University Press, 2007).
Google Scholar 
Ulrich, R. S. Natural versus urban scenes: Some psychophysiological effects. Environ. Behav. 13, 523–556 (1981).Article 

Google Scholar 
Choi, Y., Kim, M. & Chun, C. Measurement of occupants’ stress based on electroencephalograms (EEG) in twelve combined environments. Build. Environ. 88, 65–72 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gorji, M. A. H., Davanloo, A. A. & Heidarigorji, A. M. The efficacy of relaxation training on stress, anxiety, and pain perception in hemodialysis patients. Indian J. Nephrol. 24, 356 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cahn, B. R. & Polich, J. Meditation states and traits: EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies. Psychol. Bull. 132, 180 (2006).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gruzelier, J. A theory of alpha/theta neurofeedback, creative performance enhancement, long distance functional connectivity and psychological integration. Cogn. Process. 10, 101–109 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vecchiato, G. et al. Neurophysiological correlates of embodiment and motivational factors during the perception of virtual architectural environments. Cogn. Process. 16, 425–429 (2015).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lagopoulos, J. et al. Increased theta and alpha EEG activity during nondirective meditation. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 15, 1187–1192 (2009).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wascher, E. et al. Frontal theta activity reflects distinct aspects of mental fatigue. Biol. Psychol. 96, 57–65 (2014).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kabat-Zinn, J. Mindfulness. Mindfulness 6, 1481–1483 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
McGarrigle, T. & Walsh, C. A. Mindfulness, self-care, and wellness in social work: Effects of contemplative training. J. Relig. Spiritual. Soc. Work Soc. Thought 30, 212–233 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Grossman, P., Niemann, L., Schmidt, S. & Walach, H. Mindfulness-based stress reduction and health benefits: A meta-analysis. J. Psychosom. Res. 57, 35–43 (2004).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bailey, A. W., Allen, G., Herndon, J. & Demastus, C. Cognitive benefits of walking in natural versus built environments. World Leisure J. 60, 293–305 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Qin, J., Zhou, X., Sun, C., Leng, H. & Lian, Z. Influence of green spaces on environmental satisfaction and physiological status of urban residents. Urban For. Urban Green. 12, 490–497 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kolb, B. & Whishaw, I. Q. Fundamentals of Human Neuropsychology (Freeman, 1990).
Google Scholar 
Milner, B. Visual recognition and recall after right temporal-lobe excision in man. Neuropsychologia 6, 191–209 (1968).Article 

Google Scholar 
Corbetta, M. & Shulman, G. L. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3, 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn755 (2002).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Chang, C.-Y. & Chen, P.-K. Human response to window views and indoor plants in the workplace. HortScience 40, 1354–1359 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Herzog, T. R., Black, A. M., Fountaine, K. A. & Knotts, D. J. Reflection and attentional recovery as distinctive benefits of restorative environments. J. Environ. Psychol. 17, 165–170 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
Baehr, E., Rosenfeld, J. P. & Baehr, R. Clinical use of an alpha asymmetry neurofeedback protocol in the treatment of mood disorders: Follow-up study one to five years post therapy. J. Neurother. 4, 11–18 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sia, A. et al. Nature-based activities improve the well-being of older adults. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–8 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Olszewska-Guizzo, A., Sia, A., Fogel, A. & Ho, R. Can exposure to certain urban green spaces trigger frontal alpha asymmetry in the brain?—Preliminary findings from a passive task EEG study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17, 394 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Olszewska-Guizzo, A. et al. Therapeutic garden with contemplative features induces desirable changes in mood and B rain activity in depressed adults. Front. Psychiatry https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.757056 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tan, S. B., Vignesh, L. N. & Donald, L. Public Housing in Singapore: Examining Fundamental Shifts (Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, 2014).Tan, P. Y. Nature, Place & People: Forging Connections Through Neighbourhood Landscape Design (World Scientific Publishing Co., 2018).Book 

Google Scholar 
Peirce, J. et al. PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behav. Res. Methods 51, 195–203. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Edwards, A. L. Balanced Latin-square designs in psychological research. Am. J. Psychol. 64, 598–603 (1951).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Korpela, K. M., Ylén, M., Tyrväinen, L. & Silvennoinen, H. Determinants of restorative experiences in everyday favorite places. Health Place 14, 636–652 (2008).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ojala, A., Korpela, K., Tyrväinen, L., Tiittanen, P. & Lanki, T. Restorative effects of urban green environments and the role of urban-nature orientedness and noise sensitivity: A field experiment. Health Place 55, 59–70 (2019).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Tyrväinen, L. et al. The influence of urban green environments on stress relief measures: A field experiment. J. Environ. Psychol. 38, 1–9 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Herzog, T. R. & Barnes, G. J. Tranquility and preference revisited. J. Environ. Psychol. 19, 171–181 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Neale, C. et al. The impact of walking in different urban environments on brain activity in older people. Cities Health 4, 94–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2019.1619893 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kaplan, R. & Kaplan, S. The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective (CUP Archive, 1989).
Google Scholar 
Treib, M. In Contemporary Landscapes of Contemplation (ed Rebecca Krinke) 27–49 (Routledge, 2005).Appleton, J. The Experience of Landscape (Wiley Chichester, 1996).
Google Scholar 
Grahn, P., Ottosson, J. & Uvnäs-Moberg, K. The oxytocinergic system as a mediator of anti-stress and instorative effects induced by nature: The calm and connection theory. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Hartig, T., Mang, M. & Evans, G. W. Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environ. Behav. 23, 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916591231001 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stamps Iii, A. E. Use of photographs to simulate environments: A meta-analysis. Percept. Mot. Skills 71, 907–913 (1990).Article 

Google Scholar 
Menardo, E., Brondino, M., Hall, R. & Pasini, M. Restorativeness in natural and urban environments: A meta-analysis. Psychol. Rep. 124, 417–437 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar  More

Pitcher, T. J. et al. Seamounts: Ecology, Fisheries & Conservation (Blackwell Publishing, 2007).Book 

Google Scholar 
Harris, P. T., Macmillan-Lawler, M., Rupp, J. & Baker, E. K. Geomorphology of the oceans. Mar. Geol. 352, 4–24 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wessel, P., Sandwell, D. T. & Kim, S.-S. The global seamount census. Oceanography 23, 24–33 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Etnoyer, P. J. et al. BOX 12|How large is the seamount biome?. Oceanography 23, 206–209 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
De Forges, B. R., Koslow, J. A. & Pooro, G. C. B. Diversity and endemism of the benthic seamount fauna in the southwest Pacific. Nature 405, 944–947 (2000).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Rowden, A. A., Dower, J. F., Schlacher, T. A., Consalvey, M. & Clark, M. R. Paradigms in seamount ecology: Fact, fiction and future. Mar. Ecol. 31, 226–241 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pinheiro, H. T. et al. Fish biodiversity of the Vitória-Trindade seamount chain, southwestern Atlantic: An updated database. PLoS ONE 10, 1–17 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Morato, T., Hoyle, S. D., Allain, V. & Nicol, S. J. Seamounts are hotspots of pelagic biodiversity in the open ocean. PNAS 107, 9711 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rowden, A. A. et al. A test of the seamount oasis hypothesis: Seamounts support higher epibenthic megafaunal biomass than adjacent slopes. Mar. Ecol. 31, 95–106 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Busch, K. et al. On giant shoulders: How a seamount affects the microbial community composition of seawater and sponges. Biogeosciences 17, 3471–3486 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zhao, Y. et al. Virioplankton distribution in the tropical western Pacific Ocean in the vicinity of a seamount. Microbiol Open 9, e1031 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Arístegui, J. et al. Plankton metabolic balance at two North Atlantic seamounts. Deep-Sea Res. II 56, 2646–2655 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dower, J. F. & Mackast, D. L. “Seamount effects” in the zooplankton community near Cobb Seamount. Deep-Sea Res. I 43, 837–858 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
O’Hara, T. D., Rowden, A. A. & Bax, N. J. A Southern Hemisphere bathyal fauna is distributed in latitudinal bands. Curr. Biol. 21, 226–230 (2011).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Williams, A., Althaus, F., Clark, M. R. & Gowlett-Holmes, K. Composition and distribution of deep-sea benthic invertebrate megafauna on the Lord Howe Rise and Norfolk Ridge, southwest Pacific Ocean. Deep-Sea Res. II 58, 948–958 (2011).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bridges, A. E. H., Barnes, D. K. A., Bell, J. B., Ross, R. E. & Howell, K. L. Benthic assemblage composition of South Atlantic seamounts. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 660648 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lapointe, A. E., Watling, L., France, S. C. & Auster, P. J. Megabenthic assemblages in the lower bathyal (700–3000 m) on the New England and corner rise seamounts Northwest Atlantic. Deep-Sea Res. I 165, 103366 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Clark, M. R. & Bowden, D. A. Seamount biodiversity: High variability both within and between seamounts in the Ross Sea region of Antarctica. Hydrobiologia 761, 161–180 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
McClain, C. R., Lundsten, L., Barry, J. & DeVogelaere, A. Assemblage structure, but not diversity or density, change with depth on a northeast Pacific seamount. Mar. Ecol. 31, 14–25 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Long, D. J. & Baco, A. R. Rapid change with depth in megabenthic structure-forming communities of the Makapu’u deep-sea coral bed. Deep-Sea Res. II 99, 158–168 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Thresher, R. et al. Strong septh-related zonation of megabenthos on a rocky continental margin (∼ 700–4000 m) off southern Tasmania Australia. PLoS ONE 9, e85872 (2014).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
O’Hara, T. D., Consalvey, M., Lavrado, H. P. & Stocks, K. I. Environmental predictors and turnover of biota along a seamount chain. Mar. Ecol. 31, 84–94 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Boschen, R. E. et al. Megabenthic assemblage structure on three New Zealand seamounts: Implications for seafloor massive sulfide mining. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 523, 1–14 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Caratori Tontini, F. et al. Crustal magnetization of brothers volcano, New Zealand, measured by autonomous underwater vehicles: Geophysical expression of a submarine hydrothermal system. Econ. Geol. 107, 1571–1581 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rex, M. A., Etter, R. J., Clain, A. J. & Hill, M. S. Bathymetric patterns of body size in deep-sea gastropods. Evolution (N Y) 53, 1298–1301 (1999).
Google Scholar 
O’Hara, T. D. Seamounts: Centres of endemism or species richness for ophiuroids?. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 16, 720–732 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Clark, M. R. et al. The ecology of seamounts: Structure, function, and human impacts. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2, 253–278 (2010).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Cowen, R. K. & Sponaugle, S. Larval dispersal and marine population connectivity. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 1, 443–466 (2009).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Levin, L. A. & Thomas, C. L. The influence of hydrodynamic regime on infaunal assemblages inhabiting carbonate sediments on central Pacific seamounts. Deep Sea Res. A 36, 1897–1915 (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
Puerta, P. et al. Variability of deep-sea megabenthic assemblages along the western pathway of the Mediterranean outflow water. Deep-Sea Res. I 185, 103791 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tapia-Guerra, J. M. et al. First description of deep benthic habitats and communities of oceanic islands and seamounts of the Nazca Desventuradas Marine Park Chile. Sci. Rep. 11, 6209 (2021).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Morgan, N. B., Goode, S., Roark, E. B. & Baco, A. R. Fine scale assemblage structure of benthic invertebrate megafauna on the North Pacific seamount Mokumanamana. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 715 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Perez, J. A. A., Kitazato, H., Sumida, P. Y. G., Sant’Ana, R. & Mastella, A. M. Benthopelagic megafauna assemblages of the Rio Grande Rise (SW Atlantic). Deep-Sea Res. I 134, 1–11 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Poore, G. C. B. et al. Invertebrate diversity of the unexplored marine western margin of Australia: Taxonomy and implications for global biodiversity. Mar. Biodivers. 45, 271–286 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Henry, L. A., Moreno Navas, J. & Roberts, J. M. Multi-scale interactions between local hydrography, seabed topography, and community assembly on cold-water coral reefs. Biogeosciences 10, 2737–2746 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Meyer, K. S. et al. Rocky islands in a sea of mud: Biotic and abiotic factors structuring deep-sea dropstone communities. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 556, 45–57 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stratmann, T., Soetaert, K., Kersken, D. & van Oevelen, D. Polymetallic nodules are essential for food-web integrity of a prospective deep-seabed mining area in Pacific abyssal plains. Sci. Rep. 11, 12238 (2021).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Genin, A., Dayton, P. K., Lonsdale, P. F. & Spiess, F. N. Corals on seamount peaks provide evidence of current acceleration over deep-sea topography. Nature 322, 59–61 (1986).Article 

Google Scholar 
Roberts, J. M., Wheeler, A. J. & Freiwald, A. Reefs of the deep: The biology and geology of cold-water coral ecosystems. Science 1979(312), 543–547 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kutti, T., Bannister, R. J. & Fosså, J. H. Community structure and ecological function of deep-water sponge grounds in the Traenadypet MPA-Northern Norwegian continental shelf. Cont. Shelf Res. 69, 21–30 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Beazley, L., Kenchington, E. L., Murillo, F. J. & Sacau, M. D. M. Deep-sea sponge grounds enhance diversity and abundance of epibenthic megafauna in the Northwest Atlantic. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 70, 1471–1490 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Buhl-Mortensen, L. et al. Biological structures as a source of habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity on the deep ocean margins. Mar. Ecol. 31, 21–50 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Victorero, L., Robert, K., Robinson, L. F., Taylor, M. L. & Huvenne, V. A. I. Species replacement dominates megabenthos beta diversity in a remote seamount setting. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–11 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Yesson, C., Clark, M. R., Taylor, M. L. & Rogers, A. D. The global distribution of seamounts based on 30 arc seconds bathymetry data. Deep-Sea Res. I 58, 442–453 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
ICES. Report of the ICES-NAFO Working Group on Deep-Water Ecology (WGDEC), 9–13 March 2009, ICES CM2009ACOM:23. 2009.Cárdenas, P. & Rapp, H. T. Demosponges from the Northern mid-Atlantic ridge shed more light on the diversity and biogeography of North Atlantic deep-sea sponges. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 95, 1475–1516 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cárdenas, P. et al. Taxonomy, biogeography and DNA barcodes of Geodia species (Porifera, Demospongiae, Tetractinellida) in the Atlantic boreo-arctic region. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 169, 251–311 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Roberts, E. M. et al. Oceanographic setting and short-timescale environmental variability at an Arctic seamount sponge ground. Deep-Sea Res. I 138, 98–113 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Roberts, E. et al. Water masses constrain the distribution of deep-sea sponges in the North Atlantic Ocean and Nordic seas. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 659, 75–96 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Morganti, T. M. et al. Giant sponge grounds of central Arctic seamounts are associated with extinct seep life. Nat. Commun. 13, 638 (2022).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Morganti, T. M. et al. In situ observation of sponge trails suggests common sponge locomotion in the deep central Arctic. Curr. Biol. 31, R368–R370 (2021).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Meyer, H. K., Roberts, E. M., Rapp, H. T. & Davies, A. J. Spatial patterns of arctic sponge ground fauna and demersal fish are detectable in autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) imagery. Deep-Sea Res. I 153, 103137 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
McIntyre, F. D., Drewery, J., Eerkes-Medrano, D. & Neat, F. C. Distribution and diversity of deep-sea sponge grounds on the Rosemary bank seamount NE Atlantic. Mar. Biol. 163, 143 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Buhl-Mortensen, P. & Buhl-Mortensen, L. Diverse and vulnerable deep-water biotopes in the Hardangerfjord. Mar. Biol. Res. 10, 253–267 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
de Clippele, L. H. et al. The effect of local hydrodynamics on the spatial extent and morphology of cold-water coral habitats at Tisler Reef Norway. Coral Reefs 37, 253–266 (2018).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Dunlop, K., Harendza, A., Plassen, L. & Keeley, N. Epifaunal habitat Associations on mixed and hard bottom substrates in coastal waters of Northern Norway. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 568802 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fiore, C. L. & Cox Jutte, P. Characterization of macrofaunal assemblages associated with sponges and tunicates collected off the southeastern United States. Biology 129, 105–120 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Murillo, F. J. et al. Deep-sea sponge grounds of the Flemish Cap, Flemish Pass and the Grand Banks of Newfoundland (Northwest Atlantic Ocean): Distribution and species composition. Mar. Biol. Res. 8, 842–854 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Purser, A. et al. Local variation in the distribution of benthic megafauna species associated with cold-water coral reefs on the Norwegian margin. Cont. Shelf Res. 54, 37–51 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Klitgaard, A. B. & Tendal, O. S. Distribution and species composition of mass occurrences of large-sized sponges in the northeast Atlantic. Prog. Oceanogr. 61, 57–98 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Klitgaard, A. B. The fauna associated with outer shelf and upper slope sponges (porifera, demospongiae) at the faroe islands, northeastern Atlantic. Sarsia 80, 1–22 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cárdenas, P. & Moore, J. A. First records of Geodia demosponges from the New England seamounts, an opportunity to test the use of DNA mini-barcodes on museum specimens. Mar. Biodivers. 49, 163–174 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schejter, L., Chiesa, I. L., Doti, B. L. & Bremec, C. Mycale (Aegogropila) magellanica (Porifera: Demospongiae) in the southwestern Atlantic Ocean: Endobiotic fauna and new distributional information. Sci. Mar. 76, 753–761 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Beaulieu, S. E. Life on glass houses: Sponge stalk communities in the deep sea. Mar. Biol. 138, 803–817 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Goren, L., Idan, T., Shefer, S. & Ilan, M. Macrofauna inhabiting massive demosponges from shallow and mesophotic habitats along the Israeli Mediterranean coast. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 612779 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kersken, D. et al. The infauna of three widely distributed sponge species (Hexactinellida and Demospongiae) from the deep Ekström Shelf in the Weddell Sea Antarctica. Deep-Sea Res. II 108, 101–112 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Meyer, H. K., Roberts, E. M., Rapp, H. T. & Davies, A. J. Spatial patterns of arctic sponge ground fauna and demersal fish are detectable in autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) imagery. Deep Sea Res. 1 Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 153, 103137 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bart, M. C., Hudspith, M., Rapp, H. T., Verdonschot, P. F. M. & de Goeij, J. M. A Deep-Sea Sponge Loop? Sponges transfer dissolved and particulate organic carbon and nitrogen to associated fauna. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 604879 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
de Goeij, J. M. et al. Surviving in a marine desert: The sponge loop retains resources within coral reefs. Science 1979(342), 108–110 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pawlik, J. R. & Mcmurray, S. E. The emerging ecological and biogeochemical importance of sponges on coral reefs. (2019) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-010419Wassmann, P., Slagstad, D. & Ellingsen, I. Primary production and climatic variability in the European sector of the Arctic Ocean prior to 2007: Preliminary results. Polar Biol. 33, 1641–1650 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Arrigo, K. R., van Dijken, G. & Pabi, S. Impact of a shrinking Arctic ice cover on marine primary production. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L19603 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dunne, J. P., Sarmiento, J. L. & Gnanadesikan, A. A synthesis of global particle export from the surface ocean and cycling through the ocean interior and on the seafloor. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 21, GB4006 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wei, C.-L. et al. Global patterns and predictions of seafloor biomass using random forests. PLoS ONE 5, e15323 (2010).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Stratmann, T. et al. The BenBioDen database, a global database for meio-, macro- and megabenthic biomass and densities. Sci. Data 7, 206 (2020).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
McClain, C. R., Lundsten, L., Ream, M., Barry, J. & DeVogelaere, A. Endemicity, biogeography, composition, and community structure on a Northeast Pacific seamount. PLoS ONE 4, e4141 (2009).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Walter, M., Köhler, J., Myriel, H., Steinmacher, B. & Wisotzki, A. Physical oceanography measured on water bottle samples during POLARSTERN cruise PS101 (ARK-XXX/3). PANGAEA https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.871927 (2017).van Appen, W.-J., Latarius, K. & Kanzow, T. Physical oceanography and current meter data from mooring F6–17. PANGAEA https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.870845 (2017).Ruhl, H. A. & Smith, K. L. Shifts in deep-sea community structure linked to climate and food supply. Science 1979(305), 513–515 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Boetius, A. et al. Export of algal biomass from the melting Arctic sea ice. Science 1979(339), 1430–1432 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rybakova, E., Kremenetskaia, A., Vedenin, A., Boetius, A. & Gebruk, A. Deep-sea megabenthos communities of the Eurasian Central Arctic are influenced by ice-cover and sea-ice algal falls. PLoS ONE 14, e0211009 (2019).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Zhulay, I., Bluhm, B. A., Renaud, P. E., Degen, R. & Iken, K. Functional pattern of benthic epifauna in the Chukchi borderland Arctic deep sea. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 609956 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Boetius, A. & Purser, A. The expedition PS101 of the research vessel Polarstern to the Arctic Ocean in 2016. Berichte zur Polar-und Meeresforschung = Rep Polar Mar Res https://doi.org/10.2312/BzPM_0706_2017 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Simon-Lledó, E. et al. Multi-scale variations in invertebrate and fish megafauna in the mid-eastern Clarion Clipperton Zone. Prog. Oceanogr. 187, 102405 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Simon-Lledó, E. et al. Preliminary observations of the abyssal megafauna of Kiribati. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 1–13 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhulay, I., Iken, K., Renaud, P. E. & Bluhm, B. A. Epifaunal communities across marine landscapes of the deep Chukchi Borderland (Pacific Arctic). Deep Sea Res. 1 Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 151, 103065 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Åström, E. K. L., Sen, A., Carroll, M. L. & Carroll, J. L. Cold seeps in a warming Arctic: Insights for benthic ecology. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00244 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pedersen, R. B. et al. Discovery of a black smoker vent field and vent fauna at the Arctic Mid-Ocean Ridge. Nat. Commun. 1, 1–6 (2010).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Åström, E. K. L. et al. Methane cold seeps as biological oases in the high-Arctic deep sea. Limnol. Oceanogr. 63, S209–S231 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rybakova Goroslavskaya, E., Galkin, S., Bergmann, M., Soltwedel, T. & Gebruk, A. Density and distribution of megafauna at the Håkon Mosby mud volcano (the Barents Sea) based on image analysis. Biogeosciences 10, 3359–3374 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sweetman, A. K., Levin, L. A., Rapp, H. T. & Schander, C. Faunal trophic structure at hydrothermal vents on the southern mohn’s ridge, arctic ocean. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 473, 115–131 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Decker, C. & Olu, K. Does macrofaunal nutrition vary among habitats at the Hakon Mosby mud volcano?. Cah. Biol. Mar. 51, 361–367 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Macdonald, I. R., Bluhm, B. A., Iken, K., Gagaev, S. & Strong, S. Benthic macrofauna and megafauna assemblages in the Arctic deep-sea Canada Basin. Deep-Sea Res. II 57, 136–152 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Taylor, J., Krumpen, T., Soltwedel, T., Gutt, J. & Bergmann, M. Dynamic benthic megafaunal communities: Assessing temporal variations in structure, composition and diversity at the Arctic deep-sea observatory HAUSGARTEN between 2004 and 2015. Deep Sea Res. 1 Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 122, 81–94 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vedenin, A. A. et al. Uniform bathymetric zonation of marine benthos on a Pan-Arctic scale. Prog. Oceanogr. 202, 102764 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bart, M. C. et al. A deep-sea sponge loop? Sponges transfer dissolved and particulate organic carbon and nitrogen to associated fauna. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 604879 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Guihen, D., White, M. & Lundälv, T. Temperature shocks and ecological implications at a cold-water coral reef. ANZIAM J. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755267212000413 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Strand, R. et al. The response of a boreal deep-sea sponge holobiont to acute thermal stress. Sci. Rep. 7, 1660 (2017).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hanz, U. et al. The important role of sponges in carbon and nitrogen cycling in a deep-sea biological hotspot. Funct. Ecol. 36, 2188–2199 (2022).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Maier, S. R. et al. Reef communities associated with ‘dead’ cold-water coral framework drive resource retention and recycling in the deep sea. Deep-Sea Res. I 175, 103574 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bart, M. C. et al. Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) is essential to balance the metabolic demands of four dominant North-Atlantic deep-sea sponges. Limnol. Oceanogr. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.11652 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bart, M. C. et al. Differential processing of dissolved and particulate organic matter by deep-sea sponges and their microbial symbionts. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–13 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Maier, S. R. et al. Recycling pathways in cold-water coral reefs: Use of dissolved organic matter and bacteria by key suspension feeding taxa. Sci. Rep. 10, 9942 (2020).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
International Hydrographic Bureau. 16th meeting of the GEBCO sub-committee on undersea feature names (SCUFN). Preprint at (2003).Torres-Valdés, S., Morische, A. & Wischnewski, L. Revision of nutrient data from Polarstern expedition PS101 (ARK-XXX/3). PANGAEA https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.908179 (2019).Purser, A. et al. Ocean floor observation and bathymetry system (OFOBS): A new towed camera/sonar system for deep-sea habitat surveys. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 44, 87–99 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Marcon, Y. & Purser, A. PAPARA(ZZ)I : An open-source software interface for annotating photographs of the deep-sea. SoftwareX 6, 69–80 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Greene, H. G., Bizzarro, J. J., O’Connell, V. M. & Brylinsky, C. K. Construction of digital potential marine benthic habitat maps using a coded classification scheme and its application. Spec. Pap.: Geol. Assoc. Canada 47, 141–155 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Horton, T. et al. Recommendations for the standardisation of open taxonomic nomenclature for image-based identifications. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 620702 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Davison, A. C. & Hinkley, D. V. Bootstrap Methods and Their Application (Cambridge University Press, 1997).Book 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Rodgers, J. L. The bootstrap, the jackknife, and the randomization test: A sampling taxonomy. Multivar. Behav. Res. 34, 441–456 (1999).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Crowley, P. H. Resampling methods for computation-intensive data analysis in ecology and evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23, 405–447 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
Simon-Lledó, E. et al. Ecology of a polymetallic nodule occurrence gradient: Implications for deep-sea mining. Limnol. Oceanogr. 64, 1883–1894 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Jost, L. Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113, 363–375 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Clarke, K. R. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust. J. Ecol. 18, 117–143 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
R-Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Preprint at https://www.r-project.org/ (2017).Oksanen, J. et al. vegan: Community ecology package. Preprint at (2017).Veech, J. A. A probabilistic model for analysing species co-occurrence. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 22, 252–260 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Griffith, D. M., Veech, J. A. & Marsh, C. J. Cooccur: Probabilistic species co-occurrence analysis in R. J. Stat. Softw. 69, 1–17 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bligh, E. G. & Dyer, W. J. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 37, 911–917 (1959).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
de Kluijver, A. Fatty acid analysis sponges. protocols.io 1, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bhnpj5dn (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
de Kluijver, A. et al. Bacterial precursors and unsaturated long-chain fatty acids are biomarkers of North-Atlantic deep-sea demosponges. PLoS ONE 16, e0241095 (2021).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar  More

Area-based sub-targetWe found that 13.2% of Asian terrestrial landscapes were covered by PAs by the target date for Aichi 11 based on our in-country sources. However, it was 17.4% lower based on WDPA data (10.9%). The average increase in coverage across Asia during the 2010s was 0.4% ± SE 0.1% per year. PA coverage at the level of individual countries increased from a mean 11.1% in 2010 (SE = 1.4%) to 14.1% by 2020 (SE = 1.8%) based on our in-country sources, which was 16.5% higher than WDPA data (12.1 ± SE 1.6%). However, these overall figures concealed considerable country-level and sub-regional heterogeneity.A total of 8,673,433 km2 across 10 countries, equaling 19.6% of Asian terrestrial landscapes was managed as hunting concessions, governed by governments, communities or private sectors, but these areas have not been included in the countries’ report to the Protected Planet Initiative databases. Most of these areas are locally important in terms of biodiversity conservation and local socioeconomic outcomes which may qualify them as examples of “other effective area-based conservation measures” (OECMs). The increase in area-based conservation coverage represented by these areas, above the current Protected Planet Initiative statistic, ranged from 0.2% (Iran) to 41.4% (Russia). With that update incorporated, a total of 32.9% of Asian terrestrial landscapes are under protection, either as protected areas or hunting concessions (potentially as one type of OECMs).We found that 40% of Asian countries met a target of 17% coverage for PAs by 2020 based on our in-country sources, mainly in East and some South Asia, whereas West and Central Asian countries had generally not achieved this target (Figs. 1 and 2). We did not find any statistically significant association between the proportions of highly at-risk (CR/EN) mammalian species range outside PAs and the % PA extent in 2020 (β = −0.22 ± SE 0.15, t = −1.51, P = 0.14 in a Generalized Linear Model). The highest proportions of the highly at-risk (CR/EN) mammalian species range outside PAs were seen in West (βCR/EN_outsidePA = 1.77 ± SE 0.46, t = 3.86, P 10%, but Kuwait lost area. In East Asia, all countries showed at least some PA expansion (South Korea and Japan by >10%) whereas in Central Asia, almost no change was seen. It is also noteworthy that between 2010 and 2015, agricultural lands increased by 2.0% across the continent, averaging 0.51 ± SE 0.03% per year at country level, although 18 counties (45.0%) had agricultural land loss, mainly in West and Central Asia (12 out of 18 countries with agricultural land loss; Fig. 2).In our attempt to model the variation in achievement of area-based target (% PA extent), we found a single model with a ΔAICc weight of 1.0 (R2adj = 0.66; Table 1). There was no evidence to reject the null hypothesis that the model fits well (P = 0.99). This model included the predictors % agricultural extent in 2015, % PA extent in 2010, and sub-region (Table 1). Specifically, the coefficients suggested that countries with greater PA extent in 2010 and a smaller percentage of agricultural lands in 2015 were more likely to achieve higher percentage of PA extent by 2020 (βPAExtent2020 = 0.58 ± SE 0.10, t = 5.74, P  0.05).Table 2 Results of generalized linear models testing different hypotheses on the association between the percentage of ecoregions protected by the PA network in 2020 and ecological and geopolitical factors in Asian countries.Full size tableFor the coverage of highly at-risk (CR/EN) mammalian species, a single statistical model was also selected, with non-significant deviance goodness of fit (P = 0.83), which included only the % PA extent by 2020 and Region as predictors (R2adj = 0. 27). Although there was no evidence for association between the % PA extent by 2020 and the coverage of threatened species (βPAExtent2020 = −0.23 ± SE 0.15, t = −1.57, P = 0.13). However, the coverage of threatened species varied geographically, with high intercept differences for East Asia (βEastAsia = −0.23 ± SE 0.15, t = −1.57, P = 0.13), implying the largest median of range of highly at-risk (CR/EN) mammalian species outside the current network of PAs within each country.PA management effectiveness sub-targetFor the level of PAME assessment, we found that out of 22781 PAs within the 40 studied Asian countries, only 7.0% have been assessed based on PAME criteria (n = 1599), averaging 17.4% ± of PAs per country (SE = 2.5%). Israel, Japan, Lao, Bahrain, Oman and Qatar had no PA assessed based on the PAME criteria while over 1/3 of PAs in Indonesia, Cambodia, Bhutan, Jordan, Nepal, Turkey, Singapore and the UAE were PAME assessed. When modeling the level of PAME assessment, three best supported models were averaged (Table 3), with the averaged model including GDP2019, % PA extent 2020 and the Region as predictors. The averaged model coefficients would be non-significant under a hypothesis-testing approach (βGDP2019 = −0.18 ± SE 0.12, t = 1.47, P = 0.14 and βPAExtent2020 = −0.15 ± SE 0.11, t = 1.31, P = 0.19). Similarly, there was no evidence for the association between the ratio of PAs with PAME and Asian regions (P  > 0.05).Table 3 Results of generalized linear models testing different hypotheses on the association between the ratio of PAs with management effectiveness (PAME) in 2020 and ecological and geopolitical factors in Asian countries.Full size table More

Butt, N. et al. Opportunities for biodiversity conservation as cities adapt to climate change. Geo Geogr. Environ. 5, 52 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Norton, B. A. et al. Planning for cooler cities: A framework to prioritise green infrastructure to mitigate high temperatures in urban landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plan. 134, 127–138 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ossola, A. et al. Small vegetated patches greatly reduce urban surface temperature during a summer heatwave in Adelaide, Australia. Landsc. Urban Plan. 209, 104046 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Grey, V., Livesley, S. J., Fletcher, T. D. & Szota, C. Tree pits to help mitigate runoff in dense urban areas. J. Hydrol. 565, 400–410 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Szota, C. et al. Street tree stormwater control measures can reduce runoff but may not benefit established trees. Landsc. Urban Plan. 182, 144–155 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, L. & Jensen, M. B. Green infrastructure for sustainable urban water management: Practices of five forerunner cities. Cities 74, 126–133 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Astell-Burt, T. & Feng, X. Association of urban green space with mental health and general health among adults in Australia. JAMA Netw. Open 2, 198209 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Astell Burt, T. et al. More green, less lonely? A longitudinal cohort study. Int. J. Epidemiol. 51, 99–110 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Astell-Burt, T., Navakatikyan, M. A. & Feng, X. Urban green space, tree canopy and 11-year risk of dementia in a cohort of 109,688 Australians. Env. Int. 145, 106102 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Feng, X. & Astell-Burt, T. Residential green space quantity and quality and child well-being: a longitudinal study. Am. J. Prev. Med. 53, 616–624 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Knobel, P. et al. Quality of urban green spaces influences residents’ use of these spaces, physical activity, and overweight/obesity. Environ. Pollut. 271, 116393 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Haaland, C. & van den Bosch, C. K. Challenges and strategies for urban green-space planning in cities undergoing densification: A review. Urban For.Urban Green 14, 760–771 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Russo, A. & Cirella, G. T. Modern compact cities: How much greenery do we need? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15, 2180 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Garrard, G. E., Williams, N. S. G., Mata, L., Thomas, J. & Bekessy, S. A. Biodiversity sensitive urban design. Conserv. Lett. 11, 1–10 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Eaton, T. T. Approach and case-study of green infrastructure screening analysis for urban stormwater control. J. Environ. Manage. 209, 495–504 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Maes, M. J. A., Jones, K. E., Toledano, M. B. & Milligan, B. Mapping synergies and trade-offs between urban ecosystems and the sustainable development goals. Environ. Sci. Policy 93, 181–188 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Astell-Burt, T., Feng, X., Mavoa, S., Badland, H. M. & Giles-Corti, B. Do low-income neighbourhoods have the least green space? A cross-sectional study of Australia’s most populous cities. BMC Public Health 14, 19–21 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Coutts, A. M., Tapper, N. J., Beringer, J., Loughnan, M. & Demuzere, M. Watering our cities: The capacity for Water Sensitive Urban Design to support urban cooling and improve human thermal comfort in the Australian context. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 37, 2–28 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability | Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. IPCC Sixth Assessment Report https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/ (2022).Davies, C. & Lafortezza, R. Urban green infrastructure in Europe: Is greenspace planning and policy compliant? Land Use Policy 69, 93–101 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Faivre, N., Fritz, M., Freitas, T., de Boissezon, B. & Vandewoestijne, S. Nature-based solutions in the EU: Innovating with nature to address social, economic and environmental challenges. Environ. Res. 159, 509–518 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Meerow, S. & Newell, J. P. Spatial planning for multifunctional green infrastructure: Growing resilience in Detroit. Landsc. Urban Plan. 159, 62–75 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
City of Los Angeles. L.A.’s Green New Deal: Sustainability Plan 2019. https://plan.lamayor.org/ (2019).City of Paris. Urban forests soon on four emblematic sites. https://www.paris.fr/pages/des-forets-urbaines-bientot-sur-quatre-sites-emblematiques-6899/ (2019).Brisbane City Council. Brisbane’s urban forest. https://www.brisbane.qld.gov.au/clean-and-green/natural-environment-and-water/plants-trees-and-gardens/brisbanes-trees/brisbanes-urban-forest (2019).Cortinovis, C., Olsson, P., Boke-Olén, N. & Hedlund, K. Scaling up nature-based solutions for climate-change adaptation: Potential and benefits in three European cities. Urban For. Urban Green. 67, 127450 (2022).Furchtlehner, J., Lehner, D. & Lička, L. Sustainable streetscapes: design approaches and examples of Viennese practice. Sustainability 14, 961 (2022).Schmidt, S., Guerrero, P. & Albert, C. Advancing sustainable development goals with localised nature-based solutions: Opportunity spaces in the Lahn river landscape, Germany. J. Environ. Manage. 309, 114696 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gómez Martín, E., Giordano, R., Pagano, A., van der Keur, P. & Máñez Costa, M. Using a system thinking approach to assess the contribution of nature based solutions to sustainable development goals. Sci. Total Environ. 738, 139693 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bush, J. & Doyon, A. Building urban resilience with nature-based solutions: How can urban planning contribute? Cities 95, 102483 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brink, E. et al. Cascades of green: A review of ecosystem-based adaptation in urban areas. Glob. Environ. Chang. 36, 111–123 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Oke, C. et al. Cities should respond to the biodiversity extinction crisis. npj Urban Sustain. 1, 9–12 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ives, C. D. et al. Cities are hotspots for threatened species. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 25, 117–126 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Spotswood, E. N. et al. Nature inequity and higher COVID-19 case rates in less-green neighbourhoods in the United States. Nat. Sustain. 4, 1092–1098 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Moglia, M. et al. Accelerating a green recovery of cities: Lessons from a scoping review and a proposal for mission-oriented recovery towards post-pandemic urban resilience. Dev. Built Environ. 7, 100052 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
OECD. Focus on green recovery. https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/en/themes/green-recovery (2021).European Commission. A European Green Deal. https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en (2021).UNEP. Smart, Sustainable and Resilient cities: the Power of Nature-based Solutions. https://www.unep.org/resources/report/smart-sustainable-and-resilient-cities-power-nature-based-solutions (2021).Croeser, T. et al. Diagnosing delivery capabilities on a large international nature-based solutions project. npj Urban Sustain. 1, 32 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
McPhillips, L. E. & Matsler, A. M. Temporal evolution of green stormwater infrastructure strategies in three us cities. Front. Built. Environ. 4, 1–14 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Spahr, K. M., Bell, C. D., McCray, J. E. & Hogue, T. S. Greening up stormwater infrastructure: Measuring vegetation to establish context and promote cobenefits in a diverse set of US cities. Urban For. Urban Green 48, 126548 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hamel, P. & Tan, L. Blue–Green Infrastructure for Flood and Water Quality Management in Southeast Asia: Evidence and Knowledge Gaps. Environ. Manage. 69, 699–718 (2021)City of Melbourne. Elizabeth Street Integrated Water Cycle Management Plan. http://urbanwater.melbourne.vic.gov.au/industry/our-strategies/elizabeth-street-catchment-iwcm-plan/#:~:text =The Elizabeth Street Catchment Integrated,within the municipality of Melbourne. (2015).Phelan, K., Hurley, J. & Bush, J. Land-use planning’s role in urban forest strategies: recent local government approaches in Australia. Urban Policy Res 37, 215–226 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bradford, J. B. & D’Amato, A. W. Recognizing trade-offs in multi-objective land management. Front. Ecol. Environ. 10, 210–216 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kindler, J. Linking ecological and development objectives: Trade-offs and imperatives. Ecol. Appl. 8, 591–600 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
UN Habitat. Streets as Public Spaces and Drivers of Urban Prosperity. https://unhabitat.org/streets-as-public-spaces-and-drivers-of-urban-prosperity (2013).De Gruyter, C., Zahraee, S. M. & Young, W. Street space allocation and use in Melbourne’s activity centres: Working paper. https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2021-09/apo-nid314604.pdf (2021).Shoup, D. C. The trouble with minimum parking requirements. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 33, 549–574 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Barter, P. A. A parking policy typology for clearer thinking on parking reform. Int. J. Urb. Sci. 5934, 136–156 (2015).Taylor, E. J. Transport Strategy Refresh Background Paper: Parking. https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/hdp.au.prod.app.com-participate.files/2615/2963/7455/Transport_Strategy_Refresh_-_Background_paper_-_Car_Parking.pdf (2018).Guo, Z. & Schloeter, L. Street standards as parking policy: rethinking the provision of residential street parking in American Suburbs. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 33, 456–470 (2013).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Taylor, D. E. Free parking for free people: German road laws and rights as constraints on local car parking management. Transp. Policy 101, 23–33 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pierce, G., Willson, H. & Shoup, D. Optimizing the use of public garages: Pricing parking by demand. Transp. Policy 44, 89–95 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Taylor, E. J. Parking policy: The politics and uneven use of residential parking space in Melbourne. Land Use Policy 91, 103706 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Thigpen, C. G. & Volker, J. M. B. Repurposing the paving: The case of surplus residential parking in Davis, CA. Cities 70, 111–121 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Volker, J. M. B. & Thigpen, C. G. Not enough parking, you say? A study of garage use and parking supply for single-family homes in Sacramento and implications for ADUs. J. Transp. Land Use 15, 183–206 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rosenblum, J., Hudson, A. W. & Ben-Joseph, E. Parking futures: An international review of trends and speculation. Land Use Policy 91, 104054 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gössling, S. Why cities need to take road space from cars – and how this could be done. J. Urban Des. 25, 443–448 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Clements, R. Parking: an opportunity to deliver sustainable transport. in Handbook of Sustainable Transport 280–288 (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789900477.00041.Barter, P. A. Off-street parking policy surprises in Asian cities. Cities 29, 23–31 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shao, C., Yang, H., Zhang, Y. & Ke, J. A simple reservation and allocation model of shared parking lots. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 71, 303–312 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pojani, D. et al. Setting the agenda for parking research in other cities. in Parking: An International Perspective 245–260 (Elsevier, 2019).Guo, Z. Home parking convenience, household car usage, and implications to residential parking policies. Transp. Policy 29, 97–106 (2013).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Scheiner, J., Faust, N., Helmer, J., Straub, M. & Holz-Rau, C. What’s that garage for? Private parking and on-street parking in a high-density urban residential neighbourhood. J. Transp. Geogr. 85, 102714 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Inci, E. Economics of Transportation A review of the economics of parking. Econ. Transp. 4, 50–63 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Arnott, R. Spatial competition between parking garages and downtown parking policy. Transp. Policy 13, 458–469 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Marsden, G. The evidence base for parking policies-a review. Transp. Policy 13, 447–457 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Taylor, E. “Fight the towers! Or kiss your car park goodbye”: How often do residents assert car parking rights in Melbourne planning appeals? Plan. Theory Pract. 15, 328–348 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kimpton, A. et al. Contemporary parking policy, practice, and outcomes in three large Australian cities. Prog. Plann. 153, 100506 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Taylor, E. J. Journey into an immense heart of car parking. Plan. Theory Pract. 20, 448–455 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Van Ommeren, J. N., Wentink, D. & Rietveld, P. Empirical evidence on cruising for parking. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 46, 123–130 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Croeser, T. et al. Patterns of tree removal and canopy change on public and private land in the City of Melbourne. Sustain. Cities Soc. 56, 102096 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hurley, J. et al. Urban vegetation cover change in Melbourne. https://cur.org.au/cms/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/urban-vegetation-cover-change.pdf (2019).Hartigan, M., Fitzsimons, J., Grenfell, M. & Kent, T. Developing a metropolitan-wide urban forest strategy for a large, expanding and densifying capital city: Lessons from Melbourne, Australia. Land 10, 809 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Department of Environment Land Water and Planning. Port Phillip Bay Environmental Management Plan. https://www.marineandcoasts.vic.gov.au/coastal-programs/port-phillip-bay (2017).City of Melbourne. Urban Forest Strategy. https://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/community/greening-the-city/urban-forest/Pages/urban-forest-strategy.aspx (2014).City of Melbourne. Total Watermark: City as a Catchment (2014 Update). (2014).City of Melbourne. Nature in the City Strategy. https://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/community/greening-the-city/urban-nature/Pages/nature-in-the-city-strategy.aspx (2017).Li, F. & Guo, Z. Do parking standards matter? Evaluating the London parking reform with a matched-pair approach. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract 67, 352–365 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ríos Flores, R. A., Vicentini, V. L. & Acevedo-Daunas, R. M. Practical Guidebook: Parking and Travel Demand Management Policies in Latin America. https://publications.iadb.org/en/publication/17409/practical-guidebook-parking-and-travel-demand-management-policies-latin-america (2015).Mingardo, G., van Wee, B. & Rye, T. Urban parking policy in Europe: A conceptualization of past and possible future trends. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 74, 268–281 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Barter, P. A. Parking requirements in some major Asian cities. Transp. Res. Rec. 2245, 79–86 (2011)Taylor, E. J. & van Bemmel-Misrachi, R. The elephant in the scheme: Planning for and around car parking in Melbourne, 1929–2016. Land use policy 60, 287–297 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
City of Melbourne. Transport Strategy 2030. https://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/parking-and-transport/transport-planning-projects/Pages/transport-strategy.aspx (2020).City of Melbourne. Total Watermark. https://www.clearwatervic.com.au/user-data/resource-files/City-of-Melbourne-Total-Watermark-Strategy.pdf (2009).Roy, A. H. et al. Impediments and solutions to sustainable, watershed-scale urban stormwater management: Lessons from Australia and the United States. Environ. Manag. 42, 344–359 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
City of Melbourne. Annual Report 2020-2021. https://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/SiteCollectionDocuments/annual-report-2020-21.pdf (2021).Sprei, F., Hult, Å., Hult, C. & Roth, A. Review of the effects of developments with low parking requirements. ECEEE Summer Study Proc. 2019-June, 1079–1086 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Langemeyer, J. et al. Creating urban green infrastructure where it is needed – A spatial ecosystem service-based decision analysis of green roofs in Barcelona. Sci. Total Environ. 707, 135487 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ossola, A. et al. Landscape and Urban Planning Small vegetated patches greatly reduce urban surface temperature during a summer heatwave in Adelaide, Australia. Landsc. Urban Plan. 209, 104046 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dhakal, K. P. & Chevalier, L. R. Managing urban stormwater for urban sustainability: Barriers and policy solutions for green infrastructure application. J. Environ. Manage. 203, 171–181 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Siqueira, F. F. et al. Small landscape elements double connectivity in highly fragmented areas of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Front. Ecol. Evol. 9, 1–14 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mimet, A., Kerbiriou, C., Simon, L., Julien, J. F. & Raymond, R. Contribution of private gardens to habitat availability, connectivity and conservation of the common pipistrelle in Paris. Landsc. Urban Plan. 193, 103671 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Braschler, B., Dolt, C. & Baur, B. The function of a set-aside railway bridge in connecting urban habitats for animals: A case study. Sustain 12, 1194 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kirk, H., Threlfall, C. G., Soanes, K. & Parris, K. Linking Nature in the City Part Two: Applying the Connectivity Index. https://nespurban.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Linking-nature-in-the-city-Part-2.pdf (2020).Ossola, A., Locke, D., Lin, B. & Minor, E. Yards increase forest connectivity in urban landscapes. Landsc. Ecol. 34, 2935–2948 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lindenmayer, D. Small patches make critical contributions to biodiversity conservation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 717–719 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wintle, B. A. et al. Global synthesis of conservation studies reveals the importance of small habitat patches for biodiversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 909–914 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Rolf, W., Peters, D., Lenz, R. & Pauleit, S. Farmland–an Elephant in the room of urban green infrastructure? Lessons learned from connectivity analysis in three German cities. Ecol. Indic. 94, 151–163 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Marissa Matsler, A. Making ‘green’ fit in a ‘grey’ accounting system: The institutional knowledge system challenges of valuing urban nature as infrastructural assets. Environ. Sci. Policy 99, 160–168 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Meerow, S. The politics of multifunctional green infrastructure planning in New York City. Cities 100, 102621 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wolf, K. L. & Robbins, A. S. T. Metro nature, environmental health, and economic value. Environ. Health Perspect. 123, 390–398 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bell, J. F., Wilson, J. S. & Liu, G. C. Neighborhood greenness and 2-year changes in body mass index of children and youth. Am. J. Prev. Med. 35, 547–553 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Miller, S. M. & Montalto, F. A. Stakeholder perceptions of the ecosystem services provided by Green Infrastructure in New York City. Ecosyst. Serv. 37, 100928 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Janhäll, S. Review on urban vegetation and particle air pollution – Deposition and dispersion. Atmos. Environ. 105, 130–137 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, L., Uyttenhove, P. & Vaneetvelde, V. Planning green infrastructure to mitigate urban surface water flooding risk–A methodology to identify priority areas applied in the city of Ghent. Landsc. Urban Plan. 194, 103703 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Haghighatafshar, S. et al. Efficiency of blue-green stormwater retrofits for flood mitigation–Conclusions drawn from a case study in Malmö, Sweden. J. Environ. Manage. 207, 60–69 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Croeser, T., Garrard, G., Sharma, R., Ossola, A. & Bekessy, S. Choosing the right nature-based solutions to meet diverse urban challenges. Urban For. Urban Green 65, 127337 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hansen, R., Olafsson, A. S., van der Jagt, A. P. N., Rall, E. & Pauleit, S. Planning multifunctional green infrastructure for compact cities: What is the state of practice? Ecol. Indic. 96, 99–110 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Roy Morgan. Return of Corporate Workforce. https://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/SiteCollectionDocuments/roy-morgan-report-return-to-the-workplace.pdf (2020).Bloomberg CityLab. A Modest Proposal to Eliminate 11,000 Urban Parking Spots. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-03-29/amsterdam-s-plan-to-eliminate-11-000-parking-spots (2019).World Economic Forum. Paris halves street parking and asks residents what they want to do with the space. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/12/paris-parking-spaces-greenery-cities/ (2020).Urry, J. The ‘System’ of automobility. Theory, Cult. Soc. 21, 25–39 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Docherty, I., Marsden, G. & Anable, J. The governance of smart mobility. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract 115, 114–125 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Burdett, R. & Rode, P. Shaping cities in an urban age. (Phaidon Press Inc, 2018).Egerer, M., Haase, D., Frantzeskaki, N. & Andersson, E. Urban change as an untapped opportunity for climate adaptation. npj Urban Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-021-00024-y (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
New York City Department of Environmental Protection. NYC Green Infrastructure Annual Report. https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/dep/downloads/pdf/water/stormwater/green-infrastructure/gi-annual-report-2020.pdf (2020).Eggimann, S. The potential of implementing superblocks for multifunctional street use in cities. Nat. Sustain. (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00855-2.City of Melbourne. Open Data Platform. https://data.melbourne.vic.gov.au/ (2022).City of Melbourne. Off-street car parks with capacity and type. https://data.melbourne.vic.gov.au/Transport/Off-street-car-parks-with-capacity-and-type/krh5-hhjn (2020).Ding, C. & Cao, X. How does the built environment at residential and work locations a ff ect car ownership? An application of cross-classi fi ed multilevel model. J. Transp. Geogr. 75, 37–45 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Scheiner, J., Faust, N., Helmer, J., Straub, M. & Holz-rau, C. What’ s that garage for? Private parking and on-street parking in a high- density urban residential neighbourhood. J. Transp. Geogr. 85, 102714 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Arnold, J. E., Graesch, A. P., Ochs, E. & Ragazzini, E. Life at Home in the Twenty-First Century in Life at home in the twenty-first century: 32 families open their doors. (ISD LLC, 2012).Beck, M. J., Hensher, D. A. & Wei, E. Slowly coming out of COVID-19 restrictions in Australia: Implications for working from home and commuting trips by car and public transport. J. Transp. Geogr. 88, 102846 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hensher, D. A., Ho, C. Q. & Reck, D. J. Mobility as a service and private car use: Evidence from the Sydney MaaS trial. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract 145, 17–33 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
ESRI. ArcGIS Network Analyst Extension. https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/products/arcgis-network-analyst/overview (2022).Daniels, R. & Mulley, C. Explaining walking distance to public transport: The dominance of public transport supply. J. Transp. Land Use 6, 5–20 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sanders, J., Grabosky, J. & Cowie, P. Establishing maximum size expectations for urban trees with regard to designed space. Arboric. Urban For. 39, 68–73 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Grey, V., Livesley, S. J., Fletcher, T. D. & Szota, C. Establishing street trees in stormwater control measures can double tree growth when extended waterlogging is avoided. Landsc. Urban Plan. 178, 122–129 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kirk, H. et al. Linking nature in the city: A framework for improving ecological connectivity across the City of Melbourne. https://nespurban.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Kirk_Ramalho_et_al_Linking_nature_in_the_city_03Jul18_lowres.pdf (2018).Jaeger, J. A. G. Landscape division, splitting index, and effective mesh size: New measures of landscape fragmentation. Landsc. Ecol 15, 115–130 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Spanowicz, A. G. & Jaeger, J. A. G. Measuring landscape connectivity: On the importance of within-patch connectivity. Landsc. Ecol. 34, 2261–2278 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Casalegno, S., Anderson, K., Cox, D. T. C., Hancock, S. & Gaston, K. J. Ecological connectivity in the three-dimensional urban green volume using waveform airborne lidar. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–8 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Garrard, G. E., McCarthy, M. A., Vesk, P. A., Radford, J. Q. & Bennett, A. F. A predictive model of avian natal dispersal distance provides prior information for investigating response to landscape change. J. Anim. Ecol 81, 14–23 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Duncan, D. Pollination of Black-anther flax lily (Dianella revoluta) in fragmented New South Wales Mallee: A report to the Australian Flora Foundation. 12, http://aff.org.au/wpcontent/uploads/Duncan_Dianella_final.pdf (2003).Pebesma, E. Simple features for R: Standardized support for spatial vector. Data. R J. 10, 439–446 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Imteaz, M. A., Ahsan, A., Rahman, A. & Mekanik, F. Modelling stormwater treatment systems using MUSIC: Accuracy. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 71, 15–21 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Melbourne Water. Raingardens. https://www.melbournewater.com.au/building-and-works/stormwater-management/options-treating-stormwater/raingardens#:~:text=Designing a raingarden,2%25 of the catchment area. (2017). More