Ecology

Ratcliffe, N. et al. A protocol for the aerial survey of penguin colonies using UAVs. J. Unmanned Veh. Syst. 3, 95–101 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Albores-Barajas, Y. V. et al. A new use of technology to solve an old problem: Estimating the population size of a burrow nesting seabird. PLoS ONE 13, 1–15 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Rush, G. P., Clarke, L. E., Stone, M. & Wood, M. J. Can drones count gulls? Minimal disturbance and semiautomated image processing with an unmanned aerial vehicle for colony-nesting seabirds. Ecol. Evol. 8, 12322–12334 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Chabot, D., Craik, S. R. & Bird, D. M. Population census of a large Common tern colony with a small unmanned aircraft. PLoS ONE 10, 1–14 (2015).
Google Scholar 
McClelland, G. T. W., Bond, A. L., Sardana, A. & Glass, T. Rapid population estimate of a surface-nesting seabird on a remote island using a low-cost unmanned aerial vehicle. Mar. Ornithol. 44, 215–220 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Lynch, H. J., White, R., Black, A. D. & Naveen, R. Detection, differentiation, and abundance estimation of penguin species by high-resolution satellite imagery. Polar Biol. 35, 963–968 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Fretwell, P. T. et al. An Emperor penguin population estimate: The first global, synoptic survey of a species from space. PLoS ONE 7, e33751 (2012).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Xue, Y., Wang, T. & Skidmore, A. K. Automatic counting of large mammals from very high resolution panchromatic satellite imagery. Remote Sens. 9, 1–16 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Laliberte, A. S. & Ripple, W. J. Automated wildlife counts from remotely sensed imagery. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 31, 362–371 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Lyons, M. B. et al. Monitoring large and complex wildlife aggregations with drones. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 1024–1035 (2019).
Google Scholar 
LaRue, M. A., Stapleton, S. & Anderson, M. Feasibility of using high-resolution satellite imagery to assess vertebrate wildlife populations. Conserv. Biol. 31, 213–220 (2017).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sardà-Palomera, F., Bota, G., Padilla, N., Brotons, L. & Sardà, F. Unmanned aircraft systems to unravel spatial and temporal factors affecting dynamics of colony formation and nesting success in birds. J. Avian Biol. 48, 1273–1280 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Schofield, G., Katselidis, K. A., Lilley, M. K. S., Reina, R. D. & Hays, G. C. Detecting elusive aspects of wildlife ecology using drones: New insights on the mating dynamics and operational sex ratios of sea turtles. Funct. Ecol. 31, 2310–2319 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Lachman, D., Conway, C., Vierling, K. & Matthews, T. Drones provide a better method to find nests and estimate nest survival for colonial waterbirds: A demonstration with Western grebes. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 28, 837–845 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Torres, L. G., Nieukirk, S. L., Lemos, L. & Chandler, T. E. Drone up! Quantifying whale behavior from a new perspective improves observational capacity. Front. Mar. Sci. 5, 1–14 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Jagielski, P. M., Dey, C. J., Gilchrist, H. G., Richardson, E. S. & Semeniuk, C. A. D. Polar bear foraging on common eider eggs: Estimating the energetic consequences of a climate-mediated behavioural shift. Anim. Behav. 171, 63–75 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Jagielski, P. M. et al. Polar bears are inefficient predators of seabird eggs. R. Soc. Open Sci. 8, 210391 (2021).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Callaghan, C. T., Brandis, K. J., Lyons, M. B., Ryall, S. & Kingsford, R. T. A comment on the limitations of UAVS in wildlife research—The example of colonial nesting waterbirds. J. Avian Biol. 49, e01825 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Brisson-Curadeau, É. et al. Seabird species vary in behavioural response to drone census. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–9 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Nowak, M. M., Dziób, K. & Bogawski, P. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in environmental biology: A review. Eur. J. Ecol. 4, 56–74 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Watts, A. C. et al. Small unmanned aircraft systems for low-altitude aerial surveys. J. Wildl. Manag. 74, 1614–1619 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Sasse, D. B. Job-related mortality of wildlife workers in the United States, 1937–2000. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 31, 1015–1020 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Carey, M. J. The effects of investigator disturbance on procellariiform seabirds: A review. N. Z. J. Zool. 36, 367–377 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Carney, K. M. & Sydeman, W. J. A review of human disturbance effects on nesting colonial waterbirds. Int. J. Waterbird Biol. 22, 68–79 (1999).
Google Scholar 
Barber-Meyer, S. M., Kooyman, G. L. & Ponganis, P. J. Estimating the relative abundance of Emperor penguins at inaccessible colonies using satellite imagery. Polar Biol. 30, 1565–1570 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Lyons, M. et al. A protocol for using drones to assist monitoring of large breeding bird colonies. EcolEvol https://doi.org/10.32942/osf.io/p9j3f (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hodgson, J. C. et al. Drones count wildlife more accurately and precisely than humans. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 1160–1167 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Hodgson, J. C., Baylis, S. M., Mott, R., Herrod, A. & Clarke, R. H. Precision wildlife monitoring using unmanned aerial vehicles. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–7 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Weston, M. A., O’Brien, C., Kostoglou, K. N. & Symonds, M. R. E. Escape responses of terrestrial and aquatic birds to drones: Towards a code of practice to minimize disturbance. J. Appl. Ecol. 57, 777–785 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Korczak-Abshire, M. et al. Preliminary study on nesting Adélie penguins disturbance by unmanned aerial vehicles. CCAMLR Sci. 23, 1–16 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Mesquita, G. P., Rodríguez-Teijeiro, J. D., Wich, S. A. & Mulero-Pázmány, M. Measuring disturbance at a swift breeding colonies due to the visual aspects of a drone: A quasi-experiment study. Curr. Zool. 41, 259–266 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Weimerskirch, H., Prudor, A. & Schull, Q. Flights of drones over sub-Antarctic seabirds show species- and status-specific behavioural and physiological responses. Polar Biol. 41, 259–266 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Mulero-Pázmány, M. et al. Unmanned aircraft systems as a new source of disturbance for wildlife: A systematic review. PLoS ONE 12, 1–14 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Barnas, A. et al. Evaluating behavioral responses of nesting Lesser snow geese to unmanned aircraft surveys. Ecol. Evol. 8, 1328–1338 (2018).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ellis-felege, S. N. et al. Nesting Common eiders (Somateria mollissima) show little behavioral response to fixed-wing drone surveys. J. Unmanned Veh. Syst. https://doi.org/10.1139/juvs-2021-0012 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wilson, R. P., Culik, B., Danfeld, R. & Adelung, D. People in Antarctica—how much do Adélie penguins Pygoscelis adeliae care?. Polar Biol. 11, 363–370 (1991).
Google Scholar 
Ricklefs, R. E. An analysis of nesting mortality in birds. Smithson. Contrib. Zool. 9, 1–48 (1969).
Google Scholar 
Ditmer, M. A. et al. Bears show a physiological but limited behavioral response to unmanned aerial vehicles. Curr. Biol. 25, 2278–2283 (2015).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ditmer, M. A. et al. Bears habituate to the repeated exposure of a novel stimulus, unmanned aircraft systems. Conserv. Physiol. 6, 1–7 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Jaatinen, K., Seltmann, M. W. & Öst, M. Context-dependent stress responses and their connections to fitness in a landscape of fear. J. Zool. 294, 147–153 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Seltmann, M. W. et al. Stress responsiveness, age and body condition interactively affect flight initiation distance in breeding female eiders. Anim. Behav. 84, 889–896 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Cockrem, J. F. Stress, corticosterone responses and avian personalities. J. Ornithol. 148, S169–S178 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Criscuolo, F. Does blood sampling during eider incubation induce nest desertion in the female Common eider Somateria mollissima?. Mar. Ornithol. 29, 47–50 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Ellenberg, U., Mattern, T. & Seddon, P. J. Heart rate responses provide an objective evaluation of human disturbance stimuli in breeding birds. Conserv. Physiol. 1, 1–11 (2013).
Google Scholar 
DeRose-Wilson, A., Fraser, J. D., Karpanty, S. M. & Hillman, M. D. Effects of overflights on incubating Wilson’s plover behavior and heart rate. J. Wildl. Manag. 79, 1246–1254 (2015).
Google Scholar 
de Villiers, M., Bause, M., Giese, M. & Fourie, A. Hardly hard-hearted: Heart rate responses of incubating Northern giant petrels (Macronectes halli) to human disturbance on sub-Antarctic Marion Island. Polar Biol. 29, 717–720 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Borneman, T. E., Rose, E. T. & Simons, T. R. Minimal changes in heart rate of incubating American oystercatchers (Haematopus palliatus) in response to human activity. Condor 116, 493–503 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Felton, S. K., Pollock, K. H. & Simons, T. R. Response of beach-nesting American oystercatchers to off-road vehicles: An experimental approach reveals physiological nuances and decreased nest attendance. Condor 120, 47–62 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Bolduc, F. & Guillemette, M. Human disturbance and nesting success of Common eiders: Interaction between visitors and gulls. Biol. Conserv. 110, 77–83 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Hennin, H. L. et al. Plasma mammalian leptin analogue predicts reproductive phenology, but not reproductive output in a capital-income breeding seaduck. Ecol. Evol. 9, 1512–1521 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Culik, B., Adelung, D. & Woakes, A. J. The effect of disturbance on the heart rate and behaviour of Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) during the breeding season. In Antarctic Ecosystems. Ecological Change and Conservation (eds Kerry, K. R. & Hempel, G.) 177–182 (Springer, 1990).
Google Scholar 
Weimerskirch, H. et al. Heart rate and energy expenditure of incubating Wandering albatrosses: Basal levels, natural variation, and the effects of human disturbance. J. Exp. Biol. 205, 475–483 (2002).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Egan, C. C., Blackwell, B. F., Fernández-Juricic, E. & Klug, P. E. Testing a key assumption of using drones as frightening devices: Do birds perceive drones as risky?. Condor 122, 1–15 (2020).
Google Scholar 
McEvoy, J. F., Hall, G. P. & McDonald, P. G. Evaluation of unmanned aerial vehicle shape, flight path and camera type for waterfowl surveys: Disturbance effects and species recognition. PeerJ 4, e1831 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Goebel, M. E. et al. A small unmanned aerial system for estimating abundance and size of Antarctic predators. Polar Biol. 38, 619–630 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Bevan, E. et al. Measuring behavioral responses of sea turtles, saltwater crocodiles, and Crested terns to drone disturbance to define ethical operating thresholds. PLoS ONE 13, 4–6 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Rümmler, M. C., Mustafa, O., Maercker, J., Peter, H. U. & Esefeld, J. Measuring the influence of unmanned aerial vehicles on Adélie penguins. Polar Biol. 39, 1329–1334 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Vas, E., Lescroël, A., Duriez, O., Boguszewski, G. & Grémillet, D. Approaching birds with drones: First experiments and ethical guidelines. Biol. Lett. 11, 20140754 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Frid, A. & Dill, L. Human-caused disturbance stimuli as a form of predation risk. Ecol. Soc. 6, 11 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Forbes, M. R. L., Clark, R. G., Weatherhead, P. J. & Armstrong, T. Risk-taking by female ducks: Intra-and interspecific tests of nest defense theory. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 34, 79–85 (1994).
Google Scholar 
Viblanc, V. A., Smith, A. D., Gineste, B., Kauffmann, M. & Groscolas, R. Modulation of heart rate response to acute stressors throughout the breeding season in the King penguin Aptenodytes patagonicus. J. Exp. Biol. 218, 1686–1692 (2015).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Montgomerie, R. D. & Weatherhead, P. J. Risks and rewards of nest defence by parent birds. Q. Rev. Biol. 63, 167–187 (1988).
Google Scholar 
Criscuolo, F., Gabrielsen, G. W., Gendner, J.-P. & Maho, Y. L. Body mass regulation during incubation in female Common eiders Somateria mollissima. J. Avian Biol. 33, 83–88 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Cyr, N. E., Wikelski, M. & Romero, L. M. Increased energy expenditure but decreased stress responsiveness during molt. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. Ecol. Evol. Approaches 81, 452–462 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Kralj-Fišer, S., Scheiber, I. B. R., Kotrschal, K., Weiß, B. M. & Wascher, C. A. F. Glucocorticoids enhance and suppress heart rate and behaviour in time dependent manner in Greylag geese (Anser anser). Physiol. Behav. 100, 394–400 (2010).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hodgson, J. C. & Koh, L. P. Best practice for minimising unmanned aerial vehicle disturbance to wildlife in biological field research. Curr. Biol. 26, R404–R405 (2016).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Parker, H. & Holm, H. Patterns of nutrient and energy expenditure in female Common eiders nesting in the high Arctic. Auk 107, 660–668 (1990).
Google Scholar 
Mehlum, F. Eider Studies in Svalbard Vol. 195 (Norsk Polarinstitutt Skrifter, 1991).
Google Scholar 
Markowitz, E. M., Nisbet, M. C., Danylchuk, A. J. & Engelbourg, S. I. What’s that buzzing noise? Public opinion on the use of drones for conservation science. Bioscience 67, 382–385 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Legagneux, P. et al. Unpredictable perturbation reduces breeding propensity regardless of pre-laying reproductive readiness in a partial capital breeder. J. Avian Biol. 47, 880–886 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Love, O. P., Gilchrist, H. G., Descamps, S., Semeniuk, C. A. D. & Bêty, J. Pre-laying climatic cues can time reproduction to optimally match offspring hatching and ice conditions in an Arctic marine bird. Oecologia 164, 277–286 (2010).ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Fast, P. L. F., Gilchrist, H. G. & Clark, R. G. Nest-site materials affect nest-bowl use by Common eiders (Somateria mollissima). Can. J. Zool. 88, 214–218 (2010).
Google Scholar 
McKinnon, L., Gilchrist, H. G. & Scribner, K. T. Genetic evidence for kin-based female social structure in Common eiders (Somateria mollissima). Behav. Ecol. 17, 614–621 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Descamps, S., Forbes, M. R., Gilchrist, H. G., Love, O. P. & Bêty, J. Avian cholera, post-hatching survival and selection on hatch characteristics in a long-lived bird, the Common eider Somateria mollissima. J. Avian Biol. 42, 39–48 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Buttler, E. I. Avian Cholera Among Arctic Breeding Common eiders Somateria mollissima: Temporal Dynamics and the Role of Handling Stress in Reproduction and Survival (Carleton University, 2009).
Google Scholar 
Descamps, S., Gilchrist, H. G., Bêty, J., Buttler, E. I. & Forbes, M. R. Costs of reproduction in a long-lived bird: large clutch size is associated with low survival in the presence of a highly virulent disease. Biol. Lett. 5, 278–281 (2009).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Iverson, S. A., Gilchrist, H. G., Smith, P. A., Gaston, A. J. & Forbes, M. R. Longer ice-free seasons increase the risk of nest depredation by Polar bears for colonial breeding birds in the Canadian Arctic. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 281, 20133128 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Dey, C. J. et al. Increasing nest predation will be insufficient to maintain Polar bear body condition in the face of sea ice loss. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 1821–1831 (2017).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Giese, M., Handsworth, R. & Stephenson, R. Measuring resting heart rates in penguins using an artificial egg. J. Field Ornithol. 70, 49–54 (1999).
Google Scholar 
Weller, M. W. A simple field candler for waterfowl eggs. J. Wildl. Manag. 20, 111–113 (1956).
Google Scholar 
Barnas, A. F. et al. A standardized protocol for reporting methods when using drones for wildlife research. J. Unmanned Veh. Syst. 8, 89–98 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Audacity Team. Audacity(R): Free Audio Editor and Recorder [Computer Application]. Version 2.3.2 retrieved Oct 10th 2019 from https://www.audacityteam.org/ (2019).Nimon, A. J., Schroter, R. C. & Oxenham, R. K. C. Artificial eggs: Measuring heart rate and effects of disturbance in nesting penguins. Physiol. Behav. 60, 1019–1022 (1996).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
SAS Institute Inc. SAS® Studio 3.8: User’s Guide (SAS Institute Inc, 2018).
Google Scholar 
Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach (Springer, 2002).MATH 

Google Scholar 
Akaike, H. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In Breakthroughs in Statistics, Volume I, Foundations and Basic Theory (eds Kotz, S. & Johnson, N. L.) 610–624 (Springer, New York, 1998).
Google Scholar 
Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L. & Müller, K. dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation. R package version 0.8.3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr (2015).Grolemund, G. & Wickham, H. Dates and times made easy with lubridate. J. Stat. Softw. 40, 1–25 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Hijmans, R. J., Williams, E. & Vennes, C. Geosphere: Spherical Trigonometry. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=geosphere (2017).Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer, 2016).MATH 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Found. Stat. Comput., Vienna, 2017).
Google Scholar  More

Gibney, E. R. & Nolan, C. M. Epigenetics and gene expression. Heredity 105, 4–13 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Vogt, G. Facilitation of environmental adaptation and evolution by epigenetic phenotype variation: Insights from clonal, invasive, polyploid, and domesticated animals. Environ. Epigenet. 3, 1–17 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Beal, A., Rodriguez-Casariego, J., Rivera-Casas, C., Suarez-Ulloa, V. & Eirin-Lopez, J. M. Environmental Epigenomics and Its Applications in Marine Organisms 325–359 (Springer, 2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/13836_2018_28.Book 

Google Scholar 
Hofmann, G. E. Ecological epigenetics in marine metazoans. Front. Mar. Sci. 4, 1–7 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Richards, C. L. et al. Ecological plant epigenetics: Evidence from model and non-model species, and the way forward. Ecol. Lett. 20, 1576–1590 (2017).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ryu, T., Veilleux, H. D., Donelson, J. M., Munday, P. L. & Ravasi, T. The epigenetic landscape of transgenerational acclimation to ocean warming. Nat. Clim. Chang. 8, 504–509 (2018).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Liew, Y. J. et al. Epigenome-associated phenotypic acclimatization to ocean acidification in a reef-building coral. Sci. Adv. 4, 6 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Anastasiadi, D., Díaz, N. & Piferrer, F. Small ocean temperature increases elicit stage-dependent changes in DNA methylation and gene expression in a fish, the European sea bass. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–12 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Strader, M. E., Wong, J. M., Kozal, L. C., Leach, T. S. & Hofmann, G. E. Parental environments alter DNA methylation in offspring of the purple sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 517, 54–64 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Rey, O. et al. Linking epigenetics and biological conservation: Towards a conservation epigenetics perspective. Funct. Ecol. 34, 414–427 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Eirin-Lopez, J. M. & Putnam, H. Editorial: Marine environmental epigenetics. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 5 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Herrera, C. M. & Bazaga, P. Untangling individual variation in natural populations: Ecological, genetic and epigenetic correlates of longterm inequality in herbivory. Mol. Ecol. 20, 1675–1688 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Varriale, A. DNA methylation, epigenetics, and evolution in vertebrates: Facts and challenges. Int. J. Evol. Biol. 2014, 1–7 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Liebl, A. L., Wesner, J. S., Russell, A. F. & Schrey, A. W. Methylation patterns at fledging predict delayed dispersal in a cooperatively breeding bird. PLoS ONE 16, e0252227 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Metzger, D. C. H. & Schulte, P. M. Persistent and plastic effects of temperature on DNA methylation across the genome of threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 284, 5 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Putnam, H. M., Davidson, J. M. & Gates, R. D. Ocean acidification influences host DNA methylation and phenotypic plasticity in environmentally susceptible corals. Evol. Appl. 9, 1165–1178 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Watson, R. G. A., Baldanzi, S., Pérez-Figueroa, A., Gouws, G. & Porri, F. Morphological and epigenetic variation in mussels from contrasting environments. Mar. Biol. 165, 8 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Baldanzi, S., Watson, R., McQuaid, C. D., Gouws, G. & Porri, F. Epigenetic variation among natural populations of the South African sandhopper Talorchestia capensis. Evol. Ecol. 31, 77–91 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Ardura, A., Zaiko, A., Morán, P., Planes, S. & Garcia-Vazquez, E. Epigenetic signatures of invasive status in populations of marine invertebrates. Sci. Rep. 7, 5 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Baldanzi, S., Storch, D., Navarrete, S. A., Graeve, M. & Fernández, M. Latitudinal variation in maternal investment traits of the kelp crab Taliepus dentatus along the coast of Chile. Mar. Biol. 165, 1 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Sobarzo, M., Bravo, L., Donoso, D., Garcés-Vargas, J. & Schneider, W. Coastal upwelling and seasonal cycles that influence the water column over the continental shelf off central Chile. Prog. Oceanogr. 75, 363–382 (2007).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Letelier, J., Pizarro, O. & Nuñez, S. Seasonal variability of coastal upwelling and the upwelling front off central Chile. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 114, 12009 (2009).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Vargas, C. A. et al. Species-specific responses to ocean acidification should account for local adaptation and adaptive plasticity. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1–7 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Pérez, C. A. et al. Influence of climate and land use in carbon biogeochemistry in lower reaches of rivers in central southern Chile: Implications for the carbonate system in river-influenced rocky shore environments. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosciences 120, 673–692 (2015).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Saldías, G. S. et al. Satellite-measured interannual variability of turbid river plumes off central-southern Chile: Spatial patterns and the influence of climate variability. Prog. Oceanogr. 146, 212–222 (2016).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Lara, C. et al. Coastal biophysical processes and the biogeography of rocky intertidal species along the south-eastern Pacific. J. Biogeogr. 46, 420–431 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Wieters, E. A. Upwelling control of positive interactions over mesoscales: A new link between bottom-up and top-down processes on rocky shores. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 301, 43–54 (2005).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Pérez-Matus, A., Carrasco, S. A., Gelcich, S., Fernandez, M. & Wieters, E. A. Exploring the effects of fishing pressure and upwelling intensity over subtidal kelp forest communities in Central Chile. Ecosphere 8, e01808 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Iranon, N. N. & Miller, D. L. Interactions between oxygen homeostasis, food availability, and hydrogen sulfide signaling. Front. Genet. 3, 5 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Ramajo, L., Lagos, N. A. & Duarte, C. M. Seagrass Posidonia oceanica diel pH fluctuations reduce the mortality of epiphytic forams under experimental ocean acidification. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 146, 247–254 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Aiken, C. & Navarrete, S. Environmental fluctuations and asymmetrical ­dispersal: Generalized stability theory for studying metapopulation persistence and marine protected areas. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 428, 77–88 (2011).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Baldanzi, S. et al. Combined effects of temperature and hypoxia shape female brooding behaviors and the early ontogeny of the Chilean kelp crab Taliepus dentatus. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 646, 93–107 (2020).ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Moran, A. L. & McAlister, J. S. Egg size as a life history character of marine invertebrates: Is it all it’s cracked up to be?. Biol. Bull. 216, 226–242 (2009).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Doherty-Weason, D. et al. Bioenergetics of parental investment in two polychaete species with contrasting reproductive strategies: The planktotrophic Boccardia chilensis and the poecilogonic Boccardia wellingtonensis (Spionidae). Mar. Ecol. 41, 1 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 57, 289–300 (1995).MathSciNet 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Steneck, R. S. et al. Kelp forest ecosystems: Biodiversity, stability, resilience and future. Environ. Conserv. 29, 436–459 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Sayols-Baixeras, S., Irvin, M. R., Arnett, D. K., Elosua, R. & Aslibekyan, S. W. Epigenetics of lipid phenotypes. Curr. Cardiovasc. Risk Rep. 10, 1–205 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Adam, A. C. et al. Profiling DNA methylation patterns of zebrafish liver associated with parental high dietary arachidonic acid. PLoS ONE 14, e0220934 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
García-Fernández, P., García-Souto, D., Almansa, E., Morán, P. & Gestal, C. Epigenetic DNA methylation mediating Octopus vulgaris early development: Effect of essential fatty acids enriched diet. Front. Physiol. 8, 1–9 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Hearn, J., Pearson, M., Blaxter, M., Wilson, P. J. & Little, T. J. Genome-wide methylation is modified by caloric restriction in Daphnia magna. BMC Genomics 20, 1–11 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Palma, A. T., Henríquez, L. A. & Ojeda, F. P. Phytoplanktonic primary production modulated by coastal geomorphology in a highly dynamic environment of central Chile. Rev. Biol. Mar. Oceanogr. 44, 325–334 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Faúndez-Báez, P., Morales, C. E. & Arcos, D. Variabilidad espacial y temporal en la hidrografía invernal del sistema de bahías frente a la VIII región (Chile centro-sur). Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat. 74, 817–831 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Osma, N. et al. Response of phytoplankton assemblages from naturally acidic coastal ecosystems to elevated pCO2. Front. Mar. Sci. 1, 323 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Rebolledo, L. et al. Siliceous productivity changes in Gulf of Ancud sediments (42°S, 72°W), southern Chile, over the last ∼150 years. Cont. Shelf Res. 31, 356–365 (2011).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Sun, Y. et al. Genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation in five tissues of Zhikong Scallop, Chlamys farreri. PLoS ONE 9, e86232 (2014).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bernhardt, J. R., O’Connor, M. I., Sunday, J. M. & Gonzalez, A. Life in fluctuating environments. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 375, 20190454 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Feinberg, A. P. & Irizarry, R. A. Colloquium Paper: Stochastic epigenetic variation as a driving force of development, evolutionary adaptation, and disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 1757 (2010).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Tapia, F. J., Largier, J. L., Castillo, M., Wieters, E. A. & Navarrete, S. A. Latitudinal discontinuity in thermal conditions along the nearshore of Central-Northern Chile. PLoS ONE 9, e110841 (2014).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Reyna-López, G. E., Simpson, J. & Ruiz-Herrera, J. Differences in DNA methylation patterns are detectable during the dimorphic transition of fungi by amplification of restriction polymorphisms. Mol. Gen. Genet. 253, 703–710 (1997).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Pérez-Figueroa, A. msap: A tool for the statistical analysis of methylation-sensitive amplified polymorphism data. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 13, 522–527 (2013).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gu, Z., Eils, R. & Schlesner, M. Complex heatmaps reveal patterns and correlations in multidimensional genomic data. Bioinformatics 32, 2847–2849 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Valladares, F., Sanches-Gomez, D. & Zavala, M. A. Quantitative estimation of phenotypic plasticity: Bridging the gap between the evolutionary concept and its ecological applications. J. Ecol. 94, 1103–1116 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Excoffier, L., Smouse, P. E. & Quattro, J. M. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: Application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131, 479–491 (1992).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar  More

Lim, C. & Putnam, R. D. Religion, social networks, and life satisfaction. Am. Sociol. Rev. 75, 914–933 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Fox, R. Kinship and marriage: an anthropological perspective/by Robin Fox. (1967).Lévi-Strauss, C. The elementary structures of kinship. (Beacon Press, 1969).Murdock, G. P. Social structure. Macmillan 387 (1949).Chapais, B. Primeval kinship: how pair-bonding gave birth to human society. (Harvard University Press, 2009).Walker, R. S. & Hill, K. R. Causes, consequences, and kin bias of human group fissions. Hum. Nat. 25, 465–475 (2014).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Shenk, M. K., Towner, M. C., Voss, E. A. & Alam, N. Consanguineous marriage, kinship ecology, and market transition. Curr. Anthropol. 57, S167–S180 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Swann, W. B. Jr., Gómez, A., Seyle, D. C., Morales, J. F. & Huici, C. Identity fusion: The interplay of personal and social identities in extreme group behavior. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 96, 995–1011 (2009).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Richerson, P. J. & Boyd, R. Complex societies. Hum. Nat. 10, 253–289 (1999).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zelinsky, W. The hypothesis of the mobility transition. Geogr. Rev. 61, 219–249 (1971).
Google Scholar 
Gurven, M., Jaeggi, A. V., von Rueden, C., Hooper, P. L. & Kaplan, H. Does market integration buffer risk, erode traditional sharing practices and increase inequality? A test among Bolivian forager-farmers. Hum. Ecol. Interdiscip. J. 43, 515–530 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Godoy, R. A. et al. Do markets worsen economic inequalities? Kuznets in the Bush. Hum. Ecol. 32, 339–364 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Kaplan, H. A theory of fertility and parental investment in traditional and modern human societies. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 101, 91–135 (1996).
Google Scholar 
Duernecker, G. & Vega-Redondo, F. Social Networks and the Process of Globalization. Rev. Econ. Stud. 85, 1716–1751 (2017).MathSciNet 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Colleran, H. Market integration reduces kin density in women’s ego-networks in rural Poland. Nat. Commun. 11, 266 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wilding, R. Families, intimacy and globalization. (Macmillan International Higher Education, 2018).Hackman, J. V. & Kramer, K. L. Kin Ties and market integration in a Yucatec Mayan Village. Soc. Sci. 10, 216 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Norenzayan, A. Big gods: How religion transformed cooperation and conflict. (Princeton University Press, 2013).Lauder, W., Mummery, K. & Sharkey, S. Social capital, age and religiosity in people who are lonely. J. Clin. Nurs. 15, 334–340 (2006).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Agate, S. T., Zabriskie, R. B. & Eggett, D. L. Praying, playing, and successful families. Marriage Fam. Rev. 42, 51–75 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Day, R. D. et al. Family processes and adolescent religiosity and religious practice: View from the NLSY97. Marriage Fam. Rev. 45, 289–309 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Fagan, P. F. Why religion matters even more: The impact of religious practice on social stability. Backgrounder 1992, 1–19 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Ellison, C. G. & George, L. K. Religious involvement, social ties, and social support in a Southeastern Community. J. Sci. Study Relig. 33, 46–61 (1994).
Google Scholar 
Ellison, C. G. & Xu, X. Religion and families. The Wiley Blackwell companion to the sociology of families 277–299 (2014).Ginges, J., Hansen, I. & Norenzayan, A. Religion and support for suicide attacks. Psychol. Sci. 20, 224–230 (2009).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lynch, R., Palestis, B. G. & Trivers, R. Religious devotion and extrinsic religiosity affect in-group altruism and out-group hostility oppositely in rural Jamaica. Evol. Psychol. Sci. 3, 335 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Walker, R. S. & Bailey, D. H. Marrying kin in small-scale societies. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 26, 384–388 (2014).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R. & Nanetti, R. Y. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. (Princeton University Press, 1994).Coleman, J. Foundations of Social Theory. (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1990).Wuthnow, R. The Left Behind: Decline and Rage in Rural America. (Princeton University Press, 2018).Sunstein, C. R. # Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. (Princeton University Press, 2018).Putnam, R. D. E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-first Century The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture. Scan. Polit. Stud. 30, (2007).Putnam, R. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. (Simon and Schuster, 2000).Olson, M. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Second printing with new preface and appendix (Harvard Economic Studies). Harvard economic studies, v. 124 (Harvard University Press, 1971).Granovetter, M. S. The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. (1973).Lynch, R., Lummaa, V. & Panchanathan, K. Integration involves a trade-off between fertility and status for World War II evacuees. Nature Human Behaviour (2019).Beyerlein, K. & Hipp, J. R. Social capital, too much of a good thing? American Religious Traditions and Community Crime. Soc. Forces 84, 995–1013 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Lewis, V. A., Macgregor, C. A. & Putnam, R. D. Religion, networks, and neighborliness: The impact of religious social networks on civic engagement. Soc. Sci. Res. 42, 331–346 (2013).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Yu, M. & Stiffman, A. R. Positive family relationships and religious affiliation as mediators between negative environment and illicit drug symptoms in American Indian adolescents. Addict. Behav. 35, 694–699 (2010).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Regnerus, M. D. & Burdette, A. Religious change and adolescent family dynamics. Sociol. Q. 47, 175–194 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Marks, L. Religion and family relational health: An overview and conceptual model. J. Relig. Health (2006).Thornton, A. Reciprocal Influences of Family and Religion in a Changing World. J. Marriage Fam. Couns. 47, 381–394 (1985).
Google Scholar 
Mahoney, A., Pargament, K. I., Murray-Swank, A. & Murray-Swank, N. Religion and the Sanctification of Family Relationships. Rev. Relig. Res. 44, 220–236 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Mahoney, A. Religion in families 1999 to 2009: A relational spirituality framework. J. Marriage Fam. 72, 805–827 (2010).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ebstyne King, P. & Furrow, J. L. Religion as a resource for positive youth development: religion, social capital, and moral outcomes. Dev. Psychol. 40, 703–713 (2004).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Dudley, M. G. & Kosinski, F. A. Religiosity and marital satisfaction: A research note. Rev. Relig. Res. 32, 78–86 (1990).
Google Scholar 
Milevsky, A., Smoot, K., Leh, M. & Ruppe, A. Familial and contextual variables and the nature of sibling relationships in emerging adulthood. Marriage Fam. Rev. 37, 123–141 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Galbraith, D. & Shaver, J. H. Religion and Fertility Bibliography. evolutionarydemographyofreligion.Shaver, J. H., Sibley, C. G., Sosis, R., Galbraith, D. & Bulbulia, J. Alloparenting and religious fertility: A test of the religious alloparenting hypothesis. Evol. Hum. Behav. 40, 315–324 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Kaufmann, E. Shall the Religious Inherit the Earth?: Demography and Politics in the Twenty-First Century. (Profile Books, 2010).Ebaugh, H. R. & Curry, M. Fictive Kin as social capital in new immigrant communities. Sociol. Perspect. 43, 189–209 (2000).
Google Scholar 
Taylor, R. J., Chatters, L. M., Woodward, A. T. & Brown, E. Racial and ethnic differences in extended family, friendship, fictive kin and congregational informal support networks. Fam. Relat. 62, 609–624 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Durkheim, E. The elementary forms of the religious life. Preprint at (1915).Rappaport, R. A. Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity. vol. 110 (Cambridge University Press, 1999).Hastings, O. P. Not a lonely crowd? Social connectedness, religious service attendance, and the spiritual but not religious. Soc. Sci. Res. 57, 63–79 (2016).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Putnam, R. & Campbell, D. E. American grace: How religion is reshaping our civic and political lives. Preprint at (2010).Turke, P. W. Evolution and the demand for children. Popul. Dev. Rev. 15, 61–90 (1989).
Google Scholar 
Sear, R. & Coall, D. How much does family matter? Cooperative breeding and the demographic transition. Popul. Dev. Rev. 37, 81–112 (2011).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Jenkins, P. Fertility and Faith: The Demographic Revolution and the Transformation of World Religions. (Baylor University Press, 2020).Rothstein, B. Corruption and social trust: Why the fish rots from the head down. Soc. Res. 80, 1009–1032 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Lynch, R, Schaffnit, S. and Shenk, M. OSF preregistration – Does religion help to preserve the density of kin networks often disrupted by globalization? Open Science Framework Registries. https://osf.io/xvyqm/registrations (2020).Alam, N. et al. Health and demographic surveillance system (HDSS) in Matlab, Bangladesh. Int. J. Epidemiol. 46, 809–816 (2017).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Icddr, B. Health and Demographic Surveillance System-Matlab. 2005 Socioeconomic Census (2007).Imf. International Monetary Fund. World Economic Outlook Database. (2016).Razzaque, A., Streatfield, P. K. & Evans, A. Family size and children’s education in Matlab, Bangladesh. J. Biosoc. Sci. 39, 245–256 (2007).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Afsar, R. Unravelling the vicious cycle of recruitment: Labour migration from Bangladesh to the gulf states. http://ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—ed_norm/—declaration/documents/publication/wcms_106536.pdf (2009).Kabeer, N. Ideas, economics and ‘the sociology of supply’: Explanations for fertility decline in Bangladesh. J. Dev. Stud. 38, 29–70 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Novak, J. J. Bangladesh: Reflections on the water. (Indiana University Press, 1993).Shenk, M. K., Towner, M. C., Kress, H. C. & Alam, N. A model comparison approach shows stronger support for economic models of fertility decline. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 8045–8050 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Devine, J., Hinks, T. & Naveed, A. Happiness in Bangladesh: The role of religion and connectedness. J. Happiness Stud. 20, 351–371 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Henrich, J. Market incorporation, agricultural change, and sustainability among the Machiguenga Indians of the Peruvian Amazon. Hum. Ecol. 25, 319–351 (1997).
Google Scholar 
Lu, F. Integration into the market among indigenous peoples: A cross-cultural perspective from the Ecuadorian Amazon. Curr. Anthropol. 48, 593–602 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Bürkner, P.-C. Advanced Bayesian Multilevel Modeling with the R Package brms. arXiv [stat.CO] (2017).Team, R. C. & Others. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (2013).Lynch, R. Kin_density_and-religiosity. (2021).McElreath, R. Statistical rethinking. (2017).Clarke, M. New kinship, Islam, and the liberal tradition: sexual morality and new reproductive technology in Lebanon. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 14, 153–169 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Swann, W. B. et al. What makes a group worth dying for? Identity fusion fosters perception of familial ties, promoting self-sacrifice. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 106, 912–926 (2014).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Benítez, D. M. Bangladesh: Economy Overview and Structural Changes. (2018).Viry, G. Residential mobility and the spatial dispersion of personal networks: Effects on social support. Soc. Networks 34, 59–72 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Mok, D., Wellman, B. & Carrasco, J. Does distance matter in the age of the internet?. Urban Stud. 47, 2747–2783 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Rivera, M. T., Soderstrom, S. B. & Uzzi, B. Dynamics of dyads in social networks: Assortative, relational, and proximity mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 36, 91–115 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Pollet, T. V., Roberts, S. G. B. & Dunbar, R. I. M. Going that extra mile: Individuals travel further to maintain face-to-face contact with highly related kin than with less related kin. PLoS ONE 8, e53929 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Madhavan, S., Clark, S., Araos, M. & Beguy, D. Distance or location? How the geographic distribution of kin networks shapes support given to single mothers in urban Kenya. Geogr. J. 184, 75–88 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Curry, O., Roberts, S. G. B. & Dunbar, R. I. M. Altruism in social networks: evidence for a ‘kinship premium’. Br. J. Psychol. 104, 283–295 (2013).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sullivan, K. & Sullivan, A. Adolescent–parent separation. Dev. Psychol. 16, 93 (1980).
Google Scholar 
Roberts, S. G. B. & Dunbar, R. I. M. Communication in social networks: Effects of kinship, network size, and emotional closeness. Pers. Relatsh. 18, 439–452 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Shenk, M. K. et al. Social support, nutrition and health among women in rural Bangladesh: complex tradeoffs in allocare, kin proximity and support network size. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 376, 207 (2021).Snopkowski, K. & Sear, R. Grandparental help in Indonesia is directed preferentially towards needier descendants: A potential confounder when exploring grandparental influences on child health. Soc. Sci. Med. 128, 105–114 (2015).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Schaffnit, S. B. & Sear, R. Support for new mothers and fertility in the United Kingdom: Not all support is equal in the decision to have a second child. Popul. Stud. 71, 345–361 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Boyer, P. The Naturalness of Religious Ideas: A Cognitive Theory of Religion. (University of California Press, 1994).Thomas, M. G. et al. Kinship underlies costly cooperation in Mosuo villages. R Soc Open Sci 5, 171535 (2018).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Maqsood, A. Love as understanding. Am. Ethnol. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.13000 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schurmann, A. T. & Mahmud, S. Civil society, health, and social exclusion in Bangladesh. J. Health Popul. Nutr. 27, 536–544 (2009).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Haque, M. R., Hasan, M. S., Alam, N., Barkat, S. & Others. Fertility preferences in Bangladesh. in Family Demography in Asia (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018).Mattison, S. M. Economic impacts of tourism and erosion of the visiting system among the Mosuo of Lugu Lake. Asia Pac. J. Anthropol. 11, 159–176 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Mattison, S. M. et al. Context specificity of ‘market integration’ among the matrilineal Mosuo of Southwest China. Curr. Anthropol. 63, 118–124 (2022).
Google Scholar 
Uchida, Y., Kitayama, S., Mesquita, B., Reyes, J. A. S. & Morling, B. Is perceived emotional support beneficial? Well-being and health in independent and interdependent cultures. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 34, 741–754 (2008).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Reblin, M. & Uchino, B. N. Social and emotional support and its implication for health. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 21, 201–205 (2008).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Inglehart, R. Faith and freedom: Traditional and modern ways to happiness. Int. Differ. Well-being 351, 397 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Ferriss, A. L. Religion and the Quality of Life. J. Happiness Stud. 3, 199–215 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Greeley, A. & Hout, M. Happiness and lifestyle among conservative Christians. The truth about conservative Christians 1, 150–161 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Pilisuk, M. Kinship, social networks, social support and health. Soc. Sci. Med. 12, 273–280 (1978).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Schaffnit, S. B. & Sear, R. Supportive families versus support from families: The decision to have a child in the Netherlands. Demogr. Res. 37, 417–454 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Hassan, A., Lawson, D., Schaffnit, S. B., Urassa, M. & Sear, R. Childcare in transition: evidence that patterns of childcare differ by degree of market integration in north-western Tanzania. (2021).https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/gtc6kPutnam, R. D. Democracies in Flux: The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society. (Oxford University Press, 2004). More

Chromatographic separation and mass spectrometric optimizationTo obtain the best monitoring conditions for each compound, a 0.5 mg/L mixed standard solution of 11 pesticides was mixed with the mobile phase through a syringe pump and then injected into the mass spectrometer for tuning. The precursor ion of the compound to be tested was determined by the primary mass spectrometry scan under ESI+ and ESI- modes, and then the product ion was scanned by the secondary mass spectrometry. Two groups of ion pairs with the best sensitivity were selected for detection; one group was used for quantification, and another, for qualitative analysis. The optimization results showed high sensitivity of all the 11 pesticides under the ESI+ mode. Among them, abamectin (B1a), β-cypermethrin, deltamethrin, fenpropathrin, and bifenthrin were [M + NH4]+, and other compounds were [M + H]+. MS parameters of 11 pesticides are mentioned in Table S2.Formic acid and ammonium acetate are commonly used reagents to enhance the ionization of target compounds [M + H]+ and [M + NH4]+ under the ESI+ mode, and they can effectively improve the peak pattern, making the peak sharper and more symmetrical; therefore, they need to be added during gradient elution38. To improve work efficiency, it is necessary to separate and complete the monitoring of 11 pesticides in the shortest possible time; therefore, we selected two different types of chromatographic columns (ACQUITY UPLC HSS C18 and ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3) and three different mobile phases (Ι: 0.1% formic acid aqueous solution—ACN, II: 0.05% formic acid aqueous solution—ACN, and III: 0.1% formic acid/5 mmol/L ammonium acetate aqueous solution—ACN) for optimization experiments. We observed that when using the HSS T3 chromatographic column, β-cypermethrin, deltamethrin, fenpropathrin, and bifenthrin did not show a good retention effect under the three mobile phase systems, and there was substantial tailing of the chromatographic peak. The shape of the chromatographic peak and sensitivity of the target compound were used as evaluation indicators. Compared with Ι and II, mobile phase III produced better sensitivity for all target compounds (Fig. 1), with sharper and more symmetrical peaks of β-cypermethrin, deltamethrin, fenpropathrin, and bifenthrin. This may be because the addition of 5 mmol/L ammonium acetate improved the retention performance of the HSS C18 chromatography columns without affecting the ionization efficiency of all target compounds. In summary, we selected the HSS C18 column for chromatographic separation and used 0.1% formic acid/5 mmol/L ammonium acetate aqueous solution—ACN as the mobile phase to further optimize the gradient elution procedure and effectively separate and detect all the target compounds within 8 min.Figure 1When using HSS C18, the peak areas of 11 pesticides in three different mobile phases.Full size imageOptimization of purification materialsThe flesh of apricot contains sugar, protein, calcium, phosphorus, carotene, thiamine, riboflavin, niacin, and vitamin C. Due to these diverse impurities, the analysis of the sample matrix becomes highly complex. Therefore, these impurities need to be removed from the matrix samples before analysis. Currently, PSA, C18, and MWCNTs are widely used to adsorb to the fruit substrate39. PSA has a strong adsorption capacity for metal ions, fatty acids, sugars, and fat-soluble pigments, C18 has a strong adsorption capacity for non-polar impurities (such as fat, sterol, and volatile oil), while MWCNTs have a strong adsorption capacity for pigments, which can effectively remove chlorophyll, lutein, and carotene. However, C18 and MWCNTs can also simultaneously adsorb pesticides, resulting in poor recovery. Nano-ZrO2 has a large specific surface area and good adsorption stability and has recently been used to purify substrates. It can selectively remove fats and pigments from samples compared to conventional C18 fillers.In the current study, different purification materials were combined for the analysis of 11 pesticide residues and to propose the best purification strategy in the pretreatment of apricot samples. As displayed in Fig. 2, the average recovery of 11 pesticides in the apricot was higher using the C18/nano-ZrO2/MWCNTs than other combinations. Nano-ZrO2 showed better adsorption than PSA in purifying fatty acids, organic acids, polar pigments, and sugars in apricot, owing to its larger specific surface area, better adsorption capacity, and stability. To conclude, the combination of 10 mg C18, 30 mg nano-ZrO2, and 5 mg MWCNTs demonstrated the best recovery for 11 pesticides, with recovery in the range of 72% to 114%, at a pesticide spiking level of 0.01 mg/kg. In summary, we finally determined that among the tested combinations, C18/nano-ZrO2/MWCNTs (10 mg/ 30 mg/5 mg) is the best purification combination for the pre-treatment of apricot samples.Figure 2The recoveries of 11 pesticides in apricot matrix under different scavenger combinations (2–1 C18/nano-ZrO2/MWCNTs, 2–2 PSA/C18/MWCNTs, 2–3 nano-ZrO2/PSA/MWCNTs; 0.01 mg/kg, n = 3).Full size imageLinearity, matrix effects, limit of detection and limit of quantificationThe standard curve obtained from the standard working solutions of 11 pesticides and the calibration curve from blank apricot matrix spiked with 11 pesticides showed good linearity (0.001, 0.005, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, and 0.5 mg/L), with R2 ≥ 0.9959 for all tested samples (Table 1).Table 1 The standard curves, R2 and MEs of 11 pesticides in apricot.Full size tableTo evaluate MEs, the slopes of matching 11 pesticide standards with solvent and apricot matrix were calculated at the same concentration. According to the derived slope of the matrix-matched calibration curve, MEs of 11 pesticides in apricot were between 89 and 113% (Table 1), well within the range of 80% to 120%, indicating that the MEs could be ignored. It also suggests that the current pre-treatment method has a good purification effect and eliminates the matrix effect very well, laying a robust foundation for the subsequent step of quantitative analysis of samples. We next used the standard solution curve to quantify the 11 pesticide residues in apricot.The LOD refers to the minimum concentration or minimum amount of a component to be tested that can be detected from a test sample under a given confidence level by an analytical method. Its physical meaning is the amount of the measured component when the signal is 3 times the standard deviation (S = 3σ) of the reagent blank signal (background signal). Sometimes it also refers to the amount of the measured component corresponding to when the signal is three times the background signal generated by the reagent blank (S = 3 N). The LOQ refers to the minimum amount of the analyte in the sample that can be quantitatively determined, and the determination result should have a certain accuracy40. The LOQ reflects whether the analytical method has the sensitive quantitative detection ability. The LOQ is the lowest validated level with sufficient recovery and precision, which was estimated to be 0.001 mg/L, while the LOD is the lowest calibration level, which was 2 µg/kg, according to SANTE/12,682/2020.Accuracy and precisionIn the matrix, 11 pesticides were spiked at four levels (0.002, 0.02, 0.1, and 1 mg/kg), and for each spiked sample, there were six replicates. The recoveries of 11 pesticides in apricot at all levels ranged between 72 and 119%. The inter- and intra-level relative standard deviations (RSDs, %) of 11 pesticides in apricot were  More

The richness of Melanesian FrogsApproximately 7.2% (534 out of 7404) of Earth’s recognised frog species occur in Melanesia, a region comprising < 0.7% of the world’s land area. Frog richness in Melanesia, and especially on New Guinea and nearby land-bridge islands (471 species), is higher than in any other tropical insular region (Fig. 1a). New Melanesian frog species have been described at an average rate of nearly 13 species/year since 2000, and the recognised frog fauna has grown by > 50% in that timeframe (Fig. 1b). The authorship of new species has been concentrated, with six authors featuring on 20 or more descriptions since 2000, and one or more of these six authors on every species description since 2000. A small number of species descriptions has included genetic data (31 species), although a higher number of Melanesian frog species have at least one sequence available on GenBank (~38%, or approximately 200 species). This taxonomic work has revealed or emphasised many evolutionary novelties (Fig. 2): multiple apparently independent derivations of extremely miniaturised vertebrates22,23,24, including some of the world’s smallest known tetrapods23,25,26; multiple derivations of complex parental care in different genera27,28; frequent evolutionary shifts between terrestrial, arboreal and scansorial lifecycles22,29; the most extreme sexual size dimorphism yet documented in anurans30; drastic ontogenetic colour change31; a radiation of canopy-dwelling treefrogs32 that show extensive finger webbing and parachuting behaviour convergent with unrelated frog lineages in Asia and the Neotropics; and treefrogs with erectile noses33,34. Taxonomic work has also elucidated novel concentrations of range-restricted endemic taxa, especially in the Milne Bay Region at the far eastern edge of New Guinea21.Fig. 1: Temporal trends in the documentation of the Melanesian frog fauna.a Species accumulation curves for species-rich ( >100 species) insular frog biotas (Species lists from AmphibiaWeb as of 1 October 2021). Separate accumulation curves are given for the entire fauna of Melanesia (including New Guinea), and the fauna of New Guinea and nearby predominantly land-bridge islands. b Species accumulation curve for frogs within Melanesia. Bar at end indicates predicted number of species in each major family based on known, but as yet undescribed candidate species.Full size imageFig. 2: Melanesian frog species described within the last 15 years illustrating the ecological and morphological diversity of the fauna.a Paedophryne titan and b Choerophryne gracilirostris – examples of lineages that have undergone convergent minaturisation; c Choerophryne alpestris – a fossorial species within a largely scansorial lineage; d Xenorhina macrodisca – scansorial species within a largely fossorial lineage; e Cornufer custos and f Oreophryne oviprotector – independent derivations of complex parental care; g Litoria pallidofemora – extensive digital webbing for parachuting; and h Litoria pinocchio – sexually dimorphic and erectile rostral spikes. Photographs F. Kraus (a), S. Richards (b–g), and courtesy of T. Laman (h).Full size imageFrog species richness in Melanesia is highly concentrated into just three families, with Pelodryadidae (137 recognised species, estimated ~200) and especially Microhylidae (317 species, estimated >400) dominating. Melanesian Pelodryadidae are phylogenetically interdigitated with relatives in Australia, suggesting multiple dispersals between the two regions35. In contrast, ancestors of the direct-developing microhylids colonised Melanesia from Asia via trans-marine dispersal likely only once36, radiated across open ecological niches37, and are now the most species-rich insular radiation of frogs in the world. The third major family comprises an ecologically diverse radiation of the direct-developing Ceratobatrachidae (57 species, estimated 66) largely associated with island-arc terranes of East Melanesia and the Philippines, indicating a long history of insular diversification and trans-marine dispersal38. The predominance of direct-developing frogs in Melanesia (~70% of species) mirrors insular faunas in Madagascar (~34%), Sri Lanka (~67%) and the Greater Antilles (~87%). The other four frog families in Melanesia are all relatively species poor (2, 3, 4, and 13 species) (Fig. 1a), centred in New Guinea, and include lineages originating in Asia (Ranidae, Dicroglossidae) or Australia (Myobatrachidae, Limnodynastidae).The described diversity of Melanesian amphibian species remains an underestimate. Survey work and investigation of museum collections by the co-authors identified ~190 additional candidate species distributed across 16 different genera, mostly from Papua New Guinea, suggesting a total richness of over 700 frog species (Fig. 1a, Supplementary Table 1). This estimated percentage of undescribed diversity (~25%) mirrors estimates for the New Guinean flora (~18–22%)7. The majority of candidate species are concentrated in the two most diverse families (Microhylidae and Pelodryadidae), although genetic, morphological, and acoustic evidence indicate the diversity of Melanesian Ranidae is also underestimated (S. Richards and F. Kraus pers. obs.). Most material documenting candidate species has been collected in the last 20 years, and the vast majority is from Papua New Guinea (Supplementary Fig. 1). There is some suggestion of a slowing in the rate of candidate species discovery in the last decade (Supplementary Fig. 2); however, several of the most active field workers in this region have ceased survey work in recent years, which likely accounts for much of this decline. The pervasiveness of complexes of morphologically and/or acoustically cryptic taxa is poorly understood; survey work continues to reveal novelties, and large areas of the region remain unsurveyed or undersampled. In particular, comparisons of area-to-diversity ratios between the better-known eastern portion of New Guinea (Papua New Guinea) with the poorly surveyed western (Indonesian) portion of the island further suggest that, even with candidate species included, diversity in the latter region may be underestimated by as much as 50% (Supplementary Methods and Results, Supplementary Table 2). These trends and patterns all indicate that ~ 700 species is a very conservative minimum estimate of total diversity and support analyses in other taxa showing Melanesia remains a hotspot of unrecognised diversity39,40.Endemism and distributional patternsThe Melanesian frog fauna is highly endemic (97.2%), with tiny proportions of species shared with Australia (2.4%) or with islands farther west in Indonesia (0.6%), indicating that Australia and Melanesia are discrete centres of frog diversification, despite periodic connection via land bridges through the late Tertiary41. The vast majority of Melanesian frog species (471) occur on New Guinea and nearby land-bridge islands (Raja Ampats, Japen and the Milne Bay islands). In comparison, the frog fauna of the much smaller region of Maluku is depauperate (16 species, of which nine are endemic) but also almost certainly underestimated (e.g., there are no Microhylidae recorded from Buru). Most taxa from Maluku are congeneric (and several conspecific) with lineages centred on New Guinea, supporting the biogeographic clustering of Maluku’s amphibians with the main island of New Guinea. In contrast, the frog fauna of East Melanesia is more diverse and highly endemic and dominated by an ecologically diverse radiation of a different family (Ceratobatrachidae) with only four (all pelodryadid treefrogs) out of 56 species shared with nearby New Guinea. East Melanesia and New Guinea appear to be discrete and long-isolated centres of diversification, as expected from their independent geological histories42.Melanesia spans five countries, and this has possibly to some degree masked the exceptional species diversity of the overall region. Papua New Guinea has the highest number of species (398) and endemic species (318). This likely reflects some combination of its slightly larger area (when islands to the north are included), more diverse geological origins, and greater inventory work than seen in neighbouring regions of Indonesia7. Papua, West Papua and Maluku (Indonesia) have many fewer documented species (197), of which a majority (134) is endemic. The boundary between Papua and Papua New Guinea is visible in species-richness maps (Fig. 3a), with lower diversity to the west, indicating that the distribution and diversity of frogs in Indonesia remain less documented in science. The frog faunas of the Solomon Islands (21 species) and Fiji (two species) are more depauperate but include a significant endemic or near-endemic component, whereas the geographically intervening islands of Vanuatu support no native frogs.Fig. 3: Frog species richness in Melanesia based on IUCN distributional maps for all species described by 2019.a All species; b Ceratobatrachidae; c Microhylidae; d Pelodryadidae. Areas of highest estimated diversity correspond to mountain ranges in central and northern New Guinea. The boundaries between Maluku, New Guinea and East Melanesia are indicated. Fiji has only two frog species and is geographically distant from other areas of Melanesia inhabited by frogs and is not visble on this map.Full size imageBased on distribution maps generated for all species recognised by 31 August 2019, the highest regional alpha diversity of frogs occurs along the Central Cordillera of New Guinea (especially in Papua New Guinea) and around the higher mountain ranges along the north coast of Papua New Guinea (Fig. 3a). These centres of diversity correlate with extensive areas of hill and montane forest and broadly correspond with elevational species-richness patterns for mammals and birds in Melanesia43 and for many other taxa elsewhere in the tropics44,45. Large areas of montane forest with lower species richness along the northern versant of the Central Cordillera in Papua New Guinea and in mountain ranges across Papua certainly reflect inadequate sampling. The ceratobatrachid-dominated frog fauna of East Melanesia is richest in Bougainville (Fig. 3d), with attenuating richness towards the west and especially to the east. The two most speciose families both show alpha diversity peaks in mountainous areas of central New Guinea (Fig. 3c–d). In contrast, microhylids are largely absent from the seasonally dry woodlands of the Trans-Fly region in southern New Guinea and exhibit high diversity in northern New Guinea, whereas pelodryadids are much more speciose in the lowlands of southern New Guinea than northern New Guinea. These broad trends may have both ecological (sensitivity of direct-developing microhylids to dry conditions) and historical (Australia as a centre of origin for savanna-adapted Pelodrydidae) underpinnings.The historical and contemporary factors underpinning high frog species diversity in New Guinea remain largely unstudied, especially when compared to other species-rich insular amphibian faunas such as Madagascar46 or the Greater Antilles47. When compared to some areas of the Neotropics, alpha and beta diversities of frogs in lowland forests in the basins of the Sepik and Ramu rivers in New Guinea are unremarkable48. However, the Milne Bay Region has exceptionally high levels of endemism21, so species turnover will be higher in this area. Extent-of-occurrence estimates derived from IUCN maps indicate that direct-developing microhylids have smaller mean and median range sizes than all other families of frogs in Melanesia (Supplementary Table 3). Microhylidae also dominate anuran species diversity in Milne Bay21 and many mountain areas where standing water is very limited49. These data suggest that, as with some areas in the Neotropics50, high beta diversity in lineages with direct development is a key factor underpinning amphibian megadiversity in Melanesia. To address these questions further, synthetic analyses are required to better quantify the extent to which regional megadiversity in Melanesia reflects high community diversity versus species turnover, how elevation and insularity moderates these two parameters, and to what extent emergent patterns may differ from diverse frog communities in other regions such as the Neotropics.The conservation status of Melanesian FrogsThe frog fauna of Melanesia is currently less threatened but more Data Deficient than other comparable insular regions (Fig. 4a). The vast majority of Melanesian frogs are categorised as Least Concern (68%) or Data Deficient (24%). Thirty-one species (6%, or 8% if Data Deficient taxa are excluded) are threatened (Critically Endangered, Endangered, Vulnerable) (Supplementary Table 4), and eight species are considered Near Threatened. No species are assessed as Extinct or Extinct in the Wild. Since the first Global Amphibian Assessment in 2004, the number of Melanesian frog species has grown by 44%, and nearly 60% of the 31 Melanesian frog species now considered threatened were described after 2004 (Fig. 1a). Only one change in status between 2004 and 2019 was considered genuine (Cophixalus sphagnicola), due to the emerging threat of a newly opened mine. All other status changes (for 116 taxa) reflect better information on distribution or changed assessment protocols (Supplementary Table 5). Applying stricter criteria for use of the Data Deficient category in the 2019 IUCN assessment reduced the number of Data Deficient species when compared to 2004 (125 versus 197), but Melanesia still has a higher percentage of Data Deficient taxa than other species-rich tropical insular faunas (Fig. 4a).Fig. 4: The conservation status of Melanesian frogs.a Comparison of number of species in each IUCN threat category across Melanesia, other diverse insular regions, and the nearby continent of Australia. Melanesia has a proportionally low number of threatened taxa but high number of Data Deficient taxa (EX Extinct, CR Critically Endangered, EN Endangered, VU Vulnerable, NT Near Threatened, DD Data Deficient, LC Least Concern, NE Not Evaluated); b Slopes around Mt Simpson, Milne Bay Province, a hotspot of threatened frog diversity due to forest loss through conversion to anthropogenic grasslands; c Choerophryne sanguinopicta from Mt Simpson (Critically Endangered); d Oreophryne ezra from Rossel Island (Critically Endangered) and; e Cornufer citrinospilus from New Britain (Vulnerable). Photographs F. Kraus (b–d), S. Richards (e).Full size imageAll Critically Endangered and Endangered—and most of the Vulnerable—species were listed because of their small extent of occurrence and on-going decline in habitat area and/or quality (criteria B1ab(iii)) (Supplementary Table 6). The key threatening processes were typically forest disturbance or loss due to conversion to plantations or gardens, repeated burning, or mining (Fig. 4b–c). Only two insular species with very localised montane distributions were considered threatened by climatic disturbance and/or climate change alone (Cornufer citrinospilus and Oreophryne ezra) (Fig. 4d–e). No species were currently declining from pathogens, and in particular Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd), which remains undetected in Melaneisa51. However, the introduction and establishment of Bd has been identified as a severe threat for well over one hundred taxa52, especially for montane pelodryadid treefrogs, a group that has been devastated by this disease in parts of Australia.Although much of New Guinea has historically been considered a ‘wilderness area’ with comparatively little human impact53, the distributions of threatened taxa also highlight areas of conservation concern wherein range-restricted (often single-island endemic) taxa overlap with extensive and increasing anthropogenic impacts (Fig. 5a–b). Nearly half the species identified as threatened (13) are restricted to a recently delineated dramatic centre of herpetofaunal endemism in the Milne Bay Region at the eastern tip of Papua New Guinea21. Three clusters of small-range endemics in this region (all documented in the last two decades) present immediate conservation issues. The first is Mount Simpson, where six microhylids (four named, two awaiting description) with highly restricted ranges are threatened by habitat loss, especially repeated burning and associated conversion of forest to grassland (Fig. 4b). The second is Woodlark Island, where the status of seven endemic microhylids (six named, one undescribed) is likely to worsen rapidly if current, approved proposals to convert large areas of primary forest to oil-palm plantation and/or gold mines proceed21. Finally, Misima Island is home to four endemic microhylids (two considered threatened) with ranges that overlap areas disturbed by mining and forest loss21. Other regions with multiple overlapping threatened taxa are the Adelbert Mountains in Morobe Province (two species), New Britain (two lowland species and one highland species), and Greater Bukida in the Solomon Islands (three lowland species). These clusters of narrow-range taxa highlight important—and in most cases largely overlooked—conservation priorities for Melanesian frogs (and likely other taxa as well21,54). The high percentage of Data Deficient species and low level of survey effort in many areas (especially Papua and West Papua Provinces, Indonesia) also raise the possibility that other threatened hotspots remain overlooked. One area of particular concern may be the island of Biak in Indonesia, which has lost much of its primary vegetation but is home to at least three endemic frogs (one Data Deficient, two Least Concern).Fig. 5: The distribution of threatened frogs in Melanesia.a The estimated distribution of all 31 Melanesian frog species considered Critically Endangered, Endangered or Vulnerable at the end of 2019. Distributional areas are not colour coded by the number of threatened taxa. b Close up of the Milne Bay endemism hotspot. Distributional areas are colour coded by number of taxa, with darker tones indicating more taxa. In both a and b upland areas or islands where the distributions of two or more threatened species overlap are labelled and the number of threatened taxa are indicated in parentheses. Background maps uses the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) 30-meter digital elevation model, accessed from USGS Earth Explorer (https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/).Full size imageUnderstanding and conserving a megadiverse biotaThe Melanesian flora and frog fauna are both now shown to be megadiverse and highly endemic, yet both also remain poorly known with large areas under-surveyed. An updated comprehensive assessment of threats and taxonomic trends across the frog fauna presented here further highlights that the biota of Melanesia remains relatively intact and less threatened when compared to other biodiverse insular regions. However, a large proportion of the fauna remains Data Deficient or undescribed, and key hotspots of endemism have been overlooked and are increasingly threatened. In both plants and anurans much scientific knowledge of Melanesia’s biota has also been contributed by a relatively small number of productive, but later-career researchers based outside of Melanesia7.Further documenting and conserving the exceptional diversity of Melanesia presents a suite of challenges and opportunities. Recommendations to enable improved documentation of plant megadiversity in Melanesia7 centre around training, capacity-building and support for taxonomy in Melanesia and globally, improving access to specimen collections and diagnostic resources, and ongoing support for survey and collecting within Melanesia. These recommendations apply equally to amphibians. However, addressing these challenges is tempered by the limited career opportunities available to ecologists and taxonomists (both in developed, but especially in developing countries), the variable quality of scientific infrastructure that exists across the region, and the high cost of doing fieldwork in remote areas with limited logistical infrastructure. In the context of these challenges, we hereby focus on suggesting some short-term key priorities and opportunities to build capacity for understanding and conserving frog biodiversity in Melanesia.First, over the last twenty years opportunities to employ Melanesian nationals in survey, monitoring and outreach work have been (and will continue to be) generated predominantly by NGOs, universities and large-scale extractive projects, for example through recent work in the gas fields of the Papua New Guinea Highlands49. While there are diverse perspectives on extractive industries, monitoring and survey work associated with large development projects are a key source of funds to provide training to enable Melanesians to undertake biodiversity work within the region. A key driver of this is strong environmental legislation required by some governments and major lending agencies, in particular the International Finance Corporation under Performance Standard 655. These requirements need to be maintained, enforced and, where possible, exceeded.To further support fieldwork by national scientists there is a need for more readily accessible identification resources for Melanesian researchers, land-owners and managers. An up-to-date comprehensive identification guide to the frog fauna of the whole region would assist and promote taxonomic, ecological and conservation research. However, for many Melanesians, small, regionally focused guides are more usable. These have already been produced for several areas (Supplementary References), providing a model that can be updated and transferred to other regions. Mobile phones are widely used throughout Melanesia, so app- and online-based identification resources may become increasingly accessible. Smartphone-friendly citizen science platforms like iNaturalist56 or even Facebook groups57 also provide potentially powerful resources through which locally collected data can be captured, vetted and disseminated, although their use is currently limited in Melanesia due to patchy internet coverage in many areas. Working with and supporting people from Melanesia to explore and increase the use of these resources could help to ensure longer-term preservation and accessibility of species records and associated data.The latest IUCN assessment for Melanesian frogs also highlights how taxonomic and conservation knowledge is accumulating rapidly. The key geographic areas of threat identified in our study were largely invisible to assessments made less than two decades ago (in 2004) both because the relevant taxonomic work had not been done, and because the situation in Melanesia is changing rapidly. To keep track of these rapid changes it is critical for workers in the region to work together to synthesise and collate new taxonomic, distributional and conservation data. Indeed, since the 2019 IUCN assessment over 20 additional species of Melanesian frogs have been described, and their conservation status should be assessed as a matter of urgency. Preliminary conservation assessments against IUCN criteria are increasingly being included in descriptions, and this trend should be supported and encouraged. More Melanesian nationals need to be involved in conservation assessment processes. Updated comprehensive conservation assessments of other vertebrate groups will also identify complementarity of conservation priorities among taxa in the Melanesian region.Patterns of distribution and threat suggest some geographic priority areas for documenting the diversity of amphibians (and potentially other low-vagility taxa) in Melanesia. First, work in eastern New Guinea has allowed the delineation of geographically localised clusters of threatened taxa that have until now gone unnoticed, perhaps in part because of the designation of much of Melanesia as a sparsely populated and comparatively undisturbed ‘wilderness’ area21. Most threatened frog taxa in these regions are associated with small islands or isolated ‘sky island’ mountains. The degree to which other taxa show endemism in these areas is poorly known. The biotas of potentially comparable islands in Indonesia such as the Raja Ampat Islands, Geelvink Bay and southern Maluku, also remain poorly known, suggesting additional priority areas for survey, taxonomic investigation and conservation assessment. Second, mid-elevation areas show highest alpha diversity, but large areas of this habitat, especially along the northern slopes of the Central Cordillera, remain poorly surveyed. The frog pathogen Bd has devastated montane communities of two Australian frog families that also occur in montane New Guinea (Myobatrachidae and Pelodryadidae)52. In the unfortunate event that Bd colonised New Guinea a wave of rapid declines and extinctions would likely follow52, so a strong baseline of information on montane species diversity, distributions and population status is critical for detecting these impacts. More

Potts, S. G. et al. (eds.). IPBES: The Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services on Pollinators, Pollination and Food Production (Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, Bonn, Germany) (2016).Potts, S. G. et al. Global pollinator declines: Trends, impacts and drivers. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 345–353 (2010).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Goulson, D., Nicholls, E., Botías, C. & Rotheray, E. L. Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers. Science 347, 1255957 (2015).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Majewska, A. A. & Altizer, S. Planting gardens to support insect pollinators. Conserv. Biol. 34, 15–25 (2020).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Image, M. et al. Does agri-environment scheme participation in England increase pollinator populations and crop pollination services?. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 325, 107755 (2022).
Google Scholar 
Vaissière, B., Freitas, B. M. & Gemmill-Herren, B. Protocol to Detect and Assess Pollination Deficits in Crops: A Handbook for Its Use (FAO, 2011).
Google Scholar 
Archer, C. R., Pirk, C. W. W., Carvalheiro, L. G. & Nicolson, S. W. Economic and ecological implications of geographic bias in pollinator ecology in the light of pollinator declines. Oikos 123, 401–407 (2014).
Google Scholar 
M’Gonigle, L. K., Ponisio, L. C., Cutler, K. & Kremen, C. Habitat restoration promotes pollinator persistence and colonization in intensively managed agriculture. Ecol. Appl. 25, 1557–1565 (2015).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Garbuzov, M. & Ratnieks, F. L. W. Listmania: The strengths and weaknesses of lists of garden plants to help pollinators. Bioscience 64, 1019–1026 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Garbuzov, M. & Ratnieks, F. L. W. Quantifying variation among garden plants in attractiveness to bees and other flower-visiting insects. Funct. Ecol. 28, 364–374 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Garbuzov, M., Alton, K. & Ratnieks, F. L. W. Most ornamental plants on sale in garden centres are unattractive to flower-visiting insects. PeerJ 5, e3066 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Nichols, R. N., Goulson, D. & Holland, J. M. The best wildflowers for wild bees. J. Insect Conserv. 23, 819–830 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Harmon-Threatt, A. Influence of nesting characteristics on health of wild bee communities. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 65, 39–56 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Requier, F. & Leonhardt, S. D. Beyond flowers: Including non-floral resources in bee conservation schemes. J. Insect Conserv. 24, 5–16 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Sinu, P. A. & Bronstein, J. L. Foraging preferences of leafcutter bees in three contrasting geographical zones. Divers. Distrib. 24, 621–628 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Cecala, J. M. & Rankin, E. E. Pollinators and plant nurseries: How irrigation and pesticide treatment of native ornamental plants impact solitary bees. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 288, 20211287 (2021).
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Gonzalez, V. H., Gustafson, G. T. & Engel, M. S. Morphological phylogeny of Megachilini and the evolution of leaf-cutter behavior in bees (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). J. Melittology 85, 1–123 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Kambli̇, S. S. et al. M. S. Aiswarya, K. Manoj, S. Varma, G. Asha, T. P. Rajesh, P. A. Sinu, Leaf foraging sources of leafcutter bees in a tropical environment: Implications for conservation. Apidologie 48, 473–482 (2017).Ascher, J. S. & Pickering, J. Discover Life Bee Species Guide and World Checklist (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila) (2019).McCabe, L. M., Aslan, S. E. & Cobb, N. S. Decreased bee emergence along an elevation gradient: implications for climate change revealed by a transplant experiment. Ecology 103, e03598 (2021).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Pitts-Singer, T. L. & Cane, J. H. The Alfalfa leafcutting bee, Megachile rotundata: The worlds most intensively managed solitary bee. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 56, 221–237 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
MacIvor, J. S. & Packer, L. “Bee hotels” as tools for native pollinator conservation: A premature verdict?. PLoS ONE 10, e0122126 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Maclvor, J. S. DNA barcoding to identify leaf preference of leafcutting bees. R. Soc. Open Sci. 3, 150623 (2016).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Wissemann, V. & Ritz, C. M. The genus Rosa (Rosoideae, Rosaceae) revisited: Molecular analysis of nrITS-1 and atpB-rbcL intergenic spacer (IGS) versus conventional taxonomy. Botanical J. Linn. Soc. 147, 275–290 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Wang, G. Study on the history of Chinese roses from ancient works and images. Acta Hort. 751, 347–356 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Nybom, H. & Werlemark, G. Realizing the potential of health-promoting rosehips from dogroses (Rosa sect. Caninae). Curr. Bioact. Compd. 13, 3–17 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Chang, Y. Z., Chen, H. M. & Qi, R. S. Ornamental pest—studies on leafcutting bees Megachile subtranquilla Yasumatsu. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Pekinensis 15, 208–213 (1989).
Google Scholar 
Stroom, K., Fetzer, J. & Krischik, V. Insect Pests of Roses. 1–12 (Minnesota Extension Service, University of Minnesota, 1997).Knox, G. W., Paret, M. & Mizell, R. F. III. Pests of roses in Florida (2008).Hayward, A. et al. The leafcutter bee, Megachile rotundata, is more sensitive to N-cyanoamidine neonicotinoid and butenolide insecticides than other managed bees. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1521–1524 (2019).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Fox, J. et al. Package ‘car’, Vol. 16, (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2012).K. Barton, Package Multi-Model Inference (MuMIn). https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MuMIn/MuMIn.pdf (2013).Hartig, F. & Hartig M. F. Package ‘DHARMa’:R package (2017).R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing https://www.R-project.org/ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021).Boff, S., Raizer, J. & Lupi, D. Environmental display can buffer the effect of pesticides on solitary bees. Insects. 11, 1–15 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Cameron, S. A. et al. Patterns of widespread decline in North American bumble bees. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 108, 662–667 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Cameron, S. A. & Sadd, B. M. Global trends in bumble bee health. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 65, 209–232 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kopit, A. M. & Pitts-Singer, T. L. Routes of pesticide exposure in solitary, cavity-nesting bees. Environ. Entomol. 47, 499–510 (2018).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Pitts-Singer, T. L. & Barbour, J. D. Effects of residual novaluron on reproduction in alfalfa leafcutting bees, Megachile rotundata F. (Megachilidae). Pest Manag. Sci. 73, 153–159 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
McKinney, M. L. Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience 52, 883–890 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Baldock, K. C. R. et al. A systems approach reveals urban pollinator hotspots and conservation opportunities. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 363–373 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Choate, B. A., Hickman, P. L. & Moretti, E. A. Wild bee species abundance and richness across an urban–rural gradient. J. Insect Conserv. 22, 391–403 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Theodorou, P. et al. Pollination services enhanced with urbanization despite increasing pollinator parasitism. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 283, 20160561 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Theodorou, P. et al. Urban areas as hotspots for bees and pollination but not a panacea for all insects. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–13 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Rocha-Filho, L. C., Martins, A. C. & Marchi, P. Notes on a nest of Megachile (Moureapis) apicipennis Schrottky (Megachilidae) constructed in an abandoned gallery of Xylocopa frontalis (Olivier) (Apidae). Sociobiology 64, 442–450 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Sheffield, C. S. Unusual nesting behavior in Megachile (Eutricharaea) rotundata (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). J. Melittol. 69, 1–6 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Krischik, V., Rogers, M., Gupta, G. & Varshney, A. Soil-applied imidacloprid translocates to ornamental flowers and reduces survival of adult Coleomegilla maculata, Harmonia axyridis, and Hippodamia convergens lady beetles, and larval Danaus plexippus and Vanessa cardui butterflies. PLoS ONE 10, e0119133 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Senapathi, D. et al. The impact of over 80 years of land cover changes on bee and wasp pollinator communities in England. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 282, 20150294 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Potts, S. G. et al. Role of nesting resources in organising diverse bee communities in a Mediterranean landscape. Ecol. Entomol. 30, 78–85 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Acar, C., Acar, H. & Eroǧlu, E. Evaluation of ornamental plant resources to urban biodiversity and cultural changing: A case study of residential landscapes in Trabzon city (Turkey). Build. Environ. 42, 218–229 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Wang, H. F., Qureshi, S., Knapp, S., Friedman, C. R. & Hubacek, K. A basic assessment of residential plant diversity and its ecosystem services and disservices in Beijing, China. Appl. Geogr. 64, 121–131 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Pergl, J. et al. Dark side of the fence: ornamental plants as a source of wildgrowing flora in the Czech Republic. Preslia 88, 163–184 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Avolio, M. et al. Urban plant diversity in Los Angeles, California: Species and functional type turnover in cultivated landscapes. Plants People Planet. 2, 144–156 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Orr, M. C. et al. Global patterns and drivers of bee distribution. Curr. Biol. 31, 451–458 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sinu, P. A., Kuriakose, G. & Shivanna, K. R. Is the bumblebee (Bombus haemorrhoidalis) the only pollinator of large cardamom in central Himalayas, India?. Apidologie 42, 690–695 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Veereshkumar, V. V. & Gupta, A. Parasitisation of leaf-cutter bees (Megachilidae: Apoidea) by Melittobia. Entomon 40, 105–112 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Cecala, J. M. & Wilson Rankin, E. E. Petals and leaves: Quantifying the use of nest building materials by the world’s most valuable solitary bee. Ecology 103, e03584 (2021).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Soh, E. J. Y., Soh, Z. W. W., Ascher, J. S. & Tan, H. T. W. Diversity of plants with leaves cut by bees of the genus Megachile in Singapore. Nat. Singap. 12, 63–74 (2019).
Google Scholar 
MacIvor, J. S. & Moore, A. E. Bees collect polyurethane and polyethylene plastics as novel nest materials. Ecosphere 4, 155 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Allasino, M. L., Marrero, H. J., Dorado, J. & Torretta, J. P. Scientific note: First global report of a bee nest built only with plastic. Apidologie 50, 230–233 (2019).
Google Scholar  More

Sites overview and characteristicsThis study focused on three regions located in subantarctic, arctic, and subarctic latitudes. The respective latitudinal and longitudinal ranges covered in this study were: 54.95 to 52.08 °S, and 72.03 to 67.34 °W in Patagonia; 67.44 to 67.54 °N, and 86.59 to 86.71 °E in Siberia; 63.21 to 68.63 °N, and −150.79 to −145.98 °W in Alaska (Figs. 1 and 2). The exact coordinates for each sample were included in the submitted dataset. The field campaigns were conducted in 2016, during the summer for each respective region: January-February in Chilean Patagonia, June-July in Alaska and July-August in Siberia.Fig. 1Location of the three areas included in this study (panel a). The permafrost state and the number of sites and samples per region is indicated for each area. General views of 5 sites are provided as examples (b–f). Panel B provides a large view of the ecosystem surrounding the wetland ALP2 (Alaska, exact location indicated by the white circle). Lake PCL1 (panel c) is representative of the lakes on Navarino island (Chilean Patagonia). The glacial lake SIL2 is shown in panel d. At site SIP5, the hollow at first plan is surrounded by palsa (hummock, second plan), characterized by dark organic matter and lichen vegetation (panel e). The PPP3 peatland shown in panel f is dominated by Sphagnum magellanicum, like most peatlands in the area.Full size imageFig. 2Maps of sampling sites in Patagonia, Alaska and Siberia, indicating the ecosystem type (lake, wetland, soil). The tables show the complete- (in white) and the partial- (in grey) characterization sites. The exact coordinates of each sample are provided in the data record (See data records section).Full size imageFor every site included in the present study, a set of nine qualitative environmental and/or ecological site-scale descriptors was selected and adapted from ENVO Environment Ontology40, which included for example permafrost state, biome, environmental feature and vegetation type (Table 1, Fig. 3). Permafrost state was obtained from the NSIDC permafrost map41. The biome, large-scale descriptor based on climate and vegetation criteria, was derived from Olson et al.42. Temperate forest, boreal forest, and tundra biomes were included. The environmental features that were representative for the three regions were considered: lakes, wetlands, broadleaf/coniferous/mixed forest soils, grassland, tundra, and palsa. All the metadata was included in the submitted dataset. Table 2 summarizes the main types of sampled ecosystems and their main characteristics in the three regions, while Supplementary Table S1 provides the details of each sampling site.Table 1 Overview of the dataset contained in Mimarks sheet.Full size tableFig. 3Description of the qualitative environmental/ecological descriptors used to describe every sample, derived from ENVO Environment Ontology40.Full size imageTable 2 Main types of sampled ecosystems in the three studied regions.Full size tableIn Alaska, the studied area ranged from the Alaska Range and Fairbanks area (interior, continental climate, 63–65°N, discontinuous permafrost) up to Toolik Field Station (North Slope, arctic climate, 66–69°N, continuous permafrost; Fig. 2). The physiochemistry and CH4 emissions of lakes ALL1 (Killarney lake), ALL2 (Otto lake), ALL3 (Nutella lake), and ALL4 (Goldstream lake) were previously characterized35. A number of heterogeneous soil and wetland samples were collected around the studied Alaskan lakes and/or from monitored sites, as detailed in Supplementary Table S1. In the Alaska Range and Fairbanks area, soils were mostly covered by mixed or taiga forests, alpine tundra, and bogs or fens wetlands. In the norther Brooks Ranges mountain system, the landscape was piedmont hills with a predominant soil of porous organic peat underlain by silt and glacial till, all in a permafrost state, characterized mainly by Sphagnum and Eriophorum vegetation, as well as dwarf shrubs.In Siberia, the studied area was located in the discontinuous permafrost region surrounding Igarka, on the eastern bank of the Yenisei River (Fig. 2). This region was mainly covered by forest, dominated by larch (Larix Siberica), birch (Betula Pendula), and Siberian pine (Pinus Siberica), and palsa landscapes (frozen peat mounts), the latter being dominated by moss, lichens, Labrador tea and dwarf birch. In degraded areas, thermokarst bogs were dominated by Sphagnum spp. and Eriophorum spp. Land cover was an indicator of permafrost status, since forested areas reflected a deep permafrost table ( >2 m) associated with Pleistocene permafrost, while palsa-dominated landscapes were indicative of the presence of near-surface ( More

Most records of N-tiger cats were from savanna environments, and it was not surprising that this vegetative formation has a key influence on the N-tiger cat range in the Amazon. The bulk of the L. t. tigrinus distribution lies in the savannas, dry forests and shrublands of the Cerrado and Caatinga biomes. These are also the areas with the vast majority of records for this lowland subspecies (Supplemental Fig. S5). Hence, L. t. tigrinus is more associated with savannas and savanna-like environments than with rainforests. In fact, more than 80% of the records in the Amazon were within 100 km of a savanna patch. Colonization of the northern savanna formations of the Amazon by the N-tiger cat likely occurred during the forest-savanna shifts of the glacial period18, and the cat currently shows a patchy distribution. Strong evidence of established biogeographic corridor connections between the savannas of the Cerrado and those of the Amazon exists, suggesting northward expansion of the former during glacial periods, perhaps predating the Last Glacial Maximum19,20,21. Further corroborating this evidence, tiger cat ‘gene flow’ niche modelling showed prior connectivity between the Guiana population and that of Central Brazil and no connectivity with the Andean population22. Additionally, Guianan tiger cat skin patterns are found in savanna and transitional savanna/Amazon areas and in the semiarid shrub-woodland of Brazil and are very distinct from the patterns of the tiger cats from the Andes of northwestern South America and Central America (Supplementary Information Fig. S6).The bioclimatic variables in the best model also supported the cat’s preference for savanna areas. The best model indicated a positive effect of precipitation in the driest month on the probability of the presence of the N-tiger cat, likely indicating the Aw/As climates of tropical savannas23. These climates are marked by seasonal variation in rainfall, with a pronounced dry season. Higher rainfall during the dry season favors the growth of vegetation, which results in some tree cover within the savannas. Thus, our results agree with previous research suggesting that tiger cats avoid open savanna formations24. Similarly, the species had a significant negative response to net primary productivity. This also supports the species’ avoidance of dense lowland rainforests, which are the most productive habitats. In the Amazon biome, the least productive areas are found in more open landscapes25.The N-tiger cat’s range considered from an ecoregion perspective12 could biogeographically explain its distribution in the Amazon. All records but 2 fell within Guiana savannas, Guiana highland forest, Guiana rainforest, part of the Uatumã-Trombetas rainforest bordering the Guianas or all of it connecting to Gurupá and Monte Alegre varzea forests, as well as Marajó varzeas, the interfluve Tocantins-Araguaia/Maranhão, and the southern block of the interfluve Xingu/Tocantins-Araguaia. There were two records from the Negro-Branco moist forest, which also includes savanna-like “campinarana” formations. The range also reaches the transitional babaçu palm forests of Maranhão and the Mato Grosso seasonal forests (Supplementary Information Fig. S7, Table S3). The N-tiger cat’s range in the Amazon was determined by combining records with species distribution modeling, also matching the ecoregion perspective.Outside the Guiana Shield and likely the savanna patches of the region of the Upper Negro River, in other parts of the Amazon, the N-tiger cat seems to be restricted to the forests of the eastern Amazon, along the arc of deforestation and to transitional areas with savanna formations. The presence and absence points at camera-trapping sites could explain the N-tiger cat’s range in the Amazon and define its distribution range in the biome. Absence points, for instance, were usually located in dense rainforest habitats throughout the Amazon biome.The species may occasionally occupy rainforests, such as those of the Guianas, where it tends to be very rare. At a site in central Suriname, after an enormous trapping effort of  > 20,000 trap days in four years by cat specialists, over an area  > 1100 km2, no records of the N-tiger cat were found (Supplementary Information Table S2), although its presence is expected in that area26. This finding attests to the inherent rarity of this felid in its limited range within the Amazon. However, could its association with the arc of deforestation be related to the replacement of forest by bushy savanna-like vegetation that succeeds abandoned pastures? The other currently recognized subspecies, L. t. pardinoides (the Andean tiger cat) and L. t. oncilla (the oncilla), and the recently split southern tiger cat L. guttulus are all associated with forested areas. Conversely, L. t. tigrinus has higher abundance and is mostly found in the nonforested habitats of the Cerrado and Caatinga domains of Brazil and only rarely in rainforests. Thus, L. t. tigrinus may be an open-habitat (sub)species. However, within savannas, N-tiger cats are restricted to denser savanna formations, with open savannas deemed unsuitable24. In the semiarid Caatinga, the N-tiger cat also prefers denser formations27,28.One of the most interesting findings was the clear relationship between the ranges of the dominant mesopredator and subordinate species. The ranges of ocelots and N-tiger cats in the Amazon were diametrically opposite (Fig. 1), a finding never recorded for felids. The reported ocelot densities and relative abundance indexes (RAIs) in the Amazon range from 0.29 to 0.95 ind/km2 and 0.07–13.2 ind/100 trap-days, respectively7,29. Thus, the expected ocelot density found using modeling that allows for N-tiger cat presence is very low (Fig. 2A). In the Rupununi, the ocelot:N-tiger cat RAI ratio was roughly 10:1, with a very low RAI and expected density for N-tiger cats (see Supplementary Material). The only other relative abundance estimate of tiger cats presented for the Amazon30 was not confirmed as an estimate of tiger cats following inspection of the original records by the authors but as an estimate of margays or ocelots. This antagonistic relationship between ocelots and all other small cat species in their area of sympatry is quite impressive. It is density-dependent, as it seems to take effect only above an ocelot density threshold of 0.12 ind./km231. The influence can range from patterns of density, distribution, and occupancy to spatial and temporal use. Conversely, such an impact was not detected when either the small cats or ocelots were compared to the larger cats31,32,33,34,35.In view of the Red List assessments and applying the limited estimates presented, the expected total population size for N-tiger cats in the Amazon would be approximately 150 and 1622 individuals, considering their AOO or EOO, respectively. Applying the IUCN’s formula for mature individuals8, these numbers would be 45 and 487 individuals for the AOO and EOO, respectively.The ocelot’s preference for very dense rainforests may explain the low probability of N-tiger cat occurrence within the Amazon biome. Notably, most tiger cat records from rainforests and all those from premontane forests came from the Guiana Shield, a region where tropical grasslands and savannas dot more forested landscapes. The Guiana Highlands and Pantepui ecoregions, which make up a considerable portion of the shield, tend to have low ocelot densities (below 0.30 ind/km2), although they do contain some rainforest. Ocelot densities reach some of their lowest values in the Guianan savanna ecoregion (mean ocelot density of 0.029 in the savanna formations), where the N-tiger cat probability of occurrence was highest. At the Karanambu site in the Rupununi, all ocelot records came from either gallery forests or forest patches embedded in the savanna. Although the data did not allow us to test further hypotheses, it is likely that spatial partitioning occurs in the Guiana Shield, with N-tiger cats favoring habitats that are more open. Conversely, areas farther west in the Amazon biome, other than the predicted area, do not have any major savanna patches and are covered mostly by lowland tropical rainforest formations, where ocelots can potentially reach densities in excess of 0.7 ind/km2. Of all Amazonian records of N-tiger cats, only one came from west of the 68th meridian: a preserved specimen from Puerto Leguizamo on the Putumayo River in Colombia. The specimen was identified as L. t. pardinoides by its collector, so it most likely represents an individual that came down from the foothills of the Andes. Alternatively, it could have been caught in the Andean foothills but labeled generally as from Puerto Leguizamo, as museum records do not always present precise locations, like most of those from our dataset; thus, they could represent a broader region, not a single collection location.The records of L. t. tigrinus in the Monte-Alegre Várzea ecoregion and Tapajós-Xingu Moist Forest ecoregion (which shares a border with the Amazon River) are actually from the small savanna patches of Terra Santa and Alter do Chão, respectively, which are imbedded within the forests of these ecoregions. Similarly, the Negro-Branco Moist Forest ecoregion includes open-canopy white sand forests with savanna-like vegetation, known as ‘campinaranas’36.Although our model predicted a high probability of N-tiger cat presence in the Marajó Várzea ecoregion, the records from the island came from savanna patches and not from flooded forests and mangroves. Hence, we did not include such large areas in the AOO for the subspecies. It is likely that the highly predicted probability of presence there is an artifact of low predicted ocelot density. Nevertheless, the environment there is not suitable for either cat. Our ocelot density model was highly significant and explained almost 50% of the variation in ocelot density. The remaining variation was related to either other variables that could not be measured via satellite imagery (such as prey availability) or the sampling design of the different studies. Nonetheless, ocelot densities predicted from our model across the Amazon were within the expected range for the species29.Why are N-tiger cats absent in camera-trapping studies in Amazonian forests throughout the biome? The most straightforward answer seems to be because they simply are not there (central and western Amazon) or, where present, their numbers are extremely low (Guianas and eastern Amazon). The lack of surveys cannot be cited as a potential reason for their apparent absence because the studies that did not detect the species were conducted throughout the Amazon biome, in all nine Amazonian countries. Some of the areas have been surveyed for several years—or decades in some cases—and have failed to record a single individual (Supplementary Information Table S2). Typically, N-tiger cats appear, even prominently, on cameras in other biomes, such as in the savannas of the Cerrado and semiarid scrub of the Caatinga domain in Brazil, including sites where ocelots are present24,27,37. Clouded tiger cats (L. t. pardinoides) have also been frequently recorded on cameras in the Andes, higher than 1500 m above sea level34,38, but not in lowland Amazonian forests. This finding indicates that the N-tiger cat is not camera-shy. In northern Brazilian savannas, its density can reach 0.25 ind/km2 24. Coincidentally, this highest density estimate of the N-tiger cat is the same as the lowest ocelot density estimate for Amazonian forests24,29.Tiger cats and margays show high similarity, making misidentifications relatively common39. However, the evaluation of  > 3000 camera trap images of small-medium felids in the Amazon revealed that only one mildly resembled a tiger cat, a finding that supports the species being absent there and does not represent a case of mistaken identity with margays or even ocelots7.The Amazonian range of L. tigrinus is very limited, and populations are expected to be very small. With the upcoming split of L. t. tigrinus and L. t. pardinoides into two different species40, this situation would have serious implications for the conservation of the former. Thus, L. t. tigrinus conservation lies outside the “Amazonian safe haven” of most other carnivore species found there7. The Brazilian drylands Cerrado and Caatinga represent such places for L. t. tigrinus populations. Unfortunately, these biomes have had  > 50% of their cover completely removed41. Very importantly, besides being extremely rare in the Amazonian savannas, this rather limited vegetative formation is also considered highly threatened and of conservation priority42. Therefore, the tiger cat could become an emblematic flagship species representing the uniqueness of this vegetative formation in dire need of protection.In short, the picture that emerges is that although the N-tiger cat uses both rainforests and deciduous forests in the Amazon, it seems to be mostly associated with savanna formations and that its distribution in the Amazon is highly influenced by the ocelot, the dominant mesopredator. The N-tiger cat’s inherent rarity, expected population size, and restricted range in the Amazon suggest that this biome does not in fact represent a safe haven for the global conservation of this small felid. In addition to shedding light on and refining the N-tiger cat distribution in the Amazon, this paper highlights the importance of including biological variables, such as the potential impacts of competitors and predators on species presence and distribution, in SDMs. More