More stories

  • in

    Little urchins, mischievous molluscs: my life as a sea champion

    “In this photo, I’m examining some of the animals in my care. I work as an ecologist at the St John’s Island National Marine Laboratory, which is sited on a small island off the coast of mainland Singapore.The tank I’m leaning over contains sand-filtered seawater pumped directly from the ocean. The baskets are kept afloat by air-filled tubes and contain white short-spined sea urchins (Salmacis sphaeroides). We keep the urchins like this so we can keep track of individuals and reduce the spread of disease.My work aims to understand the ecology of the sea urchins and other marine invertebrates and promote their conservation. My colleagues and I want to gauge how the creatures react to changes in environmental conditions, such as temperature, salinity and the pH of the water.We also host threatened species to guard against extinction: if there was an event that hurt a wild population, I’m fairly confident we could renew the natural stock.Finally, we’re exploring how we can use aquaculture to combat damage caused by the wildlife trade. Some marine species in southeast Asia, including sea urchins, are harvested from the wild for aquariums. Perhaps the animal groups we keep here could be sold into the aquarium trade directly instead.

    Enjoying our latest content?
    Login or create an account to continue

    Access the most recent journalism from Nature’s award-winning team
    Explore the latest features & opinion covering groundbreaking research

    Access through your institution

    or

    Sign in or create an account

    Continue with Google

    Continue with ORCiD More

  • in

    Mammoth challenge: why we called our de-extinction company Colossal Biosciences

    Colossal Biosciences as a company name was picked to engage children, says chief executive Ben Lamm.Credit: Colossal BiosciencesThe meaning behind our monikerColossal Biosciences, in Dallas, Texas, describes itself as the world’s first de-extinction company. It aims to revive lost species using CRISPR gene-editing technology, including the mammoth (Mammuthus spp.). It attracted controversy when it announced it has ‘de-extincted’ the dire wolf (Aenocyon dirus), a large-bodied wolf species that last roamed North America during the ice age that ended some 11,500 years ago. Its co-founders are technology entrepreneur Ben Lamm, Colossal’s chief executive, and George Church, the company’s genetics adviser, who also holds academic research positions at Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge. In the third article of a six-part series about science-company names and how to choose them, Lamm describes how the name ‘Colossal Biosciences’ came about. The fact that the world will lose up to 25% of all biodiversity between now and 2050 is a huge problem. At my company, we asked ourselves, how do we come up with a name that encompasses three elements: the problem, the solution and our flagship species, the mammoth? Climate change, biodiversity, CRISPR and gene editing, artificial intelligence, computational analysis and advanced embryology can be difficult concepts for the public to fully grasp. We came up with ‘Colossal Biosciences’ because losing species is a colossal problem, our solution is colossal and the mammoth is a colossal animal.We felt that our brand and name should not only reflect the problem and solution, but also be approachable to children, including some who will grow up to read Cell, Nature and Science. Every week, we get little pictures of dodos and baby mammoths that kids draw, and their parents mail us physical letters, saying things such as: ‘Thank you so much for doing what you’re doing. My kid is excited about science. You’re making science cool.’ A big, awesome nameTo come up with Colossal, I worked with Chris Klee, executive vice-president of design at the company, and Chris Stevens, co-founder of Maven Creative, our branding agency, in Orlando, Florida.We’ve worked together for the past 20 years. We had a list of seven or eight potential names — including ‘Huge’, ‘Macedon’ (an ancient kingdom) and ‘Footprint’ (because every species has a unique one). Everything was centred around the concept of ‘big and awesome’. Obviously, ‘Mammoth’ was on the list because the world is facing a mammoth challenge, but we felt that calling it that would have pigeonholed us to one species. We also liked ‘Colossus’, and the idea of using ‘us’ to signify a team effort. But Colossus is a character in the Marvel Universe media franchise, and we didn’t want to be too Hollywood. We also considered names linked to evolution, and thought ‘Darwin’ could be a cool one. But when we said ‘Colossal’ out loud, we were like, ‘That’s it!’ Alongside the name, there’s the brand — so before we decided on Colossal, we underwent a process to come up with a brand that encapsulated ‘Harvard University meets 1980’s MTV’.

    Enjoying our latest content?
    Login or create an account to continue

    Access the most recent journalism from Nature’s award-winning team
    Explore the latest features & opinion covering groundbreaking research

    Access through your institution

    or

    Sign in or create an account

    Continue with Google

    Continue with ORCiD More

  • in

    Climate change is reshaping fish communities in the United States

    Dudgeon, D. Curr. Biol. 29, R960–R967 (2019).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    WWF. Living Planet Report 2024 (WWF, 2024).Haase, P. et al. Nature 620, 582–588 (2023).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    van Klink, R. et al. Science 368, 417–420 (2020).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Rumschlag, S. L. et al. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09556-0 (2025).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Leprieur, F., Beauchard, O., Blanchet, S., Oberdorff, T. & Brosse, S. PLoS Biol. 6, e28 (2008).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Su, G. et al. Science 371, 835–838 (2021).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Rahel, F. J. & Olden, J. D. Conserv. Biol. 22, 521–533 (2008).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Broadmeadow, S. & Nisbet, T. R. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 8, 286–305 (2004).Article 

    Google Scholar  More

  • in

    Combat the human-made causes of Spain’s wildfires

    Spain’s wildfires are spreading at a record pace, with a greater area burnt this year than at any other time since satellite monitoring began. By mid-August, more than 400,000 hectares of forest had gone up in flames — an area larger than Mallorca. Lives, livelihoods and biodiversity are at stake.
    Competing Interests
    The author declares no competing interests. More

  • in

    Long-standing marine reserves need continued support

    In August, the Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food cut funding for its network of 12 marine reserves by 40%. The cut echoes changes in the United States, where marine reserves have been opened up to industrial fishing.
    Competing Interests
    The authors declare no competing interests. More

  • in

    Caribbean coral reefs are threatened by rising seas

    Perry, C. T. et al. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09439-4 (2025).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lee, H. & Romero, J. (eds.) Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report (IPCC, 2023).
    Google Scholar 
    Morris, R. L. et al. Sci. Total Environ. 917, 170363 (2024).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Hopley, D. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Modern Coral Reefs: Structure, Form and Process (Springer, 2011).
    Google Scholar 
    Kinsey, D. W. & Hopley, D. Palaeogeogr. Palaeclimatol. Palaeoecol. 89, 363–377 (1991).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bramante, J. F., Ashton, A. D., Storlazzi, C. D., Cheriton, O. M. & Donnelly, J. P. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 125, e2019JF005446 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Cornwall, C. E. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2015265118 (2021).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Torda, G. et al. Nature Clim. Change 7, 627–636 (2017).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Perry, C. T. & Smithers, S. G. Geology 38, 119–122 (2010).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Poloczanska, E. S., Skirving, W. & Dove, S. Front. Mar. Sci. 4, 158 (2017).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lirman, D. & Schopmeyer, S. Peer J. 4, e2597 (2016).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar  More

  • in

    A population plunge could help to mitigate the global biodiversity crisis

    Ecologist Paul Ehrlich and conservation biologist Anne Ehrlich might have been wrong in their 1968 prediction that human overpopulation would lead to mass human starvation, as your recent News feature notes (see Nature 644, 594–596; 2025). However, their concerns about the environmental impacts of humanity have mainly been borne out. The global population now takes just over seven months to use the living resources generated by the planet in a year — for instance, by consuming timber and fish, and by converting natural ecosystems to agriculture (see go.nature.com/47zcvty).
    Competing Interests
    The authors declare no competing interests. More

  • in

    A revolution is sweeping Europe’s farms: can it save agriculture?

    At first glance, Ruben Jorge’s farm near the village of Penha Garcia in eastern Portugal doesn’t seem all that unusual. But look closer, and signs emerge that Jorge is shedding tradition in the hope of future-proofing his farm.Between the rows of chestnut and pistachio saplings, a mix of grasses covers the ground where a stretch of bare dirt would typically be — a deliberate attempt to prevent erosion. To retain water, Jorge has wrapped a blanket of wood chips around the base of each sapling. And among the young trees grow yellow lupin flowers, known as tremocilha in Portuguese, that have a special power: they capture nitrogen and store it underground.“It’s a natural fertilizer,” Jorge says, looking out over the field of chest-high saplings under an intense springtime Sun. The flowers, mowing and mulch are part of Jorge’s transition to regenerative agriculture, a method of farming that prioritizes soil health, boosts biodiversity, minimizes tilling and uses pesticides sparingly. “Anything that we can do that adds resilience to the land, that preserves this land for the future, is always a better option,” Jorge says, “as long as it’s economically viable, of course.”What humanity should eat to stay healthy and save the planetThe future is coming hard at Europe — the fastest-warming continent on the planet since the 1980s1. In just the past few years, farmers on the Iberian Peninsula have struggled with shrivelled crops, shrinking water supplies and more-frequent wildfires. Going forwards, the economic hit to the European Union and the United Kingdom from drought alone could reach more than €65 billion (US$76 billion) each year by 2100, in part because of crop damage and lost water supplies2.With an estimated 4 °C of warming expected over the next 75 years if no action is taken to curb or adapt to climate change, southern and western Europe could lose 10% of its agricultural economic output2. Meanwhile, widespread erosion continues to sweep away soil, taking with it crucial nutrients and increasing the risk of flooding and landslides. Between 60% and 70% of soils in the EU are degraded, according to the European Commission.These mounting risks are leading farmers such as Jorge to bet on regenerative agriculture. Together with climate advocates and scientists, they increasingly see these practices as key to withstanding changing climatic conditions — and to helping farmers stay in business. And Europe is showing how it can be done, they say.“We believe right now we’re at a point where the grassroots are spreading,” says Simon Krämer, executive director at the European Alliance for Regenerative Agriculture (EARA), a farmer-led advocacy group in Berlin that was founded in 2023. According to Krämer, about 2% of farms in Europe are fully regenerative, and another 5–10% are on the regenerative path.This budding regenerative revolution now faces some headwinds, however. After farmer protests across Europe in 2023 and 2024, the EU has backed away from some environmental requirements for the agricultural sector, and farmers say that incentives fall short of what’s needed to help them make the transition.But many advocates expect that the momentum behind regenerative agriculture will continue to build, particularly given Europe’s need to meet its commitments to restore ecosystems and reduce greenhouse-gas emissions. And farmers and researchers around the world are carefully watching Europe’s attempts to pull off one of the biggest transitions in agriculture in generations. Regenerative agriculture, Krämer says, “is the most important farmer and science movement in the world”.Saving the soilIn Portugal and many other parts of the globe, farmers are coming to realize that what worked for their parents and grandparents is no longer viable. To survive increasingly harsh conditions, they need to rethink how they farm – from the soil up.About 180 kilometres south of Jorge’s farm, just outside the tiny cobblestoned hamlet of Assumar, Herberto Brunk is undertaking his own regenerative experiment. As he manoeuvres his black Peugeot truck up his long dirt driveway, he stops between two of his fields. On the left, Brunk has planted mixed grasses as ground cover. On the right is a thriving field dominated by buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) with some millet, pumpkin and sunflowers mixed in. A few months later, after a dry summer, he decided not to harvest the buckwheat and to leave it as a cover crop instead. Kept intact, it has helped to prevent nitrogen from leaching out of the soil.Much of the work Brunk is doing is aimed at improving the soil — the foundation for a healthy bottom line. “Our main goal is to actually recover the soil, get our organic matter up, get our nutrients recycled and reduce as much as possible the erosion,” Brunk says. He’s already beginning to see some positive results: “At the moment, we don’t have any erosion at all due to water.”Brunk is working to increase the amount of carbon stored in his farm’s soil.Credit: Barbora MrazkovaAnd Brunk says his farm is likely to be more resilient during wildfires. In August, as fires burnt across Portugal, he helped his neighbour, a cattle grower, to put out a fire. If it had reached Brunk’s property, he says, it probably wouldn’t have done much damage because the fields are green and well hydrated.This is year three of Brunk’s five-year plan, and he doesn’t expect to see a profit for a while. But both Jorge and Brunk are hopeful that the eventual pay-off will be worth the wait. For them, the regenerative approach is not only a way to restore the soil — it’s also good for business in the long run.Improving the soil will help to retain water, protecting it from drought, says Brunk. He has also seen the amount of carbon in his soils increase from 1.9% in 2019 to 3.5% in 2024 — more than halfway to his goal of 6%. Under a new partnership with Terra Madre, a company based in Porto, Portugal, that helps farmers transition to regenerative agriculture, he will receive payments for increasing the amount of carbon stored in plants and the soil; companies buy carbon credits based on this sequestered carbon to offset their pollution.The practices that Brunk and Jorge are deploying — planting cover crops, rotating crops, reducing tilling, integrating trees — can help to protect their farms against the vagaries of a changing climate, says Thomas Elmqvist, a sustainability scientist at the Stockholm Resilience Centre at Stockholm University. He co-wrote a 2022 report from the European Academies’ Science Advisory Council on the state of regenerative agriculture in Europe. “There is fairly strong scientific evidence for the practices having an impact,” he says.For example, growing different crops on the same field in rotation can boost the number and types of microorganisms in the soil3. And a 2021 meta-analysis4 spanning 85 countries showed that diversifying crops in this way increased the biodiversity of other plants and animals by 24%. Growing a variety of crops brings a host of other benefits: the study also found the practice led to a 51% increase in water quality, a 63% boost in pest and disease control and an 11% spike in soil quality.How farming could become the ultimate climate-change toolA 2022 study5 using soil samples from 1,267 farm sites across Germany found that tripling the area used to grow cover crops could boost the amount of organic carbon added to the soil by 12% within 50 years.When it comes to crop yields, the results are less clear. A 2019 review6, for example, found that using cover crops decreased grain production by 4%, but including legumes such as clover in the cover crop could increase yields by 13%.Other studies show positive trends in terms of profitability for farmers. In June, Krämer’s group released a multi-year analysis7 that looked at 78 farms across 14 European countries. The results, which have not been published in a scientific journal but were reviewed by agricultural experts across Europe, found that farms that had adopted regenerative practices used 61% less synthetic nitrogen and 75% less pesticides than did their conventional counterparts. Per hectare, regenerative farms also achieved a 20% higher margin (the difference between income and costs).And a 2023 analysis of regenerative farms in Germany by Krämer and his co-authors — written for the Boston Consulting Group, a global management consultancy firm — reported that these operations should be at least 60% more profitable after six to ten years compared with conventional farms using other approaches.But what works in one location might not work in another, Elmqvist says. “More long-term studies are needed to fully understand the sustainability and profitability of regenerative practices over multiple growing seasons, in different regions and under different climatic conditions,” he says.A push for reformOn paper, at least, the EU has some of the world’s most ambitious commitments to sustainable agriculture, several of which encourage a regenerative approach. But in practice, observers say, the bloc has struggled to deliver on those promises.In 2020, after a brutal European heatwave in 2019, the EU committed to building a food system that “works for consumers, producers, climate and the environment”. It had also launched its signature environmental law in 2019, the European Green Deal, which aims to make Europe the first climate-neutral continent by 2050. And, last year, the bloc adopted a landmark nature-restoration law, which includes a requirement for member states to boost biodiversity on farmlands.Reducing the amount of soil disturbance has helped Brunk to avoid erosion in his fields.Credit: Barbora MrazkovaThe bloc now funds an initiative to help farmers to scale up regenerative practices and, in February, it unveiled a road map that calls for farmers to be compensated for increasing carbon storage, boosting biodiversity and providing other environmental benefits. If implemented, this should encourage more farmers to make the switch to regenerative agriculture, says Teresa Pinto Correia, a landscape ecologist at the University of Évora in Portugal, who served on a recent EU-funded task force for regenerative agriculture.“I think it will help,” says Correia. “There’s a strong economic argument.”

    Enjoying our latest content?
    Login or create an account to continue

    Access the most recent journalism from Nature’s award-winning team
    Explore the latest features & opinion covering groundbreaking research

    Access through your institution

    or

    Sign in or create an account

    Continue with Google

    Continue with ORCiD More