Ecology

Falchi, F. et al. The new world atlas of artificial night sky brightness. Sci. Adv. 2, e1600377 (2016).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Holker, F., Wolter, C., Perkin, E. K. & Tockner, K. Light pollution as a biodiversity threat. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 681–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.09.007 (2010).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kyba, C., Mohar, A. & Posch, T. How bright is moonlight?. Astron. Geophys. 58, 1.31-1.32 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Hölker, F. et al. The dark side of light: A transdisciplinary research agenda for light pollution policy. Ecol. Soc. 15, 150413 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Sanders, D., Frago, E., Kehoe, R., Patterson, C. & Gaston, K. J. A meta-analysis of biological impacts of artificial light at night. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 74–81 (2021).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gaston, K. J., Bennie, J., Davies, T. W. & Hopkins, J. The ecological impacts of nighttime light pollution: A mechanistic appraisal. Biol. Rev. 88, 912–927. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12036 (2013).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gaston, K. J. & Bennie, J. Demographic effects of artificial nighttime lighting on animal populations. Environ. Rev. 22, 323–330. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2014-0005 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gaston, K. J., Visser, M. E. & Hoelker, F. The biological impacts of artificial light at night: The research challenge. R. Soc. Philos. Trans. Biol. Sci. 370, 20140133–20140133 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Ouyang, J. Q. et al. Stressful colours: Corticosterone concentrations in a free-living songbird vary with the spectral composition of experimental illumination. Biol. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2015.0517 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ouyang, J. Q., Davies, S. & Dominoni, D. Hormonally mediated effects of artificial light at night on behavior and fitness: Linking endocrine mechanisms with function. J. Exp. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.156893 (2018).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Dominoni, D., Quetting, M. & Partecke, J. Artificial light at night advances avian reproductive physiology. Proc. Biol. Sci. 280(1756), 20123017. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.3017 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ayalon, I. et al. Coral gametogenesis collapse under artificial light pollution. Curr. Biol. 31, 413–419 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ayalon, I., de Barros Marangoni, L. F., Benichou, J. I., Avisar, D. & Levy, O. Red Sea corals under Artificial Light Pollution at Night (ALAN) undergo oxidative stress and photosynthetic impairment. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 4194–4207 (2019).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Amichai, E. & Kronfeld-Schor, N. Artificial light at night promotes activity throughout the night in nesting common swifts (Apus apus). Sci. Rep. 9, 11052 (2019).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kronfeld-Schor, N. et al. Drivers of infectious disease seasonality: Potential implications for COVID-19. J. Biol. Rhythms 36, 35–54 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kronfeld-Schor, N., Visser, M. E., Salis, L. & van Gils, J. A. Chronobiology of interspecific interactions in a changing world. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0248 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kronfeld-Schor, N. et al. Chronobiology by moonlight. Proc. R. Soc. B 280, 20123088 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Stevenson, T. J. et al. Disrupted seasonal biology impacts health, food security and ecosystems. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.1453 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kaniewska, P., Alon, S., Karako-Lampert, S., Hoegh-Guldberg, O. & Levy, O. Signaling cascades and the importance of moonlight in coral broadcast mass spawning. eLife 4, e09991 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Liu, J. A., Meléndez-Fernández, O. H., Bumgarner, J. R. & Nelson, R. J. Effects of light pollution on photoperiod-driven seasonality. Horm. Behav. 141, 105150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2022.105150 (2022).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Grubisic, M. et al. Light pollution, circadian photoreception, and melatonin in vertebrates. Sustainability 11, 6400 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Stevenson, T. J. & Prendergast, B. J. Photoperiodic time measurement and seasonal immunological plasticity. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 37, 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2014.10.002 (2015).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bumgarner, J. R. & Nelson, R. J. Light at night and disrupted circadian rhythms alter physiology and behavior. Integr. Comp. Biol. 61, 1160–1169 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Mishra, I. et al. Light at night disrupts diel patterns of cytokine gene expression and endocrine profiles in zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). Sci. Rep. 9, 1–12 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Grunst, M. L. et al. Early-life exposure to artificial light at night elevates physiological stress in free-living songbirds. Environ. Pollut. 259, 113895 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bedrosian, T., Galan, A., Vaughn, C., Weil, Z. M. & Nelson, R. J. Light at night alters daily patterns of cortisol and clock proteins in female Siberian hamsters. J. Neuroendocrinol. 25, 590–596 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Touzot, M. et al. Artificial light at night alters the sexual behaviour and fertilisation success of the common toad. Environ. Pollut. 259, 113883 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
de Jong, M. et al. Effects of nocturnal illumination on life-history decisions and fitness in two wild songbird species. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 370, 20140128 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Spoelstra, K. et al. Experimental illumination of natural habitat: An experimental set-up to assess the direct and indirect ecological consequences of artificial light of different spectral composition. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 370, 20140129 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Hattar, S., Liao, H. W., Takao, M., Berson, D. M. & Yau, K. W. Melanopsin-containing retinal ganglion cells: Architecture, projections, and intrinsic photosensitivity. Science 295, 1065–1070. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1069609 (2002).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Gutman, R., Dayan, T., Levy, O., Schubert, I. & Kronfeld-Schor, N. The effect of the lunar cycle on fecal cortisol metabolite levels and foraging ecology of nocturnally and diurnally active spiny mice. PLoS ONE 6, e23446 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Dhairykar, M., Singh, K. P., Kumar Jadav, K. & Rajput, N. Comparison of cortisol level in Asian elephants of different tiger reserves of Madhya Pradesh. Int. J. Vet. Sci. Anim. Husb. 5, 152–155 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Sosnowski, M. J., Benítez, M. E. & Brosnan, S. F. Endogenous cortisol correlates with performance under pressure on a working memory task in capuchin monkeys. Sci. Rep. 12, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-04986-6 (2022).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bewick, V., Cheek, L. & Ball, J. Statistics review 12: survival analysis. Crit. care 8, 1–6 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Shkolnik, A. Studies in the Comparative Biology of Israel’s Two Species of Spiny Mice (genus Acomys). Hebrew (1966).Shkolnik, A. Diurnal activity in a small desert rodent. Int. J. Biometeorol. 15, 115–120 (1971).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Levy, O., Dayan, T. & Kronfeld-Schor, N. The relationship between the golden spiny mouse circadian system and its diurnal activity: An experimental field enclosures and laboratory study. Chronobiol. Int. 24, 599–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/07420520701534640 (2007).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Levy, O., Dayan, T. & Kronfeld-Schor, N. Interspecific competition and torpor in golden spiny mice: Two sides of the energy-acquisition coin. Integr. Comp. Biol. 51, 441–448. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icr071 (2011).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Jones, M. & Dayan, T. Foraging behavior and microhabitat use by spiny mice, Acomys cahirinus and A. russatus, in the presence of Blanford’s fox (Vulpes cana) odor. J. Chem. Ecol. 26, 455–469 (2000).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Jones, M., Mandelik, Y. & Dayan, T. Coexistence of temporally partitioned spiny mice: Roles of habitat structure and foraging behavior. Ecology 82, 2164–2176 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Kronfeld, N., Dayan, T., Zisapel, N. & Haim, A. Coexisting populations of Acomys cahirinus and A. russatus: A preliminary report. Isr. J. Zool. 40, 177–183 (1994).
Google Scholar 
Kronfeld-Schor, N. & Dayan, T. Partitioning of time as an ecological resource. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34, 153–181. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132435 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kronfeld-Schor, N. & Dayan, T. The dietary basis for temporal partitioning: Food habits of coexisting Acomys species. Oecologia 121, 123–128 (1999).ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Pinter-Wollman, N., Dayan, T., Eilam, D. & Kronfeld-Schor, N. Can aggression be the force driving temporal separation between competing common and golden spiny mice?. J. Mammal. 87, 48–53 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Shargal, E., Kronfeld-Schor, N. & Dayan, T. Population biology and spatial relationships of coexisting spiny mice (Acomys) in Israel. J. Mammal. 81, 1046–1052 (2000).
Google Scholar 
Pasco, R., Gardner, D. K., Walker, D. W. & Dickinson, H. A superovulation protocol for the spiny mouse (Acomys cahirinus). Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 24, 1117–1122 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lee, T. E., Watkins, J. F. & Cash, C. G. Acomys russatus. Mammal. Species 550, 1–4 (1998).
Google Scholar 
Dominoni, D., Quetting, M. & Partecke, J. Artificial light at night advances avian reproductive physiology. Proc. R. Soc. B 280, 20123017 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kempenaers, B., Borgström, P., Loës, P., Schlicht, E. & Valcu, M. Artificial night lighting affects dawn song, extra-pair siring success, and lay date in songbirds. Curr. Biol. 20, 1735–1739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.08.028 (2010).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Le Tallec, T., Théry, M. & Perret, M. Melatonin concentrations and timing of seasonal reproduction in male mouse lemurs (Microcebus murinus) exposed to light pollution. J. Mammal. 97, 753–760 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Vonshak, M., Dayan, T. & Kronfeld-Schor, N. Arthropods as a prey resource: Patterns of diel, seasonal, and spatial availability. J. Arid Environ. 73, 458–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.11.013 (2009).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Levy, O., Dayan, T. & Kronfeld-Schor, N. Adaptive thermoregulation in golden spiny mice: The influence of season and food availability on body temperature. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 84, 175–184 (2011).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Levy, O., Dayan, T., Rotics, S. & Kronfeld-Schor, N. Foraging sequence, energy intake and torpor: An individual-based field study of energy balancing in desert golden spiny mice. Ecol. Lett. 15, 1240–1248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01845.x (2012).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Katz, N., Dayan, T. & Kronfeld-Schor, N. Fitness effects of interspecific competition between two species of desert rodents. Zoology 128, 62–68 (2018).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Brzezinski, A. Melatonin in humans. N. Engl. J. Med. 336, 186–195 (1997).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hastings, M., Vance, G. & Maywood, E. Some reflections on the phylogeny and function of the pineal. Experientia 45, 903–909 (1989).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Oster, H. et al. The circadian rhythm of glucocorticoids is regulated by a gating mechanism residing in the adrenal cortical clock. Cell Metab. 4, 163–173 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Mora, F., Segovia, G., Del Arco, A., de Blas, M. & Garrido, P. Stress, neurotransmitters, corticosterone and body–brain integration. Brain Res. 1476, 71–85 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Farrell, M. R. Sex Differences and Stress Effects in Corticolimbic Structure and Function (Indiana University, 2013).
Google Scholar 
Son, G. H., Chung, S. & Kim, K. The adrenal peripheral clock: Glucocorticoid and the circadian timing system. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 32, 451–465 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Schradin, C. Seasonal changes in testosterone and corticosterone levels in four social classes of a desert dwelling sociable rodent. Horm. Behav. 53, 573–579 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zatra, Y. et al. Seasonal changes in plasma testosterone and cortisol suggest an androgen mediated regulation of the pituitary adrenal axis in the Tarabul’s gerbil Gerbillus tarabuli (Thomas, 1902). Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 258, 173–183 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Richardson, C. S., Heeren, T. & Kunz, T. H. Seasonal and sexual variation in metabolism, thermoregulation, and hormones in the big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus). Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 91, 705–715 (2018).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Touitou, S., Heistermann, M., Schülke, O. & Ostner, J. Triiodothyronine and cortisol levels in the face of energetic challenges from reproduction, thermoregulation and food intake in female macaques. Horm. Behav. 131, 104968 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Rotics, S., Dayan, T. & Kronfeld-Schor, N. Effect of artificial night lighting on temporally partitioned spiny mice. J. Mammal. 92, 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1644/10-mamm-a-112.1 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rotics, S., Dayan, T., Levy, O. & Kronfeld-Schor, N. Light masking in the field: An experiment with nocturnal and diurnal spiny mice under semi-natural field conditions. Chronobiol. Int. 28, 70–75. https://doi.org/10.3109/07420528.2010.525674 (2011).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Padgett, D. A. & Glaser, R. How stress influences the immune response. Trends Immunol. 24, 444–448 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Khansari, D. N., Murgo, A. J. & Faith, R. E. Effects of stress on the immune system. Immunol. Today 11, 170–175 (1990).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zozaya, S. M., Alford, R. A. & Schwarzkopf, L. Invasive house geckos are more willing to use artificial lights than are native geckos. Austral. Ecol. 40, 982–987 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Komine, H., Koike, S. & Schwarzkopf, L. Impacts of artificial light on food intake in invasive toads. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–8 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Murphy, S., Vyas, D., Sher, A. & Grenis, K. Light pollution affects invasive and native plant traits important to plant competition and herbivorous insects. Biol. Invasions 24, 599–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-021-02670-w (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Murphy, S. M. et al. Streetlights positively affect the presence of an invasive grass species. Ecol. Evol. 11, 10320–10326 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar  More

Comparative characteristics of rations for feeding cattle from different regions of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the impact of animal feeding types on the faecal microbiotaDue to the huge differences in the natural and climatic conditions of Kazakhstan, animals from different regions of Kazakhstan were enrolled for this study. The difference in soil and climatic conditions of different zones has a significant impact on the type of feeding (Table 1) and the composition of diets, which has a certain effect on the microbiota of intestinal contents and methanogenic archaea in particular.Table 1 Animal diets in different regions of Kazakhstan.Full size tableIn the course of the research work, regions and specific agricultural formations were identified in the context of these regions.In North Kazakhstan, the fodder base is represented by such fodders as alfalfa hay, herb hay, alfalfa haylage, wheat straw, fodder wheat and sunflower cake. The feed is mainly of 2 quality classes. The live weight of cattle ranged from 375 to 480 kg. Feeding type: hay-concentrate and haylage-hay-concentrate.In the Western region, the animals were on the pasture, represented by the green mass of feather grass, hair, sage and tansy. Beef cattle are represented by the following breeds: Kazakh white-headed, Aberdeen-Angus and Hereford. Average live weight is 350–550 kg.In the Southeast region, the fodder base consists of wheat hay, sainfoin + alfalfa hay, mountain hay, herb haylage, corn silage and crushed corn. The feed is mainly of 2 and 3 classes. Hay-concentrate type of feeding is used, as well as pastures. Livestock of Angus, Kazakh white-headed breeds and animals of the local population are kept. Live weight of young animals is in the range of 360–380 kg.The diets of the Southern Region include natural grass hay, alfalfa hay, wheat straw, alfalfa haylage and concentrates. Hay-concentrate type of livestock feeding is widespread in the region. The average live weight of bulls for fattening of the Kazakh white-headed and Angus breeds—360–420 kg with a daily increase in live weight of 870–920 g.The composition of the fecal microbiota depending on the type of feeding is presented in Table 2.Table 2 The content of methanogenic archaea in feces.Full size tableFrom the data of Table 2 it follows that the largest amount of Bacteria was found in the faeces of animals with silage-concentrated feeding (98.59 ± 13.0%), and the smallest—with pasture-concentrated (93.24 ± 3.73%) and haylage—concentrated (93.8 ± 12.41%) types of feeding. The differences amounted to 5.35 and 4.79 absolute percent, respectively. However, the differences were not significant at P  More

Systematic palaeontologyOrder Hemiptera Linnaeus, 1758Suborder Sternorrhyncha Amyot et Audinet-Serville, 1843Superfamily Protopsyllidioidea Carpenter, 1931Family Postopsyllidiidae Hakim, Azar et Huang, 2019Genus Megalophthallidion Drohojowska et Szwedo, gen. nov.LSID urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:A6F71390-9B8E-4A19-8F30-C2A024B6EFB1Type speciesMegalophthallidion burmapateron Drohojowska et Szwedo, sp. nov.; by present designation and monotypy.EtymologyGeneric name is derived from Classic Greek megas (μέγας)—large, ophthalmos (ὀφθαλμός)—an eye and Greek form of generic name Psyllidium. Gender: masculine.Type localityNorthern Myanmar: state of Kachin, Noije bum 2001 Summit Site amber mine in the Hukawng Valley, SW of Maingkhwan.Type stratumLowermost Cenomanian, Upper Cretaceous (‘mid-Cretaceous’).DiagnosisHead capsule with 12 stiff setae on tubercles (18 setae in Postopsyllidium); fore wing without pterostigma (tiny pterostigma, widening of ScP + RA present in Postopsyllidium); vein CuP not thickened distally (distinctly thickened distally in Postopsyllidium); profemur with a row of ventral (ventrolateral) setae (two rows in Postopsyllidium).Megalophthallidion burmapateron Drohojowska et Szwedo, sp. nov.LSID urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:F3F971F4-AE04-4F41-98B0-9A0A04470625.(Figs. 1A–F, 2A–I).Figure 1Megalophthallidion burmapteron gen. et sp. nov., holotype (MAIG 6687), imago. (A) Photo of body, ventral side; (B) photo of right antennae and (C) drawing of antenna; (D) drawing of body, dorsal side; (E) drawing of thorax structure with sclerites marked: red—pronotum; orange—mesopraescutum; yellow—mesoscutum; light green—mesoscutellum, dark green—mesopostnotum; light blue—metascutum; dark blue—metascutellum; violet—metapostnotum; (F) photo of thorax dorsal side. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (A), 0.2 mm (B–D), 0.1 mm (F).Full size imageFigure 2Megalophthallidion burmapteron gen. et sp. nov., holotype (MAIG 6687), imago. (A) Photo of right fore wing; (B) photo of right wings; (C) photo of antenna and proleg; (D) photo of proleg and mesoleg, and (E) photo of femur of proleg, and (F) photo of right metatarsus and left mesotarsus in the background, and (G) photo of right mesotarsus of mesoleg, and (H) Photo of tarsi; (I) photo of male genital block. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (A–D), 0.2 mm (B,E,F,H), 0.1 mm (G,I).Full size imageMaterialHolotype, number MAIG 6687 (BUB 96), deposited in Museum of Amber Inclusions (MAIG), University of Gdańsk, Poland. Imago, a complete and well-preserved male. Piece of amber 8 × 6 × 3 mm, cut from larger lump, polished flat on both sides.Type localityNorthern Myanmar: state of Kachin, Noije bum 2001 Summit Site amber mine in the Hukawng Valley, SW of Maingkhwan.Type stratumLowermost Cenomanian, Upper Cretaceous (‘mid-Cretaceous’).DiagnosisAs for the genus with the following additions: three ocelli distinct, antennomere IX the longest, about as long as pedicel, antennomeres III–VII and XI of similar length, antennomere XII the shortest, subconically tapered in apical portion. Paramere lobate, ventral margin with acute, small process, apical and dorsal margins rounded. Aedeagus geniculately bent at base, directed dorsally, tapered apicad.DescriptionMale (Figs. 1A–F, 2A–I). Head with compound eyes distinctly wider than pronotum (Fig. 1D–F). Compound eyes subglobular, protruding laterally. Vertex short in midline, about 2.5 times as wide as posterior margin and as long in middle; trapezoidal, anterior margin slightly arched, lateral margins diverging posteriad, posterior margin shallowly arched, disc of vertex with distinct setae on large tubercles: four setae at posterior margin, two at anterior angles of compound eyes, two medial, over the median ocellus. Three ocelli present, median ocellus distinct, visible from above, lateral ocelli near anterior angles of compound eyes. Frons about as wide as long in midline, two rows of setae on tubercles, upper row at level of median ocellus, lower one, below half of compound eye height. Clypeus, elongate, triangular, in lower portion roof-like; two setae on tubercles near upper margin. Genae very narrow. Rostrum reaching slightly beyond mesocoxae, apical segment slightly shorter than subapical one, darker. Antennae bases placed at lower margin of compound eyes; antennal fovea elevated; scapus shorter than pedicel, cylindrical; pedicel cylindrical; antennomeres IIIrd–VIIth and XIth of similar length, VIIIth slightly longer than VIIth, as long as Xth antennomere, IXth the longest, XIIth the shortest, tapered apically; rhinaria absent.Thorax (Fig. 1D–F): pronotum quadrangular, about as long as mesothorax; pronotum with anterior and posterior margins parallel, merely arcuate, disc with transverse groove in the median portion, lateral margins slightly arcuate, two distinct setae on tubercles in anterolateral angle, two setae on tubercles anterior margin at distance1/3 to median line, three distinct setae on tubercles in posterolateral angles. Mesopraescutum subtriangular, with apex widely rounded, about 0.4 times as wide as pronotum, about 0.4 times as long as wide, delicately separated from mesoscutum. Mesoscutum as wide as pronotum at widest point, distinctly narrowed medially, anterior angles rounded, anterolateral margin sigmoid, lateral angle acute, posterior angles wide, posterior margin V-shape incised, posterolateral areas of mesoscutum disc declivent posteriorly; disc with two setae on tubercles, at 1/3 of mesoscutum width. Mesoscutellum about as long as wide, diamond-shape, anterior and lateral angles acute, posterior angle rounded. Mesopostnotum in form of transverse band, slightly widened in median portion. Metascutum narrower than mesoscutum, anterior angles widely rounded, lateral angles acute, anterolateral margin concave, posterior margin arcuate, with deep median arcuate incision. The suture between metascutum and metascutellum weakly visible, metascutellum subtriangular, longer than wide at base.Parapteron with three distinct setae.Fore wing (Fig. 2A,B) membranous, narrow, elongate, about 3.5 times as long as wide, widest at 2/3 of length. Anterior margin merely arcuate, slightly bent at very base, anteroapical angle widely arcuate, apex rounded, posteroapical angle widely arcuate, tornus arcuate, claval margin straight, with incision between terminals of Pcu (claval apex) and A1. Stem ScP + R + MP + CuA slightly arcuate, very short stalk ScP + R + MP + CuA leaving basal cell, stem ScP + R oblique, straight, forked in basal half of fore wing length, branch ScP + RA, oblique, reaching anterior margin slightly distally of half of fore wing length, slightly distally of ending of CuA2 branch; branch RP slightly arcuate, a little more curved in basal section, reaching margin at anteroapical angle; stalk MP + CuA slightly shorter than basal cell; stem MP almost straight, forked in apical half of fore wing, at about 2/3 of fore wing length, with three terminals reaching margin between apex and posteroapical angle; stem CuA shorter than branches CuA1 and CuA2, about half as long as branch CuA1; claval vein CuP weak at base, not thickened distally; claval vein Pcu straight, claval vein A1 straight. Basal cell present, subtriangular, about twice as long as wide, basal veinlet cua-cup oblique, no other veinlets present; cell r (radial) very long, longer than half of fore wing length; cell m (medial) the shortest, shorter than cell cu (areola postica). Margins of fore wing with fringe of long setae, starting on costal margin near base of fore wing, ending at level of middle of cell cu; longitudinal veins with distinct, scarcely but evenly dispersed, movable setae; terminal section of CuP with two setae; costal margin with row of short, densely distributed setae, apical margin, tornus and claval margin with rows of scaly setae.Hind wing (Fig. 2B) membranous, shorter than fore wing, 3.23 times as long as wide. Costal margin bent at base, then almost straight up to the level of ScP + RA end and wing coupling lobe, then straight to anteroapical angle, anteroapical angle widely arcuate, apex arcuate, posteroapical angle arcuate, tornus straight, claval margin merely arcuate, posteroclaval angle angulate; stem ScP + R + MP bent at base, then straight, stem ScP + R short, branch ScP + RA short, about as long as stem ScP + R, branch RP arcuate basally than straight, reaching apex; stem MP arcuate, forked slightly distad CuA1 terminus level, branch MP1+2 slightly arcuate, reaching margin at posteroapical angle, branch MP3+4 straight, reaching tornus; stem CuA slightly bent at base, then straight, forked slightly distad ScP + R forking, branch CuA1 arcuate, branch CuA2 short, straight, slightly oblique, reaching tornus; claval vein CuP weak, visible only at base, claval vein Pcu slightly arcuate; wing coupling apparatus (fold) with a few short setae.Legs slender, relatively long, profemora armed (Fig. 2C–H). Procoxa as long as profemur, narrow, flattened. Protrochanter scaphoid, elongate, with long apical and subapical setae. Profemur flattened laterally, about as long as protibia, ventrally armed with four large setae on elevated plinths; dorsal margin with row of short, decumbent setae. Protibia narrow, rounded in cross section, covered with short setae, a few longer setae in distal portion. Protarsus—single, long tarsomere, plantar surface with row of semi-erect setae; tarsal claws long, straight, directed ventrally, no arolium nor empodium.Mesocoxa elongate, narrow, slightly flattened. Mesotrochanter scaphoid. Mesofemur slender, flattened laterally, dorsal margin with short setae. Mesotibia subequal to mesofemur, slender, covered with setae, two apical setae slightly thicker and longer. Mesotarsus with three tarsomeres, basimesotarsomere the longest, shorter than cumulative length of mid- and apical mesotarsomere, plantar margins with setae, two apical setae slightly longer and thicker; midmesotarsomere the shortest, 1/3 of basimesotarsomere length, a few setae on plantar surface; apical tarsomere shorter than basimesotarsomere, twice as long as midmesotarsomere, plantar surface with a few, scarcely dispersed setae, tarsal claws long, narrow, directed ventrally, no arolium nor empodium.Metacoxa conical, narrow. Metatrochanter scaphoid, elongate. Metafemur slender, laterally flattened, longer than mesofemur, dorsal margin with row of short setae. Metatibia, long, slender, 1.6 times as long as metafemur, with suberect setae of different size, two larger and longer and two shorter setae subapical setae. Metatarsus slightly less than half of metatibia length, with three tarsomeres, basimetatarsomere the longest, more than twice as long as apical metatarsomere, 1.5 times as long as combined length of mid- and apical metatarsomere, plantar surface with scarce decumbent setae; mid metatarsomere the shortest, 1/4 of basimetatarsomere length, plantar surface with a few setae, two apical ones slightly thicker; apical metatarsomere about 0.4 of basimetatarsomere length, with scarcely dispersed setae on along plantar surface; tarsal claws, long, slender, other pretarsal structures absent.Abdomen (Fig. 1F) narrowly attached to thorax, tergite segment shorter, 2nd tergite distinctly longer, 3rd to 8th tergites of similar length; pygofer narrowing apicad, ventral margin strongly elongated posteriorly; anal tube short, directed posterodorsad, anal style shorter than anal tube. Paramere lobate, ventral margin with acute, small process, apical and dorsal margins rounded. Aedeagus (Fig. 2I) geniculately bent at base, directed dorsad, tapered apicad.Female. Unknown.Megalophthallidion sp. (5th instar nymph)(Figs. 3A–D, 4A–F)Figure 3Megalophthallidion sp. (MAIG 6688), nymph. (A) Photo of body, dorsal side and (B) drawing of body dorsal side; (C) photo of body dorsal side and (D) drawing of body ventral side. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (A–D).Full size imageFigure 4Megalophthallidion sp. (MAIG 6688), nymph. Photo of clypeus and (B) drawing of clypeus; (C) photo of proleg, and (D) photo of mesoleg, and (E) photo of metaleg; (F) photo of posterior part of abdomen ventral side. Scale bars: 0.1 mm (A–F).Full size imageMaterialNymph, 5th instar, MAIG 6688 (BUB 1799), deposited in Museum of Amber Inclusions (MAIG), University of Gdańsk, Poland. Piece of amber 13 × 6 × 2 mm, cut from larger lump, polished flat on one side, more convex on the other.Diagnostic charactersThe nymph of Megalophthallidion gen. nov. is similar in general body shape to the only known fossil protopsyllidioidean nymph described from Lower Cretaceous Lebanese amber—Talaya batraba Drohojowska et Szwedo, 2013. The nymph of Talaya batraba is 2nd or 3rd instar, therefore some features are difficult to compare with this last instar nymph of Megalophthallidion gen. nov. The morphological states observed in those two specimens are: head covered with strongly expanded disc and expanded disc of pronotum, however shapes and ratios of these structures differ; compound eyes on ventral side of head, shifted laterad (ommatidia on cones in T. batraba, while ventroposterior expansions are present in Megalophthallidion gen. nov.); compound eyes visible from above as short, stout cones in fissure between posterior margin of disc (hypertrophied vertex) and anterior margin of pronotum (compound eyes (?) are visible on dorsal side of Permian Aleuronympha bibulla Riek, 1974); in Megalophthallidion gen. nov. rostrum reached mesocoxa, while in Talaya batraba distinctly exceeds length of the body; abdomen with 9 segments; tergites of abdominal segments 5th–9th expanded posterolaterad in form of fan-like expansion; 9th abdominal segment short, placed ventral; anal tube short, cylindrical, epiproct (?) globular.DescriptionNymph, 5th instar (Figs. 3A–D, 4A–F). Body oval shaped, dorso-ventrally flattened, 1.5 times longer than wide with segmentation visible; on the ventral side slightly concave. Length of body c. 1.56 mm long, outline, in dorsal view, maximum width of body 0.94 mm; length of head and pronotum (cephaloprothorax) c. 0.46 mm in midline, width c. 0.83 mm; cumulative length of mesonotum + metanotum c. 0.25 mm; abdomen c. 0.8 mm long. Dorsal side (Fig. 3A,B) with distinct median line (ecdysial line), not reaching anterior or posterior margin of the body, the line distinctly roof-like in abdominal portion. Anterior margin of head (cephaloprothorax) disc arcuate, lateral angles rounded; anterior margin of pronotum arcuate, lateral margins arcuately diverging posteriad, posterior margin distinctly arcuate, anterior angles widely rounded, posterior angles acutely rounded, disc elevated, convex, lateral portions declivitous; the fissure between posterior margin of head disc and anterior margin of pronotum narrow, widened medially, with stalked compound eyes popping out.Head partly separated from prothorax, wide in ventral view. Bases of antennae protruding anterolaterally, wide, anterior margin arcuate, with a small lump extending anteriorly connecting margin with vertex expansion. Suture separating anteclypeus and postclypeus visible in ventral aspect (Fig. 4A,B). Postclypeus about three times as long as wide, oval, slightly swollen, without any setae; weak traces of salivary pump muscle attachments visible. Anteclypeus about as long as postclypeus, widened in upper section below clypeal suture, convex, carinately elevated in lower section, with sides distinctly declivitous, clypellus long, carinately elevated. Lora (mandibulary plates) distinct, separated from anteclypeus by shallow suture, with upper angles at half of postclypeus length, lower angles at half of anteclypeus length, about as wide as half of postclypeus width. Maxillary plates narrow. Genal portion of head enlarged, medial portion arcuately convex; lateral sections narrowing laterally, terminally encircling bases of compound eyes. Antennae short (Fig. 3C,D), placed in front of genal portion. Antennal flagellum indistinctly subdivided into four segments. Rostrum (Fig. 4A,B) three-segmented, 0.2 mm long, with apex reaching apex of mesocoxae; apical segment about 2.5 times as long as subapical one.No lateral sclerites on meso- and metathorax, only one plus one large medial sclerite on both meso- and metathorax. Mesothoracic and metathoracic wing pads distinct, wide, subtriangular, with posterior apices directed posteriorly; lateral portions of mesothoracic wing pads arcuate. Fore wing pad 0.6 mm long, with small, straight humeral lobe, forming a right angle, not protruding anteriorly. Mesothoracic tergites slightly larger than metathoracic segments (respectively c. 0.14 mm and c. 0.12 mm long in midline, 0.26 mm and 0.27 mm in lateral lines); mesothoracic tergum with distinct median elevation (low double crest with ecdysial line in between), slightly wider than long in midline, anterior margin arcuate, lateral margins straight, subparallel, posterior margin concave. Metathoracic wing pad apex slightly exceeding mesothoracic wing pad. Metathoracic tergum wider than long, slightly shorter than mesothoracic tergum, with distinct elevation in the middle.Legs relatively long (Figs. 3C,D, 4C–E). Coxae of legs placed near the median axis of the body. Prolegs: procoxal pit with margins elevated, procoxa conical (c. 0.1 mm long), protrochanter scaphoid, about as long as procoxa, profemur c. 0.13 mm long, slightly flattened laterally, merely thickened, protibia longer than profemur, c. 0.23 mm long; tarsus shorter than protibia, basiprotarsomere about as long as apical protarsomere, the latter with distinct tarsal claws, and wide arolium. Mesoleg similar to proleg, mesocoxa conical (c. 0.1 mm long), mesotrochanter scaphoid, mesofemur (c. 0.13 mm) slightly flattened laterally, mesotibia slightly longer than mesofemur (c. 0.18 mm), mesotarsus slightly shorter than mesotibia, three-segmented, basimesotarsomere the longest (c. 0.07 mm), about as long as combined length of mid- and apical mesotarsomeres (c. 0.04 mm respectively), arolium wide, tarsal claws distinct. Metaleg: metacoxa conical (c. 0.1 mm), metatrochanter scaphoid, about as long as metacoxa (c. 0.12 mm). Metafemur (c. 0.17 mm) slightly more thickened than pro- and mesofemur, metatibia slightly longer (0.19 mm) than pro- and mesotibiae. Metatarsus three-segmented: basimetatarsomere about as long (0.08 mm) as combined length of mid- and apical metatarsomeres (0.04 mm respectively), arolium lobate, wide, tarsal claws distinct, widely spread.Abdomen (Fig. 3A–D) 9-segmented, narrow at base, widening fan-shape posteriorly, 1st segment visible from above, segmentation visible, abdominal terga 5th–9th expanded posterolaterally. Tergites carinately elevated in the middle, separated by ecdysial line. 1st sternite visible in ventral view, sternites 2nd–4th fused medially, sternites 5th–9th separated; 9th abdominal segment short (Fig. 4F), placed ventrally, under tergal expansion; anal tube short, cylindrical, epiproct (?) globular. More

DeVault, T. L., Rhodes, O. E. & Shivik, J. A. Scavenging by vertebrates: Behavioral, ecological, and evolutionary perspectives on an important energy transfer pathway in terrestrial ecosystems. Oikos 102, 225–234 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Selva, N., Jedrzejewska, B., Jedrzejewski, W. & Wajrak, A. Scavenging on European bison carcasses in Bialowieza Primeval Forest (eastern Poland). Ecoscience 10, 303–311 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Wilson, E. E. & Wolkovich, E. M. Scavenging: How carnivores and carrion structure communities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 129–135 (2011).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Inger, R., Cox, D. T. C., Per, E., Norton, B. A. & Gaston, K. J. Ecological role of vertebrate scavengers in urban ecosystems in the UK. Ecol. Evol. 6, 7015–7023 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Moleón, M. et al. Humans and scavengers: The evolution of interactions and ecosystem services. Bioscience 64, 394–403 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Moleón, M., Sánchez-Zapata, J. A., Selva, N., Donázar, J. A. & Owen-Smith, N. Inter-specific interactions linking predation and scavenging in terrestrial vertebrate assemblages. Biol. Rev. 89, 1042–1054 (2014).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Mateo-Tomás, P., Olea, P. P., Moleón, M., Selva, N. & Sánchez-Zapata, J. A. Both rare and common species support ecosystem services in scavenger communities. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 26, 1459–1470 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Houston, D. C. Scavenging efficiency of turkey vultures in tropical forest. Condor 88, 318–323 (1986).
Google Scholar 
Morales-Reyes, Z. et al. Scavenging efficiency and red fox abundance in Mediterranean mountains with and without vultures. Acta Oecol. 79, 81–88 (2017).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Kane, A. & Kendall, C. J. Understanding how mammalian scavengers use information from avian scavengers: Cue from above. J. Anim. Ecol. 86, 837–846 (2017).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sebastián-González, E. et al. Functional traits driving species role in the structure of terrestrial vertebrate scavenger networks. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3519 (2021).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Beasley, J. C., Olson, Z. H. & DeVault, T. L. Ecological role of vertebrate scavengers. In Carrion Ecology, Evolution and Their Applications (eds Benbow, M. E. et al.) 107–127 (CRC Press, 2015).
Google Scholar 
Bassi, E., Battocchio, D., Marcon, A., Stahlberg, S. & Apollonio, M. Scavenging on ungulate carcasses in a mountain forest area in Northern Italy. Mamm. Study 43, 1–11 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Enari, H. & Enari, H. S. Not avian but mammalian scavengers efficiently consume carcasses under heavy snowfall conditions: A case from northern Japan. Mamm. Biol. 101, 419–428 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Peers, M. J. L. et al. Prey availability and ambient temperature influence carrion persistence in the boreal forest. J. Anim. Ecol. 89, 2156–2167 (2020).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Selva, N. & Fortuna, M. A. The nested structure of a scavenger community. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 274, 1101–1108 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Inagaki, A. et al. Vertebrate scavenger guild composition and utilization of carrion in an East Asian temperate forest. Ecol. Evol. 10, 1223–1232 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Sebastián-González, E. et al. Network structure of vertebrate scavenger assemblages at the global scale: Drivers and ecosystem functioning implications. Ecography (Cop.) 43, 1143–1155 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Cortés-Avizanda, A., Selva, N., Carrete, M. & Donázar, J. A. Effects of carrion resources on herbivore spatial distribution are mediated by facultative scavengers. Basic Appl. Ecol. 10, 265–272 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Sebastián-González, E. et al. Nested species-rich networks of scavenging vertebrates support high levels of interspecific competition. Ecology 97, 95–105 (2016).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Beasley, J. C., Olson, Z. H. & Devault, T. L. Carrion cycling in food webs: Comparisons among terrestrial and marine ecosystems. Oikos 121, 1021–1026 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Ray, R. R., Seibold, H. & Heurich, M. Invertebrates outcompete vertebrate facultative scavengers in simulated lynx kills in the Bavarian Forest National Park, Germany. Anim. Biodivers. Conserv. 37, 77–88 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Sugiura, S. & Hayashi, M. Functional compensation by insular scavengers: The relative contributions of vertebrates and invertebrates vary among islands. Ecography (Cop.) 41, 1173–1183 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Wilmers, C. C., Stahler, D. R., Crabtree, R. L., Smith, D. W. & Getz, W. M. Resource dispersion and consumer dominance: Scavenging at wolf- and hunter-killed carcasses in Greater Yellowstone, USA. Ecol. Lett. 6, 996–1003 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Putman, A. R. J. Patterns of carbon dioxide evolution from decaying carrion: Decomposition of small mammal carrion in temperate systems, Part 1. Oikos 31, 47–57 (1978).CAS 

Google Scholar 
DeVault, T. L. & Rhodes, O. E. Identification of vertebrate scavengers of small mammal carcasses in a forested landscape. Acta Theriol. (Warsz.) 47, 185–192 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Selva, N., Jȩdrzejewska, B., Jȩdrzejewski, W. & Wajrak, A. Factors affecting carcass use by a guild of scavengers in European temperate woodland. Can. J. Zool. 83, 1590–1601 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Ogada, D. L., Torchin, M. E., Kinnaird, M. F. & Ezenwa, V. O. Effects of vulture declines on facultative scavengers and potential implications for mammalian disease transmission. Conserv. Biol. 26, 453–460 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Turner, K. L., Abernethy, E. F., Conner, L. M., Rhodes, O. E. & Beasley, J. C. Abiotic and biotic factors modulate carrion fate and vertebrate scavenging communities. Ecology 98, 2413–2424 (2017).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Arrondo, E. et al. Rewilding traditional grazing areas affects scavenger assemblages and carcass consumption patterns. Basic Appl. Ecol. 41, 56–66 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Moleón, M. et al. Carrion availability in space and time. In Carrion Ecology and Management (eds Pedro, P. O. et al.) 23–44 (Springer, 2019).
Google Scholar 
Pereira, L. M., Owen-Smith, N. & Moleón, M. Facultative predation and scavenging by mammalian carnivores: Seasonal, regional and intra-guild comparisons. Mamm. Rev. 44, 44–55 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Animal Care and Use Committee. Guidelines for the capture, handling, and care of mammals as approved by the American Society of Mammalogists. J. Mamm. 79, 1416–1431 (1998).
Google Scholar 
Committee of Reviewing Taxon Names and Specimen Collections. Guidelines for the Procedure of Obtaining Mammal Specimens as Approved by the Mammal Society of Japan (Revised in 2009) (Mammal Society of Japan, 2009).
Google Scholar 
Yoshino, M. Microclimate: New Edition (Chijin Shokan, 1986).
Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.r-project.org/ (2019).Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. Biometry 4th edn. (WH Freeman and Company, 2012).MATH 

Google Scholar 
Fisher, R. A. Statistical Methods for Research Workers (Oliver and Boyd, 1934).MATH 

Google Scholar 
Therneau, T. A Package for Survival Analysis in S. Version 2.38 (2015).Pardo-Barquín, E., Mateo-Tomás, P. & Olea, P. P. Habitat characteristics from local to landscape scales combine to shape vertebrate scavenging communities. Basic Appl. Ecol. 34, 126–139 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Moleón, M., Sánchez-Zapata, J. A., Sebastián-González, E. & Owen-Smith, N. Carcass size shapes the structure and functioning of an African scavenging assemblage. Oikos 124, 1391–1403 (2015).
Google Scholar 
DeVault, T. L., Brisbin, I. L. & Rhodes, O. E. Factors influencing the acquisition of rodent carrion by vertebrate scavengers and decomposers. Can. J. Zool. 82, 502–509 (2004).
Google Scholar  More

McCallum, M. L. Vertebrate biodiversity losses point to a sixth mass extinction. Biodivers. Conserv. 24, 2497–2519 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Wake, D. B. & Vredenburg, V. T. Are we in the midst of the sixth mass extinction? A view from the world of amphibians. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 11466–11473. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0801921105 (2008).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Blehert, D. S. et al. Bat white-nose syndrome: An emerging fungal pathogen?. Science 323, 227. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1163874 (2009).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Pautasso, M., Aas, G., Queloz, V. & Holdenrieder, O. European ash (Fraxinus excelsior) dieback—A conservation biology challenge. Biol. Cons. 158, 37–49 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Daszak, P., Cunningham, A. A. & Hyatt, A. D. Infectious disease and amphibian population declines. Divers. Distrib. 9, 141–150 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Fisher, M. C., Gow, N. A. R. & Gurr, S. J. Tackling emerging fungal threats to animal health, food security and ecosystem resilience. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0332 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fisher, M. C. et al. Emerging fungal threats to animal, plant and ecosystem health. Nature 484, 186–194 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lips, K. R., Reeve, J. D. & Witters, L. R. Ecological traits predicting amphibian population declines in Central America. Conserv. Biol. 17, 1078–1088 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Zipkin, E. F., DiRenzo, G. V., Ray, J. M., Rossman, S. & Lips, K. R. Tropical snake diversity collapses after widespread amphibian loss. Science 367, 814–816. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay5733 (2020).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Berger, L. et al. Chytridiomycosis causes amphibian mortality associated with population declines in the rain forests of Australia and Central America. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95, 9031–9036 (1998).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Martel, A. et al. Recent introduction of a chytrid fungus endangers Western Palearctic salamanders. Science 346, 630–631. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258268 (2014).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Yap, T. A., Koo, M. S., Ambrose, R. F., Wake, D. B. & Vredenburg, V. T. Averting a North American biodiversity crisis. Science 349, 481–482 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Weldon, C., du Preez, L. H., Hyatt, A. D., Muller, R. & Speare, R. Origin of the amphibian chytrid fungus. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 10, 2100–2105 (2004).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Talley, B. L., Muletz, C. R., Vredenburg, V. T., Fleischer, R. C. & Lips, K. R. A century of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in Illinois amphibians (1888–1989). Biol. Cons. 182, 254–261 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Rodriguez, D., Becker, C., Pupin, N., Haddad, C. & Zamudio, K. Long-term endemism of two highly divergent lineages of the amphibian-killing fungus in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Mol. Ecol. 23, 774–787 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Goka, K. et al. Amphibian chytridiomycosis in Japan: Distribution, haplotypes and possible route of entry into Japan. Mol. Ecol. 18, 4757–4774 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bataille, A. et al. Genetic evidence for a high diversity and wide distribution of endemic strains of the pathogenic chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in wild Asian amphibians. Mol. Ecol. 23, 4196–4209. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12385 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
O’Hanlon, S. J. et al. Recent Asian origin of chytrid fungi causing global amphibian declines. Science 360, 621–627. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar1965 (2018).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Swei, A. et al. Is chytridiomycosis an emerging infectious disease in Asia?. PLoS ONE 6, e23179 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bai, C. M., Garner, T. W. J. & Li, Y. M. First evidence of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in China: Discovery of chytridiomycosis in introduced American bullfrogs and native amphibians in the Yunnan Province, China. EcoHealth 7, 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-010-0307-0 (2010).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Yang, H. et al. First detection of the amphibian chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in free-ranging populations of amphibians on mainland Asia: Survey in South Korea. Dis. Aquat. Org. 86, 9–13 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Fong, J. J. et al. Early 1900s detection of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in Korean amphibians. PLoS ONE 10, e0115656 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kusrini, M., Skerratt, L., Garland, S., Berger, L. & Endarwin, W. Chytridiomycosis in frogs of Mount Gede Pangrango, Indonesia. Diseases Aquat. Organ. 82, 187–194 (2008).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Laking, A. E., Ngo, H. N., Pasmans, F., Martel, A. & Nguyen, T. T. Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans is the predominant chytrid fungus in Vietnamese salamanders. Sci. Rep. 7, 44443. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44443 (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Zhu, W. et al. A survey for Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans in Chinese amphibians. Curr. Zool. 60, 729–735 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Beukema, W. et al. Environmental context and differences between native and invasive observed niches of Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans affect invasion risk assessments in the Western Palaearctic. Divers. Distrib. 24, 1788–1801. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12795 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Auliya, M. et al. The global amphibian trade flows through Europe: The need for enforcing and improving legislation. Biodivers. Conserv. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1193-8 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Scheffers, B. R., Edwards, D. P., Diesmos, A., Williams, S. E. & Evans, T. A. Microhabitats reduce animal’s exposure to climate extremes. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 495–503 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Schmeller, D. S. et al. People, pollution and pathogens—Global change impacts in mountain freshwater ecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 622–623, 756–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.006 (2018).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bernardo-Cravo, A., Schmeller, D. S., Chatzinotas, A., Vredenburg, V. T. & Loyau, A. Environmental factors and host microbiomes shape host-pathogen dynamics. Trends Parasitol. 36, 29–36 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Harris, R. N. et al. Skin microbes on frogs prevent morbidity and mortality caused by a lethal skin fungus. ISME J. 3, 818–824. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2009.27 (2009).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Harris, R. N., James, T. Y., Lauer, A., Simon, M. A. & Patel, A. Amphibian pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis is inhibited by the cutaneous bacteria of amphibian species. EcoHealth 3, 53–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-10005-10009-10391 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Piovia-Scott, J. et al. Greater species richness of bacterial skin symbionts better suppresses the amphibian fungal pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Microb. Ecol. 74, 217–226 (2017).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ellison, S., Knapp, R. A., Sparagon, W., Swei, A. & Vredenburg, V. T. Reduced skin bacterial diversity correlates with increased pathogen infection intensity in an endangered amphibian host. Mol. Ecol. 28, 127–140 (2019).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Jani, A. J. & Briggs, C. J. The pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis disturbs the frog skin microbiome during a natural epidemic and experimental infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, E5049-5058. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1412752111 (2014).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kueneman, J. G. et al. The amphibian skin-associated microbiome across species, space and life history stages. Mol. Ecol. 23, 1238–1250 (2014).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kueneman, J. G. Ecology of the Amphibian Skin-Associated Microbiome and Its Role in Pathogen Defense (University of Colorado at Boulder, 2015).
Google Scholar 
Kueneman, J. G. et al. Community richness of amphibian skin bacteria correlates with bioclimate at the global scale. Nat. Ecol. Evolut. 3, 381–389. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0798-1 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jiménez, R. R. & Sommer, S. The amphibian microbiome: Natural range of variation, pathogenic dysbiosis, and role in conservation. Biodivers. Conserv. 26, 763–786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1272-x (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Walke, J. B. et al. Amphibian skin may select for rare environmental microbes. ISME J 8, 2207–2217. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.77 (2014).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
McKenzie, V. J., Bowers, R. M., Fierer, N., Knight, R. & Lauber, C. L. Co-habiting amphibian species harbor unique skin bacterial communities in wild populations. ISME J 6, 588–596. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.129 (2012).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bates, K. A. et al. Amphibian chytridiomycosis outbreak dynamics are linked with host skin bacterial community structure. Nat. Commun. 9, 693. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-02967-w (2018).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ellison, S. et al. The influence of habitat and phylogeny on the skin microbiome of amphibians in Guatemala and Mexico. Microb. Ecol. 78, 257–267 (2019).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Fisher, M. C., Pasmans, F. & Martel, A. Virulence and pathogenicity of chytrid fungi causing amphibian extinctions. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-micro-052621-124212 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Haver, M. et al. The role of abiotic variables in an emerging global amphibian fungal disease in mountains. Sci. Total Environ. 815, 152735 (2021).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Turner, A., Wassens, S., Heard, G. & Peters, A. Temperature as a driver of the pathogenicity and virulence of amphibian chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis: A systematic review. J. Wildl. Dis. 57, 477–494 (2021).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Woodhams, D., Alford, R., Briggs, C., Johnson, M. & Rollins-Smith, L. Life history trade-offs influence disease in changing climates: Strategies of an amphibian pathogen. Ecology 89, 1627–1639 (2008).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sonn, J. M., Berman, S. & Richards-Zawacki, C. L. The influence of temperature on chytridiomycosis in vivo. EcoHealth 14, 762–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-017-1269-2 (2017).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Schmidt, B., Küpfer, E., Geiger, C., Wolf, S. & Schär, S. Elevated temperature clears chytrid fungus infections from tadpoles of the midwife toad, Alytes obstetricans. Amphibia-Reptilia 32, 276–280 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Bielby, J., Cooper, N., Cunningham, A. A., Garner, T. W. J. & Purvis, A. Predicting susceptibility to future declines in the world’s frogs. Conserv. Lett. 1, 82–90 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Gray, M. J., Miller, D. L. & Hoverman, J. T. Ecology and pathology of amphibian ranaviruses. Dis. Aquat. Org. 87, 243–266 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Murray, K., Skerratt, L., Speare, R. & McCallum, H. Impact and dynamics of disease in species threatened by the amphibian chytrid fungus, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Conserv. Biol. 23, 1242–1252 (2009).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Schmeller, D. S. et al. Microscopic aquatic predators strongly affect infection dynamics of a globally emerged pathogen. Curr. Biol. 24, 176–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.11.032 (2014).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Metzger, M. J. et al. Environmental stratifications as the basis for national, European and global ecological monitoring. Ecol. Ind. 33, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.11.009 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Metzger, M. J. et al. A high-resolution bioclimate map of the world: A unifying framework for global biodiversity research and monitoring. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 22, 630–638. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12022 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Clare, F., Daniel, O., Garner, T. & Fisher, M. Assessing the ability of swab data to determine the true burden of infection for the amphibian pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. EcoHealth 13, 360–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-016-1114-z (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Cheng, T. L., Rovito, S. M., Wake, D. B. & Vredenburg, V. T. Coincident mass extirpation of neotropical amphibians with the emergence of the infectious fungal pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 9502–9507 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Vredenburg, V. T. et al. Pathogen invasion history elucidates contemporary host pathogen dynamics. PLoS ONE 14, e0219981. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219981 (2019).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hyatt, A. D. et al. Diagnostic assays and sampling protocols for the detection of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Dis. Aquat. Org. 73, 175–192 (2007).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Blooi, M. et al. Duplex real-time PCR for rapid simultaneous detection of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis and B. salamandrivorans in amphibian samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 51, 4173–4177 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Boyle, D. G., Boyle, D. B., Olsen, V., Morgan, J. A. T. & Hyatt, A. D. Rapid quantitative detection of chytridiomycosis (Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis) in amphibian samples using real-time Taqman PCR assay. Dis. Aquat. Org. 60, 141–148 (2004).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet. J. 17, 10–12 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Callahan, B. J. et al. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pruesse, E., Peplies, J. & Glöckner, F. O. SINA: Accurate high-throughput multiple sequence alignment of ribosomal RNA genes. Bioinformatics 28, 1823–1829 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: Improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–D596 (2012).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bokulich, N. A. & Mills, D. A. Improved selection of internal transcribed spacer-specific primers enables quantitative, ultra-high-throughput profiling of fungal communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.03870-12 (2013).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. Waste not, want not: Why rarefying microbiome data is inadmissible. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003531 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Abatzoglou, J. T., Dobrowski, S. Z., Parks, S. A. & Hegewisch, K. C. TerraClimate, a high-resolution global dataset of monthly climate and climatic water balance from 1958–2015. Sci. Data 5, 170191. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.191 (2018).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wells, N., Goddard, S. & Hayes, M. J. A self-calibrating Palmer Drought Severity Index. J. Clim. 17, 2335–2351 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Segata, N. et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 12, R60. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60 (2011).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Fisher, M. C. et al. RACE: Risk assessment of chytridiomycosis to European Amphibian Biodiversity. Froglog 101, 45–47 (2012).
Google Scholar  More

Analysis of contents of heavy metals in wasteland soilThe test results show (Table 5) that the contents of Hg, Cd, As, Pb, Cr, Zn, Ni and Cu in the surface soil within Shigetai Coal Mine vary from 0.043 to 0.255, 0.44 to 2.23, 2.66 to 18.40, 11.80 to 42.80, 40.50 to 118.60, 18.90 to 70.10, 4.31 to 28.10, 4.96 to 46.25 mg/kg, respectively; the average contents of Hg, Cd, As, Pb, Cr, Zn, Ni and Cu are 0.128, 1.03, 4.73, 23.08, 76.22, 46.94, 16.11 and 12.10 mg/kg, respectively. The average contents of Hg, Cd, Pb and Cr in soil within the research area are 2.03, 1.36, 1.11 and 1.23 times of the soil background values in Shaanxi Province, respectively. The average contents of As, Zn and Cu are lower than the soil background value in Shaanxi Province, but the maximum contents of these three elements are 1.65, 1.01 and 2.16 times of the soil background values in Shaanxi Province, respectively. It is reported that the average concentration of lead in agricultural soil affected by coal mines is relatively high (433 mg kg−1)38. Lead is usually related to minerals in coal and occurs mainly in the form of sulfide such as PbS and PbSe39. In addition, aluminosilicate and carbonate also contain lead40. Chromium is a non-volatile element, which is related to aluminosilicate minerals41. In the mining process, chromium may be accumulated in coal, gangue or other tailings, and then enter the soil or water body through rain leaching42.Table 5 Statistics of contents of heavy metals in wasteland soil (n = 79).Full size tableThe coefficient of variation (CV) of Hg and Cd contents in soil within the research area is 0.050 and 0.37, respectively, with moderate variation, indicating that the content of these two heavy metals is less affected by the external factors; the coefficient of variation (CV) of As, Pb, Cr, Zn, Ni and Cu contents is 2.81, 7.46, 18.00, 13.51, 5.44 and 5.64, respectively, with strong variation (CV  > 0.50)43, indicating that the content of these eight heavy metals may be affected by some local pollution sources. The skewness coefficient (SK) ranges from − 3 to 3, and the larger its absolute value, the greater its skewness. When SK  > 0, it is positive skewness; when SK  More

Pax, F. Grundzüge der Pflanzenverbreitung in den Karpathen. 1–342 (W. Engelmann, 1898). https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.20419.Popov [Попов], M. G. [М. Г.]. Ocherk rastitel’nosti i flory Karpat [Очерк растительности и флоры Карпат]. vol. 5 (XIII) (Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo Obshchestva Ispytateley Prirody [Издательство Московского Общества Испытателей Природы], 1949).Mráz, P. & Ronikier, M. Biogeography of the Carpathians: Evolutionary and spatial facets of biodiversity. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 119, 528–559 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Breman, E. et al. Conserving the endemic flora of the Carpathian Region: An international project to increase and share knowledge of the distribution, evolution and taxonomy of Carpathian endemics and to conserve endangered species. Plant Syst. Evol. 306, 59 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bálint, M. et al. The Carpathians as a Major Diversity Hotspot in Europe. in Biodiversity Hotspots: Distribution and Protection of Conservation Priority Areas (eds. Zachos, F. E. & Habel, J. C.) 189–205 (Springer, 2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20992-5_11.Rahbek, C. et al. Humboldt’s enigma: What causes global patterns of mountain biodiversity?. Science 365, 1108–1113 (2019).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hurdu, B. et al. Patterns of plant endemism in the Romanian Carpathians (South-Eastern Carpathians). Contrib. Bot. 47, 25–38 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Pawłowski, B. Remarques sur l’endemisme dans la flore des Alpes et des Carpates. Plant Ecol. 21, 181–243 (1970).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ronikier, M. Biogeography of high-mountain plants in the Carpathians: An emerging phylogeographical perspective. Taxon 373–389 (2011).Hendrych, R. Primula vulgaris in der Slowakei und in den umliegenden Gebieten. Preslia Praha 68, 135–156 (1996).
Google Scholar 
Hendrych, R. & Hendrychová, H. Preliminary report on the Dacian migroelement in the flora of Slovakia. Preslia Praha 51, 313–332 (1979).
Google Scholar 
Sramkó, G. „Dunántúli” közép-dunai flóraválasztós fajok a Matricum flórájában. KITAIBELIA 9, 31–56 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Juřičková, L. et al. Early postglacial recolonisation, refugial dynamics and the origin of a major biodiversity hotspot. A case study from the Malá Fatra mountains, Western Carpathians, Slovakia. The Holocene 28, 583–594 (2018).Kliment, J., Turis, P. & Janišová, M. Taxa of vascular plants endemic to the Carpathian Mts. Preslia -Praha- 88, 19–76 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Konowalik, K. Reconstructing reticulate relationships in the polyploid complex of Leucanthemum Mill. (Compositae, Anthemideae). (Fakultät für Biologie und Vorklinische Medizin, Universität Regensburg, 2014).Konowalik, K., Wagner, F., Tomasello, S., Vogt, R. & Oberprieler, C. Detecting reticulate relationships among diploid Leucanthemum Mill. (Compositae, Anthemideae) taxa using multilocus species tree reconstruction methods and AFLP fingerprinting. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 92, 308–328 (2015).Wagner, F. et al. ‘At the crossroads towards polyploidy’: Genomic divergence and extent of homoploid hybridization are drivers for the formation of the ox-eye daisy polyploid complex (Leucanthemum, Compositae-Anthemideae). New Phytol. 223, 2039–2053 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wagner, F., Härtl, S., Vogt, R. & Oberprieler, C. “Fix Me Another Marguerite!”: Species delimitation in a group of intensively hybridizing lineages of ox-eye daisies (Leucanthemum Mill., Compositae-Anthemideae). Mol. Ecol. 26, 4260–4283 (2017).Piękoś-Mirkowa, H., Mirek, Z. & Miechowka, A. Endemic vascular plants in the Polish Tatra Mts. – distribution and ecology. Pol. Bot. Stud. 12, (1996).Zelený, V. Taxonomisch-chorologische Studie über die Art Leucanthemum rotundifolium (W. K.) DC. Folia Geobot. 5, 369–400 (1970).Piękoś, H. Nowy mieszaniec między Leucanthemum rotundifolium (W. et K.) DC. a L. vulgare Lam. var. alpicolum Gremli – Hybrida nova inter Leucanthemum rotundifolium (W. et K.) DC. et L. vulgare Lam. var. alpicolum Gremli. Fragm. Florist. Geobot. 16, 319–326 (1970).Rogalski, M., do Nascimento Vieira, L., Fraga, H. P. & Guerra, M. P. Plastid genomics in horticultural species: importance and applications for plant population genetics, evolution, and biotechnology. Front. Plant Sci. 6, (2015).Greiner, R., Vogt, R. & Oberprieler, C. Evolution of the polyploid north-west Iberian Leucanthemum pluriflorum clan (Compositae, Anthemideae) based on plastid DNA sequence variation and AFLP fingerprinting. Ann. Bot. 111, 1109–1123 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Oberprieler, C., Konowalik, K., Fackelmann, A. & Vogt, R. Polyploid speciation across a suture zone: phylogeography and species delimitation in S French Leucanthemum Mill. representatives (Compositae–Anthemideae). Plant Syst. Evol. 304, 1141–1155 (2018).Oberprieler, C., Greiner, R., Konowalik, K. & Vogt, R. The reticulate evolutionary history of the polyploid NW Iberian Leucanthemum pluriflorum clan (Compositae, Anthemideae) as inferred from nrDNA ETS sequence diversity and eco-climatological niche-modelling. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 70, 478–491 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Alexander, P. J., Rajanikanth, G., Bacon, C. D. & Bailey, C. D. Recovery of plant DNA using a reciprocating saw and silica-based columns. Mol. Ecol. Notes 7, 5–9 (2007).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sang, T., Crawford, D. & Stuessy, T. Chloroplast DNA phylogeny, reticulate evolution, and biogeography of Paeonia (Paeoniaceae). Am. J. Bot. 84, 1120 (1997).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Scheunert, A., Dorfner, M., Lingl, T. & Oberprieler, C. Can we use it? On the utility of de novo and reference-based assembly of Nanopore data for plant plastome sequencing. PLoS ONE 15, e0226234 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Timme, R. E., Kuehl, J. V., Boore, J. L. & Jansen, R. K. A comparative analysis of the Lactuca and Helianthus (Asteraceae) plastid genomes: Identification of divergent regions and categorization of shared repeats. Am. J. Bot. 94, 302–312 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hall, T. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser 41, 95–98 (1999).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ronquist, F. et al. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 61, 539–542 (2012).Simmons, M. P. & Ochoterena, H. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 49, 369–381 (2000).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Müller, K. SeqState: Primer design and sequence statistics for phylogenetic DNA datasets. Appl. Bioinformatics 4, 65–69 (2005).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Darriba, D., Taboada, G. L., Doallo, R. & Posada, D. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat. Meth. 9, 772 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Guindon, S. & Gascuel, O. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 52, 696–704 (2003).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jukes, T. H. & Cantor, C. R. Evolution of Protein Molecules. in Mammalian Protein Metabolism 21–132 (Elsevier, 1969). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4832-3211-9.50009-7.Rambaut, A., Drummond, A. J., Xie, D., Baele, G. & Suchard, M. A. Posterior summarization in bayesian phylogenetics using tracer 1.7. Syst. Biol. 67, 901–904 (2018).Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C. & Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1547–1549 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tamura, K., Tao, Q. & Kumar, S. Theoretical foundation of the reltime method for estimating divergence times from variable evolutionary rates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1770–1782 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tamura, K. et al. Estimating divergence times in large molecular phylogenies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 19333–19338 (2012).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tao, Q., Tamura, K., Mello, B. & Kumar, S. Reliable confidence intervals for reltime estimates of evolutionary divergence times. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 280–290 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bouckaert, R. et al. BEAST 2.5: An advanced software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLOS Comput. Biol. 15, e1006650 (2019).Mello, B., Tao, Q., Barba-Montoya, J. & Kumar, S. Molecular dating for phylogenies containing a mix of populations and species by using Bayesian and RelTime approaches. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 21, 122–136 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, wei-M. On the origin and development of Artemisia (Asteraceae) in the geological past. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 145, 331–336 (2004).Clement, M., Snell, Q., Walker, P., Posada, D. & Crandall, K. TCS: Estimating Gene Genealogies. in Proceedings of the 16th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium 311 (IEEE Computer Society, 2002).Leigh, J. W. & Bryant, D. popart: full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 1110–1116 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cheng, L., Connor, T. R., Sirén, J., Aanensen, D. M. & Corander, J. Hierarchical and spatially explicit clustering of DNA sequences with BAPS software. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 1224–1228 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tonkin-Hill, G., Lees, J. A., Bentley, S. D., Frost, S. D. W. & Corander, J. RhierBAPS: An R implementation of the population clustering algorithm hierBAPS. Wellcome Open Res. 3, 93 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yu, Y., Blair, C. & He, X. RASP 4: Ancestral state reconstruction tool for multiple genes and characters. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 604–606 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ali, S. S., Yu, Y., Pfosser, M. & Wetschnig, W. Inferences of biogeographical histories within subfamily Hyacinthoideae using S-DIVA and Bayesian binary MCMC analysis implemented in RASP (Reconstruct Ancestral State in Phylogenies). Ann. Bot. 109, 95–107 (2012).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Araújo, M. B. et al. Standards for distribution models in biodiversity assessments. Sci. Adv. 5, eaat4858 (2019).Konowalik, K. & Nosol, A. Evaluation metrics and validation of presence-only species distribution models based on distributional maps with varying coverage. Sci. Rep. 11, 1482 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hamner, B., Frasco, M. & LeDell, E. Metrics: Evaluation metrics for machine learning (2018).Ripley, B. & Venables, W. nnet: Feed-forward neural networks and multinomial log-linear models. (2020).Thuiller, W., Georges, D., Engler, R. & Breiner, F. biomod2: Ensemble Platform for Species Distribution Modeling. (2020).Therneau, T., Atkinson, B., port, B. R. (producer of the initial R. & maintainer 1999–2017). rpart: Recursive Partitioning and Regression Trees. (2019).Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P., Dudík, M., Schapire, R. E. & Blair, M. E. Opening the black box: An open-source release of Maxent. Ecography 40, 887–893 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Friedman, J. H. Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Ann. Stat. 29, 1189–1232 (2001).MathSciNet 
MATH 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hijmans, R. J., Phillips, S., Leathwick, J. & Elith, J. dismo: Species distribution modeling. (2017).Carlson, C. J. embarcadero: Species distribution modelling with Bayesian additive regression trees in r. Methods Ecol. Evol. 11, 850–858 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jasiewicz, A. Rośliny naczyniowe Bieszczadów Zachodnich [The Vascular Plants of the Western Bieszczady Mts. (East Carpathians)]. Monogr. Bot. 20, 1–340 (1965).Kornaś, J. Charakterystyka geobotaniczna Gorców [Caractéristique géobotanique des Gorces (Karpathes Occidentales Polonaises)]. Monogr. Bot. 3, 3–230 (1955).Article 

Google Scholar 
de Oliveira, G., Rangel, T. F., Lima-Ribeiro, M. S., Terribile, L. C. & Diniz-Filho, J. A. F. Evaluating, partitioning, and mapping the spatial autocorrelation component in ecological niche modeling: a new approach based on environmentally equidistant records. Ecography 37, 637–647 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sobral-Souza, T., Lima-Ribeiro, M. S. & Solferini, V. N. Biogeography of Neotropical Rainforests: past connections between Amazon and Atlantic Forest detected by ecological niche modeling. Evol. Ecol. 29, 643–655 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Varela, S., Anderson, R. P., García-Valdés, R. & Fernández-González, F. Environmental filters reduce the effects of sampling bias and improve predictions of ecological niche models. Ecography 37, 1084–1091 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Barve, N. et al. The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling. Ecol. Model. 222, 1810–1819 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Karger, D. N. et al. Data from: Climatologies at high resolution for the earth’s land surface areas. 7266827510 bytes (2018) 10.5061/DRYAD.KD1D4.Karger, D. N. et al. Climatologies at high resolution for the earth’s land surface areas. Sci. Data 4, 1–20 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wing, M. K. C. from J. et al. caret: Classification and regression training. (2019).Smith, A. B. & Santos, M. J. Testing the ability of species distribution models to infer variable importance. Ecography 43, 1801–1813 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Evans, J. S., Murphy, M. A. & Ram, K. spatialEco: Spatial analysis and modelling utilities. (2021).Brown, J. L., Hill, D. J., Dolan, A. M., Carnaval, A. C. & Haywood, A. M. PaleoClim, high spatial resolution paleoclimate surfaces for global land areas. Sci. Data 5, 180254 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Araújo, M. B., Whittaker, R. J., Ladle, R. J. & Erhard, M. Reducing uncertainty in projections of extinction risk from climate change. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 14, 529–538 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhu, G., Fan, J. & Peterson, A. T. Cautions in weighting individual ecological niche models in ensemble forecasting. Ecol. Model. 448, 109502 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hijmans, R. J. et al. raster: Geographic data analysis and modeling. (2021).R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (2019).QGIS Development Team. QGIS geographic information system. (2019).Frajman, B. & Oxelman, B. Reticulate phylogenetics and phytogeographical structure of Heliosperma (Sileneae, Caryophyllaceae) inferred from chloroplast and nuclear DNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 43, 140–155 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ronikier, M., Cieślak, E. & Korbecka, G. High genetic differentiation in the alpine plant Campanula alpina Jacq. (Campanulaceae): evidence for glacial survival in several Carpathian regions and long-term isolation between the Carpathians and the Alps. Mol. Ecol. 17, 1763–1775 (2008).Ehrich, D. et al. Genetic consequences of Pleistocene range shifts: contrast between the Arctic, the Alps and the East African mountains. Mol. Ecol. 16, 2542–2559 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Šrámková, G. et al. Phylogeography and taxonomic reassessment of Arabidopsis halleri—a montane species from Central Europe. Plant Syst. Evol. 305, 885–898 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Birks & Willis, K. J. Alpines, trees, and refugia in Europe. Plant Ecol. Divers. 1, 147–160 (2008).Jarčuška, B., Kaňuch, P., Naďo, L. & Krištín, A. Quantitative biogeography of Orthoptera does not support classical qualitative regionalization of the Carpathian Mountains. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 128, 887–900 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tadono, T. et al. Precise global DEM generation by ALOS PRISM. ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 4, 71–76 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lisiecki, L. E. & Raymo, M. E. A Pliocene-Pleistocene stack of 57 globally distributed benthic δ18O records. Paleoceanography 20, 1 (2005).
Google Scholar  More

Filgueira, R. R., Fournier, L. L., Cerisola, C. I., Gelati, P. & Garcia, M. G. Particle-size distribution in soils: A critical study of the fractal model validation. Geoderma 134, 327–334 (2006).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Deng, J. F., Li, J. H., Deng, G., Zhu, H. Y. & Zhang, R. H. Fractal scaling of particle-size distribution and associations with soil properties of Mongolian pine plantations in the Mu Us Desert, China. Sci. Rep. 7, 6742 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gao, Y. J. et al. “Fertile islands” beneath three desert vegetation on soil phosphorus fractions, enzymatic activities, and microbial biomass in the desert-oasis transition zone. CATENA 212, 106090 (2022).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zeraatpisheh, M., Ayoubi, S., Mirbagheri, Z., Mosaddeghi, M. R. & Xu, M. Spatial prediction of soil aggregate stability and soil organic carbon in aggregate fractions using machine learning algorithms and environmental variables. Geoderma Regioanl. 27, e00440 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zha, C., Shao, M., Jia, X. & Zhang, C. Particle size distribution of soils (0–500 cm) in the Loess Plateau, China. Geoderma 7, 251–258 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Callesen, I., Keck, H. & Andersen, T. J. Particle size distribution in soils and marine sediments by laser diffraction using Malvern Mastersizer 2000-method uncertainty including the effect of hydrogen peroxide pretreatment. J. Soils Sediments 18, 2500–2510 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
He, Y. J. & Lv, D. Y. Fractal expression of soil particle-size distribution at the basin scale. Open Geosci. 14, 70–78 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Besalatpour, A. A., Ayoubi, S., Hajabbasi, M. A., Mosaddeghi, M. R. & Schulin, R. Estimating wet soil aggregate stability from easily available properties in a highly mountainous watershed. CATENA 111, 72–79 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Besalatpour, A. A., Ayoubi, S., Hajabbasi, M. A., Yousefian, J. A. & Gharipour, A. Feature selection using parallel genetic algorithm for the prediction of geometric mean diameter of soil aggregates by machine learning methods. Arid Land Res. Manag. 28, 383–394 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Xu, G. C., Li, Z. B. & Li, P. Fractal features of soil particle-size distribution and total soil nitrogen distribution in a typical watershed in the source area of the middle Dan River, China. CATENA 101, 17–23 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jia, W. R. et al. Grain size distribution at four developmental stages of crescent dunes in the hinterland of the Taklimakan Desert, China. J. Arid Land 8, 722–733 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rabot, E., Wiesmeier, M., Schlüter, S. & Vogel, H. J. Soil structure as an indicator of soil functions: A review. Geoderma 314, 122–137 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ghanbarian, B. & Daigle, H. Fractal dimension of soil fragment mass-size distribution: A critical analysis. Geoderma 245–246, 98–103 (2015).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Deng, Y., Cai, C., Xia, D., Ding, S. & Chen, J. Fractal features of soil particle size distribution under different land-use patterns in the alluvial fans of collapsing gullies in the hilly granitic region of southern China. PLoS ONE 12, e0173555 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhai, J. Y. et al. Change in soil particle size distribution and erodibility with latitude and vegetation restoration chronosequence on the Loess Plateau, China. Int. J Environ. Res. Public Health 17, 822 (2020).CAS 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gao, Z. Y., Niu, F. J., Lin, Z. J. & Luo, J. Fractal and multifractal analysis of soil particle-size distribution and correlation with soil hydrological properties in active layer of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. CATENA 203, 105373 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, T. L. et al. Multifractal characteristics and spatial variability of soil particle-size distribution in different land use patterns in a small catchment of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region, China. J. Mt. Sci. 18, 111–125 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gui, D. W. et al. Characterizing variations in soil particle size distribution in oasis farmlands-a case study of the Cele Oasis. Math. Comput. Model. 51, 1306–1311 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Millán, H., Gonzalez-Posada, M., Aguilar, M., Domınguez, J. & Céspedes, L. On the fractal scaling of soil data. Particle-size distributions. Geoderma 117, 117–128 (2003).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Qi, F. et al. Soil particle size distribution characteristics of different land-use types in the Funiu mountainous region. Soil Till. Res. 184, 45–51 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Muhtar, Q., Hiroki, T. & Mijit, H. Formation and internal structure of Tamarix cones in the Taklimakan Desert. J. Arid Environ. 50, 81–97 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhao, Y. J. & Xia, X. C. Research on the Relationship Between Tamarix Cone and Environmental Change in Lop Nur Region of Xinjiang 38–142 (Sci. Press, 2011) (in Chinese).
Google Scholar 
Yin, C. H., Shi, Q. M., Liang, F. & Tian, C. Y. Distribution pattern of soil salinity in Tamarix Nebkhas in Tarim Basin. Bull Soil Water Conserv. 33, 287–293 (2013) (in Chinese).
Google Scholar 
Zheng, T., Li, J. G., Li, W. H. & Wan, J. H. Soil heterogeneity and its effects on plant community in oasis desert transition zone in the lower peaches of Tarim River. J. Desert Res. 30, 128–134 (2010) (in Chinese).
Google Scholar 
Liu, J. H., Wang, X. Q., Ma, Y. & Tan, F. Z. Spatial variation of soil salinity on Tamarix ramosissima nebkhas and interdune in oasis-desert ecotone. J. Desert Res. 36, 181–189 (2016) (in Chinese).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Dong, Z. W. et al. Stoichiometric features of C, N, and P in soil and litter of Tamarix cones and their relationship with environmental factors in the Taklimakan Desert, China. J. Soils Sediments 20, 690–704 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dong, Z. W., Li, S. Y., Mao, D. L. & Lei, J. Q. Distribution pattern of soil grain size in Tamarix sand dune in the southwest of Gurbantunggut Desert. J. Soil Water Conserv. 35, 64-72/79 (2021) (in Chinese).
Google Scholar 
Dong, Z. W., Zhao, Y., Lei, J. Q. & Xi, Y. Q. Distribution pattern and influencing factors of soil salinity at Tamarix cones in the Taklimakan Desert. Chin. J. Plant Eco. 42, 873–884 (2018) (in Chinese).Article 

Google Scholar 
Xu, L. S. et al. Oasis microclimate effect on the dust deposition in Cele Oasis at southern Tarim Basin, China. Arab J. Geosci. 9, 294 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, J. H., Wang, X. Q., Ma, Y. & Tan, F. Z. Spatial heterogeneity of soil grain size on Tamarix ramosissima nebkhas and interdune in desert-oasis ecotone. J. Beijing For. Univ. 37, 89–99 (2015) (in Chinese).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Mao, D. L. et al. Fractal characteristics of grain size of sand and dust in aeolian sand movement in Cele oasis-desert ecotone in Xinjiang, China. Acta Pedol. Sinica 55, 88–99 (2018) (in Chinese).
Google Scholar 
Li, J. R. & Ravib, S. Interactions among hydrological-aeolian processes and vegetation determine grain-size distribution of sediments in a semi-arid coppice dune (nebkha) system. J. Arid Environ. 154, 24–33 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ayoubi, S., Karchegani, P. M., Mosaddeghi, M. R. & Honarjoo, N. Soil aggregation and organic carbon as affected by topography and land use change in western Iran. Soil Till. Res. 121, 18–26 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, X. M., Dong, Z. B., Zhang, J. W. & Chen, G. T. Geomorphology of sand dunes in the Northeast Taklimakan Desert. Geomorphology 42, 183–195 (2002).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, W. G. et al. Onset of permanent Taklimakan Desert linked to the mid-Pleistocene transition. Geology 48, 782–786 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yang, X. H. et al. Characteristics of soil particle size distribution and its effect on dust emission in Taklimakan Desert. Trans. CSAE 36, 167–174 (2020) (in Chinese).
Google Scholar 
Bao, S. D. Soil agricultural chemistry analysis 152–200 (China Agr. Press, 2000) (in Chinese).
Google Scholar 
Folk, R. L. & Ward, W. C. Brazos Riverbar: A study in the significance of grain size parameters. J. Sediment Petrol. 27, 3–26 (1957).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Weil, R. R. & Brady, N. C. The Nature and Properties of Soils 15th edn. (PrenticeHall Press, 2017).
Google Scholar 
Churchman, G. J. Game changer in soil science. Functional role of clay minerals in soil. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 181, 99–103 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tyler, S. W. & Wheatcraft, S. W. Fractal scaling of soil particle size distributions: Analysis and limitations. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56, 362–369 (1992).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lin, Y. C., Mu, G. J., Xu, L. S. & Zhao, X. The origin of bimodal grain-size distribution for aeolian deposits. Aeolian Res. 20, 80–88 (2016).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sha, G. L., Wei, T. X., Chen, Y. X., Fu, Y. C. & Ren, K. Characteristics of soil particle size distribution of typical plantcommunities on the hilly areas of Loess Plateau. Arid Land Geogr. https://doi.org/10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2021.487 (2022) (in Chinese).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yang, J. D., Li, G. J., Dai, Y., Rao, W. B. & Ji, J. F. Isotopic evidences for provenances of loess of the Chinese Loess Plateau. Earth Sci. Front. 16, 195–206 (2009) (in Chinese).
Google Scholar 
Wu, L. & Zhang, Y. M. Precipitation and soil particle size co-determine spatial distribution of biological soil crusts in the Gurbantunggut Desert, China. J. Arid Land 10, 701–711 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, X. B. et al. Relationship between soil particle size distribution and soil nutrient distribution characteristics in typical communities of desert grassland. Actabot. Boreal-Occident Sin. 37, 1635–1644 (2017) (in Chinese).
Google Scholar 
Gao, G. L. et al. Fractal scaling of particle size distribution and relationships with topsoil properties affected by biological soil crusts. PLoS ONE 9, e88559 (2014).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhao, Y., Feng, Q. & Yang, H. Soil salinity distribution and its relationship with soil particle size in the lower reaches of Heihe River, Northwestern China. Environ. Earth Sci. 75, 1–18 (2016).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, X. Y. et al. Sources of Asian dust and role of climate change versus desertification in Asian dust emission. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 2272 (2003).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar  More