Ecology

Metcalf, C. J. & Pavard, S. Why evolutionary biologists should be demographers. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 205–212 (2007).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
French, J. C., Riris, P., Fernandez-Lopez de Pablo, J., Lozano, S. & Silva, F. A manifesto for palaeodemography in the twenty-first century. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 376, 20190707 (2021).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
French, J. C. Demography and the Palaeolithic archaeological record. J. Archaeol. Method Th. 23, 150–199 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Henrich, J. Demography and cultural evolution: how adaptive cultural processes can produce maladaptive losses – The Tasmanian case. Am. Antiquity 69, 197–214 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Powell, A., Shennan, S. & Thomas, M. G. Late Pleistocene demography and the appearance of modern human behavior. Science 324, 1298–1301 (2009).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Shennan, S. Demography and cultural innovation: a model and its implications for the emergence of modern human culture. Camb. Archaeol. J. 11, 5–16 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jorgensen, E. K. The palaeodemographic and environmental dynamics of prehistoric Arctic Norway: an overview of human-climate covariation. Quat. Int. 549, 36–51 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jorgensen, E. K. & Riede, F. Convergent catastrophes and the termination of the Arctic Norwegian Stone Age: a multi-proxy assessment of the demographic and adaptive responses of mid-Holocene collectors to biophysical forcing. Holocene 29, 1782–1800 (2019).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Riede, F. Lateglacial and Postglacial Pioneers in Northern Europe (Archaeopress, 2014).Tallavaara, M. & Seppä, H. Did the mid-Holocene environmental changes cause the boom and bust of hunter-gatherer population size in eastern Fennoscandia? Holocene 22, 215–225 (2011).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kavanagh, P. H. et al. Hindcasting global population densities reveals forces enabling the origin of agriculture. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 478–484 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tallavaara, M., Luoto, M., Korhonen, N., Jarvinen, H. & Seppa, H. Human population dynamics in Europe over the Last Glacial Maximum. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 8232–8237 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bliege Bird, R. & Codding, B. F. Promise and peril of ecological and evolutionary modelling using cross-cultural datasets. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6, 1–3 (2021).Hamilton, M. J. & Tallavaara, M. Statistical inference, scale and noise in comparative anthropology. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6, 122 (2022).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gurven, M. D. & Davison, R. J. Periodic catastrophes over human evolutionary history are necessary to explain the forager population paradox. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 12758–12766 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tallavaara, M. & Jorgensen, E. K. Why are population growth rate estimates of past and present hunter-gatherers so different? Philos. T R Soc. B 376, 20190708 (2021).Blackman, F. F. Optima and limiting factors. With two diagrams in the text. Ann. Bot. Lond. 19, 281–296 (1905).Article 

Google Scholar 
Maier, A. et al. Cultural evolution and environmental change in Central Europe between 40 and 15 ka. Quat. Int. 581-582, 225–240 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhu, D., Galbraith, E. D., Reyes-Garcia, V. & Ciais, P. Global hunter-gatherer population densities constrained by influence of seasonality on diet composition. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1536 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Binford, L. R. Archaeology as anthropology. Am. Antiquity 28, 217–225 (1962).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lowe, J. J. et al. Synchronisation of palaeoenvironmental events in the North Atlantic region during the Last Termination: a revised protocol recommended by the INTIMATE group. Quat. Sci. Rev. 27, 6–17 (2008).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bocquet-Appel, J. P., Demars, P. Y., Noiret, L. & Dobrowsky, D. Estimates of upper Palaeolithic meta-population size in Europe from archaeological data. J. Archaeol. Sci. 32, 1656–1668 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fort, J., Pujol, T. & Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. Palaeolithic populations and waves of advance (Human range expansions). Camb. Archaeol. J. 14, 53–61 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schmidt, I. et al. Approaching prehistoric demography: proxies, scales and scope of the Cologne Protocol in European contexts. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 376, 20190714 (2021).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
de Pablo, J. F. L. et al. Palaeodemographic modelling supports a population bottleneck during the Pleistocene-Holocene transition in Iberia. Nat. Commun. 10, 1872 (2019).Binford, L. R. Constructing Frames of Reference: An Analytical Method for Archaeological Theory Building Using Ethnographic and Environmental Data Sets. (Univ. California Press, 2019).Johnson, A. L. Exploring adaptive variation among hunter-gatherers with Binford’s frames of reference. J. Archaeol. Res. 22, 1–42 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Graham, M. H. Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology 84, 2809–2815 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tallavaara, M., Eronen, J. T. & Luoto, M. Productivity, biodiversity, and pathogens influence the global hunter-gatherer population density. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 1232–1237 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cade, B. S. & Noon, B. R. A gentle introduction to quantile regression for ecologists. Front Ecol. Environ. 1, 412–420 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cade, B. S., Terrell, J. W. & Schroeder, R. L. Estimating effects of limiting factors with regression quantiles. Ecology 80, 311–323 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Burman, P., Chow, E. & Nolan, D. A cross-validatory method for dependent data. Biometrika 81, 351–358 (1994).MathSciNet 
MATH 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Burke, K. D. et al. Differing climatic mechanisms control transient and accumulated vegetation novelty in Europe and eastern North America. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 374, 20190218 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Currie, D. J. Energy and large-scale patterns of animal-species and plant-species richness. Am. Nat. 137, 27–49 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
Franklin, J. Mapping Species Distributions: Spatial Inference and Prediction (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010).Harcourt, A. Human Biogeography (Univ. California Press, 2012).Marlowe, F. W. Hunter-gatherers and human evolution. Evol. Anthropol. 14, 54–67 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Belovsky, G. E. An optimal foraging-based model of hunter-gatherer population-dynamics. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 7, 329–372 (1988).Article 

Google Scholar 
Williams, J. W. & Jackson, S. T. Novel climates, no-analog communities, and ecological surprises. Front. Ecol. Environ. 5, 475–482 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ohlemuller, R. Climate. Running out of climate space. Science 334, 613–614 (2011).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Williams, J. W., Jackson, S. T. & Kutzbach, J. E. Projected distributions of novel and disappearing climates by 2100 AD. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 5738–5742 (2007).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Warren, D. L., Glor, R. E. & Turelli, M. Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: quantitative approaches to niche evolution. Evolution 62, 2868–2883 (2008).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Broennimann, O. et al. Measuring ecological niche overlap from occurrence and spatial environmental data. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 21, 481–497 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Warren, D. L., Cardillo, M., Rosauer, D. F. & Bolnick, D. I. Mistaking geography for biology: inferring processes from species distributions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 29, 572–580 (2014).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wobst, H. M. The archaeo-ethnology of hunter-gatherers or the tyranny of the ethnographic record in archaeology. Am Antiquity 43, 303–309 (1978).Maier, A. et al. Demographic estimates of hunter-gatherers during the Last Glacial Maximum in Europe against the background of palaeoenvironmental data. Quat. Int. 425, 49–61 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Riede, F. Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology and Anthropology of Hunter-Gatherers (Oxford Univ. Press, 2014).Jochim, M., Herhahn, C. & Starr, H. The Magdalenian colonization of southern Germany. Am. Anthropol. 101, 129–142 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Arts, N. & Deeben, J. On the Northwestern Border of Late Magdalenian Territory: Ecology and Archaeology of Early Late Glacial Band Societies in Northwestern Europe. In Late Glacial in Central Europe. Culture and Environment. (eds Burdukiewicz, J. M. & Kobusiewicz, M.) (Polska Akademia Nauk, Warszawa 1987).Maier, A. Population and settlement dynamics from the Gravettian to the Magdalenian. Mitteilungen der Ges. f.ür. Urgesch. 26, 83–101 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Maier, A., Liebermann, C. & Pfeifer, S. J. Beyond the Alps and Tatra Mountains-the 20-14 ka repopulation of the northern mid-latitudes as inferred from palimpsests deciphered with keys from Western and Central Europe. J. Paleolit. Archaeol. 3, 398–452 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gamble, C., Davies, W., Pettitt, P. & Richards, M., Climate change. and evolving human diversity in Europe during the last glacial. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 359, 243–253 (2004).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Housley, R. A., Gamble, C. S., Street, M. & Pettitt, P. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society. (Cambridge Univ. Press).Bellwood, P. S. First Farmers: the Origins of Agricultural Societies. (Blackwell, Oxford 2005).d’Errico, F. et al. The origin and evolution of sewing technologies in Eurasia and North America. J. Hum. Evol. 125, 71–86 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Moseler, F. Brandstrukturen im späten Magdalénien: Betrieb, Nutzung und Funktion (Verlag des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums, 2020).Simova, I. & Storch, D. The enigma of terrestrial primary productivity: measurements, models, scales and the diversity-productivity relationship. Ecography 40, 239–252 (2017).Rosenzweig, M. L. Net primary productivity of terrestrial communities – prediction from climatological data. Am. Nat. 102, 67 (1968).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jensen, H. J. & Møberg, T. Et røgeri fra ældre stenalder ved Bølling Sø? Midtjyske Fortaellinger 2007, 51–62 (2008).Holst, D. Hazelnut economy of early Holocene hunter-gatherers: a case study from Mesolithic Duvensee, northern Germany. J. Archaeol. Sci. 37, 2871–2880 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Boethius, A. Something rotten in Scandinavia: the world’s earliest evidence of fermentation. J. Archaeol. Sci. 66, 169–180 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dyson‐Hudson, R. & Smith, E. A. Human territoriality: an ecological reassessment. Am. Anthropol. 80, 21–41 (1978).Article 

Google Scholar 
Finlayson, C. The water optimisation hypothesis and the human occupation of the mid-latitude belt in the Pleistocene. Quat. Int 300, 22–31 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Laland, K. N. & Brown, G. R. Niche construction, human behavior, and the adaptive-lag hypothesis. Evol. Anthropol. 15, 95–104 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Laland, K. N. & O’Brien, M. J. Niche construction theory and archaeology. J. Archaeol. Method Th. 17, 303–322 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Riede, F. Handbook of Evolutionary Research in Archaeology (Springer, 2019).Jöris, O. & Terberger, T. Zur Rekonstruktion eines Zeltes mit Trapezförmigem Grundriss am Magdalénien-Fundplatz Gönnersdorf/Mittelrhein: Eine» Quadratur des Kreises «? Arch.äologisches Korrespondenzblatt 31, 163–172 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Salomon, H., Vignaud, C., Lahlil, S. & Menguy, N. Solutrean and Magdalenian ferruginous rocks heat-treatment: accidental and/or deliberate action? J. Archaeol. Sci. 55, 100–112 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nakazawa, Y., Straus, L. G., Gonzalez-Morales, M. R., Solana, D. C. & Saiz, J. C. On stone-boiling technology in the Upper Paleolithic: behavioral implications from an Early Magdalenian hearth in El Miron Cave, Cantabria, Spain. J. Archaeol. Sci. 36, 684–693 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pedersen, J., Maier, A. & Riede, F. A punctuated model for the colonisation of the Late Glacial margins of northern Europe by Hamburgian hunter-gatherers. Quart.är. 65, 85–104 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Whallon, R. Social networks and information: non-“utilitarian” mobility among hunter-gatherers. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 25, 259–270 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Leal Filho, W. et al. Impacts of climate change to African indigenous communities and examples of adaptation responses. Nat. Commun. 12, 6224 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Heitz, C. F., Hinz, M., Laabs, J. & Hafner, A. Mobility as resilience capacity in northern Alpine Neolithic settlement communities. Archaeol. Rev. Camb. 36, 75–106 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Riede, F., Oetelaar, G. A. & VanderHoek, R. From crisis to collapse in hunter-gatherer societies. A comparative investigation of the cultural impacts of three large volcanic eruptions on past hunter-gatherers. Crisis to Collapse–The Archaeology of Social Breakdown. Louvain-la-Neuve: UCL Presses Universitaires De Louvian 23–39 (2017).Halstead, P., O’Shea, J. & O’Shea, J. M. Bad Year Economics: Cultural Responses to Risk and Uncertainty. (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2004).Brovkin, V. et al. Past abrupt changes, tipping points and cascading impacts in the Earth system. Nat. Geosci. 14, 550–558 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Burke, A. et al. The archaeology of climate change: the case for cultural diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 118, e2108537118 (2021).Binford, L. R. Willow smoke and dogs tails – Hunter-gatherer settlement systems and archaeological site formation. Am. Antiquity 45, 4–20 (1980).Article 

Google Scholar 
Birdsell, J. B. Some environmental and cultural factors influencing the structuring of Australian aboriginal populations. Am. Nat. 87, 171–207 (1953).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kelly, R. L. The Lifeways of Hunter-Gatherers: The Foraging Spectrum (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).Penington, R. Hunter-gatherer demography. In Hunter-Gatherers: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. (eds. Panter-Brick, C., Layton, R. H. & Rowley-Conwy, P.) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001).Wobst, H. M. Locational relationships in Paleolithic society. J. Hum. Evol. 5, 49–58 (1976).Article 

Google Scholar 
Richards, M. P., Pettitt, P. B., Stiner, M. C. & Trinkaus, E. Stable isotope evidence for increasing dietary breadth in the European mid-Upper Paleolithic. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 6528–6532 (2001).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Drucker, D. & Bocherens, H. Carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes as tracers of change in diet breadth during Middle and Upper Palaeolithic in Europe. Int J. Osteoarchaeol. 14, 162–177 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kretschmer, I. Demographische Untersuchungen zu Bevölkerungsdichten, Mobilität und Landnutzungsmustern im späten Jungpaläolithikum (Verlag Marie Leidorf GmbH, 2015).Langley, M. C. & Street, M. Long range inland-coastal networks during the Late Magdalenian: evidence for individual acquisition of marine resources at Andernach-Martinsberg, German Central Rhineland. J. Hum. Evol. 64, 457–465 (2013).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lanczont, M. et al. Late Glacial environment and human settlement of the Central Western Carpathians: a case study of the Nowa Biala 1 open-air site (Podhale Region, southern Poland). Quat. Int 512, 113–132 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cziesla, E. Robbenjagd in Brandenburg? Gedanken zur Verwendung großer Widerhakenspitzen. Ethnographisch-archaologische Z. 48, 1–48 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Fick, S. E. & Hijmans, R. J. WorldClim 2: new 1‐km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 37, 4302–4315 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Le Cook, B. & Manning, W. G. Thinking beyond the mean: a practical guide for using quantile regression methods for health services research. Shanghai Arch. Psychiatry 25, 55 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Yee, T. W. & Mitchell, N. D. Generalized additive-models in plant ecology. J. Veg. Sci. 2, 587–602 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
Guisan, A., Edwards, T. C. & Hastie, T. Generalized linear and generalized additive models in studies of species distributions: setting the scene. Ecol. Model 157, 89–100 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fewster, R. M., Buckland, S. T., Siriwardena, G. M., Baillie, S. R. & Wilson, J. D. Analysis of population trends for farmland birds using generalized additive models. Ecology 81, 1970–1984 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Drexler, M. & Ainsworth, C. H. Generalized additive models used to predict species abundance in the Gulf of Mexico: an ecosystem modeling tool. PLos ONE 8, e64458 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Moisen, G. G. & Frescino, T. S. Comparing five modelling techniques for predicting forest characteristics. Ecol. Model 157, 209–225 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wood, S. N. Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R (CRC Press, 2006).Zuur, A. F. A Beginner’s Guide to Generalized Additive Models with R (Highland Statistics Limited, 2012).Team, R. C. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. (2013).Wood, S. N. Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R (CRC Press, 2017).Fasiolo, M., Wood, S. N., Zaffran, M., Nedellec, R. & Goude, Y. Fast calibrated additive quantile regression. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 116, 1402–1412 (2021).MathSciNet 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
AlejoOrdonez/PaleoPopDen: (Version NatCommV0) [Computer software]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.6962693 (2022).Liu, Z. et al. Transient simulation of last deglaciation with a new mechanism for Bolling-Allerod warming. Science 325, 310–314 (2009).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lorenz, D. J., Nieto-Lugilde, D., Blois, J. L., Fitzpatrick, M. C. & Williams, J. W. Downscaled and debiased climate simulations for North America from 21,000 years ago to 2100AD. Sci. Data 3, 160048 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Peltier, W. R., Argus, D. & Drummond, R. Space geodesy constrains ice age terminal deglaciation: the global ICE‐6G_C (VM5a) model. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 120, 450–487 (2015).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Vermeersch, P. M. European population changes during the Marine Isotope Stages 2 and 3. Quat. Int 137, 77–85 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gamble, C., Davies, W., Pettitt, P., Hazelwood, L. & Richards, M. The archaeological and genetic foundations of the European population during the late glacial: Implications for ‘agricultural thinking’. Camb. Archaeol. J. 15, 193–223 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Steele, J. Radiocarbon dates as data: quantitative strategies for estimating colonization front speeds and event densities. J. Archaeol. Sci. 37, 2017–2030 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shennan, S. et al. Regional population collapse followed initial agriculture booms in mid-Holocene Europe. Nat. Commun. 4, 2486 (2013).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Surovell, T. A., Finley, J. B., Smith, G. M., Brantingham, P. J. & Kelly, R. Correcting temporal frequency distributions for taphonomic bias. J. Archaeol. Sci. 36, 1715–1724 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Williams, A. N. The use of summed radiocarbon probability distributions in archaeology: a review of methods. J. Archaeol. Sci. 39, 578–589 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kelly, R. L., Surovell, T. A., Shuman, B. N. & Smith, G. M. A continuous climatic impact on Holocene human population in the Rocky Mountains. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 443–447 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hijmans, R. J. et al. Package ‘raster’. R package 734, (2015).Lewin-Koh, N. J. et al. Package ‘maptools’. Internet: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/maptools/maptools.pdf (2012).Thornthwaite, C. W. An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geogr. Rev. 38, 55–94 (1948).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lieth, H.Primary Productivity of the Biosphere (Springer, 1975). More

Sample collection and metagenomic sequencingWritten informed consent was obtained prior to participation in the project. The study protocol for the Japanese (Disease, Drug, Diet, Daily life) microbiome project was approved by the medical ethics committees of the Tokyo Medical University (Approval No: T2019-0119), National Center for Global Health and Medicine (Approval No: 1690), the University of Tokyo (Approval No: 2019185NI), Waseda University (Approval No: 2018-318), and the RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences (Approval No: H30-7). We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study of 4198 individuals participating in the Japanese 4D microbiome project, which commenced in January 2015 and is ongoing20.Participants registered in the project were those who visited hospitals in the area for disease diagnosis or a health checkup. Faecal samples are collected from both healthy and diseased participants. The eligibility criteria for participants are as follows: (1) born and raised in Japan; (2) age >15 years; (3) written informed consent provided; and (4) having an endoscopic diagnosis on colonoscopy; either having undergone a colonoscopy within the last 3 years or planning to undergo colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening, surveillance, and diagnosis of various gastrointestinal symptoms. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) suspected acute infectious disease based on clinical findings (e.g., acute enterocolitis, pneumonia, tuberculosis etc.); (2) acute bleeding; (3) hearing loss; (4) unable to understand written documents; (5) unable to write and (6) limited ability to perform activities of daily living. No compensation was paid to participants.Participants collected faecal samples using a Cary–Blair medium-containing tube60 at home, and the samples were refrigerated for up to 2 days before the hospital visit. Immediately after participants arrived at the hospital, their faecal samples were frozen at −80 °C until DNA extraction. We avoided collecting samples within 1 month of administering bowel preparation for colonoscopy because it has a profound effect on the gut microbiome and metabolome61. Health professionals checked that the amount of stool was sufficient for analysis. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing was performed for 4241 faecal samples and quality controls were conducted20, from which 43 samples were excluded from further analyses due to the low number of high-quality reads (130 bp. Encoded genes in the contigs were predicted by MetaGeneMark (3.38)70. Assembled contigs were defined as phages if they passed all of the following six criteria.

1.

A genome size threshold was applied, and contigs less than 10 Kb were excluded, as typical dsDNA phages have genomes larger than >10 Kb71.

2.

Viral-specific k-mer patterns were checked by DeepVirFinder (v1.0)22. Contigs with p-values >0.05 were excluded from further analysis.

3.

To detect viral hallmark genes (VHGs) and plasmid hallmark genes, we performed a highly sensitive HMM-HMM search against the Pfam database72. First, the encoded genes were aligned to the viral protein database, collected from complete (circular) viral genomes (n = 13,628) in the IMG/VR v2 database30 using JackHMMER. The obtained HMM profiles were searched against the Pfam database using hhblits73 with a  >95% probability cut-off. These procedures were performed using the pipeline_for_high_sensitive_domain_search script (https://github.com/yosuken/pipeline_for_high_sensitive_domain_search)74,75. Contigs with plasmid hallmark genes or those without VHGs were excluded. The hallmark genes used in this analysis are summarised in Supplementary Data 3.

4.

The presence of housekeeping marker genes of prokaryotic species was checked by fetchMG (v1.0)76, and ribosomal RNA genes (5 S, 16 S and 23 S) were identified by barrnap (0.9) (https://github.com/tseemann/barrnap). Contigs with the marker genes and ribosomal RNA genes were excluded from further analysis.

5.

The encoded genes of each contig were aligned to the viral protein database and a plasmid protein database constructed from the reference plasmids in RefSeq (n = 16,136, in April 2020) using DIAMOND (v0.9.29.130)77 with the more-sensitive option. The number of genes aligned to each database was compared, and contigs with more genes aligned to the plasmid protein database were excluded from further analysis.

6.

The proportion of provirus regions was assessed by CheckV (v0.7)24, and contigs estimated with 70% and 10% contamination.To evaluate the performance of this custom pipeline, we applied the pipeline to reference phage genomes (n = 2609, as positive data) and plasmid sequences (n = 16,136, as negative data) in Refseq. The true positive rate was defined as the number of phages detected as phages by the pipeline divided by the number of reference phages. The false positive rate was defined as the number of plasmids detected as phages by the pipeline divided by the number of reference plasmids. DeepVirFinder22, VirSorter (v1.0.3)23 Virsorter2 (2.2.3)25, VIBRANT (v1.2.1)26, Seeker (v1.0.3)27 and ViralVerify (v1.1)28 were also applied to the same datasets with the default parameters, and the performance was compared among them.Analysis of phage genomesViral operational taxonomic units (vOTUs) were constructed by clustering phage genomes with a  > 95% identity29 using dRep (v2.2.3)78 with the default options. Representative sequences of each vOTU selected by dRep were further clustered with reference sequences in RefSeq, IMG/VR30, gut virome database (GVD)15, gut phage database (GPD)9, and metagenomic gut virus (MGV) database31 with >95% identity and >85% length coverage using aniclust.py script in the CheckV package to identify common sequences among the databases.To further construct broader viral clusters (VC), proportions of protein clusters shared between phages were assessed. First, to define protein clusters, similarity searches of all protein sequences from all the phages identified in this study were performed using DIAMOND with the more-sensitive option (e-value 20% of clusters were grouped as a VC, which corresponds approximately to family- or subfamily-level clusters7,37. Rarefaction curves of the vOTUs and VCs were estimated with the iNEXT function in the iNEXT package (v2.0.20)80. The similarity matrix of the phages based on the percentage of shared protein clusters was further projected by tSNE using the tsne function in the Rtsne package (v0.16).Taxonomy annotation of phages was performed with a voting approach described previously16 with minor modifications. First, the protein sequences of each phage were aligned to viral proteins detected from phage genomes in RefSeq (n = 2609, in April 2020) using DIAMOND with the more-sensitive option. Then, the best-hit taxonomy of each protein (family levels) was counted, and the most common taxonomy was assigned to the phage if >20% of proteins in the phage were aligned to the same taxonomy.Phage lifestyles (i.e. virulent or temperate) were predicted by BACPHLIP40 and alignments to reference bacterial genomes in the RefSeq. Phages were defined as temperate if the BACPHLIP score was >0.8 or the phage genome was aligned to any reference genomes with >1000 bp alignment length with >95% identity.Host predictionBacterial and archaeal genomes were downloaded from the RefSeq database (in April 2019). To reduce the redundancy of genomes from closely related strains in the same species (e.g. Escherichia coli), 10 genomes were selected randomly for species with more than 10 genomes, and other genomes were excluded from the dataset. The reference dataset consisted of 33,215 bacterial and 822 archaeal genomes.Host prediction of the identified phages was performed using CRISPR spacers81. CRISPR spacers were predicted from the reference microbial genomes and assembled contigs ( >10,000 bp) from the 4198 metagenomic datasets using PILER-CR (1.06)82. Short (100 bp) spacers were discarded. In total, 679,323 and 283,619 spacers were identified from the reference microbial genomes and assembled contigs, respectively. Taxonomy information was assigned to the assembled contigs if they were aligned to the microbial reference genomes with >90% identity and >70% length coverage thresholds using MiniMap283. The CRISPR spacers were mapped to the phage genomes using BLASTN with the option for short sequences: -a20 -m9 -e1 -G10 -E2 -q1 -W7 -F F81. CRISPR spacers, which were mapped with 100% identity or 1 mismatch/indel with >95% sequence alignment, were used for host assignment at the genus level. Assignments of host species were checked manually, and if any of the following non-human intestinal species were assigned, the host was excluded: Dickeya, Anaerobutyricum, Rubellimicrobium, Eisenbergiella, Harryflintia, Leucothrix, Photorhabdus, Spirosoma, Syntrophobotulus, Thermincola, Algoriphagus, Franconibacter, Kandleria, Lawsonibacter, Methylomonas, Provencibacterium, Pseudoruminoccoccus, Rhodanobacter, Romboutsia, Sharpea, Varibaculum and Thioalkalivibrio.Quantification of viral abundance and analysis of the virome profileTo quantify the viral abundances in each sample, metagenomic reads were mapped to the gene set of VHGs (Supplementary Data 3) of each representative vOTU using Bowtie2 with a  > 95% identity threshold, and reads per kilobase million (RPKM) were calculated for each vOTU. The reason for using only VHGs in the analysis was to avoid over-counting of viral reads, which could be caused by spurious mapping of reads from horizontally transferred genes of other phages or bacterial species. The α-diversity (Shannon diversity) of the vOTU-level viral profile was calculated using the diversity function in the vegan package. The β-diversity (Bray-Curtis distance) between individuals was assessed using the vegdist function, and the average distance against other individuals was calculated for each individual. The VC-level viral profile was obtained by summing all the RPKM of vOTUs for each VC.Phylogenetic analysis of novel VCsTo construct phylogenetic trees for the vOTUs and reference genomes, protein sequences of large terminases, portal proteins, and major capsid proteins (Supplementary Data 3), which are often used to construct phage phylogenetic trees7,9, were extracted from the vOTUs in the 10 most abundant VCs (VC_19, 1, 2, 24, 12, 15, 3, 44, 18, 6), and their homologues were searched for in the reference phage genomes in RefSeq using DIAMOND with the more-sensitive option (e-value 0.01% (n = 865) and genera with average relative abundance >0.5% (n = 32) were included in the analysis.Analysis of VLPs and whole metagenomes from 24 faecal samplesQuality filtering of sequenced reads from the 24 VLPs and whole metagenomes was performed using fastp (version 0.20.1)92 with the default parameters. Contamination with human (hg38) or phiX genomes was excluded by mapping the reads to the genomes using Bowtie2.To exclude bacterial DNA contamination in the VLP dataset, we performed further filtering. First, the VLP reads were assembled into contigs using MEGAHIT and the contigs were checked for virus or not. Contigs were defined as viral contigs if they were predicted as viruses by DeepVirFinder (P-value More

Moore, J., Pope, J., Woods, M. & Ellis, A. 2018 Aerial Survey Results: California (USDA, 2018).Stephens, S. L. et al. Drought, tree mortality, and wildfire in forests adapted to frequent fire. Bioscience 68, 77–88 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, S. & Banerjee, T. Spatial and temporal pattern of wildfires in California from 2000 to 2019. Sci. Rep. 11, 8779 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, D. et al. Economic footprint of California wildfires in 2018. Nat. Sustain. 4, 252–260 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Asner, G. P. et al. Progressive forest canopy water loss during the 2012–2015 California drought. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E249–E255 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Brodrick, P. G., Anderegg, L. D. L. & Asner, G. P. Forest drought resistance at large geographic scales. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 2752–2760 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jump, A. S. et al. Structural overshoot of tree growth with climate variability and the global spectrum of drought-induced forest dieback. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 3742–3757 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Goulden, M. L. & Bales, R. C. California forest die-off linked to multi-year deep soil drying in 2012–2015 drought. Nat. Geosci. 12, 632–637 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Paz-Kagan, T. et al. What mediates tree mortality during drought in the southern Sierra Nevada? Ecol. Appl. 27, 2443–2457 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Trugman, A. T., Anderegg, L. D. L., Anderegg, W. R. L., Das, A. J. & Stephenson, N. L. Why is Tree Drought Mortality so Hard to Predict? Trends Ecol. Evol. 36, 520–532.(2021).Goodfellow, B. W. et al. The chemical, mechanical, and hydrological evolution of weathering granitoid. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 121, 1410–1435 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shen, X., Arson, C., Ferrier, K. L., West, N. & Dai, S. Mineral weathering and bedrock weakening: modeling microscale bedrock damage under biotite weathering. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 124, 2623–2646 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
McLaughlin, B. C. et al. Weather underground: subsurface hydrologic processes mediate tree vulnerability to extreme climatic drought. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 3091–3107 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hahm, W. J. et al. Low subsurface water storage capacity relative to annual rainfall decouples Mediterranean plant productivity and water use from rainfall variability. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 6544–6553 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, Y., Keenan, T. F. & Zhou, S. Exacerbated drought impacts on global ecosystems due to structural overshoot. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1490–1498 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tague, C. & Peng, H. The sensitivity of forest water use to the timing of precipitation and snowmelt recharge in the California Sierra: implications for a warming climate. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 118, 875–887 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hahm, W. J., Riebe, C. S., Lukens, C. E. & Araki, S. Bedrock composition regulates mountain ecosystems and landscape evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3338–3343 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Uhlig, D., Schuessler, J. A., Bouchez, J., Dixon, J. L. & von Blanckenburg, F. Quantifying nutrient uptake as driver of rock weathering in forest ecosystems by magnesium stable isotopes. Biogeosciences 14, 3111–3128 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stone, E. C. Dew as an ecological factor: II. The effect of artificial dew on the survival of Pinus ponderosa and associated species. Ecology 38, 414–422 (1957).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wald, J. A., Graham, R. C. & Schoeneberger, P. J. Distribution and properties of soft weathered bedrock at ≤1 m depth in the contiguous United States. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 38, 614–626 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Klos, P. Z. et al. Subsurface plant-accessible water in mountain ecosystems with a Mediterranean climate. WIREs Water 5, e1277 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dawson, T. E., Hahm, W. J. & Crutchfield-Peters, K. Digging deeper: what the critical zone perspective adds to the study of plant ecophysiology. N. Phytol. 226, 666–671 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rempe, D. M. & Dietrich, W. E. Direct observations of rock moisture, a hidden component of the hydrologic cycle. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 2664–2669 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Holbrook, W. S. et al. Links between physical and chemical weathering inferred from a 65-m-deep borehole through Earth’s critical zone. Sci. Rep. 9, 4495 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Krone, L. V. et al. Deep weathering in the semi-arid Coastal Cordillera, Chile. Sci. Rep. 11, 13057 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Callahan, R. P. et al. Subsurface weathering revealed in hillslope‐integrated porosity distributions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, e2020GL088322 (2020).Holbrook, W. S. et al. Geophysical constraints on deep weathering and water storage potential in the Southern Sierra Critical Zone Observatory. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 39, 366–380 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hayes, J. L., Riebe, C. S., Holbrook, W. S., Flinchum, B. A. & Hartsough, P. C. Porosity production in weathered rock: where volumetric strain dominates over chemical mass loss. Sci. Adv. 5, eaao0834 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Riebe, C. S. et al. Anisovolumetric weathering in granitic saprolite controlled by climate and erosion rate. Geology 49, 551–555 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
McCormick, E. L. et al. Widespread woody plant use of water stored in bedrock. Nature 597, 225–229 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vitousek, P. M., Porder, S. & Houlton, B. Z. Terrestrial phosphorus limitation: mechanisms, implications, and nitrogen–phosphorus interactions. Ecol. Appl. 20, 5–15 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bateman, P. C., Dodge, F. C. W. & Bruggman, P. E. Major Oxide Analyses, CPIW Norms, Modes, and Bulk Specific Gravities of Plutonic Rocks from the Mariposa 1° × 2° Sheet, Central Sierra Nevada, California Open-File Report 84–162 (USGS, 1984).Amundson, R., Richter, D. D., Humphreys, G. S., Jobbagy, E. G. & Gaillardet, J. Coupling between biota and earth materials in the critical zone. Elements 3, 327–332 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tune, A. K., Druhan, J. L., Wang, J., Bennett, P. C. & Rempe, D. M. Carbon dioxide production in bedrock beneath soils substantially contributes to forest carbon cycling. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 125, e2020JG005795 (2020).Gabet, E. J. & Mudd, S. M. Bedrock erosion by root fracture and tree throw: a coupled biogeomorphic model to explore the humped soil production function and the persistence of hillslope soils. J. Geophys. Res. 115, F04005 (2010).Bateman, P. C. Plutonism in the Central Part of the Sierra Nevada Batholith, California (USGS, 1992); http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp1483Callahan, R. P. et al. Arrested development: erosional equilibrium in the southern Sierra Nevada, California, maintained by feedbacks between channel incision and hillslope sediment production. GSA Bull. 131, 1179–1202 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Flinchum, B. A. et al. Estimating the water holding capacity of the critical zone using near-surface geophysics. Hydrol. Process. 32, 3308–3326 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
St. Clair, J. Geophysical Investigations of Underplating at the Middle American Trench, Weathering in the Critical Zone, and Snow Water Equivalent in Seasonal Snow. PhD thesis, Univ. Wyoming (2015).Dvorkin, J. & Nur, A. Elasticity of high‐porosity sandstones: theory for two North Sea data sets. Geophysics 61, 1363–1370 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gu, X. et al. Seismic refraction tracks porosity generation and possible CO2 production at depth under a headwater catchment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 18991–18997 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pasquet, S., Holbrook, W. S., Carr, B. J. & Sims, K. W. W. Geophysical imaging of shallow degassing in a Yellowstone hydrothermal system. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 12,027–12,035 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dahlgren, R. A., Boettinger, J. L., Huntington, G. L. & Amundson, R. G. Soil development along an elevational transect in the western Sierra Nevada, California. Geoderma 78, 207–236 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stone, E. L. & Kalisz, P. J. On the maximum extent of tree roots. For. Ecol. Manage. 46, 59–102 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
Carlson, T. N. & Ripley, D. A. On the relation between NDVI, fractional vegetation cover, and leaf area index. Remote Sens. Environ. 62, 241–252 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
Goulden, M. L. et al. Evapotranspiration along an elevation gradient in California’s Sierra Nevada. J. Geophys. Res. 117, G03028 (2012).Ma, Q. et al. Wildfire controls on evapotranspiration in California’s Sierra Nevada. J. Hydrol. 590, 125364 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Roche, J. W., Goulden, M. L. & Bales, R. C. Estimating evapotranspiration change due to forest treatment and fire at the basin scale in the Sierra Nevada, California. Ecohydrology 11, e1978 (2018).Bales, R. C. et al. Mechanisms controlling the impact of multi-year drought on mountain hydrology. Sci. Rep. 8, 690 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Roy, D. P. et al. Characterization of Landsat-7 to Landsat-8 reflective wavelength and normalized difference vegetation index continuity. Remote Sens. Environ. 185, 57–70 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Su, Y. et al. Emerging stress and relative resiliency of giant sequoia groves experiencing multiyear dry periods in a warming climate. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 122, 3063–3075 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Moore, J., McAfee, L. & Iaccarino, J. 2016 Aerial Survey Results: California (USDA, 2017).Budyko, M. I., Miller, D. H. & Miller, D. H. Climate and Life (Academic Press, 1974).Hargreaves, G. H. & Samani, Z. A. Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature. Appl. Eng. Agric. 1, 96–99 (1985).Article 

Google Scholar 
PRISM Climate Group PRISM Climate Data (Oregon State Univ., 2019).Bales, R. et al. Spatially distributed water-balance and meteorological data from the rain–snow transition, southern Sierra Nevada, California. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 10, 1795–1805 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Callahan, R. P. Supplement for “Forest vulnerability to drought controlled by bedrock composition”. Hydroshare https://doi.org/10.4211/hs.edbb6ebfbc744186b5800932cd00b507 (2022).Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center USGS EROS Archive—Aerial Phorography—National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) (USGS, 2017); https://doi.org/10.5066/F7QN651G More

Gregory, R. D. & van Strien, A. Wild bird indicators: Using composite population trends of birds as measures of environmental health. Ornithol. Sci. 9, 3–22 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cox, D. T. C. & Gaston, K. J. Urban bird feeding: Connecting people with nature. PLoS ONE 11, e0158717 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Anderson, R. M. & May, R. M. Population biology of infectious diseases: Part I. Nature 280, 361–367 (1979).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Keesing, F. et al. Impacts of biodiversity on the emergence and transmission of infectious diseases. Nature 468, 647–652 (2010).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Smith, K. F., Acevedo-Whitehouse, K. & Pedersen, A. B. The role of infectious diseases in biological conservation. Anim. Conserv. 12, 1–12 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Han, B. A., Kramer, A. M. & Drake, J. M. Global patterns of zoonotic disease in mammals. Trends Parasitol. 32, 565–577 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Estrada-Peña, A., Ostfeld, R. S., Peterson, A. T., Poulin, R. & de la Fuente, J. Effects of environmental change on zoonotic disease risk: An ecological primer. Trends Parasitol. 30, 205–214 (2014).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Daszak, P., Cunningham, A. A. & Hyatt, A. D. Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife–threats to biodiversity and human health. Science 287(5452), 443–449 (2000).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pedersen, A. B., Jones, K. E., Nunn, C. L. & Altizer, S. Infectious diseases and extinction risk in wild mammals. Conserv. Biol. 21, 1269–1279 (2007).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Atkinson, C. T. & Samuel, M. D. Avian malaria Plasmodium relictum in native Hawaiian forest birds: Epizootiology and demographic impacts on àapapane Himatione sanguinea. J. Avian Biol. 41, 357–366 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
George, T. L. et al. Persistent impacts of West Nile virus on North American bird populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 112, 14290–14294 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dhondt, A. A., Tessaglia, D. L. & Slothower, R. L. Epidemic mycoplasmal conjunctivitis in house finches from Eastern North America. J. Wildl. Dis. 34, 265–280 (1998).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Monterroso, P. et al. Disease-mediated bottom-up regulation: An emergent virus affects a keystone prey, and alters the dynamics of trophic webs. Sci. Rep. 6, 36072 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cheng, T. L. et al. The scope and severity of white-nose syndrome on hibernating bats in North America. Conserv. Biol. 35, 1586–1597 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rushton, S. P. et al. Disease threats posed by alien species: The role of a poxvirus in the decline of the native red squirrel in Britain. Epidemiol. Infect. 134, 521–533 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Scheele, B. C. et al. Amphibian fungal panzootic causes catastrophic and ongoing loss of biodiversity. Science 363(6434), 1459–1463 (2019).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bradley, C. A. & Altizer, S. Urbanization and the ecology of wildlife diseases. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 95–102 (2007).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Murray, M. H. et al. City sicker? A meta-analysis of wildlife health and urbanization. Front. Ecol. Environ. 17, 575–583 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Giraudeau, M., Mousel, M., Earl, S. & McGraw, K. Parasites in the city: Degree of urbanization predicts poxvirus and coccidian infections in house finches (Haemorhous mexicanus). PLoS ONE 9, e86747 (2014).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Shutt, J. D. & Lees, A. C. Killing with kindness: Does widespread generalised provisioning of wildlife help or hinder biodiversity conservation efforts? Biol. Conserv. 261, 109295 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Van Doren, B. M. et al. Human activity shapes the wintering ecology of a migratory bird. Glob. Chang. Biol. 27, 2715–2727 (2021).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Plummer, K. E., Risely, K., Toms, M. P. & Siriwardena, G. M. The composition of British bird communities is associated with long-term garden bird feeding. Nat. Commun. 10, 2088 (2019).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lawson, B. et al. Health hazards to wild birds and risk factors associated with anthropogenic food provisioning. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 373, 20170091 (2018).Galbraith, J. A., Stanley, M. C., Jones, D. N. & Beggs, J. R. Experimental feeding regime influences urban bird disease dynamics. J. Avian Biol. 48, 700–713 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Siriwardena, G. M. et al. The effect of supplementary winter seed food on breeding populations of farmland birds: Evidence from two large-scale experiments. J. Appl. Ecol. 44, 920–932 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kubasiewicz, L. M., Bunnefeld, N., Tulloch, A. I. T., Quine, C. P. & Park, K. J. Diversionary feeding: An effective management strategy for conservation conflict? Biodivers. Conserv. 25, 1–22 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lawson, B. et al. A clonal strain of Trichomonas gallinae is the aetiologic agent of an emerging avian epidemic disease. Infect. Genet. Evol. 11, 1638–1645 (2011).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Robinson, R. A. et al. Emerging infectious disease leads to rapid population declines of common British birds. PLoS ONE 5, e12215 (2010).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Forrester, D. J. & Foster, G. W. Trichomonosis. In: Parasitic Diseases of Wild Birds 120–153 (Wiley-Blackwell, 2008).Lawson, B. et al. Evidence of spread of the emerging infectious disease, finch trichomonosis, by migrating birds. EcoHealth 8, 143–153 (2011).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lawson, B. et al. The emergence and spread of finch trichomonosis in the British Isles. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 367, 2852–2863 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Woodward, I. D. et al. BirdTrends 2020: Trends in numbers, breeding success and survival for UK breeding birds. Research Report 732. BTO, Thetford. (2020).Enoksson, B. Age- and sex-related differences in dominance and foraging behaviour of nuthatches Sitta europaea. Anim. Behav. 36, 231–238 (1988).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tarvin, K. A. & Woolfenden, G. E. Patterns of dominance and aggressive behavior in blue jays at a feeder. Condor 99, 434–444 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brittingham, M. C. & Temple, S. A. Use of winter feeders by black-capped chickadees. Wildl. Soc. 56, 103–110 (1992).
Google Scholar 
Woodward, I. et al. Population estimates of birds in Great Britain and the United Kingdom. Br. Birds 113, 69–104 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Musgrove, A. J. et al. Population estimates of birds in Great Britain and the United Kingdom. Br. Birds 106, 64–100 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Wernham, C. et al. The Migration Atlas: Movements of the Birds of Britain and Ireland. (T & AD Poyser, 2002).Main, I. G. The partial migration of Fennoscandian Greenfinches Carduelis chloris. Ringing Migr. 20, 167–180 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lack, P. C. The Atlas of Wintering Birds in Britain and Ireland. (T. & A.D. Poyser, 1986).Robinson, R. A. BirdFacts: profiles of birds occurring in Britain & Ireland. BTO, Thetford (2005). Available at: http://www.bto.org/birdfacts. Accessed: 15 May 2022.Tratalos, J. et al. Bird densities are associated with household densities. Glob. Chang. Biol. 13, 1685–1695 (2007).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gregory, R. D. Broad-scale habitat use of sparrows, finches and buntings in Britain. Die Vogelwelt 120, 47–57 (1999).
Google Scholar 
Newton, I. Finches. New Naturalist Series, Volume: 55. (HarperCollins, 1972).Robinson, R. A., Baillie, S. R. & Crick, H. Q. P. Weather-dependent survival: Implications of climate change for passerine population processes. Ibis. 149, 357–364 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Crick, H. Q. P. A bird-habitat coding system for use in Britain and Ireland incorporating aspects of land-management and human activity. Bird Study 39, 1–12 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
Davies, Z. G. et al. A national scale inventory of resource provision for biodiversity within domestic gardens. Biol. Conserv. 142, 761–771 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Balmer, D. E. et al. Bird Atlas 2007–11: The breeding and wintering birds of Britain and Ireland. (BTO Books, 2013).Lawson, B. et al. Epidemiology of salmonellosis in garden birds in England and Wales, 1993 to 2003. EcoHealth 7, 294–306 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Svensson, L. Identification guide to European passerines, 4th edition. (BTO, 1992).Jenni, L. & Winkler, R. Moult and ageing of European passerines, 2nd edition. (Helm, 2020).Baillie, S. R. The contribution of ringing to the conservation and management of bird populations: A review. Ardea 89, 167–184 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Kéry, M. & Schaub, M. Bayesian Population Analysis using WinBUGS: A hierarchical perspective (Academic Press, 2012).
Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (2020).Plummer, M. JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling. in Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Distributed Statistical Computing (DSC 2003) (eds. Hornik, K., Leisch, F. & Zeileis, A.) (2003).Su, Y.-S. & Yajima, M. R2jags: Using R to Run ‘JAGS’. R package version 0.6–1. (2020).Robinson, R. A., Morrison, C. A. & Baillie, S. R. Integrating demographic data: Towards a framework for monitoring wildlife populations at large spatial scales. Methods Ecol. Evol. 5, 1361–1372 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Newson, S. E., Evans, K. L., Noble, D. G., Greenwood, J. J. D. & Gaston, K. J. Use of distance sampling to improve estimates of national population sizes for common and widespread breeding birds in the UK. J. Appl. Ecol. 45, 1330–1338 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Newson, S. E., Massimino, D., Johnston, A., Baillie, S. R. & Pearce-Higgins, J. W. Should we account for detectability in population trends? Bird Study 60, 384–390 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Crick, H. Q. P., Baillie, S. R. & Leech, D. I. The UK Nest Record Scheme: its value for science and conservation. Bird Study 50, 254–270 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Abadi, F., Gimenez, O., Arlettaz, R. & Schaub, M. An assessment of integrated population models: Bias, accuracy, and violation of the assumption of independence. Ecology 91, 7–14 (2010).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Plard, F., Turek, D., Grüebler, M. U. & Schaub, M. IPM2: Toward better understanding and forecasting of population dynamics. Ecol. Monogr. 89, e01364 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Weegman, M. D., Arnold, T. W., Clark, R. G. & Schaub, M. Partial and complete dependency among data sets has minimal consequence on estimates from integrated population models. Ecol. Appl. 31, e02258 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Koons, D. N., Iles, D. T., Schaub, M. & Caswell, H. A life-history perspective on the demographic drivers of structured population dynamics in changing environments. Ecol. Lett. 19, 1023–1031 (2016).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Koons, D. N., Arnold, T. W. & Schaub, M. Understanding the demographic drivers of realized population growth rates. Ecol Appl. 27, 2102–2115 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Caswell, H. Matrix population models: Construction, analysis and interpretation. (Sinauer Associates, 2001).Stubben, C. & Milligan, B. Estimating and analyzing demographic models using the popbio package in R. J. Stat. Softw. 22, 1–23 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stanbury, A. et al. The status of our bird populations: The fifth Birds of Conservation Concern in the United Kingdom, Channel Islands and Isle of Man and second IUCN Red List assessment of extinction risk for Great Britain. Br. Birds 114, 723–747 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Lehikoinen, A., Lehikoinen, E., Valkama, J., Väisänen, R. A. & Isomursu, M. Impacts of trichomonosis epidemics on greenfinch Chloris chloris and chaffinch Fringilla coelebs populations in Finland. Ibis 155, 357–366 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
PECBMS. EBCC/BirdLife/RSPB/CSO’ Pan-European Common Bird Monitoring Scheme. (2021). Available at: https://pecbms.info/. (Accessed: 14th July 2022)Keller, V. et al. European Breeding Bird Atlas 2: Distribution, Abundance and Change. (European Bird Census Council and Lynx Edicions, 2020).Rijks, J. M. et al. Trichomonosis in greenfinches (Chloris chloris) in the Netherlands 2009–2017: A concealed threat. Front. Vet. Sci. 6, 425 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Boele, A. et al. Broedvogels in Nederland in 2020. Sovonrapport 2022/05. (Sovon Vogelonderzoek Nederland, Nijmegen., 2022).Jones, D. The Birds at My Table: Why We Feed Wild Birds and Why It Matters. (Cornell University Press, 2018).Pennycott, T. W. et al. Causes of death of wild birds of the family fringillidae in Britain. Vet. Rec. 143, 155–158 (1998).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bouwman, K. M. & Hawley, D. M. Sickness behaviour acting as an evolutionary trap? Male house finches preferentially feed near diseased conspecifics. Biol. Lett. 6, 462–465 (2010).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lawson, B. et al. Acute necrotising pneumonitis associated with Suttonella ornithocola infection in tits (Paridae). Vet. J. 188, 96–100 (2011).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Clewley, G. D., Robinson, R. A. & Clark, J. A. Estimating mortality rates among passerines caught for ringing with mist nets using data from previously ringed birds. Ecol. Evol. 8, 5164–5172 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Francis, M. L. et al. Effects of supplementary feeding on interspecific dominance hierarchies in garden birds. PLoS ONE 13, e0202152 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wojczulanis-Jakubas, K., Kulpińska, M. & Minias, P. Who bullies whom at a garden feeder? Interspecific agonistic interactions of small passerines during a cold winter. J. Ethol. 33, 159–163 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cramp, S. Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. Volume VIII: Crows to Finches. (Oxford University Press, 1994).Brook, B. W. & Bradshaw, C. J. A. Strength of evidence for density dependence in abundance time series of 1198 species. Ecology 87, 1445–1451 (2006).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hochachka, W. M. & Dhondt, A. A. Density-dependent decline of host abundance resulting from a new infectious disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97, 5303–5306 (2000).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hochachka, W. M., Dobson, A. P., Hawley, D. M. & Dhondt, A. A. Host population dynamics in the face of an evolving pathogen. J. Anim. Ecol. 90, 1480–1491 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chi, J. F. et al. The finch epidemic strain of Trichomonas gallinae is predominant in British non-passerines. Parasitology 140, 1234–1245 (2013).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Orros, M. E. & Fellowes, M. D. E. Wild bird feeding in an urban area: Intensity, economics and numbers of individuals supported. Acta Ornithol. 50, 43–58 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dirren, S., Borel, S., Wolfrum, N. & Korner-Nievergelt, F. Trichomonas gallinae infections in the naïve host Montifringilla nivalis subsp nivalis. J. Ornithol. 163, 333–337 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tulloch, A. I. T., Possingham, H. P., Joseph, L. N., Szabo, J. & Martin, T. G. Realising the full potential of citizen science monitoring programs. Biol. Conserv. 165, 128–138 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Silvertown, J., Buesching, C., Jacobson, S. & Rebelo, T. Citizen science and nature conservation. in Key Topics in Conservation Biology 2 (eds. Macdonald, D. W. & Willis, K. J.) 127–142 (John Wiley & Sons, 2013).Dickinson, J. L., Zuckerberg, B. & Bonter, D. N. Citizen science as an ecological research tool: Challenges and benefits. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 41, 149–172 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Baillie, S. R., Wernham, C. V. & Clark, J. A. Development of the British and Irish ringing scheme and its role in conservation biology. Ringing Migr. 19, S5–S19 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Greenwood, J. J. D. Citizens, science and bird conservation. J. Ornithol. 148, S77–S124 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Horns, J. J., Adler, F. R. & Şekercioğlu, Ç. H. Using opportunistic citizen science data to estimate avian population trends. Biol. Conserv. 221, 151–159 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ryan, R. L., Kaplan, R. & Grese, R. E. Predicting volunteer commitment in environmental stewardship programmes. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 44, 629–648 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Maund, P. R. et al. What motivates the masses: Understanding why people contribute to conservation citizen science projects. Biol. Conserv. 246, 108587 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Martin, V. Y. & Greig, E. I. Young adults’ motivations to feed wild birds and influences on their potential participation in citizen science: An exploratory study. Biol. Conserv. 235, 295–307 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cox, D. T. C. & Gaston, K. J. Human–nature interactions and the consequences and drivers of provisioning wildlife. Philos.Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 373, 20170092 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Murray, M. H., Becker, D. J., Hall, R. J. & Hernandez, S. M. Wildlife health and supplemental feeding: A review and management recommendations. Biol. Conserv. 204, 163–174 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rocha, G. & Quillfeldt, P. Effect of supplementary food on age ratios of European turtle doves (Streptopelia turtur L.). Anim. Biodivers. Conserv. 38, 11–21 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Dubois, S. et al. International consensus principles for ethical wildlife control. Conserv. Biol. 31(4), 753–760 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Frank, B. & Glikman, J. A. Human–wildlife conflicts and the need to include coexistence. In Human–Wildlife Interactions (eds Frank, B. et al.) 1–19 (Cambridge University Press, 2019).
Google Scholar 
Meng, X. J., Lindsay, D. S. & Sriranganathan, N. Wild boars as sources for infectious diseases in livestock and humans. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 364, 2697–2707 (2009).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Massei, G., Roy, S. & Bunting, R. Too many hogs? A review of methods to mitigate impact by wild boar and feral hogs. Hum. Wildl. Interact. 5, 79–99 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Carpio, A. J., Apollonio, M. & Acevedo, P. Wild ungulate overabundance in Europe: Contexts, causes, monitoring and management recommendations. Mamm. Rev. 51, 95–108 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stillfried, M. et al. Secrets of success in a landscape of fear: Urban wild boar adjust risk perception and tolerate disturbance. Front. Ecol. Evol. 5, 157 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Castillo-Contreras, R. et al. Urban wild boars prefer fragmented areas with food resources near natural corridors. Sci. Total Environ. 615, 282–288 (2018).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Keuling, O., Strauß, E. & Siebert, U. Regulating wild boar populations is ‘somebody else’s problem’!—Human dimension in wild boar management. Sci. Total Environ. 554–555, 311–319 (2016).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Vajas, P. et al. Many, large and early: Hunting pressure on wild boar relates to simple metrics of hunting effort. Sci. Total Environ. 698, 134251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134251 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Licoppe, A. et al. Wild boar/feral pig in (peri-)urban areas. Managing wild boar in human-dominated landscapes. in International Union of Game Biologists (IUGB)—Congress IUGB 2013, 1–31 (2013).Torres-Blas, I. et al. Assessing methods to live-capture wild boars (Sus scrofa) in urban and peri-urban environments. Vet. Rec. 187, e85. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.105766 (2020).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Adams, C. E. Urban Wildlife Management (CRC Press, 2016).
Google Scholar 
Conejero, C. et al. Past experiences drive citizen perception of wild boar in urban areas. Mamm. Biol. 96, 68–72 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lewis, J. S., VerCauteren, K. C., Denkhaus, R. M. & Mayer, J. J. Wild pig populations along the urban gradient. In Invasive Wild Pigs in North America (eds VerCauteren, K. C. et al.) 439–463 (CRC Press, 2019).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Massei, G. et al. Effect of the GnRH vaccine GonaCon on the fertility, physiology and behaviour of wild boar. Wildl. Res. 35, 540–547 (2008).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Náhlik, A. et al. Wild boar management in Europe: Knowledge and practice. In Ecology, Conservation and Management of Wild Pigs and Peccaries (eds Melletti, M. & Meijaard, E.) 339–353 (Cambridge University Press, 2017).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Croft, S., Franzetti, B., Gill, R. & Massei, G. Too many wild boar? Modelling fertility control and culling to reduce wild boar numbers in isolated populations. PLoS One 15, e0238429. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238429 (2020).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
González-Crespo, C. et al. Stochastic assessment of management strategies for a Mediterranean peri-urban wild boar population. PLoS One 13, e0202289. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202289 (2018).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Schemnitz, S. D., Batcheller, G. R., Lovallo, M. J., White, H. B. & Fall, M. W. Capturing and handling wild animals. In Research and Management Techniques for Wildlife and Habitats (ed. Silvy, N. J.) 232–269 (John Hopkins University Press, 2009).
Google Scholar 
ECGCGRF (European Community, Government of Canada, and Government of the Russian Federation). Agreement on international humane trapping standards. Off. J. Eur. Communities 42, 43–57 (1997).
Google Scholar 
Anonymous. International agreement in the form of an agreed minute between the European Community and the United States of America on humane trapping standards. Off. J. Eur. Communities L219, 26–37 (1998).
Google Scholar 
ISO 10990-4. Methods for testing killing trap systems used on land and underwater. in Animal (Mammal) Traps—Part 4 (International Organization for Standardization, 1999).ISO 10990-5. Methods for testing restraining traps. in Animal (Mammal) Traps—Part 5 (International Organization for Standardization, 1999).Proulx, G., Cattet, M., Serfass, T. L. & Baker, S. E. Updating the AIHTS trapping standards to improve animal welfare and capture efficiency and selectivity. Animals 10, 1–26 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Proulx, G. Mammal Trapping—Wildlife Management, Animal Welfare and International Standards (Alpha Wildlife Publications, 2022).
Google Scholar 
Iossa, G., Soulsbury, C. & Harris, S. Mammal trapping: A review of animal welfare standards of killing and restraining traps. Anim. Welf. 16, 335–352 (2007).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Muñoz-Igualada, J., Shivik, J. A., Domínguez, F. G., Lara, J. & González, L. M. Evaluation of cage-traps and cable restraint devices to capture red foxes in Spain. J. Wildl. Manag. 72, 830–836 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Trap Research and Development Committee. Best Trapping Practices (Fur Institute of Canada, 2018).
Google Scholar 
Virgós, E. et al. A poor international standard for trap selectivity threatens global carnivore and biodiversity conservation. Biodivers. Conserv. 25, 1409–1419 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Barasona, J. A., López-Olvera, J. R., Beltrán-Beck, B., Gortázar, C. & Vicente, J. Trap-effectiveness and response to tiletamine-zolazepam and medetomidine anaesthesia in Eurasian wild boar captured with cage and corral traps. BMC Vet. Res. 9, 107 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Shury, T. Physical capture and restraint. In Zoo Animal and Wildlife Immobilization and Anesthesia (eds West, G. et al.) 109–124 (Wiley Blackwell, 2015).
Google Scholar 
Webb, S. L., Lewis, J. S., Hewitt, D. G., Hellickson, M. W. & Bryant, F. C. Assessing the helicopter and net gun as a capture technique for white-tailed deer. J. Wildl. Manag. 72, 310–314 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
López-Olvera, J. R. et al. Comparative evaluation of effort, capture and handling effects of drive nets to capture roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), Southern chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica) and Spanish ibex (Capra pyrenaica). Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 55, 193–202 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Breed, D. et al. Conserving wildlife in a changing world: Understanding capture myopathy—A malignant outcome of stress during capture and translocation. Conserv. Physiol. 7, 1–21 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Mentaberre, G. et al. Azaperone and sudden death of drive net-captured southern chamois. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 58, 489–493 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gaskamp, J. A., Gee, K. L., Campbell, T. A., Silvy, N. J. & Webb, S. L. Effectiveness and efficiency of corral traps, drop nets and suspended traps for capturing wild pigs (Sus scrofa). Animals 11, 1565 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Baker, S. E., Macdonald, D. W. & Ellwood, S. A. Double standards in spring trap welfare. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Urban Pests (eds Daivies, C. & Pfeiffer, W. H.) 139–145 (Pureprint Group, 2017).
Google Scholar 
López-Olvera, J. R., Castillo-Contreras, R., González-Crespo, C., Conejero, C. & Mentaberre, G. Wild boar is not welcome in the city. Barcelona Metròpolis 103, 22–23 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Conejero, C. et al. Conflicto o habituación: las dos caras de la percepción social del jabalí urbano. in Proceedings of XIV Congreso de la Sociedad Española para la Conservación y Estudio de los Mamíferos (SECEM, 2019).Conferencia Sectorial de Medio Ambiente. Directrices Técnicas para la Captura de Especies Cinegéticas Predadoras: Homologación de Métodos y Acreditación de Usuarios (Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica y el Reto Demográfico de España, 2011).Generalitat de Catalunya—Government of Catalonia. Decret 56/2014 relatiu a l’homologació de mètodes de captura en viu d’espècies cinegètiques depredadores i d’espècies exòtiques invasores depredadores i l’acreditació de les persones que en són usuàries. Diari Oficial de la Generalitat de Catalunya 6609 (2014).Fahlman, Å. et al. Wild boar behaviour during live-trap capture in a corral-style trap: Implications for animal welfare. Acta Vet. Scand. 62, 1–11 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sharp, T. & Saunders, G. A Model for Assessing the Relative Humaneness of Pest Animal Control Methods (Australian Government—Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry [New Millennium Print], 2011).
Google Scholar 
Ziegler, L., Fischer, D., Nesseler, A. & Lierz, M. Validation of the live trap ‘Krefelder Fuchsfalle’ in combination with electronic trap sensors based on AIHTS standards. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 64, 17 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Marco, I. et al. Capture myopathy in little bustards after trapping and marking. J. Wildl. Dis. 42, 889–891 (2006).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rideout, C. B. Comparison of techniques for capturing mountain goats. J. Wildl. Manag. 38, 573 (1974).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jedrzejewski, W. & Kamler, J. F. Modified drop-net for capturing ungulates. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 32, 1305–1308 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gaskamp, J. A. Use of drop-nets for wild pig damage and disease abatement. Master’s thesis, available electronically from https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/148198 (Texas A&M University, 2012).Lavelle, M. J. et al. When pigs fly: Reducing injury and flight response when capturing wild pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 215, 21–25 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Masilkova, M. et al. Observation of rescue behaviour in wild boar (Sus scrofa). Sci. Rep. 11, 16217 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Podgórski, T. et al. Spatiotemporal behavioral plasticity of wild boar (Sus scrofa) under contrasting conditions of human pressure: Primeval forest and metropolitan area. J. Mammal. 94, 109–119 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Manfredo, M., Teel, T. & Bright, A. Why are public values toward wildlife changing?. Hum. Dimens. Wildl. 8, 287–306 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cahill, S., Llimona, F., Cabañeros, L. & Calomardo, F. Characteristics of wild boar (Sus scrofa) habituation to urban areas in the Collserola Natural Park (Barcelona) and comparison with other locations. Anim. Biodivers. Conserv. 35, 221–233 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Land use changes has led to the disappearance of trees from many dryland landscapes in recent centuries, like in western North American and northern China, often accompanied by desertification. Reforestation has the potential to restore these ecosystems and help keep more carbon in soils, especially when natural regeneration is being outpaced by human pressures.
Your institute does not have access to this article More

Rapacciuolo, G. & Blois, J. L. Understanding ecological change across large spatial, temporal and taxonomic scales: Integrating data and methods in light of theory. Ecography 42, 1247–1266 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Cowles, H. C. The ecological relations of the vegetation on the sand dunes of Lake Michigan. Part I. Geographical relations of the Dune Floras. Bot. Gaz. 27, 95–117 (1899).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gleason, H. A. The individualistic concept of the plant association. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 53, 7–26 (1926).Article 

Google Scholar 
Denslow, J. S. Patterns of plant species diversity during succession under different disturbance regimes. Oecologia 46, 18–21 (1980).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Budowski, G. Studies on Forest Succession in Costa Rica und Panama. Ph.D. Thesis, Yale University, New Haven (1961).Opler, P. A., Baker, H. G. & Frankie, G. W. Plant reproductive characteristics during secondary succession in neotropical lowland forest ecosystems. Biotropica 12, 40–46 (1980).Article 

Google Scholar 
Clements, F. E. Plant Succession: An Analysis of Development in Vegetation (Carnegie Institute, Washington, 1916).Book 

Google Scholar 
Grigg, R. W. & Maragos, J. E. Recolonization of hermatypic corals on submerged lava flows in Hawaii. Ecology 55, 387–395 (1974).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tomascik, T., Van Woesik, R. & Mah, A. J. Rapid coral colonization of a recent lava flow following a volcanic eruption, Banda Islands, Indonesia. Coral Reefs 15, 169–175 (1996).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
McClanahan, T. R. Primary succession of coral-reef algae: Differing patterns on fished versus unfished reefs. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 218, 77–102 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
Reaka-Kudia, M. L. The global biodiversity of coral reefs: A comparison with rain forests. In Biodiversity II: Understanding and Proteting our Biological Resources (eds Reaka-Kudla, M. et al.) 83–108 (Joseph Henry Press, 1997).
Google Scholar 
Ginsburg, R. N. Geological and biological roles of cavities in coral reefs. In Perspectives on Coral Reefs (ed. Barnes, D. J.) 148–153 (Australian Institute of Marine Science, Manuka, A.C.T., Australia, 1983).Fautin, D. et al. An overview of marine biodiversity in United States waters. PLoS ONE 5, e11914 (2010).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Pearman, J. K., Anlauf, H., Irigoien, X. & Carvalho, S. Please mind the gap—Visual census and cryptic biodiversity assessment at central Red Sea coral reefs. Mar. Environ. Res. 118, 20–30 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kobluk, D. R. & Van Soest, R. W. M. Cavity-dwelling sponges in a southern Caribbean coral reef and their paleontological implications. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44, 1207–1235 (1989).
Google Scholar 
Richter, C. & Wunsch, M. Cavity-dwelling suspension feeders in coral reefs – A new link in reef trophodynamics. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 188, 105–116 (1999).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wunsch, M., Al-Moghrabi, S. M. & Kötter, I. Communities of coral reef Cavities in Jordan, Gulf of Aqaba (Red Sea). In Proceedings of 9th International Coral Reef Symposium, Vol. 1 (2000).Kornder, N. A. et al. Implications of 2D versus 3D surveys to measure the abundance and composition of benthic coral reef communities. Coral Reefs 40, 1137–1153 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Richter, C., Wunsch, M., Rasheed, M., Kötter, I. & Badran, M. I. Endoscopic exploration of Red Sea coral reefs reveals dense populations of cavity-dwelling sponges. Nature 413, 726–730 (2001).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
De Goeij, J. M. & Van Duyl, F. C. Coral cavities are sinks of dissolved organic carbon (DOC). Limnol. Oceanogr. 52, 2608–2617 (2007).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Slattery, M., Gochfeld, D. J., Easson, C. G. & O’Donahue, L. R. K. Facilitation of coral reef biodiversity and health by cave sponge communities. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 476, 71–86 (2013).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
McMurray, S. E., Stubler, A. D., Erwin, P. M., Finelli, C. M. & Pawlik, J. R. A test of the sponge-loop hypothesis for emergent Caribbean reef sponges. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 588, 1–14 (2018).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
De Goeij, J. M., Van Den Berg, H., Van Oostveen, M. M., Epping, E. H. G. & Van Duyl, F. C. Major bulk dissolved organic carbon (DOC) removal by encrusting coral reef cavity sponges. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 357, 139–151 (2008).ADS 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
De Goeij, J. M. et al. Surviving in a marine desert: The sponge loop retains resources within coral reefs. Science (80-) 342, 108–110 (2013).ADS 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Rix, L. et al. Reef sponges facilitate the transfer of coral-derived organic matter to their associated fauna via the sponge loop. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 589, 85–96 (2018).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
De Goeij, J. M., Lesser, M. P. & Pawlik, J. R. Nutrient fluxes and ecological functions of coral reef sponges in a changing ocean. In Climate Change, Ocean Acidification and Sponges: Impacts Across Multiple Levels of Organization (Springer, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59008-0_8.Choi, D. R. Ecological succession of reef cavity-dwellers (coelobites) in coral rubble. Bull. Mar. Sci. 35, 72–79 (1984).
Google Scholar 
Jackson, J. B. C. Competition on marine hard substrata: The adaptive significance of solitary and colonial strategies. Am. Nat. 111, 743–767 (1977).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kobluk, D. R. Cryptic faunas in reefs: Ecology and geologic importance. Palaios 3, 379–390 (1988).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hooper, J. N. A. & Van Soest, R. W. M. Class Demospongiae Sollas, 1885. In Systema Porifera (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0747-5_3.Rützler, K. The role of sponges in the mesoamerican barrier-reef ecosystem, Belize. Adv. Mar. Biol. 61, 211–271 (2012).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wulff, J. Ecological interactions and the distribution, abundance, and diversity of sponges. Adv. Mar. Biol. 61, 273–344 (2012).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Riesgo, A. et al. Inferring the ancestral sexuality and reproductive condition in sponges (Porifera). Zool. Scr. 43, 101–117 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pawlik, J. R., Chanas, B., Toonen, R. J. & Fenical, W. Defenses of Caribbean sponges against predatory reef fish. I. Chemical deterrency. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 127, 183–194 (1995).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Leong, W. & Pawlik, J. R. Evidence of a resource trade-off between growth and chemical defenses among Caribbean coral reef sponges. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 406, 71–78 (2010).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Maldonado, M. & Bergquist, P. R. Phylum porifera. In Atlas of Marine Invertebrates (ed. Young, C.) 21–50 (Academic, 2002).
Google Scholar 
Lanna, E. & Klautau, M. Life history and reproductive dynamics of the cryptogenic calcareous sponge Sycettusa hastifera (Porifera, Calcarea) living in tropical rocky shores. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U. K. 98, 505–514 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lanna, E., Monteiro, L. C. & Klautau, M. Life cycle of Paraleucilla magna Klautau, Monteiro and Borojevic, 2004 (Porifera, Calcarea). In Porifera Research: Biodiversity, Innovation and Sustainability 413–418 (2007).Calazans, V. P. S. B. & Lanna, E. Influence of endogenous and exogenous factors on the reproductive output of a cryptogenic calcareous sponge. Mar. Biodivers. 49, 2837–2850 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zimmerman, T. L. & Martin, J. W. Artificial reef matrix structures (ARMS): An inexpensive and effective method for collecting coral reef-associated invertebrates. Gulf Caribb. Res. 16, 59–64 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brainard, R. et al. Autonomous reef monitoring structures (ARMS): A tool for monitoring indices of biodiversity in the Pacific Islands. In 11th Pacific Science Inter-Congress, Papeete, Tahiti (2009).Knowlton, N. et al. Coral reef biodiversity. In Life in the World’s Oceans: Diversity, Distribution, and Abundance 65–74 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444325508.ch4.Timmers, M. A., Vicente, J., Webb, M., Jury, C. P. & Toonen, R. J. Sponging up diversity: Evaluating metabarcoding performance for a taxonomically challenging phylum within a complex cryptobenthic community. Environ. DNA https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.163 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vicente, J. et al. Unveiling hidden sponge biodiversity within the Hawaiian reef cryptofauna. Coral Reefs https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-021-02109-7 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Grottoli, A. G. et al. Increasing comparability among coral bleaching experiments. Ecol. Appl. 31, e02262 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rodgers, K. S., Jokiel, P. L., Brown, E. K., Hau, S. & Sparks, R. Over a decade of change in spatial and temporal dynamics of Hawaiian coral reef communities. Pac. Sci. 69, 1–13 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Franklin, E. C., Jokiel, P. L. & Donahue, M. J. Predictive modeling of coral distribution and abundance in the Hawaiian Islands. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 481, 121–132 (2013).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jury, C. et al. Experimental reef communities persist under future ocean acidification and warming. Res. Sq. (2021).Gorospe, K. D. et al. Local biomass baselines and the recovery potential for Hawaiian coral reef fish communities. Front. Mar. Sci. 5, 162 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Timmers, M. A. et al. Biodiversity of coral reef cryptobiota shuffles but does not decline under the combined stressors of ocean warming and acidification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 118(39), e2103275118 (2021).
Wörheide, G. & Erpenbeck, D. DNA taxonomy of sponges—Progress and perspectives. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U. K. 87, 1629–1633 (2007).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing (2020). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.Oksanen, J. et al. Package vegan. Community Ecology Packaging version 2, 1-295 (2013).Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D. & Team, R. C. nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models (2020).Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N. & Elphick, C. S. A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1, 3–14 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lenth, R. V. Least-squares means: The R package. J. Stat. Softw. 69, 1–33 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer, 2016).MATH 
Book 

Google Scholar 
Ribeiro, B., Padua, A., Paiva, P. C., Custódio, M. R. & Klautau, M. Exploitation of micro refuges and epibiosis: Survival strategies of a calcareous sponge. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U. K. 98, 495–503 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bahr, K. D., Jokiel, P. L. & Toonen, R. J. The unnatural history of Kāne’ohe bay: Coral reef resilience in the face of centuries of anthropogenic impacts. PeerJ 3, e950 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Byrne, M. Impact of ocean warming and ocean acidification on marine invertebrate life history stages: Vulnerabilities and potential for persistence in a changing ocean. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Annu. Rev. 49, 1–42 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Barnes, D. K. A., Ashton, G. V., Morley, S. A. & Peck, L. S. 1 °C warming increases spatial competition frequency and complexity in Antarctic marine macrofauna. Commun. Biol. 4, 1–7 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Maldonado, M., Giraud, K. & Carmona, C. Effects of sediment on the survival of asexually produced sponge recruits. Mar. Biol. 154, 631–641 (2008).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Eckman, J. E. Hydrodynamic processes affecting benthic recruitment. Limnol. Oceanogr. 28, 241–257 (1983).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Palardy, J. E. & Witman, J. D. Water flow drives biodiversity by mediating rarity in marine benthic communities. Ecol. Lett. 14, 63–68 (2011).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Falter, J. L., Atkinson, M. J. & Merrifield, M. A. Mass-transfer limitation of nutrient uptake by a wave-dominated reef flat community. Limnol. Oceanogr. 49, 1820–1831 (2004).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sale, P. F. Coexistence of coral reef fishes—A lottery for living space. Environ. Biol. Fish. 3, 85–102 (1978).Article 

Google Scholar 
Karlson, R. H. & Jackson, J. B. C. Competitive networks and community structure: A simulation study. Ecology 62, 670–678 (1981).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hixon, M. A. Predation as a process structuring coral reef fish communities. In The Ecology of Fishes on Coral Reefs (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-092551-6.50022-2.Hobson, E. S. Feeding patterns among tropical reef fishes. Am. Sci. 63, 382–392 (1975).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Bailey-Brock, J. H. Fouling community development on an artificial reef in Hawaiian waters. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44, 580–591 (1989).
Google Scholar 
Vicente, J., Toonen, R. J. & Bowen, B. W. Hawaiian green turtles graze on bioeroding sponges at Maunalua Bay, O‘ahu, Hawai‘i, Galaxea. J. Coral Reef Stud. 21, 3–4 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vicente, J., Osberg, A., Marty, M. J., Rice, K. & Toonen, R. J. Influence of sponge palatability on the feeding preferences of the endemic Hawaiian tiger cowrie for indigenous and introduced sponges. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 647, 109–122 (2020).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Klumpp, D., McKinnon, A. & Mundy, C. Motile cryptofauna of a coral reef: Abundance, distribution and trophic potential. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 45, 95–108 (1988).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Carpenter, R. C. Invertebrate predators and grazers. In Life and Death of Coral Reefs (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5995-5_9.Glynn, P. W. & Enochs, I. C. Invertebrates and their roles in coral reef ecosystems. In Coral Reefs: An Ecosystem in Transition (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0114-4_18.Ďuriš, Z., Horká, I., Juračka, P. J., Petrusek, A. & Sandford, F. These squatters are not innocent: The evidence of parasitism in Sponge-Inhabiting shrimps. PLoS ONE 6, e21987 (2011).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Pawlik, J. R. A sponge-eating worm from Bermuda: Branchiosyllis oculata (Polychaeta, Syllidae). Mar. Ecol. 4, 65–79 (1983).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Degoeij, J. M. et al. Cell kinetics of the marine sponge Halisarca caerulea reveal rapid cell turnover and shedding. J. Exp. Biol. 212, 3892–3900 (2009).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Alexander, B. E. et al. Cell turnover and detritus production in marine sponges from tropical and temperate benthic ecosystems. PLoS ONE 9, e109486 (2014).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bart, M. C., Hudspith, M., Rapp, H. T., Verdonschot, P. F. M. & de Goeij, J. M. A deep-sea sponge loop? Sponges transfer dissolved and particulate organic carbon and nitrogen to associated fauna. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 604879 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pawlik, J. R. & McMurray, S. E. The emerging ecological and biogeochemical importance of sponges on coral reefs. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 12, 315–337 (2020).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Brandl, S. J. et al. Demographic dynamics of the smallest marine vertebrates fuel coral reef ecosystem functioning. Science (80-). 364, 1189–1192 (2019).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Buss, L. W. & Jackson, J. B. C. Competitive networks: Nontransitive competitive relationships in cryptic coral reef environments. Am. Nat. 113, 223–234 (1979).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vicente, J., Ríos, J. A., Zea, S. & Toonen, R. J. Molecular and morphological congruence of three new cryptic Neopetrosia spp in the Caribbean. PeerJ 7, e6371–e6381 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar  More

Izdebski, A. et al. Palaeoecological data indicates land-use changes across Europe linked to spatial heterogeneity in mortality during the Black Death pandemic. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6, 297–306 (2022).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Benedictow, O. J. The Complete History of the Black Death (The Boydell Press, 2021).Palermo, L. Mercati del Grano a Roma tra Medioevo e Rinascimento. Il Mercato Distrettuale del Grano in Età Comunale (Istituto Nazionale di Studi Romani, 1990).Cortonesi, A. I cereali nell’Italia del tardo medioevo. Note sugli aspetti qualitativi del consumo. Riv. Stor. Agricol. 37, 3–30 (1997).
Google Scholar 
Nanni, P. in The Crisis of the 14th Century. Teleconnections Between Environmental and Societal Change? (eds Bauch M. & Schenk G. J.) 169–189 (De Gruyter, 2020).Lagerås, P. Environment, Society and the Black Death: An Interdisciplinary Approach to the Late-Medieval Crisis in Sweden (Oxbow Books, 2016).Roosen, J. & Curtis, D. The ‘light touch’ of the Black Death in the southern Netherlands: an urban trick? Econ. Hist. Rev. 72, 32–56 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Preiser-Kapeller, J. Der Lange Sommer und die Kleine Eiszeit: Klima, Pandemien und der Wandel der Alten Welt 500–1500 n. Chr. (Mandelbaum, 2021).Sadori, L. The Lateglacial and Holocene vegetation and climate history of Lago di Mezzano (central Italy). Quat. Sci. Rev. 202, 30–44 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cortonesi, A. Ruralia. Economie e Paesaggi del Medioevo Italiano (Il Calamo, 1995).Cortonesi, A. L’olivo nell’Italia medievale. Reti Medievali Riv. 6, 1–29 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Mensing, S. A. et al. Historical ecology reveals landscape transformation coincident with cultural development in central Italy since the Roman Period. Sci. Rep. 8, 2138 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cortonesi, A. in Il Paesaggio Agrario Italiano Medievale: Storia e Didattica, 113–120 (Istituto Alcide Cervi, 2011). More