Ecology

Fodrie, F. J. et al. Measuring individuality in habitat use across complex landscapes: Approaches, constraints, and implications for assessing resource specialization. Oecologia 178, 75–87 (2015).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bacheler, N. M., Michelot, T., Cheshire, R. T. & Shertzer, K. W. Fine-scale movement patterns and behavioral states of gray triggerfish Balistes capriscus determined from acoustic telemetry and hidden Markov models. Fish. Res. 215, 76–89 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Furey, N. B., Dance, M. A. & Rooker, J. R. Fine-scale movements and habitat use of juvenile southern flounder Paralichthys lethostigma in an estuarine seascape. J. Fish Biol. 82, 1469–1483 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Froehlich, C. Y. M., Garcia, A. & Kline, R. J. Daily movement patterns of red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) on a large artificial reef. Fish. Res. 209, 49–57 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Williams-Grove, L. J. & Szedlmayer, S. T. Acoustic positioning and movement patterns of red snapper, Lutjanus campechanus, around artificial reefs in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 553, 233–251 (2016).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Secor, D. H., Zhang, F., O’Brien, M. H. P. & Li, M. Ocean destratification and fish evacuation caused by a Mid-Atlantic tropical storm. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 76, 573–584 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bacheler, N. M., Shertzer, K. W., Cheshire, R. T. & MacMahan, J. H. Tropical storms influence the movement behavior of a demersal oceanic fish species. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–13 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lowerre-Barbieri, S. K., Walters, S., Bickford, J., Cooper, W. & Muller, R. Site fidelity and reproductive timing at a spotted seatrout spawning aggregation site: Individual versus population scale behavior. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 481, 181–197 (2013).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Espinoza, M., Farrugia, T. J., Webber, D. M., Smith, F. & Lowe, C. G. Testing a new acoustic telemetry technique to quantify long-term, fine-scale movements of aquatic animals. Fish. Res. 108, 364–371 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Roy, R. et al. Testing the VEMCO positioning system: Spatial distribution of the probability of location and the positioning error in a reservoir. Anim. Biotelemetry 2, 1 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Guzzo, M. M. et al. Field testing a novel high residence positioning system for monitoring the fine-scale movements of aquatic organisms. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 1478–1488 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Smedbol, S., Smith, F., Webber, D., Vallée, R. & King, T. Using underwater coded acoustic telemetry for fine scale positioning of aquatic animals. In 20th Symposium of the International Society on Biotelemetry Proceedings, 9–11 (2014).Dean, M. J., Hoffman, W. S., Zemeckis, D. R. & Armstrong, M. P. Fine-scale diel and gender-based patterns in behaviour of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) on a spawning ground in the western Gulf of Maine. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 71, 1474–1489 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tarnecki, J. H. & Patterson, W. F. A mini ROV-based method for recovering marine instruments at depth. PLoS One 15, 1–9 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Ellis, R. D. et al. Acoustic telemetry array evolution: From species- and project-specific designs to large-scale, multispecies, cooperative networks. Fish. Res. 209, 186–195 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Friess, C. et al. Regional-scale variability in the movement ecology of marine fishes revealed by an integrative acoustic tracking network. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 663, 157–177 (2021).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Walters, C. J. & Juanes, F. Recruitment limitation as a consequence of natural selection for use of restricted feeding habitats and predation risk taking by juvenile fishes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50, 2058–2070 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ahrens, R. N. M., Walters, C. J. & Christensen, V. Foraging arena theory. Fish Fish. 13, 41–59 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schwartzkopf, B. D., Langland, T. A. & Cowan, J. H. Habitat selection important for red snapper feeding ecology in the northwestern Gulf of Mexico. Mar. Coast. Fish. 9, 373–387 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wells, R. J. D., Cowan, J. H. Jr. & Fry, B. Feeding ecology of red snapper Lutjanus campechanus in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 361, 213–225 (2008).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Goldman, S. F., Glasgow, D. M. & Falk, M. M. Feeding habits of 2 reef-associated fishes, red porgy (Pagrus pagrus) and gray triggerfish (Balistes capriscus), off the Southeastern United States. Fish. Bull. 114, 317–329 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Villegas-Ríos, D., Réale, D., Freitas, C., Moland, E. & Olsen, E. M. Personalities influence spatial responses to environmental fluctuations in wild fish. J. Anim. Ecol. 87, 1309–1319 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rooker, J. R. et al. Seascape connectivity and the influence of predation risk on the movement of fishes inhabiting a back-reef ecosystem. Ecosphere 9, e02200 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Forman, R. T. T. & Godron, M. Patches and structural components for a landscape ecology. Bioscience 31, 733–740 (1981).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dahl, K. A. & Patterson, W. F. Movement, home range, and depredation of invasive lionfish revealed by fine-scale acoustic telemetry in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Mar. Biol. 167, 1–22 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Schoener, T. W. Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185, 27–39 (1974).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Moulton, D. L. et al. Habitat partitioning and seasonal movement of red drum and spotted seatrout. Estuaries Coasts 40, 905–916 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hammerschlag, N., Luo, J., Irschick, D. J. & Ault, J. S. A Comparison of spatial and movement patterns between sympatric predators: bull sharks (Carcharhinus leucas) and Atlantic tarpon (Megalops atlanticus). PLoS ONE 7, e45958 (2012).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Novak, A. J. et al. Scale of biotelemetry data influences ecological interpretations of space and habitat use in yellowtail snapper. Mar. Coast. Fish. 12, 364–377 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lima, S. L. & Dill, L. M. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: A review and prospectus. Can. J. Zool. 68, 619–640 (1990).Article 

Google Scholar 
Werner, E. E. & Gilliam, J. F. The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15, 393–425 (1984).Article 

Google Scholar 
Reale, D. et al. Personality and the emergence of the pace-of-life syndrome concept at the population level. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 365, 4051–4063 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sih, A., Bell, A. & Johnson, J. C. Behavioral syndromes: An ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 372–378 (2004).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Huntingford, F. A. The relationship between anti-predator behavior and aggression among conspecifics in the three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Anim. Behav. 24, 245–260 (1976).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wilson, D. S., Clark, A. B., Coleman, K. & Dearstyne, T. Shyness and boldness in humans and other animals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9, 442–446 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
Harrison, P. M. et al. Personality-dependent spatial ecology occurs independently from dispersal in wild burbot (Lota lota). Behav. Ecol. 26, 483–492 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gosling, S. D. From mice to men: What can we learn about personality from animal research?. Psychol. Bull. 127, 45–86 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hussey, N. E. et al. Aquatic animal telemetry: A panoramic window into the underwater world. Science 348, 1255642–1255642 (2015).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lowerre-Barbieri, S. K., Kays, R., Thorson, J. T. & Wikelski, M. The ocean’s movescape: Fisheries management in the bio-logging decade (2018–2028). ICES J. Mar. Sci. 76, 477–488 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
National Marine Fisheries Service. Fisheries Economics of the United State 2016. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-F/SPO-187a. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/document/fisheries-economics-united-states-report-2016 (2018). Accessed 08 January 2018.Patterson, W. F. III, Tarnecki, J., Addis, D. T. & Barbieri, L. R. Reef fish community structure at natural versus artificial reefs in the northern Gulf of Mexico. In Proc. 66th Gulf Caribb. Fish. Inst. 4–8 (2014).Streich, M. K. et al. Effects of a new artificial reef complex on red snapper and the associated fish community: An evaluation using a before–after control–impact approach. Mar. Coast. Fish. 9, 404–418 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dance, M. A., Patterson, W. F. III. & Addis, D. T. Fish community and trophic structure at artificial reef sites in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico. Bull. Mar. Sci. 87, 301–324 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cowan, J. H. Red snapper in the Gulf of Mexico and the U.S. South Atlantic: data, doubt, and debate. Fisheries 36, 319–331 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Addis, D. T., Patterson, W. F. III. & Dance, M. A. The potential for unreported artificial reefs to serve as refuges from fishing mortality for reef fishes. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 36, 131–139 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
McCawley, J. R., Cowan, J. H. Jr. & Shipp, R. L. Feeding periodicity and prey habitat preference of red snapper, Lutjanus campechanus (Poey, 1860), on Alabama artificial reefs. Gulf Mex. Sci. 24, 14–27 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Glenn, H. D., Cowan, J. H. Jr. & Powers, J. E. A comparison of red snapper reproductive potential in the northwestern Gulf of Mexico: Natural versus artificial habitats. Mar. Coast. Fish. 9, 139–148 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kulaw, D. H., Cowan, J. H. Jr. & Jackson, M. W. Temporal and spatial comparisons of the reproductive biology of northern Gulf of Mexico (USA) red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) collected a decade apart. PLoS One 12, e0172360 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Vose, F. E. & Nelson, W. G. Gray triggerfish (Balistes capriscus Gmelin) feeding from artificial and natural substrate in shallow Atlantic waters of Florida. Bull. Mar. Sci. 55, 1316–1323 (1994).
Google Scholar 
Herbig, J. L. & Szedlmayer, S. T. Movement patterns of gray triggerfish, Balistes capriscus, around artificial reefs in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 23, 418–427 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Szedlmayer, S. T. & Schroepfer, R. L. Long-term residence of red snapper on artificial reefs in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 134, 315–325 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Watterson, J. C. III., Patterson, W. F. I. I. I., Shipp, R. L. & Cowan, J. H. Jr. Movement of red snapper, Lutjanus campechanus, in the north central Gulf of Mexico: Potential effects of hurricanes. Gulf Mex. Sci. 16, 92–104 (1998).
Google Scholar 
Ingram, G. W. Jr. & Patterson, W. F. I. I. I. Movement patterns of red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus), greater amberjack (Seriola dumerili), and gray triggerfish (Balistes capriscus) in the Gulf of Mexico and the utility of marine reserves as management tools. Proc. Gulf Caribb. Fish. Inst. 52, 686–699 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Strelcheck, A. J., Cowan, J. H. Jr. & Patterson, W. F. III. Site fidelity, movement, and growth of red snapper Lutjanus campechanus: implications for artificial reef management. In Red Snapper Ecology and Fisheries in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. American Fisheries Society Symposium 60 (eds. Patterson, W. F. III, Cowan, J. H. Jr., Nieland, D. A. & Fitzhugh, G. R.), 147–162 (2007).Addis, D. T., Patterson, W. F. I. I. I., Dance, M. A. & Ingram, G. W. Jr. Implications of reef fish movement from unreported artificial reef sites in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Fish. Res. 147, 349–358 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Topping, D. T. & Szedlmayer, S. T. Site fidelity, residence time and movements of red snapper Lutjanus campechanus estimated with long-term acoustic monitoring. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 437, 183–200 (2011).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Everett, A. G., Szedlmayer, S. T. & Gallaway, B. J. Movement patterns of red snapper Lutjanus campechanus based on acoustic telemetry around oil and gas platforms in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 649, 155–173 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tarnecki, J. H. & Patterson, W. F. I. I. I. Changes in red snapper diet and trophic ecology following the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill. Mar. Coast. Fish. 7, 135–147 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
McCawley, J. R. & Cowan, J. H. Jr. Seasonal and size specific diet and prey demand of Red Snapper on Alabama artificial reefs. In Red Snapper Ecology and Fisheries in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. American Fisheries Society Symposium 60 (eds. Patterson, W. F. III., Cowan, J. H. Jr., Fitzhugh, G. R. & Nieland, D. L.), 77–104 (2007).Piraino, M. N. & Szedlmayer, S. T. Fine-scale movements and home ranges of red snapper around artificial reefs in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 143, 988–998 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Williams-Grove, L. J. & Szedlmayer, S. T. Depth preferences and three-dimensional movements of red snapper, Lutjanus campechanus, on an artificial reef in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Fish. Res. 190, 61–70 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Topping, D. T. & Szedlmayer, S. T. Home range and movement patterns of red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) on artificial reefs. Fish. Res. 112, 77–84 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Baker, M. S. J. & Wilson, C. A. Use of bomb radiocarbon to validate otolith section ages of red snapper Lutjanus campechanus from the northern Gulf of Mexico. Limnol. Oceanogr. 46, 1819–1824 (2001).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Allman, R. J., Fioramonti, C. L., Patterson, W. F. III. & Pacicco, A. E. Validation of annual growth-zone formation in gray triggerfish Balistes capriscus dorsal spines, fin rays, and vertebrae. Gulf Mex. Sci. 33, 68–76 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Frazer, T. K., Lindberg, W. J. & Stanton, G. R. Predation on sand dollars by gray triggerfish, Balistes capriscus, in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico. Bull. Mar. Sci. 48, 159–164 (1991).
Google Scholar 
Delorenzo, D. M., Bethea, D. M. & Carlson, J. K. An assessment of the diet and trophic level of Atlantic sharpnose shark Rhizoprionodon terraenovae. J. Fish Biol. 86, 385–391 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Aines, A. C., Carlson, J. K., Boustany, A., Mathers, A. & Kohler, N. E. Feeding habits of the tiger shark, Galeocerdo cuvier, in the northwest Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico. Environ. Biol. Fish. 101, 403–415 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Castro, J. I. The Sharks of North America (Oxford University Press, 2011).
Google Scholar 
Springer, S. A collection of fishes from the stomachs of sharks taken off Salerno, Florida. Copeia 3, 174–175 (1946).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bohaboy, E. C., Guttridge, T. L., Hammerschlag, N., Van Zinnicq Bergmann, M. P. M. & Patterson, W. F. III. Application of three-dimensional acoustic telemetry to assess the effects of rapid recompression on reef fish discard mortality. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 77, 83–96 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Drymon, J. M., Powers, S. P., Dindo, J., Dzwonkowski, B. & Henwood, T. Distributions of sharks across a continental shelf in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Mar. Coast. Fish. Dyn. Manag. Ecosyst. Sci. 2, 440–450 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ajemian, M. J. et al. Movement patterns and habitat use of tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier) across ontogeny in the Gulf of Mexico. PLoS One 15, 1–24 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Ouzts, A. C. & Szedlmayer, S. T. Diel feeding patterns of Red Snapper on artificial reefs in the north-central Gulf of Mexico. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 132, 1186–1193 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
White, D. B. & Palmer, S. M. Age, growth, and reproduction of the red snapper, Lutjanus campechanus, from the Atlantic waters of the Southeastern US. Bull. Mar. Sci. 75, 335–360 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Fitzhugh, G. R., Lyon, H. M. & Barnett, B. K. Reproductive parameters of gray triggerfish (Balistes capriscus) from the Gulf of Mexico: Sex ratio, maturity and spawning fraction. SEDAR43-WP-03. (2015). http://sedarweb.org/sedar-82-rd14-sedar43-wp-03reproductive-parameters-gray-triggerfish-balistes-capriscus-gulf-mexico. Accessed 12 April 2021.Kelly-Stormer, A. et al. Gray Triggerfish reproductive biology, age, and growth off the Atlantic coast of the Southeastern USA. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 146, 523–538 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Porch, C. E., Fitzhugh, G. R., Lang, E. T., Lyon, H. M. & Linton, B. C. Estimating the dependence of spawning frequency on size and age in Gulf of Mexico red snapper. Mar. Coast. Fish. 7, 233–245 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lang, E. T. & Fitzhugh, G. R. Oogenesis and fecundity type of gray triggerfish in the Gulf of Mexico. Mar. Coast. Fish. Dyn. Manag. Ecosyst. Sci. 7, 338–348 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Woods, M. K. et al. Size and age at maturity of female red snapper Lutjanus campechanus in the Northern Gulf of Mexico. Proc. Gulf Caribb. Fish. Inst. 54, 526–537 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Simmons, C. M. & Szedlmayer, S. T. Territoriality, reproductive behavior, and parental care in gray triggerfish, Balistes capriscus, from the Northern Gulf of Mexico. Bull. Mar. Sci. 88, 197–209 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mackichan, C. A. & Szedlmayer, S. T. Reproductive behavior of the gray triggerfish, Balistes capriscus, in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico. Proc. Gulf Caribb. Fish. Inst. 59, 213–218 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Diamond, S. L. et al. Movers and stayers: Individual variability in site fidelity and movements of red snapper off Texas. In Red Snapper Ecology and Fisheries in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. American Fisheries Society Symposium 60 (eds. Patterson, W. F. III, Cowan, J. H. Jr., Nieland, D. A. & Fitzhugh, G. R.), 163–187 (2007).Spiegel, O., Leu, S. T., Bull, C. M. & Sih, A. What’s your move? Movement as a link between personality and spatial dynamics in animal populations. Ecol. Lett. 20, 3–18 (2017).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Smith, F. Understanding HPE in the VEMCO Positioning System (VPS). (2013).US Department of Defense. Global Positioning System Standard Positioning Service Performance Standard. http://www.gps.gov/technical/ps/2008-SPS-performance-standard.pdf (2008). Accessed 08 July 2020.Heupel, M. R., Reiss, K. L., Yeiser, B. G. & Simpfendorfer, C. A. Effects of biofouling on performance of moored data logging acoustic receivers. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 6, 327–335 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration & National Weather Service. National Data Buoy Center: Station 42012—Orange Beach. http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=42012 (2017). Accessed 07 November 2017.National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration & National Weather Service. National Data Buoy Center: Station 42040- Luke Offshore Test Platform. https://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=42040 (2019). Accessed 07 January 2019.Lazaridis, E. R Package ‘lunar’: lunar phase & distance, seasons and other environmental factors. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lunar/lunar.pdf (2015). Accessed 12 August 2019.Thieurmel, B. & Elmarhraoui, A. R Package ‘suncalc’: compute sun position, sunlight phases, moon position and lunar phase. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/suncalc/suncalc.pdf (2019). Accessed 22 June 2019.National Geophysical Data Center. U.S. Coastal Relief Model—Central Gulf of Mexico. https://doi.org/10.7289/V54Q7RW0 (2001).Cox, D. R. & Oakes, D. Analysis of Survival Data (Chapman and Hall, 1984).Benhamou, S. Dynamic approach to space and habitat use based on biased random bridges. PLoS One 6, e14592 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Horne, J. S., Garton, E. O., Krone, S. M. & Lewis, J. S. Analyzing animal movements using Brownian bridges. Ecology 88, 2354–2363 (2007).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tracey, J. A. et al. Movement-based estimation and visualization of space use in 3D for wildlife ecology and conservation. PLoS One 9, e101205 (2014).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Tracey, J. A. et al. R Package ‘mkde’: 2D and 3D movement-based kernel density estimates (MKDEs). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=mkde (2014). Accessed 17 June 2019.Worton, B. J. Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology 70, 164–168 (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wood, S. N. Package ‘mgcv’: Mixed GAM computation vehicle with automatic smoothness estimation. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315370279 (2019). More

Wilson, E. O. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis (Harvard Univ. Press, 1975).Diamond, J. M. & Ordunio, D. Guns, Germs, and Steel (Books on Tape, 1999).Couzin, I. D. et al. Self-organization and collective behavior in vertebrates. Adv. Study Behav. 32, 1–75 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Keller, L. Adaptation and the genetics of social behaviour. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 364, 3209–3216 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Kay, T., Keller, L. & Lehmann, L. The evolution of altruism and the serial rediscovery of the role of relatedness. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 28894–28898 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Cryan, J. F. & Dinan, T. G. Mind-altering microorganisms: the impact of the gut microbiota on brain and behaviour. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 701–712 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Johnson, K. V. A. & Foster, K. R. Why does the microbiome affect behaviour? Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16, 647–655 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sherwin, E., Bordenstein, S. R., Quinn, J. L., Dinan, T. G. & Cryan, J. F. Microbiota and the social brain. Science 366, eaar2016 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Desbonnet, L., Clarke, G., Shanahan, F., Dinan, T. G. & Cryan, J. F. Microbiota is essential for social development in the mouse. Mol. Psychiatry 19, 146–148 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sharon, G. et al. Human gut microbiota from autism spectrum disorder promote behavioral symptoms in mice. Cell 177, 1600–1618 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, M. et al. A quasi-paired cohort strategy reveals the impaired detoxifying function of microbes in the gut of autistic children. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba3760 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wu, W.-L. et al. Microbiota regulate social behaviour via stress response neurons in the brain. Nature 595, 409–414 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Vuong, H. E., Yano, J. M., Fung, T. C. & Hsiao, E. Y. The microbiome and host behavior. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 40, 21–49 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Douglas, A. E. Simple animal models for microbiome research. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 764–775 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Schretter, C. E. Links between the gut microbiota, metabolism, and host behavior. Gut Microbes 11, 245–248 (2020).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Liberti, J. & Engel, P. The gut microbiota–brain axis of insects. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 39, 6–13 (2020).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
O’Donnell, M. P., Fox, B. W., Chao, P.-H., Schroeder, F. C. & Sengupta, P. A neurotransmitter produced by gut bacteria modulates host sensory behaviour. Nature 583, 415–420 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wilson, E. O. The Insect Societies (Harvard Univ. Press, 1971).Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E. O. The Ants (Harvard Univ. Press, 1990).Teseo, S. et al. The scent of symbiosis: gut bacteria may affect social interactions in leaf-cutting ants. Anim. Behav. 150, 239–254 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Vernier, C. L. et al. The gut microbiome defines social group membership in honey bee colonies. Sci. Adv. 6, eabd3431 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Li, L. et al. Gut microbiome drives individual memory variation in bumblebees. Nat. Commun. 12, 6588 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Choi, S. H. et al. Individual variations lead to universal and cross-species patterns of social behavior. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 31754–31759 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Geffre, A. C. et al. Honey bee virus causes context-dependent changes in host social behavior. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 10406–10413 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kwong, W. K. & Moran, N. A. Gut microbial communities of social bees. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 374–384 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bonilla-Rosso, G. & Engel, P. Functional roles and metabolic niches in the honey bee gut microbiota. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 43, 69–76 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Raymann, K. & Moran, N. A. The role of the gut microbiome in health and disease of adult honey bee workers. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 26, 97–104 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Zheng, H., Powell, J. E., Steele, M. I., Dietrich, C. & Moran, N. A. Honeybee gut microbiota promotes host weight gain via bacterial metabolism and hormonal signaling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 4775–4780 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kešnerová, L. et al. Disentangling metabolic functions of bacteria in the honey bee gut. PLoS Biol. 15, e2003467 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kešnerová, L. et al. Gut microbiota structure differs between honeybees in winter and summer. ISME J. 14, 801–814 (2020).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Mersch, D. P., Crespi, A. & Keller, L. Tracking individuals shows spatial fidelity is a key regulator of ant social organization. Science 340, 1090–1093 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Stroeymeyt, N. et al. Social network plasticity decreases disease transmission in a eusocial insect. Science 362, 941–945 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kao, A. B. & Couzin, I. D. Modular structure within groups causes information loss but can improve decision accuracy. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 374, 20180378 (2019).
Google Scholar 
de Groot, A. P. Protein and amino acid requirements of the honeybee (Apis mellifica L.). Physiol. Comp. Oecol. 3, 197–285 (1953).
Google Scholar 
Billard, J.-M. d-Amino acids in brain neurotransmission and synaptic plasticity. Amino Acids 43, 1851–1860 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Marcaggi, P. & Attwell, D. Role of glial amino acid transporters in synaptic transmission and brain energetics. Glia 47, 217–225 (2004).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gage, S. L., Calle, S., Jacobson, N., Carroll, M. & DeGrandi-Hoffman, G. Pollen alters amino acid levels in the honey bee brain and this relationship changes with age and parasitic stress. Front. Neurosci. 14, 231 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kawase, T. et al. Gut microbiota of mice putatively modifies amino acid metabolism in the host brain. Br. J. Nutr. 117, 775–783 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Socha, E., Koba, M. & Koslinski, P. Amino acid profiling as a method of discovering biomarkers for diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases. Amino Acids 51, 367–371 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Tarlungeanu, D. C. et al. Impaired amino acid transport at the blood brain barrier is a cause of autism spectrum disorder. Cell 167, 1481–1494 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Maynard, T. M. & Manzini, M. C. Balancing act: maintaining amino acid levels in the autistic brain. Neuron 93, 476–479 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kurochkin, I. et al. Metabolome signature of autism in the human prefrontal cortex. Commun. Biol. 2, 234 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
van der Velpen, V. et al. Systemic and central nervous system metabolic alterations in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Res. Ther. 11, 93 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Aldana, B. I. et al. Glutamate–glutamine homeostasis is perturbed in neurons and astrocytes derived from patient iPSC models of frontotemporal dementia. Mol. Brain 13, 125 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Galizia, C. G., Eisenhardt, D. & Giurfa M. (eds) Honeybee Neurobiology and Behavior: A Tribute to Randolf Menzel (Springer Science & Business Media, 2011).Menzel, R. The honeybee as a model for understanding the basis of cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 758–768 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ellegaard, K. M. & Engel, P. Genomic diversity landscape of the honey bee gut microbiota. Nat. Commun. 10, 446 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bruno, F., Angilica, A., Cosco, F., Luchi, M. L. & Muzzupappa, M. Mixed prototyping environment with different video tracking techniques. In IMProVe 2011 International Conference on Innovative Methods in Product Design (eds Concheri, G. et al.) 105–113 (Libreria Internazionale Cortina Padova, 2011).R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020).Anderson, K. E., Rodrigues, P. A. P., Mott, B. M., Maes, P. & Corby-Harris, V. Ecological succession in the honey bee gut: shift in Lactobacillus strain dominance during early adult development. Microb. Ecol. 71, 1008–1019 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Almasri, H., Liberti, J., Brunet, J. L., Engel, P. & Belzunces, L. P. Mild chronic exposure to pesticides alters physiological markers of honey bee health without perturbing the core gut microbiota. Sci. Rep. 12, 4281 (2022).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pfaffl, M. W. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, e45 (2001).Gallup, J. M. in PCR Troubleshooting and Optimization: The Essential Guide (eds Kennedy, S. & Oswald, N.) 23–65 (Caister Academic Press, 2011).Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet. J. 17, 10–12 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Callahan, B. J. et al. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE 8, e61217 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Davis, N. M., Proctor, D. M., Holmes, S. P., Relman, D. A. & Callahan, B. J. Simple statistical identification and removal of contaminant sequences in marker-gene and metagenomics data. Microbiome 6, 1–14 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Patassini, S. et al. Identification of elevated urea as a severe, ubiquitous metabolic defect in the brain of patients with Huntington’s disease. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 468, 161–166 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gonzalez-Riano, C., Garcia, A. & Barbas, C. Metabolomics studies in brain tissue: a review. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 130, 141–168 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Belle, J. E. L., Harris, N. G., Williams, S. R. & Bhakoo, K. K. A comparison of cell and tissue extraction techniques using high-resolution 1H-NMR spectroscopy. NMR Biomed. 15, 37–44 (2002).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wanichthanarak, K., Jeamsripong, S., Pornputtapong, N. & Khoomrung, S. Accounting for biological variation with linear mixed-effects modelling improves the quality of clinical metabolomics data. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 17, 611–618 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wallberg, A. et al. A hybrid de novo genome assembly of the honeybee, Apis mellifera, with chromosome-length scaffolds. BMC Genomics 20, 275 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ritchie, M. E. et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e47 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Durinck, S., Spellman, P. T., Birney, E. & Huber, W. Mapping identifiers for the integration of genomic datasets with the R/Bioconductor package biomaRt. Nat. Protoc. 4, 1184–1191 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Falcon, S. & Gentleman, R. Using GOstats to test gene lists for GO term association. Bioinformatics 23, 257–258 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Reijnders, M. J. & Waterhouse, R. M. Summary visualisations of gene ontology terms with GO-Figure! Front. Bioinform. 1, 638255 (2021).
Google Scholar  More

Flombaum, P. et al. Present and future global distributions of the marine Cyanobacteria Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus. PNAS 110, 9824–9829 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Honda, D. & Yokota, A. Detection of seven major evolutionary lineages in cyanobacteria based on the 165 rRNA gene sequence analysis with new sequences of five marine Synechococcus strains. J Mol Evol 48, 723–739 (1999).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Robertson, B. R., Tezuka, N. & Watanabe, M. M. Phylogenetic analyses of Synechococcus strains (cyanobacteria) using sequences of 16S rDNA and part of the phycocyanin operon reveal multiple evolutionary lines and reflect phycobilin content. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 51, 861–871 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Stomp, M. et al. Adaptive divergence in pigment composition promotes phytoplankton biodiversity. Nature 432, 104–107 (2004).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Albrecht, M., Pröschold, T. & Schumann, R. Identification of Cyanobacteria in a eutrophic coastal lagoon on the Southern Baltic Coast. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1–16 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bertos-Fortis, M. et al. Unscrambling cyanobacteria community dynamics related to environmental factors. Front. Microbiol. 7, 625 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Guidi, L. et al. Plankton networks driving carbon export in the oligotrophic ocean. Nature 532, 465–470 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hunter-Cevera, K. R. et al. Seasons of syn. Limnol. Oceanogr. 65, 1–18 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Kuosa, H. Picoplanktonic algae in the northern Baltic Sea: Seasonal dynamics and flagellate grazing. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 73, 269–276 (1991).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sathicq, M. B., Unrein, F. & Gómez, N. Recurrent pattern of picophytoplankton dynamics in estuaries around the world: The case of Río de la Plata. Mar. Environ. Res. 161, 105136 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rajaneesh, K. M. & Mitbavkar, S. Factors controlling the temporal and spatial variations in Synechococcus abundance in a monsoonal estuary. Mar. Environ. Res. 92, 133–143 (2013).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Crosbie, N. D., Pöckl, M. & Weisse, T. Dispersal and phylogenetic diversity of nonmarine picocyanobacteria, inferred from 16S rRNA gene and cpcBA-intergenic spacer sequence analyses. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 5716–5721 (2003).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ernst, A., Becker, S., Wollenzien, U. I. A. & Postius, C. Ecosystem-dependent adaptive radiations ofpicocyanobacteria inferred from 16S rRNA and ITS-1 sequence analysis. Microbiology 149, 217–228 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sánchez-Baracaldo, P., Handley, B. A. & Hayest, P. K. Picocyanobacterial community structure of freshwater lakes and the Baltic Sea revealed by phylogenetic analyses and clade-specific quantitative PCR. Microbiology 154, 3347–3357 (2008).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hu, Y. O. O., Karlson, B., Charvet, S. & Andersson, A. F. Diversity of pico- to mesoplankton along the 2000 km salinity gradient of the Baltic Sea. Front. Microbiol. 7, 679 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Larsson, J. et al. Picocyanobacteria containing a novel pigment gene cluster dominate the brackish water Baltic Sea. ISME J. 8, 1892–1903 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Celepli, N. et al. Meta-omic analyses of Baltic Sea cyanobacteria: Diversity, community structure and salt acclimation. Environ. Microbiol. 19, 673–686 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Flombaum, P., Wang, W. L., Primeau, F. W. & Martiny, A. C. Global picophytoplankton niche partitioning predicts overall positive response to ocean warming. Nat. Geosci. 13, 116–120 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bopp, L. et al. Multiple stressors of ocean ecosystems in the 21st century: Projections with CMIP5 models. Biogeosciences 10, 6225–6245 (2013).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cabré, A., Marinov, I. & Leung, S. Consistent global responses of marine ecosystems to future climate change across the IPCC AR5 earth system models. Clim. Dyn. 45, 1253–1280 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, T., Chen, X., Qin, S. & Li, J. Phylogenetic and phenogenetic diversity of Synechococcus along a yellow sea section reveal its environmental dependent distribution and co-occurrence microbial pattern. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 9, 1018 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tai, V. & Palenik, B. Temporal variation of Synechococcus clades at a coastal Pacific Ocean monitoring site. ISME J. 3, 903–915 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ahlgren, N. A. & Rocap, G. Diversity and distribution of marine Synechococcus: Multiple gene phylogenies for consensus classification and development of qPCR assays for sensitive measurement of clades in the ocean. Front. Microbiol. 3, 1–24 (2012).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Rajaneesh, K. M., Mitbavkar, S., Anil, A. C. & Sawant, S. S. Synechococcus as an indicator of trophic status in the Cochin backwaters, west coast of India. Ecol. Indic. 55, 118–130 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Campbell, L. & Carpenter, E. J. Characterization of phycoerythrin-containing Synechococcus spp. populations by immunofluorescence. J. Plankton Res. 9, 1167–1181 (1987).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stomp, M. et al. Colourful coexistence of red and green picocyanobacteria in lakes and seas. Ecol. Lett. 10, 290–298 (2007).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Callieri, C. & Stockner, J. G. Freshwater autotrophic picoplankton: A review. J. Limnol. 61, 1–14 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, H., Jing, H., Wong, T. H. C. & Chen, B. Co-occurrence of phycocyanin- and phycoerythrin-rich Synechococcus in subtropical estuarine and coastal waters of Hong Kong. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 6, 90–99 (2014).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Haverkamp, T. et al. Diversity and phylogeny of Baltic Sea picocyanobacteria inferred from their ITS and phycobiliprotein operons. Environ. Microbiol. 10, 174–188 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Otero-Ferrer, J. L. et al. Factors controlling the community structure of picoplankton in contrasting marine environments. Biogeosciences 15, 6199–6220 (2018).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ploug, H. et al. Carbon, nitrogen and O2 fluxes associated with the cyanobacterium Nodularia spumigena in the Baltic Sea. ISME J. 5, 1549–1558 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ohlendieck, U., Stuhr, A. & Siegmund, H. Nitrogen fixation by diazotrophic cyanobacteria in the Baltic Sea and transfer of the newly fixed nitrogen to picoplankton organisms. J. Mar. Syst. 25, 213–219 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Klawonn, I. et al. Untangling hidden nutrient dynamics: Rapid ammonium cycling and single-cell ammonium assimilation in marine plankton communities. ISME J. 13, 1960–1974 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lin, Y., Wang, L., Xu, K., Huang, H. & Ren, H. Algae biofilm reduces microbe-derived dissolved organic nitrogen discharges: Performance and mechanisms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 6227–6238 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Berthelot, H., Bonnet, S., Camps, M., Grosso, O. & Moutin, T. Assessment of the dinitrogen released as ammonium and dissolved organic nitrogen by unicellular and filamentous marine diazotrophic cyanobacteria grown in culture. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2015.00080 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Loick-Wilde, N. et al. De novo amino acid synthesis and turnover during N2 fixation. Limnol. Ocean. 63, 1076–1092 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Glibert, P. M. & Bronk, D. A. Release of dissolved organic nitrogen by marine diazotrophic cyanobacteria Trichodesmium spp.. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60, 3996–4000 (1994).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kuo, J. et al. Picoplankton dynamics and picoeukaryote diversity in a hyper-eutrophic subtropical lagoon. J. Environ. Sci. Heal. 4, 521–523 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Grébert, T. et al. Light color acclimation is a key process in the global ocean distribution of Synechococcus cyanobacteria. PNAS 115, E2010–E2019 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Urbach, E., Scanlan, D., Distel, D., Waterbury, J. & Chisholm, S. Rapid diversification of marine picophytoplankton with dissimilar light-harvesting structures inferred from sequences of Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus (cyanobacteria). J. Mol. Biol. 46, 188–201 (1998).ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Farrant, G. K. et al. Delineating ecologically significant taxonomic units from global patterns of marine picocyanobacteria. PNAS 113, E3365–E3374 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rocap, G., Distel, D. L., Waterbury, J. B. & Chisholm, S. W. Resolution of Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus ecotypes by using 16S–23S ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer sequences. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68, 1180–1191 (2002).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mazard, S., Ostrowski, M., Partensky, F. & Scanlan, D. J. Multi-locus sequence analysis, taxonomic resolution and biogeography of marine Synechococcus. Environ. Microbiol. 14, 372–386 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Huang, S. et al. Novel lineages of Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus in the global oceans. ISME J. 6, 285–297 (2011).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Choi, D. H. & Noh, J. H. Phylogenetic diversity of Synechococcus strains isolated from the East China Sea and the East Sea. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 69, 439–448 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lee, M. D. et al. Marine Synechococcus isolates representing globally abundant genomic lineages demonstrate a unique evolutionary path of genome reduction without a decrease in GC content. Environ. Microbiol. 21, 1677–1686 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Paerl, R., Foster, R., Jenkins, B., Montoya, J. & Zehr, J. Phylogenetic diversity of cyanobacterial narB genes from various marine habitats. Environ. Microbiol. 10, 3377–3387 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fuller, N. et al. Clade-specific 16S ribosomal DNA oligonucleotides reveal the predominance of a single marine Synechococcus clade throughout a stratified water column in the Red sea. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 2430–2443 (2003).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Scanlan, D. J. et al. Ecological genomics of marine Picocyanobacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 73, 249–299 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mazard, S., Wilson, W. H. & Scanlan, D. J. Dissecting the physiological response to phosphorus stress in marine Synechococcus isolates (cyanophyceae). J. Phycol. 48, 94–105 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, J. et al. Synechococcus bloom in the Pearl River Estuary and adjacent coastal area –With special focus on flooding during wet seasons. Sci. Total Environ. 692, 769–783 (2019).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zwirglmaier, K. et al. Global phylogeography of marine Synechococcus and Prochlorococcus reveals a distinct partitioning of lineages among oceanic biomes. Environ. Microbiol. 10, 147–161 (2008).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sohm, J. A. et al. Co-occurring Synechococcus ecotypes occupy four major oceanic regimes defined by temperature, macronutrients and iron. ISME J. 10, 333–345 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bunse, C. et al. High frequency multi-year variability in Baltic Sea microbial plankton stocks and activities. Front. Microbiol. 10, 1–18 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Alegria Zufia, J., Farnelid, H. & Legrand, C. Seasonality of coastal picophytoplankton growth, nutrient limitation and biomass contribution. Front. Microbiol. 12, 1–13 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Granéli, E., Wallström, K., Larsson, U., Granéli, W. & Elmgren, R. Nutrient limitation of primary production in the Baltic Sea Area. Ambio 19, 142–151 (1990).
Google Scholar 
Mazur-Marzec, H. et al. Occurrence of cyanobacteria and cyanotoxin in the Southern Baltic Proper. Filamentous cyanobacteria versus single-celled picocyanobacteria. Hydrobiologia 701, 235–252 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Stal, L. et al. BASIC: Baltic Sea cyanobacteria. An investigation of the structure and dynamics of water blooms of cyanobacteria in the Baltic Sea—Responses to a changing environment. Cont. Shelf Res. 23, 1695–1714 (2003).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Herlemann, D. P. et al. Transitions in bacterial communities along the 2000 km salinity gradient of the Baltic Sea. ISME J. 5, 1571–1579 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hugerth, L. W. et al. Metagenome-assembled genomes uncover a global brackish microbiome. Genome Biol. 16, 1–18 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Walve, J. & Larsson, U. Seasonal changes in Baltic Sea seston stoichiometry: The influence of diazotrophic cyanobacteria. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 407, 13–25 (2010).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Huber, P. et al. Primer design for an accurate view of picocyanobacterial community structure by using high-throughput sequencing. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 85, 1–17 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jiang, T. et al. Temporal and spatial variations of abundance of phycocyanin- and phycoerythrin-rich Synechococcus in Pearl River Estuary and adjacent coastal area. J. Ocean Univ. China 15, 897–904 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, S. et al. Unexpected predominance of photosynthetic picoeukaryotes in shallow eutrophic lakes. J. Plankton Res. 38, 830–842 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Collos, Y. et al. Oligotrophication and emergence of picocyanobacteria and a toxic dinoflagellate in Thau lagoon, southern France. J. Sea Res. 61, 68–75 (2009).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bec, B., Husseini-Ratrema, J., Collos, Y., Souchu, P. & Vaquer, A. Phytoplankton seasonal dynamics in a Mediterranean coastal lagoon: Emphasis on the picoeukaryote community. J. Plankton Res. 27, 881–894 (2005).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hunter-Cevera, K. R. et al. Physiological and ecological drivers of early spring blooms of coastal phytoplankter. Science 354, 326–329 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Albertano, P., Di Somma, D. & Capucci, E. Cyanobacterial picoplankton from the central Baltic Sea: Cell size classification by image analyzed fluorescence microscopy. J. Plankton Res. 19, 1405–1416 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
Paulsen, M. L. et al. Synechococcus in the Atlantic gateway to the Arctic Ocean. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00191 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Felföldi, T. et al. Diversity and seasonal dynamics of the photoautotrophic picoplankton in Lake Balaton (Hungary). Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 63, 273–287 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Grinienė, E., Šulčius, S. & Kuosa, H. Size-selective microzooplankton grazing on the phytoplankton in the Curonian Lagoon (SE Baltic Sea). Oceanologia 58, 292–301 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tsai, A. Y., Gong, G. C., Huang, Y. W. & Chao, C. F. Estimates of bacterioplankton and Synechococcus spp. mortality from nanoflagellate grazing and viral lysis in the subtropical Danshui River estuary. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 153, 54–61 (2015).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Camacho, A., Miracle, M. R. & Vicente, E. Which factors determine the abundance and distribution of picocyanobacteria in inland waters? A comparison among different types of lakes and ponds. Arch. Hydrobiol. 157(321), 338 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Berry, D. L. et al. Shifts in cyanobacterial strain dominance during the onset of harmful algal blooms in Florida Bay, USA. Microb. Ecol. 70, 361–371 (2015).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zborowsky, S. & Lindell, D. Resistance in marine cyanobacteria differs against specialist and generalist cyanophages. PNAS 116, 16899–16908 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wall, C. C., Rodgers, B. S., Gobler, C. J. & Peterson, B. J. Responses of loggerhead sponges Spechiospongia vesparium during harmful cyanobacterial blooms in a sub-tropical lagoon. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 451, 31–43 (2012).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Glibert, P. M. et al. Pluses and minuses of ammonium and nitrate uptake and assimilation by phytoplankton and implications for productivity and community composition, with emphasis on nitrogen-enriched conditions. Limnol. Oceanogr. 61, 165–197 (2016).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Herbert, R. A. Nitrogen cycling in coastal marine ecosystems. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 23, 563–590 (1999).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cai, J., Hodoki, Y. & Nakano, S. I. Phylogenetic diversity of the picocyanobacterial community from a novel winter bloom in Lake Biwa. Limnology 22, 161–167 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Guyet, U. et al. Synergic effects of temperature and irradiance on the physiology of the marine Synechococcus strain WH7803. Front. Microbiol. 11, 1707 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Meier, H. E. M. et al. Ensemble modeling of the Baltic Sea ecosystem to provide scenarios for management. Ambio 43, 37–48 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Neumann, T. et al. Extremes of temperature, oxygen and blooms in the baltic sea in a changing climate. Ambio 41, 574–585 (2012).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Andersson, A. et al. Projected future climate change and Baltic Sea ecosystem management. Ambio 44, 345–356 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Schmidt, K. et al. Increasing picocyanobacteria success in shelf waters contributes to long-term food web degradation. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 5574–5587 (2020).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Legrand, C. et al. Interannual variability of phyto-bacterioplankton biomass and production in coastal and offshore waters of the Baltic Sea. Ambio 44, 427–438 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Capuzzo, E. et al. A decline in primary production in the North Sea over 25 years, associated with reductions in zooplankton abundance and fish stock recruitment. Glob. Change Biol. 24, e352–e364 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Valderrama, J. C. Methods of nutrient analysis. In Manual on Harmful Marine Microalgae (eds Hallagraeff, G. M. et al.) 251–268 (IOC Manuals and Guides, 1995).
Google Scholar 
Jespersen, A. M. & Christoffersen, K. Measurements of chlorophyll-a from phytoplankton using ethanol as extraction solvent. Arch. Hydrobiol. 109, 445–454 (1987).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Edler, L. Recommendations on methods for marine biological studies in the Baltic Sea. Phytoplankton and chlorophyll (Baltic Marine Biologists BMB (Sweden), 1979).HELCOM Phytoplankton Expert Group. Phytoplankton biovolume and carbon content. https://www.ices.dk/data/Documents/ENV/PEG_BVOL.zip (2013).Mostböck, S. FCSalyzer (2021).Gregory Caporaso, J. et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.303 (2010).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Callahan, B. et al. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Katoh, K., Misawa, K., Kuma, K. I. & Miyata, T. MAFFT: A novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 3059–3066 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C. & Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1547–1549 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Crosbie, N. D., Pöckl, M. & Weisse, T. Rapid establishment of clonal isolates of freshwater autotrophic picoplankton by single-cell and single-colony sorting. J. Microbiol. Methods 55, 361–370 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Silva, C. S. P., Genuário, D. B., Vaz, M. G. M. V. & Fiore, M. F. Phylogeny of culturable cyanobacteria from Brazilian mangroves. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 37, 100–112 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Marsan, D., Wommack, K. E. & Ravel, J. Draft genome sequence of Synechococcus sp. strain CB0101, isolated from the Chesapeake Bay estuary. Genome Announc. 2, e01111 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. R version 3.5.1. https://www.r-project.org/ (2019).Oksanen, J. et al. Package ‘vegan’ (2020).Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2016) (ISBN 978-3-319-24277-4).MATH 
Book 

Google Scholar 
Gu, Z., Eils, R. & Schlesner, M. Complex heatmaps reveal patterns and correlations in multidimensional genomic data. Bioinformatics 32, 2847–2849 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gill, A. E. Atmosphere-Ocean Dynamics (Academic Press, USA, 1982).
Google Scholar 
Li, X., Wang, Y., Li, J. & Lei, B. Physical and socioeconomic driving forces of land-use and land-cover changes: A Case Study of Wuhan City, China. Discret Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2016 (2016).Paliy, O. & Shankar, V. Application of multivariate statistical techniques in microbial ecology. Mol. Ecol. 25, 1032–1057 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.This is a summary of: Lu, N. et al. Biophysical and economic constraints on China’s natural climate solutions. Nat. Clim. Change https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01432-3 (2022). More

Appel, M., Lahn, F., Buytaert, W. & Pebesma, E. Open and scalable analytics of large earth observation datasets: From scenes to multidimensional arrays using SCIDB and GDAL. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 138, 47–56 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Audebert, N., Saux, B. L. & Lefvre, S. Beyond RGB: Very high resolution urban remote sensing with multimodal deep networks. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 140, 20–32 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ball J. E., Anderson D. T., & Chan C. S. Comprehensive survey of deep learning in remote sensing: Theories, tools, and challenges for the community. J. Appl. Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.11.042609 (2017).Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. Vol. 282. 20141657 (2015).Velázquez, E., Paine, C. T., May, F. & Wiegand, T. Linking trait similarity to interspecific spatial associations in a moist tropical forest. J. Veg. Sci. 26, 1068–1079 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ben-Said, M. Spatial point-pattern analysis as a powerful tool in identifying pattern-process relationships in plant ecology: an updated review. Ecol. Process. 10, 1–23 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Watt, A. S. Pattern and process in the plant community. J. Ecol. 35, 1–22 (1947).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pielou, E.C. Mathematical Ecology; Number 574.50151 P613 1977. (Wiley, 1977).Chesson, P. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31, 343–366 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brown, C., Law, R., Illian, J. B. & Burslem, D. F. Linking ecological processes with spatial and non-spatial patterns in plant communities. J. Ecol. 99, 1402–1414 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Detto, M. & Muller-Landau, H. C. Fitting ecological process models to spatial patterns using scalewise variances and moment equations. Am. Nat. 181, E68–E82 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
May, F., Huth, A., & Wiegand, T. Moving beyond abundance distributions: neutral theory and spatial patterns in a tropical forest. Proceedings. Biological sciences 282(1802), 20141657. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.1657 (2015).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kerr, J. T. & Ostrovsky, M. From space to species: Ecological applications for remote sensing. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 299–305 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gillespie, T. W., Foody, G. M., Rocchini, D., Giorgi, A. P. & Saatchi, S. Measuring and modelling biodiversity from space. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 32, 203–221 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
He, J., Zhang, L., Wang, Q. & Li, Z. Using diffusion geometric coordinates for hyperspectral imagery representation. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 6(4), 767–771 (2009).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lechner, A.M., Foody, G.M., & Boyd, D.S. Applications in remote sensing to forest ecology and management. One Earth 2.5, 405–412 (2020).Arévalo, P., Olofsson, P. & Woodcock, C. E. Continuous monitoring of land change activities and post-disturbance dynamics from Landsat time series: A test methodology for REDD+ reporting. Remote Sens. Environ. 238, 111051 (2020).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gillespie, T.W. et al. Measuring and modelling biodiversity from space. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 32.2, 203–221 (2008).Lausch, A., Erasmi, S., King, D. J., Magdon, P. & Heurich, M. Understanding forest health with remote sensing-part II—A review of approaches and data models. Remote Sens. 9(2), 129 (2017).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rouse, J.W., Haas, R.H., Schell, J.A., Deering, D.W., et al. Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. in NASA Special Publication. Vol. 351. 309 (1974).Chen, J. M. & Black, T. Defining leaf area index for non-flat leaves. Plant Cell Environ. 15, 421–429 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zha, Y., Gao, J. & Ni, S. Use of normalized difference built-up index in automatically mapping urban areas from TM imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens. 24, 583–594 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhao, S. et al. Remote detection of bare soil moisture using a surface-temperature-based soil evaporation transfer coefficient. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 12, 351–358 (2010).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Gao, B. C. NDWI—A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space. Remote Sens. Environ. 58, 257–266 (1996).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wan, Z. & Dozier, J. A generalized split-window algorithm for retrieving land-surface temperature from space. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 34, 892–905 (1996).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Xu, H., Wang, Y., Guan, H., Shi, T. & Hu, X. Detecting ecological changes with a remote sensing based ecological index (RSEI) produced time series and change vector analysis. Remote Sensing 11, 2345 (2019).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
List of Top 10 Sources of Free Remote Sensing Data (2017).USGS Earth Explorer: Download Free Landsat Imagery (2021).Blaschke, T. Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote. Sens. 65, 2–16 (2010).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, M., Zang, S., Zhang, B., Li, S. & Wu, C. A review of remote sensing image classification techniques: The role of spatio-contextual information. Eur. J. Remote Sens. 47, 389–411 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gómez-Chova, L., Tuia, D., Moser, G. & Camps-Valls, G. Multimodal classification of remote sensing images: A review and future directions. Proc. IEEE 103, 1560–1584 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Alajlan, N., Bazi, Y., Melgani, F. & Yager, R. R. Fusion of supervised and unsupervised learning for improved classification of hyperspectral images. Inf. Sci. 217, 39–55 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Csillik, O. Fast segmentation and classification of very high resolution remote sensing data using SLIC superpixels. Remote Sens. 9, 243 (2017).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Thanh Noi, P. & Kappas, M. Comparison of random forest, k-nearest neighbor, and support vector machine classifiers for land cover classification using Sentinel-2 imagery. Sensors 18, 18 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jiang, S., Zhao, H., Wu, W., & Tan, Q. A novel framework for remote sensing image scene classification. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. 2018, 42 (2018).Baddeley, A. Spatial Point Process Modelling and Its Applications. Vol. 20. (Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I, 2004).Vasudevan, K., Eckel, S., Fleischer, F., Schmidt, V. & Cook, F. Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns on deep seismic reflection data: A preliminary test. Geophys. J. Int. 171, 823–840 (2007).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cheng, Y. & Luo, J. Statistical analysis of metastable pitting events on carbon steel. Br. Corros. J. 35, 125–130 (2000).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Velázquez, E., Martínez, I., Getzin, S., Moloney, K. A. & Wiegand, T. An evaluation of the state of spatial point pattern analysis in ecology. Ecography 39, 1042–1055 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Clark, P. J. & Evans, F. C. Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35, 445–453 (1954).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stoyan, D., & Penttinen, A. Recent applications of point process methods in forestry statistics. Stat. Sci. 2000, 61–78 (2000).Illian, J., Penttinen, A., Stoyan, H., & Stoyan, D. Statistical Analysis and Modelling of Spatial Point Patterns. Vol. 70. (Wiley, 2008).Brodrick, P. G., Davies, A. B. & Asner, G. P. Uncovering ecological patterns with convolutional neural networks. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 734–745 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, S., Luo, H., Tu, Y., He, Z., & Li, J. Wide contextual residual network with active learning for remote sensing image classification. in IGARSS 2018–2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. 7145–7148 (IEEE, 2018).Lee, H. & Kwon, H. Going deeper with contextual CNN for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 26, 4843–4855 (2017).ADS 
MathSciNet 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cheng, G., Xie, X., Han, J., Guo, L. & Xia, G. S. Remote sensing image scene classification meets deep learning: Challenges, methods, benchmarks, and opportunities. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 13, 3735–3756 (2020).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lewy, D., & Mandziuk, J. An overview of mixing augmentation methods and augmentation strategies. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.09887 (2021).Cubuk, E.D., Zoph, B., Mane, D., Vasudevan, V., & Le, Q.V. Autoaugment: Learning augmentation policies from data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.09501 (2018).Naveed, H. Survey: Image mixing and deleting for data augmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.07085 (2021).Freeman, I., Roese-Koerner, L. & Kummert, A. Effnet: An efficient structure for convolutional neural networks. 25th IEEE international conference on image processing (ICIP). IEEE 2018, 6–10 (2018).
Google Scholar 
LeCun, Y. et al. Backpropagation applied to handwritten zip code recognition. Neural Comput. 1, 541–551 (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
Raeisi, M., Bonneu, F. & Gabriel, E. A spatio-temporal multi-scale model for Geyer saturation point process: Application to forest fire occurrences. Spatial Stat. 41, 100492 (2021).MathSciNet 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Baddeley, A. Analysing spatial point patterns in R. in Workshop Notes Version. Vol. 3 (2008). More

Urban, M. C. Accelerating extinction risk from climate change. Science 348, 571–573 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Brown, S. C., Wigley, T. M. L., Otto-Bliesner, B. L., Rahbek, C. & Fordham, D. A. Persistent Quaternary climate refugia are hospices for biodiversity in the Anthropocene. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 244–248 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
O’Hara, C. C., Frazier, M. & Halpern, B. S. At-risk marine biodiversity faces extensive, expanding, and intensifying human impacts. Science 372, 84–87 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Halpern, B. S. et al. An index to assess the health and benefits of the global ocean. Nature 488, 615–620 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Free, C. M. et al. Impacts of historical warming on marine fisheries production. Science 363, 979–983 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Costello, C. et al. The future of food from the sea. Nature 588, 95–100 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lotze, H. K., Bryndum-Buchholz, A. & Boyce, D. G. in The Impacts of Climate Change: Comprehensive Study of the Physical, Societal and Political Issues (ed. Letcher, T.) 205–231 (Elsevier, 2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822373-4.00017-3Boyce, D. G., Lotze, H. K., Tittensor, D. P., Carozza, D. A. & Worm, B. Future ocean biomass losses may widen socioeconomic equity gaps. Nat. Commun. 11, 2235 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tittensor, D. P. et al. Integrating climate adaptation and biodiversity conservation in the global ocean. Sci. Adv. 5, 2235 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wilson, K. L., Tittensor, D. P., Worm, B. & Lotze, H. K. Incorporating climate change adaptation into marine protected area planning. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 3251–3267 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Barange, M. et al. (eds) Impacts of Climate Change on Fisheries and Aquaculture: Synthesis of Current Knowledge, Adaptation and Mitigation Options FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 627 (FAO, 2018).Hare, J. A. et al. A vulnerability assessment of fish and invertebrates to climate change on the northeast U.S. continental shelf. PLoS ONE 11, 1–654 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Boyce, D. G., Fuller, S., Karbowski, C., Schleit, K. & Worm, B. Leading or lagging: how well are climate change considerations being incorporated into Canadian fisheries management? Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 78, 1120–1129 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
IPCC Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability (eds Field, C. B. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).Pacifici, M. et al. Assessing species vulnerability to climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 215–225 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
de los Ríos, C., Watson, J. E. M. & Butt, N. Persistence of methodological, taxonomical, and geographical bias in assessments of species’ vulnerability to climate change: a review. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 15, e00412 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Foden, W. B. et al. Climate change vulnerability assessment of species. WIREs Clim. Change 10, e551 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Comte, L. & Olden, J. D. Climatic vulnerability of the world’s freshwater and marine fishes. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 718–722 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Albouy, C. et al. Global vulnerability of marine mammals to global warming. 1–12 (2020).Foden, W. B. et al. Identifying the world’s most climate change vulnerable species: a systematic trait-based assessment of all birds, amphibians and corals. PLoS ONE 8, e65427 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kesner-Reyes, K. et al. AquaMaps: algorithm and data sources for aquatic organisms. In FishBase v.04/2012 (eds. Froese, R. & Pauly, D.) www.fishbase.org (2016).Stuart-Smith, R. D., Edgar, G. J., Barrett, N. S., Kininmonth, S. J. & Bates, A. E. Thermal biases and vulnerability to warming in the world’s marine fauna. Nature 528, 88–92 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Trisos, C. H., Merow, C. & Pigot, A. L. The projected timing of abrupt ecological disruption from climate change. Nature 580, 496–501 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cheung, W. W. L., Watson, R., Morato, T., Pitcher, T. J. & Pauly, D. Intrinsic vulnerability in the global fish catch. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 333, 1–12 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
IPCC Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, in the press).IPCC Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability (eds McCarthy, J. J. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2001).The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species v.2021-1 (IUCN, 2021); https://www.iucnredlist.orgTittensor, D. P. et al. Global patterns and predictors of marine biodiversity across taxa. Nature 466, 1098–1101 (2010).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rogers, A. et al. Critical Habitats and Biodiversity: Inventory, Thresholds and Governance. Sci. Rep. 10, 548 (World Resources Institute, 2020).Sala, E. et al. Protecting the global ocean for biodiversity, food and climate. Nature 592, 397–402 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Halpern, B. S. et al. Spatial and temporal changes in cumulative human impacts on the world’s ocean. Nat. Commun. 6, 7615 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pontavice, H., Gascuel, D., Reygondeau, G., Stock, C. & Cheung, W. W. L. Climate‐induced decrease in biomass flow in marine food webs may severely affect predators and ecosystem production. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 2608–2622 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Estes, J. A., Heithaus, M., McCauley, D. J., Rasher, D. B. & Worm, B. Megafaunal impacts on structure and function of ocean ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Environ. Res. 41, 83–116 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jenkins, C. N., Pimm, S. L. & Joppa, L. N. Global patterns of terrestrial vertebrate diversity and conservation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, E2602–E2610 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Moilanen, A., Kujala, H. & Mikkonen, N. A practical method for evaluating spatial biodiversity offset scenarios based on spatial conservation prioritization outputs. Methods Ecol. Evol. 11, 794–803 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ceballos, G. & Ehrlich, P. R. Global mammal distributions, biodiversity hotspots, and conservation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 19374–19379 (2006).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Williams, P. H., Gaston, K. J. & Humphries, C. J. Mapping biodiversity value worldwide: combining higher-taxon richness from different groups. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264, 141–148 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
Blanchard, J. L. et al. Linked sustainability challenges and trade-offs among fisheries, aquaculture and agriculture. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1240–1249 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Robiou Du Pont, Y. et al. Equitable mitigation to achieve the Paris Agreement goals. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 38–43 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Payne, N. L. et al. Fish heating tolerance scales similarly across individual physiology and populations. Commun. Biol. 4, 264 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
First Draft of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (Convention on Biological Diversity, 2021).Keppel, G. et al. Refugia: identifying and understanding safe havens for biodiversity under climate change. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 21, 393–404 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bryndum‐Buchholz, A., Tittensor, D. P. & Lotze, H. K. The status of climate change adaptation in fisheries management: policy, legislation and implementation. Fish Fish. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12586 (2021).Maureaud, A. et al. Are we ready to track climate‐driven shifts in marine species across international boundaries? A global survey of scientific bottom trawl data. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 220–236 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Boyce, D. G. et al. Operationalizing climate risk for fisheries in a global warming hotspot. Preprint at: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.19.500650 (2022).Estes, J. A. et al. Trophic downgrading of planet Earth. Science 333, 301–306 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Olden, J. D., Hogan, Z. S. & Vander Zanden, M. J. Small fish, big fish, red fish, blue fish: size-biased extinction risk of the world’s freshwater and marine fishes. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 16, 694–701 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tittensor, D. P. et al. A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets. Science 346, 241–244 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pinsky, M. L., Eikeset, A. M., McCauley, D. J., Payne, J. L. & Sunday, J. M. Greater vulnerability to warming of marine versus terrestrial ectotherms. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1132-4 (2019).Sunday, J. M., Bates, A. E. & Dulvy, N. K. Thermal tolerance and the global redistribution of animals. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 686–690 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Laidre, K. L. et al. Quantifying the sensitivity of Arctic marine mammals to climate-induced habitat change. Ecol. Appl. 18, S97–S125 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rosset, V. & Oertli, B. Freshwater biodiversity under climate warming pressure: identifying the winners and losers in temperate standing waterbodies. Biol. Conserv. 144, 2311–2319 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Peters, R. L. The greenhouse effect and nature reserves. Biosciences 35, 707–717 (1985).Article 

Google Scholar 
Garcia, R. A. et al. Matching species traits to projected threats and opportunities from climate change. J. Biogeogr. 41, 724–735 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1 (IUCN, 2012).Worm, B. et al. Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science 314, 787–790 (2006).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Worm, B., Lotze, H. K., Hillebrand, H. & Sommer, U. Consumer versus resource control of species diversity and ecosystem functioning. Nature 417, 848–851 (2002).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Worm, B. & Duffy, J. E. Biodiversity, productivity, and stability in real food webs. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 628–632 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Halpern, B. S. et al. A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science 319, 948–952 (2008).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ottersen, G., Hjermann, D. O. & Stenseth, N. C. Changes in spawning stock structure strengthen the link between climate and recruitment in a heavily fished cod (Gadus morhua) stock. Fish. Oceanogr. 15, 230–243 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Le Bris, A. et al. Climate vulnerability and resilience in the most valuable North American fishery. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 1831–1836 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Henson, S. A. et al. Rapid emergence of climate change in environmental drivers of marine ecosystems. Nat. Commun. 8, 14682 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bates, A. E. et al. Climate resilience in marine protected areas and the ‘Protection Paradox’. Biol. Conserv. 236, 305–314 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Xu, C., Kohler, T. A., Lenton, T. M., Svenning, J.-C. & Scheffer, M. Future of the human climate niche. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 11350–11355 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Davies, T. E., Maxwell, S. M., Kaschner, K., Garilao, C. & Ban, N. C. Large marine protected areas represent biodiversity now and under climate change. Sci. Rep. 7, 9569 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
MacKenzie, B. R. et al. A cascade of warming impacts brings bluefin tuna to Greenland waters. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 2484–2491 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shackell, N. L., Ricard, D. & Stortini, C. Thermal habitat index of many Northwest Atlantic temperate species stays neutral under warming projected for 2030 but changes radically by 2060. PLoS ONE 9 (2014).Boyce, D. G., Frank, K. T., Worm, B. & Leggett, W. C. Spatial patterns and predictors of trophic control across marine ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 18, 1001–1011 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Boyce, D. G., Frank, K. T. & Leggett, W. C. From mice to elephants: overturning the ‘one size fits all’ paradigm in marine plankton food chains. Ecol. Lett. 18, 504–515 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Frank, K. T., Petrie, B., Shackell, N. L. & Choi, J. S. Reconciling differences in trophic control in mid-latitude marine ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 9, 1096–1105 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Frank, K. T., Petrie, B. & Shackell, N. L. The ups and downs of trophic control in continental shelf ecosystems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 236–242 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Loarie, S. R. et al. The velocity of climate change. Nature 462, 1052–1056 (2009).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Burrows, M. T. et al. The pace of shifting climate in marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Science 334, 652–655 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mora, C. et al. The projected timing of climate departure from recent variability. Nature 502, 183–187 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Poloczanska, E. S. et al. Responses of marine organisms to climate change across oceans. Front. Mar. Sci. 3, 62 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Boyce, D. G., Lewis, M. L. & Worm, B. Global phytoplankton decline over the past century. Nature 466, 591–596 (2010).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Burek, K. A., Gulland, F. M. D. & O’Hara, T. M. Effects of climate change on Arctic marine mammal health. Ecol. Appl. 18, S126–S134 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Staude, I. R., Navarro, L. M. & Pereira, H. M. Range size predicts the risk of local extinction from habitat loss. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 16–25 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Moore, S. E. & Huntington, H. P. Arctic marine mammals and climate change: impacts and resilience. Ecol. Appl. 18, S157–S165 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kaschner, K., Watson, R., Trites, A. & Pauly, D. Mapping world-wide distributions of marine mammal species using a relative environmental suitability (RES) model. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 316, 285–310 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gonzalez-Suarez, M., Gomez, A. & Revilla, E. Which intrinsic traits predict vulnerability to extinction depends on the actual threatening processes. Ecosphere 4, 6 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rogan, J. E. & Lacher, T. E. in Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences (Elsevier, 2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.10913-3Warren, M. S. et al. Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change. Nature 414, 65–69 (2001).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chessman, B. C. Identifying species at risk from climate change: traits predict the drought vulnerability of freshwater fishes. Biol. Conserv. 160, 40–49 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Davidson, A. D. D. et al. Drivers and hotspots of extinction risk in marine mammals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 3395–3400 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cheung, W. W. L., Pauly, D. & Sarmiento, J. L. How to make progress in projecting climate change impacts. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 70, 1069–1074 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fenchel, T. Intrinsic rate of natural increase: the relationship with body size. Oecologia 14, 317–326 (1974).Article 

Google Scholar 
Healy, K. et al. Ecology and mode-of-life explain lifespan variation in birds and mammals. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20140298 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Carilli, J., Donner, S. D. & Hartmann, A. C. Historical temperature variability affects coral response to heat stress. PLoS ONE 7, e34418 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Guest, J. R. et al. Contrasting patterns of coral bleaching susceptibility in 2010 suggest an adaptive response to thermal stress. PLoS ONE 7, e33353 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Donner, S. D. & Carilli, J. Resilience of Central Pacific reefs subject to frequent heat stress and human disturbance. Sci. Rep. 9, 3484 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Rehm, E. M., Olivas, P., Stroud, J. & Feeley, K. J. Losing your edge: climate change and the conservation value of range‐edge populations. Ecol. Evol. 5, 4315–4326 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ready, J. et al. Predicting the distributions of marine organisms at the global scale. Ecol. Modell. 221, 467–478 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jones, M. C., Dye, S. R., Pinnegar, J. K., Warren, R. & Cheung, W. W. L. Modelling commercial fish distributions: prediction and assessment using different approaches. Ecol. Modell. 225, 133–145 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Froese, R. & Pauly, D. FishBase v.02/2022 www.fishbase.org (2022).Palomares, M. L. D. & Pauly, D. SeaLifeBase v.11/2014 www.sealifebase.org (2022).van Buuren, S. Flexible Imputation of Missing Data (Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2012).Dahlke, F. T., Wohlrab, S., Butzin, M. & Portner, H.-O. Thermal bottlenecks in the life cycle define climate vulnerability of fish. Science 369, 65–70 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Stortini, C. H., Shackell, N. L., Tyedmers, P. & Beazley, K. Assessing marine species vulnerability to projected warming on the Scotian Shelf, Canada. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 72, 1713–1743 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Reynolds, R. W. et al. Daily high-resolution-blended analyses for sea surface temperature. J. Clim. 20, 5473–5496 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Meinshausen, M. et al. The shared socio-economic pathway (SSP) greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions to 2500. Geosci. Model Dev. 13, 3571–3605 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Samhouri, J. F. et al. Sea sick? Setting targets to assess ocean health and ecosystem services. Ecosphere 3, art41 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rao, T. R. A curve for all reasons. Resonance 5, 85–90 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mora, C. et al. Biotic and human vulnerability to projected changes in ocean biogeochemistry over the 21st century. PLoS Biol. 11, 10 (2013).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lotze, H. K. et al. Ensemble projections of global ocean animal biomass with climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1900194116 (2019).Eyring, V. et al. Taking climate model evaluation to the next level. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 102–110 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Oppenheimer, M., Little, C. M. & Cooke, R. M. Expert judgement and uncertainty quantification for climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 445–451 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Budescu, D. V., Por, H. H. & Broomell, S. B. Effective communication of uncertainty in the IPCC reports. Climatic Change 113, 181–200 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Swart, R., Bernstein, L., Ha-Duong, M. & Petersen, A. Agreeing to disagree: uncertainty management in assessing climate change, impacts and responses by the IPCC. Climatic Change 92, 1–29 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
NAFO Annual Fisheries Statistics Database (NAFO, 2021).Horton, T. et al. World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) https://www.marinespecies.org (2020).Total Wealth per Capita, 1995 to 2014 (World Bank, 2022); https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/total-wealth-per-capitaDepth of the Food Deficit in Kilocalories per Person per Day, 1992 to 2016 (World Bank, 2022); https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/depth-of-the-food-deficitBoyce, D. G. et al. A climate risk index for marine life. Dryad https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.7wm37pvwr (2022).R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing Version 4.0.4 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021). More

The Insect Pollinators Initiative & Vanbergen, A. J. Threats to an ecosystem service: Pressures on pollinators. Front. Ecol. Environ. 11, 251–259 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Powney, G. D. et al. Widespread losses of pollinating insects in Britain. Nat. Commun. 10, 1018. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08974-9 (2019).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Woodcock, B. A. et al. Impacts of neonicotinoid use on long-term population changes in wild bees in England. Nat. Commun. 7, 12459. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12459 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Potts, S. G. et al. Global pollinator declines: Trends, impacts and drivers. TREE 25, 345–353 (2010).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Becher, M. A., Osborne, J. L., Thorbek, P., Kennedy, P. J. & Grimm, V. REVIEW: Towards a systems approach for understanding honeybee decline: A stocktaking and synthesis of existing models. J. Appl. Ecol. 50, 868–880 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Becher, M. A. et al. BEEHAVE: A systems model of honeybee colony dynamics and foraging to explore multifactorial causes of colony failure. J. Appl. Ecol. 51, 470–482 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Carvell, C. et al. Bumblebee family lineage survival is enhanced in high-quality landscapes. Nature 543, 547–549. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21709 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Alaux, C., Ducloz, F., Crauser, D. & Le Conte, Y. Diet effects on honeybee immunocompetence. Biol. Lett. 6, 562–565 (2010).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dolezal, A. G. et al. Interacting stressors matter: Diet quality and virus infection in honeybee health. R. Soc. Open Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181803 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Conti, I. et al. Sugar and protein content in different monofloral pollens – Building a database. Bull. Insectol. 69, 318–320 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Rodney, S. & Kramer, V. J. Probabilistic assessment of nectar requirements for nectar-foraging honey bees. Apidologie 51, 180–200 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cartar, R. V. Colony energy-reuirements affect response to predation risk in foraging bumble bees. Ethology 87, 90–96 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cook, S. M., Awmack, C. S., Murray, D. A. & Williams, I. H. Are honey bees’ foraging preferences affected by pollen amino acid composition?. Ecol. Entomol. 28, 622–627 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Baude, M. et al. Historical nectar assessment reveals the fall and rise of floral resources in Britain. Nature 530, 85–88. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16532 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Di Pasquale, G. et al. Influence of pollen nutrition on honey bee health: Do Pollen quality and diversity matter?. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072016 (2013).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Sanchez-Bayo, F. et al. Are bee diseases linked to pesticides?—A brief review. Environ. Int. 89–90, 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.01.009 (2016).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Park, M. G., Blitzer, E. J., Gibbs, J., Losey, J. E. & Danforth, B. N. Negative effects of pesticides on wild bee communities can be buffered by landscape context. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 282, 20150299. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.0299 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Woodcock, B. A. et al. Country-specific effects of neonicotinoid pesticides on honeybees and wild bees. Science 356, 1393–1395. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1190 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
PPDB. The pesticide properties DataBase (PPDB) (Agriculture & Environment Research Unit (AERU), University of Hertfordshire, 2013).Belden, J. B. The acute toxicity of pesticide mixtures to honeybees. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4595 (2022).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Battisti, L. et al. Is glyphosate toxic to bees? A meta-analytical review. Sci. Tot. Environ. 767, 145397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145397 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Siviter, H. et al. Agrochemicals interact synergistically to increase bee mortality. Nature 596, 389–392. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03787-7 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Robinson, R. A. & Sutherland, W. J. Post-war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great Britain. J. Appl. Ecol. 39, 157–176 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Carvell, C. et al. Declines in forage availability for bumblebees at a national scale. Biol. Conserv. 132, 481–489 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Carmona, C. P. et al. Agriculture intensification reduces plant taxonomic and functional diversity across European arable systems. Funct. Ecol. 34, 1448–1460 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Storkey, J. & Westbury, D. B. Managing arable weeds for biodiversity. Pest Manag. Sci. 63, 517–523 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hutchinson, L. A. et al. Using ecological and field survey data to establish a national list of the wild bee pollinators of crops. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 315, 107447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107447 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Requier, F., Odoux, J. F., Henry, M. & Bretagnolle, V. The carry-over effects of pollen shortage decrease the survival of honeybee colonies in farmlands. J. Appl. Ecol. 54, 1161–1170 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Alburaki, M., Gregorc, A., Adamczyk, J. & Stewart, S. D. Insights on pollen diversity of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies Located in various agricultural landscapes. Southwest. Nat. 63, 49–58 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Donkersley, P., Rhodes, G., Pickup, R. W., Jones, K. C. & Wilson, K. Honeybee nutrition is linked to landscape composition. Ecol. Evol. 4, 4195–4206 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cole, L. J., Brocklehurst, S., Robertson, D., Harrison, W. & McCracken, D. I. Exploring the interactions between resource availability and the utilisation of semi-natural habitats by insect pollinators in an intensive agricultural landscape. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 246, 157–167 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Steffan-Dewenter, I. & Kuhn, A. Honeybee foraging in differentially structured landscapes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 270, 569–575 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Woodcock, B. A. et al. Enhancing floral resources for pollinators in productive agricultural grasslands. Biol. Conserv. 171, 44–51 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Requier, F. et al. Honey bee diet in intensive farmland habitats reveals an unexpectedly high flower richness and a major role of weeds. Ecol. App. 25, 881–890 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ausseil, A. G. E., Dymond, J. R. & Newstrom, L. Mapping floral resources for honey bees in New Zealand at the catchment scale. Ecol. Appl. 28, 1182–1196. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1717 (2018).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kamo, T. et al. A DNA barcoding method for identifying and quantifying the composition of pollen species collected by European honeybees, Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 53, 353–361 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nurnberger, F., Keller, A., Hartel, S. & Steffan-Dewenter, I. Honey bee waggle dance communication increases diversity of pollen diets in intensively managed agricultural landscapes. Mol. Ecol. 28, 3602–3611 (2019).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Richardson, R. T. et al. Applications of ITS2 metabarcoding to determine the provenance of pollen collected by honey bees in an agroecosystem. Appl. Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3732/apps.1400066 (2015).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Oliver, A. E. et al. Integration of DNA extraction, metabarcoding and an informatics pipeline to underpin a national citizen science honey monitoring scheme. MethodsX 8, 101303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101303 (2021).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Jones, L. et al. Shifts in honeybee foraging reveal historical changes in floral resources. Commun. Biol. 4, 37. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01562-4 (2021).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Barroso-Arevalo, S., Vicente-Rubiano, M., Ruiz, J. A., Bentabol, A. & Sanchez-Vizcaino, J. M. Does pollen diversity influence honey bee colony health?. Sp. J. Agric. Res. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2019173-13991 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bansch, S., Tscharntke, T., Ratnieks, F. L. W., Hartel, S. & Westphal, C. Foraging of honey bees in agricultural landscapes with changing patterns of flower resources. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.106792 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Danner, N., Molitor, A. M., Schiele, S., Hartel, S. & Steffan-Dewenter, I. Season and landscape composition affect pollen foraging distances and habitat use of honey bees. Ecol. Appl. 26, 1920–1929 (2016).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
EFSA. EFSA Guidance Document on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees (Apis mellifera, Bombus spp. and solitary bees). EFSA J. 11, 3295 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Hatjina, F. et al. Citizen scientist initiative for measuring varroa damage thresholds: Common efforts for data collection—CSI varroa. Bee World 98, 132–135 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gratzer, K. & Brodschneider, R. How and why beekeepers participate in the INSIGNIA citizen science honey bee environmental monitoring project. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28, 37995–38006 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brodschneider, R. et al. CSI pollen: Diversity of honey bee collected pollen studied by citizen scientists. Insects 12, 987. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12110987 (2021).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Brodschneider, R. et al. A citizen science supported study on seasonal diversity and monoflorality of pollen collected by honey bees in Austria. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53016-5 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Taberlet, P., Coissac, E., Hajibabaei, M. & Rieseberg, L. H. Environmental DNA. Mol. Ecol. 21, 1789–1793 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Deiner, K. et al. Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities. Mol. Ecol. 26, 5872–5895. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14350 (2017).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Nagaharu, U. Genome analysis in brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. Napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Jpn. J. Bot. 7, 389–452 (1935).
Google Scholar 
Herbertsson, L., Lindstrom, S. A. M., Rundlof, M., Bornmarco, R. & Smith, H. G. Competition between managed honeybees and wild bumblebees depends on landscape context. Basic Appl. Ecol. 17, 609–616 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Magrach, A., Gonzalez-Varo, J. P., Boiffier, M., Vila, M. & Bartomeus, I. Honeybee spillover reshuffles pollinator diets and affects plant reproductive success. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1299–1307 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Adams-Groom, B., Martin, P. & Banon, A. Pollen characterization of English honey from Worcestershire, West Midlands (UK). Bee World https://doi.org/10.1080/0005772X.2019.1698105 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Smart, M. D. et al. A comparison of honey bee-collected pollen from working agricultural lands using light microscopy and ITS metabarcoding. Environ. Entomol. 46, 38–49 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Danner, N., Keller, A., Hartel, S. & Steffan-Dewenter, I. Honey bee foraging ecology: Season but not landscape diversity shapes the amount and diversity of collected pollen. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183716 (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Piroux, M. et al. Correlating the pollens gathered by Apis mellifera with the landscape features in Western France. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 12, 423–439 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Di Pasquale, G. et al. Variations in the availability of pollen resources affect honey bee health. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162818 (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Donkersley, P. et al. Nutritional composition of honey bee food stores vary with floral composition. Oecologia 185, 749–761 (2017).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Shaw, R. F. et al. Mass-flowering crops have a greater impact than semi-natural habitat on crop pollinators and pollen deposition. Landsc. Ecol. 35, 513–527 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
LoCascio, G. M., Aguirre, L., Irwin, R. E. & Adler, L. S. Pollen from multiple sunflower cultivars and species reduces a common bumblebee gut pathogen. R. Soc. Open Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190279 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Egan, P. A. et al. Plant toxin levels in nectar vary spatially across native and introduced populations. J. Ecol. 104, 1106–1115 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Flombaum, P., Sala, O. E. & Rastetter, E. B. Interactions among resource partitioning, sampling effect, and facilitation on the biodiversity effect: A modeling approach. Oecologia 174, 559–566 (2014).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cullen, M. G., Thompson, L. J., Carolan, J. C., Stout, J. C. & Stanley, D. A. Fungicides, herbicides and bees: A systematic review of existing research and methods. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225743 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Siviter, H. et al. Agrochemicals interact synergistically to increase bee mortality. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03787-7 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Haber, A. I., Steinhauer, N. A. & van Engelsdorp, D. Use of chemical and nonchemical methods for the control of Varroa destructor (Acari: Varroidae) and associated winter colony losses in U.S. beekeeping operations. J. Econ. Entomol. 112, 1509–1525 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Martin, S. J. et al. Global honey bee viral landscape altered by a parasitic mite. Science 336, 1304. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1220941 (2012).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Jarvis, S. G. et al. CEH land cover plus: Pesticides 2012-2017 (England, Scotland and Wales). NERC Environmental Information Data Centre. https://doi.org/10.5285/99a2d3a8-1c7d-421e-ac9f-87a2c37bda62 (2020).Simon-Delso, N. et al. Honeybee colony disorder in crop areas: The role of pesticides and viruses. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103073 (2014).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Greenleaf, S. G., Williams, N. M., Winfree, R. & Kremen, C. Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size. Oecologia 153, 589–596 (2007).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
FERA. PUS STAT: Pesticide usage surveys. https://secure.fera.defra.gov.uk/pusstats/myindex.cfm (2015).McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. phyloseq: An R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE 8, e61217. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061217 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
UKCEH. Land cover plus: Crops © NERC (CEH) 2019. (Remote Sensing Applications Consultants Ltd., 2019).Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N. & Elphick, C. S. A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1, 3–14 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kovach, J., Petzoldt, C., Degni, J. & Tette, J. A method to measure the environmental impact of pesticides, Vol. 139 1–8 (New York Food and Life Sciences Bulletin, 1992).Juraske, R., Antón, A. & Castells, F. Estimating half-lives of pesticides in/on vegetation for use in multimedia fate and exposure models. Chemosphere 70, 1748–1755 (2008).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Thompson, H. M., Fryday, S. L., Harkin, S. & Milner, S. Potential impacts of synergism in honeybees (Apis mellifera) of exposure to neonicotinoids and sprayed fungicides in crops. Apidologie 45, 545–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-014-0273-6 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Biddinger, D. J. et al. Comparative toxicities and synergism of apple orchard pesticides to Apis mellifera (L.) and Osmia cornifrons (Radoszkowski). PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072587 (2013).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ridley, L. et al. Pesticide usage survey report 295. Arable crops in the United Kingdom 2020 (Food & Environment Research Agency, 2020).Dormann, C. F., Gruber, B. & Fründ, J. Introducing the bipartite package: analysing ecological networks. R News 8, 8–11 (2008).
Google Scholar 
R Core Development Team. R: Version 3.6.3. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Bristol, UK. http://cran.r-project.org (2021).Pinheiro, J. C., Bates, D. & DebRoy, S. The R core team nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R Package nlme Version 3, 1–83 (2007).
Google Scholar  More

Cardinale, B. J. et al. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486, 59–67 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hooper, D. U. et al. A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change. Nature 486, 105–108 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Potts, S. G. et al. Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 345–353 (2010).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kennedy, C. M. et al. A global quantitative synthesis of local and landscape effects on wild bee pollinators in agroecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 16, 584–599 (2013).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cameron, S. A. et al. Patterns of widespread decline in North American bumble bees. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 662–667 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Xu, S. et al. Species richness promotes ecosystem carbon storage: evidence from biodiversity-ecosystem functioning experiments. Proc. Biol. Sci. 287, 20202063 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Jochum, M. et al. The results of biodiversity–ecosystem functioning experiments are realistic. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1485–1494 (2020).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Isbell, F. et al. High plant diversity is needed to maintain ecosystem services. Nature 477, 199–202 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Barnes, A. D. et al. Species richness and biomass explain spatial turnover in ecosystem functioning across tropical and temperate ecosystems. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 371, 20150279 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Manning, P. & Cutler, G. C. Ecosystem functioning is more strongly impaired by reducing dung beetle abundance than by reducing species richness. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 264, 9–14 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
van der Plas, F. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in naturally assembled communities. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 94, 1220–1245 (2019).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Blüthgen, N. & Klein, A.-M. Functional complementarity and specialisation: the role of biodiversity in plant–pollinator interactions. Basic Appl. Ecol. 12, 282–291 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Loreau, M. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: a mechanistic model. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 5632–5636 (1998).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Loreau, M. et al. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science 294, 804–808 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tilman, D. The ecological consequences of changes in biodiversity: a search for general principles. Ecology 80, 1455–1474 (1999).
Google Scholar 
Duffy, J. E., Godwin, C. M. & Cardinale, B. J. Biodiversity effects in the wild are common and as strong as key drivers of productivity. Nature 549, 261–264 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gonzalez, A. et al. Scaling-up biodiversity-ecosystem functioning research. Ecol. Lett. 23, 757–776 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Garibaldi, L. A. et al. Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance. Science 340, 1608–1611 (2013).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Greenop, A., Woodcock, B. A., Wilby, A., Cook, S. M. & Pywell, R. F. Functional diversity positively affects prey suppression by invertebrate predators: a meta-analysis. Ecology 99, 1771–1782 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
McGill, B. J. et al. Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework. Ecol. Lett. 10, 995–1015 (2007).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Genung, M. A. et al. The relative importance of pollinator abundance and species richness for the temporal variance of pollination services. Ecology 98, 1807–1816 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Winfree, R., Fox, J. W., Williams, N. M., Reilly, J. R. & Cariveau, D. P. Abundance of common species, not species richness, drives delivery of a real-world ecosystem service. Ecol. Lett. 18, 626–635 (2015).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kleijn, D. et al. Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation. Nat. Commun. 6, 7414 (2015).Smith, M. D. & Knapp, A. K. Dominant species maintain ecosystem function with non-random species loss. Ecol. Lett. 6, 509–517 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lohbeck, M., Bongers, F., Martinez-Ramos, M. & Poorter, L. The importance of biodiversity and dominance for multiple ecosystem functions in a human-modified tropical landscape. Ecology 97, 2772–2779 (2016).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Balvanera, P., Kremen, C. & Martínez-Ramos, M. Applying community structure analysis to ecosystem function: examples from pollination and carbon storage. Ecol. Appl. 15, 360–375 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Maureaud, A. et al. Biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationships in fish communities: biomass is related to evenness and the environment, not to species richness. Proc. Biol. Sci. 286, 20191189 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Genung, M. A., Fox, J. & Winfree, R. Species loss drives ecosystem function in experiments, but in nature the importance of species loss depends on dominance. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 1531–1541 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Potts, S. G., Vulliamy, B., Dafni, A., Ne’eman, G. & Willmer, P. Linking bees and flowers: how do floral communities structure pollinator communities? Ecology 84, 2628–2642 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tilman, D., Isbell, F. & Cowles, J. M. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 45, 471–493 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Craven, D. et al. A cross-scale assessment of productivity–diversity relationships. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 1940–1955 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Thompson, P. L., Isbell, F., Loreau, M., O’Connor, M. I. & Gonzalez, A. The strength of the biodiversity–ecosystem function relationship depends on spatial scale. Proc. Biol. Sci. 285, 20180038 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Qiu, J. & Cardinale, B. J. Scaling up biodiversity–ecosystem function relationships across space and over time. Ecology 101, e03166 (2020).Winfree, R. et al. Species turnover promotes the importance of bee diversity for crop pollination at regional scales. Science 359, 791–793 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Albrecht, J. et al. Species richness is more important for ecosystem functioning than species turnover along an elevational gradient. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1582–1593 (2021).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yachi, S. & Loreau, M. Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 1463–1468 (1999).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Shanafelt, D. W. et al. Biodiversity, productivity, and the spatial insurance hypothesis revisited. J. Theor. Biol. 380, 426–435 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Naeem, S. & Li, S. Biodiversity enhances ecosystem reliability. Nature 390, 507–509 (1997).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tilman, D. Biodiversity: population versus ecosystem stability. Ecology 77, 350–363 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
Herrera, C. M. Variation in mutualisms: the spatiotemporal mosaic of a pollinator assemblage. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 35, 95–125 (1988).Article 

Google Scholar 
McCormack, M. L., Adams, T. S., Smithwick, E. A. H. & Eissenstat, D. M. Variability in root production, phenology, and turnover rate among 12 temperate tree species. Ecology 95, 2224–2235 (2014).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wright, K. W., Vanderbilt, K. L., Inouye, D. W., Bertelsen, C. D. & Crimmins, T. M. Turnover and reliability of flower communities in extreme environments: insights from long-term phenology data sets. J. Arid Environ. 115, 27–34 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tylianakis, J. M. et al. Resource heterogeneity moderates the biodiversity-function relationship in real world ecosystems. PLoS Biol. 6, e122 (2008).PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kremen, C. Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology? Ecol. Lett. 8, 468–479 (2005).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Iserbyt, S. & Rasmont, P. The effect of climatic variation on abundance and diversity of bumblebees: a ten years survey in a mountain hotspot. Ann. Soc. Entomol. Fr. 48, 261–273 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Houlahan, J. E. et al. Compensatory dynamics are rare in natural ecological communities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 3273–3277 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ernest, S. K. M. & Brown, J. H. Homeostasis and compensation: the role of species and resources in ecosystem stability. Ecology 82, 2118–2132 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kremen, C., Williams, N. M. & Thorp, R. W. Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 16812–16816 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Allan, E. et al. More diverse plant communities have higher functioning over time due to turnover in complementary dominant species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 17034–17039 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tilman, D., Reich, P. B. & Knops, J. M. H. Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade-long grassland experiment. Nature 441, 629–632 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Awasthi, A., Singh, M., Soni, S. K., Singh, R. & Kalra, A. Biodiversity acts as insurance of productivity of bacterial communities under abiotic perturbations. ISME J. 8, 2445–2452 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tuck, S. L. et al. The value of biodiversity for the functioning of tropical forests: Insurance effects during the first decade of the Sabah biodiversity experiment. Proc. Biol. Sci. 283, 20161451 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Isbell, F. et al. Quantifying effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning across times and places. Ecol. Lett. 21, 763–778 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Reich, P. B. et al. Impacts of biodiversity loss escalate through time as redundancy fades. Science 336, 589–592 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Perry, C. J., Søvik, E., Myerscough, M. R. & Barron, A. B. Rapid behavioral maturation accelerates failure of stressed honey bee colonies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 3427–3432 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Benjamin, F. E. & Winfree, R. Lack of pollinators limits fruit production in commercial blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum). Environ. Entomol. 43, 1574–1583 (2014).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Isaacs, R. & Kirk, A. K. Pollination services provided to small and large highbush blueberry fields by wild and managed bees. J. Appl. Ecol. 47, 841–849 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, Y., Chen, H. Y. H. & Reich, P. B. Forest productivity increases with evenness, species richness and trait variation: a global meta-analysis. J. Ecol. 100, 742–749 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Baumgärtner, S. The insurance value of biodiversity in the provision of ecosystem services. Nat. Resour. Model. 20, 87–127 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Manning, P. et al. in Advances in Ecological Research (eds Eisenhauer, N., Bohan, D. A. & Dumbrell, A. J.) 323–356 (Academic Press, 2019).Naeem, S. Species redundancy and ecosystem reliability. Conserv. Biol. 12, 39–45 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
CaraDonna, P. J. et al. Interaction rewiring and the rapid turnover of plant–pollinator networks. Ecol. Lett. 20, 385–394 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gonzalez, A. & Loreau, M. The causes and consequences of compensatory dynamics in ecological communities. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40, 393–414 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, D., Chang, P.-H. S., Power, S. A., Bell, J. N. B. & Manning, P. Changes in plant species abundance alter the multifunctionality and functional space of heathland ecosystems. New Phytol. 232, 1238–1249 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Buschke, F. T., Hagan, J. G., Santini, L. & Coetzee, B. W. T. Random population fluctuations bias the Living Planet Index. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1145–1152 (2021).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Almond, R. E. A., Grooten, M. & Peterson, T. Living Planet Report 2020: Bending the Curve of Biodiversity Loss (World Wildlife Fund, 2020).Collen, B. et al. Monitoring change in vertebrate abundance: the Living Planet Index. Conserv. Biol. 23, 317–327 (2009).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wagner, D. L. Insect declines in the Anthropocene. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 65, 457–480 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Stanghellini, M. S., Ambrose, J. T. & Schultheis, J. R. The effects of honey bee and bumble bee pollination on fruit set and abortion of cucumber and watermelon. Am. Bee. J. 137, 386–391 (1997).
Google Scholar 
Winfree, R., Williams, N. M., Dushoff, J. & Kremen, C. Native bees provide insurance against ongoing honey bee losses. Ecol. Lett. 10, 1105–1113 (2007).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tamburini, G., Bommarco, R., Kleijn, D., van der Putten, W. H. & Marini, L. Pollination contribution to crop yield is often context-dependent: a review of experimental evidence. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 280, 16–23 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stanghellini, M. S., Ambrose, J. T. & Schultheis, J. R. Seed production in watermelon: a comparison between two commercially available pollinators. HortScience 33, 28–30 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Reilly, J. R. et al. Crop production in the USA is frequently limited by a lack of pollinators. Proc. Biol. Sci. 287, 20200922 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Greenleaf, S. S. & Kremen, C. Wild bees enhance honey bees’ pollination of hybrid sunflower. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 13890–13895 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sáez, A. Managed honeybees decrease pollination limitation in self-compatible but not in self-incompatible crops. Proc. Biol. Sci. 289, 20220086 (2022).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Brittain, C., Williams, N., Kremen, C. & Klein, A. M. Synergistic effects of non-Apis bees and honey bees for pollination services. Proc. Biol. Sci. 280, 20122767 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Aizen, M. A. & Harder, L. D. The global stock of domesticated honey bees is growing slower than agricultural demand for pollination. Curr. Biol. 19, 915–918 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Houlahan, J. E. et al. Negative relationships between species richness and temporal variability are common but weak in natural systems. Ecology 99, 2592–2604 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Winfree, R. Global change, biodiversity, and ecosystem services: what can we learn from studies of pollination? Basic Appl. Ecol. 14, 453–460 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Greenleaf, S. S., Williams, N. M., Winfree, R. & Kremen, C. Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size. Oecologia 153, 589–596 (2007).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cariveau, D. P., Williams, N. M., Benjamin, F. E. & Winfree, R. Response diversity to land use occurs but does not consistently stabilise ecosystem services provided by native pollinators. Ecol. Lett. 16, 903–911 (2013).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gamfeldt, L., Hillebrand, H. & Jonsson, P. R. Multiple functions increase the importance of biodiversity for overall ecosystem functioning. Ecology 89, 1223–1231 (2008).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zavaleta, E. S., Pasari, J. R., Hulvey, K. B. & Tilman, G. D. Sustaining multiple ecosystem functions in grassland communities requires higher biodiversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 1443–1446 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Haupt, R. L. & Haupt, S. E. Practical Genetic Algorithms (Wiley, 2004).Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lüdecke, D., Makowski, D., Waggoner, P. & Patil, I. performance: Assessment of regression models performance. R package version 0.7.0 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3952174 (2020).Venables, W. N. & Ripley, B. D. Modern Applied Statistics with S (Springer, 2002).Brooks, M. et al. glmmTMB: Generalized linear mixed models using template model builder. R package version 1.1.3 https://glmmtmb.github.io/glmmTMB/ (2022).R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021). More