Ecology

Ballantyne, G., Baldock, K. C. R., Rendell, L. & Willmer, P. G. Pollinator importance networks illustrate the crucial value of bees in a highly speciose plant community. Sci. Rep. 7, 8389 (2017).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Smith, M. R., Singh, G. M., Mozaffarian, D. & Myers, S. S. Effect of decreases of animal pollinators on human nutrition and global health: A modeling analysis. Lancet 386, 1964–1972 (2015).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jung, C. & Cho, S. Relationship between honey bee population and honey production in Korea: A historical trend analysis. J. Apic. 30(1), 7–12 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Abrol, D. P. Asiatic Honey Bee Apis cerana: Biodiversity Conservation and Agricultural Production (Springer, 2013).Book 

Google Scholar 
Chandel, Y. S., Kumar, A. & Srivastva, S. Comparative performance of Apis mellifera L. vis a vis Apis cerana Fab. on toria (Brassica campestris var Toria) in mid-hill zone of Himachal Pradesh, India. Indian J. Agric. Res. 34, 264–267 (2000).
Google Scholar 
Feng, M., Ramadan, H., Han, B., Yu, F. & Li, J. Hemolymph proteome changes during worker brood development match the biological divergences between western honey bees (Apis mellifera) and eastern honey bees (Apis cerana). BMC Genomics 15, 563–576 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Peng, Y. S., Fang, Y., Xu, S. & Ge, L. The resistance mechanism of the Asian honey bee, Apis cerana Fabr., to an ectoparasitic mite, Varroa jacobsoni Oudemans. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 49, 54–60 (1987).Article 

Google Scholar 
McClenaghan, et al. Behavioral responses of honey bees, Apis cerana and Apis mellifera, to Vespa mandarinia marking and alarm pheromones. J. Apic. Res. 58(1), 141–148 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lin, Z. et al. Go east for better honey bee health: Apis cerana is faster at hygienic behavior than A. mellifera. PLoS ONE 11(9), e0162647 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Verma, L. R. & Dutta, P. C. Foraging behaviour of Apis cerana indicia and Apis mellifera in pollinating apple flowers. J. Apic. Res. 25, 197–201 (1986).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, Z. & Tan, K. Comparative analysis of olfactory learning of Apis cerana and Apis mellifera. Apidologie 45(1), 45–52 (2014).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Beekman, M. & Ratnieks, F. L. W. Long-range foraging by the honey-bee Apis mellifera L.. Funct. Ecol. 14, 490–496 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dyer, F. C. & Seeley, T. D. Dance dialects and foraging range in three Asian honey bee species. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 28, 227–233 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
Koetz, A. H. Ecology, behaviour and control of Apis cerana with a focus on relevance to the Australian incursion. Insects 4(4), 558–592 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Joshi, N. C. & Joshi, P. C. Foraging behavior of Apis spp. On apple flowers in a subtropical environment. N. Y. Sci. J. 3(3), 71–76 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Atwal, A. S. & Sharma, O. P. The dominance of Apis mellifera over Apis indica. Am. Bee J. 111, 343 (1971).
Google Scholar 
Kato, M., Shibata, A., Yasui, T. & Nagamasu, H. Impact of introduced honey bees, Apis mellifera, upon native bee communities in the Bonin (Ogasawara) Islands. Res. Popul. Ecol. 41, 217–228 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Thorp, D. W., Wenner, A. M. & Barthell, J. F. Pollen and nectar resource overlap among bees on Santa Cruz Island. MBC Appl. Environ. Sci. 2020, 261–267 (2000).
Google Scholar 
Yang, G. Harm of introducing the western honey bee Apis mellifera L. to the Chinese honey bee Apis cerana F. and its ecological impact. Acta Entomol. Sin. 48, 401–406 (2005) ((in Chinese)).
Google Scholar 
Dubois, T., Pasquaretta, C., Barron, A. B., Gautrais, J. & Lihoreau, M. A model of resource partitioning between foraging bees based on learning. PLoS Comput. Biol. 17(7), e1009260 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Louveaux, J., Maurizio, A. & Vorwohl, G. Methods of melissopalynology. Bee World 59, 139–153 (1978).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hawkins, J., de Vere, N., Griffith, A. & Ford, C. R. Using DNA metabarcoding to Identify the floral composition of honey: A new tool for investigating honey bee foraging preferences. PLoS ONE 10(8), e0134735 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Smart, M. D. et al. A Comparison of honey bee-collected pollen from working agricultural lands using light microscopy and its metabarcoding. Environ. Entomol. 46(1), 38–49 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Keller, A. et al. Evaluating multiplexed next-generation sequencing as a method in palynology for mixed pollen samples. Plant Biol. 17, 558–566 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Richardson, R. T. et al. Rank-based characterization of pollen assemblages collected by honey bees using a multi-locus metabarcoding approach. Appl. Plant Sci. 3, 1500043 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sickel, W. et al. Increased efficiency in identifying mixed pollen samples by meta-barcoding with a dual-indexing approach. BMC Ecol. 15, 20 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kress, W. J. & Erickson, D. L. DNA barcodes: Genes, genomics, and bioinformatics. PNAS 105, 2761–2762 (2008).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hollingsworth, P. M., Graham, S. W. & Little, D. P. Choosing and using a plant DNA barcode. PLoS ONE 6, e19254 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, S. et al. Validation of the ITS2 region as a novel DNA barcode for identifying medicinal plant species. PLoS ONE 5, e8613 (2010).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
CBOL Plant Working Group. A DNA barcode for land plants. PNAS 106, 12794–12797 (2009).ADS 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pornon, A. et al. Using metabarcoding to reveal and quantify plant-pollinator interactions. Sci. Rep. 6, 27282 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bell, K. L. et al. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of pollen DNA metabarcoding using constructed species mixtures. Mol. Ecol. 28(2), 431–455 (2018).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Baksay, S. et al. Experimental quantificarion of pollen with DNA metabarcoding using ITS1 and trnL. Sci. Rep. 10, 4202 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ghosh, S. & Jung, C. Nutritional value of bee-collected pollens of hardy kiwi, Actinidia arguta (Actinidiaceae) and oak, Quercus sp. (Fagaceae). J. Asia Pac. Entomol. 20(1), 245–251 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brunet, J., Thairu, M. W., Henss, J. M., Link, R. I. & Kluevert, J. A. The effects of flower, floral display, and reward sizes on bumblebee foraging behaviour when pollen is the reward and plants are dichogamous. Int. J. Plant Sci. 176(9), 811–819 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
de Vere, N. et al. Using DNA metabarcoding to investigate honey bee foraging reveals limited flower use despite high floral availability. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 42838 (2017).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Barth, O. M. In O polen no mel brasileiro. Rio de Janeiro, Luxor 151 (1989).Lo, T., Gloag, R. S., Anderson, D. L. & Oldroyd, B. P. A molecular phylogeny of the genus Apis suggests that the giant honey bee of southern India, A. indica Fabricius, are valid species. Syst. Entomol. 35, 226–223 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pirk, C. W. W., Sole, C. L. & Crewe, R. M. Pheromones. In Honey Bees of Asia (eds Hepburn, H. R. & Radloff, S. E.) 207–214 (Springer, Berlin, 2011).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Theisen-Jones, H. & Bienefeld, K. The Asian honey bee (Apis cerana) is significantly in decline. Bee World 93, 90–97 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sakagami, S. F. Some interspecific relations between Japanese and European honey bees. J. Anim. Ecol. 28, 51–68 (1959).Article 

Google Scholar 
Thomson, D. Competitive interactions between the invasive European honey bee and native bumble bees. Ecology 85, 458–470 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brosi, B. J. & Briggs, H. M. Single pollinator species losses reduce floral fidelity and plant reproductive function. PNAS 110(32), 13044–13048 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Iwasaki, J. M. et al. Floral usage partitioning and competition between social (Apis mellifera, Bombus terrestris) and solitary bees in New Zealand: Niche partitioning via floral preferences?. Austral Ecol. 43(8), 937–948 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rodrigues, C. S., Ferasso, D. C., Mossi, A. J. & Coelho, G. C. Pollen resources partitioning of stingless bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) from the southern Atlantic forest Acta Scientiarum. Biol. Sci. 42, e48714 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Lucas, A. et al. Floral resource partitioning by individuals within generalised hoverfly pollination networks revealed by DNA metabarcoding. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 5133 (2018).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lucek, K. et al. Metabarcoding of honey to assess differences in plant-pollinator interactions between urban and non-urban sites. Apidologie 50, 317–329 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tatsuno, M. & Osawa, N. Flower visitation patterns of the coexisting honey bees Apis cerana japonica and Apis mellifera (Hymentoptera: Apidae). Entomol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1111/ens.12206 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kuang, B. Y. & Kuang, H. O. Biology of the Honey bee (Yunnan Science and Technology Press, 2002) ([In Chines]).
Google Scholar 
Ghorab, A. et al. Sensorial, melissopalynological and physico-chemical characteristics of honey from Babors Kabylia’s region (Algeria). Foods 10, 225 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sasaki, M. In Bee’s eye view of flowering plants: Nectar- and pollen-source plants and related honey bee products. Kaiyusha, Tokyo, Japan (2010).Simpson, M. G. Diversity and classification of flowering plant: Eudicots. Plant Syst. 2010, 275–448 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wilms, W. & Wiechers, B. Floral resource partitioning between native Melipona bees and the introduced Africanized honey bee in the Brazilian Atlantic rain forest. Apidologie 28, 339–355 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
Klein, S. et al. Honey bees increase their foraging performance and frequency of pollen trips through experience. Sci. Rep. 9, 6778 (2019).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bovo, S. et al. Shotgun metagenomics of honey DNA: Evaluation of a methodological approach to describe a multikingdom honey bee derived environmental DNA signature. PLoS ONE 13(10), e0205575 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Prosser, S. W. J. & Hebert, P. D. N. Rapid identification of the botanical and entomological sources of honey using DNA metabarcoding. Food Chem. 214, 183–191 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dhaliwai, H. S. & Sharma, P. L. Foraging range of the Indian honey bee. J. Apic. Res. 13, 137–141 (1974).Article 

Google Scholar 
ESRI. ArcGis Pro (Version 10.6); ESRI Inc.: Redlands, CA, USA (2020).Palmieri, L., Bozza, E. & Giongo, L. Soft fruit traceability in food matrices using real-time PCR. Nutrients 1, 316–328 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kress, W. J. et al. Plant DNA barcodes and a community phylogeny of a tropical forest dynamics plot in Panama. PNAS 106, 18621–18626 (2009).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kress, J. W. & Erickson, L. D. A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: The coding rbcL gene complements the non-coding trnH-psbA spacer region. PLoS ONE 2(6), 1–10 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30(15), 2114–2120 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rognes, T., Flouri, T., Nichols, B., Quince, C. & Mahé, F. VSEARCH: A versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ 4, e2584 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Joshi, N. A. & Fass, J. N. Sickle: A sliding-window, adaptive, quality-based trimming tool for FastQ files (Version 1.33). https://github.com/najoshi/sickle (2011).Boyer, F. et al. OBITools: A Unix-inspired software package for DNA metabarcoding. Mol. Ecol. Res. 16, 176–182 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Altschul, S. F. et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3389–3402 (1997).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.gbif.org/tool/81287/r-a-language-andenvironment-for-statistical-computing (2022).Bosch, J., Retana, J. & Cerdá, X. Flowering phenology, floral traits and pollinator composition in a herbaceous Mediterranean plant community. Oecologia 109, 583–591 (1997).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Endress, P. K. Flower structure and trends of evolution in eudicots and their major subclades. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 97(4), 541–583 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gómez, J. M., Torices, R., Lorite, J., Klingenberg, C. P. & Perfectti, F. The role of pollinators in the evolution of corolla shape variation, disparity and integration in a highly diversified plant family with a conserved floral bauplan. Ann. Bot. 117, 899–904 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Watts, S., Dormann, C. F., González, M. M. & Ollerton, J. The influence of floral traits on specialization and modularity of plant-pollinator networks in a biodiversity hotspot in the Peruvian Andes. Ann. Bot. 118, 415–429 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lee, C. B. Coloured Flora of Korea. Hyangmunsa, Seoul, Republic of Korea (2003). More

DataWe used temperature data, rainfall data, and data on the incidence of malaria collected from 1901 to 2015 for 43 African countries to construct networks to determine the relationships between transmission of malaria and climate change elements, especially temperature and rainfall. Data resolution is given by the latitude and longitude of the capital city for every country in Africa. Temperature and rainfall data are provided in terms of monthly averages in the country wise. The nodes in the network represent the country, and the edges in the network represent the relationship between countries. We collected malaria data from Harvard Dataverse35 and the world malaria report from the WHO31. Data for temperature and rainfall were obtained from the Climate Change Knowledge Portal of the World Bank Group36.Network generation and analysisThe networks were constructed by using the threshold method where the network depends on the mean, standard deviation, and the real number ((n)) used to control the features of the network. Therefore, data for temperature, rainfall, and the incidence of malaria were divided into six groups mostly comprising ranges of 20 years (1900–1920, 1921–1940, 1941–1960, 1961–1980, 1981–2000) as well as the period from 2001 to 2015. The missing data in Malaria incidence data are filled by the average amount of malaria incidence collected per year.In Table S1, a malaria report from the World Health Organization shows that the rate of death is directly proportional to the incidence of malaria35. The death toll in Africa from malaria is about 98% of world deaths from malaria. Such deaths in African regions decrease thanks to efforts the WHO, governments, and the private sector have been conducting to prevent them. Weather and climate are among the factors that drive increases in malaria infections in different areas.We consider networks based on the threshold method (see the “Methods and Materials” section below). First, we fill the missing malaria incidence data, and we calculate normalized Pearson correlation coefficients of three-time series between two countries. Then, we obtain a correlation matrix for the countries. We estimate the average value of the correlation coefficients from the time intervals 1901–1920, 1921–1940, 1941–1960, 1961–1980, 1981–2000, and 2001–2015 for three time series: temperature, rainfall, and incidence of malaria. We summarize the averages and standard deviations of the correlation coefficients, as shown in Table S2. The mean values from the correlation in temperature are high, compared to those for rainfall and the incidence of malaria. The standard deviations in temperature and rainfall are large, but the standard deviation for the incidence of malaria is small.We chose an ad hoc threshold value of the correlation coefficients to generate sparse networks. The characteristic values for (n) of the threshold are given in Table S3. We consider three types of thresholds in order to observe changes in the networks according to the threshold.Let us define the normalized variance of each time series. We considered time series (T_{i} left( t right)), (M_{i} left( t right)), and (R_{i} left( t right)) in country (i) for temperature, the incidence of malaria, and rainfall, respectively. We define normalized variance as$$r_{ij} = frac{{x_{i} left( t right)x_{j} left( t right) – x_{i} left( t right)x_{j} left( t right)}}{{sigma_{i} sigma_{j} }}$$
(1)
where (x_{i} left( t right)) = (T_{i} left( t right)), (M_{i} left( t right)), (R_{i} left( t right)). We obtained a Pearson correlation matrix for each time series as follows:$$R_{S} = left[ {begin{array}{*{20}c} {r_{11} } & cdots & {r_{1N} } \ vdots & {r_{ij} } & vdots \ {r_{N1} } & cdots & {r_{NN} } \ end{array} } right]$$
(2)
where (S = T, M, R).We calculated the average value, (overline{r }), and the standard deviation, (sigma), for the correlation coefficients of the matrix. We applied the threshold method to generate a sparse network from the correlation matrix. Two countries are connected in the correlation network if and only if the value of the correlation coefficient is greater than, or equal to, the threshold value:$$r_{{ij}} = left{ {begin{array}{*{20}c} 1 & {{text{if}};r_{{ij}} ge bar{r}{text{ + n}}sigma } \ 0 & {{text{otherwise}}} \ end{array} } right.$$
(3)
where (r_{ij}) is the correlation coefficient between two countries, and (n) is an element of real numbers ((n in {mathbb{R}})). The value of (n) determines whether the network is sparsely or densely connected.We use Python programming language, packages, numpy for mathematical functions and random number generator, pandas for data analysis and manipulations, networkx for creation, manipulation, and studying the structure of the complex network, matplotlib for visualization and plotting graph and base map for map projection and visualization of geographic information. More

MacFarlane, G. R., Koller, C. E. & Blomberg, S. P. Accumulation and partitioning of heavy metals in mangroves: A synthesis of field-based studies. Chemosphere 69, 1454–1464 (2007).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Krauss, K. W. & Osland, M. J. Tropical cyclones and the organization of mangrove forests: A review. Ann. Bot. 125, 213–234 (2020).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kirk, G. J. D. & Krinzucker, H. J. The potential for nitrification and nitrate uptake in the rhizosphere of wetland plants: A modeling study. Ann. Bot. 96, 639–646 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wu, C., Huang, L., Xue, S. G. & Pan, W. S. Oxic and anoxic conditions affect arsenic (As) accumulation and arsenite transporter expression in rice. Chemosphere 168, 969–975 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tripathi, R. D. et al. Roles for root iron plaque in sequestration and uptake of heavy metals and metalloids in aquatic and wetland plants. Metallomics 6, 1789–1800 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Xiao, W. et al. Continuous flooding stimulates root iron plaque formation and reduces chromium accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Sci. Total Environ. 788, 147786 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lee, C. H., Hsieh, Y. C., Lin, T. H. & Lee, D. Y. Iron plaque formation and its effect on arsenic uptake by different genotypes of paddy rice. Plant Soil 363, 231–241 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dai, M. Y. et al. Phosphorus effects on radial oxygen loss, root porosity and iron plaque in two mangrove seedlings under cadmium stress. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 119, 262–269 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, C. Y., Chen, C. L., Gong, X. F., Zhou, W. B. & Yang, J. Y. Progress in research of iron plaque on root surface of wetland plants. Acta Ecol. Sin. 34, 2470–2480 (2014).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Li, J., Liu, J. C., Yan, C. L., Du, D. L. & Li, H. L. The alleviation effect of iron on cadmium phytotoxicity on mangrove A. marina. Alleviation effect of rion on cadmium phytotoxicity in mangrove Avicennia marina (Forsk.) Vierh. Chemosphere 226, 413–420 (2019).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, J. Y. et al. Effects of nano-Fe3O4-modified biochar on iron plaque formation and Cd accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Environ. Pollut. 260, 113970 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Farhat, Y. A., Kim, S. H., Seyfferth, A. L., Zhang, L. & Neumann, R. B. Altered arsenic availability, uptake, and allocation in rice under elevated temperature. Sci. Total Environ. 763, 143049 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wu, X. Y. et al. A review of toxicity and mechanisms of individual and mixtures of heavy metals in the environment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. R. 23, 8244–8259 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Abubakar, U. S., Zulkifli, S. Z. & Ismail, A. Heavy metals bioavailability and pollution indices evaluation in the mangrove surface sediment of Sungai Puloh Malaysia. Environ. Earth. Sci. 77, 225 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kulkarni, R., Deobagkar, D. & Zinjarde, S. Metals in mangrove ecosystems and associated biota: A global perspective. Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 153, 215–228 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Shi, C., Ding, H., Zan, Q. J. & Li, R. L. Spatial variation and ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in mangrove sediments across China. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 143, 115–124 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cheng, H. et al. Mixture of Pb, Zn and Cu on root permeability and radial oxygen loss in the mangrove Bruguiera gymnorrhiza. Ecotoxicology 29, 691–697 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cheng, S. S. et al. Temporal variations in physiological responses of kandelia obovata seedlings exposed to multiple heavy metals. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 124, 1089–1095 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Shen, X. X. et al. Does combined heavy metal stress enhance iron plaque formation and heavy metal bioaccumulation in Kandelia obovata?. Environ. Exp. Bot. 186, 104463 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Shen, X. X. et al. Interactive effects of single, binary and trinary trace metals (lead, zinc and copper) on the physiological responses of Kandelia obovata seedlings. Environ. Geochem. Hlth. 41, 135–148 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Youssef, T. & Saenger, P. Anatomical adaptive strategies to flooding and rhizosphere oxidation in mangrove seedlings. Aust. J. Bot. 44, 297–313 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cheng, H., Wang, Y. S., Fei, J., Jiang, Z. Y. & Ye, Z. H. Differences in root aeration, iron plaque formation and waterlogging tolerance in six mangroves along a continues tidal gradient. Ecotoxicology 24, 1659–1667 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Takahashi, H., Yamauchi, T., Colmer, T. D. & Nakazono, M. Aerenchyma formation in plants. In Low-Oxygen Stress in Plants (eds van Dongen, J. T. & Licausi, F.) 247–265 (Springer, 2014).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Yamauchi, T., Colmer, T. D., Pedersen, O. & Nakazono, M. Regulation of root traits for internal aeration and tolerance to soil waterlogging-flooding stress. Plant Physiol. 176, 1118–1130 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cheng, H. et al. The role of radial oxygen loss and root anatomy on zinc uptake and tolerance in mangrove seedlings. Environ. Pollut. 158, 1189–1196 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, Y. et al. Mixed heavy metals tolerance and radial oxygen loss in mangrove seedlings. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 58, 1843–1849 (2009).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wu, C., Li, H., Ye, Z., Wu, F. & Wong, M. H. Effects of As levels on radial oxygen loss and as speciation in rice. Environ. Sci. Pollut R. 20, 8334–8341 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mendellshn, A., Kleiss, B. A. & Wakeley, J. S. Factors controlling the formation of oxidized root channels—a review. Wetlands 15, 37–46 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
Moller, C. L. & Sand-Jesen, K. Iron plaques improve the oxygen supply to root meristems of the freshwater plant Lobelia dortmanna. New Phytol. 179, 848–856 (2008).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Yang, J. X., Liu, Y. & Ye, Z. H. Root-induced changes of pH, eh, Fe (II) and fractions of Pb and Zn in rhizosphere soils of four wetland plants with different radial oxygen losses. Pedosphere 22, 518–527 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hu, M., Li, F., Liu, C. & Wu, W. The diversity and abundance of as (III) oxidizers on root iron plaque is critical for arsenic bioavailability to rice. Sci. Rep. 5, 13611 (2015).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Huang, G. X., Ding, C. F., Li, Y. S., Zhang, T. L. & Wang, X. X. Selenium enhances iron plaque formation by elevating the radial oxygen loss of roots to reduce cadmium accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Hazard. Mater. 398, 122860 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Thakur, S. et al. Plant-driven removal of heavy metals from soil: Uptake, translocation, tolerance mechanism, challenges, and future perspectives. Environ. Monit. Assess. 188, 206–212 (2016).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Huang, H., Zhu, Y., Chen, Z., Yin, X. & Sun, G. Arsenic mobilization and speciation during iron plaque decomposition in a paddy soil. J. Soil. Sediment. 12, 402–410 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhong, S. Q. Effect of iron plaque on root growth and activity of two wetland plants. J. Hydroecol. 36, 74–79 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Khan, N. et al. Root iron plaque on wetland plants as a dynamic pool of nutrients and contaminants. Adv. Agron. 138, 1–96 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ma, H. H. et al. Formation of iron plaque on roots of Iris pseudacorus and its consequence for cadmium immobilization is impacted by zinc concentration. Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 193, 110306 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Martinez, S., Sáenz, M. E., Alberdi, J. L. & Di Marzio, W. D. Comparative ecotoxicity of single and binary mixtures exposures of cadmium and zinc on growth and biomarkers of Lemna gibba. Ecotoxicology 29, 571–583 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Huang, Y. Z., Hu, Y. & Liu, Y. X. Heavy metal accumulation in iron plaque and growth of rice plants upon exposure to single and combined contamination by copper, cadmium and lead. Acta Ecol. Sin. 29, 320–326 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Deraison, H., Badenhausser, I., Börger, L. & Gross, N. Herbivore effect traits and their impact on plant community biomass: An experimental test using grasshoppers. Funct. Ecol. 29, 650–661 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, F., Wang, X. & Song, N. Polythylene microplastics increase cadmium uptake in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) by altering the soil microenvironment. Sci. Total Environ. 784, 147133 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yu, H. et al. Microplastic residues in wetland ecosystems: Do they truly threaten the plant-microbe-soil system?. Environ. Int. 156, 106708 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
He, B., Li, R. L., Chai, M. W. & Qiu, G. Y. Threat of heavy metal contamination in eight mangrove plants from the Futian mangrove forest, China. Environ. Geochem. Hlth. 36, 467–476 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Du, J. N., Yan, C. L. & Li, Z. D. Formation of iron plaque on mangrove Kandalar. Obovata (S.L.) Root surfaces and its role in cadmium uptake and translocation. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 74, 105–109 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hao, Z. B., Cang, J. & Xu, Z. Plant Physiology Experiment (Harbin Institute of Technology Press, 2004).
Google Scholar 
Kludze, H. K., Delaune, R. D. & Patrick, W. H. A colorimetric method for assaying dissolved oxygen loss from container-grown rice roots. Agron. J. 86, 483–487 (1994).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kludze, H. K., Delaune, R. D. & Patrick, W. H. Aerenchyma formation and methane and oxygen-exchange in rice. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57, 386–391 (1993).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mei, X. Q., Yang, Y., Tam, N. F. Y., Wang, Y. W. & Li, L. Roles of root porosity, radial oxygen loss, Fe plaque formation on nutrient removal and tolerance of wetland plants to domestic wastewater. Water Res. 50, 147–159 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Taylor, G. J. & Crowder, A. Use of the DCB technique for extraction of hydrous iron oxides from roots of wetland plants. Am. J. Bot. 70, 1254–1257 (1983).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). Method 3052: microwave assisted acid digestion of siliceous and organically based matrices SW-846. DC: Washington (1996). More

Appel, M., Lahn, F., Buytaert, W. & Pebesma, E. Open and scalable analytics of large earth observation datasets: From scenes to multidimensional arrays using SCIDB and GDAL. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 138, 47–56 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Audebert, N., Saux, B. L. & Lefvre, S. Beyond RGB: Very high resolution urban remote sensing with multimodal deep networks. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 140, 20–32 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ball J. E., Anderson D. T., & Chan C. S. Comprehensive survey of deep learning in remote sensing: Theories, tools, and challenges for the community. J. Appl. Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.11.042609 (2017).Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. Vol. 282. 20141657 (2015).Velázquez, E., Paine, C. T., May, F. & Wiegand, T. Linking trait similarity to interspecific spatial associations in a moist tropical forest. J. Veg. Sci. 26, 1068–1079 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ben-Said, M. Spatial point-pattern analysis as a powerful tool in identifying pattern-process relationships in plant ecology: an updated review. Ecol. Process. 10, 1–23 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Watt, A. S. Pattern and process in the plant community. J. Ecol. 35, 1–22 (1947).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pielou, E.C. Mathematical Ecology; Number 574.50151 P613 1977. (Wiley, 1977).Chesson, P. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31, 343–366 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brown, C., Law, R., Illian, J. B. & Burslem, D. F. Linking ecological processes with spatial and non-spatial patterns in plant communities. J. Ecol. 99, 1402–1414 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Detto, M. & Muller-Landau, H. C. Fitting ecological process models to spatial patterns using scalewise variances and moment equations. Am. Nat. 181, E68–E82 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
May, F., Huth, A., & Wiegand, T. Moving beyond abundance distributions: neutral theory and spatial patterns in a tropical forest. Proceedings. Biological sciences 282(1802), 20141657. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.1657 (2015).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kerr, J. T. & Ostrovsky, M. From space to species: Ecological applications for remote sensing. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 299–305 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gillespie, T. W., Foody, G. M., Rocchini, D., Giorgi, A. P. & Saatchi, S. Measuring and modelling biodiversity from space. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 32, 203–221 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
He, J., Zhang, L., Wang, Q. & Li, Z. Using diffusion geometric coordinates for hyperspectral imagery representation. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 6(4), 767–771 (2009).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lechner, A.M., Foody, G.M., & Boyd, D.S. Applications in remote sensing to forest ecology and management. One Earth 2.5, 405–412 (2020).Arévalo, P., Olofsson, P. & Woodcock, C. E. Continuous monitoring of land change activities and post-disturbance dynamics from Landsat time series: A test methodology for REDD+ reporting. Remote Sens. Environ. 238, 111051 (2020).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gillespie, T.W. et al. Measuring and modelling biodiversity from space. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 32.2, 203–221 (2008).Lausch, A., Erasmi, S., King, D. J., Magdon, P. & Heurich, M. Understanding forest health with remote sensing-part II—A review of approaches and data models. Remote Sens. 9(2), 129 (2017).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rouse, J.W., Haas, R.H., Schell, J.A., Deering, D.W., et al. Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. in NASA Special Publication. Vol. 351. 309 (1974).Chen, J. M. & Black, T. Defining leaf area index for non-flat leaves. Plant Cell Environ. 15, 421–429 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zha, Y., Gao, J. & Ni, S. Use of normalized difference built-up index in automatically mapping urban areas from TM imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens. 24, 583–594 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhao, S. et al. Remote detection of bare soil moisture using a surface-temperature-based soil evaporation transfer coefficient. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 12, 351–358 (2010).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Gao, B. C. NDWI—A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space. Remote Sens. Environ. 58, 257–266 (1996).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wan, Z. & Dozier, J. A generalized split-window algorithm for retrieving land-surface temperature from space. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 34, 892–905 (1996).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Xu, H., Wang, Y., Guan, H., Shi, T. & Hu, X. Detecting ecological changes with a remote sensing based ecological index (RSEI) produced time series and change vector analysis. Remote Sensing 11, 2345 (2019).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
List of Top 10 Sources of Free Remote Sensing Data (2017).USGS Earth Explorer: Download Free Landsat Imagery (2021).Blaschke, T. Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote. Sens. 65, 2–16 (2010).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, M., Zang, S., Zhang, B., Li, S. & Wu, C. A review of remote sensing image classification techniques: The role of spatio-contextual information. Eur. J. Remote Sens. 47, 389–411 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gómez-Chova, L., Tuia, D., Moser, G. & Camps-Valls, G. Multimodal classification of remote sensing images: A review and future directions. Proc. IEEE 103, 1560–1584 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Alajlan, N., Bazi, Y., Melgani, F. & Yager, R. R. Fusion of supervised and unsupervised learning for improved classification of hyperspectral images. Inf. Sci. 217, 39–55 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Csillik, O. Fast segmentation and classification of very high resolution remote sensing data using SLIC superpixels. Remote Sens. 9, 243 (2017).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Thanh Noi, P. & Kappas, M. Comparison of random forest, k-nearest neighbor, and support vector machine classifiers for land cover classification using Sentinel-2 imagery. Sensors 18, 18 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jiang, S., Zhao, H., Wu, W., & Tan, Q. A novel framework for remote sensing image scene classification. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. 2018, 42 (2018).Baddeley, A. Spatial Point Process Modelling and Its Applications. Vol. 20. (Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I, 2004).Vasudevan, K., Eckel, S., Fleischer, F., Schmidt, V. & Cook, F. Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns on deep seismic reflection data: A preliminary test. Geophys. J. Int. 171, 823–840 (2007).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cheng, Y. & Luo, J. Statistical analysis of metastable pitting events on carbon steel. Br. Corros. J. 35, 125–130 (2000).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Velázquez, E., Martínez, I., Getzin, S., Moloney, K. A. & Wiegand, T. An evaluation of the state of spatial point pattern analysis in ecology. Ecography 39, 1042–1055 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Clark, P. J. & Evans, F. C. Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35, 445–453 (1954).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stoyan, D., & Penttinen, A. Recent applications of point process methods in forestry statistics. Stat. Sci. 2000, 61–78 (2000).Illian, J., Penttinen, A., Stoyan, H., & Stoyan, D. Statistical Analysis and Modelling of Spatial Point Patterns. Vol. 70. (Wiley, 2008).Brodrick, P. G., Davies, A. B. & Asner, G. P. Uncovering ecological patterns with convolutional neural networks. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 734–745 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, S., Luo, H., Tu, Y., He, Z., & Li, J. Wide contextual residual network with active learning for remote sensing image classification. in IGARSS 2018–2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. 7145–7148 (IEEE, 2018).Lee, H. & Kwon, H. Going deeper with contextual CNN for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 26, 4843–4855 (2017).ADS 
MathSciNet 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cheng, G., Xie, X., Han, J., Guo, L. & Xia, G. S. Remote sensing image scene classification meets deep learning: Challenges, methods, benchmarks, and opportunities. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 13, 3735–3756 (2020).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lewy, D., & Mandziuk, J. An overview of mixing augmentation methods and augmentation strategies. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.09887 (2021).Cubuk, E.D., Zoph, B., Mane, D., Vasudevan, V., & Le, Q.V. Autoaugment: Learning augmentation policies from data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.09501 (2018).Naveed, H. Survey: Image mixing and deleting for data augmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.07085 (2021).Freeman, I., Roese-Koerner, L. & Kummert, A. Effnet: An efficient structure for convolutional neural networks. 25th IEEE international conference on image processing (ICIP). IEEE 2018, 6–10 (2018).
Google Scholar 
LeCun, Y. et al. Backpropagation applied to handwritten zip code recognition. Neural Comput. 1, 541–551 (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
Raeisi, M., Bonneu, F. & Gabriel, E. A spatio-temporal multi-scale model for Geyer saturation point process: Application to forest fire occurrences. Spatial Stat. 41, 100492 (2021).MathSciNet 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Baddeley, A. Analysing spatial point patterns in R. in Workshop Notes Version. Vol. 3 (2008). More

Urban, M. C. Accelerating extinction risk from climate change. Science 348, 571–573 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Brown, S. C., Wigley, T. M. L., Otto-Bliesner, B. L., Rahbek, C. & Fordham, D. A. Persistent Quaternary climate refugia are hospices for biodiversity in the Anthropocene. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 244–248 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
O’Hara, C. C., Frazier, M. & Halpern, B. S. At-risk marine biodiversity faces extensive, expanding, and intensifying human impacts. Science 372, 84–87 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Halpern, B. S. et al. An index to assess the health and benefits of the global ocean. Nature 488, 615–620 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Free, C. M. et al. Impacts of historical warming on marine fisheries production. Science 363, 979–983 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Costello, C. et al. The future of food from the sea. Nature 588, 95–100 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lotze, H. K., Bryndum-Buchholz, A. & Boyce, D. G. in The Impacts of Climate Change: Comprehensive Study of the Physical, Societal and Political Issues (ed. Letcher, T.) 205–231 (Elsevier, 2021); https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822373-4.00017-3Boyce, D. G., Lotze, H. K., Tittensor, D. P., Carozza, D. A. & Worm, B. Future ocean biomass losses may widen socioeconomic equity gaps. Nat. Commun. 11, 2235 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tittensor, D. P. et al. Integrating climate adaptation and biodiversity conservation in the global ocean. Sci. Adv. 5, 2235 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wilson, K. L., Tittensor, D. P., Worm, B. & Lotze, H. K. Incorporating climate change adaptation into marine protected area planning. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 3251–3267 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Barange, M. et al. (eds) Impacts of Climate Change on Fisheries and Aquaculture: Synthesis of Current Knowledge, Adaptation and Mitigation Options FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 627 (FAO, 2018).Hare, J. A. et al. A vulnerability assessment of fish and invertebrates to climate change on the northeast U.S. continental shelf. PLoS ONE 11, 1–654 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Boyce, D. G., Fuller, S., Karbowski, C., Schleit, K. & Worm, B. Leading or lagging: how well are climate change considerations being incorporated into Canadian fisheries management? Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 78, 1120–1129 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
IPCC Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability (eds Field, C. B. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).Pacifici, M. et al. Assessing species vulnerability to climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 215–225 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
de los Ríos, C., Watson, J. E. M. & Butt, N. Persistence of methodological, taxonomical, and geographical bias in assessments of species’ vulnerability to climate change: a review. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 15, e00412 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Foden, W. B. et al. Climate change vulnerability assessment of species. WIREs Clim. Change 10, e551 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Comte, L. & Olden, J. D. Climatic vulnerability of the world’s freshwater and marine fishes. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 718–722 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Albouy, C. et al. Global vulnerability of marine mammals to global warming. 1–12 (2020).Foden, W. B. et al. Identifying the world’s most climate change vulnerable species: a systematic trait-based assessment of all birds, amphibians and corals. PLoS ONE 8, e65427 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kesner-Reyes, K. et al. AquaMaps: algorithm and data sources for aquatic organisms. In FishBase v.04/2012 (eds. Froese, R. & Pauly, D.) www.fishbase.org (2016).Stuart-Smith, R. D., Edgar, G. J., Barrett, N. S., Kininmonth, S. J. & Bates, A. E. Thermal biases and vulnerability to warming in the world’s marine fauna. Nature 528, 88–92 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Trisos, C. H., Merow, C. & Pigot, A. L. The projected timing of abrupt ecological disruption from climate change. Nature 580, 496–501 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cheung, W. W. L., Watson, R., Morato, T., Pitcher, T. J. & Pauly, D. Intrinsic vulnerability in the global fish catch. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 333, 1–12 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
IPCC Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, in the press).IPCC Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability (eds McCarthy, J. J. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2001).The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species v.2021-1 (IUCN, 2021); https://www.iucnredlist.orgTittensor, D. P. et al. Global patterns and predictors of marine biodiversity across taxa. Nature 466, 1098–1101 (2010).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rogers, A. et al. Critical Habitats and Biodiversity: Inventory, Thresholds and Governance. Sci. Rep. 10, 548 (World Resources Institute, 2020).Sala, E. et al. Protecting the global ocean for biodiversity, food and climate. Nature 592, 397–402 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Halpern, B. S. et al. Spatial and temporal changes in cumulative human impacts on the world’s ocean. Nat. Commun. 6, 7615 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pontavice, H., Gascuel, D., Reygondeau, G., Stock, C. & Cheung, W. W. L. Climate‐induced decrease in biomass flow in marine food webs may severely affect predators and ecosystem production. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 2608–2622 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Estes, J. A., Heithaus, M., McCauley, D. J., Rasher, D. B. & Worm, B. Megafaunal impacts on structure and function of ocean ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Environ. Res. 41, 83–116 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jenkins, C. N., Pimm, S. L. & Joppa, L. N. Global patterns of terrestrial vertebrate diversity and conservation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, E2602–E2610 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Moilanen, A., Kujala, H. & Mikkonen, N. A practical method for evaluating spatial biodiversity offset scenarios based on spatial conservation prioritization outputs. Methods Ecol. Evol. 11, 794–803 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ceballos, G. & Ehrlich, P. R. Global mammal distributions, biodiversity hotspots, and conservation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 19374–19379 (2006).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Williams, P. H., Gaston, K. J. & Humphries, C. J. Mapping biodiversity value worldwide: combining higher-taxon richness from different groups. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264, 141–148 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
Blanchard, J. L. et al. Linked sustainability challenges and trade-offs among fisheries, aquaculture and agriculture. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1240–1249 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Robiou Du Pont, Y. et al. Equitable mitigation to achieve the Paris Agreement goals. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 38–43 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Payne, N. L. et al. Fish heating tolerance scales similarly across individual physiology and populations. Commun. Biol. 4, 264 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
First Draft of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (Convention on Biological Diversity, 2021).Keppel, G. et al. Refugia: identifying and understanding safe havens for biodiversity under climate change. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 21, 393–404 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bryndum‐Buchholz, A., Tittensor, D. P. & Lotze, H. K. The status of climate change adaptation in fisheries management: policy, legislation and implementation. Fish Fish. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12586 (2021).Maureaud, A. et al. Are we ready to track climate‐driven shifts in marine species across international boundaries? A global survey of scientific bottom trawl data. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 220–236 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Boyce, D. G. et al. Operationalizing climate risk for fisheries in a global warming hotspot. Preprint at: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.19.500650 (2022).Estes, J. A. et al. Trophic downgrading of planet Earth. Science 333, 301–306 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Olden, J. D., Hogan, Z. S. & Vander Zanden, M. J. Small fish, big fish, red fish, blue fish: size-biased extinction risk of the world’s freshwater and marine fishes. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 16, 694–701 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tittensor, D. P. et al. A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets. Science 346, 241–244 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pinsky, M. L., Eikeset, A. M., McCauley, D. J., Payne, J. L. & Sunday, J. M. Greater vulnerability to warming of marine versus terrestrial ectotherms. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1132-4 (2019).Sunday, J. M., Bates, A. E. & Dulvy, N. K. Thermal tolerance and the global redistribution of animals. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 686–690 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Laidre, K. L. et al. Quantifying the sensitivity of Arctic marine mammals to climate-induced habitat change. Ecol. Appl. 18, S97–S125 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rosset, V. & Oertli, B. Freshwater biodiversity under climate warming pressure: identifying the winners and losers in temperate standing waterbodies. Biol. Conserv. 144, 2311–2319 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Peters, R. L. The greenhouse effect and nature reserves. Biosciences 35, 707–717 (1985).Article 

Google Scholar 
Garcia, R. A. et al. Matching species traits to projected threats and opportunities from climate change. J. Biogeogr. 41, 724–735 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1 (IUCN, 2012).Worm, B. et al. Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science 314, 787–790 (2006).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Worm, B., Lotze, H. K., Hillebrand, H. & Sommer, U. Consumer versus resource control of species diversity and ecosystem functioning. Nature 417, 848–851 (2002).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Worm, B. & Duffy, J. E. Biodiversity, productivity, and stability in real food webs. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 628–632 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Halpern, B. S. et al. A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science 319, 948–952 (2008).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ottersen, G., Hjermann, D. O. & Stenseth, N. C. Changes in spawning stock structure strengthen the link between climate and recruitment in a heavily fished cod (Gadus morhua) stock. Fish. Oceanogr. 15, 230–243 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Le Bris, A. et al. Climate vulnerability and resilience in the most valuable North American fishery. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 1831–1836 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Henson, S. A. et al. Rapid emergence of climate change in environmental drivers of marine ecosystems. Nat. Commun. 8, 14682 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bates, A. E. et al. Climate resilience in marine protected areas and the ‘Protection Paradox’. Biol. Conserv. 236, 305–314 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Xu, C., Kohler, T. A., Lenton, T. M., Svenning, J.-C. & Scheffer, M. Future of the human climate niche. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 11350–11355 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Davies, T. E., Maxwell, S. M., Kaschner, K., Garilao, C. & Ban, N. C. Large marine protected areas represent biodiversity now and under climate change. Sci. Rep. 7, 9569 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
MacKenzie, B. R. et al. A cascade of warming impacts brings bluefin tuna to Greenland waters. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 2484–2491 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shackell, N. L., Ricard, D. & Stortini, C. Thermal habitat index of many Northwest Atlantic temperate species stays neutral under warming projected for 2030 but changes radically by 2060. PLoS ONE 9 (2014).Boyce, D. G., Frank, K. T., Worm, B. & Leggett, W. C. Spatial patterns and predictors of trophic control across marine ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 18, 1001–1011 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Boyce, D. G., Frank, K. T. & Leggett, W. C. From mice to elephants: overturning the ‘one size fits all’ paradigm in marine plankton food chains. Ecol. Lett. 18, 504–515 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Frank, K. T., Petrie, B., Shackell, N. L. & Choi, J. S. Reconciling differences in trophic control in mid-latitude marine ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 9, 1096–1105 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Frank, K. T., Petrie, B. & Shackell, N. L. The ups and downs of trophic control in continental shelf ecosystems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 236–242 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Loarie, S. R. et al. The velocity of climate change. Nature 462, 1052–1056 (2009).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Burrows, M. T. et al. The pace of shifting climate in marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Science 334, 652–655 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mora, C. et al. The projected timing of climate departure from recent variability. Nature 502, 183–187 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Poloczanska, E. S. et al. Responses of marine organisms to climate change across oceans. Front. Mar. Sci. 3, 62 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Boyce, D. G., Lewis, M. L. & Worm, B. Global phytoplankton decline over the past century. Nature 466, 591–596 (2010).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Burek, K. A., Gulland, F. M. D. & O’Hara, T. M. Effects of climate change on Arctic marine mammal health. Ecol. Appl. 18, S126–S134 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Staude, I. R., Navarro, L. M. & Pereira, H. M. Range size predicts the risk of local extinction from habitat loss. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 16–25 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Moore, S. E. & Huntington, H. P. Arctic marine mammals and climate change: impacts and resilience. Ecol. Appl. 18, S157–S165 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kaschner, K., Watson, R., Trites, A. & Pauly, D. Mapping world-wide distributions of marine mammal species using a relative environmental suitability (RES) model. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 316, 285–310 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gonzalez-Suarez, M., Gomez, A. & Revilla, E. Which intrinsic traits predict vulnerability to extinction depends on the actual threatening processes. Ecosphere 4, 6 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rogan, J. E. & Lacher, T. E. in Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences (Elsevier, 2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.10913-3Warren, M. S. et al. Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change. Nature 414, 65–69 (2001).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chessman, B. C. Identifying species at risk from climate change: traits predict the drought vulnerability of freshwater fishes. Biol. Conserv. 160, 40–49 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Davidson, A. D. D. et al. Drivers and hotspots of extinction risk in marine mammals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 3395–3400 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cheung, W. W. L., Pauly, D. & Sarmiento, J. L. How to make progress in projecting climate change impacts. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 70, 1069–1074 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fenchel, T. Intrinsic rate of natural increase: the relationship with body size. Oecologia 14, 317–326 (1974).Article 

Google Scholar 
Healy, K. et al. Ecology and mode-of-life explain lifespan variation in birds and mammals. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20140298 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Carilli, J., Donner, S. D. & Hartmann, A. C. Historical temperature variability affects coral response to heat stress. PLoS ONE 7, e34418 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Guest, J. R. et al. Contrasting patterns of coral bleaching susceptibility in 2010 suggest an adaptive response to thermal stress. PLoS ONE 7, e33353 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Donner, S. D. & Carilli, J. Resilience of Central Pacific reefs subject to frequent heat stress and human disturbance. Sci. Rep. 9, 3484 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Rehm, E. M., Olivas, P., Stroud, J. & Feeley, K. J. Losing your edge: climate change and the conservation value of range‐edge populations. Ecol. Evol. 5, 4315–4326 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ready, J. et al. Predicting the distributions of marine organisms at the global scale. Ecol. Modell. 221, 467–478 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jones, M. C., Dye, S. R., Pinnegar, J. K., Warren, R. & Cheung, W. W. L. Modelling commercial fish distributions: prediction and assessment using different approaches. Ecol. Modell. 225, 133–145 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Froese, R. & Pauly, D. FishBase v.02/2022 www.fishbase.org (2022).Palomares, M. L. D. & Pauly, D. SeaLifeBase v.11/2014 www.sealifebase.org (2022).van Buuren, S. Flexible Imputation of Missing Data (Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2012).Dahlke, F. T., Wohlrab, S., Butzin, M. & Portner, H.-O. Thermal bottlenecks in the life cycle define climate vulnerability of fish. Science 369, 65–70 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Stortini, C. H., Shackell, N. L., Tyedmers, P. & Beazley, K. Assessing marine species vulnerability to projected warming on the Scotian Shelf, Canada. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 72, 1713–1743 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Reynolds, R. W. et al. Daily high-resolution-blended analyses for sea surface temperature. J. Clim. 20, 5473–5496 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Meinshausen, M. et al. The shared socio-economic pathway (SSP) greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions to 2500. Geosci. Model Dev. 13, 3571–3605 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Samhouri, J. F. et al. Sea sick? Setting targets to assess ocean health and ecosystem services. Ecosphere 3, art41 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rao, T. R. A curve for all reasons. Resonance 5, 85–90 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mora, C. et al. Biotic and human vulnerability to projected changes in ocean biogeochemistry over the 21st century. PLoS Biol. 11, 10 (2013).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lotze, H. K. et al. Ensemble projections of global ocean animal biomass with climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1900194116 (2019).Eyring, V. et al. Taking climate model evaluation to the next level. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 102–110 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Oppenheimer, M., Little, C. M. & Cooke, R. M. Expert judgement and uncertainty quantification for climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 445–451 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Budescu, D. V., Por, H. H. & Broomell, S. B. Effective communication of uncertainty in the IPCC reports. Climatic Change 113, 181–200 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Swart, R., Bernstein, L., Ha-Duong, M. & Petersen, A. Agreeing to disagree: uncertainty management in assessing climate change, impacts and responses by the IPCC. Climatic Change 92, 1–29 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
NAFO Annual Fisheries Statistics Database (NAFO, 2021).Horton, T. et al. World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) https://www.marinespecies.org (2020).Total Wealth per Capita, 1995 to 2014 (World Bank, 2022); https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/total-wealth-per-capitaDepth of the Food Deficit in Kilocalories per Person per Day, 1992 to 2016 (World Bank, 2022); https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/depth-of-the-food-deficitBoyce, D. G. et al. A climate risk index for marine life. Dryad https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.7wm37pvwr (2022).R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing Version 4.0.4 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021). More

The Insect Pollinators Initiative & Vanbergen, A. J. Threats to an ecosystem service: Pressures on pollinators. Front. Ecol. Environ. 11, 251–259 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Powney, G. D. et al. Widespread losses of pollinating insects in Britain. Nat. Commun. 10, 1018. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08974-9 (2019).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Woodcock, B. A. et al. Impacts of neonicotinoid use on long-term population changes in wild bees in England. Nat. Commun. 7, 12459. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12459 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Potts, S. G. et al. Global pollinator declines: Trends, impacts and drivers. TREE 25, 345–353 (2010).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Becher, M. A., Osborne, J. L., Thorbek, P., Kennedy, P. J. & Grimm, V. REVIEW: Towards a systems approach for understanding honeybee decline: A stocktaking and synthesis of existing models. J. Appl. Ecol. 50, 868–880 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Becher, M. A. et al. BEEHAVE: A systems model of honeybee colony dynamics and foraging to explore multifactorial causes of colony failure. J. Appl. Ecol. 51, 470–482 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Carvell, C. et al. Bumblebee family lineage survival is enhanced in high-quality landscapes. Nature 543, 547–549. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21709 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Alaux, C., Ducloz, F., Crauser, D. & Le Conte, Y. Diet effects on honeybee immunocompetence. Biol. Lett. 6, 562–565 (2010).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dolezal, A. G. et al. Interacting stressors matter: Diet quality and virus infection in honeybee health. R. Soc. Open Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181803 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Conti, I. et al. Sugar and protein content in different monofloral pollens – Building a database. Bull. Insectol. 69, 318–320 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Rodney, S. & Kramer, V. J. Probabilistic assessment of nectar requirements for nectar-foraging honey bees. Apidologie 51, 180–200 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cartar, R. V. Colony energy-reuirements affect response to predation risk in foraging bumble bees. Ethology 87, 90–96 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cook, S. M., Awmack, C. S., Murray, D. A. & Williams, I. H. Are honey bees’ foraging preferences affected by pollen amino acid composition?. Ecol. Entomol. 28, 622–627 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Baude, M. et al. Historical nectar assessment reveals the fall and rise of floral resources in Britain. Nature 530, 85–88. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16532 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Di Pasquale, G. et al. Influence of pollen nutrition on honey bee health: Do Pollen quality and diversity matter?. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072016 (2013).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Sanchez-Bayo, F. et al. Are bee diseases linked to pesticides?—A brief review. Environ. Int. 89–90, 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.01.009 (2016).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Park, M. G., Blitzer, E. J., Gibbs, J., Losey, J. E. & Danforth, B. N. Negative effects of pesticides on wild bee communities can be buffered by landscape context. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 282, 20150299. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.0299 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Woodcock, B. A. et al. Country-specific effects of neonicotinoid pesticides on honeybees and wild bees. Science 356, 1393–1395. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1190 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
PPDB. The pesticide properties DataBase (PPDB) (Agriculture & Environment Research Unit (AERU), University of Hertfordshire, 2013).Belden, J. B. The acute toxicity of pesticide mixtures to honeybees. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4595 (2022).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Battisti, L. et al. Is glyphosate toxic to bees? A meta-analytical review. Sci. Tot. Environ. 767, 145397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145397 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Siviter, H. et al. Agrochemicals interact synergistically to increase bee mortality. Nature 596, 389–392. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03787-7 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Robinson, R. A. & Sutherland, W. J. Post-war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great Britain. J. Appl. Ecol. 39, 157–176 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Carvell, C. et al. Declines in forage availability for bumblebees at a national scale. Biol. Conserv. 132, 481–489 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Carmona, C. P. et al. Agriculture intensification reduces plant taxonomic and functional diversity across European arable systems. Funct. Ecol. 34, 1448–1460 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Storkey, J. & Westbury, D. B. Managing arable weeds for biodiversity. Pest Manag. Sci. 63, 517–523 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hutchinson, L. A. et al. Using ecological and field survey data to establish a national list of the wild bee pollinators of crops. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 315, 107447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107447 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Requier, F., Odoux, J. F., Henry, M. & Bretagnolle, V. The carry-over effects of pollen shortage decrease the survival of honeybee colonies in farmlands. J. Appl. Ecol. 54, 1161–1170 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Alburaki, M., Gregorc, A., Adamczyk, J. & Stewart, S. D. Insights on pollen diversity of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies Located in various agricultural landscapes. Southwest. Nat. 63, 49–58 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Donkersley, P., Rhodes, G., Pickup, R. W., Jones, K. C. & Wilson, K. Honeybee nutrition is linked to landscape composition. Ecol. Evol. 4, 4195–4206 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cole, L. J., Brocklehurst, S., Robertson, D., Harrison, W. & McCracken, D. I. Exploring the interactions between resource availability and the utilisation of semi-natural habitats by insect pollinators in an intensive agricultural landscape. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 246, 157–167 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Steffan-Dewenter, I. & Kuhn, A. Honeybee foraging in differentially structured landscapes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 270, 569–575 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Woodcock, B. A. et al. Enhancing floral resources for pollinators in productive agricultural grasslands. Biol. Conserv. 171, 44–51 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Requier, F. et al. Honey bee diet in intensive farmland habitats reveals an unexpectedly high flower richness and a major role of weeds. Ecol. App. 25, 881–890 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ausseil, A. G. E., Dymond, J. R. & Newstrom, L. Mapping floral resources for honey bees in New Zealand at the catchment scale. Ecol. Appl. 28, 1182–1196. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1717 (2018).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kamo, T. et al. A DNA barcoding method for identifying and quantifying the composition of pollen species collected by European honeybees, Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 53, 353–361 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nurnberger, F., Keller, A., Hartel, S. & Steffan-Dewenter, I. Honey bee waggle dance communication increases diversity of pollen diets in intensively managed agricultural landscapes. Mol. Ecol. 28, 3602–3611 (2019).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Richardson, R. T. et al. Applications of ITS2 metabarcoding to determine the provenance of pollen collected by honey bees in an agroecosystem. Appl. Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3732/apps.1400066 (2015).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Oliver, A. E. et al. Integration of DNA extraction, metabarcoding and an informatics pipeline to underpin a national citizen science honey monitoring scheme. MethodsX 8, 101303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101303 (2021).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Jones, L. et al. Shifts in honeybee foraging reveal historical changes in floral resources. Commun. Biol. 4, 37. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01562-4 (2021).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Barroso-Arevalo, S., Vicente-Rubiano, M., Ruiz, J. A., Bentabol, A. & Sanchez-Vizcaino, J. M. Does pollen diversity influence honey bee colony health?. Sp. J. Agric. Res. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2019173-13991 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bansch, S., Tscharntke, T., Ratnieks, F. L. W., Hartel, S. & Westphal, C. Foraging of honey bees in agricultural landscapes with changing patterns of flower resources. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.106792 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Danner, N., Molitor, A. M., Schiele, S., Hartel, S. & Steffan-Dewenter, I. Season and landscape composition affect pollen foraging distances and habitat use of honey bees. Ecol. Appl. 26, 1920–1929 (2016).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
EFSA. EFSA Guidance Document on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees (Apis mellifera, Bombus spp. and solitary bees). EFSA J. 11, 3295 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Hatjina, F. et al. Citizen scientist initiative for measuring varroa damage thresholds: Common efforts for data collection—CSI varroa. Bee World 98, 132–135 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gratzer, K. & Brodschneider, R. How and why beekeepers participate in the INSIGNIA citizen science honey bee environmental monitoring project. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28, 37995–38006 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brodschneider, R. et al. CSI pollen: Diversity of honey bee collected pollen studied by citizen scientists. Insects 12, 987. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12110987 (2021).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Brodschneider, R. et al. A citizen science supported study on seasonal diversity and monoflorality of pollen collected by honey bees in Austria. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53016-5 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Taberlet, P., Coissac, E., Hajibabaei, M. & Rieseberg, L. H. Environmental DNA. Mol. Ecol. 21, 1789–1793 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Deiner, K. et al. Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities. Mol. Ecol. 26, 5872–5895. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14350 (2017).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Nagaharu, U. Genome analysis in brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. Napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Jpn. J. Bot. 7, 389–452 (1935).
Google Scholar 
Herbertsson, L., Lindstrom, S. A. M., Rundlof, M., Bornmarco, R. & Smith, H. G. Competition between managed honeybees and wild bumblebees depends on landscape context. Basic Appl. Ecol. 17, 609–616 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Magrach, A., Gonzalez-Varo, J. P., Boiffier, M., Vila, M. & Bartomeus, I. Honeybee spillover reshuffles pollinator diets and affects plant reproductive success. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1299–1307 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Adams-Groom, B., Martin, P. & Banon, A. Pollen characterization of English honey from Worcestershire, West Midlands (UK). Bee World https://doi.org/10.1080/0005772X.2019.1698105 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Smart, M. D. et al. A comparison of honey bee-collected pollen from working agricultural lands using light microscopy and ITS metabarcoding. Environ. Entomol. 46, 38–49 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Danner, N., Keller, A., Hartel, S. & Steffan-Dewenter, I. Honey bee foraging ecology: Season but not landscape diversity shapes the amount and diversity of collected pollen. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183716 (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Piroux, M. et al. Correlating the pollens gathered by Apis mellifera with the landscape features in Western France. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 12, 423–439 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Di Pasquale, G. et al. Variations in the availability of pollen resources affect honey bee health. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162818 (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Donkersley, P. et al. Nutritional composition of honey bee food stores vary with floral composition. Oecologia 185, 749–761 (2017).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Shaw, R. F. et al. Mass-flowering crops have a greater impact than semi-natural habitat on crop pollinators and pollen deposition. Landsc. Ecol. 35, 513–527 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
LoCascio, G. M., Aguirre, L., Irwin, R. E. & Adler, L. S. Pollen from multiple sunflower cultivars and species reduces a common bumblebee gut pathogen. R. Soc. Open Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190279 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Egan, P. A. et al. Plant toxin levels in nectar vary spatially across native and introduced populations. J. Ecol. 104, 1106–1115 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Flombaum, P., Sala, O. E. & Rastetter, E. B. Interactions among resource partitioning, sampling effect, and facilitation on the biodiversity effect: A modeling approach. Oecologia 174, 559–566 (2014).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cullen, M. G., Thompson, L. J., Carolan, J. C., Stout, J. C. & Stanley, D. A. Fungicides, herbicides and bees: A systematic review of existing research and methods. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225743 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Siviter, H. et al. Agrochemicals interact synergistically to increase bee mortality. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03787-7 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Haber, A. I., Steinhauer, N. A. & van Engelsdorp, D. Use of chemical and nonchemical methods for the control of Varroa destructor (Acari: Varroidae) and associated winter colony losses in U.S. beekeeping operations. J. Econ. Entomol. 112, 1509–1525 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Martin, S. J. et al. Global honey bee viral landscape altered by a parasitic mite. Science 336, 1304. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1220941 (2012).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Jarvis, S. G. et al. CEH land cover plus: Pesticides 2012-2017 (England, Scotland and Wales). NERC Environmental Information Data Centre. https://doi.org/10.5285/99a2d3a8-1c7d-421e-ac9f-87a2c37bda62 (2020).Simon-Delso, N. et al. Honeybee colony disorder in crop areas: The role of pesticides and viruses. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103073 (2014).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Greenleaf, S. G., Williams, N. M., Winfree, R. & Kremen, C. Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size. Oecologia 153, 589–596 (2007).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
FERA. PUS STAT: Pesticide usage surveys. https://secure.fera.defra.gov.uk/pusstats/myindex.cfm (2015).McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. phyloseq: An R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE 8, e61217. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061217 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
UKCEH. Land cover plus: Crops © NERC (CEH) 2019. (Remote Sensing Applications Consultants Ltd., 2019).Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N. & Elphick, C. S. A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1, 3–14 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kovach, J., Petzoldt, C., Degni, J. & Tette, J. A method to measure the environmental impact of pesticides, Vol. 139 1–8 (New York Food and Life Sciences Bulletin, 1992).Juraske, R., Antón, A. & Castells, F. Estimating half-lives of pesticides in/on vegetation for use in multimedia fate and exposure models. Chemosphere 70, 1748–1755 (2008).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Thompson, H. M., Fryday, S. L., Harkin, S. & Milner, S. Potential impacts of synergism in honeybees (Apis mellifera) of exposure to neonicotinoids and sprayed fungicides in crops. Apidologie 45, 545–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-014-0273-6 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Biddinger, D. J. et al. Comparative toxicities and synergism of apple orchard pesticides to Apis mellifera (L.) and Osmia cornifrons (Radoszkowski). PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072587 (2013).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ridley, L. et al. Pesticide usage survey report 295. Arable crops in the United Kingdom 2020 (Food & Environment Research Agency, 2020).Dormann, C. F., Gruber, B. & Fründ, J. Introducing the bipartite package: analysing ecological networks. R News 8, 8–11 (2008).
Google Scholar 
R Core Development Team. R: Version 3.6.3. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Bristol, UK. http://cran.r-project.org (2021).Pinheiro, J. C., Bates, D. & DebRoy, S. The R core team nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R Package nlme Version 3, 1–83 (2007).
Google Scholar  More

Cardinale, B. J. et al. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486, 59–67 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hooper, D. U. et al. A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change. Nature 486, 105–108 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Potts, S. G. et al. Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 345–353 (2010).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kennedy, C. M. et al. A global quantitative synthesis of local and landscape effects on wild bee pollinators in agroecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 16, 584–599 (2013).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cameron, S. A. et al. Patterns of widespread decline in North American bumble bees. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 662–667 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Xu, S. et al. Species richness promotes ecosystem carbon storage: evidence from biodiversity-ecosystem functioning experiments. Proc. Biol. Sci. 287, 20202063 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Jochum, M. et al. The results of biodiversity–ecosystem functioning experiments are realistic. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1485–1494 (2020).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Isbell, F. et al. High plant diversity is needed to maintain ecosystem services. Nature 477, 199–202 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Barnes, A. D. et al. Species richness and biomass explain spatial turnover in ecosystem functioning across tropical and temperate ecosystems. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 371, 20150279 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Manning, P. & Cutler, G. C. Ecosystem functioning is more strongly impaired by reducing dung beetle abundance than by reducing species richness. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 264, 9–14 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
van der Plas, F. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in naturally assembled communities. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 94, 1220–1245 (2019).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Blüthgen, N. & Klein, A.-M. Functional complementarity and specialisation: the role of biodiversity in plant–pollinator interactions. Basic Appl. Ecol. 12, 282–291 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Loreau, M. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: a mechanistic model. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 5632–5636 (1998).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Loreau, M. et al. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science 294, 804–808 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tilman, D. The ecological consequences of changes in biodiversity: a search for general principles. Ecology 80, 1455–1474 (1999).
Google Scholar 
Duffy, J. E., Godwin, C. M. & Cardinale, B. J. Biodiversity effects in the wild are common and as strong as key drivers of productivity. Nature 549, 261–264 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gonzalez, A. et al. Scaling-up biodiversity-ecosystem functioning research. Ecol. Lett. 23, 757–776 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Garibaldi, L. A. et al. Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance. Science 340, 1608–1611 (2013).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Greenop, A., Woodcock, B. A., Wilby, A., Cook, S. M. & Pywell, R. F. Functional diversity positively affects prey suppression by invertebrate predators: a meta-analysis. Ecology 99, 1771–1782 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
McGill, B. J. et al. Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework. Ecol. Lett. 10, 995–1015 (2007).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Genung, M. A. et al. The relative importance of pollinator abundance and species richness for the temporal variance of pollination services. Ecology 98, 1807–1816 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Winfree, R., Fox, J. W., Williams, N. M., Reilly, J. R. & Cariveau, D. P. Abundance of common species, not species richness, drives delivery of a real-world ecosystem service. Ecol. Lett. 18, 626–635 (2015).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kleijn, D. et al. Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation. Nat. Commun. 6, 7414 (2015).Smith, M. D. & Knapp, A. K. Dominant species maintain ecosystem function with non-random species loss. Ecol. Lett. 6, 509–517 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lohbeck, M., Bongers, F., Martinez-Ramos, M. & Poorter, L. The importance of biodiversity and dominance for multiple ecosystem functions in a human-modified tropical landscape. Ecology 97, 2772–2779 (2016).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Balvanera, P., Kremen, C. & Martínez-Ramos, M. Applying community structure analysis to ecosystem function: examples from pollination and carbon storage. Ecol. Appl. 15, 360–375 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Maureaud, A. et al. Biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationships in fish communities: biomass is related to evenness and the environment, not to species richness. Proc. Biol. Sci. 286, 20191189 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Genung, M. A., Fox, J. & Winfree, R. Species loss drives ecosystem function in experiments, but in nature the importance of species loss depends on dominance. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 1531–1541 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Potts, S. G., Vulliamy, B., Dafni, A., Ne’eman, G. & Willmer, P. Linking bees and flowers: how do floral communities structure pollinator communities? Ecology 84, 2628–2642 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tilman, D., Isbell, F. & Cowles, J. M. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 45, 471–493 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Craven, D. et al. A cross-scale assessment of productivity–diversity relationships. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 1940–1955 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Thompson, P. L., Isbell, F., Loreau, M., O’Connor, M. I. & Gonzalez, A. The strength of the biodiversity–ecosystem function relationship depends on spatial scale. Proc. Biol. Sci. 285, 20180038 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Qiu, J. & Cardinale, B. J. Scaling up biodiversity–ecosystem function relationships across space and over time. Ecology 101, e03166 (2020).Winfree, R. et al. Species turnover promotes the importance of bee diversity for crop pollination at regional scales. Science 359, 791–793 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Albrecht, J. et al. Species richness is more important for ecosystem functioning than species turnover along an elevational gradient. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1582–1593 (2021).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yachi, S. & Loreau, M. Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 1463–1468 (1999).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Shanafelt, D. W. et al. Biodiversity, productivity, and the spatial insurance hypothesis revisited. J. Theor. Biol. 380, 426–435 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Naeem, S. & Li, S. Biodiversity enhances ecosystem reliability. Nature 390, 507–509 (1997).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tilman, D. Biodiversity: population versus ecosystem stability. Ecology 77, 350–363 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
Herrera, C. M. Variation in mutualisms: the spatiotemporal mosaic of a pollinator assemblage. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 35, 95–125 (1988).Article 

Google Scholar 
McCormack, M. L., Adams, T. S., Smithwick, E. A. H. & Eissenstat, D. M. Variability in root production, phenology, and turnover rate among 12 temperate tree species. Ecology 95, 2224–2235 (2014).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wright, K. W., Vanderbilt, K. L., Inouye, D. W., Bertelsen, C. D. & Crimmins, T. M. Turnover and reliability of flower communities in extreme environments: insights from long-term phenology data sets. J. Arid Environ. 115, 27–34 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tylianakis, J. M. et al. Resource heterogeneity moderates the biodiversity-function relationship in real world ecosystems. PLoS Biol. 6, e122 (2008).PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kremen, C. Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology? Ecol. Lett. 8, 468–479 (2005).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Iserbyt, S. & Rasmont, P. The effect of climatic variation on abundance and diversity of bumblebees: a ten years survey in a mountain hotspot. Ann. Soc. Entomol. Fr. 48, 261–273 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Houlahan, J. E. et al. Compensatory dynamics are rare in natural ecological communities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 3273–3277 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ernest, S. K. M. & Brown, J. H. Homeostasis and compensation: the role of species and resources in ecosystem stability. Ecology 82, 2118–2132 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kremen, C., Williams, N. M. & Thorp, R. W. Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 16812–16816 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Allan, E. et al. More diverse plant communities have higher functioning over time due to turnover in complementary dominant species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 17034–17039 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tilman, D., Reich, P. B. & Knops, J. M. H. Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade-long grassland experiment. Nature 441, 629–632 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Awasthi, A., Singh, M., Soni, S. K., Singh, R. & Kalra, A. Biodiversity acts as insurance of productivity of bacterial communities under abiotic perturbations. ISME J. 8, 2445–2452 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tuck, S. L. et al. The value of biodiversity for the functioning of tropical forests: Insurance effects during the first decade of the Sabah biodiversity experiment. Proc. Biol. Sci. 283, 20161451 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Isbell, F. et al. Quantifying effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning across times and places. Ecol. Lett. 21, 763–778 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Reich, P. B. et al. Impacts of biodiversity loss escalate through time as redundancy fades. Science 336, 589–592 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Perry, C. J., Søvik, E., Myerscough, M. R. & Barron, A. B. Rapid behavioral maturation accelerates failure of stressed honey bee colonies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 3427–3432 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Benjamin, F. E. & Winfree, R. Lack of pollinators limits fruit production in commercial blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum). Environ. Entomol. 43, 1574–1583 (2014).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Isaacs, R. & Kirk, A. K. Pollination services provided to small and large highbush blueberry fields by wild and managed bees. J. Appl. Ecol. 47, 841–849 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, Y., Chen, H. Y. H. & Reich, P. B. Forest productivity increases with evenness, species richness and trait variation: a global meta-analysis. J. Ecol. 100, 742–749 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Baumgärtner, S. The insurance value of biodiversity in the provision of ecosystem services. Nat. Resour. Model. 20, 87–127 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Manning, P. et al. in Advances in Ecological Research (eds Eisenhauer, N., Bohan, D. A. & Dumbrell, A. J.) 323–356 (Academic Press, 2019).Naeem, S. Species redundancy and ecosystem reliability. Conserv. Biol. 12, 39–45 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
CaraDonna, P. J. et al. Interaction rewiring and the rapid turnover of plant–pollinator networks. Ecol. Lett. 20, 385–394 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gonzalez, A. & Loreau, M. The causes and consequences of compensatory dynamics in ecological communities. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40, 393–414 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, D., Chang, P.-H. S., Power, S. A., Bell, J. N. B. & Manning, P. Changes in plant species abundance alter the multifunctionality and functional space of heathland ecosystems. New Phytol. 232, 1238–1249 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Buschke, F. T., Hagan, J. G., Santini, L. & Coetzee, B. W. T. Random population fluctuations bias the Living Planet Index. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1145–1152 (2021).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Almond, R. E. A., Grooten, M. & Peterson, T. Living Planet Report 2020: Bending the Curve of Biodiversity Loss (World Wildlife Fund, 2020).Collen, B. et al. Monitoring change in vertebrate abundance: the Living Planet Index. Conserv. Biol. 23, 317–327 (2009).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wagner, D. L. Insect declines in the Anthropocene. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 65, 457–480 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Stanghellini, M. S., Ambrose, J. T. & Schultheis, J. R. The effects of honey bee and bumble bee pollination on fruit set and abortion of cucumber and watermelon. Am. Bee. J. 137, 386–391 (1997).
Google Scholar 
Winfree, R., Williams, N. M., Dushoff, J. & Kremen, C. Native bees provide insurance against ongoing honey bee losses. Ecol. Lett. 10, 1105–1113 (2007).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tamburini, G., Bommarco, R., Kleijn, D., van der Putten, W. H. & Marini, L. Pollination contribution to crop yield is often context-dependent: a review of experimental evidence. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 280, 16–23 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stanghellini, M. S., Ambrose, J. T. & Schultheis, J. R. Seed production in watermelon: a comparison between two commercially available pollinators. HortScience 33, 28–30 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Reilly, J. R. et al. Crop production in the USA is frequently limited by a lack of pollinators. Proc. Biol. Sci. 287, 20200922 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Greenleaf, S. S. & Kremen, C. Wild bees enhance honey bees’ pollination of hybrid sunflower. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 13890–13895 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sáez, A. Managed honeybees decrease pollination limitation in self-compatible but not in self-incompatible crops. Proc. Biol. Sci. 289, 20220086 (2022).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Brittain, C., Williams, N., Kremen, C. & Klein, A. M. Synergistic effects of non-Apis bees and honey bees for pollination services. Proc. Biol. Sci. 280, 20122767 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Aizen, M. A. & Harder, L. D. The global stock of domesticated honey bees is growing slower than agricultural demand for pollination. Curr. Biol. 19, 915–918 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Houlahan, J. E. et al. Negative relationships between species richness and temporal variability are common but weak in natural systems. Ecology 99, 2592–2604 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Winfree, R. Global change, biodiversity, and ecosystem services: what can we learn from studies of pollination? Basic Appl. Ecol. 14, 453–460 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Greenleaf, S. S., Williams, N. M., Winfree, R. & Kremen, C. Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size. Oecologia 153, 589–596 (2007).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cariveau, D. P., Williams, N. M., Benjamin, F. E. & Winfree, R. Response diversity to land use occurs but does not consistently stabilise ecosystem services provided by native pollinators. Ecol. Lett. 16, 903–911 (2013).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gamfeldt, L., Hillebrand, H. & Jonsson, P. R. Multiple functions increase the importance of biodiversity for overall ecosystem functioning. Ecology 89, 1223–1231 (2008).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zavaleta, E. S., Pasari, J. R., Hulvey, K. B. & Tilman, G. D. Sustaining multiple ecosystem functions in grassland communities requires higher biodiversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 1443–1446 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Haupt, R. L. & Haupt, S. E. Practical Genetic Algorithms (Wiley, 2004).Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lüdecke, D., Makowski, D., Waggoner, P. & Patil, I. performance: Assessment of regression models performance. R package version 0.7.0 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3952174 (2020).Venables, W. N. & Ripley, B. D. Modern Applied Statistics with S (Springer, 2002).Brooks, M. et al. glmmTMB: Generalized linear mixed models using template model builder. R package version 1.1.3 https://glmmtmb.github.io/glmmTMB/ (2022).R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021). More

Dale, V. H. et al. Climate change and forest disturbances. BioScience 51, 723 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
McDowell, N. et al. Drivers and mechanisms of tree mortality in moist tropical forests. New Phytol. 219, 851–869 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Esquivel-Muelbert, A. et al. Compositional response of Amazon forests to climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 39–56 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
McDowell, N. G. et al. Pervasive shifts in forest dynamics in a changing world. Science 368, eaaz9463 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gora, E. M. & Esquivel-Muelbert, A. Implications of size-dependent tree mortality for tropical forest carbon dynamics. Nat. Plants 7, 384–391 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yanoviak, S. P. et al. Lightning is a major cause of large tree mortality in a lowland neotropical forest. New Phytol. 225, 1936–1944 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gora, E. M. et al. A mechanistic and empirically supported lightning risk model for forest trees. J. Ecol. 108, 1956–1966 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gora, E. M., Burchfield, J. C., Muller‐Landau, H. C., Bitzer, P. M. & Yanoviak, S. P. Pantropical geography of lightning‐caused disturbance and its implications for tropical forests. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 5017–5026 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Harel, M. & Price, C. Thunderstorm trends over Africa. J. Clim. 33, 2741–2755 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Maxwell, H. Observations on trees, as conductors of lightning. Mem. Am. Acad. Arts Sci. 2, 143 (1793).
Google Scholar 
Covert, R. N. Why an oak is often struck by lightning: a method of protecting trees against lightning. Mon. Weather Rev. 52, 492–493 (1924).Article 

Google Scholar 
Taylor, A. R. Lightning damage to forest trees in Montana. Weatherwise 17, 61–65 (1964).Article 

Google Scholar 
Furtado, C. X. Lightning injuries to trees. J. Malays. Branch R. Asiat. Soc. 13, 157–162 (1935).
Google Scholar 
Magnusson, W. E., Lima, A. P. & De Lima, O. Group lightning mortality of trees in a neotropical forest. J. Trop. Ecol. 12, 899–903 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yanoviak, S. P., Gora, E. M., Burchfield, J. M., Bitzer, P. M. & Detto, M. Quantification and identification of lightning damage in tropical forests. Ecol. Evol. 7, 5111–5122 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Makela, J., Karvinen, E., Porjo, N., Makela, A. & Tuomi, T. Attachment of natural lightning flashes to trees: preliminary statistical characteristics. J. Light. Res. 1, 9–21 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yanoviak, S. P. in Treetops at Risk (eds Lowman, M. et al.) 147–153 (Springer, 2013).Gora, E. M., Bitzer, P. M., Burchfield, J. C., Schnitzer, S. A. & Yanoviak, S. P. Effects of lightning on trees: a predictive model based on in situ electrical resistivity. Ecol. Evol. 7, 8523–8534 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Orville, R. E. Photograph of a close lightning flash. Science 162, 666–667 (1968).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gora, E. M. & Yanoviak, S. P. Electrical properties of temperate forest trees: a review and quantitative comparison with vines. Can. J. For. Res. 45, 236–245 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hietz, P., Rosner, S., Hietz-Seifert, U. & Wright, S. J. Wood traits related to size and life history of trees in a Panamanian rainforest. New Phytol. 213, 170–180 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Clarke, P. J. et al. Resprouting as a key functional trait: how buds, protection and resources drive persistence after fire. New Phytol. 197, 19–35 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kozlowski, T. T. & Pallardy, S. G. Physiology of Woody Plants (Academic Press, 1997).Bruijning, M. et al. Surviving in a cosexual world: a cost–benefit analysis of dioecy in tropical trees. Am. Nat. 189, 297–314 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Visser, M. D. et al. Strict mast fruiting for a tropical dipterocarp tree: a demographic cost–benefit analysis of delayed reproduction and seed predation. J. Ecol. 99, 1033–1044 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Charles, A. E. Coconut lightning strike. Papua New Guin. Agric. J. 12, 192–195 (1960).
Google Scholar 
Sharples, A. Lightning storms and their significance in relation to diseases of Cocos nucifera and Hevea brasilensis. Ann. Appl. Biol. 20, 1–22 (1933).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wright, S. J. et al. Functional traits and the growth–mortality trade‐off in tropical trees. Ecology 91, 3664–3674 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Camac, J. S. et al. Partitioning mortality into growth-dependent and growth-independent hazards across 203 tropical tree species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 12459–12464 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Poorter, L. Leaf traits show different relationships with shade tolerance in moist versus dry tropical forests. New Phytol. 181, 890–900 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gora, E. M., Bitzer, P. M., Burchfield, J. C., Gutiérrez, C. & Yanoviak, S. P. The contributions of lightning to biomass turnover, gap formation, and plant mortality in a tropical forest. Ecology 102, e03541 (2021).R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021).Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer-Verlag, 2016).Brooks, M. E. et al. glmmTMB: Generalized linear mixed models using template model builder. R package version 1.1.3 (2019).Zeileis, A. & Hothorn, T. Diagnostic checking in regression relationships. R News 2, 7–10 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Condit, R. et al. Complete data from the Barro Colorado 50-ha plot: 423617 trees, 35 years, 2019 version. Dryad https://doi.org/10.15146/5xcp-0d46 (2019).Chave, J. et al. Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum. Ecol. Lett. 12, 351–366 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zanne, A. E. et al. Data from: Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum. Dryad https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.234 (2009).Kattge, J. et al. TRY plant trait database—enhanced coverage and open access. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 70 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gora, E. M. et al. Data from: A mechanistic and empirically-supported lightning risk model for forest trees. Dryad https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.c59zw3r48 (2020). More