More stories

  • in

    Trawling the ocean virome

    Microbial biodiversity surveys have often been done in a number of generally better-studied regions3, as with the San Pedro Time Series from the San Pedro Channel off the coast of Southern California. Global surveys have also been emerging, such as the Sorcerer II Global Ocean Sampling Expedition from 2004 to 2006 launched by J. Craig Venter. There are also data and samples from the Malaspina circumnavigation, an expedition devoted to data collection on ocean biodiversity and climate change that was led by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation.As microbiome researcher Shinichi Sunagawa of the ETH Zurich and colleagues point out4, sequencing technologies have advanced such that they now enable systematic and quantitative global ocean surveys. These advances, in turn, made it possible to find and assess marine double-stranded DNA virus populations. This latest work on marine RNA viruses, says Sunagawa, in which he was also involved, embeds new phylum-level findings into a “robust taxonomic framework.” In his view, this research ranks in importance with the reconstruction a few years ago of a group of bacterial genomes representing more than 35 phyla that the researchers call “the candidate phyla radiation”5. If one counts viruses in with other taxonomic groups, the finding might be the largest single expansion of established microbial taxonomy, he says. And he especially likes the definition of a new basal Orthornavirae megataxon, the proposed phylum ‘Taraviricota’. This proposed phylum is one of several findings from recently published analyses of sampling data from Tara Oceans1,2, a global expedition supported by the Tara Ocean Foundation, or Fondation Tara Océan, based in France and with many partner organizations and supporters. The foundation is a major source of global data about the ocean and ocean microbes and, as its president Étienne Bourgois says, it’s a “family project.” The family business is the French fashion house agnès b., founded by his mother Agnès Troublé.Because the family cares about the sea, they bought a 36-meter schooner from Lady Pippa Blake, widow of yachtsman and explorer Sir Peter Blake, after pirates killed him during an environmental expedition in the Amazon delta, and turned it into the expedition vessel and floating science laboratory Tara, devoted to understanding and protecting the world’s marine environment. It’s a way to continue what Peter Blake started, to continue the conversation about the ocean and do research as well, says sailor-scientist Romain Troublé, executive director of the foundation and nephew of Agnès Troublé. The boat had been previously owned by explorer Jean-Louis Étienne. The foundation has supported several expeditions with Tara including the Tara Oceans and Tara Oceans Polar Circle expeditions, as well as Tara Mission Microbiomes, which is currently underway. The equilibrium of the planet “depends on the microbiome of the ocean in the same way we depend on our own microbiome,” says Romain Troublé. Viruses are part of the larger picture of how life is supported on the planet. It’s “a great mystery of the century” to decipher the roles, behaviors and functions of the ocean microbiome, including its beneficial effects. Over the last decade, he says, the expeditions have, for example, collected plankton samples from coastal waters, coral reefs and the high seas around the world for scientists to ask questions of. Microplastics in the ocean concentrate chemical pollutants such as pesticides, and microplastics appear to be substrates for distinct microbiomes. Polystyrene and polypropylene, for example, harbor different microbial communities. “We call it the plastisphere,” he says. All sample collection, not just of microplastics, happens with a view to scientific rigor to assure data quality, says Troublé. Many institutes are part of and support the expeditions through the Tara Ocean Foundation, including AtlantECO, the French Ministry of Research, the Swiss National Science Foundation, the US National Science Foundation, the European Molecular Biology Laboratory and the French National Centre for Scientific Research.Tara Oceans was an expedition initiated by EMBL researcher Eric Karsenti, here in the foreground. He is checking a rosette of Niskin bottles that collect water, and ocean microbe samples, at various depths. Sensors capture parameters such as temperature.
    Credit: Fondation Tara OcéanIts expedition Tara Oceans was initiated by cell and marine biologist Eric Karsenti of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory. The expedition ran from 2009 to 2013 and covered 125,000 kilometers of ocean, taking ocean water and samples. It collected nearly 35,000 samples of viruses, algae and plankton and delivered more than 60 terabases of DNA and RNA sequences.The research community strives to follow FAIR data principles, the principles of findability, accessibility, interoperability and reusability, says Sunagawa. Tara Ocean’s data troves can be found, for instance, in the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA), Pangeaea, Cyverse, iVIRUS and on Genoscope. Other data-collection efforts target users with less programming experience and offer various types of data relevant to marine microbial research, he says: for example, the Ocean Gene Atlas, a portal to search for a gene or protein sequence to see, for instance, its abundance on an ocean map. The Ocean Barcode Atlas lets users explore, for example, operational taxonomic units (OTU) data and plankton communities from Tara Oceans and OTUs from Malaspina prokaryote data. Sunagawa also points to the Ocean Microbiomics Database and its high-quality genome-resolved information about the global microbiome, which has sequencing data from 2003 onwards and which includes Tara Oceans data as well as datasets such as the Hawaii Ocean Time-Series (HOT), the Bermuda Atlantic Time-series Study (BATS), with its collection of ocean data dating back to 1988, and BioGeotraces, with hydrographic and marine geochemical data from various expeditions.The recent publications on RNA viruses1,2, in which Sunagawa was also involved, have expanded the known diversity of these viruses, he says. They build on efforts by, for example, the research team that created and applied a cloud-based infrastructure called Serratus6, with which researchers can perform sequence alignment using bowtie2 for nucleotide sequences and DIAMOND2 for protein sequences in ‘ultra-high throughput’ on a petabase scale. Using Serratus, the team identified more than 130,000 previously unknown RNA viruses, both on land and in the oceans. The wealth of resources for microbial and viral data about the oceans is helpful to the research community, but “we could still improve the connectivity between various datasets though,” says Sunagawa. That would help, for example, with searching and finding data products that are derived from primary data, such as identifiers of individual genome assemblies, genes and metagenome assembled genomes, which are all presented in different online locations. But connecting data resources is a project that itself takes resources, and such projects are hard to get funding for.Going forward, it will be challenging, says Sunagawa, to update and keep up to date both past projects and ongoing projects such as the Global Ocean Ship-based Hydrographic Investigations program (GO-SHIP), which is focused on physical oceanography; the Antarctic Circumnavigation Expedition (ACE), on carbon-cycle marine biogeochemistry; Mission Microbiomes; and many more. “And ultimately, we will need to cross boundaries that currently separate biome-focused research to better understand processes at the sea–land–atmosphere interfaces.”Tara Mission Microbiomes has been underway for nearly two years and wraps up in October 2022. At press time, the schooner Tara was off the Angolan Coast. At the end of the expedition, it will have traveled a total of 70,000 km of ocean area around South America, Africa, Europe and Antarctica. Mission Microbiomes is part of the EU-funded AtlantECO and also includes 42 research organizations from 13 countries. The microbiome mission is collecting data on how climate change is affecting the marine microbiome, on how pollution, microplastics pollution in particular, affects the marine environments and on the beneficial impact of the ocean microbiome.Krill are small ocean crustaceans that mainly eat phytoplankton and are a food source for animals such as whales and seals. Krill play a crucial role in biogeochemical cycles.
    Credit: F. Aurat, Fondation Tara OcéanChris Bowler, from the Institut de Biologie de l’École Normale Supérieure, is scientific director of the Tara Oceans consortium, was scientific coordinator of the Tara Oceans expedition and was onboard in Antarctica during the Tara Mission Microbiomes expedition to collect data on the impact of icebergs on the Weddell Sea ecosystem. The project’s scientists in Tara Mission Microbiomes, he says, are studying specific processes, including the Amazon plume, the Malvinas confluence, the impact of tabular icebergs in the Weddell Sea, the Benguela upwelling and more. The data from this expedition will be similar to those from Tara Oceans but, he says, “we will have much more contextual data related to the specific processes we have been studying.” The applied techniques are all ones that have undergone much advancement since Tara Oceans, he says. They include long-read sequencing, Hi-C sequencing to capture chromatin organization on a genome-wide basis and various types of microscopy.Data and results from previous and ongoing expeditions are impressive, says Sunagawa but “we are still data-limited in our field of research.” Geographically, sampling stations are usually still separated by hundreds of kilometers, and often they are even further apart than that. This means that what is missing is both temporal and seasonal resolution, “and we keep detecting new organisms,” he says. Tara Mission Microbiomes will help to fill in some of these gaps. The mission is unlike Tara Oceans, with its focus more on coastal areas and environmental pollutants such as microplastics. Sunagawa and his group are not currently involved with Tara Mission Microbiomes, “but we look forward to seeing the first results coming out soon.”Through photosynthesis, phytoplankton deliver oxygen to the planet. They are food for zooplankton, which are food for other marine organisms. This food web and its associated decomposition are part of the ocean’s carbon pump, in which marine viruses play an important role that scientists have only begun exploring.
    Credit: M. Bardy, Fondation Tara Océan More

  • in

    Chlorophytes response to habitat complexity and human disturbance in the catchment of small and shallow aquatic systems

    Response of chlorophytes to environmental variables in field vs. forest pondsOur study demonstrated that human-originated transformation in the catchment area surrounding a small water body may influence the water conditions in terms of physical, chemical, and biological parameters as well as the ecological state of the aquatic environment in respect to green algae communities.Chlorophytes inhabiting field ponds were more abundant compared with the forest ponds. This shows that field ponds, due to the higher values of TRP and water conductivity, created favorable conditions for chlorophyte development. The high concentrations of TRP and conductivity in aquatic environments are characteristic in the case of agricultural catchments exposed to anthropogenic pressure because of the inflow from the surrounding fertilized fields42. In this type of pond, we also observed significantly higher water temperatures and pH due to the lack of trees around them compared to the forest ponds, two factors which also positively influenced the growth of chlorophytes. Both the higher light intensity and the smaller size of the field ponds cause earlier warming up than the forest ponds and give an advantage to high light tolerant species. Moreover, it is well known that an increase in temperature stimulates the release of phosphorus from the bottom sediments, so this could be another reason for the higher levels of TRP in the field ponds. Our CCA analysis showed that TRP and conductivity were the strongest determinants of the distribution of chlorophyte species in the examined water bodies. We found a large group of dominant species indicated high values of TRP (e.g. Ankistrodesmus falcatus, A. arcuatus, Monoraphidium griffithii, Pseudopediastrum boryanum, Pediastrum duplex, Scenedesmus obtusus, Scenedesmus arcuatus var. gracilis, Desmodesmus communis, Coelastrum microporum), and another group of species (e.g. Kirchneriella irregularis var. spiralis, Tetraedron minimum, Scenedesmus ecornis) that preferred high levels of conductivity.In the field ponds generally higher mean abundances of filtrators and Rotifera were observed. This could be another important factor stimulating the growth of chlorophytes and increasing their abundances by the resupply of nutrients through excretion43,44. On the other hand, the high densities of algae could be the factor that caused better zooplankton development, and therefore its abundance in field ponds was greater. Filtrating cladocerans and Rotifera also had a significant influence on the distribution of chlorophyte dominating species. However, even though the total abundance of both chlorophytes and filtering zooplankton was greater in the field ponds, CCA analysis revealed a negative relationship existing between filtrators and most dominant species of chlorophytes (e.g. Pandorina morum, Willea rectangularis, Desmodesmus armatus, Nephrochlamys willeana, Cosmarium trilobulatum). Only two chlorophyte species—Lemmermannnia tetrapedia and Tetraedron triangulare—co-occurred with cladoceran zooplankton. These latter species are very small compared to the species above and can therefore be overlooked by filtrators, which have a choice of larger and perhaps more nutritiously satisfying algae of the genus Pandorina, Crucigeniella, Cosmarium or Nephrochlamys, but still of a size suitable for zooplankton. It can also be interpreted in such a way that Crucigenia and Tetraedron are among the r-strategists that reproduce very quickly, so grazing pressure by zooplankton can stimulate their rapid development45 and thus they remain at a stable level.Specific environmental conditions prevailing in the field ponds resulted in a high number of exclusive taxa44, found only in this type of water body. Moreover, a greater diversity of the representatives of different functional groups were found here, compared to the forest ponds.Analyzing the distribution of chlorophytes in terms of phytoplankton functional groups39,40, we found that group W1 was represented by only one species, Gonium pectorale. This was especially noted in the field water bodies. This group is known to prefer small water bodies rich in organic matter from husbandry or sewage40, which suggests that the field catchment in our study migh be a supplier of these substances. It also proves that field surroundings are far more human impacted. In the field ponds we observed a higher abundance of chlorophytes belonging to the groups G (Eudorina elegans, Pandorina morum, Pandorina smithii and Volvox aureus), J (e.g. representatives of the genus Actinastrum, Chlorotetraedron, Coelastrum, Crucigenia, Desmodesmus/Scenedesmus, Golenkinia, Pediastrum, Tetraedron, Tetrastrum, Westella, Willea/Crucigeniella), W0 (genera Chlamydomonas, Chlorangiopsis, Chlamydomonadopsis, Planktococcomyxa/Coccomyxa) and X3 (Chlorella sp.), typical for shallow nutrient-rich waters (G and J), ponds with extremely high organic contents (W0), and for shallow well-mixed layers (X3), according to classification given by Padisak et al.40. Considering that nitrogen compounds had a similar level in both types of ponds it can be stated that the representatives of the above mentioned functional groups of chlorophytes associated with the field ponds were presumably dependent on higher concentrations of TRP and conductivity and not that much on nitrogen concentrations.In the forest ponds significantly higher values of water saturation were recorded compared to the field ponds. Moreover, the lack of inflow of fertilizers from the catchment area resulted in lower TRP concentrations, which along with lower water temperatures, pH and conductivity in the forest ponds may have contributed to the reduced abundance of chlorophytes compared to the field water bodies. RDA analysis showed that some dominant chlorophyte species (e.g. Closterium moniliferum, Closterium tumidulum, Cosmarium trilobulatum and Mougeotia sp.) were associated with this type of small water body. At the same time the abundance of these species was smaller in the field ponds. We also found that chlorophyte diversity (Shannon–Weaver index) was greater in the forest ponds. This suggests that water bodies located within the forested area, usually more natural ponds being less exposed to anthropogenic pressure, are characterized by greater biodiversity. Moreover, in this type of water body we found many exclusive species39, not reported from the field ponds. Interestingly, about the half of these taxa belonged to desmids, which prefer lower pH and conductivity46, conditions typical for forest ponds. This could be also a reason for the dominance of desmid species with the highest abundance/frequency, associated with forest ponds.Taking into consideration the phytoplankton functional groups39,40 our study showed that the chlorophytes associated with forest ponds prefer mesotrophic waters (from the group TD: Cladophora glomerata, Geminella turfosa, Geminella planctonica, Microspora sp., Netrium digitus, Oedogonium sp., Oocystidium ovale, Spirogyra sp. Zygnema sp. and those belonging to the group N: mainly genera Closterium, Cosmarium, Euastrum, Micrasterias, Staurastrum, Staurodesmus, Xanthidium). This explains their greater share in the less fertile forest ponds. Another group associated with the forest ponds – T (Mougeotia sp., Binuclearia lauterbornii) contains species tolerant to light deficiency, so they were able to develop well in the more shaded water bodies located in the forest catchment.Chlorophyte community structure in two types of habitats (open water vs. macrophyte-dominated zone)In our study, the type of habitat (open water and macrophyte-dominated zones) also had a significant structuring effect on chlorophytes. There were a group of species linked to the open water zone (Pandorina morum, Nephrochlamys willeana, Oocystis lacustris, Scenedesmus armatus, Scenedesmus intermedius and Desmodesmus communis), being negatively related to vegetated stations at the same time. Generally, we found here a higher mean abundance of chlorophytes compared to the macrophyte-dominated zones, possibly due to the higher values of nutrients such as NH4 and TRP, the conditions favouring the development of many algae species. The results of the CCA analysis with habitats confirmed the high importance of both nutritional factors in structuring the distribution of chlorophyte species. There was a group of species associated with a rise in the concentration of ammonium (e.g. Scenedesmus arcuatus var. gracilis, Pediastrum duplex, Closterium moniliferum, Closterium tumidulum, Cosmarium trilobulatum, Willea rectangularis) as well as with phosphates (Monoraphidium tortile, Scenedesmus ecornis, Tetradesmus lagerheimii and Tetraedron minimum). Generally, high abundance of chlorophytes in the open water area was accompanied by a small-sized fraction of zooplankton–rotifers. Therefore, rotifers had a lower impact on the distribution of chlorophytes than filtrators. The increasing numbers of cladocerans contributed to the lowering abundance of some chlorophytes, such as Monoraphidium tortile, Scenedesmus ecornis, Tetradesmus lagerheimii or Tetraedron minimum. This shows that filtrators, whose densities were significantly higher among macrophytes, were able to control the development of some chlorophyte species much more efficiently than small-bodied rotifers.The effect of habitat was also visible in the case of phytoplankton functional groups39,40. We found that representatives of the group N (e.g. Closterium, Cosmarium, Euastrum, Micrasterias, Staurastrum) had a significantly higher mean abundance in the open water zones compared to the macrophyte-dominated zones. Interestingly, according to Padisak et al.40 group N prefers less fertile (mesotrophic) conditions, which is inconsistent with our results. However, we think that their association with the open water sites could be connected rather with the place/level where they live in the water column, rather than with the trophic state of water. The above mentioned chlorophytes taxonomically belong to desmids, which are mostly benthic organisms. Their greater quantitative share in the samples from the open water areas could be an effect of the intensive water mixing in the shallow ponds due to the lack of macrophytes. Neustupa et al.47 confirm that desmids are able to form tychoplanktonic communities due to water movements. In the samples collected from the macrophyte-dominated stations the mean abundance of desmids was generally lower, probably because of the macrophyte stabilizing effect. Aquatic plants are known to reduce turbidity and stabilize bottom sediments48, so they can prevent any intensive water mixing in ponds. In the examined open water stations, we also found a higher mean abundance of chlorophytes typical for shallow nutrient-rich waters (group G: Eudorina, Pandorina, Volvox and group K: Radiococcus) and/or for ponds with extremely high organic contents (group W0: e.g. Chlamydomonas), which proves that the sites lacking macrophytes were more fertile. Additionally, clearly more representatives from the codon J and X1 (typical for waters with high trophic levels) and a greater diversity of the representatives of different functional groups were recorded in the open water area compared to the macrophyte-dominated zones.The macrophyte-dominated stations had more abundant communities of filtrators, as aquatic plants are known to provide a profitable shelter for zooplankton49. Cladoceran predominance among macrophytes may have been a force reducing green algae numbers. The chlorophytes of the investigated ponds were mostly small- or medium-size species. Their size distribution makes them a high quality food for zooplankton, particularly for cladoceran filtrators. According to RDA analysis apart from pond size, the presence of filtrators significanly reduced the abundance of several chlorophyte dominating species. The lower algae abundance among macrophytes compared to the open water zone could also be explained by competition between algae and macrophytes for light and nutrients37,50 and/or with the secretion of allelopathic substances e.g. by Ceratophyllum demersum51 inhibiting algal development. Our studies demonstrated that among chemical factors which clearly differentiated the two types of analysed habitat, TRP and NH4 significantly influenced the distribution of chlorophyte dominating species. The lower levels of these parameters in macrophyte-dominated zones suggest that the nutrient uptake by aquatic plants in the investigated water bodies was high. There are many reports on the decrease of nutrient concentrations by macrophytes30,37,52, which are consistent with our observations. Despite lower, compared to the open water zone, chlorophyte densities within the macrophyte-dominated zones there was a group of species (e.g. Mougeotia sp., Pediastrum tetras, Scenedesmus obtusus, Monoraphidium contortum) that selectively chose vegetated stands. Furthermore, we found a great number29 of exclusive chlorophyte species for macrophyte-dominated zones. Half of these taxa belong to desmids, which are often periphytic organisms associated with aquatic macrophytes53,54.Preference towards macrophyte-dominated stations was also documented for two phytoplankton functional groups (T: Mougeotia sp. and Binuclearia lauterbornii and TD: e.g., Spirogyra sp., Zygnema sp., Cladophora glomerata, Oedogonium sp.) and one group which occurred exlusively among vegetated sites (MP—Ulothrix). Interestingly, all the representatives of these groups had a similar filamentous morphological form, which suggests that many of them are of epithytic origin, coexisting within aquatic plants. Two more groups—X2 (Pseudodidymocystis/Didymocystis, Pteromonas) and W1 (Gonium pectorale) were clearly affected by the presence of macrophytes. According to Padisak et al.40, codons TD and X2 indicate mesoeutrophic conditions and their higher abundances in the macrophyte-dominated zones also proves that plants contribute to lowering the trophic levels in the examined ponds. On the other hand, the relatively high abundance of the representative of the group W1 in these habitats suggests that macrophytes could enrich ponds with organic matter during the process of their decomposition.Concluding, our results prove that different types of catchment area (field and forest) as well as different types of habitats (open water zone and macrophyte-dominated zone) create distinct, specific conditions (dependent on some physical–chemical and biological variables) for the occurrence of chlorophytes in small water bodies. We conclude that cosmopolitan chlorophytes undoubtedly respond to the level of habitat heterogeneity, contributing to the ecological assessment of small water bodies. Chlorophytes in particularl react to the level of human transformation in the ponds’ vicinities. This is why we suggest using them for water quality evaluation in ponds. This interdisciplinary research significantly broadens the knowledge, not only about the response of chlorophytes to physical–chemical parameters of water, but also about the food preferences of zooplankton for which green algae are the basic food, and vice versa about the impact of zooplankton on microalgae communities. The analyses provide valuable information on chlorophytes-zooplankton interactions and also about the relationships between chlorophytes and macrophytes. Received data emphasize the high value of field ponds, underestimated habitats particularly vulnerable to destruction in the agricultural landscape. The research will help to better understand the functioning of poorly studied small water bodies, which will contribute to the preservation of their biodiversity and protection against degradation. They will also be useful in the management of small water bodies based on the specificity of chlorophyte occurrence in various habitats and catchment type ponds. Moreover, these results are important in a broader context, as the interactions between the studied organisms and the physico-chemical parameters of water in small bodies of water are to some extent universal, so the analyses will broaden the knowledge about the functioning of larger bodies of water. More

  • in

    Acoustic characteristics of sound produced by males of Bactrocera oleae change in the presence of conspecifics

    Benelli, G. et al. Sexual communication and related behaviours in Tephritidae: Current knowledge and potential applications for Integrated Pest Management. J. Pest Sci. 87, 385–405 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kuba, H. & Sokei, Y. The production of pheromone clouds by spraying in the melon fly, Dacus cucurbitae coquillett (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Ethol. 6, 105–110 (1988).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Fletcher, B. S. The structure and function of the sex pheromone glands of the male Queensland fruit fly, Dacus tryoni.. J. Insect Physiol. 15, 1309–1322 (1969).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Nation, J. L. Courtship behavior and evidence for a sex attractant in the male Caribbean fruit fly, Anastrepha suspensa. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 65, 1364–1367 (1972).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Arita, L. H. & Kaneshiro, K. Y. Sexual selection and lek behavior in the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae). Pacific Sci. (EUA) 43, 135–143 (1989).
    Google Scholar 
    Briceño, R.D. & Eberhard, W.G. Male wing positions during courtship by Mediterranean fruit flies (Ceratitis capitata) (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 143–47 (2000).Benelli, G. et al. Male wing vibration in the mating behavior of the Olive fruit fly Bactrocera oleae (Rossi) (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Insect Behav. 25, 590–603 (2012).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Feron, M. L’appel sonore du mâle dans le comportement sexuel de Dacus oleae Gmel [Dipt Trypetidae]. Bull. Soc. Entomol. Fr. 65, 139–143 (1960).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Feron, M. & Andrieu, A. J. Etude des signaux acoustiques du male dans le comportement sexuel de Dacus Oleae Gmel (Dipt. Trypetidae). Ann. Epiphyt. 13, 269–276 (1962).
    Google Scholar 
    Rolli, K. Die akustischen Sexualsignale von Ceratitis capitata Wied. Und Dacus oleae Gmel. Z. Angew. Entomol. 81, 219–223 (1976).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Webb, J. C., Calkins, C. O., Chambers, D. L., Schwienbacher, W. & Russ, K. Acoustical aspects of behavior of Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata: Analysis and identification of courtship sounds. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 33, 1–8 (1983).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Mankin, R. W., Lemon, M., Harmer, A. M. T., Evans, C. S. & Taylor, P. W. Time pattern and frequency analyses of sounds produced by irradiated and untreated male Bactrocera tryoni (Diptera: Tephritidae) during mating behavior. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 101, 664–674 (2008).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Miyatake, T. & Kanmiya, K. Male courtship song in circadian rhythm mutants of Bactrocera cucurbitae (Tephritidae: Diptera). J. Insect Physiol. 50, 85–91 (2004).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Sivinski, J., Burk, T. & Webb, J. Acoustic courtship signals in the Caribbean fruit fly, Anastrepha suspensa (Loew). Anim. Behav. 32, 1011–1016 (1984).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Mankin, R. W. et al. Broadcasts of wing-fanning vibrations recorded from calling male Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) increase captures of females in traps. J. Econ. Entomol. 97, 1299–1309 (2004).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Mankin, R. W., Petersson, E., Epsky, N. D., Heath, R. R. & Sivinski, J. Exposure to male pheromones enhances Anastrepha suspensa (Diptera: Tephritidae) female response to male calling song. Fla. Entomol. 83, 411 (2000).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Sivinski, J. & Webb, J. C. Changes in a Caribbean fruit fly acoustic signal with social situation (Diptera: Tephritidae)1. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 79, 146–149 (1986).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Canale, A. et al. The courtship song of fanning males in the fruit fly parasitoid Psyttalia concolor (Szépligeti) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 103, 303–309 (2013).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Wicker-Thomas, C. Pheromonal communication involved in courtship behavior in Diptera. J. Insect. Physiol. 53, 1089–1100 (2007).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Tan, K.H., Nishida, R., Jang, E.B. & Shelly, T.E. Pheromones, male lures, and trapping of tephritid fruit flies. In: Trapping and the Detection, Control, and Regulation of Tephritid Fruit Flies: Lures, Area-Wide Programs, And Trade Implications 15–74 (Springer, 2014).Poramarcom, R. Sexual communication in the Oriental fruit fly, Dacus dorsalis Hendel (Diptera: Tephritidae). Doctoral dissertation. (University of Hawaii at Manoa, 1988).Ekanayake, D. The mating system and courtship behaviour of the Queensland fruit fly, Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Doctoral dissertation. (Queensland University of Technology, 2017).Suzuki, Y. & Koyama, J. Courtship behavior of the melon fly, Dacus cucurbitae Coquillett (Diptera: Tephritidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 16, 164–166 (1981).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Scolari, F., Valerio, F., Benelli, G., Papadopoulos, N. T. & Vaníčková, L. Tephritid fruit fly semiochemicals: Current knowledge and future perspectives. Insects 12, 408 (2021).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Nieri, R., Anfora, G., Mazzoni, V. & Rossi Stacconi, M. V. Semiochemicals, semiophysicals and their integration for the development of innovative multi-modal systems for agricultural pests’ monitoring and control. Entomol. Gen. 42, 167–183 (2022).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Cocroft, R. B. & Rodríguez, R. L. The behavioral ecology of insect vibrational communication. Bioscience 55, 323–334 (2005).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Daane, K. M. & Johnson, M. W. Olive fruit fly: Managing an ancient pest in modern times. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 55, 151–169 (2010).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Rice, R. E., Phillips, P. A., Stewart-Leslie, J. & Sibbett, G. S. Olive fruit fly populations measured in Central and Southern California. Calif. Agric. 57, 122–127 (2003).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Wang, X. et al. Exploration for olive fruit fly parasitoids across Africa reveals regional distributions and dominance of closely associated parasitoids. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–14 (2021).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Loher, W. & Zervas, G. The mating rhythm of the olive fruitfly, Dacus oleae Gmelin. Z. Angew. Entomol. 88, 425–435 (1979).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Benelli, G. Aggression in Tephritidae flies: Where, when, why? Future directions for research in integrated pest management. Insects 6, 38–53 (2014).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Benelli, G. Aggressive behavior and territoriality in the olive fruit fly, Bactrocera oleae (Rossi) (Diptera: Tephritidae): Role of residence and time of day. J. Insect. Behav. 27, 145–161 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Shelly, T. E. Aggression between wild and laboratory-reared sterile males of the mediterranean fruit fly in a natural habitat (Diptera: Tephritidae). Fla. Entomol. 83, 105–108 (2000).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ekanayake, W. M., Clarke, A. R. & Schutze, M. K. Close-distance courtship of laboratory reared Bactrocera tryoni (Diptera: Tephritidae). Austral. Entomol. 58, 578–588 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ant, T. et al. Control of the olive fruit fly using genetics-enhanced sterile insect technique. BMC Biol. 10, 1–8 (2012).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Estes, A. M. et al. A basis for the renewal of sterile insect technique for the olive fly, Bactrocera oleae (Rossi). J. Appl. Entomol. 136, 1–16 (2012).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Zanini, D., Geurten, B., Spalthoff, C. & Göpfert, M. C. Sound communication in Drosophila. In Insect Hearing and Acoustic Communication Animal Signals and Communication, Vol. 1 (ed. Hedwig, B.) (Springer, 2014).
    Google Scholar 
    Windmill, J. F. C. & Jackson, J. C. Mechanical specializations of insect ears. In Insect Hearing. Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, Vol. 55 (eds Pollack, G. et al.) (Springer, 2016).
    Google Scholar 
    Talyn, B. C. & Dowse, H. B. The role of courtship song in sexual selection and species recognition by female Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 68, 1165–1180 (2004).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kanmiya, K. Acoustic studies on the mechanism of sound production in the mating songs of the melon fly, Dacus cucurbitae Coquillett (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Ethol. 6, 143–151 (1988).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Benelli, G. et al. Wing-fanning frequency as a releaser boosting male mating success—High-speed video analysis of courtship behavior in Campoplex capitator, a parasitoid of Lobesia botrana. Insect Sci. 27, 1298–1310 (2020).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ge, J. et al. Pea leafminer Liriomyza huidobrensis (Diptera: Agromyzidae) uses vibrational duets for efficient sexual communication. Insect Sci. 26, 510–522 (2019).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Mazzoni, V., Anfora, G. & Virant-Doberlet, M. Substrate vibrations during courtship in three drosophila species. PLoS ONE 8, e80708 (2013).ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    McKelvey, E. G. Z. et al. Drosophila females receive male substrate-borne signals through specific leg neurons during courtship. Curr. Biol. 31, 3894–3904 (2021).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Strauß, J., Stritih-Peljhan, N., Nieri, R., Virant-Doberlet, M., & Mazzoni, V. Communication by substrate-borne mechanical waves in insects: From basic to applied biotremology. In: Advances in Insect Physiology, vol. 61, 189–307 (Academic Press, 2021).Mazomenos, B. E. Effect of age and mating on pheromone production in the female olive fruit fly, Dacus oleae (Gmel.). J. Insect Physiol. 30, 765–769 (1984).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Carpita, A. et al. (Z)-9-tricosene identified in rectal gland extracts of Bactrocera oleae males: First evidence of a male-produced female attractant in in olive fruit fly. Naturwissenschaften 99, 77–81 (2012).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Canale, A. et al. Behavioural and electrophysiological responses of the olive fruit fly, Bactrocera oleae (Rossi) (Diptera: Tephritidae), to male- and female-borne sex attractants. Chemoecology 23, 155–164 (2013).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Mcdonald, P. T. Intragroup stimulation of pheromone release by male mediterranean fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 80, 17–20 (1987).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Iwahashi, O. & Majima, T. Lek formation and male–male competition in the melon fly, Dacus cucurbitae Coquillett: Diptera: Tephritidae. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 21, 70–75 (1986).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Keiser, I., Kobayashi, R. M., Chambers, D. L. & Schneider, E. L. Relation of sexual dimorphism in the wings, potential stridulation, and illumination to mating of oriental fruit flies, melon flies, and Mediterranean fruit flies in Hawaii. Ann. Ent. Soc. Am. 66, 937–941 (1973).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Benelli, G. & Canale, A. Aggressive behavior in olive fruit fly females: Oviposition site guarding against parasitic wasps. J. Insect Behav. 29, 680–688 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Rohde, B. B. et al. An acoustic trap to survey and capture two neoscapteriscus species. Fla. Entomol. 102, 654–657 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Shelly, T. E. Lek size and female visitation in two species of tephritid fruit flies. Anim. Behav. 62, 33–40 (2001).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Niyazi, N., Shuker, D. M. & Wood, R. J. Male position and calling effort together influence male attractiveness in leks of the medfly, Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae): Male attractiveness in leks of Ceratitis capitata. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 95, 479–487 (2008).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Greenfield, M. D. Signal interactions and interference in insect choruses: Singing and listening in the social environment. J. Comp. Physiol. A 201, 143–154 (2015).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kouloussis, N. A. et al. Age related assessment of sugar and protein intake of Ceratitis capitata in ad libitum conditions and modeling its relation to reproduction. Front. Physiol. 8, 1–13 (2017).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Boersma, P. & Van Heuven, V. Speak and unSpeak with PRAAT. Glot Int. 5, 341–347 (2001).
    Google Scholar 
    Joyce, A. L. et al. Effect of continuous rearing on courtship acoustics of five braconid parasitoids, candidates for augmentative biological control of Anastrepha species. Biocontrol 55, 573–582 (2010).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Sall, J. et al. JMP Start Statistics: A Guide to Statistics and Data Analysis Using JMP (Sas Institute, 2017).
    Google Scholar  More

  • in

    Stochastic models of Mendelian and reverse transcriptional inheritance in state-structured cancer populations

    Pienta, K. J., Hammarlund, E. U., Austin, R. H., Axelrod, R., Brown, J. S. & Amend, S. R. Cancer cells employ an evolutionarily conserved polyploidization program to resist therapy. In Seminars in Cancer Biology, 1–15 (2020).Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D. & Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 70(1), 7–30 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Duesberg, P. & Rasnick, D. Aneuploidy, the somatic mutation that makes cancer a species of its own. Cell Motil. Cytoskelet. 47(2), 81–107 (2000).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R. A. Leading edge review hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell 144, 646–674 (2011).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Amend, S. R. et al. Polyploid giant cancer cells: Unrecognized actuators of tumorigenesis, metastasis, and resistance. Prostate 79(13), 1489–1497 (2019).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Pienta, K. J. et al. Convergent evolution, evolving evolvability, and the origins of lethal cancer. Mol. Cancer Res. 18(6), 801–810 (2020).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Pienta, K. J., Hammarlund, E. U., Axelrod, R., Brown, J. S. & Amend, S. R. Poly-aneuploid cancer cells promote evolvability, generating lethal cancer. Evol. Appl. 13(7), 1626–1634 (2020).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Roychowdhury, S. et al. Personalized oncology through integrative high-throughput sequencing: A pilot study. Sci. Transl. Med. 3(111), 1–12 (2011).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Kuczler, M. D., Olseen, A. M., Pienta, K. J. & Amend, S. R. ROS-induced cell cycle arrest as a mechanism of resistance in polyaneuploid cancer cells (PACCs). Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 165, 3–7 (2021).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

    Brown, R. L. What evolvability really is. Br. J. Philos. Sci.65(3), 549–572 (2014).MathSciNet 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Crother, B. I. & Murray, C. M. Early usage and meaning of evolvability. Ecol. Evol. 9(7), 3784–3793 (2019).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Payne, J. L. & Wagner, A. The causes of evolvability and their evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 20, 24–38 (2019).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Pigliucci, M. Is evolvability evolvable?. Genetics 9, 75–82 (2008).CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Sniegowski, P. D. & Murphy, H. A. Evolvability. Curr. Biol. 16, R831–R834 (2006).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kostecka, L. G., Pienta, K. J. & Amend, S. R. Polyaneuploid cancer cell dormancy: Lessons from evolutionary phyla. Front. Ecol. Evol. 9, 439 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Rajaraman, R., Rajaraman, M. M., Rajaraman, S. R. & Guernsey, D. L. Neosis–a paradigm of self-renewal in cancer. Cell Biol. Int. 29(12), 1084–1097 (2005).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Rajaraman, R., Guernsey, D. L., Rajaraman, M. M. & Rajaraman, S. R. Neosis–A parasexual somatic reduction division in cancer. Int. J. Hum. Genet. 7(1), 29–48 (2007).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Sundaram, M., Guernsey, D. L., Rajaraman, M. M. & Rajaraman, R. Neosis: A novel type of cell division in cancer. Cancer Biol. Ther. 3(2), 207–218 (2004).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Gatenby, R. A., Cunningham, J. J. & Brown, J. S. Evolutionary triage governs fitness in driver and passenger mutations and suggests targeting never mutations. Nat. Commun. 5(1), 1–9 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bukkuri, A. & Brown, J. S. Evolutionary game theory: Darwinian dynamics and the G function approach. MDPI Games 12(4), 1–19 (2021).MathSciNet 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 
    Lopez-Sánchez, L. M. et al. CoCl2, a mimic of hypoxia, induces formation of polyploid giant cells with stem characteristics in colon cancer. PLoS ONE 9(6), e99143 (2014).ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Mittal, K. et al. Multinucleated polyploidy drives resistance to Docetaxel chemotherapy in prostate cancer. Br. J. Cancer 116(9), 1186–1194 (2017).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Niu, N., Mercado-Uribe, I. & Liu, J. Dedifferentiation into blastomere-like cancer stem cells via formation of polyploid giant cancer cells. Oncogene 36(34), 4887–4900 (2017).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ogden, A., Rida, P. C. G., Knudsen, B. S., Kucuk, O. & Aneja, R. Docetaxel-induced polyploidization may underlie chemoresistance and disease relapse. Cancer Lett. 367, 89–92 (2015).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Puig, P. E. et al. Tumor cells can escape DNA-damaging cisplatin through DNA endoreduplication and reversible polyploidy. Cell Biol. Int. 32(9), 1031–1043 (2008).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Zhang, S. et al. Generation of cancer stem-like cells through the formation of polyploid giant cancer cells. Oncogene 33(1), 116–128 (2014).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lin, K. C. et al. The role of heterogeneous environment and docetaxel gradient in the emergence of polyploid, mesenchymal and resistant prostate cancer cells. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 36(2), 97–108 (2019).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lin, K.-C. et al. Epithelial and mesenchymal prostate cancer cell population dynamics on a complex drug landscape. Converg. Sci. Phys. Oncol. 3(4), 045001 (2017).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Boe, L. Mechanism for induction of adaptive mutations in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 4(4), 597–601 (1990).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Cairns, J. Mutation and cancer: The antecedents to our studies of adaptive mutation. Genetics 148(4), 1433–1440 (1998).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hall, B. G. Adaptive mutagenesis: A process that generates almost exclusively beneficial mutations. Genetica 102, 109 (1998).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Waddington, C. H. Genetic assimilation of an acquired character. Evolution 7(2), 118–126 (1953).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Waddington, C. H. Genetic assimilation. Adv. Genet. 10, 257–293 (1961).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Jablonka, E. V. A. & Raz, G. A. L. Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: Prevalence, mechanisms, and implications for the study of heredity and evolution. Q. Rev. Biol. 84(2), 131–176 (2009).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Steele, E. J. & Pollard, J. W. Hypothesis: Somatic hypermutation by gene conversion via the error prone DNA(longrightarrow )RNA(longrightarrow )DNA information loop. Mol. Immunol. 24(6), 667–673 (1987).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Steele, E. J. Somatic hypermutation in immunity and cancer: Critical analysis of strand-biased and codon-context mutation signatures. DNA Repair 45, 1–24 (2016).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Steele, E. J. Somatic Selection and Adaptive Evolution (Springer, US, 1979).
    Google Scholar 
    Steele, E. J., Lindley, R. A. & Blanden, R. V. Lamarck’s Signature (Perseus Books, 1998).
    Google Scholar 
    Foster, P. L. Adaptive mutation: Implications for evolution. Bioessays 22, 1067–1074 (2000).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    McCutcheon, J. P. & Moran, N. A. Extreme genome reduction in symbiotic bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10(1), 13–26 (2012).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Badyaev, A. V. Stress-induced variation in evolution: From behavioural plasticity to genetic assimilation. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 272, 877–886 (2005).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bateman, K. G. The genetic assimilation of four venation phenocopies. J. Genet. 56(3), 443–474 (1959).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Milkman, R. D. The genetic basis of natural variation. VI. Selection of a crossveinless strain of Drosophila by phenocopying at high temperature. Genetics 51(1), 87 (1965).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Waddington, C. H. Genetic assimilation of the bithorax phenotype. Evolution 10(1), 1–13 (1956).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Godoy, O., Saldaña, A., Fuentes, N., Valladares, F. & Gianoli, E. Forests are not immune to plant invasions: Phenotypic plasticity and local adaptation allow Prunella vulgaris to colonize a temperate evergreen rainforest. Biol. Invasions 13(7), 1615–1625 (2011).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Schlichting, C. D. & Wund, M. A. Phenotypic plasticity and epigenetic marking: An assessment of evidence for genetic accommodation. Evolution 68(3), 656–672 (2014).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Otaki, J. M., Hiyama, A., Iwata, M. & Kudo, T. Phenotypic plasticity in the range-margin population of the lycaenid butterfly Zizeeria maha. BMC Evol. Biol. 10(1), 1–13 (2010).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Aubret, F. & Shine, R. Genetic assimilation and the postcolonization erosion of phenotypic plasticity in island tiger snakes. Curr. Biol. 19(22), 1932–1936 (2009).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Losos, J. B., Irschick, D. J. & Schoener, T. W. Adaptation and constraint in the evolution of specialization of Bahamian Anolis lizards. Evolution 48(6), 1786–1798 (1994).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Losos, J. B. et al. Evolutionary implications of phenotypic plasticity in the hindlimb of the lizard Anolis sagrei. Evolution 54(1), 301–305 (2000).CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Sword, G. A. Density-dependent warning coloration. Nature 397(6716), 217 (1999).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Sword, G. A. A role for phenotypic plasticity in the evolution of aposematism. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 269(1501), 1639–1644 (2002).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Clausen, J. & Hiesey, W. M. The balance between coherence and variation in evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 46(4), 494–506 (1960).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Gurevitch, J. Variation in leaf dissection and leaf energy budgets among populations of Achillea from an altitudinal gradient. Am. J. Bot. 75(9), 1298–1306 (1988).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Gurevitch, J. & Schuepp, P. H. Boundary layer properties of highly dissected leaves: An investigation using an electrochemical fluid tunnel. Plant Cell Environ. 13(8), 783–792 (1990).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Gurevitch, J. Sources of variation in leaf shape among two populations of Achillea lanulosa. Genetics 130(2), 385–394 (1992).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Foster, P. L. Stress-induced mutagenesis in bacteria. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 42(5), 373–397 (2007).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Soppa, J. Polyploidy in archaea and bacteria: About desiccation resistance, giant cell size, long-term survival, enforcement by a eukaryotic host and additional aspects. Microb. Physiol. 24, 409–419 (2014).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bastide, A. & David, A. The ribosome, (slow) beating heart of cancer (stem) cell. Oncogenesis 7(4), 1–13 (2018).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Cairns, J., Overbaugh, J. & Miller, S. The origin of mutants. Nature 335, 142–145 (1988).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Foster, P. L. Adaptive mutation: The uses of adversity. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 47, 467–504. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.mi.47.100193.002343 (2003).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lenski, R. E. & Mittler, J. E. The directed mutation controversy and neo-Darwinism. Science 259(5092), 188–194 (1993).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lenski, R. E. & Sniegowski, P. D. “Adaptive mutation’’: The debate goes on. Science 269, 285–288 (1995).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Noller, H. F., Hoffarth, V. & Zimniak, L. Unusual resistance of peptidyl transferase to protein extraction procedures. Science 256(5062), 1416–1419 (1992).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Pribis, J. P. et al. Gamblers: An antibiotic-induced evolvable cell subpopulation differentiated by reactive-oxygen-induced general stress response. Mol. Cell 74(4), 785–800 (2019).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Silvera, D., Formenti, S. C. & Schneider, R. J. Translational control in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 10(4), 254–266 (2010).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Shcherbakov, D. et al. Ribosomal mistranslation leads to silencing of the unfolded protein response and increased mitochondrial biogenesis. Commun. Biol. 2(1), 1–16 (2019).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Truitt, M. L. & Ruggero, D. New frontiers in translational control of the cancer genome. Nat. Rev. Cancer 16(5), 288–304 (2016).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Alphey, L. S., Crisanti, A., Randazzo, F. & Akbari, O. S. Opinion: Standardizing the definition of gene drive. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117(49), 30864 (2020).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Champer, J., Buchman, A. & Akbari, O. S. Cheating evolution: Engineering gene drives to manipulate the fate of wild populations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17, 146–159 (2016).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Champer, S. E. et al. Modeling CRISPR gene drives for suppression of invasive rodents using a supervised machine learning framework. PLOS Comput. Biol. 17(12), e1009660 (2021).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Deredec, A., Burt, A. & Godfray, H. C. J. The population genetics of using homing endonuclease genes in vector and pest management. Genetics 179(4), 2013–2026 (2008).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Heffel, M. G. & Finnigan, G. C. Mathematical modeling of self-contained CRISPR gene drive reversal systems. Sci. Rep. 9(1), 1–10 (2019).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Leftwich, P. T. et al. Recent advances in threshold-dependent gene drives for mosquitoes. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 46, 1203–1212 (2018).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Nijhout, H. F., Kudla, A. M. & Hazelwood, C. C. Genetic assimilation and accommodation: Models and mechanisms. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 141, 337–369 (2021).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Noble, C., Adlam, B., Church, G. M., Esvelt, K. M. & Nowak, M. A. Current CRISPR gene drive systems are likely to be highly invasive in wild populations. eLife 7, e33423 (2018).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Novozhilov, A. S., Karev, G. P. & Koonin, E. V. Mathematical modeling of evolution of horizontally transferred genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22(8), 1721–1732 (2005).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Pigliucci, M. & Murren, C. J. Perspective: Genetic assimilation and a possible evolutionary paradox: Can macroevolution sometimes be so fast as to pass us by?. Evolution 57, 1455–1464 (2003).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hammerstein, P. Darwinian adaptation, population genetics and the streetcar theory of evolution. J. Math. Biol. 34(5–6), 511–532 (1996).CAS 
    PubMed 
    MATH 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Dieckmann, U. Coevolutionary Dynamics of Stochastic Replicator Systems (Central Library of the Research Center Jülich, 1994).
    Google Scholar 
    Dieckmann, U., Marrow, P. & Law, R. Evolutionary cycling in predator-prey interactions: population dynamics and the red queen. J. Theor. Biol. 176(1), 91–102 (1995).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Dieckmann, U. & Law, R. The dynamical theory of coevolution: a derivation from stochastic ecological processes. J. Math. Biol. 34, 579–612 (1996).MathSciNet 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    MATH 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Metz, J. A. J., Nisbet, R. M. & Geritz, S. A. H. How should we define ‘fitness’ for general ecological scenarios?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7(6), 198–202 (1992).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Goldschmidt, R. Some aspects of evolution. Science 78(2033), 539–547 (1933).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Vincent, T. L., Cohen, Y. & Brown, J. S. Evolution via strategy dynamics. Theor. Popul. Biol. 44(2), 149–176 (1993).MATH 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bell, G. Evolutionary rescue. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 48, 605–627 (2017).Article 

    Google Scholar  More

  • in

    Rewetting global wetlands effectively reduces major greenhouse gas emissions

    Lindgren, A., Hugelius, G. & Kuhry, P. Extensive loss of past permafrost carbon but a net accumulation into present-day soils. Nature 560, 219–222 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Nichols, J. E. & Peteet, D. M. Rapid expansion of northern peatlands and doubled estimate of carbon storage. Nat. Geosci. 12, 917–921 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bridgham, S. D. et al. The carbon balance of North American wetlands. Wetlands 26, 889–916 (2006).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Dixon, M. J. R. et al. Tracking global change in ecosystem area: the wetland extent trends index. Biol. Conserv. 193, 27–35 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Darrah, S. E. et al. Improvements to the Wetland Extent Trends (WET) index as a tool for monitoring natural and human-made wetlands. Ecol. Indic. 99, 294–298 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Asselen, S. et al. Drivers of wetland conversion: a global meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 8, e81292 (2013).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Davidson, N. C. How much wetland has the world lost? Long-term and recent trends in global wetland area. Mar. Freshw. Res. 65, 934–941 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Galatowitsch, S. M. in The Wetland Book II: Distribution, Description, and Conservation (eds Finlayson, C.M. et al.) 359–367 (Springer, 2018).Limpert, K. E. et al. Reducing emissions from degraded floodplain wetlands. Front. Environ. Sci. 8, 8 (2020); https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.00008Laine, J. et al. Effect of water-level drawdown on global climatic warming: northern peatlands. AMBIO 25, 179–184 (1996).
    Google Scholar 
    Ise, T. et al. High sensitivity of peat decomposition to climate change through water-table feedback. Nat. Geosci. 1, 763–766 (2008).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Saunois, M. et al. The global methane budget 2000–2017. Earth. Syst. Sci. Data 12, 1561–1623 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Leifeld, J. et al. Intact and managed peatland soils as a source and sink of GHGs from 1850 to 2100. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 945–947 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Günther, A. et al. Prompt rewetting of drained peatlands reduces climate warming despite methane emissions. Nat. Commun. 11, 1644 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hooijer, A. et al. Subsidence and carbon loss in drained tropical peatlands. Biogeoscience 9, 1053–1071 (2012).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Prananto, J. A. et al. Drainage increases CO2 and N2O emissions from tropical peat soils. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 4583–4600 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Jauhiainen, J. et al. Carbon dioxide and methane fluxes in drained tropical peat before and after hydrological restoration. Ecology 89, 3503–3514 (2008).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bridgham, S. D. et al. Methane emissions from wetlands: biogeochemical, microbial, and modeling perspectives from local to global scales. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 1325–1346 (2013).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Schuldt, R. et al. Modelling Holocene carbon accumulation and methane emissions of boreal wetlands—an Earth system model approach. Biogeosciences 10, 1659–1674 (2012).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    McNicol, G. et al. Effects of seasonality, transport pathway, and spatial structure on greenhouse gas fluxes in a restored wetland. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 2768–2782 (2017).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Yu, K. et al. Redox window with minimum global warming potential contribution from rice soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68, 2086–2091 (2004).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Huang, Y. et al. Tradeoff of CO2 and CH4 emissions from global peatlands under water-table drawdown. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 618–622 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ojanen, P. & Minkkinen, K. Rewetting offers rapid climate benefits for tropical and agricultural peatlands but not for forestry‐drained peatlands. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 34, e2019GB006503 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Evans, C. D. et al. Overriding water table control on managed peatland greenhouse gas emissions. Nature 593, 548–552 (2021).
    Google Scholar 
    Strack, M., Keith, A. M. & Xu, B. Growing season carbon dioxide and methane exchange at a restored peatland on the Western Boreal Plain. Ecol. Eng. 64, 231–239 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Karki, S. et al. Carbon balance of rewetted and drained peat soils used for biomass production: a mesocosm study. Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy 8, 969–980 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Whiting, G. J. & Chanton, J. P. Greenhouse carbon balance of wetlands: methane emission versus carbon sequestration. Tellus B 53, 521–528 (2001).
    Google Scholar 
    Moore, T. R. et al. A multi-year record of methane flux at the Mer Bleue Bog, Southern Canada. Ecosystems 14, 646–657 (2011).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Zhu, X. et al. Ammonia oxidation pathways and nitrifier denitrification are significant sources of N2O and NO under low oxygen availability. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 6328–6333 (2013).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Cole, J. J. et al. Plumbing the global carbon cycle: integrating inland waters into the terrestrial carbon budget. Ecosystems 10, 171–184 (2007).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Holgerson, M. A. & Raymond, P. A. Large contribution to inland water CO2 and CH4 emissions from very small ponds. Nat. Geosci. 9, 222–226 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Raymond, P. A. et al. Global carbon dioxide emissions from inland waters. Nature 503, 355–359 (2013).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Rosentreter, J. A. et al. Half of global methane emissions come from highly variable aquatic ecosystem sources. Nat. Geosci. 14, 225–230 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lehner, B. & Döll, P. Development and validation of a global database of lakes, reservoirs and wetlands. J. Hydrol. 296, 1–22 (2004).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Schuur, E. A. et al. The effect of permafrost thaw on old carbon release and net carbon exchange from tundra. Nature 459, 556–559 (2009).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Delgado-Baquerizo, M. et al. Climate legacies drive global soil carbon stocks in terrestrial ecosystems. Sci. Adv. 3, e1602008 (2017).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hengl, T. et al. SoilGrids250m: global gridded soil information based on machine learning. PLoS ONE 12, e0169748 (2017).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Walker, X. J. et al. Increasing wildfires threaten historic carbon sink of boreal forest soils. Nature 572, 520–523 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Baird, A. J. et al. Validity of managing peatlands with fire. Nat. Geosci. 12, 884–885 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ritchie, H., Roser, M. & Rosado, P. CO2 and GHG Emissions: Atmospheric Concentrations (Our World in Data, 2020); https://ourworldindata.org/atmospheric-concentrations#citationFriedlingstein, P. et al. Global carbon budget 2019. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 11, 1783–1838 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Tian, H. et al. A comprehensive quantification of global nitrous oxide sources and sinks. Nature 586, 248–256 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Cook-Patton, S. C. et al. Mapping carbon accumulation potential from global natural forest regrowth. Nature 585, 545–550 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Jaenicke, J. et al. Planning hydrological restoration of peatlands in Indonesia to mitigate carbon dioxide emissions. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change 15, 223–239 (2010).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Wohl, E. Landscape-scale carbon storage associated with beaver dams. Geophys. Res. Lett. 40, 3631–3636 (2013).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Law, A. et al. Using ecosystem engineers as tools in habitat restoration and rewilding: beaver and wetlands. Sci. Total Environ. 605–606, 1021–1030 (2017).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Brown, L. E. et al. Macroinvertebrate community assembly in pools created during peatland restoration. Sci. Total Environ. 569, 361–372 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Finlayson, C. M. & Rea, N. Reasons for the loss and degradation of Australian wetlands. Wetl. Ecol. Manage. 7, 1–11 (1999).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Liu, J. et al. Water conservancy projects in China: achievements, challenges and way forward. Glob. Environ. Change 23, 633–643 (2013).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Rogelj, J. et al. in Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 °C (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) Ch. 2 (IPCC, WMO, 2018).Svensson, B. H. & Rosswall, T. In situ methane production from acid peat in plant communities with different moisture regimes in a subarctic mire. Oikos 43, 341–350 (1984).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Waddington, J. M. & Roulet, N. T. Atmosphere–wetland carbon exchanges: scale dependency of CO2 and CH4 exchange on the developmental topography of a peatland. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 10, 233–245 (1996).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kling, G. W. et al. The flux of CO2 and CH4 from lakes and rivers in Arctic Alaska. Hydrobiologia 240, 23–36 (1992).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Humphreys, E. R. et al. Two bogs in the Canadian Hudson Bay lowlands and a temperate bog reveal similar annual net ecosystem exchange of CO2. Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res. 46, 103–113 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Caffrey, J. M. Factors controlling net ecosystem metabolism in US estuaries. Estuaries 27, 90–101 (2004).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Roberts, B. J. et al. Multiple scales of temporal variability in ecosystem metabolism rates: results from 2 years of continuous monitoring in a forested headwater stream. Ecosystems 10, 588–606 (2007).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Myhre, G. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T.F. et al.) 710–714 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).Glenn, A. J. et al. Comparison of net ecosystem CO2 exchange in two peatlands in western Canada with contrasting dominant vegetation, Sphagnum and Carex. Agric. For. Meteorol. 140, 115–135 (2006).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bond-Lamberty, B. & Thomson, A. Temperature-associated increases in the global soil respiration record. Nature 464, 579–582 (2010).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Zhao, J. et al. Intensified inundation shifts a freshwater wetland from a CO2 sink to a source. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 3319–3333 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Peichl, M. et al. A 12-year record reveals pre-growing season temperature and water table level threshold effects on the net carbon dioxide exchange in a boreal fen. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 55006 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Peng, Z. & Peng, G. Suitability mapping of global wetland areas and validation with remotely sensed data. Sci. China Earth Sci. 57, 2883–2892 (2014).
    Google Scholar 
    Zhang, B. et al. Methane emissions from global wetlands: an assessment of the uncertainty associated with various wetland extent data sets. Atmos. Environ. 165, 310–321 (2017).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Gumbricht, T. et al. An expert system model for mapping tropical wetlands and peatlands reveals South America as the largest contributor. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 3581–3599 (2017).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    ERA5 Monthly Averaged Data on Pressure Levels from 1979 to Present (ECMWF, 2020); https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.6860a573FAOSTAT Emissions Database (FAO, 2020); http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GTQiu, C. et al. Large historical carbon emissions from cultivated northern peatlands. Sci. Adv. 7, eabf1332 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Frolking, S., Roulet, N. & Fuglestvedt, J. How northern peatlands influence the Earth’s radiative budget: sustained methane emission versus sustained carbon sequestration. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 111, G01008 (2006).
    Google Scholar 
    Neubauer, S. C. & Megonigal, J. P. Moving beyond global warming potentials to quantify the climatic role of ecosystems. Ecosystems 18, 1000–1013 (2015).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Matthews, E. & Fung, I. Methane emission from natural wetlands: global distribution, area, and environmental characteristics of sources. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 1, 61–86 (1987).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Melton, J. R. et al. Present state of global wetland extent and wetland methane modelling: conclusions from a model inter-comparison project (WETCHIMP). Biogeosciences 10, 753–788 (2013).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Papa, F. et al. Interannual variability of surface water extent at the global scale, 1993–2004. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 115, D12111 (2010).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Junk, W. J. et al. Current state of knowledge regarding the world’s wetlands and their future under global climate change: a synthesis. Aquat. Sci. 75, 151–167 (2013).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Schroeder, R. et al. Development and evaluation of a multi-year fractional surface water data set derived from active/passive microwave remote sensing data. Remote Sens. 7, 16688–16732 (2015).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Vanessa, R. et al. A global assessment of inland wetland conservation status. Bioscience 6, 523–533 (2017).
    Google Scholar 
    Davidson, N. et al. Global extent and distribution of wetlands: trends and issues. Mar. Freshw. Res. 69, 620–627 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    ArcWorld 1:3 M. Continental Coverage (ESRI, 1992); http://www.oceansatlas.org/subtopic/en/c/593/Digital Chart of the World 1:1 M (ESRI, 1993); https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/topo/report/s5/s5Avii.htmlGlobal Wetlands (UNEP-WCMC, 1993); https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=105a402642e146eaa665315279a322d1Moreno-Mateos, D. et al. Structural and functional loss in restored wetland ecosystems. PLoS Biol. 10, e1001247 (2012).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ramsar COP12 DOC.8 Report of the Secretary General to COP12 on the Implementation of the Convention (Ramsar Convention Secretariat, 2015).Page, S. E. et al. Peatlands and global change: response and resilience. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 41, 35–57 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Swindles, G. T. et al. Widespread drying of European peatlands in recent centuries. Nat. Geosci. 12, 922–928 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar  More

  • in

    Factors associated with the differential distribution of cetaceans linked with deep habitats in the Western Mediterranean Sea

    Panigada, S., Lauriano, G., Burt, L., Pierantonio, N. & Donovan, G. Monitoring winter and summer abundance of cetaceans in the Pelagos Sanctuary (northwestern Mediterranean Sea) through aerial surveys. PLoS One 6, e22878 (2011).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Moura, A. E., Sillero, N. & Rodrigues, A. Common dolphin (Delphinus delphis) habitat preferences using data from two platforms of opportunity. Acta Oecol. 38, 24–32 (2012).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Rendell, L. et al. Abundance and movements of sperm whales in the western Mediterranean basin. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 24, 31–40 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Schipper, J. et al. The status of the world’s land and marine mammals: Diversity. Threat Knowl. 322, 225–230 (2008).CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Luksenburg, J. A. & Parsons, E. C. M. Attitudes towards marine mammal conservation issues before the introduction of whale-watching: A case study in Aruba (southern Caribbean). Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 24, 135–146 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Erbe, C. et al. Managing the effects of noise from ship traffic, seismic surveying and construction on marine mammals in Antarctica. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 25 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Wurtz, M. & Simard, F. Following the food chain- an ecosystem approach to pelagic protected areas in the Mediterranean by means of cetacean presence. Rapp. Comm. Int. Mer Médit 38, 634 (2007).
    Google Scholar 
    Bǎnaru, D. et al. Trophic structure in the Gulf of Lions marine ecosystem (north-western Mediterranean Sea) and fishing impacts. J. Mar. Syst. 111–112, 45–68 (2013).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Moore, S. E. Marine mammals as ecosystem sentinels. J. Mammal. 89, 534–540 (2008).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hooker, S. K. & Gerber, L. R. Marine reserves as a tool for ecosystem-based management: The potential importance of Megafauna. Bioscience 54, 27–39 (2004).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Burek, K. A., Gulland, F. M. D. & O’Hara, T. M. Effects of climate change on Arctic marine mammal health. Ecol. Appl. 18, S126–S134 (2008).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Laran, S. et al. Seasonal distribution and abundance of cetaceans within French waters—Part I: The North-Western Mediterranean, including the Pelagos sanctuary. Deep. Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 141, 20–30 (2017).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Arranz, P. et al. Diving behavior and fine-scale kinematics of free-ranging Risso’s dolphins foraging in shallow and deep-water habitats. Front. Ecol. Evol. 7, 1–15 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Praca, E. & Gannier, A. Ecological niche of three teuthophageous odontocetes in the northwestern Mediterranean Sea. Ocean Sci. Discuss. 4, 785–815 (2008).ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Tepsich, P., Rosso, M., Halpin, P. N. & Moulins, A. Habitat preferences of two deep-diving cetacean species in the northern Ligurian Sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 508, 247–260 (2014).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Gannier, A., Drouot, V. & Goold, J. C. Distribution and relative abundance of sperm whales in the Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 243, 281–293 (2002).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Gannier, A. & Praca, E. SST fronts and the summer sperm whale distribution in the north-west Mediterranean Sea. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 87, 187–193 (2007).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Azzellino, A. et al. Predictive habitat models for managing marine areas: Spatial and temporal distribution of marine mammals within the Pelagos Sanctuary (Northwestern Mediterranean sea). Ocean Coast. Manage. 67, 63–74 (2012).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    de Stephanis, R., Giménez, J., Carpinelli, E., Gutierrez-Exposito, C. & Cañadas, A. As main meal for sperm whales: Plastics debris. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 69, 206–214 (2013).PubMed 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Notarbartolo-Di-Sciara, G. Sperm whales, Physeter macrocephalus, in the Mediterranean Sea: A summary of status, threats, and conservation recommendations. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 24, 4–10 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Laran, S. & Drouot-dulau, V. Seasonal variation of striped dolphins , fin- and sperm whales ’ abundance in the Ligurian Sea (Mediterranean Sea). 345–352 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315407054719.Notarbartolo-Di-Sciara, G., Agardy, T., Hyrenbach, D., Scovazzi, T. & Van Klaveren, P. The Pelagos Sanctuary for Mediterranean marine mammals. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 18, 367–391 (2008).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Azzellino, A., Gaspari, S., Airoldi, S. & Nani, B. Habitat use and preferences of cetaceans along the continental slope and the adjacent pelagic waters in the western Ligurian Sea. Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 55, 296–323 (2008).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Cañadas, A., Sagarminaga, R., De Stephanis, R., Urquiola, E. & Hammond, P. S. Habitat preference modelling as a conservation tool: Proposals for marine protected areas for cetaceans in southern Spanish waters. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 15, 495–521 (2005).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Cañadas, A. & Vázquez, J. A. Conserving Cuvier’s beaked whales in the Alboran Sea (SW Mediterranean): Identification of high density areas to be avoided by intense man-made sound. Biol. Conserv. 178, 155–162 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lewis, T. et al. Sperm whale abundance estimates from acoustic surveys of the Ionian Sea and Straits of Sicily in 2003. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 87, 353 (2007).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Caruso, F. et al. Size distribution of sperm whales acoustically identified during long term deep-sea monitoring in the Ionian Sea. PLoS One 10, e0144503 (2015).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Frantzis, A., Leaper, R., Alexiadou, P., Prospathopoulos, A. & Lekkas, D. Shipping routes through core habitat of endangered sperm whales along the Hellenic Trench, Greece: Can we reduce collision risks?. PLoS One 14, 1–21 (2019).
    Google Scholar 
    Pirotta, E., Matthiopoulos, J., Mackenzie, M., Scott-hayward, L. & Rendell, L. Modelling sperm whale habitat preference: A novel approach combining transect and follow data. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 436, 257–272 (2011).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Mussi, B., Miragliuolo, A., Zucchini, A. & Pace, D. S. Occurrence and spatio-temporal distribution of sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus) in the submarine canyon of Cuma (Tyrrhenian Sea, Italy). Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 24, 59–70 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Arcangeli, A., Campana, I. & Bologna, M. A. Influence of seasonality on cetacean diversity, abundance, distribution and habitat use in the western Mediterranean Sea: Implications for conservation. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 27, 995–1010 (2017).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Carlucci, R. et al. Residency patterns and site fidelity of Grampus griseus (Cuvier, 1812) in the Gulf of Taranto (Northern Ionian Sea, Central-Eastern Mediterranean Sea). Mammal Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-020-00485-z (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Cañadas, A. et al. The challenge of habitat modelling for threatened low density species using heterogeneous data: The case of Cuvier’s beaked whales in the Mediterranean. Ecol. Indic. 85, 128–136 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Aïssi, M., Ouammi, A., Fiori, C. & Alessi, J. Modelling predicted sperm whale habitat in the central Mediterranean Sea: Requirement for protection beyond the Pelagos Sanctuary boundaries. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 24, 50–58 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Taylor, B. L. et al. Physeter macrocephalus, sperm whale (Amended version). IUCN Red List Threat. Species 8235, 1–17 (2019).
    Google Scholar 
    Notarbartolo Di Sciara, G., Frantzis, A., Bearzi, G. & Reeves, R. R. Physeter macrocephalus (Mediterranean subpopulation). IUCN Red List Threat. Species 2012 8235, e.T16370739A16370477 (2012).Notarbartolo di Sciara, G. & Birkun, A. J. Conserving whales, dolophins and porpoises in the Mediterranean and Black Seas. (2010).Kiszka, J. & Braulik, G. Grampus griseus. IUCN Red List Threat. Species 2018 8235, e.T9461A50356660 (2018).Gaspari, S. & Natoli, A. Grampus griseus (Mediterranean subpopulation). IUCN Red List Threat. Species 2012 e.T16378423A16378453 8235, 10 (2012).Baird, R. W., Brownell, R. L. Jr. & Taylor, B. L. Ziphius cavirostris. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Popul. (English Ed.) 8235, 1–3 (2020).
    Google Scholar 
    Canadas, A. Ziphius cavirostris (Mediterranean subpopulation). IUCN Red List Threat. Species Version 20 (2012).Drouot, V. et al. A note on genetic isolation of Mediterranean sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) suggested by mitochondrial DNA. J. Cetacean Res. Manage. 6, 29–32 (2004).
    Google Scholar 
    Engelhaupt, D. et al. Female philopatry in coastal basins and male dispersion across the North Atlantic in a highly mobile marine species, the sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus). Mol. Ecol https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04355.x (2009).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Lewis, T. et al. Abundance estimates for sperm whales in the Mediterranean Sea from acoustic line-transect surveys. J. Cetacean Res. Manage. 18, 103–117 (2018).
    Google Scholar 
    Rendell, L. & Frantzis, A. Mediterranean Sperm Whales, Physeter macrocephalus: The Precarious State of a Lost Tribe. In Advances in Marine Biology, Vol 75 (ed. Sad, D.) (Elsevier, 2016).
    Google Scholar 
    Alessi, J., Aïssi, M. & Fiori, C. Photo-identification of sperm whales in the north-western Mediterranean Sea: An assessment of natural markings. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 24, 11–22 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Blanco, C., Raduán, M. Á. & Raga, J. A. Diet of Risso’s dolphin (Grampus griseus) in the western Mediterranean Sea. Sci. Mar. 70, 407–411 (2006).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Jefferson, T. A. et al. Global distribution of Risso’s dolphin Grampus griseus: A review and critical evaluation. Mamm. Rev. 44, 56–68 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Gaspari, S. & Natoli, A. Grampus griseus, Risso’s dolphin. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. https://www.iucnredlist.org/es/species/9461/3151471 (2012).Macias Lopez, D., Garcia Barcelona, S., Baez, J. C., De La Serna, J. M. & Ortizde Urbina, J. M. Marine mammal bycatch in Spanish Mediterranean large pelagic longline fisheries, with a focus on Risso’s dolphin (Grampus griseus). Aquat. Liv. Resour. 331, 321–331 (2012).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Zucca, P. et al. Causes of stranding in four Risso’s dolphins (Grampus griseus) found beached along the North Adriatic Sea coast. Vet. Res. Commun. 29, 261–264 (2005).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Alexiadou, P., Foskolos, I. & Frantzis, A. Ingestion of macroplastics by odontocetes of the Greek Seas, Eastern Mediterranean: Often deadly!. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 146, 67–75 (2019).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Jepson, P. D. et al. Gas-bubble lesions in stranded cetaceans. Nature 425, 575–576 (2003).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Mannocci, L. et al. Assessing cetacean surveys throughout the Mediterranean Sea: A gap analysis in environmental space. Sci. Rep. 8, 3126 (2018).ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Báez, J., Estrada, A., Torreblanca, D. & Real, R. Predicting the distribution of cryptic species: The case of the spur-thighed tortoise in Andalusia (southern Iberian Peninsula). Biodivers. Conserv. 20, 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0164-3 (2012).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Torreblanca, E. et al. Using opportunistic sightings to infer differential spatio-temporal use of western mediterranean waters by the fin whale. PeerJ 2019, 1–20 (2019).
    Google Scholar 
    Russo, D., Sgammato, R. & Bosso, L. First sighting of the humpback whale Megaptera novaeangliae in the Tyrrhenian Sea and a mini-review of Mediterranean records. Hystrix Ital. J. Mammal. 27, 219–221 (2016).
    Google Scholar 
    Esteban, R. et al. Identifying key habitat and seasonal patterns of a critically endangered population of killer whales. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 94, 1317–1325 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Folkens, P. & Reeves, R. Guide to Marine Mammals of the World (Knopf, 2005).
    Google Scholar 
    Real, R., Barbosa, A. M. & Vargas, J. M. Obtaining environmental favourability functions from logistic regression. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 13, 237–245 (2006).MathSciNet 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    MacNally, R. Regression and model-building in conservation biology, biogeography and ecology: The distinction between—and reconciliation of—‘predictive’ and ‘explanatory’ models. Biodivers. Conserv. 20, 655–671. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.66.085018 (2000).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Real, R., Márcia Barbosa, A. & Bull, J. W. Species distributions, quantum theory, and the enhancement of biodiversity measures. Syst. Biol. 66, 453–462 (2017).PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Praca, E., Gannier, A., Das, K. & Laran, S. Modelling the habitat suitability of cetaceans: Example of the sperm whale in the northwestern Mediterranean Sea. Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 56, 648–657 (2009).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Boisseau, O. et al. Encounter rates of cetaceans in the Mediterranean Sea and contiguous Atlantic area. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 90, 1589–1599 (2010).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hamazaki, T. Spatiotemporal prediction models of cetacean habitats in the mid-western North Atlantic Ocean (from Cape Hatteras, North Carolina, USA to Nova Scotia, Canada). Mar. Mammal Sci. 18, 920–939 (2002).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Cañadas, A., Sagarminaga, R. & Garcıa-Tiscar, S. Cetacean distribution related with depth and slope in the Mediterranean waters off southern Spain. Deep Sea Res. Part I 49, 2053–2073 (2002).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Fiori, C., Giancardo, L., Aïssi, M., Alessi, J. & Vassallo, P. Geostatistical modelling of spatial distribution of sperm whales in the Pelagos Sanctuary based on sparse count data and heterogeneous observations. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 24, 41–49 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Pikesley, S. K. Cetacean sightings and strandings: Evidence for spatial and temporal trends?. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 92, 1809–1820 (2012).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    O’Reilly, J. E. et al. Ocean color chlorophyll algorithms for SeaWiFS. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 103, 24937–24953 (1998).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Carton, J. A., Chepurin, G. A. & Chen, L. SODA3: A new ocean climate reanalysis. J. Clim. 31, 6967–6983 (2018).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Romero, J. & Real, R. Macroenvironmental factors as ultimate determinants of distribution of common toad and natterjack toad in the south of Spain. Ecography (Cop.) 20, 305–312 (1996).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hosmer, D. W. & Lemeshow, S. Applied Logistic Regression 2nd edn. (Wiley, 2000).MATH 
    Book 

    Google Scholar 
    Legendre, P. & Legendre, L. Numerical Ecology (Elsevier BV, New York, 1998).MATH 

    Google Scholar 
    Peng, C.-Y.J., Lee, K. L. & Ingersoll, G. M. An introduction to logistic regression analysis and reporting. J. Educ. Res. 96, 3–14 (2002).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Acevedo, P., Ward, A. I., Real, R. & Smith, G. C. Assessing biogeographical relationships of ecologically related species using favourability functions: A case study on British deer. Divers. Distrib. 16, 515–528 (2010).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Zhang, Y., Tang, J., Ren, G., Zhao, K. & Wang, X. Global potential distribution prediction of Xanthium italicum based on Maxent model. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–10 (2021).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Ancillotto, L. et al. An African bat in Europe, Plecotus gaisleri: Biogeographic and ecological insights from molecular taxonomy and Species Distribution Models. Ecol. Evol. 10, 5785–5800 (2020).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Akaike. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. 199–213 (1929). More

  • in

    Warming response of peatland CO2 sink is sensitive to seasonality in warming trends

    Xia, J. et al. Terrestrial carbon cycle affected by non-uniform climate warming. Nat. Geosci. 7, 173–180 (2014).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Tang, R. et al. Increasing terrestrial ecosystem carbon release in response to autumn cooling and warming. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 380–385 (2022).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hugelius, G. et al. Large stocks of peatland carbon and nitrogen are vulnerable to permafrost thaw. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 20438–20446 (2020).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Gallego-Sala, A. V. et al. Latitudinal limits to the predicted increase of the peatland carbon sink with warming. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 907–913 (2018).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Treat, C. C. et al. Widespread global peatland establishment and persistence over the last 130,000 y. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 4822–4827 (2019).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Frolking, S., Roulet, N. & Fuglestvedt, J. How northern peatlands influence the Earth’s radiative budget: sustained methane emission versus sustained carbon sequestration. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 111, G01008 (2006).
    Google Scholar 
    Loisel, J. et al. Expert assessment of future vulnerability of the global peatland carbon sink. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 70–77 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Helbig, M. et al. Direct and indirect climate change effects on carbon dioxide fluxes in a thawing boreal forest–wetland landscape. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 3231–3248 (2017).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Koebsch, F. et al. Refining the role of phenology in regulating gross ecosystem productivity across European peatlands. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 876–887 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Huang, Y. et al. Tradeoff of CO2 and CH4 emissions from global peatlands under water-table drawdown. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 618–622 (2021).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Evans, C. D. et al. Overriding water table control on managed peatland greenhouse gas emissions. Nature 593, 548–552 (2021).CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Helfter, C. et al. Drivers of long-term variability in CO2 net ecosystem exchange in a temperate peatland. Biogeosciences 12, 1799–1811 (2015).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Järveoja, J., Nilsson, M. B., Gažovič, M., Crill, P. M. & Peichl, M. Partitioning of the net CO2 exchange using an automated chamber system reveals plant phenology as key control of production and respiration fluxes in a boreal peatland. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 3436–3451 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Mäkiranta, P. et al. Responses of phenology and biomass production of boreal fens to climate warming under different water-table level regimes. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 944–956 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Li, Q. et al. Abiotic and biotic drivers of microbial respiration in peat and its sensitivity to temperature change. Soil Biol. Biochem. 153, 108077 (2021).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Moore, T. R. et al. Spring photosynthesis in a cool temperate bog. Glob. Change Biol. 12, 2323–2335 (2006).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Korrensalo, A. et al. Species-specific temporal variation in photosynthesis as a moderator of peatland carbon sequestration. Biogeosciences 14, 257–269 (2017).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Weltzin, J. F. et al. Response of bog and fen plant communities to warming and water-table manipulations. Ecology 81, 3464–3478 (2000).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Dimitrov, D. D., Grant, R. F., Lafleur, P. M. & Humphreys, E. R. Modeling the effects of hydrology on gross primary productivity and net ecosystem productivity at Mer Bleue bog. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 116, G04010 (2011).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Bubier, J., Crill, P., Mosedale, A., Frolking, S. & Linder, E. Peatland responses to varying interannual moisture conditions as measured by automatic CO2 chambers. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 17, 1066 (2003).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Moore, T. R. & Knowles, R. The influence of water table levels on methane and carbon dioxide emissions from peatland soils. Can. J. Soil Sci. 69, 33–38 (1989).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Nichols, D. S. Temperature of upland and peatland soils in a north central Minnesota forest. Can. J. Soil Sci. 78, 493–509 (1998).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bellisario, L. M., Moore, T. R. & Bubier, J. L. Net ecosystem CO2 exchange in a boreal peatland, northern Manitoba. Écoscience 5, 534–541 (1998).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Yu, Z. et al. Peatlands and their role in the global carbon cycle. Eos 92, 97–98 (2011).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hanson, P. J. et al. Rapid net carbon loss from a whole-ecosystem warmed peatland. AGU Adv. 1, e2020AV000163 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Vincent, L. A. et al. Observed trends in Canada’s climate and influence of low-frequency variability modes. J. Clim. 28, 4545–4560 (2015).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Templer, P. H. et al. Climate Change Across Seasons Experiment (CCASE): a new method for simulating future climate in seasonally snow-covered ecosystems. PLoS ONE 12, e0171928 (2017).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Peichl, M. et al. A 12-year record reveals pre-growing season temperature and water table level threshold effects on the net carbon dioxide exchange in a boreal fen. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 055006 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Helbig, M., Humphreys, E. R. & Todd, A. Contrasting temperature sensitivity of CO2 exchange in peatlands of the Hudson Bay Lowlands, Canada. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 124, 2126–2143 (2019).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Griffis, T. J., Rouse, W. R. & Waddington, J. M. Interannual variability of net ecosystem CO2 exchange at a subarctic fen. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 14, 1109–1121 (2000).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bubier, J. L., Crill, P. M., Moore, T. R., Savage, K. & Varner, R. K. Seasonal patterns and controls on net ecosystem CO2 exchange in a boreal peatland complex. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 12, 703–714 (1998).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Park, S.-B. et al. Temperature control of spring CO2 fluxes at a coniferous forest and a peat bog in Central Siberia. Atmosphere 12, 984 (2021).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Adkinson, A. C., Syed, K. H. & Flanagan, L. B. Contrasting responses of growing season ecosystem CO2 exchange to variation in temperature and water table depth in two peatlands in northern Alberta, Canada. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 116, G01004 (2011).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Heiskanen, L. et al. Carbon dioxide and methane exchange of a patterned subarctic fen during two contrasting growing seasons. Biogeosciences 18, 873–896 (2021).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lafleur, P. M., Roulet, N. T., Bubier, J. L., Frolking, S. & Moore, T. R. Interannual variability in the peatland-atmosphere carbon dioxide exchange at an ombrotrophic bog. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 17, 1036 (2003).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Joiner, D. W., Lafleur, P. M., McCaughey, J. H. & Bartlett, P. A. Interannual variability in carbon dioxide exchanges at a boreal wetland in the BOREAS northern study area. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 104, 27663–27672 (1999).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    McVeigh, P., Sottocornola, M., Foley, N., Leahy, P. & Kiely, G. Meteorological and functional response partitioning to explain interannual variability of CO2 exchange at an Irish Atlantic blanket bog. Agric. For. Meteorol. 194, 8–19 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Helbig, M. et al. Increasing contribution of peatlands to boreal evapotranspiration in a warming climate. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 555–560 (2020).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bourgault, M.-A., Larocque, M. & Garneau, M. How do hydrogeological setting and meteorological conditions influence water table depth and fluctuations in ombrotrophic peatlands? J. Hydrol. X 4, 100032 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Yurova, A., Wolf, A., Sagerfors, J. & Nilsson, M. Variations in net ecosystem exchange of carbon dioxide in a boreal mire: modeling mechanisms linked to water table position. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 112, G02025 (2007).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Laine, A. M. et al. Warming impacts on boreal fen CO2 exchange under wet and dry conditions. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 1995–2008 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Chivers, M. R., Turetsky, M. R., Waddington, J. M., Harden, J. W. & McGuire, A. D. Effects of experimental water table and temperature manipulations on ecosystem CO2 fluxes in an Alaskan rich fen. Ecosystems 12, 1329–1342 (2009).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Juszczak, R. et al. Ecosystem respiration in a heterogeneous temperate peatland and its sensitivity to peat temperature and water table depth. Plant Soil 366, 505–520 (2013).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hao, D. et al. Estimating hourly land surface downward shortwave and photosynthetically active radiation from DSCOVR/EPIC observations. Remote Sens. Environ. 232, 111320 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    O’Donnell, J. A., Romanovsky, V. E., Harden, J. W. & McGuire, A. D. The effect of moisture content on the thermal conductivity of moss and organic soil horizons from black spruce ecosystems in interior Alaska. Soil Sci. 174, 646–651 (2009).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Nijp, J. J. et al. Rain events decrease boreal peatland net CO2 uptake through reduced light availability. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 2309–2320 (2015).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Zhang, Y., Commane, R., Zhou, S., Williams, A. P. & Gentine, P. Light limitation regulates the response of autumn terrestrial carbon uptake to warming. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 739–743 (2020).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Samson, M. et al. The impact of experimental temperature and water level manipulation on carbon dioxide release in a poor fen in northern Poland. Wetlands 38, 551–563 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Drever, C. R. et al. Natural climate solutions for Canada. Sci. Adv. 7, eabd6034 (2021).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hemes, K. S., Runkle, B. R. K., Novick, K. A., Baldocchi, D. D. & Field, C. B. An ecosystem-scale flux measurement strategy to assess natural climate solutions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 3494–3504 (2021).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Walker, T. W. N. et al. A systemic overreaction to years versus decades of warming in a subarctic grassland ecosystem. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 101–108 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Xu, B. et al. Seasonal variability of forest sensitivity to heat and drought stresses: a synthesis based on carbon fluxes from North American forest ecosystems. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 901–918 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Piao, S. et al. Net carbon dioxide losses of northern ecosystems in response to autumn warming. Nature 451, 49–52 (2008).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Joyce, P. et al. How robust Is the apparent break-down of northern high-latitude temperature control on spring carbon uptake? Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2020GL091601 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Grant, R. F. et al. Changes in net ecosystem productivity of boreal black spruce stands in response to changes in temperature at diurnal and seasonal time scales. Tree Physiol. 29, 1–17 (2009).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kwon, M. J. et al. Siberian 2020 heatwave increased spring CO2 uptake but not annual CO2 uptake. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 124030 (2021).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Yu, Z., Griffis, T. J. & Baker, J. M. Warming temperatures lead to reduced summer carbon sequestration in the U.S. Corn Belt. Commun. Earth Environ. 2, 53 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Wang, S. et al. Warmer spring alleviated the impacts of 2018 European summer heatwave and drought on vegetation photosynthesis. Agric. For. Meteorol. 295, 108195 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Wang, T. et al. Emerging negative impact of warming on summer carbon uptake in northern ecosystems. Nat. Commun. 9, 5391 (2018).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lin, X. et al. Siberian and temperate ecosystems shape Northern Hemisphere atmospheric CO2 seasonal amplification. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 21079–21087 (2020).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Helbig, M. et al. Warming response of peatland CO2 sink is sensitive to seasonality in warming trends. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6685222 (2022).Didan, K. MOD13Q1 MODIS/Terra Vegetation Indices 16-Day L3 Global 250 m SIN Grid V006 [Data set]. NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC (2015); https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD13Q1.006Harris, I., Osborn, T. J., Jones, P. & Lister, D. Version 4 of the CRU TS monthly high-resolution gridded multivariate climate dataset. Sci. Data 7, 109 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lees, K. J. et al. Using spectral indices to estimate water content and GPP in Sphagnum moss and other peatland vegetation. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 58, 4547–4557 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bennett, A. C., McDowell, N. G., Allen, C. D. & Anderson-Teixeira, K. J. Larger trees suffer most during drought in forests worldwide. Nat. Plants 1, 15139 (2015).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Page, S. E. & Baird, A. J. Peatlands and global change: response and resilience. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 41, 35–57 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Juottonen, H. et al. Integrating decomposers, methane-cycling microbes and ecosystem carbon fluxes along a peatland successional gradient in a land uplift region. Ecosystems https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-021-00713-w (2021). More