Ecology

Tedersoo L, Bahram M, Põlme S, Kõljalg U, Yorou NS, Wijesundera R, et al. Fungal biogeography. Global diversity and geography of soil fungi. Science (80-). 2014;346:1256688.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Oliverio AM, Geisen S, Delgado Baquerizo M, Maestre FT, Turner BL, Fierer N. The global-scale distributions of soil protists and their contributions to belowground systems. Sci Adv. 2020;6:eaax8787.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Delgado Baquerizo M, Oliverio AM, Brewer TE, Benavent-Gonzalez A, Eldridge DJ, Bardgett RD, et al. A global atlas of the dominant bacteria found in soil. Science. 2018;359:320–5.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bates ST, Clemente JC, Flores GE, Walters WA, Parfrey LW, Knight R, et al. Global biogeography of highly diverse protistan communities in soil. ISME J. 2012;7:652–9.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Crowther TW, van den Hoogen J, Wan J, Mayes MA, Keiser AD, Mo L, et al. The global soil community and its influence on biogeochemistry. Science. 2019;365:eaav0550.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Xiong W, Jousset A, Li R, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Bahram M, Logares R, et al. A global overview of the trophic structure within microbiomes across ecosystems. Environ Int. 2021;151:106438.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Singh BK, Bardgett RD, Smith P, Reay DS. Microorganisms and climate change: terrestrial feedbacks and mitigation options. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8:779–90.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nowicka B, Kruk J. Powered by light: Phototrophy and photosynthesis in prokaryotes and its evolution. Microbiol Res. 2016;186-7:99–118.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hamard S, Céréghino R, Barret M, Sytiuk A, Lara E, Dorrepaal E, et al. Contribution of microbial photosynthesis to peatland carbon uptake along a latitudinal gradient. J Ecol. 2021;109:3424–41.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Seppey CVW, Singer D, Dumack K, Fournier B, Belbahri LL, Mitchell EAD, et al. Distribution patterns of soil microbial eukaryotes suggests widespread algivory by phagotrophic protists as an alternative pathway for nutrient cycling. Soil Biol Biochem. 2017;112:68–76.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Schmidt O, Dyckmans J, Schrader S. Photoautotrophic microorganisms as a carbon source for temperate soil invertebrates. Biol Lett. 2016;12:20150646.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Halvorson HM, Barry JR, Lodato MB, Findlay RH, Francoeur SN, Kuehn KA. Periphytic algae decouple fungal activity from leaf litter decomposition via negative priming. Funct Ecol. 2019;33:188–201.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wyatt KH, Turetsky MR. Algae alleviate carbon limitation of heterotrophic bacteria in a boreal peatland. J Ecol. 2015;103:1165–71.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Elbert W, Weber B, Burrows S, Steinkamp J, Büdel B, Andreae MO, et al. Contribution of cryptogamic covers to the global cycles of carbon and nitrogen. Nat Geosci. 2012;5:459–62.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jassey VEJ, Walcker R, Kardol P, Geisen S, Heger T, Lamentowicz M, et al. Contribution of soil algae to the global carbon cycle. New Phytol. 2022;234:64–76.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tahon G, Tytgat B, Willems A. Diversity of phototrophic genes suggests multiple bacteria may be able to exploit sunlight in exposed soils from the Sør Rondane Mountains, East Antarctica. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:2026.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Maier S, Tamm A, Wu D, Caesar J, Grube M, Weber B. Photoautotrophic organisms control microbial abundance, diversity, and physiology in different types of biological soil crusts. ISME J. 2018;12:1032–46.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Büdel B. Ecology and diversity of rock-inhabiting cyanobacteria in tropical regions. Eur J Phycol. 1999;34:361–70.Article 

Google Scholar 
Hamard S, Küttim M, Céréghino R, Jassey VEJ. Peatland microhabitat heterogeneity drives phototrophic microbes distribution and photosynthetic activity. Environ Microbiol. 2021;23:6811–27.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cano-Díaz C, Maestre FT, Eldridge DJ, Singh BK, Bardgett RD, Fierer N, et al. Contrasting environmental preferences of photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic soil cyanobacteria across the globe. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2020;29:2025–38.Article 

Google Scholar 
Rodriguez-Caballero E, Belnap J, Büdel B, Crutzen PJ, Andreae MO, Pöschl U, et al. Dryland photoautotrophic soil surface communities endangered by global change. Nat Geosci. 2018;11:185–9.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pointing SB, Belnap J. Microbial colonization and controls in dryland systems. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012;10:551–62.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bates ST, Clemente JC, Flores GE, Walters WA, Parfrey LW, Knight R, et al. Global biogeography of highly diverse protistan communities in soil. ISME J. 2013;7:652–9.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Küttim L, Küttim M, Puusepp L, Sugita S. The effects of ecotope, microtopography and environmental variables on diatom assemblages in hemiboreal bogs in Northern Europe. Hydrobiologia. 2017;792:137–49.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Mahé F, de Vargas C, Bass D, Czech L, Stamatakis A, Lara E, et al. Parasites dominate hyperdiverse soil protist communities in Neotropical rainforests. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017;1:91.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lindo Z, Gonzalez A. The Bryosphere: An Integral and Influential Component of the Earth’s Biosphere. Ecosystems. 2010;13:612–27.Article 

Google Scholar 
Sporn SG, Bos MM, Kessler M, Gradstein SR. Vertical distribution of epiphytic bryophytes in an Indonesian rainforest. Biodivers Conserv. 2010;19:745–60.Article 

Google Scholar 
Cornelissen JHC, Lang SI, Soudzilovskaia NA, During HJ. Comparative cryptogam ecology: a review of bryophyte and lichen traits that drive biogeochemistry. Ann Bot. 2007;99:987–1001.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Van Breemen N. How Sphagnum bogs down other plants. Trends Ecol Evol. 1995;10:270–5.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jonsson M, Kardol P, Gundale MJ, Bansal S, Nilsson M-C, Metcalfe DB, et al. Direct and Indirect Drivers of Moss Community Structure, Function, and Associated Microfauna Across a Successional Gradient. Ecosystems. 2014;18:1–16.
Google Scholar 
Bragina A, Berg C, Cardinale M, Shcherbakov A, Chebotar V, Berg G. Sphagnum mosses harbour highly specific bacterial diversity during their whole lifecycle. ISME J. 2012;6:802–13.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bay G, Nahar N, Oubre M, Whitehouse MJ, Wardle DA, Zackrisson O, et al. Boreal feather mosses secrete chemical signals to gain nitrogen. New Phytol. 2013;200:54–60.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kip N, van Winden JF, Pan Y, Bodrossy L, Reichart G-J, Smolders AJP, et al. Global prevalence of methane oxidation by symbiotic bacteria in peat-moss ecosystems. Nat Geosci. 2010;3:617–21.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lindo Z, Nilsson M-C, Gundale MJ. Bryophyte-cyanobacteria associations as regulators of the northern latitude carbon balance in response to global change. Glob Chang Biol. 2013;19:2022–35.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jassey VEJ, Shimano S, Dupuy C, Toussaint M-L, Gilbert D. Characterizing the feeding habits of the testate amoebae Hyalosphenia papilio and Nebela tincta along a narrow ‘fen-bog’ gradient using digestive vacuole content and 13C and 15N isotopic analyses. Protist. 2012;163:451–64.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Raanan H, Oren N, Treves H, Keren N, Ohad I, Berkowicz SM, et al. Towards clarifying what distinguishes cyanobacteria able to resurrect after desiccation from those that cannot: The photosynthetic aspect. Biochim Biophys Acta – Bioenerg. 2016;1857:715–22.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Puente-Sánchez F, Arce-Rodríguez A, Oggerin M, García-Villadangos M, Moreno-Paz M, Blanco Y, et al. Viable cyanobacteria in the deep continental subsurface. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:10702–7.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Küttim M, Küttim L, Ilomets M, Laine AM. Controls of Sphagnum growth and the role of winter. Ecol Res. 2020;35:219–34.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Jassey VEJ, Chiapusio G, Mitchell EAD, Binet P, Toussaint M-L, Gilbert D. Fine-scale horizontal and vertical micro-distribution patterns of testate amoebae along a narrow Fen/Bog gradient. Microb Ecol. 2011;61:374–85.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wilken S, Huisman J, Naus-Wiezer S, Van Donk E. Mixotrophic organisms become more heterotrophic with rising temperature. Ecol Lett. 2012;16:225–33.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jassey VEJ, Signarbieux C. Effects of climate warming on Sphagnumphotosynthesis in peatlands depend on peat moisture and species‐specific anatomical traits. Glob Chang Biol. 2019;182:12–65.
Google Scholar 
McDonald D, Price MN, Goodrich J, Nawrocki EP, Desantis TZ, Probst A, et al. An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea. ISME J. 2011;6:610–8. 2012 63PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lozupone CA, Stombaugh J, Gonzalez A, Ackermann G, Wendel D, Vázquez-Baeza Y, et al. Meta-analyses of studies of the human microbiota. Genome Res. 2013;23:1704–14.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pawluczyk M, Weiss J, Links MG, Egaña Aranguren M, Wilkinson MD, Egea-Cortines M. Quantitative evaluation of bias in PCR amplification and next-generation sequencing derived from metabarcoding samples. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2015;407:1841–8.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ramirez KS, Knight CG, de Hollander M, Brearley FQ, Constantinides B, Cotton A, et al. Detecting macroecological patterns in bacterial communities across independent studies of global soils. Nat Microbiol. 2018;3:189–96.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2019.Opelt K, Berg C, Schönmann S, Eberl L, Berg G. High specificity but contrasting biodiversity of Sphagnum-associated bacterial and plant communities in bog ecosystems independent of the geographical region. ISME J. 2007;1:502–16.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hamard S, Robroek BJM, Allard P-M, Signarbieux C, Zhou S, Saesong T, et al. Effects of Sphagnum Leachate on Competitive Sphagnum Microbiome Depend on Species and Time. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:3317.Article 

Google Scholar 
Holland-Moritz H, Stuart J, Lewis LR, Miller S, Mack MC, McDaniel SF, et al. Novel bacterial lineages associated with boreal moss species. Environ Microbiol. 2018;20:2625–38.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Singer D, Metz S, Unrein F, Shimano S, Mazei Y, Mitchell EAD, et al. Contrasted Micro-Eukaryotic Diversity Associated with Sphagnum Mosses in Tropical, Subtropical and Temperate Climatic Zones. Microb Ecol. 2019;78:714–24.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Holland-Moritz H, Stuart JEM, Lewis LR, Miller SN, Mack MC, Ponciano JM, et al. The bacterial communities of Alaskan mosses and their contributions to N2-fixation. Microbiome. 2021;9:1–14.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Righetti D, Vogt M, Gruber N, Psomas A, Zimmermann NE. Global pattern of phytoplankton diversity driven by temperature and environmental variability. Sci Adv. 2019;5:eaau6253.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Amend AS, Cobian GM, Laruson AJ, Remple K, Tucker SJ, Poff KE, et al. Phytobiomes are compositionally nested from the ground up. PeerJ. 2019;2019:e6609.Article 

Google Scholar 
Dedysh SN, Pankratov TA, Belova SE, Kulichevskaya IS, Liesack W. Phylogenetic analysis and in situ identification of Bacteria community composition in an acidic Sphagnum peat bog. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:2110–7.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Robroek BJM, Martí M, Svensson BH, Dumont MG, Veraart AJ, Jassey VEJ. Rewiring of peatland plant–microbe networks outpaces species turnover. Oikos. 2021;303:605–15.
Google Scholar 
Holland-Moritz H, Stuart J, Lewis LR, Miller S, Mack MC, Mcdaniel SF, et al. Novel bacterial lineages associated with boreal moss species. Environ Microbiol. 2018;20:2625–38.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sytiuk A, Céréghino R, Hamard S, Delarue F, Guittet A, Barel JM, et al. Predicting the structure and functions of peatland microbial communities from Sphagnum phylogeny, anatomical and morphological traits and metabolites. J Ecol. 2021;1365-2745:13728.
Google Scholar 
Rudolph H, Samland J. Occurrence and metabolism of sphagnum acid in the cell walls of bryophytes. Phytochemistry. 1985;24:745–9.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chiapusio G, Jassey VEJ, Bellvert F, Comte G, Weston LA, Delarue F, et al. Sphagnum species modulate their phenolic profiles and mycorrhizal colonization of surrounding Andromeda polifolia along peatland microhabitats. J Chem Ecol. 2018;27:1–12.
Google Scholar 
Rasmussen S, Wolff C, Rudolph H. Compartmentalization of phenolic constituents in sphagnum. Phytochemistry. 1995;38:35–39.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sytiuk A, Céréghino R, Hamard S, Delarue F, Dorrepaal E, Küttim M, et al. Biochemical traits enhance the trait concept in Sphagnum ecology. Oikos 2022;00:00.Hájek T, Ballance S, Limpens J, Zijlstra M, Verhoeven JTA. Cell-wall polysaccharides play an important role in decay resistance of Sphagnum and actively depressed decomposition in vitro. Biogeochemistry. 2011;103:45–57.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bengtsson F, Rydin Hå, Hájek T. Biochemical determinants of litter quality in 15 species of Sphagnum. Plant Soil. 2018;425:161–76.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fudyma JD, Lyon J, AminiTabrizi R, Gieschen H, Chu RK, Hoyt DW, et al. Untargeted metabolomic profiling of Sphagnum fallax reveals novel antimicrobial metabolites. Plant Direct. 2019;3:e00179–17.Article 

Google Scholar 
He L, Mazza Rodrigues JL, Soudzilovskaia NA, Barceló M, Olsson PA, Song C, et al. Global biogeography of fungal and bacterial biomass carbon in topsoil. Soil Biol Biochem. 2020;151:108024.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hanson CA. Beyond biogeographic patterns: processes shaping the microbial landscape. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012;10:497–506.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Waddington JM, Morris PJ, Kettridge N, Granath G, Thompson DK, Moore PA. Hydrological feedbacks in northern peatlands. Ecohydrology. 2015;8:113–27.Article 

Google Scholar 
Reczuga MK, Lamentowicz M, Mulot M, Mitchell EAD, Buttler A, Chojnicki B, et al. Predator–prey mass ratio drives microbial activity under dry conditions in Sphagnum peatlands. Ecol Evol. 2018;8:5752–64.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ritchie RJ. Consistent sets of spectrophotometric chlorophyll equations for acetone, methanol and ethanol solvents. Photosynth Res. 2006;89:27–41.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Perrine Z, Negi S, Sayre RT. Optimization of photosynthetic light energy utilization by microalgae. Algal Res. 2012;1:134–42.Article 

Google Scholar 
Carey CC, Ibelings BW, Hoffmann EP, Hamilton DP, Brookes JD. Eco-physiological adaptations that favour freshwater cyanobacteria in a changing climate. Water Res. 2012;46:1394–407.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gorbunov MY, Falkowski PG. Using chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics to determine photosynthesis in aquatic ecosystems. Limnol Ocean. 2020;66:1–13.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
MacIntyre HL, Kana TM, Anning T, Geider RJ. Photoacclimation of photosynthesis irradiance response curves and photosynthetic pigments in microalgae and cyanobacteria. J Phycol. 2002;38:17–38.Article 

Google Scholar 
Grote EE, Belnap J, Housman DC, Sparks JP. Carbon exchange in biological soil crust communities under differential temperatures and soil water contents: implications for global change. Glob Chang Biol. 2010;16:2763–74.Article 

Google Scholar 
Robarts RD, Zohary T. Temperature effects on photosynthetic capacity, respiration, and growth rates of bloom‐forming cyanobacteria. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research. 1987;21:391–9.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Le Quéré C, Andrew RM, Friedlingstein P, Sitch S, Pongratz J, Manning AC, et al. Global Carbon Budget 2017. Earth Syst Sci Data. 2018;10:405–48.Article 

Google Scholar  More

Overview of hydrologic and ecological mapping protocolMapping hydrologic and ecological alteration at the stream reach level followed a 7-step process that builds upon several previously published methods (Fig. 1). The steps include: (1) compiling a nationwide dataset of streamflow gauges from the US Geological Survey (USGS) and distinguishing reference and non-reference gages and associated records21,22,23, (2) assembling stream flow records and calculating hydrologic indices23, (3) quantifying hydrologic alteration for stream gages22, (4) developing models to predict hydrologic alteration from human disturbance variables24, (5) using models to extrapolate hydrologic alteration to ungauged stream reaches24, (6) developing empirical models of fish species richness responses to hydrologic alteration17, and (7) mapping fish richness responses to ungauged stream reaches based on modeled estimates of hydrologic alteration. Methodological details are provided in each of the publications cited above; however, an overview of the steps is provided here. We elaborate more fully on the detailed methodology starting at step 3, as this reflects more of the focus of the technical validation of the dataset (Fig. 1).Fig. 1Overview of the 7-step approach used to map hydrologic alteration and ecological consequences in stream reaches of the conterminous US.Full size imageStep 1 – Compiling a nationwide streamflow datasetWe assembled streamflow information for 7,088 USGS stream gages with at least 15 years of daily discharge data as of 2010. We only included gages with at least 15 years of complete annual records (i.e., those with More

Mixing fire occurrence with wildfire activity is problematic also when trying to draw policy conclusions. Fang et al.1 examined the temporal pattern of fire numbers between 2005-18 and concluded that the application of a fire suppression policy after 1987 has contributed to decreases in fire occurrences after 2007. However, fire suppression is an effort to mitigate the results of a fire once it has started10. Consequently, fire suppression strictly affects the burned area, and not fire occurrence. Other aspects associated with fire planning, like awareness campaigns or fire bans, may act on fire occurrence. However, any relationship between fire occurrence and fire suppression will necessarily be artefactual because the latter does not affect the former.We acknowledge that part of the discrepancy with Fang et al.1 may lie in the different scales used in these analyses. However, fire activity is a term that currently lacks a rigorous definition and should be used with caution. Fire occurrence depends primarily on the number of ignitions (along with other factors affecting fire detection such as climate, topography or vegetation), which, in turn, results from human activity1 and, in some areas, lightning11. Using fire occurrence as an indicator for fire activity is particularly problematic when comparing multiple biomes that show marked differences in fire regime, as we demonstrate here. Additionally, ENSO and fire suppression may both affect burned area, but there is currently no mechanism that can explain a mechanistic link between either of these processes and the number of fire events. Consequently, fire occurrence should not be used as a sole metric of fire activity.We additionally note that burned area is not necessarily a reliable metric of fire impacts on ecosystems and society. Significant variation in severity and intensity may occur within a fire perimeter12. Additionally, damage to people and property are not captured by this metric13. While we caution against the use of a single metric to evaluate fire activity, we hope to have demonstrated that using fire occurrence alone is particularly problematic, and that the picture it paints is rather unrealistic. More

Species composition of vegetation in the WLFZIn this survey, a total of 44 species in 43 genera of 21 families of vascular plants were found and confirmed in the reservoir WLFZ of the Jinsha River basin, among which, 13 genera and 13 species of Compositae, 4 genera and 4 species of Gramineae, 3 genera and 3 species of Amaranthaceae, 2 genera and 2 species of Verbenaceae, Labiatae, Umbelliferae, Cruciferae and Convolvulaceae, 1 genus and 2 species of Polygonaceae, and the remaining 12 families were all single genera. Compositae had the highest number of species, followed by Gramineae and Amaranthaceae, accounting for 29.55%, 9.09% and 6.82% of the total number of species in this survey, respectively, which are the main dominant families in the region.According to the life type classification system of the Flora of China, the plants in the WLFZ of this survey can be classified into five life types: annual herbs, perennial herbs, annual or biennial herbs, annual or perennial herbs, and biennial herbs. The community is overwhelmingly dominated by annuals with a high proportion of 54.55%, followed by perennials with 34.09% and the rest of all life types with a total of 11.36%.The higher number of annual plants indicates that the environmental conditions in the WLFZ are harsher after inundation by water storage, and plants that can complete their entire life cycle in a short period of time after receding water are more likely to survive compared to plants that take a long time to complete their entire life cycle.The vegetation types in each study area of the WLFZ are shown in Table 3, among which 17 species, including S. subulatum, E. humifusa, C. bonariensis, V. officinalis, O. biennis, S. plebeia, U. fissa, B. juncea, S. orientalis, D. repens, A. lividus, T. mongolicum, G. parviflora, P. praeruptorum, P. hys-terophorus, D. stramonium and Ph. Nil, are newly discovered species in the reservoir WLFZ, which are rarely reported in other reservoir WLFZ studies so far. Among the study areas, the Longkou study area was the richest in vegetation types, with the most families, species and life types among all study areas, and the number of perennial herb species was comparable to that of annual herb species, while all other study areas were mainly dominated by annual herbs. The vegetation composition of the remaining study areas averaged 6–8 families and 11–12 species, except for the Ludila study area with no plants growing and the Liyuan study area with only 5 families and 5 species. In general, each study area was dominated by Compositae and Gramineae.Table 3 Vegetation composition in each study area.Full size tableVegetation area, coverage, and percentage of the WLFZAccording to the vegetation classification in the WLFZ of each study area (Fig. 5 and Table 4), the vegetation coverage of the study areas of the Liyuan, Ahai, Ludila and Guanyinyan reservoir WLFZ were all less than 5%. The study area of Ludila was completey devoid of vegetation in the WLFZ. The coverage in Liyuan was only 0.02%, with mostly individual herbaceous plants sporadically distributed on the upper boundary of the WLFZ. In Ahai, C. dactylon grow concentratly in patches at the top of the WLFZ together with some other sparsely growing vegetation, with a coverage of 1.47%. The vegetation coverage of Guanyinyan was 3.21%, mainly distributed in the upper part of the WLFZ and expanding towards the middle. In this area, 30.39% of the vegetation was X. sibiricum, growing in large tracts as low seedlings; 21.03% was A. sessilis growing in patches, 10.87% was C. dactylon growing mainly on the upper boundary of the WLFZ, and 37.71% was a mixture of plants growing in clusters with only a few of each.Figure 5The results of vegetation classification in the WLFZ of each study area. (a) Liyuan, (b) Ahai (c) Longkaikou, (d) Ludila, (e) Guanyinyan, (f) Xiluodu. Note: Non-Veg (Non-vegetation), Other-Veg (Other vegetation), C. Dac (Cynodon dactylon), A. Ses (Alternanthera sessilis), C. Bon (Conyza bonariensis), Ch. Amb (Chenopodium ambrosioides), C. Can (Conyza canadensis), D. Rep (Dichondra repens), H. Sib (Hydrocotyle sibthorpioides), V. Off (Verbena officinalis), X. Sib (Xanthium sibiricum). (Generated with eCognition Developer, and the URL is https://www.ecognition.com).Full size imageTable 4 Vegetation area, vegetation coverage and vegetation classification accuracy of WLFZ in each study area.Full size tableThe vegetation coverage of Longkaikou and Xiluodu WLFZ was more abundant, 46.47% and 55.81% respectively. In Longkaikou, vegetation mainly covered the middle and upper parts of the WLFZ. Of the vegetation, 66.38% was C. dactylon, 26.50% was A. sessilis, 2.35% was H. sibthorpioides, 1.68% was Ch. ambrosioides, and 3.09% was a variety of vegetation species, only a few of each, divided into Other-Veg class.Due to weather and equipment constraints, we were unable to photograph the upper and lower boundaries of the WLFZ in Xiluodu study area, but we still obtained the images of the main part of the WLFZ, which consisted mainly of 58.4% X. sibiricum, 28.04% C. dactylon, 10.59% S. viridis, and 2.97% other vegetation.The vegetation coverage in the WLFZ of different reservoirs of the Jinsha River basin varied significantly, but in terms of quantity, most of them were absolutely dominated by 1–4 species, which were distributed in patches and strips, and covered an area and proportion far more than the rest of the vegetation, while the rest of the vegetation was sparse in quantity each and was sporadically distributed. C. dactylon, A. sessilis, X. sibiricum, S. viridis, H. sibthorpioides, Ch. Ambrosioides were the main dominant and pioneer species for vegetation restoration in the reservoir WLFZ of the Jinsha River basin.Spatial distribution pattern of vegetation in fluctuating zoneSince no vegetation survived in the Ludila study area, and the vegetation in the Liyuan, Ahai and Guanyinyan study areas was sparse, with less than 5% coverage, and all of them were concentrated in the upper part of the WLFZs (Fig. 5), this paper mainly analyzed the spatial distribution pattern of vegetation in the Longkou and Xiluodu study areas, which had better vegetation coverage.Landscape patternCA is a basic index for landscape pattern study, and LPI reflects the proportion of the largest patch in the landscape type to the total landscape area, which is an expression of patch dominance. The SHAPE and PAFRAC describe the complexity of patch shape, the larger the SHAPE value indicates the more complex patch shape; the closer the PAFRAC value to 1 indicates the more regular patch shape. PROX reflects the degree of proximity of each landscape type, the larger its value indicates the higher degree of patch aggregation and the lower degree of fragmentation; ENN describes the degree of physical connection of the landscape types, the larger its value indicates the greater distance between patches and the greater degree of fragmentation.From the overall landscape level (Fig. 6), in the Longkaikou study area, CA and LPI showed that the areas of vegetation patches were large, less spatially fluctuating and uniform distribution, with obvious patch dominance, reflecting characteristics of patchy distribution; PROX and ENN showed that the vegetation patches were clustered and the landscape was well connected; SHAPE and PAFRAC showed that there was little variation in the shape complexity of vegetation patches in most areas of the WLFZ.Figure 6Spatial characteristics of vegetation landscape pattern index in the Longkaikou study area (Generated with ArcGIS 10.5 software, and the URL is: https://www.esri.com/en-us/home).Full size imageAt the level of landscape types (Table 5), the vegetation landscape types in the Longkou study area included C. dactylon, A. sessilis, H. sibthorpioides and other vegetation, among which, C. dactylon showed significant advantages in patch area, patch dominance, patch aggregation and connectivity; followed by A. sessilis and H. sibthorpioides, A. sessilis was significantly better than H. sibthorpioides in patch area, but in patch shape, H. sibthorpioides was more aggregated than A. sessilis and had better patch connectivity; Other-Veg showed significant weaknesses in patch area and aggregation; there were no significant differences among the landscape types in patch shape.Table 5 Landscape index of patch types in the Longkaikou study area.Full size tableThe spatial characteristics of the vegetation landscape pattern index in the Xiluodu study area were shown in Fig. 7. From the overall level of the landscape, the area of vegetation patches and the dominance of patches were spatially variable, the vegetation was well connected, with obvious characteristics of patchy distribution, and the shape of vegetation patches did not show obvious spatial characteristics.Figure 7Spatial characteristics of vegetation landscape pattern index in the Xiluodu study area (Generated with ArcGIS 10.5 software, and the URL is:https://www.esri.com/en-us/home).Full size imageFrom the level of landscape types (Table 6), the vegetation landscape types in Xiluodu study area included four categories: X. sibiricum, C. dactylon, S. viridis and Other-Veg type. Among them, X. sibiricum showed obvious advantages in patch area, patch dominance, patch aggregation and connectivity, followed by C. dactylon, both of which were significantly better than S. viridis and Other-Veg, and the differences in patch shape complexity among landscape types were small.Table 6 Landscape index of patch types in the Xiluodu study area.Full size tableDistribution characteristics along terrainAccording to the statistics (Fig. 8), the vegetation area share of Longkaikou study area in the upper, middle and lower elevation gradients of the WLFZ was 54.61%, 26.62% and 18.77%, respectively, indicating that the vegetation was mostly in the upper part of the WLFZ, with a coverage of 83.80%, while the vegetation in the lower part was the least, with a coverage of less than 1%. From the viewpoint of each vegetation species, in the upper part of the WLFZ, C. dactylon had the largest area, accounting for 66.9% of the total vegetation area, followed by A. sessilis, accounting for 25.9%, while H. sibthorpioides and Other-Veg only survived in the upper part, accounting for 2.3% and 4.9% each. From the distribution of each slope class, the vegetation of the WLFZ gradually decreased with the increase of slope, and the vegetation was mainly concentrated in the range of slope 35°, and the coverage of each vegetation decreased significantly when the slope exceeded 35°. In the aspect, the distribution of vegetation in the WLFZ did not show any obvious preference. The surface relief in the study area of Longkou was generally low, and C. dactylon was mainly distributed in the range of surface relief less than 0.84 m. When the surface relief is greater than 2.52 m, the vegetation coverage tends to be close to 0. The vegetation showed no obvious distribution preference in terms of surface roughness and topographic wetness index.Figure 8Changes in vegetation coverage with topographic factors in the Longkaikou study area (Drawn with Origin 2018_64Bit, and the URL is https://www.OriginLab.cn/).Full size imageThe spatial distribution of vegetation in the study area of Xiluodu was shown in Fig. 9. The maximum drop in water level at Xiluodu study area can reach 60 m, but only the half of the upper part of the subsidence zone with a drop of about 30 m was photographed. The coverage rate of C. dactylon was the largest in this elevation gradient, S. viridis was mainly distributed in the uppermost part of the zone, while X. strumarium was well covered in all elevation gradients. From the distribution of surface relief, the overall vegetation coverage decreases with the increase of surface relief, with X. strumarium and S. viridis mainly distributed in the area of 0–3.45 m, while both the coverage of C. dactylon and Other-Veg were not much different across the surface relief . The distribution of vegetation showed no obvious preference in terms of slope, aspect, surface roughness and topographic wetness index.Figure 9Changes in vegetation coverage with topographic factors in the Xiluodu study area (Drawn with Origin 2018_64Bit, and the URL is https://www.OriginLab.cn/).Full size imageInfluence of topographic factors on the spatial distribution pattern of vegetation in the WLFZAccording to the results of species distribution modeling, the number of samples in the study area of Longkaikou was 39,321, and the overall accuracy of the model was 88.2%. The terrain factors, in descending order of importance, were elevation  > slope  > surface relief  > surface roughness  > aspect  > topographic wetness index, with values of 0.681, 0.146, 0.091, 0.042, 0.033 and 0.007, respectively (Fig. 10). It can be seen that the vegetation distribution in the WLFZ was mainly influenced by elevation, followed by slope and surface relief, and is less influenced by surface roughness, aspect and topographic wetness index. This was consistent with the results of typical correlation analysis.Figure 10Ranking of important values of topographic factors in the Longkaikou study area (Drawn with Origin 2018_64Bit, and the URL is https://www.OriginLab.cn/).Full size imageA total of six pairs of typical variables were calculated in the Longkou study area, and standardized typical coefficients were used due to the inconsistency of each landscape pattern index as well as topographic factor units. According to the results of significance test (Table 7), the first four pairs of typical p-values were less than 0.05, indicating that the correlations reached a significant level, and their correlation coefficients were 0.565, 0.262, 0.142, and 0.034, among which the correlation coefficient of the first pair was the largest, so the first pair was selected for analysis. The topographic factors and landscape indices highly correlated with the first pair of typical variables were elevation, surface relief and CA and SHAPE, respectively. According to Tables 8 and 9, their mechanism of action was that the greater the elevation, the smaller the surface relief, resulting in a larger patch size and more complex shape of the vegetation, and therefore a more frequent exchange of energy with the outside world and a greater ability to survive.Table 7 Significance test of typical correlation coefficient in the Longkaikou study area.Full size tableTable 8 Standardized canonical correlation coefficients of terrain factors in the Longkaikou study area.Full size tableTable 9 Standardized typical correlation coefficients of landscape pattern in the Longkaikou study area.Full size tableThe number of samples in the study area of Xiluodu was 41,010, and the overall accuracy of the model was 61.4%. The terrain factors, in descending order of importance, were elevation  > surface relief  > ground roughness  > aspect  > slope  > terrain moisture index, with values of 0.395, 0.209, 0.157, 0.123, 0.073, and 0.043, respectively (Fig. 11). It can be seen that the vegetation distribution in the WLFZ was most influenced by the elevation, followed by the surface relief.According to the typical correlation analysis, six pairs of typical variables were calculated for the Xiluodu study area, of which the first four pairs had typical P values less than 0.05 (Table 10), indicating that the correlation reached a significant level, and their correlation coefficients were 0.299, 0.208, 0.102, and 0.033, and the first pair was the largest, so the first pair was selected for analysis.The topographic factors and landscape indices with high correlation with the first pair of typical variables were elevation,surface relief and CA, PAFRAC, respectively, and according to Tables 11 and 12, their mechanism of action was that the greater the elevation, the greater the surface relief, leading to a smaller patch area and simpler shape of the vegetation.Figure 11Ranking of important values of topographic factors in the Xiluodu study area (Drawn with Origin 2018_64Bit, and the URL is https://www.OriginLab.cn/).Full size imageTable 10 Significance test of typical correlation coefficient in the Xiluodu study area.Full size tableTable 11 Standardized canonical correlation coefficients of terrain factors in the Xiluodu study area.Full size tableTable 12 Standardized typical correlation coefficients of landscape pattern in the Xiluodu study area.Full size tableLimiting factors of vegetation restoration in WLFZPreliminary studies showed that after long-term water level fluctuations in the cascade reservoirs, most of the vegetation in the WLFZs of the cascade reservoirs in the Jinsha River basin could be restored to different degrees, however, the restored species types were relatively simple, all of them were herbaceous plants, and mainly annual herbaceous plants. The restoration of the WLFZs of different reservoirs varied significantly, with vegetation coverage of more than 46% and 27 species types in the better restored areas, such as the Longkou study area, while the vegetation coverage of the less restored areas was usually less than 5% and 5–12 species types, and some areas even had no grass, such as the Ludila study area. According to the statistics (Fig. 12), the habitats in the study area of different reservoirs in the Jinsha River basin were significantly heterogeneous, with significant differences in climate, soil conditions, topography, and water level drop, etc. Because of the inconsistent range of values and units of different environmental factors, comparative analysis was performed by normalization, as shown in Fig. 12, vegetation cover was significantly correlated with the average soil Ph and the average thickness of the subsurface 30 cm soil layer, and the two study areas with average soil Ph greater than 8, Pear Garden and Rudyra, were almost completely bare. These two study areas were almost dominated by sand and gravel, with thin soils averaging  8 and soil thickness  More

Amesbury, M. J., Gallego-Sala, A. & Loisel, J. Nat. Geosci. 12, 880–883 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Friedlingstein, P. et al. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 14, 1917–2005 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Helbig, M. et al. Nat. Clim. Change https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01428-z (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Morris, P. J. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 560–562 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Huang, Y. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 618–622 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Laine, A. M. et al. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 1995–2008 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hanson, P. J. et al. AGU Adv. 1, e2020AV000163 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Aurela, M., Laurila, T. & Tuovinen, J.-P. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L16119 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rinne, J. et al. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 375, 20190517 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Xia, J. et al. Nat. Geosci. 7, 173–180 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tang, R. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 380–385 (2022).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

Hughes, T. P. et al. Global warming and recurrent mass bleaching of corals. Nature 543, 373–377 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Glynn, P. W. Coral reef bleaching: facts, hypotheses and implications. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2, 495–509 (1996).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Riegl, B. & Piller, W. E. Possible refugia for reefs in times of environmental stress. Int. J. Earth Sci. 92, 520–531 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hinderstein, L. M. et al. Theme section on ‘Mesophotic Coral Ecosystems: Characterization, Ecology, and Management’. Coral Reefs 29, 247–251 (2010).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bongaerts, P., Ridgway, T., Sampayo, E. M. & Hoegh-Guldberg, O. Assessing the ‘deep reef refugia’ hypothesis: Focus on Caribbean reefs. Coral Reefs 29, 309–327 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Smith, T. B. et al. Caribbean mesophotic coral ecosystems are unlikely climate change refugia. Global Change Biol. 22, 2756–2765 (2016).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Frade, P. R. et al. Deep reefs of the Great Barrier Reef offer limited thermal refuge during mass coral bleaching. Nat. Commun. 9, 3447 (2018).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Holstein, D. M., Paris, C. B., Vaz, A. C. & Smith, T. B. Modeling vertical coral connectivity and mesophotic refugia. Coral Reefs 35, 23–37 (2016).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Prasetia, R., Sinniger, F., Hashizume, K. & Harii, S. Reproductive biology of the deep brooding coral Seriatopora hystrix: Implications for shallow reef recovery. PLoS ONE 12, e0177034 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Shlesinger, T., Grinblat, M., Rapuano, H., Amit, T. & Loya, Y. Can mesophotic reefs replenish shallow reefs? Reduced coral reproductive performance casts a doubt. Ecology 99, 421–437 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gleason, D. F. & Hofmann, D. K. Coral larvae: From gametes to recruits. J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 408, 42–57 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hughes, T. P. & Tanner, J. E. Recruitment failure, life histories, and long-term decline of Caribbean corals. Ecology 81, 2250–2263 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bongaerts, P. et al. Deep reefs are not universal refuges: Reseeding potential varies among coral species. Sci. Adv. 3, e1602373 (2017).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
van Oppen, M. J. H., Bongaerts, P., Underwood, J. N., Peplow, L. M. & Cooper, T. F. The role of deep reefs in shallow reef recovery: An assessment of vertical connectivity in a brooding coral from west and east Australia. Mol. Ecol. 20, 1647–1660 (2011).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cohen, I. & Dubinsky, Z. Long term photoacclimation responses of the coral Stylophora pistillata to reciprocal deep to shallow transplantation: Photosynthesis and calcification. Front. Mar. Sci. 2, 45 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Eyal, G. et al. Euphyllia paradivisa, a successful mesophotic coral in the northern Gulf of Eilat/Aqaba, Red Sea. Coral Reefs 35, 91–102 (2016).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ben-Zvi, O. et al. Photophysiology of a mesophotic coral 3 years after transplantation to a shallow environment. Coral Reefs 39, 903–913 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Murata, N., Takahashi, S., Nishiyama, Y. & Allakhverdiev, S. I. Photoinhibition of photosystem II under environmental stress. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerget. 1767, 414–421 (2007).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Takahashi, S. & Murata, N. How do environmental stresses accelerate photoinhibition?. Trends Plant Sci. 13, 178–182 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cumbo, V. R., Baird, A. H. & van Oppen, M. J. H. The promiscuous larvae: Flexibility in the establishment of symbiosis in corals. Coral Reefs 32, 111–120 (2013).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Little, A. F., Van Oppen, M. J. H. & Willis, B. L. Flexibility in algal endosymbioses shapes growth in reef corals. Science 304, 1492–1494 (2004).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sinniger, F., Morita, R. & Harii, S. ‘Locally extinct’ coral species Seriatopora hystrix found at upper mesophotic depths in Okinawa. Coral Reefs 32, 153 (2013).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sinniger, F. et al. Overview of the mesophotic coral ecosystems around Sesoko Island, Okinawa, Japan. Galaxea J. Coral Reef Stud. 24, 69–76 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Loya, Y. et al. Coral bleaching: the winners and the losers. Ecol. Lett. 4, 122–131 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
van Woesik, R., Sakai, K., Ganase, A. & Loya, Y. Revisiting the winners and the losers a decade after coral bleaching. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 434, 67–76 (2011).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sinniger, F., Prasetia, R., Yorifuji, M., Bongaerts, P. & Harii, S. Seriatopora diversity preserved in upper mesophotic coral ecosystems in Southern Japan. Front. Mar. Sci. 4, 155 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Atoda, K. The larva and postlarval development of some reef-building corals. V. Seriatopora hystrix. Sci. Rep. Tohoku Univ. 19, 33–39 (1951).
Google Scholar 
Hata, T. et al. Coral larvae are poor swimmers and require fine-scale reef structure to settle. Sci. Rep. 7, 2249 (2017).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Harii, S. & Kayanne, H. Larval dispersal, recruitment, and adult distribution of the brooding stony octocoral Heliopora coerulea on Ishigaki Island, southwest Japan. Coral Reefs 22, 188–196 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mulla, A. J., Lin, C. H., Takahashi, S. & Nozawa, Y. Photo-movement of coral larvae influences vertical positioning in the ocean. Coral Reefs 40, 1297–1306 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Figueiredo, J., Baird, A. H., Harii, S. & Connolly, S. R. Increased local retention of reef coral larvae as a result of ocean warming. Nat. Clim. Chang. 4, 498–502 (2014).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Shanks, A. L., Largier, J., Brink, L., Brubaker, J. & Hooff, R. Demonstration of the onshore transport of larval invertebrates by the shoreward movement of an upwelling front. Limnol. Oceanogr. 45, 230–236 (2000).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Singh, T. et al. Long-term trends and seasonal variations in environmental conditions in Sesoko Island, Okinawa, Japan. Galaxea J. Coral Reef Stud. 24, 121–133 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Roth, M. S., Fan, T.-Y. & Deheyn, D. D. Life history changes in coral fluorescence and the effects of light intensity on larval physiology and settlement in Seriatopora hystrix. PLoS ONE 8, e59476 (2013).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mundy, C. N. & Babcock, R. C. Role of light intensity and spectral quality in coral settlement: Implications for depth-dependent settlement?. J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 223, 235–255 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nesa, B., Baird, A. H., Harii, S., Yakovleva, I. & Hidaka, M. Algal symbionts increase DNA damage in coral planulae exposed to sunlight. Zool. Stud. 51, 12–17 (2012).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Cunning, R. & Baker, A. C. Excess algal symbionts increase the susceptibility of reef corals to bleaching. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 259–262 (2013).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nakamura, T. Mass coral bleaching event in Sekisei lagoon observed in the summer of 2016. J. Jpn. Coral Reef Soc. 19, 29–40 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sakai, K., Singh, T. & Iguchi, A. Bleaching and post-bleaching mortality of Acropora corals on a heat-susceptible reef in 2016. PeerJ 7, e8138 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Edmunds, P. J., Gates, R. D. & Gleason, D. F. The biology of larvae from the reef coral Porites astreoides, and their response to temperature disturbances. Mar. Biol. 139, 981–989 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Baker, A. C. Reef corals bleach to survive change. Nature 411, 765–766 (2001).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bongaerts, P. et al. Adaptive divergence in a scleractinian coral: Physiological adaptation of Seriatopora hystrix to shallow and deep reef habitats. BMC Evol. Biol. 11, 303 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Einbinder, S. et al. Novel adaptive photosynthetic characteristics of mesophotic symbiotic microalgae within the reef-building coral, Stylophora pistillata. Front. Mar. Sci. 3, 195 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rogers, C. S., Fitz, H. C., Gilnack, M., Beets, J. & Hardin, J. Scleractinian coral recruitment patterns at Salt River submarine canyon, St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands. Coral Reefs 3, 69–76 (1984).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Maida, M., Collb, J. C. & Sammarco, P. W. Shedding new light on scleractinian coral recruitment. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 180, 189–202 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sato, M. Mortality and growth of juvenile coral Pocillopora damicornis (Linnaeus). Coral Reefs 4, 27–33 (1985).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nozawa, Y. Micro-crevice structure enhances coral spat survivorship. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 367, 127–130 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gleason, D. F. & Wellington, G. M. Ultraviolet radiation and coral bleaching. Nature 365, 836–838 (1993).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Shlesinger, T. & Loya, Y. Depth-dependent parental effects create invisible barriers to coral dispersal. Commun. Biol. 4, 1–10 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Groves, S. H. et al. Growth rates of Porites astreoides and Orbicella franksi in mesophotic habitats surrounding St. Thomas, US Virgin Islands. Coral Reefs 37, 345–354 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Al-Horani, F. A., Al-Moghrabi, S. M. & De Beer, D. The mechanism of calcification and its relation to photosynthesis and respiration in the scleractinian coral Galaxea fascicularis. Mar. Biol. 142, 419–426 (2003).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jiang, L. et al. Increased temperature mitigates the effects of ocean acidification on the calcification of juvenile Pocillopora damicornis, but at a cost. Coral Reefs 37, 71–79 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jurriaans, S. & Hoogenboom, M. O. Thermal performance of scleractinian corals along a latitudinal gradient on the Great Barrier Reef. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 374, 20180546 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Brown, B. E. et al. Diurnal changes in photochemical efficiency and xanthophyll concentrations in shallow water reef corals: evidence for photoinhibition and photoprotection. Coral Reefs 18, 99–105 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Salih, A., Larkum, A., Cox, G., Kühl, M. & Hoegh-Guldberg, O. Fluorescent pigments in corals are photoprotective. Nature 408, 850–853 (2000).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Matz, M. V., Marshall, N. J. & Vorobyev, M. Are corals colorful?. Photochem. Photobiol. 82, 345–350 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Haddock, S. H. D. & Dunn, C. W. Fluorescent proteins function as a prey attractant: Experimental evidence from the hydromedusa Olindias formosus and other marine organisms. Biol. Open 4, 1094–1104 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Eyal, G. et al. Spectral diversity and regulation of coral fluorescence in a mesophotic reef habitat in the Red Sea. PLoS ONE 10, 1–19 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ben-Zvi, O., Eyal, G. & Loya, Y. Light-dependent fluorescence in the coral Galaxea fascicularis. Hydrobiologia 759, 15–26 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Roth, M. et al. Fluorescent proteins in dominant mesophotic reef-building corals. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 521, 63–79 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ben-Zvi, O., Eyal, G. & Loya, Y. Response of fluorescence morphs of the mesophotic coral Euphyllia paradivisa to ultra-violet radiation. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–9 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hughes, T. P. et al. Coral reefs in the Anthropocene. Nature 546, 82–90 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Oliver, E. C. J. et al. Longer and more frequent marine heatwaves over the past century. Nat. Commun. 9, 1324 (2018).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Nakamura, T., van Woesik, R. & Yamasaki, H. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis is reduced by water flow in the reef-building coral Acropora digitifera. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 301, 109–118 (2005).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

Parker, J. & Johnston, L. A. The proximate determinants of insect size. J. Biol. 5, 15 (2006).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Honěk, A. Intraspecific variation in body size and fecundity in insects: A general relationship. Oikos 66, 483 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kingsolver, J. G. & Huey, R. B. Size, temperature, and fitness: Three rules. Evol. Ecol. Res. 10, 251–268 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Beukeboom, L. W. Size matters in insects—An introduction. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 166, 2–3 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
West, S. A., Flanagan, K. E. & Godfray, H. C. J. The relationship between parasitoid size and fitness in the field, a study of Achrysocharoides zwoelferi (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). J. Anim. Ecol. 65, 631–639 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sagarra, L. A., Vincent, C. & Stewart, R. K. Body size as an indicator of parasitoid quality in male and female Anagyrus kamali (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 91, 363–367 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ellers, J., Alphen, J. J. M. V. & Sevenster, J. G. A field study of size–fitness relationships in the parasitoid Asobara tabida. J. Anim. Ecol. 67, 318–324 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Armbruster, P. & Hutchinson, R. A. Pupal mass and wing length as indicators of fecundity in Aedes albopictus and Aedes geniculatus (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 39, 699–704 (2002).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tantawy, A. O. & Vetukhiv, M. O. Effects of size on fecundity, longevity and viability in populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Am. Nat. 94, 395–403 (1960).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lefranc, A. & Bundgaard, J. The influence of male and female body size on copulation duration and fecundity in Drosophila melanogaster. Hereditas 132, 243–247 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Atkinson, D. Temperature and organism size: A biological law for ectotherms? Adv. Ecol. Res. 25, 1–58 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
Poças, G. M., Crosbie, A. E. & Mirth, C. K. When does diet matter? The roles of larval and adult nutrition in regulating adult size traits in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 139, 104051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2020.104051 (2020).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Tammaru, T. Determination of adult size in a folivorous moth: constraints at instar level? Ecol. Entomol. 23, 80–89 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Miller, R. S. & Thomas, J. L. The effects of larval crowding and body size on the longevity of adult Drosophila melanogaster. Ecology 39, 118–125 (1958).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nijhout, H. F. The control of body size in insects. Dev. Biol. 261, 1–9 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Shingleton, A. W., Mirth, C. K. & Bates, P. W. Developmental model of static allometry in holometabolous insects. Proc. R. Soc. B 275, 1875–1885 (2008).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Koenraadt, C. J. M. Pupal dimensions as predictors of adult size in fitness studies of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 45, 331–336 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Stillwell, R. C., Dworkin, I., Shingleton, A. W. & Frankino, W. A. Experimental manipulation of body size to estimate morphological scaling relationships in Drosophila. JoVE 56, 3162. https://doi.org/10.3791/3162 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shin, S.-M., Akram, W. & Lee, J.-J. Effect of body size on energy reserves in Culex pipiens pallens females (Diptera: Culicidae). Entomol. Res. 42, 163–167 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mirth, C. K. & Riddiford, L. M. Size assessment and growth control: How adult size is determined in insects. BioEssays 29, 344–355 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chown, S. L. & Gaston, K. J. Body size variation in insects: A macroecological perspective. Biol. Rev. 85, 139–169 (2010).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Beadle, G. W., Tatum, E. L. & Clancy, C. W. Food level in relation to rate of development and eye pigmentation in Drosophila melanogaster. Biol. Bull. 75, 447–462 (1938).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gayon, J. History of the concept of allometry1. Am. Zool. 40, 748–758 (2000).
Google Scholar 
Takken, W. et al. Larval nutrition differentially affects adult fitness and Plasmodium development in the malaria vectors Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles stephensi. Parasit. Vectors 6, 345 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Briegel, H. Metabolic relationship between female body size, reserves, and fecundity of Aedes aegypti. J. Insect Physiol. 36, 165–172 (1990).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ellers, J. Fat and eggs: An alternative method to measure the trade-off between survival and reproduction in insect parasitoids. Neth. J. Zool. 3, 227–235 (1996).
Google Scholar 
González-Tokman, D. et al. Energy storage, body size and immune response of herbivore beetles at two different elevations in Costa Rica. Rev. Biol. Trop. 67, 608–620 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Timmermann, S. E. & Briegel, H. Larval growth and biosynthesis of reserves in mosquitoes. J. Insect Physiol. 45, 461–470 (1999).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Strohm, E. Factors affecting body size and fat content in a digger wasp. Oecologia 123, 184–191 (2000).PubMed 
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Lease, H. M. & Wolf, B. O. Lipid content of terrestrial arthropods in relation to body size, phylogeny, ontogeny and sex. Physiol. Entomol. 36, 29–38 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Arrese, E. L. & Soulages, J. L. Insect fat body: Energy, metabolism, and regulation. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 55, 207–225 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kühnlein, R. P. Lipid droplet-based storage fat metabolism in Drosophila. J. Lipid Res. 53, 1430–1436 (2012).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Church, R. B. & Robertson, F. W. A biochemical study of the growth of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Exp. Zool. 162, 337–351 (1966).Article 

Google Scholar 
Merkey, A. B., Wong, C. K., Hoshizaki, D. K. & Gibbs, A. G. Energetics of metamorphosis in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 57, 1437–1445 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nestel, D., Tolmasky, D., Rabossi, A. & Quesada-Allué, L. A. Lipid, carbohydrates and protein patterns during metamorphosis of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 96, 237–244 (2003).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lee, K. P. & Jang, T. Exploring the nutritional basis of starvation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. Funct. Ecol. 28, 1144–1155 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hahn, D. A. & Denlinger, D. L. Meeting the energetic demands of insect diapause: Nutrient storage and utilization. J. Insect Physiol. 53, 760–773 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tejeda, M. T. et al. Effects of size, sex and teneral resources on the resistance to hydric stress in the tephritid fruit fly Anastrepha ludens. J. Insect Physiol. 70, 73–80 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hoffmann, A. A., Hallas, R., Anderson, A. R. & Telonis-Scott, M. Evidence for a robust sex-specific trade-off between cold resistance and starvation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 18, 804–810 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Alaux, C., Ducloz, F., Crauser, D. & Le Conte, Y. Diet effects on honeybee immunocompetence. Biol. Lett. 6, 562–565 (2010).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bryk, B., Hahn, K., Cohen, S. M. & Teleman, A. A. MAP4K3 regulates body size and metabolism in Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 344, 150–157 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gasser, M., Kaiser, M., Berrigan, D. & Stearns, S. C. Life-history correlates of evolution under high and low adult mortality. Evolution 54, 1260–1272 (2000).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chippindale, A. K., Chu, T. J. F. & Rose, M. R. Complex trade-offs and the evolution of starvation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 50, 753 (1996).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kristensen, T. N., Overgaard, J., Loeschcke, V. & Mayntz, D. Dietary protein content affects evolution for body size, body fat and viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Biol. Lett. 7, 269–272 (2011).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Juarez-Carreño, S. et al. Body-fat sensor triggers ribosome maturation in the steroidogenic gland to initiate sexual maturation in Drosophila. Cell Rep. 37, 109830 (2021).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Markow, T. A. The secret lives of Drosophila flies. Elife 4, e06793 (2015).PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Choma, M. A., Suter, M. J., Vakoc, B. J., Bouma, B. E. & Tearney, G. J. Physiological homology between Drosophila melanogaster and vertebrate cardiovascular systems. Dis. Model. Mech. 4, 411–420 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Morgan, T. H., Sturtevant, A. H., Muller, H. J. & Bridges, C. B. The Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity (H. Holt, 1923).
Google Scholar 
Dobzhansky, T. The influence of the quantity and quality of chromosomal material on the size of the cells in Drosophila melanogaster. Wilhelm Roux Arch. Entwickl Mech. Org. 115, 363–379 (1929).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Musselman, L. P. & Kühnlein, R. P. Drosophila as a model to study obesity and metabolic disease. J. Exp. Biol. 221, 163881 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
DiAngelo, J. R. & Birnbaum, M. J. Regulation of fat cell mass by insulin in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29, 6341–6352 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rovenko, B. M. et al. High sucrose consumption promotes obesity whereas its low consumption induces oxidative stress in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 79, 42–54 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hardy, C. M. et al. Obesity-associated cardiac dysfunction in starvation-selected Drosophila melanogaster. Am. J. Physiol.-Regul. Integr. Compar. Physiol. 309, R658–R667 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hardy, C. M. et al. Genome-wide analysis of starvation-selected Drosophila melanogaster—A genetic model of obesity. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 50–65 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Musselman, L. P. et al. A high-sugar diet produces obesity and insulin resistance in wild-type Drosophila. Dis. Model. Mech. 4, 842–849 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Henry, Y., Renault, D. & Colinet, H. Hormesis-like effect of mild larval crowding on thermotolerance in Drosophila flies. J. Exp. Biol. 221, 169342 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bulletin, E. P. P. O. Drosophila suzukii. EPPO Bull. 43, 417–424 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bächli, G., Vilela, C. R., Escher, S. A. & Saura, A. The Drosophilidae (Diptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark (Brill Academic Publishers, 2004).Book 

Google Scholar 
Markow, T. A. & O’Grady, P. M. Drosophila: A Guide to Species Identification and Use (Elsevier, 2006).
Google Scholar 
Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Visser, B. et al. Variation in lipid synthesis, but genetic homogeneity, among Leptopilina parasitic wasp populations. Ecol. Evol. 8, 7355–7364 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Williams, C. M., Thomas, R. H., MacMillan, H. A., Marshall, K. E. & Sinclair, B. J. Triacylglyceride measurement in small quantities of homogenised insect tissue: Comparisons and caveats. J. Insect Physiol. 57, 1602–1613 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020).Fox, J. & Weisberg, S. An R Companion to Applied Regression 2nd edn. (Sage, 2011).
Google Scholar 
Lenth, R., Singmann, H., Love, J., Buerkner, P. & Herve, M. Emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R Package Version 1, 3 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. A practical information-theoretic approach. In Model Selection and Multimodel Inference (ed. Burnham, K. P.) (Springer, 2002).MATH 

Google Scholar 
Crawley, M. J. The R Book (Wiley, 2007).MATH 
Book 

Google Scholar 
Borash, D. J. & Ho, G. T. Patterns of selection: Stress resistance and energy storage in density-dependent populations of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 47, 1349–1356 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Klepsatel, P., Procházka, E. & Gáliková, M. Crowding of Drosophila larvae affects lifespan and other life-history traits via reduced availability of dietary yeast. Exp. Gerontol. 110, 298–308 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Henry, Y., Overgaard, J. & Colinet, H. Dietary nutrient balance shapes phenotypic traits of Drosophila melanogaster in interaction with gut microbiota. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A: Mol. Integr. Physiol. 241, 110626 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ireland, S. & Turner, B. The effects of larval crowding and food type on the size and development of the blowfly, Calliphora vomitoria. Forensic Sci. Int. 159, 175–181 (2006).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Saunders, D. S. & Bee, A. Effects of larval crowding on size and fecundity of the blow fly, Calliphora vicina (Diptera: Calliphoridae). EJE 92, 615–622 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Ziegler, R. Changes in lipid and carbohydrate metabolism during starvation in adult Manduca sexta. J. Comp. Physiol. B 161, 125–131 (1991).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ojeda-Avila, T., Arthur Woods, H. & Raguso, R. A. Effects of dietary variation on growth, composition, and maturation of Manduca sexta (Sphingidae: Lepidoptera). J. Insect Physiol. 49, 293–306 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Borash, D. J., Gibbs, A. G., Joshi, A. & Mueller, L. D. A genetic polymorphism maintained by natural selection in a temporally varying environment. Am. Nat. 151, 148. https://doi.org/10.1086/286108 (1998).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Klepsatel, P., Knoblochová, D., Girish, T. N., Dircksen, H. & Gáliková, M. The influence of developmental diet on reproduction and metabolism in Drosophila. BMC Evol. Biol. 20, 93 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Matzkin, L. M., Johnson, S., Paight, C., Bozinovic, G. & Markow, T. A. Dietary protein and sugar differentially affect development and metabolic pools in ecologically diverse Drosophila. J. Nutr. 141, 1127–1133 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Musselman, L. P. et al. Role of fat body lipogenesis in protection against the effects of caloric overload in Drosophila. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 8028–8042 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Reeve, M. W., Fowler, K. & Partridge, L. Increased body size confers greater fitness at lower experimental temperature in male Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 13, 836–844 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lounibos, L. P. et al. Does temperature affect the outcome of larval competition between Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus?. J. Vector Ecol. 27, 86–95 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bergland, A. O., Genissel, A., Nuzhdin, S. V. & Tatar, M. Quantitative trait loci affecting phenotypic plasticity and the allometric relationship of ovariole number and thorax length in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 180, 567–582 (2008).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Holm, S. et al. A comparative perspective on longevity: The effect of body size dominates over ecology in moths. J. Evol. Biol. 29, 2422–2435 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nunney, L. The response to selection for fast larval development in Drosophila melanogaster and its effect on adult weight: An example of a fitness trade-off. Evolution 50, 1193–1204 (1996).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Partridge, L. & Farquhar, M. Lifetime mating success of male fruitflies (Drosophila melanogaster) is related to their size. Anim. Behav. 31, 871–877 (1983).Article 

Google Scholar 
Markow, T. A. & Ricker, J. P. Male size, developmental stability, and mating success in natural populations of three Drosophila species. Heredity 69, 122–127 (1992).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wikelski, M. & Romero, L. M. Body size, performance and fitness in galapagos marine iguanas. Integr. Comp. Biol. 43, 376–386 (2003).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
van Buskirk, J. & Crowder, L. B. Life-history variation in marine turtles. Copeia 1994, 66–81 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
Broderick, A. C., Glen, F., Godley, B. J. & Hays, G. C. Variation in reproductive output of marine turtles. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 288, 95–109 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wauters, L. A. et al. Effects of spatio-temporal variation in food supply on red squirrel Sciurus vulgaris body size and body mass and its consequences for some fitness components. Ecography 30, 51–65 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lindström, J. Early development and fitness in birds and mammals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 343–348 (1999).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Reim, C., Teuschl, Y. & Blanckenhorn, W. U. Size-dependent effects of temperature and food stress on energy reserves and starvation resistance in yellow dung flies. Evol. Ecol. Res. 8, 1215–1234 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Kölliker-Ott, U. M., Blows, M. W. & Hoffmann, A. A. Are wing size, wing shape and asymmetry related to field fitness of Trichogramma egg parasitoids? Oikos 100, 563–573 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Knapp, M. Relative importance of sex, pre-starvation body mass and structural body size in the determination of exceptional starvation resistance of Anchomenus dorsalis (Coleoptera: Carabidae). PLoS ONE 11, e0151459 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lue, C.-H. et al. DROP: Molecular voucher database for identification of Drosophila parasitoids. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 21, 2437–2454 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Visser, B. et al. Loss of lipid synthesis as an evolutionary consequence of a parasitic lifestyle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107, 8677–8682 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Visser B et al. Why do
many parasitoids lack adult triglyceride accumulation, despite functioning fatty acid biosynthesis machinery? EcoEvoRxiv:
https://doi.org/10.32942/osf.io/zpf4jArakawa, R., Miura, M. & Fujita, M. Effects of host species on the body size, fecundity, and longevity of Trissolcus mitsukurii (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae), a solitary egg parasitoid of stink bugs. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 39, 177–181 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Visser, B., Alborn, H.T., Rondeaux, S. et al. Phenotypic plasticity explains apparent reverse evolution of fat synthesis in parasitic
wasps. Sci Rep 11, 7751 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86736-8.Krüger, A. P. et al. Effects of irradiation dose on sterility induction and quality parameters of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 111, 741–746 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nikolouli, K. et al. Sterile insect technique and Wolbachia symbiosis as potential tools for the control of the invasive species Drosophila suzukii. J. Pest Sci. 91, 1–15 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Nikolouli, K., Sassù, F., Mouton, L., Stauffer, C. & Bourtzis, K. Combining sterile and incompatible insect techniques for the population suppression of Drosophila suzukii. J. Pest Sci. 93, 647–661 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Calkins, C. O. & Parker, A. G. Sterile insect quality. In Sterile Insect Technique (eds Dyck, V. A. et al.) 269–296 (Springer, 2005).Chapter 

Google Scholar  More

IPCC. Summary for policymakers. In: Climate change 2021: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Masson-Delmotte, V, Zhai P, Pirani A, Connors S L, Péan C, Berger S, et al. Editors. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.Zhang J, Zhang S, Cheng M, Jiang H, Zhang X, Peng C, et al. Effect of drought on agronomic traits of rice and wheat: a meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15:839.Article 

Google Scholar 
FAO. Global agriculture towards 2050, high-level expert forum, how to feed the world 2050. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations FAO. 2009.Agoussar A, Yergeau E. Engineering the plant microbiota in the context of the theory of ecological communities. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2021;70:220–5.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Quiza L, St-Arnaud M, Yergeau E. Harnessing phytomicrobiome signaling for rhizosphere microbiome engineering. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:507.Article 

Google Scholar 
Mitter B, Pfaffenbichler N, Flavell R, Compant S, Antonielli L, Petric A, et al. A new approach to modify plant microbiomes and traits by introducing beneficial bacteria at flowering into progeny seeds. Front Microbiol. 2017;8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00011.Li X, Jousset A, de Boer W, Carrión VJ, Zhang T, Wang X, et al. Legacy of land use history determines reprogramming of plant physiology by soil microbiome. ISME J. 2019;13:738–51.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nelson EB, Simoneau P, Barret M, Mitter B, Compant S. Editorial special issue: the soil, the seed, the microbes and the plant. Plant Soil. 2018;422:1–5.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Trivedi P, Leach JE, Tringe SG, Sa T, Singh BK. Plant–microbiome interactions: from community assembly to plant health. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020;18:607–21.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Moroenyane I, Tremblay J, Yergeau E. Soybean microbiome recovery after disruption is modulated by the seed and not the soil microbiome. Phytobiomes J. 2021;5:418–31.Article 

Google Scholar 
Xiong C, Zhu Y-G, Wang J-T, Singh B, Han L-L, Shen J-P, et al. Host selection shapes crop microbiome assembly and network complexity. New Phytol. 2021;229:1091–104.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Schimel J, Balser TC, Wallenstein M. Microbial stress-response physiology and its implications for ecosystem function. Ecology. 2007;88:1386–94.Article 

Google Scholar 
Allison SD, Martiny JBH. Resistance, resilience, and redundancy in microbial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:11512–9.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bouskill NJ, Lim HC, Borglin S, Salve R, Wood TE, Silver WL, et al. Pre-exposure to drought increases the resistance of tropical forest soil bacterial communities to extended drought. ISME J. 2013;7:384–94.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Evans SE, Wallenstein MD. Soil microbial community response to drying and rewetting stress: does historical precipitation regime matter? Biogeochemistry. 2012;109:101–16.Article 

Google Scholar 
Meisner A, Snoek BL, Nesme J, Dent E, Jacquiod S, Classen AT, et al. Soil microbial legacies differ following drying-rewetting and freezing-thawing cycles. ISME J. 2021;15:1207–21.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Azarbad H, Constant P, Giard-Laliberté C, Bainard LD, Yergeau E. Water stress history and wheat genotype modulate rhizosphere microbial response to drought. Soil Biol Biochem. 2018;126:228–36.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jones DL, Nguyen C, Finlay RD. Carbon flow in the rhizosphere: carbon trading at the soil–root interface. Plant Soil. 2009;321:5–33.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sasse J, Martinoia E, Northen T. Feed your friends: do plant exudates shape the root microbiome? Trends Plant Sci. 2018;23:25–41.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Holz M, Zarebanadkouki M, Kuzyakov Y, Pausch J, Carminati A. Root hairs increase rhizosphere extension and carbon input to soil. Ann Bot. 2018;121:61–9.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Marasco R, Rolli E, Ettoumi B, Vigani G, Mapelli F, Borin S, et al. A drought resistance-promoting microbiome is selected by root system under desert farming. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e48479.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Moroenyane I, Mendes L, Tremblay J, Tripathi B, Yergeau É. Plant compartments and developmental stages modulate the balance between niche-based and neutral processes in soybean Microbiome. Microb Ecol. 2021;82:416–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-021-01688-w.Chaparro JM, Badri DV, Vivanco JM. Rhizosphere microbiome assemblage is affected by plant development. ISME J. 2014;8:790–803.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Azarbad H, Tremblay J, Giard-Laliberté C, Bainard LD, Yergeau E. Four decades of soil water stress history together with host genotype constrain the response of the wheat microbiome to soil moisture. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2020;96. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiaa098.Chen S, Cade-Menun BJ, Bainard LD, St. Luce M, Hu Y, Chen Q. The influence of long-term N and P fertilization on soil P forms and cycling in a wheat/fallow cropping system. Geoderma. 2021;404:115274.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Smith EG, Zentner RP, Campbell CA, Lemke R, Brandt K. Long-term crop rotation effects on production, grain quality, profitability, and risk in the northern great plains. Agron J. 2017;109:957–67.Article 

Google Scholar 
Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 2015;67:1–48.Article 

Google Scholar 
Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB. lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J Stat Softw. 2017;82:1–26.Article 

Google Scholar 
Yang S. otuSummary: summarizing OTU table regarding the composition, abundance and beta diversity of abundant and rare biospheres. 2018.Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, et al. vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.5-6. 2019. Available online at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.Wagner MR, Lundberg DS, del Rio TG, Tringe SG, Dangl JL, Mitchell-Olds T. Host genotype and age shape the leaf and root microbiomes of a wild perennial plant. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12151.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hardoim PR, Hardoim CCP, Overbeek LS, van, Elsas JD. Dynamics of seed-borne rice endophytes on early plant growth stages. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e30438.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Grady KL, Sorensen JW, Stopnisek N, Guittar J, Shade A. Assembly and seasonality of core phyllosphere microbiota on perennial biofuel crops. Nat Commun. 2019;10:4135.Article 

Google Scholar 
Walsh CM, Becker-Uncapher I, Carlson M, Fierer N. Variable influences of soil and seed-associated bacterial communities on the assembly of seedling microbiomes. ISME J. 2021;15:2748–62.Morales Moreira ZP, Helgason BL, Germida JJ Environment has a Stronger Effect than Host Plant Genotype in Shaping Spring Brassica napus Seed Microbiomes. Phytobiomes J. 2021:PBIOMES-08-20-0059-R.Abdullaeva Y, Ambika Manirajan B, Honermeier B, Schnell S, Cardinale M. Domestication affects the composition, diversity, and co-occurrence of the cereal seed microbiota. J Adv Res. 2021;31:75–86.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chandrasekaran M, Chanratana M, Kim K, Seshadri S, Sa T. Impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on photosynthesis, water status, and gas exchange of plants under salt stress–a meta-analysis. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00457.Begum N, Qin C, Ahanger MA, Raza S, Khan MI, Ashraf M, et al. Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in plant growth regulation: implications in abiotic stress tolerance. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01068.Rashid MI, Mujawar LH, Shahzad T, Almeelbi T, Ismail IMI, Oves M. Bacteria and fungi can contribute to nutrients bioavailability and aggregate formation in degraded soils. Microbiol Res. 2016;183:26–41.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Crowther TW, Thomas SM, Maynard DS, Baldrian P, Covey K, Frey SD, et al. Biotic interactions mediate soil microbial feedbacks to climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:7033–8.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Evans SE, Wallenstein MD. Climate change alters ecological strategies of soil bacteria. Ecol Lett. 2014;17:155–64.Article 

Google Scholar 
Santos-Medellín C, Edwards J, Liechty Z, Nguyen B, Sundaresan V. Drought stress results in a compartment-specific restructuring of the rice root-associated microbiomes. mBio. 2017;8:e00764–17.Article 

Google Scholar 
Naylor D, Coleman-Derr D. Drought stress and root-associated bacterial communities. Front Plant Sci. 2018;8:2223.Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhou C, Ma Z, Zhu L, Xiao X, Xie Y, Zhu J, et al. Rhizobacterial Strain Bacillus megaterium BOFC15 induces cellular polyamine changes that improve plant growth and drought resistance. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:E976.Article 

Google Scholar 
Bokhari A, Essack M, Lafi FF, Andres-Barrao C, Jalal R, Alamoudi S, et al. Bioprospecting desert plant Bacillus endophytic strains for their potential to enhance plant stress tolerance. Sci Rep. 2019;9:18154.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Xu L, Naylor D, Dong Z, Simmons T, Pierroz G, Hixson KK, et al. Drought delays development of the sorghum root microbiome and enriches for monoderm bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:E4284–93.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Na X, Cao X, Ma C, Ma S, Xu P, Liu S, et al. Plant stage, not drought stress, determines the effect of cultivars on bacterial community diversity in the rhizosphere of broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum L.). Front Microbiol. 2019;10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00828. More