More stories

  • in

    Restoration prioritization must be informed by marginalized people

    Strassburg, B. B. N. et al. Global priority areas for ecosystem restoration. Nature 586, 724–729 (2020).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Holl, K. D. Restoring tropical forests from the bottom up. Science 355, 455–456 (2017).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Rights and Resources Initiative. Estimate of the Area of Land and Territories of Indigenous Peoples, Local Communities, and Afro-Descendants Where Their Rights Have Not Been Recognized https://doi.org/10.53892/UZEZ6605 (Rights + Resources, 2020).Erbaugh, J. T. et al. Global forest restoration and the importance of prioritizing local communities. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1472–1476 (2020).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Adams, C., Rodrigues, S. T., Calmon, M. & Kumar, C. Impacts of large-scale forest restoration on socioeconomic status and local livelihoods: what we know and do not know. Biotropica 48, 731–744 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ramprasad, V., Joglekar, A. & Fleischman, F. Plantations and pastoralists: afforestation activities make pastoralists in the Indian Himalaya vulnerable. Ecol. Soc. 25, 1 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kumar, B. M. Species richness and aboveground carbon stocks in the homegardens of central Kerala, India. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 140, 430–440 (2011).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ribot, J. Cause and response: vulnerability and climate in the Anthropocene. J. Peasant Stud. 41, 667–705 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Davis, D. K. & Robbins, P. Ecologies of the colonial present: pathological forestry from the taux de boisement to civilized plantations. Environ. Plan. E Nat. Space 1, 447–469 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Agrawal, A. & Redford, K. Conservation and displacement: an overview. Conserv. Soc. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26392956.pdf (2009).Barletti, J. P. S. & Larson, A. M. Rights Abuse Allegations in the Context of REDD+ Readiness and Implementation: A Preliminary Review and Proposal for Moving Forward https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/006630 (Center for International Forestry Research, 2017).Pellegrini, P. & Fernández, R. J. Crop intensification, land use, and on-farm energy-use efficiency during the worldwide spread of the green revolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 2335–2340 (2018).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    IUFRO. Forests, Trees and the Eradication of Poverty: Potential and Limitations. World Series Vol. 39 (International Union of Forest Research Organizations, 2020).Luttrell, C., Sills, E., Aryani, R., Ekaputri, A. D. & Evinke, M. F. Beyond opportunity costs: who bears the implementation costs of reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation? Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang 23, 291–310 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Coleman, E. A., Manyindo, J., Parker, A. R. & Schultz, B. Stakeholder engagement increases transparency, satisfaction, and civic action. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 24486–24491 (2019).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar  More

  • in

    Tropical forests as drivers of lake carbon burial

    Pan, Y. et al. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333, 988–993 (2011).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Brando, P. M. et al. Drought effects on litterfall, wood production and belowground carbon cycling in an Amazon forest: results of a throughfall reduction experiment. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 363, 1839–1848 (2008).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Nobre, C. A. et al. Land-use and climate change risks in the Amazon and the need of a novel sustainable development paradigm. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 10759–10768 (2016).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Malhi, Y. & Grace, J. Tropical forests and atmospheric carbon dioxide. Trends Res. Ecol. Environ. 15, 332–337 (2000).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Mulholland, P. J. & Elwood, J. W. The role of lake and reservoir sediments as sinks in the perturbed global carbon cycle. Tellus 34, 490–499 (1982).ADS 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Dean, W. E. & Gorham, E. Magnitude and significance of carbon burial in lakes, reservoirs, and peatlands. Geology 26, 535–538 (1998).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Tranvik, L. J., Cole, J. J. & Prairie, Y. T. The study of carbon in inland waters-from isolated ecosystems to players in the global carbon cycle. Limnol. Oceanogr. Lett. 3, 41–48 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Mendonça, R. et al. Organic carbon burial in global lakes and reservoirs. Nat. Commun. 8, 1694 (2017).ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Stallard, R. F. Terrestrial sedimentation and the carbon cycle: coupling weathering and erosion to carbon burial. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 12, 231–257 (1998).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Anderson, N. J., Heathcote, A. J. & Engstrom, D. R. Anthropogenic alteration of nutrient supply increases the global freshwater carbon sink. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaw2145 (2020).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Marotta, H., Pinho, L. & Gudasz, C. Greenhouse gas production in low-latitude lake sediments responds strongly to warming. Nat. Clim. Chang. 4, 11–14 (2014).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Cardoso, S. J. B., Enrich-Prast, A. C., Pace, M. L. & Rol, F. B. Do models of organic carbon mineralization extrapolate to warmer tropical sediments? Limnol. Oceanogr. 59, 48–54 (2014).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Messager, M. L., Lehner, B., Grill, G., Nedeva, I. & Schmitt, O. Estimating the volume and age of water stored in global lakes using a geo-statistical approach. Nat. Commun. 7, 13603 (2016).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Olson, D. M. et al. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth. Bioscience 51, 933 (2001).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Tateishi, R. et al. Production of global land cover data – GLCNMO2008. J. Geogr. Geol. 6, (2014).Hess, L. L. et al. Wetlands of the lowland Amazon basin: extent, vegetative cover, and dual-season inundated area as mapped with JERS-1 synthetic aperture radar. Wetlands 35, 745–756 (2015).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Clow, D. W. et al. Organic carbon burial in lakes and reservoirs of the conterminous United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 7614–7622 (2015).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lundin, E. J. et al. Large difference in carbon emission – burial balances between boreal and arctic lakes. Sci. Rep. 5, 14248 (2015).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Heathcote, A. J., Anderson, N. J., Prairie, Y. T., Engstrom, D. R. & del Giorgio, P. A. Large increases in carbon burial in northern lakes during the Anthropocene. Nat. Commun. 6, 10016 (2015).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Raymond, P. et al. Global carbon dioxide emissions from inland waters. Nature 503, 355–359 (2013).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Anderson, N. J., Dietz, R. D. & Engstrom, D. R. Land-use change, not climate, controls organic carbon burial in lakes. Proc. Biol. Sci. 280, 20131278 (2013).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Sanders, L. M. et al. Carbon accumulation in Amazonian floodplain lakes: a significant component of Amazon budgets? Limnol. Oceanogr. Lett. 2, 29–35 (2017).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Appleby, P. G. & Oldfield, F. In Uranium-series Disequilibrium: Applications to Earth, Marine, and Environmental Sciences (eds. Ivanovich, M. & Harmon, R. S.) (Clarendon Press, 1992).Engstrom, D. R., Fritz, S. C., Almendinger, J. E. & Juggins, S. Chemical and biological trends during lake evolution in recently deglaciated terrain. Nature 408, 161–166 (2000).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kim, J.-H. et al. Tracing soil organic carbon in the lower Amazon River and its tributaries using GDGT distributions and bulk organic matter properties. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 90, 163–180 (2012).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Boye, K. et al. Thermodynamically controlled preservation of organic carbon in floodplains. Nat. Geosci. 10, 415–419 (2017).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Marotta, H., Paiva, L. T. & Petrucio, M. M. Changes in thermal and oxygen stratification pattern coupled to CO2 outgassing persistence in two oligotrophic shallow lakes of the Atlantic Tropical Forest, Southeast Brazil. Limnology 10, 195–202 (2009).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Anderson, N. J., Bennion, H. & Lotter, A. F. Lake eutrophication and its implications for organic carbon sequestration in Europe. Glob. Chang. Biol. 20, 2741–2751 (2014).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Sanders, L. M. et al. Historic carbon burial spike in an Amazon floodplain lake linked to riparian deforestation near Santarém, Brazil. Biogeosciences 15, 447–455 (2018).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Fernández-Martínez, M. et al. Global trends in carbon sinks and their relationships with CO2 and temperature. Nat. Clim. Chang. 9, 73–79 (2019).ADS 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Marotta, H., Duarte, C. M., Sobek, S. & Enrich-Prast, A. Large CO 2 disequilibria in tropical lakes. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 23, (2009).Richey, J. E., Melack, J. M., Aufdenkampe, A. K., Ballester, V. M. & Hess, L. L. Outgassing from Amazonian rivers and wetlands as a large tropical source of atmospheric CO2. Nature 416, 617–620 (2002).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Dunne, T., Mertes, L. A. K. K., Meade, R. H., Richey, J. E. & Forsberg, B. R. Exchanges of sediment between the flood plain and channel of the Amazon River in Brazil. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 110, 450–467 (1998).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    McLeod, E. et al. A blueprint for blue carbon: toward an improved understanding of the role of vegetated coastal habitats in sequestering CO2. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9, 552–560 (2011).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Abril, G. et al. Technical note: large overestimation of pCO2 calculated from pH and alkalinity in acidic, organic-rich freshwaters. Biogeosciences 12, 67–78 (2015).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Verpoorter, C., Kutser, T., Seekell, D. A. & Tranvik, L. J. A global inventory of lakes based on high-resolution satellite imagery. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 6396–6402 (2014).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Gardner, T. A. et al. Prospects for tropical forest biodiversity in a human-modified world. Ecol. Lett. 12, 561–582 (2009).Dietz, R. D., Engstrom, D. R. & Anderson, N. J. Patterns and drivers of change in organic carbon burial across a diverse landscape: insights from 116 Minnesota lakes. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 29, 708–727 (2015).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hobbs, W. O., Engstrom, D. R., Scottler, S. P., Zimmer, K. D. & Cotner, J. B. Estimating modern carbon burial rates in lakes using a single sediment sample. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 11, 316–326 (2013).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Appleby, P. G. & Oldfield, F. The calculation of Pb-210 dates assuming a constant rate of supply of unsupported Pb-210 to the sediment. Catena 5, 1–8 (1978).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Turner, L. J. & Delorme, L. D. Assessment of 210Pb data from Canadian lakes using the CIC and CRS models. Environ. Geol. 28, 78–87 (1996).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Breithaupt, J. L., Smoak, J. M., Smith, T. J. & Sanders, C. J. Temporal variability of carbon and nutrient burial, sediment accretion, and mass accumulation over the past century in a carbonate platform mangrove forest of the Florida Everglades. J. Geophys. Res. G Biogeosci. 119, 2032–2048 (2014).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Sanders, C. J. et al. Elevated rates of organic carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus accumulation in a highly impacted mangrove wetland. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 2475–2480 (2014).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Mitra, S., Wassmann, R. & Vlek, P. L. G. An appraisal of global wetland area and its organic carbon stock. Curr. Sci. 88, 25–35 (2005).CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Ravichandran, K. S. Thermal residual stresses in a functionally graded material system. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 201, 269–276 (1995).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hedges, J. I. et al. Compositions and fluxes of particulate organic material in the Amazon River1. Limnol. Oceanogr. 31, 717–738 (1986).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Araujo-Lima, C. A. R. M., Forsberg, B. R., Victoria, R. & Martinelli, L. Energy sources for detritivorous fishes in the Amazon. Science 234, 1256–1258 (1986).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Martinelli, L. A., Victoria, R. L. & Forsberg, B. R. Isotopic composition of majors carbon reservoirs in the Amazon floodplain. Int. J. Ecol. Environ. Sci. 20, 31–46 (1994).
    Google Scholar 
    Martinelli, L. A. et al. Inland variability of carbon-nitrogen concentrations and δ13C in Amazon floodplain (várzea) vegetation and sediment. Hydrol. Process. 17, 1419–1430 (2003).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Zar, J. H. Biostatistical Analysis, Books a la Carte Edition (Pearson, 2010). More

  • in

    Small-scale spontaneous dynamics in temperate beech stands as an importance driver for beetle species richness

    Lindenmayer, D. B., Cunningham, R. B., Donnelly, C. F. & Lesslie, R. On the use of landscape surrogates as ecological indicators in fragmented forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 159(3), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00433-9 (2002).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hannah, L., Carr, J. L. & Lankerani, A. Human disturbance and natural habitat: a biome level analysis of a global data set. Biodivers. Conserv. 4(2), 128–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137781 (1995).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Sabatini, F. M. et al. Where are europe’s last primary forests?. Divers. Distrib. 24(10), 1426–1439. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12778 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Mikoláš, M. et al. Primary forest distribution and representation in a central european landscape: results of a large-scale field-based census. For. Ecol. Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117466 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hilmers, T. et al. Biodiversity along temperate forest succession. J. Appl. Ecol. 55(6), 2756–2766. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13238 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Nagel, T. A., Svoboda, M. & Diaci, J. Regeneration patterns after intermediate wind disturbance in an old-growth fagus-abies forest in southeastern Slovenia. For. Ecol. Manag. 226(1–3), 268–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.01.039 (2006).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Thorn, S. et al. Estimating retention benchmarks for salvage logging to protect biodiversity. Nat. Commun. 11, 4762. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18612-4 (2020).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Hallmann, C. A. et al. More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185809 (2017).Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Sánchez-Bayo, F. & Wyckhuys, K. A. G. Worldwide decline of the entomofauna: a review of its drivers. Biol. Conserv. 232, 8–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.020 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Seibold, S. et al. Arthropod decline in grasslands and forests is associated with landscape-level drivers. Nature 574, 671–674. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1684-3 (2019).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Seibold, S. et al. Experimental studies of dead-wood biodiversity — a review identifying global gaps in knowledge. Biol. Conserv. 191, 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.06.006 (2015).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Paillet, Y. et al. Biodiversity differences between managed and unmanaged forests: meta-analysis of species richness in Europe. Conserv. Biol. 24(1), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01399.x (2010).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Cálix, M., Alexander, K. N. A., Nieto, A., Dodelin, B. et al. European Red List of Saproxylic Beetles (IUCN. 19 s, Brussels, Belgium, 2018). Available at: http://www.iucnredlist.org/initiatives/europe/publicationsSchiegg, K. Effects of dead wood volume and connectivity on saproxylic insect species diversity. Écoscience 7(3), 290–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/11956860.2000.11682598 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Müller, J. et al. Implications from large-scale spatial diversity patterns of saproxylic beetles for the conservation of european beech forests. Insect Conserv. Divers. 6(2), 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4598.2012.00200.x (2013).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Schneider, A. et al. Animal diversity in beech forests – an analysis of 30 years of intense faunistic research in hessian strict forest reserves. For. Ecol. Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119564 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Brunet, J., Fritz, Ö. & Richnau, G. Biodiversity in European beech forests—a review with recommendations for sustainable forest management. Ecol. Bull. 53, 77–94 (2010).
    Google Scholar 
    Bilek, L., Remes, J. & Zahradnik, D. Managed vs. unmanaged. Structure of beech forest stands (Fagus sylvatica L.) after 50 years of development central Bohemia. For. Syst. 20(1), 122–138. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2011201-10243 (2011).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Müller, J., Bußler, H. & Kneib, T. Saproxylic beetle assemblages related to silvicultural management intensity and stand structures in a beech forest in southern Germany. J. Insect Conserv. 12(2), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-006-9065-2 (2008).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Doerfler, I., Müller, J., Gossner, M. M., Hofner, B. & Weisser, W. W. Success of a deadwood enrichment strategy in production forests depends on stand type and management intensity. For. Ecol. Manag. 400, 607–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.06.013 (2017).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Doerfler, I., Gossner, M. M., Müller, J., Seibold, S. & Weisser, W. W. Deadwood enrichment combining integrative and segregative conservation elements enhances biodiversity of multiple taxa in managed forests. Biol. Conserv. 228, 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.10.013 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Doerfler, I. et al. Restoration-oriented forest management affects community assembly patterns of deadwood-dependent organisms. J. Appl. Ecol. 57(12), 2429–2440. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13741 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Zumr, V., Remeš, J. & Pulkrab, K. How to increase biodiversity of saproxylic beetles in commercial stands through integrated forest management in central Europe. Forests https://doi.org/10.3390/f12060814 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Svoboda, M., Fraver, S., Janda, P., Bače, R. & Zenáhlíková, J. Natural development and regeneration of a central european montane spruce forest. For. Ecol. Manag. 260(5), 707–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.05.027 (2010).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Šebková, B. et al. Spatial and volume patterns of an unmanaged submontane mixed forest in central Europe: 160 years of spontaneous dynamics. For. Ecol. Manag. 262(5), 873–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.05.028 (2011).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bílek, L. et al. Gap regeneration in near-natural european beech forest stands in central bohemia – the role of heterogeneity and micro-habitat factors. Dendrobiology https://doi.org/10.12657/denbio.071.006 (2013).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Čada, V. et al. Frequent severe natural disturbances and non-equilibrium landscape dynamics shaped the mountain spruce forest in central Europe. For. Ecol. Manag. 363, 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.12.023 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Thorn, S. et al. Impacts of salvage logging on biodiversity: a meta-analysis. J. Appl. Ecol. 55(1), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12945 (2018).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Schelhaas, M.-J., Nabuurs, G.-J. & Schuck, A. Natural disturbances in the European forests in the 19th and 20th centuries. Glob. Change Biol. 9(11), 1620–1633. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00684.x (2003).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Vera, F. W. M. (ed.) Grazing Ecology and Forest History (CABI, 2000). https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851994420.0000.Book 

    Google Scholar 
    Vera, F. W. M. The dynamic European forest. Arboric. J. 26(3), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071375.2002.9747335 (2012).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Swanson, M. E. et al. The forgotten stage of forest succession: early-successional ecosystems on forest sites. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9(2), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1890/090157 (2011).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lachat, T. et al. Influence of canopy gaps on saproxylic beetles in primeval beech forests: a case study from the Uholka-Shyrokyi Luh forest, Ukraine. Insect Conserv. Divers. 9(6), 559–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12188 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Gossner, M. M. et al. Current near-to-nature forest management effects on functional trait composition of saproxylic beetles in beech forests. Conserv. Biol. 27(3), 605–614. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12023 (2013).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Procházka, J. & Schlaghamerský, J. Does dead wood volume affect saproxylic beetles in montane beech-fir forests of central Europe?. J. Insect Conserv. 23(1), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-019-00130-4 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Winter, S. & Möller, G. C. Microhabitats in lowland beech forests as monitoring tool for nature conservation. For. Ecol. Manag. 255(3–4), 1251–1261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.10.029 (2008).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bouget, C., Larrieu, L. & Brin, A. Key features for saproxylic beetle diversity derived from rapid habitat assessment in temperate forests. Ecol. Ind. 36, 656–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.031 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Sebek, P. et al. Open-grown trees as key habitats for arthropods in temperate woodlands: the diversity, composition, and conservation value of associated communities. For. Ecol. Manag. 380, 172–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.08.052 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kozel, P. et al. Connectivity and succession of open structures as a key to sustaining light-demanding biodiversity in deciduous forests. J. Appl. Ecol. 58(12), 2951–2961. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.14019 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Nagel, T. A., Svoboda, M. & Kobal, M. Disturbance, life history traits, and dynamics in an old-growth forest landscape of southeastern Europe. Ecol. Appl. 24(4), 663–679. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-0632.1 (2014).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Christensen, M. et al. The forest cycle of Suserup Skov – revisited and revised. Ecol. Bull. 52, 33–42 (2007).
    Google Scholar 
    Trotsiuk, V., Hobi, M. L. & Commarmot, B. Age structure and disturbance dynamics of the relic virgin beech forest Uholka (Ukrainian Carpathians). For. Ecol. Manag. 265, 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.10.042 (2012).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Wermelinger, B., Duelli, P. & Obrist, M. K. Dynamics of saproxylic beetles (Coleoptera) in windthrow areas in alpine spruce forests. For. Snow Landsc. Res. 77, 133–148 (2002).
    Google Scholar 
    Wermelinger, B. et al. Impact of windthrow and salvage-logging on taxonomic and functional diversity of forest arthropods. For. Ecol. Manag. 391, 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.01.033 (2017).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Meyer, P., Schmidt, M., Feldmann, E., Willig, J. & Larkin, R. Long-term development of species richness in a central European beech (Fagus Sylvatica) forest affected by windthrow—support for the intermediate disturbance hypothesis?. Ecol. Evol. 11(18), 12801–12815. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.8028 (2021).Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Korpeľ, S. Die Urwälder der Westkarpaten (Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart, 1995) (in German).
    Google Scholar 
    Emborg, J., Christensen, M. & Heilmann-Clausen, J. The structural dynamics of Suserup Skov, a near natural temperate deciduous forest in Denmark. For. Ecol. Manag. 126, 173–189 (2000).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Peňa, J., Remeš, J. & Bílek, L. Dynamics of natural regeneration of even-aged beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stands at different shelterwood densities. J. For. Sci. 56(12), 580–588 (2010).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bílek, L., Peňa, J. F. B., Remeš, J. (2013b). National Nature Reserve Voděradské Bučiny 30 Years of Forestry Research Folia Forestalia Bohemica edn, Vol. 86 (Lesnická práce, 2013).Ruchin, A. B. & Egorov, L. V. Vertical stratification of beetles in deciduous forest communities in the centre of European Russia. Diversity 13, 508. https://doi.org/10.3390/d13110508 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Parmain, G. et al. Can rove beetles (Staphylinidae) be excluded in studies focusing on saproxylic beetles in central European beech forests?. Bull. Entomol. Res. 105(1), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485314000741 (2015).CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Schmidl, J. & Bußler, H. Ökologische gilden xylobionter Käfer Deutschlands. Nat. Landsch. 36, 202–218 (2004).
    Google Scholar 
    Seibold, S. et al. Association of extinction risk of saproxylic beetles with ecological degradation of forests in Europe. Conserv. Biol. 29(2), 382–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12427 (2015).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Hejda, R., Farkač, J. & Chobot, K. Red List of Threatened Species of the Czech Republic Vol. 36, 1–612 (Agentura ochrany přírody a krajiny České republiky, Praha, 2017).
    Google Scholar 
    Lepš, J., Šmilauer, P. Biostatistika (Nakladatelství Jihočeské univerzity v Českých Budějovicích, 2016)Chao, A. Non-parametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scand. J. Stat. 11, 265–270 (1984).
    Google Scholar 
    Chao, A. Estimating the population size for capture-recapture data with unequal catchability. Biometrics 43, 783–791 (1987).MathSciNet 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Colwell, R. K. EstimateS: Statistical Estimation of Species Richness and Shared Species from Samples. Version 9. User’s Guide and application published at: http://purl.oclc.org/estimates (2013).Seibold, S. et al. Experiments with dead wood reveal the importance of dead branches in the canopy for saproxylic beetle conservation. For. Ecol. Manag. 409, 564–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.11.052 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Chao, A. et al. Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: a framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies. Ecol. Monogr. 84, 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-0133.1 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Chao, A., Ma, K. H., Hsieh, T. C. iNEXT (iNterpolation and EXTrapolation)Online: Software for Interpolation and Extrapolation of Species Diversity. ProgramandUser’s Guide published at http://chao.stat.nthu.edu.tw/wordpress/software_download/ (2016).Schenker, N. & Gentleman, J. F. On judging the significance of differences by examining the overlap between confidence intervals. Am. Stat. 55, 182–186 (2001).MathSciNet 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Horak, J. et al. Biodiversity of most dead wood-dependent organisms in thermophilic temperate oak woodlands thrives on diversity of open landscape structures. For. Ecol. Manag. 315, 80–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.12.018 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lepš, J. & Šmilauer, P. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data Using Canoco (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615146.Book 
    MATH 

    Google Scholar 
    Šmilauer, P. & Lepš, J. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data Using Canoco 5 2nd edn. (New York, 2014).Book 

    Google Scholar 
    Parisi, F. et al. Spatial patterns of saproxylic beetles in a relic silver fir forest (Central Italy), relationships with forest structure and biodiversity indicators. For. Ecol. Manag. 381, 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.09.041 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Siitonen, J. Decaying wood and saproxylic coleoptera in two old spruce forests: a comparison based on two sampling methods. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 31, 89–95 (1994).
    Google Scholar 
    Alinvi, O., Ball, J. P., Danell, K., Hjältén, J. & Pettersson, R. B. Sampling saproxylic beetle assemblages in dead wood logs: comparing window and eclector traps to traditional bark sieving and a refinement. J. Insect Conserv. 11(2), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-006-9012-2 (2007).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Økland, B. A comparison of three methods of trapping saproxylic beetles. Eur. J. Entomol. 93, 195–209 (1996).
    Google Scholar 
    Quinto, J., Marcos-García, M. D. L. Á., Brustel, H., Galante, E. & Micó, E. Effectiveness of three sampling methods to survey saproxylic beetle assemblages in mediterranean Woodland. J. Insect Conserv. 17(4), 765–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-013-9559-7 (2013).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Müller, J. et al. Increasing temperature may compensate for lower amounts of dead wood in driving richness of saproxylic beetles. Ecography 38(5), 499–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.00908 (2015).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Schiegg, K. Are there saproxylic beetle species characteristic of high dead wood connectivity?. Ecography 23, 579–587 (2000).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bouget, C., Larrieu, L., Nusillard, B. & Parmain, G. In search of the best local habitat drivers for saproxylic beetle diversity in temperate deciduous forests. Biodivers. Conserv. 22(9), 2111–2130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0531-3 (2013).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Brunet, J. & Isacsson, G. Restoration of beech forest for saproxylic beetles—effects of habitat fragmentation and substrate density on species diversity and distribution. Biodivers. Conserv. 18(9), 2387–2404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9595-5 (2009).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Eckelt, A. et al. “Primeval forest relict beetles” of central Europe: a set of 168 umbrella species for the protection of primeval forest remnants. J. Insect Conserv. 22(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-017-0028-6 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Speight, M. C. D. (1989). Saproxylic Invertebrates and Their Conservation. Saproxylic Invertebrates and Their Conservation, Vol. 42, Nature and Environmental Series, Strasbourg, 81.Gustafsson, L. et al. Research on retention forestry in northern Europe. Ecol. Process. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-019-0208-2 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Zumr, V. & Remeš, J. Saproxylic beetles as an indicator of forest biodiversity and the influence of forest management on their crucial life attributes: review. Rep. For. Res. 65, 242–257 (2020).
    Google Scholar 
    Bouget, C. & Duelli, P. The effects of windthrow on forest insect communities: a literature review. Biol. Cons. 118(3), 281–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2003.09.009 (2004).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Gran, O. & Götmark, F. Long-term experimental management in Swedish mixed oak-rich forests has a positive effect on saproxylic beetles after 10 years. Biodivers. Conserv. 28, 1451–1472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01736-5 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Fahrig, L. & Storch, D. Why do several small patches hold more species than few large patches?. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29(4), 615–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13059 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Müller, J., Engel, H. & Blaschke, M. Assemblages of wood-inhabiting fungi related to silvicultural management intensity in beech forests in southern Germany. Eur. J. For. Res. 126(4), 513–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-007-0173-7 (2007).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Friess, N. et al. Arthropod communities in fungal fruitbodies are weakly structured by climate and biogeography across European beech forests. Divers. Distrib. 25(5), 783–796. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12882 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Brin, A., Brustel, H. & Jactel, H. Species variables or environmental variables as indicators of forest biodiversity: a case study using saproxylic beetles in maritime pine plantations. Ann. For. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/2009009 (2009).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Müller, J. & Bütler, R. A review of habitat thresholds for dead wood: a baseline for management recommendations in european forests. Eur. J. For. Res. 129(6), 981–992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-010-0400-5 (2010).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Alencar, J. B. R., Fonseca, C. R. V., Marra, D. M. & Baccaro, F. B. Windthrows promote higher diversity of saproxylic beetles (Coleoptera: Passalidae) in a central Amazon forest. Insect Conserv. Divers. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12523 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Audisio, P. et al. Preliminary re-examination of genus-level taxonomy of the pollen beetle subfamily Meligethinae (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae). Acta Entomol. Musei Natl. Pragae 49(2), 341–504 (2009).
    Google Scholar 
    Burakowski, B., Mroczkowski, M., Stefańska, J. Chrząszcze – Coleoptera. Ryjkowce – Curculionidae, Część 1. Katalog Fauny Polski Vol. XXIII, no, 19 Warszawa.Laibner, S. Elateridae of the Czech and Slovak Republics (Kabourek, Zlín, 2000).
    Google Scholar 
    Frank, T. & Reichhart, B. Staphylinidae and Carabidae overwintering in wheat and sown wildflower areas of different age. Bull. Entomol. Res. 94(3), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1079/BER2004301 (2004).CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Herrmann, S., Kahl, T. & Bauhus, J. Decomposition dynamics of coarse woody debris of three important central European tree species. For. Ecosyst. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-015-0052-5 (2015).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hararuk, O., Kurz, W. A. & Didion, M. Dynamics of dead wood decay in swiss forests. For. Ecosyst. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-020-00248-x (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Jonsell, M., Weslien, J. & Ehnström, B. Substrate requirements of red-listed saproxylic invertebrates in Sweden. Biodivers. Conserv. 7(6), 749–764. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008888319031 (1998).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bobiec, A. (ed.) The After Life of a Tree 252 (Warsawa, WWF Poland, 2005).
    Google Scholar 
    Gossner, M. M. et al. Deadwood enrichment in European forests – which tree species should be used to promote saproxylic beetle diversity?. Biol. Cons. 201, 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.06.032 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Vogel, S. et al. Optimizing enrichment of deadwood for biodiversity by varying sun exposure and tree species: an experimental approach. J. Appl. Ecol. 57(10), 2075–2085. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13648 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Gough, L. A. et al. Specialists in ancient trees are more affected by climate than generalists. Ecol. Evol. 5(23), 5632–5641. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1799 (2015).Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Koch Widerberg, M., Ranius, T., Drobyshev, I., Nilsson, U. & Lindbladh, M. Increased openness around retained oaks increases species richness of saproxylic beetles. Biodivers. Conserv. 21(12), 3035–3059. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-012-0353-8 (2012).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Horák, J., Pavlíček, J., Kout, J. & Halda, J. P. Winners and losers in the wilderness: response of biodiversity to the abandonment of ancient forest pastures. Biodivers. Conserv. 27(11), 3019–3029. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1585-z (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Vandekerkhove, K. et al. Saproxylic beetles in non-intervention and coppice-with-standards restoration management in meerdaal forest (Belgium): an exploratory analysis. IFor. Biogeosci. For. 9(4), 536–545. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1841-009 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lachat, T. et al. Saproxylic beetles as indicator species for dead-wood amount and temperature in European beech forests. Ecol. Ind. 23, 323–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.04.013 (2012).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Müller, J. et al. Primary determinants of communities in deadwood vary among taxa but are regionally consistent. Oikos 129(10), 1579–1588. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.07335 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Černecká, Ľ, Mihál, I., Gajdoš, P. & Jarčuška, B. The effect of canopy openness of European beech (Fagus Sylvatica) forests on ground-dwelling spider communities. Insect Conserv. Divers. 13(3), 250–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12380 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Spitzer, L. et al. Does closure of traditionally managed open woodlands threaten epigeic invertebrates? Effects of coppicing and high deer densities. Biol. Cons. 141(3), 827–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.01.005 (2008).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Podrázský, V., Remeš, J. & Farkač, J. Složení společenstev střevlíkovitých brouků (Coleoptera: Carabidae) v lesních porostech s různou druhovou strukturou a systémem hospodaření. Zpr. Lesn. Výzk. 55, 10–15 (2010).
    Google Scholar 
    Welti, E. A. R. et al. Temperature drives variation in flying insect biomass across a german malaise trap network. Insect Conserv. Divers. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12555 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Brang, P. et al. Suitability of close-to-nature silviculture for adapting temperate European forests to climate change. Forestry 87(4), 492–503. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpu018 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Schall, P. et al. The impact of even-aged and uneven-aged forest management on regional biodiversity of multiple taxa in European beech forests. J. Appl. Ecol. 55(1), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12950 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Leidinger, J. et al. Shifting tree species composition affects biodiversity of multiple taxa in central European forests. For. Ecol. Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119552 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Christensen, M. et al. Dead wood in European beech (Fagus Sylvatica) forest reserves. For. Ecol. Manag. 210(1–3), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.032 (2005).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Plieninger, T. et al. Wood-pastures of Europe: geographic coverage, social-ecological values, conservation management, and policy implications. Biol. Cons. 190, 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.05.014 (2015).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Weiss, M. et al. The effect of coppicing on insect biodiversity. Small-scale mosaics of successional stages drive community turnover. For. Ecol. Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118774 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar  More

  • in

    Brazil: heed price of marine mining for an alternative fertilizer

    Brazil’s government risks fuelling the climate and biodiversity crisis by offsetting the fertilizer shortage resulting from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine this year (J. Liu et al. Nature 604, 425 (2022); S. Osendarp et al. Nature 604, 620–624; 2022). To produce an alternative fertilizer, it plans to mine up to 12 million tonnes annually of rhodoliths taken from an area in the South Atlantic that is roughly the size of the United Kingdom (see go.nature.com/3yhiyio).A full list of co-signatories to this letter appears in Supplementary Information.
    Competing Interests
    The author declares no competing interests. More

  • in

    A feeding frenzy of 150 whales marks a species’ comeback

    Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain
    the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in
    Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles
    and JavaScript. More

  • in

    Prediction of the potential distribution of the predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) in China under current and future climate scenarios

    Moraes, G. J., Mcmurtry, J. A., Denmark, H. A. & Campos, C. B. A revised catalog of the mite family Phytoseiidae. Zootaxa 434, 1–494 (2004).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Fraulo, A. B. & Liburd, O. E. Biological control of twospotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae, with predatory mite, Neoseiulus californicus, in strawberries. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 43, 109–119 (2007).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kuştutan, O. & Cakmak, I. Development, fecundity, and prey consumption of Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) fed Tetranychus cinnabarinus Boisduval. Turk. J. Agric. For. 33, 19–28 (2009).
    Google Scholar 
    Kishimoto, H. et al. Occurrence of Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on citrus in Kyushu district, Japan. J. Acarol. Soc. Japan 16, 129–137 (2007).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Albayrak, T., Yorulmaz, S., İnak, E., Toprak, U. & Van Leeuwen, T. Pirimicarb resistance and associated mechanisms in field-collected and selected populations of Neoseiulus californicus. Pestic. Biochem. Phys. 180, 104984 (2022).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Abdellah, A., Abdelaziz, Z., Philipe, A., Serge, K. & Abdelhamid, E. M. Seasonal trend of Eutetranychus orientalis in Moroccan citrus orchards and its potential control by Neoseiulus californicus and Stethorus punctillum. Syst. Appl. Acarol. 26, 1458–1480 (2021).
    Google Scholar 
    Vidrih, M., Turnšek, A., Rak Cizej, M., Bohinc, T. & Trdan, S. Results of the single release efficacy of the predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) against the two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae Koch) on a hop plantation. Appl. Sci. 11, 118 (2021).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Jiang, C. X., Chen, L., Huang, T. T., Mumtaz, M. & Li, Q. Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) shows good predation potential when reared on an artificial diet supplemented with Tetranychus cinnabarinus. Syst. Appl. Acarol. 26, 2229–2246 (2021).
    Google Scholar 
    Katayama, H. et al. Density suppression of the citrus red mite Panonychus citri (Acari: Tetranychidae) due to the occurrence of Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on Satsuma mandarin. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 41, 679–684 (2006).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Zhu, R., Guo, J. J., Yi, T. C., Xiao, R. & Jin, D. C. Preying potential of predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus to broad mite Polyphagotarsonemus latus. J. Plant Prot. 46, 465–471 (2019) ([In Chinese]).
    Google Scholar 
    Silva, D. E. et al. Impact of vineyard agrochemicals against Panonychus ulmi (Acari: Tetranychidae) and its natural enemy, Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in Brazil. Crop Prot. 123, 5–11 (2019).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Sato, M. E., Da Silva, M. Z., De Souza Filho, M. F., Matioli, A. L. & Raga, A. Management of Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) in strawberry fields with Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and acaricides. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 42, 107–120 (2007).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    De Souza-Pimentel, G. C. et al. Biological control of Tetranychus urticae (Tetranychidae) on rosebushes using Neoseiulus californicus (Phytoseiidae) and agrochemical selectivity. Rev. Colombi. Entomol. 40, 80–84 (2014).
    Google Scholar 
    Elith, J. & Leathwick, J. R. Species distribution models: Ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40, 677–697 (2009).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Peterson, A. T. & Shaw, J. Lutzomyia vectors for cutaneous leishmaniasis in southern Brazil: ecological niche models, predicted geographic distribution, and climate change effects. Int. J. Parasitol. 33, 919–931 (2003).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Peterson, A. T. & Soberón, J. Species distribution modeling and ecological niche modeling: Getting the Concepts Right. Nat. Conserv. 10, 102–107 (2012).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P. & Schapire, R. E. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Model. 190, 231–259 (2006).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Stockwell, D. & Peters, D. P. The GARP modelling system: problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 13, 143–158 (1999).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Beaumont, L. J., Hughes, L. & Poulsen, M. Predicting species distributions: use of climatic parameters in BIOCLIM and its impact on predictions of species’ current and future distributions. Ecol. Model. 186, 251–270 (2005).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Arslan, E. S. & Örücü, Ö. K. MaxEnt modelling of the potential distribution areas of cultural ecosystem services using social media data and GIS. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 23, 2655–2667 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hutchinson, G. E. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 22, 415–427 (1957).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Soberon, J. & Peterson, A. T. Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species distributions areas. Biodivers. Inf. 2, 1–10 (2005).
    Google Scholar 
    Ab Lah, N. Z., Yusop, Z., Hashim, M., Salim, J. M. & Numata, S. Predicting the habitat suitability of Melaleuca cajuputi based on the MaxEnt Species Distribution Model. Forests 12, 1449 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ali, H. et al. Expanding or shrinking? range shifts in wild ungulates under climate change in Pamir-Karakoram mountains, Pakistan. PLoS ONE 16, e0260031 (2021).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Boral, D. & Moktan, S. Predictive distribution modeling of Swertia bimaculata in Darjeeling-Sikkim Eastern Himalaya using MaxEnt: current and future scenarios. Ecol. Process. 10, 1–16 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kamyo, T. & Asanok, L. Modeling habitat suitability of Dipterocarpus alatus (Dipterocarpaceae) using MaxEnt along the Chao Phraya River in Central Thailand. Forest Sci. Technol. 16, 1–7 (2020).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Barber, R. A., Ball, S. G., Morris, R. K. A. & Gilbert, F. Target-group backgrounds prove effective at correcting sampling bias in Maxent models. Divers. Distrib. 28, 128–141 (2022).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Pearson, R. G., Raxworthy, C. J., Nakamura, M. & Peterson, A. T. Predicting species distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: a test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar. J. Biogeogr. 34, 102–117 (2007).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Elith, J. et al. Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29, 129–151 (2006).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Comino, E., Fiorucci, A., Rosso, M., Terenziani, A. & Treves, A. Vegetation and Glacier Trends in the area of the Maritime Alps Natural Park (Italy): MaxEnt application to predict habitat development. Clim. 9, 54 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Wang, R. L. et al. Prediction of the potential distribution of the predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus McGregor in China using MaxEnt. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 29, e01733 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bertolino, S. et al. Spatially explicit models as tools for implementing effective management strategies for invasive alien mammals. Mamm. Rev. 50, 187–199 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Raffini, F. et al. From nucleotides to satellite imagery: approaches to identify and manage the invasive Pathogen Xylella fastidiosa and its insect vectors in Europe. Sustainability 12, 4508 (2020).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Tang, J. T., Li, J. H., Lu, H., Lu, F. P. & Lu, B. Q. Potential distribution of an invasive pest, Euplatypus parallelus, in China as predicted by Maxent. Pest Manag. Sci. 75, 1630–1637 (2019).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Chang, Y. et al. Predicting dynamics of the potential breeding habitat of Larus saundersi by MaxEnt model under changing land-use conditions in wetland nature reserve of Liaohe Estuary, China. Remote Sens. 14, 552 (2022).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Freeman, B. G., Lee-Yaw, J. A., Sunday, J. M. & Hargreaves, A. L. Expanding, shifting and shrinking: The impact of global warming on species’ elevational distributions. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27, 1268–1276 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Smeraldo, S. et al. Generalists yet different: distributional responses to climate change may vary in opportunistic bat species sharing similar ecological traits. Mamm. Rev. 51, 571–584 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Pörtner, H. O. et al. Climate Change 2022: The Physical Science Basis. Working Group II contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 15. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/ (2022).Ahmed, S. E. et al. Scientists and software–surveying the species distribution modelling community. Divers. Distrib. 21, 258–267 (2015).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Tognelli, M. F., Roig-Juñent, S. A., Marvaldi, A. E., Flores, G. E. & Lobo, J. M. An evaluation of methods for modelling distribution of Patagonian insects. Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat. 82, 347–360 (2009).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Pangga, I., Salvacion, A., Hamor, N. & Yap, S. Maximum entropy (MaxEnt) modeling of the potential distribution of Aspidiotus rigidus Reyne (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) in the Philippines. Philipp. Agric. Sci. 104, 1–7 (2021).
    Google Scholar 
    Zhou, R. B. et al. Projecting the potential distribution of Glossina morsitans (Diptera: Glossinidae) under climate change using the MaxEnt model. Biol. 10, 1150 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Soberon, J. & Peterson, A. T. Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species’s distribtional areas. Biodivers. Inform. 2, 1–10 (2005).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Soberon, J. M. Niche and area of distribution modeling: a population ecology perspective. Ecography 33, 159–167 (2010).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Soberon, J. M. & Nakamura, M. Niches and distributional areas: concepts, methods and assumptions. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 19644–19650 (2009).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Zhang, Y. X., Ji, J., Chen, X., Lin, J. Z. & Chen, B. L. The effect of temperature on reproduction and development duration of Neoseiulus (Amblyseius) californicus (Mcgregor). Fujian J. Agric. Sci. 27, 157–161 (2012) ([In Chinese]).
    Google Scholar 
    Neto, M. P., Reis, P. R., Zacarias, M. S. & Silva, R. A. Influence of rainfall on mite distribution in organic and conventional coffee systems. Coffee Sci. 5, 67–74 (2010).
    Google Scholar 
    Hu, Z., Gui, L. Y., Hua, D. K. & Luo, J. Effect of simulated rainfall on laboratory population dynamics of Tetranychus cinnabarinus. J. Environ. Entomol. 38, 936–941 (2016) ([In Chinese]).
    Google Scholar 
    Lawler, J. J. Climate change adaptation strategies for resource management and conservation planning. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1162, 79–98 (2009).ADS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    www.carbonbrief.org/cmip6-the-next-generation-of-climate-models-explained.Gotoh, T., Yamaguchi, K. & Mori, K. Effect of temperature on life history of the predatory mite Amblyseius (Neoseiulus) californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 32, 15–30 (2004).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Yuan, X. P., Wang, X. D., Wang, J. W. & Zhao, Y. Y. Effects of brief exposure to high temperature on Neoseiulus californicus. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao 26, 853–858 (2015) ([In Chinese]).PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Zhang, G. H. et al. Intraspecific variations on thermal susceptibility in the predatory mite Neoseiulus barkeri Hughes (Acari: Phytoseiidae): responding to long-term heat acclimations and frequent heat hardenings. Biol. Control 121, 208–215 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Phillips, S. J., Dudík, M. & Schapire, R. E.[Internet] Maxent software for modeling species niches and distributions (Version 3.4.1). url: http://biodiversityinformatics.amnh.org/open_source/maxent/. Accessed 17 March 2022.R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. url: https://www.R-project.org/ (2021).Seyedizadeh, S., Ghane-Jahromi, M., Sedaratian-Jahromi, A. & Faraji, F. Discovery of the predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in some rose greenhouses in Iran and describing variation in spermathecal calyx shape. Pers. J. Acarol. 6, 67–70 (2017).
    Google Scholar 
    Fang, X. D., Nguyen, V. L., Ouyang, G. C. & Wu, W. N. Survey of phytoseiid mites (Acari: Mesostigmata, Phytoseiidae) in citrus orchards and a key for Amblyseiinae in Vietnam. Acarologia 60, 254–267 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Greco, N. M., Tetzlaff, G. T. & Liljesthröm, G. G. Presence–absence sampling for Tetranychus urticae and its predator Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Tetranychidae; Phytoseiidae) on strawberries. Int. J. Pest Manag. 50, 23–27 (2004).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Beaulieu, F. & Beard, J. J. Acarine biocontrol agents Neoseiulus californicus sensu Athias-Henriot (1977) and N. barkeri Hughes (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae) redescribed, their synonymies assessed, and the identity of N. californicus (McGregor) clarified based on examination of types. Zootaxa 4500, 451–507 (2018).Kawashima, M. & Jung, C. Effects of sheltered ground habitats on the overwintering potential of the predacious mite Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in apple orchards on mainland Korea. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 55, 375–388 (2011).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Koller, M., Knapp, M. & Schausberger, P. Direct and indirect adverse effects of tomato on the predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus feeding on the spider mite Tetranychus evansi. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 125, 297–305 (2007).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ohno, S. et al. Geographic distribution of phytoseiid mite species (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on crops in Okinawa, a subtropical area of Japan. Entomol. Sci. 15, 115–120 (2012).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Tixier, M. S., Otto, J., Kreiter, S., Dos Santos, V. & Beard, J. Is Neoseiulus wearnei the Neoseiulus californicus of Australia? Exp. Appl. Acarol. 62, 267–277 (2014).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Vacacela Ajila, H. E. et al. Supplementary food for Neoseiulus californicus boosts biological control of Tetranychus urticae on strawberry. Pest Manag. Sci. 75, 1986–1992 (2019).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Xu, X. N., Wang, B. M., Wang, E. D. & Zhang, Z. Q. Comments on the identity of Neoseiulus californicus sensu lato (Acari: Phytoseiidae) with a redescription of this species from southern China. Syst. Appl. Acarol. 18, 329–344 (2013).
    Google Scholar 
    Pringle, K. L. & Heunis, J. M. Biological control of phytophagous mites in apple orchards in the Elgin area of South Africa using the predatory mite, Neoseiulus californicus (McGregor) (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae): a benefit-cost analysis. Afr. Entomol. 14, 113–121 (2006).
    Google Scholar 
    Tai, Y. W. et al. R package ‘corrplot’: Visualization of a Correlation Matrix. url: https://github.com/taiyun/corrplot (2021).Muscarella, R. et al. ENMeval: An R package for conducting spatially independent evaluations and estimating optimal model complexity for Maxent ecological niche models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 5, 1198–1205 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Araujo, M. B., Pearson, R. G., Tuiller, W. & Erhard, M. Validation of species–climate impact models under climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 11, 1504–1513 (2005).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Allouche, O., Tsoar, A. & Kadmon, R. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: Prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). J. Appl. Ecol. 43, 1223–1232 (2006).Article 

    Google Scholar  More

  • in

    No new evidence for an Atlantic eels spawning area outside the Sargasso Sea

    The Sargasso Sea was identified as the spawning area of the European eel (Anguilla anguilla) 100 years ago, and numerous subsequent surveys have verified that eel larvae just a week old are regularly recorded there. However, no adult eels or eel eggs have ever been found, leaving room for alternative hypotheses on the reproduction biology of this enigmatic species. Chang et al.1 theorize about an area along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge as a potential spawning ground. The main argument for this hypothesis was that the chemical signature found in eel otoliths would indicate that early stage larvae had been exposed to a volcanic environment, such as the one present along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Since this correlation was solely based on a mis-interpretation of cited literature data, no new, conclusive information to pinpoint the Mid-Atlantic Ridge as an additional or even alternative spawning area was presented by Chang et al.For more than 100 years, the life history of Atlantic eels remains a matter of scientific debate. In a recent paper by Chang and colleagues, published in Scientific Reports (Sci Rep 10, 15981 (2020)), it is hypothesized that the spawning areas of the European eel (Anguilla anguilla) and the American eel (A. rostrata) are located along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge at longitudes between 50° W and 40° W1. This area lies outside the Sargasso Sea, which has so far been widely assumed to be the spawning region of both species since the beginning of the twentieth century2. The Danish researcher Johannes Schmidt collected eel leptocephali 30 mm long or less, some as short as 9 mm, all south of 30° N and west of 50° W3,4. Since then, Schmidt’s assumption was supported by a number of investigations that found recently hatched European eel larvae ( More

  • in

    Caught by a whisker

    The whiskers of seals are known to function as vibration receptors. Earlier experiments with blindfolded harbour seals in captivity have for example revealed that the animals can detect small water movements, and follow the hydrodynamic trails created by passing objects. But it is unclear if seals in the wild actively use this ability to find prey.
    This is a preview of subscription content More