Global and seasonal variation of marine phosphonate metabolism
Proteobacteria are major contributors to marine microbial phosphonate cyclingDatabases for all putative sequences of genes for phosphonate production (pepM, aepY, phpC, mpnS, hepD), substrate-specific catabolism (phnAWXYZ, palA), and broad-specificity catabolism (phnIJM) were created using available public genomes from JGI IMG/MER and GORG-Tropics. Gene identity was verified by the presence of catalytically essential residues (Supplementary Table S2). Phosphonate genes were identified in 10,337 genomes of bacteria and archaea spanning over 100 unique classes, suggesting a wide variety of microorganisms mediate phosphonate production and catabolism (Fig. 2, Supplementary Dataset S1). A high proportion of all collected sequences affiliated with Proteobacteria (Gamma, Alpha, and Beta classes), averaging 52% of the production genes, 78% of substrate-specific catabolism genes, and 88% of broad-specificity catabolism genes before dereplication (Fig. 2).Fig. 2: Phosphonate gene and genome count with taxonomic distribution.Number of sequences and genomes collected for study (A, D, G) with distribution of class-level taxa for all redundant sequences (B, E, H) and marine redundant (C, F, I) sequences. Results are shown for selected genes representing phosphonate (A–C) production, (D–F) substrate-specific catabolism, and (G–I) broad-specificity catabolism. The taxa shown are the 15 classes with the highest representation across all databases.Full size imageOf the 10,337 genomes, 1556 (15%) were confirmed to be marine organisms from 35 different classes (Fig. 2, Supplementary Dataset S1). Proteobacteria had even greater representation in the subset of marine genomes, averaging 65% of marine production genes, 88% of marine substrate-specific catabolism genes, and 96% of marine broad-specificity catabolism genes from the redundant databases (Fig. 2). The dominance of Alphaproteobacteria in the marine subset may be attributed to the wide variety of Pelagibacterales bacterium captured in the database, making up 426 (27%) of the 1556 genomes involved in all three categories of phosphonate cycling. Rhodobacterales (Ascidiaceihabitans sp., Roseovarius sp., Sulfitobacter sp., Labrenzia sp., and Phaeobacter sp.) alongside Rhodospirillales (Thalassobaculum sp., Thalassospira sp., Roseospira sp., Varunaivibrio sp., and Oceanibaculum sp.) were also highly represented among the marine subset with 214 (14%) and 251 (16%) genomes, respectively (Supplemental Dataset S1), though these taxa primarily show potential for phosphonate catabolism rather than production. Vibrionales were well represented in the JGI IMG/MER marine genome subset with 107 (7%) genomes spanning 59 different species including Vibrio lentus, Vibrio breoganii, and Vibrio splendidus.Diverse taxa encode the capacity to produce phosphonate derivativesPhosphonate production is widespread and distributed throughout many different bacteria and archaea. Genes responsible for the first two steps in phosphonate production, pepM and aepY, had the broadest taxonomic distribution within the redundant databases (Shannon indices of 2.66 and 2.76) for all genes in this study, distributed with 0.59 and 0.61 evenness from 70 and 72 unique, verified classes, respectively. Their broad distribution further highlights the ubiquity and necessity of phosphonate compounds to microbial life and function across all environments. Within the marine setting, both pepM and aepY have reference sequences from 22 unique, verified classes which is the second highest class representation in the marine genome subset (Fig. 2). The marine subset of pepM and aepY also have the highest Shannon indices (1.76 and 1.92) distributed with 0.53 and 0.58 evenness, respectively. A majority (87%) of the Alphaproteobacteria phosphonate producers are Pelagibacterales bacterium with other notable taxa including Bacteria: Candidatus Actinomarinaceae, Prochlorococcus sp., Synechococcus sp., Nitrosococcus sp., and MG-I Archaea: Candidatus Nitrosomarinus catalina, Nitrosopumilus maritimus, alongside other unidentified Crenarchaeota and Thaumarchaeota genomes.The gene phpC was found in less than half the number of genomes than pepM and aepY, and encoded by fewer classes in both the general database (47) and marine subset (10). In the full databases, the distribution of retrieved phpC sequences are similar to pepM and aepY with respect to taxonomic ranking, Shannon index (2.49), and evenness (0.60) (Fig. 2A–C, Supplementary Table 5). Within the marine subset, phpC has less Shannon index (1.61) but greater evenness (0.61) than the marine subset of pepM and aepY. All three upstream phosphonate production genes (pepM, aepY, phpC) are found together within Pelagibacterales bacterium, Prochlorococcus sp., Thaumarchaeota, and Crenarchaoeta alongside other taxa such as Oceanospirillales sp., Arenimonas donghaensis, Desulfuromusa kysingii, and Cellulosilyticum lentocellum.We further investigated the relationship between pepM, aepY, and phpC by examining co-occurrence in genomes and synteny with the general, redundant databases. The first two steps in phosphonate biosynthesis are intimately linked (Fig. 3). Out of all genomes with pepM, 86% have aepY, and out of all genomes with aepY, 90% have pepM. By contrast, phpC is not as closely tied to pepM and phosphonate production. We found phpC in just over 20% of genomes with the capability of phosphonate production (Fig. 3), implying that a majority of bacterial and archaeal phosphonate production stops at the production of phosphonoacetaldehyde or 2-AEP (Fig. 1A). Furthermore, half of the phpC genes were not associated with phosphonate production, given 53% of genomes with phpC did not have pepM and 54% did not have aepY (Fig. 3). In these instances, microbes may use phpC within a 2-AEP substrate-specific catabolism operon (Fig. 3) that allows phosphonate compounds to be synthesized by transforming 2-AEP with phnW and phpC into 2-HEP (Figs. 1A and 3). By repurposing 2-AEP, individuals can still create the specific compound needed while bypassing the energetically unfavourable first step of phosphonate production.Fig. 3: Co-occurrence of phosphonate cycling genes within the same genome and examples of genetic organization of phosphonate cycling genes.The heatmap displays co-occurrence of phosphonate cycling genes. Each column represents the subset of all genomes which contain the source gene and the heatmap value represents the fraction of the source genomes which also contain the co-occurring gene. Heatmap values are not symmetrical due to differing number of genomes represented in each column, database size listed above each column. Examples for phosphonate cycling genomic neighbourhoods were chosen to maximize diversity in synteny with examples from both Bacteria and Archaea where applicable. Several phosphonate-specific ABC transport system clusters are labelled as follows: phnC = phosphonate transport system ATPase; phnD = phosphonate transport system substrate-binding; phnE = phosphonate transport system permease; phnS = 2-AEP transport system substrate-binding; phnT = 2-AEP transport system ATP-binding; phnV = 2-AEP transport system permease; palC = transport system permease; palD = transport system ATP-binding; palE = transport system permease. Genes are colour coded by: red = lyase; orange = transcriptional regulator; yellow = hydrolase; green = transferase; light blue = oxidoreductase; dark blue = transaminase; purple = kinase; pink = isomerase; brown = transport; white = synthase; black = uncharacterized protein; grey = unknown.Full size imageA narrow but diverse selection of taxa encoded MpnS, the marker gene for Mpn production and a key determinant in marine methane production. We observed distinct clades of this enzyme in autotrophic archaea and heterotrophic bacteria (Fig. 2B, C). Within the marine ecosystems, Pelagibacterales, Rhodospirillales, Rickettsiales, Oceanospirillales, Flavobacteriales, and Synechococcales are bacterial candidates for MPn production alongside Thaumarchaeota and Crenarchaeota archaeon (Fig. 2B, C). While six of the bacterial genomes with MpnS also encoded genes for phosphonate catabolism, none of the archaeal MPn producers showed capacity for catabolism (Supplementary Dataset S1). The genomic neighbourhoods for general phosphonate production (pepM, aepY, phpC) and MPn production (mpnS) in both bacteria and archaea include genes such as glycosyltransferase, lipopolysaccharide choline phosphotransferase, choline kinase, adenylyltransferase, and arylsulfatase A (Fig. 3) suggesting the potential for synthesis of (methyl)phosphonate esters [93]. This is consistent with previous analysis [29] of the Nitrosopumilus maritimus SCM1 MPn production genomic neighbourhood and biophysical evidence that MPn producing archaea synthesize an exopolysaccharide modified with MPn similar to 2-AEP modified polymers.Contrary to the diversity of the other phosphonate production databases, the hepD database has low Shannon index (0.62) and evenness (0.45) with 79% of sequences mapping to Actinomycetia including Streptomycetales and Corynebacteriales (Fig. 2B, C). The marine subset has lower Shannon index (0.28) and evenness (0.41) where all sequences derive from Pelagibacterales except one from Prochlorococcus sp. The genomic neighbourhood of HMP production may contain genes for cell surface modification such as acetyltransferase, peptidoglycan biosynthesis, and adenylylsulfate transferase, suggesting that some organisms may use HMP as a conjugate for membrane-associated or exported macromolecules similar to theories on MPn utilization. Other examples of hepD synteny contain more specific genes such as the HMP dehydrogenase or other enzymes for downstream modification (Fig. 3).Marine proteobacteria encode genes for substrate-specific and broad-specificity phosphonate catabolismGenes for marine substrate-specific phosphonate catabolism were widespread among Proteobacterial classes, and to a lesser extent amongst other classes including Bacilli, Planctomycetes, and Synechococcus (Fig. 2E,F). Marine substrate-specific catabolism has lower average Shannon index (1.00) and evenness (0.43) than the three general production genes (pepM, aepY, phpC). The most widespread of these genes was phnW, likely due to its pivotal role in 2-AEP transformations as a precursor reaction to phnAY or phnX (Fig. 1, Supplementary Table 5). Marine hydrolases for 2-AEP catabolism, phnA, phnX, and phnZ, have similar Shannon indices (mean: 1.11 ± 0.05) and evenness (mean: 0.41 ± 0.03) (Fig. 2E, F, Supplementary Table 5).While not exclusive, sequenced references demonstrate a strong taxonomic partition between Proteobacterial classes for 2-AEP catabolism pathways phnAWY and phnWX. Over 74% of marine genomes with phnAWY are Alphaproteobacteria, in particular Rhodobacterales species such as Roseovarius nubinhibens, Marivita geojedonensis, and Pelagicola litoralis. On the contrary, ~80% of marine genomes with phnWX are Gammaproteobacteria, specifically of Vibrionales, Oceanospirillales, and Alteromonadales including a wide range of species from Vibrio, Photobacterium, Marinobacterium, Halomonas, and Pseudoalteromonas.Taxonomic distribution for marine phnZ was 72% Alphaproteobacteria with Pelagibacterales making up 45% of marine phnZ sequences. Note that phnZ has the most (17) reference sequences from marine Cyanobacteriia, specifically Prochlorococcus sp., than any other phosphonate catabolizing gene. Lack of marine sequence representatives for catabolism of phosphonopyruvate by palA suggests that either the substrate is uncommon, therefore the function unnecessary, or marine microbes have other methods of catabolizing phosphonopyruvate, perhaps by the C-P lyase. Overall taxonomic distribution of phosphonate substrate-specific catabolism, specifically targeting 2-AEP, suggests said function is essential to many marine heterotrophs within Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria. However 2-AEP catabolism appears to be less universally important than phosphonate production to marine microbial life since the required genes are found in a less diverse selection of taxa.Genetic organization for substrate-specific catabolism genes, particularly those targeting 2-AEP, varied widely in line with the numerous options for 2-AEP catabolism (Fig. 3). Though some bacteria specialize in a single 2-AEP degradation pathway such as only containing phnWAY, others contained multiple hydrolases for 2-AEP catabolism with some incorporating phpC into a 2-AEP specific catabolism operon (Fig. 3). When a genome has two hydrolases for phosphonate catabolism, often phnZ was paired with either phnA or phnX. Co-occurrence between phnZ and either phnA or phnX ranged between 30-50%, whereas co-occurrence between phnA and phnX was between 6-12% (Fig. 3). This discrepancy in co-occurrence may be due to the metabolic similarity between phnA and phnX, where having both may be redundant. Both of these enzymes rely on phnW for 2-AEP catabolism and produce carbon metabolites, whereas phnZ does not need phnW and produces the amino acid glycine (Fig. 1B).C-P lyase genes representing substrate non-specific catabolism were overwhelmingly attributed to Alphaproteobacteria which consisted over 75% of all collected marine sequences for phnIJM (Fig. 2H, I). A wide variety of Rhodobacterales, spanning 55 different genus are the most numerous representatives, followed by Pelagibacterales and Rhodospirillales. The genes in all three databases have very high genome co-occurrence, 89–99%, as expected given all three operate within the same enzyme complex (Fig. 3). Gene co-occurrence, Shannon index, and evenness is lower for phnM than the other two C-P lyase components, phnI and phnJ, likely due to instances of organisms containing two copies of phnM where one copy lies outside the C-P lyase operon [94]. C-P lyase gene databases have lower Shannon index (mean 0.81 ± 0.11) than phosphonate production and 2-AEP substrate-specific catabolism genes (phnAWXZ) (Fig. 3D, G), suggesting broad-specificity phosphonate catabolism by the C-P lyase is a narrowly distributed function (Supplementary Table 5). Organization of C-P lyase operons held the most consistency between example genomes, likely due to the high number of genes simultaneously utilized for lyase construction. These operons encoded a consecutive string of lyase subunits, including a generic phosphonate transporter (phnCDE) and GntR transcriptional regulator (Fig. 3). C-P lyase genes had low genomic co-occurrence with all other phosphonate cycling genes with notable co-occurrence between phnW at 26%, phnZ at 21%, and phnX and 18% (Fig. 3). The low rate of co-occurrence may be due to redundancy in function for P harvesting between the C-P lyase and substrate-specific catabolism. In some cases there are instances of a substrate-specific hydrolase gene located within the C-P lyase operon (Fig. 3).Phosphonate biosynthesis genes are globally prevalent in oceans and increase in mesopelagic watersFollowing curation of phn-gene databases, we analysed 121 metagenomes and 91 metatranscriptomes from the publicly available TARA Oceans expedition (spanning samples from the Atlantic, Indian, Pacific, and Southern Ocean and Red Sea) to investigate the global potential for marine phosphonate cycling. Measuring the proportion of the community capable of performing specific tasks through metagenomics indicates the long-term selective pressures that shape P-cycling and microbial communities.Potential for phosphonate production (pepM) was globally ubiquitous across all depths, with 14–17% of the community encoding in the surface waters and deep chlorophyll maximum (DCM), increasing to 45% in mesopalagic waters (Fig. 4A, Supplementary Tables S6 and S7), highlighting the importance of phosphonate compounds to marine microbial communities. Relative abundance of phpC was 64–76% that of pepM and aepY across all depths (Fig. 4A). We observed significant increase in relative abundance between the surface and mesopelagic for pepM (ANOVA: F = 1262, p More