More stories

  • in

    Individual and joint estimation of humpback whale migratory patterns and their environmental drivers in the Southwest Atlantic Ocean

    Mackintosh NA. The southern stocks of whalebone whales 1942.Perrin, W. F. & Wursig, B. Thewissen JGM “Hans” (Academic Press, 2009).
    Google Scholar 
    Rizzo, L. Y. & Schulte, D. A review of humpback whales’ migration patterns worldwide and their consequences to gene flow. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 89, 995–1002. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315409000332 (2009).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Baker, C. S. et al. Strong maternal fidelity and natal philopatry shape genetic structure in North Pacific humpback whales. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 494, 291–306. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps10508 (2013).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Clapham, P. J. et al. Seasonal occurrence and annual return of humpback whales, Megaptera novaeangliae, in the southern Gulf of Maine. Can J Zool 71, 440–443. https://doi.org/10.1139/z93-063 (1993).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Dawbin, W. H. The seasonal migratory cycle of humpback whales. Whales Dolphins Porpoises 4, 145–70 (1966).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Horton, T. W., Zerbini, A. N., Andriolo, A., Danilewicz, D. & Sucunza, F. Multi-decadal humpback whale migratory route fidelity despite oceanographic and geomagnetic change. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00414 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Larsen, A. H., Sigurjónsson, J., Oien, N., Vikingsson, G. & Palsbøll, P. Populations genetic analysis of nuclear and mitochondrial loci in skin biopsies collected from central and northeastern North Atlantic humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae): Population identity and migratory destinations. Proc. Biol. Sci. 263, 1611–1618. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1996.0236 (1996).CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Palsbøll, P. J. et al. Genetic tagging of humpback whales. Nature 388, 767–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/42005 (1997).ADS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Barendse, J. et al. Migration redefined? Seasonality, movements and group composition of humpback whales Megaptera novaeangliae off the west coast of South Africa. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 32, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2989/18142321003714203 (2010).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Best, B. P., Sekiguchi, K. & Findlay, P. K. A suspended migration of humpback whales Megaptera novaeangliae on the west coast of South Africa. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 118, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps118001 (1995).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Brown, M. R., Corkeron, P. J., Hale, P. T., Schultz, K. W. & Bryden, M. M. Evidence for a sex-segregated migration in the humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 259, 229–234. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1995.0034 (1995).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Christensen, I., Haug, T. & Øien, N. Seasonal distribution, exploitation and present abundance of stocks of large baleen whales (Mysticeti) and sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) in Norwegian and adjacent waters. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 49, 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/49.3.341 (1992).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Corkeron, P. J. & Connor, R. C. Why do baleen whales migrate?1. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 15, 1228–1245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.1999.tb00887.x (1999).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Pomilla, C. & Rosenbaum, H. C. Against the current: An inter-oceanic whale migration event. Biol. Lett. 1, 476–479. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2005.0351 (2005).Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Druskat, A., Ghosh, R., Castrillon, J. & Bengtson Nash, S. M. Sex ratios of migrating southern hemisphere humpback whales: A new sentinel parameter of ecosystem health. Mar. Environ. Res. 151, 104749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2019.104749 (2019).CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Atkinson, A. et al. Krill (Euphausia superba) distribution contracts southward during rapid regional warming. Nat. Clim. Chang. 9, 142–147. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0370-z (2019).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Atkinson, A., Siegel, V., Pakhomov, E. & Rothery, P. Long-term decline in krill stock and increase in salps within the Southern Ocean. Nature 432, 100–103. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02996 (2004).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Flores, H. et al. Impact of climate change on Antarctic krill. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 458, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09831 (2012).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Andrews-Goff, V. et al. Humpback whale migrations to Antarctic summer foraging grounds through the southwest Pacific Ocean. Sci. Rep. 8, 12333. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30748-4 (2018).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Garrigue, C., Clapham, P. J., Geyer, Y., Kennedy, A. S. & Zerbini, A. N. Satellite tracking reveals novel migratory patterns and the importance of seamounts for endangered South Pacific humpback whales. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2, 150489. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150489 (2015).ADS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Riekkola, L., Andrews-Goff, V., Friedlaender, A., Constantine, R. & Zerbini, A. N. Environmental drivers of humpback whale foraging behavior in the remote Southern Ocean. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 517, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2019.05.008 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Fleming, A. H., Clark, C. T., Calambokidis, J. & Barlow, J. Humpback whale diets respond to variance in ocean climate and ecosystem conditions in the California Current. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 1214–1224. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13171 (2016).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Nash, S. M. B. et al. Signals from the south; humpback whales carry messages of Antarctic sea-ice ecosystem variability. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 1500–1510. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14035 (2018).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Cartwright, R. et al. Fluctuating reproductive rates in Hawaii’s humpback whales, Megaptera novaeangliae, reflect recent climate anomalies in the North Pacific. R. Soc. Open Sci. 6, 181463. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181463 (2019).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Tulloch, V. J. D., Plagányi, É. E., Matear, R., Brown, C. J. & Richardson, A. J. Ecosystem modelling to quantify the impact of historical whaling on Southern Hemisphere baleen whales. Fish Fish. 19, 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12241 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Jonsen, I. D., Flemming, J. M. & Myers, R. A. Robust state–space modeling of animal movement data. Ecology 86, 2874–2880. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-1852 (2005).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Morales, J. M., Haydon, D. T., Frair, J., Holsinger, K. E. & Fryxell, J. M. Extracting more out of relocation data: Building movement models as mixtures of random walks. Ecology 85, 2436–2445. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-0269 (2004).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Patterson, T. A., Thomas, L., Wilcox, C., Ovaskainen, O. & Matthiopoulos, J. State–space models of individual animal movement. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.009 (2008).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Jonsen, I. Joint estimation over multiple individuals improves behavioural state inference from animal movement data. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20625 (2016).Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Mills Flemming, J., Jonsen, I. D., Myers, R. A. & Field, C. A. Hierarchical state-space estimation of leatherback turtle navigation ability. PLoS ONE 5, e14245. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014245 (2010).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Andriolo, A., Kinas, P. G., Engel, M. H., Martins, C. C. A. & Rufino, A. M. Humpback whales within the Brazilian breeding ground: Distribution and population size estimate. Endanger. Species Res. 11, 233–243. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00282 (2010).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ward, E., Zerbini, A. N., Kinas, P. G., Engel, M. H. & Andriolo, A. Estimates of population growth rates of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) in the wintering grounds off the coast of Brazil (Breeding Stock A). J Cetacean Res. Manag. 3, 145–149 (2011).
    Google Scholar 
    Zerbini, A. N. et al. Assessing the recovery of an Antarctic predator from historical exploitation. R. Soc. Open Sci. 6, 190368. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190368 (2019).ADS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Bortolotto, G. A., Danilewicz, D., Hammond, P. S., Thomas, L. & Zerbini, A. N. Whale distribution in a breeding area: Spatial models of habitat use and abundance of western South Atlantic humpback whales. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 585, 213–227. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12393 (2017).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Martins, C. C. A., Andriolo, A., Engel, M. H., Kinas, P. G. & Saito, C. H. Identifying priority areas for humpback whale conservation at Eastern Brazilian Coast. Ocean Coast. Manag. 75, 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.02.006 (2013).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Albertson, G. R. et al. Temporal stability and mixed-stock analyses of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) in the nearshore waters of the Western Antarctic Peninsula. Polar Biol. 41, 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-017-2193-1 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Engel, M. & Martin, A. Feeding grounds of the western South Atlantic humpback whale population. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 25, 964–969 (2009).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Engel, M. H. et al. Mitochondrial DNA diversity of the Southwestern Atlantic humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) breeding area off Brazil, and the potential connections to Antarctic feeding areas. Conserv. Genet. 5, 1253–1262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-007-9453-5 (2008).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Stevick, P., De Godoy, L. P., McOsker, M., Engel, M. & Allen, J. A note on the movement of a humpback whale from Abrolhos Bank, Brazil to South Georgia. J. Cetac. Res. Manag. 8, 297 (2006).
    Google Scholar 
    Zerbini, A. N. et al. Migration and summer destinations of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) in the western South Atlantic Ocean. J. Cetacean Res. Manag. 3, 113–8 (2011).
    Google Scholar 
    Zerbini, A. N. et al. Satellite-monitored movements of humpback whales Megaptera novaeangliae in the Southwest Atlantic Ocean. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 313, 295–304. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps313295 (2006).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    de Castro, F. R. et al. Are marine protected areas and priority areas for conservation representative of humpback whale breeding habitats in the western South Atlantic?. Biol. Conserv. 179, 106–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.09.013 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Heide-Jørgensen, M. P., Kleivane, L., OIen, N., Laidre, K. L. & Jensen, M. V. A new technique for deploying Sa℡lite transmitters on baleen whales: Tracking a blue whale (balaenoptera Musculus) in the North Atlantic. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 17, 949–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2001.tb01309.x (2011).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Heide-Jørgensen, M. P. et al. From greenland to Canada in ten days: Tracks of bowhead whales, Balaena mysticetus, across Baffin Bay. Arctic 56, 21–31 (2003).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Heide-Jørgensen, M. P., Laidre, K. L., Jensen, M. V., Dueck, L. & Postma, L. D. Dissolving stock discreteness with Sa℡lite tracking: Bowhead whales in Baffin Bay. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 22, 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2006.00004.x (2006).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Zerbini, A. N., Fernandez, A. A., Andriolo, A., Clapham, P. J., Crespo, E., Gonzalez, R., et al. Satellite tracking of southern right whales (Eubalaena australis) from Golfo San Matias, Rio Negro Province, Argentina. Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission SC67b, Bled, Slovenia (2018).Chittleborough, R. G. Dynamics of two populations of the humpback whale, Megaptera novaeangliae (Borowski). Mar. Freshwater Res. 16, 33–128. https://doi.org/10.1071/mf9650033 (1965).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Freitas, C., Lydersen, C., Fedak, M. A. & Kovacs, K. M. A simple new algorithm to filter marine mammal Argos locations. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 24, 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2007.00180.x (2008).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lambertsen, R. H. A biopsy system for large whales and its use for cytogenetics. J. Mamm. 68, 443–445. https://doi.org/10.2307/1381495 (1987).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Mendelssohn, R. rerddapXtracto: Extracts Environmental Data from “ERDDAP” Web Services. (2020).Chin, T. M., Milliff, R. F. & Large, W. G. Basin-scale, high-wavenumber sea surface wind fields from a multiresolution analysis of scatterometer data. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. 15, 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1998)015%3c0741:BSHWSS%3e2.0.CO;2 (1998).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Orsi, A. H., Whitworth, T. & Nowlin, W. D. On the meridional extent and fronts of the antarctic circumpolar current. Deep Sea Res. Part I 42, 641–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0637(95)00021-W (1995).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Johnson, D. S., London, J. M., Lea, M.-A. & Durban, J. W. Continuous-time correlated random walk model for animal telemetry data. Ecology 89, 1208–1215. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1032.1 (2008).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Bedriñana-Romano, L. et al. Defining priority areas for blue whale conservation and investigating overlap with vessel traffic in Chilean Patagonia, using a fast-fitting movement model. Sci. Rep. 11, 2709. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82220-5 (2021).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    McClintock, B. T., London, J. M., Cameron, M. F. & Boveng, P. L. Modelling animal movement using the Argos satellite telemetry location error ellipse. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 266–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12311 (2015).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Akaike, H. Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principal. International Symposium on Information Theory (Akademiai Kaiado, 1973).MATH 

    Google Scholar 
    Auger-Méthé, M. et al. Spatiotemporal modelling of marine movement data using Template Model Builder (TMB). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 565, 237–249. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12019 (2017).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Jonsen, I. D. et al. Movement responses to environment: Fast inference of variation among southern elephant seals with a mixed effects model. Ecology 100, e02566. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2566 (2019).CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Kristensen, K., Nielsen, A., Berg, C. W., Skaug, H. & Bell, B. TMB: Automatic differentiation and laplace approximation. J. Stat. Softw. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v070.i05 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Marcondes, M. C. C. et al. The Southern Ocean Exchange: Porous boundaries between humpback whale breeding populations in southern polar waters. Sci. Rep. 11, 23618. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-02612-5 (2021).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Derville, S., Torres, L. G., Zerbini, A. N., Oremus, M. & Garrigue, C. Horizontal and vertical movements of humpback whales inform the use of critical pelagic habitats in the western South Pacific. Sci. Rep. 10, 4871. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61771-z (2020).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Noad, M. J. & Cato, D. H. Swimming speeds of singing and non-singing humpback whales during migration. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 23, 481–495. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2007.02414.x (2007).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Gabriele, C. M. et al. Estimating the mortality rate of humpback whale calves in the central North Pacific Ocean. Can. J. Zool. 79, 589–600. https://doi.org/10.1139/z01-014 (2001).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Korb, R. E., Whitehouse, M. J., Atkinson, A. & Thorpe, S. E. Magnitude and maintenance of the phytoplankton bloom at South Georgia: A naturally iron-replete environment. Mar. Ecol. Progress Ser. 368, 75–91 (2008).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Korb, R. E., Whitehouse, M. J. & Ward, P. SeaWiFS in the southern ocean: Spatial and temporal variability in phytoplankton biomass around South Georgia. Deep Sea Res. Part II 51, 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2003.04.002 (2004).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Atkinson, A. et al. Oceanic circumpolar habitats of Antarctic krill. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 362, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07498 (2008).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Murphy, E. J. et al. Southern antarctic circumpolar current front to the northeast of South Georgia: Horizontal advection of krill and its role in the ecosystem. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JC001522 (2004).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Schmidt, K., Atkinson, A., Pond, D. W. & Ireland, L. C. Feeding and overwintering of Antarctic krill across its major habitats: The role of sea ice cover, water depth, and phytoplankton abundance. Limnol. Oceanogr. 59, 17–36. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2014.59.1.0017 (2014).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Trathan, P. N. et al. Oceanographic variability and changes in Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) abundance at South Georgia. Fish. Oceanogr. 12, 569–583. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2419.2003.00268.x (2003).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Venables, H. J. & Meredith, M. P. Theory and observations of Ekman flux in the chlorophyll distribution downstream of South Georgia. Geophys. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL041371 (2009).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Krafft, B. A. et al. Distribution and demography of Antarctic krill in the Southeast Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean during the austral summer 2008. Polar Biol. 33, 957–968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-010-0774-3 (2010).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Murphy, E. J. et al. Spatial and temporal operation of the Scotia Sea ecosystem: A review of large-scale links in a krill centred food web. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 362, 113–48. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.1957 (2007).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Thorpe, S. E., Murphy, E. J. & Watkins, J. L. Circumpolar connections between Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba Dana) populations: Investigating the roles of ocean and sea ice transport. Deep Sea Res. Part I 54, 792–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2007.01.008 (2007).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Mori, M. et al. Modelling dispersal of juvenile krill released from the Antarctic ice edge: Ecosystem implications of ocean movement. J. Mar. Syst. 189, 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2018.09.005 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kohlbach, D. et al. Ice algae-produced carbon is critical for overwintering of antarctic krill Euphausia superba. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00310 (2017).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Meyer, B. et al. The winter pack-ice zone provides a sheltered but food-poor habitat for larval Antarctic krill. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1853–1861. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0368-3 (2017).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Meyer, B. et al. Physiology, growth, and development of larval krill Euphausia superba in autumn and winter in the Lazarev Sea, Antarctica. Limnol. Oceanogr. 54, 1595–1614. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2009.54.5.1595 (2009).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lancelot, C. et al. Spatial distribution of the iron supply to phytoplankton in the Southern Ocean: A model study. Biogeosciences 6, 2861–2878. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-2861-2009 (2009).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Brierley, A. S. et al. Antarctic krill under Sea Ice: Elevated abundance in a narrow band just south of Ice Edge. Science 295, 1890–1892. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1068574 (2002).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Schmidt, K., Atkinson, A., Venables, H. J. & Pond, D. W. Early spawning of Antarctic krill in the Scotia Sea is fuelled by “superfluous” feeding on non-ice associated phytoplankton blooms. Deep Sea Res. Part II 59–60, 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2011.05.002 (2012).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Walsh, J., Reiss, C. S. & Watters, G. M. Flexibility in Antarctic krill Euphausia superba decouples diet and recruitment from overwinter sea-ice conditions in the northern Antarctic Peninsula. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 642, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps13325 (2020).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Saba, G. K. et al. Winter and spring controls on the summer food web of the coastal West Antarctic Peninsula. Nat. Commun. 5, 4318. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5318 (2014).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Friedlaender, A. S. et al. Whale distribution in relation to prey abundance and oceanographic processes in shelf waters of the Western Antarctic Peninsula. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 317, 297–310. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps317297 (2006).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Murase, H., Matsuoka, K., Ichii, T. & Nishiwaki, S. Relationship between the distribution of euphausiids and baleen whales in the Antarctic (35° E–145° W). Polar Biol 25, 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003000100321 (2002).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Reisinger, R. R. et al. Combining regional habitat selection models for large-scale prediction: Circumpolar habitat selection of Southern Ocean humpback whales. Remote Sens. 13, 2074. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13112074 (2021).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Thiele, D. et al. Seasonal variability in whale encounters in the Western Antarctic Peninsula. Deep Sea Res. Part II 51, 2311–2325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2004.07.007 (2004).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Whitehouse, M. J. et al. Rapid warming of the ocean around South Georgia, Southern Ocean, during the 20th century: Forcings, characteristics and implications for lower trophic levels. Deep Sea Res. Part I 55, 1218–1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2008.06.002 (2008).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Dawson, H. R. S., Strutton, P. G. & Gaube, P. The unusual surface chlorophyll signatures of southern Ocean Eddies. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 123, 6053–6069. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JC013628 (2018).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kahru, M., Mitchell, B. G., Gille, S. T., Hewes, C. D. & Holm-Hansen, O. Eddies enhance biological production in the weddell-scotia confluence of the Southern Ocean. Geophys. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030430 (2007).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Fach, B. A., Hofmann, E. E. & Murphy, E. J. Modeling studies of antarctic krill Euphausia superba survival during transport across the Scotia Sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 231, 187–203. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps231187 (2002).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ichii, T., Katayama, K., Obitsu, N., Ishii, H. & Naganobu, M. Occurrence of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) concentrations in the vicinity of the South Shetland Islands: Relationship to environmental parameters. Deep Sea Res. Part I 45, 1235–1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0637(98)00011-9 (1998).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Witek, Z., Kalinowski, J. & Grelowski, A. Formation of Antarctic Krill Concentrations in Relation to Hydrodynamic Processes and Social Behaviour. In Antarctic Ocean and Resources Variability (ed. Sahrhage, D.) 237–44 (Springer, 1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73724-4_21.Chapter 

    Google Scholar 
    Bost, C. A. et al. The importance of oceanographic fronts to marine birds and mammals of the southern oceans. J. Mar. Syst. 78, 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2008.11.022 (2009).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Carranza, M. M. & Gille, S. T. Southern Ocean wind-driven entrainment enhances satellite chlorophyll-a through the summer. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 120, 304–323. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JC010203 (2015).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Luis, A. J. & Pandey, P. C. Seasonal variability of QSCAT-derived wind stress over the Southern Ocean. Geophys. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL019355 (2004).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Fiechter, J. & Moore, A. M. Interannual spring bloom variability and Ekman pumping in the coastal Gulf of Alaska. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JC005140 (2009).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Cimino, M. A. et al. Essential krill species habitat resolved by seasonal upwelling and ocean circulation models within the large marine ecosystem of the California Current System. Ecography 43, 1536–1549. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.05204 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Meehl, G. A. et al. Sustained ocean changes contributed to sudden Antarctic sea ice retreat in late 2016. Nat. Commun. 10, 14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07865-9 (2019).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Parkinson, C. L. A 40-y record reveals gradual Antarctic sea ice increases followed by decreases at rates far exceeding the rates seen in the Arctic. PNAS 116, 14414–14423. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1906556116 (2019).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Siegel, V. Krill stocks in high latitudes of the Antarctic Lazarev Sea: seasonal and interannual variation in distribution, abundance and demography. Polar Biol. 35, 1151–1177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-012-1162-y (2012).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Francis, D., Eayrs, C., Cuesta, J. & Holland, D. Polar cyclones at the origin of the reoccurrence of the maud rise polynya in austral winter 2017. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 124, 5251–5267. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030618 (2019).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Jena, B., Ravichandran, M. & Turner, J. Recent reoccurrence of large open-ocean polynya on the maud rise seamount. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 4320–4329. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081482 (2019).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Brandt, A. et al. Maud rise–a snapshot through the water column. Deep Sea Res. Part II 58, 1962–1982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2011.01.008 (2011).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Plötz, J., Weidel, H. & Bersch, M. Winter aggregations of marine mammals and birds in the north-eastern Weddell Sea pack ice. Polar Biol 11, 305–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00239022 (1991).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hazen, E. L. et al. Predicted habitat shifts of Pacific top predators in a changing climate. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 234–238. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1686 (2013).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Moore, S. E. & Huntington, H. P. Arctic marine mammals and climate change: Impacts and resilience. Ecol. Appl. 18, S157–S165. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-0571.1 (2008).Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar  More

  • in

    Succession comprises a sequence of threshold-induced community assembly processes towards multidiversity

    Chang, C. & HilleRisLambers, J. Integrating succession and community assembly perspectives. F1000Research 5, 1–10 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Suding, K. N. & Hobbs, R. J. Threshold models in restoration and conservation: a developing framework. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 271–279 (2009).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kadowaki, K., Nishijima, S., Kéfi, S., Kameda, K. O. & Sasaki, T. Merging community assembly into the regime-shift approach for informing ecological restoration. Ecol. Indic. 85, 991–998 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J. A., Folke, C. & Walker, B. Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413, 591–596 (2001).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lu, M. & Hedin, L. O. Global plant–symbiont organization and emergence of biogeochemical cycles resolved by evolution-based trait modelling. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 239–250 (2019).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Berdugo, M. et al. Global ecosystem thresholds driven by aridity. Science 367, 787–790 (2020).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Allan, E. et al. Interannual variation in land-use intensity enhances grassland multidiversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 308–313 (2014).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Delgado-Baquerizo, M. et al. Multiple elements of soil biodiversity drive ecosystem functions across biomes. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 210–220 (2020).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Felipe-Lucia, M. R. et al. Land-use intensity alters networks between biodiversity, ecosystem functions, and services. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 28140–28149 (2020).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Manning, P. et al. Grassland management intensification weakens the associations among the diversities of multiple plant and animal taxa. Ecology 96, 1492–1501 (2015).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kaufmann, R. Invertebrate succession on an alpine glacier foreland. Ecology 82, 2261–2278 (2001).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Blaalid, R. et al. Changes in the root-associated fungal communities along a primary succession gradient analysed by 454 pyrosequencing. Mol. Ecol. 21, 1897–1908 (2012).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Fenton, N. J. & Bergeron, Y. Stochastic processes dominate during boreal bryophyte community assembly. Ecology 94, 1993–2006 (2013).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Dini-Andreote, F., Stegen, J. C., Van Elsas, J. D. & Salles, J. F. Disentangling mechanisms that mediate the balance between stochastic and deterministic processes in microbial succession. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E1326–E1332 (2015).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Måren, I. E., Kapfer, J., Aarrestad, P. A., Grytnes, J. A. & Vandvik, V. Changing contributions of stochastic and deterministic processes in community assembly over a successional gradient. Ecology 99, 148–157 (2018).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Pulsford, S. A., Lindenmayer, D. B. & Driscoll, D. A. A succession of theories: purging redundancy from disturbance theory. Biol. Rev. 91, 148–167 (2016).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Odum, E. P. The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164, 262–270 (1969).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ohlmann, M. et al. Mapping the imprint of biotic interactions on β-diversity. Ecol. Lett. 21, 1660–1669 (2018).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Chen, C., Chen, H. Y. H., Chen, X. & Huang, Z. Meta-analysis shows positive effects of plant diversity on microbial biomass and respiration. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–10 (2019).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Howard, M. M., Kao-Kniffin, J. & Kessler, A. Shifts in plant–microbe interactions over community succession and their effects on plant resistance to herbivores. N. Phytol. 226, 1144–1157 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lepš, J., Rejmánek, M., Leps, J. & Rejmanek, M. Convergence or divergence: what should we expect from vegetation succession? Oikos 62, 261–264 (1991).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Fukami, T., Bezemer, T. M., Mortimer, S. R. & Van Der Putten, W. H. Species divergence and trait convergence in experimental plant community assembly. Ecol. Lett. 8, 1283–1290 (2005).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Brown, S. P. & Jumpponen, A. Contrasting primary successional trajectories of fungi and bacteria in retreating glacier soils. Mol. Ecol. 23, 481–497 (2014).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Castle, S. C. et al. Biogeochemical drivers of microbial community convergence across actively retreating glaciers. Soil Biol. Biochem. 101, 74–84 (2016).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Chang, C. C. et al. Testing conceptual models of early plant succession across a disturbance gradient. J. Ecol. 107, 517–530 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Junker, R. R. et al. Ödenwinkel: an Alpine platform for observational and experimental research on the emergence of multidiversity and ecosystem complexity. Web Ecol. 20, 95–106 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Groffman, P. M. et al. Ecological thresholds: the key to successful environmental management or an important concept with no practical application? Ecosystems 9, 1–13 (2006).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lindeløv, J. K. mcp: an R package for regression With multiple change points. J. Stat. Softw. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/fzqxv (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ohler, L. M., Lechleitner, M. & Junker, R. R. Microclimatic effects on alpine plant communities and flower-visitor interactions. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–9 (2020).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Cavieres, L. A. et al. Facilitative plant interactions and climate simultaneously drive alpine plant diversity. Ecol. Lett. 17, 193–202 (2014).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lowe, W. H. & McPeek, M. A. Is dispersal neutral? Trends Ecol. Evol. 29, 444–450 (2014).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Legendre, P., Borcard, D. & Peres-Neto, P. R. Analyzing beta diversity: partitioning the spatial variation of community composition data. Ecol. Monogr. 75, 435–450 (2005).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ranta, E. et al. Detecting compensatory dynamics in competitive communities under environmental forcing. Oikos 117, 1907–1911 (2008).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Houlahan, J. E. et al. The utility of covariances: a response to Ranta et al. Oikos 117, 1912–1913 (2008).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Tscherko, D., Rustemeier, J., Richter, A., Wanek, W. & Kandeler, E. Functional diversity of the soil microflora in primary succession across two glacier forelands in the Central Alps. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 54, 685–696 (2003).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Raffl, C., Mallaun, M., Mayer, R. & Erschbamer, B. Vegetation succession pattern and diversity changes in a Glacier Valley, Central Alps, Austria. Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res. 38, 421–428 (2006).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Schütte, U. M. E. et al. Bacterial diversity in a glacier foreland of the high Arctic. Mol. Ecol. 19, 54–66 (2010).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Dong, K. et al. Soil fungal community development in a high Arctic glacier foreland follows a directional replacement model, with a mid-successional diversity maximum. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–9 (2016).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Houlahan, J. E. et al. Compensatory dynamics are rare in natural ecological communities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 3273–3277 (2007).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Vellend, M. Effects of diversity on diversity: consequences of competition and facilitation. Oikos 117, 1075–1085 (2008).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Rottstock, T., Joshi, J., Kummer, V. & Fischer, M. Higher plant diversity promotes higher diversity of fungal pathogens, while it decreases pathogen infection per plant. Ecology 95, 1907–1917 (2014).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Baudy, P. et al. Fungal–fungal and fungal–bacterial interactions in aquatic decomposer communities: bacteria promote fungal diversity. Ecology 102, 1–16 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bardgett, R. D. et al. Heterotrophic microbial communities use ancient carbon following glacial retreat. Biol. Lett. 3, 487–490 (2007).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bokhorst, S. & Wardle, D. A. Snow fungi as a food source for micro-arthropods. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 60, 77–80 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hågvar, S. et al. Ecosystem birth near melting glaciers: a review on the pioneer role of ground-dwelling arthropods. Insects 11, 1–35 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Wardle, D. A. The influence of biotic interactions on soil biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 9, 870–886 (2006).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Sabatini, M. A. & Innocenti, G. Functional relationships between Collembola and plant pathogenic fungi of agricultural soils. Pedobiologia (Jena.) 44, 467–475 (2000).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Klironomos, J. N. & Kendrick, W. B. Palatability of microfungi to soil arthropods in relation to the functioning of arbuscular mycorrhizae. Biol. Fertil. Soils 21, 43–52 (1996).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Klironomos, J. N., Widden, P. & Deslandes, I. Feeding preferences of the collembolan Folsomia candida in relation to microfungal successions on decaying litter. Soil Biol. Biochem. 24, 685–692 (1992).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Connell, J. H. & Slatyer, R. O. Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. Am. Nat. 111, 1119–1144 (1977).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Arróniz-Crespo, M. et al. Bryophyte-cyanobacteria associations during primary succession in recently deglaciated areas of Tierra del Fuego (Chile). PLoS One 9, 15–17 (2014).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Jean, M. et al. Experimental assessment of tree canopy and leaf litter controls on the microbiome and nitrogen fixation rates of two boreal mosses. N. Phytol. 227, 1335–1349 (2020).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Jean, M., Alexander, H. D., Mack, M. C. & Johnstone, J. F. Patterns of bryophyte succession in a 160-year chronosequence in deciduous and coniferous forests of boreal Alaska. Can. J. Res. 47, 1021–1032 (2017).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Blanchet, F. G., Cazelles, K. & Gravel, D. Co‐occurrence is not evidence of ecological interactions. Ecol. Lett. 23, 1050–1063 (2020).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Fukami, T. & Nakajima, M. Complex plant-soil interactions enhance plant species diversity by delaying community convergence. J. Ecol. 101, 316–324 (2013).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Martínez-García, L. B., Richardson, S. J., Tylianakis, J. M., Peltzer, D. A. & Dickie, I. A. Host identity is a dominant driver of mycorrhizal fungal community composition during ecosystem development. N. Phytol. 205, 1565–1576 (2015).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Paulson, J. metagenomeSeq: statistical analysis for sparse high-throughput sequencing. Bioconductor.Jp https://github.com/nosson/metagenomeSeq/ (2014).Francesco Ficetola, G. & Denoël, M. Ecological thresholds: an assessment of methods to identify abrupt changes in species-habitat relationships. Ecography 32, 1075–1084 (2009).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Aho, K., Derryberry, D. & Peterson, T. Model selection for ecologists: the worldviews of AIC and BIC. Ecology 95, 631–636 (2014).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Conn, P. B., Johnson, D. S., Williams, P. J., Melin, S. R. & Hooten, M. B. A guide to Bayesian model checking for ecologists. Ecol. Monogr. 88, 526–542 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hanusch, M., Ortiz, E. M., Patiño, J. & Schaefer, H. Biogeography and integrative taxonomy of epipterygium (Mniaceae, Bryophyta). Taxon 69, 1150–1171 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Oksanen, J. et al. vegan: community ecology package. Github https://github.com/vegandevs/vegan (2019).Baker, S. C. & Barmuta, L. A. Evaluating spatial autocorrelation and depletion in pitfall-trap studies of environmental gradients. J. Insect Conserv. 10, 269–276 (2006).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Pickett, S. T. A. in Long-Term Studies in Ecology (ed. Likens, G. E.) 110–135 (Springer, 1989).Bivand, R. S. & Wong, D. W. S. Comparing implementations of global and local indicators of spatial association. Test 27, 716–748 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hanusch, M., He, X., Ruiz-Hernández, V. & Junker, R. R. Successional generation of functional multidiversity and ecosystem complexity—a dataset from the Ödenwinkel research platform. Mendeley Data. https://doi.org/10.17632/xkv89tbftc.1 (2022).Hanusch, M., He, X., Ruiz-Hernández, V. & Junker, R. R. Supporting dataset and code: succession comprises a sequence of threshold-induced community assembly processes towards multidiversity. Mendeley Data. https://doi.org/10.17632/dr6d3728xb.1 (2022). More

  • in

    Microbial community functioning during plant litter decomposition

    Kalbitz, K. & Kaiser, K. Contribution of dissolved organic matter to carbon storage in forest mineral soils. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 171, 52–60 (2008).CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Michalzik, B. et al. Modelling the production and transport of dissolved organic carbon in forest soils. Biogeochemistry 66, 241–264 (2003).CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Sokol, N. W., Sanderman, J. & Bradford, M. A. Pathways of mineral-associated soil organic matter formation: Integrating the role of plant carbon source, chemistry, and point of entry. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 12–24 (2019).ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Roth, V.-N. et al. Persistence of dissolved organic matter explained by molecular changes during its passage through soil. Nat. Geosci. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0417-4 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Jones, O. A. H. et al. Metabolomics and its use in ecology: Metabolomics in ecology. Austral Ecol. 38, 713–720 (2013).
    Google Scholar 
    Gołębiewski, M. et al. Rapid microbial community changes during initial stages of pine litter decomposition. Microb. Ecol. 77, 56–75 (2019).PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Chomel, M. et al. Plant secondary metabolites: A key driver of litter decomposition and soil nutrient cycling. J. Ecol. 104, 1527–1541 (2016).
    Google Scholar 
    Purahong, W., Wubet, T., Krüger, D. & Buscot, F. Molecular evidence strongly supports deadwood-inhabiting fungi exhibiting unexpected tree species preferences in temperate forests. ISME J. 12, 289–295 (2018).
    Google Scholar 
    Djukic, I. et al. Early stage litter decomposition across biomes. Sci. Total Environ. 628–629, 1369–1394 (2018).ADS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Rousk, J. et al. Soil bacterial and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil. ISME J. 4, 1340–1351 (2010).PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Wu, Y., Zeng, J., Zhu, Q., Zhang, Z. & Lin, X. pH is the primary determinant of the bacterial community structure in agricultural soils impacted by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon pollution. Sci. Rep. 7, 40093 (2017).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Griffiths, R. I. et al. The bacterial biogeography of British soils: Mapping soil bacteria. Environ. Microbiol. 13, 1642–1654 (2011).PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Bahram, M. et al. Structure and function of the global topsoil microbiome. Nature 560, 233–237 (2018).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Büttner, H. et al. Bacterial endosymbionts protect beneficial soil fungus from nematode attack. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2110669118 (2021).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Lucas, J. M., Gora, E., Salzberg, A. & Kaspari, M. Antibiotics as chemical warfare across multiple taxonomic domains and trophic levels in brown food webs. Proc. R. Soc. B 286, 20191536 (2019).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Goldbeck, O. et al. Establishing recombinant production of pediocin PA-1 in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Metab. Eng. 68, 34–45 (2021).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Wu, X. et al. Microbial interactions with dissolved organic matter drive carbon dynamics and community succession. Front. Microbiol. 9, 1234 (2018).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    D’Andrilli, J., Junker, J. R., Smith, H. J., Scholl, E. A. & Foreman, C. M. DOM composition alters ecosystem function during microbial processing of isolated sources. Biogeochemistry 142, 281–298 (2019).
    Google Scholar 
    Benk, S. A. et al. Fueling diversity in the subsurface: Composition and age of dissolved organic matter in the critical zone. Front. Earth Sci. 7, 296 (2019).ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Marschner, P., Umar, S. & Baumann, K. The microbial community composition changes rapidly in the early stages of decomposition of wheat residue. Soil Biol. Biochem. 43, 445–451 (2011).CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Badri, D. V., Zolla, G., Bakker, M. G., Manter, D. K. & Vivanco, J. M. Potential impact of soil microbiomes on the leaf metabolome and on herbivore feeding behavior. New Phytol. 198, 264–273 (2013).CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Kohlhepp, B. et al. Pedological and hydrogeological setting and subsurface flow structure of the carbonate-rock CZE Hainich in western Thuringia, Germany. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2016-374 (2016).Dittmar, T., Koch, B. P., Hertkorn, N. & Kattner, G. A simple and efficient method for the solid-phase extraction of dissolved organic matter (SPE-DOM) from seawater. Limnol. Oceanogr. 6, 230–235 (2008).CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Simon, C., Roth, V.-N., Dittmar, T. & Gleixner, G. Molecular signals of heterogeneous terrestrial environments identified in dissolved organic matter: A comparative analysis of orbitrap and ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometers. Front. Earth Sci. 6, 138 (2018).ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 27–30 (2000).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Herlemann, D. P. et al. Transitions in bacterial communities along the 2000 km salinity gradient of the Baltic Sea. ISME J. 5, 1571–1579 (2011).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Kumar, S. et al. Thiosulfate- and hydrogen-driven autotrophic denitrification by a microbial consortium enriched from groundwater of an oligotrophic limestone aquifer. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 94, 10 (2018).
    Google Scholar 
    Kozich, J. J., Westcott, S. L., Baxter, N. T., Highlander, S. K. & Schloss, P. D. Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the miseq illumina sequencing platform. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79, 5112–5120 (2013).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Taubert, M. et al. Tracking active groundwater microbes with D 2 O labelling to understand their ecosystem function: Tracking active groundwater microbes. Environ. Microbiol. 20, 369–384 (2018).CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Schloss, P. D. et al. Introducing mothur: Open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 7537–7541 (2009).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590-596 (2013).CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Lohmann, P. et al. Function is what counts: How microbial community complexity affects species, proteome and pathway coverage in metaproteomics. Expert Rev. Proteomics 17, 163–173 (2020).CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Starke, R. et al. Candidate brocadiales dominates C, N and S cycling in anoxic groundwater of a pristine limestone-fracture aquifer. J. Proteomics 152, 153–160 (2017).CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019).Oksanen, J. et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package (Springer, 2018).
    Google Scholar 
    Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer, 2016).MATH 

    Google Scholar 
    Zoppi, J., Guillaume, J.-F., Neunlist, M. & Chaffron, S. MiBiOmics: an interactive web application for multi-omics data exploration and integration. BMC Bioinform. 22, 6 (2021).
    Google Scholar 
    Adler, D. & Murdoch, D. rgl: 3D Visualization Using OpenGL (Springer, 2019).
    Google Scholar 
    Aßhauer, K. P., Wemheuer, B., Daniel, R. & Meinicke, P. Tax4Fun: Predicting functional profiles from metagenomic 16S rRNA data: Fig. 1. Bioinformatics 31, 2882–2884 (2015).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Fath, M. J. & Kolter, R. ABC transporters: Bacterial exporters. Microbiol. Rev. 57, 995 (1993).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Waters, C. M. & Bassler, B. L. Quorum sensing: Cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 21, 319–346 (2005).CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Deutscher, J., Francke, C. & Postma, P. W. How phosphotransferase system-related protein phosphorylation regulates carbohydrate metabolism in bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 70, 939–1031 (2006).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Vogt, T. Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. Mol. Plant 3, 2–20 (2010).CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Polturak, G. et al. Engineered gray mold resistance, antioxidant capacity, and pigmentation in betalain-producing crops and ornamentals. PNAS 114, 9062–9067 (2017).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Mille-Lindblom, C. & Tranvik, L. J. Antagonism between bacteria and fungi on decomposing aquatic plant litter. Microb. Ecol. 45, 173–182 (2003).CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Chopra, I. & Roberts, M. Tetracycline antibiotics: Mode of action, applications, molecular biology, and epidemiology of bacterial resistance. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 65, 232–260 (2001).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Schiessl, K. T. et al. Phenazine production promotes antibiotic tolerance and metabolic heterogeneity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Nat. Commun. 10, 762 (2019).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Reading, C. & Cole, M. Clavulanic acid: A beta-lactamase-inhiting beta-lactam from Streptomyces clavuligerus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 11, 852–857 (1977).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Šnajdr, J. et al. Transformation of Quercus petraea litter: Successive changes in litter chemistry are reflected in differential enzyme activity and changes in the microbial community composition: Transformation of Quercus petraea litter. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 75, 291–303 (2011).PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Voříšková, J. & Baldrian, P. Fungal community on decomposing leaf litter undergoes rapid successional changes. ISME J. 7, 477–486 (2013).PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Buresova, A. et al. Succession of microbial decomposers is determined by litter type, but site conditions drive decomposition rates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 85, e01760-19 (2019).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Hopwood, D. A. Streptomyces in Nature and Medicine: The Antibiotic Makers (Oxford University Press, 2007).
    Google Scholar 
    Anaya-López, J. L., López-Meza, J. E. & Ochoa-Zarzosa, A. Bacterial resistance to cationic antimicrobial peptides. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 39, 180–195 (2013).PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Lindner, K. R., Bonner, D. P. & Koster, W. H. Monobactams. Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology (Wiley, 2000). https://doi.org/10.1002/0471238961.1315141512091404.a01.Book 

    Google Scholar 
    Eustáquio, A. S. et al. Novobiocin biosynthesis: Inactivation of the putative regulatory gene novE and heterologous expression of genes involved in aminocoumarin ring formation. Arch. Microbiol. 180, 25–32 (2003).PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Banerjee, S. et al. Network analysis reveals functional redundancy and keystone taxa amongst bacterial and fungal communities during organic matter decomposition in an arable soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 97, 188–198 (2016).CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Taubert, M., Stähly, J., Kolb, S. & Küsel, K. Divergent microbial communities in groundwater and overlying soils exhibit functional redundancy for plant-polysaccharide degradation. PLoS ONE 14, e0212937 (2019).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Wallenstein, M. D., Hess, A. M., Lewis, M. R., Steltzer, H. & Ayres, E. Decomposition of aspen leaf litter results in unique metabolomes when decomposed under different tree species. Soil Biol. Biochem. 42, 484–490 (2010).CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Backlund, I. et al. Extractive profiles of different lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) fractions grown under a direct seeding-based silvicultural regime. Ind. Crops Prod. 58, 220–229 (2014).CAS 

    Google Scholar  More

  • in

    Competition contributes to both warm and cool range edges

    Study area and speciesWe selected three sites across an elevation gradient in the western Swiss Alps (Bex, Canton de Vaud), situated at 890, 1400 and 1900 m above sea level (hereafter, the low, middle, and high sites; Supplementary Fig. 1). The three sites span a temperature gradient ranging from 2.5 to 9.6 °C (mean annual temperature from 1981 to 201544; Supplementary Table 1). With increasing elevation, soil moisture increased, and the growing season length was shortened by a longer snow-covered period, as measured from July 2019 to June 2020 (Supplementary Fig. 2). All sites were established on south-facing and shallow slopes in pasture and fenced to exclude livestock.We included 14 herbaceous focal species that frequently occur in this region, half of which originated from low elevation (hereafter lowland species) and half from high elevation (highland species, Supplementary Table 2). Lowland species had upper range limits (defined as the 90th percentile of their elevation distribution) below 1500 m (with the exception of Plantago lanceolata, with a 90th percentile of 1657 m), while highland species had lower range limits (defined as the 10th percentile of their elevation distribution) above 1500 m, based on a dataset of 550 vegetation plots from the study area45. These species consisted of 12 perennial and two biennial species, which are the dominant life histories in this region. Species were selected to include a range of functional types (7 forbs, 4 grasses, 3 legumes) and functional traits (based on plant height, specific leaf area and seed mass). Seeds were obtained from regional suppliers given the large quantities that were needed to establish the experiment (Supplementary Table 2).Field competition experimentWe designed a field experiment to study the effects of elevation on population growth rates and competitive outcomes by growing focal plants either without competition or competing with a background monoculture of the same or another species (Supplementary Fig. 1). In spring 2017, we established 18 plots (1.6 × 1 m, 0.2 m deep) at each of the three field sites, lined with wire mesh to exclude rodents (except at the high site) and with weed-suppressing fabric on the sides to prevent roots growing in from outside. To control for soil effects, the beds were then filled with a silt loam soil that originated from a nutrient-poor meadow at 1000 m a.s.l. within the study area. Four plots were maintained as bare soil plots (non-competition plots). The other 14 plots received 9 g m−2 of viable seeds of each species, which allowed the establishment of a monoculture of relatively high density (competition plots). We then periodically weeded the plots to maintain monocultures over the course of the experiment. All species except for two (Arnica montana and Daucus carota) successfully established monocultures, of which 11 species (including six lowland species and five highland species) were fully established by autumn 2017. We then resowed the other plots that failed to establish, which subsequently established either in spring 2018 (Poa trivialis and Poa alpina in the low site and Bromus erectus in the middle site) or autumn 2018 (Aster alpinus, P. trivialis and P. alpina in the middle site and Sesleria caerulea in the low and high sites). Species that failed to establish were included only as focal species for the calculation of invasion population growth rates (i.e. the density was low for A. montana and D. carota in all sites, Trifolium badium in the low site and S. caerulea in the middle site, probably due to high mortality rates caused by drought).We first raised focal seedlings of each species in a greenhouse for six weeks on standard compost and then transplanted them into the field (Supplementary Fig. 1). To test for responses to elevation in the absence of competition, focal plants were transplanted into non-competition plots at 25 cm apart in autumn 2017 (n = 9 per species and site). To test for effects of competition, we transplanted focal individuals into established plots with 14 cm spacing (n = 9 per focal species, competitor and site). Focal plants that died within two weeks of transplanting were replaced (ca. 5%), assuming mortality was caused by transplant shock. Note that we transplanted focal plants into plots only when the background monocultures were fully established. In 2018 and 2019, we replaced dead focal individuals in spring and autumn (ca. 10% each time). The full design included 56 unique interspecific pairs in each site accounting for 61% of all 14 × 13 = 91 possible pairwise combinations. These pairs were selected to evenly sample differences in functional trait space based on a pilot analysis using plant height, specific leaf area and seed mass obtained from the LEDA dataset46. Each focal species competed against four lowland and four highland species, yielding 14 lowland–lowland and highland–highland pairs and 28 lowland–highland pairs. Across all three sites, this design resulted in N = 3780 individuals in total ([56 interspecific pairs × 2 + 14 intraspecific pairs + 14 non-competition] × 9 individuals × 3 sites).Demographic dataWe followed each focal individual between 2017 and 2020 to monitor individual-based demographic performance (i.e. vital rates; Supplementary Fig. 4). Survival was monitored twice a year at the beginning and the end of the growing season. Towards the end of the growing season each year (August–September), we measured all individuals to record plant size, whether they flowered, and to estimate seed production on flowering individuals. To estimate focal plant size, we measured size-related morphological traits on all focal individuals at each census (i.e. the number and/or length of flowering stalks, leaves or ramets, depending on the species) and estimated dry aboveground biomass using regression models fitted using collected plant samples (mean R2 = 0.871; Supplementary Data 1; Supplementary Methods). To estimate seed production, we counted the number and measured the size of fruits on reproductive individuals; we then estimated the number of seeds produced by each individual using regression models fitted using intact fruits of each species collected at the early fruiting stage on background plants (mean R2 = 0.806; Supplementary Data 2; Supplementary Methods). We conducted a separate experiment to estimate the germination and recruitment of each species in each site (Supplementary Methods).Population modellingTo estimate population growth rates (λ), we built integral projection models to incorporate multiple vital rates across the life cycle47 (see Supplementary Table 3 for model structure and parameters). Separate IPMs were built to estimate intrinsic growth rates using plants growing in the absence of competition (in non-competition plots) and invasion growth rates using plants growing within the background monocultures (in competition plots), under the assumption that monocultures were at equilibrium (see Supplementary Fig. 5 for a test of this assumption) and that focal individuals did not interact with each other but only with the background species. We used plant size (i.e. estimated dry aboveground biomass, log scale) as a continuous state variable and fitted linear models to estimate vital rate parameters by combining multiple-year demographic data over three censuses (i.e. 2017–2018, 2018–2019, and 2019–2020; see Supplementary Methods for consideration of more complex models). We modelled the probability of survival, flowering, and seedling establishment using generalized linear models with a binomial error distribution, modelled growth and seed production using general linear models and described the offspring size distribution using Gaussian probability density functions. We modelled seed germination, seedling establishment and the seedling size distribution as size-independent functions, assuming they are unaffected by maternal size (Supplementary Fig. 4; Supplementary Table 3). For each vital rate of each species, we selected the best-fitted vital rate model by comparing all nested models of the full models using the Akaike information criterion corrected for small samples (AICc), which allowed us to avoid overfitting models and to borrow strength across competitor species and sites in cases where full models were outperformed by reduced models (Supplementary Methods; Supplementary Data 3 and 4).We calculated population growth rates (λ) as the dominant eigenvalue of the IPMs, which represents the discrete per-capita growth rate (i.e. ({N}_{t+1}=lambda {N}_{t}))47. To evaluate the uncertainty around λ, we performed parametric bootstraps for size-dependent vital rates (i.e. survival, growth, flowering, and fecundity). Specifically, we resampled the parameters of each vital rate model using multivariate normal distributions based on their means and covariance matrices48. We then fitted all IPMs and estimated λ for each of the 500 bootstrap replicates (Supplementary Data 5).Estimation of niche differences, relative fitness differences, and coexistence outcomesWe quantified niche and relative fitness differences and predicted coexistence outcomes following the method of Carroll et al.49. This method is based on species’ sensitivity to competition defined as the proportional reduction of the population growth rate of a focal species i when invading a population of a competitor species j that is at its single-species equilibrium, and is mathematically equivalent to one minus the response ratio:$${S}_{ij}=1-frac{{{{{{{rm{ln}}}}}}}(lambda_{{ij}})}{{{{{{rm{ln}}}}}}({lambda}_{i})}$$
    (1)
    where λij denotes the invasion growth rate of focal species i and λi is its intrinsic growth rate. The natural logarithm of discrete population growth rates λ estimated from IPMs are equivalent to per-capita growth rate in continuous population growth models50, and this transformation makes sensitivities compatible with the coexistence analysis described below. Sensitivity is greater than 0 for antagonistic interactions, with higher values equating to stronger competition, while facilitative interactions lead to negative sensitivities.For a pair of species, modern coexistence theory predicts that niche differences (ND) promote coexistence by reducing the intensity of interspecific competition experienced by both species. Therefore, a pair of species with a large niche difference should display small mean sensitivities to competition from each other. Consequently, niche differences can be calculated as one minus the geometric mean of the two sensitivities (i.e. niche overlap). In contrast, relative fitness differences (RFD) quantify the degree of asymmetry in species’ competitive abilities. Therefore, a pair of species with a large fitness difference should display large differences in their sensitivities to competition from each other, as quantified as the geometric standard deviation of sensitivities49:$${{{{{rm{ND}}}}}}=1-sqrt{{S}_{{ij}}{S}_{{ji}}}$$
    (2)
    $${{{{{rm{RFD}}}}}}=sqrt{{S}_{{ji}}/{S}_{{ij}}}$$
    (3)
    There are three possible outcomes of competition between a given pair of species: stable coexistence, a priority effect, and competitive exclusion. These can be quantified based on either invasion criteria or the relative magnitude of niche differences versus relative fitness differences15,51. Stable coexistence is only possible when both species are able to invade each other’s equilibrium populations; this condition is met when ND  > 0 and ({{{{{rm{RFD}}}}}} , < , frac{1}{1-{{{{{rm{ND}}}}}}})49, which is equivalent to (frac{1}{{{{{{rm{RFD}}}}}}(1-{{{{{rm{ND}}}}}})} > 1), with greater values indicating more stable coexistence and providing a metric for the strength of coexistence (i.e., coexistence metric26). When neither species can invade when rare, then priority effects occur, meaning that whichever species is initially established within a community has an advantage and excludes the other. This could happen when a species pair has a small niche difference and a small relative fitness difference, that is ND  , frac{1}{1-{{{{{rm{ND}}}}}}}). We quantified competitive outcomes and coexistence metrics for each of the 500 bootstrap replicates of the dataset (Supplementary Data 6).Note that we excluded facilitative interactions that were present in 13% of all pairs because the equations for niche differences and relative fitness differences are not compatible with negative values of sensitivity (Eq. 2 and 3); we did not exclude facilitative interactions for other analyses. We quantified the coexistence determinants of species pairs in cases where either one or both of the species were predicted to be unable to persist in the absence of neighbours (i.e. ln(λintrinsic)  More

  • in

    Effects of the application of different improved materials on reclaimed soil structure and maize yield of Hollow Village in Loess Area

    Effects of the application of different improved materials on properties of reclaimed soilSoil organic matter (SOM) and total nitrogen (TN)After the application of different improved materials, the SOM and TN contents in both 0–0.15 m and 0.15–0.30 m layers of the hollow village reclaimed soil showed an overall increasing trend (Fig. 1). In the 0–0.15 m layer, the organic matter content increased by 9.6%, 79.0%, 90.0%, 61.4%, 120.1%, and 131.7% respectively under TM, TF, TO, TMF, TMO and TFO treatments compared with CK treatment, indicating that different improved materials all played important roles in improving the organic matter content of reclaimed soil (Fig. 1a). The improvement of organic matter content in the 0–0.15 m layer of reclaimed soil by the treatments of different improved materials showed as follows: TFO  > TMO  > TO  > TF  > TMF  > TM  > CK, and TO, TMO and TFO treatments with organic fertilizer addition could significantly improve the organic matter content of the reclaimed soil (P  2 mm water-stable aggregates was increased by 88.1%, 194.5%, 203.7%, 376.2%, and 781.7% respectively under TF, TO, TMF, TMO and TFO compared with CK. The proportion of water-stable macroaggregates under different treatments showed as follows: TFO (35.8%)  > TMO (20.7%)  > TO (16.9%)  > TMF (16.3%)  > TF (12.3%)  > TM (10.1%)  > CK (9.0%), and the water-stable macroaggregates were increased by 328.2%, 130.0%, 87.8%, 81.1%, 36.7%, and 12.2% respectively compared with CK, with the maximum increase of 328.2%. In general, all six different amendment material treatments increased the proportion of water-stable macroaggregates in reclaimed soil and promoted the aggregation and cementation of water-stable microaggregates ( 0.25 mm). And the TFO showed the best effect on the increase of water-stable macroaggregates, followed by TMO, TO, and TMF, while TF and TM treatments showed little effect.Figure 2Percentage (%) of soil water-stable aggregates under the application of different improved materials at 0.15–0.30 m Depth. CK: no improved material; TM: maturing agent (ferrous sulfate); TF: fly ash; TO: organic fertilize; TMF: maturing agent + fly ash, TMO: maturing agent + organic fertilizer; TFO: fly ash + organic fertilizer. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences among different improved material treatments in the same particle-size aggregates.Full size imageFigure 3Percentage (%) of soil water-stable aggregates under the application of different improved materials at 0.15–0.30 m Layer. CK: no improved material; TM: maturing agent (ferrous sulfate); TF: fly ash; TO: organic fertilize; TMF: maturing agent + fly ash, TMO: maturing agent + organic fertilizer; TFO: fly ash + organic fertilizer. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences among different improved material treatments in the same particle-size aggregates.Full size imageIn the 0.15–0.30 m layer, the change of water-stable aggregates showed a similar trend to that in the 0–0.15 m layer compared with CK treatment. TF, TO, TMF, TMO and TFO treatments all significantly increased the proportion of  > 2 mm and 1–2 mm water-stable aggregates, and decreased the proportion of water-stable microaggregates (P  2 mm water-stable aggregates by 130.3%, 94.5%, 133.9%, 151.4%, and 309.2% respectively compared with CK, of which TFO treatment showed the most significant effect on the increase of the proportion of water-stable macroaggregates. Compared with the 0–0.15 m layer, the proportion of water-stable macroaggregates in the 0.15–0.30 m layer showed a gradual decrease with the increase of soil depth.Water-stable aggregates structure stabilityThe mean weight diameter (MWD), geometric mean diameter (GMD), unstable aggregate index (ELT), and fractal dimension (D) are important indicators reflecting the structural geometry and stability of soil aggregates, and it has been indicated in this research that the higher the MWD and GMD and the smaller the ELT and D, the better the structural stability of the aggregates and the soil structure27,28. Compared with CK treatment, the MWD and GMD showed a trend of significant increase while the D and ELT showed a trend of significant decrease (P  TF  > TMF  > TM  > CK. The combination of organic–inorganic improved materials can effectively reduce the BD of reclaimed soil, and the BD under TFO treatment was the smallest, 1.19 g cm−3. In the 0.15–0.30 m layer, through variance analysis, the effect of different improved materials on the BD showed a similar decreasing trend to that in the 0–0.15 m layer.Figure 4Effects of the application of different improved materials on BD and SMC. CK: no improved material; TM: maturing agent (ferrous sulfate); TF: fly ash; TO: organic fertilize; TMF: maturing agent + fly ash, TMO: maturing agent + organic fertilizer; TFO: fly ash + organic fertilizer; BD, soil bulk density; SMC, soil moisture content. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences among different improved material treatments in the same soil layer.Full size imageThe soil moisture content (SMC) of the reclaimed soil in the 0–0.15 m and 0.15–0.30 m layers increased significantly after the application of different improved materials (P  TMO  > TMF  > TO  > TF≈TM  > CK (Fig. 4b). In the 0–0.15 m soil layer, the SMC under TM, TF, TO, TMF, TMO and TFO treatments was increased by13.5%, 13.8%, 21.4%, 21.9%, 32.4% and 38.3% respectively compared with CK. The TMO and TFO showed the most significant positive effect on the SMC of reclaimed soil, and the mass water content was 17.4% and 18.2% respectively. In conclusion, compared with CK, these improved materials increased the SOM content and porosity, promoted the formation and stability of aggregates, and increased the retention and transmission of water, which was helpful to maintain more water. Among them, the coupling treatment of organic and inorganic improved materials can hold more soil moisture, and the most significant increase was observed under TFO and TMO.Correlation analysis between soil organic matter and water-stable aggregates parametersTo further explore the correlation between the parameters of the reclaimed soil after the application of six different improved materials, a regression analysis was conducted in this paper on the correlation between the parameters of organic matter and water-stable aggregates with different particle sizes. From Table 2, it could be seen that the organic matter content had a highly significant positive correlation with MWD, GMD and  > 2 mm water-stable aggregates content and a highly significant negative correlation with ELT, D and water-stable microaggregates content ( 2 mm, 1–2 mm, and 0.5–1 mm) content had a significant positive correlation with MWD and GMD values and a highly significant negative correlation with ELT and D values; water-stable microaggregates ( TMO  > TO  > TMF  > TF  > TM  > CK, and different improved materials all significantly increased maize yield compared with CK (P  More

  • in

    Spatiotemporal variation characteristics of livestock manure nutrient in the soil environment of the Yangtze River Delta from 1980 to 2018

    Spatiotemporal variations in N and P emissions from livestock manureManure N and P production and comparison with fertilizer usage in the Yangtze River DeltaAlthough the amounts of chemical fertilizers used in the Yangtze River Delta region fluctuated greatly before 2000, the overall trend was still increasing, and there was a continuous downward trend since 2000 (Fig. 1). Specifically, the amount of chemical fertilizer used in the Yangtze River Delta region reached a peak of nearly 40 years in 1985, with 1.87 × 109 kg of nitrogen fertilizer and 3.38 × 108 kg of phosphate fertilizer. After entering the low period in 1990, it began to recover slowly, but since the beginning of the twenty-first century, the amount of fertilizer application has shown a continuous downward trend. By 2018, the amount of fertilizer nitrogen and phosphorus applied in the Yangtze River Delta region was 7.79 × 108 kg and 1.31 × 108 kg, respectively, which was a decrease of 58.28% and 61.28% compared to 1985.Figure 1Application of N and P fertilizers and the amount of N and P emissions from organic fertilizers (manure) in the Yangtze River Delta from 1980 to 2018.Full size imageThe change trend of fertilizer application in the Yangtze River Delta may be a combined effect of the national policy and the change of cultivated land area. Since the 1970s, my country has vigorously promoted the fertilizer industry and agricultural fertilization47,48, which reached a peak in 1985. However, due to the adjustment of agricultural policies around 1990, the fertilizer market at this time is relatively chaotic49, resulting in fluctuations in the amount of fertilizer used. The amount of fertilizer application is closely related to the area of arable land. Around 2000, the area of arable land in China decreases, and the amount of fertilization is also affected. However, the use of chemical fertilizers per unit area still causes serious environmental pollution. In 2015, the Ministry of Agriculture formulated and issued the “Action Plan for Zero Growth of Chemical Fertilizer Use by 2020”, which provided new guidance for chemical fertilizer application, which led to a fundamental reduction.Over the past 40 years, emissions of N and P from manure in the Yangtze River Delta generally increased at first and then decreased. From 1980 to 2005, N and P emissions from manure in the Yangtze River Delta showed an increasing trend. Manure N increased from 2.13 × 108 kg in 1980 to 2.66 × 108 kg in 2005, increased by 24.77%. Manure P increased from 7.34 × 107 kg in 1980 to 1.03 × 108 kg in 2005, increased by 40.11%. After reaching a peak in 2005, emissions showed a continuous declining trend. In 2018, N and P emissions from manure used as organic fertilizer were 1.46 × 108 kg and 5.68 × 107 kg, respectively, back to 1980 levels.The change trend of manure nitrogen and phosphorus emissions in the Yangtze River Delta is mainly affected by economic development and national policies. From 1985 to 2005, the vigorous economic development also promoted the increasing demand for meat, eggs, and milk in people’s lives. The development of animal husbandry50, and there were almost no special regulations on the establishment of sound manure management in the livestock and poultry farming industry before 2000. Factors have contributed to the increase in the discharge of livestock and poultry manure. After 2000, the State Environmental Protection Administration successively promulgated many normative documents, which effectively curb the increase of nitrogen and phosphorus emissions from livestock manure.Spatiotemporal variation characteristics of N and P emissions from livestock manureThere have obvious temporal and spatial variabilities in manure N and P emissions in the soils among cities in the Yangtze River Delta over the past 40 years (Figs. 2, 3). N and P emissions from livestock manure in the soils showed a trend of increasing and then decreasing, with manure nutrient emissions from livestock in some areas showed a fluctuating trend.Figure 2Manure N emissions in cities in the Yangtze River Delta.Full size imageFigure 3Manure P emissions in cities in the Yangtze River Delta.Full size imageNantong and Shanghai have always been the geographic focus of livestock manure nutrient emissions in terms of spatial change. Average N and P emissions from livestock manure in Nantong over the past 40 years was 3.47 × 107 and 1.39 × 107 kg, respectively; average N and P emissions from livestock manure in Shanghai over the past 40 years was 2.67 × 107 and 9.70 × 106 kg, respectively. During the past 40 years, the total N and P emissions from livestock manure were lowest in Zhoushan. From 1980 to 2018, the average yields of N and P in livestock manure were only 1.18 × 106 and 4.34 × 105 kg, respectively, in Zhoushan. The N and P emissions from livestock manure in other cities fluctuated 3.54 × 105 to 3.01 × 107 kg and 1.35 × 105 to 1.14 × 107 kg, respectively.Nantong and Shanghai have become the geographic focus of livestock and poultry manure emissions due to the following reasons: on the one hand, rapid economic development, abundant population resources, urban density and high degree of agricultural intensification are all factors that have caused the rapid development of livestock and poultry breeding. On the other hand, arable land resources are extremely scarce, resulting in a unit arable land carrying capacity much higher than other cities, and the dense water network has also accelerated the loss of nitrogen and phosphorus in livestock manure. As Zhoushan is located at the intersection of the golden coastline of eastern China and the golden waterway of the Yangtze River, it is China’s largest seafood production base, and its development focus is not on the livestock and poultry breeding industry.Changes in manure loads of livestock in the Yangtze River Delta from 1980 to 2018Spatiotemporal pattern of manure N and P loads in livestockFrom 1980 to 2018, the manure N load in the soils of the Yangtze River Delta showed an overall trend of increasing first and then decreasing (Fig. 4). From 1980 to 2010, most regions of the study area showed an increasing trend in manure N load. In 2010, the on average manure N load was highest. The high load area was rapidly expanding from the north and the middle east to the south of the study area, and the load center shifted from the east to the middle and southwest. From 2010 to 2018, the manure N load decreased year by year, especially in the middle of the study area, and the high-load area transferred to the edge area. In 2018, manure N load recovered roughly to the level seen in the 1990s.Figure 4Spatiotemporal distribution of manure N load in the Yangtze River Delta from 1980 to 2018.Full size imageFrom 1980 to 2010, average manure N load increased from 27.46 to 50.61 kg hm−2, representing a growth of 84.30% to the maximum manure N load of the past 40 years. This trend is basically consistent with the gradual increase in the average nitrogen pollution load per unit of arable land in China as shown by the results of earlier studies48,51,52,53. Manure N load in Zhoushan (located in the eastern coastal area), Shanghai, Huzhou, and Jiaxing (located in the central area), and Hangzhou (located in the southwest region) increased significantly: Zhoushan saw the largest increase (295.25%) from 22.04 kg hm−2 in 1980 to 87.10 kg hm−2 in 2010. On the one hand, the livestock breeding industry is affected by the price regulation and management of the agricultural material market, and on the other hand, it is affected by production price factors. Therefore, the rapid increase in demand for livestock caused by the rapid economic development, the increase in prices, and the increase in the number of breeding industries are the main reasons for the rapid increase in the manure N load during this period. From 2010 to 2018, the average manure loads dropped dramatically, decreasing from 50.61 to 30.29 kg hm−2, representing a decline of 40.15%. The average manure N load in Wuxi, Suzhou, Jiaxing (located in the central part), and Zhoushan (located in the eastern coastal area) showed significant declines, with that in Jiaxing decreasing from 100.88 to 24.60 kg hm−2, representing a decrease of 75.62%. Feng et al.54 found that policy is an important factor that makes livestock breeding industry more standardized and the environment improved. Therefore, the reduction in the manure N load during this period was largely affected by policy regulation. Over the past 40 years, the manure N load in Shanghai has been maintained at a high level, with a load of over 50 kg hm−2 throughout the period. By contrast, the manure N load in Yangzhou has been maintained at a low level for a long time, which was below 30 kg hm−2, highlighting significant regional differences. The reason is the difference caused by the difference in the degree of urban construction and economic development in different regions. In areas with relatively developed economies, the demand for livestock products is large, and the amount of livestock is large, but the area of arable land is small, and the capacity of absorbing livestock and poultry manure is limited, resulting in a relatively large manure N and P loads on cultivated land55.From 1980 to 2018, the manure N load center moved from the central and northern regions of the study area to the northwestern and eastern, and then to the southwestern and eastern regions after a peak of manure loads was reached in each city. In the 1980s, the maximum livestock manure loads were located in the middle (Jiaxing) and the northern part (Wuxi) of the study area. Subsequently, the center of gravity of manure N emissions from livestock gradually shifted to the east. In the 1990s, the livestock manure N load gravity center was located in the northwestern (Zhenjiang) and eastern (Shanghai) areas. At the beginning of the twenty-first century, the livestock manure N load was maintained at a relatively high level in most cities, and the emission center gradually shifted to the east. In 2018, the livestock manure N load was centred in the southwestern region (Hangzhou) and the eastern region (Nantong, Shanghai).Considering that there is no systematic standard limit of organic fertilizer N in China, we used the European Union’s farmland manure N limit standard of as the basis for determining the manure N load51. From 1980 to 2018, the manure N load did not exceed the European Union’s standard (170 kg hm−2), but still showed an increasing trend. It can be seen that the discharge of livestock manure in each city has had adverse impact on the environment of the Yangtze River Delta.From 1980 to 2018, the spatiotemporal evolution pattern of livestock manure P load in the soils was very similar to that of the manure N load, with an overall trend of first increasing and then decreasing (Fig. 5). From 1980 to 2010, the livestock manure P load showed an increasing trend. By 2010, the livestock manure P load had reached its maximum over the past 40 years. Areas with high livestock manure P load spread from the central area to the surrounding cities, and finally radiated to the surrounding regions with the central area as the load center; from 2010 to 2018, the livestock manure P load decreased significantly, and areas with high manure P load migrated from the central region to the southwestern marginal region and the northeastern coastal cities.Figure 5Spatiotemporal distribution of manure P load in the Yangtze River Delta from 1980 to 2018.Full size imageFrom 1980 to 2010, the average livestock manure P load in the Yangtze River Delta increased from 9.36 to 19.47 kg hm−2, representing a growth rate of 108.02%. Average manure P loads in Zhoushan, Ningbo (located in the eastern coastal area), and Jiaxing, Hangzhou, and Huzhou (located in the central and southern regions) showed significant increases of 347.66%, 323.28%, 198.13%, 181.88%, and 155.39%, respectively. From 2010 to 2018, the average livestock manure P load was reduced from 19.47 to 11.74 kg hm−2, representing a reduction of 39.71%. Zhoushan (located in the eastern coastal area) and Jiaxing and Suzhou (located in the central area) saw the most obvious declines of 73.26%, 72.49%, and 68.05%, respectively. In addition, the average manure P load content was greater than 20 kg hm−2 in the central region (Huzhou, Jiaxing, Shanghai) and the southwestern region (Hangzhou), but lower than 15 kg hm−2 in the southeastern region (Tai) and northwestern region (Yangzhou, Taizhou).From 1980 to 2018, the center of the livestock manure P load shifted from the central and northern regions of the study area to the eastern and northwestern regions, and then to the northeastern and southwestern regions after reaching peak P loading in each city. In the 1980s, the livestock manure P load was mainly concentrated in the middle (Jiaxing) and the northern region (Wuxi); in the 1990s, the center of the livestock manure P load moved to the east (Shanghai) and the northwest (Zhenjiang); at the beginning of the twenty-first century, the livestock manure P load remained at high levels in most cities. By 2018, the center of the livestock manure P load had accumulated toward the edge of the Yangtze River Delta, mainly in the northeastern (Nantong) and southwestern regions (Hangzhou).It is generally believed that annual P application from manure should not exceed 35 kg hm−256, otherwise excessive P will result in leaching of soil P and eutrophication of the water body. Livestock manure P load in Jinxing exceeded this standard in 2010, having a certain negative impact on the local environment. The rational treatment and utilization of livestock manure is imminent57.In summary, the Yangtze River Delta’s livestock manure has increased first and then decreased in the past 40 years. The reason for its significant increase before 2010 is mainly due to the urban construction and rapid economic development in various regions, and it spreads to the surrounding areas. With urban development, the area of agricultural land has been greatly reduced, and the area carrying livestock manure nutrient has been relatively reduced, resulting in an increase in the manure N and P load in the Yangtze River Delta. After 2010, the reason for the decrease in the manure N and P load in the Yangtze River Delta may be related to the successive introduction and implementation of environmental protection policies for livestock breeding in various provinces and cities. After the promulgation of the “Pollution Prevention and Control Technology Policy for Livestock and Poultry Breeding Industry” in 2010, the state has strengthened the macro-control of the livestock breeding industry, the Yangtze River Delta has been listed as a restricted development zone, the industrial structure has been further optimized and adjusted, and the amount of livestock breeding has been significantly reduced. This leads to a decrease in the manure N and P load in the Yangtze River Delta. The manure N and P load has been weakened year by year. This change pattern is also consistent with the trend of policy measures. To a certain extent, it shows that the current livestock and poultry pollution prevention and control measures have achieved remarkable results58.Changes in livestock manure N and P loads from 1980 to 2018Between 1980 and 2018, manure N and P loads showed significant spatial variability (Fig. 6). Due to the influence of government guidance, large demand for production land, and environmental protection pressure, changes to animal husbandry space have been promoted59,60,61. Livestock manure N and P loads in the northwestern and central regions have decreased significantly, while manure N and P loads in the surrounding areas have increased to varying degrees, showing a general shift from the central region to the surrounding cities. Specifically, in 2018, the manure N and P loads in Nanjing, Wuxi, Suzhou, and Jiaxing showed a decreasing trend. Compared with 1980, the manure N load decreased by 41.55%, 48.26%, 44.49%, and 33.46%, respectively. Compared with 1980, the manure P load decreased by 21.63%, 43.08%, 43.47%, and 17.98%, respectively. The reduction in manure N and P loads in the central region is related to policies of livestock pollution prevention, which were successively promulgated in the Tai Lake area32,33,62. The relevant departments have optimized the regional layout of animal husbandry and comprehensively made use of the livestock manure to reduce pollution, thereby reducing the manure N and P loads. All the 11 cities of Yangzhou, Zhenjiang, Changzhou, Nantong, Shanghai, Huzhou, Hangzhou, Shaoxing, Ningbo, Zhoushan, and Tai saw different degrees of increase in their manure N and P loads, and Hangzhou increased most. Compared with 1980, the manure N and P load of Hangzhou in 2018 increased by 76.72% and 112.58%, respectively. The manure N and P loads in the remaining 10 cities increase less than 100%. Increases in manure N and P loads may be related to the small scale63,64 and scattered distribution of local farms, and lack of environmental protection awareness among residents65,66.Figure 6(a) Percentage change of manure N loads from 1980 to 2018; (b) Percentage change of manure P loads from 1980 to 2018.Full size imageIdentification of high-risk areas of soil pollution caused by livestock manureThe high-risk areas for manure N and P emissions in 2018 were mainly located in the northwestern and southern regions of the Yangtze River Delta (Fig. 7), while the manure N and P emissions in some northern cities could not meet the nutrient requirements of the local land. Manure N and P emissions in Changzhou were 215.60% and 334.54% of the land’s absorption capacity, while those in Nanjing were 102.18% and 71.02%, respectively. It shows that the imbalance between the supply and demand of planting and breeding may cause a greater risk of environmental pollution of livestock and poultry, and it is necessary to reduce the scale of breeding or expand the scale of planting67,68. Manure P emissions in Wuxi, Huzhou, Jiaxing, Hangzhou, and Zhoushan were close to the maximum land absorption capacity for livestock manure nutrients, indicating that the supply and demand for planting and breeding were balanced. Therefore, the use of local organic fertilizers can be appropriately increased to reduce the amount of chemical fertilizers used and reduce the potential pollution threat caused by the enrichment of manure nutrients69,70. In the northern region, the discharge of livestock manure in Yangzhou, Taizhou, Nantong, and Zhenjiang was only 0–20% of the land absorption capacity, indicating that livestock manure nutrient in these areas cannot meet the nutrient needs of local crops. Therefore, additional nutrient supply is needed to meet the normal growth of local crops71.Figure 7(a) Manure N emission relative to land absorption capacity in 2018; (b) manure P emission relative to land absorption capacity in 2018.Full size imageSelection of typical models and main control factors based on long-term manure N and P emissionsSystematic clustering analysis of manure N and P emissionsAccording to the similarity of manure N and P emissions in the cities, we carried out variable analysis based on the Ward minimum variance method72. Cities were divided into four categories based on the change trend of manure N emissions in the Yangtze River Delta73 (Fig. 8a). Class I: Yangzhou, Tai, Wuxi, Suzhou, Shaoxing, Ningbo, Zhoushan, Hangzhou; class II: Nantong, Taizhou, Changzhou; class III: Huzhou, Jiaxing; class IV: Nanjing, Shanghai, Zhenjiang.Figure 8(a) Systematic clustering of manure N emissions from 1980 to 2018; (b) systematic clustering of manure P emissions from 1980 to 2018.Full size imageSimilar to the manure N classification method, cities were divided into four categories based on the change trend of manure P emissions in the Yangtze River Delta (Fig. 8b). Class I: Nantong, Taizhou, Changzhou, Yangzhou, Tai, Shaoxing, Ningbo, Zhoushan, Hangzhou; class II: Huzhou, Jiaxing; class III: Wuxi, Suzhou; class IV: Nanjing, Shanghai, Zhenjiang.Principal component analysis of manure N and P emissionsBased on the results of systematic clustering, typical cities were extracted to establish a typical model of manure N and P emissions and the main control factors were selected74. For manure N emissions, Yangzhou, Nantong, Huzhou, and Shanghai were selected from Class I, Class II, Class III, and Class IV, respectively. Combining these with the rising and falling trend characteristics of manure N emissions over the long study period, we established four typical models of manure N emissions as “up-down-down” model, “down-up-up” model, “down-up-down” model, and “up-up-down” model. According to the clustering results of manure P emissions, Hangzhou, Jiaxing, Suzhou, and Shanghai were selected from Class I, Class II, Class III, and Class IV, respectively. Four typical models of manure P emissions were established based on rising and falling trend characteristics of manure N emissions over the long study period as “up-up-down” model, “down-up-down” model, “down-level-down” model, and “up-down-down” model.Analysis on the main control factors for manure N emissionsFor the “up-down-down” model in Yangzhou, the total variance of the two principal components accounted for 85% (Fig. 9a); Nantong was characterized as a typical “down-up-up” model city, where the variance of the two principal components ac-counted for 82% (Fig. 9b); Huzhou represented a typical “down-up-down” model city, where the sum of the variances of the two principal components was 82% (Fig. 9c); in the “up-up-down” model for Shanghai, the sum of variance of the two principal com-ponents was 96% (Fig. 9d).Figure 9Manure N emissions from 1980 to 2018 and main control factors based on principal component analysis.Full size imageThere was a significant positive correlation between changes in manure N emissions and the proportion of the primary industry in Yangzhou, indicating that the “up-down-down” model of Class I is mainly affected by the primary industry. The “Pollution Prevention and Control Plan for Livestock Breeding Industry in Yangzhou” proposes to delimit forbidden and restricted areas, regulate livestock breeding, and reduce pollutant discharge from livestock breeding. Therefore, the scale of livestock breeding in Yangzhou has decreased, and the total manure N has shown a downward trend, which is consistent with the interannual changes in the proportion of the primary industry. The primary industry in this class is mainly agriculture and animal husbandry; thus, the main control factor for the total manure N is the proportion of primary industry.The total manure N in Nantong first decreased and then increased, and finally tended to be flat over the study period. There was a clear correlation between changes in manure N emissions in Nantong, meat production, and the total output value of animal husbandry, indicating that Class II is dominated by these two factors. The livestock breeding industry in Class II is relatively developed75,76, and meat production showed a consistent trend with total manure N. Hence, meat production and the total output value of animal husbandry are the factors having the greatest impact on Class II.Total manure N in Huzhou showed a trend of decreasing, then increasing, and finally decreasing. Manure N emissions changes and meat production showed a relatively obvious positive correlation, indicating that Class III is mainly affected by meat production and has little correlation with factors such as GDP, which is consistent with the changing trend of meat production. Huzhou’s agriculture is dominated by planting and fishery77, and the impact of animal husbandry is not significant, so meat production is the factor having the greatest impact on such cities.Total manure N in Shanghai began to increase over the study period, consistent with changes in meat production. There was a strong positive correlation between changes in manure N emissions and meat production, indicating that Class IV is greatly affected by arable land area. After that, Shanghai issued relevant measures to regulate livestock breeding, such as the “Shanghai Livestock a Breeding Management Measures”. Due to a decline in farmland area, meat production decreased, and manure N showed a downward trend78. Total manure N and meat production in Shanghai both increased at first and then decreased. Therefore, meat production is the most influential factor in such cities.Selection of main control factors for manure P emissionsIn the “up-up-down” model for Hangzhou, the total variance of the two principal components accounted for 91% (Fig. 10a); as a typical “down-up-down” model, the total variance of the two principal components in Jiaxing accounted for 88% (Fig. 10b); Su-zhou represented a typical “down-flat-down” model, and the sum of the variance of the two principal components accounted for 95% (Fig. 10c); as an example of the “up-down-down” model, the variance of the two principal components in Shanghai accounted for 96% (Fig. 10d).Figure 10Manure P emissions from 1980 to 2018 and main control factors based on principal component analysis.Full size imageManure P in Hangzhou first increased and then decreased, essentially the same as the trend for Hangzhou’s meat production. There was a strong positive correlation between changes in manure P emissions and the total meat production in Yangzhou, indicating that the “up-up-down” model of Class I is mainly affected by meat production. Due to the serious pollution from livestock and poultry in Hangzhou79, relevant policies have been introduced to reduce the amount of livestock breeding, thereby reducing meat production.Manure P in Jiaxing showed a trend of first decline, then rise, and finally decline. There was a large positive correlation between changes in manure P emissions and meat production in Jiaxing, indicating that the “down-up-down” model of Class II is mainly affected by meat production. Class II is dominated by agriculture and animal husbandry34,35, and the breeding industry is relatively developed. Meat production also changes with these industries, and its inter-annual variation is consistent with that of manure P.Manure P in Suzhou showed a downward trend, consistent with inter-annual changes in the area of arable land. Changes in manure P emissions and the area of arable land showed a significant positive correlation, indicating that the Class III cities with a “decrease-level-decrease” model were mainly affected by the area of arable land and the proportion of the primary industry. Suzhou is an industrial development base that cannot be ignored. Local economic development is relatively rapid80, so its arable land area is continuously decreasing81.The livestock manure P in Shanghai increased at first and then decreased, which is consistent with inter-annual changes in meat production. In 2002, the Shanghai Municipal People’s Government highlighted a special plan for Shanghai’s animal husbandry, stipulating prohibition of breeding areas, control of breeding areas and moderate breeding areas. The city’s total livestock and poultry production decreased, and meat production decreased82. There was a strong positive correlation between the changes in livestock manure P emissions and meat production, indicating that the “up-down-down” model of Class IV is mainly affected by meat production. More

  • in

    Evolutionary causes and consequences of ungulate migration

    Dobson, A. P. et al. Road will ruin Serengeti. Nature 467, 272–273 (2010).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Larsen, F. et al. Wildebeest migration drives tourism demand in the Serengeti. Biol. Conserv. 248, 108688 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Aikens, E. O. et al. The greenscape shapes surfing of resource waves in a large migratory herbivore. Ecol. Lett. 20, 741–750 (2017).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bischof, R. et al. A migratory northern ungulate in the pursuit of spring: jumping or surfing the green wave? Am. Nat. 180, 407–424 (2012).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Merkle, J. A. et al. Large herbivores surf waves of green-up during spring. Proc. Biol. Sci. 283, 20160456 (2016).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Fryxell, J. M., Greever, J. & Sinclair, A. R. E. Why are migratory ungulates so abundant? Am. Nat.131, 781–798 (1988).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Staver, A. C. & Hempson, G. P. Seasonal dietary changes increase the abundances of savanna herbivore species. Sci. Adv. 6, eabd2848 (2020).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kauffman, M. J. et al. Causes, consequences, and conservation of ungulate migration. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 52, 453–478 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lundberg, J. & Moberg, F. Mobile link organisms and ecosystem functioning: implications for ecosystem resilience and management. Ecosystems 6, 0087–0098 (2003).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bauer, S. & Hoye, B. J. Migratory animals couple biodiversity and ecosystem functioning worldwide. Science 344, 1242552 (2014).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bolger, D. T., Newmark, W. D., Morrison, T. A., & Doak, D. F. The need for integrative approaches to understand and conserve migratory ungulates. Ecol. Lett. 11, 63–77 (2007).PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Fryxell, J. M. & Holt, R. D. Environmental change and the evolution of migration. Ecology 94, 1274–1279 (2013).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Shaw, A. K. Drivers of animal migration and implications in changing environments. Evol. Ecol. 30, 991–1007 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hebblewhite, M. & Merrill, E. H. Trade-offs between predation risk and forage differ between migrant strategies in a migratory ungulate. Ecology 90, 3445–3454 (2009).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Nelson, M. E. Development of migratory behavior in northern white-tailed deer. Can. J. Zool. 76, 426–432 (1998).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Berg, J. E., Hebblewhite, M., St. Clair, C. C. & Merrill, E. H. Prevalence and mechanisms of partial migration in ungulates. Front. Ecol. Evol. 7, 325 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Jesmer, B. R. et al. Is ungulate migration culturally transmitted? Evidence of social learning from translocated animals. Science 361, 1023–1025 (2018).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Sih, A., Bell, A. & Johnson, J. C. Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 372–378 (2004).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Found, R. & St. Clair, C. C. Behavioural syndromes predict loss of migration in wild elk. Anim. Behav. 115, 35–46 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Abraham, J. O., Hempson, G. P., Faith, J. T. & Staver, A. C.Seasonal strategies differ between tropical and extratropical herbivores. J. Anim. Ecol. 91, 681–692 (2022).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Whitehead, H., Laland, K. N., Rendell, L., Thorogood, R. & Whiten, A. The reach of gene–culture coevolution in animals. Nat. Commun. 10, 2405 (2019).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Scanlon, T. M., Caylor, K. K., Manfreda, S., Levin, S. A. & Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. Dynamic response of grass cover to rainfall variability: implications for the function and persistence of savanna ecosystems. Adv. Water Res. 28, 291–302 (2005).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Staver, A. C., Wigley-Coetsee, C. & Botha, J. Grazer movements exacerbate grass declines during drought in an African savanna. J. Ecol. 107, 1482–1491 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Fryxell, J. M. & Sinclair, A. R. Causes and consequences of migration by large herbivores. Trends Ecol. Evol. 3, 237–241 (1988).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Running, S. W. et al. A continuous satellite-derived measure of global terrestrial primary production. Bioscience 54, 547–560 (2004).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Langvatn, R., Albon, S. D., Burkey, T. & Clutton-Brock, T. H. Climate, plant phenology and variation in age of first reproduction in a temperate herbivore. J. Anim. Ecol. 65, 653–670 (1996).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Webber, Q. M. R. & McGuire, L. P. Heterothermy, body size, and locomotion as ecological predictors of migration in mammals. Mamm. Rev. 52, 82–95 (2022).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Mann, D. H., Groves, P., Gaglioti, B. V. & Shapiro, B. A. Climate-driven ecological stability as a globally shared cause of Late Quaternary megafaunal extinctions: the Plaids and Stripes Hypothesis. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 94, 328–352 (2018).PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Jarman, P. J. The social organisation of antelope in relation to their ecology. Behaviour 48, 215–267 (1974).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hein, A. M., Hou, C. & Gillooly, J. F. Energetic and biomechanical constraints on animal migration distance. Ecol. Lett. 15, 104–110 (2012).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Abraham, J. O., Hempson, G. P. & Staver, A. C. Drought-response strategies of savanna herbivores. Ecol. Evol. 9, 7047–7056 (2019).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Owen-Smith, R. N. Megaherbivores: the Influence of Very Large Body Size on Ecology (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1988).Book 

    Google Scholar 
    Gonzalez-Voyer, A. & von Hardenberg, A. in Modern Phylogenetic Comparative Methods and Their Application in Evolutionary Biology: Concepts and Practice (ed. Garamszegi, L. Z.) 201–229 (Springer, 2014).Pérez-Barbería, F. J., Gordon, I. J. & Nores, C. Evolutionary transitions among feeding styles and habitats in ungulates. Evol. Ecol. Res. 3, 221–230 (2001).
    Google Scholar 
    Staver, A. C., Abraham, J. O., Hempson, G. P., Karp, A. T. & Faith, J. T. The past, present, and future of herbivore impacts on savanna vegetation. J. Ecol. 109, 2804–2822 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Janis, C. M. in The Ecology of Browsing and Grazing (eds Gordon, I. J. & Prins, H. H. T.) 21–45 (Springer, 2008).Janis, C. M. Tertiary mammal evolution in the context of changing climates, vegetation, and tectonic events. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24, 467–500 (1993).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Zachos, J., Pagani, M., Sloan, L., Thomas, E. & Billups, K. Trends, rhythms, and aberrations in global climate 65 Ma to present. Science 292, 686–693 (2001).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Edwards, E. J. et al. The origins of C4 grasslands: integrating evolutionary and ecosystem. Science 328, 587–591 (2010).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bhat, U., Kempes, C. P. & Yeakel, J. D. Scaling the risk landscape drives optimal life-history strategies and the evolution of grazing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 1580–1586 (2020).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Fagan, W. F. et al. Spatial memory and animal movement. Ecol. Lett. 16, 1316–1329 (2013).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Merkle, J. A. et al. Spatial memory shapes migration and its benefits: evidence from a large herbivore. Ecol. Lett. 22, 1797–1805 (2019).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Mueller, T., O’Hara, R. B., Converse, S. J., Urbanek, R. P. & Fagan, W. F. Social learning of migratory performance. Science 341, 999–1002 (2013).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Wcislo, W. T. Behavioral environments and evolutionary change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20, 137–169 (1989).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Wyles, J. S., Kunkel, J. G. & Wilson, A. C. Birds, behavior, and anatomical evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 80, 4394–4397 (1983).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Yeakel, J. D., Kempes, C. P. & Redner, S. Dynamics of starvation and recovery predict extinction risk and both Damuth’s law and Cope’s rule. Nat. Commun. 9, 657 (2018).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Purdon, A., Mole, M. A., Chase, M. J. & van Aarde, R. J. Partial migration in savanna elephant populations distributed across southern Africa. Sci. Rep. 8, 11331 (2018).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Upham, N. S., Esselstyn, J. A. & Jetz, W. Inferring the mammal tree: species-level sets of phylogenies for questions in ecology, evolution, and conservation. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000494 (2019).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Abrahms, B. et al. Memory and resource tracking drive blue whale migrations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 5582–5587 (2019).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Barnosky, A. D., Koch, P. L., Feranec, R. S., Wing, S. L. & Shabel, A. B. Assessing the causes of late Pleistocene extinctions on the continents. Science 306, 70–75 (2004).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Dirzo, R. et al. Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science 345, 401–406 (2014).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Faith, J. T., Rowan, J. & Du, A. Early hominins evolved within non-analog ecosystems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 21478–21483 (2019).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Holdo, R. M. et al. A disease-mediated trophic cascade in the Serengeti and its implications for ecosystem C. PLoS Biol. 7, e1000210 (2009).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Janzen, D. H. & Martin, P. S. Neotropical anachronisms: the fruits the gomphotheres ate. Science 215, 19–27 (1982).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Dantas, V. L. & Pausas, J. G. The legacy of the extinct Neotropical megafauna on plants and biomes. Nat. Commun. 13, 129 (2022).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Harris, G., Thirgood, S., Hopcraft, J. G. C., Cromsigt, J. P. G. M. & Berger, J. Global decline in aggregated migrations of large terrestrial mammals. Endanger. Species Res. 7, 55–76 (2009).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Seersholm, F. V. et al. Rapid range shifts and megafaunal extinctions associated with late Pleistocene climate change. Nat. Commun. 11, 2770 (2020).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Alroy, J. A multispecies overkill simulation of the end-Pleistocene megafaunal mass extinction. Science 292, 1893–1896 (2001).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Berger, J. The last mile: how to sustain long-distance migration in mammals. Conserv. Biol. 18, 320–331 (2004).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Faurby, S. & Svenning, J.-C. Resurrection of the island rule: human-driven extinctions have obscured a basic evolutionary pattern. Am. Nat. 187, 812–820 (2016).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Wilman, H. et al. EltonTraits 1.0: species-level foraging attributes of the world’s birds and mammals. Ecology 95, 2027 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Smith, F. A. et al. Body mass of late Quaternary mammals. Ecology 84, 3403 (2003).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    IUCN. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019 (IUCN, 2019).Toljagić, O., Voje, K. L., Matschiner, M., Liow, L. H. & Hansen, T. F. Millions of years behind: slow adaptation of ruminants to grasslands. Syst. Biol. 67, 145–157 (2018).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Pinzon, J. E. & Tucker, C. J. A non-stationary 1981–2012 AVHRR NDVI3g time series. Remote Sens. 6, 6929–6960 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    R Core Team. R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020).Revell, L. J. phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 217–223 (2012).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Blomberg, S. P., Garland, T. Jr. & Ives, A. R. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57, 717–745 (2003).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Orme, D. The caper package: Comparative analysis of phylogenetics and evolution in R. R package version 1.0.1 https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/caper/vignettes/caper.pdf (2018).Beaulieu, J. M. & O’Meara, B. OUwie: Analysis of evolutionary rates in an OU framework. R package version 2.6 https://rdrr.io/cran/OUwie/ (2014).Cressler, C. E., Butler, M. A. & King, A. A. Detecting adaptive evolution in phylogenetic comparative analysis using the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck model. Syst. Biol. 64, 953–968 (2015).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ho, L. S. & Ané, C. A linear-time algorithm for Gaussian and non-Gaussian trait evolution models. Syst. Biol. 63, 397–408 (2014).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    van der Bijl, W. phylopath: easy phylogenetic path analysis in R. PeerJ 6, e4718 (2018).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Chen, L. et al. Large-scale ruminant genome sequencing provides insights into their evolution and distinct traits. Science 364, eaav6202 (2019).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar  More

  • in

    Ungulates on the move

    Joly, K. et al. Sci. Rep. 9, 15333 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Shaw, A. K. Evol. Ecol 30, 991–1007 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bauer, S. & Hoye, B. J. Science 344, 1242552 (2014).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Abraham, J. O., Upham, N. S., Damian-Serrano, A. & Jesmer, B. R. Nat. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01749-4 (2022).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Middleton, A. D. et al. Oikos 127, 1060–1068 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hein, A. M., Hou, C. & Gillooly, J. F. Ecol. Lett. 15, 104–110 (2012).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Zachos, J., Pagani, M., Sloan, L., Thomas, E. & Billups, K. Science 292, 686–693 (2001).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Edwards, E. J. et al. Science 328, 587–591 (2010).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Aikens, E. O. et al. Curr. Biol. 30, 3444–3449 (2020).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Merkle, J. A. et al. Ecol. Lett. 22, 1797–1805 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Jesmer, B. R. et al. Science 361, 1023–1025 (2018).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Harris, G., Thirgood, S., Hopcraft, J. G. C., Cromsigt, J. & Berger, J. Endanger. Species Res. 7, 55–76 (2009).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Aikens, E. O. et al. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 4215–4225 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Doughty, C. E. et al. Ecography 43, 1107–1117 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kauffman, M. J. et al. Science 372, 566–569 (2021).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar  More