Ecology

Chang, C. & HilleRisLambers, J. Integrating succession and community assembly perspectives. F1000Research 5, 1–10 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Suding, K. N. & Hobbs, R. J. Threshold models in restoration and conservation: a developing framework. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 271–279 (2009).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kadowaki, K., Nishijima, S., Kéfi, S., Kameda, K. O. & Sasaki, T. Merging community assembly into the regime-shift approach for informing ecological restoration. Ecol. Indic. 85, 991–998 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J. A., Folke, C. & Walker, B. Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413, 591–596 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lu, M. & Hedin, L. O. Global plant–symbiont organization and emergence of biogeochemical cycles resolved by evolution-based trait modelling. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 239–250 (2019).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Berdugo, M. et al. Global ecosystem thresholds driven by aridity. Science 367, 787–790 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Allan, E. et al. Interannual variation in land-use intensity enhances grassland multidiversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 308–313 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Delgado-Baquerizo, M. et al. Multiple elements of soil biodiversity drive ecosystem functions across biomes. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 210–220 (2020).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Felipe-Lucia, M. R. et al. Land-use intensity alters networks between biodiversity, ecosystem functions, and services. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 28140–28149 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Manning, P. et al. Grassland management intensification weakens the associations among the diversities of multiple plant and animal taxa. Ecology 96, 1492–1501 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kaufmann, R. Invertebrate succession on an alpine glacier foreland. Ecology 82, 2261–2278 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Blaalid, R. et al. Changes in the root-associated fungal communities along a primary succession gradient analysed by 454 pyrosequencing. Mol. Ecol. 21, 1897–1908 (2012).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fenton, N. J. & Bergeron, Y. Stochastic processes dominate during boreal bryophyte community assembly. Ecology 94, 1993–2006 (2013).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dini-Andreote, F., Stegen, J. C., Van Elsas, J. D. & Salles, J. F. Disentangling mechanisms that mediate the balance between stochastic and deterministic processes in microbial succession. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E1326–E1332 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Måren, I. E., Kapfer, J., Aarrestad, P. A., Grytnes, J. A. & Vandvik, V. Changing contributions of stochastic and deterministic processes in community assembly over a successional gradient. Ecology 99, 148–157 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pulsford, S. A., Lindenmayer, D. B. & Driscoll, D. A. A succession of theories: purging redundancy from disturbance theory. Biol. Rev. 91, 148–167 (2016).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Odum, E. P. The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164, 262–270 (1969).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ohlmann, M. et al. Mapping the imprint of biotic interactions on β-diversity. Ecol. Lett. 21, 1660–1669 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, C., Chen, H. Y. H., Chen, X. & Huang, Z. Meta-analysis shows positive effects of plant diversity on microbial biomass and respiration. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–10 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Howard, M. M., Kao-Kniffin, J. & Kessler, A. Shifts in plant–microbe interactions over community succession and their effects on plant resistance to herbivores. N. Phytol. 226, 1144–1157 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lepš, J., Rejmánek, M., Leps, J. & Rejmanek, M. Convergence or divergence: what should we expect from vegetation succession? Oikos 62, 261–264 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fukami, T., Bezemer, T. M., Mortimer, S. R. & Van Der Putten, W. H. Species divergence and trait convergence in experimental plant community assembly. Ecol. Lett. 8, 1283–1290 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brown, S. P. & Jumpponen, A. Contrasting primary successional trajectories of fungi and bacteria in retreating glacier soils. Mol. Ecol. 23, 481–497 (2014).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Castle, S. C. et al. Biogeochemical drivers of microbial community convergence across actively retreating glaciers. Soil Biol. Biochem. 101, 74–84 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chang, C. C. et al. Testing conceptual models of early plant succession across a disturbance gradient. J. Ecol. 107, 517–530 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Junker, R. R. et al. Ödenwinkel: an Alpine platform for observational and experimental research on the emergence of multidiversity and ecosystem complexity. Web Ecol. 20, 95–106 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Groffman, P. M. et al. Ecological thresholds: the key to successful environmental management or an important concept with no practical application? Ecosystems 9, 1–13 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lindeløv, J. K. mcp: an R package for regression With multiple change points. J. Stat. Softw. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/fzqxv (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ohler, L. M., Lechleitner, M. & Junker, R. R. Microclimatic effects on alpine plant communities and flower-visitor interactions. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–9 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Cavieres, L. A. et al. Facilitative plant interactions and climate simultaneously drive alpine plant diversity. Ecol. Lett. 17, 193–202 (2014).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lowe, W. H. & McPeek, M. A. Is dispersal neutral? Trends Ecol. Evol. 29, 444–450 (2014).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Legendre, P., Borcard, D. & Peres-Neto, P. R. Analyzing beta diversity: partitioning the spatial variation of community composition data. Ecol. Monogr. 75, 435–450 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ranta, E. et al. Detecting compensatory dynamics in competitive communities under environmental forcing. Oikos 117, 1907–1911 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Houlahan, J. E. et al. The utility of covariances: a response to Ranta et al. Oikos 117, 1912–1913 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tscherko, D., Rustemeier, J., Richter, A., Wanek, W. & Kandeler, E. Functional diversity of the soil microflora in primary succession across two glacier forelands in the Central Alps. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 54, 685–696 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Raffl, C., Mallaun, M., Mayer, R. & Erschbamer, B. Vegetation succession pattern and diversity changes in a Glacier Valley, Central Alps, Austria. Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res. 38, 421–428 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schütte, U. M. E. et al. Bacterial diversity in a glacier foreland of the high Arctic. Mol. Ecol. 19, 54–66 (2010).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dong, K. et al. Soil fungal community development in a high Arctic glacier foreland follows a directional replacement model, with a mid-successional diversity maximum. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–9 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Houlahan, J. E. et al. Compensatory dynamics are rare in natural ecological communities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 3273–3277 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Vellend, M. Effects of diversity on diversity: consequences of competition and facilitation. Oikos 117, 1075–1085 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rottstock, T., Joshi, J., Kummer, V. & Fischer, M. Higher plant diversity promotes higher diversity of fungal pathogens, while it decreases pathogen infection per plant. Ecology 95, 1907–1917 (2014).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Baudy, P. et al. Fungal–fungal and fungal–bacterial interactions in aquatic decomposer communities: bacteria promote fungal diversity. Ecology 102, 1–16 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bardgett, R. D. et al. Heterotrophic microbial communities use ancient carbon following glacial retreat. Biol. Lett. 3, 487–490 (2007).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bokhorst, S. & Wardle, D. A. Snow fungi as a food source for micro-arthropods. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 60, 77–80 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hågvar, S. et al. Ecosystem birth near melting glaciers: a review on the pioneer role of ground-dwelling arthropods. Insects 11, 1–35 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wardle, D. A. The influence of biotic interactions on soil biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 9, 870–886 (2006).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sabatini, M. A. & Innocenti, G. Functional relationships between Collembola and plant pathogenic fungi of agricultural soils. Pedobiologia (Jena.) 44, 467–475 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Klironomos, J. N. & Kendrick, W. B. Palatability of microfungi to soil arthropods in relation to the functioning of arbuscular mycorrhizae. Biol. Fertil. Soils 21, 43–52 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
Klironomos, J. N., Widden, P. & Deslandes, I. Feeding preferences of the collembolan Folsomia candida in relation to microfungal successions on decaying litter. Soil Biol. Biochem. 24, 685–692 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
Connell, J. H. & Slatyer, R. O. Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. Am. Nat. 111, 1119–1144 (1977).Article 

Google Scholar 
Arróniz-Crespo, M. et al. Bryophyte-cyanobacteria associations during primary succession in recently deglaciated areas of Tierra del Fuego (Chile). PLoS One 9, 15–17 (2014).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Jean, M. et al. Experimental assessment of tree canopy and leaf litter controls on the microbiome and nitrogen fixation rates of two boreal mosses. N. Phytol. 227, 1335–1349 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jean, M., Alexander, H. D., Mack, M. C. & Johnstone, J. F. Patterns of bryophyte succession in a 160-year chronosequence in deciduous and coniferous forests of boreal Alaska. Can. J. Res. 47, 1021–1032 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Blanchet, F. G., Cazelles, K. & Gravel, D. Co‐occurrence is not evidence of ecological interactions. Ecol. Lett. 23, 1050–1063 (2020).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fukami, T. & Nakajima, M. Complex plant-soil interactions enhance plant species diversity by delaying community convergence. J. Ecol. 101, 316–324 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Martínez-García, L. B., Richardson, S. J., Tylianakis, J. M., Peltzer, D. A. & Dickie, I. A. Host identity is a dominant driver of mycorrhizal fungal community composition during ecosystem development. N. Phytol. 205, 1565–1576 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Paulson, J. metagenomeSeq: statistical analysis for sparse high-throughput sequencing. Bioconductor.Jp https://github.com/nosson/metagenomeSeq/ (2014).Francesco Ficetola, G. & Denoël, M. Ecological thresholds: an assessment of methods to identify abrupt changes in species-habitat relationships. Ecography 32, 1075–1084 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Aho, K., Derryberry, D. & Peterson, T. Model selection for ecologists: the worldviews of AIC and BIC. Ecology 95, 631–636 (2014).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Conn, P. B., Johnson, D. S., Williams, P. J., Melin, S. R. & Hooten, M. B. A guide to Bayesian model checking for ecologists. Ecol. Monogr. 88, 526–542 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hanusch, M., Ortiz, E. M., Patiño, J. & Schaefer, H. Biogeography and integrative taxonomy of epipterygium (Mniaceae, Bryophyta). Taxon 69, 1150–1171 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Oksanen, J. et al. vegan: community ecology package. Github https://github.com/vegandevs/vegan (2019).Baker, S. C. & Barmuta, L. A. Evaluating spatial autocorrelation and depletion in pitfall-trap studies of environmental gradients. J. Insect Conserv. 10, 269–276 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pickett, S. T. A. in Long-Term Studies in Ecology (ed. Likens, G. E.) 110–135 (Springer, 1989).Bivand, R. S. & Wong, D. W. S. Comparing implementations of global and local indicators of spatial association. Test 27, 716–748 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hanusch, M., He, X., Ruiz-Hernández, V. & Junker, R. R. Successional generation of functional multidiversity and ecosystem complexity—a dataset from the Ödenwinkel research platform. Mendeley Data. https://doi.org/10.17632/xkv89tbftc.1 (2022).Hanusch, M., He, X., Ruiz-Hernández, V. & Junker, R. R. Supporting dataset and code: succession comprises a sequence of threshold-induced community assembly processes towards multidiversity. Mendeley Data. https://doi.org/10.17632/dr6d3728xb.1 (2022). More

Spatiotemporal variations in N and P emissions from livestock manureManure N and P production and comparison with fertilizer usage in the Yangtze River DeltaAlthough the amounts of chemical fertilizers used in the Yangtze River Delta region fluctuated greatly before 2000, the overall trend was still increasing, and there was a continuous downward trend since 2000 (Fig. 1). Specifically, the amount of chemical fertilizer used in the Yangtze River Delta region reached a peak of nearly 40 years in 1985, with 1.87 × 109 kg of nitrogen fertilizer and 3.38 × 108 kg of phosphate fertilizer. After entering the low period in 1990, it began to recover slowly, but since the beginning of the twenty-first century, the amount of fertilizer application has shown a continuous downward trend. By 2018, the amount of fertilizer nitrogen and phosphorus applied in the Yangtze River Delta region was 7.79 × 108 kg and 1.31 × 108 kg, respectively, which was a decrease of 58.28% and 61.28% compared to 1985.Figure 1Application of N and P fertilizers and the amount of N and P emissions from organic fertilizers (manure) in the Yangtze River Delta from 1980 to 2018.Full size imageThe change trend of fertilizer application in the Yangtze River Delta may be a combined effect of the national policy and the change of cultivated land area. Since the 1970s, my country has vigorously promoted the fertilizer industry and agricultural fertilization47,48, which reached a peak in 1985. However, due to the adjustment of agricultural policies around 1990, the fertilizer market at this time is relatively chaotic49, resulting in fluctuations in the amount of fertilizer used. The amount of fertilizer application is closely related to the area of arable land. Around 2000, the area of arable land in China decreases, and the amount of fertilization is also affected. However, the use of chemical fertilizers per unit area still causes serious environmental pollution. In 2015, the Ministry of Agriculture formulated and issued the “Action Plan for Zero Growth of Chemical Fertilizer Use by 2020”, which provided new guidance for chemical fertilizer application, which led to a fundamental reduction.Over the past 40 years, emissions of N and P from manure in the Yangtze River Delta generally increased at first and then decreased. From 1980 to 2005, N and P emissions from manure in the Yangtze River Delta showed an increasing trend. Manure N increased from 2.13 × 108 kg in 1980 to 2.66 × 108 kg in 2005, increased by 24.77%. Manure P increased from 7.34 × 107 kg in 1980 to 1.03 × 108 kg in 2005, increased by 40.11%. After reaching a peak in 2005, emissions showed a continuous declining trend. In 2018, N and P emissions from manure used as organic fertilizer were 1.46 × 108 kg and 5.68 × 107 kg, respectively, back to 1980 levels.The change trend of manure nitrogen and phosphorus emissions in the Yangtze River Delta is mainly affected by economic development and national policies. From 1985 to 2005, the vigorous economic development also promoted the increasing demand for meat, eggs, and milk in people’s lives. The development of animal husbandry50, and there were almost no special regulations on the establishment of sound manure management in the livestock and poultry farming industry before 2000. Factors have contributed to the increase in the discharge of livestock and poultry manure. After 2000, the State Environmental Protection Administration successively promulgated many normative documents, which effectively curb the increase of nitrogen and phosphorus emissions from livestock manure.Spatiotemporal variation characteristics of N and P emissions from livestock manureThere have obvious temporal and spatial variabilities in manure N and P emissions in the soils among cities in the Yangtze River Delta over the past 40 years (Figs. 2, 3). N and P emissions from livestock manure in the soils showed a trend of increasing and then decreasing, with manure nutrient emissions from livestock in some areas showed a fluctuating trend.Figure 2Manure N emissions in cities in the Yangtze River Delta.Full size imageFigure 3Manure P emissions in cities in the Yangtze River Delta.Full size imageNantong and Shanghai have always been the geographic focus of livestock manure nutrient emissions in terms of spatial change. Average N and P emissions from livestock manure in Nantong over the past 40 years was 3.47 × 107 and 1.39 × 107 kg, respectively; average N and P emissions from livestock manure in Shanghai over the past 40 years was 2.67 × 107 and 9.70 × 106 kg, respectively. During the past 40 years, the total N and P emissions from livestock manure were lowest in Zhoushan. From 1980 to 2018, the average yields of N and P in livestock manure were only 1.18 × 106 and 4.34 × 105 kg, respectively, in Zhoushan. The N and P emissions from livestock manure in other cities fluctuated 3.54 × 105 to 3.01 × 107 kg and 1.35 × 105 to 1.14 × 107 kg, respectively.Nantong and Shanghai have become the geographic focus of livestock and poultry manure emissions due to the following reasons: on the one hand, rapid economic development, abundant population resources, urban density and high degree of agricultural intensification are all factors that have caused the rapid development of livestock and poultry breeding. On the other hand, arable land resources are extremely scarce, resulting in a unit arable land carrying capacity much higher than other cities, and the dense water network has also accelerated the loss of nitrogen and phosphorus in livestock manure. As Zhoushan is located at the intersection of the golden coastline of eastern China and the golden waterway of the Yangtze River, it is China’s largest seafood production base, and its development focus is not on the livestock and poultry breeding industry.Changes in manure loads of livestock in the Yangtze River Delta from 1980 to 2018Spatiotemporal pattern of manure N and P loads in livestockFrom 1980 to 2018, the manure N load in the soils of the Yangtze River Delta showed an overall trend of increasing first and then decreasing (Fig. 4). From 1980 to 2010, most regions of the study area showed an increasing trend in manure N load. In 2010, the on average manure N load was highest. The high load area was rapidly expanding from the north and the middle east to the south of the study area, and the load center shifted from the east to the middle and southwest. From 2010 to 2018, the manure N load decreased year by year, especially in the middle of the study area, and the high-load area transferred to the edge area. In 2018, manure N load recovered roughly to the level seen in the 1990s.Figure 4Spatiotemporal distribution of manure N load in the Yangtze River Delta from 1980 to 2018.Full size imageFrom 1980 to 2010, average manure N load increased from 27.46 to 50.61 kg hm−2, representing a growth of 84.30% to the maximum manure N load of the past 40 years. This trend is basically consistent with the gradual increase in the average nitrogen pollution load per unit of arable land in China as shown by the results of earlier studies48,51,52,53. Manure N load in Zhoushan (located in the eastern coastal area), Shanghai, Huzhou, and Jiaxing (located in the central area), and Hangzhou (located in the southwest region) increased significantly: Zhoushan saw the largest increase (295.25%) from 22.04 kg hm−2 in 1980 to 87.10 kg hm−2 in 2010. On the one hand, the livestock breeding industry is affected by the price regulation and management of the agricultural material market, and on the other hand, it is affected by production price factors. Therefore, the rapid increase in demand for livestock caused by the rapid economic development, the increase in prices, and the increase in the number of breeding industries are the main reasons for the rapid increase in the manure N load during this period. From 2010 to 2018, the average manure loads dropped dramatically, decreasing from 50.61 to 30.29 kg hm−2, representing a decline of 40.15%. The average manure N load in Wuxi, Suzhou, Jiaxing (located in the central part), and Zhoushan (located in the eastern coastal area) showed significant declines, with that in Jiaxing decreasing from 100.88 to 24.60 kg hm−2, representing a decrease of 75.62%. Feng et al.54 found that policy is an important factor that makes livestock breeding industry more standardized and the environment improved. Therefore, the reduction in the manure N load during this period was largely affected by policy regulation. Over the past 40 years, the manure N load in Shanghai has been maintained at a high level, with a load of over 50 kg hm−2 throughout the period. By contrast, the manure N load in Yangzhou has been maintained at a low level for a long time, which was below 30 kg hm−2, highlighting significant regional differences. The reason is the difference caused by the difference in the degree of urban construction and economic development in different regions. In areas with relatively developed economies, the demand for livestock products is large, and the amount of livestock is large, but the area of arable land is small, and the capacity of absorbing livestock and poultry manure is limited, resulting in a relatively large manure N and P loads on cultivated land55.From 1980 to 2018, the manure N load center moved from the central and northern regions of the study area to the northwestern and eastern, and then to the southwestern and eastern regions after a peak of manure loads was reached in each city. In the 1980s, the maximum livestock manure loads were located in the middle (Jiaxing) and the northern part (Wuxi) of the study area. Subsequently, the center of gravity of manure N emissions from livestock gradually shifted to the east. In the 1990s, the livestock manure N load gravity center was located in the northwestern (Zhenjiang) and eastern (Shanghai) areas. At the beginning of the twenty-first century, the livestock manure N load was maintained at a relatively high level in most cities, and the emission center gradually shifted to the east. In 2018, the livestock manure N load was centred in the southwestern region (Hangzhou) and the eastern region (Nantong, Shanghai).Considering that there is no systematic standard limit of organic fertilizer N in China, we used the European Union’s farmland manure N limit standard of as the basis for determining the manure N load51. From 1980 to 2018, the manure N load did not exceed the European Union’s standard (170 kg hm−2), but still showed an increasing trend. It can be seen that the discharge of livestock manure in each city has had adverse impact on the environment of the Yangtze River Delta.From 1980 to 2018, the spatiotemporal evolution pattern of livestock manure P load in the soils was very similar to that of the manure N load, with an overall trend of first increasing and then decreasing (Fig. 5). From 1980 to 2010, the livestock manure P load showed an increasing trend. By 2010, the livestock manure P load had reached its maximum over the past 40 years. Areas with high livestock manure P load spread from the central area to the surrounding cities, and finally radiated to the surrounding regions with the central area as the load center; from 2010 to 2018, the livestock manure P load decreased significantly, and areas with high manure P load migrated from the central region to the southwestern marginal region and the northeastern coastal cities.Figure 5Spatiotemporal distribution of manure P load in the Yangtze River Delta from 1980 to 2018.Full size imageFrom 1980 to 2010, the average livestock manure P load in the Yangtze River Delta increased from 9.36 to 19.47 kg hm−2, representing a growth rate of 108.02%. Average manure P loads in Zhoushan, Ningbo (located in the eastern coastal area), and Jiaxing, Hangzhou, and Huzhou (located in the central and southern regions) showed significant increases of 347.66%, 323.28%, 198.13%, 181.88%, and 155.39%, respectively. From 2010 to 2018, the average livestock manure P load was reduced from 19.47 to 11.74 kg hm−2, representing a reduction of 39.71%. Zhoushan (located in the eastern coastal area) and Jiaxing and Suzhou (located in the central area) saw the most obvious declines of 73.26%, 72.49%, and 68.05%, respectively. In addition, the average manure P load content was greater than 20 kg hm−2 in the central region (Huzhou, Jiaxing, Shanghai) and the southwestern region (Hangzhou), but lower than 15 kg hm−2 in the southeastern region (Tai) and northwestern region (Yangzhou, Taizhou).From 1980 to 2018, the center of the livestock manure P load shifted from the central and northern regions of the study area to the eastern and northwestern regions, and then to the northeastern and southwestern regions after reaching peak P loading in each city. In the 1980s, the livestock manure P load was mainly concentrated in the middle (Jiaxing) and the northern region (Wuxi); in the 1990s, the center of the livestock manure P load moved to the east (Shanghai) and the northwest (Zhenjiang); at the beginning of the twenty-first century, the livestock manure P load remained at high levels in most cities. By 2018, the center of the livestock manure P load had accumulated toward the edge of the Yangtze River Delta, mainly in the northeastern (Nantong) and southwestern regions (Hangzhou).It is generally believed that annual P application from manure should not exceed 35 kg hm−256, otherwise excessive P will result in leaching of soil P and eutrophication of the water body. Livestock manure P load in Jinxing exceeded this standard in 2010, having a certain negative impact on the local environment. The rational treatment and utilization of livestock manure is imminent57.In summary, the Yangtze River Delta’s livestock manure has increased first and then decreased in the past 40 years. The reason for its significant increase before 2010 is mainly due to the urban construction and rapid economic development in various regions, and it spreads to the surrounding areas. With urban development, the area of agricultural land has been greatly reduced, and the area carrying livestock manure nutrient has been relatively reduced, resulting in an increase in the manure N and P load in the Yangtze River Delta. After 2010, the reason for the decrease in the manure N and P load in the Yangtze River Delta may be related to the successive introduction and implementation of environmental protection policies for livestock breeding in various provinces and cities. After the promulgation of the “Pollution Prevention and Control Technology Policy for Livestock and Poultry Breeding Industry” in 2010, the state has strengthened the macro-control of the livestock breeding industry, the Yangtze River Delta has been listed as a restricted development zone, the industrial structure has been further optimized and adjusted, and the amount of livestock breeding has been significantly reduced. This leads to a decrease in the manure N and P load in the Yangtze River Delta. The manure N and P load has been weakened year by year. This change pattern is also consistent with the trend of policy measures. To a certain extent, it shows that the current livestock and poultry pollution prevention and control measures have achieved remarkable results58.Changes in livestock manure N and P loads from 1980 to 2018Between 1980 and 2018, manure N and P loads showed significant spatial variability (Fig. 6). Due to the influence of government guidance, large demand for production land, and environmental protection pressure, changes to animal husbandry space have been promoted59,60,61. Livestock manure N and P loads in the northwestern and central regions have decreased significantly, while manure N and P loads in the surrounding areas have increased to varying degrees, showing a general shift from the central region to the surrounding cities. Specifically, in 2018, the manure N and P loads in Nanjing, Wuxi, Suzhou, and Jiaxing showed a decreasing trend. Compared with 1980, the manure N load decreased by 41.55%, 48.26%, 44.49%, and 33.46%, respectively. Compared with 1980, the manure P load decreased by 21.63%, 43.08%, 43.47%, and 17.98%, respectively. The reduction in manure N and P loads in the central region is related to policies of livestock pollution prevention, which were successively promulgated in the Tai Lake area32,33,62. The relevant departments have optimized the regional layout of animal husbandry and comprehensively made use of the livestock manure to reduce pollution, thereby reducing the manure N and P loads. All the 11 cities of Yangzhou, Zhenjiang, Changzhou, Nantong, Shanghai, Huzhou, Hangzhou, Shaoxing, Ningbo, Zhoushan, and Tai saw different degrees of increase in their manure N and P loads, and Hangzhou increased most. Compared with 1980, the manure N and P load of Hangzhou in 2018 increased by 76.72% and 112.58%, respectively. The manure N and P loads in the remaining 10 cities increase less than 100%. Increases in manure N and P loads may be related to the small scale63,64 and scattered distribution of local farms, and lack of environmental protection awareness among residents65,66.Figure 6(a) Percentage change of manure N loads from 1980 to 2018; (b) Percentage change of manure P loads from 1980 to 2018.Full size imageIdentification of high-risk areas of soil pollution caused by livestock manureThe high-risk areas for manure N and P emissions in 2018 were mainly located in the northwestern and southern regions of the Yangtze River Delta (Fig. 7), while the manure N and P emissions in some northern cities could not meet the nutrient requirements of the local land. Manure N and P emissions in Changzhou were 215.60% and 334.54% of the land’s absorption capacity, while those in Nanjing were 102.18% and 71.02%, respectively. It shows that the imbalance between the supply and demand of planting and breeding may cause a greater risk of environmental pollution of livestock and poultry, and it is necessary to reduce the scale of breeding or expand the scale of planting67,68. Manure P emissions in Wuxi, Huzhou, Jiaxing, Hangzhou, and Zhoushan were close to the maximum land absorption capacity for livestock manure nutrients, indicating that the supply and demand for planting and breeding were balanced. Therefore, the use of local organic fertilizers can be appropriately increased to reduce the amount of chemical fertilizers used and reduce the potential pollution threat caused by the enrichment of manure nutrients69,70. In the northern region, the discharge of livestock manure in Yangzhou, Taizhou, Nantong, and Zhenjiang was only 0–20% of the land absorption capacity, indicating that livestock manure nutrient in these areas cannot meet the nutrient needs of local crops. Therefore, additional nutrient supply is needed to meet the normal growth of local crops71.Figure 7(a) Manure N emission relative to land absorption capacity in 2018; (b) manure P emission relative to land absorption capacity in 2018.Full size imageSelection of typical models and main control factors based on long-term manure N and P emissionsSystematic clustering analysis of manure N and P emissionsAccording to the similarity of manure N and P emissions in the cities, we carried out variable analysis based on the Ward minimum variance method72. Cities were divided into four categories based on the change trend of manure N emissions in the Yangtze River Delta73 (Fig. 8a). Class I: Yangzhou, Tai, Wuxi, Suzhou, Shaoxing, Ningbo, Zhoushan, Hangzhou; class II: Nantong, Taizhou, Changzhou; class III: Huzhou, Jiaxing; class IV: Nanjing, Shanghai, Zhenjiang.Figure 8(a) Systematic clustering of manure N emissions from 1980 to 2018; (b) systematic clustering of manure P emissions from 1980 to 2018.Full size imageSimilar to the manure N classification method, cities were divided into four categories based on the change trend of manure P emissions in the Yangtze River Delta (Fig. 8b). Class I: Nantong, Taizhou, Changzhou, Yangzhou, Tai, Shaoxing, Ningbo, Zhoushan, Hangzhou; class II: Huzhou, Jiaxing; class III: Wuxi, Suzhou; class IV: Nanjing, Shanghai, Zhenjiang.Principal component analysis of manure N and P emissionsBased on the results of systematic clustering, typical cities were extracted to establish a typical model of manure N and P emissions and the main control factors were selected74. For manure N emissions, Yangzhou, Nantong, Huzhou, and Shanghai were selected from Class I, Class II, Class III, and Class IV, respectively. Combining these with the rising and falling trend characteristics of manure N emissions over the long study period, we established four typical models of manure N emissions as “up-down-down” model, “down-up-up” model, “down-up-down” model, and “up-up-down” model. According to the clustering results of manure P emissions, Hangzhou, Jiaxing, Suzhou, and Shanghai were selected from Class I, Class II, Class III, and Class IV, respectively. Four typical models of manure P emissions were established based on rising and falling trend characteristics of manure N emissions over the long study period as “up-up-down” model, “down-up-down” model, “down-level-down” model, and “up-down-down” model.Analysis on the main control factors for manure N emissionsFor the “up-down-down” model in Yangzhou, the total variance of the two principal components accounted for 85% (Fig. 9a); Nantong was characterized as a typical “down-up-up” model city, where the variance of the two principal components ac-counted for 82% (Fig. 9b); Huzhou represented a typical “down-up-down” model city, where the sum of the variances of the two principal components was 82% (Fig. 9c); in the “up-up-down” model for Shanghai, the sum of variance of the two principal com-ponents was 96% (Fig. 9d).Figure 9Manure N emissions from 1980 to 2018 and main control factors based on principal component analysis.Full size imageThere was a significant positive correlation between changes in manure N emissions and the proportion of the primary industry in Yangzhou, indicating that the “up-down-down” model of Class I is mainly affected by the primary industry. The “Pollution Prevention and Control Plan for Livestock Breeding Industry in Yangzhou” proposes to delimit forbidden and restricted areas, regulate livestock breeding, and reduce pollutant discharge from livestock breeding. Therefore, the scale of livestock breeding in Yangzhou has decreased, and the total manure N has shown a downward trend, which is consistent with the interannual changes in the proportion of the primary industry. The primary industry in this class is mainly agriculture and animal husbandry; thus, the main control factor for the total manure N is the proportion of primary industry.The total manure N in Nantong first decreased and then increased, and finally tended to be flat over the study period. There was a clear correlation between changes in manure N emissions in Nantong, meat production, and the total output value of animal husbandry, indicating that Class II is dominated by these two factors. The livestock breeding industry in Class II is relatively developed75,76, and meat production showed a consistent trend with total manure N. Hence, meat production and the total output value of animal husbandry are the factors having the greatest impact on Class II.Total manure N in Huzhou showed a trend of decreasing, then increasing, and finally decreasing. Manure N emissions changes and meat production showed a relatively obvious positive correlation, indicating that Class III is mainly affected by meat production and has little correlation with factors such as GDP, which is consistent with the changing trend of meat production. Huzhou’s agriculture is dominated by planting and fishery77, and the impact of animal husbandry is not significant, so meat production is the factor having the greatest impact on such cities.Total manure N in Shanghai began to increase over the study period, consistent with changes in meat production. There was a strong positive correlation between changes in manure N emissions and meat production, indicating that Class IV is greatly affected by arable land area. After that, Shanghai issued relevant measures to regulate livestock breeding, such as the “Shanghai Livestock a Breeding Management Measures”. Due to a decline in farmland area, meat production decreased, and manure N showed a downward trend78. Total manure N and meat production in Shanghai both increased at first and then decreased. Therefore, meat production is the most influential factor in such cities.Selection of main control factors for manure P emissionsIn the “up-up-down” model for Hangzhou, the total variance of the two principal components accounted for 91% (Fig. 10a); as a typical “down-up-down” model, the total variance of the two principal components in Jiaxing accounted for 88% (Fig. 10b); Su-zhou represented a typical “down-flat-down” model, and the sum of the variance of the two principal components accounted for 95% (Fig. 10c); as an example of the “up-down-down” model, the variance of the two principal components in Shanghai accounted for 96% (Fig. 10d).Figure 10Manure P emissions from 1980 to 2018 and main control factors based on principal component analysis.Full size imageManure P in Hangzhou first increased and then decreased, essentially the same as the trend for Hangzhou’s meat production. There was a strong positive correlation between changes in manure P emissions and the total meat production in Yangzhou, indicating that the “up-up-down” model of Class I is mainly affected by meat production. Due to the serious pollution from livestock and poultry in Hangzhou79, relevant policies have been introduced to reduce the amount of livestock breeding, thereby reducing meat production.Manure P in Jiaxing showed a trend of first decline, then rise, and finally decline. There was a large positive correlation between changes in manure P emissions and meat production in Jiaxing, indicating that the “down-up-down” model of Class II is mainly affected by meat production. Class II is dominated by agriculture and animal husbandry34,35, and the breeding industry is relatively developed. Meat production also changes with these industries, and its inter-annual variation is consistent with that of manure P.Manure P in Suzhou showed a downward trend, consistent with inter-annual changes in the area of arable land. Changes in manure P emissions and the area of arable land showed a significant positive correlation, indicating that the Class III cities with a “decrease-level-decrease” model were mainly affected by the area of arable land and the proportion of the primary industry. Suzhou is an industrial development base that cannot be ignored. Local economic development is relatively rapid80, so its arable land area is continuously decreasing81.The livestock manure P in Shanghai increased at first and then decreased, which is consistent with inter-annual changes in meat production. In 2002, the Shanghai Municipal People’s Government highlighted a special plan for Shanghai’s animal husbandry, stipulating prohibition of breeding areas, control of breeding areas and moderate breeding areas. The city’s total livestock and poultry production decreased, and meat production decreased82. There was a strong positive correlation between the changes in livestock manure P emissions and meat production, indicating that the “up-down-down” model of Class IV is mainly affected by meat production. More

Dobson, A. P. et al. Road will ruin Serengeti. Nature 467, 272–273 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Larsen, F. et al. Wildebeest migration drives tourism demand in the Serengeti. Biol. Conserv. 248, 108688 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Aikens, E. O. et al. The greenscape shapes surfing of resource waves in a large migratory herbivore. Ecol. Lett. 20, 741–750 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bischof, R. et al. A migratory northern ungulate in the pursuit of spring: jumping or surfing the green wave? Am. Nat. 180, 407–424 (2012).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Merkle, J. A. et al. Large herbivores surf waves of green-up during spring. Proc. Biol. Sci. 283, 20160456 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Fryxell, J. M., Greever, J. & Sinclair, A. R. E. Why are migratory ungulates so abundant? Am. Nat.131, 781–798 (1988).Article 

Google Scholar 
Staver, A. C. & Hempson, G. P. Seasonal dietary changes increase the abundances of savanna herbivore species. Sci. Adv. 6, eabd2848 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kauffman, M. J. et al. Causes, consequences, and conservation of ungulate migration. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 52, 453–478 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lundberg, J. & Moberg, F. Mobile link organisms and ecosystem functioning: implications for ecosystem resilience and management. Ecosystems 6, 0087–0098 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bauer, S. & Hoye, B. J. Migratory animals couple biodiversity and ecosystem functioning worldwide. Science 344, 1242552 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bolger, D. T., Newmark, W. D., Morrison, T. A., & Doak, D. F. The need for integrative approaches to understand and conserve migratory ungulates. Ecol. Lett. 11, 63–77 (2007).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Fryxell, J. M. & Holt, R. D. Environmental change and the evolution of migration. Ecology 94, 1274–1279 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Shaw, A. K. Drivers of animal migration and implications in changing environments. Evol. Ecol. 30, 991–1007 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hebblewhite, M. & Merrill, E. H. Trade-offs between predation risk and forage differ between migrant strategies in a migratory ungulate. Ecology 90, 3445–3454 (2009).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nelson, M. E. Development of migratory behavior in northern white-tailed deer. Can. J. Zool. 76, 426–432 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Berg, J. E., Hebblewhite, M., St. Clair, C. C. & Merrill, E. H. Prevalence and mechanisms of partial migration in ungulates. Front. Ecol. Evol. 7, 325 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jesmer, B. R. et al. Is ungulate migration culturally transmitted? Evidence of social learning from translocated animals. Science 361, 1023–1025 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sih, A., Bell, A. & Johnson, J. C. Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 372–378 (2004).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Found, R. & St. Clair, C. C. Behavioural syndromes predict loss of migration in wild elk. Anim. Behav. 115, 35–46 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Abraham, J. O., Hempson, G. P., Faith, J. T. & Staver, A. C.Seasonal strategies differ between tropical and extratropical herbivores. J. Anim. Ecol. 91, 681–692 (2022).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Whitehead, H., Laland, K. N., Rendell, L., Thorogood, R. & Whiten, A. The reach of gene–culture coevolution in animals. Nat. Commun. 10, 2405 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Scanlon, T. M., Caylor, K. K., Manfreda, S., Levin, S. A. & Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. Dynamic response of grass cover to rainfall variability: implications for the function and persistence of savanna ecosystems. Adv. Water Res. 28, 291–302 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Staver, A. C., Wigley-Coetsee, C. & Botha, J. Grazer movements exacerbate grass declines during drought in an African savanna. J. Ecol. 107, 1482–1491 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fryxell, J. M. & Sinclair, A. R. Causes and consequences of migration by large herbivores. Trends Ecol. Evol. 3, 237–241 (1988).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Running, S. W. et al. A continuous satellite-derived measure of global terrestrial primary production. Bioscience 54, 547–560 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Langvatn, R., Albon, S. D., Burkey, T. & Clutton-Brock, T. H. Climate, plant phenology and variation in age of first reproduction in a temperate herbivore. J. Anim. Ecol. 65, 653–670 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
Webber, Q. M. R. & McGuire, L. P. Heterothermy, body size, and locomotion as ecological predictors of migration in mammals. Mamm. Rev. 52, 82–95 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mann, D. H., Groves, P., Gaglioti, B. V. & Shapiro, B. A. Climate-driven ecological stability as a globally shared cause of Late Quaternary megafaunal extinctions: the Plaids and Stripes Hypothesis. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 94, 328–352 (2018).PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jarman, P. J. The social organisation of antelope in relation to their ecology. Behaviour 48, 215–267 (1974).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hein, A. M., Hou, C. & Gillooly, J. F. Energetic and biomechanical constraints on animal migration distance. Ecol. Lett. 15, 104–110 (2012).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Abraham, J. O., Hempson, G. P. & Staver, A. C. Drought-response strategies of savanna herbivores. Ecol. Evol. 9, 7047–7056 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Owen-Smith, R. N. Megaherbivores: the Influence of Very Large Body Size on Ecology (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1988).Book 

Google Scholar 
Gonzalez-Voyer, A. & von Hardenberg, A. in Modern Phylogenetic Comparative Methods and Their Application in Evolutionary Biology: Concepts and Practice (ed. Garamszegi, L. Z.) 201–229 (Springer, 2014).Pérez-Barbería, F. J., Gordon, I. J. & Nores, C. Evolutionary transitions among feeding styles and habitats in ungulates. Evol. Ecol. Res. 3, 221–230 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Staver, A. C., Abraham, J. O., Hempson, G. P., Karp, A. T. & Faith, J. T. The past, present, and future of herbivore impacts on savanna vegetation. J. Ecol. 109, 2804–2822 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Janis, C. M. in The Ecology of Browsing and Grazing (eds Gordon, I. J. & Prins, H. H. T.) 21–45 (Springer, 2008).Janis, C. M. Tertiary mammal evolution in the context of changing climates, vegetation, and tectonic events. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24, 467–500 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zachos, J., Pagani, M., Sloan, L., Thomas, E. & Billups, K. Trends, rhythms, and aberrations in global climate 65 Ma to present. Science 292, 686–693 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Edwards, E. J. et al. The origins of C4 grasslands: integrating evolutionary and ecosystem. Science 328, 587–591 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bhat, U., Kempes, C. P. & Yeakel, J. D. Scaling the risk landscape drives optimal life-history strategies and the evolution of grazing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 1580–1586 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fagan, W. F. et al. Spatial memory and animal movement. Ecol. Lett. 16, 1316–1329 (2013).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Merkle, J. A. et al. Spatial memory shapes migration and its benefits: evidence from a large herbivore. Ecol. Lett. 22, 1797–1805 (2019).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mueller, T., O’Hara, R. B., Converse, S. J., Urbanek, R. P. & Fagan, W. F. Social learning of migratory performance. Science 341, 999–1002 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wcislo, W. T. Behavioral environments and evolutionary change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20, 137–169 (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wyles, J. S., Kunkel, J. G. & Wilson, A. C. Birds, behavior, and anatomical evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 80, 4394–4397 (1983).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yeakel, J. D., Kempes, C. P. & Redner, S. Dynamics of starvation and recovery predict extinction risk and both Damuth’s law and Cope’s rule. Nat. Commun. 9, 657 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Purdon, A., Mole, M. A., Chase, M. J. & van Aarde, R. J. Partial migration in savanna elephant populations distributed across southern Africa. Sci. Rep. 8, 11331 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Upham, N. S., Esselstyn, J. A. & Jetz, W. Inferring the mammal tree: species-level sets of phylogenies for questions in ecology, evolution, and conservation. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000494 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Abrahms, B. et al. Memory and resource tracking drive blue whale migrations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 5582–5587 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Barnosky, A. D., Koch, P. L., Feranec, R. S., Wing, S. L. & Shabel, A. B. Assessing the causes of late Pleistocene extinctions on the continents. Science 306, 70–75 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dirzo, R. et al. Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science 345, 401–406 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Faith, J. T., Rowan, J. & Du, A. Early hominins evolved within non-analog ecosystems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 21478–21483 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Holdo, R. M. et al. A disease-mediated trophic cascade in the Serengeti and its implications for ecosystem C. PLoS Biol. 7, e1000210 (2009).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Janzen, D. H. & Martin, P. S. Neotropical anachronisms: the fruits the gomphotheres ate. Science 215, 19–27 (1982).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dantas, V. L. & Pausas, J. G. The legacy of the extinct Neotropical megafauna on plants and biomes. Nat. Commun. 13, 129 (2022).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Harris, G., Thirgood, S., Hopcraft, J. G. C., Cromsigt, J. P. G. M. & Berger, J. Global decline in aggregated migrations of large terrestrial mammals. Endanger. Species Res. 7, 55–76 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Seersholm, F. V. et al. Rapid range shifts and megafaunal extinctions associated with late Pleistocene climate change. Nat. Commun. 11, 2770 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Alroy, J. A multispecies overkill simulation of the end-Pleistocene megafaunal mass extinction. Science 292, 1893–1896 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Berger, J. The last mile: how to sustain long-distance migration in mammals. Conserv. Biol. 18, 320–331 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Faurby, S. & Svenning, J.-C. Resurrection of the island rule: human-driven extinctions have obscured a basic evolutionary pattern. Am. Nat. 187, 812–820 (2016).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wilman, H. et al. EltonTraits 1.0: species-level foraging attributes of the world’s birds and mammals. Ecology 95, 2027 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Smith, F. A. et al. Body mass of late Quaternary mammals. Ecology 84, 3403 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
IUCN. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2019 (IUCN, 2019).Toljagić, O., Voje, K. L., Matschiner, M., Liow, L. H. & Hansen, T. F. Millions of years behind: slow adaptation of ruminants to grasslands. Syst. Biol. 67, 145–157 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pinzon, J. E. & Tucker, C. J. A non-stationary 1981–2012 AVHRR NDVI3g time series. Remote Sens. 6, 6929–6960 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020).Revell, L. J. phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 217–223 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Blomberg, S. P., Garland, T. Jr. & Ives, A. R. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57, 717–745 (2003).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Orme, D. The caper package: Comparative analysis of phylogenetics and evolution in R. R package version 1.0.1 https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/caper/vignettes/caper.pdf (2018).Beaulieu, J. M. & O’Meara, B. OUwie: Analysis of evolutionary rates in an OU framework. R package version 2.6 https://rdrr.io/cran/OUwie/ (2014).Cressler, C. E., Butler, M. A. & King, A. A. Detecting adaptive evolution in phylogenetic comparative analysis using the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck model. Syst. Biol. 64, 953–968 (2015).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ho, L. S. & Ané, C. A linear-time algorithm for Gaussian and non-Gaussian trait evolution models. Syst. Biol. 63, 397–408 (2014).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
van der Bijl, W. phylopath: easy phylogenetic path analysis in R. PeerJ 6, e4718 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, L. et al. Large-scale ruminant genome sequencing provides insights into their evolution and distinct traits. Science 364, eaav6202 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

Joly, K. et al. Sci. Rep. 9, 15333 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shaw, A. K. Evol. Ecol 30, 991–1007 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bauer, S. & Hoye, B. J. Science 344, 1242552 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Abraham, J. O., Upham, N. S., Damian-Serrano, A. & Jesmer, B. R. Nat. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01749-4 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Middleton, A. D. et al. Oikos 127, 1060–1068 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hein, A. M., Hou, C. & Gillooly, J. F. Ecol. Lett. 15, 104–110 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zachos, J., Pagani, M., Sloan, L., Thomas, E. & Billups, K. Science 292, 686–693 (2001).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Edwards, E. J. et al. Science 328, 587–591 (2010).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Aikens, E. O. et al. Curr. Biol. 30, 3444–3449 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Merkle, J. A. et al. Ecol. Lett. 22, 1797–1805 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jesmer, B. R. et al. Science 361, 1023–1025 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Harris, G., Thirgood, S., Hopcraft, J. G. C., Cromsigt, J. & Berger, J. Endanger. Species Res. 7, 55–76 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Aikens, E. O. et al. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 4215–4225 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Doughty, C. E. et al. Ecography 43, 1107–1117 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kauffman, M. J. et al. Science 372, 566–569 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

Petropoulos, G. A. Fenugreek © 2002. (2002).Megias, C. et al. Free amino acids, Including Canavanine, in the Seeds from 24 Wild Mediterranean Legumes. J. Food Chem. Nanotechnol. 2, 178–183 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Legume Phylogeny Working Group. Legume phylogeny and classification in the 21st century: Progress , prospects and lessons for other species-rich clades. Taxon. 62, 217–248 (2013).Grela, E. R., Kiczorowska, B., Samolińska, W. & Matras, J. Chemical composition of leguminous seeds : part I — content of basic nutrients, amino acids, phytochemical compounds, and antioxidant activity. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 243, 1385–1395 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bradshaw, A. D. Producing patterns in plants. New Phytol. 170, 639–641 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brunetti, C., George, R. M., Tattini, M., Field, K. & Davey, M. P. Metabolomics in plant environmental physiology. J. Exp. Bot. 64, 4011–4020 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Allevato, D. M., Kiyota, E., Mazzafera, P. & Nixon, K. C. Ecometabolomic analysis of wild populations of Pilocarpus pennatifolius (Rutaceae ) Using Unimodal Analyses. Front. Plant Sci. 10 (2019).Chen, W., Hou, L., Zhang, Z., Pang, X. & Li, Y. Genetic diversity, population structure, and linkage disequilibrium of a core collection of Ziziphus jujuba assessed with genome-wide SNPs developed by genotyping-by-sequencing and SSR. Markers. 8, 1–14 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Aljuhaimi, F., Şimşek, Ş., Özcan, M. M., Ghafoor, K. & Babiker, E. E. Effect of location on chemical properties, amino acid and fatty acid compositions of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) seed and oils. J. Food Process. Preserv. 42, e13569 (2018).Kapoor, N. & Pande, V. Antioxidative defense to salt stress in Trigonella foenum-graecum L. Curr. discov. 2, 123–127 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Kyani, A. & Niknam, V. Comparative responses of two Trigonella species to salinity and drought stresses in vitro. Prog. Biol. Sci. 5, 233–248 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Saberali, S. F. & Moradi, M. Effect of salinity on germination and seedling growth of Trigonella foenum-graecum, Dracocephalum moldavica, Satureja hortensis and Anethum graveolens. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 18, 316–323 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Ahari, D. S., Kashi, A. K., Hassandokht, M. R., Amri, A. & Alizadeh, K. Assessment of drought tolerance in Iranian fenugreek landraces. J. Food Agric. Environ. 7, 414–419 (2009).Meena, S. et al. Water stress induced biochemical changes in fenugreek (Trigonella foenum graecum L .) genotypes. International J. Seed Spices. 6, 61–70 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Nour, A. A. M. & Magboul, B. I. Chemical and amino acid composition of fenugreek seeds grown in Sudan. Food Chem. 22, 1–5 (1986).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hassanzadeh, E., Chaichi, M. R., Mazaheri, D., Rezazadeh, S. & Badi, H. A. N. Physical and chemical variabilities among domestic Iranian Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graceum) seeds. Asian J. Plant Sci. 10, 323–330 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nagulapalli Venkata, K. C., Swaroop, A., Bagchi, D. & Bishayee, A. A small plant with big benefits: Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum Linn.) for disease prevention and health promotion. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 61 (2017).Robinson, A. R., Ukrainetz, N. K., Kang, K., Mansfield, S. D. & Mansfield, S. D. Metabolite profiling of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii ) field trials reveals strong environmental and weak genetic variation. New Phytol . 174, 762–773 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, C. et al. Extraction of sensitive bands for monitoring the winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) growth status and yields based on the spectral reflectance. PLoS ONE. 12, 1–16 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Mehrafarin, A. et al. Bioengineering of important secondary metabolites and metabolic pathways in fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.). J. Med. Plants 9, 1–18 (2010).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bhutia, P. H. & Sharangi, A. B. Influence of dates of sowing and irrigation scheduling on phenology, growth and yield dynamics of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum greacum L .). Legume Res. 41, 275–280 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Guillermo A. A. Dosio, Luis A. N. Aguirreza´bal,* Fernando H. Andrade & ABSTRACT, V. R. P. Solar Radiation Intercepted during Seed Filling and Oil Production in Two Sunflower Hybrids. Crop Sci. 40, 1637–1644 (2000).Ishimaru, T. et al. High temperature and low solar radiation during ripening differentially affect the composition of milky-white grains in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Prod. Sci. 21, 370–379 (2018).Larsson, S., Wirén, A., Lundgren, L. & Ericsson, T. Effects of light and nutrient stress on leaf phenolic chemistry in salix dasyclados and susceptibility to galerucella lineola (Coleoptera). Oikos. 47, 205–210 (1986).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chua, I. Y. P., King, P. J. H., Ong, K. H., Sarbini, S. R. & Yiu, P. H. Influence of light intensity and temperature on antioxidant activity in Premna serratifolia L. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 15, 605–614 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Sharma, A., Shahzad, B., Rehman, A., Bhardwaj, R., Landi, M. Response of phenylpropanoid pathway and the role of polyphenols in plants under abiotic stress. Molecules. 4, 2452. https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/24/13/2452Vaast, P. et al. Shade: A key factor for coffee sustainability and quality. 20th Int. Conf. Coffee Sci. 4, 887–896 (2005).Borges, C. V., Minatel, I. O., Gomez-Gomez, H. A. & Lima, G. P. P. Medicinal plants: Influence of environmental factors on the content of secondary metabolites. Med. Plants Environ. Challenges 259–277 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68717-9_15Hanifah, A., Maharijaya, A., Putri, S. P., Laviña, W. A. & Sobir. Untargeted metabolomics analysis of eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) fruit and its correlation to fruit morphologies. Metabolites 8, (2018).Szakiel, A. & Henry, M. Influence of environmental biotic factors on the content of saponins in plants Influence of environmental abiotic factors on the content of saponins in plants. Phytochem Rev. 10, (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11101-010-9177-xObata, T. & Fernie, A. R. The use of metabolomics to dissect plant responses to abiotic stresses. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 69, 3225–3243 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hamidou, M. et al. Genetic Variability and its implications on early generation sorghum lines selection for yield, Yield contributing traits, and resistance to sorghum midge. 2018, (2018).Tierno, R. & Galarreta, J. I. R. De. Heritability of target bioactive compounds and hydrophilic antioxidant capacity in purple- and red- fl eshed tetraploid potatoes. Crop Pasture Sci. 67, 1309–1317 (2016).Culley, D. Variation of anthocyanin and carotenoid contents and associated antioxidant values in potato breeding Lines. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 130 (2005). https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.130.2.174Stephens, M. J., Hall, H. K. & Alspach, P. A. Variation and heritabilities of antioxidant activity and total phenolic content estimated from a red raspberry factorial experiment. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 130, 403–411 (2015). https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.130.3.403Antoine, M., Nicolas, Y., Noubissié, T. J., Marcel, R. & Martin, J. Genetics of seed flavonoid content and antioxidant activity in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L . Walp .). Crop J. 4, 391–397 (2016).Matros, A. et al. Genome-metabolite associations revealed low heritability, high genetic complexity, and causal relations for leaf metabolites in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Exp. Bot
.
68, 415–428 (2017).Labarrere, B., Prinzing, A., Dorey, T., Chesneau, E., Hennion, F. Variations of secondary metabolites among natural suggest functional redundancy and versatility. Plants. 19, 234 (2019).Ghaffari, M. R., Shahinnia, F. & Schreiber, F. The metabolic signature of biomass formation in barley. Plant Cell Physiol. 57, 1943–1960 (2016).Aryal S, Baniya MK, Danekhu K, Kunwar P, Gurung R, Koirala N. Total phenolic content, flavonoid content and antioxidant potential of wild vegetables from Western Nepal. Plants. 11, 96 (2019).Praksh, R., Singh, D., Meena, B. L., Kumari, R. & Meena, S. K. Assessment of genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance for quantitative traits in Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.). Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App.Sci. 6, 2389–2399 (2017).Haefelé, C., Bonfils, C. & Sauvaire, Y. Characterization of a dioxygenase from Trigonella foenum-graecum involved in 4-hydroxyisoleucine biosynthesis. Phytochemistry 44, 563–566 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zafar, M. I. & Gao, F. 4-Hydroxyisoleucine: A Potential New Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. BioDrugs 30, 255–262 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hosamath, J. V., Hegde, R. V & Venugopal, C. K. Studies on genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L .). Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App.Sci. 6, 4029–4036 (2017).Al-Naggar AM, El-Salam R, Badran AE, Boulos ST, El-Moghazi M. Heritability and genetic advance from selection for morphological, biochemical and anatomical traits of Chenopodium quinoa under water stress. Bionature. 38, 66–85 (2018).Yadav, T. C., Meena, R. S. & Dhakar, L. Genetic variability analysis in Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) Genotypes. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 7, 2998–3003 (2018).Di Martino, C., Delfine, S., Pizzuto, R., Loreto, F. & Fuggi, A. Free amino acids and glycine betaine in leaf osmoregulation of spinach responding to increasing salt stress. New Phytol. 158, 455–463 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Haji, M. H., Sadat, E. S., Amanzadeh, Y., Izaddoust, M., Givi, E. Identification and quantitative determination of 4-hydroxyisoleucine in Trigonella foenum-graecum L. from Iran. J. Med. Plants 9, 29–34 (2010).Zhuo, R., Wang, L., Wang, L., Xiao, H. & Cai, S. Determination of trigonelline in Trigonella foenum-graecum L. by hydrophilic interaction chromatography. Se pu. 28, 379—382 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kim, D. O., Jeong, S. W. & Lee, C. Y. Antioxidant capacity of phenolic phytochemicals from various cultivars of plums. Food Chem. 81, 321–326 (2003).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Molyneux, P. The use of the stable free radical diphenylpicryl- hydrazyl (DPPH) for estimating antioxidant activity. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 26, 211–216 (2004)CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wei, T. Title visualization of a correlation matrix. R Packag. 56, 1–17 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Husson, F., Josse, J. and Pages, J., 2010. Principal component methods-hierarchical clustering-partitional clustering: why would we need to choose for visualizing data. Applied Mathematics Department, 17 (2010)Hanson, C. H., Robinson, H. F. & Comstock, R. E. Biometrical studies of yield in segregating populations of Korean Lespedeza1. Agron. J. 48, 268–272 (1956).Article 

Google Scholar 
Herbert, W., Robinson, H. F. & Comstock, R. E. Estimates of Genetic and Environmental Variability in Soybeans. Agron J. 46, 314–318 (1955).
Google Scholar 
Oksanen, J. et al. Package ‘vegan’ title community ecology package. Community Ecol. Packag. 2, 1–297 (2019).
Google Scholar 
R Foundation for Statistical Computing. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria 2, (2008). More

IPBES The IPBES Assessment Report on Land Degradation and Restoration (Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, 2018).Barlow, J. et al. Anthropogenic disturbance in tropical forests can double biodiversity loss from deforestation. Nature 535, 144–147 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
The State of the World’s Forests 2020. Forests, Biodiversity and People (FAO and UNEP, 2020).Pendrill, F. et al. Agricultural and forestry trade drives large share of tropical deforestation emissions. Glob. Environ. Change 56, 1–10 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Geist, H. J. & Lambin, E. F. What Drives Tropical Deforestation? LUCC Report Series 4 (LUCC International Project Office, 2001).Austin, K. G., González-Roglich, M., Schaffer-Smith, D., Schwantes, A. M. & Swenson, J. J. Trends in size of tropical deforestation events signal increasing dominance of industrial-scale drivers. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 054009 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Graesser, J., Ramankutty, N. & Coomes, O. T. Increasing expansion of large-scale crop production onto deforested land in sub-Andean South America. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 084021 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Meyfroidt, P. et al. Middle-range theories of land system change. Glob. Environ. Change 53, 52–67 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Verburg, P. H. et al. Land system science and sustainable development of the Earth system: a global land project perspective. Anthropocene 12, 29–41 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Václavík, T. et al. Investigating potential transferability of place-based research in land system science. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 095002 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stocks, G., Seales, L., Paniagua, F., Maehr, E. & Bruna, E. M. The geographical and institutional distribution of ecological research in the tropics. Biotropica 40, 397–404 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schröder, J. M., Ávila Rodríguez, L. P. & Günter, S. Research trends: tropical dry forests: the neglected research agenda? For. Policy Econ. 122, 102333 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rodrigues, A. S. L. et al. Boom-and-bust development patterns across the Amazon deforestation frontier. Science 324, 1435–1437 (2009).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
de Jong, E. B. P., Knippenberg, L. & Bakker, L. New frontiers: an enriched perspective on extraction frontiers in Indonesia. Crit. Asian Stud. 49, 330–348 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tyukavina, A. et al. Congo Basin forest loss dominated by increasing smallholder clearing. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat2993 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pacheco, P. et al. Deforestation Fronts: Drivers and Responses in a Changing World (WWF, 2021).Hansen, M. C. et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342, 850–853 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Oberlack, C. et al. Archetype analysis in sustainability research: meanings, motivations, and evidence-based policy making. Ecol. Soc. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10747-240226 (2019).Sietz, D. et al. Archetype analysis in sustainability research: methodological portfolio and analytical frontiers. Ecol. Soc. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11103-240334 (2019).Václavík, T., Lautenbach, S., Kuemmerle, T. & Seppelt, R. Mapping global land system archetypes. Glob. Environ. Change 23, 1637–1647 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vallejos, M. et al. Social-ecological functional types: connecting people and ecosystems in the Argentine Chaco. Ecosystems 23, 471–484 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Oberlack, C., Tejada, L., Messerli, P., Rist, S. & Giger, M. Sustainable livelihoods in the global land rush? Archetypes of livelihood vulnerability and sustainability potentials. Glob. Environ. Change 41, 153–171 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Miles, L. et al. A global overview of the conservation status of tropical dry forests. J. Biogeogr. 33, 491–505 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pennington, R. T., Lehmann, C. E. R. & Rowland, L. M. Tropical savannas and dry forests. Curr. Biol. 28, R541–R545 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ribeiro, N. S., Katerere, Y., Chirwa, P. W. & Grundy, I. M. in Miombo Woodlands in a Changing Environment: Securing the Resilience and Sustainability of People and Woodlands (eds Ribeiro, N. S. et al.) 1–8 (Springer, 2020).Murphy, B. P., Andersen, A. N. & Parr, C. L. The underestimated biodiversity of tropical grassy biomes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20150319 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chidumayo, E. & Marunda, C. in The Dry Forests and Woodlands of Africa (eds Chidumayo, E. N. & Gumbo, D.) 1–9 (Earthscan, 2010).Gasparri, N. I. & Grau, H. R. Deforestation and fragmentation of Chaco dry forest in NW Argentina (1972–2007). For. Ecol. Manag. 258, 913–921 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Miranda, J., Börner, J., Kalkuhl, M. & Soares-Filho, B. Land speculation and conservation policy leakage in Brazil. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 045006 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ingalls, M. L., Meyfroidt, P., To, P. X., Kenney-Lazar, M. & Epprecht, M. The transboundary displacement of deforestation under REDD+: problematic intersections between the trade of forest-risk commodities and land grabbing in the Mekong region. Glob. Environ. Change 50, 255–267 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Davis, K. F. et al. Tropical forest loss enhanced by large-scale land acquisitions. Nat. Geosci. 13, 482–488 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ordway, E. M., Asner, G. P. & Lambin, E. F. Deforestation risk due to commodity crop expansion in sub-Saharan Africa. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 044015 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vancutsem, C. et al. Long-term (1990–2019) monitoring of forest cover changes in the humid tropics. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe1603 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sunderland, T. et al. Global dry forests: a prologue. Int. For. Rev. 17, 1–9 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Grau, H. R. & Aide, M. Globalization and land-use transitions in Latin America. Ecol. Soc. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-02559-130216 (2008).le Polain de Waroux, Y. et al. Rents, actors, and the expansion of commodity frontiers in the Gran Chaco. Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr. 108, 204–225 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Romero-Muñoz, A. et al. Fires scorching Bolivia’s Chiquitano forest. Science 366, 1082 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hoang, N. T. & Kanemoto, K. Mapping the deforestation footprint of nations reveals growing threat to tropical forests. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 845–853 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Eigenbrod, F. et al. Identifying agricultural frontiers for modeling global cropland expansion. One Earth 3, 504–514 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nolte, C., le Polain de Waroux, Y., Munger, J., Reis, T. N. P. & Lambin, E. F. Conditions influencing the adoption of effective anti-deforestation policies in South America’s commodity frontiers. Glob. Environ. Change 43, 1–14 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Volante, J. N. & Seghezzo, L. Can’t see the forest for the trees: can declining deforestation trends in the Argentinian Chaco region be ascribed to efficient law enforcement? Ecol. Econ. 146, 408–413 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chirwa, P. W. & Adeyemi, O. in Zero Hunger: Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (eds Leal Filho, W. et al.) 1–15 (Springer, 2019).Pacheco, P. Actor and frontier types in the Brazilian Amazon: assessing interactions and outcomes associated with frontier expansion. Geoforum 43, 864–874 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
García, A. K., Meyfroidt, P., Abeygunawardane, D. & Sitoe, A. Waves and legacies: the making of an investment frontier in Niassa, Mozambique. Ecol. Soc. 27, 40 (2022).Leal, I. R., Da Silva, J. M. C., Tabarelli, M. & Lacher, T. E.Jr Changing the course of biodiversity conservation in the Caatinga of northeastern Brazil. Conserv. Biol. 19, 701–706 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Osabuohien, E. S. & Karakara, A. A. in The Palgrave Handbook of Agricultural and Rural Development in Africa (ed. Osabuohien, E. S.) 627–640 (Springer, 2020).Gautier, D., Garcia, C., Negi, S. & Wardell, D. A. The limits and failures of existing forest governance standards in semi-arid contexts. Int. For. Rev. 17, 114–126 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Brandt, M. et al. An unexpectedly large count of trees in the West African Sahara and Sahel. Nature 587, 78–82 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bastin, J. F. et al. The extent of forest in dryland biomes. Science 356, 635–638 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fagan, M. E. A lesson unlearned? Underestimating tree cover in drylands biases global restoration maps. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 4679–4690 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bey, A. & Meyfroidt, P. Improved land monitoring to assess large-scale tree plantation expansion and trajectories in Northern Mozambique. Environ. Res. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ac26ab (2021).Harris, N., Goldman, E. D. & Gibbes, S. Spatial Database of Planted Trees (SDPT Version 1.0) (World Resources Institute, accessed 21 November 2021).Timberlake, W. J., Chidumayo, E. & Sawadogo, L. in The Dry Forests and Woodlands of Africa (eds Chidumayo, E. N. & Gumbo, D.) 11–41 (Earthscan, 2010).Portillo-Quintero, C. A. & Sánchez-Azofeifa, G. A. Extent and conservation of tropical dry forests in the Americas. Biol. Conserv. 143, 144–155 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dinerstein, E. et al. An ecoregion-based approach to protecting half the terrestrial realm. BioScience 67, 534–545 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Murphy, P. G. & Lugo, A. E. Ecology of tropical dry forest. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17, 67–88 (1986).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lock, J. M. in Neotropical Savannas and Seasonally Dry Forests (eds Pennington, R. T. & Ratter, J. A.) 449–467 (CRC Press, 2006).Malhi, Y. et al. Megafauna and ecosystem function from the Pleistocene to the Anthropocene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 838–846 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Baldi, G., Veron, S. R. & Jobbagy, E. G. The imprint of humans on landscape patterns and vegetation functioning in the dry subtropics. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 441–458 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lahsen, M., Bustamante, M. M. C. & Dalla-Nora, E. L. Undervaluing and overexploiting the Brazilian Cerrado at our peril. Environ. Sci. Policy Sustain. Dev. 58, 4–15 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sitoe, A., Chidumayo, E. & Alberto, M. in The Dry Forests and Woodlands of Africa (eds Chidumayo, E. N. & Gumbo, D.) 131–153 (Earthscan, 2010).Ozdogan, M. & Woodcock, C. E. Resolution dependent errors in remote sensing of cultivated areas. Remote Sens. Environ. 103, 203–217 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Estes, L. et al. A large-area, spatially continuous assessment of land cover map error and its impact on downstream analyses. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 322–337 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dlamini, W. M. Mapping forest and woodland loss in Swaziland: 1990–2015. Remote Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ. 5, 45–53 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Geist, H. J. & Lambin, E. F. Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation: tropical forests are disappearing as the result of many pressures, both local and regional, acting in various combinations in different geographical locations. BioScience 52, 143–150 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Walker, R. Mapping process to pattern in the landscape change of the Amazonian frontier. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 93, 376–398 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Baumann, M. et al. Frontier metrics for a process-based understanding of deforestation dynamics. Preprint at EarthArXiv https://doi.org/10.31223/X55S7J (2022).Curtis, P. G., Slay, C. M., Harris, N. L., Tyukavina, A. & Hansen, M. C. Classifying drivers of global forest loss. Science 361, 1108–1111 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lesiv, M. et al. Estimating the global distribution of field size using crowdsourcing. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 174–186 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Weiss, D. J. et al. A global map of travel time to cities to assess inequalities in accessibility in 2015. Nature 553, 333–336 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Global Agro-Ecological Zones (GAEZ v3. 0) (IIASA and FAO, accessed 24 July 2020).Heinimann, A. et al. A global view of shifting cultivation: recent, current, and future extent. PLoS ONE 12, e0184479 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Shamseer, L. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ 349, g7647 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain
the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in
Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles
and JavaScript. More

Update of the Zero Draft of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (Convention on Biological Diversity, 2020); https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/3064/749a/0f65ac7f9def86707f4eaefa/post2020-prep-02-01-en.pdfCorlett, R. T. et al. Impacts of the coronavirus pandemic on biodiversity conservation. Biol. Conserv. 246, 108571 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Singh, R. et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on rangers and the role of rangers as a planetary health service. Parks 27, 119–134 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hockings, M. et al. COVID‐19 and protected and conserved areas. Parks 26, 7–24 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Waithaka, J. The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Africa’s Protected Areas Operations and Programmes (IUCN, 2020); https://www.iucn.org/sites/dev/files/content/documents/2020/report_on_the_impact_of_covid_19_doc_july_10.pdfLindsey, P. et al. Conserving Africa’s wildlife and wildlands through the COVID-19 crisis and beyond. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1300–1310 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Amador-Jiménez, M., Millner, N., Palmer, C., Pennington, R. T. & Sileci, L. The unintended impact of Colombia’s COVID-19 lockdown on forest fires. Environ. Resour. Econ. 76, 1081–1105 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Poulter, B., Freeborn, P. H., Matt Jolly, W. & Morgan Varner, J. COVID-19 lockdowns drive decline in active fires in southeastern United States. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2015666118 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Curtis, P. G., Slay, C. M., Harris, N. L., Tyukavina, A. & Hansen, M. C. Classifying drivers of global forest loss. Science 361, 1108–1111 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Leclère, D. et al. Bending the curve of terrestrial biodiversity needs an integrated strategy. Nature 585, 551–556 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Geldmann, J., Manica, A., Burgess, N. D., Coad, L. & Balmford, A. A global-level assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas at resisting anthropogenic pressures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 23209–23215 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tabor, K. et al. Evaluating the effectiveness of conservation and development investments in reducing deforestation and fires in Ankeniheny–Zahemena Corridor, Madagascar. PLoS ONE 12, e0190119 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Cochrane, M. A. Fire science for rainforests. Nature 421, 913–919 (2003).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Driscoll, D. A. et al. How fire interacts with habitat loss and fragmentation. Biol. Rev. 96, 976–998 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nelson, A. & Chomitz, K. M. Effectiveness of strict vs. multiple use protected areas in reducing tropical forest fires: a global analysis using matching methods. PLoS ONE 6, e22722 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Carlson, K. M. et al. Effect of oil palm sustainability certification on deforestation and fire in Indonesia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 121–126 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Turco, M. et al. Skilful forecasting of global fire activity using seasonal climate predictions. Nat. Commun. 9, 2718 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Abatzoglou, J. T. & Williams, A. P. Impact of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire across western US forests. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 11770–11775 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Andela, N. et al. A human-driven decline in global burned area. Science 356, 1356–1362 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Brooks, T. M. et al. Global biodiversity conservation priorities. Science 313, 58–61 (2006).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jones, J. P. G. et al. Last chance for Madagascar’s biodiversity. Nat. Sustain. 2, 350–352 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gardner, C. J. et al. The rapid expansion of Madagascar’s protected area system. Biol. Conserv. 220, 29–36 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hockley, N., Mandimbiniaina, R. & Rakotonarivo, O. S. Fair and equitable conservation: do we really want it, and if so, do we know how to achieve it? Madag. Conserv. Dev. 13, 3–5 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Corson, C. in Conservation and Environmental Management in Madagascar (ed. Scales, I. R.) 193–215 (Routledge, 2014).Davies, B. et al. Community factors and excess mortality in first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in England. Nat. Commun. 12, 3755 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kull, C. A. & Lehmann, C. E. R. in The New Natural History of Madagascar (ed. Goodman, S. M.) 197–203 (Princeton Univ. Press, in the press).Razafindrakoto, M., Roubaud, F. & Wachsberger, J.-M. Puzzle and Paradox: A Political Economy of Madagascar (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2020).Ruggiero, P. G. C., Pfaff, A., Nichols, E., Rosa, M. & Metzger, J. P. Election cycles affect deforestation within Brazil’s Atlantic Forest. Conserv. Lett. 14, e12818 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Morpurgo, J., Kissling, W. D., Tyrrell, P., Negret, P. J. & Allan, J. R. The role of elections as drivers of tropical deforestation. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.04.442551 (2021).Tourism in Madagascar (WorldData, 2021); https://www.worlddata.info/africa/madagascar/tourism.phpRapport annuel d’activites 2018 (Madagascar National Parks, 2018).Vyawahare, M. As minister and activists trade barbs, Madagascar’s forests burn. Mongabay (17 December 2020).Cochrane, M. A. in Tropical Fire Ecology: Climate Change, Land Use, and Ecosystem Dynamics (ed. Cochrane, M. A.) 389–426 (Springer-Verlag, 2009); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77381-8_14Cochrane, M. A. in Tropical Rainforest Responses to Climatic Change (eds Bush, M. et al.) 213–240 (Springer, 2011); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05383-2_7Mondal, N. & Sukumar, R. Fires in seasonally dry tropical forest: testing the varying constraints hypothesis across a regional rainfall gradient. PLoS ONE 11, e0159691 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Madagascar Economic Update: COVID-19 Increases Poverty, a New Reform Momentum is Needed to Build Back Stronger (World Bank, 2020); https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/madagascar/publication/madagascar-economic-update-covid-19-increases-poverty-a-new-reform-momentum-is-needed-to-build-back-strongerBaker, A. Climate, not conflict. Madagascar’s famine is the first in modern history to be solely caused by global warming. Time (20 July 2021).Graham, V. et al. Management resourcing and government transparency are key drivers of biodiversity outcomes in Southeast Asian protected areas. Biol. Conserv. 253, 108875 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Geldmann, J. et al. A global analysis of management capacity and ecological outcomes in terrestrial protected areas. Conserv. Lett. 11, e12434 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gill, D. A. et al. Capacity shortfalls hinder the performance of marine protected areas globally. Nature 543, 665–669 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Eklund, J., Coad, L., Geldmann, J. & Cabeza, M. What constitutes a useful measure of protected area effectiveness? A case study of management inputs and protected area impacts in Madagascar. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 1, e107 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Nolte, C. & Agrawal, A. Linking management effectiveness indicators to observed effects of protected areas on fire occurrence in the Amazon rainforest. Conserv. Biol. 27, 155–165 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schleicher, J., Peres, C. A. & Leader-Williams, N. Conservation performance of tropical protected areas: how important is management? Conserv. Lett. 12, e12650 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schroeder, W., Oliva, P., Giglio, L. & Csiszar, I. A. The new VIIRS 375m active fire detection data product: algorithm description and initial assessment. Remote Sens. Environ. 143, 85–96 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Forest Monitoring Designed for Action (Global Forest Watch, 2021); https://www.globalforestwatch.org/Musinsky, J. et al. Conservation impacts of a near real-time forest monitoring and alert system for the tropics. Remote Sens. Ecol. Conserv 4, 189–196 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ramo, R. et al. African burned area and fire carbon emissions are strongly impacted by small fires undetected by coarse resolution satellite data. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2011160118 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Global Economic Prospects, June 2021 (World Bank, 2021).Razanatsoa, E. et al. Fostering local involvement for biodiversity conservation in tropical regions: lessons from Madagascar during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Biotropica 53, 994–1003 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nolte, C., Agrawal, A., Silvius, K. M. & Soares-Filho, B. S. Governance regime and location influence avoided deforestation success of protected areas in the Brazilian Amazon. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 4956–4961 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
ArcGIS 10.8 for Desktop (ESRI, 2021).Python Language Reference v.3.8.5 (Python Software Foundation, 2021); http://www.python.orgR Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R version 4.0.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020); https://www.R-project.org/Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer-Verlag, 2016).The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN, 2020); www.protectedplanet.netGoodman, S. M., Raherilalao, J. M. & Wohlhauser, S. The Terrestrial Protected Areas of Madagascar: Their History, Description, and Biota (Association Vahatra, 2018).Dinerstein, E. et al. An ecoregion-based approach to protecting half the terrestrial realm. Bioscience 67, 534–545 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
NRT VIIRS 375 m Active Fire Product VNP14IMGT (NASA, 2020); https://doi.org/10.5067/FIRMS/VIIRS/VNP14IMGT_NRT.002Chen, D., Shevade, V., Baer, A. E. & Loboda, T. V. Missing burns in the high northern latitudes: the case for regionally focused burned area products. Remote Sens. 13, 4145 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schroeder, W. & Giglio, L. NASA VIIRS Land Science Investigator Processing System (SIPS) Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) 375 m & 750 m Active Fire Products: Product User’s Guide Version 1.4 (NASA, 2018).Global Precipitation Measurement: Precipitation Data Directory (NASA, 2020); https://gpm.nasa.gov/data/directoryGlobal Precipitation Measurement: The Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) (NASA, 2020) https://gpm.nasa.gov/missions/trmmHantson, S. et al. Rare, intense, big fires dominate the global tropics under drier conditions. Sci. Rep. 7, 14374 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zeileis, A., Kleiber, C. & Jackman, S. Regression models for count data in R. J. Stat. Softw. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v027.i08 (2008).Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N. J., Saveliev, A. A. & Smith, G. M. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R 261–293 (Springer, 2009).Joseph, M. B. et al. Spatiotemporal prediction of wildfire extremes with Bayesian finite sample maxima. Ecol. Appl. 29, e01898 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Guo, F. et al. Comparison of six generalized linear models for occurrence of lightning-induced fires in northern Daxing’an Mountains, China. J. For. Res. 27, 379–388 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Garay, A. M., Hashimoto, E. M., Ortega, E. M. M. & Lachos, V. H. On estimation and influence diagnostics for zero-inflated negative binomial regression models. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 55, 1304–1318 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N. J., Saveliev, A. A. & Smith, G. M. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R (Springer, 2009).Shcherbakov, M. V. et al. A survey of forecast error measures. World Appl. Sci. J. 24, 171–176 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Efron, B. Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann. Stat. 7, 1–26 (1979).Article 

Google Scholar 
Canty, A. & Ripley, B. boot: Bootstrap R (S-Plus) Functions. R package version 1.3-28 (2021). More