Ecology

Gienapp, P., Reed, T. E. & Visser, M. E. Why climate change will invariably alter selection pressures on phenology. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20141611 (2014).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Parmesan, C. Influences of species, latitudes and methodologies on estimates of phenological response to global warming. Glob. Change Biol. 13, 1860–1872 (2007).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Root, T. L. et al. Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature 421, 57–60 (2003).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Thackeray, S. J. et al. Phenological sensitivity to climate across taxa and trophic levels. Nature 535, 241–245 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Thackeray, S. J. et al. Trophic level asynchrony in rates of phenological change for marine, freshwater and terrestrial environments. Glob. Change Biol. 16, 3304–3313 (2010).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Blondel, J., Dias, P. C., Perret, P., Maistre, M. & Lambrechts, M. M. Selection-based biodiversity at a small spatial scale in a low-dispersing insular bird. Science 285, 1399–1402 (1999).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Serreze, M. C. & Barry, R. G. Processes and impacts of Arctic amplification: a research synthesis. Glob. Planet. Change 77, 85–96 (2011).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Inouye, D. W., Barr, B., Armitage, K. B. & Inouye, B. D. Climate change is affecting altitudinal migrants and hibernating species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 97, 1630–1633 (2000).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Walther, G.-R. et al. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416, 389–395 (2002).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Reneerkens, J. et al. Effects of food abundance and early clutch predation on reproductive timing in a high Arctic shorebird exposed to advancements in arthropod abundance. Ecol. Evol. 6, 7375–7386 (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bonamour, S., Chevin, L.-M., Charmantier, A. & Teplitsky, C. Phenotypic plasticity in response to climate change: the importance of cue variation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 374, 20180178 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Saalfeld, S. T. & Lanctot, R. B. Multispecies comparisons of adaptability to climate change: a role for life-history characteristics? Ecol. Evol. 7, 10492–10502 (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Visser, M. E. et al. Variable responses to large-scale climate change in European Parus populations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 270, 367–372 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wolkovich, E. M. et al. Warming experiments underpredict plant phenological responses to climate change. Nature 485, 494–497 (2012).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Asch, M. V., Tienderen, P. H. V., Holleman, L. J. M. & Visser, M. E. Predicting adaptation of phenology in response to climate change, an insect herbivore example. Glob. Change Biol. 13, 1596–1604 (2007).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Silverin, B. et al. Ambient temperature effects on photo induced gonadal cycles and hormonal secretion patterns in Great Tits from three different breeding latitudes. Horm. Behav. 54, 60–68 (2008).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kharouba, H. M. & Wolkovich, E. M. Disconnects between ecological theory and data in phenological mismatch research. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 406–415 (2020).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Visser, M. E. & Gienapp, P. Evolutionary and demographic consequences of phenological mismatches. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 879–885 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Silverin, B., Massa, R. & Stokkan, K. A. Photoperiodic adaptation to breeding at different latitudes in great tits. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 90, 14–22 (1993).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Phillimore, A. B. et al. Passerines may be sufficiently plastic to track temperature‐mediated shifts in optimum lay date. Glob. Chang Biol. 22, 3259–3272 (2016).ADS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bailey, L. D. & van de Pol, M. climwin: an R toolbox for climate window analysis. PLoS ONE 11, e0167980 (2016).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
van de Pol, M. et al. Identifying the best climatic predictors in ecology and evolution. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 1246–1257 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Van de Pol, M. & Bailey, L. D. Quantifying the climatic sensitivity of individuals, populations, and species. Eff. Clim. Change Birds 44; pp. 44–59 (2019).Culina, A. et al. Connecting the data landscape of long‐term ecological studies: the SPI‐Birds data hub. J. Anim. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13388 (2020).Verhagen, I., Tomotani, B. M., Gienapp, P. & Visser, M. E. Temperature has a causal and plastic effect on timing of breeding in a small songbird. J. Exp. Biol. 223, jeb218784 (2020).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Buse, A., Dury, S. J., Woodburn, R. J. W., Perrins, C. M. & Good, J. E. G. Effects of elevated temperature on multi-species interactions: the case of Pedunculate Oak, Winter Moth and Tits. Funct. Ecol. 13, 74–82 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Van Noordwijk, A. J., McCleery, R. H. & Perrins, C. M. Selection for the timing of great tit breeding in relation to caterpillar growth and temperature. J. Anim. Ecol. 64, 451–458 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
Visser, M. E., Holleman, L. J. M. & Gienapp, P. Shifts in caterpillar biomass phenology due to climate change and its impact on the breeding biology of an insectivorous bird. Oecologia 147, 164–172 (2006).ADS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Foden, W. B. et al. Identifying the world’s most climate change vulnerable species: a systematic trait-based assessment of all birds, amphibians and corals. PLOS ONE 8, e65427 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pacifici, M. et al. Assessing species vulnerability to climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 215–224 (2015).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Williams, S. E., Shoo, L. P., Isaac, J. L., Hoffmann, A. A. & Langham, G. Towards an integrated framework for assessing the vulnerability of species to climate change. PLOS Biol. 6, e325 (2008).Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Dhondt, A. A., Eyckerman, R., Moermans, R. & Hublé, J. Habitat and laying date of Great and Blue Tit Parus major and P. caeruleus. Ibis 126, 388–397 (1984).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bourgault, P., Thomas, D., Perret, P. & Blondel, J. Spring vegetation phenology is a robust predictor of breeding date across broad landscapes: a multi-site approach using the Corsican blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus). Oecologia 162, 885–892 (2010).ADS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Blondel, J., Dias, P. C., Maistre, M. & Perret, P. Habitat Heterogeneity and Life-History Variation of Mediterranean Blue Tits (Parus caeruleus). Auk 110, 511–520 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
Blondel, J., Dervieux, A., Maistre, M. & Perret, P. Feeding ecology and life history variation of the blue tit in Mediterranean deciduous and sclerophyllous habitats. Oecologia 88, 9–14 (1991).ADS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Vatka, E., Orell, M. & Rytkönen, S. Warming climate advances breeding and improves synchrony of food demand and food availability in a boreal passerine. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 3002–3009 (2011).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Massa, B., Cusimano, C. A., Margagliotta, B. & Galici, R. Reproductive characteristics and differential response to seasonal temperatures of blue and great tits (Cyanistes caeruleus & Parus major) in three neighbouring mediterranean habitats. Rev. Ecol. 66, 157–172 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Both, C., van Asch, M., Bijlsma, R. G., van den Burg, A. B. & Visser, M. E. Climate change and unequal phenological changes across four trophic levels: constraints or adaptations? J. Anim. Ecol. 78, 73–83 (2009).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Nolet, B. A. et al. Faltering lemming cycles reduce productivity and population size of a migratory Arctic goose species. J. Anim. Ecol. 82, 804–813 (2013).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Petanidou, T. et al. Variable flowering phenology and pollinator use in a community suggest future phenological mismatch. Acta Oecologica 59, 104–111 (2014).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
McLean, N., van der Jeugd, H. P. & van de. Pol, M. High intra-specific variation in avian body condition responses to climate limits generalisation across species. PLOS ONE 13, e0192401 (2018).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
van de Pol, M. & Wright, J. A simple method for distinguishing within-versus between-subject effects using mixed models. Anim. Behav. 77, 753–758 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Radchuk, V. et al. Adaptive responses of animals to climate change are most likely insufficient. Nat. Commun. 10, 3109 (2019).ADS 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Burgess, M. D. et al. Tritrophic phenological match–mismatch in space and time. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 970–975 (2018).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Martin, R. O., Cunningham, S. J. & Hockey, P. A. R. Elevated temperatures drive fine-scale patterns of habitat use in a savanna bird community. Ostrich 86, 127–135 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Latimer, C. E. & Zuckerberg, B. Forest fragmentation alters winter microclimates and microrefugia in human-modified landscapes. Ecography 40, 158–170 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Frey, S. J. K. et al. Spatial models reveal the microclimatic buffering capacity of old-growth forests. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501392 (2016).ADS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Zellweger, F. et al. Forest microclimate dynamics drive plant responses to warming. Science 368, 772–775 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hansen, M. C. et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342, 850–853 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Tang, H. et al. Characterizing global forest canopy cover distribution using spaceborne lidar. Remote Sens. Environ. 231, 111262 (2019).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Visser, M. E. & Both, C. Shifts in phenology due to global climate change: the need for a yardstick. Proc. Biol. Sci. 272, 2561–2569 (2005).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Samplonius, J. M. et al. Strengthening the evidence base for temperature-mediated phenological asynchrony and its impacts. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 155–164 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Langmore, N. E., Bailey, L. D., Heinsohn, R. G., Russell, A. F. & Kilner, R. M. Egg size investment in superb fairy-wrens: helper effects are modulated by climate. Proc. Biol. Sci. 283, 20161875 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
del Hoyo, J. et al. Handbook of the Birds of the World and BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World (Lynx Edicions/Birdlife International, 2016).Both, C. et al. Large–scale geographical variation confirms that climate change causes birds to lay earlier. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 271, 1657–1662 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Haylock, M. R. et al. A European daily high-resolution gridded data set of surface temperature and precipitation for 1950–2006. J. Geophys. Res. Atmospheres 113, D20119 (2008).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Klok, E. J. & Klein Tank, A. M. G. Updated and extended European dataset of daily climate observations. Int. J. Climatol. 29, 1182–1191 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Simmonds, E. G., Cole, E. F. & Sheldon, B. C. Cue identification in phenology: a case study of the predictive performance of current statistical tools. J. Anim. Ecol. 88, 1428–1440 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Samplonius, J. M. et al. Phenological sensitivity to climate change is higher in resident than in migrant bird populations among European cavity breeders. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 3780–3790 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Slagsvold, T. Annual and geographical variation in the time of breeding of the great tit Parus major and the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca in relation to environmental phenology and spring temperature. Ornis Scand. Scand. J. Ornithol. 7, 127–145 (1976).Article 

Google Scholar 
Haest, B., Hüppop, O. & Bairlein, F. Challenging a 15‐year‐old claim: the North Atlantic Oscillation index as a predictor of spring migration phenology of birds. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 1523–1537 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rosseel, Y. lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J. Stat. Softw. 48, 1–36 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Metzger, M. J., Bunce, R. G. H., Jongman, R. H. G., Mücher, C. A. & Watkins, J. W. A climatic stratification of the environment of Europe. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 14, 549–563 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rousset, F. & Ferdy, J.-B. Testing environmental and genetic effects in the presence of spatial autocorrelation. Ecography 37, 781–790 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
R. Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2018).Bailey, L. D. et al. Bird populations most exposed to climate change are less sensitive to climatic variation, Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5747634 (2022).Bailey, L. D. et al. Bird populations most exposed to climate change are less sensitive to climatic variation, LiamDBailey/baileyetal2021, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6027546 (2022). More

Fosberg, F. R. & Chapman, V. J. Mangrove Vegetation. Taxon 26, 113 (1977).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vo, Q. T., Kuenzer, C., Vo, Q. M., Moder, F. & Oppelt, N. Review of valuation methods for mangrove ecosystem services. Ecol. Indic. 23, 431–446 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Costanza, R. et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387, 253–260 (1997).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Duke, N. C. et al. A world without mangroves?. Science. 317, 41b–42b (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Barbier, E. B. et al. The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol. Monogr. 81, 169–193 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Saderne, V. et al. Total alkalinity production in a mangrove ecosystem reveals an overlooked Blue Carbon component. Limnol. Oceanogr. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10170 (2020).Allen, J. R. L. Morphodynamics of Holocene salt marshes: a review sketch from the Atlantic and Southern North Sea coasts of Europe. Quat. Sci. Rev. 19, 1155–1231 (2000).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fagherazzi, S. et al. Tidal networks 1. Automatic network extraction and preliminary scaling features from digital terrain maps. Water Resour. Res. 35, 3891–3904 (1999).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
D’Alpaos, A., Lanzoni, S., Mudd, S. M. & Fagherazzi, S. Modeling the influence of hydroperiod and vegetation on the cross-sectional formation of tidal channels. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 69, 311–324 (2006).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
D’Alpaos, A. & Marani, M. Reading the signatures of biologic-geomorphic feedbacks in salt-marsh landscapes. Adv. Water Resour. 93, 265–275 (2016).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Schwarz, C. et al. Self-organization of a biogeomorphic landscape controlled by plant life-history traits. Nat. Geosci. 11, 672–677 (2018).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mariotti, G. & Canestrelli, A. Long-term morphodynamics of muddy backbarrier basins: fill in or empty out? Water Resour. Res. 53, 7029–7054 (2017).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Stark, J., Van Oyen, T., Meire, P. & Temmerman, S. Observations of tidal and storm surge attenuation in a large tidal marsh. Limnol. Oceanogr. 60, 1371–1381 (2015).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Montgomery, J., Bryan, K., Horstman, E. & Mullarney, J. Attenuation of tides and surges by mangroves: contrasting case studies from New Zealand. Water 10, 1119 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Temmerman, S. et al. Vegetation causes channel erosion in a tidal landscape. Geology 35, 631–634 (2007).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
van Maanen, B., Coco, G. & Bryan, K. R. On the ecogeomorphological feedbacks that control tidal channel network evolution in a sandy mangrove setting. Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 471, 20150115 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Bij de Vaate, I., Brückner, M. Z. M., Kleinhans, M. G. & Schwarz, C. On the Impact of Salt Marsh Pioneer Species-Assemblages on the Emergence of Intertidal Channel Networks. Water Resour. Res. 56, (2020).Bouma, T. J. et al. Density-dependent linkage of scale-dependent feedbacks: a flume study on the intertidal macrophyte Spartina anglica. Oikos 118, 260–268 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schwarz, C. et al. Impacts of salt marsh plants on tidal channel initiation and inheritance. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 119, 385–400 (2014).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mcowen, C. J. et al. A global map of saltmarshes. Biodivers. Data J. 5, (2017).Spalding, M. World Atlas of Mangroves. World Atlas of Mangroves https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849776608 (2010).Fromard, F., Vega, C. & Proisy, C. Half a century of dynamic coastal change affecting mangrove shorelines of French Guiana. A case study based on remote sensing data analyses and field surveys. in. Mar. Geol. 208, 265–280 (2004).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Proisy, C. et al. Mud bank colonization by opportunistic mangroves: a case study from French Guiana using lidar data. Cont. Shelf Res. 29, 632–641 (2009).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Balke, T. et al. Windows of opportunity: thresholds to mangrove seedling establishment on tidal flats. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 440, 1–9 (2011).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tomlinson, P. B. The botany of mangroves. Bot. Mangroves https://doi.org/10.2307/2996392 (1986).Article 

Google Scholar 
Duke, N. C., Ball, M. C. & Ellison, J. C. Factors influencing biodiversity and distributional gradients in mangroves. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. Lett. 7, 27–47 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Swales, A., Bentley, S. J. & Lovelock, C. E. Mangrove-forest evolution in a sediment-rich estuarine system: Opportunists or agents of geomorphic change? Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 40, 1672–1687 (2015).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nardin, W. et al. Dynamics of a fringe mangrove forest detected by Landsat images in the Mekong River Delta, Vietnam. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 41, 2024–2037 (2016).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Proffitt, C. E., Travis, S. E. & Edwards, K. R. Genotype and elevation influence Spartina alterniflora colonization and growth in a created salt marsh. Ecol. Appl. 13, 180–192 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
van Wesenbeeck, B. K. et al. Potential for sudden shifts in transient systems: distinguishing between local and landscape-scale processes. Ecosystems 11, 1133–1141 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ranwell, D. S. Spartina salt marshes in southern England 3. Rates of establishment, succession and nutrient supply at Bridgewater Bay, Somerset. J. Ecol. 52, 95–105 (1964).Article 

Google Scholar 
van Wesenbeeck, B. K., van de Koppel, J., Herman, P. M. J. & Bouma, T. J. Does scale dependent feedback explain spatial complexity in salt marsh ecosystems? Oikos 117, 152–159 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Taylor, C. M. & Hastings, A. Finding optimal control strategies for invasive species: a density-structured model for Spartina alterniflora. J. Appl. Ecol. 41, 1049–1057 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vandenbruwaene, W. et al. Flow interaction with dynamic vegetation patches: Implications for biogeomorphic evolution of a tidal landscape. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 116, 1–13 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mobberley, D. G. Taxonomy and distribution of the genus Spartina. (Iowa State University, 1953).Gourgue, O. et al. A Convolution Method to Assess Subgrid-Scale Interactions Between Flow and Patchy Vegetation in Biogeomorphic Models. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 127, 1–25 (2021).Zong, L. & Nepf, H. Spatial distribution of deposition within a patch of vegetation. Water Resour. Res. 47, (2011).Suyadi, Gao, J., Lundquist, C. J. & Schwendenmann, L. Characterizing landscape patterns in changing mangrove ecosystems at high latitudes using spatial metrics. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 215, 1–10 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Best, S. N. et al. Do salt marshes survive sea level rise? Modelling wave action, morphodynamics and vegetation dynamics. Environ. Model. Softw. 109, 152–166 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, Y., Li, Y., Cai, T., Thompson, C. & Li, Y. A comparison of biohydrodynamic interaction within mangrove and saltmarsh boundaries. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 41, 1967–1979 (2016).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Xie, D. et al. Mangrove diversity loss under sea-level rise triggered by bio-morphodynamic feedbacks and anthropogenic pressures. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 114033 (2020).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Steel, T. J. & Pye, K. The development of salt marsh tidal creek networks: evidence from the UK. In Proceedings of the Canadian Coastal Conference 1, 267–280 (1997).Fagherazzi, S. & Sun, T. A stochastic model for the formation of channel networks in tidal marshes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L21503 (2004).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
D’Alpaos, A., Lanzoni, S., Marani, M., Fagherazzi, S. & Rinaldo, A. Tidal network ontogeny: channel initiation and early development. J. Geophys. Res. 110, F02001 (2005).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Marani, M. et al. On the drainage density of tidal networks. Water Resour. Res. 39, 1040 (2003).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Liu, Z. et al. Efficient tidal channel networks alleviate the drought-induced die-off of salt marshes: Implications for coastal restoration and management. Sci. Total Environ. 749, 141493 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kearney, W. S. et al. Salt marsh vegetation promotes efficient tidal channel networks. Nat. Commun. 7, 12287 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hood, W. G. Applying tidal landform scaling to habitat restoration planning, design, and monitoring. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 244, 106060 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Horstman, E., Dohmen-Janssen, C., Geomorphology, T. B.- & 2015, undefined. Tidal-scale flow routing and sedimentation in mangrove forests: Combining field data and numerical modelling. ElsevierCoco, G. et al. Morphodynamics of tidal networks: Advances and challenges. Mar. Geol. 346, 1–16 (2013).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Geng, L., Gong, Z., Zhou, Z., Lanzoni, S. & D’Alpaos, A. Assessing the relative contributions of the flood tide and the ebb tide to tidal channel network dynamics. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 45, 237–250 (2020).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Andutta, F. P., Wang, X. H., Li, L. & Williams, D. Hydrodynamics and Sediment Transport in a Macro-tidal Estuary: Darwin Harbour, Australia. in 111–129 (Springer, Dordrecht, 2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7019-5_7Elmqvist, T. & Cox, P. A. The Evolution of Vivipary in Flowering Plants. Oikos 77, 3 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, X., Leonardi, N., Donatelli, C. & Fagherazzi, S. Fate of cohesive sediments in a marsh-dominated estuary. Adv. Water Resour. 125, 32–40 (2019).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nardin, W. & Edmonds, D. A. Optimum vegetation height and density for inorganic sedimentation in deltaic marshes. Nat. Geosci. 7, 722–726 (2014).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Swales, A., Bentley, S. J., Lovelock, C. & Bell, R. G. Sediment Processes and Mangrove-Habitat Expansion on a Rapidly-Prograding Muddy Coast, New Zealand. In Coastal Sediments ’07 1441–1454 (American Society of Civil Engineers, 2007). https://doi.org/10.1061/40926(239)111Wang, F., Lu, X., Sanders, C. J. & Tang, J. Tidal wetland resilience to sea level rise increases their carbon sequestration capacity in United States. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–11 (2019).ADS 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kristensen, E., Bouillon, S., Dittmar, T. & Marchand, C. Organic carbon dynamics in mangrove ecosystems: A review. Aquat. Bot. 89, 201–219 (2008).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fagherazzi, S. et al. Fluxes of water, sediments, and biogeochemical compounds in salt marshes. Ecol. Process 2, 1–16 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kirchner, J. W. Statistical inevitability of Horton’s laws and the apparent randomness of stream channel networks. Geology 21, 591–594 (1993).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Vandenbruwaene, W., Meire, P. & Temmerman, S. Formation and evolution of a tidal channel network within a constructed tidal marsh. Geomorphology (2012).Marani, M. et al. Patterns in tidal environments: salt-marsh channel networks and vegetation. in Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. IEEE 5 3269–3271 (2003).Horstman, E. M., Karin R. B., and Julia C. M. “Drag variations, tidal asymmetry and tidal range changes in a mangrove creek system.” Earth Surf. Process. Landf. (2021).R. Core, Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (2013).Lillesand, T. M. & Kiefer, R. W. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. John Willey & Sons. Inc, USA. (1994).Vandenbruwaene, W., Bouma, T. J., Meire, P. & Temmerman, S. Bio-geomorphic effects on tidal channel evolution: impact of vegetation establishment and tidal prism change. Earth Surf. Process. Landforms 38, 122–132 (2013).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Stefanon, L., Carniello, L., D’Alpaos, A. & Lanzoni, S. Experimental analysis of tidal network growth and development. Cont. Shelf Res. 30, 950–962 (2010).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Braat, L., Leuven, J. R. F. W., Lokhorst, I. R. & Kleinhans, M. G. Effects of estuarine mudflat formation on tidal prism and large-scale morphology in experiments. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 44, 417–432 (2019).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kleinhans, M. G. et al. Turning the tide: Comparison of tidal flow by periodic sea level fluctuation and by periodic bed tilting in scaled landscape experiments of estuaries. Earth Surf. Dyn. 5, 731–756 (2017).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Paola, C., Straub, K., Mohrig, D. & Reinhardt, L. The ‘unreasonable effectiveness’ of stratigraphic and geomorphic experiments. Earth-Sci. Rev. 97, 1–43 (2009).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kleinhans, M. G., Leuven, J. R. F. W., Braat, L. & Baar, A. Scour holes and ripples occur below the hydraulic smooth to rough transition of movable beds. Sedimentology 64, 1381–1401 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lokhorst, I. R., Lange, S. I., Buiten, G., Selaković, S. & Kleinhans, M. G. Species selection and assessment of eco‐engineering effects of seedlings for biogeomorphological landscape experiments. Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 44, 2922–2935 (2019).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Widdows, J. et al. Inter-comparison between five devices for determining erodability of intertidal sediments. Cont. Shelf Res. 27, 1174–1189 (2007).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Verney, R., Brun-Cottan, J. C., Lafite, R., Deloffre, J. & Taylor, J. A. Tidally-induced shear stress variability above intertidal mudflats in the macrotidal seine estuary. Estuaries and Coasts 29, 653–664 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wu, W., Perera, C., Smith, J. & Sanchez, A. Critical shear stress for erosion of sand and mud mixtures. J. Hydraul. Res. 56, 96–110 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wolters, M., Garbutt, A., Bekker, R. M., Bakker, J. P. & Carey, P. D. Restoration of salt-marsh vegetation in relation to site suitability, species pool and dispersal traits. J. Appl. Ecol. 45, 904–912 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Here at the Germplasm Bank of Wild Species of China at the Kunming Institute of Botany, we want to preserve the seeds of as many wild plants as possible from across China’s vast land area. I work on developing the best techniques to freeze plant seeds and tissues at ultracold temperatures, to maintain their viability for years. The idea is that if we plant these seeds again in hundreds of years, a plant will grow.The picture shows me taking a sample of embryos from the seeds of a magnolia tree out of a liquid-nitrogen cryopreservation tank to test whether they’ll regrow when thawed. I dress in protective equipment from head to toe to protect me from the nitrogen, which has a temperature of −196 °C.When I came to the institute in 2009 as a PhD student, it had just purchased its first liquid-nitrogen cryopreservation system, but no one knew how to operate it. I was the one to work it out.Over the years, human activities and climate change have had a negative impact on plant biodiversity. The ultimate goal of the plant seed bank is to collect and preserve all wild plant species in China that are endangered, rare or valuable. We want to save these species before they go extinct. We’ve collected seeds from nearly 11,000 plant species, but that’s only one-third of what grows in China.Many wild plants have genes that help them to survive in harsh environments and make them disease- or drought-resistant. In the future, we might need these genetic materials to breed new crops that can better adapt to the changing climate.I am constantly amazed by how diverse and beautiful seeds are. Some of them are brightly coloured and others are star-shaped. I feel proud when I see the unfrozen seeds germinate in test tubes and gradually grow into large plants. We have three plants in the seed-bank lobby that we cultivated from preserved tissues, and they are all now taller than me. More

Henrich, J. et al. Costly punishment across human societies. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127333 (2006).Ostrom, E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge University Press, 1990).Ostrom, E., Walker, J. & Gardner, R. Covenants with and without a sword: self-governance is possible. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 86, 404–417 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fehr, E. & Gächter, S. Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. Am. Econ. Rev. 90, 980–994 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dreber, A., Rand, D. G., Fudenberg, D. & Nowak, M. A. Winners don’t punish. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06723 (2008).Rand, D. G., Ohtsuki, H. & Nowak, M. A. Direct reciprocity with costly punishment: generous tit-for-tat prevails. J. Theor. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.09.015 (2009).Ohtsuki, H., Iwasa, Y. & Nowak, M. A. Indirect reciprocity provides only a narrow margin of efficiency for costly punishment. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07601 (2009).Sethi, R. & Somanathan, E. Understanding reciprocity. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 50, 1–27 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bowles, S. & Gintis, H. A Cooperative Species (Princeton Univ. Press, 2011).Hauert, C., Traulsen, A., Brandt, H., Nowak, M. A. & Sigmund, K. Via freedom to coercion: the emergence of costly punishment. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1141588 (2007).Brandt, H., Hauert, C. & Sigmund, K. Punishment and reputation in spatial public goods games. Proc. R. Soc. B https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2336 (2003).Helbing, D., Szolnoki, A., Perc, M. & Szabó, G. Evolutionary establishment of moral and double moral standards through spatial interactions. PLoS Comput. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000758 (2010).Helbing, D., Szolnoki, A., Perc, M. & Szabó, G. Punish, but not too hard: how costly punishment spreads in the spatial public goods game. New J. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/12/8/083005 (2010).Perc, M. & Szolnoki, A. Self-organization of punishment in structured populations. New J. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/14/4/043013 (2012).Boyd, R., Gintis, H. & Bowles, S. Coordinated punishment of defectors sustains cooperation and can proliferate when rare. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183665 (2010).Sigmund, K., De Silva, H., Traulsen, A. & Hauert, C. Social learning promotes institutions for governing the commons. Nature 466, 861–863 (2010).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hilbe, C., Traulsen, A., Röhl, T. & Milinski, M. Democratic decisions establish stable authorities that overcome the paradox of second-order punishment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 752–756 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Murphy, B. The Punisher’s Brain: The Evolution of Judge and Jury. By Hoffman, Morris B. Pp. xi, 359. Cambridge/NY, Cambridge University Press, 2014, £21.99/$30.00. Heythrop J. https://doi.org/10.1111/heyj.12249_81 (2015).Gruter, M. & Masters, R. D. Ostracism as a social and biological phenomenon: an introduction. Ethol. Sociobiolo. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(86)90043-9 (1986).Molleman, L., Kölle, F., Starmer, C. & Gächter, S. People prefer coordinated punishment in cooperative interactions. Nat. Hum. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0707-2 (2019).Szolnoki, A., Szabó, G. & Perc, M. Phase diagrams for the spatial public goods game with pool punishment. Phys. Rev. E https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.83.036101 (2011).Ostrom, E. Collective action and the evolution of social norms. J. Econ. Perspect. 14, 137–158 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Platteau, J.-P. Institutions, Social Norms, and Economic Development Vol. 1 (Psychology Press, 2000).van den Bergh, J. C. J. M., Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. & Munda, G. Alternative models of individual behaviour and implications for environmental policy. Ecol. Econ. 32, 43–61 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Traulsen, A., Nowak, M. A. & Pacheco, J. M. Stochastic dynamics of invasion and fixation. Phys. Rev. E 74, 11909 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dequech, D. Institutions, social norms, and decision-theoretic norms. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 72, 70–78 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dunn, S. P. Bounded rationality is not fundamental uncertainty: a post Keynesian perspective. J. Post Keynes. Econ. 23, 567–587 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Levin, S. The trouble of discounting tomorrow. Solutions 3, 20–24 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Alford, R. P. The proliferation of international courts and tribunals: international adjudication in ascendance. In Proc. Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law Vol. 94, 160–165 (Cambridge University Press, 2000).Dunn, L. A. Containing Nuclear Proliferation (International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1991).Potoski, M. Green clubs in building block climate change regimes. Climatic Change 144, 53–63 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Trzyna, T. C., Margold, E. & Osborn, J. K. World Directory of Environmental Organizations: A Handbook of National and International Organizations and Programs—Governmental and Non-governmental—Concerned with Protecting the Earth’s Resources Vol. 5 (Earthscan, 1996).Dixit, A. & Levin, S. in The Theory of Externalities and Public Goods: Essays in Memory of Richard C. Cornes (eds Buchholz, W. and Rübbelke, D.) 127–143 (Springer, 2017); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49442-5_7Vasconcelos, V. V., Santos, F. C. & Pacheco, J. M. A bottom-up institutional approach to cooperative governance of risky commons. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 797–801 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vasconcelos, V. V., Santos, F. C. & Pacheco, J. M. Cooperation dynamics of polycentric climate governance. Math. Model. Methods Appl. Sci. 25, 2503–2517 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ostrom, E. Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Am. Econ. Rev. 100, 641–672 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vasconcelos, V. V., Hannam, P. M., Levin, S. A. & Pacheco, J. M. Coalition-structured governance improves cooperation to provide public goods. Sci. Rep. 10, 9194 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nyborg, K. et al. Social norms as solutions. Science 354, 42–43 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hannam, P. M., Vasconcelos, V. V., Levin, S. A. & Pacheco, J. M. Incomplete cooperation and co-benefits: deepening climate cooperation with a proliferation of small agreements. Climatic Change 144, 65–79 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Markussen, T., Putterman, L. & Tyran, J.-R. Self-organization for collective action: an experimental study of voting on sanction regimes. Rev. Econ. Stud. 81, 301–324 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gürerk, Ö., Irlenbusch, B. & Rockenbach, B. The competitive advantage of sanctioning institutions. Science 312, 108–111 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dannenberg, A. & Gallier, C. The choice of institutions to solve cooperation problems: a survey of experimental research. Exp. Econ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-019-09629-8 (2019).Bühren, C. & Dannenberg, A. The demand for punishment to promote cooperation among like-minded people. Eur. Econ. Rev. 138, 103862 (2021).Radzvilavicius, A. L., Kessinger, T. A. & Plotkin, J. B. Adherence to public institutions that foster cooperation. Nat. Commun. 12, 3567 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

Darwin, C. The Effects of Cross and Self Fertilisation in the Vegetable Kingdom (D. Appleton and Company, 1877).
Google Scholar 
Charlesworth, D. Androdioecy and the evolution of dioecy. Biol. J. Linn Soc. 22, 333–348 (1984).Article 

Google Scholar 
Charlesworth, D., Morgan, M. T. & Charlesworth, B. Inbreeding depression, genetic load, and the evolution of outcrossing rates in a multilocus system with no linkage. Evolution 44, 1469–1489 (1990).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lande, R. & Schemske, D. W. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39, 24–40 (1985).
Google Scholar 
Weeks, S. C. When males and hermaphrodites coexist: a review of androdioecy in animals. Integr. Comp. Biol. 46, 449–464 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pannell, J. The maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in a metapopulation. Evolution 51, 10–20 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wolf, D. E. & Takebayashi, N. Pollen limitation and the evolution of androdioecy from dioecy. Am. Nat. 163, 122–137 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Charlesworth, D. Theories of the evolution of dioecy. In Gender and Sexual Dimorphism in Flowering Plants (eds Geber, M. A. et al.) 33–60 (Springer, Berlin, 1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03908-3_2.Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Denver, D. R., Clark, K. A. & Raboin, M. J. Reproductive mode evolution in nematodes: insights from molecular phylogenies and recently discovered species. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 61, 584–592 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pires-daSilva, A. Evolution of the control of sexual identity in nematodes. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 18, 362–370 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kanzaki, N. et al. Description of two three-gendered nematode species in the new genus Auanema (Rhabditina) that are models for reproductive mode evolution. Sci. Rep. 7, 11135 (2017).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tandonnet, S. et al. Sex- and gamete-specific patterns of X chromosome segregation in a trioecious nematode. Curr. Biol. 28, 93-99.e3 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chaudhuri, J. et al. Mating dynamics in a nematode with three sexes and its evolutionary implications. Sci. Rep. 5, 17676 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Félix, M.-A. Alternative morphs and plasticity of vulval development in a rhabditid nematode species. Dev. Genes Evol. 214, 55–63 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shakes, D. C., Neva, B. J., Huynh, H., Chaudhuri, J. & Pires-daSilva, A. Asymmetric spermatocyte division as a mechanism for controlling sex ratios. Nat. Commun. 2, 157 (2011).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Winter, E. S. et al. Cytoskeletal variations in an asymmetric cell division support diversity in nematode sperm size and sex ratios. Development 144, 3253–3263 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Robles, P. et al. Parental energy-sensing pathways control intergenerational offspring sex determination in the nematode Auanema freiburgensis. BMC Biol. 19, 102 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zuco, G. et al. Sensory neurons control heritable adaptation to stress through germline reprogramming. bioRxiv 406033 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1101/406033.Colegrave, N., Kaltz, O. & Bell, G. The ecology and genetics of fitness in chlamydomonas. VIII. The dynamics of adaptation to novel environments after a single episode of sex. Evolution 56, 14–21 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Goddard, M. R., Godfray, H. C. J. & Burt, A. Sex increases the efficacy of natural selection in experimental yeast populations. Nature 434, 636–640 (2005).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gray, J. C. & Goddard, M. R. Sex enhances adaptation by unlinking beneficial from detrimental mutations in experimental yeast populations. BMC Evol. Biol. 12, 43 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Poon, A. & Chao, L. Drift increases the advantage of sex in RNA bacteriophage ⌽6. Genetics 166, 19 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stewart, A. D. & Phillips, P. C. Selection and maintenance of androdioecy in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 160, 975–982 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stiernagle, T. Maintenance of C. elegans. WormBook: The Online Review of C. elegans Biology (WormBook, 2006).Avery, L. The genetics of feeding in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 133, 897–917 (1993).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bargmann, C. I. & Horvitz, H. R. Control of larval development by chemosensory neurons in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science 251, 1243–1246 (1991).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lenth, R. V. Emmeans: estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means (2021).Lipton, J., Kleemann, G., Ghosh, R., Lints, R. & Emmons, S. W. Mate searching in Caenorhabditis elegans: a genetic model for sex drive in a simple invertebrate. J. Neurosci. 24, 7427–7434 (2004).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pino, E. C., Webster, C. M., Carr, C. E. & Soukas, A. A. Biochemical and high throughput microscopic assessment of fat mass in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Vis. Exp. https://doi.org/10.3791/50180 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hakim, A. et al. WorMachine: machine learning-based phenotypic analysis tool for worms. BMC Biol. 16, 8 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Motola, D. L. et al. Identification of ligands for DAF-12 that govern dauer formation and reproduction in C. elegans. Cell 124, 1209–1223 (2006).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ogawa, A., Streit, A., Antebi, A. & Sommer, R. J. A conserved endocrine mechanism controls the formation of dauer and infective larvae in nematodes. Curr. Biol. 19, 67–71 (2009).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, Z. et al. Identification of the nuclear receptor DAF-12 as a therapeutic target in parasitic nematodes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106, 9138–9143 (2009).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hu, P. Dauer. WormBook: The C. elegans Research Community (2007).Chaudhuri, J., Kache, V. & Pires-daSilva, A. Regulation of sexual plasticity in a nematode that produces males, females, and hermaphrodites. Curr. Biol. 21, 1548–1551 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Luciani, G. M. et al. Dafadine inhibits DAF-9 to promote dauer formation and longevity of Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat. Chem. Biol. 7, 891–893 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Adams, S., Pathak, P., Shao, H., Lok, J. B. & Pires-daSilva, A. Liposome-based transfection enhances RNAi and CRISPR-mediated mutagenesis in non-model nematode systems. Sci. Rep. 9, 483 (2019).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Andrews, S. FastQC: A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data [Online]. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ (2010).Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Grabherr, M. G. et al. Trinity: reconstructing a full-length transcriptome without a genome from RNA-Seq data. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 644–652 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Haas, B. J. et al. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-Seq: reference generation and analysis with Trinity. Nat. Protoc. 8, 1494 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Schmieder, R. & Edwards, R. Fast identification and removal of sequence contamination from genomic and metagenomic datasets. PLoS ONE 6, e17288 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Huang, Y., Niu, B., Gao, Y., Fu, L. & Li, W. CD-HIT Suite: a web server for clustering and comparing biological sequences. Bioinformatics 26, 680–682 (2010).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, B. & Dewey, C. N. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinform. 12, 323 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bendtsen, J. D., Nielsen, H., von Heijne, G. & Brunak, S. Improved prediction of signal peptides: SignalP 3.0. J. Mol. Biol. 340, 783–795 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bryant, D. M. et al. A tissue-mapped axolotl de novo transcriptome enables identification of limb regeneration factors. Cell Rep. 18, 762–776 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Finn, R. D., Clements, J. & Eddy, S. R. HMMER web server: interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucl. Acids Res. 39, W29–W37 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Andersen, C. L., Jensen, J. L. & Ørntoft, T. F. Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: a model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets. Cancer Res. 64, 5245–5250 (2004).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
McGhee, J. D. The C. elegans intestine. WormBook: The Online Review of C. elegans Biology [Internet] (WormBook, 2007).Mullaney, B. C. & Ashrafi, K. C. elegans fat storage and metabolic regulation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 1791, 474–478 (2009).CAS 

Google Scholar 
O’Rourke, E. J., Soukas, A. A., Carr, C. E. & Ruvkun, G. C. elegans major fats are stored in vesicles distinct from lysosome-related organelles. Cell Metab. 10, 430–435 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mak, H. Y. Lipid droplets as fat storage organelles in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Lipid Res. 53, 28–33 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kroetz, S. M., Srinivasan, J., Yaghoobian, J., Sternberg, P. W. & Hong, R. L. The cGMP signaling pathway affects feeding behavior in the necromenic nematode Pristionchus pacificus. BMC Proc. 6, P27 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Edgar, L. G. & McGhee, J. D. Embryonic expression of a gut-specific esterase in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev. Biol. 114, 109–118 (1986).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Barr, M. M. & Sternberg, P. W. A polycystic kidney-disease gene homologue required for male mating behaviour in C. elegans. Nature 401, 386 (1999).ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bendesky, A., Tsunozaki, M., Rockman, M. V., Kruglyak, L. & Bargmann, C. I. Catecholamine receptor polymorphisms affect decision-making in C. elegans. Nature 472, 313–318 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Garrison, J. L. et al. Oxytocin/vasopressin-related peptides have an ancient role in reproductive behavior. Science 338, 540–543 (2012).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Joo, H.-J. et al. Contribution of the peroxisomal acox gene to the dynamic balance of daumone production in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 29319–29325 (2010).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yassin, L. et al. Characterization of the DEG-3/DES-2 receptor: a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor that mutates to cause neuronal degeneration. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 17, 589–599 (2001).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Perez, D. H., Lipinski, R. A. J. & Butcher, R. A. Acyl-CoA oxidases fine-tune the production of ascaroside pheromones with specific side chain lengths. ACS Chem. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.7b01021 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Borne, F., Kasimatis, K. R. & Phillips, P. C. Quantifying male and female pheromone-based mate choice in Caenorhabditis nematodes using a novel microfluidic technique. PLoS ONE 87, 511 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Choe, A. et al. Sex-specific mating pheromones in the nematode Panagrellus redivivus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 20949–20954 (2012).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Duggal, C. L. Sex attraction in the free-living nematode panagrellus redivivus. Nematologica 24, 213–221 (1978).Article 

Google Scholar 
Andersson, M. Sexual Selection Vol. 72 (Princeton University Press, 1994).Book 

Google Scholar 
Bateman, A. J. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2, 349–368 (1948).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kvarnemo, C. & Simmons, L. W. Polyandry as a mediator of sexual selection before and after mating. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 368, 20120042 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Parker, G. A. & Birkhead, T. R. Polyandry: the history of a revolution. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 368, 20120335 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rhainds, M. Female mating failures in insects. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 136, 211–226 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hammond, K. A. Adaptation of the maternal intestine during lactation. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 2, 243–252 (1997).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Speakman, J. R. The physiological costs of reproduction in small mammals. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 363, 375–398 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Reiff, T. et al. Endocrine remodelling of the adult intestine sustains reproduction in Drosophila. Elife 4, e06930 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kaliszewicz, A. Interference of asexual and sexual reproduction in the green hydra. Ecol. Res. 26, 147–152 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Oyarzún, P. A., Nuñez, J. J., Toro, J. E. & Gardner, J. P. A. Trioecy in the Marine Mussel Semimytilus algosus (Mollusca, Bivalvia): stable sex ratios across 22 degrees of a latitudinal gradient. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 348 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Armoza-Zvuloni, R., Kramarsky-Winter, E., Loya, Y., Schlesinger, A. & Rosenfeld, H. Trioecy, a unique breeding strategy in the sea anemone aiptasia diaphana and its association with sex steroids. Biol. Reprod. 90, 122 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Greene, J. S. et al. Balancing selection shapes density-dependent foraging behaviour. Nature. 539(7628), 254–258. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19848 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kieninger, M. R. et al. The Nuclear Hormone Receptor NHR-40 Acts Downstream of the Sulfatase EUD-1 as Part of a Developmental Plasticity Switch in Pristionchus.Curr Biol 26(16), 2174–2179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.06.018 (2016).Therrien, M., Rouleau, G. A., Dion, P. A., Parker, J. A. & Dupuy, D. Deletion of C9ORF72 Results in Motor Neuron Degeneration and Stress Sensitivity in C. elegans. PLoS ONE 8(12), e83450. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083450 (2013).Lee, B. H., Liu, J., Wong, D., Srinivasan, S., Ashrafi, K. & Kim, S. K. Hyperactive Neuroendocrine Secretion Causes Size Feeding and Metabolic Defects of C. elegans Bardet-Biedl Syndrome Mutants. PLoS Biol 9(12), e1001219. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001219 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, C. & Kim, K. Family of FLP Peptides in Caenorhabditis elegans and Related Nematodes. Front Endocrinol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2014.00150 (2014). Buntschuh, I. et al. FLP-1 neuropeptides modulate sensory and motor circuits in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS ONE 13(1), e0189320. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189320 (2018).Topalidou, I. et al. The EARP Complex and Its Interactor EIPR-1 Are Required for Cargo Sorting to Dense-Core Vesicles. PLOS Genet 12(5), e1006074. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006074 (2016).Maman, M. et al. A Neuronal GPCR is Critical for the Induction of the Heat Shock Response in the Nematode C. elegans. J Neurosci 33(14), 6102–6111. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4023-12.2013 (2013). More

High-severity fire results in a multi-decadal recovery of the soil microbiome, with concomitant differences in aboveground vegetation and soil chemistryMicrobial community composition was significantly different among all post-fire stages (PerMANOVA – prokaryotes: p  More

Franklin, J. F., Shugart, H. H. & Harmon, M. E. Tree death as an ecological process. Bioscience 37, 550–556 (1987).Article 

Google Scholar 
Harmon, M. E. et al. Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. In Advances in Ecological Research (eds MacFadyen, A. & Ford, E. D.) 133–302 (Academic Press, 1986).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Harmon, M. E. & Bell, D. M. Mortality in forested ecosystems: suggested conceptual advances. Forests 11, 572 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
van Mantgem, P. J. et al. Widespread increase of tree mortality rates in the Western United States. Science 323, 521–524 (2009).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kinnucan, H. W. Timber price dynamics after a natural disaster: Hurricane Hugo revisited. J. For. Econ. 25, 115–129 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Marsinko, A. P., Straka, T. J. & Haight, R. G. The effect of a large-scale natural disaster on regional timber supply. J. World For. Resour. Manag. 8, 75–85 (1997).
Google Scholar 
Lugo, A. E. Visible and invisible effects of hurricanes on forest ecosystems: an international review. Austral Ecol. 33, 368–398 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shifley, S. R., Brookshire, B. L., Larsen, D. R. & Herbeck, L. A. Snags and down wood in missouri old-growth and mature second-growth forests. North. J. Appl. For. 14, 165–172 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bobiec, A. Living stands and dead wood in the Białowieża forest: suggestions for restoration management. For. Ecol. Manag. 165, 125–140 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Spetich, M. A., Shifley, S. R. & Parker, G. R. Regional distribution and dynamics of coarse woody debris in midwestern old-growth forests. For. Sci. 45, 302–313 (1999).
Google Scholar 
Rimle, A., Heiri, C. & Bugmann, H. Deadwood in Norway spruce dominated mountain forest reserves is characterized by large dimensions and advanced decomposition stages. For. Ecol. Manag. 404, 174–183 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ruokolainen, A., Shorohova, E., Penttilä, R., Kotkova, V. & Kushnevskaya, H. A continuum of dead wood with various habitat elements maintains the diversity of wood-inhabiting fungi in an old-growth boreal forest. Eur. J. For. Res. 137, 707–718 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ranius, T. & Kindvall, O. Modelling the amount of coarse woody debris produced by the new biodiversity-oriented silvicultural practices in Sweden. Biol. Conserv. 119, 51–59 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bouget, C. & Duelli, P. The effects of windthrow on forest insect communities: a literature review. Biol. Conserv. 118, 281–299 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Svensson, M. et al. The relative importance of stand and dead wood types for wood-dependent lichens in managed boreal forests. Fungal Ecol. 20, 166–174 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bahuguna, D., Mitchell, S. J. & Nishio, G. R. Post-harvest windthrow and recruitment of large woody debris in riparian buffers on Vancouver Island. Eur. J. For. Res. 131, 249–260 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fortin, M. & DeBlois, J. Modeling tree recruitment with zero-inflated models: the example of hardwood stands in southern Quebec Canada. For. Sci. 53, 529–539 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Herrero, C., Pando, V. & Bravo, F. Modelling coarse woody debris in Pinus spp. Plantations. A case study in Northern Spain. Ann. For. Sci. 67, 708–708 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Arekhi, S. Modeling spatial pattern of deforestation using GIS and logistic regression: a case study of northern Ilam forests, Ilam province Iran. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 10, 16236–16249 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Kumar, R., Nandy, S., Agarwal, R. & Kushwaha, S. P. S. Forest cover dynamics analysis and prediction modeling using logistic regression model. Ecol. Indic. 45, 444–455 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Podur, J. J., Martell, D. L. & Stanford, D. A compound poisson model for the annual area burned by forest fires in the province of Ontario. Environmetrics 21, 457–469 (2010).MathSciNet 

Google Scholar 
Tobler, W. R. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit Region. Econ. Geogr. 46, 234–240 (1970).Article 

Google Scholar 
Griffith, D. & Chun, Y. Spatial autocorrelation and spatial filtering. In Handbook of regional science 1477–1507 (eds Fischer, M. M. & Nijkamp, P.) (Springer, 2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23430-9_72.Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Li, T. & Meng, Q. Forest dynamics in relation to meteorology and soil in the Gulf Coast of Mexico. Sci. Total Environ. 702, 134913 (2019).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Brunsdon, C., Fotheringham, A. S. & Charlton, M. E. Geographically weighted regression: a method for exploring spatial nonstationarity. Geogr. Anal. 28, 281–298 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fotheringham, A. S., Charlton, M. E. & Brunsdon, C. Geographically weighted regression: a natural evolution of the expansion method for spatial data analysis. Environ. Plan. A 30, 1905–1927 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yang, C., Fu, M., Feng, D., Sun, Y. & Zhai, G. Spatiotemporal changes in vegetation cover and its influencing factors in the loess Plateau of China based on the geographically weighted regression model. Forests 12, 673 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Monjarás-Vega, N. et al. Predicting forest fire kernel density at multiple scales with geographically weighted regression in Mexico. Sci. Total Environ. 718, 137313 (2020).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Peng, X., Wu, H. & Ma, L. A study on geographically weighted spatial autoregression models with spatial autoregressive disturbances. Commun. Stat. Theor. Methods 49, 5235–5251 (2020).MathSciNet 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Harris, P. & Brunsdon, C. Exploring spatial variation and spatial relationships in a freshwater acidification critical load data set for Great Britain using geographically weighted summary statistics. Comput. Geosci. 36, 54–70 (2010).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, J., Jin, M. & Li, H. Exploring spatial influence of remotely sensed PM2.5 concentration using a developed deep convolutional neural network model. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16, 454 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Peng, C., Wang, M. & Chen, W. Spatial analysis of PAHs in soils along an urban-suburban-rural gradient: scale effect, distribution patterns, diffusion and influencing factors. Sci. Rep. 6, 37185 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wu, S. et al. Geographically and temporally neural network weighted regression for modeling spatiotemporal non-stationary relationships. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 35, 582–608 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wu, S. et al. Modeling spatially anisotropic nonstationary processes in coastal environments based on a directional geographically neural network weighted regression. Sci. Total Environ. 709, 136097 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Du, Z., Wang, Z., Wu, S., Zhang, F. & Liu, R. Geographically neural network weighted regression for the accurate estimation of spatial non-stationarity. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 34, 1353–1377 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sun, Y., Ao, Z., Jia, W., Chen, Y. & Xu, K. A geographically weighted deep neural network model for research on the spatial distribution of the down dead wood volume in liangshui national nature reserve (China). IForest 14, 353–361 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wilkinson, L. Tests of significance in stepwise regression. Psychol. Bull. 86, 168–174 (1979).Article 

Google Scholar 
Henderson, D. A. & Denison, D. R. Stepwise regression in social and psychological research. Psychol. Rep. 64, 251–257 (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
Carl, G. & Kühn, I. Analyzing spatial autocorrelation in species distributions using Gaussian and logit models. Ecol. Model. 207, 159–170 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wu, W. & Zhang, L. Comparison of spatial and non-spatial logistic regression models for modeling the occurrence of cloud cover in north-eastern Puerto Rico. Appl. Geogr. 37, 52–62 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ozdemir, A. Using a binary logistic regression method and GIS for evaluating and mapping the groundwater spring potential in the Sultan Mountains (Aksehir, Turkey). J. Hydrol. 405, 123–136 (2011).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pineda Jaimes, N. B., Bosque Sendra, J., Gómez Delgado, M. & Franco, Plata R. Exploring the driving forces behind deforestation in the state of Mexico (Mexico) using geographically weighted regression. Appl. Geogr. 30, 576–591 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tutmez, B., Kaymak, U., Erhan Tercan, A. & Lloyd, C. D. Evaluating geo-environmental variables using a clustering based areal model. Comput. Geosci. 43, 34–41 (2012).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, X., Wu, P., Guo, F.-T. & Hu, X. A geographically weighted regression approach to detect divergent changes in the vegetation activity along the elevation gradients over the last 20 years. For. Ecol. Manag. 490, 119089 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Que, X., Ma, C., Ma, X. & Chen, Q. Parallel computing for fast spatiotemporal weighted regression. Comput. Geosci. 150, 104723 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wu, L. et al. Spatial analysis of severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome virus in China using a geographically weighted logistic regression model. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 13, 1125 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, Y. et al. Geographical variations in maternal lifestyles during pregnancy associated with congenital heart defects among live births in Shaanxi province Northwestern China. Sci. Rep. 10, 12958 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Saefuddin, A., Saepudin, D. & Kusumaningrum, D. Geographically weighted poisson regression (GWPR) for analyzing the malnutrition data in java-Indonesia (European Regional Science Association (ERSA), 2013).
Google Scholar 
Lecun, Y., Bengio, Y. & Hinton, G. Deep learning. Nature 521, 436–444 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ketkar, N. Introduction to Keras. In Deep learning with python: a hands-on introduction (ed. Ketkar, N.) 97–111 (Apress, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-2766-4_7.Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Tsomokos, D. I., Ashhab, S. & Nori, F. Fully connected network of superconducting qubits in a cavity. New J. Phys. 10, 113020 (2008).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hu, T. et al. Study on the estimation of forest volume based on multi-source data. Sensors 21, 7796 (2021).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, L., Ren, C., Zhang, B., Wang, Z. & Xi, Y. Estimation of forest above-ground biomass by geographically weighted regression and machine learning with sentinel imagery. Forests 9, 582 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I. & Salakhutdinov, R. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15, 1929–1958 (2014).MathSciNet 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Mastromichalakis, S. ALReLU: A different approach on Leaky ReLU activation function to improve neural networks performance. arXiv:2012.07564 [Cs] arXiv:2012.07564 (2021).Chen, C., Li, Y., Yan, C., Dai, H. & Liu, G. A robust algorithm of multiquadric method based on an improved huber loss function for interpolating remote-sensing-derived elevation data sets. Remote Sens. 7, 3347–3371 (2015).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
de Jong, P., Sprenger, C. & Veen, F. On extreme values of Moran’s I and Geary’s c ( spatial autocorrelation). Geogr. Anal. 16, 17–24 (1984).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fu, W. J., Jiang, P. K., Zhou, G. M. & Zhao, K. L. Using Moran’s i and GIS to study the spatial pattern of forest litter carbon density in a subtropical region of southeastern China. Biogeosciences 11, 2401–2409 (2014).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Parizi, E., Hosseini, S. M., Ataie-Ashtiani, B. & Simmons, C. T. Normalized difference vegetation index as the dominant predicting factor of groundwater recharge in phreatic aquifers: case studies across Iran. Sci. Rep. 10, 17473 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Moore, J. R. Differences in maximum resistive bending moments of Pinus radiata trees grown on a range of soil types. For. Ecol. Manag. 135, 63–71 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lanquaye-Opoku, N. & Mitchell, S. J. Portability of stand-level empirical windthrow risk models. For. Ecol. Manag. 216, 134–148 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, X. et al. Response of species and stand types to snow/wind damage in a temperate secondary forest Northeast China. J. For. Res. 29, 395–404 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhen, Z. et al. Geographically local modeling of occurrence, count, and volume of downwood in Northeast China. Appl. Geogr. 37, 114–126 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vozmishcheva, A. et al. Strong disturbance impact of tropical cyclone Lionrock (2016) on Korean pine-broadleaved forest in the Middle Sikhote-Alin Mountain range Russian Far East. Forests 10, 15 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bivand, R., Müller, W. G. & Reder, M. Power calculations for global and local Moran’s I. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 53, 2859–2872 (2009).MathSciNet 
MATH 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yuan, J. et al. Dynamics of coarse woody debris characteristics in the Qinling mountain forests in China. Forests 8, 403–403 (2017).MathSciNet 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Næsset, E. Estimating timber volume of forest stands using airborne laser scanner data. Remote Sens. Environ. 61, 246–253 (1997).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Næsset, E. Determination of mean tree height of forest stands by digital photogrammetry. Scand. J. For. Res. 17, 446–459 (2002).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rich, R. L., Frelich, L. E. & Reich, P. B. Wind-throw mortality in the southern boreal forest: effects of species, diameter and stand age. J. Ecol. 95, 1261–1273 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Odhiambo, B. O., Kenduiywo, B. K. & Were, K. Spatial prediction and mapping of soil pH across a tropical afro-montane landscape. Appl. Geogr. 114, 102129 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Caldeira, K. & Wickett, M. E. Oceanography: Anthropogenic carbon and ocean pH. Nature 425, 365–365 (2003).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sabine, C. L. et al. The oceanic sink for anthropogenic CO2. Science 305, 367–371 (2004).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
IPCC. In IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate (eds. Pörtner, H.-O., Roberts, D. C., Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Tignor, M., Poloczanska, E., Mintenbeck, K., Alegría, A., Nicolai, M., Okem, A., Petzold, J., Rama, B., Weyer, N. M.) (2019).Kroeker, K. J. et al. Impacts of ocean acidification on marine organisms: Quantifying sensitivities and interaction with warming. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 1884–1896 (2013).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ries, J. B., Cohen, A. L. & McCorkle, D. C. Marine calcifiers exhibit mixed responses to CO2-induced ocean acidification. Geology 37, 1131–1134 (2014).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ramajo, L. et al. Food supply confers calcifiers resistance to ocean acidification. Sci. Rep. 6, 19374 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Vargas, C. A. et al. Species-specific responses to ocean acidification should account for local adaptation and adaptive plasticity. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0084 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kleypas, J. A. & Yates, K. K. Coral reefs and ocean acidification. Oceanography 22, 108–117 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hoegh-Guldberg, O. et al. Coral reefs under rapid climate change and ocean acidification. Science 318, 1737–1742 (2007).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pandolfi, J. M., Connolly, S. R., Marshall, D. J. & Cohen, A. L. Projecting coral reef futures under global warming and ocean acidification. Science 333, 418–422 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cornwall, C. E. et al. Global declines in coral reef calcium carbonate production under ocean acidification and warming. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 118, e2015265118 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Langer, M. R., Silk, M. T. & Lipps, J. H. Global ocean carbonate and carbon dioxide production: The role of reef foraminifera. J. Foraminifer. Res. 27, 271–277 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
Langer, M. R. Assessing the contribution of foraminiferan protists to global ocean carbonate production. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 55, 163–169 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hallock, P. Symbiont-bearing Foraminifera. In Modern Foraminifera (ed. Sen Gupta, B. K.) 123–139 (Springer Netherlands, 2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48104-9_8.BouDagher-Fadel, M. K. Biology and evolutionary history of larger benthic foraminifera. In Evolution and Geological Significance of Larger Benthic Foraminifera 1–44 (UCL Press, 2018).Köhler-Rink, S. & Kühl, M. Microsensor studies of photosynthesis and respiration in larger symbiotic foraminifera. I The physico-chemical microenvironment of Marginopora vertebralis, Amphistegina lobifera and Amphisorus hemprichii. Mar. Biol. 137, 473–486 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Glas, M. S., Fabricius, K. E., de Beer, D. & Uthicke, S. The O2, pH and Ca2+ microenvironment of benthic foraminifera in a high CO2 world. PLoS One 7, e50010 (2012).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
De Nooijer, L. J., Toyofuku, T. & Kitazato, H. Foraminifera promote calcification by elevating their intracellular pH. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106, 15374–15378 (2009).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Glas, M., Langer, G. & Keul, N. Calcification acidifies the microenvironment of a benthic foraminifer (Ammonia sp.). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 424–425, 53–58 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Toyofuku, T. et al. Proton pumping accompanies calcification in foraminifera. Nat. Commun. 8, 14145 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hallock, P., Lidz, B. H., Cockey-Burkhard, E. M. & Donnelly, K. B. Foraminifera as bioindicators in coral reef assessment and monitoring: The FORAM Index. Environ. Monit. Assess. 81, 221–238 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Uthicke, S., Thompson, A. & Schaffelke, B. Effectiveness of benthic foraminiferal and coral assemblages as water quality indicators on inshore reefs of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Coral Reefs 29, 209–225 (2010).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Prazeres, M., Martínez-Colón, M. & Hallock, P. Foraminifera as bioindicators of water quality: The FoRAM Index revisited. Environ. Pollut. 257, 113612 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sen Gupta, B. K. Modern Foraminifera. (Springer Science & Business Media, 2003).Morse, J. W., Andersson, A. J. & Mackenzie, F. T. Initial responses of carbonate-rich shelf sediments to rising atmospheric pCO2 and “ocean acidification”: Role of high Mg-calcites. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 70, 5814–5830 (2006).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Andersson, A. J., Mackenzie, F. T. & Bates, N. R. Life on the margin: Implications of ocean acidification on Mg-calcite, high latitude and cold-water marine calcifiers. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 373, 265–273 (2008).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Van Dijk, I., De Nooijer, L. J. & Reichart, G.-J. Trends in element incorporation in hyaline and porcelaneous foraminifera as a function of pCO2. Biogeosciences 14, 497–510 (2017).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Not, C., Thibodeau, B. & Yokoyama, Y. Incorporation of Mg, Sr, Ba, U, and B in high-Mg calcite benthic foraminifers cultured under controlled pCO2. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 19, 83–98 (2018).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Levi, A., Müller, W. & Erez, J. Intrashell variability of trace elements in benthic foraminifera grown under high CO2 levels. Front. Earth Sci. 7, 247 (2019).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Doo, S. S., Fujita, K., Byrne, M. & Uthicke, S. Fate of calcifying tropical symbiont-bearing large benthic foraminifera: Living sands in a changing ocean. Biol. Bull. 226, 169–186 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fujita, K. et al. Effects of ocean acidification on calcification of symbiont-bearing reef foraminifers. Biogeosciences 8, 2089–2098 (2011).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hikami, M. et al. Contrasting calcification responses to ocean acidification between two reef foraminifers harboring different algal symbionts. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L19601 (2011).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Vogel, N. & Uthicke, S. Calcification and photobiology in symbiont-bearing benthic foraminifera and responses to a high CO2 environment. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 424–425, 15–24 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
McIntyre-Wressnig, A., Bernhard, J. M., McCorkle, D. C. & Hallock, P. Non-lethal effects of ocean acidification on the symbiont-bearing benthic foraminifer Amphistegina gibbosa. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 472, 45–60 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kuroyanagi, A., Kawahata, H., Suzuki, A., Fujita, K. & Irie, T. Impacts of ocean acidification on large benthic foraminifers: Results from laboratory experiments. Mar. Micropaleontol. 73, 190–195 (2009).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Knorr, P. O., Robbins, L. L., Harries, P. J., Hallock, P. & Wynn, J. Response of the Miliolid Archaias angulatus to simulated ocean acidification. J. Foraminifer. Res. 45, 109–127 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Prazeres, M., Uthicke, S. & Pandolfi, J. M. Ocean acidification induces biochemical and morphological changes in the calcification process of large benthic foraminifera. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 282, 20142782 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Reymond, C., Lloyd, A., Kline, D., Dove, S. & Pandolfi, J. Decline in growth of foraminifer Marginopora rossi under eutrophication and ocean acidification scenarios. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 291–302 (2013).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sinutok, S., Hill, R., Doblin, M. A., Wuhrer, R. & Ralph, P. J. Warmer more acidic conditions cause decreased productivity and calcification in subtropical coral reef sediment-dwelling calcifiers. Limnol. Oceanogr. 56, 1200–1212 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sinutok, S., Hill, R., Kühl, M., Doblin, M. A. & Ralph, P. J. Ocean acidification and warming alter photosynthesis and calcification of the symbiont-bearing foraminifera Marginopora vertebralis. Mar. Biol. 161, 2143–2154 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Schmidt, C., Kucera, M. & Uthicke, S. Combined effects of warming and ocean acidification on coral reef Foraminifera Marginopora vertebralis and Heterostegina depressa. Coral Reefs 33, 805–818 (2014).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Engel, B., Hallock, P., Price, R. & Pichler, T. Shell dissolution in larger benthic foraminifers exposed to pH and temperature extremes: Results from an in situ experiment. J. Foraminifer. Res. 45, 190–203 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Marques, J. A., de Barros Marangoni, L. F. & Bianchini, A. Combined effects of sea water acidification and copper exposure on the symbiont-bearing foraminifer Amphistegina gibbosa. Coral Reefs 36, 489–501 (2017).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Uthicke, S. & Fabricius, K. E. Productivity gains do not compensate for reduced calcification under near-future ocean acidification in the photosynthetic benthic foraminifer species Marginopora vertebralis. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 2781–2791 (2012).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Uthicke, S., Momigliano, P. & Fabricius, K. E. High risk of extinction of benthic foraminifera in this century due to ocean acidification. Sci. Rep. 3, 1–5 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pettit, L. R., Smart, C. W., Hart, M. B., Milazzo, M. & Hall-Spencer, J. M. Seaweed fails to prevent ocean acidification impact on foraminifera along a shallow-water CO2 gradient. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1784–1793 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Martinez, A., Hernández-Terrones, L., Rebolledo-Vieyra, M. & Paytan, A. Impact of carbonate saturation on large Caribbean benthic foraminifera assemblages. Biogeosciences 15, 6819–6832 (2018).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pettit, L. R. et al. Benthic foraminifera show some resilience to ocean acidification in the northern Gulf of California, Mexico. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 73, 452–462 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Charrieau, L. M. et al. The effects of multiple stressors on the distribution of coastal benthic foraminifera: A case study from the Skagerrak-Baltic Sea region. Mar. Micropaleontol. 139, 42–56 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Narayan, G. R. et al. Response of large benthic foraminifera to climate and local changes: Implications for future carbonate production. Sedimentology https://doi.org/10.1111/sed.12858 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Le Cadre, V., Debenay, J.-P. & Lesourd, M. Low pH effect on Ammonia beccarii test deformation: Implications for using test deformations as a pollution indicator. J. Foraminifer. Res. 33, 1–9 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kurtarkar, S. R., Nigam, R., Saraswat, R. & Linshy, V. N. Regeneration and abnormality in benthic foraminifer Rosalina leei: Implications in reconstructing past salinity changes. Riv. Ital. Paleontol. E Stratigr. 117(1), 189–196 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Haynert, K., Schönfeld, J., Polovodova-Asteman, I. & Thomsen, J. The benthic foraminiferal community in a naturally CO2-rich coastal habitat of the southwestern Baltic Sea. Biogeosciences 9, 4421–4440 (2012).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lee, J. J. ‘Living Sands’—Larger foraminifera and their endosymbiotic algae. Symbiosis 25, 71–100 (1997).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Parker, J. Ultrastructure of the test wall in modern porcelaneous foraminifera: Implications for the classification of the Miliolida. J. Foraminifer. Res. 47, 136–174 (2017).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Erez, J. The source of ions for biomineralization in foraminifera and their implications for paleoceanographic proxies. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 54, 115–149 (2003).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dissard, D., Nehrke, G., Reichart, G. J. & Bijma, J. Impact of seawater pCO2 on calcification and Mg/Ca and Sr/Ca ratios in benthic foraminifera calcite: results from culturing experiments with Ammonia tepida. Biogeosciences 7, 81–93 (2010).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
McIntyre-Wressnig, A., Bernhard, J. M., Wit, J. C. & Mccorkle, D. C. Ocean acidification not likely to affect the survival and fitness of two temperate benthic foraminiferal species: Results from culture experiments. J. Foraminifer. Res. 44, 341–351 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Charrieau, L. M. et al. Decalcification and survival of benthic foraminifera under the combined impacts of varying pH and salinity. Mar. Environ. Res. 138, 36–45 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Saraswat, R. et al. Effect of salinity induced pH/alkalinity changes on benthic foraminifera: A laboratory culture experiment. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 153, 96–107 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Buzas-Stephens, P. & Buzas, M. A. Population dynamics and dissolution of foraminifera in Nueces Bay, Texas. J. Foraminifer. Res. 35, 248–258 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cesbron, F. et al. Vertical distribution and respiration rates of benthic foraminifera: Contribution to aerobic remineralization in intertidal mudflats covered by Zostera noltei meadows. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 179, 23–38 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lee, J. J. et al. Nutritional and related experiments on laboratory maintenance of three species of symbiont-bearing, large foraminifera. Mar. Biol. 109, 417–425 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yanko, V., Arnold, A. J. & Parker, W. C. Effects of marine pollution on benthic Foraminifera. In Modern Foraminifera 217–235 (Springer Netherlands, 1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48104-9_13.Polovodova Asteman, I. & Schönfeld, J. Foraminiferal test abnormalities in the western Baltic Sea. J. Foraminifer. Res. 38, 318–336 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Boltovskoy, E. & Wright, R. The test. In Recent Foraminifera (eds. Boltovskoy, E. & Wright, R.) 51–93 (Springer Netherlands, 1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2860-7_3.Kaczmarek, K. et al. Boron incorporation in the foraminifer Amphistegina lessonii under a decoupled carbonate chemistry. Biogeosciences 12, 1753–1763 (2015).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Allen, K. et al. Controls on boron incorporation in cultured tests of the planktic foraminifer Orbulina universa. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 309, 291–301 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Allen, K., Hönisch, B., Eggins, S. & Rosenthal, Y. Environmental controls on B/Ca in calcite tests of the tropical planktic foraminifer species Globigerinoides ruber and Globigerinoides sacculifer. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. s351–352, 270–280 (2012).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Howes, E. L. et al. Decoupled carbonate chemistry controls on the incorporation of boron into Orbulina universa. Biogeosciences 14, 415–430 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lea, D. W. Trace elements in foraminiferal calcite. In Modern Foraminifera 259–277 (Springer Netherlands, 2003).Quigg, A. Micronutrients. In The Physiology of Microalgae (eds. Borowitzka, M. A., Beardall, J. & Raven, J. A.) 211–231 (Springer International Publishing, 2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24945-2_10.Jennings, D. Culturing Benthic Foraminifera to Understand the Effects of Changing Seawater Chemistry and Temperature on Foraminiferal Shell Chemistry. (2015).Van Dijk, I., De Nooijer, L. J., Barras, C. & Reichart, G.-J. Mn Incorporation in large benthic foraminifera: Differences between species and the impact of pCO2. Front. Earth Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.567701 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Raitzsch, M., Dueñas-Bohórquez, A., Reichart, G.-J., de Nooijer, L. J. & Bickert, T. Incorporation of Mg and Sr in calcite of cultured benthic foraminifera: Impact of calcium concentration and associated calcite saturation state. Biogeosciences 7, 869–881 (2010).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Holzmann, M., Hohenegger, J., Hallock, P., Piller, W. E. & Pawlowski, J. Molecular phylogeny of large miliolid foraminifera (Soritacea Ehrenberg 1839). Mar. Micropaleontol. 43, 57–74 (2001).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hottinger, L., Halicz, E. & Reiss, Z. Recent Foraminiferida from the Gulf of Aqaba, Red Sea. vol. 33 (Slovenska Akademija Znanosti in Umetnosti, Dela Opera, Classis IV: Historia Naturalis, 1993).Langer, M., Makled, W., Pietsch, S. & Weinmann, A. Asynchronous calcification in juvenile megalospheres: An ontogenetic window into the life cycle and polymorphism of Peneroplis. J. Foraminifer. Res. 39, 8–14 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dissard, D., Nehrke, G., Reichart, G.-J. & Bijma, J. The impact of salinity on the Mg/Ca and Sr/Ca ratio in the benthic foraminifera Ammonia tepida: Results from culture experiments. Geochim. Chosmocimica Acta 74, 928–940 (2010).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Schiebel, R. & Hemleben, C. Planktic Foraminifers in the Modern Ocean. (Springer, 2017).Culberson, C. H., Pytkowicz, R. M. & Hawley, J. E. Seawater alkalinity determination by the pH method. J. Mar. Res. 28, 15–21 (1970).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Dickson, A. G. & Goyet, C. DOE. Handbook of Methods for the Analysis of the Various Parameters of the Carbon Dioxide System in Sea Water, Version 2. (eds., ORNL/CDIAC-74., 1994).Suga, H., Sakai, S., Toyofuku, T. & Ohkouchi, N. A simplified method for determination of total alkalinity in seawater based on the small sample one-point titration method. JAMSTEC Rep. Res. Dev. 17, 23–33 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Robbins, L. L., Hansen, M. E., Kleypas, J. A. & Meylan, S. C. CO2calc: A User-Friendly Seawater Carbon Calculator for Windows, Mac OS X, and iOS (iPhone): U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2010–1280. 17 (2010).Lueker, T. J., Dickson, A. G. & Keeling, C. D. Ocean pCO2 calculated from dissolved inorganic carbon, alkalinity, and equations for K1 and K2: Validation based on laboratory measurements of CO2 in gas and seawater at equilibrium. Mar. Chem. 70, 105–119 (2000).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Uppström, L. R. The boron/chlorinity ratio of deep-sea water from the Pacific Ocean. Deep Sea Res. Oceanogr. Abstr. 21, 161–162 (1974).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Orr, J. C., Epitalon, J.-M. & Gattuso, J.-P. Comparison of ten packages that compute ocean carbonate chemistry. Biogeosciences 12, 1483–1510 (2015).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fontanier, C. et al. Living (stained) deep-sea foraminifera from the Sea of Marmara: A preliminary study. Deep Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 153, 61 (2018).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gaffey, S. & Bronnimann, C. Effects of bleaching on organic and mineral phases in biogenic carbonates. J. Sediment. Res. 63, 752–754 (1993).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jochum, K. P. et al. Determination of reference values for NIST SRM 610–617 glasses following ISO guidelines. Geostand. Geoanal. Res. 35, 397–429 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar  More