Ecology

1.Field, C. B., Behrenfeld, M. J., Randerson, J. T. & Falkowski, P. Science 281, 237–240 (1998).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Lewis, K. M., Van Duken, G. L. & Arrigo, K. R. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay8380 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
3.Charlson, R. J., Lovelock, J. E., Andreae, M. O. & Warren, S. G. Nature 326, 655–661 (1987).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Seymour, J. R., Simó, R., Ahmed, T. & Stocker, R. Science 329, 342–345 (2010).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Shemi, A. et al. Nat. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-021-00971-3 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Teng, Z.-J. et al. Nat. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-021-00981-1 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Sieburth, J. M. Science 132, 676–677 (1960).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Strom, S., Wolfe, G., Holmes, J., Stecher, H., Shimeneck, C. & Sarah, L. Limnol. Oceanogr. 48, 217–229 (2003).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Wolfe, G. V., Steinke, M. & Kirst, G. O. Nature 387, 894–897 (1997).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Curson, A. R. J. et al. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 17009 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

1.Filkins LM, Hampton TH, Gifford AH, Gross MJ, Hogan DA, Sogin ML, et al. Prevalence of Streptococci and increased polymicrobial diversity associated with cystic fibrosis patient stability. J Bacteriol. 2012;194:4709–17.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Fodor AA, Klem ER, Gilpin DF, Elborn JS, Boucher RC, Tunney MM, et al. The adult cystic fibrosis airway microbiota is stable over time and infection type, and highly resilient to antibiotic treatment of exacerbations. PLoS One. 2012;7:e45001.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Goddard AF, Staudinger BJ, Dowd SE, Joshi-Datar A, Wolcott RD, Aitken ML, et al. Direct sampling of cystic fibrosis lungs indicates that DNA-based analyses of upper-airway specimens can misrepresent lung microbiota. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:13769–74.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Guss AM, Roeselers G, Newton IL, Young CR, Klepac-Ceraj V, Lory S, et al. Phylogenetic and metabolic diversity of bacteria associated with cystic fibrosis. ISME J. 2011;5:20–9.Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Harris JK, De Groote MA, Sagel SD, Zemanick ET, Kapsner R, Penvari C, et al. Molecular identification of bacteria in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from children with cystic fibrosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:20529–33.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Brown PS, Pope CE, Marsh RL, Qin X, McNamara S, Gibson R, et al. Directly sampling the lung of a young child with cystic fibrosis reveals diverse microbiota. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11:1049–55.Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Jorth P, Staudinger BJ, Wu X, Hisert KB, Hayden H, Garudathri J, et al. Regional isolation drives bacterial diversification within cystic fibrosis lungs. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;18:307–19.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Sibley CD, Parkins MD, Rabin HR, Duan K, Norgaard JC, Surette MG. A polymicrobial perspective of pulmonary infections exposes an enigmatic pathogen in cystic fibrosis patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:15070–5.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
9.van der Gast CJ, Walker AW, Stressmann FA, Rogers GB, Scott P, Daniels TW, et al. Partitioning core and satellite taxa from within cystic fibrosis lung bacterial communities. ISME J. 2011;5:780–91.Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Zhao J, Carmody LA, Kalikin LM, Li J, Petrosino JF, Schloss PD, et al. Impact of enhanced Staphylococcus DNA extraction on microbial community measures in cystic fibrosis sputum. PLoS One. 2012;7:e33127.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Carmody LA, Zhao J, Schloss PD, Petrosino JF, Murray S, Young VB, et al. Changes in cystic fibrosis airway microbiota at pulmonary exacerbation. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2013;10:179–87.Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Cox MJ, Allgaier M, Taylor B, Baek MS, Huang YJ, Daly RA, et al. Airway microbiota and pathogen abundance in age-stratified cystic fibrosis patients. PLoS One. 2010;5:e11044.Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Stressmann FA, Rogers GB, van der Gast CJ, Marsh P, Vermeer LS, Carroll MP, et al. Long-term cultivation-independent microbial diversity analysis demonstrates that bacterial communities infecting the adult cystic fibrosis lung show stability and resilience. Thorax. 2012;67:867–73.Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Zhao J, Schloss PD, Kalikin LM, Carmody LA, Foster BK, Petrosino JF, et al. Decade-long bacterial community dynamics in cystic fibrosis airways. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:5809–14.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Rogers GB, Bruce KD, Hoffman LR. How can the cystic fibrosis respiratory microbiome influence our clinical decision-making? Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2017;23:536–43.Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Widder S, Knapp S. Microbial metabolites in cystic fibrosis: a target for future therapy? Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2019;61:132–3.17.Mahboubi MA, Carmody LA, Foster BK, Kalikin LM, VanDevanter DR, LiPuma JJ. Culture-based and culture-independent bacteriologic analysis of cystic fibrosis respiratory specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54:613–9.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Carmody LA, Caverly LJ, Foster BK, Rogers MAM, Kalikin LM, Simon RH, et al. Fluctuations in airway bacterial communities associated with clinical states and disease stages in cystic fibrosis. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0194060.Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Zhao J, Li J, Schloss PD, Kalikin LM, Raymond TA, Petrosino JF, et al. Effect of sample storage conditions on cultureindependent bacterial community measures in cystic fibrosis sputum specimens. J Clin Microbiol 2011;49:3717–8.20.Hnizdo E, Yu L, Freyder L, Attfield M, Lefante J & Glindmeyer HW. The precision of longitudinal lung function measurements: Monitoring and interpretation. Occup Environ Med 2005;62:695–701.21.Konstan MW, Wagener JS, VanDevanter DR. Characterizing aggressiveness and predicting future progression of CF lung disease. J Cyst Fibros. 2009;8:S15–19.Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Schloss PD, Gevers D, Westcott SL. Reducing the effects of PCR amplification and sequencing artifacts on 16s rRNA-based studies. PLoS One. 2011;6:e27310.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, et al. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:7537–41.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Cole JR, Wang Q, Cardenas E, Fish J, Chai B, Farris RJ, et al. The ribosomal database project: Improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:D141–145.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
25.Sung J, Kim S, Cabatbat JJT, Jang S, Jin YS, Jung GY, et al. Global metabolic interaction network of the human gut microbiota for context-specific community-scale analysis. Nat Commun 2017;8:15393.26.Friedman J, Alm EJ. Inferring correlation networks from genomic survey data. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8:e1002687.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Holmes I, Harris K, Quince C. Dirichlet multinomial mixtures: generative models for microbial metagenomics. PLoS One. 2012;7:e30126.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Ding T, Schloss PD. Dynamics and associations of microbial community types across the human body. Nature. 2014;509:357–60.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Price KE, Hampton TH, Gifford AH, Dolben EL, Hogan DA, Morrison HG, et al. Unique microbial communities persist in individual cystic fibrosis patients throughout a clinical exacerbation. Microbiome 2013;1:27.30.Carmody LA, Zhao J, Kalikin LM, LeBar W, Simon RH, Venkataraman A, et al. The daily dynamics of cystic fibrosis airway microbiota during clinical stability and at exacerbation. Microbiome 2015;3:12.31.de Dios Caballero J, Vida R, Cobo M, Maiz L, Suarez L, Galeano J, et al. Individual patterns of complexity in cystic fibrosis lung microbiota, including predator bacteria, over a 1-year period. mBio 2017;8::e00959–17.32.Whelan, FJ, Heirali AA, Rossi L, Rabin HR, Parkins MD, & Surette MG. Longitudinal sampling of the lung microbiota in individuals with cystic fibrosis. PLoS One 2017:12:e0172811.33.Noecker C, Eng A, Srinivasan S, Theriot CM, Young VB, Jansson JK, et al. Metabolic model-based integration of microbiome taxonomic and metabolomic profiles elucidates mechanistic links between ecological and metabolic variation. mSystems 2016;1.34.Douglas, GM, Maffei, VJ, Zaneveld, JR, Yurgel, SN, Brown JR, Taylor CM, et al. PICRUSt2 for prediction of metagenome functions. Nat Biotechnol 2020;38:685–8.35.Caspi R, Billington R, Fulcher CA, Keseler IM, Kothari A, Krummenacker M, et al. The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes. Nucleic Acids Res 2018;46:D633–D639.36.Quinn RA, Comstock W, Zhang T, Morton JT, da Silva R, Tran A, et al. Niche partitioning of a pathogenic microbiome driven by chemical gradients. Sci Adv 2018;4:eaau1908.37.Quinn RA, Whiteson K, Lim YW, Zhao J, Conrad D, LiPuma JJ, et al. Ecological networking of cystic fibrosis lung infections. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2016;2:4.Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Pradeu T, Vivier E. The discontinuity theory of immunity. Sci Immunol. 2016;1:AAG0479.39.Flynn JM, Niccum D, Dunitz JM, Hunter RC. Evidence and role for bacterial mucin degradation in cystic fibrosis airway disease. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12:e1005846.Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Adamowicz EM, Flynn J, Hunter RC, Harcombe WR. Cross-feeding modulates antibiotic tolerance in bacterial communities. ISME J. 2018;12:2723–35.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Rose MC & Voynow JA. Respiratory tract mucin genes and mucin glycoproteins in health and disease. Physiol Rev 2006;86:245–78.42.Tailford LE, Crost EH, Kavanaugh D. & Juge N. Mucin glycan foraging in the human gut microbiome. Front Genet 2015;6:81.43.Wheeler KM, Carcamo-Oyarce G, Turner BS, Dellos-Nolan S, Co JY, Lehoux S, et al. Mucin glycans attenuate the virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in infection. Nat Microbiol 2019;4:2146–54.44.Twomey KB, O’Connell OJ, McCarthy Y, Dow JM, O’Toole GA, Plant BJ, et al. Bacterial cis-2-unsaturated fatty acids found in the cystic fibrosis airway modulate virulence and persistence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. ISME J 2012;6:939–50.45.Zemanick ET, Wagner BD, Robertson CE, Ahrens RC, Chmiel JF, Clancy JP, et al. Airway microbiota across age and disease spectrum in cystic fibrosis. Eur Respir J 2017;50:1700832.46.Lu J, Carmody LA, Opron K, Simon RH, Kalikin LM, Caverly LJ, et al. Parallel analysis of cystic fibrosis sputum and saliva’reveals overlapping communities and an opportunity for sample decontamination. mSystems 2020;5.47.Jones KL, Hegab AH, Hillman BC, Simpson KL, Jinkins PA, Grisham MB, et al. Elevation of nitrotyrosine and nitrate concentrations in cystic fibrosis sputum. Pediatr Pulmonol 2000;30:79–85.48.Quinn RA, Lim YW, Maughan H, Conrad D, Rohwer F, Whiteson KL. Biogeochemical forces shape the composition and physiology of polymicrobial communities in the cystic fibrosis lung. mBio. 2014;5:e00956–00913.Article 

Google Scholar 
49.Mirkovic B, Murray MA, Lavelle GM, Molloy K, Azim AA, Gunaratnam C, et al. The role of short-chain fatty acids, produced by anaerobic bacteria, in the cystic fibrosis airway. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;192:1314–24.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Trompette A, Gollwitzer ES, Pattaroni C, Lopez-Mejia IC, Riva E, Pernot J, et al. Dietary fiber confers protection against flu by shaping Ly6c(-) patrolling monocyte hematopoiesis and CD8(+) t cell metabolism. Immunity. 2018;48:992–1005.e1008.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
51.Flynn JM, Phan C, Hunter RC. Genome-wide survey of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 reveals a role for the glyoxylate pathway and extracellular proteases in the utilization of mucin. Infect Immun. 2017;85:e00182–17.52.Jorth P, Ehsan Z, Rezayat A, Caldwell E, Pope C, Brewington JJ, et al. Direct lung sampling indicates that established pathogens dominate early infections in children with cystic fibrosis. Cell Rep. 2019;27:1190–204.e1193.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
53.Charalampous T, Kay GL, Richardson H, Aydin A, Baldan R, Jeanes C, et al. Nanopore metagenomics enables rapid clinical diagnosis of bacterial lower respiratory infection. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:783–92.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Cowley ES, Kopf SH, LaRiviere A, Ziebis W, Newman DK. Pediatric cystic fibrosis sputum can be chemically dynamic, anoxic, and extremely reduced due to hydrogen sulfide formation. mBio. 2015;6:e00767.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
55.Cuthbertson L, Walker AW, Oliver AE, Rogers GB, Rivett DW, Hampton TH, et al. Lung function and microbiota diversity in cystic fibrosis. Microbiome 2020;8:45. More

1.Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R. & Law, K. L. Production, use and fate of all plastics ever made. Sci. Adv. 3, e1700782 (2017).2.Napper, I. E. & Thompson, R. C. Marine plastic pollution: other than microplastic in Waste: A Handbook for Management, Second Edition (ed. Letcher, T. & Vallero, D.) chapter 22, 425–442 (Academic Press, 2019).3.Eriksen, M. et al. Plastic pollution in the world’s oceans: more than 5 trillion plastic pieces weighing over 250,000 tons afloat at sea. PLoS ONE 9, e111913 (2014).4.Sharma, S. & Chatterjee, S. Microplastic pollution, a threat to marine ecosystem and human health: a short review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 24, 21530–21547 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Rocha-Santos, T. & Duarte, A. C. A critical overview of the analytical approaches to the occurrence, the fate and the behavior or microplastics in the environment. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 65, 47–53 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Cózar, A. et al. Plastic accumulation in the mediterranean sea. PLoS ONE 10, e0121762 (2015).7.Suaria, G. & Aliani, S. Floating debris in the Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 86, 494–504 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
8.Auta, H. S., Emenike, C. U. & Fauziah, S. H. Distribution and importance of microplastics in the marine environment: A review of the sources, fate, effects, and potential solutions. Environ. Int. 102, 165–176 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
9.Woodall, L. C. et al. The deep sea is a major sink for microplastic debris. R. Soc. Open Sci. 1, 140317 (2014).10.Kershaw, P., Turra, A. & Galgani, F. Guidelines for the monitoring and assessment of plastic litter in the ocean. GESAMP Reports and Studies No. 99 (2019).11.Desforges, J. P. W., Galbraith, M. & Ross, P. S. Ingestion of microplastics by zooplankton in the Northeast Pacific Ocean. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 69, 320–330 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
12.Van Cauwenberghe, L., Claessens, M., Vandegehuchte, M. B. & Janssen, C. R. Microplastics are taken up by mussels (Mytilus edulis) and lugworms (Arenicola marina) living in natural habitats. Environ. Pollut. 199, 10–17 (2015).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
13.Setälä, O., Norkko, J. & Lehtiniemi, M. Feeding type affects microplastic ingestion in a coastal invertebrate community. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 102, 95–101 (2016).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
14.Amelineau, F. et al. Microplastic pollution in the Greenland Sea: Background levels and selective contamination of planktivorous diving seabirds. Environ. Pollut. 219, 1131–1139 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
15.Zhu, J. et al. Cetaceans and microplastics: First report of microplastic ingestion by a coastal delphinid Sousa chinensis. Sci. Total Environ. 659, 649–654 (2019).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
16.Sbrana, A. et al. Spatial variability and influence of biological parameters on microplastic ingestion by Boops boops (L.) along the Italian coasts (Western Mediterranean Sea). Environ. Pollut. 263, 114429 (2020).17.De Sa, L. C., Luís, L. G. & Guilhermino, L. Effects of microplastics on juveniles of the common goby (Pomatoschistus microps): confusion with prey, reduction of the predatory performance and efficiency, and possible influence of developmental conditions. Environ. Pollut. 196, 359–362 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
18.Gallitelli, L., Cera, A., Cesarini, G., Pietrelli, L. & Scalici, M. Preliminary indoor evidences of microplastic effects on freshwater benthic macroinvertebrates. Sci. Rep. 11, 720 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Karlsson, T. M. et al. Screening for microplastics in sediment, water, marine invertebrates and fish: Method development and microplastic accumulation. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 122, 403–408 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Bour, A., Avio, C. G., Gorbi, S., Regoli, F. & Hylland, K. Presence of microplastics in benthic and epibenthic organisms: Influence of habitat, feeding mode and trophic level. Environ. Pollut. 243, 1217–1225 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
21.Díaz-Castañeda, V., & Reish, D. Polychaetes in environmental studies in Annelids as Model Systems in the Biological Sciences (ed. Shain, D. H.) chapter 11, 205–227 (Wiley, 2009).22.Gusmão, F. et al. In situ ingestion of microfibres by meiofauna from sandy beaches. Environ. Pollut. 216, 584–590 (2016).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
23.Missawi, O. et al. Abundance and distribution of small microplastics (≤ 3 μm) in sediments and seaworms from the Southern Mediterranean coasts and characterisation of their potential harmful effects. Environ. Pollut. 263, 114634 (2020).24.Piarulli, S. et al. Do different habits affect microplastics contents in organisms? A trait-based analysis on salt marsh species. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 153, 110983 (2020).25.Knutsen, et al. Microplastic accumulation by tube-dwelling, suspension feeding polychaetes from the sediment surface: A case study from the Norwegian Continental Shelf. Mar. Environ. Res. 161, 105073 (2020).26.Lusher, A. L., Welden, N. A., Sobral, P. & Cole, M. Sampling, isolating and identifying microplastics ingested by fish and invertebrates. Anal. Methods 9, 1346–1360 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Foekema, E. M. et al. Plastics in North Sea fish. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 8818–8824 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
28.Rochman, C. M. et al. Anthropogenic debris in seafood: Plastic debris and fibers from textiles in fish and bivalves sold for human consumption. Sci. Rep. 5, 1–10 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
29.Avio, C. G., Gorbi, S. & Regoli, F. Experimental development of a new protocol for extraction and characterization of microplastics in fish tissues: First observations in commercial species from Adriatic Sea. Mar. Environ. Res. 111, 18–26 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
30.Li, J., Yang, D., Li, L., Jabeen, K. & Shi, H. Microplastics in commercial bivalves from China. Environ. Pollut. 207, 190–195 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
31.Claessens, M., Van Cauwenberghe, L., Vandegehuchte, M. B. & Janssen, C. R. New techniques for the detection of microplastics in sediments and field collected organisms. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 70, 227–233 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
32.Bianchi, J. et al. Food preference determines the best suitable digestion protocol for analysing microplastic ingestion by fish. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 154, 1–9 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
33.Cole, M. et al. Isolation of microplastics in biota-rich seawater samples and marine organisms. Sci. Rep. 4, 4528 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
34.Dehaut, A. et al. Microplastics in seafood: Benchmark protocol for their extraction and characterization. Environ. Pollut. 215, 223–233 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
35.Phuong, N. N., Poirier, L., Pham, Q. T., Lagarde, F. & Zalouk-Vergnoux, A. Factors influencing the microplastic contamination of bivalves from the French Atlantic coast: Location, season and/or mode of life?. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 129, 664–674 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
36.Valente, T. et al. Exploring microplastic ingestion by three deepwater elasmobranch species: a case study from the Tyrrhenian Sea. Environ. Pollut. 253, 342–350 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
37.Thompson, R. C. et al. Lost at sea: Where is all the plastic?. Science 304, 838 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
38.Mathalon, A. & Hill, P. Microplastic fibers in the intertidal ecosystem surrounding Halifax Harbor Nova Scotia. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 81, 69–79 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
39.Setälä, O., Fleming-Lehtinen, V. & Lehtiniemi, M. Ingestion and transfer of microplastics in the planktonic food web. Environ. Pollut. 185, 77–83 (2014).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
40.Jang, M., Shim, W. J., Han, G. M., Song, Y. K. & Hong, S. H. Formation of microplastics by polychaetes (Marphysa sanguinea) inhabiting expanded polystyrene marine debris. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 131, 365–369 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
41.Naidu, S. A., Rao, V. R. & Ramu, K. Microplastics in the benthic invertebrates from the coastal waters of Kochi Southeastern Arabian Sea. Environ. Geochem. Health 40, 1377–1383 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
42.Revel, M. et al. (2018). Accumulation and immunotoxicity of microplastics in the estuarine worm Hediste diversicolor in environmentally relevant conditions of exposure. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27, 3574–3583 (2018).43.Näkki, P., Setälä, O. & Lehtiniemi, M. Seafloor sediments as microplastic sinks in the northern Baltic Sea-Negligible upward transport of buried microplastics by bioturbation. Environ. Pollut. 249, 74–81 (2019).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
44.Amin, R. M., Sohaimi, E. S., Anuar, S. T. & Bachok, Z. Microplastic ingestion by zooplankton in Terengganu coastal waters, southern South China Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 150, 110616 (2020).45.Jang, M. et al. A close relationship between microplastic contamination and coastal area use pattern. Water Res. 171, 115400 (2020).46.Torre, M., Digka, N., Anastasopoulou, A., Tsangaris, C. & Mytilineou, C. Anthropogenic microfibres pollution in marine biota. A new and simple methodology to minimize airborne contamination. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 113, 55–61 (2016).47.Courtene-Jones, W., Quinn, B., Murphy, F., Gary, S. F. & Narayanaswamy, B. E. Optimisation of enzymatic digestion and validation of specimen preservation methods for the analysis of ingested microplastics. Anal. Methods 9, 1437–1445 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
48.Digka, N., Tsangaris, C., Torre, M., Anastasopoulou, A. & Zeri, C. Microplastics in mussels and fish from the Northern Ionian Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 135, 30–40 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
49.Ding, J. et al. Detection of microplastics in local marine organisms using a multi-technology system. Anal. Methods 11, 78–87 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Botterell, Z. L. et al. Bioavailability and effects of microplastics on marine zooplankton: A review. Environ. Pollut. 245, 98–110 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
51.Huerta Lwanga, E. et al. Microplastics in the Terrestrial Ecosystem: Implications for Lumbricus terrestris (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae). Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 2685–2691 (2016).52.Hurley, R. R., Woodward, J. C. & Rothwell, J. J. Ingestion of microplastics by freshwater Tubifex worms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 12844–12851 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
53.Kowalski, N., Reichardt, A. M. & Waniek, J. J. Sinking rates of microplastics and potential implications of their alteration by physical, biological, and chemical factors. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 109, 310–319 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
54.PlasticsEurope. Plastics – the Facts 2019. An analysis of European plastics production, demand and waste data, p. 42 (2019). FINAL web version Plastics the facts2019 14102019.pdf.55.Horton, T. et al. World Register of Marine Species (2021). https://doi.org/10.14284/170.56.Currie, D. R., McArthur, M. A. & Cohen, B. F. Reproduction and distribution of the invasive European fanworm Sabella spallanzanii (Polychaeta: Sabellidae) in Port Phillip Bay, Victoria Australia. Mar. Biol. 136, 645–656 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
57.Giangrande, A. et al. Utilization of the filter feeder polychaete Sabella. Aquac. Int. 13, 129–136 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
58.Stabili, L., Licciano, M., Giangrande, A., Fanelli, G. & Cavallo, R. A. Sabella spallanzanii filter-feeding on bacterial community: ecological implications and applications. Mar. Environ. Res. 61, 74–92 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
59.Schulze, A., Grimes, C. J. & Rudek, T. E. Tough, armed and omnivorous: Hermodice carunculata (Annelida: Amphinomidae) is prepared for ecological challenges. J. Mar. Biolog. Assoc. U. K. 97, 1075–1080 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
60.Jumars, P. A., Dorgan, K. M. & Lindsay, S. M. Diet of worms emended: an update of polychaete feeding guilds. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 7, 497–520 (2015).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
61.Nel, H. A., Hean, J. W., Noundou, X. S. & Froneman, P. W. Do microplastic loads reflect the population demographics along the southern African coastline?. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 115, 115–119 (2016).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
62.Stolte, A., Forster, S., Gerdts, G. & Schubert, H. Microplastic concentrations in beach sediments along the German Baltic coast. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 99, 216–229 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
63.Karami, A. et al. A high-performance protocol for extraction of microplastics in fish. Sci. Total Environ. 578, 485–494 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
64.Hermsen, E., Mintenig, S. M., Besseling, E. & Koelmans, A. A. Quality criteria for the analysis of microplastic in biota samples: A critical review. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 10230–10240 (2018).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
65.Developer Core Team, R. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing (2019).66.Hui, W., Gel, Y. R. & Gastwirth, J. L. Lawstat: An R package for law, public policy and biostatistics. J. Stat. Softw. 28, 1–26 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
67.Ripley, B. et al. Support Functions and Datasets for Venables and Ripley’s MASS (4th edition) (Springer, 2002).68.Breheny, P. & Burchett, W. Visualization of regression models using visreg. R. J. 9, 56–71 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar  More

1.Jones, G. P., Pearlstine, L. G. & Percival, H. F. An assessment of small unmanned aerial vehicles for wildlife research. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 34, 750–758 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Jones, G. P. The feasibility of using small unmanned aerial vehicles for wildlife research. Masters Thesis. (University of Florida, 2003).3.Watts, A. C. et al. Unmanned aircraft systems (UASs) for ecological research and natural-resource monitoring (Florida). Ecol. Restor. 26, 13–14 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Chabot, D. Systematic Evaluation of a Stock Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) System for Small-Scale Wildlife Survey Applications. Masters Thesis. (McGill University, 2009).5.Koski, W. R. et al. Evaluation of an unmanned airborne system for monitoring marine mammals. Aquat. Mamm. 35, 347–357 (2009).MathSciNet 
Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Soriano, P., Caballero, F. & Ollero, A. RF-based particle filter localization for wildlife tracking by using an UAV. Int. Symp. Robot. 40, 239–244 (2009).
Google Scholar 
7.Sukkarieh, S. UAV based search for a radio tagged animal using particle filters at Stuttgart. In Australasian Conference on Robotics and Automation (ACRA) (2009).8.Abd-Elrahman, A., Pearlstine, L. & Percival, F. Development of pattern recognition algorithm for automatic bird detection from unmanned aerial vehicle imagery. Surv. L. Inf. Sci. 65, 37–45 (2005).
Google Scholar 
9.Singh, K. K., Frazier, A. E. & Frazier, A. E. A meta-analysis and review of unmanned aircraft system (UAS) imagery for terrestrial applications. Int. J. Remote Sens. 00, 1–21 (2018).
Google Scholar 
10.Rebolo-Ifran, N., Grilli, M. G. & Lambertucci, S. Drones as a threat to wildlife: YouTube complements science in providing evidence about their effect. Environ. Conserv. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892919000080 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Weston, M. A., O’Brien, C., Kostoglou, K. N. & Symonds, M. R. E. E. Escape responses of terrestrial and aquatic birds to drones: Towards a code of practice to minimize disturbance. J. Appl. Ecol. 57, 777–785 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Vas, E., Lescroël, A., Duriez, O., Boguszewski, G. & Grémillet, D. Approaching birds with drones: First experiments and ethical guidelines. Biol. Lett. 11, 20140754 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Pomeroy, P., O’Connor, L. & Davies, P. Assessing use of and reaction to unmanned aerial systems in gray and harbor seals during breeding and molt in the UK. J. Unmanned Veh. Syst. 3, 102–113 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Giles, A. B. et al. Responses of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops spp.) to small drones. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3440 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Mulero-Pázmány, M. et al. Unmanned aircraft systems as a new source of disturbance for wildlife: A systematic review. PLoS ONE 12, 1–14 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
16.Bennitt, E., Bartlam-Brooks, H. L. A., Hubel, T. Y. & Wilson, A. M. Terrestrial mammalian wildlife responses to unmanned aerial systems approaches. Sci. Rep. 9, 2142 (2019).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
17.Irigoin-Lovera, C., Luna, D. M., Acosta, D. A. & Zavalaga, C. B. Response of colonial Peruvian guano birds to flying UAVs: Effects and feasibility for implementing new population monitoring methods. PeerJ 7, e8129 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
18.McEvoy, J. F., Hall, G. P. & McDonald, P. G. Evaluation of unmanned aerial vehicle shape, flight path and camera type for waterfowl surveys: Disturbance effects and species recognition. PeerJ 2016, e1831 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
19.Barnas, A. F., Felege, C. J., Rockwell, R. F. & Ellis-Felege, S. N. A pilot(less) study on the use of an unmanned aircraft system for studying polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Polar Biol. 41, 1055–1062 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Jarrett, D., Calladine, J., Cotton, A., Wilson, M. W. & Humphreys, E. Behavioural responses of non-breeding waterbirds to drone approach are associated with flock size and habitat. Bird Study 67, 190–196 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Bevan, E. et al. Measuring behavioral responses of sea turtles, saltwater crocodiles, and crested terns to drone disturbance to define ethical operating thresholds. PLoS One 13, e0194460 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Stankowich, T. Ungulate flight responses to human disturbance: A review and meta-analysis. Biol. Conserv. 141, 2159–2173 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Weston, M. A., Mcleod, E. M., Blumstein, D. T. & Guay, P. J. A review of flight-initiation distances and their application to managing disturbance to Australian birds. Emu 112, 269–286 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Wisdom, M. J., Ager, A. A., Preisler, H. K., Cimon, N. J. & Johnson, B. K. Effects of off-road recreation on mule deer and elk. In Transactions of the 69th North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 531–550 (2004).25.Penny, S. G., White, R. L., Scott, D. M., MacTavish, L. & Pernetta, A. P. Using drones and sirens to elicit avoidance behaviour in white rhinoceros as an anti-poaching tactic. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 286, 20191135 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Frid, A. & Dill, L. M. Human-caused disturbance stimuli as a form of predation risk. Conserv. Ecol. 6, 11 (2002).
Google Scholar 
27.Dill, L. M. & Frid, A. Behaviourally mediated biases in transect surveys: A predation risk sensitivity approach. Can. J. Zool. 98, 697–704 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Pulliam, R. H. On the advantage of flocking. J. Theor. Biol. 38, 419–422 (1973).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
29.Taraborelli, P., Gregorio, P., Moreno, P., Novaro, A. & Carmanchahi, P. Cooperative vigilance: The guanaco’ s (Lama guanicoe) key antipredator mechanism. Behav. Process. 91, 82–89 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Delm, M. M. Vigilance for predators: Detection and dilution effects. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 26, 337–342 (1990).Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Roberts, G. Why individual vigilance declines as group size increases. Anim. Behav. 51, 1077–1086 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Brunton, E., Bolin, J., Leon, J. & Burnett, S. Fright or flight? Behavioural responses of kangaroos to drone-based monitoring. Drones 3, 1–11 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Lent, P. C. Mother-infant relationships in ungulates. Behav. Ungulates Relat. Manag. I, 14–55 (1974).
Google Scholar 
34.Franklin, W. Contrasting socioecologies of South America´s wild camelids: The vicuña and the guanaco. Adv. Study Mamm. Behav. 7, 573–629 (1983).
Google Scholar 
35.Ortega, I. M. & Franklin, W. L. Social organization, distribution and movements of a migratory guanaco population in the Chilean Patagonia. Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat. 68, 489–500 (1995).
Google Scholar 
36.Schroeder, N. M., Panebianco, A., Musso, R. G. & Carmanchahi, P. An experimental approach to evaluate the potential of drones in terrestrial mammal research: A gregarious ungulate as a study model. R. Soc. Open Sci. 7, 191482 (2020).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Lima, S. L. Back to the basics of anti-predatory vigilance: the group size effect. Anim. Behav. 49, 11–20 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Marino, A. & Baldi, R. Vigilance patterns of territorial guanacos (Lama guanicoe): The role of reproductive interests and predation risk. Ethology 114, 413–423 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Taraborelli, P. et al. Different factors that modify anti-predator behaviour in guanacos (Lama guanicoe). Acta Theriol. (Warsz) 59, 529–539 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Donadio, E. & Buskirk, S. W. Flight behavior in guanacos and vicuñas in areas with and without poaching in western Argentina. Biol. Conserv. 127, 139–145 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Marino, A. & Johnson, A. Behavioural response of free-ranging guanacos (Lama guanicoe) to land-use change: Habituation to motorised vehicles in a recently created reserve. Wildl. Res. 39, 503–511 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Malo, J. E., Acebes, P. & Traba, J. Measuring ungulate tolerance to human with flight distance: A reliable visitor management tool?. Biodivers. Conserv. 20, 3477e3488 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
43.Marino, A. Indirect measures of reproductive effort in a resource-defense polygynous ungulate: Territorial defense by male guanacos. J. Ethol. 30, 83–91 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
44.Marino, A. & Ricardo, B. Vigilance patterns of territorial guanacos (Lama guanicoe): the role of reproductive interests and predation risk. Ethology 114, 413–423 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
45.Merino, M. L. & Cajal, C. J. Estructura social de la población de guanacos (Lama guanicoe Muller, 1776) en la costa norte de Península Mitre, Tierra del Fuego, Argentina. Stud. Neotrop. Fauna Environ. 28, 129–138 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Marino, A. & Baldi, R. Ecological correlates of group-size variation in a resource-defense ungulate, the sedentary Guanaco. PLoS ONE 9, e89060 (2014).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
47.Fattorini, N. et al. Temporal variation in foraging activity and grouping patterns in a mountain-dwelling herbivore: Environmental and endogenous drivers. Behav. Process. 167, 103909 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
48.Blank, D., Ruckstuhl, K. & Yang, W. Influence of population density on group sizes in goitered gazelle (Gazella subgutturosa Guld., 1780). Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 58, 981–989 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
49.Isvaran, K. Intraspecific variation in group size in the blackbuck antelope: The roles of habitat structure and forage at different spatial scales. Oecologia 154, 435–444 (2007).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
50.Mahoney, S. P., Mawhinney, K., McCarthy, C., Anions, D. & Taylor, S. Caribou reactions to provocation by snowmachines in Newfoundland. Rangifer 21, 35 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
51.Ruiz Blanco, M. et al. Supervivencia y causas de mortalidad durante el primer año de vida de guanacos en el norte de patagonia. In XXVII Jornadas Argentinas de Mastozoología 151 (2014).52.Weimerskirch, H., Prudor, A. & Schull, Q. Flights of drones over sub-Antarctic seabirds show species- and status-specific behavioural and physiological responses. Polar Biol. 41, 259–266 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
53.McIntosh, R. R., Holmberg, R. & Dann, P. Looking without landing-using Remote Piloted Aircraft to monitor fur seal populations without disturbance. Front. Mar. Sci. 5, (2018).54.Mesquita, G. P., Rodríguez-Teijeiro, J. D., Wich, S. A. & Mulero-Pázmány, M. Measuring disturbance at swift breeding colonies due to the visual aspects of a drone: a quasi-experiment study. Curr. Zool. https://doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoaa038 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
55.Scobie, C. A. & Hugenholtz, C. H. Wildlife monitoring with unmanned aerial vehicles: Quantifying distance to auditory detection. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 40, 781–785 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Rümmler, M. C., Esefeld, J., Hallabrin, M. T., Pfeifer, C. & Mustafa, O. Emperor penguin reactions to UAVs: First observations and comparisons with effects of human approach. Remote Sens. Appl. Soc. Environ. 23, 100545 (2021).
Google Scholar 
57.Zbyryt, A., Dylewski, Ł, Morelli, F., Sparks, T. H. & Tryjanowski, P. Behavioural responses of adult and young White Storks Ciconia ciconia in nests to an unmanned aerial vehicle. Acta Ornithol. 55, 243–251 (2020).
Google Scholar 
58.Christiansen, F., Rojano-Doñate, L., Madsen, P. T. & Bejder, L. Noise levels of multi-rotor unmanned aerial vehicles with implications for potential underwater impacts on marine mammals. Front. Mar. Sci. 3, 277 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
59.Arona, L., Dale, J., Heaslip, S. G., Hammill, M. O. & Johnston, D. W. Assessing the disturbance potential of small unoccupied aircraft systems (UAS) on gray seals (Halichoerus grypus) at breeding colonies in Nova Scotia, Canada. PeerJ https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4467 (2018).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
60.Goebel, M. E. et al. A small unmanned aerial system for estimating abundance and size of Antarctic predators. Polar Biol. 38, 619–630 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
61.Cracknell, A. P. UAVs: Regulations and law enforcement. Int. J. Remote Sens. 38, 3054–3067 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
62.ANAC, A. N. de A. C. Reglamento de Vehículos Aéreos no Tripulados (VANT) y de Sistemas de Vehículos Aéreos no Tripulados (SVANT). (2019).63.Brisson-Curadeau, É. et al. Seabird species vary in behavioural response to drone census. Sci. Rep. 7, 17884 (2017).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
64.Rümmler, M.-C., Mustafa, O., Maercker, J., Peter, H.-U. & Esefeld, J. Sensitivity of Adélie and Gentoo penguins to various flight activities of a micro UAV. Polar Biol. 41, 2481–2493 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
65.Ditmer, M. A. et al. Bears habituate to the repeated exposure of a novel stimulus, unmanned aircraft systems. Conserv. Physiol. 7, 1–7 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
66.Young, J. K. & Franklin, W. L. Territorial Fidelity of male guanacos in the Patagonia of Southern Chile. J. Mammal. 85, 72–78 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
67.Martínez Carretero, E. La Provincia Fitogeográfica de la Payunia. Boletín la Soc. Argentina Botánica 39, 195–226 (2004).
Google Scholar 
68.Schroeder, N. M. et al. Spatial and seasonal dynamic of abundance and distribution of guanaco and livestock: Insights from using density surface and null models. PLoS One 9, e85960 (2014).
ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
69.Bolgeri, M. J. Caracterización de movimientos migratorios en guanacos (Lama guanicoe) y patrones de depredación por pumas (Puma concolor) en la Payunia, Mendoza. Phd Thesis. (Universidad Nacional del Comahue, 2016).70.Bolgeri, M. J. & Novaro, A. J. Variación espacial en la depredación por puma (Puma concolor) sobre guanacos (Lama guanicoe) en la Payunia, Mendoza,Argentina. Mastozoología Neotrop. 22, 255–264 (2015).
Google Scholar 
71.Candia, R., Puig, S., Dalmasso, A., Videla, F. & Martínez Carretero, E. Diseño del Plan de Manejo para la reserva provincial La Payunia (Malargüe, Mendoza). Multequina 2, 5–87 (1993).
Google Scholar 
72.Carmanchahi, P. D. et al. Physiological response of wild guanacos to capture for live shearing. Wildl. Res. 38, 61–68 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
73.Martin, P. & Bateson, P. Measuring Behaviour. An Introductory Guide. (Cambridge University Press, 2007).74.Ydenberg, R. C. & Dill, L. M. The economics of fleeing from predators. Adv. Study Behav. 16, 229–249 (1986).Article 

Google Scholar 
75.McCullagh, P. & Nelder, J. Generalized Linear Models. Second Edition. (Chapman & Hall, 1989).76.Fox, J. & Monette, G. Generalized collinearity diagnostics. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 87, 178–183 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
77.Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N. & Smith, G. M. Analysing Ecological Data. (Springer, 2007).78.Gelman, A. & Hill, J. Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge 651 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2277/052186706179.Korner-Nievergelt, F. et al. Bayesian Data Analysis in Ecology Using Linear Models with R, BUGS, and Stan. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.280.R Core Team. R Development Core Team. R A Lang. Environ. Stat. Comput. 55, 275–286 (2016).81.Fox, J. & Weisberg, S. An R Companion to Applied Regression, 3rd edn. (2019).82.Gelman, A. et al. Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. R package version 1, 10–1 (2018).

Google Scholar  More

1.Zhang, Z. Y. et al. A shift pattern of bacterial communities across the life stages of the citrus red mite, Panonychus citri. Front. Microbiol. 11, 1620. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01620 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
2.Pan, D., Dou, W., Yuan, G. R., Zhou, Q. H. & Wang, J. J. Monitoring the resistance of the citrus red mite (Acari: Tetranychidae) to four acaricides in different citrus orchards in China. J. Econ. Entomol. 113, 918–923. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toz335 (2020).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
3.Zhang, Y., Guo, L., Atlihan, R., Chi, H. & Chu, D. Demographic analysis of progeny fitness and timing of resurgence of Laodelphax striatellus after insecticides exposure. Entomol. Generalis 39, 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1127/entomologia/2019/0816 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Quesada, C. R. & Sadof, C. S. Field evaluation of insecticides and application timing on natural enemies of selected armored and soft scales. Biol. Control 133, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.03.013 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Ullah, F. et al. Fitness costs in chlorfenapyr-resistant populations of the chive maggot, Bradysia odoriphaga. Ecotoxicology 29, 407–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-020-02183-7 (2020).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
6.Razik, M. A. R. A. M. A. Toxicity and side effects of some insecticides applied in cotton fields on Apis mellifera. Environ. Sci. Pollut. R. 26, 4987–4996. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-04061-6 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Ochiai, N. et al. Toxicity of bifenazate and its principal active metabolite, diazene, to Tetranychus urticae and Panonychus citri and their relative toxicity to the predaceous mites, Phytoseiulus persimilis and Neoseiulus californicus. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 43, 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-007-9115-9 (2007).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
8.Van Nieuwenhuyse, P. et al. On the mode of action of bifenazate: New evidence for a mitochondrial target site. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 104, 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2012.05.013 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Wang, R. et al. Lethal and sublethal effects of a novel cis-nitromethylene neonicotinoid insecticide, cycloxaprid, on Bemisia tabaci. Crop Prot. 83, 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.01.015 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Ullah, F., Gul, H., Desneux, N., Gao, X. & Song, D. Imidacloprid-induced hormesis effects on demographic traits of the melon aphid, Aphis gossypii. Entomol. Generalis 39, 325–337 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Dong, J., Wang, K., Li, Y. & Wang, S. Lethal and sublethal effects of cyantraniliprole on Helicoverpa assulta (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 136, 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2016.08.003 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
12.Elzen, G. W. Lethal and sublethal effects of insecticide residues on Orius insidiosus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) and Geocoris punctipes (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 94, 55–59. https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-94.1.55 (2001).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
13.Desneux, N., Decourtye, A. & Delpuech, J. M. The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 52, 81–106. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.52.110405.091440 (2007).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
14.Deng, D. et al. Assessment of the effects of lethal and sublethal exposure to dinotefuran on the wheat aphid Rhopalosiphum padi (Linnaeus). Ecotoxicology 28, 825–833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-019-02080-8 (2019).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
15.Guo, L. et al. Sublethal and transgenerational effects of chlorantraniliprole on biological traits of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella L.. Crop Prot. 48, 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2013.02.009 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Duke, S. O. et al. (eds) Pesticide Dose: Effects on the Environment and Target and Non-target Organisms 101–119 (American Chemical Society, 2017).
Google Scholar 
17.Guedes, N. M. P., Tolledo, J., Correa, A. S. & Guedes, R. N. C. Insecticide-induced hormesis in an insecticide-resistant strain of the maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais. J. Appl. Entomol. 134, 142–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.2009.01462.x (2010).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Haddi, K., Oliveira, E. E., Faroni, L. R., Guedes, D. C. & Miranda, N. N. Sublethal exposure to clove and cinnamon essential oils induces hormetic-like responses and disturbs behavioral and respiratory responses in Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 108, 2815–2822. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/tov255 (2015).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
19.Chen, X. D., Seo, M. & Stelinski, L. L. Behavioral and hormetic effects of the butenolide insecticide, flupyradifurone, on Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri. Crop Prot. 98, 102–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2017.03.017 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Wang, L., Zhang, Y., Xie, W., Wu, Q. & Wang, S. Sublethal effects of spinetoram on the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). Pestic Biochem. Physiol. 132, 102–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2016.02.002 (2016).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
21.Xiao, L. F. et al. Genome-wide identification, phylogenetic analysis, and expression profiles of ATP-binding cassette transporter genes in the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. D Genomics Proteomics 25, 1–8 (2018).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Dubovskiy, I. M. et al. Effect of bacterial infection on antioxidant activity and lipid peroxidation in the midgut of Galleria mellonella L. larvae (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 148, 1–5 (2008).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Jia, B. T., Hong, S. S., Zhang, Y. C. & Cao, Y. W. Effect of sublethal concentrations of abamectin on protective and detoxifying enzymes in Diagegma semclausum. J. Environ. Entomol. 38, 990 (2016).
Google Scholar 
24.Yang, Q., Wang, S., Zhang, W., Yang, T. & Liu, Y. Toxicity of commonly used insecticides and their influences on protective enzyme activity of multicolored Asian lady beetle Harmonia axyridis (Pallas). Acta Phytophylacica Sin. 42, 258–263 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
25.Zhou, C., Yang, H., Wang, Z., Long, G. Y. & Jin, D. C. Protective and detoxifying enzyme activity and abcg subfamily gene expression in Sogatella furcifera under insecticide stress. Front. Physiol. 9, 1890. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01890 (2018).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
26.Cui, L., Yuan, H., Wang, Q., Wang, Q. & Rui, C. Sublethal effects of the novel cis-nitromethylene neonicotinoid cycloxaprid on the cotton aphid Aphis gossypii Glover (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Sci. Rep. 8, 8915. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27035-7 (2018).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
27.Li, Y. Y. et al. Sublethal effects of bifenazate on life history and population parameters of Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). Syst. Appl. Acarol. 22, 148–158. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.22.1.15 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Wang, Y., Huang, X., Chang, B. H. & Zhang, Z. The survival, growth, and detoxifying enzyme activities of grasshoppers Oedaleus asiaticus (Orthoptera: Acrididae) exposed to toxic rutin. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 55, 385–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13355-020-00694-7 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Rasheed, M. A. et al. Lethal and sublethal effects of chlorpyrifos on biological traits and feeding of the aphidophagous predator Harmonia axyridis. Insects. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects11080491 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
30.Yamamoto, A., Yoneda, H., Hatano, R. & Asada, M. Genetic analysis of hexythiazox resistance in the citrus red mite, Panonychus citri (MCGREGOR). J. Pestic. Sci. 20, 513–519 (1995).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Chi, H. & Liu, H. Two new methods for the study of insect population ecology. Acad. Sin. 24(2), 225–240 (1985).MathSciNet 

Google Scholar 
32.Chi, H. et al. Age-Stage, two-sex life table: an introduction to theory, data analysis, and application. Entomol. Generalis 40, 103 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Hsin, C. Letter to the editor. J. Econ. Entomol. 108, 1465 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Akköprü, E. P., Atlıhan, R., Okut, H. & Chi, H. Demographic assessment of plant cultivar resistance to insect pests: A case study of the dusky-veined walnut Aphid (Hemiptera: Callaphididae) on five walnut cultivars. J. Econ. Entomol. 108, 378 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
35.Mousavi, M., Ghosta, Y. & Maroofpour, N. Insecticidal activity and sublethal effects of Beauveria bassiana (Bals.-Criv.) Vuill. isolates and essential oils against Aphis gossypii Glover, 1877 (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Acta Agric. Slovenica. https://doi.org/10.14720/aas.2020.115.2.1306 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
36.Rahmani, S. & Bandani, A. R. Sublethal concentrations of thiamethoxam adversely affect life table parameters of the aphid predator, Hippodamia variegata (Goeze) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Crop Prot. 54, 168–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2013.08.002 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Papachristos, D. P. & Milonas, P. G. Adverse effects of soil applied insecticides on the predatory coccinellid Hippodamia undecimnotata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Biol. Control 47, 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.06.009 (2008).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Ranjbar, F., Reitz, S., Jalali, M. A., Ziaaddini, M. & Izadi, H. Lethal and sublethal effects of two commercial insecticides on egg parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) of green stink bugs (Hem: Pentatomidae). J. Econ. Entomol. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toaa232 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Zhao, Y. et al. Sublethal concentration of benzothiazole adversely affect development, reproduction and longevity of Bradysia odoriphaga (Diptera: Sciaridae). Phytoparasitica 44, 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-016-0506-5 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Sani, B., Hamid, G. & Elham, R. Sublethal effects of chlorfenapyr on the life table parameters of two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). Syst. Appl. Acarol. 23, 1342 (2018).
Google Scholar 
41.Leeuwen, T. V., Pottelberge, S. V. & Tirry, L. Biochemical analysis of a chlorfenapyr-selected resistant strain of Tetranychus urticae Koch. Pest Manage. Sci. 62, 425–433 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Allen, R. G. & Balin, A. K. Oxidative influence on development and differentiation: An overview of a free radical theory of development. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 6, 631–661 (1989).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
43.Bolter, C. J. & Chefurka, W. Extramitochondrial release of hydrogen peroxide from insect and mouse liver mitochondria using the respiratory inhibitors phosphine, myxothiazol, and antimycin and spectral analysis of inhibited cytochromes. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 278, 65–72 (1990).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
44.Liu, Y., Wang, C., Qi, S., He, J. & Bai, Y. The sublethal effects of ethiprole on the development, defense mechanisms, and immune pathways of honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). Environ. Geochem. Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-020-00736-7 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
45.Zhang, S. et al. Sublethal effects of triflumezopyrim on biological traits and detoxification enzyme activities in the small brown Planthopper Laodelphax striatellus (Hemiptera: Delphacidae). Front. Physiol. 11, 261. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00261 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
46.Ku, C. C., Chiang, F. M., Hsin, C. Y., Yao, Y. E. & Sun, C. N. Glutathione transferase isozymes involved in insecticide resistance of diamondback moth larvae. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 50, 191–197 (1994).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
47.Prapanthadara, L., Promtet, N., Koottathep, S., Somboon, P. & Ketterman, A. J. Isoenzymes of glutathione S-transferase from the mosquito Anopheles dirus species B: The purification, partial characterization and interaction with various insecticides. Insect Biochemi. Mol. Biol. 30, 395–403 (2000).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
48.Döker, İ, Kazak, C. & Ay, R. Resistance status and detoxification enzyme activity in ten populations of Panonychus citri (Acari: Tetranychidae) from Turkey. Crop Prot. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105488 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
49.Goel, A., Dani, V. & Dhawan, D. K. Protective effects of zinc on lipid peroxidation, antioxidant enzymes and hepatic histoarchitecture in chlorpyrifos-induced toxicity. Chem. Biol. Interact. 156, 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2005.08.004 (2005).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
50.Van Leeuwen, T., Van Pottelberge, S. & Tirry, L. Biochemical analysis of a chlorfenapyr-selected resistant strain of Tetranychus urticae Koch. Pest Manage. Sci. 62, 425–433. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1183 (2006).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

1.Kaplan, J. O., Krumhardt, K. M. & Zimmermann, N. The prehistoric and preindustrial deforestation of Europe. Quatern. Sci. Rev. 28, 3016–3034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.09.028 (2009).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Słowiński, M. et al. Drought as a stress driver of ecological changes in peatland – A palaeoecological study of peatland development between 3500 BCE and 200 BCE in central Poland. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 461, 272–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.08.038 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Dietze, E., Słowiński, M., Zawiska, I., Veh, G. & Brauer, A. Multiple drivers of Holocene lake level changes at a lowland lake in northeastern Germany. Boreas 45, 828–845. https://doi.org/10.1111/bor.12190 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Woodward, C., Shulmeister, J., Larsen, J., Jacobsen, G. E. & Zawadzki, A. Landscape hydrology. The hydrological legacy of deforestation on global wetlands. Science 346, 844–847, doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260510 (2014).5.Dreibrodt, S., Lubos, C., Terhorst, B., Damm, B. & Bork, H. R. Historical soil erosion by water in Germany: scales and archives, chronology, research perspectives. Quatern. Int. 222, 80–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2009.06.014 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Trumbore, S., Brando, P. & Hartmann, H. Forest health and global change. Science 349, 814–818. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac6759 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
7.Syvitski, J. P. & Kettner, A. Sediment flux and the Anthropocene. Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 369, 957–975. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0329 (2011).ADS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
8.McConnell, J. R. et al. Lead pollution recorded in Greenland ice indicates European emissions tracked plagues, wars, and imperial expansion during antiquity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1721818115 (2018).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
9.Christian, D. Silk roads or steppe roads? The silk roads in world history. J. World Hist. 11, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2000.0004 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Beck, C. W. The role of the scientist: the amber trade, the chemical analysis of amber, and the determination of Baltic provenience. J. Baltic Stud. 16, 191–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/01629778500000111 (1985).Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Gimbutas, M. East Baltic amber in the fourth and third millennia B.C. J. Baltic Stud. 16, 231–256, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01629778500000151 (1985).12.de Navarro, J. M. Prehistoric routes between Northern Europe and Italy defined by the amber trade. Geogr J 66, doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1783003 (1925).13.Szilágyi, M. On the Road: The History and Archaeology of Medieval Communication Networks in East-Central Europe. (Archaeolingua Alapítvány, 2014).14.Schmid, B. V. et al. Climate-driven introduction of the Black Death and successive plague reintroductions into Europe. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 3020–3025. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1412887112 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
15.Rossignol, S., Kleingärtner, S., Newfield, T., Wehner, D. & Studies, P. I. o. M. Landscapes and societies in medieval Europe east of the Elbe: Interactions between environmental settings and cultural transformations. (Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 2013).16.Drager, N. et al. Varve microfacies and varve preservation record of climate change and human impact for the last 6000 years at Lake Tiefer See (NE Germany). The Holocene 27, 450–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683616660173 (2016).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Theuerkauf, M., Drager, N., Kienel, U., Kuparinen, A. & Brauer, A. Effects of changes in land management practices on pollen productivity of open vegetation during the last century derived from varved lake sediments. Holocene 25, 733–744. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683614567881 (2015).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Izdebski, A., Koloch, G., Słoczyński, T. & Tycner, M. On the use of palynological data in economic history: New methods and an application to agricultural output in Central Europe, 0–2000AD. Explor. Econ. Hist. 59, 17–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2015.10.003 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Brauer, A. et al. The importance of independent chronology in integrating records of past climate change for the 60–8 ka INTIMATE time interval. Quatern. Sci. Rev. 106, 47–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.07.006 (2014).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Ott, F. et al. Site-specific sediment responses to climate change during the last 140 years in three varved lakes in Northern Poland. The Holocene 28, 464–477. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683617729448 (2017).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Śląski, K. Lądowe szlaki handlowe Pomorza w XI-XIII wieku. Zapiski Historyczne 34 (1969).22.Zakrzewski, I. Vol. 1 (Poznań, 1877).23.Ślaski, K. Zasięg lasów Pomorza w ostatnim tysiącleciu [in English: Range of forests Pomerania in the last millennium]. Przegląd Zachodni 5(6), 207–263 (1951).
Google Scholar 
24.Górska-Gołaska, K. in Słownik historyczno-geograficzny ziem polskich w średniowieczu Vol. part 3 (ed A. Gąsiorowski) 89 (1993–1999).25.Szulist, W. Ważniejsze szlaki handlowo-komunikacyjne północno-zachodniego Pomorza Gdańskiego w XVI-XVII w. Zapiski Historyczne 35, 105–106 (1970).
Google Scholar 
26.Wilska, M. in Historical atlas of Poland in the 2nd half of the 16th century: voivodeships of Cracow, Sandomierz, Lublin, Sieradz, Łęczyca, Rawa, Płock and Mazovia Vol. 3 (ed M. Słoń) 637 (Peter Lang, 2014).27.Pluskowski, A. The archaeology of the military orders: The material culture of holy war. Mediev. Archaeol. 62, 105–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/00766097.2018.1451590 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Związek, T. in Wielkopolska w drugiej połowie XVI w. Vol. 2 (eds K. Chłapowski & M. Słoń) 273 (Wydawnictwo Instytutu Historii PAN, 2017).29.Wielopolski, A. Polsko-pomorskie spory graniczne w latach 1536–1555. Przegląd Zachodni 10, 85 (1954).
Google Scholar 
30.Kowalkowski, K. Z dziejów gminy Kaliska oraz wsi do niej należących. (Wydawnictwo Region, 2010).31.Słowiński, M. et al. Paleoecological and historical data as an important tool in ecosystem management. J. Environ. Manage. 236, 755–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.002 (2019).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
32.Błaszkiewicz, M. et al. Climatic and morphological controls on diachronous postglacial lake and river valley evolution in the area of Last Glaciation, northern Poland. Quatern. Sci. Rev. 109, 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2014.11.023 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Woś, A. Climate of Poland (Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, (in Polish), Warszawa, 1999).34.Haldon, J. et al. History meets palaeoscience: Consilience and collaboration in studying past societal responses to environmental change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1716912115 (2018).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
35.Stivrins, N. et al. Palaeoenvironmental evidence for the impact of the crusades on the local and regional environment of medieval (13th–16th century) northern Latvia, eastern Baltic. The Holocene 26, 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683615596821 (2015).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
36.Grzegorz, M. Osady Pomorza Gdańskiego w latach 1309–1454. (Państwowe Wydawn. Nauk., 1990).37.Biskup, M. Prusy Królewskie w drugiej połowie XVI wieku. (Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1961).38.Chmielewski, S. Gospodarka rolna i hodowlana w Polsce w XIV i XV w. Technika i rozmiary produkcji, . (Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1962).39.Brown, A. et al. The ecological impact of conquest and colonization on a medieval frontier landscape: combined Palynological and geochemical analysis of lake sediments from Radzyń Chełminski Northern Poland. Geoarchaeology 30, 511–527. https://doi.org/10.1002/gea.21525 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Brown, A. & Pluskowski, A. Detecting the environmental impact of the Baltic Crusades on a late-medieval (13th–15th century) frontier landscape: palynological analysis from Malbork Castle and hinterland, Northern Poland. J. Archaeol. Sci. 38, 1957–1966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2011.04.010 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Buntgen, U. et al. Filling the Eastern European gap in millennium-long temperature reconstructions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 1773–1778. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211485110 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
42.Luterbacher, J. et al. European summer temperatures since Roman times. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 024001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/2/024001 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
43.Czaja, R. & Radzimiński, A. (eds.), The Teutonic Order in Prussia and Livonia: The political and ecclesiastical Structures 13th–16th century. 407 (TNT, Bohlau Verlag, 2015).44.Bartlett, R. The making of Europe: conquest, colonization and cultural change, 950–1350. (Allen Lane, 1993).45.Broda, J. History of forestry in Poland [in Polish]. 368 (Wydawnictwo Akademii Rolniczej im. Augusta Cieszkowskiego w Poznaniu, 2000).46.Schreg, R. in Processing, storage, distribution of food in medieval rural environment (eds J. Klápště & P. Sommer) 301–320 (2011).47.Kaczmarczyk, Z. & Sczaniecki, M. Kolonizacja na prawie niemieckim w Polsce a rozwój renty feudalnej’. Czasopismo Prawno-Historyczne 3, 59–83 (1951).
Google Scholar 
48.Czerwiński, S. et al. Environmental implications of past socioeconomic events in Greater Poland during the last 1200 years. Synthesis of paleoecological and historical data. Quaternary Science Reviews 259, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2021.106902 (2021).49.Schreg, R. in Settlement change across Medieval Europe. Old paradigms and new vistas (eds N. Brady & C. Theune) 61–70 (Sidestone Press, 2019).50.Mikulski, K. Osadnictwo wiejskie województwa pomorskiego od połowy XVI do końca XVII wieku. (1994).51.Biskup, M. & Labuda, G. Dzieje zakonu krzyżackiego w Prusach: gospodarka, społeczeństwo, państwo, ideologia. (Wydawn. Morskie, 1986).52.Kizik, E. in Dżuma, ospa, cholera. W trzechsetną rocznicę wielkiej epidemii na ziemiach Rzeczypospolitej w latach 1708–1711 (ed E. Kizik) 275 (2012).53.Brönnimann, S. Climatic Changes Since 1700. Vol. 55 360 (Springer, 2015).54.Dygdała, J. Lustracja województw Prus Królewskich. Vol. 1–2 (Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu, 2003).55.Dietze, E. et al. Human-induced fire regime shifts during 19th century industrialization: A robust fire regime reconstruction using northern Polish lake sediments. PLoS ONE 14, e0222011. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222011 (2019).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
56.Lamentowicz, M. et al. Always on the tipping point – A search for signals of past societies and related peatland ecosystem critical transitions during the last 6500 years in N Poland. Quat. Sci. Rev. 225, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.105954 (2019).57.Theuerkauf, M., Couwenberg, J., Kuparinen, A. & Liebscher, V. A matter of dispersal: REVEALSinR introduces state-of-the-art dispersal models to quantitative vegetation reconstruction. Veg. Hist. Archaeobotany 25, 541–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-016-0572-0 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
58.Hoszowski, S. “Lustracja województwa pomorskiego 1565” (Gdańskie Towarzystwo Naukowe, 1961).59.Hoszowski, S. Lustracja województw Prus Królewskich, 1624, z fragmentami lustracji 1615 roku, Lustracje dóbr królewskich XVI-XVIII wieku (Gdańskie Towarzystwo Naukowe, 1967).60.Metryka Koronna (Crown’s Metric), Central Archives of Historical Records, Warsaw, Poland, vol. XVIII, f. 23261.Ott, F. et al. Constraining the time span between the Early Holocene Hasseldalen and Askja-S Tephras through varve counting in the Lake Czechowskie sediment record Poland. J. Quat. Sci. 31, 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/jqs.2844 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
62.Roeser, P. et al. Advances in understanding calcite varve formation: new insights from a dual lake monitoring approach in the southern Baltic lowlands. Boreas (in press).63.Wulf, S. et al. Holocene tephrostratigraphy of varved sediment records from Lakes Tiefer See (NE Germany) and Czechowskie (N Poland). Quatern. Sci. Rev. 132, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.11.007 (2016).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
64.Sugita, S. Theory of quantitative reconstruction of vegetation I: pollen from large sites REVEALS regional vegetation composition. Holocene 17, 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683607075837 (2007).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
65.Giętkowski, T. Temporal change of forest area in Tuchola Pinewoods region between 1938 and 2000 (in Polish: Zmiany lesistości Borów Tucholskich w latach 1938 – 2000). Promotio Geographica Bydgostiensia IV, 1–12 (2009). More

As stated, the primary goal of this study is to promote an objective decision support framework for water resource planning and management purposes within the context of the WEF security nexus, which takes into account the uncertainties imposed by the climate change phenomenon. Such a framework is “robust” since it takes the multi-dimensionality of water-related problems into account while addressing the uncertainties imposed by climate change projections. The basic components of this decision-making paradigm are depicted in Fig. 1. In principle, while this framework is sensitive to the uncertainties associated with the climate change projections, it can provide a dynamic water resources planning and management scheme promoted within the WEF security network. Thus, in addition to the status quo, a series of climate change projections (i.e., RCP 2.6, RCP 4.5, and RCP 8.5) are also integrated into the proposed decision support framework. In essence, the main components of the proposed framework are simulation and operation of the water resources system based on the standard operation policy (SOP), evaluating the system’s efficiency through a series of quantitative performance criteria, and finally, applying the MADM-based framework to opt for a robust system renovation setting.Figure 1Basic components of the robust decision-making paradigm for water resources planning and management.Full size imageSimulating the water resources systemSOP is a primitive, and perhaps the most-well-known real-time operation policy in water resources planning and management14. The core principle here is to minimize the prioritized water shortage at the current time step with no conservation policy (e.g., hedging rules) in place. SOP, as a standard rule curve (RC), determines how the operator should behave at any given state of a reservoir15,16. This rule curve is established as an attempt to balance various water demands including but not limited to flood control, hydropower, water supply, and recreation17. A SOP operating system attempts to release water to meet a water demand at the current time, with no regard to the future.In general, SOP can be mathematically expressed as18:$$R_{t} = left{ {begin{array}{*{20}c} {D_{t} } \ {AW_{t} } \ 0 \ end{array} – S_{min } } right.begin{array}{*{20}c} {} & {if} & {AW_{t} > S_{min } } \ {} & {if} & {AW_{t} > S_{min } } \ {} & {if} & {AW_{t} le S_{min } } \ end{array} begin{array}{*{20}c} {} & {and} & {AW_{t} – S_{min } ge D_{t} } \ {} & {and} & {AW_{t} – S_{min } < D_{t} } \ {} & {} & {} \ end{array} quad t = { 1},{ 2},{ 3}, , ... , ,T$$ (1a) where$$AW_{t} = S_{t} + Q_{t} - Loss_{t}$$ (1b) in which Rt = amount of water supplied during the tth time step; Dt = consumers’ water demand during the tth time step; AWt = amount of available water during the tth time step; St = amount of stored water during the tth time step; Smin = dead storage of the reservoir; Qt = inflow during the tth time step; Losst = net water loss (i.e., precipitation minus evaporation) of the reservoir during the tth time step; and T = total number of time steps in the operational horizon.In practice, however, a different type of water demand leads to a different interpretation of water shortage. There are cases in which the stakeholders’ needs are represented by a set of volumetric demand targets, and the decision-makers’ objective would be to minimize the water deficit based on a set of priorities for these demands. This is a typical case for agricultural, domestic, industrial, and environmental demands. For hydropower generation, however, a conventional interpretation of SOP would be to generate maximum electricity permitted by the power plant capacity (PPC) at each given time step19. For a hydropower system, the amount of water needed to reach a power plant capacity is given by19:$$R_{t} = frac{{86400 times PF times Countday_{t} times PPC}}{{gamma_{w} times g times eta times Delta H_{t} }}$$ (2) in which, γw = water specific weight; g = gravitational acceleration; η = efficiency of the hydropower system; ΔHt = height difference between the reservoir water level and the tailwater level at time step t; Countdayt = number of days within time step t; and PF = plant factor of the hydropower system.As stated earlier, applying an SOP-based plan requires a set of pre-defined priorities to advise decision-makers concerning the order, in which each of these demands is to be met. The major water demands include drinking, industry, environment, agriculture, and hydropower. Thus, according to the SOP’s principle, the decision-makers, first, allocate the available water to meet the demand of the stakeholder with the highest priority (i.e., the domestic and industrial demand). After this first water demand is fully satisfied, the available water can be used for the next demand. Such an allocation process continues until no water is available. It should be noted, however, that if the released water in each stage passes through the penstock equipped with the turbines, electricity can be generated. The amount of energy generated in previous stages must be accounted for before computing the amount of water released for hydropower purposes.Performance criteriaPerformance criteria are, in essence, quantitative measures that can provide a practical insight for the decision-makers regarding the status of a system. This definition covers a broad spectrum of mathematical representations, which can range from simple mathematical formulas such as the average of a specific output to more complex and probability-based entities20,21. The most fundamental and universal probability-based performance criteria are reliability, resiliency, and vulnerability22,23,24. In essence, reliability is the probability of successful function of a system; resiliency measures the probability of successful functioning following a system failure; and vulnerability quantifies the severity of failure during an operation horizon25. It should be noted that these three criteria assess different aspects of a water resources system, and as such, they complement one another26. For more information regarding these probabilistic performance criteria, the readers can refer to Sandoval-Solis et al.27 and Zolghadr-Asli et al.20.In this study, the concept of levelized cost of energy (LCOE) is utilized for economic evaluation. The LCOE of a given hydropower system is the ratio of lifetime costs to lifetime electricity generation, both of which are discounted back to a common year using a discount rate that reflects the average cost of capital28. The LCOE of renewable energy systems depends on the technology, geographic criteria, capital and operating costs, and the efficiency of the system. The LCOE can be mathematically expressed as follows29:$$LCOE = frac{{sumnolimits_{t = 1}^{n} {frac{{I_{t} + M_{t} + F_{t} }}{{left( {1 + r} right)^{t} }}} }}{{sumnolimits_{t = 1}^{n} {frac{{E_{t} }}{{left( {1 + r} right)^{t} }}} }}$$ (3) in which It = investment expenditures in year t; Mt = operation and maintenance expenditures in year t; Ft = fuel expenditures in year t; Et = electricity generation in year t; r = discount rate; and n = economic life expectancy of the system.MADMMADM is an umbrella term to describe a series of frameworks, which aim to help individuals or a group of individuals to prioritize a series of discretely defined alternatives with regard to a set of evaluation attributes30,31. MADM can provide the necessary means to conduct planning and management under changing circumstances such as those under climate change conditions10,32. According to one of the basic principles of MADM, the decision-maker can use the similarity of the feasible alternatives and the preferential result and/or incongruity of the undesirable alternatives. The notion mentioned above is, chiefly, the core principle of the reference-dependent theory33. Accordingly, the reference-based branch of the MADM methods can, itself, be classified into two major groups: screening methods and ranking methods. Screening methods eliminate alternatives that cannot satisfy the pre-determined conditions for the desirable solution, while ranking methods order all the alternatives from the best to the worst34.Pioneered by Hwang and Yoon35, the technique for order references by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) is a compensatory, objective MADM solving method rooted from the basic principles of the reference-dependent theory. The core idea is that the chosen alternative should have the shortest distance from the ideal solution and the farthest distance from the negative-ideal solution36. The basic computation algorithm of TOPSIS can be summarized as follows37,38:Step I: Construct the original decision matrix (X), where m feasible alternatives are to be evaluated based on n evaluation criteria:$$X = left[ {begin{array}{*{20}c} {x_{11} } & {x_{12} } & cdots & {x_{1n} } \ {x_{21} } & {x_{22} } & cdots & {x_{2n} } \ vdots & vdots & ddots & vdots \ {x_{m1} } & {x_{m2} } & cdots & {x_{mn} } \ end{array} } right]$$ (4) in which xij = the element of the ith alternative concerning the jth criterion.Step II: Defining the reference alternatives [i.e., the ideal solution (s+) and the negative-ideal solution (s−)]. To do so, first, the elements of the decision matrix that are associated with negative criteria must be redefined by using the following equation:$$x_{ij}^{ * } = frac{1}{{x_{ij} }}$$ (5a) The elements of the decision matrix that are associated with positive criteria would remain the same:$$x_{ij}^{ * } = x_{ij}$$ (5b) The ideal alternative is an arbitrarily defined vector, which describes the aspired solution to the given problem, while the inferior alternative is an arbitrarily defined solution that represents the most undesirable option for the given MADM problem. Here, the ideal and negative-ideal solutions would be represented with two separate vectors where each pair of the corresponding elements in these vectors is, respectively, the maximum and minimum values of (x_{ij}^{ * }) with regard to each of the evaluation criteria.Step III: Each element of the decision matrix should be normalized by using the following equation:$$p_{ij} = frac{{x_{ij}^{ * } }}{{sqrt {sumnolimits_{i = 1}^{m} {x_{ij}^{ * 2} } } }}$$ (6) in which pij = the normalized performance value for the ith alternative with respect to the jth criterion.Step IV: The weighted normalized preference value (zij) can be computed as follows:$$z_{ij} = p_{ij} times w_{j} quad forall i,j$$ (7) in which wj = the weight (i.e., the importance value) of the jth criterion. The weights assigned to the evolution criteria reflect their relative importance to the decision-makers. The higher the weights are, the more crucial their roles would be in the selection process. Chiefly, these weighting mechanisms are either subjective in nature or follow an objective procedure. In the subjective approaches, the weights of the attributes are assigned based on the performance information given by the decision-maker, whereas in the objective approaches, the weights of the evaluation attributes would be obtained by using the objective information extracted from the decision matrix39. Shannon’s Entropy method, used in this study as the weight assignment mechanism, is a well-known objective weighting technique40. This method tends to assign the highest weight to an evaluation attribute with the highest dispersity in its values. For more information on the computational framework of this method, the readers can refer to Lotfi and Fallahnejad41.Step V: In this step, every given alternative is compared to the reference points, namely, the ideal and inferior alternatives. The described procedure, which is known as the separation measurement in TOPSIS, can be mathematically expressed as follows35:$$D_{i}^{ + } = sqrt {sumlimits_{j = 1}^{n} {left( {z_{ij} - z_{j}^{ + } } right)^{2} } }$$ (8) And$$D_{i}^{ - } = sqrt {sumlimits_{j = 1}^{n} {left( {z_{ij} - z_{j}^{ - } } right)^{2} } }$$ (9) in which (D_{j}^{ + }) and (D_{j}^{ - }) = separation measurements of the jth criterion with respect to the ideal and inferior alternatives, respectively.Step VI: The relative closeness to the ideal solution (χi), which can be used to rank the desirability of the feasible alternative, can be computed as follows35:$$chi_{i} = frac{{D_{i}^{ - } }}{{D_{i}^{ + } + D_{i}^{ - } }}quad forall i$$ (10) The further this distance (i.e., larger values of χi), the more desirable the alternative would be.Robust multi-attribute frameworkAs stated, each climate change scenario depicts a unique future with regard to the changing climate, which in turn introduces an element of uncertainty to the projected performance of water resources systems during their operation horizon. Furthermore, downscaling methods, which link these projected changes in the global climatic pattern to a local or regional scale, can be another source of uncertainty. Naturally, for long-lasting water infrastructure such as a hydropower system, addressing these uncertainties in a proper and timely manner can be one of the key components of a robust project. Thus, this study aims to not only evaluate the system’s performance under the status quo but also assess the credibility of the system under the projected climate change conditions.The other characteristic one might expect from a robust project is its ability to take into account the multi-dimensionality nature of water-related infrastructure. Most notably, addressing the WEF security nexus must be a priority in water resources planning and management. Resultantly, any robust decision-making paradigm for water resources planning and management purposes should also account for the other pillars of the WEF nexus (i.e., energy and food sectors), as they would be consequentially affected by such decisions. It is also important to note that these sectors could be affected by the climate change phenomenon. The other crucial feature of a robust decision-making paradigm is that it should be able to account for the socio-economic, environmental, and technical factors that determine the overall quality of the project. Such a decision-making paradigm is depicted in Fig. 2. This notion in practice, however, can typically lead to a mega decision matrix composed of numerous criteria and alternatives that can be overwhelming if the subjective MADM methods are to be employed. This study, thus, employs an objective MADM framework (i.e., TOPSIS/Entropy) to help overcome the above-described problem. The basic idea is to promote a universal and practical decision support framework that enables the water resources planners and managers to account for the intricacies of the WEF security nexus while simultaneously taking the uncertainties of climate change projections into account. Figure 3 illustrates the flowchart of the proposed decision support framework.Figure 2Schematic diagram of the MADM problem.Full size imageFigure 3Flowchart of the proposed framework.Full size image More

1.Dawbin, W. H. The migrations of humpback whales which pass the New Zealand coast. Trans. R. Soc. New Zeal. 84, 147–196 (1956).
Google Scholar 
2.Chittleborough, R. Dynamics of two populations of the humpback whale, Megaptera novaeangliae (Borowski). Mar. Freshw. Res. 16, 33–128. https://doi.org/10.1071/mf9650033 (1965).Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Rasmussen, K. et al. Southern Hemisphere humpback whales wintering off Central America: Insights from water temperature into the longest mammalian migration. Biol. Let. 3, 302–305. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2007.0067 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Friedlaender, A. S. et al. Whale distribution in relation to prey abundance and oceanographic processes in shelf waters of the Western Antarctic Peninsula. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 317, 297–310. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps317297 (2006).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Nowacek, D. P. et al. Super-aggregations of krill and humpback whales in Wilhelmina Bay Antarctic Peninsula. PLoS ONE 6, e19173. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019173 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
6.Barendse, J. et al. Transit station or destination? Attendance patterns, movements and abundance estimate of humpback whales off west South Africa from photographic and genotypic matching. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 33, 353–373. https://doi.org/10.2989/1814232X.2011.637343 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Best, P. B., Sekiguchi, K. & Findlay, K. P. A suspended migration of humpback whales Megaptera novaeangliae on the west coast of South Africa. Marine Ecol. Progr. Ser. Oldendorf 118, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps118001 (1995).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Findlay, K. & Best, P. Summer incidence of humpback whales on the west coast of South Africa. S. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 15, 279–282. https://doi.org/10.2989/02577619509504851 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Findlay, K. P. et al. Humpback whale “super-groups”–A novel low-latitude feeding behaviour of Southern Hemisphere humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) in the Benguela Upwelling System. PLoS ONE 12, e0172002. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172002 (2017).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
10.Pirotta, V., Owen, K., Donnelly, D., Brasier, M. J. & Harcourt, R. First evidence of bubble‐net feeding and the formation of ‘super‐groups’ by the east Australian population of humpback whales during their southward migration. Aquat. Conserv. (2021).11.Veitch, J., Penven, P. & Shillington, F. The Benguela: A laboratory for comparative modeling studies. Prog. Oceanogr. 83, 296–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2009.07.008 (2009).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Preston-Whyte, R. A. & Tyson, P. D. Atmosphere and weather of southern Africa (Oxford University Press, 1988).
Google Scholar 
13.Nemoto, T., Best, P., Ishimaru, K. & Takano, H. Diatom films on whales [minke whales and 4 species of toothed whales] in South African waters. Scientific Reports of the Whales Research Institute (1980).14.Hutchings, L., Pitcher, G., Probyn, T. & Bailey, G. in Upwelling in the ocean: modern processes and ancient records Vol. 18 (eds CP Summerhayes et al.) Ch. 3, 65–81 (Wiley & Sons, 1995).15.Clapham, P. J. in Encyclopedia of marine mammals (eds B Würsig, JGM Thewissen, & KM Kovacs) 489–492 (Academic Press, 2018).16.Bakun, A. et al. Anticipated effects of climate change on coastal upwelling ecosystems. Curr. Clim. Change Rep. 1, 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-015-0008-4 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Mackas, D. L. & Beaugrand, G. Comparisons of zooplankton time series. J. Mar. Syst. 79, 286–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2008.11.030 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Mackas, D. et al. Changing zooplankton seasonality in a changing ocean: Comparing time series of zooplankton phenology. Prog. Oceanogr. 97, 31–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2011.11.005 (2012).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Huggett, J., Verheye, H., Escribano, R. & Fairweather, T. Copepod biomass, size composition and production in the Southern Benguela: Spatio–temporal patterns of variation, and comparison with other eastern boundary upwelling systems. Prog. Oceanogr. 83, 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2009.07.048 (2009).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Verheye, H. M., Lamont, T., Huggett, J. A., Kreiner, A. & Hampton, I. Plankton productivity of the Benguela current large marine ecosystem (BCLME). Environ. Dev. 17, 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2015.07.011 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Shannon, L. J. et al. Exploring temporal variability in the Southern Benguela ecosystem over the past four decades using a time-dynamic ecosystem model. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 540 (2020).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Jarre, A. et al. Synthesis: climate effects on biodiversity, abundance and distribution of marine organisms in the Benguela. Fish. Oceanogr. 24, 122–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/fog.12086 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Lamont, T., García-Reyes, M., Bograd, S., Van Der Lingen, C. & Sydeman, W. Upwelling indices for comparative ecosystem studies: Variability in the Benguela Upwelling System. J. Mar. Syst. 188, 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2017.05.007 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Tim, N., Zorita, E. & Hünicke, B. Decadal variability and trends of the Benguela upwelling system as simulated in a high-resolution ocean simulation. Ocean Sci. 11, 483–502. https://doi.org/10.5194/os-11-483-2015 (2015).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
25.Lamont, T., Barlow, R. & Brewin, R. Long-term trends in phytoplankton chlorophyll a and size structure in the Benguela Upwelling System. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 124, 1170–1195. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014334 (2019).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Ragoasha, N. et al. Lagrangian pathways in the southern Benguela upwelling system. J. Mar. Syst. 195, 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2019.03.008 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Shannon, V., Hempel, G., Moloney, C., Woods, J. D. & Malanotte-Rizzoli, P. Benguela: Predicting a Large Marine Ecosystem (Elsevier, 2006).
Google Scholar 
28.Veitch, J., Penven, P. & Shillington, F. Modeling equilibrium dynamics of the Benguela current system. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 40, 1942–1964. https://doi.org/10.1175/2010jpo4382.1 (2010).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Lachkar, Z. & Gruber, N. A comparative study of biological production in eastern boundary upwelling systems using an artificial neural network. Biogeosciences 9, 293–308. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-293-2012 (2012).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Gruber, N. et al. Eddy-induced reduction of biological production in eastern boundary upwelling systems. Nat. Geosci. 4, 787–792. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1273 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Hutchings, L. et al. Multiple factors affecting South African anchovy recruitment in the spawning, transport and nursery areas. S. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 19, 211–225. https://doi.org/10.2989/025776198784126908 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Rossi, V., López, C., Sudre, J., Hernández-García, E. & Garçon, V. Comparative study of mixing and biological activity of the Benguela and Canary upwelling systems. Geophys. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008gl033610 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Barendse, J. & Best, P. B. Shore-based observations of seasonality, movements, and group behavior of southern right whales in a nonnursery area on the South African west coast. Mar. Mamm. Sci. 30, 1358–1382 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Barendse, J. et al. Migration redefined? Seasonality, movements and group composition of humpback whales Megaptera novaeangliae off the west coast of South Africa. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 32, 1–22 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
35.Gibbons, M. J. An introduction to the Zooplankton of the Benguella current Region. (1997).36.Olsen, Ø. Hvaler og hvalfangst i Sydafrika. 1–56 (Bergens Museums Arbok 1914–1915, 1914).37.Meynecke, J. O. et al. Responses of humpback whales to a changing climate in the Southern Hemisphere: Priorities for research efforts. Mar. Ecol. 41, e12616 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Stockin, K. A. & Burgess, E. A. Opportunistic Feeding of an Adult Humpback Whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) Migrating Along the Coast of Southeastern Queensland, Australia. Aquat. Mamm. 31, 120. https://doi.org/10.1578/AM.31.1.2005.120 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Visser, F., Hartman, K. L., Pierce, G. J., Valavanis, V. D. & Huisman, J. Timing of migratory baleen whales at the Azores in relation to the North Atlantic spring bloom. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 440, 267–279. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09349 (2011).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Trudelle, L. et al. Influence of environmental parameters on movements and habitat utilization of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) in the Madagascar breeding ground. R. Soc. Open Sci. 3, 160616. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160616 (2016).ADS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
41.Veitch, J., Hermes, J., Lamont, T., Penven, P. & Dufois, F. Shelf-edge jet currents in the southern Benguela: A modelling approach. J. Mar. Syst. 188, 27–38 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Hutchings, L. et al. The Benguela current: An ecosystem of four components. Prog. Oceanogr. 83, 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2009.07.046 (2009).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
43.Rockwood, R. C., Elliott, M. L., Saenz, B., Nur, N. & Jahncke, J. Modeling predator and prey hotspots: Management implications of baleen whale co-occurrence with krill in Central California. PLoS ONE 15, e0235603 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
44.Hayward, T. L. & Venrick, E. L. Nearsurface pattern in the California Current: Coupling between physical and biological structure. Deep Sea Res. Part II 45, 1617–1638 (1998).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
45.Croll, D. A. et al. From wind to whales: trophic links in a coastal upwelling system. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 289, 117–130 (2005).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Walker, D. & Peterson, W. Relationships between hydrography, phytoplankton production, biomass, cell size and species composition, and copepod production in the southern Benguela upwelling system in April 1988. S. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 11, 289–305 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
47.Stuart, V. & Pillar, S. Diel grazing patterns of all ontogenetic stages of Euphausia lucens and in situ predation rates on copepods in the southern Benguela upwelling region. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 2, 227–241 (1990).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
48.Clapham, P. & Baker, C. (Academic, New York, 2002).49.Shannon, L. J., Field, J. G. & Moloney, C. L. Simulating anchovy–sardine regime shifts in the southern Benguela ecosystem. Ecol. Model. 172, 269–281 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Lett, C., Roy, C., Levasseur, A., Van Der Lingen, C. D. & Mullon, C. Simulation and quantification of enrichment and retention processes in the southern Benguela upwelling ecosystem. Fish. Oceanogr. 15, 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2419.2005.00392.x (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
51.Branch, T. A. Humpback whale abundance south of 60°S from three complete circumpolar sets of surveys. J. Cetacean Res. Manage. https://doi.org/10.47536/jcrm.vi.305 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
52.Findlay, K., Best, P. & Meÿer, M. Migrations of humpback whales past Cape Vidal, South Africa, and an estimate of the population increase rate (1988–2002). Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 33, 375–392. https://doi.org/10.2989/1814232x.2011.637345 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
53.Henson, S. A., Cole, H. S., Hopkins, J., Martin, A. P. & Yool, A. Detection of climate change-driven trends in phytoplankton phenology. Glob. Change Biol. 24, e101–e111 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Carvalho, I. et al. Does temporal and spatial segregation explain the complex population structure of humpback whales on the coast of West Africa?. Mar. Biol. 161, 805–819 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
55.Kershaw, F. et al. Multiple processes drive genetic structure of humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) populations across spatial scales. Mol. Ecol. 26, 977–994 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Korrûbel, J. An age-structured simulation model to investigate species replacement between pilchard and anchovy populations in the southern Benguela. S. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 12, 375–391 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
57.Shannon, L. et al. The 1980s–a decade of change in the Benguela ecosystem. S. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 12, 271–296 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
58.Verheye, H., Richardson, A., Hutchings, L., Marska, G. & Gianakouras, D. Long-term trends in the abundance and community structure of coastal zooplankton in the southern Benguela system, 1951–1996. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 19, 2 (1998).
Google Scholar 
59.Bakun, A. Global climate change and intensification of coastal ocean upwelling. Science 247, 198–201 (1990).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
60.Sydeman, W. et al. Climate change and wind intensification in coastal upwelling ecosystems. Science 345, 77–80 (2014).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
61.Bonino, G., Di Lorenzo, E., Masina, S. & Iovino, D. Interannual to decadal variability within and across the major eastern boundary upwelling systems. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–14 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
62.Fearon, G. et al. Enhanced vertical mixing in coastal upwelling systems driven by diurnal-inertial resonance: Numerical experiments. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans https://doi.org/10.1002/essoar.10502743.1 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
63.Xiu, P., Chai, F., Curchitser, E. N. & Castruccio, F. S. Future changes in coastal upwelling ecosystems with global warming: The case of the California Current System. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–9 (2018).
Google Scholar 
64.Roxy, M. K. et al. A reduction in marine primary productivity driven by rapid warming over the tropical Indian Ocean. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 826–833 (2016).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
65.Lockerbie, E. M. & Shannon, L. Toward exploring possible future states of the southern Benguela. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 380 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
66.Ortega-Cisneros, K., Cochrane, K. L., Fulton, E. A., Gorton, R. & Popova, E. Evaluating the effects of climate change in the southern Benguela upwelling system using the Atlantis modelling framework. Fish. Oceanogr. 27, 489–503 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
67.Rykaczewski, R. R. & Checkley, D. M. Influence of ocean winds on the pelagic ecosystem in upwelling regions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 1965–1970 (2008).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
68.Veitch, J. A. & Penven, P. The role of the A gulhas in the B enguela current system: A numerical modeling approach. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 122, 3375–3393 (2017).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
69.Beal, L. M., De Ruijter, W. P., Biastoch, A. & Zahn, R. On the role of the Agulhas system in ocean circulation and climate. Nature 472, 429–436 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
70.Beal, L. M. & Elipot, S. Broadening not strengthening of the Agulhas current since the early 1990s. Nature 540, 570–573 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
71.Lilliefors, H. W. On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for the exponential distribution with mean unknown. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 64, 387–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1969.10500983 (1969).Article 

Google Scholar 
72.Shchepetkin, A. F. & McWilliams, J. C. The regional oceanic modeling system (ROMS): A split-explicit, free-surface, topography-following-coordinate oceanic model. Ocean Model 9, 347–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2004.08.002 (2005).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
73.Debreu, L., Marchesiello, P., Penven, P. & Cambon, G. Two-way nesting in split-explicit ocean models: Algorithms, implementation and validation. Ocean Model 49, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2012.03.003 (2012).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
74.Shchepetkin, A. F. & McWilliams, J. C. Quasi-monotone advection schemes based on explicit locally adaptive dissipation. Mon. Weather Rev. 126, 1541–1580. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126%3C1541:qmasbo%3E2.0.co;2 (1998).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
75.Warner, J. C., Sherwood, C. R., Arango, H. G. & Signell, R. P. Performance of four turbulence closure models implemented using a generic length scale method. Ocean Model 8, 81–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2003.12.003 (2005).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
76.Saha, S. et al. NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR) 6-Hourly Products, January 1979 to December 2010 (Boulder, 2010).
Google Scholar 
77.Saha, S. et al. NCEP Climate Forecast System Version 2 (CFSv2) 6-hourly Products. D61C61TXF (Boulder, 2011).
Google Scholar 
78.Burchard, H. & Hofmeister, R. A dynamic equation for the potential energy anomaly for analysing mixing and stratification in estuaries and coastal seas. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 77, 679–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2007.10.025 (2008).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
79.Yamaguchi, R., Suga, T., Richards, K. J. & Qiu, B. Diagnosing the development of seasonal stratification using the potential energy anomaly in the North Pacific. Clim. Dyn. 53, 4667–4681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04816-y (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
80.Lennard, C., Hahmann, A. N., Badger, J., Mortensen, N. G. & Argent, B. Development of a numerical wind atlas for South Africa. Energy Proc. 76, 128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.873 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
81.Thomson, R. E. & Emery, W. J. Data Analysis Methods in Physical Oceanography 3rd edn. (Elsevier, 2014).
Google Scholar  More