Ecology

Gámez-Virués, S. et al. Landscape simplification filters species traits and drives biotic homogenization. Nat. Commun. 6, 1–8 (2015). 2015 61.Article 

Google Scholar 
Smart, S. M. et al. Biotic homogenization and changes in species diversity across human-modified ecosystems. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 273, 2659–2665 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
McKinney, M. L. & Lockwood, J. L. Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 450–453 (1999).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Pigot, A. L., Jetz, W., Sheard, C. & Tobias, J. A. The macroecological dynamics of species coexistence in birds. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1112–1119 (2018). 2018 27.Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Reidsma, P., Tekelenburg, T., Van Den Berg, M. & Alkemade, R. Impacts of land-use change on biodiversity: An assessment of agricultural biodiversity in the European Union. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 114, 86–102 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Newbold, T. et al. Has land use pushed terrestrial biodiversity beyond the planetary boundary? A global assessment. Science 353, 291–288 (2016).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Meier, E. S., Lüscher, G. & Knop, E. Disentangling direct and indirect drivers of farmland biodiversity at landscape scale. Ecol. Lett. 00, 1–13 (2022).
Google Scholar 
Martínez-Núñez, C. et al. Temporal and spatial heterogeneity of semi-natural habitat, but not crop diversity, is correlated with landscape pollinator richness. J. Appl. Ecol. 59, 1258–1267 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Benton, T. G., Vickery, J. A. & Wilson, J. D. Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 182–188 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sparrow, A. D. A heterogeneity of heterogeneities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 422–423 (1999).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Tscharntke, T., Grass, I., Wanger, T. C., Westphal, C. & Batáry, P. Spatiotemporal land-use diversification for biodiversity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 37, 734–735 (2022).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Quintero, C., Morales, C. L. & Aizen, M. A. Effects of anthropogenic habitat disturbance on local pollinator diversity and species turnover across a precipitation gradient. Biodivers. Conserv. 19, 257–274 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Allen, D. C. et al. Long-term effects of land-use change on bird communities depend on spatial scale and land-use type. Ecosphere 10, e02952 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
MacArthur, R. H. Patterns of species diversity. Biol. Rev. 40, 510–533 (1965).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kinlock, N. L. et al. Explaining global variation in the latitudinal diversity gradient: Meta-analysis confirms known patterns and uncovers new ones. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27, 125–141 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hillebrand, H. On the generality of the latitudinal diversity gradient. Am. Nat. 163, 192–211 (2004).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Jarzyna, M. A., Quintero, I. & Jetz, W. Global functional and phylogenetic structure of avian assemblages across elevation and latitude. Ecol. Lett. 24, 196–207 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Guo, Q. et al. Global variation in elevational diversity patterns. Sci. Rep. 3, 1–7 (2013). 2013 31.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
McCain, C. M. Elevational gradients in diversity of small mammals. Ecology 86, 366–372 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rahbek, C. The elevational gradient of species richness: a uniform pattern? Ecography 18, 200–205 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gillman, L. N. et al. Latitude, productivity and species richness. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 24, 107–117 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cusens, J., Wright, S. D., McBride, P. D. & Gillman, L. N. What is the form of the productivity–animal-species-richness relationship? A critical review and meta-analysis. Ecology 93, 2241–2252 (2012).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Currie, D. J. et al. Predictions and tests of climate-based hypotheses of broad-scale variation in taxonomic richness. Ecol. Lett. 7, 1121–1134 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gaston, K. J. Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature 405, 220–227 (2000).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Burrell, A. L., Evans, J. P. & De Kauwe, M. G. Anthropogenic climate change has driven over 5 million km2 of drylands towards desertification. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–11 (2020). 2020 111.Article 

Google Scholar 
Simkin, R. D., Seto, K. C., McDonald, R. I. & Jetz, W. Biodiversity impacts and conservation implications of urban land expansion projected to 2050. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 119, e2117297119 (2022).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hughes, E. C. et al. Global biogeographic patterns of avian morphological diversity. Ecol. Lett. 25, 598–610 (2022).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Cadotte, M. W., Carscadden, K. & Mirotchnick, N. Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services. J. Appl. Ecol. 48, 1079–1087 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
McGill, B. J., Enquist, B. J., Weiher, E. & Westoby, M. Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 178–185 (2006).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Brun, P. et al. The productivity-biodiversity relationship varies across diversity dimensions. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–11 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Santillán, V. et al. Different responses of taxonomic and functional bird diversity to forest fragmentation across an elevational gradient. Oecologia 189, 863–873 (2018).Article 
ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Chesson, P. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31, 343–366 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Finke, D. L. & Snyder, W. E. Niche partitioning increases resource exploitation by diverse communities. Science 321, 1488–1490 (2008).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Stein, A., Gerstner, K. & Kreft, H. Environmental heterogeneity as a universal driver of species richness across taxa, biomes, and spatial scales. Ecol. Lett. 17, 866–880 (2014).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Chisholm, R. A. et al. Species–area relationships and biodiversity loss in fragmented landscapes. Ecol. Lett. 21, 804–813 (2018).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Grinnell, J. The Niche-relationships of the California Thrasher. Auk 34, 427–433 (1917).Article 

Google Scholar 
Soberón, J. Grinnellian and Eltonian niches and geographic distributions of species. Ecol. Lett. 10, 1115–1123 (2007).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kraft, N. J. B. et al. Community assembly, coexistence, and the environmental filtering metaphor. Funct. Ecol. 29, 592–599 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tarifa, R. et al. Agricultural intensification erodes taxonomic and functional diversity in Mediterranean olive groves by filtering out rare species. J. Appl. Ecol. 58, 2266–2276 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Noble, I. R. & Slatyer, R. O. The use of vital attributes to predict successional changes in plant communities subject to recurrent disturbances. Vegetatio 43, 5–21 (1980).Article 

Google Scholar 
Morelli, F. et al. Evidence of evolutionary homogenization of bird communities in urban environments across Europe. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 25, 1284–1293 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Veech, J. A. & Crist, T. O. Habitat and climate heterogeneity maintain beta-diversity of birds among landscapes within ecoregions. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 16, 650–656 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
García-Navas, V. et al. Partitioning beta diversity to untangle mechanisms underlying the assembly of bird communities in Mediterranean olive groves. Divers. Distrib. 28, 112–127 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Haddad, N. M. et al. Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500052 (2015).Article 
ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Slatyer, R. A., Hirst, M. & Sexton, J. P. Niche breadth predicts geographical range size: a general ecological pattern. Ecol. Lett. 16, 1104–1114 (2013).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Winkler, K., Fuchs, R., Rounsevell, M. & Herold, M. Global land use changes are four times greater than previously estimated. Nat. Commun. 12, 1–10 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Reynolds, J. F. et al. Global desertification: building a science for dryland development. Science. 316, 847–851 (2007).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Meyfroidt, P. & Lambin, E. F. Global forest transition: prospects for an end to deforestation. 36, 343–371 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-090710-143732 (2011).McKinney, M. L. Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol. Conserv. 127, 247–260 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brook, B. W., Sodhi, N. S. & Bradshaw, C. J. A. Synergies among extinction drivers under global change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 453–460 (2008).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Tobias, J. A. et al. AVONET: morphological, ecological and geographical data for all birds. Ecol. Lett. 25, 581–597 (2022).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Dray, S. & Dufour, A. B. The ade4 Package: Implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. J. Stat. Softw. 22, 1–20 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gruson, H. & Grenié, M. Fundiversity: Easy computation of functional diversity Indices. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.7360757 (2022).Mammola, S., Carmona, C. P., Guillerme, T. & Cardoso, P. Concepts and applications in functional diversity. Funct. Ecol. 35, 1869–1885 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kohli, B. A. & Jarzyna, M. A. Pitfalls of ignoring trait resolution when drawing conclusions about ecological processes. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 30, 1139–1152 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Buchhorn, M. et al. Copernicus global land cover layers—Collection 2. Remote Sens. 12, 1044 (2020). 2020, Vol. 12, Page 1044.Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Gorelick, N. et al. Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sens. Environ. 202, 18–27 (2017).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Mu, H. et al. A global record of annual terrestrial Human Footprint dataset from 2000 to 2018. Sci. Data 9, 1–9 (2022). 2022 91.Article 

Google Scholar 
Díaz, S. et al. Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science 366, eaax3100 (2019).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Stewart, P. S. et al. Global impacts of climate change on avian functional diversity. Ecol. Lett. 25, 673–685 (2022).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wood, S. N. Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 73, 3–36 (2011).Article 
MathSciNet 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Wickham, H. ggplot2. (Springer International Publishing, 2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4.Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Breheny, P. & Burchett, W. Visualization of regression models using Visreg. R. J. 9, 56–71 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Met Office. Cartopy: a cartographic python library with matplotlib support. (2013).Martinez-Nuñez, C., Martinez-Prentice, R. & García-Navas, V. Dataset: Environmental as well as bird taxonomic and functional richness data for ca. 18,000 grid cells in the world. Figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21747257.v1 (2023). More

Abicair K, Manning AD, Ford F, Newport J, Banks SC (2020) Habitat selection and genetic diversity of a reintroduced ‘refugee species’. Anim Conserv 23:330–341Article 

Google Scholar 
Adamack AT, Gruber B (2014) PopGenReport: Simplifying basic population genetic analyses in R. Methods Ecol Evol 5:384–387Article 

Google Scholar 
Amori G, Gippoliti S (2003) A higher-taxon approach to rodent conservation priorities for the 21st century. Anim Biodivers Conserv 26.2:1–18
Google Scholar 
Andersen LW, Fog K, Damgaard C (2004) Habitat fragmentation causes bottlenecks and inbreeding in the European tree frog (Hyla arborea). Proc Biol Sci 271:1293–1302Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ball IR, Possingham H, Watts M (2009) Marxan and relatives: Software for spatial conservation prioritization. In: Moilanen A, Wilson KA, Possingham H (eds) Spatial Conservation Prioritisation: Quantitative Methods and Computational Tools. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K., p 320
Google Scholar 
Barbato M, Orozco-terWengel P, Tapio M, Bruford MW (2015). SNeP: a tool to estimate trends in recent effective population size trajectories using genome-wide SNP data. Front Genet 6:109Barbosa S, Mestre F, White TA, Paupério J, Alves PC, Searle JB (2018) Integrative approaches to guide conservation decisions: Using genomics to define conservation units and functional corridors. Mol Ecol 27:3452–3465Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bowman DMJS, Brown GK, Braby MF, Brown JR, Cook LG, Crisp MD et al. (2010) Biogeography of the Australian monsoon tropics. J Biogeogr 37:201–216Article 

Google Scholar 
Caballero A, García-Dorado A (2013) Allelic diversity and its implications for the rate of adaptation. Genetics 195:1373–1384Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Cardillo M, Mace GM, Gittleman JL, Jones KE, Bielby J, Purvis A (2008) The predictability of extinction: biological and external correlates of decline in mammals. Proc R Soc B: Biol Sci 275:1441–1448Article 

Google Scholar 
Catchen J, Hohenlohe PA, Bassham S, Amores A, Cresko WA (2013) Stacks: an analysis tool set for population genomics. Mol Ecol 22:3124–3140Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Catullo RA, Lanfear R, Doughty P, Keogh JS (2014) The biogeographical boundaries of northern Australia: evidence from ecological niche models and a multi-locus phylogeny of Uperoleia toadlets (Anura: Myobatrachidae). J Biogeogr 41:659–672Article 

Google Scholar 
Caye K, Deist TM, Martins H, Michel O, François O (2016) TESS3: fast inference of spatial population structure and genome scans for selection. Mol Ecol Resour 16:540–548Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Caye K, Jay F, Michel O, François O (2018) Fast inference of individual admixture coefficients using geographic data. Ann Appl Stat 12:586–608Article 

Google Scholar 
CBD (2021) First draft of the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. UN Convention on Biological DiversityCeballos G, Ehrlich PR, Barnosky AD, García A, Pringle RM, Palmer TM (2015) Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction. Sci Adv 1:e1400253Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Corbin LJ, Liu AYH, Bishop SC, Woolliams JA (2012) Estimation of historical effective population size using linkage disequilibria with marker data. J Anim Breed Genet 129:257–270Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Crichton EG (1969) Reproduction in the pseudomyine rodent Mesembriomys gouldii (Gray) (Muridae). Aust J Zool 17:785–797Article 

Google Scholar 
Davies HF, McCarthy MA, Firth RSC, Woinarski JCZ, Gillespie GR, Andersen AN et al. (2017) Top-down control of species distributions: feral cats driving the regional extinction of a threatened rodent in northern Australia (N Roura-Pascual, Ed.). Divers Distrib 23:272–283Article 

Google Scholar 
Davies HF, McCarthy MA, Firth RSC, Woinarski JCZ, Gillespie GR, Andersen AN et al. (2018) Declining populations in one of the last refuges for threatened mammal species in northern Australia. Austral Ecol 43:602–612Article 

Google Scholar 
Díaz S, Settele J, Brondízio ES, Ngo HT, Agard J, Arneth A et al. (2019) Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science 366:6471Dyer R (2016) gstudio: tools related to the spatial analysis of genetic marker data. R package version 152Edwards RD, Crisp MD, Cook DH, Cook LG (2017) Congruent biogeographical disjunctions at a continent-wide scale: Quantifying and clarifying the role of biogeographic barriers in the Australian tropics. PLoS One 12:e0174812Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Eldridge MDB, Potter S, Cooper SJB, Eldridge MDB, Potter S, Cooper SJB (2012) Biogeographic barriers in north-western Australia: an overview and standardisation of nomenclature. Aust J Zool 59:270–272Article 

Google Scholar 
Fitak RR (2021) OptM: estimating the optimal number of migration edges on population trees using Treemix. Biol Methods Protoc 6:bpab017Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Frichot E, François O (2015) LEA: An R package for landscape and ecological association studies. Methods Ecol Evol 6:925–929Article 

Google Scholar 
Friend GR (1987) Population ecology of Mesembriomys gouldii (Rodentia, Muridae) in the wet-dry tropics of the Northern Territory. Wildl Res 14:293–303Article 

Google Scholar 
Funk WC, McKay JK, Hohenlohe PA, Allendorf FW (2012) Harnessing genomics for delineating conservation units. Trends Ecol Evol 27:489–496Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Goudet J (2005) hierfstat, a package for r to compute and test hierarchical F‐statistics. Mol Ecol Notes 5:184–186Article 

Google Scholar 
Goudet J, Kay T, Weir BS (2018) How to estimate kinship. Mol Ecol 27:4121–4135Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Greenbaum G, Templeton AR, Zarmi Y, Bar-David S (2014) Allelic richness following population founding events – a stochastic modeling framework incorporating gene flow and genetic drift. PLoS One 9:e115203Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hanson JO, Schuster R, Morrell N, Strimas-Mackey M, Watts ME, Arcese P et al. (2020) prioritizr: systematic conservation prioritization in R. R package version 415Hoban S, Bruford M, D’Urban Jackson J, Lopes-Fernandes M, Heuertz M, Hohenlohe PA et al. (2020) Genetic diversity targets and indicators in the CBD post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework must be improved. Biol Conserv 248:108654Article 

Google Scholar 
Kamvar ZN, Tabima JF, Grünwald NJ (2014) Poppr: an R package for genetic analysis of populations with clonal, partially clonal, and/or sexual reproduction. PeerJ 2:e281Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kim SY, Lohmueller KE, Albrechtsen A, Li Y, Korneliussen T, Tian G et al. (2011) Estimation of allele frequency and association mapping using next-generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinforma 12:231Article 

Google Scholar 
Korneliussen TS, Albrechtsen A, Nielsen R (2014) Open Access ANGSD: Analysis of Next Generation Sequencing Data. BMC Bioinforma 15:1–13Article 

Google Scholar 
Lambert C, Power V, Gaikhorst G (2016) Captive breeding of the Shark Bay mouse Pseudomys fieldi to facilitate species recovery in the wild. J Zoo Aquar Res 4:164–168
Google Scholar 
Laurie CC, Nickerson DA, Anderson AD, Weir BS, Livingston RJ, Dean MD et al. (2007) Linkage disequilibrium in wild mice. PLOS Genet 3:e144Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Leakey RE, Lewin R (1995) The sixth extinction: patterns of life and the future of humankind, 1st ed. Doubleday, New York
Google Scholar 
Li H (2013). Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv:13033997Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N et al. (2009) The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078–2079Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Martins H, Caye K, Luu K, Blum MGB, François O (2016) Identifying outlier loci in admixed and in continuous populations using ancestral population differentiation statistics. Mol Ecol 25:5029–5042Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Melville J, Ritchie EG, Chapple SNJ, Glor RE, Schulte JA (2011) Evolutionary origins and diversification of dragon lizards in Australia’s tropical savannas. Mol Phylogenetics Evol 58:257–270Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Morton CM (1992) Diets of three species of tree-rat: Mesembriomys gouldii (Gray), M. macrurus (Peters) and Conilurus Pencillatus (Gould) from the Mitchell Plateau, Western Australia. University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT
Google Scholar 
Ottewell KM, Bickerton DC, Byrne M, Lowe AJ (2016) Bridging the gap: a genetic assessment framework for population-level threatened plant conservation prioritization and decision-making. Divers Distrib 22:174–188Article 

Google Scholar 
Ottewell K, Dunlop J, Thomas N, Morris K, Coates D, Byrne M (2014) Evaluating success of translocations in maintaining genetic diversity in a threatened mammal. Biol Conserv 171:209–219Article 

Google Scholar 
Pacifici M, Santini L, Marco MD, Baisero D, Francucci L, Marasini GG et al. (2013) Generation length for mammals. Nat Conserv 5:89–94Article 

Google Scholar 
Palsbøll PJ, Bérubé M, Allendorf FW (2007) Identification of management units using population genetic data. Trends Ecol Evol 22:11–16Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Pembleton LW, Cogan NOI, Forster JW (2013) StAMPP: an R package for calculation of genetic differentiation and structure of mixed-ploidy level populations. Mol Ecol Resour 13:946–952Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Penton CE, Davies HF, Radford IJ, Woolley L-A, Rangers TL, Murphy BP (2021) A hollow argument: understory vegetation and disturbance determine abundance of hollow-dependent mammals in an Australian tropical savanna. Front Ecol Evol 9:778Article 

Google Scholar 
Penton CE, Radford IJ, Woolley L-A, von Takach B, Murphy BP (2021) Unexpected overlapping use of tree hollows by birds, reptiles and declining mammals in an Australian tropical savanna. Biodivers Conserv 30:2977–3001Article 

Google Scholar 
Penton CE, Woolley L-A, Radford IJ, Murphy BP (2020) Overlapping den tree selection by three declining arboreal mammal species in an Australian tropical savanna. J Mammal 101:1165–1176Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Peterson BK, Weber JN, Kay EH, Fisher HS, Hoekstra HE (2012) Double digest RADseq: an inexpensive method for de novo SNP discovery and genotyping in model and non-model species. PLoS One 7:e37135Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Petit RJ, Mousadik AE, Pons O (1998) Identifying populations for conservation on the basis of genetic markers. Conserv Biol 12:844–855Article 

Google Scholar 
Pickrell JK, Pritchard JK (2012) Inference of population splits and mixtures from genome-wide allele frequency data. PLOS Genet 8:e1002967Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Potter S, Close RL, Taggart DA, Cooper SJB, Eldridge MDB, Potter S et al. (2014) Taxonomy of rock-wallabies, Petrogale (Marsupialia: Macropodidae). IV. Multifaceted study of the brachyotis group identifies additional taxa. Aust J Zool 62:401–414Article 

Google Scholar 
Price O, Rankmore B, Milne D, Brock C, Tynan C, Kean L et al. (2005) Regional patterns of mammal abundance and their relationship to landscape variables in eucalypt woodlands near Darwin, northern Australia. Wildl Res 32:435–446Article 

Google Scholar 
Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MAR, Bender D et al. (2007) PLINK: A tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet 81:559–575Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computingRadford IJ, Corey B, Carnes K, Shedley E, McCaw L, Woolley L-A (2021). Landscape-scale effects of fire, cats, and feral livestock on threatened savanna mammals: unburnt habitat matters more than pyrodiversity. Front Ecol Evol 9: 739817Rankmore BR, Friend GR (2008). Black-footed tree-rat, Mesembriomys gouldii. In: The mammals of Australia, Reed New Holland: Sydney, Australia, pp 591–593Rick K, Ottewell K, Lohr C, Thavornkanlapachai R, Byrne M, Kennington WJ (2019) Population genomics of Bettongia lesueur: admixing increases genetic diversity with no evidence of outbreeding depression. Genes 10:851Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Robledo-Ruiz DA, Pavlova A, Clarke RH, Magrath MJL, Quin B, Harrisson KA et al. (2022) A novel framework for evaluating in situ breeding management strategies in endangered populations. Mol Ecol Resour 22:239–253Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Rowe KC, Reno ML, Richmond DM, Adkins RM, Steppan SJ (2008) Pliocene colonization and adaptive radiations in Australia and New Guinea (Sahul): Multilocus systematics of the old endemic rodents (Muroidea: Murinae). Mol Phylogenetics Evol 47:84–101Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Roycroft E, MacDonald AJ, Moritz C, Moussalli A, Miguez RP, Rowe KC (2021) Museum genomics reveals the rapid decline and extinction of Australian rodents since European settlement. PNAS 118:e2021390118Roycroft EJ, Moussalli A, Rowe KC (2020) Phylogenomics uncovers confidence and conflict in the rapid radiation of Australo-Papuan rodents. Syst Biol. 69:431–444Sandoval-Castillo J, Robinson NA, Hart AM, Strain LWS, Beheregaray LB (2018) Seascape genomics reveals adaptive divergence in a connected and commercially important mollusc, the greenlip abalone (Haliotis laevigata), along a longitudinal environmental gradient. Mol Ecol 27:1603–1620Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Scheele BC, Foster CN, Banks SC, Lindenmayer DB (2017) Niche contractions in declining species: mechanisms and consequences. Trends Ecol Evol 32:346–355Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Schipper J, Chanson JS, Chiozza F, Cox NA, Hoffmann M, Katariya V et al. (2008) The status of the world’s land and marine mammals: diversity, threat, and knowledge. Science 322:225–230Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Schmidt TL, Jasper M-E, Weeks AR, Hoffmann AA (2021) Unbiased population heterozygosity estimates from genome-wide sequence data. Methods Ecol Evol 12:1888–1898Article 

Google Scholar 
Smith AP, Quin DG (1996) Patterns and causes of extinction and decline in Australian conilurine rodents. Biol Conserv 77:243–267Article 

Google Scholar 
Stobo-Wilson AM, Stokeld D, Einoder LD, Davies HF, Fisher A, Hill BM et al. (2020) Bottom-up and top-down processes influence contemporary patterns of mammal species richness in Australia’s monsoonal tropics. Biol Conserv 247:108638Article 

Google Scholar 
Sved JA, Feldman MW (1973) Correlation and probability methods for one and two loci. Theor Popul Biol 4:129–132Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
von Takach Dukai B, Peakall R, Lindenmayer DB, Banks SC (2020a) The influence of fire and silvicultural practices on the landscape-scale genetic structure of an Australian foundation tree species. Conserv Genet 21:231–246Article 

Google Scholar 
von Takach B, Ahrens CW, Lindenmayer DB, Banks SC (2021) Scale-dependent signatures of local adaptation in a foundation tree species. Mol Ecol 30:2248–2261Article 

Google Scholar 
von Takach B, Jolly CJ, Dixon KM, Penton CE, Doherty TS, Banks SC (2022) Long-unburnt habitat is critical for the conservation of threatened vertebrates across Australia. Landsc Ecol 37:1469–1482Article 

Google Scholar 
von Takach B, Penton CE, Murphy BP, Radford IJ, Davies HF, Hill BM et al. (2021) Population genomics and conservation management of a declining tropical rodent. Heredity 126:763–775Article 

Google Scholar 
von Takach B, Ranjard L, Burridge CP, Cameron SF, Cremona T, Eldridge MDB et al. (2022) Population genomics of a predatory mammal reveals patterns of decline and impacts of exposure to toxic toads. Mol Ecol 31:5468–5486Article 

Google Scholar 
von Takach B, Scheele BC, Moore H, Murphy BP, Banks SC (2020b) Patterns of niche contraction identify vital refuge areas for declining mammals. Divers Distrib 26:1467–1482Article 

Google Scholar 
Troughton E (1967) Furred animals of Australia, 9th edn. Angus and Robertson, Sydney, Australia
Google Scholar 
Van Dyck S, Gynther I, Baker A (Eds.) (2013) Field Companion to the Mammals of Australia. New Holland Publishers, London, Sydney
Google Scholar 
Van Dyck S, Strahan R (2008) The Mammals of Australia, 3rd edn. Reed New Holland, Chatswood, NSW, Australia
Google Scholar 
Vladislav K (2018) lpsymphony: Symphony integer linear programming solver in R. R package version 1180Watts ME, Ball IR, Stewart RS, Klein CJ, Wilson K, Steinback C et al. (2009) Marxan with Zones: Software for optimal conservation based land- and sea-use zoning. Environ Model Softw 24:1513–1521Article 

Google Scholar 
Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Weir BS, Goudet J (2017) A unified characterization of population structure and relatedness. Genetics 206:2085–2103Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wheeler J (1982) Notes on the black-footed tree-rat in a modified environment. North Territ Nat 5:8–9
Google Scholar 
White LC, Thomson VA, West R, Ruykys L, Ottewell K, Kanowski J et al. (2020) Genetic monitoring of the greater stick-nest rat meta-population for strategic supplementation planning. Conserv Genet 21:941–956Article 

Google Scholar 
Whitlock MC, Lotterhos KE (2015) Reliable detection of loci responsible for local adaptation: inference of a null model through trimming the distribution of FST. Am Nat 186:S24–S36Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wickham H (2009) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag, New YorkBook 

Google Scholar 
Wintle BA, Cadenhead NCR, Morgain RA, Legge SM, Bekessy SA, Cantele M et al. (2019) Spending to save: What will it cost to halt Australia’s extinction crisis? Conserv Lett 12:e12682Article 

Google Scholar 
Woinarski JCZ, Armstrong M, Brennan K, Fisher A, Griffiths AD, Hill B et al. (2010) Monitoring indicates rapid and severe decline of native small mammals in Kakadu National Park, northern Australia. Wildl Res 37:116Article 

Google Scholar 
Woinarski JCZ, Braby MF, Burbidge AA, Coates D, Garnett ST, Fensham RJ et al. (2019) Reading the black book: The number, timing, distribution and causes of listed extinctions in Australia. Biol Conserv 239:108261Article 

Google Scholar 
Woinarski JCZ, Burbidge AA (2016) Mesembriomys gouldii. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016:eT13211A22448856Woinarski JC, Burbidge AA, Harrison P (2014) The action plan for Australian mammals 2012. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, AustraliaBook 

Google Scholar 
Woinarski JCZ, Legge S, Fitzsimons JA, Traill BJ, Burbidge AA, Fisher A et al. (2011) The disappearing mammal fauna of northern Australia: context, cause, and response. Conserv Lett 4:192–201Article 

Google Scholar 
Woinarski JCZ, Milne DJ, Wanganeen G (2001) Changes in mammal populations in relatively intact landscapes of Kakadu National Park, Northern Territory, Australia. Austral Ecol 26:360–370Article 

Google Scholar 
Zheng X, Levine D, Shen J, Gogarten SM, Laurie C, Weir BS (2012) A high-performance computing toolset for relatedness and principal component analysis of SNP data. Bioinformatics 28:3326–3328Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar  More

Devillers, R. et al. Aquat. Conserv. 25, 480–504 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Silvestro, D., Goria, S., Sterner, T. & Antonelli, A. Nat. Sustain. 5, 415–424 (2022).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Cowell, C. R. et al. Biodivers. Conserv. 32, 119–137 (2023).Article 

Google Scholar 
Joly, C. A., Metzger, J. P. & Tabarelli, M. New Phytol. 204, 459–473 (2014).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Darbyshire, I. et al. Biodivers. Conserv. 26, 1767–1800 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Antonelli, A. et al. Science 378, eabf0869 (2022).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Farooq, H., Antonelli, A. & Faurby, S. Perspect. Ecol. Conserv. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2023.02.002 (2023).Geldmann, J., Manica, A., Burgess, N. D., Coad, L. & Balmford, A. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 23209–23215 (2019).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Jetz, W. et al. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6, 123–126 (2022).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hockings, M., Dudley, N., Stolton, S., Pasha, M. K. S. & van Nimwegen, P. Oryx 55, 333 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ralimanana, H. et al. Science 378, eadf1466 (2022).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Maxwell, S. L. et al. Nature 586, 217–227 (2020).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Milner-Gulland, E. J. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6, 1243–1244 (2022).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wilson, E. O. Half-Earth: Our Planet’s Fight for Life (W. W. Norton & Co., 2016).Leclère, D. et al. Nature 585, 551–556 (2020).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar  More

To supplement the limited publicly available information on rabies risk, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) performs an annual country-by-country qualitative assessment of rabies risks and protective factors. The results of this assessment are released annually in an open-access database of core metrics consisting of the presence of lyssaviruses (specifically canine or wildlife rabies virus variants, or other bat lyssaviruses), access to rabies immunoglobulins and vaccines, rabies surveillance capacity and canine rabies control capacity18. The analysis presented here builds upon the current CDC evaluation and specifically examines publicly available data to better inform the parameter of rabies surveillance capacity. This study found publicly available data regarding rabies animal testing by species, described testing practices in relation to the country’s human and dog populations, as well as by their stage of DMRVV control (defined by WHO), and used this data to calculate a surveillance testing threshold for DMRVV endemic countries.Data sources were categorized into four tiers, with the order reflecting the preference for selecting the most appropriate data for the purposes of this analysis. Tier 1 data sources were considered to be the preferential data source and included any official government data submitted to a Regional or International data repository. Official data repositories included the WHO GHO, Pan-American Health Organization Regional Information System for Epidemiologic Surveillance of Rabies (PAHO SIRVERA), and the European Rabies Bulletin. Tier 1 data sources also included official country reports found through literature search, so long as they were publicly available. Tier 2 data sources consisted of published reports in peer-reviewed literature or on a ministry of health or agriculture site that includes data from the entire country, as well as unofficial data repositories (e.g., Global Alliance on Rabies Control (GARC) Rabies Epidemiologic Bulletin). Tier 3 data consisted of one-time cross-sectional studies or studies describing sub-national testing activities and which could not be reliably extrapolated to an entire country. Tier 4 data sources include any resource not captured in the previous criteria that were obtained during literature searches. The primary data search was conducted in September 2021, with an update in September 2022. Only Tier 1 and Tier 2 data sources were included in the evaluation of animal testing rates. If multiple data sources contained conflicting testing rates, we prioritized data from surveillance repositories, then reports from ministries of health or agriculture, and, finally, peer-reviewed publications.For Tier 1 data (i.e., surveillance repository), data was included in this study if it described rabies testing conducted between the years 2010 and 2019. As political, economic, and epidemiologic factors directly influence the reliability and transparency of surveillance system data, we decided that a ten-year limit would capture any year-to-year variation in data and better characterize current passive surveillance practices. Additionally, the cutoff of 2019 was chosen so that the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on rabies surveillance capacity would not affect this comprehensive evaluation and would account for lag time in reporting to Tier 1 data sources19,20. This study assumed data from these surveillance repositories is entered secondary to passive surveillance systems. If data was known to be from active surveillance activities, it was removed from analyses.For Tier 2 data (i.e., peer-reviewed publications), certain publications presented aggregated testing data that included years prior to the Tier 1 cutoff (i.e., 2010). To increase inclusivity of eligible data and keep the findings from this evaluation representative of current practices, eligible data must have had an end year ≥ 2012, regardless of the starting year of data (Table S1). The literature search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Google for “rabies” AND “[country name]” from 2010 to December 2021. “Publicly available” was defined as any result appearing in PubMed or Scopus, or within the first three pages of a Google search. Exceptions to the first three pages were made for similar country names (e.g., Guinea, Congo). The first 10% of Spanish- and French-speaking countries were also searched for “rabia” and “raj,” respectively, to potentially capture any other sources of surveillance data. However, after no additional data was found, this was discontinued. If an article or resource quantifying animal testing capacity within these criteria was not found, the country was deemed to not have readily available data for analysis.For any countries that were part of the surveillance threshold calculation for DMRVV endemic countries, the preferred tiered data was compared to all other data sources. For one country (i.e., Brazil), there was a notable lack of dog testing data and known discrepancies in data reporting between their two reporting systems (i.e., SINAN, SIRVERA)21. In this situation, a median rate was calculated between a Tier 1 and Tier 3 data source. No other such discrepancies were noted. The type of surveillance (active or passive) was noted for each data source; we assumed passive surveillance with Tier 1 data unless compelling evidence existed to display that this was not the case. A strictly active surveillance program was excluded from all analyses. A summary of overall testing practices was performed and standardized according to the number of years each data source contained.As evaluations of rabies testing rates spanned over multiple years, population estimates were obtained to reflect the most recent year in the available data. Three separate testing rates were calculated and standardized based on the human population within the country: [1] All animal, [2] Domestic animal, and [3] Wildlife. There are different social and cultural behaviors that affect the human to dog ratio and interactions between people and animals. These differences can impact the susceptibility of dogs to rabies virus infection and the likelihood of human interactions with rabid animals. Therefore, we additionally calculated country testing rates standardized by the estimated dog population, to provide an additional indicator value of adequate surveillance capacity. Estimated dog populations were obtained from a previous study22. This resulted in up to four calculated rabies testing rates per country, depending upon available data.Equation 1: All-animal per human testing rate (AAHR)$$frac{Average,number,of,all,animals,tested/year}{{Estimated,human,population}} times 100,000$$
(1)
Equation 2: Domestic animal per human testing rate (DAHR)$$frac{Average, number, of, domestic, animals, tested/year}{{Estimated, human, population}} times 100,000$$
(2)
Equation 3: Domestic animal per dog testing rate (DADR)$$frac{Average, number, of, domestic ,animals, tested/year}{{Estimated ,dog, population}} times 100,000$$
(3)
Equation 4: Wildlife per human testing rate (WHR)$$frac{Average, number ,of, wildlife, animals, tested/year}{{Estimated ,human, population}} times 100,000$$
(4)
The WHO rabies epidemiologic Status is divided into five categories in escalating levels of dog rabies control: [1] Endemic dog-transmitted human rabies, [2] Endemic dog rabies, [3] Sporadic dog-transmitted rabies, [4] Controlled dog rabies, and [5] No dog rabies. The WHO Status was established based on existing data and expert knowledge to help better define the level of rabies control for each country23. In addition to these five WHO Statuses, countries in Status [5] were further sub-categorized into [5a] (rabies virus free), and [5b] (wildlife rabies enzootic) based on CDC’s wildlife rabies status; the CDC rabies status was also used for any country without a WHO Status (n = 11)24. Average testing rates for the aforementioned equations were calculated for each WHO Rabies Status category, treating each country as an equally weighted value in the rate calculation. Only descriptive analyses were conducted to describe surveillance and testing data, as data quality was not deemed acceptable for multi-variable statistical analysis and testing rates were heavily left-skewed. Data is presented as median and IQR as the data was noted to not reflect a parametric distribution.Ethics approvalThis activity was reviewed by CDC and was conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy. (See e.g., 45 C.F.R. part 46, 21 C.F.R. part 56; 42 U.S.C. §241(d); 5 U.S.C. §552a; 44 U.S.C. §3501 et seq.) The views and opinions of the manuscript are of the authors alone and do not represent those of CDC or any other federal agency. More

Summary of SCTLD microbiome studiesInitially, datasets were acquired from 17 SCTLD studies, but one study [24] did not pass quality filtering and was removed from the analysis, resulting in 16 SCTLD studies used in this meta-analysis. In addition, one Acropora spp. rapid tissue loss (RTL) disease study was included for comparison of bacteria which may be associated more generally with coral tissue loss diseases (Supplementary Table 1). The combined dataset included 2425 samples, representing various coral species and environments described below. A total of 63 miscellaneous samples such as lab controls were included in this total (Supplementary Table 1). Samples from the studies were sequenced using five primer pairs: CS1-515F/CS2-806R [31] with additional 5’ linker sequences [32] (n = 79), 515FY [33]/806RB [34] (n = 1219), S-D-Bact-0341-b-S-17/S-D-Bact-0785-a-A-21 [35] (n = 31), 515F/806R [31] (n = 49), and 515F [31]/Arch806R [36] (n = 984; Fig. 1A). Although five primer pairs were used across studies, only the forward reads were evaluated in this analysis (see “Methods”). A description of the differences between 515F primers can be found in detail [34].Fig. 1: The number of aquaria and field samples for each coral species.A small subunit (SSU) rRNA gene primer sets, B sample type, and C disease state. NAs in (A, B) represent sediment and seawater samples. Coral species codes represent the following: Acropora cervicornis (ACER), Acropora palmata (APAL), Colpophyllia natans (CNAT), Diploria labyrinthiformis (DLAB), Dichocoenia stokesii (DSTO), Montastraea cavernosa (MCAV), Meandrina meandrites (MMEA), Orbicella annularis (OANN), Orbicella faveolata (OFAV), Orbicella franksi (OFRA), Porites astreoides (PAST), Pseudodiploria clivosa (PCLI), Pseudodiploria strigosa (PSTR), Stephanocoenia intersepta (SINT), and Siderastrea siderea (SSID).Full size imageSamples were collected throughout Florida and the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI). Field samples totaled 1274, representing 40 sites, and a further 1088 samples were from aquaria (i.e., laboratory-based experiments; Fig. 1). Thirteen SCTLD-susceptible coral species were included, with Montastraea cavernosa (MCAV; n = 543) and Orbicella faveolata (OFAV; n = 357) most represented and Pseudodiploria clivosa (PCLI; n = 6) and Orbicella franksi (OFRA; n = 7) least represented (Fig. 1). Coral samples (n = 2031) were from three compartments: mucus only (n = 393), mucus and surface tissue (tissue slurry; n = 1585), and skeleton samples with embedded coral tissue (tissue slurry skeleton; n = 53). Seawater (n = 198) and sediment (n = 133) samples from both the field and aquaria experiments also were included to evaluate potential sources of transmission of disease-associated bacteria (Fig. 1B). For seawater from aquaria experiments, 18 L samples were collected [27], while in the field between 60 mL and 1 L samples were collected [11, 25]. In sediment aquaria experiments, 2 mL samples were collected [12], and in the field, approximately 5 mL samples were collected (of the 5 mL, DNA was extracted from 0.25 g sediment [11]). Coral samples represented three SCTLD health states: apparently healthy colonies (AH), which was the most represented (n = 1021), followed by lesions on diseased colonies (DL; n = 661), and unaffected areas on diseased colonies (DU; n = 349; Fig. 1C). AH represents grossly normal tissue, DU grossly normal tissue on diseased colonies, and DL grossly abnormal tissue.Differences in the microbial composition were found in AH corals among zones (vulnerable, endemic, and epidemic)Differences in alpha-diversity were tested among three SCTLD zones: vulnerable (i.e., locations where the disease had not been observed/reported), endemic (i.e., locations where a disease outbreak had moved through the reef and no or few colonies had active lesions), and epidemic (i.e., locations where the outbreak was active and prevalent). For alpha-diversity, for AH field-sourced samples, after filtering, 41,504 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) remained, which were reduced to 15,021 following rarefaction. Among the filtered AH samples, Shannon (alpha) diversity from the vulnerable zone was slightly higher (estimated marginal means (emmean) = 3.95) compared to the epidemic zone (emmean = 3.70), but this was not significant (Supplementary Fig. 1). For beta-diversity, both within and between-group differences were tested using a filtered counts table. Within-group beta-diversity (variation in microbial composition or dispersion) was not different between zones, but was significant for all comparisons between zones (PERMANOVA, P-adjusted (Padj) More

Roux, R., Gosselin, M., Desrosiers, G. & Nozais, C. Effects of reduced UV radiation on a microbenthic community during a microcosm experiment. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 225, 29–43. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps225029 (2002).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Häder, D. P., Helbling, E. W., Williamson, C. E. & Worrest, R. C. Effects of UV radiation on aquatic ecosystems and interactions with climate change. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 10, 242–260. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0PP90036B (2011).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Schmidt, É. C. et al. Response of the agarophyte Gelidium floridanum after in vitro exposure to ultraviolet radiation B: changes in ultrastructure, pigments, and antioxidant systems. J. Appl. Phycol. 24, 1341–1352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-012-9786-4 (2012).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zhu, L. et al. Physiological responses of macroalga Gracilaria lemaneiformis (Rhodophyta) to UV-B radiation exposure. Chin. J. Oceanol. Limnol. 33, 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-015-4073-2 (2015).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Liu, Y. N., Ao, M., Li, B. & Guan, Y. X. Effect of ultraviolet- B( UV-B) radiation on plant growth and development and its application value. Soils and Crops 9, 191–202. https://doi.org/10.11689/j.issn.2095-2961.2020.02.011 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, Y. Y., Xu, X. L., Shen, X. Y. & Zhang, Z. G. Advances of Research on Effects of Enhanced UV-B on Algae. JiangXi Science 23, 180–184. https://doi.org/10.13990/j.issn1001-3679.2005.02.025 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Aguilera, J., Bischof, K., Karsten, U., Hanelt, D. & Wiencke, C. Seasonal variation in ecophysiological patterns in macroalgae from an Arctic fjord. II. Pigment accumulation and biochemical defence systems against high light stress. Mar. Biol. 140, 1087–1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-002-0792-y (2002).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Xu, F. H., Zhang, P. Y., Yu, D. S. & Li, Y. The effect of enhanced UV-B radiation to the growth of Ulva Pertusa Kjell man and Platy monas Hel gol andi ca Kylin var. Tsi ngt aoensis. J. Qingdao Univ. (E & T) 21, 49–53. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-9798.2006.02.010 (2006).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Guan, W. C., Chen, H., Wang, T., Chen, S. & Xu, J. Effect of the solar ultraviolet radiation on the growth and fluorescence parameters of Sargassum horner. J. Fish. China 40, 83–91. https://doi.org/10.11964/jfc.20150109683 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sun, Y. et al. Physiological responses and metabonomics analysis of male and female Sargassum thunbergii macroalgae exposed to ultraviolet-B stress. Front. Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.778602 (2022).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Sun, Y. et al. The differing responses of central carbon cycle metabolism in male and female Sargassum thunbergii to ultraviolet-B radiation. Front. Plant Sci. 13, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.904943 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lu, P. et al. Gender differences response characteristics of Sargassum thunbergii in reactive oxygen species scavenging system to enhanced UV-B radiation. Period. Ocean Univ. China 52, 5259. https://doi.org/10.16441/j.cnki.hdxb.20210224 (2022).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Ji, Y., Xu, Z., Zou, D. & Gao, K. Ecophysiological responses of marine macroalgae to climate change factors. J. Appl. Phycol. 28, 2953–2967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-016-0840-5 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Chen, S. W. & Wu, B. X. Algal responses to enhanced UV-B and its mechanism on molecular level. J. Jinan Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 21, 88–94. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-9965.2000.05.017 (2000).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Pescheck, F., Lohbeck, K. T., Roleda, M. Y. & Bilger, W. UV-B -induced DNA and photosystem II damage in two intertidal green macroalgae: distinct survival strategies in UV-screening and non-screening Chlorophyta. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 132, 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.02.006 (2014).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Dong, K. Physiological and biochemical responses of Ulva pertusa and Sargassum thunbergii to UV-B radiation Master thesis, Ocean University of China (2008).Selvarajan, R., Sibanda, T., Venkatachalam, S., Ogola, H. & Msagati, T. A. Distribution, interaction and functional profiles of epiphytic bacterial communities from the rocky intertidal seaweeds, South Africa. Sci. Rep. 9, 19835. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56269-2 (2019).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, Z. H., Tang, L. L. & Zhang, Y. Y. Algae-bacteria interactions and their ecological functions in the ocean. Microbiol. China 45, 2043–2053. https://doi.org/10.13344/j.microbiol.china.180178 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Xuan, L. et al. Effects of UV-B radiation on quantity of epiphytic bacteria, endophytic bacteria and physiological mechanism of Erigeron breviscapus. Ecol. Environ. Sci. 18, 2211–2215. https://doi.org/10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2009.06.055 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zheng, H. Effects of UV-B radiation on the endophytic bacteria in plants of Qinghai-Tibet plateau Master thesis, Lanzhou University (2009).Dobretsov, S., Véliz, K., Romero, M. S., Tala, F. & Thiel, M. Impact of UV radiation on the red seaweed Gelidium lingulatum and its associated bacteria. Eur. J. Phycol. 56, 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2020.1775309 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Serebryakova, A., Aires, T., Viard, F., Serrao, E. & Engelen, A. Summer shifts of bacterial communities associated with the invasive brown seaweed Sargassum muticum are location and tissue dependent. PLoS ONE 13, e0206734. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206734 (2018).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Florez, J. Z., Carolina, C., Hengst, M. B. & Buschmann, A. H. A functional perspective analysis of macroalgae and epiphytic bacterial community interaction. Front. Microbiol. 8, 2561. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02561 (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Xu, X. et al. Different growth sensitivity to enhanced UV-B radiation between male and female Populus cathayana. Tree Physiol. 30, 1489–1498. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpq094 (2010).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Chen, M. et al. Various responses of antioxidant enzyme system and photosynthetic pigments in male and female mulberry (Morus alba L.) seedlings to UV-B radiation. J. China West Normal Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 35, 327–332. https://doi.org/10.16246/j.issn.1673-5072.2014.04.010 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Norul, S. et al. Accumulation of phenolics and growth of dioecious Populus tremula (L.) seedlings over three growing seasons under elevated temperature and UV-B radiation. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 165, 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.05.012 (2021).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Sun, Y. et al. Development and utilization status of Sargassum thunbergii. Fish. Sci. Technol. Inf. 45, 343–346. https://doi.org/10.16446/j.cnki.1001-1994.2018.06.011 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Amaral-Zettler, L. A. et al. Comparative mitochondrial and chloroplast genomics of a genetically distinct form of Sargassum contributing to recent “Golden Tides” in the Western Atlantic. Ecol. Evol. 7, 516–525. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2630 (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wu, H., Liu, H., Yang, D. & Li, M. Research present situation of Sargassum thunbergii. Terr. Nat. Resour. Study 1, 95–96. https://doi.org/10.16202/j.cnki.tnrs.2010.01.009 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Njage, P. et al. Quantitative microbial risk assessment based on whole genome sequencing data: case of Listeria monocytogenes. Microorganisms 8, 1772. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8111772 (2020).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
McHugh, A. J. et al. Tracking the dairy microbiota from farm bulk tank to skimmed milk powder. mSystems 5, e00226-00220. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00226-20 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sun, Y. Polyphasic Taxonomy of Fluviibacterium aquatile SM1902T and Effect of starvation treatment on the variation of bacterial community in the open ocean surface seawater Master thesis, Shandong University, (2020).Gao, X. et al. Survival, virulent characteristics, and transcriptomic analyses of the pathogenic Vibrio anguillarum under starvation stress. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 16, 389. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2018.00389 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Gao, Y. Study on denitrification performance of marine anammox bacteria under UV and electron mediators Master thesis, Qingdao University, (2020).Fernández Zenoff, V., Siñeriz, F. & Farías, M. E. Diverse responses to UV-B radiation and repair mechanisms of bacteria isolated from high-altitude aquatic environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 7857–7863. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01333-06 (2006).Article 
ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kadivar, H. & Stapleton, A. E. Ultraviolet radiation alters maize phyllosphere bacterial diversity. Microb. Ecol. 45, 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-002-1065-5 (2003).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lynch, M. D. J. & Neufeld, J. D. Ecology and exploration of the rare biosphere. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13, 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3400 (2015).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Reintjes, G., Arnosti, C., Fuchs, B. & Amann, R. Selfish, sharing and scavenging bacteria in the Atlantic Ocean: A biogeographical study of bacterial substrate utilisation. ISME J. 13, 1119–1132. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-018-0326-3 (2019).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Roth Rosenberg, D. et al. Prochlorococcus cells rely on microbial interactions rather than on chlorotic resting stages to survive long-term nutrient starvation. MBio 11, e01846-01820. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.01846-20 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Berg, K. A. et al. High diversity of cultivable heterotrophic bacteria in association with cyanobacterial water blooms. ISME J. 3, 314–325. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2008.110 (2009).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Pootakham, W. et al. High resolution profiling of coral-associated bacterial communities using full-length 16S rRNA sequence data from PacBio SMRT sequencing system. Sci. Rep. 7, 2774. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03139-4 (2017).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Soto, C. Y. et al. IS6110 mediates increased transcription of the phoP virulence gene in a multidrug-resistant clinical isolate responsible for tuberculosis outbreaks. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42, 212–219. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.42.1.212-219.2004 (2004).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Di Cesare, A. et al. Diverse distribution of Toxin-Antitoxin II systems in Salmonella enterica serovars. Sci. Rep. 6, 28759. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28759 (2016).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Das, S., Saha, S. K., De, A., Das, D. & Khuda-Bukhsh, A. R. Potential of the homeopathic remedy, Arnica Montana 30C, to reduce DNA damage in Escherichia coli exposed to ultraviolet irradiation through up-regulation of nucleotide excision repair genes. Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao 10, 337–346. https://doi.org/10.3736/jcim20120314 (2012).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Jallouli, W., Sellami, S., Sellami, M. & Tounsi, S. Efficacy of olive mill wastewater for protecting Bacillus thuringiensis formulation from UV radiations. Acta Trop. 140, 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2014.07.016 (2014).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Huang, L. et al. Effects of UV-B radiation on the expression of four pathogenic genes in the infection stage of Magnaporthe grisea. J. Agro-Environ. Sci. 38, 494–501. https://doi.org/10.11654/jaes.2018-0625 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
He, K., Marden, J. N., Quardokus, E. M. & Bauer, C. E. Phosphate flow between hybrid histidine kinases CheA3 and CheS3 controls Rhodospirillum centenum cyst formation. PLoS Genet. 9, e1004002. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004002 (2013).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Deutscher, J., Francke, C. & Postma, P. W. How phosphotransferase system-related protein phosphorylation regulates carbohydrate metabolism in bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 70, 939–1031. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.00024-06 (2006).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Li, L., Zhao, Y., Zhou, B., Dong, K. S. & Tang, X. X. Effect of UV-B irradiation on the activity and isoforms of antioxidant enzymes in the Brown Alga Sargassum thunbergii(Mert.) O.Kuntze. Period. Ocean Univ. China 39, 1246–1250. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-5174.2009.06.012 (2009).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Li, L., Tang, T., Hai, M., Chen, J. & Zhou, P. Response and molecular mechanisms of plants to enhanced UV-B radiation. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 31, 159–163. https://doi.org/10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2014-1871 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, Y. et al. Dietary corn-resistant starch suppresses broiler abdominal fat deposition associated with the reduced cecal Firmicutes. Poult. Sci. 99, 5827–5837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.07.042 (2020).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pilla, R. et al. Effects of metronidazole on the fecal microbiome and metabolome in healthy dogs. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 34, 1853–1866. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15871 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hong, S. Cloning and identification of a novel CDF family transporter gene cdffT from Planococcus sp. NEAU-ST10–9 Master thesis, Northeast Forestry University (2014).Egan, S., Thomas, T. & Kjelleberg, S. Unlocking the diversity and biotechnological potential of marine surface associated microbial communities. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 11, 219–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2008.04.001 (2008).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wang, J. et al. Sex plays a role in the construction of epiphytic bacterial communities on the algal bodies and receptacles of Sargassum thunbergii. Front. Microbiol. 13, 935222. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.935222 (2022).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wang, J. et al. Diversity of epiphytic bacterial communities on male and female Sargassum thunbergii. AMB Express 12, 97. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-022-01439-1 (2022).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Tang, X. X. et al. Simulated intertidal UV-B radiation enhancement large-sized seaweed culture irradiation system, has salinity detector and temperature detector, culturing tank provided with fluorescent lamp tube and adjustable bracket. China patent CN208047639-U (2018).Lu, P. et al. Gender differences response characteristics of Sargassum thunbergii in reactive oxygen species scavenging system to enhanced UV-B radiation. Period. Ocean Univ. China 52, 52–59. https://doi.org/10.16441/j.cnki.hdxb.20210224 (2022).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Ren, G. et al. Response of soil, leaf endosphere and phyllosphere bacterial communities to elevated CO2 and soil temperature in a rice paddy. Plant Soil 392, 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2503-8 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Mathai, P. et al. Spatial and temporal characterization of epiphytic microbial communities associated with Eurasian Watermilfoil: A highly invasive macrophyte in North America. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 94, 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiy178 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Czekalski, N., Berthold, T., Caucci, S., Egli, A. & Bürgmann, H. Increased levels of multiresistant bacteria and resistance genes after wastewater treatment and their dissemination into lake Geneva, Switzerland. Front. Microbiol. 3, 106–106. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2012.00106 (2012).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bolyen, E. et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 852–857. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0252-6 (2019).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Janssen, S. et al. Phylogenetic placement of exact amplicon sequences improves associations with clinical information. MSystems 3, e00021-e118. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00021-18 (2018).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Li, S. et al. Exploring untapped potential of Streptomyces spp. in Gurbantunggut Desert by use of highly selective culture strategy. Sci. Total Environ. 790, 148235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148235 (2021).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Qin, W. et al. Gut microbiota plasticity influences the adaptability of wild and domestic animals in co-inhabited areas. Front. Microbiol. 11, 125. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00125 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Douglas, G. M., Beiko, R. G. & Langille, M. G. I. Predicting the functional potential of the microbiome from marker genes using PICRUSt. Methods Mol. Biol. 169–177, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8728-311 (1849).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kanehisa, M. et al. KEGG: Ntegrating viruses and cellular organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D545–D551. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa970 (2021).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kanehisa, M. Toward understanding the origin and evolution of cellular organisms. Protein Sci. 28, 1947–1951. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.3715 (2019).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 27–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.1.27 (2000).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Douglas, G. M. et al. PICRUSt2: An improved and extensible approach for metagenome inference. BioRxiv 7, 672295. https://doi.org/10.1101/672295 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Jones, J. B., Arkhipkin, A. I., Marriott, A. L. & Pierce, G. J. Using statolith elemental signatures to confirm ontogenetic migrations of the squid Doryteuthis gahi around the Falkland Islands (Southwest Atlantic). Chemi. Geol. 481, 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2018.01.034 (2018).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wright, P. J., Regnier, T., Gibb, F. M., Augley, J. & Devalla, S. Assessing the role of ontogenetic movement in maintaining population structure in fish using otolith microchemistry. Ecol. Evol. 8, 7907–7920. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4186 (2018).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hobbs, J. A., Lewis, L. S., Willmes, M., Denney, C. & Bush, E. Complex life histories discovered in a critically endangered fish. Sci. Rep. 9, 16772. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52273-8 (2019).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ryan, D., Wogerbauer, C. & Roche, W. K. Otolith microchemistry to investigate nursery site fidelity and connectivity of juvenile European sea bass in Ireland. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. MFCav2 https://doi.org/10.3354/meps14185 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sabetian, A. et al. Fish nearshore habitat-use patterns as ecological indicators of nursery quality. Ecol. Indic. 131, 108225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108225 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nelson, T. R., Hightower, C. L., Coogan, J., Walther, B. D. & Powers, S. P. Patterns and consequences of life history diversity in salinity exposure of an estuarine dependent fish. Environ. Biol. Fish. 104, 419–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-021-01080-0 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Russell, A., Taylor, M. D., Barnes, T. C., Johnson, D. D. & Gillanders, B. M. Habitat transitions by a large coastal sciaenid across life history stages, resolved using otolith chemistry. Mar. Environ. Res. 176, 105614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2022.105614 (2022).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Moore, J. W., Yeakel, J. D., Peard, D., Lough, J. & Beere, M. Life-history diversity and its importance to population stability and persistence of a migratory fish: steelhead in two large North American watersheds. J. Anim. Ecol. 83, 1035–1046. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12212 (2014).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Moore, B. R. & Simpfendorfer, C. A. Assessing connectivity of a tropical estuarine teleost through otolith elemental profiles. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 501, 225–238 (2014).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Pan, X. et al. Population connectivity in a highly migratory fish, Japanese Spanish mackerel (Scomberomorus niphonius), along the Chinese coast, implications from otolith chemistry. Fish. Res. 231, 105690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2020.105690 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Delerue-Ricard, S. et al. Extensive larval dispersal and restricted movement of juveniles on the nursery grounds of sole in the Southern North Sea. J. Sea Res. 155, 101822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2019.101822 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hoey, J. A. et al. Using multiple natural tags provides evidence for extensive larval dispersal across space and through time in summer flounder. Mol. Ecol. 29, 1421–1435. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15414 (2020).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Campana, S. E. Chemistry and composition of fish otoliths: Pathways, mechanisms and applications. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 188, 263–297 (1999).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Thomas, O. R., Ganio, K., Roberts, B. R. & Swearer, S. E. Trace element-protein interactions in endolymph from the inner ear of fish: Implications for environmental reconstructions using fish otolith chemistry. Metallomics 9, 239–249. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6mt00189k (2017).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Doubleday, Z. A., Harris, H. H., Izzo, C. & Gillanders, B. M. Strontium randomly substituting for calcium in fish otolith aragonite. Anal. Chem. 86, 865–869. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac4034278 (2014).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Izzo, C., Doubleday, Z. A. & Gillanders, B. M. Where do elements bind within the otoliths of fish?. Mar. Freshwater Res. 67, 1072–1076. https://doi.org/10.1071/mf15064 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Clarke, L. M., Gillanders, B., Thorrold, S. R. & Conover, D. O. Population differences in otolith chemistry have a genetic basis in Menidia menidia. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 68, 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1139/f10-147 (2011).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Sturrock, A. M. et al. Quantifying physiological influences on otolith microchemistry. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 6(7), 806–816 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hamer, P. et al. Atypical correlation of otolith strontium : calcium and barium : calcium across a marine–freshwater life history transition of a diadromous fish. Mar. Freshwater Res. 66, 411–419. https://doi.org/10.1071/mf14001 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Izzo, C., Reis-Santos, P. & Gillanders, B. M. Otolith chemistry does not just reflect environmental conditions: A meta-analytic evaluation. Fish Fish. 19, 441–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12264 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Motomura, H. Threadfins of the World (family Polynemidae). An Annotated and Illustrated Catalogue of Polynemid Species Known to Date 117 (FAO, 2004).
Google Scholar 
Huang, C. T. et al. Bioeconomic evaluation of Eleutheronema tetradactylum farming: A case study in Taiwan. Fish. Sci. 88, 437–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12562-022-01591-4 (2022).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Shihab, I. et al. Histological profiling of gonads depicting protandrous hermaphroditism in Eleutheronema tetradactylum. J. Fish. Biol. 90, 2402–2411. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13324 (2017).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Presti, P., Johnson, G. D. & Datovo, A. Anatomy and evolution of the pectoral filaments of threadfins (Polynemidae). Sci. Rep. 10, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74896-y (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Alshari, N. F. M. A. H. et al. Metabarcoding of fish larvae in the merbok river reveals species diversity and distribution along its mangrove environment. Zool. Stud. 60, e76. https://doi.org/10.6620/ZS.2021.60-76 (2021).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Tobin, A. J., Mapleston, A., Harry, A. V. & Espinoza, M. Big fish in shallow water; use of an intertidal surf-zone habitat by large-bodied teleosts and elasmobranchs in tropical northern Australia. Environ. Biol. Fish. 97, 821–838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-013-0182-y (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Adkins, M. E., Simpfendorfer, C. A. & Tobin, A. J. Large tropical fishes and their use of the nearshore littoral, intertidal and subtidal habitat mosaic. Mar. Freshwater Res. 67, 1534–1545. https://doi.org/10.1071/mf14339 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Xuan, Z. et al. Otolith microchemistry reveals different environmental histories for two endangered fourfinger threadfin species. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 700, 161–178 (2022).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Condini, M. V. et al. Prolonged estuarine habitat use by dusky grouper Epinephelus marginatus at subtropical latitudes revealed by otolith microchemistry. Endanger. Species Res. 29, 271–277 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Teichert, N. et al. A multi-approach study to reveal eel life-history traits in an obstructed catchment before dam removal. Hydrobiologia 849, 1885–1903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-022-04833-9 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, J., Sun, P. & Yin, F. Low mtDNA Cytb diversity and shallow population structure of Eleutheronema tetradactylum in the East China Sea and the South China Sea. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 55, 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2014.03.026 (2014).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Du, J. et al. Connectivity of fish assemblages along the mangrove-seagrass-coral reef continuum in Wenchang, China. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 39, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-019-1490-7 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pember, M. B., Newman, S.J., Hesp, S.A., Young, G.C., Skepper, C.L., Hall, N.G. & Potter, I.C. Biological parameters for managing the fisheries for Blue and King Threadfin Salmons, Estuary Rockcod, Malabar Grouper and Mangrove Jack in north-western Australia. Fisheries Research and Development Corporation. (2005).Zheng, Q., Fang, G. & Song, Y. T. Introduction to special section: Dynamics and Circulation of the Yellow, East, and South China Seas. J. Geophys. Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jc003261 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, P. et al. Spatiotemporal variation, speciation, and transport flux of TDP in Leizhou Peninsula coastal waters, South China Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 167, 112284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112284 (2021).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Stewart, J., Hughes, J. M., Stanley, C. & Fowler, A. M. The influence of rainfall on recruitment success and commercial catch for the large sciaenid, Argyrosomus japonicus, in eastern Australia. Mar. Environ. Res. 157, 104924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2020.104924 (2020).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Alber, M. A conceptual model of estuarine freshwater inflow management. Estuaries 25, 1246–1261. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02692222 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Possamai, B. et al. Freshwater inflow variability affects the relative importance of allochthonous sources for estuarine fishes. Estuar. Coast. 43, 880–893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-019-00693-0 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Halliday, I. A., Robins, J. B., Mayer, D. G., Staunton-Smith, J. & Sellin, M. J. Effects of freshwater flow on the year-class strength of a non-diadromous estuarine finfish, king threadfin (Polydactylus macrochir), in a dry-tropical estuary. Mar. Freshwater Res. 59, 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF07077 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Muñoz Sabater, J. ERA5-Land monthly averaged data from 1981 to present. Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS). doi:https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.68d2bb30 (2023).Xiao, J. et al. Molecular phylogenetic and morphometric analysis of population structure and demography of endangered threadfin fish Eleutheronema from Indo-Pacific waters. Sci. Rep. 12, 3455. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-07342-w (2022).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Mischel, S. A., Mertz-Kraus, R., Jochum, K. P. & Scholz, D. TERMITE: An R script for fast reduction of laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry data and its application to trace element measurements. Rapid Commun. Mass Sp. 31, 1079–1087. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.7895 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Butcher, D. J. Recent advances in the determination of calcium and its use as an internal standard in environmental samples: Fundamentals and applications. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 55, 60–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/05704928.2019.1570520 (2020).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Vignon, M. Extracting environmental histories from sclerochronological structures—Recursive partitioning as a mean to explore multi-elemental composition of fish otolith. Ecol. Inform. 30, 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2015.10.002 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vivancos, A. et al. Hydrological connectivity drives longitudinal movement of endangered endemic Chilean darter Percilia irwini (Eigenmann, 1927). J. Fish. Biol. 98, 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.14554 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (2013).Hegg, J. C. & Kennedy, B. P. Let’s do the time warp again: non-linear time series matching as a tool for sequentially structured data in ecology. Ecosphere 12, e03742. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3742 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhong, L., Wang, M., Li, D., Tang, S. & Chen, X. Mitochondrial genome of Eleutheronema rhadinum with an additional non-coding region and novel insights into the phylogenetics. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 746598 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Leis, J. M., Piola, R. F., Hay, A. C., Wen, C. & Kan, K.-P. Ontogeny of behaviour relevant to dispersal and connectivity in the larvae of two non-reef demersal, tropical fish species. Mar. Freshwater Res. 60, 211–223 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nelson, T. R., DeVries, D. R. & Wright, R. A. Salinity and temperature effects on element incorporation of gulf killifish Fundulus grandis otoliths. Estuar. Coast. 41, 1164–1177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-017-0341-z (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Nelson, T. R. & Powers, S. P. Elemental concentrations of water and otoliths as salinity proxies in a Northern Gulf of Mexico estuary. Estuar. Coast. 43, 843–864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-019-00686-z (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Breine, J. J., Lambeens, I., Maes, Y., De Bruyn, A. & Galle, L. First record of the fourfinger threadfin, Eleutheronema tetradactylum (Shaw, 1804) in Belgium. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 187, 28–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2016.12.025 (2017).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Pan, X. et al. Combining otolith elemental signatures with multivariate analytical models to verify the migratory pattern of Japanese Spanish mackerel (Scomberomorus niphonius) in the southern Yellow Sea. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 39, 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-020-1606-0 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Miller, J. A. Effects of water temperature and barium concentration on otolith composition along a salinity gradient: Implications for migratory reconstructions. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 405, 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2011.05.017 (2011).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Yokouchi, K. et al. Time lag of the response on the otolith strontium/calcium ratios of the Japanese eel, Anguilla japonica to changes in strontium/calcium ratios of ambient water. Environ. Biol. Fish. 92, 469–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-011-9864-5 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wheeler, S. G., Russell, A. D., Fehrenbacher, J. S. & Morgan, S. G. Evaluating chemical signatures in a coastal upwelling region to reconstruct water mass associations of settlement-stage rockfishes. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 550, 191–206. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11704 (2016).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lin, P., Hu, J., Zheng, Q., Sun, Z. & Zhu, J. Observation of summertime upwelling off the eastern and northeastern coasts of Hainan Island, China. Ocean Dyn. 66, 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-016-0934-2 (2016).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Liu, W. et al. Dissolved barium as a tracer of Kuroshio incursion in the Kuroshio region east of Taiwan Island and the adjacent East China Sea. Sci. China Earth Sci. 60, 1356–1367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-016-9039-7 (2017).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Able, K. W. A re-examination of fish estuarine dependence: Evidence for connectivity between estuarine and ocean habitats. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 64, 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2005.02.002 (2005).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Whitfield, A. K. Littoral habitats as major nursery areas for fish species in estuaries: A reinforcement of the reduced predation paradigm. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 649, 219–234. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps13459 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Acha, E. M., Simionato, C. G., Carozza, C. & Mianzan, H. Climate-induced year-class fluctuations of whitemouth croaker Micropogonias furnieri (Pisces, Sciaenidae) in the Río de la Plata estuary, Argentina-Uruguay. Fish. Oceanogr. 21, 58–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2419.2011.00609.x (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schilling, H. T. et al. Evaluating estuarine nursery use and life history patterns of Pomatomus saltatrix in eastern Australia. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 598, 187–199. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12495 (2018).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Menezes, R. et al. Habitat use plasticity by the dog snapper (Lutjanus jocu) across the Abrolhos Bank shelf, eastern Brazil, inferred from otolith chemistry. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 263, 107637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2021.107637 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Santos, R. O. et al. Linking bonefish (Albula vulpes) populations to nearshore estuarine habitats using an otolith microchemistry approach. Environ. Biol. Fish. 102, 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-018-0839-7 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pinceel, T. et al. An empirical confirmation of diversified bet hedging as a survival strategy in unpredictably varying environments. Ecology 102, e03496. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3496 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wang, V. H., White, J. W., Arnott, S. A. & Scharf, F. S. Population connectivity of southern flounder in the US South Atlantic revealed by otolith chemical analysis. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 596, 165–179 (2018).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Gillson, J., Scandol, J. & Suthers, I. Estuarine gillnet fishery catch rates decline during drought in eastern Australia. Fish. Res. 99, 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2009.04.007 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pritt, J. J., Roseman, E. F. & O’Brien, T. P. Mechanisms driving recruitment variability in fish: Comparisons between the Laurentian Great Lakes and marine systems. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 71, 2252–2267. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsu080 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mai, A. C. G. et al. High plasticity in habitat use of Lycengraulis grossidens (Clupeiformes, Engraulididae). Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 141, 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2014.01.014 (2014).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Horne, J. B., Momigliano, P., Welch, D. J., Newman, S. J. & Van Herwerden, L. Limited ecological population connectivity suggests low demands on self-recruitment in a tropical inshore marine fish (Eleutheronema tetradactylum: Polynemidae). Mol. Ecol. 20, 2291–2306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05097.x (2011).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Newman, S. J. et al. Stock structure of blue threadfin Eleutheronema tetradactylum across northern Australia as inferred from stable isotopes in sagittal otolith carbonate. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 18, 246–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2400.2010.00780.x (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ballagh, A. C., Welch, D. J., Newman, S. J., Allsop, Q. & Stapley, J. M. Stock structure of the blue threadfin (Eleutheronema tetradactylum) across northern Australia derived from life-history characteristics. Fish. Res. 121–122, 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2012.01.011 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Moore, B. R. et al. Stock structure of blue threadfin Eleutheronema tetradactylum across northern Australia, as indicated by parasites. J. Fish. Biol. 78, 923–936. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2011.02917.x (2011).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
McGuigan, C. J., Schlenker, L. S., Stieglitz, J. D., Benetti, D. D. & Grosell, M. Quantifying the effects of pop-up satellite archival tags on the swimming performance and behavior of young-adult mahi-mahi (Coryphaena hippurus). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 78, 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2020-0030 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Macdonald, J. I., Drysdale, R. N., Witt, R., Cságoly, Z. & Marteinsdóttir, G. Isolating the influence of ontogeny helps predict island-wide variability in fish otolith chemistry. Rev. Fish Biol. Fisheries 30, 173–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-019-09591-x (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Grammer, G. L. et al. Coupling biogeochemical tracers with fish growth reveals physiological and environmental controls on otolith chemistry. Ecol. Monogr. 87, 487–507. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1264 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Kruuk, H. Feeding and social behaviour of the striped hyaena (Hyaena vulgaris). East Afr. Wildl. J. 14, 91–111 (1976).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wanger A.P. Behavioral ecology of the striped hyena (Hyaena hyaena) . Diss. Montana State University-Bozeman, College of Letters & Science (2006).AbiSaid, M. & Dloniak, S.M.D. Hyaena hyaena. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015: e.T10274A45195080 (2015).Abi-Said, M. R. & Abi-Said, D. M. Distribution of the striped hyena (Hyaena hyaena syriaca Matius, 1882) (Carnivora: Hyaenidae) in urban and rural areas of Lebanon. Zool. Middle East 42, 3–1 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Al Younis, J. S. Hyaenas in Eastern Jordan. IUCN Hyaena Spec. Group Newsl. 6, 2–3 (1993).
Google Scholar 
Qarqaz, M. A., Abu Baker, M. A. & Amr, Z. S. Status and ecology of the Striped Hyena, Hyaena hyaena, in Jordan. Zool. Middle East 33, 87–92 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bhandari, S., Youlatos, D., Thapamagar, T. & Bhusal, D. R. Shrinking striped hyena (Hyaena hyaena Linnaeus, 1758) distribution in Nepal. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 67, 1–4 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mendelssohn, H. Mass destruction of bird-life by secondary poisoning from insecticides and rodenticides. Atlantic Nat. 17, 247–248 (1962).
Google Scholar 
Mendelssohn, H. The impact of pesticides on bird life in Israel. Bull. Int. Council Bird Preserv. 11, 75–104 (1972).
Google Scholar 
Hadad, E., Kosicki, J. Z. & Yosef R. Spatial modeling of road collisions of striped hyena (Hyaena hyaena) in Israel. Ecol. Res.Ilani, G. Hyaenas in Israel. Israel Land Nat. 10–18 (1975).Tristram, H. B. The land of Israel: A journal of travels in palestine. Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, London. 657 pp (1866).Schmitz, E. J. Wird Palästina wieder jüdisch werden?. Das Heilige Land 54, 92–95 (1910).
Google Scholar 
Schmitz, E. J. Kampf mit einem Leoparden. Das Heilige Land 56, 23–27 (1912).
Google Scholar 
Hadad, E. The persecution of the striped hyaena by humans. Teva HaDvarim 258, 68–78 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Hadad, E. 2021. Israel a heaven and a haven for striped hyaenas. Teva HaDvarim 310, 52–63 (2021).Ilani, G. Zoogeographic survey of carnivores in Israel (Golan, Judea and Samaria, Sinai). Pp. 84—94 Unpublished Internal report, Israel Nature Reserves Authority (1979).Skinner, J. D. & Ilani, G. The striped hyaena Hyaena hyaena of the Judean and Negev Deserts and a comparison with the brown hyaena H. brunnea. Israel J. Zool. 28, 229–232 (2013).
Google Scholar 
van Aarde, R. J., Skinner, J. D., Knight, M. H. & Skinner, D. C. Range use by a striped hyaena (Hyaena hyaena) in the Negev desert. J. Zool. 216, 575–577 (1988).
Google Scholar 
Dolev, A. & Pervolutzky, A. Endangered species in Israel. Red list of threatened species. Pp. 257 Hyaena hyaena (Linnaeus 1758). Nature & Parks Authority and SPNI, Keter Publishers, Jerusalem (2002).Hadad, E. Striped hyaenas in Israel. Teva HaDvarim 232, 3–14 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Albada, I. M. Primary survey of the striped hyena, Hyaena hyaena, (Linnaeus, 1758) (Carnivora:Hyaenidae) status in the West Bank Governorates, Palestine. Glob. Scholast. Res. J. Mulitidiscip. 1, 39–44 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Handal, E. N., Qumsiehm, G. H., Hammash, S. Y. & Qumsiyeh, M. B. Status and conservation of the striped hyena (Hyaena hyaena) in the occupied Palestinian Territories (West Bank). Jordan J. Nat. History 6, 11–18 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Knape, J. Decomposing trends in Swedish bird populations using generalized additive mixed models. J. Appl. Ecol. 53, 1852–1861 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wood, S. N. Generalized additive models: An introduction with R 2nd edn. (Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2017).Book 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Mills L.S. Conservation of wildlife populations. Demography, genetics, and management. Second Edition. Wiley–Blackwell, Oxford (2013).Rieger, I. Hyaena hyaena. Mammalian Species 150, 1–5. The American Society of Mammalogists (1981).Hofer, H. & Mills, M.G.L. Worldwide distribution of Hyaenas. In: M.G.L. Mills and H. Hofer (eds), Hyaenas. Status survey and conservation action plan, pp. 39–63. IUCN/SSC Hyaena Specialist Group. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK (1998a).Hofer, H. & Mills, M.G.L. Population size, threats and conservation status of hyaenas. In: M.G.L. Mills and H. Hofer (eds) Hyaenas. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan, pp. 64–79. IUCN/SSC Hyaena Specialist Group. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK (1998b).Bar-Ziv, E., Picardi, S., Kaplan, A., Avgar, T. & Berger-Tal, O. Sex differences dictate the movement patterns of Striped Hyenas, Hyaena hyaena, in a human-dominated landscape. Front. Ecol. Evol. 10, 897132 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shamon, H., Sorek, M., Dan, H. & Shapira, I. A large carnivore in a rapidly changing environment: occurrence and density of the striped hyaena hyaena hyaena in Israel. The 54th Israel Zoological Society Conference, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv (2017).Shamoon, H. & Shapira, I. Limiting factors of Striped Hyaena, Hyaena hyaena, distribution and densities across climatic and geographical gradients (Mammalia: Carnivora). Zool. Middle East 65, 189–200 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yom-Tov, Y. Body sizes of carnivores commensal with humans increased over past 50 years. Funct. Ecol. 17, 323–327 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Monchot, H. & Mashkour, M. Hyenas around the city (Kashan, Iran). J. Taphon. 8, 17–32 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Panda, D. et al. High striped hyena density suggests coexistence with humans in an agricultural landscape Rajasthan. PLoS ONE 17, e0266832 (2022).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Mendelssohn, H. & Yom-Tov, Y. A report of birds and mammals which have increased their distribution and abundance in Israel due to human activity. Isr. J. Zool. 45, 35–47 (1998).
Google Scholar 
Meretsky, V. J. & Mannan, R. W. Supplemental feeding regimes for Egyptian vultures in the Negev Desert Israel. J. Wildl. Manag. 63, 107–115 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mallon, D. & Budd, K. (eds). Regional red list status of carnivores in the Arabian Peninsula. Cambridge, UK and Gland Switzerland: IUCN, and Sharjah, UAE: Environment and Protected Areas Authority vi+49pp (2011).Jaffa, N. A. B. K-P. S. The Arabian striped Hyena (Hyaena hyaena sultana Pocock, 1934) (Carnivora: Hyaenidae) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Gazelle Palestin. Biol. Bull. 185, 1–39 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Cogal, M., Ilemin, Y. & Sozen, M. Status and distribution of the Striped Hyaena, Hyaena hyaena, in Turkey: An updated assessment (Carnivora: Mammalia). Turk. J. Zool. 45, 131–141 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Almasieh, K., Mohammadi, A. & Alvandi, R. Identifying core habitats and corridors of a near threatened carnivore, striped hyaena (Hyaena hyaena) in southwestern Iran. Sci. Rep. 12, 3425 (2022).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Tourani, M., Moqanaki, E. M. & Kiabi, B. H. Vulnerability of striped hyaenas, Hyaena hyaena, in a human-dominated landscape of Central Iran. Zool. Middle East 56, 133–136 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bhandari, S. et al. Climate change threatens striped hyena (Hyaena hyaena) distribution in Nepal. Mammal Res. 67, 433–443 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tichon, J., Gilchrist, J. S., Rotem, R., Ward, P. & Spiegel, O. Social interactions in striped hyena inferred from camera trap data: Is it more social than previously thought?. Curr. Zool. 66, 345–353 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Dean, W. R. J., Seymour, C. L., Joseph, G. S. & Foord, S. H. A review of the impacts of roads on wildlife in semi-arid regions. Diversity 11, 81 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Landau, Y., Abu-Rabiya, A., Avlegon, A. & Abu-Siam, S. Seasonl grazing of livestock by Beduin in KKL forests: Developments from 2009 to 2014. Forests 15, 30–39 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Jacobson, A. P. et al. Leopard (Panthera pardus) status, distribution, and the research efforts across its range. PeerJ 4, e1974 (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lazagabaster, I. A. et al. Changes in the large carnivore community structure of the Judean Desert in connection to Holocene human settlement dynamics. Sci. Rep. 11, 3548 (2021).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lazagabaster, I. A. et al. Cave paleozoology in the Judean Desert: assembling records of Holocene mammal communities. J. Quarten. Sci. 37, 651–663 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Davidson, A., Malkinson, D. & Shanas, U. Wild boar foraging and risk perception—variation among urban, natural, and agricultural areas. J. Mammal. 20, 1–11 (2022).
Google Scholar 
Panda, D. et al. Competitive interactions with dominant carnivores affect carrion acquisition of striped hyena in a semi-arid landscape of Rajasthan India. Mammal Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-022-00663-1 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mandal, D., Basak, K., Mishra, R. P., Kaul, R. & Mondal, K. Staus of leopard Panthera pardus and striped hyena Hyaena hyaena and their prey in Achanakmar Tiger Reserve, Central Inida. J. Zool. Stud. 4, 34–41 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Alam, M. S., Khan, J. A. & Pathak, B. J. Striped hyena (Hyaena hyaena) status and factors affecting its distribution in the Gir National Park and Sanctuary India. Folia Zool. 64, 32–39 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Singh, P., Gopalaswamy, A. M. & Karanth, K. U. Factors influencing densities of striped hyenas (Hyaena hyaena) in arid regions of India. J. Mammol. 91, 1152–1159 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Handal, E. N., Amr, Z. S., Basha, W. S. & Qumsiyeh, M. B. Illegal trade in wildlife vertebrate species in the West Bank Palestine. J. Asia-Pac. Biodivers. 14, 636–639 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kumbhojkar, S., Yosef, R., Benedetti, Y. & Morelli, F. Human-leopard (Panthera pardus fusca) co-existence in Jhalana Forest Reserve India. Sustainability 11, 3912 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bhandari, S., Bhusal, D. R., Psaralexi, M. & Sgardelis, S. Habitat preference indicators for striped hyena (Hyaena hyaena) in Nepal. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 27, e01619 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar  More