Ecology

Andrade, G. S. & Rhodes, J. R. Protected areas and local communities: an inevitable partnership toward successful conservation strategies? Ecol. Soc. 17, 14–23 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
UNHCR. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. The Sustainable Development Goals and Addressing Statelessness (2017). https://www.refworld.org/docid/58b6e3364.html [accessed 16 April 2021]Ngorima, A., Brown, A., Masunungure, C. & Biggs, D. Local community benefits from elephants: Can willingness to support anti-poaching efforts be strengthened? Conserv. Sci. Pract. 2, e303 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Ripple, W. J. et al. Status and ecological effects of the world’s largest carnivores. Science 343, 1241484 (2014).O’Bryan, C. J. et al. The contribution of predators and scavengers to human well-being. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 229–236 (2018).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Levi, T. et al. Community ecology and conservation of bear-salmon ecosystems. Front. Ecol. Evol. 8, 433 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Raynor, J. L., Grainger, C. A. & Parker, D. P. Wolves make roadways safer, generating large economic returns to predator conservation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2023251118 (2021).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Tortato, F. R., Izzo, T. J., Hoogesteijn, R. & Peres, C. A. The numbers of the beast: Valuation of jaguar (Panthera onca) tourism and cattle depredation in the Brazilian Pantanal. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 11, 106–114 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jacobsen, K. S. et al. What is a lion worth to local people—quantifying of the costs of living alongside a top predator. Ecol. Econ. 198, 107431 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Thirgood, S., Woodroffe, R. & Rabinowitz, A. The impact of human-wildlife conflict on human lives and livelihoods. Conserv. Biol. Ser. 9, 13 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Mackenzie, C. A. & Ahabyona, P. Elephants in the garden: financial and social costs of crop raiding. Ecol. Econ. 75, 72–82 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Anaya, F. C. & Espírito-Santo, M. M. Protected areas and territorial exclusion of traditional communities. Ecol. Soc. 23 (2018).Nsukwini, S. & Bob, U. Protected areas, community costs and benefits: a comparative study of selected conservation case studies from northern KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. GeoJ. Tour. Geosites 27, 1377–1391 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Heydinger, J. M., Packer, C. & Tsaneb, J. Desert-adapted lions on communal land: surveying the costs incurred by, and perspectives of, communal-area livestock owners in northwest Namibia. Biol. Conserv. 236, 496–504 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dickman, A. J., Macdonald, E. A. & Macdonald, D. W. A review of financial instruments to pay for predator conservation and encourage human–carnivore coexistence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 13937–13944 (2011).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wang, S. W. & Macdonald, D. W. Livestock predation by carnivores in Jigme Singye Wangchuck National Park, Bhutan. Biol. Conserv. 129, 558–565 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Holmern, T., Nyahongo, J. & Røskaft, E. Livestock loss caused by predators outside the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania. Biol. Conserv. 135, 518–526 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Thornton, P. K. et al. Locating poor livestock keepers at the global level for research and development targeting. Land Use Policy 20, 311–322 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
McDermott, J. J., Staal, S. J., Freeman, H. A., Herrero, M. & Van de Steeg, J. A. Sustaining intensification of smallholder livestock systems in the tropics. Livest. Sci. 130, 95–109 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dyson-Hudson, N. & Dyson-Hudson, R. The structure of East African herds and the future of East African herders. Dev. Change 13, 213–238 (1982).Article 

Google Scholar 
Herrero, M. et al. Greenhouse gas mitigation potentials in the livestock sector. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 452–461 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kgathi, D. L., Ngwenya, B. N. & Wilk, J. Shocks and rural livelihoods in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. Dev. South. Afr. 24, 289–308 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Letta, M., Montalbano, P. & Tol, R. S. Temperature shocks, short-term growth and poverty thresholds: evidence from rural Tanzania. World Dev. 112, 13–32 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cottrell, R. S. et al. Food production shocks across land and sea. Nat. Sustain. 2, 130–137 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, J. et al. Role of Tibetan Buddhist monasteries in snow leopard conservation. Conserv. Biol. 28, 87–94 (2014).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bhatia, S., Redpath, S. M., Suryawanshi, K. & Mishra, C. The relationship between religion and attitudes toward large carnivores in northern India? Hum. Dimens. Wildl. 22, 30–42 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gebresenbet, F., Baraki, B., Yirga, G., Sillero-Zubiri, C. & Bauer, H. A culture of tolerance: coexisting with large carnivores in the Kafa Highlands, Ethiopia. Oryx 52, 751–760 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cardillo, M. et al. Human population density and extinction risk in the world’s carnivores. PLoS Biol. 2, e197 (2004).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hazzah, L., Mulder, M. B. & Frank, L. Lions and warriors: social factors underlying declining African lion populations and the effect of incentive-based management in Kenya. Biol. Conserv. 142, 2428–2437 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Plaza, P. I., Martínez-López, E. & Lambertucci, S. A. The perfect threat: pesticides and vultures. Sci. Total Environ. 687, 1207–1218 (2019).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Mateo-Tomás, P. & López-Bao, J. V. Poisoning poached megafauna can boost trade in African vultures. Biol. Conserv. 241, 108389 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tumenta, P. N. et al. Threat of rapid extermination of the lion (Panthera leo leo) in Waza National Park, Northern Cameroon. Afr. J. Ecol. 48, 888–894 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Braczkowski, A. et al. Detecting early warnings of pressure on an African lion (Panthera leo) population in the Queen Elizabeth Conservation Area, Uganda. Ecol. Solut. Evid. 1, e12015 (2020b).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ickes, K. Hyper-abundance of Native Wild Pigs (Sus scrofa) in a Lowland Dipterocarp Rain Forest of Peninsular Malaysia 1. Biotropica 33, 682–690 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ripple, W. J. et al. Widespread mesopredator effects after wolf extirpation. Biol. Conserv. 160, 70–79 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ripple, W. J. & Beschta, R. L. Linking a cougar decline, trophic cascade, and catastrophic regime shift in Zion National Park. Biol. Conserv. 133, 397–408 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ripple, W. J. & Beschta, R. L. Trophic cascades involving cougar, mule deer, and black oaks in Yosemite National Park. Biol. Conserv. 141, 1249–1256 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gilbert, S. L. et al. Socioeconomic benefits of large carnivore recolonization through reduced wildlife-vehicle collisions. Conserv. Lett. 10, 431–439 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
ILRI. Rangelands Atlas. (ILRI, IUCN, FAO, WWF, UNEP and ILC, 2021). Nairobi Kenya: ILRI.Williams, D. R. et al. Proactive conservation to prevent habitat losses to agricultural expansion. Nat. Sustain. 4, 314–322 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
McManus, J. S. et al. Dead or alive? Comparing costs and benefits of lethal and non-lethal human-wildlife conflict mitigation on livestock farms. Oryx 49, 687–695 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Broekhuis, F. et al. Identification of human-carnivore conflict hotspots to prioritize mitigation efforts. Ecol. Evol. 7, 10630–10639 (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lozano, J. et al. Human-carnivore relations: a systematic review. Biol. Conserv. 237, 480–492 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Khorozyan, I. & Waltert, M. A global view on evidence-based effectiveness of interventions used to protect livestock from wild cats. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 3, e317 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Di Minin, E., Slotow, R., Fink, C., Bauer, H. & Packer, C. A pan-African spatial assessment of human conflicts with lions and elephants. Nat. Commun. 12, 1–10 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lybbert, T. J. et al. Stochastic wealth dynamics and risk management among a poor population. Econ. J. 114, 750–777 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Otte, M. J. & Chilonda, P. Cattle and Small Ruminant Production Systems in Sub-Saharan. Africa – Systematic Rev. (FAO, Rome, Italy, 2002).
Google Scholar 
Maystadt, J. F. & Ecker, O. Extreme weather and civil war: Does drought fuel conflict in Somalia through livestock price shocks? Am. J. Agric. Econ. 96, 1157–1182 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Galvin, K. A. Transitions: pastoralists living with change. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 38, 185–198 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stavi, I. et al. Food security among dryland pastoralists and agropastoralists: The climate, land-use change, and population dynamics nexus. Anthropocene Rev. (2021). 20530196211007512.Ogra, M. V. Human–wildlife conflict and gender in protected area borderlands: a case study of costs, perceptions, and vulnerabilities from Uttarakhand (Uttaranchal), India. Geoforum 39, 1408–1422 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Botreau, H., & Cohen, M. J. Gender Inequalities and Food Insecurity: Ten Years After The Food Price Crisis, Why Are Women Farmers Still Food-Insecure? Oxfam:Oxford, UK (2019).Salerno, J. et al. Wildlife impacts and changing climate pose compounding threats to human food security. Curr. Biol. 31, 5077–5085 (2021).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Prado, E. L. & Dewey, K. G. Nutrition and brain development in early life. Nutr. Rev. 72, 267–284 (2014).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Madhusudan, M. D. The global village: linkages between international coffee markets and grazing by livestock in a south Indian wildlife reserve. Conserv. Biol. 19, 411–420 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Margulies, J. D. & Karanth, K. K. The production of human-wildlife conflict: A political animal geography of encounter. Geoforum 95, 153–164 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Simoons, F. J., Simoons, F. I. & Lodrick, D. O. Background to understanding the cattle situation of India: The sacred cow concept in Hindu religion and folk culture. Zeitschrift Für Ethnologie 106, 121–137 (1981).Good, C., Burnham, D. & Macdonald, D. W. A cultural conscience for conservation. Animals 7, 52 (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Courchamp, F. et al. The paradoxical extinction of the most charismatic animals. PLoS Biol. 16, e2003997 (2018).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bond, J. & Mkutu, K. Exploring the hidden costs of human–wildlife conflict in northern Kenya. Afr. Stud. Rev. 61, 33–54 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Di Minin, E., Leader-Williams, N. & Bradshaw, C. J. Banning trophy hunting will exacerbate biodiversity loss. Trends Ecol. Evol. 31, 99–102 (2016).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Dickman, A. et al. Trophy hunting bans imperil biodiversity. Science 365, 874–874 (2019).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bruskotter, J. T., Vucetich, J. A., Gilbert, S. L., Carter, N. H. & George, K. A. Tragic trade‐offs accompany carnivore coexistence in the modern world. Conserv. Lett. 15, e412841 (2022).Dempsey, J. et al. Biodiversity targets will not be met without debt and tax justice. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6, 237–239 (2022).Hallegatte, S. & Rozenberg, J. Climate change through a poverty lens. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 250–256 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Islam, S. N., and Winkel, J. Climate change and social inequality. DESA Working Paper No. 152. New York, NY: United Nations Department of Economic & Social Affairs (2017).Platteau, J. P. Monitoring elite capture in community-driven development. Dev. Change 35, 223–246 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Karanth, K. K. & DeFries, R. Nature-based tourism in Indian protected areas: new challenges for park management. Conserv. Lett. 4, 137–149 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ament, J. M., Collen, B., Carbone, C., Mace, G. M. & Freeman, R. Compatibility between agendas for improving human development and wildlife conservation outside protected areas: insights from 20 years of data. People Nat. 1, 305–316 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Geldmann, J., Manica, A., Burgess, N. D., Coad, L. & Balmford, A. A global-level assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas at resisting anthropogenic pressures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 23209–23215 (2019).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Naidoo, R. et al. Evaluating the impacts of protected areas on human well-being across the developing world. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav3006 (2019).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lichtenfeld, L. L., Trout, C. & Kisimir, E. L. Evidence-based conservation: predator-proof bomas protect livestock and lions. Biodivers. Conserv. 24, 483–491 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Persson, J., Rauset, G. R. & Chapron, G. Paying for an endangered predator leads to population recovery. Conserv. Lett. 8, 345–350 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Barichievy, C. et al. A demographic model to support an impact financing mechanism for black rhino metapopulations. Biol. Conserv. 257, 109073 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Maingi, S. W. Safari tourism and its role in sustainable poverty eradication in East Africa: the case of Kenya. Worldwide Hosp. Tour. Themes 13, 81–94 (2021).Homewood, K. M., Trench, P. C. & Brockington, D. Pastoralist livelihoods and wildlife revenues in East Africa: a case for coexistence? Pastoralism: Res. Pol. Pract. 2, 1–23 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Thornton, P., Nelson, G., Mayberry, D. & Herrero, M. Impacts of heat stress on global cattle production during the 21st century: a modelling study. Lancet Planet. Health 6, e192–e201 (2022).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lessmann, C. & Seidel, A. Regional inequality, convergence, and its determinants–a view from outer space. Eur. Econ. Rev. 92, 110–132 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brooks, T. M. et al. Measuring terrestrial area of habitat (AOH) and its utility for the IUCN Red List. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 977–986 (2019).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Miller, J. R. Mapping attack hotspots to mitigate human–carnivore conflict: approaches and applications of spatial predation risk modeling. Biodivers. Conserv. 24, 2887–2911 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gastineau, A., Robert, A., Sarrazin, F., Mihoub, J. B. & Quenette, P. Y. Spatiotemporal depredation hotspots of brown bears, Ursus arctos, on livestock in the Pyrenees, France. Biol. Conserv. 238, 108210 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kruuk, H. Surplus killing by carnivores. J. Zool. 166, 233–244 (1972).Article 

Google Scholar 
Khorozyan, I. et al. Effects of shepherds and dogs on livestock depredation by leopards (Panthera pardus) in north-eastern Iran. PeerJ 5, e3049 (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lucherini, M., Guerisoli, M. D. L. M. & Luengos Vidal, E. M. Surplus killing by pumas Puma concolor: rumours and facts. Mammal. Rev. 48, 277–283 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ocaido, M., Muwazi, R. T. & Opuda-Asibo, J. Financial analysis of livestock production systems around Lake Mburo National Park, in South Western Uganda. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 21, 70 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Dyson-Hudson, R. & Dyson-Hudson, N. Nomadic pastoralism. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 9, 15–61 (1980).Barber, J. P. The Karamoja District of Uganda: a pastoral people under colonial rule. J. Afr. Hist. 3, 111–124 (1962).Article 

Google Scholar 
Oberg, K. Analysis of the Bahima marriage ceremony. Africa 19, 107–120 (1949).Article 

Google Scholar 
Purseglove, J. W. Banyankole Agriculture. East Afr. Agric. J. 5, 198–207 (1939).
Google Scholar 
Canonici, N. N. Food in Zulu folktales. South. Afr. J. Folk. Stud. 2, 24–36 (1991).
Google Scholar 
United Nations. World Population Prospects 2022: Summary of Results. UN DESA/POP/2022/TR/NO. 3 (2022).Tomas, W. M. et al. Sustainability agenda for the Pantanal Wetland: perspectives on a collaborative interface for science, policy, and decision-making. Trop. Conserv. Sci. 12, 1940082919872634 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vale, P. et al. Mapping the cattle industry in Brazil’s most dynamic cattle-ranching state: Slaughterhouses in Mato Grosso, 1967-2016. PLOS One 14, e0215286 (2019).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
De Leeuw, P. N., Bekure, S., & Grandin, B. E. Aspects of livestock productivity in Maasai group ranches in Kenya. ILCA Bull. (1984).Barua, M., Bhagwat, S. A. & Jadhav, S. The hidden dimensions of human–wildlife conflict: health impacts, opportunity and transaction costs. Biol. Conserv. 157, 309–316 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Choudhury, A. Human–elephant conflicts in Northeast India. Hum. Dimens. Wildl. 9, 261–270 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sherman, P. B., & Dixon, J. A. Economics of protected areas: a new look at benefits and costs. Earthscan Publications Limited (1990).Braczkowski, A. et al. Evidence for increasing human‐wildlife conflict despite a financial compensation scheme on the edge of a Ugandan National Park. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 2, e309 (2020c).
Google Scholar 
Gulati, S., Karanth, K., Nguyet Anh Le, N. & Noack, F. Human casualties are the dominant cost of human–wildlife conflict in India. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 118, e1921338118 (2021).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Rondinini, C. et al. Global habitat suitability models of terrestrial mammals. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. 366, 2633–2641 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lewis, J. S. et al. Biotic and abiotic factors predicting the global distribution and population density of an invasive large mammal. Sci. Rep. 7, 44152 (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Strassburg, B. et al. Global priority areas for ecosystem restoration. Nature 586, 724–729 (2020).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
O’Bryan, C. J. et al. The importance of indigenous peoples’ lands for the conservation of terrestrial mammals. Conserv. Biol. 35, 1002–1008 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Rondinini, C., Wilson, K. A., Boitani, L., Grantham, H. & Possingham, H. P. Tradeoffs of different types of species occurrence data for use in systematic conservation planning. Ecol. Lett. 9, 1136–1145 (2006).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Henderson, J. V., Storeygard, A. & Weil, D. N. Measuring economic growth from outer space. Am. Econ. Rev. 102, 994–1028 (2012).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ebener, S., Murray, C., Tandon, A. & Elvidge, C. C. From wealth to health: modelling the distribution of income per capita at the sub-national level using night-time light imagery. Int. J. Health Geographics 4, 5 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, X. & Nordhaus, W. D. Using luminosity data as a proxy for economic statistics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 108, 8589–8594 (2011).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Jean, N. et al. Combining satellite imagery and machine learning to predict poverty. Science 353, 790–794 (2016).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
FAO Meat live weight, cattle database. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#search/cattle (2021). Accessed 24 April 2021.Gilbert, M. et al. Global distribution data for cattle, buffaloes, horses, sheep, goats, pigs, chickens and ducks in 2010. Sci. Data 5, 1–11 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
United Nations University & World Health Organization. Human Energy Requirements: Report of a Joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation: Rome, 17–24 October 2001 (Vol. 1) Food & Agriculture Org (2004). More

Animal collection and holding for this project was conducted under Marine Research Permit RE-19–28 issued by the Ministry of Natural Resources, Environment, and Tourism of the Republic of Palau (10.03.2019), Marine Research/Collection Permit and Agreement 62 issued by the Koror State Government (08.10.2019), Queensland Government GBRMPA Marine Parks Permit G14/36689.1, Queensland Government DNPRSR Marine Parks Permits QS2014/MAN247 and QS2014/MAN247a, Queensland Government General Fisheries Permit 168991, Queensland Government DAFF Animal Ethics approval CA2013/11/733, approval by The Bahamas Department of Marine Resources, approval by the Animal Care Officer of both the University of Bremen and the Leibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research (ZMT), and in accordance with UK and Germany animal care guidelines.Sample collectionWe collected fish carbonate samples at four study locations across three tropical and subtropical regions: Eleuthera (24°50’N, 76°20’W), The Bahamas, between 2009 and 201127,37; Heron Reef (23°27’S, 151°55’E) and Moreton Bay (27°29’S, 153°24’E) in Queensland, Australia, in 2014 and 201528; and Koror (7°20’N, 134°28’E), Palau, during November and December 2019. These are located within four distinct marine biogeographic provinces and three realms (Tropical Atlantic, Central Indo-Pacific, and Temperate Australasia)43. At each location fish were collected using barrier nets, dip nets, clove oil or hook and line, and immediately transferred to aquaria facilities at the Cape Eleuthera Institute, Heron Island and Moreton Bay Research Stations, and the Palau International Coral Reef Center. Fish were held in a range of tanks (60, 400, or 1400 L in the Bahamas, 10, 60, 100, 120, or 400 L in Heron Island and Moreton Bay, and 8, 80, 280, or 400 L in Palau) of suitable dimensions for different fish sizes ( 5). Each sample was titrated with 0.01–0.5 N HCl (with continuous aeration with CO2-free air) until the end point (grey-lavender; pH~4.80) was reached and stable for at least 10 min. If the sample was over-titrated (pink), 0.01–0.1 N NaOH was added to titrate back to the end point and the amount of base used was subtracted from the amount of acid. Acid and base were added using an electronic multi-dispenser pipette (Eppendorf Repeater ®E3X, Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) with a precision of  ± 1 ({{{{{rm{mu }}}}}})L. Additionally, the pH of several samples was monitored using a pH microelectrode (Mettler Toledo InLab Micro) to ascertain the correctness of the colorimetric end point. The amount of carbonate in the sample was then calculated using Eq. (1). The method was validated using certified reference material (Alkalinity Standard Solution, 25,000 mg/L as CaCO3, HACH) and the accuracy in the determination of solid samples was verified using certified CaCO3 powder (Suprapur, ≥ 99.95% purity, Merck) samples (60–500 ({{{{{rm{mu }}}}}})g) and resulted in 96.53 ± 1.94% accuracy (mean ± SE; n = 8).To compare values obtained with the two titration methods we further analysed 12 samples collected at Lizard Island, Australia, in February 2016. Samples were collected at 24 h intervals from one individual of Lethrinus atkinsoni (f. Lethrinidae, body mass: 245 g), a group of five Lutjanus fulvus (f. Lutjanidae, mean body mass: 21 g), and an individual of Cephalopholis cyanostigma (f. Serranidae, body mass: 295 g), following the procedures described above. During sample collection water temperature ranged from 29.1 °C during the night to 32.6 °C during the day, with an average of ~31 °C, mean salinity was 35.4, and pHNBS ranged from 8.13 to 8.21. To compare the amount of carbonate measured by the two methods we added carbonate samples to 20 ml ultrapure water and disaggregated crystals via sonication. We then used a Metrohm Titrando autotitrator and Metrohm Aquatrode pH electrode to measure initial pH of the suspension of carbonates, then titrated each sample of carbonate in two stages. Firstly, they were titrated down to pH 4.80 using 0.1 M HCl, adding 20 µl increments of acid until this was sufficient to keep pH below 4.80 for 10 min whilst bubbling with CO2-free air. This first stage was comparable to the single end point titration used for samples collected in Palau. Secondly, whilst continuing to bubble with CO2-free air, further acid was added to the sample until it reached pH 3.89 and was stable for 1 min. Then 0.1 M NaOH was added to the samples to return them to the initial pH. For all samples the first end point titration (to pH 4.80) yielded slightly higher values for carbonate content than the second double titration. The ratio between the two methods (single end point/double titration) was 1.08 ± 0.01 (mean ± SE; range: 1.04–1.14; Supplementary Table 2). As we found a small but consistent difference between the two methods, all following analyses were initially performed on the actual data obtained with the double titration for samples from Australia and The Bahamas, and the single end point titration for samples from Palau. Then, to assess the robustness of the results, we repeated the analyses after applying a correction factor of 1.08 to the excretion rates of Palauan fishes (that used the single end point titration method). All results were consistent and robust to the measured difference between the titration methods (Supplementary Figs. 8, 9).Finally, measurements of multiple samples from each individual collected over periods of 18–169 h (median: 64 h) were combined to produce an average individual excretion rate in ({{{{{rm{mu }}}}}})mol h−1. For fish held in groups, carbonate excretion rates per individual (of average biomass) were obtained by averaging the total excretion rate of the group across the sampling period and dividing it by the number of individuals in the tank. Excretion rates obtained from fish groups thus evened the intraspecific variability within tanks, and are therefore more robust than those directly obtained from fish held individually. This aspect was considered in our models by fitting weighted regressions (see the “Statistical modelling” section). In total, we measured the carbonate excretion rates of 382 individual fishes arranged in 192 groups (i.e., independent observations), representing 85 species from 35 families across three tropical regions (180 individuals from 29 species in Australia, 90 individuals from 10 species in the Bahamas, and 112 individuals from 46 species in Palau; Supplementary Table 1).We assume that during the sampling of carbonates fishes were close to their resting metabolic rate and that their carbonate excretion rates are representative of fish at rest. Although the ratio of tank volume to fish volume in our study (median ~660; inter-quartile range ~180–1700) typically greatly exceeds the guideline ideal range for measuring resting metabolic rate (20–50)85, fishes were fasted prior to and throughout sampling, and in most instances their movement was somewhat constrained by tank volume. Fasting reduces metabolic rate in all animals, including fish, as they do not undergo energy-intensive digestive processes and use energy reserves to support vital processes, triggering metabolic changes in many tissues and reducing activity levels86,87. Additionally, other than the carbonate syphoning ( More

Moore, J. An overview of parasite-induced behavioral alterations – and some lessons from bats. J. Exp. Biol. 216, 11–17 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nunn, C. L. & Altizer, S. Infectious Diseases in Primates: Behavior, Ecology and Evolution (Oxford University Press, 2006).Book 

Google Scholar 
Hutchings, M. R., Athanasiadou, S., Kyriazakis, I. & Gordon, I. J. Nutrition and Behaviour Group Symposium on ‘Exploitation of medicinal properties of plants by animals and man through food intake and foraging behaviour’: Can animals use foraging behaviour to combat parasites?. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 62, 361–370 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hawley, D. M., Etienne, R. S., Ezenwa, V. O. & Jolles, A. E. Does animal behavior underlie covariation between hosts’ exposure to infectious agents and susceptibility to infection? Implications for disease dynamics. Integr. Comp. Biol. 51, 528–539 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rimbach, R. et al. Brown spider monkeys (Ateles hybridus): a model for differentiating the role of social networks and physical contact on parasite transmission dynamics. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 370, 20140110 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Friant, S., Ziegler, T. E. & Goldberg, T. L. Changes in physiological stress and behaviour in semi-free-ranging red-capped mangabeys (Cercocebus torquatus) following antiparasitic treatment. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 283, 20161201 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hudson, P. J. & Dobson, A. P. Macroparasites: Observed patterns in naturally fluctuating animal populations. In Ecology of infectious diseases in natural populations (eds Grenfell, B. T. & Dobson, A. P.) 144–176 (Cambridge University Press, 1995). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511629396.006.Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Murray, D. L., Lloyd, B. K. & Cary, J. R. Do parasitism and nutritional status interact to affect production in snowshoe hares?. Ecology 79, 1209–1222 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Coop, R. L. & Holmes, P. H. Nutrition and parasite interaction. Int. J. Parasitol. 26, 951–962 (1996).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Møller, A. P., de Lope, F., Moreno, J., González, G. & Pérez, J. J. Ectoparasites and host energetics: House martin bugs and house martin nestlings. Oecologia 98, 263–268 (1994).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Munger, J. C. & Karasov, W. H. Sublethal parasites and host energy budgets: Tapeworm infection in white-footed mice. Ecology 70, 904–921 (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hicks, O. et al. The energetic cost of parasitism in a wild population. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 285, 20180489 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sánchez, C. A. et al. On the relationship between body condition and parasite infection in wildlife: A review and meta-analysis. Ecol. Lett. 21, 1869–1884 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kyriazakis, I., Tolkamp, B. J. & Hutchings, M. R. Towards a functional explanation for the occurrence of anorexia during parasitic infections. Anim. Behav. 56, 265–274 (1998).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hart, B. L. Behavioral adaptations to pathogens and parasites: Five strategies. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 14, 273–294 (1990).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lopes, P. C., Block, P. & König, B. Infection-induced behavioural changes reduce connectivity and the potential for disease spread in wild mice contact networks. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–10 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pelletier, F. & Festa-Bianchet, M. Effects of body mass, age, dominance and parasite load on foraging time of bighorn rams. Ovis canadensis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 56, 546–551 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bonneaud, C. et al. Assessing the cost of mounting an immune response. Am. Nat. 161, 367–379 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hart, B. L. The behavior of sick animals. Vet. Clin. North Am. Small Anim. Pract. 21, 225–237 (1991).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Poulin, R. Meta-analysis of parasite-induced behavioural changes. Anim. Behav. 48, 137–146 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
Janson, C. H. Toward an experiemental socioecology of primates. Examples from Argentine brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella nigritus). In Adaptive Radiations of Neotropical Primates (eds Janson, C. H. et al.) 309–325 (Plenum Press, 1996).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Robinson, J. G. Seasonal variation in use of time and space by the wedge-capped capuchin monkey, Cebus olivaceus: Implications for foraging theory. Smithson. Contrib. Zool. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00810282.431 (1986).Article 

Google Scholar 
Saj, T., Sicotte, P. & Paterson, J. D. Influence of human food consumption on the time budget of vervets. Int. J. Primatol. 20, 977–994 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ghai, R. R., Fugère, V., Chapman, C. A., Goldberg, T. L. & Davies, T. J. Sickness behaviour associated with non-lethal infections in wild primates. Proc. Biol. Sci. 282, 20151436 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Blersch, R. et al. Sick and tired: Sickness behaviour, polyparasitism and food stress in a gregarious mammal. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 75, 169 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Müller-Klein, N. et al. Physiological and social consequences of gastrointestinal nematode infection in a nonhuman primate. Behav. Ecol. 30, 322–335 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chapman, C. A. et al. Social behaviours and networks of vervet monkeys are influenced by gastrointestinal parasites. PLoS ONE 11, e0161113 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Owen-Ashley, N. T. & Wingfield, J. C. Acute phase responses of passerine birds: characterization and seasonal variation. J. Ornithol. 148, 583–591 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Owen-Ashley, N. T. & Wingfield, J. C. Seasonal modulation of sickness behavior in free-living northwestern song sparrows (Melospiza melodia morphna). J. Exp. Biol. 209, 3062–3070 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Janson, C. H. & Di Bitetti, M. S. Experimental analysis of food detection in capuchin monkeys: Effects of distance, travel speed, and resource size. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41, 17–24 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
Di Bitetti, M. S. Food-associated calls in the tufted capuchin monkey (Cebus apella). PhD Thesis. (Stony Brook University, New York, 2001).Di Bitetti, M. S. & Janson, C. H. Reproductive socioecology of tufted capuchins (Cebus apella nigritus) in Norteastern Argentina. Int. J. Primatol. 22, 127–142 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Janson, C., Baldovino, M. C. & Di Bitetti, M. The group life cycle and demography of brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus [apella] nigritus) in Iguazú National Park, Argentina. In Long-Term Field Studies of Primates (eds Kappeler, P. M. & Watts, D. P.) 185–212 (Springer, Berlin, 2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22514-7_9.Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Robinson, J. C. & Galán Saúco, V. Bananas and plantains. (Crop production science in horticulture series N. 19, CAB International, 2010). https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845936587.0000Tiddi, B., Pfoh, R. & Agostini, I. The impact of food provisioning on parasite infection in wild black capuchin monkeys: A network approach. Primates 60, 297–306 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Agostini, I., Vanderhoeven, E., Di Bitetti, M. S. & Beldomenico, P. M. Experimental testing of reciprocal effects of nutrition and parasitism in wild black capuchin monkeys. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–11 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
de Vries, H., Netto, W. J. & Hanegraaf, P. L. H. Matman: a program for the analysis of sociometric matrices and behavioural transition matrices. Behaviour 125, 157–175 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
Martin, P. & Bateson, P. Measuring Behaviour (Cambridge University Press, 1993). https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511810893.Book 

Google Scholar 
Cox, D. D. & Todd, A. C. Survey of gastrointestinal parasitism in Wisconsin dairy cattle. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 141, 706–709 (1962).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ballweber, L. R., Beugnet, F., Marchiondo, A. A. & Payne, P. A. American association of veterinary parasitologists’ review of veterinary fecal flotation methods and factors influencing their accuracy and use—Is there really one best technique?. Vet. Parasitol. 204, 73–80 (2014).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Godfrey, S. S. Networks and the ecology of parasite transmission: a framework for wildlife parasitology. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2, 235–245 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sosa, S., Sueur, C. & Puga-Gonzalez, I. Network measures in animal social network analysis: Their strengths, limits, interpretations and uses. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2020, 1–12 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Sosa, S. et al. A multilevel statistical toolkit to study animal social networks: The Animal Network Toolkit Software (ANTs) R package. Sci. Rep. 10, 12507 (2020).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Croft, D. P., Madden, J. R., Franks, D. W. & James, R. Hypothesis testing in animal social networks. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 502–507 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Farine, D. R. Animal social network inference and permutations for ecologists in R using asnipe. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4, 1187–1194 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach (2nd ed). Ecological Modelling (Springer, 2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.11.004Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Barton, K. MuMIn: Multi-model inference. R package version 1.15.6. 63 (2016). citeulike:11961261Carlton, E. D., Demas, G. E. & French, S. S. Leptin, a neuroendocrine mediator of immune responses, inflammation, and sickness behaviors. Horm. Behav. 62, 272–279 (2012).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Tizard, I. Sickness behavior, its mechanisms and significance. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 9, 87–99 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Inoue, W. & Luheshi, G. N. Acute starvation alters lipopolysaccharide-induced fever in leptin-dependent and -independent mechanisms in rats. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 299, R1709-19 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Macdonald, L., Radler, M., Paolini, A. G. & Kent, S. Calorie restriction attenuates LPS-induced sickness behavior and shifts hypothalamic signaling pathways to an antiinflammatory bias. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 301, 172–184 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wisse, B. E. et al. Physiological regulation of hypothalamic IL-1β gene expression by leptin and glucocorticoids: implications for energy homeostasis. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 287, R1107–R1113 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pohl, J., Woodside, B. & Luheshi, G. N. Changes in hypothalamically mediated acute-phase inflammatory responses to lipopolysaccharide in diet-induced obese rats. Endocrinology 150, 4901–4910 (2009).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bretscher, P. On analyzing how the Th1/Th2 phenotype of an immune response is determined: classical observations must not be ignored. Front. Immunol. 10, 1–7 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Poppi, D. P., Sykes, A. R. & Dynes, R. A. The effect of endoparasitism on host nutrition – the implications for nutrient manipulation. Proc. New Zeal. Soc. Anim. Prod. 50, 237–243 (1990).
Google Scholar 
Coulson, G., Cripps, J. K., Garnick, S., Bristow, V. & Beveridge, I. Parasite insight: assessing fitness costs, infection risks and foraging benefits relating to gastrointestinal nematodes in wild mammalian herbivores. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 373, 197 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Worsley-Tonks, K. E. L. & Ezenwa, V. O. Anthelmintic treatment affects behavioural time allocation in a free-ranging ungulate. Anim. Behav. 108, 47–54 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jones, O. R., Anderson, R. M. & Pilkington, J. G. Parasite-induced anorexia in a free-ranging mammalian herbivore: An experimental test using Soay sheep. Can. J. Zool. 84, 685–692 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cripps, J. K., Martin, J. K. & Coulson, G. Anthelmintic treatment does not change foraging strategies of female eastern grey kangaroos, Macropus giganteus. PLoS ONE 11, e0147384 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Giles, N. Predation risk and reduced foraging activity in fish: experiments with parasitized and non-parasitized three-spined sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus L.. J. Fish Biol. 31, 37–44 (1987).Article 

Google Scholar 
Knutie, S. A., Wilkinson, C. L., Wu, Q. C., Ortega, C. N. & Rohr, J. R. Host resistance and tolerance of parasitic gut worms depend on resource availability. Oecologia 183, 1031–1040 (2017).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Lopes, P. C., French, S. S., Woodhams, D. C. & Binning, S. A. Metabolic response of dolphins to short-term fasting reveals physiological changes that differ from the traditional fasting model. J. Exp. Biol. 224, jeb225847 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Behringer, D. C., Butler, M. J. & Shields, J. D. Ecology: Avoidance of disease by social lobsters. Nature 441, 421 (2006).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Poirotte, C. et al. Mandrills use olfaction to socially avoid parasitized conspecifics. Sci. Adv. 3, e1601721 (2017).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar  More

Hatton, P. J., Castanha, C., Torn, M. S. & Bird, J. A. Litter type control on soil C and N stabilization dynamics in a temperate forest. Glob. Change Biol. 21(3), 1358–1367. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12786 (2015).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Lladó, S., López-Mondéjar, R. & Baldrian, P. Forest soil bacteria: Diversity, involvement in ecosystem processes, and response to global change. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 81(2), e00063–16. https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.00063-16 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ranjard, L. & Richaume, A. Quantitative and qualitative microscale distribution of bacteria in soil. Res. Microbiol. 152(8), 707–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-2508(01)01251-7 (2001).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Nannipieri, P., Badalucco, L., Benbi, D. K., & Nieder, R. Handbook of processes and modelling in the soil-plant system. Biological Processes, 57–82 (2003).Wixon, D. L. & Balser, T. C. Complexity, climate change and soil carbon: A systems approach to microbial temperature response. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 26(5), 601–620. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.995 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Van Der Heijden, M. G., Bardgett, R. D. & Van Straalen, N. M. The unseen majority: Soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 11(3), 296–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01139.x (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tisdall, J. M. Possible role of soil microorganisms in aggregation in soils. Plant Soil 159, 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00000100 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ingham, E. R. Soil biology primer, Chapter 4: Soil fungus. Soil and Water Conservation 22–23 (Soil and Water Conservation Society, 2009).
Google Scholar 
Stevens, W. B., Sainju, U. M., Caesar, A. J., West, M. & Gaskin, J. F. Soil-aggregating bacterial community as affected by irrigation, tillage, and cropping system in the northern great plains. Soil Sci. 179(1), 11–20 (2014).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Islam, K. R. Lecture on Soil Physics, Personal Collection of K. Islam (Ohio State University, 2008).
Google Scholar 
López-Mondéjar, R., Zühlke, D., Becher, D., Riedel, K. & Baldrian, P. Cellulose and hemicellulose decomposition by forest soil bacteria proceeds by the action of structurally variable enzymatic systems. Sci. Rep. 6(1), 25279. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep25279 (2016).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wardle, D. A., Nilsson, M. C. & Zackrisson, O. Fire-derived charcoal causes loss of forest humus. Science 320(5876), 629–629. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1154960 (2008).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Shelobolina, E., Roden, E., Benzine, J. & Xiong, M. Y. Using phyllosilicate-Fe (II)-oxidizing soil bacteria to improve Fe and K plant nutrition. U.S. Patent Application 14/924,397 (Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, 2016).
Google Scholar 
Kumar, A., & Verma, J. P. The role of microbes to improve crop productivity and soil health. In Ecological Wisdom Inspired Restoration Engineering 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0149-0_14 (2019).Dick, W. Lecture on Biochemistry Process in Soil Microbiology, Personal Collection of W. Dick (The Ohio State University School of Environment and Natural Resources, 2009).
Google Scholar 
Reed, S. C., Cleveland, C. C. & Townsend, A. R. Functional ecology of free-living nitrogen fixation: A contemporary perspective. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 42, 489–512. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102710-145034 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sylvia, D. M., Fuhrmann, J. J., Hartel, P. G. & Zuberer, D. A. Principles and Applications of Soil Microbiology (No. QR111 S674 2005) 2nd edn. (Prentice Hall, 2005).
Google Scholar 
Torsvik, V., Daae, F. L., Sandaa, R. A. & Øvreås, L. Novel techniques for analysing microbial diversity in natural and perturbed environments. J. Biotechnol. 64(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-1656(98)00103-5 (1998).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Roesch, L. F. W. et al. Pyrosequencing enumerates and contrasts soil microbial diversity. ISME J. 1(4), 283–290. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2007.53 (2007).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Rousk, J., Brookes, P. C. & Bååth, E. The microbial PLFA composition as affected by pH in an arable soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 42(3), 516–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.11.026 (2010).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Brockett, B. F., Prescott, C. E. & Grayston, S. J. Soil moisture is the major factor influencing microbial community structure and enzyme activities across seven biogeoclimatic zones in western Canada. Soil Biol. Biochem. 44(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.09.003 (2012).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Urbanová, M., Šnajdr, J. & Baldrian, P. Composition of fungal and bacterial communities in forest litter and soil is largely determined by dominant trees. Soil Biol. Biochem. 84, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.02.011 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Binkley, D. & Vitousek, P. M. Soil nutrient availability. In Plant Physiological, Field Methods and Instrumentation (eds Pearey, R. W. et al.) 75–96 (Champan and Hall, 1989).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Ruess, J. O. & Innis, G. S. A grassland nitrogen flow simulation mode. Ecology 58, 348–429. https://doi.org/10.2307/1935612 (1977).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kumar, M., Sharma, C. M. & Rajwar, G. S. Physico-chemical properties of forest soil along altitudinal gradient in Garhwal Himalaya. J. Hill Res. 17(2), 60–64 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Smit, E. et al. Diversity and seasonal fluctuations of the dominant members of the bacterial soil community in a wheat field as determined by cultivation and molecular methods. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67(5), 2284–2291. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.67.5.2284-2291.2001 (2001).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Qazi, P. H. Bioprospecting Himalayan microbial diversity. ENVIS Newsletter on Himalayan Ecology 12(4). http://gbpihedenvis.nic.in/ENVIS%20Newsletter/vol%2012(4).pdf (2015).Pradhan, S. et al. Bacterial biodiversity from Roopkund glacier, Himalayan Mountain ranges, India. Extremophiles 14, 377–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00792-010-0318-3 (2010).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Shivaji, S. et al. Bacterial diversity of soil in the vicinity of Pindari glacier, Himalayan Mountain ranges, India, using culturable bacteria and soil 16S rRNA gene clones. Extremophiles 15, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00792-010-0333-4 (2011).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Das, J. & Dangar, T. K. Microbial population dynamics, especially stress tolerant Bacillus thuringiensis, in partially anaerobic rice field soils during post-harvest period of the Himalayan, island, brackish water and coastal habitats of India. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 24, 1403–1410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-007-9620-3 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lyngwi, N. A., Koijam, K., Sharma, D. & Joshi, S. R. Cultivable bacterial diversity along the altitudinal zonation and vegetation range of tropical Eastern Himalaya. Rev. Biol. Trop. 61(1), 467–490. https://doi.org/10.15517/rbt.v61i1.11141 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pandey, S., Singh, S., Yadav, A. N., Nain, L. & Saxena, A. K. Phylogenetic diversity and characterization of novel and efficient cellulase producing bacterial isolates from various extreme environments. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 77(7), 1474–1480. https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.130121 (2013).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Venkatachalam, S., Gowdaman, V. & Prabagaran, S. R. Culturable and culture-independent bacterial diversity and the prevalence of cold-adapted enzymes from the Himalayan Mountain ranges of India and Nepal. Microb. Ecol. 69, 472–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-014-0476-4 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Saxena, A. K., Yadav, A. N., Kaushik, R., Tyagi, S. P., & Shukla, L. Biotechnological applications of microbes isolated from cold environments in agriculture and allied sectors. In International Conference on Low Temperature Science and Biotechnological Advances, Vol. 104 (Society of Low Temperature Biology, 2015).Singh, R. N. et al. First high-quality draft genome sequence of a plant growth promoting and cold active enzyme producing psychrotrophic Arthrobacter agilis strain L77. Stand. Genom. Sci. 11, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-016-0176-4 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Mushtaq, H. et al. Biochemical characterization and functional analysis of heat stable high potential protease of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain HM48 from soils of Dachigam National Park in Kashmir Himalaya. Biomolecules 11(1), 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11010117 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Maharana, A. K. & Ray, P. Isolation and screening of cold active extracellular enzymes producing psychrotrophic bacteria from soil of Jammu City. Biosci. Biotechnol. Res. Asia 10(1), 267–273. https://doi.org/10.13005/bbra/1120 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rehakova, K., Chlumska, Z. & Dolezal, J. Soil cyanobacterial and microalgal diversity in dry mountains of Ladakh, NW Himalaya, as related to site, altitude, and vegetation. Microb. Ecol. 62, 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-011-9878-8 (2011).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Rehakova, K. et al. Bacterial community of cushion plant Thylacospermum ceaspitosum on elevational gradient in the Himalayan cold desert. Front. Microbiol. 6, 304. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00304 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gupta, P. & Vakhlu, J. Culturable bacterial diversity and hydrolytic enzymes from Drass, a cold desert in India. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 9, 1866–1876. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJMR2015.7424 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yadav, A. N. et al. Culturable diversity and functional annotation of psychrotrophic bacteria from cold desert of Leh Ladakh (India). World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 31, 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-014-1768-z (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Farooq, S., Nazir, R., Ganai, B. A., Mushtaq, H. & Dar, G. J. Psychrophilic and psychrotrophic bacterial diversity of Himalayan Thajwas glacial soil, India. Biologia 77, 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11756-021-00915-6 (2022).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ahmad, N., Johri, S., Abdin, M. Z. & Qazi, G. N. Molecular characterization of bacterial population in the forest soil of Kashmir, India. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 25, 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-008-9868-2 (2009).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Thakur, D., Yadav, A., Gogoi, B. K. & Bora, T. C. Isolation and screening of Streptomyces in soil of protected forest areas from the states of Assam and Tripura, India, for antimicrobial metabolites. J. Mycol. Méd. 17(4), 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mycmed.2007.08.001 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rina, K., Hiral, P., Payal, P., Dharaiya, N. & Patel, R. K. Study on microbial diversity of Wild Ass Sanctuary, Little Rann of Kutch, Gujarat, India. ICFAI Univ. J. Life Sci. 3(1), 34–41 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Das, S., Saikia, P., Baruah, P. P. & Chakraborty, A. Isolation and identification of soil bacteria collected from Dibru-Saikhowa, the National Park and Biosphere Reserve Forest of Assam, India. Int. J. Sci. Res. (IJSR), 1937–1940 (2016).De Mandal, S., Lalremsanga, H. T. & Kumar, N. S. Bacterial diversity of Murlen National Park located in Indo-Burman Biodiversity hotspot region: A metagenomic approach. Genom. Data 5, 25–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gdata.2015.04.025 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Megha, B., Sejal, P., Puja, P. & Jasrai, Y. T. Isolation and identification of soil microflora of national parks of Gujarat, India. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 4(3), 421–429 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Kumar, A., Singh, R. D., Patra, A. K., Sahu, S. K. & Singh, M. Impact of oak and pine canopy cover on soil biochemical and microbial indicators of Binsar Wildlife Sanctuary in the Western Himalaya, India. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 11(3), 1599–1607. https://doi.org/10.22207/JPAM.11.3.47 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Dhiman, P., Mehta, J. P., Singh, P. & andSharesthBaldotra, S. S.,. Effect of prescribe fire on bacterial abundance and their enzymatic activity in burnt and unburnt soil of Chilla Forest, Raja Ji National Park, Uttarakhand, India. Plant Arch. 18(1), 1125–1128 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Behera, P. et al. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in the structure and function of sediment bacterial communities of a tropical mangrove forest. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 26, 3893–3908 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Sharma, P. & Thakur, D. Antimicrobial biosynthetic potential and diversity of culturable soil actinobacteria from forest ecosystems of Northeast India. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60968-6 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Dar, G. H., Bhagat, R. C. & Khan, M. A. Biodiversity of the Kashmir Himalaya (Valley Book House, 2002).
Google Scholar 
Shameem, S. A., Kangroo, N. I. & Bhat, G. A. Comparative assessment of edaphic features and herbaceous diversity in lower Dachigam national park, Kashmir, Himalaya. J. Ecol. Nat. Environ. 3(6), 196–204 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Thakur, M., Sharma, L. K., Charoo, S. A. & Sathyakumar, S. Conflict bear translocation: Investigating population genetics and fate of bear translocation in Dachigam National Park, Jammu and Kashmir, India. PLoS One 10, e0132005. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132005 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ahmad, K., Qureshi, Q., Agoramoorthy, G. & Nigam, P. Habitat use patterns and food habits of the Kashmir red deer or Hangul (Cervus elaphus hanglu) in Dachigam National Park, Kashmir, India. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 28(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/03949370.2015.1018955 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jammu and Kashmir Forest Department (JKFD). Handbook of Forest Statistics (Jammu and Kashmir Forest Department, 2011).
Google Scholar 
Anderson, J. M. & Ingram, J. S. I. A Handbook of Methods 62–65 (CAB International, 1993).
Google Scholar 
Joshi, S. R., Chauhan, M. A. N. J. U., Sharma, G. D. & Mishra, R. R. Effect of deforestation on microbes, VAM fungi and their enzymatic activity in Eastern Himalaya. In Studies in Himalayan Ecobiology 141–152 (Today and Tommorows Publication, 1991).
Google Scholar 
Jackson, M. L. Soil Chemical Analysis 151–154 (Prentice-Hall, 1958). https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.19590850311.Book 

Google Scholar 
Gardner, W. H. Water content. Methods of soil analysis: Part 1. Phys. Mineral. Methods 5, 493–544 (1986).
Google Scholar 
Walkley, A. & Black, I. A. Estimation of soil organic carbon by the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 37(1), 29–38 (1934).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bremner, J. M. Determination of nitrogen in soil by the Kjeldahl method. J. Agric. Sci. 55(1), 1–23 (1960).Article 

Google Scholar 
Coursey, D. G. & Eggins, H. O. W. Microorganismes responsables de l’altération de l’huile de palme pendant le stockage. Oléagineux 16, 227–233 (1961).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kumar, R., Acharya, C. & Joshi, S. R. Isolation and analyses of uranium tolerant Serratia marcescens strains and their utilization for aerobic uranium U (VI) bioadsorption. J. Microbiol. 49, 568–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-011-0366-0 (2011).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Team, R. C. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.R-project.org (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2017).Bergey, D. H. & Holt, J. G. Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1994).
Google Scholar 
Gürtler, V. & Stanisich, V. A. New approaches to typing and identification of bacteria using the 16S–23S rDNA spacer region. Microbiology 142(1), 3–16 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T. & Ryan, P. D. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 4, 1–9 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Sorensen, T. A. A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons. Biol. Skar. 5, 1–34 (1948).
Google Scholar 
Muhumuza, M. & Balkwill, K. Factors affecting the success of conserving biodiversity in national parks: A review of case studies from Africa. Int. J. Biodivers. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/798101 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yaqoob, A., Yunus, M., Bhat, G. A. & Singh, D. P. Phytodiversity and seasonal variations in the soil characteristics of shrublands of Dachigam National Park, Jammu and Kashmir, India. Clim. Change Environ. Sustain. 3(2), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.5958/2320-642X.2015.00015.0 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mir, Z. R., Noor, A., Habib, B. & Veeraswami, G. G. Seasonal population density and winter survival strategies of endangered Kashmir gray langur (Semnopithecus ajax) in Dachigam National Park, Kashmir, India. Springer Plus 4, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1366-z (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Buchan, G. D. Soil temperature regime. In Soil and Environmental Analysis: Physical Methods (eds Smith, K. A. & Mullins, C.) 539–594 (Marcel Dekker, 2001).
Google Scholar 
Buchan, G. D. Temperature effects in soil. In Encyclopedia of Agrophysics, Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series (Springer, 2011).
Google Scholar 
Chiemeka, I. U. Soil temperature profile at Uturu, Nigeria. Pac. J. Sci. Technol. 11(1), 478–482 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Decker, K. L. M., Wang, D., Waite, C. & Scherbatskoy, T. Snow removal and ambient air temperature effects on forest soil temperatures in northern Vermont. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 67(4), 1234–1242. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2003.1234 (2003).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Abu-Hamdeh, N. H. & Reeder, R. C. Soil thermal conductivity effects of density, moisture, salt concentration, and organic matter. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64(4), 1285–1290. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2000.6441285x (2000).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lu, S., Ren, T., Gong, Y. & Horton, R. An improved model for predicting soil thermal conductivity from water content at room temperature. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 71(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2006.0041 (2007).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Elizbarashvili, E. S., Urushadze, T. F., Elizbarashvili, M. E., Elizbarashvili, S. E. & Schaefer, M. K. Temperature regime of some soil types in Georgia. Eurasian Soil Sci. 43(4), 427–435. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229310040083 (2010).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Walter, H. & Burnett, J. H. Ecology of Tropical and Subtropical Vegetation Vol. 539, xviii+-539 (Oliver and Boyd, 1971).
Google Scholar 
Callaway, R. M. Positive interactions and interdependence in plant communities. Springer Science Business Media https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6224-7 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Song, Y. et al. Effects of vegetation height and density on soil temperature variations. Chin. Sci. Bull. 58(8), 907–912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-012-5596-y (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dimri, B. M., Singh, S. B., Baneriee, S. K. & Singh, B. Relation of age and dominance of tree species with soil chemical attributes in Kalimpong and Kurseong District of West Bengal. Indian For. 113(4), 307–311 (1987).
Google Scholar 
Jackson, R. B., Mooney, H. A. & Schulze, E. D. A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94(14), 7362–7366. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.14.7362 (1997).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wilson, S. D. Competition between grasses and woody plants. In Population Biology of Grasses (ed. Cheplick, G. P.) 231–254 (Cambridge University Press, 1998).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Reth, S., Reichstein, M. & Falge, E. The effect of soil water content, soil temperature, soil pH-value and the root mass on soil CO2 efflux—A modified model. Plant Soil 268, 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-0175-5 (2005).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zinke, P. J. The pattern of influence of individual forest trees on soil properties. Ecology 43(1), 130–133 (1962).Article 

Google Scholar 
Patric, J. H. Forest management and nutrient cycling in eastern hardwoods Vol. 324 (Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, 1975).
Google Scholar 
Mroz, G. D., Jurgensen, M. F. & Frederick, D. J. Soil nutrient changes following whole tree harvesting on three northern hardwood sites. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 49(6), 1552–1557. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1985.03615995004900060044x (1985).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Maggs, J. & Hewett, B. Organic C and nutrients in surface soils from some primary rainforests, derived grasslands and secondary rainforests on the Atherton Tableland in North East Queensland. Soil Res. 31(3), 343–350 (1993).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hart, S. C. & Perry, D. A. Transferring soils from high-to low-elevation forests increases nitrogen cycling rates: Climate change implications. Glob. Change Biol. 5(1), 23–32 (1999).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Atlas, R. M. Diversity of microbial communities. Adv. Microb. Ecol., 1–47 (1984).Dimitriu, P. A. & Grayston, S. J. Relationship between soil properties and patterns of bacterial β-diversity across reclaimed and natural boreal forest soils. Microb. Ecol. 59, 563–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-009-9590-0 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bele, S. S. Soil Testing and Soil Microbiology 79–108 (Satyam Publishers and Distributors, 2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3927-5.Book 

Google Scholar 
Cattelan, A. J., Hartel, P. G. & Fuhrmann, J. J. Bacterial composition in the rhizosphere of nodulating and non-nodulating soybean. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 62(6), 1549–1555. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1998.03615995006200060011x (1998).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Silva, P. D. & Nahas, E. Bacterial diversity in soil in response to different plans, phosphate fertilizers and liming. Braz. J. Microbiol. 33, 304–310 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Begum, K. et al. Isolation and characterization of bacteria with biochemical and pharmacological importance from soil samples of Dhaka City. Dhaka Univ. J. Pharm. Sci. 16(1), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.3329/dujps.v16i1.33390 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, D., Liu, Y., Fang, S. & Tian, Y. Tree species composition influenced microbial diversity and nitrogen availability in rhizosphere soil. Plant Soil Environ. 61(10), 438–443. https://doi.org/10.17221/94/2015-PSE (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Chodak, M., Klimek, B., Azarbad, H. & Jaźwa, M. Functional diversity of soil microbial communities under Scots pine, Norway spruce, silver birch and mixed boreal forests. Pedobiologia 58(2–3), 81–88 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gartzia-Bengoetxea, N., Kandeler, E., de Arano, I. M. & Arias-González, A. Soil microbial functional activity is governed by a combination of tree species composition and soil properties in temperate forests. Appl. Soil. Ecol. 100, 57–64 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shameem, S. A., Mushtaq, H., Wani, A. A., Ahmad, N. & Hai, A. Phytodiversity of herbaceous vegetation in disturbed and undisturbed forest ecosystems of Pahalgam valley, Kashmir Himalaya, India. Br. J. Environ. Clim. Change 7(3), 148–167 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Felske, A., Wolterink, A., Van Lis, R. & Akkermans, A. D. Phylogeny of the main bacterial 16S rRNA sequences in Drentse A grassland soils (The Netherlands). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64(3), 871–879. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.64.3.871-879.1998 (1998).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Chodak, M., Gołębiewski, M., Morawska-Płoskonka, J., Kuduk, K. & Niklińska, M. Soil chemical properties affect the reaction of forest soil bacteria to drought and rewetting stress. Ann. Microbiol. 65, 1627–1637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-014-1002-0 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lugo, M. A. et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizospheric bacteria diversity along an altitudinal gradient in South American Puna grassland. Microb. Ecol. 55, 705–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-007-9313-3 (2008).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wang, Q., Wang, S., Fan, B. & Yu, X. Litter production, leaf litter decomposition and nutrient return in Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations in south China: Effect of planting conifers with broadleaved species. Plant Soil 297, 201–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9333-2 (2007).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Nüsslein, K. & Tiedje, J. M. Soil bacterial community shift correlated with change from forest to pasture vegetation in a tropical soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65(8), 3622–3626. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.65.8.3622-3626.1999 (1999).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Hackl, E., Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S., Bodrossy, L. & Sessitsch, A. Comparison of diversities and compositions of bacterial populations inhabiting natural forest soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70(9), 5057–5065. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.9.5057-5065.2004 (2004).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Chan, C. et al. Vegetation cover of forest, shrub and pasture strongly influences soil bacterial community structure as revealed by 16S rRNA gene T-RFLP analysis. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 64(3), 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00488.x (2008).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Adamczyk, B., Kitunen, V. & Smolander, A. Protein precipitation by tannins in soil organic horizon and vegetation in relation to tree species. Biol. Fertil. Soils 45(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-008-0308-0 (2008).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kanerva, S., Kitunen, V., Loponen, J. & Smolander, A. Phenolic compounds and terpenes in soil organic horizon layers under silver birch, Norway spruce and Scots pine. Biol. Fertil. Soils 44(4), 547–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-007-0234-6 (2008).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ushio, M., Balser, T. C. & Kitayama, K. Effects of condensed tannins in conifer leaves on the composition and activity of the soil microbial community in a tropical montane forest. Plant Soil 365(1), 157–170. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42952341 (2013).Lomolino, M. V. Elevation gradients of species-density: Historical and prospective views. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 10(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-822x.2001.00229.x (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Thomson, B. C. et al. Vegetation affects the relative abundances of dominant soil bacterial taxa and soil respiration rates in an upland grassland soil. Microb. Ecol. 59(2), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-009-9575-z (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
May, R. M. Patterns of species abundance and diversity. In Ecology and Evolution of Communities (eds Cody, M. L. & Diamond, J. M.) 81–120 (Harvard University, 1975).
Google Scholar 
Kapur, M. & Jain, R. K. Microbial diversity: Exploring the unexplored. World Federation of Culture Collection Newsletter 39, 12–16 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Bryant, J. A. et al. Microbes on mountainsides: Contrasting elevational patterns of bacterial and plant diversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105(Suppl 1), 11505–11511 (2008).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Fierer, N. et al. Microbes do not follow the elevational diversity patterns of plants and animals. Ecology 92(4), 797–804. https://doi.org/10.1890/10-1170.1 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Benca, J. P., Duijnstee, I. A. & Looy, C. V. Fossilized pollen malformations as indicators of past environmental stress and meiotic disruption: Insights from modern conifers. Paleobiology, 1–34 (2022).Marshall, J. E., Lakin, J., Troth, I. & Wallace-Johnson, S. M. Uv-b radiation was the devonian-carboniferous boundary terrestrial extinction kill mechanism. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba0768 (2020).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Looy, C. V., Twitchett, R. J., Dilcher, D. L., Van Konijnenburg-Van Cittert, J. H. & Visscher, H. Life in the end-permian dead zone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 98, 7879–7883 (2001).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Foster, C. & Afonin, S. Abnormal pollen grains: An outcome of deteriorating atmospheric conditions around the permian-triassic boundary. J. Geol. Soc. 162, 653–659 (2005).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Hochuli, P. A., Schneebeli-Hermann, E., Mangerud, G. & Bucher, H. Evidence for atmospheric pollution across the permian-triassic transition. Geology 45, 1123–1126 (2017).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Galasso, F., Bucher, H. & Schneebeli-Hermann, E. Mapping monstrosity: Malformed sporomorphs across the smithian/spathian boundary interval and beyond (salt range, pakistan). Global Planet. Change 219, 103975 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Van de Schootbrugge, B. et al. Floral changes across the triassic/jurassic boundary linked to flood basalt volcanism. Nat. Geosci. 2, 589–594 (2009).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Lindström, S. et al. Volcanic mercury and mutagenesis in land plants during the end-triassic mass extinction. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw4018 (2019).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Gravendyck, J., Schobben, M., Bachelier, J. B. & Kürschner, W. M. Macroecological patterns of the terrestrial vegetation history during the end-triassic biotic crisis in the central european basin: A palynological study of the bonenburg section (nw-germany) and its supra-regional implications. Global Planet. Change 194, 103286 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vilas-Boas, M., Pereira, Z., Cirilli, S., Duarte, L. V. & Fernandes, P. New data on the palynology of the triassic-jurassic boundary of the silves group, lusitanian basin, portugal. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 290, 104426 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Galasso, F., Feist-Burkhardt, S. & Schneebeli-Hermann, E. The palynology of the toarcian oceanic anoxic event at dormettingen, southwest germany, with emphasis on changes in vegetational dynamics. Rev. Palaeobotany Palynol. 304, 104701 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Galasso, F., Feist-Burkhardt, S. & Schneebeli-Hermann, E. Do spores herald the toarcian oceanic anoxic event?. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 306, 104748 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hay, W. W. & Floegel, S. New thoughts about the cretaceous climate and oceans. Earth Sci. Rev. 115, 262–272 (2012).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Faucher, G., Erba, E., Bottini, C. & Gambacorta, G. Calcareous nannoplankton response to the latest cenomanian oceanic anoxic event 2 perturbation. RIVISTA ITALIANA DI PALEONTOLOGIA E STRATIGRAFIA (2017).Cohen, K. M., Finney, S. C., Gibbard, P. L. & Fan, J.-X. The ics international chronostratigraphic chart. Epis. J. Int. Geosci. 36, 199–204 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Caron, M. & Homewood, P. Evolution of early planktic foraminifers. Mar. Micropaleontol. 7, 453–462 (1983).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Jarvis, I. et al. Microfossil assemblages and the cenomanian-turonian (late cretaceous) oceanic anoxic event. Cretac. Res. 9, 3–103 (1988).Article 

Google Scholar 
Huber, B. T., Leckie, R. M., Norris, R. D., Bralower, T. J. & CoBabe, E. Foraminiferal assemblage and stable isotopic change across the cenomanian-turonian boundary in the subtropical north atlantic. J. Foraminiferal Res. 29, 392–417 (1999).
Google Scholar 
Culver, S. J. & Rawson, P. F. Biotic response to global change: The last 145 million years (Cambridge University Press, 2006).Erba, E. Calcareous nannofossils and mesozoic oceanic anoxic events. Mar. Micropaleontol. 52, 85–106 (2004).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Gebhardt, H., Kuhnt, W. & Holbourn, A. Foraminiferal response to sea level change, organic flux and oxygen deficiency in the cenomanian of the tarfaya basin, southern morocco. Mar. Micropaleontol. 53, 133–157 (2004).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Hardenbol, J. et al. Mesozoic and cenozoic sequence chronostratigraphic framework of european basins. Soc. Sediment. Geol. (1998).Miller, K. G. et al. The phanerozoic record of global sea-level change. Science 310, 1293–1298 (2005).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Voigt, S., Gale, A. S. & Voigt, T. Sea-level change, carbon cycling and palaeoclimate during the late cenomanian of northwest europe; an integrated palaeoenvironmental analysis. Cretac. Res. 27, 836–858 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Haq, B. U. Cretaceous eustasy revisited. Global Planet. Change 113, 44–58 (2014).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Sames, B. et al. Short-term sea-level changes in a greenhouse world-a view from the cretaceous. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 441, 393–411 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Arthur, M. A., Dean, W. E. & Pratt, L. M. Geochemical and climatic effects of increased marine organic carbon burial at the cenomanian/turonian boundary. Nature 335, 714–717 (1988).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Tsikos, H. et al. Carbon-isotope stratigraphy recorded by the cenomanian-turonian oceanic anoxic event: Correlation and implications based on three key localities. J. Geol. Soc. 161, 711–719 (2004).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Jarvis, I., Lignum, J. S., Gröcke, D. R., Jenkyns, H. C. & Pearce, M. A. Black shale deposition, atmospheric co2 drawdown, and cooling during the cenomanian-turonian oceanic anoxic event. Paleoceanography26 (2011).van Bentum, E. C., Reichart, G.-J. & Damsté, J. S. S. Organic matter provenance, palaeoproductivity and bottom water anoxia during the cenomanian/turonian oceanic anoxic event in the newfoundland basin (northern proto north atlantic ocean). Org. Geochem. 50, 11–18 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Owens, J. D., Lyons, T. W. & Lowery, C. M. Quantifying the missing sink for global organic carbon burial during a cretaceous oceanic anoxic event. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 499, 83–94 (2018).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bralower, T. J. Calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy and assemblages of the cenomanian-turonian boundary interval: Implications for the origin and timing of oceanic anoxia. Paleoceanography 3, 275–316 (1988).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Leckie, R. M., Bralower, T. J. & Cashman, R. Oceanic anoxic events and plankton evolution: Biotic response to tectonic forcing during the mid-cretaceous. Paleoceanography 17, 13–1 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Slater, S. M., Bown, P., Twitchett, R. J., Danise, S. & Vajda, V. Global record of “ghost’’ nannofossils reveals plankton resilience to high co2 and warming. Science 376, 853–856 (2022).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Forster, A., Schouten, S., Moriya, K., Wilson, P. A. & Sinninghe Damsté, J. S. Tropical warming and intermittent cooling during the cenomanian/turonian oceanic anoxic event 2: Sea surface temperature records from the equatorial atlantic. Paleoceanography22 (2007).Barclay, R. S., McElwain, J. C. & Sageman, B. B. Carbon sequestration activated by a volcanic co2 pulse during ocean anoxic event 2. Nat. Geosci. 3, 205–208 (2010).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Damsté, J. S. S., van Bentum, E. C., Reichart, G.-J., Pross, J. & Schouten, S. A co2 decrease-driven cooling and increased latitudinal temperature gradient during the mid-cretaceous oceanic anoxic event 2. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 293, 97–103 (2010).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Heimhofer, U. et al. Vegetation response to exceptional global warmth during oceanic anoxic event 2. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–8 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Huber, B. T., MacLeod, K. G., Watkins, D. K. & Coffin, M. F. The rise and fall of the cretaceous hot greenhouse climate. Global Planet. Change 167, 1–23 (2018).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Robinson, S. A. et al. Southern hemisphere sea-surface temperatures during the cenomanian-turonian: Implications for the termination of oceanic anoxic event 2. Geology 47, 131–134 (2019).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Voigt, S., Gale, A. S. & Flögel, S. Midlatitude shelf seas in the cenomanian-turonian greenhouse world: Temperature evolution and north atlantic circulation. Paleoceanography19 (2004).Van Helmond, N. et al. Freshwater discharge controlled deposition of cenomanian-turonian black shales on the nw european epicontinental shelf (wunstorf, north germany). Clim. Past Discuss 10, 3755–3786 (2014).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Li, Y.-X., Montanez, I. P., Liu, Z. & Ma, L. Astronomical constraints on global carbon-cycle perturbation during oceanic anoxic event 2 (oae2). Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 462, 35–46 (2017).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
O’Brien, C. L. et al. Cretaceous sea-surface temperature evolution: Constraints from tex86 and planktonic foraminiferal oxygen isotopes. Earth Sci. Rev. 172, 224–247 (2017).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Jones, C. E. & Jenkyns, H. C. Seawater strontium isotopes, oceanic anoxic events, and seafloor hydrothermal activity in the jurassic and cretaceous. Am. J. Sci. 301, 112–149 (2001).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Snow, L. J., Duncan, R. A. & Bralower, T. J. Trace element abundances in the rock canyon anticline, pueblo, colorado, marine sedimentary section and their relationship to caribbean plateau construction and oxygen anoxic event 2. Paleoceanography20 (2005).Kuroda, J. et al. Contemporaneous massive subaerial volcanism and late cretaceous oceanic anoxic event 2. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 256, 211–223 (2007).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Turgeon, S. C. & Creaser, R. A. Cretaceous oceanic anoxic event 2 triggered by a massive magmatic episode. Nature 454, 323–326 (2008).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Floegel, S. et al. Simulating the biogeochemical effects of volcanic co2 degassing on the oxygen-state of the deep ocean during the cenomanian/turonian anoxic event (oae2). Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 305, 371–384 (2011).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Tegner, C. et al. Magmatism and eurekan deformation in the high arctic large igneous province: 40ar-39ar age of kap washington group volcanics, north greenland. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 303, 203–214 (2011).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Du Vivier, A. D. et al. Marine 187os/188os isotope stratigraphy reveals the interaction of volcanism and ocean circulation during oceanic anoxic event 2. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 389, 23–33 (2014).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Du Vivier, A., Selby, D., Condon, D., Takashima, R. & Nishi, H. Pacific 187os/188os isotope chemistry and u-pb geochronology: Synchroneity of global os isotope change across oae 2. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 428, 204–216 (2015).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Meyers, P. A. Why are the (delta )13corg values in phanerozoic black shales more negative than in modern marine organic matter?. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 15, 3085–3106 (2014).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Jenkyns, H. C., Dickson, A. J., Ruhl, M. & Van den Boorn, S. H. Basalt-seawater interaction, the plenus cold event, enhanced weathering and geochemical change: Deconstructing oceanic anoxic event 2 (cenomanian-turonian, late cretaceous). Sedimentology 64, 16–43 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Scaife, J. et al. Sedimentary mercury enrichments as a marker for submarine large igneous province volcanism? evidence from the mid-cenomanian event and oceanic anoxic event 2 (late cretaceous). Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 18, 4253–4275 (2017).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Schröder-Adams, C. J., Herrle, J. O., Selby, D., Quesnel, A. & Froude, G. Influence of the high arctic igneous province on the cenomanian/turonian boundary interval, sverdrup basin, high canadian arctic. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 511, 76–88 (2019).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Jolet, P., Philip, J., Thomel, G., Lopez, G. & Tronchetti, G. Nouvelles données biostratigraphiques sur la limite cénomanien-turonien. la coupe de cassis (sud-est de la france): Proposition d’un hypostratotype européen. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences-Series IIA-Earth and Planetary Science325, 703–709 (1997).Bown, P. R. & Young, J. Calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy (Springer, 1998).Green, T., Renne, P. R. & Keller, C. B. Continental flood basalts drive phanerozoic extinctions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 119, e2120441119 (2022).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Percival, L. M. et al. Does large igneous province volcanism always perturb the mercury cycle? Comparing the records of oceanic anoxic event 2 and the end-cretaceous to other mesozoic events. Am. J. Sci. 318, 799–860 (2018).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Salazar, L. et al. Diversity patterns of ferns along elevational gradients in andean tropical forests. Plant Ecol. Divers. 8, 13–24 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mehltreter, K., Walker, L. R. & Sharpe, J. M. Fern ecology (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Carvajal-Hernández, C. I., Gómez-Díaz, J. A., Kessler, M. & Krömer, T. Influence of elevation and habitat disturbance on the functional diversity of ferns and lycophytes. Plant Ecol. Divers. 11, 335–347 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kürschner, W. M., Batenburg, S. J. & Mander, L. Aberrant classopollis pollen reveals evidence for unreduced (2 n) pollen in the conifer family cheirolepidiaceae during the triassic-jurassic transition. Proc. Royal Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 280, 20131708 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Traverse, A. Paleopalynology Vol. 28 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2007).Tyson, R. V. Palynofacies investigation of callovian (middle jurassic) sediments from dsdp site 534, blake-bahama basin, western central atlantic. Mar. Pet. Geol. 1, 3–13 (1984).Article 

Google Scholar 
RV, T. Sedimentary organic matter: Organic facies and palynofacieschapman & hall. London, 615pp (1995).Vakhrameyev, V. Classopollis pollen as an indicator of jurassic and cretaceous climate. Int. Geol. Rev. 24, 1190–1196 (1982).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vakhrameev, V. Range and palaeoecology of mesozoic conifers, the cheirolepidiaceae. Paleontol. Zh. 1, 19–34 (1970).
Google Scholar 
WATSON, J. Some lower cretaceous conifers of the cheirolepidiaceae from the usa and england. Palaeontology 20, 715–749 (1977).
Google Scholar 
Fonseca, C., Mendonça Filho, J. G., Lézin, C., De Oliveira, A. D. & Duarte, L. V. Organic matter deposition and paleoenvironmental implications across the cenomanian-turonian boundary of the subalpine basin (se france): Local and global controls. Int. J. Coal Geol. 218, 103364 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Benca, J. P., Duijnstee, I. A. & Looy, C. V. Uv-b-induced forest sterility: Implications of ozone shield failure in earth’s largest extinction. Sci. Adv. 4, e1700618 (2018).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Wilson, L. A study in variation of picea glauca (moench) voss pollen. Grana 4, 380–387 (1963).
Google Scholar 
Lindström, S., McLoughlin, S. & Drinnan, A. N. Intraspecific variation of taeniate bisaccate pollen within permian glossopterid sporangia, from the prince charles mountains, antarctica. Int. J. Plant Sci. 158, 673–684 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
Leitch, A. & Leitch, I. Ecological and genetic factors linked to contrasting genome dynamics in seed plants. New Phytol. 194, 629–646 (2012).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Coffin, M. F. & Eldholm, O. Large igneous provinces: crustal structure, dimensions, and external consequences. Rev. Geophys. 32, 1–36 (1994).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Wignall, P. B. Large igneous provinces and mass extinctions. Earth Sci. Rev. 53, 1–33 (2001).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
McElwain, J. C., Wade-Murphy, J. & Hesselbo, S. P. Changes in carbon dioxide during an oceanic anoxic event linked to intrusion into gondwana coals. Nature 435, 479–482 (2005).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bond, D. P., Wignall, P. B., Keller, G. & Kerr, A. Large igneous provinces and mass extinctions: An update. Volcan., Impacts, Mass Extinc.: Causes Effects 505, 29–55 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Burgess, S., Bowring, S., Fleming, T. & Elliot, D. High-precision geochronology links the ferrar large igneous province with early-jurassic ocean anoxia and biotic crisis. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 415, 90–99 (2015).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Burgess, S. D., Muirhead, J. D. & Bowring, S. A. Initial pulse of siberian traps sills as the trigger of the end-permian mass extinction. Nat. Commun. 8, 1–6 (2017).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ernst, R. E. & Youbi, N. How large igneous provinces affect global climate, sometimes cause mass extinctions, and represent natural markers in the geological record. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 478, 30–52 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ruhl, M. et al. Reduced plate motion controlled timing of early jurassic karoo-ferrar large igneous province volcanism. Sci. Adv. 8, eabo0866 (2022).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Dickens, G. R., Paull, C. K. & Wallace, P. Direct measurement of in situ methane quantities in a large gas-hydrate reservoir. Nature 385, 426–428 (1997).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Courtillot, V. E. & Renne, P. R. On the ages of flood basalt events. C.R. Geosci. 335, 113–140 (2003).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Rampino, M. R., Rodriguez, S., Baransky, E. & Cai, Y. Global nickel anomaly links siberian traps eruptions and the latest permian mass extinction. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–6 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Clapham, M. E. & Renne, P. R. Flood basalts and mass extinctions. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 47, 275–303 (2019).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
McElwain, J. C., Popa, M. E., Hesselbo, S. P., Haworth, M. & Surlyk, F. Macroecological responses of terrestrial vegetation to climatic and atmospheric change across the triassic/jurassic boundary in east greenland. Paleobiology 33, 547–573 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Van de Schootbrugge, B. et al. End-triassic calcification crisis and blooms of organic-walled ‘disaster species’. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 244, 126–141 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ruckwied, K., Götz, A. E., Pálfy, J. & Török, Á. Palynology of a terrestrial coal-bearing series across the triassic/jurassic boundary (mecsek mts, hungary). Central Euro. Geol. 51, 1–15 (2008).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Götz, A., Ruckwied, K., Pálfy, J. & Haas, J. Palynological evidence of synchronous changes within the terrestrial and marine realm at the triassic/jurassic boundary (csővár section, hungary). Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 156, 401–409 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hochuli, P. A., Hermann, E., Vigran, J. O., Bucher, H. & Weissert, H. Rapid demise and recovery of plant ecosystems across the end-permian extinction event. Global Planet. Change 74, 144–155 (2010).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Bonis, N. et al.Palaeoenvironmental changes and vegetation history during the Triassic-Jurassic transition (LPP Contribution Series No. 29, 2010).Bonis, N. R. & Kürschner, W. M. Vegetation history, diversity patterns, and climate change across the triassic/jurassic boundary. Paleobiology 38, 240–264 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Visscher, H. et al. Environmental mutagenesis during the end-permian ecological crisis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101, 12952–12956 (2004).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar  More

Pawlowski, J. et al. CBOL Protist working group: barcoding eukaryotic richness beyond the animal, plant, and fungal kingdoms. PLOS Biol. 10, e1001419 (2012).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
del Campo, J. et al. The others: our biased perspective of eukaryotic genomes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 29, 252–259 (2014).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Handbook of the Protists (Springer, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28149-0.Lang, B. F., O’Kelly, C., Nerad, T., Gray, M. W. & Burger, G. The closest unicellular relatives of animals. Curr. Biol. 12, 1773–1778 (2002).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
del Campo, J. et al. Ecological and evolutionary significance of novel protist lineages. Eur. J. Protistol. 55, 4–11 (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Grau-Bové, X. et al. Dynamics of genomic innovation in the unicellular ancestry of animals. Life 6, e26036 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Gawryluk, R. M. R. et al. Non-photosynthetic predators are sister to red algae. Nature 572, 240–243 (2019).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gabr, A., Grossman, A. R. & Bhattacharya, D. Paulinella, a model for understanding plastid primary endosymbiosis. J. Phycol. 56, 837–843 (2020).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Gao, Z., Karlsson, I., Geisen, S., Kowalchuk, G. & Jousset, A. Protists: Puppet masters of the rhizosphere microbiome. Trends Plant Sci. 24, 165–176 (2019).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Caron, D. A. New accomplishments and approaches for assessing protistan diversity and ecology in natural ecosystems. Bioscience 59, 287–299 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gooday, A. J., Schoenle, A., Dolan, J. R. & Arndt, H. Protist diversity and function in the dark ocean: Challenging the paradigms of deep-sea ecology with special emphasis on foraminiferans and naked protists. Eur. J. Protistol. 75, 125721 (2020).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Stoecker, D. K., Johnson, M. D., de Vargas, C. & Not, F. Acquired phototrophy in aquatic protists. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 57, 279–310 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Strom, S. L., Benner, R., Ziegler, S. & Dagg, M. J. Planktonic grazers are a potentially important source of marine dissolved organic carbon. Limnol. Oceanogr. 42, 1364–1374 (1997).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Orsi, W. D. et al. Identifying protist consumers of photosynthetic picoeukaryotes in the surface ocean using stable isotope probing. Environ. Microbiol. 20, 815–827 (2018).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Corno, G. & Jürgens, K. Direct and indirect effects of protist predation on population size structure of a bacterial strain with high phenotypic plasticity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 78–86 (2006).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Mahé, F. et al. Parasites dominate hyperdiverse soil protist communities in Neotropical rainforests. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 91 (2017).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ruppert, K. M., Kline, R. J. & Rahman, M. S. Past, present, and future perspectives of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding: A systematic review in methods, monitoring, and applications of global eDNA. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 17, e00547 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Epstein, S. & López-García, P. “Missing” protists: a molecular prospective. Biodivers. Conserv. 17, 261–276 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
López-García, P., Rodríguez-Valera, F., Pedrós-Alió, C. & Moreira, D. Unexpected diversity of small eukaryotes in deep-sea Antarctic plankton. Nature 409, 603–607 (2001).Article 
ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lovejoy, C., Massana, R. & Pedrós-Alió, C. Diversity and distribution of marine microbial eukaryotes in the Arctic Ocean and adjacent seas. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 3085–3095 (2006).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Worden, A. Z., Cuvelier, M. L. & Bartlett, D. H. In-depth analyses of marine microbial community genomics. Trends Microbiol. 14, 331–336 (2006).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Countway, P. D. et al. Distinct protistan assemblages characterize the euphotic zone and deep sea (2500 m) of the western North Atlantic (Sargasso Sea and Gulf Stream). Environ. Microbiol. 9, 1219–1232 (2007).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Massana, R. & Pedrós-Alió, C. Unveiling new microbial eukaryotes in the surface ocean. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 11, 213–218 (2008).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Alexander, E. et al. Microbial eukaryotes in the hypersaline anoxic L’Atalante deep-sea basin. Environ. Microbiol. 11, 360–381 (2009).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Stoeck, T. et al. Multiple marker parallel tag environmental DNA sequencing reveals a highly complex eukaryotic community in marine anoxic water. Mol. Ecol. 19, 21–31 (2010).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Logares, R. et al. Patterns of rare and abundant marine microbial eukaryotes. Curr. Biol. 24, 813–821 (2014).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
de Vargas, C. et al. Eukaryotic plankton diversity in the sunlit ocean. Science 348, 150 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fell, J. W., Scorzetti, G., Connell, L. & Craig, S. Biodiversity of micro-eukaryotes in Antarctic Dry Valley soils with More

Darwin, C. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. (John Murray, 1871).Andersson, M. Sexual Selection. (Princeton University Press, 1994).Shuster, S. & Wade, M. J. Mating Systems and Strategies. (Princeton University Press, 2003).Gosden, T. P. & Svensson, E. I. Spatial and temporal dynamics in a sexual selection mosaic. Evolution 62, 845–856 (2008).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kasumovic, M. M., Bruce, M. J., Andrade, M. C. B. & Herberstein, M. E. Spatial and temporal demographic variation drives within-season fluctuations in sexual selection. Evolution 62, 2316–2325 (2008).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Mobley, K. B. & Jones, A. G. Environmental, demographic, and genetic mating system variation among five geographically distinct dusky pipefish (Syngnathus floridae) populations. Mol. Ecol. 18, 1476–1490 (2009).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hoffer, J. N., Mariën, J., Ellers, J. & Koene, J. M. Sexual selection gradients change over time in a simultaneous hermaphrodite. eLife 6, e25139 (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Sih, A., Montiglio, P.-O., Wey, T. W. & Fogarty, S. Altered physical and social conditions produce rapidly reversible mating systems in water striders. Behav. Ecol. 28, 632–639 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Preston, B. T., Stevenson, I. R., Pemberton, J. M. & Wilson, K. Dominant rams lose out by sperm depletion. Nature 409, 681–682 (2001).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Cornwallis, C. K. & Uller, T. Towards an evolutionary ecology of sexual traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 145–152 (2010).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Forsgren, E., Amundsen, T., Borg, A. A. & Bjelvenmark, J. Unusually dynamic sex roles in a fish. Nature 429, 551–554 (2004).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hare, R. M. & Simmons, L. W. Sexual selection maintains a female-specific character in a species with dynamic sex roles. Behav. Ecol. 32, 609–616 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fox, R. J., Donelson, J. M., Schunter, C., Ravasi, T. & Gaitán-Espitia, J. D. Beyond buying time: the role of plasticity in phenotypic adaptation to rapid environmental change. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 374, 20180174 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ingleby, F. C., Hunt, J. & Hosken, D. J. The role of genotype-by-environment interactions in sexual selection. J. Evol. Biol. 23, 2031–2045 (2010).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lindström, J., Pike, T. W., Blount, J. D. & Metcalfe, N. B. Optimization of resource allocation can explain the temporal dynamics and honesty of sexual signals. Am. Nat. 174, 515–525 (2009).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Janicke, T., David, P. & Chapuis, E. Environment-dependent sexual selection: Bateman’s parameters under varying levels of food availability. Am. Nat. 185, 756–768 (2015).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Morimoto, J., Pizzari, T. & Wigby, S. Developmental environment effects on sexual selection in male and female Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS ONE 11, e0154468 (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Cattelan, S., Evans, J. P., Garcia-Gonzalez, F., Morbiato, E. & Pilastro, A. Dietary stress increases the total opportunity for sexual selection and modifies selection on condition-dependent traits. Ecol. Lett. 23, 447–456 (2020).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Glavaschi, A., Cattelan, S., Grapputo, A. & Pilastro, A. Imminent risk of predation reduces the relative strength of postcopulatory sexual selection in the guppy. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 375, 20200076 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Clark, D. C., DeBano, S. J. & Moore, A. J. The influence of environmental quality on sexual selection in Nauphoeta cinerea (Dictyoptera: Blaberidae). Behav. Ecol. 8, 46–53 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
Emlen, S. & Oring, L. Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197, 215–223 (1977).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Liker, A., Freckleton, R. P. & Székely, T. The evolution of sex roles in birds is related to adult sex ratio. Nat. Commun. 4, 1–6 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wacker, S. et al. Operational sex ratio but not density affects sexual selection in a fish. Evolution 67, 1937–1949 (2013).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wacker, S., Ness, M. H., Östlund-Nilsson, S. & Amundsen, T. Social structure affects mating competition in a damselfish. Coral Reefs 36, 1279–1289 (2017).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Janicke, T. & Morrow, E. H. Operational sex ratio predicts the opportunity and direction of sexual selection across animals. Ecol. Lett. 21, 384–391 (2018).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Procter, D. S., Moore, A. J. & Miller, C. W. The form of sexual selection arising from male-male competition depends on the presence of females in the social environment. J. Evol. Biol. 25, 803–812 (2012).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Eldakar, O. T., Dlugos, M. J., Pepper, J. W. & Wilson, D. S. Population structure mediates sexual conflict in Water striders. Science 326, 816–816 (2009).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Martin, A. M., Festa-Bianchet, M., Coltman, D. W. & Pelletier, F. Demographic drivers of age-dependent sexual selection. J. Evol. Biol. 29, 1437–1446 (2016).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Pilakouta, N. & Ålund, M. Sexual selection and environmental change: what do we know and what comes next? Curr. Zool. 67, 293–298 (2021).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kahn, A. T., Dolstra, T., Jennions, M. D. & Backwell, P. R. Y. Strategic male courtship effort varies in concert with adaptive shifts in female mating preferences. Behav. Ecol. 24, 906–913 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jordan, L. A. & Brooks, R. C. Recent social history alters male courtship preferences. Evolution 66, 280–287 (2012).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wilson, D. R., Nelson, X. J. & Evans, C. S. Seizing the opportunity: Subordinate male fowl respond rapidly to variation in social context. Ethology 115, 996–1004 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gwynne, D. T., Bailey, W. J. & Annells, A. The sex in short supply for matings varies over small Spatial scales in a Katydid (Kawanaphila nartee, Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 42, 157–162 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fedina, T. Y. & Lewis, S. M. Female mate choice across mating stages and between sequential mates in flour beetles. J. Evol. Biol. 20, 2138–2143 (2007).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Clark, H. L. & Backwell, P. R. Y. Temporal and spatial variation in female mating preferences in a fiddler crab. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 69, 1779–1784 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Serbezov, D., Bernatchez, L., Olsen, E. M. & Vøllestad, L. A. Mating patterns and determinants of individual reproductive success in brown trout (Salmo trutta) revealed by parentage analysis of an entire stream living population. Mol. Ecol. 19, 3193–3205 (2010).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gerlach, N. M., McGlothlin, J. W., Parker, P. G. & Ketterson, E. D. Reinterpreting Bateman gradients: multiple mating and selection in both sexes of a songbird species. Behav. Ecol. 23, 1078–1088 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dubuc, C., Ruiz-Lambides, A. & Widdig, A. Variance in male lifetime reproductive success and estimation of the degree of polygyny in a primate. Behav. Ecol. 25, 878–889 (2014).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Breuer, T. et al. Variance in the male reproductive success of western gorillas: acquiring females is just the beginning. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 64, 515–528 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Germain, R. R., Hallworth, M. T., Kaiser, S. A., Sillett, T. S. & Webster, M. S. Variance in within-pair reproductive success influences the opportunity for selection annually and over the lifetimes of males in a multi-brooded songbird. Evolution 75, 915–930 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lande, R. & Arnold, S. J. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37, 1210–1226 (1983).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Klug, H., Heuschele, J., Jennions, M. D. & Kokko, H. The mismeasurement of sexual selection. J. Evol. Biol. 23, 447–462 (2010).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Jennions, M. D., Kokko, H. & Klug, H. The opportunity to be misled in studies of sexual selection. J. Evol. Biol. 25, 591–598 (2012).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Krakauer, A. H., Webster, M. S., Duval, E. H., Jones, A. G. & Shuster, S. M. The opportunity for sexual selection: not mismeasured, just misunderstood. J. Evol. Biol. 24, 2064–2071 (2011).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hebets, E. A., Stafstrom, J. A., Rodriguez, R. L. & Wilgers, D. J. Enigmatic ornamentation eases male reliance on courtship performance for mating success. Anim. Behav. 81, 963–972 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fitzpatrick, J. L. & Lüpold, S. Sexual selection and the evolution of sperm quality. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 20, 1180–1189 (2014).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Jones, A. G. On the opportunity for sexual selection, the Bateman gradient and the maximum intensity of sexual selection. Evolution 63, 1673–1684 (2009).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Henshaw, J. M., Kahn, A. T. & Fritzsche, K. A rigorous comparison of sexual selection indexes via simulations of diverse mating systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E300–E308 (2016).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Evans, J. P. & Garcia-Gonzalez, F. The total opportunity for sexual selection and the integration of pre- and post-mating episodes of sexual selection in a complex world. J. Evol. Biol. 29, 2338–2361 (2016).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Downhower, J. F., Blumer, L. S. & Brown, L. Opportunity for selection: an appropriate measure for evaluating variation in the potential for selection? Evolution 41, 1395–1400 (1987).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Klug, H. & Stone, L. More than just noise: Chance, mating success, and sexual selection. Ecol. Evol. 11, 6326–6340 (2021).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Anthes, N., Häderer, I. K., Michiels, N. K. & Janicke, T. Measuring and interpreting sexual selection metrics: evaluation and guidelines. Methods Ecol. Evol. 8, 918–931 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Klug, H., Lindström, K. & Kokko, H. Who to include in measures of sexual selection is no trivial matter. Ecol. Lett. 13, 1094–1102 (2010).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Collet, J. M., Dean, R. F., Worley, K., Richardson, D. S. & Pizzari, T. The measure and significance of Bateman’s principles. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20132973 (2014).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Collet, J., Richardson, D. S., Worley, K. & Pizzari, T. Sexual selection and the differential effect of polyandry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 8641–8645 (2012).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
McDonald, G. C., Spurgin, L. G., Fairfield, E. A., Richardson, D. S. & Pizzari, T. Pre- and postcopulatory sexual selection favor aggressive, young males in polyandrous groups of red junglefowl. Evolution 71, 1653–1669 (2017).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Morimoto, J. et al. Sex peptide receptor-regulated polyandry modulates the balance of pre- and post-copulatory sexual selection in Drosophila. Nat. Commun. 10, 283 (2019).Article 
ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Shuster, S. M., Willen, R. M., Keane, B. & Solomon, N. G. Alternative mating tactics in socially monogamous prairie voles, Microtus ochrogaster. Front. Ecol. Evol. 7, 7 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dowling, J. & Webster, M. S. Working with what you’ve got: unattractive males show greater mate-guarding effort in a duetting songbird. Biol. Lett. 13, 20160682 (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pizzari, T. & McDonald, G. C. Sexual selection in socially structured, polyandrous populations: Some insights from the fowl. Adv. Study Behav. 51, 77–141 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Archer, M. S. & Elgar, M. A. Female preference for multiple partners: sperm competition in the hide beetle, Dermestes maculatus (DeGeer). Anim. Behav. 58, 669–675 (1999).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Qvarnström, A. & Forsgren, E. Should females prefer dominant males? Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 498–501 (1998).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Webster, M. S., Tarvin, K. A., Tuttle, E. M. & Pruett-Jones, S. Promiscuity drives sexual selection in a socially monogamous bird. Evolution 61, 2205–2211 (2007).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Brunton, D. H. Energy expenditure in reproductive effort of male and female Killdeer (Charadrius vociferus). Auk 105, 553–564 (1988).Article 

Google Scholar 
Johnson, L. S., Hicks, B. G. & Masters, B. S. Increased cuckoldry as a cost of breeding late for male house wrens (Troglodytes aedon). Behav. Ecol. 13, 670–675 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Boinski, S. Mating patterns in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri oerstedi): implications for seasonal sexual dimorphism. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 21, 13–21 (1987).Article 

Google Scholar 
McDonald, G. C., Spurgin, L. G., Fairfield, E. A., Richardson, D. S. & Pizzari, T. Differential female sociality is linked with the fine-scale structure of sexual interactions in replicate groups of red junglefowl, Gallus gallus. Proc. R. Soc. B 286, 20191734 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Carleial, R. et al. Temporal dynamics of competitive fertilization in social groups of red junglefowl (Gallus gallus) shed new light on avian sperm competition. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 375, 20200081 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lessells, C. M. & Birkhead, T. R. Mechanisms of sperm competition in birds: mathematical models. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 27, 325–337 (1990).Article 

Google Scholar 
Taborsky, T., Oliveira, R. F. & Brockmann, H. J. The Evolution of Alternative Reproductive Tactics: Concepts and Questions. in Alternative Reproductive Tactics: An Integrative Approach (Cambridge University Press, 2008).Ghislandi, P. G. et al. Resource availability, mating opportunity and sexual selection intensity influence the expression of male alternative reproductive tactics. J. Evol. Biol. 31, 1035–1046 (2018).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lehtonen, T. K., Wong, B. B. M. & Lindström, K. Fluctuating mate preferences in a marine fish. Biol. Lett. 6, 21–23 (2010).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Chaine, A. S. & Lyon, B. E. Adaptive plasticity in female mate choice dampens sexual selection on male ornaments in the lark bunting. Science 319, 459–462 (2008).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019).Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B. & Christensen, R. H. lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J. Stat. Softw. 82, 1–26 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Oklander, L. I., Kowalewski, M. & Corach, D. Male reproductive strategies in black and gold howler monkeys (Alouatta caraya). Am. J. Primatol. 76, 43–55 (2014).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Pröhl, H. & Hödl, W. Parental investment, potential reproductive rates, and mating system in the strawberry dart-poison frog, Dendrobates pumilio. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 46, 215–220 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Turnell, B. R. & Shaw, K. L. High opportunity for postcopulatory sexual selection under field conditions. Evolution 69, 2094–2104 (2015).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gill, L. F., van Schaik, J., von Bayern, A. M. P. & Gahr, M. L. Genetic monogamy despite frequent extrapair copulations in “strictly monogamous” wild jackdaws. Behav. Ecol. 31, 247–260 (2020).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Carleial, R., McDonald, G. C. & Pizzari, T. Dynamic phenotypic correlates of social status and mating effort in male and female red junglefowl, Gallus gallus. J. Evol. Biol. 33, 22–40 (2020).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
McDonald, G. C. & Pizzari, T. Structure of sexual networks determines the operation of sexual selection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E53–E61 (2018).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Janicke, T., Häderer, I. K., Lajeunesse, M. J. & Anthes, N. Darwinian sex roles confirmed across the animal kingdom. Sci. Adv. 2, e1500983 (2016).Article 
ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Webster, M. S., Pruett-Jones, S., Westneat, D. F. & Arnold, S. J. Measuring the effects of pairing success, extra-pair copulations and mate quality on the opportunity for sexual selection. Evolution 49, 1147–1157 (1995).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Etches, R. J. Reproduction in Poultry. (CABI, 1996).Schielzeth, H. Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients: Interpretation of regression coefficients. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1, 103–113 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Løvlie, H., Cornwallis, C. K. & Pizzari, T. Male mounting alone reduces female promiscuity in the fowl. Curr. Biol. 15, 1222–1227 (2005).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Berglund, A. Many mates make male pipefish choosy. Behaviour 132, 213–218 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
Carleial, R., Pizzari, T., Richardson, D. S. & McDonald, G. C. Data for: Disentangling the causes of temporal variation in the opportunity for sexual selection. figshare Dataset (2023) https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21902133.v1.McLain, D. K., Burnette, L. B. & Deeds, D. A. Within season variation in the intensity of sexual selection on body size in the bug Margus obscurator (Hemiptera Coreidae). Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 5, 75–86 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schlicht, E. & Kempenaers, B. Effects of social and extra-pair mating on sexual selection in Blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus). Evolution 67, 1420–1434 (2013).PubMed 

Google Scholar  More

Strains belonging to the same species display distinct growth dynamics on the marine polysaccharide alginateWe first quantified the growth dynamics of the 12 Vibrionaceae strains (Supplementary Table 1) on alginate in well-mixed batch cultures. Growth of populations was initiated at approximately the same inoculum density (105 colony forming units (c.f.u.) ml−1). We tracked the growth dynamics by measuring the optical density at 600 nm and compared the maximum population size reached over the course of 36 h (Fig. 1 and S1). We found significant differences in the maximal optical density achieved by different strains within each species (Fig. 1 and S1). In V. splendidus, strains 12B01 and FF6 reached a lower maximum population size compared to strains 1S124 and 13B01 (Fig. 1 and S1A). In V. cyclitrophicus, strain ZF270 reached a lower maximum population size compared to strains 1F175, 1F111, and ZF28 (Fig. 1 and S1A). Similarly, in V. sp. F13, strain 9ZC77 reached a lower maximum population size than strains 9CS106, 9ZC13, and ZF57 (Fig. 1 and S1A). These findings suggest that some strains are limited in their growth abilities in well-mixed environments, perhaps as a consequence of differences in the amount and activity of enzymes they release (Supplementary Table 1).Fig. 1: Vibrionaceae strains differ in their growth dynamics on the marine polysaccharide alginate under well-mixed conditions.Maximum optical density (measured at 600 nm) achieved by populations of strains belonging to Vibrio splendidus, Vibrio cyclitrophicus, and Vibrio sp. F13 during the course of a 36 h growth cycle on the same concentration (0.1% weight/volume) of the polysaccharide alginate. Points and error bars indicate the mean of measurements across populations within each ecotype (npopulations = 3) and the 95% confidence interval (CI), respectively. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences between strains within one species (One-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s post-hoc test; V. splendidus: p  More