Ecology

1.Hotez, P. J. et al. The Global Burden of Disease Study 2010: interpretation and implications for the neglected tropical diseases. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 8, e2865 (2014).2.World Health Organization. Prevention and Control of Schistosomiasis and Soil-transmitted Helminthiasis: Report of a WHO Expert Committee (World Health Organization, 2002).3.Montresor, A., Engels, D., Ramsan, M., Foum, A. & Savioli, L. Field test of the ‘dose pole’ for praziquantel in Zanzibar. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 96, 323–324 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
4.World Health Organization. Helminth Control in School-aged Children: A Guide for Managers of Control Programmes (World Health Organisation, 2006).5.World Health Organization. Schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiases: numbers of people treated in 2019. Wkly. Epidemiol. Rec. 95, 629–640 (2020).
Google Scholar 
6.Kabatereine, N. B. et al. Impact of a national helminth control programme on infection and morbidity in Ugandan schoolchildren. Bull. World Health Organ 85, 91–99 (2007).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Bronzan, R. N. et al. Impact of community-based integrated mass drug administration on schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminth prevalence in Togo. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 12, e0006551 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Deol, A. K. et al. Schistosomiasis—assessing progress toward the 2020 and 2025 global goals. N. Engl. J. Med. 381, 2519–2528 (2019).9.World Health Organization. Accelerating work to overcome the global impact of neglected tropical diseases: a roadmap for implementation. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/338712/WHO-HTM-NTD-2012.5-eng.pdf (2012).10.World Health Organization. A road map for neglected tropical diseases 2021–2030. https://www.who.int/neglected_diseases/Ending-the-neglect-to-attain-the-SDGs–NTD-Roadmap.pdf (2020).11.Mutuku, M. W. et al. A search for snail-related answers to explain differences in response of Schistosoma mansoni to praziquantel treatment among responding and persistent hotspot villages along the Kenyan shore of Lake Victoria. Am. J. Tropical Med. Hyg. 101, 65–77 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Assaré, R. K. et al. Characteristics of persistent hotspots of Schistosoma mansoni in western Côte d’Ivoire. Parasit. Vectors 13, 337 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
13.Kittur, N. et al. Persistent hotspots in schistosomiasis consortium for operational research and evaluation studies for gaining and sustaining control of schistosomiasis after four years of mass drug administration of praziquantel. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 101, 617–627 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Wiegand, R. E. et al. A persistent hotspot of Schistosoma mansoni infection in a five-year randomized trial of praziquantel preventative chemotherapy strategies. J. Infect. Dis. 216, 1425–1433 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Hedtke, S. M. et al. Genomic epidemiology in filarial nematodes: transforming the basis for elimination program decisions. Front. Genet. 10, 1282 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
16.Doyle, S. R. & Cotton, J. A. Genome-wide approaches to investigate anthelmintic resistance. Trends Parasitol. 35, 289–301 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
17.Crellen, T. et al. Whole genome resequencing of the human parasite Schistosoma mansoni reveals population history and effects of selection. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–13 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
18.Gower, C. M. et al. Population genetic structure of Schistosoma mansoni and Schistosoma haematobium from across six sub-Saharan African countries: implications for epidemiology, evolution and control. Acta Trop. 128, 261–274 (2013).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
19.Standley, C., Kabatereine, N., Lange, C., Lwambo, N. & Stothard, J. Molecular epidemiology and phylogeography of Schistosoma mansoni around Lake Victoria. Parasitology 137, 1937–1949 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
20.Faust, C. L. et al. Two-year longitudinal survey reveals high genetic diversity of Schistosoma mansoni with adult worms surviving praziquantel treatment at the start of mass drug administration in Uganda. Parasit. Vectors 12, 607 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Stothard, J. R. et al. Molecular epidemiology of Schistosoma mansoni in Uganda: DNA barcoding reveals substantial genetic diversity within Lake Albert and Lake Victoria populations. Parasitology 136, 1813–1824 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
22.Norton, A. J. et al. Genetic consequences of mass human chemotherapy for Schistosoma mansoni: population structure pre- and post-praziquantel treatment in Tanzania. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 83, 951–957 (2010).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Blanton, R. E. et al. Schistosoma mansoni population structure and persistence after praziquantel treatment in two villages of Bahia, Brazil. Int. J. Parasitol. 41, 1093–1099 (2011).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Gower, C. M. et al. Phenotypic and genotypic monitoring of Schistosoma mansoni in Tanzanian schoolchildren five years into a preventative chemotherapy national control programme. Parasit. Vectors 10, 593 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
25.Chevalier, F. D. et al. Oxamniquine resistance alleles are widespread in Old World Schistosoma mansoni and predate drug deployment. PLoS Pathog. 15, e1007881 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Platt, R. N. et al. Ancient hybridization and adaptive introgression of an invadolysin gene in schistosome parasites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 36, 2127–2142 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
27.Shortt, J. A. et al. Population genomic analyses of schistosome parasites highlight critical challenges facing endgame elimination efforts. Sci. Rep. 11, 6884 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Truscott, J. E. et al. A comparison of two mathematical models of the impact of mass drug administration on the transmission and control of schistosomiasis. Epidemics 18, 29–37 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Bouzat, J. L. Conservation genetics of population bottlenecks: the role of chance, selection, and history. Conserv. Genet. 11, 463–478 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Andrews, P. Praziquantel: mechanisms of anti-schistosomal activity. Pharmacol. Ther. 29, 129–156 (1985).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
31.Cioli, D. & Pica-Mattoccia, L. Praziquantel. Parasitol. Res. 90, S3–S9 (2003).32.Caffrey, C. R. Schistosomiasis and its treatment. Future Med. Chem. 7, 675–676 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
33.Kaplan, R. M. & Vidyashankar, A. N. An inconvenient truth: global worming and anthelmintic resistance. Vet. Parasitol. 186, 70–78 (2012).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
34.Rose, H. et al. Widespread anthelmintic resistance in European farmed ruminants: a systematic review. Vet. Rec. 176, 546 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
35.Schwab, A. E., Boakye, D. A., Kyelem, D. & Prichard, R. K. Detection of benzimidazole resistance-associated mutations in the filarial nematode Wuchereria bancrofti and evidence for selection by albendazole and ivermectin combination treatment. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 73, 234–238 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
36.Fallon, P. G. & Doenhoff, M. J. Drug-resistant schistosomiasis: resistance to praziquantel and oxamniquine induced in Schistosoma mansoni in mice is drug specific. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 51, 83–88 (1994).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Couto, F. F. B. et al. Schistosoma mansoni: a method for inducing resistance to praziquantel using infected Biomphalaria glabrata snails. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 106, 153–157 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
38.Mwangi, I. N. et al. Praziquantel sensitivity of Kenyan Schistosoma mansoni isolates and the generation of a laboratory strain with reduced susceptibility to the drug. Int. J. Parasitol. Drugs Drug Resist. 4, 296–300 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Lamberton, P. H. L., Faust, C. L. & Webster, J. P. Praziquantel decreases fecundity in Schistosoma mansoni adult worms that survive treatment: evidence from a laboratory life-history trade-offs selection study. Infect. Dis. Poverty 6, 110 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Stelma, F. F. et al. Efficacy and side effects of praziquantel in an epidemic focus of Schistosoma mansoni. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 53, 167–170 (1995).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Melman, S. D. et al. Reduced susceptibility to praziquantel among naturally occurring Kenyan isolates of Schistosoma mansoni. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 3, e504 (2009).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
42.Crellen, T. et al. Reduced efficacy of praziquantel against Schistosoma mansoni is associated with multiple rounds of mass drug administration. Clin. Infect. Dis. 63, 1151–1159 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
43.King, C. H., Muchiri, E. M. & Ouma, J. H. Evidence against rapid emergence of praziquantel resistance in Schistosoma haematobium, Kenya. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 6, 585–594 (2000).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
44.Gryseels, B. et al. Are poor responses to praziquantel for the treatment of Schistosoma mansoni infections in Senegal due to resistance? An overview of the evidence. Trop. Med. Int. Health 6, 864–873 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
45.Fenwick, A. & Webster, J. P. Schistosomiasis: challenges for control, treatment and drug resistance. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 19, 577–582 (2006).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Albonico, M. et al. Monitoring the efficacy of drugs for neglected tropical diseases controlled by preventive chemotherapy. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist 3, 229–236 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
47.Fukushige, M., Chase-Topping, M., Woolhouse, M. E. J. & Mutapi, F. Efficacy of praziquantel has been maintained over four decades (from 1977 to 2018): a systematic review and meta-analysis of factors influence its efficacy. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 15, e0009189 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
48.Hodgkinson, J. E. et al. Refugia and anthelmintic resistance: concepts and challenges. Int. J. Parasitol. Drugs Drug Resist. 10, 51–57 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
49.Walker, M. et al. New approaches to measuring anthelminthic drug efficacy: parasitological responses of childhood schistosome infections to treatment with praziquantel. Parasit. Vectors 9, 41 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
50.Kittur, N. et al. Defining persistent hotspots: areas that fail to decrease meaningfully in prevalence after multiple years of mass drug administration with praziquantel for control of schistosomiasis. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 97, 1810–1817 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
51.Levecke, B. et al. Evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy of praziquantel against schistosomes in seven countries with ongoing large-scale deworming programs. Int. J. Parasitol. Drugs Drug Resist. 14, 183–187 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
52.Nei, M., Maruyama, T. & Chakraborty, R. The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29, 1–10 (1975).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
53.Gattepaille, L. M., Jakobsson, M. & Blum, M. G. B. Inferring population size changes with sequence and SNP data: lessons from human bottlenecks. Heredity 110, 409–419 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Kohn, A. B., Anderson, P. A. V., Roberts-Misterly, J. M. & Greenberg, R. M. Schistosome Calcium Channel β Subunits: unusual modulatory effects and potential role in the action of the antischistosomal drug praziquantel. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 36873–36876 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
55.Greenberg, R. M. Are Ca2+ channels targets of praziquantel action? Int. J. Parasitol. 35, 1–9 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Pica-Mattoccia, L. et al. Cytochalasin D abolishes the schistosomicidal activity of praziquantel. Exp. Parasitol. 115, 344–351 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
57.Nogi, T., Zhang, D., Chan, J. D. & Marchant, J. S. A novel biological activity of praziquantel requiring voltage-operated Ca2+ channel β subunits: subversion of flatworm regenerative polarity. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 3, e464 (2009).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
58.Kohn, A. B., Roberts-Misterly, J. M., Anderson, P. A. V., Khan, N. & Greenberg, R. M. Specific sites in the Beta Interaction Domain of a schistosome Ca2+ channel beta subunit are key to its role in sensitivity to the anti-schistosomal drug praziquantel. Parasitology 127, 349–356 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
59.Valle, C. et al. Sequence and level of endogenous expression of calcium channel β subunits in Schistosoma mansoni displaying different susceptibilities to praziquantel. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 130, 111–115 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
60.Park, S.-K. et al. The anthelmintic drug praziquantel activates a schistosome transient receptor potential channel. J. Biol. Chem. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.AC119.011093 (2019).61.Park, S.-K. et al. Mechanism of praziquantel action at a parasitic flatworm ion channel. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.09.434291 (2021).62.Le Clec’h, W., Chevalier, F. D., Mattos, A. C. A. & Strickland, A. Genetic analysis of praziquantel resistance in schistosome parasites implicates a Transient Receptor Potential channel. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.09.447779 (2021).63.Standley, C. et al. Intestinal schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthiasis in Ugandan schoolchildren: a rapid mapping assessment. Geospat. Health 4, 39–53 (2009).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
64.Steinauer, M. L., Hanelt, B., Agola, L. E., Mkoji, G. M. & Loker, E. S. Genetic structure of Schistosoma mansoni in western Kenya: the effects of geography and host sharing. Int. J. Parasitol. 39, 1353–1362 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
65.Agola, L. E. et al. Genetic diversity and population structure of Schistosoma mansoni within human infrapopulations in Mwea, central Kenya assessed by microsatellite markers. Acta Trop. 111, 219–225 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
66.Gower, C. M. et al. Population genetics of Schistosoma haematobium: development of novel microsatellite markers and their application to schistosomiasis control in Mali. Parasitology 138, 978–994 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
67.Betson, M., Sousa-Figueiredo, J. C., Kabatereine, N. B. & Stothard, J. R. New insights into the molecular epidemiology and population genetics of Schistosoma mansoni in Ugandan pre-school children and mothers. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 7, e2561 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
68.Van den Broeck, F. et al. Inbreeding within human Schistosoma mansoni: do host-specific factors shape the genetic composition of parasite populations? Heredity 113, 32–41 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
69.Thiele, E. A., Sorensen, R. E., Gazzinelli, A. & Minchella, D. J. Genetic diversity and population structuring of Schistosoma mansoni in a Brazilian village. Int. J. Parasitol. 38, 389–399 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
70.Kebede, T., Negash, Y. & Erko, B. Schistosoma mansoni infection in human and nonhuman primates in selected areas of Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. J. Vector Borne Dis. 55, 116–121 (2018).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
71.Aemero, M. et al. Genetic diversity, multiplicity of infection and population structure of Schistosoma mansoni isolates from human hosts in Ethiopia. BMC Genet. 16, 137 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
72.Neves, M. I., Webster, J. P. & Walker, M. Estimating helminth burdens using sibship reconstruction. Parasit. Vectors 12, 441 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
73.Mawa, P. A., Kincaid-Smith, J., Tukahebwa, E. M., Webster, J. P. & Wilson, S. Schistosomiasis morbidity hotspots: roles of the human host, the parasite and their interface in the development of severe morbidity. Front. Immunol. 12, 751 (2021).
Google Scholar 
74.Theron, A., Sire, C., Rognon, A., Prugnolle, F. & Durand, P. Molecular ecology of Schistosoma mansoni transmission inferred from the genetic composition of larval and adult infrapopulations within intermediate and definitive hosts. Parasitology 129, 571–585 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
75.Parker, M. et al. Border parasites: schistosomiasis control among Uganda’s fisherfolk. J. East. Afr. Stud. 6, 98–123 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
76.Messer, P. W. & Petrov, D. A. Population genomics of rapid adaptation by soft selective sweeps. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 659–669 (2013).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
77.Gilleard, J. S. & Redman, E. Genetic diversity and population structure of haemonchus contortus. Adv. Parasitol. 93, 31–68 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
78.Huyse, T. et al. Regular treatments of praziquantel do not impact on the genetic make-up of Schistosoma mansoni in Northern Senegal. Infect. Genet. Evol. 18, 100–105 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
79.Lelo, A. E. et al. No apparent reduction in schistosome burden or genetic diversity following four years of school-based mass drug administration in mwea, central kenya, a heavy transmission area. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 8, e3221 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
80.French, M. D. et al. Reductions in genetic diversity of Schistosoma mansoni populations under chemotherapeutic pressure: the effect of sampling approach and parasite population definition. Acta Trop. 128, 196–205 (2013).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
81.Van den Broeck, F., Vanoverbeeke, J., Polman, K. & Huyse, T. A Darwinian outlook on schistosomiasis elimination. Preprint at bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.28.358523 (2020).82.Hayeshi, R., Masimirembwa, C., Mukanganyama, S. & Ungell, A.-L. B. The potential inhibitory effect of antiparasitic drugs and natural products on P-glycoprotein mediated efflux. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 29, 70–81 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
83.Hines-Kay, J. et al. Transcriptional analysis of Schistosoma mansoni treated with praziquantel in vitro. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 186, 87–94 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
84.Lespine, A., Ménez, C., Bourguinat, C. & Prichard, R. K. P-glycoproteins and other multidrug resistance transporters in the pharmacology of anthelmintics: prospects for reversing transport-dependent anthelmintic resistance. Int. J. Parasitol. Drugs Drug Resist. 2, 58–75 (2012).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
85.Greenberg, R. M. ABC multidrug transporters in schistosomes and other parasitic flatworms. Parasitol. Int. 62, 647–653 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
86.Hermisson, J. & Pennings, P. S. Soft sweeps: molecular population genetics of adaptation from standing genetic variation. Genetics 169, 2335–2352 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
87.Redman, E. et al. The emergence of resistance to the benzimidazole anthlemintics in parasitic nematodes of livestock is characterised by multiple independent hard and soft selective sweeps. PLoS Neglected Tropical Dis. 9, e0003494 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
88.Doyle, S. R. et al. Genome-wide analysis of ivermectin response by Onchocerca volvulus reveals that genetic drift and soft selective sweeps contribute to loss of drug sensitivity. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 11, e0005816 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
89.Choi, Y.-J. et al. Genomic introgression mapping of field-derived multiple-anthelmintic resistance in Teladorsagia circumcincta. PLoS Genet. 13, e1006857 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
90.Chami, G. F. et al. Influence of Schistosoma mansoni and hookworm infection intensities on anaemia in Ugandan villages. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 9, e0004193 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
91.Adriko, M. et al. Impact of a national deworming campaign on the prevalence of soil-transmitted helminthiasis in Uganda (2004–2016): implications for national control programs. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 12, e0006520 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
92.Webster, J. P., Gower, C. M. & Norton, A. J. Evolutionary concepts in predicting and evaluating the impact of mass chemotherapy schistosomiasis control programmes on parasites and their hosts. Evol. Appl. 1, 66–83 (2008).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
93.Leathwick, D. M., Ganesh, S. & Waghorn, T. S. Evidence for reversion towards anthelmintic susceptibility in Teladorsagia circumcincta in response to resistance management programmes. Int. J. Parasitol. Drugs Drug Resist. 5, 9–15 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
94.Kenyon, F. et al. The role of targeted selective treatments in the development of refugia-based approaches to the control of gastrointestinal nematodes of small ruminants. Vet. Parasitol. 164, 3–11 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
95.Chabasse, D., Bertrand, G., Leroux, J. P., Gauthey, N. & Hocquet, P. Developmental bilharziasis caused by Schistosoma mansoni discovered 37 years after infestation. Bull. Soc. Pathol. Exot. Filiales 78, 643–647 (1985).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
96.Warren, K. S., Mahmoud, A. A., Cummings, P., Murphy, D. J. & Houser, H. B. Schistosomiasis mansoni in Yemeni in California: duration of infection, presence of disease, therapeutic management. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 23, 902–909 (1974).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
97.William, S. et al. Stability and reproductive fitness of Schistosoma mansoni isolates with decreased sensitivity to praziquantel. Int. J. Parasitol. 31, 1093–1100 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
98.Viana, M., Faust, C. L., Haydon, D. T., Webster, J. P. & Lamberton, P. H. L. The effects of subcurative praziquantel treatment on life‐history traits and trade‐offs in drug‐resistant Schistosoma mansoni. Evol. Appl. 11, 488–500 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
99.Standley, C. J., Goodacre, S. L., Wade, C. M. & Stothard, J. R. The population genetic structure of Biomphalaria choanomphala in Lake Victoria, East Africa: implications for schistosomiasis transmission. Parasit. Vectors 7, 524 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
100.Mitta, G. et al. The compatibility between Biomphalaria glabrata snails and Schistosoma mansoni: an increasingly complex puzzle. Adv. Parasitol. 97, 111–145 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
101.Rowel, C. et al. Environmental epidemiology of intestinal schistosomiasis in Uganda: population dynamics of Biomphalaria (Gastropoda: Planorbidae) in Lake Albert and Lake Victoria with observations on natural infections with digenetic trematodes. BioMed. Res. Int. 2015, 1–11 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
102.Anderson, L. C., Loker, E. S. & Wearing, H. J. Modeling schistosomiasis transmission: the importance of snail population structure. Parasit. Vectors 14, 94 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
103.Nikolakis, Z. L. et al. Patterns of relatedness and genetic diversity inferred from whole genome sequencing of archival blood fluke miracidia (Schistosoma japonicum). PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 15, e0009020 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
104.Kovač, J. et al. Pharmacokinetics of praziquantel in Schistosoma mansoni- and Schistosoma haematobium-infected school- and preschool-aged children. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 62, e02253-17 (2018).105.Secor, W. E. Faculty opinions recommendation of sensitivity and specificity of multiple Kato-Katz thick smears and a circulating cathodic antigen test for Schistosoma mansoni diagnosis pre- and post-repeated-praziquantel treatment. Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature. https://doi.org/10.3410/f.718871676.793510451 (2015).106.Stothard, J. R., Sousa-Figueiredo, J. C. & Navaratnam, A. M. D. Advocacy, policies and practicalities of preventive chemotherapy campaigns for African children with schistosomiasis. Expert Rev. Anti. Infect. Ther. 11, 733–752 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
107.Fenwick, A. et al. The Schistosomiasis Control Initiative (SCI): rationale, development and implementation from 2002–2008. Parasitology 136, 1719–1730 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
108.Colley, D. G., Bustinduy, A. L., Secor, W. E. & King, C. H. Human schistosomiasis. Lancet 383, 2253–2264 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
109.Crellen, T. et al. Schistosoma mansoni egg count reduction data, Ugandan Primary Schools 2014. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12687.84640 (2018).110.Hadfield, J. D. MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: the MCMCglmm R package. J. Stat. Softw. 33, 1–22 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
111.Emery, A. M., Allan, F. E., Rabone, M. E. & Rollinson, D. Schistosomiasis collection at NHM (SCAN). Parasites Vectors 5, 1 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
112.Howe, K. L., Bolt, B. J., Shafie, M., Kersey, P. & Berriman, M. WormBase ParaSite—a comprehensive resource for helminth genomics. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 215, 2–10 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
113.Protasio, A. V. et al. A systematically improved high quality genome and transcriptome of the human blood fluke Schistosoma mansoni. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 6, e1455 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
114.Wood, D. E. & Salzberg, S. L. Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol. 15, R46 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
115.McKenna, A. et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–1303 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
116.Li, H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.3997 (2013).117.Danecek, P. et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27, 2156–2158 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
118.Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
119.Manichaikul, A. et al. Robust relationship inference in genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics 26, 2867–2873 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
120.Gómez-Rubio, V. ggplot2—elegant graphics for data analysis (2nd edn). J. Stat. Softw., Book Rev. 77, 1–3 (2017).
Google Scholar 
121.Purcell, S. et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 559–575 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
122.Alexander, D. H., Novembre, J. & Lange, K. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Res. 19, 1655–1664 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
123.Paradis, E. & Schliep, K. ape 5.0: an environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R. Bioinformatics https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty633 (2018).124.Schliep, K. P. phangorn: phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics 27, 592–593 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
125.Yu, G., Smith, D. K., Zhu, H., Guan, Y. & Lam, T. T.-Y. ggtree: an R package for visualization and annotation of phylogenetic trees with their covariates and other associated data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 8, 28–36 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
126.Korunes, K. L. & Samuk, K. pixy: unbiased estimation of nucleotide diversity and divergence in the presence of missing data. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 21, 1359–1368 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
127.Kassambara, A. ggpubr:‘ggplot2’ based publication ready plots. R package version 0.25 (2018).128.Criscione, C. D., Valentim, C. L. L., Hirai, H., LoVerde, P. T. & Anderson, T. J. C. Genomic linkage map of the human blood fluke Schistosoma mansoni. Genome Biol. 10, R71 (2009).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
129.Browning, S. R. & Browning, B. L. Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 1084–1097 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
130.Szpiech, Z. A. & Hernandez, R. D. selscan: an efficient multithreaded program to perform EHH-based scans for positive selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31, 2824–2827 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
131.Vitti, J. J., Grossman, S. R. & Sabeti, P. C. Detecting natural selection in genomic data. Annu. Rev. Genet. 47, 97–120 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
132.Terhorst, J., Kamm, J. A. & Song, Y. S. Robust and scalable inference of population history from hundreds of unphased whole genomes. Nat. Genet. 49, 303–309 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
133.Gutenkunst, R. N., Hernandez, R. D., Williamson, S. H. & Bustamante, C. D. Inferring the joint demographic history of multiple populations from multidimensional SNP frequency data. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000695 (2009).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
134.R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for statistical computing, Vienna (2013).135.Wilke, C. O. cowplot: Streamlined plot theme and plot annotations for ‘ggplot2’. R package version 0.7.0 (2016).136.Tange, O. GNU Parallel: The Command-Line Power Tool | USENIX. https://www.usenix.org/publications/login/february-2011-volume-36-number-1/gnu-parallel-command-line-power-tool (2011).137.Li, H. A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data. Bioinformatics 27, 2987–2993 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
138.Berger, D. et al. Data release: Whole-genome sequencing of Schistosoma mansoni reveals extensive diversity with limited selection despite mass drug administration. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4940588 (2021).139.Berger, D. duncanberger/PZQ_POPGEN. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4975909 (2021). More

Study site and populationThe Manawatu River estuary (40.47°S, 175.22°E; Fig. 1) is a small (ca. 1 × 2 km) intertidal mudflat area on the west coast of the North Island, New Zealand. Since 2006, we have captured bar-tailed godwits by cannon-net or mist-net, and marked individuals with a numbered metal band, plus either a unique combination of the white flag and four colorbands, or an engraved white flag with a field-readable three-digit alphabetical code. During 2008–2020, 35% (range: 23–48% per year) of adult (i.e., migratory) individuals were marked in the estuary’s highly site-faithful population of 170–280 godwits.At capture, godwits were aged (≥/ males), most (89%) individuals were sexed by bill length (length of exposed culmen: >99 mm = female; More

NEWS
06 August 2021

COVID vaccine inequity, species swaps — the week in infographics

Nature highlights three key infographics from the week in science and research.

Share on Twitter
Share on Twitter

Share on Facebook
Share on Facebook

Share via E-Mail
Share via E-Mail

Inequity in vaccine accessRich nations’ plans to administer booster doses of COVID-19 vaccine to people who have been fully vaccinated have drawn criticism from many global health researchers, who highlight the growing disparities between wealth and access to vaccines. A July report from KFF, a health-policy organization based in San Francisco, California, finds that at current vaccination rates, low-income countries won’t achieve substantial levels of protection until at least 2023.

Sources: KFF/Our World in Data/World Bank

The changing face of ecosystemsDespite alarming declines in some animal and plant species, total biodiversity in many ecosystems is not decreasing. But that doesn’t mean such ecosystems are static. In fact, the mix of species in local communities is changing rapidly almost everywhere on Earth. As some inhabitants disappear, colonizers move in and add to species richness.

Source: S. A. Blowes et al. Science 366, 339–345 (2019).

Genetics behind the menopauseGenetic variants associated with age at onset of menopause have been identified in a large-scale genomic analysis, findings that bring scientists a step closer to predicting and treating early menopause. When the DNA of egg cells in ovaries is damaged in mice, expression of the gene Chek1 promotes DNA repair, whereas expression of Chek2 promotes destruction of the affected cell. The analysis found that variants of the human equivalent of Chek2 and other genes involved in the response to DNA damage are associated with differences in age at natural menopause. It also showed that mice carrying an extra copy of Chek1, or lacking expression of Chek2, had a longer reproductive age span than did typical mice.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02151-z

Related Articles

COVID boosters for wealthy nations spark outrage

The world’s species are playing musical chairs: how will it end?

Genomic analysis identifies variants that can predict the timing of menopause

Read the paper: Genetic insights into biological mechanisms governing human ovarian ageing

Subjects

SARS-CoV-2

Vaccines

Biodiversity

Genetics

Latest on:

SARS-CoV-2

Delta threatens rural regions that dodged earlier COVID waves
News 06 AUG 21

COVID vaccine boosters: the most important questions
News Feature 05 AUG 21

Cash payments in Africa could boost vaccine uptake
World View 03 AUG 21

Vaccines

COVID vaccine boosters: the most important questions
News Feature 05 AUG 21

Cash payments in Africa could boost vaccine uptake
World View 03 AUG 21

Text-message nudges encourage COVID vaccination
News & Views 02 AUG 21

Biodiversity

The world’s species are playing musical chairs: how will it end?
News Feature 04 AUG 21

Biodiversity needs every tool in the box: use OECMs
Comment 26 JUL 21

Vulnerable nations lead by example on Sustainable Development Goals research
Editorial 20 JUL 21

Jobs

Chief Editor – Nature Water

Springer Nature
London, United Kingdom

Scientific director

Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR)
Berlin, Germany

PhD Student (m/f/d) in the field of Computer Vision / Data Scientist (m/f/d) in Cancer Research

St. Anna Children’s Cancer Research Institute (CCRI)
Vienna, Austria

PhD Students (m/f/d)

St. Anna Children’s Cancer Research Institute (CCRI)
Vienna, Austria

Nature Briefing
An essential round-up of science news, opinion and analysis, delivered to your inbox every weekday.

Email address

Yes! Sign me up to receive the daily Nature Briefing email. I agree my information will be processed in accordance with the Nature and Springer Nature Limited Privacy Policy.

Sign up More

Institute of Silviculture, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), Peter-Jordan Str. 82, 1190, Wien, AustriaElisabeth PötzelsbergerEuropean Forest Institute, Platz der Vereinten Nationen 7, 53113, Bonn, GermanyElisabeth PötzelsbergerForest Entomology, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903, Birmensdorf, SwitzerlandMartin M. GossnerETH Zurich, Department of Environmental Systems Science, Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems, 8092, Zurich, SwitzerlandMartin M. GossnerForest Protection, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903, Birmensdorf, SwitzerlandLudwig Beenken & Sophie StrohekerFaculty of Forestry, University of Agriculture, Al. 29 Listopada 46, 31-425, Kraków, PolandAnna Gazda & Srđan KerenForest Research, Forestry Commission, Northern Research Station, Roslin, EH25 9SY, Great BritainMichal PetrNatural Resources Institute Finland, Luke, Latokartanonkaari 9, 00790, Helsinki, FinlandTiina YliojaFEM Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, Via E. Mach 1, 38010, San Michele all’Adige, ItalyNicola La PortaThe EFI Project Centre on Mountain Forests MOUNTFOR, Via E. Mach 1, 38010, San Michele all’Adige, ItalyNicola La PortaForest Research Institute, Hellenic Agricultural Organization Demeter, Vassilika, 57006, GreeceDimitrios N. AvtzisWalloon Public service (SPW), 23 av Maréchal Juin, 5030, Gembloux, BelgiumElodie Bay & Marjana WestergrenSlovenian Forestry Institute, Vecna pot 2, 1000, Ljubljana, SloveniaMaarten De Groot & Nikica OgrisInstitute of Forestry and Rural Engineering, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Fr. R. Kreutzwaldi 5, 51006, Tartu, EstoniaRein DrenkhanFaculty of Forestry, “Ștefan cel Mare” University of Suceava, Universității Street 13, 720229, Suceava, RomaniaMihai-Leonard DudumanInstitute for Plant Protection in Horticulture and Forests, Julius Kuehn Institute (Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants), Messeweg 11/12, 38104, Braunschweig, GermanyRasmus EnderleDepartment of Entomology, Phytopathologyy and Game fauna, Forest Research Institute – Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, St. Kliment Ohridski 132, 1756, Sofia, BulgariaMargarita GeorgievaDepartment of Fungal Plant Pathology in Forestry, Agriculture and Horticulture, Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO), Innocamp Steinkjer, skolegata 22, 7713, Steinkjer, NorwayAri M. HietalaInstitute for National and International Plant Health, Julius Kuehn Institute (Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants), Messeweg 11/12, 38104, Braunschweig, GermanyBjörn HoppeBiodiversité, Gènes et Communautés (BioGeCo), French National Institute for Agriculture, Food, and Environment (INRAE), University Bordeaux, F-33610, Cestas, FranceHervé JactelDepartment of Forestry and Renewable Forest Resources, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Vecna pot 83, 1000, Ljubljana, SloveniaKristjan JarniFaculty of Forestry, University of Banja Luka, Bulevar vojvode Stepe Stepanovica 75A, 51000, Banja Luka, Bosnia and HerzegovinaSrđan KerenForest Research Institute, National Agricultural Research and Innovation Centre, Farkassziget 3, H-4150, Püspökladány, HungaryZsolt KeseruDepartment of Ecology and Biogeography, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Lwowska 1, PL-87-100, Toruń, PolandMarcin Koprowski & Radoslaw PuchalkaCentre for Climate Change Research, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Lwowska 1, PL-87-100, Toruń, PolandMarcin Koprowski & Radoslaw PuchalkaInstitute of Plant Genetics and Biotechnology SAS, Akademicka 2, P. O. Box 39A, SK-950 07, Nitra, SlovakiaAndrej KormuťákUnidade de Xestión Ambiental e Forestal Sostible, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Campus de Lugo, 27002, Lugo, SpainMaría Josefa LombarderoLaboratory of Environmental Toxicology, National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics (NICPB), Akadeemia tee 23, 12618, Tallinn, EstoniaAljona LukjanovaFaculty of Forest Science and Ecology, Agriculture Academy, Vytautas Magnus University, Studentu 11, Akademija, 53361, Kaunas, LithuaniaVitas MarozasMediterranean Facility, European Forest Institute, Sant Pau Art Nouveau Site, Sant Antoni M. Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, SpainEdurad MauriCentro di Ricerca Foreste e Legno, Council for agricultural research and analysis of the agricultural economy (CREA), Viale Santa Margherita, 80, 52100, Arezzo, ItalyMaria Cristina MonteverdiNorwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO), P.O. Box 115, NO-1431, Ås, NorwayPer Holm Nygaard“Marin Drăcea” National Research-Development Institute in Forestry, Station Câmpulung Moldovenesc, Calea Bucovinei, 73bis, 725100, Câmpulung Moldovenesc, RomaniaNicolai OleniciEFI Atlantic, European Forest Institute, 69, Route de Arcachon, F-33610, Cestas, FranceChristophe OrazioIEFC Institut Européen de la Forêt Cultivée, 69, Route de Arcachon, F-33610, Cestas, FranceChristophe OrazioDepartment of Forest Protection, Austrian Federal Research Centre for Forests, Natural Hazards and Landscape (BFW), Seckendorff-Gudent-Weg 8, 1131, Vienna, AustriaBernhard PernyCentre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM) & Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, 3810-193, Aveiro, PortugalGlória PintoCoillte Unit 27, Coillte Forest, Danville Business Park, Kilkenny, R95 YT95, IrelandMichael PowerDepartment of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 23, DK-1958, Frederiksberg C., GermanyHans Peter RavnUCD Forestry, School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, UCD Forestry, School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8, Dublin, IrelandIgnacio SevillanoForest Research, Forestry Commission, Northern Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian, EH25 9SY, Great BritainPaul TaylorInstitute of Mediterranean Forest Ecosystems, Hellenic Agricultural Organization “Demeter”-, Terma Alkmanos, 11528, Athens, GreecePanagiotis TsopelasFaculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University, Zemědělská 3, 613 00, Brno, Czech RepublicJosef UrbanSiberian Federal University, Svobodnyy Ave, 79, 660041, Krasnoyarsk, RussiaJosef UrbanInstitute of Forestry and Rural Engineering, EstonianUniversity of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 5, 51006, Tartu, EstoniaKaljo VoolmaSouthern Swedish Forest Research Center, PO Box 49, SE-230 53, Alnarp, SwedenJohanna WitzellPolissya Branch, Ukrainian Research Institute of Forestry and Forest Melioration, Neskorenych st. 2, Dovzhik, UkraineOlga ZborovskaInstitute of Lowland Forestry and Environment (ILFE), University of Novi Sad, Antona Cehova 13d, 21 000, Novi Sad, SerbiaMilica ZlatkovicE.P., A.G, M.P., T.Y. and N.L.P. developed the concept and design of the study and organised the data collection, E.P., M.M.G. and L.B. managed the database, homogenised and cleaned the data, E.P. and M.M.G. performed the analysis and all other co-authors collected and synthesised the information for their respective countries. E.P., M.M.G. and L.B. wrote the paper and all other co-authors reviewed the paper. More

1.Batjes, N. H. Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 65, 10–21 (1996).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
2.Lal, R. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304, 1623–1627 (2004).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Buringh, P. in The role of terrestrial vegetation in the global carbon cycle: Measurement by remote sensing, 91–109 (Wiley, 1984).4.Hiederer, R. & Köchy, M. Global soil organic carbon estimates and the harmonized world soil database. EUR 79, 25225 (2011).
Google Scholar 
5.Smith, P. et al. Global change pressures on soils from land use and management. Glob. Chang. Biol. 22, 1008–1028 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Schlesinger, W. H. The Role of Terrestrial Vegetation in the Global Carbon Cycle: Measurement by Remote Sensing (Wiley, 1984).7.Conant, R. T., Cerri, C. E., Osborne, B. B. & Paustian, K. Grassland management impacts on soil carbon stocks: a new synthesis. Ecol. Appl. 27, 662–668 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Köchy, M., Hiederer, R. & Freibauer, A. Global distribution of soil organic carbon–Part 1: masses and frequency distributions of SOC stocks for the tropics, permafrost regions, wetlands, and the world. Soil 1, 351–365 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
9.Nahlik, A. M. & Fennessy, M. S. Carbon storage in US wetlands. Nat. Commun. 7, 1–9 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
10.Dixon, R. K. et al. Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science 263, 185–190 (1994).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Atwood, T. B. et al. Global patterns in mangrove soil carbon stocks and losses. Nat. Clim. Chang. 7, 523–528 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Maclean, J. L., Dawe, D. C., Hardy, B. & Hettel, G. P. Rice Almanac: Source book for the most important economic activity on earth, 3rd edn. (CABI Publishing, 2002).13.Kögel-Knabner, I. et al. Biogeochemistry of paddy soils. Geoderma 157, 1–14 (2010).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
14.Wu, J. Carbon accumulation in paddy ecosystems in subtropical China: evidence from landscape studies. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 62, 29–34 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Carlson, K. M. et al. Greenhouse gas emissions intensity of global croplands. Nat. Clim. Chang. 7, 63–68 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
16.FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). FAOSTAT: FAO Statistical Databases. http://faostat.fao.org/default.aspx (2018).17.Gattinger, A. et al. Enhanced top soil carbon stocks under organic farming. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 18226–18231 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Xie, Z. et al. Soil organic carbon stocks in China and changes from 1980s to 2000s. Glob. Chang. Biol. 13, 1989–2007 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Qin, Z., Huang, Y. & Zhuang, Q. Soil organic carbon sequestration potential of cropland in China. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 27, 711–722 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Jobbágy, E. G. & Jackson, R. B. The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecol. Appl. 10, 423–436 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Haefele, S. M., Nelson, A. & Hijmans, R. J. Soil quality and constraints in global rice production. Geoderma 235, 250–259 (2014).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
22.Pan, G., Li, L., Wu, L. & Zhang, X. Storage and sequestration potential of topsoil organic carbon in China’s paddy soils. Glob. Chang. Biol. 10, 79–92 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Wei, L. et al. Comparing carbon and nitrogen stocks in paddy and upland soils: Accumulation, stabilization mechanisms, and environmental drivers. Geoderma 398, 115121 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Wang, P. et al. Long-term rice cultivation stabilizes soil organic carbon and promotes soil microbial activity in a salt marsh derived soil chronosequence. Sci. Rep. 5, 15704 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
25.Li, Y. et al. Oxygen availability determines key regulators in soil organic carbon mineralisation in paddy soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 153, 108106 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Evans, C. D. et al. Acidity controls on dissolved organic carbon mobility in organic soils. Glob. Chang. Biol. 18, 3317–3331 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Liu, Y. et al. Impact of prolonged rice cultivation on coupling relationship among C, Fe, and Fe-reducing bacteria over a 1000-year paddy soil chronosequence. Biol. Fertil. Soils 55, 589–602 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Sinsabaugh, R. L. et al. Stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity at global scale. Ecol. Lett. 11, 1252–1264 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Liu, Y. et al. Microbial activity promoted with organic carbon accumulation in macroaggregates of paddy soils under long-term rice cultivation. Biogeosciences 13, 6565–6586 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Liu, Y. et al. Methanogenic abundance and changes in community structure along a rice soil chronosequence from east China. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 67, 443–455 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Malik, A. A. et al. Land use driven change in soil pH affects microbial carbon cycling processes. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–10 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Don, A., Schumacher, J. & Freibauer, A. Impact of tropical land‐use change on soil organic carbon stocks-a meta‐analysis. Glob. Chang. Biol. 17, 1658–1670 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Piao, S. et al. The carbon balance of terrestrial ecosystems in China. Nature 458, 1009–1013 (2009).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Davidson, E. A. & Janssens, I. A. Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature 440, 165–173 (2006).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
35.Kirk, G. The Biogeochemistry of Submerged Soils (Wiley, 2004).36.Kramer, M. G., Sanderman, J., Chadwick, O. A., Chorover, J. & Vitousek, P. M. Long‐term carbon storage through retention of dissolved aromatic acids by reactive particles in soil. Glob. Chang. Biol. 18, 2594–2605 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Scharpenseel, H. W., Pfeiffer, E. M. & Becker-Heidmann, P. in Advances in Soil Science (eds. Carter, MR, Stewart, BA) (Lewis Publishers, 1996).38.Liao, Q. et al. Increase in soil organic carbon stock over the last two decades in China’s Jiangsu Province. Glob. Chang. Biol. 15, 861–875 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Keiluweit, M., Wanzek, T., Kleber, M., Nico, P. & Fendorf, S. Anaerobic microsites have an unaccounted role in soil carbon stabilization. Nat. Commun. 8, 1–10 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Ghimire, R., Lamichhane, S., Acharya, B. S., Bista, P. & Sainju, U. M. Tillage, crop residue, and nutrient management effects on soil organic carbon in rice-based cropping systems: a review. J. Integr. Agric. 16, 1–15 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Maillard, É. & Angers, D. A. Animal manure application and soil organic carbon stocks: a meta‐analysis. Glob. Chang. Biol. 20, 666–679 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Tian, K. et al. Effects of long-term fertilization and residue management on soil organic carbon changes in paddy soils of China: a meta-analysis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 204, 40–50 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
43.Liu, Y. et al. Initial utilization of rhizodeposits with rice growth in paddy soils: rhizosphere and N fertilization effects. Geoderma 338, 30–39 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
44.Chen, J. et al. A keystone microbial enzyme for nitrogen control of soil carbon storage. Sci. Adv. 4, eaaq1689 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
45.Zhu, Z. et al. Rice rhizodeposits affect organic matter decomposition in paddy soil: the role of N fertilization and rice growth for enzyme activities, CO2 and CH4 emissions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 116, 369–377 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Moorhead, D. L. & Sinsabaugh, R. L. A theoretical model of litter decay and microbial interaction. Ecol. Monogr. 76, 151–174 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
47.Li, X. et al. Nitrogen fertilization decreases the decomposition of soil organic matter and plant residues in planted soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 112, 47–55 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
48.Cui, J. et al. Carbon and nitrogen recycling from microbial necromass to cope with C:N stoichiometric imbalance by priming. Soil Biol. Biochem. 142, 107720 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
49.Geisseler, D., Linquist, B. A. & Lazicki, P. A. Effect of fertilization on soil microorganisms in paddy rice systems—a meta-analysis. Soil Biol. Biochem. 115, 452–460 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Sun, W. et al. Climate drives global soil carbon sequestration and crop yield changes under conservation agriculture. Glob. Chang. Biol. 26, 3325–3335 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
51.Wissing, L. et al. Management-induced organic carbon accumulation in paddy soils: the role of organo-mineral associations. Soil Tillage Res. 126, 60–71 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
52.Baker, J. M., Ochsner, T. E., Venterea, R. T. & Griffis, T. J. Tillage and soil carbon sequestration—-what do we really know? Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 118, 1–5 (2007).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
53.Lal, R. Challenges and opportunities in soil organic matter research. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 60, 158–169 (2009).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Lal, R. Soil carbon sequestration in India. Clim. Change 65, 277–296 (2004).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
55.Liu, Y. et al. Carbon input and allocation by rice into paddy soils: a review. Soil Biol. Biochem. 133, 97–107 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Zhao, Y. et al. Economics-and policy-driven organic carbon input enhancement dominates soil organic carbon accumulation in Chinese croplands. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 4045–4050 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
57.Wei, X., Zhu, Z., Wei, L., Wu, J. & Ge, T. Biogeochemical cycles of key elements in the paddy-rice rhizosphere: microbial mechanisms and coupling processes. Rhizosphere 10, 100145 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
58.Alexandratos, N. & Bruinsma, J. World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.288998. (2012).59.Rui, W. & Zhang, W. Effect size and duration of recommended management practices on carbon sequestration in paddy field in Yangtze Delta Plain of China: a meta-analysis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 135, 199–205 (2010).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
60.Song, K. et al. Wetland degradation: its driving forces and environmental impacts in the Sanjiang Plain, China. Environ. Manage. 54, 255–271 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
61.Dong, J. et al. Northward expansion of paddy rice in northeastern Asia during 2000–2014. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 3754–3761 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
62.Chaturvedi, V. et al. Climate mitigation policy implications for global irrigation water demand. Mitig. Adapt. Strat. Glob. Chang. 20, 389–407 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
63.Gathorne-Hardy, A. A life cycle assessment (LCA) of greenhouse gas emissions from SRI and flooded rice production in SE India. Taiwan Water Conserv. J. 61, 111–125 (2013).
Google Scholar 
64.Linquist, B., Van Groenigen, K. J., Adviento‐Borbe, M. A., Pittelkow, C. & Van Kessel, C. An agronomic assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from major cereal crops. Glob. Chang. Biol. 18, 194–209 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
65.IPCC. in Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (eds. Field, C. B. et al) (Cambridge University Press, 2014).66.Xie, Z. et al. CO2 mitigation potential in farmland of China by altering current organic matter amendment pattern. Sci. China Earth Sci. 53, 1351–1357 (2010).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
67.Yan, X. et al. Carbon sequestration efficiency in paddy soil and upland soil under long-term fertilization in southern China. Soil Tillage Res. 130, 42–51 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
68.Shang, Q. et al. Net annual global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity in Chinese double rice‐cropping systems: a 3‐year field measurement in long‐term fertilizer experiments. Glob. Chang. Biol. 17, 2196–2210 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
69.Ma, Y. et al. Net global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity of annual rice–wheat rotations with integrated soil–crop system management. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 164, 209–219 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
70.Xiong, Z. et al. Differences in net global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity between major rice-based cropping systems in China. Sci. Rep. 5, 1–9 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
71.Jiang, Y. et al. Acclimation of methane emissions from rice paddy fields to straw addition. Sci. Adv. 5, eaau9038 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
72.Liu, C., Lu, M., Cui, J., Li, B. & Fang, C. Effects of straw carbon input on carbon dynamics in agricultural soils: a meta‐analysis. Glob. Chang. Biol. 20, 1366–1381 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
73.Shakoor, A. et al. A global meta-analysis of greenhouse gases emission and crop yield under no-tillage as compared to conventional tillage. Sci. Total Environ. 750, 142299 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
74.Zhao, X. et al. Methane and nitrous oxide emissions under no‐till farming in China: a meta‐analysis. Glob. Chang. Biol. 22, 1372–1384 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
75.Kim, S. Y., Gutierrez, J. & Kim, P. J. Unexpected stimulation of CH4 emissions under continuous no-tillage system in mono-rice paddy soils during cultivation. Geoderma 267, 34–40 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
76.Ball, B. C., Scott, A. & Parker, J. P. Field N2O, CO2 and CH4 fluxes in relation to tillage, compaction and soil quality in Scotland. Soil Tillage Res. 53, 29–39 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
77.Linquist, B. A., Adviento-Borbe, M. A., Pittelkow, C. M., van Kessel, C. & van Groenigen, K. J. Fertilizer management practices and greenhouse gas emissions from rice systems: a quantitative review and analysis. Field Crop. Res. 135, 10–21 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
78.Schlesinger, W. H. Carbon sequestration in soils: some cautions amidst optimism. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 82, 121–127 (2000).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
79.Choudhury, A. T. M. A. & Kennedy, I. R. Nitrogen fertilizer losses from rice soils and control of environmental pollution problems. Commun. Soil Sci. Plan. 36, 1625–1639 (2005).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
80.Jiang, Y. et al. Water management to mitigate the global warming potential of rice systems: a global meta-analysis. Field Crop. Res. 234, 47–54 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
81.Suryavanshi, P., Singh, Y. V., Prasanna, R., Bhatia, A. & Shivay, Y. S. Pattern of methane emission and water productivity under different methods of rice crop establishment. Paddy Water Environ. 11, 321–329 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
82.Yan, X., Akiyama, H., Yagi, K. & Akimoto, H. Global estimations of the inventory and mitigation potential of methane emissions from rice cultivation conducted using the 2006 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Guidelines. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003299 (2009).83.Jiang, Y. et al. Higher yields and lower methane emissions with new rice cultivars. Glob. Chang. Biol. 23, 4728–4738 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
84.Li, C. et al. Modeling greenhouse gas emissions from rice-based production systems: sensitivity and upscaling. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GB002045 (2004).85.Yin, S. et al. Carbon sequestration and emissions mitigation in paddy fields based on the DNDC model: a review. Artif. Intell. Agric. 4, 140–149 (2020).
Google Scholar 
86.FAO, IIASA, ISRIC, ISSCAS, and JRC: Harmonized World Soil Database (version 1.2), Tech. Rep., FAO, Rome, Italy and IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria (2012).87.Allison, L. in Organic carbon. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties, (ed. A.g. Norman). (American Society of Agronomy, 1965).88.Fang, C. & Moncrieff, J. B. The variation of soil microbial respiration with depth in relation to soil carbon composition. Plant Soil 268, 243–253 (2005).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
89.Yan, X., Cai, Z., Wang, S. & Smith, P. Direct measurement of soil organic carbon content change in the croplands of China. Glob. Chang. Biol. 17, 1487–1496 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
90.Rosenberg, M. S., Adams, D. C. & Gurevitch, J. MetaWin 2.0: statistical software for meta-analysis (Sinauer, 2000).91.Yue, Q. et al. Deriving emission factors and estimating direct nitrous oxide emissions for crop cultivation in China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 10246–10257 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
92.Hedges, L. V., Gurevitch, J. & Curtis, P. S. The meta‐analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology 80, 1150–1156 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
93.Adams, D. C., Gurevitch, J. & Rosenberg, M. S. Resampling tests for meta‐analysis of ecological data. Ecology 78, 1277–1283 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
94.Van Groenigen, K. J., Osenberg, C. W. & Hungate, B. A. Increased soil emissions of potent greenhouse gases under increased atmospheric CO2. Nature 475, 214–216 (2011).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar  More

1.Ghosh, S. K., Podder, D., Panja, S., & Mukherjee, S. In target areas where human mosquito-borne diseases are diagnosed, the inclusion of the pre-adult mosquito aquatic niches parameters will improve the integrated mosquito control program. PLos Neg. Trop. Dis. 14(8), e0008605 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Becker, B. N. et al. Mosquitoes and Their Control 499 (Springer, 2010).Book 

Google Scholar 
3.Hyde, K. D. et al. The amazing potential of fungi: 50 ways we can exploit fungi industrially. Fungal Divers. 97, 1–136 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Clark, T. B., Kellen, W. R., Fukuda, T. & Lindegren, J. E. Field and laboratory studies on the pathogenicity of the fungus Beauveria bassiana to three genera of mosquitoes. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 11(1), 1–7 (1968).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
5.Scholte, E. J., Knols, B. G. & Takken, W. Infection of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae with the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae reduces blood feeding and fecundity. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 91(1), 43–49 (2006).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
6.Bukhari, T., Takken, W. & Koenraadt, C. J. Development of Metarhizium anisopliae and Beauveria bassiana formulations for control of malaria mosquito larvae. Parasit. Vectors 4(1), 23 (2011).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Mukherjee, A., Debnath, P., Ghosh, S. K. & Medda, P. K. Biological control of papaya aphid (Aphis gossypii Glover) using entomopathogenic fungi. Vegetos 33, 1–10 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Fernández-Grandon, G. M., Harte, S. J., Ewany, J., Bray, D. & Stevenson, P. C. Additive effect of botanical insecticide and entomopathogenic fungi on pest mortality and the behavioral response of its natural enemy. Plants 9, 173 (2020).PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
9.Sobczak, J. F. et al. Manipulation of wasp (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) behavior by the entomopathogenic fungus Ophiocordyceps humbertii in the Atlantic forest in Ceará, Brazil. Entomol. News 129, 98–104 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Ghosh, S. K. & Pal, S. Entomopathogenic potential of Trichoderma longibrachiatum and its comparative evaluation with malathion against the insect pest Leucinodes orbonalis. Environ. Monit. Assess. 188(1), 37 (2016).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
11.Podder, D. & Ghosh, S. K. A new application of Trichoderma asperellum as an anopheline larvicide for eco friendly management in medical science. Sci. Reps. 9(1), 1108 (2019).ADS 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
12.Jones, E. B. G. Fungal adhesion. Mycol. Res. 98(9), 961–981 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Shah, P. A. & Pell, J. K. Entomopathogenic fungi as biological control agents. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 61, 413–423 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
14.Rudall, K. M. The chitin/protein complexes of insect cuticles. Adv. Insect Physiol. 1, 257–313 (1963).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Shah, F. A., Wang, C. S. & Butt, T. M. Nutrition influences growth and virulence of the insect-pathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 251(2), 259–266 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
16.Jackson, M. A., Dunlap, C. A. & Jaronski, S. T. Ecological considerations in producing and formulating fungal entomopathogens for use in insect biocontrol. Biocontrol 55(1), 129–145 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Vega, F.E.; Meyling, N., Luangsa-ard, J.& Blackwell, M. Fungal entomopathogens. In: edit Vega, F. and Kaya, H. A. Insect pathology, 2nd edn , San Diego, CA, Academic Press, pp 171–220 (2012).18.Gaugler, R. Entomopathogenic nematodes in biological control. CRC press (2018).19.McKinnon, A. C. et al. Detection of the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana in the rhizosphere of wound-stressed zea mays plants. Front. Microbiol. 9, 1161 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Zimmermann, G. Review on safety of the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium anisopliae. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 17(9), 879–920 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Hamer, J. E., Howard, R. J., Chumley, F. G. & Valent, B. A mechanism for surface attachment in spores of a plant pathogenic fungus. Science 239(4837), 288–290 (1988).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
22.Dhawan, M. & Joshi, N. (Enzymatic comparison and mortality of Beauveria bassiana against cabbage caterpillar Pieris brassicae LINN. Braz. J. Microbiol. 48(3), 522–529 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Mora, M. A. E., Castilho, A. M. C. & Fraga, M. E. Classification and infection mechanism of entomopathogenic fungi. Arq. Inst. Biol. 84, 0552015 (2017).
Google Scholar 
24.Li, J., Tracy, J. W. & Christensen, B. M. Phenol oxidase activity in hemolymph compartments of Aedes aegypti during melanotic encapsulation reactions against microfilariae. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 16(1), 41–48 (1992).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
25.Hillyer, J. F. & Strand, M. R. Mosquito hemocyte-mediated immune responses. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 3, 14–21 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Nanda, K. P. Chronic lead (Pb) exposure results in diminished hemocyte count and increased susceptibility to bacterial infection in Drosophila melanogaster. Chemosphere 236, 124349 (2019).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
27.Ghosh, S. K., Chatterjee, T., Chakravarty, A. & Basak, A. K. Sodium and potassium nitrite-induced developmental genotoxicity in Drosophila melanogaster—effects in larval immune and brain stem cells. Interdiscip. Toxicol. 13(4), 101–105 (2020).
Google Scholar 
28.Chatterjee, T., Ghosh, S. K., Paik, S., Chakravarty, A. & Basak, A. K. Benzoic acid treated Drosophila melanogaster the genetic disruption of larval brain stem cells and non-neural cells during metamorphosis. Toxicol. Environ. Health Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13530-021-00082-w (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Campos, R. A. Boophilus microplus infection by Beauveria amorpha and Beauveria bassiana: SEM analysis and regulation of subtilisin-like proteases and chitinases. Curr. Microbiol. 50(5), 257–261 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
30.McFarlane, H. E., Gendre, D. & Western, T. L. Seed coat ruthenium red staining assay. Bio-Protoc. 4, 1096 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Bhosale, R. R., Osmani, R. A. M. & Moin, A. Natural gums and mucilages: A review on multifaceted excipients in pharmaceutical science and research. Int. J. Res. Phytochem. Pharmacol 6(4), 901–912 (2014).
Google Scholar 
32.Shah, F. A., Allen, N., Wright, C. J. & Butt, T. M. Repeated in vitro subculturing alters spore surface properties and virulence of Metarhizium anisopliae. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 276(1), 60–66 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
33.Hsu, S. C. & Lockwood, J. L. Powdered chitin agar as a selective medium for enumeration of actinomycetes in water and soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 29(3), 422–426 (1975).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Parida, D., Jena, S. K. & Rath, C. C. Enzyme activities of bacterial isolates from iron mine areas of Barbil, Keonjhar district, Odisha, India. Int. J. Pure Appl. Biosci. 2(3), 265–271 (2014).
Google Scholar 
35.Kasana, R. C., Salwan, R., Dhar, H., Dutt, S. & Gulati, A. A rapid and easy method for the detection of microbial cellulases on agar plates using Gram’s iodine. Curr. Microbiol. 57(5), 503–507 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
36.Medina, P. & Baresi, L. Rapid identification of gelatin and casein hydrolysis using TCA. J. Microbiol. Methods 69(2), 391–393 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
37.Al-Nahdi, H. S. Isolation and screening of extracellular proteases produced by new isolated Bacillus sp. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2(9), 71–74 (2012).CAS 

Google Scholar 
38.Murthy, N. K. & Bleakley, B. H. Simplified method of preparing colloidal chitin used for screening of chitinase-producing microorganisms. Int. J. Microbiol. 10(2), 1937–8289 (2012).
Google Scholar 
39.Park, S. H., Lee, J. H. & Lee, H. K. Purification and characterization of chitinase from a marine bacterium, Vibrio sp. 98CJ11027. J. Microbiol 38, 224–229 (2000).CAS 

Google Scholar 
40.Roberts, W. K. & Selitrennikoff, C. P. Plant and bacterial chitinases differ in antifungal activity. Microbiology 134(1), 169–176 (1986).Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Tsuchida, O. et al. An alkaline proteinase of an alkalophilic Bacillus sp. Curr. Microbiol. 14(1), 7–12 (1986).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Crowell, A. M., Wall, M. J. & Doucette, A. A Maximizing recovery of water-soluble proteins through acetone precipitation. Anal. Chim. Acta. 796, 48–54 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
43.He, F. BCA (Bicinchoninic Acid) protein assay. Bio Protocol 1(5), 44 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
44.Sierra, L.M., Carmona, E.R., Aguado, L. & Marcos, R. The comet assay in Drosophila: neuroblast and hemocyte cells. In Genotoxicity and DNA Repair. Methods in Pharmacology and Toxicology. Humana Press, New York, NY. 269–82 (2014).45.Xu, T. et al. (2012) HMGB in mollusk Crassostrea ariakensis Gould: structure, pro-inflammatory cytokine function characterization and anti-infection role of its antibody. PLoS ONE 7(11), e50789 (2012).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Basak, A. K., Chatterjee, T., Chakravarty, A. & Ghosh, S. K. Silver nanoparticle-induced developmental inhibition of Drosophila melanogaster accompanies disruption of genetic material of larval neural stem cells and non-neuronal cells. Environ. Monit. Assess. 191(8), 497 (2019).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar  More

1.McFall-Ngai, M. et al. Animals in a bacterial world: a new imperative for the life sciences. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 110, 3229–3236 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Pita, L., Rix, L., Slaby, B. M., Franke, A. & Hentschel, U. The sponge holobiont in a changing ocean: from microbes to ecosystems. Microbiome 6, 46 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Caruso, R., Lo, B. C. & Núñez, G. Host–microbiota interactions in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 20, 411–426 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Hughes, T. P. et al. Spatial and temporal patterns of mass bleaching of corals in the Anthropocene. Science 359, 80–83 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Scheele, B. C. et al. Amphibian fungal panzootic causes catastrophic and ongoing loss of biodiversity. Science 363, 1459–1463 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Bell, J. J., Bennett, H. M., Rovellini, A. & Webster, N. S. Sponges to be winners under near-future climate scenarios. BioScience 68, 955–968 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Bosch, T. C. G., Guillemin, K. & McFall-Ngai, M. Evolutionary “experiments” in symbiosis: the study of model animals provides insights into the mechanisms underlying the diversity of host–microbe interactions. Bioessays 41, e1800256 (2019).8.Nyholm, S. V. & McFall-Ngai, M. J. A lasting symbiosis: how the Hawaiian bobtail squid finds and keeps its bioluminescent bacterial partner. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-021-00567-y (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
9.Visick, K. L., Stabb, E. V. & Ruby, E. G. A lasting symbiosis: how Vibrio fischeri finds a squid partner and persists within its natural host. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-021-00557-0 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
10.Peixoto, R. S. et al. Coral probiotics: premise, promise, prospects. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 9, 265–288 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar  More

1.Serebrovsky, A. S. On the possibility of a new method for the control of insect pests. Zool. Zh. 19, 618–630 (1940).
Google Scholar 
2.Curtis, C. F. Possible use of translocations to fix desirable genes in insect pest populations. Nature 218, 368–369 (1968). This paper is one of the first to describe how reciprocal chromosomal translocations could be used to drive a favoured linked trait in a threshold-dependent fashion.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Dawkins, R. The Selfish Gene Vol. 345 (Oxford University Press, 1976).4.Bastide, H. et al. Rapid rise and fall of selfish sex-ratio X chromosomes in Drosophila simulans: spatiotemporal analysis of phenotypic and molecular data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 2461–2470 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Corbett-Detig, R., Medina, P., Frerot, H., Blassiau, C. & Castric, V. Bulk pollen sequencing reveals rapid evolution of segregation distortion in the male germline of Arabidopsis hybrids. Evol. Lett. 3, 93–103 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Kingan, S. B., Garrigan, D. & Hartl, D. L. Recurrent selection on the Winters sex-ratio genes in Drosophila simulans. Genetics 184, 253–265 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
7.McLaughlin, R. N. Jr. & Malik, H. S. Genetic conflicts: the usual suspects and beyond. J. Exp. Biol. 220, 6–17 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Presgraves, D. C., Gerard, P. R., Cherukuri, A. & Lyttle, T. W. Large-scale selective sweep among segregation distorter chromosomes in African populations of Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000463 (2009).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
9.Seymour, D. K., Chae, E., Arioz, B. I., Koenig, D. & Weigel, D. Transmission ratio distortion is frequent in Arabidopsis thaliana controlled crosses. Heredity 122, 294–304 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Courret, C., Chang, C. H., Wei, K. H., Montchamp-Moreau, C. & Larracuente, A. M. Meiotic drive mechanisms: lessons from Drosophila. Proc. Biol. Sci. 286, 20191430 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
11.Kusano, A., Staber, C., Chan, H. Y. & Ganetzky, B. Closing the (Ran)GAP on segregation distortion in Drosophila. Bioessays 25, 108–115 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Merel, V., Boulesteix, M., Fablet, M. & Vieira, C. Transposable elements in Drosophila. Mob. DNA 11, 23 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Boulesteix, M. & Biemont, C. Transposable elements in mosquitoes. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 110, 500–509 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Lee, Y. C. & Langley, C. H. Transposable elements in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 365, 1219–1228 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Kelleher, E. S. Reexamining the P-element invasion of Drosophila melanogaster through the lens of piRNA silencing. Genetics 203, 1513–1531 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Majumdar, S. & Rio, D. C. P transposable elements in drosophila and other eukaryotic organisms. Microbiol. Spectr. 3, MDNA3–0004-2014 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
17.Burns, K. H. & Boeke, J. D. Human transposon tectonics. Cell 149, 740–752 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Doring, H. P., Tillmann, E. & Starlinger, P. DNA sequence of the maize transposable element Dissociation. Nature 307, 127–130 (1984).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Wallau, G. L., Capy, P., Loreto, E. & Hua-Van, A. Genomic landscape and evolutionary dynamics of mariner transposable elements within the Drosophila genus. BMC Genomics 15, 727 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
20.Hawkins, J. S., Hu, G., Rapp, R. A., Grafenberg, J. L. & Wendel, J. F. Phylogenetic determination of the pace of transposable element proliferation in plants: copia and LINE-like elements in Gossypium. Genome 51, 11–18 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Biemont, C., Vieira, C., Borie, N. & Lepetit, D. Transposable elements and genome evolution: the case of Drosophila simulans. Genetica 107, 113–120 (1999).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Buchman, A. B., Ivy, T., Marshall, J. M., Akbari, O. S. & Hay, B. A. Engineered reciprocal chromosome translocations drive high threshold, reversible population replacement in drosophila. ACS Synth. Biol. 7, 1359–1370 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Akbari, O. S. et al. Novel synthetic Medea selfish genetic elements drive population replacement in Drosophila; a theoretical exploration of Medea-dependent population suppression. ACS Synth. Biol. 3, 915–928 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Buchman, A., Marshall, J. M., Ostrovski, D., Yang, T. & Akbari, O. S. Synthetically engineered Medea gene drive system in the worldwide crop pest Drosophila suzukii. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 4725–4730 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
25.Champer, J., Zhao, J., Champer, S. E., Liu, J. & Messer, P. W. Population dynamics of underdominance gene drive systems in continuous space. ACS Synth. Biol. 9, 779–792 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Chen, C. C. et al. EXO1 suppresses double-strand break induced homologous recombination between diverged sequences in mammalian cells. DNA Repair. 57, 98–106 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Leftwich, P. T. et al. Recent advances in threshold-dependent gene drives for mosquitoes. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 46, 1203–1212 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Raban, R. R., Marshall, J. M. & Akbari, O. S. Progress towards engineering gene drives for population control. J. Exp. Biol. 223 (Suppl. 1), jeb208181 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Ward, C. M. et al. Medea selfish genetic elements as tools for altering traits of wild populations: a theoretical analysis. Evolution 65, 1149–1162 (2011).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Oberhofer, G., Ivy, T. & Hay, B. A. Gene drive and resilience through renewal with next generation Cleave and Rescue selfish genetic elements. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 9013–9021 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Oberhofer, G., Ivy, T. & Hay, B. A. Cleave and Rescue, a novel selfish genetic element and general strategy for gene drive. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 6250–6259 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Champer, J. et al. A toxin-antidote CRISPR gene drive system for regional population modification. Nat. Commun. 11, 1082 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Yen, P. S. & Failloux, A. B. A review: Wolbachia-based population replacement for mosquito control shares common points with genetically modified control approaches. Pathogens 9, 404 (2020).PubMed Central 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
34.O’Neill, S. L. The use of wolbachia by the world mosquito program to interrupt transmission of aedes aegypti transmitted viruses. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1062, 355–360 (2018).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
35.Niang, E. H. A., Bassene, H., Fenollar, F. & Mediannikov, O. Biological control of mosquito-borne diseases: the potential of wolbachia-based interventions in an IVM framework. J. Trop. Med. 2018, 1470459 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
36.Chevalier, B. S. & Stoddard, B. L. Homing endonucleases: structural and functional insight into the catalysts of intron/intein mobility. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 3757–3774 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Macreadie, I. G., Scott, R. M., Zinn, A. R. & Butow, R. A. Transposition of an intron in yeast mitochondria requires a protein encoded by that intron. Cell 41, 395–402 (1985).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Rong, Y. S. & Golic, K. G. The homologous chromosome is an effective template for the repair of mitotic DNA double-strand breaks in Drosophila. Genetics 165, 1831–1842 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Chan, Y. S., Huen, D. S., Glauert, R., Whiteway, E. & Russell, S. Optimising homing endonuclease gene drive performance in a semi-refractory species: the Drosophila melanogaster experience. PLoS ONE 8, e54130 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Windbichler, N. et al. A synthetic homing endonuclease-based gene drive system in the human malaria mosquito. Nature 473, 212–215 (2011). This study is the first demonstration of nuclease-mediated gene drive in mosquitoes based on the homing endonuclease gene I-SceI.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Carroll, D. Genome engineering with targetable nucleases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 83, 409–439 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Barrangou, R. et al. CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes. Science 315, 1709–1712 (2007).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
43.Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816–821 (2012). This foundational study developed the most widely used dual synthetic CRISPR system consisting of Cas9 endonuclease and gRNA components.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
44.Doudna, J. A., Sternberg, S. H. A Crack in Creation: Gene Editing and the Unthinkable Power to Control Evolution 281 (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2017).45.Gantz, V. M. & Bier, E. The mutagenic chain reaction: a method for converting heterozygous to homozygous mutations. Science 348, 442–444 (2015). This study reported the first CRISPR-based gene drive in a metazoan organism (D. melanogaster) with a specialized germline.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Gantz, V. M. et al. Highly efficient Cas9-mediated gene drive for population modification of the malaria vector mosquito Anopheles stephensi. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E6736–E6743 (2015). This study describes the first efficient CRISPR-based gene drive system in mosquitoes, which carried a dual anti-malarial effector cassette.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
47.Hammond, A. et al. A CRISPR-Cas9 gene drive system targeting female reproduction in the malaria mosquito vector Anopheles gambiae. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 78–83 (2016). This study describes the first efficient CRISPR-based suppression gene drive system in mosquitoes.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
48.Kyrou, K. et al. A CRISPR-Cas9 gene drive targeting doublesex causes complete population suppression in caged Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 1062–1066 (2018). This study describes a highly efficient suppression gene drive system in mosquitoes targeting an invariant genome target site in the doublesex locus.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
49.Li, M. et al. Development of a confinable gene drive system in the human disease vector Aedes aegypti. eLife 9, e51701 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Grunwald, H. A. et al. Super-Mendelian inheritance mediated by CRISPR-Cas9 in the female mouse germline. Nature 566, 105–109 (2019). This study provided the first proof-of-principle gene drive system in mammals, which selectively sustained drive via the female germline.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
51.DiCarlo, J. E., Chavez, A., Dietz, S. L., Esvelt, K. M. & Church, G. M. Safeguarding CRISPR-Cas9 gene drives in yeast. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 1250–1255 (2015). This study demonstrated CRISPR-based gene conversion in diploid yeast, which could then be transmitted meiotically.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
52.Valderrama, J. A., Kulkarni, S. S., Nizet, V. & Bier, E. A bacterial gene-drive system efficiently edits and inactivates a high copy number antibiotic resistance locus. Nat. Commun. 10, 5726 (2019). This study generalizes the concept of gene drive to bacteria, where it is applied to efficiently reduce the frequency of antibiotic reistance.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
53.Esvelt, K. M., Smidler, A. L., Catteruccia, F. & Church, G. M. Concerning RNA-guided gene drives for the alteration of wild populations. eLife 3, e03401 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Adolfi, A. et al. Efficient population modification gene-drive rescue system in the malaria mosquito Anopheles stephensi. Nat. Commun. 11, 5553 (2020). This study reports on the first recoded gene drive in mosquitoes that drove efficiently through both males and females based on the process of lethal/sterile mosaicism.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
55.Champer, J. et al. A CRISPR homing gene drive targeting a haplolethal gene removes resistance alleles and successfully spreads through a cage population. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 24377–24383 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Kandul, N. P., Liu, J., Bennett, J. B., Marshall, J. M. & Akbari, O. S. A confinable home-and-rescue gene drive for population modification. eLife 10, e65939 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
57.Terradas, G. et al. Inherently confinable split-drive systems in Drosophila. Nat. Commun. 12, 1480 (2021). This study further develops the strategy of inserting a recoded gene drive in genes essential for viability or reproduction in the context of split drive systems.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
58.Xu, X. S., Gantz, V. M., Siomava, N. & Bier, E. CRISPR/Cas9 and active genetics-based trans-species replacement of the endogenous Drosophila kni-L2 CRM reveals unexpected complexity. eLife 6, e30281 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
59.Lopez Del Amo, V. et al. A transcomplementing gene drive provides a flexible platform for laboratory investigation and potential field deployment. Nat. Commun. 11, 352 (2020). This study reports on the reconstitution of a full gene drive from split constituent parts.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
60.Guichard, A. et al. Efficient allelic-drive in Drosophila. Nat. Commun. 10, 1640 (2019). The study develops two allelic drive systems, copy-cutting and copy-grafting, to propagate favoured alleles of an essential gene.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
61.Kandul, N. P. et al. Assessment of a split homing based gene drive for efficient knockout of multiple genes. G3 10, 827–837 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
62.Xu, X.-R. S. et al. Active-genetic neutralizing elements for halting or deleting gene-drives. Mol. Cell 80, 246–262 (2020). This study reports on two drive-neutralizing systems that either inactivate (e-CHACR) or delete and replace (ERACR) a gene drive.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
63.Burt, A. Site-specific selfish genes as tools for the control and genetic engineering of natural populations. Proc. Biol. Sci. 270, 921–928 (2003). This seminal modelling study provides the theoretical underpinnings for the modern gene-drive field.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
64.North, A. R., Burt, A. & Godfray, H. C. J. Modelling the potential of genetic control of malaria mosquitoes at national scale. BMC Biol. 17, 26 (2019). This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the perfomance of suppressive gene drives following iterative releases across various topographies.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
65.North, A. R., Burt, A. & Godfray, H. C. J. Modelling the suppression of a malaria vector using a CRISPR-Cas9 gene drive to reduce female fertility. BMC Biol. 18, 98 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
66.Collins, C. M., Bonds, J. A. S., Quinlan, M. M. & Mumford, J. D. Effects of the removal or reduction in density of the malaria mosquito, Anopheles gambiae s.l., on interacting predators and competitors in local ecosystems. Med. Vet. Entomol. 33, 1–15 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
67.James, A. A. Gene drive systems in mosquitoes: rules of the road. Trends Parasitol. 21, 64–67 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
68.Gantz, V. M. & Bier, E. The dawn of active genetics. Bioessays 38, 50–63 (2016).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
69.Macias, V. M. & James, A. A. in Genetic Control of Malaria and Dengue (ed. Adelman, Z. N.) 423–444 (Elsevier Academic Press, 2015).70.Eckhoff, P. A., Wenger, E. A., Godfray, H. C. & Burt, A. Impact of mosquito gene drive on malaria elimination in a computational model with explicit spatial and temporal dynamics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E255–E264 (2017). This study provides a detailed analysis of drive parameters relevant to both suppression-based and modification-based drives and is the first to model a drive in the context of a two-dimensional environment.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
71.Hammond, A. M. et al. The creation and selection of mutations resistant to a gene drive over multiple generations in the malaria mosquito. PLoS Genet. 13, e1007039 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
72.Joyce, E. F., Paul, A., Chen, K. E., Tanneti, N. & McKim, K. S. Multiple barriers to nonhomologous DNA end joining during meiosis in Drosophila. Genetics 191, 739–746 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
73.Bozas, A., Beumer, K. J., Trautman, J. K. & Carroll, D. Genetic analysis of zinc-finger nuclease-induced gene targeting in Drosophila. Genetics 182, 641–651 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
74.Do, A. T., Brooks, J. T., Le Neveu, M. K. & LaRocque, J. R. Double-strand break repair assays determine pathway choice and structure of gene conversion events in Drosophila melanogaster. G3 4, 425–432 (2014).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
75.Wei, D. S. & Rong, Y. S. A genetic screen for DNA double-strand break repair mutations in Drosophila. Genetics 177, 63–77 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
76.Lin, C. C. & Potter, C. J. Non-Mendelian dominant maternal effects caused by CRISPR/Cas9 transgenic components in Drosophila melanogaster. G3 6, 3685–3691 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
77.Champer, J. et al. Novel CRISPR/Cas9 gene drive constructs reveal insights into mechanisms of resistance allele formation and drive efficiency in genetically diverse populations. PLoS Genet. 13, e1006796 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
78.Anopheles gambiae 1000 Genomes Consortiumet al. Genetic diversity of the African malaria vector Anopheles gambiae. Nature 552, 96–100 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
79.Deredec, A., Burt, A. & Godfray, H. C. The population genetics of using homing endonuclease genes in vector and pest management. Genetics 179, 2013–2026 (2008).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
80.Fasulo, B. et al. A fly model establishes distinct mechanisms for synthetic CRISPR/Cas9 sex distorters. PLoS Genet. 16, e1008647 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
81.Galizi, R. et al. A synthetic sex ratio distortion system for the control of the human malaria mosquito. Nat. Commun. 5, 3977 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
82.Galizi, R. et al. A CRISPR-Cas9 sex-ratio distortion system for genetic control. Sci. Rep. 6, 31139 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
83.Turner, J. M. Meiotic sex chromosome inactivation. Development 134, 1823–1831 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
84.Simoni, A. et al. A male-biased sex-distorter gene drive for the human malaria vector Anopheles gambiae. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 1054–1060 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
85.Carballar-Lejarazu, R. & et al. Next-generation gene drive for population modification of the malaria vector mosquito, Anopheles gambiae.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 22805–22814 (2020). This study describes a modification gene drive that propagates with high efficiency through both males and females.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
86.Pham, T. B. et al. Experimental population modification of the malaria vector mosquito, Anopheles stephensi. PLoS Genet. 15, e1008440 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
87.Dong, Y., Simoes, M. L. & Dimopoulos, G. Versatile transgenic multistage effector-gene combinations for Plasmodium falciparum suppression in Anopheles. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay5898 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
88.Dong, Y. et al. Engineered anopheles immunity to Plasmodium infection. PLoS Pathog. 7, e1002458 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
89.Isaacs, A. T. et al. Transgenic Anopheles stephensi coexpressing single-chain antibodies resist Plasmodium falciparum development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E1922–E1930 (2012). This study demonstrates 100% protection against parasite transmission in transgenic mosquitoes carrying a dual anti-parasite effector cassette.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
90.Haber, J. E. TOPping off meiosis. Mol. Cell 57, 577–581 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
91.Hammond, A. et al. Regulating the expression of gene drives is key to increasing their invasive potential and the mitigation of resistance. PLoS Genet. 17, e1009321 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
92.Lee, Y. et al. Genome-wide divergence among invasive populations of Aedes aegypti in California. BMC Genomics 20, 204 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
93.Callaway, E. Gene drives thwarted by emergence of resistant organisms. Nature 542, 15 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
94.Unckless, R. L., Clark, A. G. & Messer, P. W. Evolution of resistance against CRISPR/Cas9 gene drive. Genetics 205, 827–841 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
95.Drury, D. W., Dapper, A. L., Siniard, D. J., Zentner, G. E. & Wade, M. J. CRISPR/Cas9 gene drives in genetically variable and nonrandomly mating wild populations. Sci. Adv. 3, e1601910 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
96.Schmidt, H. et al. Abundance of conserved CRISPR-Cas9 target sites within the highly polymorphic genomes of Anopheles and Aedes mosquitoes. Nat. Commun. 11, 1425 (2020). This study provides computational evidence that conserved CRISPR cleavage sites are abundant in the genome.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
97.Akbari, O. S. et al. Safeguarding gene drive experiments in the laboratory. Science 349, 927–929 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
98.Li, J. et al. Genome-block expression-assisted association studies discover malaria resistance genes in Anopheles gambiae. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 20675–20680 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
99.Niu, G. et al. The fibrinogen-like domain of FREP1 protein is a broad-spectrum malaria transmission-blocking vaccine antigen. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 11960–11969 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
100.Zhang, G. et al. Anopheles midgut FREP1 mediates plasmodium invasion. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 16490–16501 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
101.Dong, Y., Simoes, M. L., Marois, E. & Dimopoulos, G. CRISPR/Cas9 -mediated gene knockout of Anopheles gambiae FREP1 suppresses malaria parasite infection. PLoS Pathog. 14, e1006898 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
102.Simoes, M. L., Caragata, E. P. & Dimopoulos, G. Diverse host and restriction factors regulate mosquito-pathogen interactions. Trends Parasitol. 34, 603–616 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
103.Nash, A. et al. Integral gene drives for population replacement. Biol. Open 8, bio037762 (2019). This study describes a bipartite drive system that can enable testing of anti-parasite effector cassettes under standard mosquito confinement protocols.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
104.Enayati, A., Hanafi-Bojd, A. A., Sedaghat, M. M., Zaim, M. & Hemingway, J. Evolution of insecticide resistance and its mechanisms in Anopheles stephensi in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region. Malar. J. 19, 258 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
105.Ffrench-Constant, R. H., Williamson, M. S., Davies, T. G. & Bass, C. Ion channels as insecticide targets. J. Neurogenet. 30, 163–177 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
106.Silva, J. J. & Scott, J. G. Conservation of the voltage-sensitive sodium channel protein within the Insecta. Insect Mol. Biol. 29, 9–18 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
107.Casida, J. E. & Durkin, K. A. Novel GABA receptor pesticide targets. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 121, 22–30 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
108.Ihara, M., Buckingham, S. D., Matsuda, K. & Sattelle, D. B. Modes of action, resistance and toxicity of insecticides targeting nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Curr. Med. Chem. 24, 2925–2934 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
109.Thapa, S., Lv, M. & Xu, H. Acetylcholinesterase: a primary target for drugs and insecticides. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 17, 1665–1676 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
110.Kleinstiver, B. P. et al. Engineered CRISPR-Cas12a variants with increased activities and improved targeting ranges for gene, epigenetic and base editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 276–282 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
111.Walton, R. T., Christie, K. A., Whittaker, M. N. & Kleinstiver, B. P. Unconstrained genome targeting with near-PAMless engineered CRISPR-Cas9 variants. Science 368, 290–296 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
112.Committee on Gene Drive Research in Non-Human Organisms: Recommendations for Responsible Conduct; Board on Life Sciences; Division on Earth and Life Studies; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Gene Drives on the Horizon: Advancing Science, Navigating Uncertainty, and Aligning Research with Public Values (The National Academies Press, 2016). This comprehensive advisory and historical review document summarizes consensus views for how to safely rear and study gene-drive systems in the laboratory.113.Adelman, Z. et al. Rules of the road for insect gene drive research and testing. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 716–718 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
114.James, S. et al. Pathway to deployment of gene drive mosquitoes as a potential biocontrol tool for elimination of malaria in Sub-Saharan Africa: recommendations of a scientific working group(dagger). Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 98, 1–49 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
115.James, S. L., Marshall, J. M., Christophides, G. K., Okumu, F. O. & Nolan, T. Toward the definition of efficacy and safety criteria for advancing gene drive-modified mosquitoes to field testing. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 20, 237–251 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
116.Warmbrod, K. L. et al. Gene Drives: Pursuing Opportunities, Minimizing Risk – A Johns Hopkins University Report on Responsible Governance (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for Health Security, Johns Hopkins University, 2020).117.Vella, M. R., Gunning, C. E., Lloyd, A. L. & Gould, F. Evaluating strategies for reversing CRISPR-Cas9 gene drives. Sci. Rep. 7, 11038 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
118.Rode, N. O., Courtier-Orgogozo, V. & Debarre, F. Can a population targeted by a CRISPR-based homing gene drive be rescued? G3 10, 3403–3415 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
119.Fedoroff, N., Wessler, S. & Shure, M. Isolation of the transposable maize controlling elements Ac and Ds. Cell 35, 235–242 (1983).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
120.Paix, A. et al. Precision genome editing using synthesis-dependent repair of Cas9-induced DNA breaks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E10745–E10754 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
121.Wu, B., Luo, L. & Gao, X. J. Cas9-triggered chain ablation of cas9 as a gene drive brake. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 137–138 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
122.Taxiarchi, C. et al. A genetically encoded anti-CRISPR protein constrains gene drive spread and prevents population suppression. Nat. Commun. 12, 3977 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
123.Conklin, B. R. On the road to a gene drive in mammals. Nature 566, 43–45 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
124.Salkeld, D. J. Vaccines for conservation: plague, prairie dogs & black-footed ferrets as a case study. Ecohealth 14, 432–437 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
125.Teem, J. L. et al. Genetic biocontrol for invasive species. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 452 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
126.Godwin, J. et al. Rodent gene drives for conservation: opportunities and data needs. Proc. Biol. Sci. 286, 20191606 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
127.McFarlane, G. R., Whitelaw, C. B. A. & Lillico, S. G. CRISPR-based gene drives for pest control. Trends Biotechnol. 36, 130–133 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
128.Klompe, S. E., Vo, P. L. H., Halpin-Healy, T. S. & Sternberg, S. H. Transposon-encoded CRISPR-Cas systems direct RNA-guided DNA integration. Nature 571, 219–225 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
129.Koonin, E. V., Makarova, K. S., Wolf, Y. I. & Krupovic, M. Evolutionary entanglement of mobile genetic elements and host defence systems: guns for hire. Nat. Rev. Genet. 21, 119–131 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
130.Strecker, J. et al. RNA-guided DNA insertion with CRISPR-associated transposases. Science 365, 48–53 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
131.Peters, J. E., Makarova, K. S., Shmakov, S. & Koonin, E. V. Recruitment of CRISPR-Cas systems by Tn7-like transposons. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E7358–E7366 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
132.Wiegand, T. & Wiedenheft, B. CRISPR Surveillance Turns Transposon Taxi. CRISPR J. 3, 10–12 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
133.Hamilton, T. A. et al. Efficient inter-species conjugative transfer of a CRISPR nuclease for targeted bacterial killing. Nat. Commun. 10, 4544 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
134.Price, V. J. et al. Enterococcus faecalis CRISPR-cas is a robust barrier to conjugative antibiotic resistance dissemination in the murine intestine. mSphere 4, e00464-19 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
135.Rodrigues, M., McBride, S. W., Hullahalli, K., Palmer, K. L. & Duerkop, B. A. Conjugative delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 for the selective depletion of antibiotic-resistant enterococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 63, e01454-19 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
136.Carraro, N. et al. Plasmid-like replication of a minimal streptococcal integrative and conjugative element. Microbiology 162, 622–632 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
137.Brophy, J. A. N. et al. Engineered integrative and conjugative elements for efficient and inducible DNA transfer to undomesticated bacteria. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 1043–1053 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
138.Bikard, D. et al. Exploiting CRISPR-Cas nucleases to produce sequence-specific antimicrobials. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1146–1150 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
139.Citorik, R. J., Mimee, M. & Lu, T. K. Sequence-specific antimicrobials using efficiently delivered RNA-guided nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1141–1145 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
140.Yosef, I., Manor, M., Kiro, R. & Qimron, U. Temperate and lytic bacteriophages programmed to sensitize and kill antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 7267–7272 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
141.Park, J. Y. et al. Genetic engineering of a temperate phage-based delivery system for CRISPR/Cas9 antimicrobials against Staphylococcus aureus. Sci. Rep. 7, 44929 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
142.Pazda, M., Kumirska, J., Stepnowski, P. & Mulkiewicz, E. Antibiotic resistance genes identified in wastewater treatment plant systems – a review. Sci. Total. Env. 697, 134023 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
143.Kraemer, S. A., Ramachandran, A. & Perron, G. G. Antibiotic pollution in the environment: from microbial ecology to public policy. Microorganisms 7, 180 (2019).CAS 
PubMed Central 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
144.Ram, G., Ross, H. F., Novick, R. P., Rodriguez-Pagan, I. & Jiang, D. Conversion of staphylococcal pathogenicity islands to CRISPR-carrying antibacterial agents that cure infections in mice. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 971–976 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
145.Bier, E. & Nizet, V. Driving to safety: CRISPR-based genetic approaches to reducing antibiotic resistance. Trends Genet. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2021.02.007 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
146.Rossati, A. et al. Climate, environment and transmission of malaria. Infez. Med. 24, 93–104 (2016).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
147.Fontenille, D. & Powell, J. R. From anonymous to public enemy: how does a mosquito become a feared arbovirus vector? Pathogens 9, 265 (2020).PubMed Central 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
148.Lidani, K. C. F. et al. Chagas disease: from discovery to a worldwide health problem. Front. Public Health 7, 166 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
149.Buscher, P., Cecchi, G., Jamonneau, V. & Priotto, G. Human African trypanosomiasis. Lancet 390, 2397–2409 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
150.Desjeux, P. Leishmaniasis: current situation and new perspectives. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 27, 305–318 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
151.Saxena, V., Bolling, B. G. & Wang, T. West nile virus. Clin. Lab. Med. 37, 243–252 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
152.Simon, L. V., Kong, E. L. & Graham, C. in St. Louis Encephalitis (StatPearls, 2020).153.Feng, X. et al. Optimized CRISPR tools and site-directed transgenesis towards gene drive development in Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes. Nat. Commun. 12, 2960 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
154.Nepomichene, T. N., Andrianaivolambo, L., Boyer, S. & Bourgouin, C. Efficient method for establishing F1 progeny from wild populations of Anopheles mosquitoes. Malar. J. 16, 21 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
155.Marchand, R. P. A new cage for observing mating behavior of wild Anopheles gambiae in the laboratory. J. Am. Mosq. Control. Assoc. 1, 234–236 (1985).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
156.Nunes-da-Fonseca, R., Berni, M., Tobias-Santos, V., Pane, A. & Araujo, H. M. Rhodnius prolixus: from classical physiology to modern developmental biology. Genesis https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.22995 (2017).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
157.Chaverra-Rodriguez, D. et al. Targeted delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein into arthropod ovaries for heritable germline gene editing. Nat. Commun. 9, 3008 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
158.Macias, V. M. et al. Cas9-mediated gene-editing in the malaria mosquito anopheles stephensi by ReMOT Control. G3 10, 1353–1360 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
159.Chaverra-Rodriguez, D. et al. Germline mutagenesis of Nasonia vitripennis through ovarian delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein. Insect Mol. Biol. 29, 569–577 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
160.Heu, C. C., McCullough, F. M., Luan, J. & Rasgon, J. L. CRISPR-Cas9-based genome editing in the silverleaf whitefly (Bemisia tabaci). CRISPR J. 3, 89–96 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
161.Prowse, T. A., Adikusuma, F., Cassey, P., Thomas, P. & Ross, J. V. A Y-chromosome shredding gene drive for controlling pest vertebrate populations. eLife 8, e41873 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
162.Carballar-Lejarazu, R. & James, A. A. Population modification of Anopheline species to control malaria transmission. Pathog. Glob. Health 111, 424–435 (2017).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
163.Annas, G. J. et al. A code of ethics for gene drive research. CRISPR J. 4, 19–24 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
164.Bier, E. & Sober, E. Gene editing and the war against malaria. Am. Sci. 108, 162–169 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
165.Long, K. C. et al. Core commitments for field trials of gene drive organisms. Science 370, 1417–1419 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
166.Kormos, A. et al. Application of the relationship-based model to engagement for field trials of genetically engineered malaria vectors.Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 104, 805–811 (2020).PubMed Central 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
167.World Health Organization. Guidance framework for testing of genetically modified mosquitoes. WHO http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/127889/1/9789241507486_eng.pdf (2014).168.Smith, D. L., McKenzie, F. E., Snow, R. W. & Hay, S. I. Revisiting the basic reproductive number for malaria and its implications for malaria control. PLoS Biol. 5, e42 (2007).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
169.Brauer, F., Castillo-Chavez, C., Mubayi, A. & Towers, S. Some models for epidemics of vector-transmitted diseases. Infect. Dis. Model. 1, 79–87 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
170.Deredec, A., Godfray, H. C. & Burt, A. Requirements for effective malaria control with homing endonuclease genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, E874–E880 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
171.Escalante, A. A. & Pacheco, M. A. Malaria molecular epidemiology: an evolutionary genetics perspective. Microbiol. Spectr. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.AME-0010-2019 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
172.Selvaraj, P. et al. Vector genetics, insecticide resistance and gene drives: An agent-based modeling approach to evaluate malaria transmission and elimination. PLoS Comput. Biol. 16, e1008121 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar  More