Ecology

The location, diameter, height and circumference of the coral were measured (Table 1, Fig. 2). The Porites was brown to cream in colour and hemispherical in shape (Fig. 2). It was identified as either Porites lutea (Hump or Pore coral) or P. lobata (Lobe coral)14.The primary habitat on the Porites was live coral (70%), followed by sponge, live coral rock and a small amount of macroalgae (Table 2). No recently dead coral, coral rubble or sand was recorded (Table 2). We observed competition between the Porites and other species of coral and invertebrate including encrusting sponge, plating and branching Acropora spp., Montipora, Chlorodesmis, soft coral and zoanthids (Table 2, Figs. 3, 4).Table 2 Reef Health Impact Survey (RHIS) of habitat and species categories on Porites sp.Full size tableFigure 3Detail of the sub-habitats and competitive interactions Porites sp. and boring sponge Cliona viridis (left) and live coral Porites sp. and Montipora sp. (right) along interspecific contact zones.Full size imageFigure 4Detail of Reef Health Impact Survey (RHIS) of Porites.Full size imageThe boring sponge, Cliona viridis, is abundant on the Great Barrier Reef15. It is a common bioeroding species advancing laterally at around 1 cm and to a depth of 1.2 cm per annum15. Abundance of Cliona viridis is often correlated to substrate availability and water energy with the greatest abundance often on the windward side of bommies15. This correlates to our observations as the large proportion of the substrate estimated to cover the bommie (15%) was on the windward side. The sponge’s advances will likely continue to compromise the colony size and health.We recorded marine debris at the base of the Porites. The debris was 2–3 m of rope that appeared to have been wrapped around the base of an adjacent coral. Adjacent to the bommie were three concrete blocks.How big is the Porites coral at Goolboodi compared to other big corals in the GBR, and the world? Potts et al.6 reported a very large, rounded Porites colony, 6.9 m in diameter which is 3.1 m smaller than this study. Lough et al.16 reported coral cores from colonies between 1.6–8.0 m in height with the largest corals of 6.0 m at Havannah, North Molle and Masthead Islands, 7.5 m at Abraham Reef and 8.0 m at Sanctuary Reef. Recognising the limitations of published data, the Porites coral at Goolboodi is the largest diameter coral that has been measured, and the 6th tallest in the GBR. It is unknown if the other corals are still alive or dead.Other comparatively large massive Porites have previously been located throughout the Pacific. These have included multiple bommies measuring more than 10 m4 and one exceptionally large colony observed measuring 17 m × 12 m in American Samoa17. Additionally, large Porites sp. bommies have been observed at Green Island, 30 km east of Taiwan18 as well as an 11 m diameter Porites australiensis at Sesoko Island, Okinawa, Japan19.How old is this massive Porites? In discussions with the Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS), there is a robust, linear relationship ( > 80% variance explained) between Porites average linear extension rate and average annual sea surface temperature (SST)20,21 that provides an estimate of colony age from its height. Using average annual SST at 18.5S, 146.5E of 26.12C (from HadiSST data set), the estimated linear extension rate is determined by (2.97 × 26.12) − 65.46 = 1.21 cm/year. Given the colony height of 5.1–5.3 m, this gives an estimated age of 421–438 years. This is well before European exploration and settlement of Australia. AIMS has investigated over 328 colonies of massive Porites corals from 69 reefs along the GBR and has aged them as being from 10–436 years21. AIMS has not investigated this coral (pers. comm Neal Cantin). Based on limitations of published data, the Porites coral at Goolboodi is one of the oldest corals on the GBR.Why is the Porites partially dead on top and living on the side? The proportion of live coral tissue on a colony reflects the cumulative, integrated effect of both beneficial and adverse environmental factors. Substantial portions of coral tissue can die from exposure to sun at low tides or warm water without lethal consequences to the colony as a whole10. Partial mortality of large bommies provides available real estate for opportunistic, fast growing sessile organisms. In this instance, multiple species of tabulate and branching Acropora sp., encrusting Montipora sp. and encrusting sponges are among the benthic organisms to have colonised 30% of the coral bommies’ surface area. Intraspecific competition is also evident from the skeletal barriers created along contact zones22 (Fig. 3). There was no observation of disease or coral bleaching.The Porites is located in a relatively remote, rarely visited and highly protected Marine National Park (green) zone. Its location had not been previously reported and there is no existing database for significant corals in Australia or globally. Cataloguing the location of massive and long-lived corals can have multiple benefits. Scientific benefits include geochemical and isotopic analyses in coral skeletal cores which can help understand century-scale changes in oceanographic events and can be used to verify climate models. Social and economic benefits can include diving tourism, citizen science23 culture and stewardship. Perhaps the Significant Trees Register, which was designed by the National Trust24 to protect and celebrate Australia’s heritage could be considered as a model. There are risks of cataloguing the location of massive corals. It could be damaged by direct and indirect human uses including anchoring, research and pollution.Indigenous languages are an integral part of Indigenous culture, spirituality, and connection to country. We consulted Manbarra Traditional Owners about protocol and an appropriate cultural name for the Porites and they considered: Big (Muga), Home (Wanga), Coral reef (Muugar), Coral (Dhambi), Old (Anki, Gurgu), Old man (Gulula) and Old person (Gurgurbu)25. The recommendation by Manbarra Traditional Owners is that the Porites is named as Muga dhambi (Big coral). The feedback from the process of consultation was very positive with acknowledgement of the respect that the scientists have demonstrated to acknowledge Traditional Owners in this way.The large Porites coral at Goolboodi (Orpheus) Island is unusually rare and resilient. It has survived coral bleaching, invasive species, cyclones, severely low tides and human activities for almost 500 years. In an attempt to contextualise the resilience of these individual Porites we have reviewed major historic disturbances such as coral bleaching which has occurred since at least 1575 and potentially 99 bleaching events in the GBR over the past 400 plus years26. Other indicators such as high-density ‘stress bands’ were recorded from 1877 and are significantly more frequent in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries in accordance with rising temperatures from anthropogenic global warming27. In addition there have been an average of 1–2 tropical cyclones per decade (40–80 in total) that have potentially impacted the coral adjacent to Goolboodi Island28,29; 46 tropical cyclones impacted the area between Ingham and Townsville from 1858 to 200830. The cumulative impact of almost 100 bleaching events and up to 80 major cyclones over a period of four centuries, plus declining nearshore water quality contextualise the high resilience of this Porites coral. Looking to the future there is real concern for corals in the GBR due to many impacts including climate change, declining water quality, overfishing and coastal development31,32. This field note provides important geospatial, environmental, and cultural information of a rare coral that can be monitored, appreciated, potentially restored and hopefully inspire future generations to care more for our reefs and culture. More

1.Irwin AJ, Oliver MJ. Are ocean deserts getting larger? Geophys Res Lett. 2009;36:L18609.Article 

Google Scholar 
2.McClain CR, Signorini SR, Christian JR. Subtropical gyre variability observed by ocean-color satellites. Deep Sea Res Part II Topical Stud Oceanogr. 2004;51:281–301.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Signorini SR, Franz BA, McClain CR. Chlorophyll variability in the oligotrophic gyres: Mechanisms, seasonality and trends. Front Mar Sci. 2015;2:1–11.Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Polovina JJ, Howell EA, Abecassis M. Ocean’s least productive waters are expanding. Geophys Res Lett. 2008;35:L03618.Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Sharma P, Marinov I, Cabre A, Kostadinov T, Singh A. Increasing biomass in the warm oceans: unexpected new insights from SeaWIFS. Geophys Res Lett. 2019;46:3900–10.Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Flombaum P, Wang W-L, Primeau FW, Martiny AC. Global picophytoplankton niche partitioning predicts overall positive response to ocean warming. Nat Geosci. 2020;13:116–20.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Carr M-E, Friedrichs MAM, Schmeltz M, Noguchi Aita M, Antoine D, Arrigo KR, et al. A comparison of global estimates of marine primary production from ocean color. Deep Sea Res Part II Topical Stud Oceanogr. 2006;53:741–70.Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Field CB, Behrenfeld MJ, Randerson JT, Falkowski P. Primary production of the biosphere: Integrating terrestrial and oceanic components. Science. 1998;281:237–40.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
9.DeVries T, Primeau F, Deutsch C. The sequestration efficiency of the biological pump. Geophys Res Lett. 2012;39:L13601.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
10.Cabré A, Marinov I, Leung S. Consistent global responses of marine ecosystems to future climate change across the IPCC AR5 earth system models. Clim Dyn. 2015;45:1253–80.Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Behrenfeld MJ, O’Malley RT, Boss ES, Westberry TK, Graff JR, Halsey KH, et al. Revaluating ocean warming impacts on global phytoplankton. Nat Clim Change. 2015;6:323–30.Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Richardson K, Bendtsen J. Vertical distribution of phytoplankton and primary production in relation to nutricline depth in the open ocean. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2019;620:33–46.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Roshan S, DeVries T. Efficient dissolved organic carbon production and export in the oligotrophic ocean. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1–8.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Marañón E, Holligan PM, Barciela R, González N, Mouriño B, Pazó MJ, et al. Patterns of phytoplankton size structure and productivity in contrasting open-ocean environments. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2001;216:43–56.Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Pérez V, Fernández E, Marañón E, Morán XAG, Zubkov MV. Vertical distribution of phytoplankton biomass, production and growth in the Atlantic subtropical gyres. Deep Sea Res Part I Oceanographic Res Pap. 2006;53:1616–34.Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Teira E, Mouriño B, Marañón E, Pérez V, Pazó MJ, Serret P, et al. Variability of chlorophyll and primary production in the Eastern North Atlantic subtropical gyre: potential factors affecting phytoplankton activity. Deep Sea Res Part I Oceanographic Res Pap. 2005;52:569–88.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Chisholm SW, Frankel SL, Goericke R, Olson RJ, Palenik B, Waterbury JB, et al. Prochlorococcus marinus nov. Gen. Nov. Sp.: an oxyphototrophic marine prokaryote containing divinyl chlorophyll a and b. Arch Microbiol. 1992;157:297–300.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Flombaum P, Gallegos JL, Gordillo RA, Rincón J, Zabala LL, Jiao N, et al. Present and future global distributions of the marine cyanobacteria Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus. PNAS. 2013;110:9824–9.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Partensky F, Hess WR, Vaulot D. Prochlorococcus, a marine photosynthetic prokaryote of global significance. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1999;63:106–27.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Li WK. Primary production of prochlorophytes, cyanobacteria, and eucaryotic ultraphytoplankton: Measurements from flow cytometric sorting. Limnol Oceanogr. 1994;39:169–75.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Jardillier L, Zubkov MV, Pearman J, Scanlan DJ. Significant CO2 fixation by small prymnesiophytes in the subtropical and tropical Northeast Atlantic Ocean. ISME J. 2010;4:1180–92.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Irion S, Christaki U, Berthelot H, L’Helguen S, Jardillier L. Small phytoplankton contribute greatly to CO2-fixation after the diatom bloom in the Southern Ocean. ISME J. 2021;15:1–14.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
23.Liu K, Suzuki K, Chen B, Liu H. Are temperature sensitivities of Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus impacted by nutrient availability in the subtropical Northwest Pacific? Limnol Oceanogr. 2020;66:639–51.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
24.D’Hondt S, Spivack AJ, Pockalny R, Ferdelman TG, Fischer JP, Kallmeyer J, et al. Subseafloor sedimentary life in the South Pacific gyre. PNAS. 2009;106:11651–6.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
25.Longhurst A, Sathyendranath S, Platt T, Caverhill C. An estimate of global primary production in the ocean from satellite radiometer data. J Plankton Res. 1995;17:1245–71.Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Morel A, Gentili B, Claustre H, Babin M, Bricaud A, Ras J, et al. Optical properties of the “clearest” natural waters. Limnol Oceanogr. 2007;52:217–29.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Halm H, Lam P, Ferdelman TG, Lavik G, Dittmar T, LaRoche J, et al. Heterotrophic organisms dominate nitrogen fixation in the south pacific gyre. ISME J. 2012;6:1238–49.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Raimbault P, Garcia N. Evidence for efficient regenerated production and dinitrogen fixation in nitrogen-deficient waters of the South Pacific Ocean: impact on new and export production estimates. Biogeosciences. 2008;5:323–38.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Shiozaki T, Bombar D, Riemann L, Sato M, Hashihama F, Kodama T, et al. Linkage between dinitrogen fixation and primary production in the oligotrophic South Pacific Ocean. Glob Biogeochem Cyc. 2018;32:1028–44.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Reintjes G, Tegetmeyer HE, Bürgisser M, Orlić S, Tews I, Zubkov M, et al. On-site analysis of bacterial communities of the ultraoligotrophic South Pacific gyre. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019;85:e00184–19.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Zielinski O, Henkel R, Voß D, Ferdelman TG. Physical oceanography during Sonne cruise SO245 (Ultrapac). PANGAEA. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.890394.32.Ferdelman TG, Klockgether G, Downes P, Lavik G. Nutrient data from CTD Nisken bottles from Sonne expedition SO-245 “Ultrapac”. PANGAEA. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.899228.33.Arar EJ, Collins GB. Method 445.0: In vitro determination of chlorophyll a and pheophytin a in marine and freshwater algae by fluorescence: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC; 1997. https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_record_report.cfm?Lab=NERL&dirEntryId=309417.34.Welschmeyer N, Naughton S. Improved chlorophyll a analysis: single fluorometric measurement with no acidification. Lake Reserv Manag. 1994;9:123.
Google Scholar 
35.Osterholz H, Kilgour D, Storey DS, Lavik G, Ferdelman T, Niggemann J, et al. Accumulation of DOC in the South Pacific subtropical gyre from a molecular perspective. Mar Chem. 2021;231:103955.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
36.Voß D, Henkel R, Wollschläger J, Zielinski O. Hyperspectral underwater light field measured during the cruise SO245 with R/V Sonne. PANGAEA. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.911558.37.Martínez-Pérez C, Mohr W, Löscher CR, Dekaezemacker J, Littmann S, Yilmaz P, et al. The small unicellular diazotrophic symbiont, UCYN-A, is a key player in the marine nitrogen cycle. Nat Microbiol. 2016;1:1–7.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
38.Marra J. Net and gross productivity: weighing in with 14C. Aquat Microb Ecol. 2009;56:123–31.Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Ribeiro CG, Marie D, Santos ALD, Brandini FP, Vaulot D. Estimating microbial populations by flow cytometry: comparison between instruments. Limnol Oceanogr Methods. 2016;14:750–8.Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Pernthaler A, Pernthaler J, Amann R. Fluorescence in situ hybridization and catalyzed reporter deposition for the identification of marine bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68:3094–101.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
41.West NJ, Schönhuber WA, Fuller NJ, Amann RI, Rippka R, Post AF, et al. Closely related Prochlorococcus genotypes show remarkably different depth distributions in two oceanic regions as revealed by in situ hybridization using 16 S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotides. Microbiology. 2001;147:1731–44.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Polerecky L, Adam B, Milucka J, Musat N, Vagner T, Kuypers MMM. Look@NanoSIMS—a tool for the analysis of nanoSIMS data in environmental microbiology. Environ Microbiol. 2012;14:1009–23.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
43.Verity PG, Robertson CY, Tronzo CR, Andrews MG, Nelson JR, Sieracki ME. Relationships between cell volume and the carbon and nitrogen content of marine photosynthetic nanoplankton. Limnol Oceanogr. 1992;37:1434–46.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
44.Khachikyan A, Milucka J, Littmann S, Ahmerkamp S, Meador T, Könneke M, et al. Direct cell mass measurements expand the role of small microorganisms in nature. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019;85:AEM00493–19.Article 

Google Scholar 
45.Walters W, Hyde ER, Berg-Lyons D, Ackermann G, Humphrey G, Parada A, et al. Improved bacterial 16 S rRNA gene (v4 and v4-5) and fungal internal transcribed spacer marker gene primers for microbial community surveys. MSystems. 2016;1:e00009–15.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Parada AE, Needham DM, Fuhrman JA. Every base matters: assessing small subunit rrna primers for marine microbiomes with mock communities, time series and global field samples. Environ Microbiol. 2016;18:1403–14.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
47.Comeau AM, Douglas GM, Langille MG. Microbiome helper: a custom and streamlined workflow for microbiome research. MSystems. 2017;2:e00127–16.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
48.Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, et al. Qiime allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2010;7:335.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
49.Haas S, Desai DK, LaRoche J, Pawlowicz R, Wallace DW. Geomicrobiology of the carbon, nitrogen and sulphur cycles in Powell Lake: a permanently stratified water column containing ancient seawater. Environ Microbiol. 2019;21:3927–52.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Zhang J, Kobert K, Flouri T, Stamatakis A. Pear: a fast and accurate Illumina paired-end read merger. Bioinformatics. 2013;30:614–20.51.Rognes T, Flouri T, Nichols B, Quince C, Mahé F. Vsearch: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ. 2016;4:e2584.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
52.Kopylova E, Noé L, Touzet H. Sortmerna: fast and accurate filtering of ribosomal RNAs in metatranscriptomic data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:3211–7.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
53.Mercier C, Boyer F, Bonin A, Coissac E (eds). Sumatra and Sumaclust: fast and exact comparison and clustering of sequences. SeqBio 2013 Workshop 2013: (abstract).54.DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie EL, Keller K, et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16 S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:5069–72.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
55.Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;41:D590–6.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
56.Decelle J, Romac S, Stern RF, Bendif EM, Zingone A, Audic S, et al. PhytoREF: A reference database of the plastidial 16 S rRNA gene of photosynthetic eukaryotes with curated taxonomy. Molec Ecol Res. 2015;15:1435–45.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
57.Guillou L, Bachar D, Audic S, Bass D, Berney C, Bittner L, et al. The protist ribosomal reference database (PR2): a catalog of unicellular eukaryote small sub-unit rRNA sequences with curated taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;4:D597–604.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
58.Del Campo J, Kolisko M, Boscaro V, Santoferrara LF, Nenarokov S, Massana R, et al. EukRef: phylogenetic curation of ribosomal RNA to enhance understanding of eukaryotic diversity and distribution. PLoS Biol. 2018;16:e2005849.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
59.Ludwig W, Strunk O, Westram R, Richter L, Meier H, Yadhukumar, et al. ARB: A software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1363–71.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
60.Gruber-Vodicka HR, Seah BK, Pruesse E. Phyloflash: rapid small-subunit rRNA profiling and targeted assembly from metagenomes. Msystems. 2020;5:e00920.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
61.Farrant GK, Doré H, Cornejo-Castillo FM, Partensky F, Ratin M, Ostrowski M, et al. Delineating ecologically significant taxonomic units from global patterns of marine picocyanobacteria. PNAS. 2016;113:E3365–74.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
62.Oggerin de Orube M, Fuchs BM. Personal communication: Unpublished shotgun metagenomes collected from in situ pump samples during R/V Sonne expedition SO245. Bremen, Germany. 2021.63.Schlitzer R. Ocean Data View. Bremerhaven, Germany. 2021. https://odv.awi.de.64.R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing,Vienna, Austria. 2017. https://www.R-project.org/.65.Wickham H. Ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York. 2016.66.McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. Phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLOS ONE. 2013;8:e61217.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
67.Oksanen J, Kindt R, Legendre P, O’Hara B, Stevens MHH, Oksanen MJ, et al. The vegan package: community ecology package. R package version 2.5–7. 2019. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.68.Chaigneau A, Pizarro O. Surface circulation and fronts of the South Pacific Ocean, east of 120°W. Geophys Res Lett. 2005;32:L08605.69.Logares R, Sunagawa S, Salazar G, Cornejo‐Castillo FM, Ferrera I, Sarmento H, et al. Metagenomic 16 S rRNA Illumina tags are a powerful alternative to amplicon sequencing to explore diversity and structure of microbial communities. Environ Microbiol. 2014;16:2659–71.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
70.Shi XL, Lepère C, Scanlan DJ, Vaulot D. Plastid 16 s rRNA gene diversity among eukaryotic picophytoplankton sorted by flow cytometry from the South Pacific Ocean. PLOS ONE. 2011;6:e18979.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
71.Fuller NJ, Campbell C, Allen DJ, Pitt FD, Zwirglmaier K, Le Gall F, et al. Analysis of photosynthetic picoeukaryote diversity at open ocean sites in the Arabian Sea using a pcr biased towards marine algal plastids. Aquat Micro Ecol. 2006;43:79–93.Article 

Google Scholar 
72.Raes EJ, Bodrossy L, Kamp JVD, Bissett A, Ostrowski M, Brown MV, et al. Oceanographic boundaries constrain microbial diversity gradients in the South Pacific Ocean. PNAS. 2018;115:E8266–75.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
73.Campbell L, Liu H, Nolla HA, Vaulot D. Annual variability of phytoplankton and bacteria in the subtropical North Pacific Ocean at station ALOHA during the 1991-4 ENSO event. Deep Sea Res Part I Oceanogr Res Pap. 1997;44:167–92.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
74.Viviani DA, Church MJ. Decoupling between bacterial production and primary production over multiple time scales in the North Pacific subtropical gyre. Deep Sea Res Part I Oceanogr Res Pap. 2017;121:132–42.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
75.Rii YM, Duhamel S, Bidigare RR, Karl DM, Repeta DJ, Church MJ. Diversity and productivity of photosynthetic picoeukaryotes in biogeochemically distinct regions of the south east pacific ocean. Limnol Oceanogr. 2016;61:806–24.Article 

Google Scholar 
76.Shi XL, Marie D, Jardillier L, Scanlan DJ, Vaulot D. Groups without cultured representatives dominate eukaryotic picophytoplankton in the oligotrophic South East Pacific Ocean. PLOS ONE. 2009;4:e7657.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
77.Kirkham AR, Lepere C, Jardillier LE, Not F, Bouman H, Mead A, et al. A global perspective on marine photosynthetic picoeukaryote community structure. ISME J. 2013;7:922–36.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
78.Lepère C, Vaulot D, Scanlan DJ. Photosynthetic picoeukaryote community structure in the South East Pacific Ocean encompassing the most oligotrophic waters on earth. Environ Microbiol. 2009;11:3105–17.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
79.Bender ML, Jönsson B. Is seasonal net community production in the South Pacific subtropical gyre anomalously low? Geophys Res Lett. 2016;43:9757–63.Article 

Google Scholar 
80.Montégut CDB, Madec G, Fischer AS, Lazar A, Iudicone D. Mixed layer depth over the global ocean: an examination of profile data and a profile-based climatology. J Geophys Res Oceans. 2004;109:C12003.Article 

Google Scholar 
81.Liu Q, Lu Y. Role of horizontal density advection in seasonal deepening of the mixed layer in the subtropical Southeast Pacific. Adv Atmospher Sci. 2016;33:442–51.Article 

Google Scholar 
82.Sato K, Suga T. Structure and modification of the South Pacific eastern subtropical mode water. J Phys Oceanogr. 2009;39:1700–14.Article 

Google Scholar 
83.Jung J, Furutani H, Uematsu M. Atmospheric inorganic nitrogen in marine aerosol and precipitation and its deposition to the north and south pacific oceans. J Atmospher Chem. 2011;68:157–81.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
84.Pavia FJ, Anderson RF, Winckler G, Fleisher MQ. Atmospheric dust inputs, iron cycling, and biogeochemical connections in the South Pacific Ocean from thorium isotopes. Glob Biogeochem Cycles. 2020;34:e2020GB006562.CAS 

Google Scholar 
85.Bonnet S, Guieu C, Bruyant F, Prášil O, Van Wambeke F, Raimbault P, et al. Nutrient limitation of primary productivity in the Southeast Pacific (Biosope Cruise). Biogeosciences. 2008;5:215–25.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
86.Mahaffey C, Björkman KM, Karl DM. Phytoplankton response to deep seawater nutrient addition in the North Pacific subtropical gyre. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2012;460:13–34.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
87.Grob C, Jardillier L, Hartmann M, Ostrowski M, Zubkov MV, Scanlan DJ. Cell-specific CO2 fixation rates of two distinct groups of plastidic protists in the Atlantic Ocean remain unchanged after nutrient addition. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2015;7:211–8.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
88.Vaulot D, Marie D, Olson RJ, Chisholm SW. Growth of Prochlorococcus, a photosynthetic prokaryote, in the equatorial pacific ocean. Science. 1995;268:1480–2.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
89.Grob C, Hartmann M, Zubkov MV, Scanlan DJ. Invariable biomass-specific primary production of taxonomically discrete picoeukaryote groups across the Atlantic Ocean. Environ Microbiol. 2011;13:3266–74.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
90.Berthelot H, Duhamel S, L’Helguen S, Maguer J-F, Wang S, Cetinić I, et al. NanoSIMS single cell analyses reveal the contrasting nitrogen sources for small phytoplankton. ISME J. 2019;13:651.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
91.Zubkov MV, Fuchs BM, Tarran GA, Burkill PH, Amann R. High rate of uptake of organic nitrogen compounds by Prochlorococcus cyanobacteria as a key to their dominance in oligotrophic oceanic waters. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:1299–304.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
92.Muñoz-Marín MC, Gómez-Baena G, López-Lozano A, Moreno-Cabezuelo JA, Díez J, García-Fernández JM. Mixotrophy in marine picocyanobacteria: use of organic compounds by Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus. ISME J. 2020;14:1065–73.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
93.Timmermans K, Van der Wagt B, Veldhuis M, Maatman A, De Baar H. Physiological responses of three species of marine pico-phytoplankton to ammonium, phosphate, iron and light limitation. J Sea Res. 2005;53:109–20.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
94.Vaulot D, Eikrem W, Viprey M, Moreau H. The diversity of small eukaryotic phytoplankton (≤ 3 μm) in marine ecosystems. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2008;32:795–820.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
95.Worden AZ, Janouskovec J, McRose D, Engman A, Welsh RM, Malfatti S, et al. Global distribution of a wild alga revealed by targeted metagenomics. Curr Biol. 2012;22:R675–7.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
96.Le Gall F, Rigaut-Jalabert F, Marie D, Garczarek L, Viprey M, Gobet A, et al. Picoplankton diversity in the South-east Pacific Ocean from cultures. Biogeosciences. 2008;5:203–14.Article 

Google Scholar 
97.NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Ocean Ecology Laboratory, Ocean Biology Processing Group. Moderate-resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Aqua Chlorophyll Data; Reprocessing. NASA OB.DAAC, Greenbelt, MD, USA. 2018. https://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/10.5067/AQUA/MODIS/L3M/CHL/2018/ Accessed 2019/08/01. More

1.Borer ET, Seabloom EW, Mitchell CE, Cronin JP. Multiple nutrients and herbivores interact to govern diversity, productivity, composition, and infection in a successional grassland. Oikos. 2014;123:214–24.Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Isbell F, Reich PB, Tilman D, Hobbie SE, Polasky S, Binder S. Nutrient enrichment, biodiversity loss, and consequent declines in ecosystem productivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110:11911–6.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Robinson RJ, Fraaije BA, Clark IM, Jackson RW, Hirsch PR, Mauchline TH. Endophytic bacterial community composition in wheat (Triticum aestivum) is determined by plant tissue type developmental stage and soil nutrient availability. Plant Soil. 2016;405:381–96.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Ratzke C, Barrere J, Gore J. Strength of species interactions determines biodiversity and stability in microbial communities. Nat Ecol Evol. 2020;4:376–83.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Lambers JHR, Harpole WS, Tilman D, Knops J, Reich PB. Mechanisms responsible for the positive diversity–productivity relationship in minnesota grasslands. Ecol Lett. 2004;7:661–8.Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Essarioui A, LeBlanc N, Kistler HC, Kinkel LL. Plant community richness mediates inhibitory interactions and resource competition between Streptomyces and fusarium populations in the rhizosphere. Micro Ecol. 2017;74:157–67.Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Pan Y, Cassman N, de Hollander M, Mendes LW, Korevaar H, Geerts RH, et al. Impact of long-term n, p, k, and npk fertilization on the composition and potential functions of the bacterial community in grassland soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2014;90:195–205.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Schlatter DC, DavelosBaines AL, Xiao K, Kinkel LL. Resource use of soilborne Streptomyces varies with location phylogeny, and nitrogen amendment. Micro Ecol. 2013;66:961–71.Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Firn J, McGree JM, Harvey E, Flores-Moreno H, Schütz M, Buckley YM, et al. Leaf nutrients, not specific leaf area, are consistent indicators of elevated nutrient inputs. Nat Ecol Evol. 2019;3:400–6.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Anderson TM, Griffith DM, Grace JB, Lind EM, Adler PB, Biederman LA, et al. Herbivory and eutrophication mediate grassland plant nutrient responses across a global climatic gradient. Ecol. 2018;99:822–31.Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Bernstein N, Gorelick J, Zerahia R, Koch S. Impact of n, p, k, and humic acid supplementation on the chemical profile of medical cannabis (Cannabis sativa L.). Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:736.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Tangolar S, Tangolar S, Torun AA, Ada M, Göçmez S. Influence of supplementation of vineyard soil with organic substances on nutritional status, yield and quality of ‘black magic’ grape (Vitis vinifera L.) and soil microbiological and biochemical characteristics. OENO One. 2020;54:1143–57.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
13.De Long JR, Sundqvist MK, Gundale MJ, Giesler R, Wardle DA. Effects of elevation and nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on plant defence compounds in subarctic tundra heath vegetation. Funct Ecol. 2016;30:314–25.Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Dietrich R, Ploss K, Heil M. Constitutive and induced resistance to pathogens in Arabidopsis thaliana depends on nitrogen supply. Plant Cell Environ. 2004;27:896–906.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Bryant JP, Chapin III FS, Klein DR. Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory. Oikos. 1983;40:357–68.16.Kinkel LL, Otto-Hanson LK, Otto-Hansen Z, Johnson M, Spawn S, Song Z, et al. Foliar endophytic microbiome composition and functional capacities vary with soil nutrient inputs. Phytopathol. 2018;108:77.
Google Scholar 
17.Seabloom EW, Condon B, Kinkel L, Komatsu KJ, Lumibao CY, May G, et al. Effects of nutrient supply, herbivory, and host community on fungal endophyte diversity. Ecol. 2019;100:e02758.Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Vandenkoornhuyse P, Quaiser A, Duhamel M, Le Van A, Dufresne A. The importance of the microbiome of the plant holobiont. N. Phytol. 2015;206:1196–206.Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Stulberg E, Fravel D, Proctor LM, Murray DM, LoTempio J, Chrisey L, et al. An assessment of US microbiome research. Nat Microbiol. 2016;1:15015.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Hanson BM, Weinstock GM. The importance of the microbiome in epidemiologic research. Ann Epidemiol. 2016;26:301–5.PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
21.Bell TH, Hockett KL, Alcalá-Briseño RI, Barbercheck M, Beattie GA, Bruns MA, et al. Manipulating wild and tamed phytobiomes: Challenges and opportunities. Phytobiomes J 2019;3:3–21.Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Henning JA, Kinkel L, May G, Lumibao CY, Seabloom EW, Borer ET. Plant diversity and litter accumulation mediate the loss of foliar endophyte fungal richness following nutrient addition. Ecol. 2021;102:e03210.Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Vacher C, Hampe A, Porté AJ, Sauer U, Compant S, Morris CE. The phyllosphere: microbial jungle at the plant–climate interface. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2016;47:1–24.Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Berendsen RL, Pieterse CM, Bakker PA. The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health. Trends Plant Sci. 2012;17:478–86.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
25.Turner TR, James EK, Poole PS. The plant microbiome. Genome Biol. 2013;14:1–10.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
26.Trivedi P, Leach JE, Tringe SG, Sa T, Singh BK. Plant–microbiome interactions: from community assembly to plant health. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020;18:607–21.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
27.Sanchez-Gorostiaga A, Bajić D, Osborne ML, Poyatos JF, Sanchez A. High-order interactions distort the functional landscape of microbial consortia. PLOS Biol. 2019;17:e3000550.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Gould AL, Zhang V, Lamberti L, Jones EW, Obadia B, Korasidis N, et al. Microbiome interactions shape host fitness. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115:E11951–E11960.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
29.O’Keeffe KR. Within-host Microbial Interactions and Plant Parasites: From Pairwise Interactions to the Microbiome. PhD thesis, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2019.30.Wemheuer F, Kaiser K, Karlovsky P, Daniel R, Vidal S, Wemheuer B. Bacterial endophyte communities of three agricultural important grass species differ in their response towards management regimes. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1–13.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
31.Wemheuer B, Thomas T, Wemheuer F. Fungal endophyte communities of three agricultural important grass species differ in their response towards management regimes. Microorg. 2019;7:37.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Layeghifard M, Hwang DM, Guttman DS. Disentangling interactions in the microbiome: a network perspective. Trends Microbiol. 2017;25:217–28.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Barabási AL Network science. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2016).
Google Scholar 
34.Scott J. Social network analysis. Sociol. 1988;22:109–27.Article 

Google Scholar 
35.Borgatti SP, Mehra A, Brass DJ, Labianca G. Network analysis in the social sciences. Science. 2009;323:892–5.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
36.Nelson GD, Rae A. An economic geography of the United States: from commutes to megaregions. PLOS ONE. 2016;11:e0166083.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
37.Danon L, Ford AP, House T, Jewell CP, Keeling MJ, Roberts GO, et al. Networks and the epidemiology of infectious disease. Interdiscip Perspectives on Infect Dis. 2011.38.Expert P, Evans TS, Blondel VD, Lambiotte R. Uncovering space-independent communities in spatial networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108:7663–8.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Röttjers L, Faust K. From hairballs to hypotheses—biological insights from microbial networks. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2018;42:761–80.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
40.Naqvi A, Rangwala H, Keshavarzian A, Gillevet P. Network-based modeling of the human gut microbiome. Chem Biodivers. 2010;7:1040–50.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Coyte KZ, Schluter J, Foster KR. The ecology of the microbiome: networks, competition, and stability. Sci. 2015;350:663–6.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Poudel R, Jumpponen A, Schlatter DC, Paulitz TC, McSpadden Gardener BB, Kinkel LL, et al. Microbiome networks: a systems framework for identifying candidate microbial assemblages for disease management. Phytopathol. 2016;106:1083–96.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
43.Bakker MG, Schlatter DC, Otto-Hanson L, Kinkel LL. Diffuse symbioses: roles of plant–plant, plant–microbe and microbe–microbe interactions in structuring the soil microbiome. Mol Ecol. 2014;23:1571–83.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
44.van der Heijden MG, Hartmann M. Networking in the plant microbiome. PLOS Biol. 2016;14:e1002378.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
45.Lau MK, Borrett SR, Baiser B, Gotelli NJ, Ellison AM. Ecological network metrics: opportunities for synthesis. Ecosphere. 2017;8:e01900.Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Billick I, Case TJ. Higher order interactions in ecological communities: what are they and how can they be detected? Ecol. 1994;75:1529–43.Article 

Google Scholar 
47.Carr A, Diener C, Baliga NS, Gibbons SM. Use and abuse of correlation analyses in microbial ecology. ISME J. 2019;13:2647–55.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
48.Vaz Jauri P, Bakker MG, Salomon CE, Kinkel LL. Subinhibitory antibiotic concentrations mediate nutrient use and competition among soil Streptomyces. PLOS ONE. 2013;8:e81064.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
49.Borer ET, Harpole WS, Adler PB, Lind EM, Orrock JL, Seabloom EW, et al. Finding generality in ecology: a model for globally distributed experiments. Methods Ecol Evol. 2014;5:65–73.Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Borer ET, Grace JB, Harpole WS, MacDougall AS, Seabloom EW. A decade of insights into grassland ecosystem responses to global environmental change. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017;1:1–7.Article 

Google Scholar 
51.Essarioui A, LeBlanc N, Kistler HC, Kinkel LL. Plant host and community diversity impact the dynamics of resource use by soil Streptomyces. Phytopathol. 2014;104:38.
Google Scholar 
52.LeBlanc N, Essarioui A, Kinkel LL, Kistler HC. Fusarium community structure and carbon metabolism phenotypes respond to grassland plant community richness and plant host. Phytopathol. 2014;104:67.Article 

Google Scholar 
53.Essarioui A, Kistler HC, Kinkel LL. Nutrient use preferences among soil Streptomyces suggest greater resource competition in monoculture than polyculture plant communities. Plant Soil. 2016;409:329–43.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Essarioui A, LeBlanc N, Otto-Hanson L, Schlatter DC, Kistler HC, Kinkel LL. Inhibitory and nutrient use phenotypes among coexisting fusarium and Streptomyces populations suggest local coevolutionary interactions in soil. Environ Microbiol. 2020;22:976–85.PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
55.Schlatter D, Fubuh A, Xiao K, Hernandez D, Hobbie S, Kinkel L. Resource amendments influence density and competitive phenotypes of Streptomyces in soil. Micro Ecol. 2009;57:413–20.Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Kinkel LL, Schlatter DC, Xiao K, Baines AD. Sympatric inhibition and niche differentiation suggest alternative coevolutionary trajectories among Streptomycetes. ISME J 2013;8:249–56.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
57.Reichardt J, Bornholdt S. Statistical mechanics of community detection. Phys Rev E 2006;74:016110.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
58.Watts DJ, Strogatz SH. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nat. 1998;393:440–2.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
59.Allesina S, Levine JM. A competitive network theory of species diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108:5638–42.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
60.Maynard DS, Bradford MA, Lindner DL, van Diepen LT, Frey SD, Glaeser JA, et al. Diversity begets diversity in competition for space. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017;1:1–8.Article 

Google Scholar 
61.Maynard DS, Crowther TW, Bradford MA. Competitive network determines the direction of the diversity–function relationship. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017;114:11464–9.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
62.Gallien L, Zimmermann NE, Levine JM, Adler PB. The effects of intransitive competition on coexistence. Ecol Lett. 2017;20:791–800.PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
63.Schlatter DC, Song Z, Vaz-Jauri P, Kinkel LL. Inhibitory interaction networks among coevolved Streptomyces populations from prairie soils. PLOS ONE. 2019;14:e0223779.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
64.Milo R. Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. Sci. 2002;298:824–7.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
65.Case TJ, Bender EA. Testing for higher order interactions. Am Nat. 1981;118:920–9.Article 

Google Scholar 
66.Levine JM, Bascompte J, Adler PB, Allesina S. Beyond pairwise mechanisms of species coexistence in complex communities. Nat. 2017;546:56–64.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
67.Mayfield MM, Stouffer DB. Higher-order interactions capture unexplained complexity in diverse communities. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017;1:0062.Article 

Google Scholar 
68.Friedman J, Higgins LM, Gore J. Community structure follows simple assembly rules in microbial microcosms. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017;1:0109.Article 

Google Scholar 
69.Bender EA, Canfield E. The asymptotic number of labeled graphs with given degree sequences. J Comb Theory Ser A 1978;24:296–307.Article 

Google Scholar 
70.Newman ME. Modularity and community structure in networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2006;103:8577–82.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
71.Guo X, Boedicker JQ. The contribution of high-order metabolic interactions to the global activity of a four-species microbial community. PLOS Comput Biol. 2016;12:e1005079.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
72.Borrelli JJ, Allesina S, Amarasekare P, Arditi R, Chase I, Damuth J, et al. Selection on stability across ecological scales. Trends Ecol Evol. 2015;30:417–25.PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
73.Davis GH, Crofoot MC, Farine DR. Estimating the robustness and uncertainty of animal social networks using different observational methods. Anim Behav. 2018;141:29–44.Article 

Google Scholar 
74.Gilbertson ML, White LA, Craft ME. Trade-offs with telemetry-derived contact networks for infectious disease studies in wildlife. Methods Ecol Evol. 2020;12:76–87.PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
75.Grilli J, Barabás G, Michalska-Smith MJ, Allesina S. Higher-order interactions stabilize dynamics in competitive network models. Nat. 2017;548:210–3.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
76.Letten AD, Stouffer DB. The mechanistic basis for higher-order interactions and non-additivity in competitive communities. Ecol Lett. 2019;22:423–36.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
77.Dormann CF, Roxburgh SH. Experimental evidence rejects pairwise modelling approach to coexistence in plant communities. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2005;272:1279–85.Article 

Google Scholar 
78.Staniczenko PP, Kopp JC, Allesina S. The ghost of nestedness in ecological networks. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1–6.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
79.Großkopf T, Soyer OS. Synthetic microbial communities. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2014;18:72–77.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
80.Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat. 1979;6:65–70.
Google Scholar  More

1.Shiels, A. B. et al. Dietary niche differentiation among three species of invasive rodents (Rattus rattus, R. exulans, Mus musculus). Biol. Invasions 15, 1037–1048 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Gulka, J. et al. Dietary niche shifts of multiple marine predators under varying prey availability on the northeast Newfoundland coast. Front. Mar. Sci. 4, 324 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Davey, C. M., Chamberlain, D. E., Newson, S. E., Noble, D. G. & Johnston, A. Rise of the generalists: Evidence for climate driven homogenization in avian communities. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 21, 568–578 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Wilby, A. & Thomas, M. B. Natural enemy diversity and pest control: Patterns of pest emergence with agricultural intensification. Ecol. Lett. 5, 353–360 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Ducatez, S., Sol, D., Sayol, F. & Lefebvre, L. Behavioural plasticity is associated with reduced extinction risk in birds. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 788–793 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Gould, J. Description of new species of finches collected by Darwin in the Galapagos. In Vol. 5, pp. 4–7 (1837).7.Jung, K. & Kalko, E. K. Where forest meets urbanization: Foraging plasticity of aerial insectivorous bats in an anthropogenically altered environment. J. Mammal. 91, 144–153 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Manenti, R., Denoël, M. & Ficetola, G. F. Foraging plasticity favours adaptation to new habitats in fire salamanders. Anim. Behav. 86, 375–382 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Amato, K. R. et al. Evolutionary trends in host physiology outweigh dietary niche in structuring primate gut microbiomes. ISME J. 13, 576–587 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Schlomann, B. H. & Parthasarathy, R. Timescales of gut microbiome dynamics. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 50, 56–63 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Legal, L., Chappe, B. & Jallon, J. M. Molecular basis of Morinda citrifolia (L.): Toxicity on drosophila. J. Chem. Ecol. 20, 1931–1943 (1994).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
12.R’kha, S., Capy, P. & David, J. R. Host-plant specialization in the Drosophila melanogaster species complex: A physiological, behavioral, and genetical analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 88, 1835–1839 (1991).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Chandler, J. A., Lang, J. M., Bhatnagar, S., Eisen, J. A. & Kopp, A. Bacterial communities of diverse Drosophila species: Ecological context of a host–microbe model system. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002272 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Storelli, G. et al. Lactobacillus plantarum promotes Drosophila systemic growth by modulating hormonal signals through TOR-dependent nutrient sensing. Cell Metab. 14, 403–414 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Ryu, J.-H. et al. Innate immune homeostasis by the homeobox gene caudal and commensal-gut mutualism in Drosophila. Science 319, 777–782 (2008).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Nishida, A. H. & Ochman, H. Rates of gut microbiome divergence in mammals. Mol. Ecol. 27, 1884–1897 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Ochman, H. et al. Evolutionary relationships of wild hominids recapitulated by gut microbial communities. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000546 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Gomez, A. et al. Plasticity in the human gut microbiome defies evolutionary constraints. MSphere 4, e00271-e319 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Chen, C.-Y., Chen, P.-C., Weng, F.C.-H., Shaw, G.T.-W. & Wang, D. Habitat and indigenous gut microbes contribute to the plasticity of gut microbiome in oriental river prawn during rapid environmental change. PLoS ONE 12, e0181427 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Vijendravarma, R. K., Narasimha, S. & Kawecki, T. J. Predatory cannibalism in Drosophila melanogaster larvae. Nat. Commun. 4, 1–8 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Fisher, A. M. et al. Relatedness modulates density-dependent cannibalism rates in Drosophila. In review.22.Amlou, M., Moreteau, B. & David, J. Genetic analysis of Drosophila sechellia specialization: Oviposition behavior toward the major aliphatic acids of its host plant. Behav. Genet. 28, 455–464 (1998).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Early, A. M., Shanmugarajah, N., Buchon, N. & Clark, A. G. Drosophila genotype influences commensal bacterial levels. PLoS ONE 12, e0170332 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Alcock, J., Maley, C. C. & Aktipis, C. A. Is eating behavior manipulated by the gastrointestinal microbiota? Evolutionary pressures and potential mechanisms. BioEssays 36, 940–949 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
25.Lizé, A. & Lewis, Z. The microbiome and host behaviour. In Microbiomes of Soils, Plants and Animals: An Integrated Approach (Eds. Antwis, R. E. et al.) 98–121 (Cambridge University Press, 2020).26.Wong, A.C.-N. et al. Gut microbiota modifies olfactory-guided microbial preferences and foraging decisions in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 27, 2397–2404 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Hulme, P. E. Climate change and biological invasions: Evidence, expectations, and response options. Biol. Rev. 92, 1297–1313 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Han, B. A., Kramer, A. M. & Drake, J. M. Global patterns of zoonotic disease in mammals. Trends Parasitol. 32, 565–577 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Gibb, R. et al. Zoonotic host diversity increases in human-dominated ecosystems. Nature 584, 398–402 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Bertani, G. Lysogeny at mid-twentieth century: P1, P2, and other experimental systems. J. Bacteriol. 186, 595–600 (2004).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Atlas, R. M. Handbook of microbiological media (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2010).Book 

Google Scholar 
32.Heys, C. et al. The effect of gut microbiota elimination in Drosophila melanogaster: A how-to guide for host–microbiota studies. Ecol. Evol. 8, 4150–4161 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403–410 (1990).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Dekker, T., Ibba, I., Siju, K., Stensmyr, M. C. & Hansson, B. S. Olfactory shifts parallel superspecialism for toxic fruit in Drosophila melanogaster sibling, D. sechellia. Curr. Biol. 16, 101–109 (2006).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
35.Arnold, T. W. Uninformative parameters and model selection using Akaike’s information criterion. J. Wildl. Manag. 74, 1175–1178 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
36.R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2019).37.Bates, D., Sarkar, D., Bates, M. D. & Matrix, L. The lme4 package. R Package Version 2, 74 (2007).
Google Scholar 
38.Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B. & Christensen, R. H. lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. J. Stat. Softw. 82, 1–26 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar  More

1.Nowakowska M, Sterzel M, Szczubiałka K. Photosensitized oxidation of cyanide in aqueous solutions of photoactive modified hydroxyethylcellulose. J Polym Environ. 2006;14:59–64.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Kamennaya NA, Chernihovsky M, Post AF. The cyanate utilization capacity of marine unicellular Cyanobacteria. Limnol Oceanogr. 2008;53:2485–94.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Palatinszky M, Herbold C, Jehmlich N, Pogoda M, Han P, von Bergen M, et al. Cyanate as an energy source for nitrifiers. Nature. 2015;524:105–8.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Mooshammer M, Wanek W, Jones SH, Richter A, Wagner M. Cyanate–a low abundant but actively cycled nitrogen compound in soil. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.07.12.199737v1.full. 2020.5.Linder T. Cyanase-independent utilization of cyanate as a nitrogen source in ascomycete yeasts. World J Micro Biot. 2019;35:1–7.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Widner B, Fuchsman CA, Chang BX, Rocap G, Mulholland MR. Utilization of urea and cyanate in waters overlying and within the eastern tropical north Pacific oxygen deficient zone. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2018;94:fiy138.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Widner B, Mulholland MR, Mopper K. Distribution, sources, and sinks of cyanate in the coastal North Atlantic Ocean. Environ Sci Tech Let. 2016;3:297–302.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Widner B, Mulholland MR, Mopper K. Chromatographic determination of nanomolar cyanate concentrations in estuarine and sea waters by precolumn fluorescence derivatization. Anal Chem. 2013;85:6661–6.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Widner B, Mordy CW, Mulholland MR. Cyanate distribution and uptake above and within the Eastern Tropical South Pacific oxygen deficient zone. Limnol Oceanogr. 2018;63:S177–S192.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Kuypers MMM, Marchant HK, Kartal B. The microbial nitrogen-cycling network. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018;16:263.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Smith SR, Dupont CL, McCarthy JK, Broddrick JT, Oborník M, Horák A, et al. Evolution and regulation of nitrogen flux through compartmentalized metabolic networks in a marine diatom. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1–14.Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Allen JrCM, Jones ME. Decomposition of carbamylphosphate in aqueous solutions. Biochemistry. 1964;3:1238–47.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Kamenaya NA, Post AF. Characterization of cyanate metabolism in marine Synechococcus and Prochlorococcus spp. Appl Enviro Micro. 2011;77:291–301.Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Kamennaya NA, Post AF. Distribution and expression of the cyanate acquisition potential among cyanobacterial populations in oligotrophic marine waters. Limnol Oceanogr. 2013;58:1959–71.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Kitzinger K, Padilla CC, Marchant HK, Hach PF, Herbold CW, Kidane AT, et al. Cyanate and urea are substrates for nitrification by Thaumarchaeota in the marine environment. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4:234–43.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Pachiadaki MG, Sintes E, Bergauer K, Brown JM, Record NR, Swan BK, et al. Major role of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in dark ocean carbon fixation. Science. 2017;358:1046–51.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Ganesh S, Bertagnolli AD, Bristow LA, Padilla CC, Blackwood N, Aldunate M, et al. Single cell genomic and transcriptomic evidence for the use of alternative nitrogen substrates by anammox bacteria. ISME J. 2018;12:2706–22.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Johnson WV, Anderson PM. Bicarbonate is a recycling substrate for cyanase. J Biol Chem. 1987;262:9021–5.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Miller AG, Espie GS. Photosynthetic metabolism of cyanate by the cyanobacterium Synechococcus UTEX 625. Arch Microbiol. 1994;162:151–7.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Harano Y, Suzuki I, Maeda S, Kaneko T, Tabata S, Omata T. Identification and nitrogen regulation of the cyanase gene from the cyanobacteria Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803 and Synechococcus sp. strain PCC 7942. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:5744.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Sung YC, Anderson PM, Fuchs JA. Characterization of high-level expression and sequencing of the Escherichia coli K-12 cynS gene encoding cyanase. J Bacteriol. 1987;169:5224.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Sáez LP, Cabello P, Ibáñez MI, Luque-Almagro VM, Roldán MD, Moreno-Vivián C. Cyanate assimilation by the alkaliphilic cyanide-degrading bacterium Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes CECT5344: mutational analysis of the cyn gene cluster. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:3008.Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Wood AP, Kelly DP, McDonald IR, Jordan SL, Morgan TD, Khan S, et al. A novel pink-pigmented facultative methylotroph, Methylobacterium thiocyanatum sp. nov., capable of growth on thiocyanate or cyanate as sole nitrogen sources. Arch Microbiol. 1998;169:148–58.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Elleuche S, Pöggeler S. A cyanase is transcriptionally regulated by arginine and involved in cyanate decomposition in Sordaria macrospora. Fungal Genet Biol. 2008;45:1458–69.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
25.Schlachter CR, Klapper V, Wybouw N, Radford T, Van Leeuwen T, Grbic M, et al. Structural characterization of a eukaryotic cyanase from Tetranychus urticae. J Agr Food Chem. 2017;65:5453–62.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Qian D, Jiang L, Lu L, Wei C, Li Y. Biochemical and structural properties of cyanases from Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa. PLoS One. 2011;6:e18300.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Zarlenga DS, Mitreva M, Thompson P, Tyagi R, Tuo W, Hoberg EP. A tale of three kingdoms: members of the Phylum Nematoda independently acquired the detoxifying enzyme cyanase through horizontal gene transfer from plants and bacteria. Parasitology. 2019;146:445–52.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Ranjan B, Choi PH, Pillai S, Permaul K, Tong L, Singh S. Crystal structure of a thermophilic fungal cyanase and its implications on the catalytic mechanism for bioremediation. Sci Rep. 2021;11:1–10.Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Villar E, Vannier T, Vernette C, Lescot M, Cuenca M, Alexandre A, et al. The Ocean Gene Atlas: exploring the biogeography of plankton genes online. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:W289–W295.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Walsh MA, Otwinowski Z, Perrakis A, Anderson PM, Joachimiak A. Structure of cyanase reveals that a novel dimeric and decameric arrangement of subunits is required for formation of the enzyme active site. Structure. 2000;8:505–14.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Butryn A, Stoehr G, Linke-Winnebeck C, Hopfner KP. Serendipitous crystallization and structure determination of cyanase (CynS) from Serratia proteamaculans. Acta Crystallogr F. 2015;71:471–6.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Pederzoli R, Tarantino D, Gourlay LJ, Chaves-Sanjuan A, Bolognesi M. Detecting the nature and solving the crystal structure of a contaminant protein from an opportunistic pathogen. Acta Crystallogr F. 2020;76:392–7.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Wybouw N, Balabanidou V, Ballhorn DJ, Dermauw W, Grbić M, Vontas J, et al. A horizontally transferred cyanase gene in the spider mite Tetranychus urticae is involved in cyanate metabolism and is differentially expressed upon host plant change. Insect Biochem Molec. 2012;42:881–9.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Spang A, Poehlein A, Offre P, Zumbrägel S, Haider S, Rychlik N, et al. The genome of the ammonia‐oxidizing candidatus nitrososphaera gargensis: insights into metabolic versatility and environmental adaptations. Environ Microbiol. 2012;14:3122–45.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
35.Palomo A, Pedersen AG, Fowler SJ, Dechesne A, Sicheritz-Pontén T, Smets BF. Comparative genomics sheds light on niche differentiation and the evolutionary history of comammox Nitrospira. ISMEJ. 2018;12:1779–93.Article 

Google Scholar  More

1.Roberts, P. & Stewart, B. A. Defining the ‘generalist specialist’ niche for Pleistocene Homo sapiens. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 542–550 (2018).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
2.Heaney, L. R. A synopsis of climatic and vegetational change in Southeast Asia. Clim. Change 19, 53–61 (1991).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Morley, R. J. Origin and Evolution of Tropical Rain Forests (Wiley, 2000).
Google Scholar 
4.Bird, M. I., Taylor, D. & Hunt, C. Palaeoenvironments of insular Southeast Asia during the last Glacial Period: a savanna corridor in Sundaland?. Quat. Sci. Rev. 24, 2228–2242 (2005).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Wurster, C. M., Rifai, H., Zhou, B., Haig, J. & Bird, M. I. Savanna in equatorial Borneo during the late Pleistocene. Sci. Rep. 9, 6392. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42670-4 (2019).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
6.Wurster, C. M. & Bird, M. I. Barriers and bridges: early human dispersals in equatorial SE Asia. Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ. 411, 235–250 (2016).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Zaim, Y. Geological evidence for the earliest appearance of hominins in Indonesia. In Out of Africa I: The First Hominin Colonization of Eurasia (eds Fleagle, J. G. et al.) 97–110 (Springer, 2010).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
8.Cannon, C. H., Morley, R. J. & Bush, A. B. G. The current refugial rainforests of Sundaland are unrepresentative of their biogeographic past and highly vulnerable to disturbance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 11188–11193 (2009).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Raes, N. et al. Historical distribution of Sundaland’s Dipterocarp rainforests at Quaternary glacial maxima. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 16790–16795 (2014).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Suraprasit, K., Jongautchariyakul, S., Yamee, C., Pothichaiya, C. & Bocherens, H. New fossil and isotope evidence for the Pleistocene zoogeographic transition and hypothesized savanna corridor in peninsular Thailand. Quat. Sci. Rev. 221, 1055861 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Pookajorn, S. Human activities and environmental changes during the late pleistocene to middle holocene in Southern Thailand and Southeast Asia. In Humans at the End of the Ice Age: The Archaeology of the Pleistocene—Holocene Transition, Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology (eds Straus, L. G. et al.) 201–213 ( Springer, 1996).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
12.Schepartz, L. A., Miller-Antonio, S. & Bakken, D. A. Upland resources and the early palaeolithic occupation of Southern China, Vietnam, Laos Thailand and Burma. World Archaeol. 32, 1–13 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Mudar, K. & Anderson, D. New evidence for Southeast Asian pleistocene foraging economies: faunal remains from the early levels of Lang Rongrien Rockshelter, Krabi, Thailand. Asian Perspect. 46, 298–334 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Shoocongdej, R. Late Pleistocene activities at the Tham Lod rockshelter in Highland Pang Mapha, Mae Hong Son province, Norhwestern Thailand. In Uncovering Southeast Asia’s Past (eds Bacus, E. et al.) 22–37 (NUS Press, 2006).
Google Scholar 
15.Shoocongdej, R. et al. Final report of Highland Archaeology Project in Pang Mapha District, Mae Hong Son Province Phase 2, Vol. 2 (Thailand Research Fund, 2007).16.Demeter, F. et al. Anatomically modern human in Southeast Asia (Laos) by 46 ka. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 14375–14380 (2012).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
17Demeter, F. et al. Early modern humans and morphological variation in Southeast Asia: fossil evidence from Tam Pa Ling. Laos. PLoS ONE 10, e0121193. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121193 (2015).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
18.Viet, N. First archaeological evidence of symbolic activities from the Pleistocene of Vietnam. In Emergence and Diversity of Human Behavior Paleolithic Asia (ed. Kaifu, Y.) 133–139 (Texas A&M University Press, 2015).
Google Scholar 
19.Higham, C. F. & Thosarat, R. An early hunter-gatherer site at Ban Non Wat, Northeast Thailand. J. Indo. Pacif. Archaeol. 43, 93–96 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Gorman, C. F. Excavations at Spirit Cave, North Thailand: Some Interim Interpretations. Asian Perspect. 13, 79–107 (1970).
Google Scholar 
21.Tayles, N., Halcrow, S. E., Sayavongkhamdy, T. & Souksavatdy, V. A prehistoric flexed human burial from Pha Phen, Middle Mekong Valley, Laos: its context in Southeast Asia. Anthropol. Sci. 123, 1–12 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Conrad, C., Higham, C., Eda, M. & Marwick, B. Palaeoecology and forager subsistence strategies during the Pleistocene—Holocene transition: A reinvestigation of the zooarchaeological assemblage from Spirit Cave, Mae Hong Son Province, Thailand. Asian Perspect. 5, 2–27 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Zeitoun, V. D. et al. Discovery of an outstanding Hoabinhian site from the Late Pleistocene at Doi Pha Kan (Lampang province, northern Thailand). Archaeol. Res. Asia 18, 1–16 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Shoocongdej, R. Forager mobility organization in seasonal tropical environments of western Thailand. World Archaeol. 32, 14–40 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
25.Forestier, H. et al. The Hoabinhian from Laang Spean Cave in its stratigraphic, chronological, typo-technological and environmental context (Cambodia, Battambang province). J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 3, 194–206 (2015).
Google Scholar 
26.Chitkament, T., Gaillard, C. & Shoocongdej, R. Tham Lod rockshelter (Pang Mapha district, north-western Thailand): Evolution of the lithic assemblages during the late Pleistocene. Quat. Int. 416, 151–161 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Marwick, B. The Hoabinhian of Southeast Asia and its relationship to regional Pleistocene lithic technologies. In Lithic Technological Organization and Paleoenvironmental Change Global and Diachronic Perspectives (eds Robinson, E. & Sellet, F.) 63–78 (Springer, 2018).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
28.Marwick, B. & Gagan, M. K. Late Pleistocene monsoon variability in northwest Thailand: an oxygen isotope sequence from the bivalve Margaritanopsis laosensis excavated in Mae Hong Son province. Quat. Sci. Rev. 30, 3088–3098 (2011).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Marwick, B. Multiple Optima in Hoabinhian flaked stone artefact palaeoeconomics and palaeoecology at two archaeological sites in Northwest Thailand. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 32, 553–564 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Wattanapituksakul, A., Filoux, A., Amphansri, A. & Tumpeesuwan, S. Late Pleistocene Caprinae assemblages of Tham Lod Rockshelter (Mae Hong Son Province, Northwest Thailand). Quat. Int. 493, 212–226 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Shoocongdej, R. & Wattanapituksakul, A. Faunal assemblages and demography during the Late Pleistocene (MIS 2–1) to Early Holocene in Highland Pang Mapha, Northwest Thailand. Quat. Int. 563, 51–63 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
32.DeNiro, M. J. & Epstein, S. Influence of diet on the distribution of carbon isotopes in animals. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 42, 495–506 (1978).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Van Der Merwe, N. J. & Vogel, J. C. 13C Content of human collagen as a measure of prehistoric diet in woodland North America. Nature 276, 815–816 (1978).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
34.Cerling, T. E. & Harris, J. M. Carbon isotope fractionation between diet and bioapatite in ungulate mammals and implications for ecological and paleoecological studies. Oecologia 120, 347–363 (1999).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
35.Cerling, T. E., Hart, J. A. & Hart, T. B. Stable isotope ecology in the Ituri Forest. Oecologia 138, 5–12 (2004).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
36.Bourgon, N. et al. Zinc isotopes in Late Pleistocene fossil teeth from a Southeast Asian cave setting preserve paleodietary information. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 4675–4681 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
37.van Klinken, G. J. Bone Collagen quality indicators for palaeodietary and radiocarbon measurements. J. Archaeol. Sci. 26, 687–695 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Pestle, W. J. & Colvard, M. Bone collagen preservation in the tropics: a case study from ancient Puerto Rico. J. Archaeol. Sci. 39, 2079–2090 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Ecker, M. et al. Middle Pleistocene ecology and Neanderthal subsistence: Insights from stable isotope analyses in Payre (Ardèche, southeastern France). J. Hum. Evol. 65, 363–373 (2013).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
40Kohn, M. & Cerling, T. E. Stable isotope compositions of biological apatite. In Phosphates—Geochemical Geobiological and Materials Importance Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry Vol. 48 (eds Kohn, M. et al.) 455–488 (Mineralogical Society of America, 2002).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
41.Biasatti, D., Wang, Y., Gao, F., Xu, Y. & Flynn, L. Paleoecologies and paleoclimates of late cenozoic mammals from Southwest China: evidence from stable carbon and oxygen isotopes. J. Asian Earth Sci. 44, 48–61 (2012).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Clementz, M. T., Fox-Dobbs, K., Wheatley, P.-V., Koch, P. L. & Doak, D. F. Revisiting old bones: coupled carbon isotope analysis of bioapatite and collagen as an ecological and palaeoecological tool. Geol. J. 44, 605–620 (2009).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
43.Domingo, M. S., Domingo, L., Badgley, C., Sanisidro, O. & Morales, J. Resource partitioning among top predators in a Miocene food web. Proc. R. Soc. B 280, 20122138. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.2138 (2013).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
44.Codron, D., Clauss, M., Codron, J. & Tütken, T. Within trophic level shifts in collagen–carbonate stable carbon isotope spacing are propagated by diet and digestive physiology in large mammal herbivores. Ecol. Evol. 8, 3983–3995 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
45Tejada-Lara, J. V. et al. Body mass predicts isotope enrichment in herbivorous mammals. Proc. R. Soc. B 285, 20181020. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.1020 (2018).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
46.Cerling, T. E. et al. Stable isotope-based diet reconstructions of Turkana Basin hominins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 10501–10506 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
47.Ayliffe, L. K. & Chivas, A. R. Oxygen isotope composition of the bone phosphate of Australian kangaroos: potential as a palaeoenvironmental recorder. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 54, 2603–2609 (1990).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
48.Levin, N. E., Cerling, T. E., Passey, B. H., Harris, J. M. & Ehleringer, J. R. A stable isotope aridity index for terrestrial environments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 11201–11205 (2006).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
49.Bocherens, H., Koch, P., Mariotti, A., Geraads, D. & Jaeger, J.-J. Isotopic biogeochemistry (13C, 18O) of mammalian enamel from African Pleistocene hominoid sites. Palaios 11, 306–308 (1996).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Hambali, K., Ismail, A., Md-Zain, B. M., Amir, A. & Karim, F. A. Diet of long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) at the entrance of Kuala Selangor Nature Park (anthropogenic habitat): food selection that leads to human-macaque conflict. Acta Biol. Malay. 3, 58–68 (2014).
Google Scholar 
51.Nila, S., Suryobroto, B. & Widayati, K. A. Dietary variation of long tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) in Telaga Warna, Bogor, West Java. HAYATI J. Biosci. 21, 8–14 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
52.Lekagul, B. & McNeely, J. A. Mammals of Thailand: Association for the Conservation of Wildlife (Kurusapa Ladproa Press, 1988).
Google Scholar 
53.Suraprasit, K., Bocherens, H., Chaimanee, Y., Panha, S. & Jaeger, J.-J. Late Middle Pleistocene ecology and climate in Northeastern Thailand inferred from the stable isotope analysis of Khok Sung herbivore tooth enamel and the land mammal cenogram. Quat. Sci. Rev. 193, 24–42 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
54Suraprasit, K. et al. Long-term isotope evidence on the diet and habitat breadth of pleistocene to holocene caprines in Thailand: implications for the extirpation and conservation of Himalayan Gorals. Front. Ecol. Evol. 8, 67. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.00067 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
55.Kohn, M. J. Predicting animal δ18O: Accounting for diet and physiological adaptation. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 60, 4811–4829 (1996).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Kohn, M. J., Schoeninger, M. J. & Valley, J. W. Herbivore tooth oxygen isotope compositions: effects of diet and physiology. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 60, 3889–3896 (1996).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
57.Dunbar, J. & Wilson, T. Oxygen and hydrogen isotopes in fruits and vegetable juices. Plant Physiol. 72, 725–727 (1983).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
58.Yakir, D. Variations in the natural abundances of oxygen-18 and deuterium in plant carbohydrates. Plant Cell Environ. 15, 1005–1020 (1992).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
59.Fricke, H. C. & O’Neil, J. R. Inter- and intra-tooth variation in the oxygen isotope composition of mammalian tooth enamel phosphate: implications for palaeoclimatological and palaeobiological research. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 126, 91–99 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
60.Fricke, H. C., Clyde, W. C. & O’Neil, J. R. Intra-tooth variations in δ18O (PO4) of mammalian tooth enamel as a record of seasonal variations in continental climate variables. Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta 62, 1839–1850 (1998).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
61.Balasse, M., Ambrose, S. H., Smith, A. B. & Price, T. D. The seasonal mobility model for prehistoric herders in the south-western Cape of South Africa assessed by isotopic analysis of sheep tooth enamel. J. Archaeol. Sci. 29, 917–932 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
62Ratnam, J., Tomlinson, K. W., Rasquinha, D. N. & Sankaran, M. Savannahs of Asia: antiquity, biogeography, and an uncertain future. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 371, 2015305. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0305 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
63.Pushkina, D., Bocherens, H., Chaimanee, Y. & Jaeger, J.-J. Stable carbon isotope reconstructions of diet and paleoenvironment from the late middle Pleistocene Snake Cave in Northeastern Thailand. Naturwissenschaften 97, 299–309 (2010).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
64.Louys, J. & Roberts, P. Environmental drivers of megafauna and hominin extinction in Southeast Asia. Nature 586, 402–406 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
65.Passey, B. H. et al. Carbon isotope fractionation between diet, breath CO2, and bioapatite in different mammals. J. Archaeol. Sci. 32, 1459–1470 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
66.Dutt, S. et al. Abrupt changes in Indian summer monsoon strength during 33,800 to 5500 years B.P. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 5526–5532 (2015).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
67.Ronay, E. R., Breitenbach, S. F. M. & Oster, J. L. Sensitivity of speleothem records in the Indian Summer Monsoon region to dry season infiltration. Sci. Rep. 9, 5091. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41630-2 (2019).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
68Liu, G. et al. On the glacial-interglacial variability of the Asian monsoon in speleothem δ18O records. Sci. Adv. 6, 8eaay8189. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay8189 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
69.Lambeck, K., Rouby, H., Purcell, A., Sun, Y. & Sambridge, M. Sea level and global ice volumes from the Last Glacial Maximum to the Holocene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 15296–15303 (2014).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
70Rabett, R. J. Human Adaptation in the Asian Palaeolithic: hominin dispersal and behaviour during the late quaternary (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Book 

Google Scholar 
71.Bailey, R. C. et al. Hunting and gathering in tropical rain forest: Is it possible?. Am. Anthropol. 91, 59–82 (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
72.Mercader, J. Forest people: the role of African rainforests in human evolution and dispersal. Evol. Anthropol. 11, 117–124 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
73.Mercader, J. Under the Canopy: The Archaeology of Tropical Rainforests (Rutgers University Press, 2002).
Google Scholar 
74.Mercader, J. Foragers of the Congo: the early settlement of the Ituri forest. In Under the Canopy: The Archeology of Tropical Rain Forests (ed. Mercader, J.) 93–116 (Rutgers University Press, London, 2003).
Google Scholar 
75.Perera, N. et al. People of the ancient rainforest: Late Pleistocene foragers at the Batadomba-lena rockshelter, Sri Lanka. J. Hum. Evol. 61, 254–269 (2011).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
76.Roberts, P. et al. Direct evidence for human reliance on rainforest resources in late Pleistocene Sri Lanka. Science 347, 1246–1249 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
77.Roberts, P. et al. Fruits of the forest: human stable isotope ecology and rainforest adaptations in Late Pleistocene and Holocene (~36 to 3 ka) Sri Lanka. J. Hum. Evol. 106, 102–118 (2017).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
78Wedage, O. et al. Specialized rainforest hunting by Homo sapiens ~45,000 years ago. Nat. Commun. 10, 739. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08623-1 (2019).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
79.Ji, X. et al. The oldest Hoabinhian technocomplex in Asia (43.5 ka) at Xiaodong rockshelter, Yunnan Province, southwest China. Quat. Int. 400, 166–174 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
80.Olsen, J. W. & Ciochon, R. L. A review of evidence for postulated Middle Pleistocene occupations in Viet Nam. J. Hum. Evol. 19, 761–788 (1990).Article 

Google Scholar 
81.Rabett, R. et al. The Tràng An Project: Late-to-Post-Pleistocene Settlement of the Lower Song Hong Valley, North Vietnam. J. R. Asiat. Soc. 19, 83–109 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
82.Rabett, R. et al. Tropical limestone forest resilience and late Pleistocene foraging during MIS-2 in the Tràng An massif, Vietnam. Quat. Int. 448, 62–81 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
83.Barker, G. et al. The ‘Human Revolution’ in lowland tropical Southeast Asia: the antiquity and behavior of anatomically modern humans at Niah Cave (Sarawak, Borneo). J. Hum. Evol. 52, 243–261 (2007).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
84.Piper, P. & Rabett, R. Hunting in a tropical rainforest: evidence from the terminal Pleistocene at Lobang Hangus, Niah Caves, Sarawak. Int. J. Osteoarchaeol. 19, 551–565 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
85.Hunt, C. O., Gilbertson, D. D. & Rushworth, G. A 50,000-year record of late Pleistocene tropical vegetation and human impact in lowland Borneo. Quat. Sci. Rev. 37, 61–80 (2012).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
86.de Vos, J. The Pongo faunas from Java and Sumatra and their significance for biostratigraphical and paleoecological interpretations. Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. B. 86, 417–425 (1983).
Google Scholar 
87.Westaway, K. E. An early modern human presence in Sumatra 73000–63000 years ago. Nature 548, 322–325 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
88.Storm, P. et al. Late Pleistocene Homo Sapiens in a tropical rainforest Fauna in East Java. J. Hum. Evol. 49, 536–545 (2005).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
89.Storm, P. & de Vos, J. Rediscovery of the late Pleistocene Punung Hominin Sites and the Discovery of a New Site Gunung Dawung in East Java. Senck. Leth. 86, 271–281 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
90Roberts, P. et al. Isotopic evidence for initial coastal colonization and subsequent diversification in the human occupation of Wallacea. Nat. Commun. 11, 2068. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15969-4 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
91.Pasveer, J. M., Clarke, S. J. & Miller, G. H. Late Pleistocene human occupation of inland rainforest, Bird’s Head, Papua. Archaeol. Oceania 37, 92–95 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
92.Summerhayes, G. R. et al. Human adaptation and plant use in highland New Guinea 49,000 to 44,000 Years Ago. Science 330, 78–81 (2010).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
93.Summerhayes, G. R., Field, J. H., Shaw, B. & Gaffney, D. The archaeology of forest exploitation and change in the tropics during the Pleistocene: the case of Northern Sahul (Pleistocene New Guinea). Quat. Int. 448, 14–30 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
94.Roberts, P., Gaffney, D., Lee-Thorp, J. A. & Summerhayes, G. R. Persistent tropical foraging in the highlands of terminal Pleistocene/Holocene New Guinea. Nature Ecol. Evol. 1, 1–6 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
95.Wedage, O. et al. Microliths in the South Asian rainforest ~45–4 ka: New insights from Fa-Hien Lena Cave, Sri Lanka. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222606 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
96.Bettis, E. A. et al. Way out of Africa: early Pleistocene paleoenvironments inhabited by Homo erectus in Sangiran, Java. J. Hum. Evol. 56, 11–24 (2009).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
97.Brumm, A. et al. Age and context of the oldest known hominin fossils from Flores. Nature 534, 249–253 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
98.Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T. & Ryan, P. D. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 4, 1–9 (2001).
Google Scholar  More

1.McLean, J. E., Pabst, M. W., Miller, C. D., Dimkpa, C. O. & Anderson, A. J. Effect of complexing ligands on the surface adsorption, internalization, and bioresponse of copper and cadmium in a soil bacterium, Pseudomonas Putida. Chemosphere 91(3), 374–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.11.071 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
2.Clemens, S. Metal ligands in micronutrient acquisition and homeostasis. Plant. Cell Environ. 42(10), 2902–2912. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.13627 (2019).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
3.Ma, H. et al. Elucidation of the mechanisms into effects of organic acids on soil fertility, cadmium speciation and ecotoxicity in contaminated soil. Chemosphere 239, 124706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124706 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
4.Ahmed, E. & Holmström, S. J. M. Siderophores in environmental research: Roles and applications. Microb. Biotechnol. 7(3), 196–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12117 (2014).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
5.Butler, A. & Theisen, R. M. Iron(III)-siderophore coordination chemistry: Reactivity of marine siderophores. Coord. Chem. Rev. 254(3–4), 288–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2009.09.010 (2010).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
6.Hider, R. C. & Kong, X. Chemistry and biology of siderophores. Nat. Prod. Rep. 27(5), 637. https://doi.org/10.1039/b906679a (2010).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
7.Kirby, M. E., Sonnenberg, J. L., Simperler, A. & Weiss, D. J. Stability series for the complexation of six key siderophore functional groups with uranyl using density functional theory. J. Phys. Chem. A 124(12), 2460–2472. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.9b10649 (2020).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
8.Harrington, J. et al. Structural dependence of Mn complexation by siderophores: Donor group dependence on complex stability and reactivity. GCA. 88, 106–119 (2012).ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
9.McRose, D. L., Seyedsayamdost, M. R. & Morel, F. M. M. Multiple siderophores: Bug or feature?. JBIC J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 23(7), 983–993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00775-018-1617-x (2018).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
10.Johnstone, T. C., Nolan, E. M. Beyond iron: Non-classical biological functions of bacterial siderophores. In Dalton Transactions. Royal Society of Chemistry April 14, 2015, pp 6320–6339. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4dt03559c.11.Northover, G. H. R., Garcia-España, E. & Weiss, D. J. Unravelling the modus operandi of phytosiderophores during zinc uptake in rice: The importance of geochemical gradients and accurate stability constants. J. Exp. Bot. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraa580 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Ghavami, N., Alikhani, H. A., Pourbabaee, A. A. & Besharati, H. Study the effects of siderophore-producing bacteria on zinc and phosphorous nutrition of canola and maize plants. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 47(12), 1517–1527. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2016.1194991 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Weiss, D. et al. Isotope fractionation of zinc in the paddy rice soil-water environment and the role of 2’deoxymugineic acid (DMA) as zincophore under Zn limiting conditions. Chem. Geol. 577, 120271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2021.120271 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Suzuki, M. et al. Biosynthesis and secretion of mugineic acid family phytosiderophores in zinc-deficient barley. Plant J. 48(1), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02853.x (2006).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
15.Zaman, M. , Shahid, S. A., Heng, L., Shahid, S. A., Zaman, M., Heng, L. Soil salinity: Historical perspectives and a world overview of the problem. In Guideline for Salinity Assessment, Mitigation and Adaptation Using Nuclear and Related Techniques 43–53 (Springer, 2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96190-3_2.16.Alfarrah, N. & Walraevens, K. Groundwater overexploitation and seawater intrusion in coastal areas of arid and semi-arid regions. Water 10(2), 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10020143 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Trenberth, K. Changes in precipitation with climate change. Clim. Res. 47(1), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr00953 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Pendergrass, A. G., Knutti, R., Lehner, F., Deser, C. & Sanderson, B. M. Precipitation variability increases in a warmer climate. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17966-y (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Errabii, T., Gandonou, C. H., Essalmani, H., Jamal; Senhaji, N. S. Effects of NaCl and mannitol induced stress on sugarcane (Saccharum Sp.) Callus Cultures. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-006-0006-1.20.Saboora, A., Hajihashemi, S. & Khatam, B. NaCl tolerance of wheat genotypes at germination and early seedling growth article in Pakistan. J. Biol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2006.2009.2021 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Chand, M., Randhawa, N. S. & Bhumbla, D. R. Effectiveness of zinc chelates in zinc nutrition of greenhouse rice crop in a saline-sodic soil. Plant Soil 59(2), 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02184195 (1981).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Lores, E. M. & Pennock, J. R. The effect of salinity on binding of Cd, Cr, Cu and Zn to dissolved organic matter. Chemosphere 37(5), 861–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(98)00090-3 (1998).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Cigala, R. M. et al. Zinc(II) complexes with hydroxocarboxylates and mixed metal species with Tin(II) in different salts aqueous solutions at different ionic strengths: Formation, stability, and weak interactions with supporting electrolytes. Monatshefte fur Chemie 146(4), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00706-014-1394-3 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Laird, D. A., Koskinen, I. W. C. Triazine Soil Interactions. In The Triazine Herbicides 275–299 (Elsevier, 2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044451167-6.50024-6.25.Cigala, R. M. et al. Speciation of Tin(II) in aqueous solution: Thermodynamic and spectroscopic study of simple and mixed hydroxocarboxylate complexes. Monatshefte fur Chemie 144(6), 761–772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00706-013-0961-3 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Daniele, P. G., Rigano, C. & Sammartano, S. Ionic strength dependence of formation constants-I protonation constants of organic and inorganic acids. Talanta 30(2), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-9140(83)80023-X (1983).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
27.Bretti, C., Foti, C. & Sammartano, S. A new approach in the use of sit in determining the dependence on ionic strength of activity coefficients. Application to Some Chloride Salts Of Interest In The Speciation Of Natural Fluids. Chem. Speciat. Bioavailab. 16(3), 105–110. https://doi.org/10.3184/095422904782775036 (2004).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Bretti, C., De Stefano, C., Foti, C. & Sammartano, S. Critical evaluation of protonation constants. Literature analysis and experimental potentiometric and calorimetric data for the thermodynamics of phthalate protonation in different ionic media. J. Solution Chem. 35(9), 1227–1244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10953-006-9057-6 (2006).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Cigala, R. M. et al. Quantitative study on the interaction of Sn2+ and Zn2+ with some phosphate ligands, in aqueous solution at different ionic strengths. J. Mol. Liq. 165, 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2011.11.002 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Northover, G. H. R., Mao, Y., Hanif M. D., Blasco, S., Vilar, R., Garcia-Espana, E. & Weiss, D. J. The control of pH and ionic strength gradients on the interaction of low-molecular-weight organic acids and siderophores. ChemRxiv. Preprint (2021). https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.14706036.v1.31.Domenico, P. A., Harris, D. R., Schwartz, F. W., Wiley, J., Chichester, N. Y., Brisbane, W. & Singapore, T. Physical and Chemical Hydrogeology 2nd edn.32.Pankow, J.; Taylor & Francis Group. Aquatic Chemistry Concepts 2nd edn.33.Graziano, G. Role of salts on the strength of pairwise hydrophobic interaction. Chem. Phys. Lett. 483(1–3), 67–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2009.10.040 (2009).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Mancera, R. L. Does salt increase the magnitude of the hydrophobic effect? A computer simulation study. Chem. Phys. Lett. 296(5–6), 459–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(98)01080-X (1998).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
35.Mancera, R. L. Computer simulation of the effect of salt on the hydrophobic effect. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 94(24), 3549–3559. https://doi.org/10.1039/a806899b (1998).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
36.Ghosh, T., Kalra, A. & Garde, S. On the salt-induced stabilization of pair and many-body hydrophobic interactions. J. Phys. Chem. B 109(1), 642–651. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0475638 (2005).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
37.Papaneophytou, C. P., Grigoroudis, A. I., McInnes, C. & Kontopidis, G. Quantification of the effects of ionic strength, viscosity, and hydrophobicity on protein-ligand binding affinity. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 5(8), 931–936. https://doi.org/10.1021/ml500204e (2014).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
38.Ghafoor, K., AL-Juhaimi, F., Ozcan, M. M. & Jahurul, M. H. A. Some nutritional characteristics and mineral contents in Barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.) seeds cultivated under salt stress. Qual. Assur. Saf. Crop. Foods 7(3), 363–368. https://doi.org/10.3920/QAS2013.0380 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Akman, Z. Effects of plant growth regulators on nutrient content of young wheat and barley plants under
saline conditions. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 8(10), 2018–2021 (2009).CAS 

Google Scholar 
40.Yousfi, S., Houmani, H., Zribi, F., Abdelly, C. & Gharsalli, M. Physiological responses of wild and cultivated barley to the interactive effect of salinity and iron deficiency. (2012). https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/121983.41.Alderighi, L. et al. Hyperquad simulation and speciation (HySS): A utility program for the investigation of equilibria involving soluble and partially soluble species. Coord. Chem. Rev. 184(1), 311–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-8545(98)00260-4 (1999).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Gans, P. & O’Sullivan, B. GLEE: A new computer program for glass electrode calibration. Talanta 51(1), 33–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-9140(99)00245-3 (2000).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
43.Gans, P., Sabatini, A. & Vacca, A. Investigation of equilibria in solution. Determination of equilibrium constants with the HYPERQUAD suite of programs. Talanta 43(10), 1739–1753. https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-9140(96)01958-3 (1996).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
44.Hu, W., Xie, J., Chau, H. W. & Si, B. C. Evaluation of parameter uncertainties in nonlinear regression using Microsoft excel spreadsheet. Environ. Syst. Res. 4(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40068-015-0031-4 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
45.Harris, W. R., Raymond, K. N. & Weitl, F. L. Ferric ion sequestering agents. 6. The spectrophotometric and potentiometric evaluation of sulfonated tricatecholate ligands. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 103(10), 2667–2675. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00400a030 (1981).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Bravin, M. N., Tentscher, P., Rose, J. & Hinsinger, P. Rhizosphere PH Gradient Controls Copper Availability in a Strongly Acidic Soil. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43(15), 5686–5691. https://doi.org/10.1021/es900055k (2009).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
47.Gollany, H. T. & Schumacher, T. E. Combined use of colorimetric and microelectrode methods for evaluating rhizosphere PH. Plant Soil 154(2), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00012520 (1993).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
48.Kirk, G. J. D. Root ventilation, rhizosphere modification, and nutrient uptake by rice. In Systems Approaches for Agricultural Development 221–232 (Springer, Netherlands, 1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2842-1_13.49.Li, J. & Heap, A. D. Spatial interpolation methods applied in the environmental sciences: A review. In Environmental Modelling and Software 173–189 (Elsevier, 2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.12.008.50.Gergely, A., Kiss, T. & Deák, G. Complexes of 3,4-dihydroxyphenyl derivatives. II. Complex formation processes in the Nickel(II)-L-DOPA and Zinc(II)-L-DOPA systems. Inorganica Chim. Acta 36(1), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1693(00)89379-2 (1979).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
51.Griesser, R. & Sigel, H. Ternary complexes in solution. XI. complex formation between the cobalt(h)-, nickel(ii)-, copper(ii)-, and zinc(II)-2,2′-bipyridyl 1:1 complexes and ethylenediamine, glycinate, or pyrocatecholate. Inorg. Chem. 10(10), 2229–2232. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic50104a028 (1971).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
52.Das, A. K. Studies on mixed ligand complexes of cobalt(II), nickel(II), copper(II) and zinc(II) involving 8-hydroxyquinoline-5-sulphonic acid as a primary ligand and substituted catechols as secondary ligands. Transition Met. Chem. 14, 200–209 (1989).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
53.Das, A. K. Astatistical aspects of the stabilities of ternary complexes of cobalt(II), nickel(II), copper(II) and zinc(II) involving amino-polycarboxylic acids and heteroaromatic N-bases as primary ligands and acetohydroxamic acid as a secondary ligand. Transition Met. Chem. 14, 66–68 (1989).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Cannan, R. K. & Kibrick, A. Complex formation between carboxylic acids and divalent metal cations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 60(10), 2314–2320. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01277a012 (1938).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
55.Farkas, E., Brown, D. A., Cittaro, R. & Glass, W. K. Metal complexes of glutamic acid-γ-hydroxamic acid (Glu-γ-Ha) (N-hydroxyglutamine) in aqueous solution. J. Chem. Soc. Dalt. Trans. 18, 2803–2807. https://doi.org/10.1039/DT9930002803 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Farkas, E., Enyedy, É. A. & Csóka, H. Some factors affecting metal ion-monohydroxamate interactions in aqueous solution. J. Inorg. Biochem. 79(1–4), 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0162-0134(99)00158-0 (2000).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
57.Warnke, Z. Investigation on divalent metal complexes with oxyacids in aqueous solutions. 6. Potentiometric investigation on copper(II), zinc(II), and cadmium(II) complexes with glycolic acd. Rocz. Chem. 43, 1939 (1969).CAS 

Google Scholar 
58.Lengyel, T. Investigations on ion exchange equilibria with radioactive tracer method. 15. Liquid ion exchange technique for investigating mixed complex species of zinc with glycolic and alpha-hydroxyisobutyric acid. Acta Chim. Acad. Sci. Hung. 60, 373 (1969).CAS 

Google Scholar 
59.Athavale, V. T., Prabhu, L. H. & Vartak, D. G. Solution stability constants of some metal complexes of derivatives of catechol. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 28(5), 1237–1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1902(66)80450-5 (1966).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
60.Portanova, R., Lajunen, L. H. J., Tolazzi, M. & Piispanen, J. Critical evaluation of stability constants for α-hydroxycarboxylic acid complexes with protons and metal ions and the accompanying enthalpy changes: Part II. Aliphatic 2-hydroxycarboxylic acids (IUPAC technical report). Pure Appl. Chem. 75(4), 495–540. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac200375040495 (2003).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
61.Krężel, A. & Maret, W. The biological inorganic chemistry of zinc ions. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 611, 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2016.04.010 (2016).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
62.Al-Sogair, F. M.; Operschall, B. P.; Sigel, A.; Sigel, H.; Schnabl, J.; Sigel, R. K. O. Probing the Metal-Ion-Binding Strength of the Hydroxyl Group. In Chemical Reviews. American Chemical Society August 10, 964–5003 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr100415s.63.Gries, D., Brunn, S., Crowley, D. E. & Parker, D. R. Phytosiderophore release in relation to micronutrient metal deficiencies in Barley. Plant Soil 172(2), 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00011332 (1995).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
64.Welch, R. M. & Shuman, L. Micronutrient nutrition of plants. CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 14(1), 49–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689509701922 (1995).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
65.Arnold, T. et al. Evidence for the mechanisms of zinc uptake by rice using isotope fractionation. Plant. Cell Environ. 33(3), 370–381. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02085.x (2010).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
66.Haas, H. Fungal siderophore metabolism with a focus on Aspergillus fumigatus. Nat. Prod. Rep. 31(10), 1266–1276. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4np00071d (2014).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
67.Griffin, A. S., West, S. A. & Buckling, A. Cooperation and competition in pathogenic bacteria. Nature 430(7003), 1024–1027. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02744 (2004).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
68.Wu, D. et al. Tissue metabolic responses to salt stress in wild and cultivated barley. PLoS ONE 8(1), e55431. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055431 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
69.Widodo, Patterson, J. H.; Newbigin, E. et al.. Metabolic responses to salt stress of Barley (Hordeum Vulgare L.) cultivars, sahara and clipper, which differ in salinity tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 60(14), 4089–4103 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp243CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
70.Yang, C.-W. et al. Comparative effects of salt-stress and alkali-stress on the growth, photosynthesis, solute accumulation, and ion balance of Barley plants. Phytosynthetica 47, 79–86 (2009).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

1.Wernberg, T. & Filbee-Dexter, K. Missing the marine forest for the trees. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 612, 209–215 (2019).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Thompson, R. C., Wilson, B. J., Tobin, M. L., Hill, A. S. & Hawkins, S. J. Biologically generated habitat provision and diversity of rocky shore organisms at a hierarchy of spatial scales. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 202, 73–84 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Christie, H., Jørgensen, N. M. & Norderhaug, K. M. Bushy or smooth, high or low; importance of habitat architecture and vertical position for distribution of fauna on kelp. J. Sea Res. 58, 198–208 (2007).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Steneck, R. S. et al. Kelp forest ecosystems: Biodiversity, stability, resilience and future. Environ. Conserv. 29, 436–459 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Strain, E. M. A., Thomson, R. J., Micheli, F., Mancuso, F. P. & Airoldi, L. Identifying the interacting roles of stressors in driving the global loss of canopy-forming to mat-forming algae in marine ecosystems. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 3300–3312 (2014).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Mineur, F. et al. European seaweeds under pressure: Consequences for communities and ecosystem functioning. J. Sea Res. 98, 91–108 (2015).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Krumhansl, K. A. et al. Global patterns of kelp forest change over the past half-century. PNAS 113, 13785–13790 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Straub, S. C. et al. Resistance, extinction, and everything in between—The diverse responses of seaweeds to marine heatwaves. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 763 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Cheminée, A. et al. Nursery value of Cystoseira forests for Mediterranean rocky reef fishes. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 442, 70–79 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Piazzi, L. et al. Biodiversity in canopy-forming algae: Structure and spatial variability of the Mediterranean Cystoseira assemblages. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 207, 132–141 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Thibaut, T., Pinedo, S., Torras, X. & Ballesteros, E. Long-term decline of the populations of Fucales (Cystoseira spp. and Sargassum spp.) in the Albères coast (France, North-western Mediterranean). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 50, 1472–1489 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
12.Gianni, F. et al. Conservation and restoration of marine forests in the Mediterranean Sea and the potential role of marine protected areas. Adv. Oceanogr. Limnol. 4, 83–101 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Blanfuné, A., Boudouresque, C. F., Verlaque, M. & Thibaut, T. The fate of Cystoseira crinita, a forest-forming Fucale (Phaeophyceae, Stramenopiles), in France (North Western Mediterranean Sea). Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 181, 196–208 (2016).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Gubbay, S. et al. European Red List of Habitats. Part 1. Marine habitats. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union (2016).15.Perkol-Finkel, S., Ferrario, F., Nicotera, V. & Airoldi, L. Conservation challenges in urban seascapes: Promoting the growth of threatened species on coastal infrastructures. J. Appl. Ecol. 49, 1457–1466 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Falace, A., Kaleb, S., Fuente, G. D. L., Asnaghi, V. & Chiantore, M. Ex situ cultivation protocol for Cystoseira amentacea var. stricta (Fucales, Phaeophyceae) from a restoration perspective. PLoS ONE 13, e0193011 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
17.Gianni, F., Bartolini, F., Airoldi, L. & Mangialajo, L. Reduction of herbivorous fish pressure can facilitate focal algal species forestation on artificial structures. Mar. Environ. Res. 138, 102–109 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
18.Gianni, F. et al. Optimizing canopy-forming algae conservation and restoration with a new herbivorous fish deterrent device. Restor. Ecol. 28, 750–756 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Verdura, J., Sales, M., Ballesteros, E., Cefalì, M. E. & Cebrian, E. Restoration of a canopy-forming alga based on recruitment enhancement: Methods and long-term success assessment. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 1832 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Fuente, G. D. L., Chiantore, M., Asnaghi, V., Kaleb, S. & Falace, A. First ex situ outplanting of the habitat-forming seaweed Cystoseira amentacea var. stricta from a restoration perspective. PeerJ 7, e7290 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Tamburello, L. et al. Are we ready for scaling up restoration actions? An insight from Mediterranean macroalgal canopies. PLoS ONE 14, e0224477 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Medrano, A. et al. From marine deserts to algal beds: Treptacantha elegans revegetation to reverse stable degraded ecosystems inside and outside a No-Take marine reserve. Restor. Ecol. 28, 632–644 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Chryssovergis, F. & Panayotidis, P. Évolution des peuplements macrophytobenthiques le long d’un gradient d’eutrophisation. Oceanol. Acta 18, 649–658 (1995).
Google Scholar 
24.Sales, M., Cebrian, E., Tomas, F. & Ballesteros, E. Pollution impacts and recovery potential in three species of the genus Cystoseira (Fucales, Heterokontophyta). Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 92, 347–357 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
25.Díez, I., Santolaria, A., Secilla, A. & Gorostiaga, J. M. Recovery stages over long-term monitoring of the intertidal vegetation in the ‘Abra de Bilbao’ area and on the adjacent coast (N. Spain). Eur. J. Phycol. 44, 1–14 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Bringloe, T. T. et al. Phylogeny and evolution of the brown algae. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 39, 281–321 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Guern, M. Embryologie de quelques espèces du genre Cystoseira Agardh 1821 (FUCALES). Vie et Milieu 649–680 (1962).28.Dudgeon, S., Kübler, J. E., Wright, W. A., Vadas, R. L. & Petraitis, P. S. Natural variability in zygote dispersal of Ascophyllum nodosum at small spatial scales. Funct. Ecol. 15, 595–604 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Mangialajo, L. et al. Zonation patterns and interspecific relationships of fucoids in microtidal environments. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 412, 72–80 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Capdevila, P. et al. Recruitment patterns in the Mediterranean deep-water alga Cystoseira zosteroides. Mar. Biol. 162, 1165–1174 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Assis, J. et al. A fine-tuned global distribution dataset of marine forests. Sci. Data 7, 119 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Fabbrizzi, E. et al. Modeling macroalgal forest distribution at Mediterranean scale: Present status, drivers of changes and insights for conservation and management. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 20 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Benedetti-Cecchi, L., Tamburello, L., Maggi, E. & Bulleri, F. Experimental perturbations modify the performance of early warning indicators of regime shift. Curr. Biol. 25, 1867–1872 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Bulleri, F., Benedetti-Cecchi, L., Ceccherelli, G. & Tamburello, L. A few is enough: A low cover of a non-native seaweed reduces the resilience of Mediterranean macroalgal stands to disturbances of varying extent. Biolical Invasions 19, 2291–2305 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
35.Rindi, L., Bello, M. D., Dai, L., Gore, J. & Benedetti-Cecchi, L. Direct observation of increasing recovery length before collapse of a marine benthic ecosystem. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1–7 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
36.Draisma, S. G. A., Ballesteros, E., Rousseau, F. & Thibaut, T. DNA sequence data demonstrate the polyphyly of the genus Cystoseira and other Sargassaceae genera (Phaeophyceae). J. Phycol. 46, 1329–1345 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Bruno de Sousa, C. et al. Improved phylogeny of brown algae Cystoseira (Fucales) from the Atlantic-Mediterranean region based on mitochondrial sequences. PLoS ONE 14, e0210143 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Jódar-Pérez, A. B., Terradas-Fernández, M., López-Moya, F., Asensio-Berbegal, L. & López-Llorca, L. V. Multidisciplinary analysis of Cystoseira sensu lato (SE Spain) suggest a complex colonization of the Mediterranean. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 8, 961 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Hughes, A. R. & Stachowicz, J. J. Genetic diversity enhances the resistance of a seagrass ecosystem to disturbance. PNAS 101, 8998–9002 (2004).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Reusch, T. B. H. & Hughes, A. R. The emerging role of genetic diversity for ecosystem functioning: Estuarine macrophytes as models. Estuaries and Coasts J ERF 29, 159–164 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Reusch, T. B. H., Ehlers, A., Hämmerli, A. & Worm, B. Ecosystem recovery after climatic extremes enhanced by genotypic diversity. PNAS 102, 2826–2831 (2005).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Ehlers, A., Worm, B. & Reusch, T. B. H. Importance of genetic diversity in eelgrass Zostera marina for its resilience to global warming. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 355, 1–7 (2008).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
43.Hughes, A. R., Inouye, B. D., Johnson, M. T. J., Underwood, N. & Vellend, M. Ecological consequences of genetic diversity. Ecol. Lett. 11, 609–623 (2008).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
44.Frankham, R., Ballou, J. D. & Briscoe, D. A. Introduction to Conservation Genetics (Cambridge University Press, 2002) https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808999
.Book 

Google Scholar 
45.Cowen, R., Gawarkiewicz, G., Pineda, J., Thorrold, S. & Werner, F. Population connectivity in marine systems: An overview. Oceanography 20, 14–21 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Mayr, E. Animal Species and Evolution. Animal Species and Evolution (Harvard University Press, 2013).
Google Scholar 
47.Kimura, M. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution (Cambridge University Press, 1983) https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511623486
.Book 

Google Scholar 
48.Frankham, R. Conservation genetics. Annu. Rev. Genet. 29, 305–327 (1995).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
49.Lacy, R. C. Loss of genetic diversity from managed populations: Interacting effects of drift, mutation, immigration, selection, and population subdivision. Conserv. Biol. 1, 143–158 (1987).Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Frankham, R. et al. Genetic Management of Fragmented Animal and Plant Populations (Oxford University Press, 2017).Book 

Google Scholar 
51.Planes, S., Jones, G. P. & Thorrold, S. R. Larval dispersal connects fish populations in a network of marine protected areas. PNAS https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808007106 (2009).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
52.Pineda, J., Hare, J. A. & Sponaugle, S. Larval transport and dispersal in the coastal ocean and consequences for population connectivity. Oceanography 20, 22–39 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
53.Caughley, G. Directions in conservation biology. J. Anim. Ecol. 63, 215–244 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Buonomo, R. et al. Predicted extinction of unique genetic diversity in marine forests of Cystoseira spp. Mar. Environ. Res. 138, 119–128 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
55.Buonomo, R. et al. Habitat continuity and stepping-stone oceanographic distances explain population genetic connectivity of the brown alga Cystoseira amentacea. Mol. Ecol. 26, 766–780 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Bermejo, R. et al. Marine forests of the Mediterranean-Atlantic Cystoseira tamariscifolia complex show a southern Iberian genetic hotspot and no reproductive isolation in parapatry. Sci. Rep. 8, 10427 (2018).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
57.Engelen, A. H. et al. A population genetics toolbox for the threatened canopy-forming brown seaweeds Cystoseira tamariscifolia and C. amentacea (Fucales, Sargassaceae). J. Appl. Phycol. 29, 627–629 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
58.Thibaut, T. et al. Connectivity of populations of the seaweed Cystoseira amentacea within the Bay of Marseille (Mediterranean Sea): Genetic structure and hydrodynamic connections. crya 37, 233–255 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
59.Guiry, M.D. & Guiry, G.M. AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication (National University of Ireland, 2021) http://www.algaebase.org (Accessed 21 Jan 2021).60.Sales, M. & Ballesteros, E. Shallow Cystoseira (Fucales: Ochrophyta) assemblages thriving in sheltered areas from Menorca (NW Mediterranean): Relationships with environmental factors and anthropogenic pressures. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 84, 476–482 (2009).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
61.Robvieux, P. et al. First characterization of eight polymorphic microsatellites for Cystoseira amentacea var. stricta (Fucales, Sargassaceae). Conserv. Genet. Resour. 4, 923–925 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
62.Sadogurska, S. S., Neiva, J., Falace, A., Serrão, E. A. & Israel, Á. The genus Cystoseira s.l. (Ochrophyta, Fucales, Sargassaceae) in the Black Sea: Morphological variability and molecular taxonomy of Gongolaria barbata and endemic Ericaria crinita f. bosphorica comb. nov. Phytotaxa 480, 1–21 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
63.Bologa, A. S. & Sava, D. Progressive decline and present trend of Romanian Black Sea macroalgal flora. Cercetari Mar. 36, 31–60 (2006).
Google Scholar 
64.Irving, A. D., Balata, D., Colosio, F., Ferrando, G. A. & Airoldi, L. Light, sediment, temperature, and the early life-history of the habitat-forming alga Cystoseira barbata. Mar. Biol. 156, 1223–1231 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
65.Allendorf, F. W. Genetics and the conservation of natural populations: Allozymes to genomes. Mol. Ecol. 26, 420–430 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
66.Ellegren, H. Microsatellites: Simple sequences with complex evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5, 435–445 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
67.De Meeûs, T. et al. Deceptive combined effects of short allele dominance and stuttering: An example with Ixodes scapularis, the main vector of Lyme disease in the USA. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/622373 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
68.De Meeûs, T. Revisiting FIS, FST, Wahlund effects, and null alleles. J. Hered. 109, 446–456 (2018).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
69.Evanno, G., Regnaut, S. & Goudet, J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: A simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 14, 2611–2620 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
70.Selkoe, K. A. & Toonen, R. J. Microsatellites for ecologists: A practical guide to using and evaluating microsatellite markers. Ecol. Lett. 9, 615–629 (2006).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
71.Manangwa, O. et al. Detecting Wahlund effects together with amplification problems: Cryptic species, null alleles and short allele dominance in Glossina pallidipes populations from Tanzania. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 19, 757–772 (2019).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
72.Chapuis, M.-P. & Estoup, A. Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 621–631 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
73.Engel, C. R., Brawley, S. H., Edwards, K. J. & Serrão, E. Isolation and cross-species amplification of microsatellite loci from the fucoid seaweeds Fucus vesiculosus, F. serratus and Ascophyllum nodosum (Heterokontophyta, Fucaceae). Mol. Ecol. Notes 3, 180–182 (2003).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
74.Paulino, C. et al. Characterization of 12 polymorphic microsatellite markers in the sugar kelp Saccharina latissima. J. Appl. Phycol. 28, 3071–3074 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
75.Coleman, M. A., Dolman, G., Kelaher, B. P. & Steinberg, P. D. Characterisation of microsatellite loci in the subtidal habitat-forming alga, Phyllospora comosa (Phaeophyceae, Fucales). Conserv. Genet. 9, 1015–1017 (2008).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
76.Coleman, M. A. & Brawley, S. H. Are life history characteristics good predictors of genetic diversity and structure? A case study of the intertidal alga Fucus spiralis (heterokontophyta; Phaeophyceae). J. Phycol. 41, 753–762 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
77.Coleman, M. A. & Brawley, S. H. Spatial and temporal variability in dispersal and population genetic structure of a rockpool alga. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 300, 63–77 (2005).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
78.Engel, C. R., Daguin, C. & Serrão, E. A. Genetic entities and mating system in hermaphroditic Fucus spiralis and its close dioecious relative F. vesiculosus (Fucaceae, Phaeophyceae). Mol. Ecol. 14, 2033–2046 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
79.Medrano, A. et al. Ecological traits, genetic diversity and regional distribution of the macroalga Treptacantha elegans along the Catalan coast (NW Mediterranean Sea). Sci. Rep. 10, 19219 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
80.Engelen, A. H. et al. Periodicity of propagule expulsion and settlement in the competing native and invasive brown seaweeds, Cystoseira humilis and Sargassum muticum (Phaeophyta). Eur. J. Phycol. 43, 275–282 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
81.Assis, J., Serrão, E. A., Claro, B., Perrin, C. & Pearson, G. A. Climate-driven range shifts explain the distribution of extant gene pools and predict future loss of unique lineages in a marine brown alga. Mol. Ecol. 23, 2797–2810 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
82.Neiva, J. et al. Genes left behind: Climate change threatens cryptic genetic diversity in the canopy-forming seaweed Bifurcaria bifurcata. PLoS ONE 10, e0131530 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
83.Coleman, M. A. & Kelaher, B. P. Connectivity among fragmented populations of a habitat-forming alga, Phyllospora comosa (Phaeophyceae, Fucales) on an urbanised coast. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 381, 63–70 (2009).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
84.Boissin, E. et al. Chaotic genetic structure and past demographic expansion of the invasive gastropod Tritia neritea in its native range, the Mediterranean Sea. Sci. Rep. 10, 21624 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
85.Olsen, J. L. et al. North Atlantic phylogeography and large-scale population differentiation of the seagrass Zostera marina L. Mol. Ecol. 13, 1923–1941 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
86.Peijnenburg, K. T. C. A., Breeuwer, J. A. J., Pierrot-Bults, A. C. & Menken, S. B. J. Phylogeography of the planktonic chaetognath Sagitta setosa reveals isolation in European Seas. Evolution 58, 1472–1487 (2004).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
87.Luttikhuizen, P. C., Campos, J., van Bleijswijk, J., Peijnenburg, K. T. C. A. & van der Veer, H. W. Phylogeography of the common shrimp, Crangon crangon (L.) across its distribution range. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 46, 1015–1030 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
88.Wilson, A. B. & Eigenmann Veraguth, I. The impact of Pleistocene glaciation across the range of a widespread European coastal species. Mol. Ecol. 19, 4535–4553 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
89.Riquet, F. et al. Parallel pattern of differentiation at a genomic island shared between clinal and mosaic hybrid zones in a complex of cryptic seahorse lineages. Evolution 73, 817–835 (2019).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
90.Hewitt, G. M. Hybrid zones-natural laboratories for evolutionary studies. Trends Ecol. Evol. 3, 158–167 (1988).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
91.Johannesson, K., Le Moan, A., Perini, S. & André, C. A Darwinian laboratory of multiple contact zones. Trends Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2020.07.015 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
92.McCoy, S. J., Krueger-Hadfield, S. A. & Mieszkowska, N. Evolutionary phycology: Toward a macroalgal species conceptual framework. J. Phycol. 56, 1404–1413 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
93.Neiva, J., Pearson, G. A., Valero, M. & Serrão, E. A. Fine-scale genetic breaks driven by historical range dynamics and ongoing density-barrier effects in the estuarine seaweed Fucus ceranoides L. BMC Evol. Biol. 12, 78 (2012).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
94.Whitlock, M. C. & McCauley, D. E. Indirect measures of gene flow and migration: FST ≠1/(4 Nm + 1). Heredity 82, 117–125 (1999).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
95.Lowe, W. H. & Allendorf, F. W. What can genetics tell us about population connectivity?. Mol. Ecol. 19, 3038–3051 (2010).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
96.Durrant, H. M. S. et al. Implications of macroalgal isolation by distance for networks of marine protected areas. Conserv. Biol. 28, 438–445 (2014).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
97.Engelen, A., Olsen, J., Breeman, A. & Stam, W. Genetic differentiation in Sargassum polyceratium (Fucales: Phaeophyceae) around the island of Curaçao (Netherlands Antilles). Mar. Biol. 139, 267–277 (2001).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
98.Billot, C., Engel, C. R., Rousvoal, S., Kloareg, B. & Valero, M. Current patterns, habitat discontinuities and population genetic structure: The case of the kelp Laminaria digitata in the English Channel. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 253, 111–121 (2003).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
99.Tatarenkov, A., Jönsson, R. B., Kautsky, L. & Johannesson, K. Genetic structure in populations of Fucus vesiculosus (phaeophyceae) over spatial scales from 10 m to 800 km. J. Phycol. 43, 675–685 (2007).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
100.Susini, M.-L., Thibaut, T., Meinesz, A. & Forcioli, D. A preliminary study of genetic diversity in Cystoseira amentacea (C. Agardh) Bory var. stricta Montagne (Fucales, Phaeophyceae) using random amplified polymorphic DNA. Phycologia 46, 605–611 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
101.Korotenko, K., Bowman, M. & Dietrich, D. High-resolution numerical model for predicting the transport and dispersal of oil spilled in the Black Sea. Terrest. Atmos. Oceanic Sci. J. 21, 123–136 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
102.Barale, V., Schiller, C., Tacchi, R. & Marechal, C. Trends and interactions of physical and bio-geo-chemical features in the Adriatic Sea as derived from satellite observations. Sci. Total Environ. 353, 68–81 (2005).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
103.Hauser, L. & Carvalho, G. R. Paradigm shifts in marine fisheries genetics: Ugly hypotheses slain by beautiful facts. Fish Fish. 9, 333–362 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
104.Orellana, S., Hernández, M. & Sansón, M. Diversity of Cystoseira sensu lato (Fucales, Phaeophyceae) in the eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean based on morphological and DNA evidence, including Carpodesmia gen. emend. and Treptacantha gen. emend. Eur. J. Phycol. 54, 447–465 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
105.Richard, B., A. & Wilks, A., R. Maps in S. AT&T Bell Laboratories Statistics Research Report [93.2] (1993).106.Richard, B., A. & Wilks, A., R. Constructing a Geographical Database. AT&T Bell Lab-oratories Statistics Research Report [95.2] (1995).107.R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing https://www.R-project.org/ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2017).108.Holleley, C. E. & Geerts, P. G. Multiplex Manager 1.0: A cross-platform computer program that plans and optimizes multiplex PCR. Biotechniques 46, 511–517 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
109.Peakall, R. & Smouse, P. E. genalex 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Notes 6, 288–295 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
110.Goudet, J. Fstat (Version 1.2): A computer program to calculate F-Statistics. J. Hered. 86, 485–486 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
111.De Meeûs, T., Guégan, J.-F. & Teriokhin, A. T. MultiTest V.1.2, a program to binomially combine independent tests and performance comparison with other related methods on proportional data. BMC Bioinform. 10, 443 (2009).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
112.Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Methodol. 57, 289–300 (1995).MathSciNet 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
113.Oosterhout, C. V., Weetman, D. & Hutchinson, W. F. Estimation and adjustment of microsatellite null alleles in nonequilibrium populations. Mol. Ecol. Notes 6, 255–256 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
114.Petit, R. J., Mousadik, A. E. & Pons, O. Identifying populations for conservation on the basis of genetic markers. Conserv. Biol. 12, 844–855 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
115.El Mousadik, A. & Petit, R. J. High level of genetic differentiation for allelic richness among populations of the argan tree [Argania spinosa (L.) Skeels] endemic to Morocco. Theor. Appl. Genet. 92, 832–839 (1996).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
116.Raymond, M. & Rousset, F. GENEPOP (Version 1.2): Population genetics Software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered. 86, 248–249 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
117.Szulkin, M., Bierne, N. & David, P. Heterozygosity-fitness correlations: A time for reappraisal. Evolution 64, 1202–1217 (2010).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
118.David, P., Pujol, B., Viard, F., Castella, V. & Goudet, J. Reliable selfing rate estimates from imperfect population genetic data. Mol. Ecol. 16, 2474–2487 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
119.Wright, S. The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution 19, 395–420 (1965).Article 

Google Scholar 
120.Weir, B. S. & Cockerham, C. C. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38, 1358–1370 (1984).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
121.Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M. & Donnelly, P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155, 945–959 (2000).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
122.Falush, D., Stephens, M. & Pritchard, J. K. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: Linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164, 1567–1587 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
123.Jombart, T. adegenet: A R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24, 1403–1405 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
124.Jakobsson, M. & Rosenberg, N. A. Clumpp: A cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure. Bioinformatics 23, 1801–1806 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
125.Goudet, J. hierfstat, a package for r to compute and test hierarchical F-statistics. Mol. Ecol. Notes 5, 184–186 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
126.Séré, M., Thévenon, S., Belem, A. M. G. & De Meeûs, T. Comparison of different genetic distances to test isolation by distance between populations. Heredity 119, 55–63 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
127.Rousset, F. & Raymond, M. Statistical analyses of population genetic data: New tools, old concepts. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12, 313–317 (1997).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
128.Hijmans, R. J. Geosphere: Spherical Trigonometry. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=geosphere. R package version 1.5–5. (2016).129.Korotenko, K. A. Effects of mesoscale eddies on behavior of an oil spill resulting from an accidental deepwater blowout in the Black Sea: An assessment of the environmental impacts. PeerJ 6, e5448 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
130.López-Márquez, V. et al. Seascape genetics and connectivity modelling for an endangered Mediterranean coral in the northern Ionian and Adriatic seas. Landsc. Ecol. 34, 2649–2668 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
131.Rousset, F. Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics 145, 1219–1228 (1997).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
132.Watts, P. C. et al. Compatible genetic and ecological estimates of dispersal rates in insect (Coenagrion mercuriale: Odonata: Zygoptera) populations: Analysis of ‘neighbourhood size’ using a more precise estimator. Mol. Ecol. 16, 737–751 (2007).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
133.Hill, W. G. Estimation of effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium. Genet. Res. 38, 209–216 (1981).Article 

Google Scholar 
134.Waples, R. S. Seed banks, salmon, and sleeping genes: Effective population size in semelparous, age-structured species with fluctuating abundance. Am. Nat. 167, 118–135 (2006).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
135.Waples, R. S. & Do, C. ldne: A program for estimating effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 8, 753–756 (2008).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
136.Do, C. et al. NeEstimator v2: Re-implementation of software for the estimation of contemporary effective population size (Ne) from genetic data. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 14, 209–214 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
137.Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., & Edwards, A. W. F. Phylogenetic analysis: Model and estimation procedures. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 19, 233–257 (1967).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar  More