Ecology

Allendorf FW (2017) Genetics and the conservation of natural populations: allozymes to genomes. Mol Ecol 26(2):420–430CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Allendorf FW, Hohenlohe PA, Luikart G (2010) Genomics and the future of conservation genetics. Nat Rev Genet 11(10):697–709CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Allendorf FW, Luikart G (2007) Conservation and the genetics of populations. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK
Google Scholar 
Allendorf FW, Luikart G, Aitken SN (2013) Conservation and the genetics of populations, 2nd ed. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK
Google Scholar 
Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic Local Alignment Searsh Tool. J Mol Biol 215(3):403–410CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Andrews S (2010) FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ArtDatabanken (2020) Mal Silurus glanis. https://artfakta.se/naturvard/taxon/100131Begun DJ, Holloway AK, Stevens K, Hillier LW, Poh YP, Hahn MW et al. (2007) Population genomics: Whole-genome analysis of polymorphism and divergence in Drosophila simulans. PLOS Biol 5(11):2534–2559CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Borger T, Kjellberg A (2006) Malprovfiske i Emån 2006 [Fish survey for wels catfish in Emån 2006; in Swedish]. Länsstyrelsen i Kalmar län informerar. Meddelande 2006:16. Länsstyrelsen i Kalmar Län
Google Scholar 
Brandies P, Peel E, Hogg CJ, Belov K (2019) The value of reference genomes in the conservation of threatened species. Genes 10(11):846CAS 
PubMed Central 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bylak A, Kukuła K (2018) Importance of peripheral basins: implications for the conservation of fish assemblages. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 28:1055–1066Article 

Google Scholar 
Bylak A, Kukuła K (2020) Conservation of fish communities: Extending the ‘research life cycle’ by achieving practical effects. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 30:1741–1746Article 

Google Scholar 
Calles EO, Greenberg LA (2005) Evaluation of nature-like fishways for re-establishing connectivity in fragmented salmonid populations in the River Emån. River Res Appl 21:951–960Article 

Google Scholar 
Carol J, Zamora L, García-Berthou E (2007) Preliminary telemetry data on the movement patterns and habitat use of European catfish (Silurus glanis) in a reservoir of the River Ebro, Spain. Ecol Freshw Fish 16:450–456Article 

Google Scholar 
Ceballos FC, Joshi PK, Clark DW, Ramsay M, Wilson JF (2018) Runs of homozygosity: windows into population history and trait architecture. Nat Rev Genet 19(4):220–235CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Channell R (2004) The conservation value of peripheral populations: The supporting science. In: Hooper TD (ed.) Proceedings of the species at risk. Pathways to Recovery Conference. Conference Organizing Committee, Victoria, BCChannell R, Lomolino MV (2000) Dynamic biogeography and conservation of endangered species. Nature 403:84–86CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Copp GH, Britton JR, Cucherousset J, Garcia-Berthou E, Kirk R, Peeler E et al. (2009) Voracious invader or benign feline? A review of the environmental biology of European catfish Silurus glanis in its native and introduced ranges. Fish Fish 10(3):252–282Article 

Google Scholar 
Cucherousset J, Horky P, Slavik O, Ovidio M, Arlinghaus R, Bouletreau S et al. (2018) Ecology, behaviour and management of the European catfish. Rev Fish Biol Fish 28(1):177–190Article 

Google Scholar 
Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers CA, Banks E, DePristo MA et al. (2011) The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27(15):2156–2158CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
DePristo MA, Banks E, Poplin R, Garimella KV, Maguire JR, Hartl C et al. (2011) A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat Genet 43(5):491–498CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Eckert CG, Samis KE, Lougheed SC (2008) Genetic variation across species’ geographical ranges: the central-marginal hypothesis and beyond. Mol Ecol 17(5):1170–1188CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2003) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164(4):1567–1587CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2010) Introduction to conservation genetics, 2 edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeBook 

Google Scholar 
Frankham R, Ballou JD, Eldridge MDB, Lacy RC, Ralls K, Dudash MR et al. (2011) Predicting the probability of outbreeding depression. Conserv Biol 25(3):465–475PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Fraser DJ, Bernatchez L (2001) Adaptive evolutionary conservation: towards a unified concept for defining conservation units. Mol Ecol 10(12):2741–2752CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Freyhof J (2010). Silurus glanis (errata version published in 2018). The IUCN red list of threatened species. https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/40713/136595620#errataGarcía-Alcalde F, Okonechnikov K, Carbonell J, Cruz LM, Götz S, Tarazona S et al. (2012) Qualimap: evaluating next-generation sequencing alignment data. Bioinformatics 28:2678–2679PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Garner BA, Hand BK, Amish SJ, Bernatchez L, Foster JT, Miller KM et al. (2016) Genomics in conservation: case studies and bridging the gap between data and application. Trends Ecol Evol 31(2):81–83PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Gibson J, Newton ME, Collins A (2006) Extended tracts of homozygosity in outbred human populations. Hum Mol Genet 15(5):789–795CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Guillerault N, Delmotte S, Bouletreau S, Lauzeral C, Poulet N, Santoul F (2015) Does the non-native European catfish Silurus glanis threaten French river fish populations? Freshw Biol 60(5):922–928Article 

Google Scholar 
Havs-och-vattenmyndighetens. (2017) Åtgärdsprogram för mal (Silurus glanis). [Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management. Action plan for wels catfish in Sweden; in Swedish]. Havs- och Vattenmyndighetens Rapp 2017:33
Google Scholar 
Helyar SJ, Hemmer-Hansen J, Bekkevold D, Taylor MI, Ogden R, Limborg MT et al. (2011) Application of SNPs for population genetics of nonmodel organisms: new opportunities and challenges. Mol Ecol Resour 11:123–136PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hendricks S, Anderson EC, Antao T, Bernatchez L, Forester BR, Garner B et al. (2018) Recent advances in conservation and population genomics data analysis. Evol Appl 11(8):1197–1211PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hohenlohe PA, Funk WC, Rajora OP (2020) Population genomics for wildlife conservation and management. Mol Ecol 30:62–82PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hohenlohe PA, Rajora OP (eds) (2020) Population genomics: wildlife. Population Genomics. Springer, ChamHöglund J (2009) Evolutionary Conservation Genetics. Oxford University Press, OxfordBook 

Google Scholar 
Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD (2019) MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief Bioinform 20:1160–1166CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kimura M (1983) The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeBook 

Google Scholar 
Krieg F, Triantafyllidis A, Guyomard R (2000) Mitochondrial DNA variation in European populations of Silurus glanis. J Fish Biol 56(3):713–724CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lamichhaney S, Fuentes-Pardo AP, Rafati N, Ryman N, McCracken GR, Bourne C et al. (2017) Parallel adaptive evolution of geographically distant herring populations on both sides of the North Atlantic Ocean. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114(17):E3452–E3461CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Leigh JW, Bryant D (2015) popart: full-feature software for haplotype network construction (S Nakagawa, Ed.). Methods Ecol Evol 6:1110–1116Article 

Google Scholar 
Lesica P, Allendorf FW (1995) When are peripheral-populations valuable for conservation. Conserv Biol 9(4):753–760Article 

Google Scholar 
Li H, Durbin R (2009) Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25(14):1754–1760CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N et al. (2009) The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078–2079PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A et al. (2010) The genome analysis toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res 20(9):1297–1303CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
McMahon BJ, Teeling EC, Hoglund J (2014) How and why should we implement genomics into conservation? Evol Appl 7(9):999–1007PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Meyermans R, Gorssen W, Buys N, Janssens S (2020) How to study runs of homozygosity using PLINK? A guide for analyzing medium density SNP data in livestock and pet species. BMC Genomics 21:94CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nathanson JE (1987). Malens utbredning i Sverige. English summary: Distribution of the sheatfish (Silurus glanis) in Sweden. Information från Sötvattenslaboratoriet (Institute of Freshwater Research), DrottningholmPalm S, Prestegaard T, Dannewitz J, Petersson E, Nathanson JE (2008). Genetisk kartläggning av svenska malbestånd [Genetic survey of swedish populations of wels catfish]. Fiskeriverkets Sötvattenslaboratorium, Drottningholm & Uppsala UniversitetPalm S, Vinterstare J, Nathanson JE, Triantafyllidis A, Petersson E (2019) Reduced genetic diversity and low effective size in peripheral northern European catfish Silurus glanis populations. J Fish Biol 95(6):1407–1421PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/Savolainen O, Lascoux M, Merilä J (2013) Ecological genomics of local adaptation. Nat Rev Genet 14(11):807–820CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Schiffels S, Durbin R (2014) Inferring human population size and separation history from multiple genome sequences. Nat Genet 46(8):919–925CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Shafer ABA, Wolf JBW, Alves PC, Bergström L, Bruford MW, Brannstrom I et al. (2015) Genomics and the challenging translation into conservation practice. Trends Ecol Evol 30(2):78–87PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Shafer ABA, Wolf JBW, Alves PC, Bergström L, Colling G, Dalen L et al. (2016) Genomics in conservation: case studies and bridging the gap between data and application reply. Trends Ecol Evol 31(2):83–84PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Shendure J, Ji HL (2008) Next-generation DNA sequencing. Nat Biotech 26(10):1135–1145CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Svensson M, Kjellberg A, Lessmark O, Nathanson JE, Almer B, Wagnström J (2013). Beskrivning av förväntade effekter av återintroduktion av mal i nedre delen av Skräbeåns vattensystem [Description of expected effects of reintroduction of wels catfish in the lower parts of Skräbeåns watersystem]. Ivösjöns FiskevårdsföreningTallmon DA, Luikart G, Waples RS (2004) The alluring simplicity and complex reality of genetic rescue. Trends Ecol Evol 19(9):489–496PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Taylor HR, Dussex N, van Heezik Y (2017) Bridging the conservation genetics gap by identifying barriers to implementation for conservation practitioners. Global Ecol Conserv 10:231–242Article 

Google Scholar 
Triantafyllidis A, Abatzopoulos TJ, Economidis PS (1999a) Genetic differentiation and phylogenetic relationships among Greek Silurus glanis and Silurus aristotelis (Pisces, Siluridae) populations, assessed by PCR-RFLP analysis of mitochondrial DNA segments. Heredity 82:503–509CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Triantafyllidis A, Krieg F, Cottin C, Abatzopoulos TJ, Triantaphyllidis C, Guyomard R (2002) Genetic structure and phylogeography of European catfish (Silurus glanis) populations. Mol Ecol 11(6):1039–1055CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Triantafyllidis A, Ozouf-Costaz C, Rab P, Suciu R, Karakousis Y (1999b) Allozyme variation in European silurid catfishes, Silurus glanis and Silurus aristotelis. Biochem Syst Ecol 27(5):487–498CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Vittas S, Drosopoulou E, Kappas I, Pantzartzi CN, Scouras ZG (2011) The mitochondrial genome of the European catfish Silurus glanis (Siluriformes, Siluridae). J Biol Res 15:25–35CAS 

Google Scholar 
Weisenfeld NI, Kumar V, Shah P, Church DM, Jaffe DB (2017) Direct determination of diploid genome sequences. Genome Res 27(5):757–767CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zoonomia Consortium (2020) A comparative genomics multitool for scientific discovery and conservation. Nature 597:240–245Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar  More

1.Amel, E., Manning, C., Scott, B. & Koger, S. Beyond the roots of human inaction: Fostering collective effort toward ecosystem conservation. Science 356, 275–279 (2017).
Google Scholar 
2.Bodin, Ö. Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems. Science 357, eaan1114 (2017).
Google Scholar 
3.Cinner, J. E. How behavioral science can help conservation. Science 362, 889–891 (2018).
Google Scholar 
4.Abrahamse, W. & Steg, L. Social influence approaches to encourage resource conservation: A meta-analysis. Glob. Environ. Chang. 23, 1773–1785 (2013).
Google Scholar 
5.Christoff, Z., Hansen, J. U. & Proietti, C. Reflecting on social influence in networks. J. Logic Lang. Inf. 25, 299–333 (2016).
Google Scholar 
6.Fowler, J. H. & Christakis, N. A. Cooperative behavior cascades in human social networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 107, 5334–5338 (2010).
Google Scholar 
7.Friedkin, N. E. & Johnsen, E. C. Social positions in influence networks. Soc. Netw. 19, 209–222 (1997).
Google Scholar 
8.Christakis, N. A. & Fowler, J. H. The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. N. Engl. J. Med. 358, 2249–2258 (2008).
Google Scholar 
9.Barnes, M. L., Lynham, J., Kalberg, K. & Leung, P. Social networks and environmental outcomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113, 6466–6471 (2016).
Google Scholar 
10.McPherson, M., Smith-lovin, L. & Cook, J. M. Homophily in social networks. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 27, 415–444 (2001).
Google Scholar 
11.Bodin, Ö., Mancilla García, M. & Robins, G. Reconciling conflict and cooperation in environmental governance: A social network perspective. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 45, 471–495 (2020).
Google Scholar 
12.Bodin, Ö. & Prell, C. Social Networks and Natural Resource. Management Uncovering the Social Fabric of Environmental Governance (Cambridge University Press, 2011).
Google Scholar 
13.Small, B., Brown, P. & Montes de Oca Munguia, O. Values, trust, and management in New Zealand agriculture. Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 14, 282–306 (2016).
Google Scholar 
14.Friedman, R. S. et al. Beyond the community in participatory forest management: A governance network perspective. Land Use Policy 97, 104738 (2020).
Google Scholar 
15.Schill, C. et al. A more dynamic understanding of human behaviour for the Anthropocene. Nat. Sustain. 2, 1075–1082 (2019).
Google Scholar 
16.Yletyinen, J., Hentati-Sundberg, J., Blenckner, T. & Bodin, O. Fishing strategy diversification and fishers’ ecological dependency. Ecol. Soc. 23, 28 (2018).
Google Scholar 
17.Grêt-Regamey, A., Huber, S. H. & Huber, R. Actors’ diversity and the resilience of social-ecological systems to global change. Nat. Sustain. 2, 290–297 (2019).
Google Scholar 
18.Kremen, C. & Merenlender, A. M. Landscapes that work for biodiversity and people. Science 362, eaau6020 (2018).
Google Scholar 
19.de Lange, E., Milner-Gulland, E. J. & Keane, A. Improving environmental interventions by understanding information flows. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 1034–1047 (2019).
Google Scholar 
20.Vainio, A., Paloniemi, R. & Hujala, T. How are forest owners’ objectives and social networks related to successful conservation?. J. Rural Stud. 62, 21–28 (2018).
Google Scholar 
21.de Snoo, G. R. et al. Toward effective nature conservation on farmland: Making farmers matter. Conserv. Lett. 6, 66–72 (2013).
Google Scholar 
22.Hanski, I. Habitat loss, the dynamics of biodiversity, and a perspective on conservation. Ambio 40, 248–255 (2011).
Google Scholar 
23.Wintle, B. A. et al. Global synthesis of conservation studies reveals the importance of small habitat patches for biodiversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116, 909–914 (2018).
Google Scholar 
24.Hill, R. et al. A social-ecological systems analysis of impediments to delivery of the Aichi 2020 Targets and potentially more effective pathways to the conservation of biodiversity. Glob. Environ. Chang. 34, 22–34 (2015).
Google Scholar 
25.Bengtsson, J. et al. Reserves, resilience and dynamic landscapes. AMBIO J. Hum. Environ. 32, 389–396 (2016).
Google Scholar 
26.Johnson, C. N. et al. Biodiversity losses and conservation responses in the Anthropocene. Science 356, 270–275 (2017).
Google Scholar 
27.Miller, B. W., Caplow, S. C. & Leslie, P. W. Feedbacks between conservation and social-ecological systems. Conserv. Biol. 26, 218–227 (2012).
Google Scholar 
28.Larrosa, C., Carrasco, L. R. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. Unintended feedbacks: Challenges and opportunities for improving conservation effectiveness. Conserv. Lett. 9, 316–326 (2016).
Google Scholar 
29.Reyers, B. & Selig, E. R. Global targets that reveal the social–ecological interdependencies of sustainable development. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1011–1019 (2020).
Google Scholar 
30.Brehony, P., Tyrrell, P., Kamanga, J., Waruingi, L. & Kaelo, D. Incorporating social-ecological complexities into conservation policy. Biol. Conserv. 248, 108697 (2020).
Google Scholar 
31.Jacob, U. et al. Marine conservation: Towards a multi-layered network approach. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. Biol. Sci. 375, 20190459 (2020).
Google Scholar 
32.Hoole, A. & Berkes, F. Breaking down fences: Recoupling social-ecological systems for biodiversity conservation in Namibia. Geoforum 41, 304–317 (2010).
Google Scholar 
33.Dajka, J. et al. Red and green loops help uncover missing feedbacks in a coral reef social–ecological system. People Nat. 2, 608–618 (2020).
Google Scholar 
34.Yletyinen, J. et al. Understanding and managing social-ecological tipping points in primary industries. Bioscience 69, 335–347 (2019).
Google Scholar 
35.Mason, W. A., Conrey, F. R. & Smith, E. R. Situating social influence processes: Dynamic, multidirectional flows of influence within social networks. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 11, 279–300 (2007).
Google Scholar 
36.Niemiec, R. M., Willer, R., Ardoin, N. M. & Brewer, F. K. Motivating landowners to recruit neighbors for private land conservation. Conserv. Biol. 33, 930–941 (2019). 
Google Scholar 
37.Brown, P. Survey of rural decision makers. Manaaki Whenua Landcare Res. https://doi.org/10.7931/J2736P2D (2015).
Google Scholar 
38.Burt, R. S. & Doreian, P. Testing a structural model of perception: Conformity and deviance with respect to Journal norms in elite sociological methodology. Qual. Quant. 16, 109–150 (1982).
Google Scholar 
39.Zhang, B., Pavlou, P. A. & Krishnan, R. On direct vs. indirect peer influence in large social networks. Inf. Syst. Res. 29, 292–314 (2018).
Google Scholar 
40.Pinheiro, F. L., Santos, M. D., Santos, F. C. & Pacheco, J. M. Origin of peer influence in social networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 1–5 (2014).
Google Scholar 
41.Lewis, K., Gonzalez, M. & Kaufman, J. Social selection and peer influence in an online social network. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 68–72 (2012).
Google Scholar 
42.Stein, C., Barron, J. & Ernstson, H. A social network approach to analyze multi-stakeholders governance arrangement in water resources management: Three case studies from catchments in Burkina Faso, Tanzania and Zambia. In Proceedings of the XIVth World Water Congress, 25–29 September, at Porto de Galinhas, Pernambuco, Brazil. (2011).43.Autant-bernard, C., Mairesse, J. & Massard, N. Spatial knowledge diffusion through collaborative networks. Pap. Reg. Sci. 86, 341–350 (2007).
Google Scholar 
44.Ward, P. S. & Pede, V. O. Capturing social network effects in technology adoption: The spatial diffusion of hybrid rice in Bangladesh. Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 59, 225–241 (2015).
Google Scholar 
45.Kuhfuss, L. et al. Nudges, social norms, and permanence in agri-environmental schemes. Land Econ. 92, 641–655 (2016).
Google Scholar 
46.Fehr, E. & Schurtenberger, I. Normative foundations of human cooperation. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 458–468 (2018).
Google Scholar 
47.Delaroche, M. Adoption of conservation practices: What have we learned from two decades of social-psychological approaches?. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 45, 25–35 (2020).
Google Scholar 
48.Knowler, D. & Bradshaw, B. Farmers’ adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of recent research. Food Policy 32, 25–48 (2007).
Google Scholar 
49.O’Sullivan, D. & Perry, G. L. W. Spatial Simulation. Exploring Pattern and Process (Wiley, 2013).
Google Scholar 
50.Will, M., Groeneveld, J., Frank, K. & Müller, B. Combining social network analysis and agent-based modelling to explore dynamics of human interaction: A review. Socio-Environ. Syst. Model. 2, 16325 (2020).
Google Scholar 
51.Bodin, Ö. & Crona, B. I. The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference?. Glob. Environ. Chang. 19, 366–374 (2009).
Google Scholar 
52.Erdős, P. & Rényi, A. On random graphs. Publ. Math. 6, 290–297 (1959).
Google Scholar 
53.Hanski, I. Dynamics of regional distribution: The core and satellite species hypothesis. Oikos 38, 210–221 (1982).
Google Scholar 
54.Groce, J. E., Farrelly, M. A., Jorgensen, B. S. & Cook, C. N. Using social-network research to improve outcomes in natural resource management. Conserv. Biol. 33, 53-65 (2018).
Google Scholar 
55.Schill, C., Wijermans, N., Schlüter, M. & Lindahl, T. Cooperation is not enough – Exploring social-ecological micro-foundations for sustainable common-pool resource use. PLoS ONE 11, e0165009 (2016).
Google Scholar 
56.Valente, T. W. Network interventions. Science 337, 49–53 (2012).
Google Scholar 
57.Valente, T. W. Putting the network in network interventions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 114, 9500–9501 (2017).
Google Scholar 
58.Kossinets, G. & Watts, D. J. Empirical analysis of an evolving social network. Science 311, 88–90 (2006).
Google Scholar 
59.De Domenico, M., Solé-Ribalta, A., Omodei, E., Gómez, S. & Arenas, A. Ranking in interconnected multilayer networks reveals versatile nodes. Nat. Commun. 6, 6868 (2015).
Google Scholar 
60.Prell, C. Social Network Analysis (SAGE publications Ltd, 2012).
Google Scholar 
61.Thampi, V. A., Anand, M. & Bauch, C. T. Socio-ecological dynamics of Caribbean coral reef ecosystems and conservation opinion propagation. Sci. Rep. 8, 2597 (2018).
Google Scholar 
62.Dannenberg, A. & Barrett, S. Cooperating to avoid catastrophe. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 435–437 (2018).
Google Scholar 
63.Rasoulkhani, K., Logasa, B., Reyes, M. P. & Mostafavi, A. Understanding fundamental phenomena affecting the water conservation technology adoption of residential consumers using agent-based modeling. Water 10, 993 (2018).
Google Scholar 
64.Wang, P., Robins, G., Pattison, P. & Lazega, E. Exponential random graph models for multilevel networks. Soc. Netw. 35, 96–115 (2013).
Google Scholar 
65.Kivelä, M. et al. Multilayer networks. J. Complex Networks 2, 203–271 (2014).
Google Scholar 
66.Gao, J., Buldyrev, S. V., Stanley, H. E. & Havlin, S. Networks formed from interdependent networks. Nat. Phys. 8, 40–48 (2011).
Google Scholar 
67.May, R. M., Levin, S. A. & Sugihara, G. Complex systems: Ecology for bankers. Nature 451, 893–895 (2008).
Google Scholar 
68.Grimm, V. et al. The ODD protocol for describing agent-based models: a second update to improve clarity, replication and structural realism. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 23(2), 7 (2020).
Google Scholar 
69.Alexander, S. M., Bodin, Ö. & Barnes, M. L. Untangling the drivers of community cohesion in small-scale fisheries. Int. J. Commons 12, 519–547 (2018).
Google Scholar 
70.QE II National Trust. QE II National Trust. Ngā Kiarauhi Papa|Forever protected. https://qeiinationaltrust.org.nz.71.Hanski, I. & Ovaskainen, O. The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Nature 404, 755–758 (2000).
Google Scholar 
72.Gower, J. C. A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27, 857–871 (1971).
Google Scholar 
73.Aral, S., Muchnik, L. & Sundararajan, A. Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. US. A. 106, 21544–21549 (2009).
Google Scholar 
74.Stefano, A. D. et al. Quantifying the role of homophily in human cooperation using multiplex evolutionary game theory. PLoS ONE 10, e0140646 (2015).
Google Scholar 
75.Wilensky, U. NetLogo. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/. (Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 1999).76.Thiele, J. C. R Marries NetLogo: Introduction to the RNetLogo Package. J. Stat. Softw. 58, 1–41 (2014).
Google Scholar 
77.R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.R-project.org/. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2018).78.Kampstra, P. Beanplot: A boxplot alternative for visual comparison of distributions. J. Stat. Softw. Code Snippets 28, 1–9 (2008).
Google Scholar 
79.Warnes, G. R. et al. gplots: Various R Programming Tools for Plotting Data. R package version 3.0.1. (2016).80.Csardi, G. & Nepusz, T. The igraph software package for complex network research. Interjournal Complex Syst. 1695, 1–9 (2006).
Google Scholar  More

1.Barbizet, J. Yawning. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 21, 203–209 (1958).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Baenninger, R. Some comparative aspects of yawning in Betta splendens, Homo sapiens, Panthera leo, and Papio sphinx. J. Comp. Psychol. 101, 349 (1987).Article 

Google Scholar 
3.de Vries, J. I. P., Visser, G. H. A. & Prechtl, H. F. R. The emergence of fetal behaviour. I. Qualitative aspects. Early Hum. Dev. 7, 301–322 (1982).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
4.Provine, R. R. Yawning as a stereotyped action pattern and releasing stimulus. Ethology 72, 109–122 (1986).Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Tesfaye, Y. & Lal, S. Hazard of yawning. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 142, 15 (1990).CAS 

Google Scholar 
6.Smith, E. O. Yawning: an evolutionary perspective. Hum. Evol. 14, 191–198 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Guggisberg, A. G., Mathis, J., Schnider, A. & Hess, C. W. Why do we yawn? Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 34, 1267–1276 (2010).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Gallup, A. C. Why do we yawn? Primitive versus derived features. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 35, 765–769 (2011).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
9.Provine, R. R., Tate, B. C. & Geldmacher, L. L. Yawning: no effect of 3–5% CO2, 100% O2, and exercise. Behav. Neural Biol. 48, 382–393 (1987).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
10.Gallup, A. C. & Gallup, G. G. Jr. Yawning as a brain cooling mechanism: nasal breathing and forehead cooling diminish the incidence of contagious yawning. Evol. Psychol. 5, 92–101 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Gallup, A. C. & Gallup, G. G. Jr. Yawning and thermoregulation. Physiol. Behav. 95, 10–16 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
12.Gallup, A. C. & Eldakar, O. T. The thermoregulatory theory of yawning: what we know from over 5 years of research. Front. Neurosci. 6, 188 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Shoup-Knox, M. L., Gallup, A. C., Gallup, G. & McNay, E. C. Yawning and stretching predict brain temperature changes in rats: support for the thermoregulatory hypothesis. Front. Evol. Neurosci. 2, 108 (2010).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Gallup, G. G. & Gallup, A. C. Excessive yawning and thermoregulation: two case histories of chronic, debilitating bouts of yawning. Sleep Breath. 14, 157–159 (2010).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
15.Eguibar, J. R., Uribe, C. A., Cortes, C., Bautista, A. & Gallup, A. C. Yawning reduces facial temperature in the high-yawning subline of Sprague-Dawley rats. BMC Neurosci. 18, 3 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Ramirez, V., Ryan, C. P., Eldakar, O. T. & Gallup, A. C. Manipulating neck temperature alters contagious yawning in humans. Physiol. Behav. 207, 86–89 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
17.Gallup, A. C., Miller, R. R. & Clark, A. B. Changes in ambient temperature trigger yawning but not stretching in rats. Ethology 117, 145–153 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Gallup, A. C. & Eldakar, O. T. Contagious yawning and seasonal climate variation. Front. Evolut. Neurosci. 3, 3 (2011).
Google Scholar 
19.Massen, J. J. M., Dusch, K., Eldakar, O. T. & Gallup, A. C. A thermal window for yawning in humans: yawning as a brain cooling mechanism. Physiol. Behav. 130, 145–148 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
20.Eldakar, O. T. et al. Temperature-dependent variation in self-reported contagious yawning. Adapt. Hum. Behav. Physiol. 1, 460–466 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Falk, D. Brain evolution in Homo: The “radiator” theory. Behav. Brain Sci. 13, 333–381 (1990).Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Kiyatkin, E. A., Brown, P. L. & Wise, R. A. Brain temperature fluctuation: a reflection of functional neural activation. Eur. J. Neurosci. 16, 164–168 (2002).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
23.Baker, M. A. Brain cooling in endotherms in heat and exercise. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 44, 85–85 (1982).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
24.Wang, H. et al. Brain temperature and its fundamental properties: a review for clinical neuroscientists. Front. Neurosci. 8, 307 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
25.Richie, J. M. Energetic aspects of nerve conduction: the relationships between heat production, electrical activity and metabolism. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 26, 147–187 (1973).Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Gallup, A. C., Church, A. M. & Pelegrino, A. J. Yawn duration predicts brain weight and cortical neuron number in mammals. Biol. Lett. 12, 20160545 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Gallup, A. C., Crowe, B. & Yanchus, M. Yawn duration predicts brain volumes in wild cats (Felidae). Int. J. Comp. Psychol. 30, 1–5 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Gallup, A. C., Moscatello, L. & Massen, J. J. M. Brain weight predicts yawn duration across domesticated dog breeds. Curr. Zool. 66, 401–405 (2020).29.Kilgore, D. L., Bernstein, M. H. & Hudson, D. M. Brain temperatures in birds. J. Comp. Physiol. 110, 209–215 (1976).Article 

Google Scholar 
30.McKechnie, A. E. & Wolf, B. O. The physiology of heat tolerance in small endotherms. Physiology 34, 302–313 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
31.Bernstein, M. H., Sandoval, I., Curtis, M. B. & Hudson, D. M. Brain temperature in pigeons: effects of anterior respiratory bypass. J. Comp. Physiol. 129, 115–118 (1979).Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Porter, W. R. & Witmer, L. M. Avian cephalic vascular anatomy, sites of thermal exchange, and the rete ophthalmicum. Anat. Rec. 299, 1461–1486 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Gallup, A. C., Miller, M. L. & Clark, A. B. Yawning and thermoregulation in budgerigars, Melopsittacus undulatus. Anim. Behav. 77, 109–113 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Gallup, A. C., Miller, M. L. & Clark, A. B. The direction and range of ambient temperature change influences yawning in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). J. Comp. Psychol. 124, 133 (2010).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
35.Gallup, A. C. et al. Thermal imaging reveals sizable shifts in facial temperature surrounding yawning in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). Temperature 4, 429–435 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
36.Herculano-Houzel, S. & Lent, R. Isotropic fractionator: a simple, rapid method for the quantification of total cell and neuron numbers in the brain. J. Neurosci. 25, 2518–2521 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Revell, L. J. Size‐correction and principal components for interspecific comparative studies. Evolution 63, 3258–3268 (2009).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Prinzinger, R., Preßmar, A. & Schleucher, E. Body temperature in birds. Comp. Biochem. Phys. A 99, 499–506 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Jessen, C. Temperature Regulation in Humans and Other Mammals (Springer, 2001).40.O’Brien, H. D. From anomalous arteries to selective brain cooling: parallel evolution of the artiodactyl carotid rete. Anat. Rec. 303, 308–317 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Tattersall, G. J., Andrade, D. V. & Abe, A. S. Heat exchange from the toucan bill reveals a controllable vascular thermal radiator. Science 325, 468–470 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
42.Olkowicz, S. et al. Birds have primate-like numbers of neurons in the forebrain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 7255–7260 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
43.Iwaniuk, A. N., Dean, K. M. & Nelson, J. E. Interspecific allometry of the brain and brain regions in parrots (Psittaciformes): Comparisons with other birds and primates. Brain Behav. Evol. 65, 40–59 (2005).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
44.von Eugen, K., Ströckens, F., Backes, H., Endepols, H., & Güntürkün, O. Glucose Metabolism of the Avian Brain: an FDG-PET Study in Pigeons (Columba livia) with Estimated Arterial Input Function of Anesthetized and Awake State. Poster # 068.12/QQ22 Neuroscience Meeting Planner (Online) (Society for Neuroscience, 2018).45.Herculano-Houzel, S. Scaling of brain metabolism with a fixed energy budget per neuron: implications for neuronal activity, plasticity and evolution. PLoS ONE 6, e17514 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Kverková, K. et al. Sociality does not drive the evolution of large brains in eusocial African mole-rats. Sci. Rep. 8, 9203 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
47.Buffenstein, R. & Yahav, S. Is the naked mole-rat Hererocephalus glaber an endothermic yet poikilothermic mammal? J. Therm. Biol. 16, 227–232 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
48.Tucker, R. The digging behavior and skin differentiations in Heterocephalus glaber. J. Morphol. 168, 51–71 (1981).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
49.McNab, B. K. The metabolism of fossorial rodents: a study of convergence. Ecology 47, 712–733 (1966).Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Stephan, H. Methodische Studien über den quantitativen Vergleich architektonischer Struktureinheiten des Gehirns. Z. wiss. Zool. 164, 143–172 (1960).
Google Scholar 
51.Herculano-Houzel, S., Mota, B. & Lent, R. Cellular scaling rules for rodent brains. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 12138–12143 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
52.Herculano-Houzel, S., Collins, C. E., Wong, P. & Kaas, J. K. Cellular scaling rules for primate brains. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 3562–3567 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
53.Herculano-Houzel, S. et al. Updated neuronal scaling rules for the brains of Glires (rodents/lagomorphs). Brain Behav. Evol. 78, 302–314 (2011).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Herculano-Houzel, S., Catania, K., Manger, P. R. & Kaas, J. H. Mammalian brains are made of these: a dataset of the numbers and densities of neuronal and nonneuronal cells in the brain of glires, primates, scandentia, eulipotyphlans, afrotherians and artiodactyls, and their relationship with body mass. Brain Behav. Evol. 86, 145–163 (2015).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
55.Dos Santos, S. E. et al. Cellular scaling rules for the brains of marsupials: not as “primitive” as expected. Brain Behav. Evol. 89, 48–63 (2017).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
56.Kazu, R. S., Maldonado, J., Mota, B., Manger, P. R. & Herculano-Houzel, S. Cellular scaling rules for the brain of Artiodactyla include a highly folded cortex with few neurons. Front. Neuroanat. 8, 128 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
57.Collins, C. E. et al. Cortical cell and neuron density estimates in one chimpanzee hemisphere. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 740–745 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
58.Jardim-Messeder, D. et al. Dogs have the most neurons, though not the largest brain: trade-off between body mass and number of neurons in the cerebral cortex of large carnivoran species. Front. Neuroanat. 11, 118 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
59.Mullen, R. J., Buck, C. R. & Smith, A. M. NeuN, a neuronal specific nuclear-protein in vertebrates. Development 116, 201–211 (1992).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
60.Mezey, S. et al. Postnatal changes in the distribution and density of neuronal nuclei and doublecortin antigens in domestic chicks (Gallus domesticus). J. Comp. Neurol. 520, 100–116 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
61.Rehkämper, G., Kart, E., Frahm, H. D. & Werner, C. W. Discontinuous variability of brain composition among domestic chicken breeds. Brain Behav. Evol. 61, 59–69 (2003).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
62.Horschler, D. J. et al. Absolute brain size predicts dog breed differences in executive function. Anim. Cogn. 22, 187–198 (2019).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
63.Rogell, B., Dowling, D. K. & Husby, A. Controlling for body size leads to inferential biases in the biological sciences. Evol. Lett. 4, 73–82 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
64.Gutierrez-Ibanez, C., Iwaniuk, A. N. & Wylie, D. R. Relative brain size is not correlated with display complexity in manakins: a reanalysis of Lindsay et al. (2015). Brain Behav. Evol. 87, 223–226 (2016).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
65.Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N. & Elphick, C. S. A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1, 3–14 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
66.Jetz, W., Thomas, G. H., Joy, J. B., Hartmann, K. & Mooers, A. O. The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature 491, 444–448 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
67.Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Suleski, M. & Hedges, S. B. TimeTree: a resource for timelines, timetrees, and divergence times. Mol. Boil. Evol. 34, 1812–1819 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
68.Currie, T. E. & Meade, A. In Modern phylogenetic comparative methods and their application in evolutionary biology (ed. Garamszegi, L. Z.) 263–286 (Springer, 2014).69.Hadfield, J. D. & Nakagawa, S. General quantitative genetic methods for comparative biology: phylogenies, taxonomies and multi‐trait models for continuous and categorical characters. J. Evol. Biol. 23, 494–508 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
70.Gelman, A. et al. Bayesian Data Analysis (CRC Press, 2013).71.McElreath, R. Statistical Rethinking: A Bayesian Course with Examples in R and Stan (CRC Press, 2016).72.Lo, S. & Andrews, S. To transform or not to transform: using generalized linear mixed models to analyse reaction time data. Front. Psychol. 6, 1171 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
73.Gelman, A., Hwang, J. & Vehtari, A. Understanding predictive information criteria for Bayesian models. Stat. Comput. 24, 997–1016 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
74.Lemoine, N. P. Moving beyond noninformative priors: why and how to choose weakly informative priors in Bayesian analyses. Oikos 128, 912–928 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
75.Bürkner, P. C. brms: an R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. J. Stat. Softw. 80, 1–28 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
76.Carpenter, B. et al. Stan: a probabilistic programming language. J. Stat. Softw. 76, 1–32 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
77.McShane, B. B., Gal, D., Gelman, A., Robert, C. & Tackett, J. L. Abandon statistical significance. Am. Stat. 73, 235–245 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
78.Sawilowsky, S. New effect size rules of thumb. J. Mod. Appl. Stat. Methods 8, 467–474 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar  More

1.Classen, A. et al. Specialization of plant–pollinator interactions increases with temperature at Mt. Kilimanjaro. Ecol. Evol. 10, 2182–2195 (2020).
Google Scholar 
2.Klecka, J., Hadrava, J., Biella, P. & Akter, A. Flower visitation by hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) in a temperate plant-pollinator network. PeerJ 2018, e6025 (2018).
Google Scholar 
3.Ollerton, J. Pollinator diversity: distribution, ecological function, and conservation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 48, 353–376 (2017).
Google Scholar 
4.Martínez-Adriano, C. A., Díaz-Castelazo, C. & Aguirre-Jaimes, A. Flower-mediated plant-butterfly interactions in an heterogeneous tropical coastal ecosystem. PeerJ 2018, e5493 (2018).
Google Scholar 
5.Mertens, J. E. J. et al. Changes of pollinating community of Scadoxus cinnabarinus (Amaryllidaceae) along its elevational range on Mount Cameroon. Arthropod. Plant. Interact. 14, 215–226 (2020).
Google Scholar 
6.Wardhaugh, C. W. How many species of arthropods visit flowers?. Arthropod. Plant. Interact. 9, 547–565 (2015).
Google Scholar 
7.Hahn, M. & Brühl, C. A. The secret pollinators: an overview of moth pollination with a focus on Europe and North America. Arthropod. Plant. Interact. 10, 21–28 (2016).
Google Scholar 
8.Willmer, P. Pollination and Floral Ecology (Princeton University Press, 2011).
Google Scholar 
9.Johnson, S. D. et al. The long and the short of it: a global analysis of hawkmoth pollination niches and interaction networks. Funct. Ecol. 31, 101–115 (2017).
Google Scholar 
10.Darwin, C. On the Various Contrivances by Which British and Foreign Orchids are Fertilized (Murray, 1862).
Google Scholar 
11.Fox, K. et al. Nectar Robbery and Thievery in the hawk moth (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae)-Pollinated Western Prairie Fringed Orchid Platanthera praeclara. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 108, 1000–1013 (2015).
Google Scholar 
12.Martins, D. J. & Johnson, S. D. Interactions between hawkmoths and flowering plants in East Africa: polyphagy and evolutionary specialization in an ecological context. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 110, 199–213 (2013).
Google Scholar 
13.Arroyo, M. T. K., Till-Bottraud, I., Torres, C., Henríquez, C. A. & Martínez, J. Display size preferences and foraging habits of high andean butterflies pollinating Chaetanthera lycopodioides (Asteraceae) in the subnival of the central Chilean Andes. Arctic Antarct. Alp. Res. 39, 347–352 (2007).
Google Scholar 
14.Santos, R. S., Milfont, M. O., Silva, M. M., Carneiro, L. T. & Castro, C. C. Butterflies provide pollination services to macadamia in northeastern Brazil. Sci. Hortic. (Amst.) 259, 108818 (2020).
Google Scholar 
15.Fleming, T. H. & Holland, J. N. The evolution of obligate pollination mutualisms: Senita cactus and senita moth. Oecologia 114, 368–375 (1998).
Google Scholar 
16.Skogen, K. A., Overson, R. P., Hilpman, E. T. & Fant, J. B. Hawkmoth pollination facilitates long-distance pollen dispersal and reduces isolation across a gradient of land-use change. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 104, 495–511 (2019).
Google Scholar 
17.Corbet, S. A. Butterfly nectaring flowers: butterfly morphology and flower form. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 96, 289–298 (2000).
Google Scholar 
18.Tiple, A. D., Khurad, A. M. & Dennis, R. L. H. Adult butterfly feeding-nectar flower associations: constraints of taxonomic affiliation, butterfly, and nectar flower morphology. J. Nat. Hist. 43, 855–884 (2009).
Google Scholar 
19.Faegri, K. & van der Pijl, L. The Principles of Pollination Ecology (Pergamon Press, 1979).
Google Scholar 
20.Mitchell, T. C., Dötterl, S. & Schaefer, H. Hawk-moth pollination and elaborate petals in Cucurbitaceae: the case of the Caribbean endemic Linnaeosicyos amara. Flora Morphol. Distrib. Funct. Ecol. Plants 216, 50–56 (2015).
Google Scholar 
21.Glover, B. J. Pollinator attraction: the importance of looking good and smelling nice. Curr. Biol. 21, R307–R309 (2011).
Google Scholar 
22.Kelber, A., Balkenius, A. & Warrant, E. J. Colour vision in diurnal and nocturnal hawkmoths. Integr. Comp. Biol. 43, 571–579 (2003).
Google Scholar 
23.Ômura, H. & Honda, K. Priority of color over scent during flower visitation by adult Vanessa indica butterflies. Oecologia 142, 588–596 (2005).
Google Scholar 
24.Pohl, N. B., Van Wyk, J. & Campbell, D. R. Butterflies show flower colour preferences but not constancy in foraging at four plant species. Ecol. Entomol. 36, 290–300 (2011).
Google Scholar 
25.Yurtsever, S., Okyar, Z. & Guler, N. What colour of flowers do Lepidoptera prefer for foraging?. Biologia (Bratisl). 65, 1049–1056 (2010).
Google Scholar 
26.Poisot, T., Stouffer, D. B. & Gravel, D. Beyond species: why ecological interaction networks vary through space and time. Oikos 124, 243–251 (2015).
Google Scholar 
27.Klomberg, Y. et al. Spatiotemporal shifts in the role of floral traits in shaping tropical plant-pollinator interactions. bioRxiv 2020.10.16.342386. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.16.342386 (2020).28.Ollerton, J., Johnson, S. D. & Hingston, A. B. Geographical variation in diversity and specificity of pollination systems. In Plant–Pollinator Interactions: From Specialization to Generalization (eds Waser, N. M. & Ollerton, J.) 283–308 (University of Chicago Press, 2006).
Google Scholar 
29.Maicher, V. et al. Flying between raindrops: strong seasonal turnover of several Lepidoptera groups in lowland rainforests of Mount Cameroon. Ecol. Evol. 8, 12761–12772 (2018).
Google Scholar 
30.Maicher, V. et al. Seasonal shifts of biodiversity patterns and species’ elevation ranges of butterflies and moths along a complete rainforest elevational gradient on Mount Cameroon. J. Biogeogr. 47, 342–354 (2020).
Google Scholar 
31.MacArthur, R. H. Geographical Ecology: Patterns in the Distribution of Species (Princeton University Press, 1972).
Google Scholar 
32.McCain, C. M. & Grytnes, J.-A. Elevational gradients in species richness. In Encyclopedia of Life Sciences (ed. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd), a0022548 (Wiley, Chichester, 2010) https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0022548.33.Šmilauer, P. & Lepš, J. Multivariate analysis of ecological data using Canoco 5 (Cambridge University Press, 2014). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139627061.
Google Scholar 
34.Kato, M. et al. Plant-pollinator interactions in tropical monsoon forests in Southeast Asia. Am. J. Bot. 95, 1375–1394 (2008).
Google Scholar 
35.Momose, K. et al. Pollination biology in a lowland dipterocarp forest in Sarawak, Malaysia. I. Characteristics of the plant-pollinator community in a lowland dipterocarp forest. Am. J. Bot. 85, 1477–1501 (1998).
Google Scholar 
36.Ramirez, N. Biologia de Polinizacion en una Comunidad Arbustiva Tropical de la Alta Guayana Venezolana. Biotropica 21, 319 (1989).
Google Scholar 
37.Van Dulmen, A. Pollination and phenology of flowers in the canopy of two contrasting rain forest types in Amazonia, Colombia. Plant Ecology. 153, 73–85 (2001).
Google Scholar 
38.Nsor, C. A. & Chapman, H. M. A preliminary investigation into the avian pollinators of three tree species in a Nigerian montane forest. Malimbus 35, 38–49 (2013).
Google Scholar 
39.Weber, N., Kalko, E. K. V. & Fahr, J. A first assessment of home range and foraging behaviour of the African long-tongued bat Megaloglossus woermanni (Chiroptera: Pteropodidae) in a heterogeneous landscape within the Lama Forest Reserve, Benin. Acta Chiropterol. 11, 317–329 (2009).
Google Scholar 
40.Borges, R. M., Gowda, V. & Zacharias, M. Butterfly pollination and high-contrast visual signals in a low-density distylous plant. Oecologia 136, 571–573 (2003).
Google Scholar 
41.Mizusawa, L., Takimoto, G., Yamasaki, M., Isagi, Y. & Hasegawa, M. Comparison of pollination characteristics between the insular shrub Clerodendrum izuinsulare and its widespread congener C.trichotomum. Plant Species Biol. 29, 73–84 (2014).
Google Scholar 
42.Budumajji, U. & Solomon Raju, A. J. Pollination ecology of Bidens pilosa L. (Asteraceae). Taiwania 63, 89–100 (2018).
Google Scholar 
43.Valentin-Silva, A., Godinho, M. A. S., Cruz, K. C., Lelis, S. M. & Vieira, M. F. Three psychophilous Asteraceae species with distinct reproductive mechanisms in southeastern Brazil. New Zeal. J. Bot. 54, 498–510 (2016).
Google Scholar 
44.Valtonen, A. et al. Tropical phenology: Bi-annual rhythms and interannual variation in an Afrotropical butterfly assemblage. Ecosphere 4, art36 (2013).
Google Scholar 
45.Aizen, M. A. Down-facing flowers, hummingbirds and rain. Taxon 52, 675–680 (2003).
Google Scholar 
46.Janeček, Š, Bartoš, M. & Njabo, K. Y. Convergent evolution of sunbird pollination systems of Impatiens species in tropical Africa and hummingbird systems of the New World. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 115, 127–133 (2015).
Google Scholar 
47.Bartoš, M. & Janeček, Š. Pollinator-induced twisting of flowers sidesteps floral architecture constraints. Curr. Biol. 24, R793–R795 (2014).
Google Scholar 
48.Bärtschi, F. et al. Elevational richness patterns of sphingid moths support area effects over climatic drivers in a near-global analysis. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 28, 917–927 (2019).
Google Scholar 
49.Beck, J. et al. Elevational species richness gradients in a hyperdiverse insect taxon: a global meta-study on geometrid moths. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 26, 412–424 (2017).
Google Scholar 
50.Hořák, D. et al. Forest structure determines spatial changes in avian communities along an elevational gradient in tropical Africa. J. Biogeogr. 46, 2466–2478 (2019).
Google Scholar 
51.Ramos-Jiliberto, R. et al. Topological change of Andean plant-pollinator networks along an altitudinal gradient. Ecol. Complex. 7, 86–90 (2010).
Google Scholar 
52.Bloch, D. & Erhardt, A. Selection toward shorter flowers by butterflies whose probosces are shorter than floral tubes. Ecology 89, 2453–2460 (2008).
Google Scholar 
53.Brehm, G., Zeuss, D. & Colwell, R. K. Moth body size increases with elevation along a complete tropical elevational gradient for two hyperdiverse clades. Ecography (Cop.) 42, 632–642 (2019).
Google Scholar 
54.Kaczorowski, R. L., Seliger, A. R., Gaskett, A. C., Wigsten, S. K. & Raguso, R. A. Corolla shape vs. size in flower choice by a nocturnal hawkmoth pollinator. Funct. Ecol. 26, 577–587 (2012).
Google Scholar 
55.Dellinger, A. S. Pollination syndromes in the 21st century: where do we stand and where may we go?. New Phytol. 228, 1193–1213 (2020).
Google Scholar 
56.Larsen, T. Butterflies of West Africa (Apollo Books, 2005).
Google Scholar 
57.Ballesteros-Mejia, L., Kitching, I. J., Jetz, W., Nagel, P. & Beck, J. Mapping the biodiversity of tropical insects: species richness and inventory completeness of African sphingid moths. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 22, 586–595 (2013).
Google Scholar 
58.Cheek, M., Cable, S., Hepper, F. N., Ndam, N. & Watts, J. Mapping plant biodiversity on Mount Cameroon. In The Biodiversity of African Plants (eds van der Maesen, L. et al.) 110–120 (Springer, 1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0285-5_16.
Google Scholar 
59.Weinstein, B. G. MotionMeerkat: integrating motion video detection and ecological monitoring. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 357–362 (2015).
Google Scholar 
60.Dormann, C. F., Fründ, J., Blüthgen, N. & Gruber, B. Indices, graphs and null models: analyzing bipartite ecological networks. Open Ecol. J. 2, 7–24 (2009).
Google Scholar 
61.R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing (2019).62.Jordano, P. Patterns of mutualistic interactions in pollination and seed dispersal: connectance, dependence asymmetries, and coevolution. Am. Nat. 129, 657–677 (1987).
Google Scholar 
63.Blüthgen, N., Menzel, F. & Blüthgen, N. Measuring specialization in species interaction networks. BMC Ecol. 6, 1–12 (2006).
Google Scholar 
64.Dormann, C. F. & Strauss, R. A method for detecting modules in quantitative bipartite networks. Methods Ecol. Evol. 5, 90–98 (2014).
Google Scholar 
65.Almeida-Neto, M., Guimarães, P., Guimarães, P. R., Loyola, R. D. & Ulrich, W. A consistent metric for nestedness analysis in ecological systems: reconciling concept and measurement. Oikos 117, 1227–1239 (2008).
Google Scholar 
66.Bartoš, M. et al. Self-compatibility and autonomous selfing of plants in meadow communities. Plant Biol. 22, 120–128 (2020).
Google Scholar 
67.Rueden, C. T. et al. Image J2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data. BMC Bioinform. 18, 529 (2017).
Google Scholar 
68.Hurvich, C. M. & Tsai, C.-L. A corrected akaike information criterion for vector autoregressive model selection. J. Time Ser. Anal. 14, 271–279 (1993).
Google Scholar 
69.ter Braak, C. J. F. & Šmilauer, P. Canoco reference manual and user’s guide: software for ordination, version 50 (Microcomputer Power, 2012).
Google Scholar  More

1.Wilson, E. O. The insect societies. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 1971).
Google Scholar 
2.Venter, O. et al. Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation. Nat. Commun. 7, 12558 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Robson, S. K. & Traniello, J. F. Key individuals and the organisation of labor in ants. In Information processing in social insects, 239–259 (Springer, 1999).4.Smith, A. The wealth of nations (London, Methuen & Co, 1776).5.Oster, G. F. & Wilson, E. O. Caste and ecology in the social insects (Princeton University Press, 1978).6.Jeanne, R. L. The evolution of the organization of work in social insects. Italian J. Zool. 20, 119–133 (1986).
Google Scholar 
7.Seeley, T. D. Adaptive significance of the age polyethism schedule in honeybee colonies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 11, 287–293 (1982).Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Franks, N. R. The organization of working teams in social insects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2, 72–75 (1987).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Robinson, G. E. Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 37, 637–665 (1992).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
10.O’Donnell, S. & Jeanne, R. L. Forager specialization and the control of nest repair in Polybia occidentalis olivier (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 27, 359–364 (1990).Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Wahl, L. Evolving the division of labour: generalists, specialists and task allocation. J. Theor. Biol. 219, 371–388 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Jaffé, R., Kronauer, D. J., Bernhard Kraus, F., Boomsma, J. J. & Moritz, R. F. Worker caste determination in the army ant Eciton burchellii. Biol. Lett. 3, 513–516 (2007).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Kuhn, S. L. & Stiner, M. C. What’s a mother to do? The division of labor among Neandertals and modern humans in Eurasia. Curr. Anthropol. 47, 953–981 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Wilson, E. O. Caste and division of labor in leaf-cutter ants (hymenoptera: Formicidae: Atta). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 7, 157–165 (1980).Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Mirenda, J. T. & Vinson, S. B. Division of labour and specification of castes in the red imported fire ant solenopsis invicta buren. Animal Behav. 29, 410–420 (1981).Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Detrain, C. & Pasteels, J. Caste differences in behavioral thresholds as a basis for polyethism during food recruitment in the ant, pheidole pallidula (nyl.)(hymenoptera: Myrmicinae). J. Insect behav. 4, 157–176 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Theraulaz, G., Bonabeau, E. & Denuebourg, J. Response threshold reinforcements and division of labour in insect societies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 265, 327–332 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Johnson, B. R. Organization of work in the honeybee: a compromise between division of labour and behavioural flexibility. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 270, 147–152 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Dukas, R. & Visscher, P. K. Lifetime learning by foraging honey bees. Animal Behav. 48, 1007–1012 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Richardson, T. O., Mullon, C., Marshall, J. A., Franks, N. R. & Schlegel, T. The influence of the few: a stable ‘oligarchy’ controls information flow in house-hunting ants. Proc. R. Soc. B 285, 20172726 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Trumbo, S. T. & Robinson, G. E. Learning and task interference by corpse-removal specialists in honey bee colonies. Ethology 103, 966–975 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Julian, G. E. & Cahan, S. Undertaking specialization in the desert leaf-cutter ant Acromyrmex versicolor. Animal Behav. 58, 437–442 (1999).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Dukas, R. Life history of learning: performance curves of honeybees in settings that minimize the role of learning. Animal Behav. 75, 1125–1130 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Charbonneau, D., Sasaki, T. & Dornhaus, A. Who needs ‘lazy’workers? inactive workers act as a ‘reserve’labor force replacing active workers, but inactive workers are not replaced when they are removed. PloS one 12, e0184074 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
25.Crall, J. D. et al. Spatial fidelity of workers predicts collective response to disturbance in a social insect. Nat. Commun. 9, 1201 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
26.Franks, N. R., Pratt, S. C., Mallon, E. B., Britton, N. F. & Sumpter, D. J. Information flow, opinion polling and collective intelligence in house–hunting social insects. Philosop. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 357, 1567–1583 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Pratt, S. C., Mallon, E. B., Sumpter, D. J. & Franks, N. R. Quorum sensing, recruitment, and collective decision-making during colony emigration by the ant Leptothorax albipennis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 52, 117–127 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Möglich, M. Social organization of nest emigration in Leptothorax (Hym., Form.). Insectes Sociaux 25, 205–225 (1978).Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Visscher, P. K. Group decision making in nest-site selection among social insects. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 52, 255–275 (2007).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
30.McGlynn, T. P. The ecology of nest movement in social insects. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 57, 291–308 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Franks, N. R. & Richardson, T. Teaching in tandem-running ants. Nature 439, 153–153 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Richardson, T. O., Sleeman, P. A., McNamara, J. M., Houston, A. I. & Franks, N. R. Teaching with evaluation in ants. Curr. Biol. 17, 1520–1526 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Franklin, E. L., Richardson, T. O., Sendova-Franks, A. B., Robinson, E. J. & Franks, N. R. Blinkered teaching: tandem running by visually impaired ants. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65, 569–579 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Franks, N. R. et al. Ant search strategies after interrupted tandem runs. J. Exper. Biol. 213, 1697–1708 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
35.Flack, J. C., Krakauer, D. C. & de Waal, F. B. M. Robustness mechanisms in primate societies: a perturbation study. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 272, 1091–1099 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
36.Pinter-Wollman, N., Hubler, J., Holley, J.-A., Franks, N. R. & Dornhaus, A. How is activity distributed among and within tasks in Temnothorax ants? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 66, 1407–1420 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach (Springer Science & Business Media, 2003).38.Burnham, K. P., Anderson, D. R. & Huyvaert, K. P. AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioral ecology: some background, observations, and comparisons. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65, 23–35 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Grueber, C., Nakagawa, S., Laws, R. & Jamieson, I. Multimodel inference in ecology and evolution: challenges and solutions. J. Evol. Biol. 24, 699–711 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Symonds, M. R. & Moussalli, A. A brief guide to model selection, multimodel inference and model averaging in behavioural ecology using Akaike’s information criterion. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65, 13–21 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Rosenthal, S. B., Twomey, C. R., Hartnett, A. T., Wu, H. S. & Couzin, I. D. Revealing the hidden networks of interaction in mobile animal groups allows prediction of complex behavioral contagion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 112, 4690–4695 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Pratt, S. C., Sumpter, D. J., Mallon, E. B. & Franks, N. R. An agent-based model of collective nest choice by the ant Temnothorax albipennis. Animal Behav. 70, 1023–1036 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
43.Volny, V. P. & Gordon, D. M. Genetic basis for queen–worker dimorphism in a social insect. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 99, 6108–6111 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
44.Walsh, J. T., Warner, M. R., Kase, A., Cushing, B. J. & Linksvayer, T. A. Ant nurse workers exhibit behavioural and transcriptomic signatures of specialization on larval stage. Animal Behav. 141, 161–169 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
45.Seeley, T. D. Division of labor between scouts and recruits in honeybee foraging. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 12, 253–259 (1983).Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Boesch, C. Cooperative hunting roles among tai chimpanzees. Human Nat. 13, 27–46 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
47.Stander, P. E. Cooperative hunting in lions: the role of the individual. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 29, 445–454 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
48.Gazda, S. K., Connor, R. C., Edgar, R. K. & Cox, F. A division of labour with role specialization in group–hunting bottlenose dolphins (tursiops truncatus) off cedar key, florida. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 272, 135–140 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
49.Nagy, M., Ákos, Z., Biro, D. & Vicsek, T. Hierarchical group dynamics in pigeon flocks. Nature 464, 890–893 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Nagy, M. et al. Context-dependent hierarchies in pigeons. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 13049–13054 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
51.Fewell, J. H., Armbruster, D., Ingraham, J., Petersen, A. & Waters, J. S. Basketball teams as strategic networks. PloS One 7, e47445 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
52.Alleman, A., Stoldt, M., Feldmeyer, B. & Foitzik, S. Tandem-running and scouting behaviour are characterized by up-regulation of learning and memory formation genes within the ant brain. Mol. Ecol. 28, 2342–2359 (2019).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
53.Collett, T. S. & Collett, M. Memory use in insect visual navigation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3, 542 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Collett, T. S., Graham, P. & Durier, V. Route learning by insects. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 13, 718–725 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
55.Wehner, R. Desert ant navigation: how miniature brains solve complex tasks. J. Comp. Physiol. A 189, 579–588 (2003).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Langridge, E. A., Franks, N. R. & Sendova-Franks, A. B. Improvement in collective performance with experience in ants. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 56, 523–529 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
57.Ravary, F., Lecoutey, E., Kaminski, G., Châline, N. & Jaisson, P. Individual experience alone can generate lasting division of labor in ants. Curr. Biol. 17, 1308–1312 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
58.Chittka, L. & Muller, H. Learning, specialization, efficiency and task allocation in social insects. Commun. Integr. Biol. 2, 151–154 (2009).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
59.Franklin, E. L., Robinson, E. J., Marshall, J. A., Sendova-Franks, A. B. & Franks, N. R. Do ants need to be old and experienced to teach? J. Exp. Biol. 215, 1287–1292 (2012).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
60.Westhus, C., Kleineidam, C. J., Roces, F. & Weidenmüller, A. Behavioural plasticity in the fanning response of bumblebee workers: impact of experience and rate of temperature change. Animal Behav. 85, 27–34 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
61.Dukas, R. Animal expertise: mechanisms, ecology and evolution. Animal Behav. 147, 199–210 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
62.Carter, C. E. & Grahn, J. A. Optimizing music learning: exploring how blocked and interleaved practice schedules affect advanced performance. Front. Psychol. 7, 1251 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
63.Stroeymeyt, N., Franks, N. R. & Giurfa, M. Knowledgeable individuals lead collective decisions in ants. J. Exp. Biol. 214, 3046–3054 (2011).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
64.Stroeymeyt, N., Giurfa, M. & Franks, N. R. Information certainty determines social and private information use in ants. Sci. Rep. 7, 43607 (2017).PubMed Central 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
65.Hansen, M. J., Schaerf, T. M. & Ward, A. J. The influence of nutritional state on individual and group movement behaviour in shoals of crimson-spotted rainbowfish (Melanotaenia duboulayi). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 69, 1713–1722 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
66.Jolles, J. W., Boogert, N. J., Sridhar, V. H., Couzin, I. D. & Manica, A. Consistent individual differences drive collective behavior and group functioning of schooling fish. Curr. Biol. 27, 2862–2868 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
67.Leca, J.-B., Gunst, N., Thierry, B. & Petit, O. Distributed leadership in semifree-ranging white-faced capuchin monkeys. Animal Behav. 66, 1045–1052 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
68.McComb, K. et al. Leadership in elephants: the adaptive value of age. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 278, 3270–3276 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
69.Jolles, J. W., King, A. J. & Killen, S. S. The role of individual heterogeneity in collective animal behaviour. Trends Ecol. Evol. 35, 278–291 (2020).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
70.Cook, C. N. et al. Individual differences in learning and biogenic amine levels influence the behavioural division between foraging honeybee scouts and recruits. J. Animal Ecol. 88, 236–246 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
71.Eyer, P.-A., Freyer, J. & Aron, S. Genetic polyethism in the polyandrous desert ant cataglyphis cursor. Behav. Ecol. 24, 144–151 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
72.Franks, N. R., Mallon, E. B., Bray, H. E., Hamilton, M. J. & Mischler, T. C. Strategies for choosing between alternatives with different attributes: exemplified by house-hunting ants. Animal Behav. 65, 215–223 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
73.Dornhaus, A., Franks, N. R., Hawkins, R. & Shere, H. Ants move to improve: colonies of Leptothorax albipennis emigrate whenever they find a superior nest site. Animal Behav. 67, 959–963 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
74.Planqué, R., Dechaume-Moncharmont, F.-X., Franks, N. R., Kovacs, T. & Marshall, J. A. Why do house-hunting ants recruit in both directions? Naturwissenschaften 94, 911–918 (2007).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar  More

1.Bonizzoni, M. et al. On the origins of medfly invasion and expansion in Australia. Mol. Ecol. 13, 3845–3855 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Tuda, M., Kagoshima, K., Toquenaga, Y. & Arnqvist, G. Global genetic differentiation in a cosmopolitan pest of stored beans: Effects of geography, host-plant usage and anthropogenic factors. PLoS ONE 9, e106268 (2014).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
3.Karsten, M., van Vuuren, B. J., Addison, P. & Terblanche, J. S. Deconstructing intercontinental invasion pathway hypotheses of the Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata) using a Bayesian inference approach: Are port interceptions and quarantine protocols successfully preventing new invasions?. Divers. Distrib. 21, 813–825 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Rodriguero, M. S. et al. Out of the forest: past and present range expansion of a parthenogenetic weevil pest, or how to colonize the world successfully. Ecol. Evol. 6, 5431–5445 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Kébé, K. et al. Global phylogeography of the insect pest Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchinae) relates to the history of its main host Vigna unguiculata. J. Biogeogr. 44, 2515–2526 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Lombaert, E. et al. Colonization history of the western corn rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera) in North America: insights from random forest ABC using microsatellite data. Biol. Invasions 20, 665–677 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Tuda, M., Ronn, J., Buranapanichpan, S., Wasano, N. & Arnqvist, G. Evolutionary diversification of the bean beetle genus Callosobruchus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): Traits associated with stored-product pest status. Mol. Ecol. 15, 3541–3551 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Wei, S. J. et al. Population genetic structure and approximate Bayesian computation analyses reveal the southern origin and northward dispersal of the oriental fruit moth Grapholita molesta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in its native range. Mol. Ecol. 24, 4094–4111 (2015).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Takano, S. et al. Unique clade of alphaproteobacterial endosymbionts induces complete cytoplasmic incompatibility in the coconut beetle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 6110–6115 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Radcliffe, E. B. & Flanders, K. L. Biological control of alfalfa weevil in North America. Integr. Pest Manag. Rev. 3, 225–242 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Kuwata, R., Tokuda, M., Yamaguchi, D. & Yukawa, J. Coexistence of two mitochondrial DNA haplotypes in Japanese populations of Hypera postica (Col., Curculionidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 129, 191–197 (2005).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Skuhrovec, J. Host plants of weevils of the genus Hypera (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) occurring in the Czech Republic. Klapalekiana 41, 215–255 (2005).
Google Scholar 
13.Wood, K. A., Armbrust, E. J., Bartell, D. P. & Irwin, B. J. The literature of arthropods associated with alfalfa. V. A bibliography of the alfalfa weevil, Hypera postica (Gyllenhal), and the Egyptian alfalfa weevil, Hypera brunneipennis (Boheman) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Illinois Agricultural Experimental Station, Special Publication, 54 (1978).14.Kimura, H., Okumura, M. & Yoshida, T. Emergence of and recent damage by the alfalfa weevil. Shokubutsu Boeki (Plant Protection) 42, 498–501 (in Japanese) (1988).15.CAB International crop protection compendium. CAB International. http://www.cabicompendium.org/cpc/home.asp (2013).16.Titus, E. G. On the life history of the alfalfa leaf-weevil. J. Econ. Entomol. 3, 459–470 (1910).Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Wehrle, L. P. The discovery of an alfalfa weevil (Hypera brunneipennis Boheman) in Arizona. J. Econ. Entomol. 33, 119–121 (1940).Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Poos, F. W. & Bissell, T. L. The alfalfa weevil in Maryland. J. Econ. Entomol. 46, 178–179 (1953).Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Volker, K. C. & Simpson, R. G. Behavior of alfalfa weevil larvae affecting the establishment of Tetrastichus incertus in Colorado. Environ. Entomol. 4, 742–744 (1975).Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Salt, G. & van den Bosch, R. The defense reactions of three species of Hypera (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) to an Ichneumon wasp. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 9, 164–177 (1967).Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Maund, C. M. & Hsiao, T. H. Differential encapsulation of two Bathyplectes parasitoids among alfalfa weevil strains, Hypera postica (Gyllenhal). Can. Entomol. 123, 197–203 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Hsiao, T. H. Studies of interactions between alfalfa weevil strains, Wolbachia endosymbionts and parasitoids. In The ecology of agricultural pests: biochemical approaches (eds, Symondson, W. O. C. & Liddell, J. E.). 57–71 (Chapman & Hall, 1996).23.Hsiao, T. H. & Stutz, J. M. Discrimination of alfalfa weevil strains by allozyme analysis. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 37, 113–121 (1985).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Erney, S. J., Pruess, K. P., Danielson, S. D. & Powers, T. O. Molecular differentiation of alfalfa weevil strains (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 89, 804–811 (1996).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
25.Böttger, J. A. A. Phylogenetic analysis of the alfalfa weevil complex (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in North America. J. Econ. Entomol. 106, 426–436 (2013).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
26.Iwase, S., Nakahira, K., Tuda, M., Kagoshima, K. & Takagi, M. Host-plant dependent population genetics of the invading weevil Hypera postica. Bull. Entomol. Res. 105, 92–100 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
27.White, C. E., Armbrust, E. J. & Ashley, J. Cross-mating studies of eastern and western strains of alfalfa weevil. J. Econ. Entomol. 65, 85–89 (1972).Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Iwase, S. & Tani, S. New haplotype and inter-strain reproductive compatibility of Wolbachia-uninfected alfalfa weevil, Hypera postica (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), in Japan. Entomol. Sci. 19, 72–76 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Werren, J. H. Biology of Wolbachia. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 42, 587–609 (1997).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
30.LePage, D. P. et al. Prophage WO genes recapitulate and enhance Wolbachia-induced cytoplasmic incompatibility. Nature 543, 243–247 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Bailly-Bechet, M. et al. How long does Wolbachia remain on board?. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34, 1183–1193 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Hale, L. R. & Hoffmann, A. A. Mitochondrial DNA polymorphism and cytoplasmic incompatibility in natural populations of Drosophila simulans. Evolution 44, 1383–1386 (1990).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Ballard, J. W. O. & Kreitman, M. Unravelling selection in the mitochondrial genome of Drosophila. Genetics 138, 757–772 (1994).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Johnstone, R. A. & Hurst, G. D. D. Maternally inherited male-killing microorganisms may confound interpretation of mitochondrial DNA variability. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 58, 453–470 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
35.Jiggins, F. M. Male-killing Wolbachia and mitochondrial DNA: selective sweeps, hybrid introgression and parasite population dynamics. Genetics 164, 5–12 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
36.Werren, J. H., Baldo, L. & Clark, M. E. Wolbachia: master manipulators of invertebrate biology. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6, 741–751 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Shoemaker, D. D., Dyer, K. A., Ahrens, M., McAbee, K. & Jaenike, J. Decreased diversity but increased substitution rate in host mtDNA as a consequence of Wolbachia endosymbiont infection. Genetics 168, 2049–2058 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Cariou, M., Duret, L. & Charlat, S. The global impact of Wolbachia on mitochondrial diversity and evolution. J. Evol. Biol. 30, 2204–2210 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Teixeira, L., Ferreira, A. & Ashburner, M. The bacterial symbiont Wolbachia induces resistance to RNA viral infections in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Biol. 6, 2753–2763 (2008).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Brownlie, J. C. et al. Evidence for metabolic provisioning by a common invertebrate endosymbiont, Wolbachia pipientis, during periods of nutritional stress. PLoS Pathog. 5, e1000368 (2009).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
41.Rand, D. M., Haney, R. A. & Fry, A. J. Cytonuclear coevolution: the genomics of cooperation. TRENDS Ecol. Evol. 19, 645–653 (2004).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Arnqvist, G. et al. The genetic architecture of metabolic rate: environment specific epistasis between mitochondrial and nuclear genes in an insect. Evolution 64, 3354–3363 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
43.Blickenstaff, C. C. Partial intersterility of eastern and western US strains of the alfalfa weevil. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 58, 523–526 (1965).Article 

Google Scholar 
44.Hsiao, T. H. & Hsiao, C. Hybridization and cytoplasmic incompatibility among alfalfa weevil strains. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 37, 155–159 (1985).Article 

Google Scholar 
45.Laven, H. Eradication of Culex pipiens fatigans through cytoplasmic incompatibility. Nature 216, 383–384 (1967).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Iwase, S. et al. Dynamics of infection with Wolbachia in Hypera postica (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) during invasion and establishment. Biol. Invasions 17, 3639–3648 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
47.Sanaei, E. et al. Global genetic diversity, lineage distribution and Wolbachia infection of the alfalfa weevil Hypera postica (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Ecol. Evol. 9, 9546–9563 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
48.Ros, V. I. D., Fleming, V. M., Feil, E. J. & Breeuwer, J. A. J. How diverse is the genus Wolbachia? Multiple-gene sequencing reveals a putatively new Wolbachia supergroup recovered from spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 1036–1043 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
49.Avise, J. C. Phylogeography: The history and formation of species (Harvard University Press, 2000).
Google Scholar 
50.Narita, S., Nomura, M., Kato, Y. & Fukatsu, T. Genetic structure of sibling butterfly species affected by Wolbachia infection sweep: evolutionary and biogeographical implications. Mol. Ecol. 15, 1095–1108 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
51.Raychoudhury, R. et al. Phylogeography of Nasonia vitripennis (Hymenoptera) indicates a mitochondrial–Wolbachia sweep in North America. Heredity 104, 318–326 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
52.Jäckel, R., Mora, D. & Dobler, S. Evidence for selective sweeps by Wolbachia infections: phylogeny of Altica leaf beetles and their reproductive parasites. Mol. Ecol. 22, 4241–4255 (2013).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
53.Jiang, W. et al. Wolbachia infection status and genetic structure in natural populations of Polytremis nascens (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae). Infect. Genet. Evol. 27, 202–211 (2014).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Jansen, V. A. A., Turelli, M. & Godfray, H. C. J. Stochastic spread of Wolbachia. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 275, 2769–2776 (2008).
Google Scholar 
55.Clancy, D. J. & Hoffmann, A. A. Environmental effects on cytoplasmic incompatibility and bacterial load in Wolbachia-infected Drosophila simulans. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 86, 13–24 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Bordenstein, S. R. & Bordenstein, S. R. Temperature affects the tripartite interactions between bacteriophage WO, Wolbachia, and cytoplasmic incompatibility. PLoS ONE 6, e29106 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
57.Kamo, T. et al. Limited distribution of natural cyanamide in higher plants: Occurrence in Vicia villosa subsp varia, V. cracca, and Robinia pseudo-acacia. Phytochemistry 69, 1166–1172 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
58.Megías, C., Cortes-Giraldo, I., Giron-Calle, J., Alaiz, M. & Vioque, J. Free amino acids, including canavanine, in the seeds from 32 Vicia species belonging to subgenus Vicilla. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 8, 126–129 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
59.Rosenthal, G. A. & Dahlman, D. L. Incorporation of L-canavanine into proteins and the expression of its antimetabolic effects. J. Agric. Food Chem. 39, 987–990 (1991).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
60.Kamo, T., Tokuoka. Y. & Miyazaki, M. Quantification of canavanine, 2-aminoethanol, and cyanamide in Aphis craccivora and its host plants, Robinia pseudoacacia and Vicia angustifolia: Effects of these compounds on larval survivorship of Harmonia axyridis. J. Chem. Ecol. 38, 1552–1560 (2012).61.Hewitt, G. M. Post-glacial re-colonization of European biota. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 68, 87–112 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
62.Schmitt, T. Molecular biogeography of Europe: Pleistocene cycles and postglacial trends. Front. Zool. 4, 11 (2007).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
63.Taberlet, P., Fumagalli, L., Wust-Saucy, A. G. & Cosson, J. F. Comparative phylogeography and postglacial colonization routes in Europe. Mol. Ecol. 7, 453–464 (1998).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
64.Jordal, B. H. & Kambestad, M. DNA barcoding of bark and ambrosia beetles reveals excessive NUMTs and consistent east-west divergence across Palearctic forests. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 14, 7–17 (2013).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
65.Quiros, C. F. & Bauchan, G. R. The genus Medicago and the origin of the Medicago sativa complex. In Alfalfa and alfalfa improvement (eds, Hanson, A. A., Barnes, D. K. & Hill, R. R.). 93–124 (American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, 1988).66.Small, E. Alfalfa and Relatives: Evolution and Classification of Medicago (NRC Research Press, 2011).
Google Scholar 
67.FAO Statistics Division. FAOSTAT: Crops and livestock products. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/TP (2017).68.Simon, C. A. et al. Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87, 651–701 (1994).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
69.Kim, C. G. et al. Pattern of morphological diversification in the Leptocarabus ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as deduced from mitochondrial ND5 gene and nuclear 28S rDNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 137–145 (2000).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
70.Holden, P. R., Brookfield, J. F. Y. & Jones, P. Cloning and characterization of an ftsZ homologue from a bacterial symbiont of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Gen. Genet. 240, 213–220 (1993).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
71.Kondo, N. I. et al. Wolbachia infections in world populations of bean beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae) infesting cultivated and wild legumes. Zool. Sci. 28, 501–508 (2011).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
72.Baldo, L. et al. Multilocus sequence typing system for the endosymbiont Wolbachia pipientis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 7098–7110 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
73.Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Ronquist, F. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Biometrics 17, 754–755 (2001).CAS 

Google Scholar 
74.Nylander, J. A. A. MrAIC.pl. Program distributed by the author. Uppsala: Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University (2004).75.Rambaut, A. & Drummond, A. J. Tracer v1.5, http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/ (2009).76.Tajima, F. Statistical methods to test for nucleotide mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123, 585–595 (1989).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
77.Fu, Y.-X. & Li, W.-H. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics 133, 693–709 (1993).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
78.Librado, P. & Rozas, J. DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25, 1451–1452 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
79.Yang, Z. PAML 4: A program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 1586–1591 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
80.Song, H., Buhay, J. E., Whiting, M. F. & Crandall, K. A. Many species in one: DNA barcoding overestimates the number of species when nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes are coamplified. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 13486–13491 (2008).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
81.Haran, J., Koutroumpa, F., Magnoux, E., Roques, A. & Roux, G. Ghost mtDNA haplotypes generated by fortuitous NUMTs can deeply disturb infra-specific genetic diversity and phylogeographic pattern. J. Zoolog. Syst. Evol. Res. 53, 109–115 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
82.Clement, M., Snell, Q., Walker, P., Posada, D. & Crandall, K. TCS: Estimating gene genealogies. Parallel Distrib. Proces. Symp. Int. Proc. 2, 184 (2002).
Google Scholar 
83.Tajima, F. Evolutionary relationship of DNA sequences in finite populations. Genetics 105, 437–460 (1983).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
84.Excoffier, L. & Lischer, H. E. L. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 10, 564–567 (2010).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
85.Wright, S. Isolation by distance. Genetics 28, 114–138 (1943).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
86.Mantel, N. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 27, 209–220 (1967).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
87.Raymond, M. & Rousset, F. Genepop (version 1.2): Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered. 86, 248–249 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
88.Nei, M. & Li, W. H. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76, 5269–5273 (1979).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
MATH 
Article 

Google Scholar 
89.Lemey, P., Rambaut, A., Drummond, A. J. & Suchard, M. A. Bayesian phylogeography finds its roots. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5, e1000520 (2009).ADS 
MathSciNet 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
90.Suchard, M. A. et al. Bayesian phylogenetic and phylodynamic data integration using BEAST 1.10. Virus Evol. 4, vey016 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
91.Drummond, A. J., Suchard, M. A., Xie, D. & Rambaut, A. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 1969–1973 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
92.Bielejec, F. et al. SpreaD3: Interactive visualization of spatiotemporal history and trait evolutionary processes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 2167–2169 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

1.Griscom, B. W. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 11645–11650 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Anderson, C. M. et al. Science 363, 933–934 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Bastin, J.-F. et al. Science 365, 6–9 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Cook-Patton, S. C. et al. Nature 585, 545–550 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Holl, K. D. & Brancalion, P. S. Science 368, 580–582 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Fargione, J. et al. Front. For. Glob. Change (in the press).7.West, T. A. P., Börner, J., Sills, E. O. & Kontoleon, A. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 24188–24194 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Brancalion, P. H. S. et al. L. Degrad. Dev. 32, 830–841 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Sills, E. O. et al. PLoS ONE 10, e0132590 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Ferraro, P. J. & Hanauer, M. M. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 39, 495–517 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Harris, N. L. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 234–240 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Reytar, K. et al. The challenge of tracking how a trillion trees grow. World Resources Institute https://www.wri.org/blog/2020/07/trillion-trees-tracking-challenges (2020).13.Shoch, D. et al. Methodology For Improved Forest Management (Family Forest Carbon Program, 2020).14.McDowell, N. G. et al. Science 368, eaaz9463 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
15.IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 °C (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (WMO, 2018). More

1.Davis, S. J. & Caldeira, K. Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 5687–5692 (2010).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Wiedmann, T. O. et al. The material footprint of nations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 6271–6276 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Rogelj, J. et al. Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C. Nature 534, 631–639 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Brandt, M. et al. Satellite passive microwaves reveal recent climate-induced carbon losses in African drylands. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 827–835 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Sankaran, M. et al. Determinants of woody cover in African savannas. Nature 438, 846–849 (2005).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Bond, W. J. & Keane, R. E. Fires, Ecological Effects of☆. In Reference Module in Life Sciences (Elsevier, 2017); https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809633-8.02098-77.Valentini, R. et al. A full greenhouse gases budget of Africa: synthesis, uncertainties, and vulnerabilities. Biogeosciences 11, 381–407 (2014).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
8.Williams, C. A. et al. Africa and the global carbon cycle. Carbon Balance Manag. 2, 3 (2007).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
9.Hanan, N. P. Agroforestry in the Sahel. Nat. Geosci. 11, 296–297 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
10.Dai, A. Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 52–58 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Zhou, L. et al. Widespread decline of Congo rainforest greenness in the past decade. Nature 509, 86–90 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Feng, S. & Fu, Q. Expansion of global drylands under a warming climate. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 10081–10094 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Anchang, J. Y. et al. Trends in woody and herbaceous vegetation in the savannas of West Africa. Remote Sens. 11, 576 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Andela, N., Liu, Y. Y., van Dijk, A. I. J. M., de Jeu, R. A. M. & McVicar, T. R. Global changes in dryland vegetation dynamics (1988–2008) assessed by satellite remote sensing: comparing a new passive microwave vegetation density record with reflective greenness data. Biogeosciences 10, 6657–6676 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Kaptué, A. T., Prihodko, L. & Hanan, N. P. On regreening and degradation in Sahelian watersheds. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 12133–12138 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
16.Schneider, S. H. The greenhouse effect: science and policy. Science 243, 771–781 (1989).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Walsh, J. et al. Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment Ch. 2 (US Global Change Research Program, 2014); https://doi.org/10.7930/J0KW5CXT18.Filatova, T., Polhill, J. G. & van Ewijk, S. Regime shifts in coupled socio-environmental systems: review of modelling challenges and approaches. Environ. Model. Softw. 75, 333–347 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Loarie, S. R. et al. The velocity of climate change. Nature 462, 1052–1055 (2009).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Brandt, M. et al. Reduction of tree cover in West African woodlands and promotion in semi-arid farmlands. Nat. Geosci. 11, 328–333 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Keys, P. W. et al. Anthropocene risk. Nat. Sustain. 2, 667–673 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Rockström, J. et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461, 472–475 (2009).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
23.Steffen, W. et al. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347, 1259855 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
24.Hanan, N. P., Prihodko, L., Ross, C. W., Bucini, G. & Tredennick, A. T. Gridded Estimates of Woody Cover and Biomass across Sub-Saharan Africa, 2000-2004 (ORNL DAAC, 2020); https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/177725.Bouvet, A. et al. An above-ground biomass map of African savannahs and woodlands at 25 m resolution derived from ALOS PALSAR. Remote Sens. Environ. 206, 156–173 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Avitabile, V. et al. An integrated pan-tropical biomass map using multiple reference datasets. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 1406–1420 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Saatchi, S. S. et al. Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 9899–9904 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Baccini, A. et al. Estimated carbon dioxide emissions from tropical deforestation improved by carbon-density maps. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 182–185 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Anchang, J. Y. et al. Toward operational mapping of woody canopy cover in tropical savannas using Google Earth Engine. Front. Environ. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.00004 (2020).30.Kahiu, M. N. & Hanan, N. P. Fire in sub-Saharan Africa: the fuel, cure and connectivity hypothesis. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27, 946–957 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Venter, O. et al. Global terrestrial Human Footprint maps for 1993 and 2009. Sci. Data 3, 160067 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Ross, C. W. et al. HYSOGs250m, global gridded hydrologic soil groups for curve-number-based runoff modeling. Sci. Data 5, 180091 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Lüdeke, M. K. B., Moldenhauer, O. & Petschel-Held, G. Rural poverty driven soil degradation under climate change: the sensitivity of the disposition towards the Sahel Syndrome with respect to climate. Environ. Model. Assess. 4, 315–326 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Hansfort, S. L. & Mertz, O. Challenging the woodfuel crisis in West African woodlands. Hum. Ecol. 39, 583 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
35.Andela, N. et al. A human-driven decline in global burned area. Science 356, 1356–1362 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
36.Wei, F. et al. Nonlinear dynamics of fires in Africa over recent decades controlled by precipitation. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 4495–4505 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Jones, B. & O’Neill, B. C. Spatially explicit global population scenarios consistent with the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 084003 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Riahi, K. et al. The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: an overview. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 153–168 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Potapov, P. et al. Mapping the World’s intact forest landscapes by remote sensing. Ecol. Soc. 13, 2 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Herold, M., Mayaux, P., Woodcock, C. E., Baccini, A. & Schmullius, C. Some challenges in global land cover mapping: an assessment of agreement and accuracy in existing 1 km datasets. Remote Sens. Environ. 112, 2538–2556 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Martens, C. et al. Large uncertainties in future biome changes in Africa call for flexible climate adaptation strategies. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 340–358 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Smith, W. K. et al. Large divergence of satellite and Earth system model estimates of global terrestrial CO2 fertilization. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 306–310 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
43.Reich, P. B., Hobbie, S. E. & Lee, T. D. Plant growth enhancement by elevated CO2 eliminated by joint water and nitrogen limitation. Nat. Geosci. 7, 920–924 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
44.Wieder, W. R., Cleveland, C. C., Smith, W. K. & Todd-Brown, K. Future productivity and carbon storage limited by terrestrial nutrient availability. Nat. Geosci. 8, 441–444 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
45.Körner, C. A matter of tree longevity. Science 355, 130–131 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Olson, D. M. & Dinerstein, E. The Global 200: priority ecoregions for global conservation. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 89, 199–224 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
47.R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019).48.Liaw, A. & Wiener, M. Classification and regression by randomForest. R News 2, 18–22 (2002).
Google Scholar 
49.Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Massey, F. J. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 46, 68–78 (1951).Article 

Google Scholar 
51.Jarvis, A., Reuter, H. I., Nelson, A. & Guevara, E. Hole-filled SRTM for the globe: version 4: data grid (CGIAR Consortium for Spatial Information, 2008).52.Ross, C. W. et al. Global Hydrologic Soil Groups (HYSOGs250m) for Curve Number-Based Runoff Modeling (ORNL DAAC, 2018); https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/156653.Simard, M., Pinto, N., Fisher, J. B. & Baccini, A. Mapping forest canopy height globally with spaceborne lidar. J. Geophys. Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JG001708 (2011).54.Jucker, T. et al. Allometric equations for integrating remote sensing imagery into forest monitoring programmes. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 177–190 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
55.Sanderson, E. W. et al. The human footprint and the last of the wild. BioScience 52, 891–904 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Molnar, C., Bischl, B. & Casalicchio, G. iml: an R package for interpretable machine learning. J. Open Source Softw. 3, 786 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
57.Wickham, H. tidyverse: Easily Install and Load the ‘Tidyverse’ (CRAN, 2017).58.Hijmans, R. J. et al. raster: Geographic Data Analysis and Modeling (CRAN, 2016).59.Perpiñán, O. & Hijmans, R. rasterVis (CRAN, 2018).60.Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer, 2016).61.Zeileis, A. et al. colorspace: A toolbox for manipulating and assessing colors and palettes. J. Stat. Soft. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v096.i01 (2020).62.Neuwirth, E. RColorBrewer: ColorBrewer Palettes (CRAN, 2014).63.Auguie, B. gridExtra: Miscellaneous Functions for ‘Grid’ Graphics (CRAN, 2017).64.Pebesma, E. Simple features for R: standardized support for spatial vector data. R J. 10, 439–446 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
65.Ross, C. W., Hanan, N. P. & Prihodko, L. Prediction Maps: Woody-Biomass Projections and Drivers of Change in Sub-Saharan Africa (Figshare, 2021); https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.14150210.V266.Ross, C. W. R Code for Woody-Biomass Projections and Drivers of Change in Sub-Saharan Africa (Figshare, 2021); https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.14143799.V1 More