Ecology

1.Hansson, G. C. Mucins and the microbiome. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 89, 769–793 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
2.Cross, B. W. & Ruhl, S. Glycan recognition at the saliva—oral microbiome interface. Cell. Immunol. 333, 19–33 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Tabak, L. A. In defense of the oral cavity: structure, biosynthesis, and function of salivary mucins. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 57, 547–564 (1995).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
4.Deng, L. et al. Oral streptococci utilize a Siglec-like domain of serine-rich repeat adhesins to preferentially target platelet sialoglycans in human blood. PLoS Pathog. 10, e1004540 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
5.Shanker, E. & Federle, M. J. Quorum sensing regulation of competence and bacteriocins in Streptococcus pneumoniae and mutans. Genes 8, 15 (2017).PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
6.Nakano, K., Nomura, R. & Ooshima, T. Streptococcus mutans and cardiovascular diseases. Jpn. Dent. Sci. Rev. 44, 29–37 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Murchison, H. H., Barrett, J. F., Cardineau, G. A. & Curtiss, R. Transformation of Streptococcus mutans with chromosomal and shuttle plasmid (pYA629) DNAs. Infect. Immun. 54, 273–282 (1986).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Villedieu, A. et al. Prevalence of tetracycline resistance genes in oral bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47, 878–882 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Chansley, P. E. & Kral, T. A. Transformation of fluoride resistance genes in Streptococcus mutans. Infect. Immun. 57, 1968–1970 (1989).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Hernando-Amado, S., Coque, T. M., Baquero, F. & Martínez, J. L. Defining and combating antibiotic resistance from one health and global health perspectives. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 1432–1442 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Villedieu, A. et al. Genetic basis of erythromycin resistance in oral bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48, 2298–2301 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Olsen, I., Tribble, G. D., Fiehn, N.-E. & Wang, B.-Y. Bacterial sex in dental plaque. J. Oral Microbiol. 5, 20736 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Loesche, W. J. Role of Streptococcus mutans in human dental decay. Microbiol. Rev. 50, 353–380 (1986).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Loesche, W. J., Rowan, J., Straffon, L. H. & Loos, P. J. Association of Streptococcus mutans with human dental decay. Infect. Immun. 11, 1252–1260 (1975).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Mathews, S. A., Kurien, B. T. & Scofield, R. H. Oral manifestations of Sjögren’s syndrome. J. Dent. Res. 87, 308–318 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Pramanik, R., Osailan, S. M., Challacombe, S. J., Urquhart, D. & Proctor, G. B. Protein and mucin retention on oral mucosal surfaces in dry mouth patients. Eur. J. Oral. Sci. 118, 245–253 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Frenkel, E. S. & Ribbeck, K. Salivary mucins in host defense and disease prevention. J. Oral Microbiol. 7, 29759 (2015).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
18.Ahn, S.-J., Wen, Z. T. & Burne, R. A. Multilevel control of competence development and stress tolerance in Streptococcus mutans UA159. Infect. Immun. 74, 1631–1642 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Ahn, S.-J., Ahn, S.-J., Wen, Z. T., Brady, L. J. & Burne, R. A. Characteristics of biofilm formation by Streptococcus mutans in the presence of saliva. Infect. Immun. 76, 4259–4268 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Duarte, S. et al. Influences of starch and sucrose on Streptococcus mutans biofilms. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 23, 206–212 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
21.Mitchell, T. J. The pathogenesis of streptococcal infections: from tooth decay to meningitis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 1, 219–230 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
22.Frenkel, E. S. & Ribbeck, K. Salivary mucins protect surfaces from colonization by cariogenic bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81, 332–338 (2015).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
23.Frenkel, E. S. & Ribbeck, K. Salivary mucins promote the coexistence of competing oral bacterial species. ISME J. 11, 1286–1290 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Levine, M. Salivary proteins may be useful for determining caries susceptibility. J. Evid. Based Dent. Pract. 13, 91–93 (2013).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
25.Thomsson, K. A., Schulz, B. L., Packer, N. H. & Karlsson, N. G. MUC5B glycosylation in human saliva reflects blood group and secretor status. Glycobiology 15, 791–804 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
26.Ajdic, D. et al. Genome sequence of Streptococcus mutans UA159, a cariogenic dental pathogen. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 14434–14439 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
27.Paik, S., Brown, A., Munro, C. L., Cornelissen, C. N. & Kitten, T. The sloABCR operon of Streptococcus mutans encodes an Mn and Fe transport system required for endocarditis virulence and its Mn-dependent repressor. J. Bacteriol. 185, 5967–5975 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Nicolas, G. G. Detection of putative new mutacins by bioinformatic analysis using available web tools. BioData Min. 4, 22 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Aframian, N. & Eldar, A. A bacterial tower of Babel: quorum-sensing signaling diversity and its evolution. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 74, 587–606 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
30.Merritt, J., Qi, F. & Shi, W. A unique nine-gene comY operon in Streptococcus mutans. Microbiology 151, 157–166 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
31.Underhill, S. A. M. et al. Intracellular signaling by the comRS system in Streptococcus mutans genetic competence. mSphere 3, e00444-18 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Dufour, D., Cordova, M., Cvitkovitch, D. G. & Lévesque, C. M. Regulation of the competence pathway as a novel role associated with a streptococcal bacteriocin. J. Bacteriol. 193, 6552–6559 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Hossain, M. S. & Biswas, I. Mutacins from Streptococcus mutans UA159 are active against multiple streptococcal species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 2428–2434 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Merritt, J. & Qi, F. The mutacins of Streptococcus mutans: regulation and ecology. Mol. Oral. Microbiol 27, 57–69 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
35.Son, M., Shields, R. C., Ahn, S. J., Burne, R. A. & Hagen, S. J. Bidirectional signaling in the competence regulatory pathway of Streptococcus mutans. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 362, fnv159 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
36.Reck, M., Tomasch, J. & Wagner-Döbler, I. The alternative sigma factor SigX controls bacteriocin synthesis and competence, the two quorum sensing regulated traits in Streptococcus mutans. PLoS Genet. 11, e1005353 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
37.Perry, J. A., Cvitkovitch, D. G. & Lévesque, C. M. Cell death in Streptococcus mutans biofilms: a link between CSP and extracellular DNA. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 299, 261–266 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Wenderska, I. B. et al. A novel function for the competence inducing peptide, XIP, as a cell death effector of Streptococcus mutans. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 336, 104–112 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Perry, D. & Kuramitsu, H. K. Genetic transformation of Streptococcus mutans. Infect. Immun. 32, 1295–1297 (1981).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Desai, K., Mashburn-Warren, L., Federle, M. J. & Morrison, D. A. Development of competence for genetic transformation of Streptococcus mutans in a chemically defined medium. J. Bacteriol. 194, 3774–3780 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Khan, R. et al. Extracellular identification of a processed type II ComR/ComS pheromone of Streptococcus mutans. J. Bacteriol. 194, 3781–3788 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Khan, R. et al. A positive feedback loop mediated by Sigma X enhances expression of the streptococcal regulator ComR. Sci. Rep. 7, 5984 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
43.Nakano, K. et al. Streptococcus mutans clonal variation revealed by multilocus sequence typing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45, 2616–2625 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
44.Mukherjee, S. & Bassler, B. L. Bacterial quorum sensing in complex and dynamically changing environments. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-019-0186-5 (2019).45.Visch, L. L., Gravenmade, E. J., Schaub, R. M., Van Putten, W. L. & Vissink, A. A double-blind crossover trial of CMC- and mucin-containing saliva substitutes. Int. J. Oral Max. Surg. 15, 395–400 (1986).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Silverman, H. S. et al. In vivo glycosylation of mucin tandem repeats. Glycobiology 11, 459–471 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
47.Zalewska, A., Zwierz, K., Zółkowski, K. & Gindzieński, A. Structure and biosynthesis of human salivary mucins. Acta Biochim. Pol. 47, 1067–1079 (2000).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
48.Wheeler, K. M. et al. Mucin glycans attenuate the virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in infection. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 2146–2154 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
49.Werlang, C., Cárcarmo-Oyarce, G. & Ribbeck, K. Engineering mucus to study and influence the microbiome. Nat. Rev. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-018-0079-7 (2019).50.Wang, B. X. et al. Mucin glycans signal through the sensor kinase RetS to inhibit virulence-associated traits in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Curr. Biol. 31, 90–102 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
51.Huang, Y., Mechref, Y. & Novotny, M. V. Microscale nonreductive release of O-Linked glycans for subsequent analysis through MALDI mass spectrometry and capillary electrophoresis. Anal. Chem. 73, 6063–6069 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
52.Khan, R. et al. Comprehensive transcriptome profiles of Streptococcus mutans UA159 map core streptococcal competence genes. mSystems 1, e00038 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
53.Rayment, S. A., Liu, B., Offner, G. D., Oppenheim, F. G. & Troxler, R. F. Immunoquantification of human salivary mucins MG1 and MG2 in stimulated whole saliva: factors influencing mucin levels. J. Dent. Res. 79, 1765–1772 (2000).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Son, M., Ahn, S.-J., Guo, Q., Burne, R. A. & Hagen, S. J. Microfluidic study of competence regulation in Streptococcus mutans: environmental inputs modulate bimodal and unimodal expression of comX. Mol. Microbiol. 86, 258–272 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
55.Ricomini Filho, A. P., Khan, R., Åmdal, H. A. & Petersen, F. C. Conserved pheromone production, response and degradation by Streptococcus mutans. Front. Microbiol. 10, 2140 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Hagen, S. J. & Son, M. Origins of heterogeneity in Streptococcus mutans competence: interpreting an environment-sensitive signaling pathway. Phys. Biol. 14, 015001 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
57.Hillman, J. D., Mo, J., McDonell, E., Cvitkovitch, D. & Hillman, C. H. Modification of an effector strain for replacement therapy of dental caries to enable clinical safety trials. J. Appl. Microbiol. 102, 1209–1219 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
58.Singla, D., Sharma, A., Sachdev, V. & Chopra, R. Distribution of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus in dental plaque of indian pre-school children using PCR and SB-20M agar medium. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 10, ZC60–ZC63 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
59.Rodriguez, A. M. et al. Physiological and molecular characterization of genetic competence in Streptococcus sanguinis. Mol. Oral Microbiol. 26, 99–116 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
60.Darch, S. E. et al. Spatial determinants of quorum signaling in a Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection model. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 4779–4784 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
61.Wu, C. et al. Regulation of ciaXRH operon expression and identification of the CiaR regulon in Streptococcus mutans. J. Bacteriol. 192, 4669–4679 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
62.Qi, F., Merritt, J., Lux, R. & Shi, W. Inactivation of the ciaH gene in Streptococcus mutans diminishes mutacin production and competence development, alters sucrose-dependent biofilm formation, and reduces stress tolerance. Infect. Immun. 72, 4895–4899 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
63.Biswas, S. & Biswas, I. Role of HtrA in surface protein expression and biofilm formation by Streptococcus mutans. Infect. Immun. 73, 6923–6934 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
64.Senadheera, M. D. et al. A VicRK signal transduction system in Streptococcus mutans affects gtfBCD, gbpB, and ftf expression, biofilm formation, and genetic competence development. J. Bacteriol. 187, 4064–4076 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
65.Domenech, A. et al. Proton motive force disruptors block bacterial competence and horizontal gene transfer. Cell Host Microbe 27, 544–555 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
66.Merritt, J., Zheng, L., Shi, W. & Qi, F. Genetic characterization of the hdrRM operon: a novel high-cell-density-responsive regulator in Streptococcus mutans. Microbiology 153, 2765–2773 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
67.Okinaga, T., Niu, G., Xie, Z., Qi, F. & Merritt, J. The hdrRM operon of Streptococcus mutans encodes a novel regulatory system for coordinated competence development and bacteriocin production. J. Bacteriol. 192, 1844–1852 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
68.Alves, L. A. et al. PepO is a target of the two-component systems VicRK and CovR required for systemic virulence of Streptococcus mutans. Virulence 11, 521–536 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
69.Underhill, S. A. M., Shields, R. C., Burne, R. A. & Hagen, S. J. Carbohydrate and PepO control bimodality in competence development by Streptococcus mutans. Mol. Microbiol. 112, 1388–1402 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
70.Kaspar, J. R., Lee, K., Richard, B., Walker, A. R. & Burne, R. A. Direct interactions with commensal streptococci modify intercellular communication behaviors of Streptococcus mutans. ISME J. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-020-00789-7 (2020).71.Idone, V. et al. Effect of an orphan response regulator on Streptococcus mutans sucrose-dependent adherence and cariogenesis. Infect. Immun. 71, 4351–4360 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
72.Nagasawa, R., Sato, T. & Senpuku, H. Raffinose induces biofilm formation by Streptococcus mutans in low concentrations of sucrose by increasing production of extracellular DNA and fructan. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 83, e00869 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
73.Suzuki, Y., Nagasawa, R. & Senpuku, H. Inhibiting effects of fructanase on competence-stimulating peptide-dependent quorum sensing system in Streptococcus mutans. J. Infect. Chemother. 23, 634–641 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
74.Yoshida, A., Ansai, T., Takehara, T. & Kuramitsu, H. K. LuxS-based signaling affects Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 2372–2380 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
75.Son, M., Ghoreishi, D., Ahn, S.-J., Burne, R. A. & Hagen, S. J. Sharply tuned pH response of genetic competence regulation in Streptococcus mutans: a microfluidic study of the environmental sensitivity of comX. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81, 5622–5631 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
76.Nielsen, S. S. in Food Analysis Laboratory Manual 137–141 (Springer, 2017).77.Aoki, K. et al. The diversity of O-linked glycans expressed during Drosophila melanogaster development reflects stage- and tissue-specific requirements for cell signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 30385–30400 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
78.Kumagai, T., Katoh, T., Nix, D. B., Tiemeyer, M. & Aoki, K. In-gel β-elimination and aqueous-organic partition for improved O- and sulfoglycomics. Anal. Chem. 85, 8692–8699 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
79.Anumula, K. R. & Taylor, P. B. A comprehensive procedure for preparation of partially methylated alditol acetates from glycoprotein carbohydrates. Anal. Biochem. 203, 101–108 (1992).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
80.Liu, Y. et al. The minimum information required for a glycomics experiment (MIRAGE) project: improving the standards for reporting glycan microarray-based data. Glycobiology 27, 280–284 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
81.Clark, K., Karsch-Mizrachi, I., Lipman, D. J., Ostell, J. & Sayers, E. W. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D67–D72 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
82.O’Leary, N. A. et al. Reference sequence (RefSeq) database at NCBI: current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D733–D745 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
83.Afgan, E. et al. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, W537–W544 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
84.Huber, W. et al. Orchestrating high-throughput genomic analysis with Bioconductor. Nat. Methods 12, 115–121 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
85.Anders, S. & Huber, W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 11, R106 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
86.Kanehisa, M., Sato, Y., Kawashima, M., Furumichi, M. & Tanabe, M. KEGG as a reference resource for gene and protein annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D457–D462 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
87.Thissen, D., Steinberg, L. & Kuang, D. Quick and easy implementation of the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure for controlling the false positive rate in multiple comparisons. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 27, 77–83 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
88.Aymanns, S., Mauerer, S., Zandbergen, G., Wolz, C. & Spellerberg, B. High-level fluorescence labeling of Gram-positive pathogens. PLoS ONE 6, e19822 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
89.Takehara, S., Yanagishita, M., Podyma-Inoue, K. A. & Kawaguchi, Y. Degradation of MUC7 and MUC5B in human saliva. PLoS ONE 8, e69059 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

AffiliationsDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandAlma Dal Co, Simon van Vliet, Daniel Johannes Kiviet, Susan Schlegel & Martin AckermannDepartment of Environmental Microbiology, Eawag, Duebendorf, SwitzerlandAlma Dal Co, Simon van Vliet, Daniel Johannes Kiviet, Susan Schlegel & Martin AckermannDepartment of Zoology, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Vancouver, CanadaSimon van VlietAuthorsAlma Dal CoSimon van VlietDaniel Johannes KivietSusan SchlegelMartin AckermannCorresponding authorCorrespondence to
Alma Dal Co. More

1.Parente, V., Ferreira, D., Moutinho dos Santos, E. & Luczynski, E. Offshore decommissioning issues: deductibility and transferability. Energy Policy 34, 1992–2001 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Macreadie, P. I., Fowler, A. M. & Booth, D. J. Rigs-to-reefs: will the deep sea benefit from artificial habitat?. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9, 455–461 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Fowler, A. M., Macreadie, P. I., Jones, D. O. B. & Booth, D. J. A multi-criteria decision approach to decommissioning of offshore oil and gas infrastructure. Ocean Coast. Manag. 87, 20–29 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Hamzah, B. A. International rules on decommissioning of offshore installations: some observations. Mar. Policy 27, 339–348 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Chandler, J., White, D., Techera, E. J., Gourvenec, S. & Draper, S. Engineering and legal considerations for decommissioning of offshore oil and gas infrastructure in Australia. Ocean Eng. 131, 338–347 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Claisse, J. T. et al. Oil platforms off California are among the most productive marine fish habitats globally. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111, 15462–15467 (2014).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Fowler, A. M. & Booth, D. J. Evidence of sustained populations of a small reef fish on artificial structures. Does depth affect production on artificial reefs?. J. Fish Biol. 80, 613–629 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Gallaway, B. J., Szedlmayer, S. T. & Gazey, W. J. A life history review for red snapper in the Gulf of Mexico with an evaluation of the importance of offshore petroleum platforms and other artificial reefs. Rev. Fish. Sci. 17, 48–67 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Love, M. S. et al. Potential use of offshore marine structures in rebuilding an overfished rockfish species, bocaccio (Sebastes paucispinis). Fish. Bull. 104, 383–390 (2006).
Google Scholar 
10.Friedlander, A. M., Ballesteros, E., Fay, M. & Sala, E. Marine communities on oil platforms in Gabon, West Africa: high biodiversity oases in a low biodiversity environment. PLoS ONE 9, e103709 (2014).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
11.McLean, D. L., Taylor, M. D., Giraldo Ospina, A. & Partridge, J. C. An assessment of fish and marine growth associated with an oil and gas platform jacket using an augmented remotely operated vehicle. Cont. Shelf Res. 179, 66–84 (2019).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Schramm, K. D. et al. A comparison of stereo-BRUVs and stereo-ROV techniques for sampling shallow water fish communities on and off pipelines. Mar. Environ. Res. 162, 105198 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
13.Schroeder, D. M. & Love, M. S. Ecological and political issues surrounding decommissioning of offshore oil facilities in the Southern California Bight. Ocean Coast. Manag. 47, 21–48 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Bull, A. S. & Love, M. S. Worldwide oil and gas platform decommissioning: a review of practices and reefing options. Ocean Coast. Manag. 168, 274–306 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources. Offshore Petroleum Decommissioning Guideline 4 (Department of Industry, Science, Energy and Resources, 2018).
Google Scholar 
16.Bell, N. & Smith, J. Coral growing on North Sea oil rigs. Nature 402, 601–601 (1999).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
17.APPEA. Scientific Literature Review. Environmental Impacts of Decommissioning Options (APPEA, 2017).
Google Scholar 
18.Stolk, P., Markwell, K. & Jenkins, J. M. Artificial reefs as recreational scuba diving resources: a critical review of research. J. Sustain. Tour. 15, 331–350 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Scarborough-Bull, A., Love, M. S. & Schroeder, D. M. Artificial reefs as fishery conservation tools: contrasting the roles of offshore structures between the Gulf of Mexico and the Southern California Bight. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 49, 899–915 (2008).
Google Scholar 
20.Moore, C. H. et al. Improving spatial prioritisation for remote marine regions: optimising biodiversity conservation and sustainable development trade-offs. Sci. Rep. 6, 32029 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Cripps, S. J. & Aabel, J. P. Environmental and socio-economic impact assessment of Ekoreef, a multiple platform rigs-to-reefs development. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 59, 300–308 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Matthews, K. R. Species similarity and movement of fishes on natural and artificial reefs in Monterey bay, California. Bull. Mar. Sci. 37, 252–270 (1985).ADS 

Google Scholar 
23.Grossman, G. D., Jones, G. P. & Seaman, W. J. Jr. Do artificial reefs increase regional fish production? A review of existing data. Fisheries 22, 17–23 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Bohnsack, J. A. Are high densities of fishes at artificial reefs the result of habitat limitation or behavioral preference?. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44, 631–645 (1989).
Google Scholar 
25.Page, H. M., Dugan, J. E., Culver, C. S. & Hoesterey, J. C. Exotic invertebrate species on offshore oil platforms. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 325, 101–107 (2006).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Pajuelo, J. G. et al. Introduction of non-native marine fish species to the Canary Islands waters through oil platforms as vectors. J. Mar. Syst. 163, 23–30 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
27.van Elden, S., Meeuwig, J. J., Hobbs, R. J. & Hemmi, J. M. Offshore oil and gas platforms as novel ecosystems: a global perspective. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 548 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Rouse, S., Hayes, P. & Wilding, T. A. Commercial fisheries losses arising from interactions with offshore pipelines and other oil and gas infrastructure and activities. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 77, 1148–1156 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Bond, T. et al. Fish associated with a subsea pipeline and adjacent seafloor of the North West Shelf of Western Australia. Mar. Environ. Res. 141, 53–65 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
30.Bond, T., Partridge, J. C., Taylor, M. D., Cooper, T. F. & McLean, D. L. The influence of depth and a subsea pipeline on fish assemblages and commercially fished species. PLoS ONE 13, e0207703 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
31.Bond, T. et al. Diel shifts and habitat associations of fish assemblages on a subsea pipeline. Fish. Res. 206, 220–234 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
32.McLean, D. L. et al. Using industry ROV videos to assess fish associations with subsea pipelines. Cont. Shelf Res. 141, 76–97 (2017).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
33.McLean, D. L., Vaughan, B. I., Malseed, B. E. & Taylor, M. D. Fish-habitat associations on a subsea pipeline within an Australian Marine Park. Mar. Environ. Res. 153, 104813 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Love, M. S. & York, A. A comparison of the fish assemblages associated with an oil/gas pipeline and adjacent seafloor in the Santa Barbara Channel, Southern California Bight. Bull. Mar. Sci. 77, 101–118 (2005).ADS 

Google Scholar 
35.Arnould, J. P. Y. et al. Use of anthropogenic sea floor structures by Australian fur seals: potential positive ecological impacts of marine industrial development?. PLoS ONE 10, e0130581 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
36.DMP. Maps and Geospatial Information (Government of Western Australia, Department of Mine, Industry Regulation and Safety, 2020).
Google Scholar 
37.McLean, D. L. et al. Distribution, abundance, diversity and habitat associations of fishes across a bioregion experiencing rapid coastal development. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 178, 36–47 (2016).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Travers, M. J., Clarke, K. R., Newman, S. J., Hall, N. G. & Potter, I. C. To what extents are species richness and abundance of reef fishes along a tropical coast related to latitude and other factors?. Cont. Shelf Res. 167, 99–110 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Travers, M. J., Newman, S. J. & Potter, I. C. Influence of latitude, water depth, day v. night and wet v. dry periods on the species composition of reef fish communities in tropical Western Australia. J. Fish Biol. 69, 987–1017 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Travers, M. J., Potter, I. C., Clarke, K. R. & Newman, S. J. Relationships between latitude and environmental conditions and the species richness, abundance and composition of tropical fish assemblages over soft substrata. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 446, 221–241 (2012).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Chevron. Wheatstone Project: Dredging and Dredge Spoil Placement Environmental Monitoring and Management Plan 234 (Chevron Australia Pty Ltd., 2016).
Google Scholar 
42.Gaughan, D. J. et al. (eds) Status Reports of the Fisheries and Aquatic Resources of Western Australia 2017/18: The State of the Fisheries (Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, 2019).
Google Scholar 
43.Ryan, K. L. et al. Statewide Survey of Boat-Based Recreational Fishing in Western Australia 2017/18. Fisheries Research Report No. 297, Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (2019).44.Harvey, E. S., Goetze, J., McLaren, B., Langlois, T. & Shortis, M. R. Influence of range, angle of view, image resolution and image compression on underwater stereo-video measurements: high-definition and broadcast-resolution video cameras compared. Mar. Technol. Soc. J. 44, 75–85 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
45.Goetze, J. S. et al. A field and video analysis guide for diver operated stereo-video. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 1083–1090 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Myers, E. M. V., Harvey, E. S., Saunders, B. J. & Travers, M. J. Fine-scale patterns in the day, night and crepuscular composition of a temperate reef fish assemblage. Mar. Ecol. 37, 668–678 (2016).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
47.Sward, D., Monk, J. & Barrett, N. A systematic review of remotely operated vehicle surveys for visually assessing fish assemblages. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 134 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
48.Gregoire, T. G. & Valentine, H. T. Sampling Strategies for Natural Resources and the Environment (CRC Press, 2007).
Google Scholar 
49.Harvey, E. S. & Shortis, M. R. Calibration stability of an underwater stereo-video system: implications for measurement accuracy and precision. Mar. Technol. Soc. J. 32, 3–17 (1998).
Google Scholar 
50.Shortis, M. R. & Harvey, E. S. Design and calibration of an underwater stereo-video system for the monitoring of marine fauna populations. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 32, 792–799 (1998).
Google Scholar 
51.Shortis, M., Harvey, E. & Abdo, D. A review of underwater stereo-image measurement for marine biology and ecology applications. In Oceanography and Marine Biology Vol. 47 (eds Gibson, R. et al.) 257–292 (Taylor & Francis, 2009).
Google Scholar 
52.Boutros, N., Shortis, M. R. & Harvey, E. S. A comparison of calibration methods and system configurations of underwater stereo-video systems for applications in marine ecology. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 13, 224–236 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
53.Taylor, R. B. & Willis, T. J. Relationships amongst length, weight and growth of north-eastern New Zealand reef fishes. Mar. Freshw. Res. 49, 255–260 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Froese, R. & Pauly, D. FishBase. www.fishbase.org, Accessed Sept 2019 (2019).55.Bach, L. L., Saunders, B. J., Newman, S. J., Holmes, T. H. & Harvey, E. S. Cross and long-shore variations in reef fish assemblage structure and implications for biodiversity management. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 218, 246–257 (2019).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Anderson, M., Gorley, R. & Clarke, K. P. PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER: Guide to Software and Statistical Methods 1st edn. (PRIMER-E, 2008).
Google Scholar 
57.Anderson, M. J. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral. Ecol. 26, 32–46 (2001).
Google Scholar 
58.Anderson, M. J. Distance-based tests for homogeneity of multivariate dispersions. Biometrics 62, 245–253 (2006).MathSciNet 
PubMed 
MATH 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
59.Harvey, E. S., Cappo, M., Butler, J. J., Hall, N. & Kendrick, G. A. Bait attraction affects the performance of remote underwater video stations in assessment of demersal fish community structure. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 350, 245–254 (2007).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
60.Watson, D. L., Harvey, E. S., Anderson, M. J. & Kendrick, G. A. A comparison of temperate reef fish assemblages recorded by three underwater stereo-video techniques. Mar. Biol. 148, 415–425 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
61.Langlois, T. J. et al. Cost-efficient sampling of fish assemblages: comparison of baited video stations and diver video transects. Aquat. Biol. 9, 155–168 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
62.Simon, T., Pinheiro, H. T. & Joyeux, J.-C. Target fishes on artificial reefs: evidences of impacts over nearby natural environments. Sci. Total Environ. 409, 4579–4584 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
63.Simon, T., Joyeux, J.-C. & Pinheiro, H. T. Fish assemblages on shipwrecks and natural rocky reefs strongly differ in trophic structure. Mar. Environ. Res. 90, 55–65 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
64.Wulff, J. L. Ecological interactions of marine sponges. Can. J. Zool. 84, 146–166 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
65.Bohnsack, J. A. & Sutherland, D. L. Artificial reef research: a review with recommendations for future priorities. Bull. Mar. Sci. 37, 11–39 (1985).
Google Scholar 
66.Harvey, E. S., Butler, J. J., McLean, D. L. & Shand, J. Contrasting habitat use of diurnal and nocturnal fish assemblages in temperate Western Australia. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 426–427, 78–86 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
67.Newman, S. J. & Williams, D. M. Mesh size selection and diel variability in catch of fish traps on the central Great Barrier Reef, Australia: a preliminary investigation. Fish. Res. 23, 237–253 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
68.Nagelkerken, I., Dorenbosch, M., Verberk, W. & van der Cocheret de la Morinière Velde, E. G. Day-night shifts of fishes between shallow-water biotopes of a Caribbean bay, with emphasis on the nocturnal feeding of Haemulidae and Lutjanidae. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 194, 55–64 (2000).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
69.Currey, L. M., Heupel, M. R., Simpfendorfer, C. A. & Williams, A. J. Assessing fine-scale diel movement patterns of an exploited coral reef fish. Anim. Biotelem. 3, 41 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
70.Newman, S. J. & Williams, D. M. Spatial and temporal variation in assemblages of Lutjanidae, Lethrinidae and associated fish species among mid-continental shelf reefs in the central Great Barrier Reef. Mar. Freshw. Res. 52, 843–851 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
71.Layman, C. A., Allgeier, J. E., Yeager, L. A. & Stoner, E. W. Thresholds of ecosystem response to nutrient enrichment from fish aggregations. Ecology 94, 530–536 (2013).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
72.Shantz, A. A., Ladd, M. C., Schrack, E. & Burkepile, D. E. Fish-derived nutrient hotspots shape coral reef benthic communities. Ecol. Appl. 25, 2142–2152 (2015).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
73.Marnane, M. J. & Bellwood, D. R. Diet and nocturnal foraging in cardinalfishes (Apogonidae) at One Tree Reef, Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 231, 261–268 (2002).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
74.Wen, C. K. C., Pratchett, M. S., Almany, G. R. & Jones, G. P. Patterns of recruitment and microhabitat associations for three predatory coral reef fishes on the southern Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Coral Reefs 32, 389–398 (2013).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
75.Friedlander, A. M. & Parrish, J. D. Habitat characteristics affecting fish assemblages on a Hawaiian coral reef. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 224, 1–30 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
76.Pradella, N., Fowler, A. M., Booth, D. J. & Macreadie, P. I. Fish assemblages associated with oil industry structures on the continental shelf of north-western Australia. J. Fish Biol. 84, 247–255 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
77.McLean, D. L. et al. Fish and habitats on wellhead infrastructure on the north west shelf of Western Australia. Cont. Shelf Res. 164, 10–27 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
78.Frisch, A. J. Are juvenile coral-trouts (Plectropomus) mimics of poisonous pufferfishes (Canthigaster) on coral reefs?. Mar. Ecol. 27, 247–252 (2006).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
79.Wen, C. K. C., Pratchett, M. S., Almany, G. R. & Jones, G. P. Role of prey availability in microhabitat preferences of juvenile coral trout (Plectropomus: Serranidae). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 443, 39–45 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
80.Kerry, J. T. & Bellwood, D. R. The effect of coral morphology on shelter selection by coral reef fishes. Coral Reefs 31, 415–424 (2012).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
81.Lindfield, S. J., Harvey, E. S., McIlwain, J. L. & Halford, A. R. Silent fish surveys: bubble-free diving highlights inaccuracies associated with SCUBA-based surveys in heavily fished areas. Methods Ecol. Evol. 5, 1061–1069 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
82.Kulbicki, M. How the acquired behaviour of commercial reef fishes may influence the results obtained from visual censuses. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 222, 11–30 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
83.Gray, A. E. et al. Comparison of reef fish survey data gathered by open and closed circuit SCUBA divers reveals differences in areas with higher fishing pressure. PLoS ONE 11, e0167724 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
84.Guidetti, P., Vierucci, E. & Bussotti, S. Differences in escape response of fish in protected and fished Mediterranean rocky reefs. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U. K. 88, 625–627 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
85.Laidig, T. E., Krigsman, L. M. & Yoklavich, M. M. Reactions of fishes to two underwater survey tools, a manned submersible and a remotely operated vehicle. Fish. Bull. 111, 54–67 (2013).
Google Scholar 
86.Sutton, S. G. & Bushnell, S. L. Socio-economic aspects of artificial reefs: considerations for the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. Ocean Coast. Manag. 50, 829–846 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
87.Florisson, J. H. et al. King Reef: an Australian first in repurposing oil and gas infrastructure to benefit regional communities. APPEA J. 60, 435–439 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
88.Rouse, S., Kafas, A., Catarino, R. & Peter, H. Commercial fisheries interactions with oil and gas pipelines in the North Sea: considerations for decommissioning. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 75, 279–286 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
89.Gratwicke, B. & Speight, M. R. The relationship between fish species richness, abundance and habitat complexity in a range of shallow tropical marine habitats. J. Fish Biol. 66, 650–667 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
90.Charbonnel, E., Serre, C., Ruitton, S., Harmelin, J.-G. & Jensen, A. Effects of increased habitat complexity on fish assemblages associated with large artificial reef units (French Mediterranean coast). ICES J. Mar. Sci. 59, 208–213 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
91.Perkol-Finkel, S., Shashar, N. & Benayahu, Y. Can artificial reefs mimic natural reef communities? The roles of structural features and age. Mar. Environ. Res. 61, 121–135 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
92.Burt, J., Bartholomew, A., Usseglio, P., Bauman, A. & Sale, P. F. Are artificial reefs surrogates of natural habitats for corals and fish in Dubai, United Arab Emirates?. Coral Reefs 28, 663–675 (2009).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
93.Folpp, H., Lowry, M., Gregson, M. & Suthers, I. M. Fish assemblages on estuarine artificial reefs: natural rocky-reef mimics or discrete assemblages?. PLoS ONE 8, e63505 (2014).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar  More

1.Berthrong, S. T. et al. Nitrogen fertilization has a stronger effect on soil nitrogen-fixing bacterial communities than elevated atmospheric CO2. Appl. Environ. Microb. 80, 3103–3112. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.04034-13 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Millar, N., Robertson, G. P., Grace, P. R., Gehl, R. J. & Hoben, J. P. Nitrogen fertilizer management for nitrous oxide (N2O) mitigation in intensive corn (Maize) production: An emissions reduction protocol for US Midwest agriculture. Mitig. Adapt. Strat. Gl. 15, 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-010-9212-7 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Zhou, J. et al. Influence of 34-years of fertilization on bacterial communities in an intensively cultivated black soil in northeast China. Soil Biol. Biochem. 90, 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.07.005 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Ding, J. et al. Influence of inorganic fertilizer and organic manure application on fungal communities in a long-term field experiment of Chinese Mollisols. Appl. Soil Ecol. 111, 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.12.003 (2017).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Zhou, J. et al. Thirty four years of nitrogen fertilization decreases fungal diversity and alters fungal community composition in black soil in northeast China. Soil Biol. Biochem. 95, 135–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.12.012 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Liu, J. et al. Diversity and distribution patterns of acidobacterial communities in the black soil zone of northeast China. Soil Biol. Biochem. 95, 212–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.12.021 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Pan, H. et al. Organic and inorganic fertilizers respectively drive bacterial and fungal community compositions in a fluvo-aquic soil in northern China. Soil Till. Res. 198, 104540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.104540 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Ma, M. et al. Chronic fertilization of 37 years alters the phylogenetic structure of soil arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in Chinese Mollisols. AMB Express 8, 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-018-0587-2 (2018).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
9.Hu, X. et al. Long-term manure addition reduces diversity and changes community structure of diazotrophs in a neutral black soil of northeast China. J. Soils Sediments 18, 2053–2062. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-1975-6 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Liu, J. et al. Ammonia-oxidizing archaea show more distinct biogeographic distribution patterns than ammonia-oxidizing bacteria across the black soil zone of northeast China. Front. Microbial. 9, 171. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00023 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Fan, K., Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Guo, X., Wang, D. & Chu, H. Suppressed N fixation and diazotrophs after four decades of fertilization. Microbiome 7, 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-019-0757-8 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
12.Kumar, U. et al. Long-term aromatic rice cultivation effect on frequency and diversity of diazotrophs in its rhizosphere. Ecol. Eng. 101, 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.02.010 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Gaby, J. C., Rishishwar, L., Valderrama-Aguirre, L. C., Green, S. J. & Kostka, J. E. Diazotroph community characterization via a high-throughput nifH amplicon sequencing and analysis pipeline. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 84, 01512–01517. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01512-17 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Wang, J. et al. Temporal variation of diazotrophic community abundance and structure in surface and subsoil under four fertilization regimes during a wheat growing season. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 216, 116–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.09.039 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Van Kessel, C. & Hartley, C. Agricultural management of grain legumes: Has it led to an increase in nitrogen fixation?. Field Crops Res. 65, 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(99)00085-4 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Wang, C. et al. Impact of 25 years of inorganic fertilization on diazotrophic abundance and community structure in an acidic soil in southern China. Soil Biol. Biochem. 113, 240–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.06.019 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Feng, M. et al. Long-term fertilization influences community assembly processes of soil diazotrophs. Soil Biol. Biochem. 126, 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.08.021 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Fan, L. Response of diazotrophic microbial community to nitrogen input and glyphosate application in soils cropped to soybean. (2013).19.Cheng, F. et al. Isolation and application of effective nitrogen fixation rhizobial strains on low-phosphorus acid soils in South China. Chin. Sci. Bull. 54, 412–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-008-0521-0 (2009).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Qiao, Y. et al. The effect of fertilizer practices on N balance and global warming potential of maize–soybean–wheat rotations in Northeastern China. Field Crops Res. 161, 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.03.005 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Hsu, S. F. & Buckley, D. H. Evidence for the functional significance of diazotroph community structure in soil. ISME J. 3, 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2008.82 (2009).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
22.Chen, J., Shen, W., Xu, H., Li, Y. & Luo, T. The composition of nitrogen-fixing microorganisms correlates with soil nitrogen content during reforestation: A comparison between legume and non-legume plantations. Front. Microbiol. 10, 508. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00508 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
23.Saleem, M., Law, A. D., Sahib, M. R., Pervaiz, Z. H. & Zhang, Q. Impact of root system architecture on rhizosphere and root microbiome. Rhizosphere 6, 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2018.02.003 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Zhang, X. et al. Response of the abundance of key soil microbial nitrogen-cycling genes to multi-factorial global changes. PLoS ONE 8, e76500. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076500 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
25.Coelho, M. et al. Molecular detection and quantification of nifH gene sequences in the rhizosphere of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) sown with two levels of nitrogen fertilizer. Appl. Soil Ecol. 42, 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2009.01.010 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Wakelin, S. A. et al. The effects of stubble retention and nitrogen application on soil microbial community structure and functional gene abundance under irrigated maize. Fems Microbiol. Ecol. 59, 661–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00235.x (2006).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
27.Shirani, H., Hajabbasi, M. A., Afyuni, M. & Hemmat, A. Effects of farmyard manure and tillage systems on soil physical properties and corn yield in central Iran. Soil Till. Res. 68, 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(02)00110-1 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Sheffer, E., Batterman, S. A., Levin, S. A. & Hedin, L. O. Biome-scale nitrogen fixation strategies selected by climatic constraints on nitrogen cycle. Nat. Plants 1, 15182. https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2015.182 (2015).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
29.Guo, J. H. et al. Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands. Science 327, 1008–1010. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182570 (2010).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
30.Ding, J. et al. Effect of 35 years inorganic fertilizer and manure amendment on structure of bacterial and archaeal communities in black soil of northeast China. Appl. Soil Ecol. 105, 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.04.010 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Soman, C., Keymer, D. P. & Kent, A. D. Edaphic correlates of feedstock-associated diazotroph communities. GCB Bioenergy 10, 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12502 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
32.He, D. et al. Evolvement of structure and abundance of soil nitrogen-fixing bacterial community in Phyllostachys edulis plantations with age of time. Acta Pedol. Sin. 52, 934–942. https://doi.org/10.11766/trxb201408070397 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Ning, Q. et al. Effects of nitrogen deposition rates and frequencies on the abundance of soil nitrogen-related functional genes in temperate grassland of northern China. J. Soils Sediments 15, 694–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1061-2 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Huang, J. et al. Responses of soil nitrogen fixation to Spartina alterniflora invasion and nitrogen addition in a Chinese salt marsh. Sci. Rep. 6, 20384. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20384 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
35.Zhu, C. et al. N-fertilizer-driven association between the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community and diazotrophic community impacts wheat yield. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 254, 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.11.029 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
36.Coelho, M. et al. Diversity of nifH gene pools in the rhizosphere of two cultivars of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) treated with contrasting levels of nitrogen fertilizer. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 111, 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00975.x (2007).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Velagaleti, R. R. & Marsh, S. Influence of host cultivars and Bradyrhizobium strains on the growth and symbiotic performance of soybean under salt stress. Plant Soil 119, 133–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02370277 (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Appunu, C. & Dhar, B. Symbiotic effectiveness of acid-tolerant Bradyrhizobium strains with soybean in low pH soil. Afr. J. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB06.131 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Kunert, K. J. et al. Drought stress responses in soybean roots and nodules. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 1015. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01015 (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
40.Ahemad, M. & Khan, M. S. Insecticide-tolerant and plant growth promoting Bradyrhizobium sp. (vigna) improves the growth and yield of greengram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] in insecticide-stressed soils. Symbiosis 54, 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-011-0122-6 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Chen, J., Zhou, Z. & Gu, J. Occurrence and diversity of nitrite-dependent anaerobic methane oxidation bacteria in the sediments of the South China Sea revealed by amplification of both 16S rRNA and pmoAgenes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 98, 5685–5696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-5733-4 (2014).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
42.Santoscaton, I. R., Caton, T. M. & Schneegurt, M. A. Nitrogen-fixation activity and the abundance and taxonomy of nifH genes in agricultural, pristine, and urban prairie stream sediments chronically exposed to different levels of nitrogen loading. Arch. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-018-1475-5 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
43.Zhou, J. et al. Effects of long term application of urea on ammonia oxidizing archaea community in black soil in Northeast China. Sci. Agric. Sin. 49, 294–304. https://doi.org/10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.02.010 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
44.Zhou, J. et al. Consistent effects of nitrogen fertilization on soil bacterial communities in black soils for two crop seasons in China. Sci. Rep. 7, 3267. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03539-6 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
45.Diedrick, K. A. Field Investigations of Nitrogen Fertility on Corn and Soybeans and Foliar Manganese-Glyphosate Interactions on Glyphosate-Tolerant Soybeans in Ohio (The Ohio State University, 2010).
Google Scholar 
46.Salamone, I., Bereiner, J., Urquiaga, S. & Boddey, R. Biological nitrogen fixation in Azospirillumstrain-maize genotype associations as evaluated by the 15N isotope dilution technique. Biol. Fertil. Soils 23, 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00335952 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
47.Carelli, M. et al. Genetic diversity and dynamics of sinorhizobium meliloti populations nodulating different alfalfa cultivars in Italiansoils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 4785–4789. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.11.4785-4789.2000 (2000).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
48.Coelho, M. R. et al. Diversity of Paenibacillus spp. in the rhizosphere of four sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) cultivars sown with two contrasting levels of nitrogen fertilizer assessed by rpoB-based PCR-DGGE and sequencing analysis. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 17, 753–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-007-0209-5 (2007).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
49.Cao, Y., Wang, E., Zhao, L., Chen, W. & Wei, G. Diversity and distribution of rhizobia nodulated with Phaseolus vulgaris in two ecoregions of China. Soil Biol. Biochem. 78, 128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.07.026 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Ahmed, I. H., Francina, L. B., Isabella, H. R. & Galaletsang, S. Nodulation efficacy of Bradyrhizobium japonicum inoculant strain WB74 on soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) is affected by several limiting factors. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 8, 2069–2076. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajmr2014.6709 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
51.Yan, J. et al. Effects of long-term fertilization strategies on soil productivity and rhizobial diversity in Chinese mollisol. Pedosphere 29, 784–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60470-3 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
52.Riffkin, P. A., Quigley, P. E., Kearney, G. A., Cameron, F. J. & Thies, J. E. Factors associated with biological nitrogen fixation in dairy pastures in south-western Victoria. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 50, 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1071/a98035 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
53.Yang, L. et al. Diazotroph abundance and community structure are reshaped by straw return and mineral fertilizer in rice-rice-green manure rotation. Appl. Soil Ecol. 136, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.12.015 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Zou, Y. et al. Effects of different land use patterns on nifH genetic diversity of soil nitrogen-fixing microbial communities in Leymus Chinensis steppe. Acta Ecol. Sin. 31, 150–156 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
55.Zahran, H. H. Rhizobium-Legume symbiosis and nitrogen fixation under severe conditions and in an arid climate. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. R 63, 968–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chnaes.2011.03.004 (1999).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Tang, Y. et al. Impact of fertilization regimes on diazotroph community compositions and N2-fixation activity in paddy soil. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment: An International Journal for Scientific Research on the Relationship of Agriculture and Food Production to the Biosphere (2017).57.Gao, P., Li, Y., Tan, L., Guo, F. & Ma, T. Composition of bacterial and archaeal communities in an alkali-surfactant-polyacrylamide-flooded oil reservoir and the responses of microcosms to nutrients. Front. Microbiol. 10, 2197. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02197 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
58.Rösch, C., Mergel, A. & Bothe, H. Biodiversity of denitrifying and dinitrogen-fixing bacteria in an acid forest soil. Appl. Enviro. Microbiol. 68, 3818–3829. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.8.3818-3829.2002 (2002).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
59.Wei, G. et al. Similar drivers but different effects lead to distinct ecological patterns of soil bacterial and archaeal communities. Soil Biol. Biochem. 144, 107759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107759 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
60.Sun, R., Guo, X., Wang, D. & Chu, H. Effects of long-term application of chemical and organic fertilizers on the abundance of microbial communities involved in the nitrogen cycle. Appl. Soil Ecol. 95, 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.06.010 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
61.Asnicar, F., Weingart, G., Tickle, T. L., Huttenhower, C. & Segata, N. Compact graphical representation of phylogenetic data and metadata with GraPhlAn. PeerJ 3, 1029. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1029 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
62.Gao, P. et al. Spatial isolation and environmental factors drive distinct bacterial and archaeal communities in different types of petroleum reservoirs in China. Sci. Rep. 6, 20174. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20174 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar  More

1.Stuart, Y. E., Losos, J. B. & Algar, A. C. The island-mainland species turnover relationship. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 279, 4071–4077 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Grant, P. R. Evolution on Islands (Oxford University Press, 1998).
Google Scholar 
3.Garant, D., Forde, S. E. & Hendry, A. P. The multifarious effects of dispersal and gene flow on contemporary adaptation. Funct. Ecol. 21, 434–443 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Armstrong, C. et al. Genomic associations with bill length and disease reveal drift and selection across island bird populations. Evol. Lett. 2(1), 22–36 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Eldridge, M. D. B. et al. Unprecedented low levels of genetic variation and inbreeding depression in an island population of the black-footed rock-wallaby. Conserv. Biol. 13, 531–541 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Wright, S. Isolation by distance under diverse systems of mating. Genetics 31, 39–59 (1946).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
7.Kimura, M. & Crow, J. F. The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genetics 49(4), 725 (1964).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Luikart, G., England, P. R., Tallmon, D., Jordan, S. & Taberlet, P. The power and promise of population genomics: From genotyping to genome typing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4(12), 981–994 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Nei, M., Suzuki, Y. & Nozawa, M. The neutral theory of molecular evolution in the genomic era. Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. 11, 265–289 (2010).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Weigelt, P., Jetz, W. & Kreft, H. Bioclimatic and physical characterization of the world’s islands. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110(38), 15307–15312 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
11.Huey, R. B., Gilchrist, G. W., Carlson, M. L., Berrigan, D. & Serra, L. Rapid evolution of a geographic cline in size in an introduced fly. Science 287(5451), 308–309 (2000).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
12.Prates, I., Angilleta, M. J., Wilson, R. S., Niehaus, A. C. & Navas, C. A. Dehydration hardly slows hopping toads (Rhinella granulosa) from xeric and mesic environments. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 86(4), 451–457 (2013).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Prates, I., Penna, A., Trefaut, M. & Carnaval, A. C. Local adaptation in mainland anole lizards: Integrating population history and genome-environment associations. Ecol. Evol. 8, 11932–11944 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Funk, W. C. et al. Adaptive divergence despite strong genetic drift: Genomic analysis of the evolutionary mechanisms causing genetic differentiation in the island fox (Urocyonlittoralis). Mol. Ecol. 25(10), 2176–2194 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Friis, G. et al. Genome-wide signals of drift and local adaptation during rapid lineage divergence in a songbird. Mol. Ecol. 27(24), 5137–5153 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Bover, P., Quintana, J. & Alcover, J. A. Three islands, three worlds: Paleogeography and evolution of the vertebrate fauna from the Balearic Islands. Quatern. Int. 182, 135–144 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Pérez-Mellado, V. Les sargantanes de les Balears (Edicions Quaderns de Natura de les Balears, Documenta Balear, 2009).
Google Scholar 
18.Pérez-Mellado, V. et al. Population density in Podarcis lilfordi (Squamata, Lacertidae), a lizard species endemic to small islets in the Balearic Islands (Spain). Amphibia-Reptilia 29(1), 49–60 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Brown, R. P. et al. Bayesian estimation of post-Messinian divergence times in Balearic Island lizards. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 48(1), 350–358 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
20.Terrasa, B. et al. Foundations for conservation of intraspecific genetic diversity revealed by analysis of phylogeographical structure in the endangered endemic lizard Podarcis lilfordi. Divers. Distrib. 15(2), 207–221 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Terrasa, B. et al. Use of NCPA to understanding genetic sub-structuring of Podarcis lilfordi from the Balearic archipelago. Amphibia-Reptilia 30(4), 505–514 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Emig, C. C. & Geistdoerfer, P. The Mediterranean deep-sea fauna: Historical evolution, bathymetric variations and geographical changes. Carnets Geol. https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/3230 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Pérez-Cembranos, A. et al. Morphological and genetic diversity of the Balearic lizard, Podarcis lilfordi (Günther, 1874): Is it relevant to its conservation?. Divers. Distrib. 26, 1122–1141 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Palumbi, S. R. The Evolution Explosion: How Humans Cause Rapid Evolutionary Change (W. W. Norton & Company, 2002).
Google Scholar 
25.Ashley, M. V. et al. Evolutionary enlightened management. Biol. Conserv. 111, 115–123 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Stockwell, C. A., Hendry, A. P. & Kinnison, M. T. Contemporary evolution meets conservation biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 94–101 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Baird, N. A. et al. Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers. PLoS ONE 3(10), e3376 (2008).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
28.Peterson, B. K., Weber, J. N., Kay, E. H., Fisher, H. S. & Hoekstra, H. E. Double digest RADseq: An inexpensive method for de novo SNP discovery and genotyping in model and non-model species. PLoS ONE 7(5), e37135 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
29.Andrews, K. R., Good, J. M., Miller, M. R., Luikart, G. & Hohenlohe, P. A. Harnessing the power of RADseq for ecological and evolutionary genomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17(2), 81 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Brown, R. P., Paterson, S. & Risse, J. Genomic signatures of historical allopatry and ecological divergence in an island lizard. Genome Biol. Evol. 8(11), 3618–3626 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Jin, Y. & Brown, R. P. Morphological species and discordant mtDNA: A genomic analysis of Phrynocephalus lizard lineages on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 139, 106523 (2019).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Yang, W. et al. Spatial variation in gene flow across a hybrid zone reveals causes of reproductive isolation and asymmetric introgression in wall lizards. Evolution 74(7), 1289–1300 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Li, Y. L., Xue, D. X., Zhang, B. D. & Liu, J. X. Population genomic signatures of genetic structure and environmental selection in the catadromous roughskin sculpin Trachidermus fasciatus. Genome Biol. Evol. 11(7), 1751–1764 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Hedrick, P. W. & Kalinowski, S. T. Inbreeding depression in conservation biology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31(1), 139–162 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
35.Willi, Y., Van Buskirk, J. & Hoffmann, A. A. Limits to the adaptive potential of small populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37, 433–458 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
36.Perrier, C., Ferchaud, A. L., Sirois, P., Thibault, I. & Bernatchez, L. Do genetic drift and accumulation of deleterious mutations preclude adaptation? Empirical investigation using RAD seq in a northern lacustrine fish. Mol. Ecol. 26(22), 6317–6335 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Sovic, M., Fries, A., Martin, S. A. & Lisle Gibbs, H. Genetic signatures of small effective population sizes and demographic declines in an endangered rattlesnake, Sistrurus catenatus. Evol. Appl. 12(4), 664–678 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Cao, R. et al. Genetic structure and diversity of Australian freshwater crocodiles (Crocodylus johnstoni) from the Kimberley, Western Australia. Conserv. Genet. 21, 421–429 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Lowe, W. H. & Allendorf, F. W. What can genetics tell us about population connectivity?. Mol. Ecol. 19(15), 3038–3051 (2010).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Ralls, K. et al. Call for a paradigm shift in the genetic management of fragmented populations. Conserv. Lett. 11(2), e12412 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Benestan, L. et al. Seascape genomics provides evidence for thermal adaptation and current-mediated population structure in American lobster (Homarus americanus). Mol. Ecol. 25(20), 5073–5092 (2016).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Campbell-Staton, S. C., Edwards, S. V. & Losos, J. B. Climate mediated adaptation after mainland colonization of an ancestrally subtropical island lizard, Anolis carolinensis. J. Evol. Biol. 29(11), 2168–2180 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
43.Rodríguez, A. et al. Genomic and phenotypic signatures of climate adaptation in an Anolis lizard. Ecol. Evol. 7(16), 6390–6403 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
44.Cooper, W. E., Hawlena, D. & Pérez-Mellado, V. Islet tameness: Escape behavior and refuge use in populations of the Balearic lizard (Podarcis lilfordi) exposed to differing predation pressure. Can. J. Zool. 87(10), 912–919 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
45.Cooper, W. E., Hawlena, D. & Pérez-Mellado, V. Influence of risk on hiding time by Balearic lizards (Podarcis lilfordi): Predator approach speed, directness, persistence, and proximity. Herpetologica 66(2), 131–141 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Cooper, W. E. & Pérez-Mellado, V. Island tameness: Reduced escape responses and morphological and physiological antipredatory adaptations related to escape in lizards. In Islands and Evolution (eds Pérez-Mellado, V. & Ramon, M. M.) 231–253 (Institut Menorquí d’Estudis, 2010).
Google Scholar 
47.Cooper, W. E. & Pérez-Mellado, V. Historical influence of predation pressure on escape by Podarcis lizards in the Balearic Islands. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 107, 254–268 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
48.Mayr, E. Animal Species and Evolution (The Belknap Press, Harvard University Press, 1963).
Google Scholar 
49.Bover, P. et al. Late Miocene/Early Pliocene vertebrate fauna from Mallorca (Balearic Islands, Western Mediterranean): An update. Integr. Zool. 9, 183–196 (2014).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Vervust, B., Grbac, I. & Van Damme, R. Differences in morphology, performance and behaviour between recently diverged populations of Podarcissicula mirror differences in predation pressure. Oikos 116(8), 1343–1352 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
51.Marques, D. A., Jones, F. C., Di Palma, F., Kingsley, D. M. & Reimchen, T. E. Experimental evidence for rapid genomic adaptation to a new niche in an adaptive radiation. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2(7), 1128–1138 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
52.Johannesson, K., Le Moan, A., Perini, S. & André, C. A Darwinian laboratory of multiple contact zones. Trends Ecol. Evol. 35, 1021–1036 (2020).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
53.Stockwell, C. A. & Ashley, M. V. Rapid adaptation and conservation. Conserv. Biol. 18, 272–273 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Truong, H. T. et al. Sequence-based genotyping for marker discovery and co-dominant scoring in germplasm and populations. PLoS ONE 7(5), e37565 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
55.Catchen, J., Hohenlohe, P. A., Bassham, S., Amores, A. & Cresko, W. A. Stacks: An analysis tool set for population genomics. Mol. Ecol. 22(11), 3124–3140 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Danecek, P. et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27(15), 2156–2158 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
57.Goudet, J. & Jombart, T. hierfstat: Estimation and tests of hierarchical F-statistics. R package version 0.5-7. Available from http://github.com/jgx65/hierfstat (2015).58.Alexander, D. H., Novembre, J. & Lange, K. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Res. 19(9), 1655–1664 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
59.Jombart, T. & Ahmed, I. Adegenet 1.3-1: New tools for the analysis of genome-wide SNP data. Bioinformatics 27(21), 3070–3071 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
60.Kumar, S., Stecher, G. & Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33(7), 1870–1874 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
61.Do, C. et al. NeEstimator v2: Re-implementation of software for the estimation of contemporary effective population size (Ne) from genetic data. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 14(1), 209–214 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
62.Sundqvist, L., Keenan, K., Zackrisson, M., Prodöhl, P. & Kleinhans, D. Directional genetic differentiation and relative migration. Ecol. Evol. 6(11), 3461–3475 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
63.Keenan, K., McGinnity, P., Cross, T. F., Crozier, W. W. & Prodöhl, P. A. diveRsity: An R package for the estimation and exploration of population genetics parameters and their associated errors. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4(8), 782–788 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
64.Nei, M. The Theory and Estimation of Genetic Distance. Genetic Structure of Populations 45–54 (University of Hawaii Press, 1973).
Google Scholar 
65.Foll, M. & Gaggiotti, O. A genome-scan method to identify selected loci appropriate for both dominant and codominant markers: A Bayesian perspective. Genetics 180(2), 977–993 (2008).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
66.Frichot, E., Schoville, S. D., Bouchard, G. & François, O. Testing for associations between loci and environmental gradients using latent factor mixed models. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30(7), 1687–1699 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
67.Rellstab, C., Gugerli, F., Eckert, A. J., Hancock, A. M. & Holderegger, R. A practical guide to environmental association analysis in landscape genomics. Mol. Ecol. 24(17), 4348–4370 (2015).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
68.Forester, B. R., Lasky, J. R., Wagner, H. H. & Urban, D. L. Comparing methods for detecting multilocus adaptation with multivariate genotype-environment associations. Mol. Ecol. 27(9), 2215–2233 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
69.Jin, L., Yu, J. P., Yang, Z. J., Merilä, J. & Liao, W. B. Modulation of gene expression in liver of hibernating Asiatic Toads (Bufo gargarizans). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19(8), 2363 (2018).PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
70.Secor, S. M. & Carey, H. V. Integrative physiology of fasting. Compr. Physiol. 6(2), 773–825 (2011).
Google Scholar 
71.Bahudhanapati, H., Bhattacharya, S. & Wei, S. Evolution of vertebrate adam genes; duplication of testicular adams from ancient adam9/9-like loci. PLoS ONE 10(8), e0136281 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
72.Alibardi, L. Immunolocalization of matrix metalloproteinases in regenerating lizard tail suggests that an intense remodelling activity allows for apical tail growth. Acta Zool. 101(2), 124–132 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
73.The UniProt Consortium. UniProt: The universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D158–D169 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
74.Tosini, G., Baba, K., Hwang, C. K. & Iuvone, P. M. Melatonin: An underappreciated player in retinal physiology and pathophysiology. Exp. Eye Res. 103, 82–89 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
75.Voronin, D. A. & Kiseleva, E. V. Functional role of proteins containing ankyrin repeats. Tsitologiia 49(12), 989–999 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
76.Yang, L. et al. Transcriptome analysis and identification of genes associated with chicken sperm storage duration. Poult. Sci. 99(2), 1199–1208 (2020).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
77.Geng, X. et al. Proteomic analysis of the skin of Chinese giant salamander (Andrias davidianus). J. Proteomics 119, 196–208 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
78.Subramaniam, N., Petrik, J. J. & Vickaryous, M. K. VEGF, FGF-2 and TGF β expression in the normal and regenerating epidermis of geckos: Implications for epidermal homeostasis and wound healing in reptiles. J. Anat. 232(5), 768–782 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
79.Pillai, A., Desai, I. & Balakrishnan, S. Pharmacological inhibition of FGFR1 signaling attenuates the progression of tail regeneration in the northern house gecko Hemidactylus flaviviridis. Int. J. Life Sci. Biotechnol. Pharma Res. 2, 263–278 (2013).
Google Scholar 
80.Schoettl, T., Fischer, I. P. & Ussar, S. Heterogeneity of adipose tissue in development and metabolic function. J. Exp. Biol. 221, jeb162958 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
81.Wang, X. et al. Identification of a novel 43-bp insertion in the heparan sulfate 6-O-sulfotransferase 3 (HS6ST3) gene and its associations with growth and carcass traits in chickens. Anim. Biotechnol. 30(3), 252–259 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
82.Sun, C. et al. Genome-wide association study revealed a promising region and candidate genes for eggshell quality in an F2 resource population. BMC Genomics 16(1), 565 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
83.Ng, C. S. et al. Transcriptomic analyses of regenerating adult feathers in chicken. BMC Genomics 16(1), 756 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
84.Qu, Y. et al. Ground tit genome reveals avian adaptation to living at high altitudes in the Tibetan plateau. Nat. Commun. 4(1), 1–9 (2013).
Google Scholar 
85.Fischer, I., Kosik, K. S. & Sapirstein, V. S. Heterogeneity of microtubule-associated protein (MAP2) in vertebrate brains. Brain Res. 436(1), 39–48 (1987).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
86.Singchat, W. et al. Chromosome map of the Siamese cobra: Did partial synteny of sex chromosomes in the amniote represent “a hypothetical ancestral super-sex chromosome” or random distribution?. BMC Genomics 19(1), 939 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
87.Tosches, M. A. et al. Evolution of pallium, hippocampus, and cortical cell types revealed by single-cell transcriptomics in reptiles. Science 360(6391), 881–888 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
88.Vitulo, N., Dalla Valle, L., Skobo, T., Valle, G. & Alibardi, L. Transcriptome analysis of the regenerating tail vs. the scarring limb in lizard reveals pathways leading to successful vs. unsuccessful organ regeneration in amniotes. Dev. Dyn. 246(2), 116–134 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
89.Carobbio, S., Guénantin, A. C., Samuelson, I., Bahri, M. & Vidal-Puig, A. Brown and beige fat: From molecules to physiology and pathophysiology. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 1864(1), 37–50 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

1.Castellano, M. A., Trappe, J. M. & Luoma, D. L. Sequestrate fungi. in Biodiversity of Fungi (ed. Mueller, G.M., Bills, G.F., Foster, M.S.) 197–213 (Elsevier, 2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012509551-8/50013-1.2.Benucci, G. M. N., Bonito, G., Falini, L. B. & Bencivenga, M. Mycorrhization of Pecan trees (Carya illinoinensis) with commercial truffle species: Tuber aestivum Vittad. and Tuber borchii Vittad. Mycorrhiza 22, 383–392 (2012).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
3.Bonito, G. M., Gryganskyi, A. P., Trappe, J. M. & Vilgalys, R. A global meta-analysis of Tuber ITS rDNA sequences: Species diversity, host associations and long-distance dispersal. Mol. Ecol. 19, 4994–5008 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
4.Kirk, P. M., Cannon, P. F., Stalpers, J. & Minter, D. W. Dictionary of the Fungi 10th ed. 1–784 (CABI, 2008).5.Splivallo, R., Novero, M., Bertea, C. M., Bossi, S. & Bonfante, P. Truffle volatiles inhibit growth and induce an oxidative burst in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02141.x (2007).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
6.Benucci, G. M. N., Bonito, G., Falini, L. B., Bencivenga, M. & Donnini, D. Truffles, timber, food, and fuel: Sustainable approaches for multi-cropping truffles and economically important plants. In Edible Ectomycorrhizal Mushrooms. Soil Biology Vol. 34 (eds Zambonelli, A. & Bonito, G.) 265–280 (Springer, 2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33823-6_15.
Google Scholar 
7.Strojnik, L., Grebenc, T. & Ogrinc, N. Species and geographic variability in truffle aromas. Food Chem. Toxicol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2020.111434 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
8.Bonet, J. A. et al. Cultivation methods of the Black Truffle, the most profitable Mediterranean non-wood forest product; a state of the artreview. EFI Proc. 57, 57–71 (2009).
Google Scholar 
9.Rinaldi, A. C., Comandini, O. & Kuyper, T. W. Ectomycorrhizal fungal diversity: Separating the wheat from the chaff. Fungal Divers. 33, 1–45 (2008).
Google Scholar 
10.Ori, F. et al. Synthesis and ultrastructural observation of arbutoid mycorrhizae of black truffles (Tuber melanosporum and T. aestivum). Mycorrhiza 30(6), 715–723 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-020-00985-5.Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
11.Schneider-Maunoury, L. et al. Two ectomycorrhizal truffles, Tuber melanosporum and T. aestivum, endophytically colonise roots of non-ectomycorrhizal plants in natural environments. New Phytol. 225, 2542–2556 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
12.Mello, A., Murat, C., Vizzini, A., Gavazza, V. & Bonfante, P. Tuber magnatum Pico, a species of limited geographical distribution: Its genetic diversity inside and outside a truffle ground. Environ. Microbiol. 7, 55–65 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
13.Hall, I., Brown, G. T. & Zambonelli, A. Taming the Truffle (The History, Lore, and Science of the Ultimate Mushroom) (Timber Press, 2007).
Google Scholar 
14.Shamekh, S., Grebenc, T., Leisola, M. & Turunen, O. The cultivation of oak seedlings inoculated with Tuber aestivum Vittad. in the boreal region of Finland. Mycol. Prog. 13, 373–380 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Kinoshita, A., Obase, K. & Yamanaka, T. Ectomycorrhizae formed by three Japanese truffle species (Tuber japonicum, T. longispinosum, and T. himalayense) on indigenous oak and pine species. Mycorrhiza 28, 679–690 (2018).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
16.Sulzbacher, M. A. et al. Fungos ectomicorrízicos em plantações de nogueira-pecã e o potencial da truficultura no Brasil. Ciência Florest. 29, 975 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Grupe, A. C. et al. Tuber brennemanii and Tuber floridanum: Two new Tuber species are among the most commonly detected ectomycorrhizal taxa within commercial pecan (Carya illinoinensis) orchards. Mycologia 110, 780–790 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
18.Chevalier, G. & Frochot, H. La Truffe de Bourgogne (Tuber unicatum Chatin) (Editions Petrarque, 2002). https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/5669.
Google Scholar 
19.Donnini, D., Benucci, G. M. N., Bencivenga, M. & Baciarelli-Falini, L. Quality assessment of truffle-inoculated seedlings in Italy: proposing revised parameters for certification. For. Syst. 23, 385 (2014).
Google Scholar 
20.Reyna, S. & Garcia-Barreda, S. Black truffle cultivation: A global reality. For. Syst. 23, 317 (2014).
Google Scholar 
21.Wedén, C., Pettersson, L. & Danell, E. Truffle cultivation in Sweden: Results from Quercus robur and Corylus avellana field trials on the island of Gotland. Scand. J. For. Res. 24, 37–53 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Iotti, M. et al. Development and validation of a real-time PCR assay for detection and quantification of Tuber magnatum in soil. BMC Microbiol. 12, 93 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Freiberg, J.A., Sulzbacher, M.A., Santana, N.A., Fronza, D., Giachini, A., Grebenc, T., Jacques, R., A. Z. Mycorrhization of pecans with European truffles (Tuber spp., Tuberaceae) under southern subtropical conditions. Appl. Soil Ecol. (2021).24.Paolocci, F., Rubini, A., Riccioni, C. & Arcioni, S. Reevaluation of the life cycle of Tuber magnatum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.72.4.2390-2393.2006 (2006).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
25.Healy, R. A. et al. High diversity and widespread occurrence of mitotic spore mats in ectomycorrhizal Pezizales. Mol. Ecol. 22(6), 1717–1732. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.12135 (2013).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
26.Pattinson, G. S., Smith, S. E. & Doube, B. M. Earthworm Aporrectodea trapezoides had no effect on the dispersal of a vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Glomus intraradices. Soil Biol. Biochem. 29, 1079–1088 (1997).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Gange, A. C. Translocation of mycorrhizal fungi by earthworms during early succession. Soil Biol. Biochem. 25, 1021–1026 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Milleret, R., Le Bayon, R. C. & Gobat, J. M. Root, mycorrhiza and earthworm interactions: Their effects on soil structuring processes, plant and soil nutrient concentration and plant biomass. Plant Soil https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9753-7 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Gormsen, D., Olsson, P. A. & Hedlund, K. The influence of collembolans and earthworms on AM fungal mycelium. Appl. Soil Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2004.06.001 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Wurst, S., Dugassa-Gobena, D., Langel, R., Bonkowski, M. & Scheu, S. Combined effects of earthworms and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas on plant and aphid performance. New Phytol. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01106.x (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Eisenhauer, N. et al. Impacts of earthworms and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomus intraradices) on plant performance are not interrelated. Soil Biol. Biochem. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.12.017 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Stobbe, U. et al. Potential and limitations of Burgundy truffle cultivation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 97, 5215–5224 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
33.Jeandroz, S., Murat, C., Wang, Y., Bonfante, P. & Le Tacon, F. Molecular phylogeny and historical biogeography of the genus Tuber, the ‘true truffles’. J. Biogeogr. 35, 815–829 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Gardin, L. I tartufi minori in Toscana. Gli ambienti di crescita dei tartufi marzuolo e scorze (ARSIA, 2005).
Google Scholar 
35.Pampanini, R., Marchini, A. & Diotallevi, F. Il mercato del tartufo fresco in Italia tra performance commerciali e vincoli allo sviluppo: il contributo delle regioni italiane. Econ. Agro-Alimentare 18, 11–28 (2012).
Google Scholar 
36.Wolf, H. EUFORGEN technical guidelines for genetic conservation and use for silver fir (Abies alba). Int. Plant Genet. Resour. Inst. Rome Italy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2010.08.025 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Comandini, O., Pacioni, G. & Rinaldi, A. C. Fungi in ectomycorrhizal associations of silver fir (Abies alba Miller) in Central Italy. Mycorrhiza 7, 323–328 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Ważny, R. Ectomycorrhizal communities associated with silver fir seedlings (Abies alba Mill.) differ largely in mature silver fir stands and in Scots pine forecrops. Ann. For. Sci. 71, 801–810 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Ważny, R. & Kowalski, S. Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities of silver-fir seedlings regenerating in fir stands and larch forecrops. Trees Struct. Funct. 31, 929–939 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
40.Rudawska, M., Pietras, M., Smutek, I., Strzeliński, P. & Leski, T. Ectomycorrhizal fungal assemblages of Abies alba Mill. outside its native range in Poland. Mycorrhiza 26, 57–65 (2016).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
41.Iotti, M., Piattoni, F. & Zambonelli, A. Techniques for host plant inoculation with truffles and other edible ectomycorrhizal mushrooms. in Edible Ectomycorrhizal Mushrooms (eds. Zambonelli, A., Bonito, G.M.) 145–161 (Springer, 2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33823-6_942.Finér, L. et al. Variation in fine root biomass of three European tree species: Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.), and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Plant Biosyst. Int. J. Deal. Asp. Plant Biol. 141, 394–405 (2007).
Google Scholar 
43.Železnik, P. et al. CASIROZ: Root parameters and types of ectomycorrhiza of young beech plants exposed to different ozone and light regimes. Plant Biol. 9, 298–308 (2007).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
44.Agerer, R. Colour Atlas of Ectomycorrhizae (Einhorn-Verlag, 1987).
Google Scholar 
45.Agerer, R. Characterization of ectomycorrhiza. Methods Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0580-9517(08)70172-7 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Agerer, R. & Rambold, G. 2004–2018 [first posted on 2004–06–01; most recent update: 2011-01-10]. DEEMY—An Information System for Characterization and Determination of Ectomycorrhizae. München, Germany (2004).47.Fischer, C. & Colinas, C. Methology for certification of Quercus ilex seedlings inoculated with Tuber melanosporum for commercial application. in First International Conference on Mycorrhiza (1996).48.Reyna, S., Boronat, J. & Palomar, E. Quality control of plants mycorrhized with Tuber melanosporum Vitt. edible mycorrhizal mushrooms and their cultivation. Proc. Second Int. Conf. Edible Mycorrhizal Mushrooms, Crop Food Res. Christchurch 1–9 (eds. Wang Y., Danell, E., Zambonelli, A.) CD-ROM (New Zealand Institute for Crop & Food Research Limited, Christchurch, 2002).49.White, T. J., Bruns, T., Lee, S. & Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. in PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications (eds. Innis, M.A., Gelfond, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J.) 315–322 (Academic Press, Inc., 1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1.50.Gardes, M. & Bruns, T. D. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes—Application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol. Ecol. 2, 113–118 (1993).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
51.Bertini, L. A new pair of primers designed for amplification of the ITS region in Tuber species. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 173, 239–245 (1999).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
52.Grebenc, T. & Kraigher, H. Changes in the community of ectomycorrhizal fungi and increased fine root number under adult beech trees chronically fumigated with double ambient ozone concentration. Plant Biol. 9, 279–287 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
53.Kearse, M. et al. Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28, 1647–1649 (2012).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Team, R. C. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (2016).55.KothariI, S. K., Marschner, H. & George, E. Effect of VA mycorrhizal fungi and rhizosphere microorganisms on root and shoot morphology, growth and water relations in maize. New Phytol. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1990.tb04718.x (1990).Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Ludwig-Müller, J. Hormonal responses in host plants triggered by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Arbuscular Mycorrhizas Physiol. Funct. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9489-6_8 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
57.Hanlon, M. T. & Coenen, C. Genetic evidence for auxin involvement in arbuscular mycorrhiza initiation. New Phytol. 189, 701–709 (2011).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
58.Sukumar, P. et al. Involvement of auxin pathways in modulating root architecture during beneficial plant-microorganism interactions. Plant. Cell Environ. 36, 909–919 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
59.Maherali, H. Is there an association between root architecture and mycorrhizal growth response?. New Phytol. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12927 (2014).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
60.Chen, W. et al. Root morphology and mycorrhizal symbioses together shape nutrient foraging strategies of temperate trees. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113, 8741–8746 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
61.Syers, J. K. & Springett, J. A. Earthworms and soil fertility. Plant Soil 76, 93–104 (1984).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
62.Mamoun, M. & Oliver, J. M. Mycorrhizal inoculation of cloned hazels by Tuber melanosporum: Effect of soil disinfestation and co-culture with Festuca ovina. Plant Soil 188, 221–262 (1997).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
63.Santelices, R. & Palfner, G. Controlled rhizogenesis and mycorrhization of hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) cuttings with Black truffle (Tuber melanosporum Vitt.). Chil. J. Agric. Res. 70, 204–212 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
64.Martin, F. M. & Hilbert, J. L. Morphological, biochemical and molecular changes during ectomycorrhiza development. Experientia 47, 321–331 (1991).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
65.Zaller, J. G. et al. Earthworm-mycorrhiza interactions can affect the diversity, structure and functioning of establishing model grassland communities. PLoS ONE 6, e29293 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
66.Robakowski, P., Wyka, T., Samardakiewicz, S. & Kierzkowski, D. Growth, photosynthesis, and needle structure of silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) seedlings under different canopies. For. Ecol. Manage. 201, 211–227 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
67.Mrak, T. & Gričar, J. Atlas of Woody Plant Roots: Morphology and Anatomy with Special Emphasis on Fine Roots (Slovenian Forestry Institute, The Silva Slovenica Publishing Centre, 2016). https://doi.org/10.20315/SFS.147.
Google Scholar 
68.Montecchi, A. & Sarasini, M. Funghi ipogei d’Europa. Vicenza: Fondazione Centro Studi (Micologica dell” A.M.B., 2000).
Google Scholar 
69.Benucci, G. M. N. et al. Ectomycorrhizal communities in a productive Tuber aestivum Vittad. orchard: Composition, host influence and species replacement. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 76, 170–184 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
70.Marjanović, Ž, Grebenc, T., Marković, M., Glišić, A. & Milenković, M. Ecological specificities and molecular diversity of truffles (genus Tuber) originating from mid-west of the Balkan Peninsula. Sydowia 1, 273–291 (2010).
Google Scholar 
71.Grebenc, T., Bajc, M. & Kraigher, H. Post-glacial migrations of mycorrhizal plants and ectomycorrhizal partners: An example of the genus Tuber. Les 62, 149–154 (2010).
Google Scholar 
72.Chavdarova, S., Kajevska, I. K. R., Grebenc, T. & Karadelev, M. Distribution and ecology of hypogenous fungi (excluding Tuber) in the Republic of Macedonia. Biol. Maced. 62, 37–48 (2011).
Google Scholar 
73.Milenković, M., Grebenc, T., Marković, M. & Ivančević, B. Tuber petrophilum, a new truffle species from Serbia. Mycotaxon 130, 1141–1152 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
74.Brown, G. G., Edwards, C. A. & Brussaard, L. How earthworms affect plant growth: Burrowing into the mechanisms. in Earthworm Ecology (ed. Edwards, C.A.) 13–49 (Boca Raton : CRC Press, 2004). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420039719.75.Pattinson, G. S. Trapezoides had no effect on the dispersal of a Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi. Can. J. Bot. 29, 1079–1088 (1997).CAS 

Google Scholar 
76.Lawrence, B., Fisk, M. C., Fahey, T. J. & Suarez, E. R. Influence of nonnative earthworms on mycorrhizal colonization of sugar maple (Acer saccharum). New Phytol. 157, 145–153 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
77.Ortiz-Ceballos, A. I., Peña-Cabriales, J. J., Fragoso, C. & Brown, G. G. Mycorrhizal colonization and nitrogen uptake by maize: Combined effect of tropical earthworms and velvetbean mulch. Biol. Fertil. Soils 44, 181–186 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
78.Reddell, P. & Spain, A. V. Earthworms as vectors of viable propagules of mycorrhizal fungi. Soil Biol. Biochem. 23, 767–774 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar  More

1.Fischer, J. & Lindenmayer, D. B. Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: A synthesis. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 16, 265–280 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
2.McKinney, M. L. Effects of urbanization on species richness: A review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosyst. 11, 161–176 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
3.McDonnell, M. J. & MacGregor-Fors, I. The ecological future of cities. Science 352, 936–938 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
4.McKinney, M. L. Urbanizartion, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience 52, 883–890 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Santos, M. N. Research on urban ants: Approaches and gaps. Insectes Soc. 63, 359–371 (2016).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
6.Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E. O. The Ants (Harvard University Press, Harvard, 1990).
Google Scholar 
7.Angilletta, M. J. et al. Urban physiology: City ants possess high heat yolerance. PLoS ONE 2, e258 (2007).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
8.Holway, D. A., Lach, L., Suarez, A. V., Tsutsui, N. D. & Case, T. J. The causes and consequences of ant invasions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33, 181–233 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
9.McIntyre, N. E., Rango, J., Fagan, W. F. & Faeth, S. H. Ground arthropod community structure in a heterogeneous urban environment. Landsc. Urban Plan. 52, 257–274 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Lessard, J. P. & Buddle, C. M. The effects of urbanization on ant assemblages (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) associated with the Molson Nature Reserve Quebec. Can. Entomol. 137, 215–225 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Buczkowski, G. & Richmond, D. S. The effect of urbanization on ant abundance and diversity: A temporal examination of factors affecting biodiversity. PLoS ONE 7, e41729 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
12.McKinney, M. L. Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol. Conserv. 127, 247–260 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Morini, M. S. C., Munhae, C. B., Leung, R., Candiani, D. F. & Voltolini, J. C. Comunidades de formigas (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) em fragmentos de Mata Atlântica situados em áreas urbanizadas. Iheringia 97, 246–252 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
14.MacGregor-Fors, I. & Schondube, J. E. Gray vs. green urbanization: Relative importance of urban features for urban bird communities. Basic Appl. Ecol. 12, 372–381 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Uno, S., Cotton, J. & Philpott, S. M. Diversity, abundance, and species composition of ants in urban green spaces. Urban Ecosyst. 13, 425–441 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Rocha-Ortega, M. & Castaño-Meneses, G. Effects of urbanization on the diversity of ant assemblages in tropical dry forests, Mexico. Urban Ecosyst. 18, 1373–1388 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Sol, D., Lapiedra, O. & González-Lagos, C. Behavioural adjustments for a life in the city. Anim. Behav. 85, 1101–1112 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Fellers, J. H. Interference and exploitation in a guild of woodland ants. Ecology 68, 1466–1478 (1987).Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Parr, C. L. & Gibb, H. The discovery–dominance trade-off is the exception, rather than the rule. J. Anim. Ecol. 81, 233–241 (2012).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Davidson, D. W. Resource discovery versus resource domination in ants: A functional mechanism for breaking the trade-off. Ecol. Entomol. 23, 484–490 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Camarota, F., Vasconcelos, H. L., Koch, E. B. & Powell, S. Discovery and defense define the social foraging strategy of Neotropical arboreal ants. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 72, id110 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Parr, C. L. & Gibb, H. Competition and the role of dominant ants. In Book: Ant Ecology (eds Lach, L. et al.) 77–96 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2010).
Google Scholar 
23.Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática (INEGI). Compendio de Información Geográfica Municipal. http://www.inegi.org.mx/geo/contenidos/topografia/compendio.aspx. (2009).24.Falfán, I., Muñoz-Robles, C. A., Bonilla-Moheno, M. & MacGregor-Fors, I. Can you really see ‘green’? Assessing physical and self-reported measurements of urban greenery. Urban For. Urban Green. 36, 13–21 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
25.Davidson, D. W. The role of resource imbalances in the evolutionary ecology of tropical arboreal ants. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 61, 153–181 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Flores-Flores, R. V. et al. Food source quality and ant dominance hierarchy influence the outcomes of ant-plant interactions in an arid environment. Acta Oecol. 87, 13–19 (2018).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
27.Wittman, S. E., O’Dowd, D. J. & Green, P. T. Carbohydrate supply drives colony size, aggression, and impacts of an invasive ant. Ecosphere 9, e02403 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
28.O’Dowd, D. J., Green, P. T. & Lake, P. S. Invasional ‘meltdown’ on an oceanic island. Ecol. Lett. 6, 812–817 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Abbott, K. L. & Green, P. T. Collapse of an ant–scale mutualism in a rainforest on Christmas Island. Oikos 116, 1238–1246 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Dáttilo, W. et al. Mexico ants: Incidence and abundance along the Nearctic-Neotropical interface. Ecology 101, e02944 (2020).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
31.MacGregor-Fors, I. Misconceptions or misunderstandings? On the standardization of basic terms and definitions in urban ecology. Landsc. Urban Plan. 100, 347–349 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Oksanen, J. et al. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. (2017).33.Dáttilo, W., Díaz-Castelazo, C. & Rico-Gray, V. Ant dominance hierarchy determines the nested pattern in ant–plant networks. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 113, 405–414 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
34.R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2018).35.Yamaguchi, T. Influence of urbanization on ant distribution in parks of Tokyo and Chiba City, Japan I. Analysis of ant species richness. Ecol. Res. 19, 209–216 (2004).36.Pacheco, R. & Vasconcelos, H. L. Invertebrate conservation in urban areas: Ants in the Brazilian Cerrado. Landsc. Urban Plan. 81, 193–199 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Dáttilo, W., Sibinel, N., Falcão, J. C. F. & Nunes, R. V. Mirmecofauna em um fragmento de Floresta Atlântica urbana no município de Marília, Brasil. Biosci. J. 27, 494–504 (2011).
Google Scholar 
38.Thompson, B. & McLachlan, S. The effects of urbanization on ant communities and myrmecochory in Manitoba, Canada. Urban Ecosyst. 10, 43–52 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Ribeiro, F. M., Sibinel, N., Ciocheti, G. & Campos, A. E. C. Analysis of ant communities comparing two methods for sampling ants in an urban park in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Sociobiology 59, 971–984 (2012).
Google Scholar 
40.Sanford, M. P., Manley, P. N. & Murphy, D. D. Effects of urban development on ant communities: Implications for ecosystem services and management. Conserv. Biol. 23, 131–141 (2009).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Holway, D. A. & Suarez, A. V. Homogenization of ant communities in mediterranean California: The effects of urbanization and invasion. Biol. Conserv. 127, 319–326 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Albrecht, M. & Gotelli, N. J. Spatial and temporal niche partitioning in grassland ants. Oecologia 126, 134–141 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
43.Campos, R. B. & Schoereder, J. H. Dominance and resource temporal partitioning in pasture ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 38, 539–550 (2001).
Google Scholar 
44.Santini, G., Tucci, L., Ottonetti, L. & Frizzi, F. Competition trade-offs in the organisation of a Mediterranean ant assemblage. Ecol. Entomol. 32, 319–326 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
45.MacGregor-Fors, I. et al. Multi-taxonomic diversity patterns in a neotropical green city: A rapid biological assessment. Urban Ecosyst. 18, 633–647 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Wetterer, J. K. Worldwide spread of the longhorn crazy ant, Paratrechina longicornis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol. News 11, 137–149 (2008).
Google Scholar 
47.Wetterer, J. K. Worldwide spread of the tropical fire ant, Solenopsis geminata (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol. News 14, 21–35 (2011).
Google Scholar  More

Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador, CanadaK. K. S. Layton & P. V. R. SnelgroveFisheries and Oceans Canada, St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador, CanadaK. K. S. Layton, J. B. Dempson, T. Kess, S. J. Lehnert, S. J. Duffy, A. M. Messmer, R. R. E. Stanley, C. DiBacco & I. R. BradburyUniversity of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UKK. K. S. LaytonDalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, CanadaP. Bentzen, S. J. Salisbury & D. E. RuzzanteUniversity of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, CanadaC. M. Nugent & M. M. FergusonUniversity of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, CanadaJ. S. Leong & B. F. Koop More