A global horizon scan of the future impacts of robotics and autonomous systems on urban ecosystems
1.
Schwab, K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution (Penguin, 2017).
2.
Marvin, S., White, A., Kovacic, M., Lockhart, A. & Macrorie, R. Urban Robotics and Automation: Critical Challenges, International Experiments and Transferable Lessons for the UK UK-RAS White Paper (UK-RAS Network, 2018).
3.
Salvini, P. Urban robotics: towards responsible innovations for our cities. Rob. Autom. Syst. 100, 278–286 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
4.
Vougioukas, S. G. Agricultural robotics. Annu. Rev. Control Robot. Auton. Syst. 2, 365–392 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
5.
Allan, B. M. et al. Futurecasting ecological research: the rise of technoecology. Ecosphere 9, e02163 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
6.
Hodgson, J. C. et al. Drones count wildlife more accurately and precisely than humans. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 1160–1167 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
7.
Dash, J. P., Watt, M. S., Paul, T. S. H., Morgenroth, J. & Hartley, R. Taking a closer look at invasive alien plant research: a review of the current state, opportunities, and future directions for UAVs. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 2020–2033 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
8.
Global Autonomous Robot Market—Industry Trends and Forecast to 2026 (Data Bridge Market Research, 2019).
9.
Seto, K. C., Güneralp, B. & Hutyra, L. R. Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 16083–16088 (2012).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
10.
Johnson, M. T. J. & Munshi-South, J. Evolution of life in urban environments. Science 358, eaam8327 (2017).
PubMed Article CAS Google Scholar
11.
Du Toit, M. J. et al. Urban green infrastructure and ecosystem services in sub-Saharan Africa. Landsc. Urban Plan. 180, 249–261 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
12.
Nitoslawski, S. A., Galle, N. J., van den Bosch, C. K. & Steenberg, J. W. N. Smarter ecosystems for smarter cities? A review of trends, technologies, and turning points for smart urban forestry. Sustain. Cities Soc. 51, 101770 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
13.
Gulsrud, N. M. et al. ‘Rage against the machine’? The opportunities and risks concerning the automation of urban green infrastructure. Landsc. Urban Plan. 180, 85–92 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
14.
Bibri, S. E. & Krogstie, J. Smart sustainable cities of the future: an extensive interdisciplinary literature review. Sustain. Cities Soc. 31, 183–212 (2017).
Article Google Scholar
15.
Colding, J. & Barthel, S. An urban ecology critique on the “Smart City” model. J. Clean. Prod. 164, 95–101 (2017).
Article Google Scholar
16.
Martin, C. J., Evans, J. & Karvonen, A. Smart and sustainable? Five tensions in the visions and practices of the smart-sustainable city in Europe and North America. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 133, 269–278 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
17.
Cantrell, B., Martin, L. J. & Ellis, E. C. Designing autonomy: opportunities for new wildness in the Anthropocene. Trends Ecol. Evol. 32, 156–166 (2017).
PubMed Article Google Scholar
18.
Luvisi, A. & Lorenzini, G. RFID-plants in the smart city: applications and outlook for urban green management. Urban For. Urban Green. 13, 630–637 (2014).
Article Google Scholar
19.
Kahila-Tani, M., Broberg, A., Kyttä, M. & Tyger, T. Let the citizens map—public participation GIS as a planning support system in the Helsinki master plan process. Plan. Pract. Res. 31, 195–214 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
20.
McPhearson, T. et al. Advancing urban ecology toward a science of cities. BioScience 66, 198–212 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
21.
Ives, C. D. et al. Cities are hotspots for threatened species. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 25, 117–126 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
22.
Gomez-Baggethun, E. & Barton, D. N. Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecol. Econ. 86, 235–245 (2013).
Article Google Scholar
23.
Sutherland, W. J. et al. A horizon scan of emerging issues for global conservation in 2019. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 83–94 (2019).
PubMed Article Google Scholar
24.
Mukherjee, N. et al. The Delphi technique in ecology and biological conservation: applications and guidelines. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 1097–1109 (2015).
Article Google Scholar
25.
Stanley, M. C. et al. Emerging threats in urban ecosystems: a horizon scanning exercise. Front. Ecol. Environ. 13, 553–560 (2015).
Article Google Scholar
26.
Sandbrook, C., Fisher, J. A., Holmes, G., Luque-Lora, R. & Keane, A. The global conservation movement is diverse but not divided. Nat. Sustain. 2, 316–323 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
27.
MacGregor-Fors, I. & Escobar-Ibáñez, J. F. Avian Ecology in Latin American Cityscapes (Springer, 2017).
28.
Dobbs, C. et al. Urban ecosystem services in Latin America: mismatch between global concepts and regional realities? Urban Ecosyst. 22, 173–187 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
29.
Cunningham, M. L., Regan, M. A., Horberry, T., Weeratunga, K. & Dixit, V. Public opinion about automated vehicles in Australia: results from a large-scale national survey. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 129, 1–18 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
30.
Kaur, K. & Rampersad, G. Trust in driverless cars: investigating key factors influencing the adoption of driverless cars. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 48, 87–96 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
31.
Artmann, M., Kohler, M., Meinel, G., Gan, J. & Ioja, I. C. How smart growth and green infrastructure can mutually support each other—a conceptual framework for compact and green cities. Ecol. Indic. 96, 10–22 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
32.
Aronson, M. F. J. et al. A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 281, 20133330 (2014).
Article Google Scholar
33.
Haaland, C. & van den Bosch, C. K. Challenges and strategies for urban green-space planning in cities undergoing densification: a review. Urban For. Urban Green. 14, 760–771 (2015).
Article Google Scholar
34.
Papa, E. & Ferreira, A. Sustainable accessibility and the implementation of automated vehicles: identifying critical decisions. Urban Sci. 2, 5 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
35.
Stead, D. & Vaddadi, B. Automated vehicles and how they may affect urban form: a review of recent scenario studies. Cities 92, 125–133 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
36.
Duarte, F. & Ratti, C.The impact of autonomous vehicles on cities: a review;. J. Urban Technol. 25, 3–18 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
37.
Fagnant, D. J. & Kockelman, K. Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 77, 167–181 (2015).
Article Google Scholar
38.
Narayanan, S., Chaniotakis, E. & Antoniou, C. Shared autonomous vehicle services: a comprehensive review. Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol. 111, 255–293 (2020).
Article Google Scholar
39.
Heinrichs, D. in Autonomous Driving: Technical, Legal and Social Aspects (eds Maurer, M. et al.) 213–231 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2016).
40.
Soteropoulos, A., Berger, M. & Ciari, F. Impacts of automated vehicles on travel behaviour and land use: an international review of modelling studies. Transp. Rev. 39, 29–49 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
41.
Meyer, J., Becker, H., Bosch, P. M. & Axhausen, K. W. Autonomous vehicles: the next jump in accessibilities? Res. Transp. Econ. 62, 80–91 (2017).
Article Google Scholar
42.
Hawkins, J. & Habib, K. N. Integrated models of land use and transportation for the autonomous vehicle revolution. Transp. Rev. 39, 66–83 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
43.
Dupras, J. et al. The impacts of urban sprawl on ecological connectivity in the Montreal Metropolitan Region. Environ. Sci. Policy 58, 61–73 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
44.
Loeb, B., Kockelman, K. M. & Liu, J. Shared autonomous electric vehicle (SAEV) operations across the Austin, Texas network with charging infrastructure decisions. Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol. 89, 222–233 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
45.
Samonte, M. J. C. et al. PHYTO: An IoT Urban Gardening Mobile App (Association for Computing Machinery, 2019).
46.
Canales-Ide, F., Zubelzu, S. & Rodriguez-Sinobas, L. Irrigation systems in smart cities coping with water scarcity: the case of Valdebebas, Madrid (Spain). J. Environ. Manag. 247, 187–195 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
47.
Kolokotsa, D. Smart cooling systems for the urban environment. Using renewable technologies to face the urban climate change. Sol. Energy 154, 101–111 (2017).
Article Google Scholar
48.
Taufik, T. & Hasanah, R. N. Light sensing smart blinds. In 2018 Electrical Power, Electronics, Communications, Controls and Informatics Seminar (EECCIS) 1–4 (IEEE, 2018); https://doi.org/10.1109/EECCIS.2018.8692805
49.
Kendal, D. et al. A global comparison of the climatic niches of urban and native tree populations. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27, 629–637 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
50.
Wheeler, M. M. et al. Continental-scale homogenization of residential lawn plant communities. Landsc. Urban Plan. 165, 54–63 (2017).
Article Google Scholar
51.
Aronson, M. F. J. et al. Biodiversity in the city: key challenges for urban green space management. Front. Ecol. Environ. 15, 189–196 (2017).
Article Google Scholar
52.
Lam, T. L. & Xu, Y. S. Climbing strategy for a flexible tree climbing robot—treebot. IEEE Trans. Rob. 27, 1107–1117 (2011).
Article Google Scholar
53.
Dallimer, M., Tang, Z. Y., Gaston, K. J. & Davies, Z. G. The extent of shifts in vegetation phenology between rural and urban areas within a human-dominated region. Ecol. Evol. 6, 1942–1953 (2016).
PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
54.
Latli, A., Michel, L. N., Lepoint, G. & Kestemont, P. River habitat homogenisation enhances trophic competition and promotes individual specialisation among young of the year fish. Freshw. Biol. 64, 520–531 (2019).
CAS Article Google Scholar
55.
Shaw, L. M., Chamberlain, D. & Evans, M. The house sparrow Passer domesticus in urban areas: reviewing a possible link between post-decline distribution and human socioeconomic status. J. Ornithol. 149, 293–299 (2008).
Article Google Scholar
56.
Ferguson, M., Roberts, H. E., McEachan, R. R. C. & Dallimer, M. Contrasting distributions of urban green infrastructure across social and ethno-racial groups. Landsc. Urban Plan. 175, 136–148 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
57.
Leong, M., Dunn, R. R. & Trautwein, M. D.Biodiversity and socioeconomics in the city: a review of the luxury effect. Biol. Lett. 14, 20180082 (2018).
PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
58.
Nesbitt, L., Meitner, M. J., Girling, C., Sheppard, S. R. J. & Lu, Y. H. Who has access to urban vegetation? A spatial analysis of distributional green equity in 10 US cities. Landsc. Urban Plan. 181, 51–79 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
59.
Hajat, A., Hsia, C. & O’Neill, M. S. Socioeconomic disparities and air pollution exposure: a global review. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2, 440–450 (2015).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
60.
Pope, R., Wu, J. & Boone, C. Spatial patterns of air pollutants and social groups: a distributive environmental justice study in the Phoenix metropolitan region of USA. Environ. Manag. 58, 753–766 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
61.
Jenerette, G. D. et al. Regional relationships between surface temperature, vegetation, and human settlement in a rapidly urbanizing ecosystem. Landsc. Ecol. 22, 353–365 (2007).
Article Google Scholar
62.
Frumkin, H. et al. Nature contact and human health: a research agenda. Environ. Health Perspect. 125, 075001 (2017).
PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
63.
Rafael, S. et al. Autonomous vehicles opportunities for cities air quality. Sci. Total Environ. 712, 136546 (2020).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
64.
Stern, R. E. et al. Quantifying air quality benefits resulting from few autonomous vehicles stabilizing traffic. Transp. Res. D Transp. Environ. 67, 351–365 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
65.
Twohig-Bennett, C. & Jones, A. The health benefits of the great outdoors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of greenspace exposure and health outcomes. Environ. Res. 166, 628–637 (2018).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
66.
Thompson Coon, J. et al. Does participating in physical activity in outdoor natural environments have a greater effect on physical and mental wellbeing than physical activity indoors? A systematic review. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 1761–1772 (2011).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
67.
Hedblom, M., Heyman, E., Antonsson, H. & Gunnarsson, B. Bird song diversity influences young people’s appreciation of urban landscapes. Urban For. Urban Green. 13, 469–474 (2014).
Article Google Scholar
68.
Parsons, R., Tassinary, L. G., Ulrich, R. S., Hebl, M. R. & Grossman-Alexander, M. The view from the road: implications for stress recovery and immunization. J. Environ. Psychol. 18, 113–140 (1998).
Article Google Scholar
69.
Hahmann, S., Miksch, J., Resch, B., Lauer, J. & Zipf, A. Routing through open spaces—a performance comparison of algorithms. Geo. Spat. Inf. Sci. 21, 247–256 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
70.
Harper, C. D., Hendrickson, C. T., Mangones, S. & Samaras, C. Estimating potential increases in travel with autonomous vehicles for the non-driving, elderly and people with travel-restrictive medical conditions. Transp. Res. C Emerg. Technol. 72, 1–9 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
71.
Wei, J. W., Lee, B. & Wen, L. B.Citizen science and the urban ecology of birds and butterflies—a systematic review. PLoS ONE 11, e0156425 (2016).
Article CAS Google Scholar
72.
Schuttler, S. G., Sorensen, A. E., Jordan, R. C., Cooper, C. & Shwartz, A.Bridging the nature gap: can citizen science reverse the extinction of experience? Front. Ecol. Environ. 16, 405–411 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
73.
Jepson, P. & Ladle, R. J. Nature apps: waiting for the revolution. Ambio 44, 827–832 (2015).
PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
74.
Botello, B., Buehler, R., Hankey, S., Mondschein, A. & Jiang, Z. Planning for walking and cycling in an autonomous-vehicle future. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect. 1, 100012 (2019).
Google Scholar
75.
Gulsrud, N. M. in Routledge Research Companion to Landscape Architecture (eds Braae, E. & Steiner, H.) 103–111 (Routledge, 2018).
76.
Potts, S. G., Neumann, P., Vaissière, B. & Vereecken, N. J. Robotic bees for crop pollination: why drones cannot replace biodiversity. Sci. Total Environ. 642, 665–667 (2018).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
77.
Kahn, P. H., Severson, R. L. & Ruckert, J. H. The human relation with nature and technological nature. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 18, 37–42 (2009).
Article Google Scholar
78.
Mackay, C. M. L. & Schmitt, M. T. Do people who feel connected to nature do more to protect it? A meta-analysis. J. Environ. Psychol. 65, 101323 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
79.
Truong, M. X. A. & Clayton, S. Technologically transformed experiences of nature: a challenge for environmental conservation? Biol. Conserv. 244, 108532 (2020).
Article Google Scholar
80.
Alonzo, M., McFadden, J. P., Nowak, D. J. & Roberts, D. A. Mapping urban forest structure and function using hyperspectral imagery and lidar data. Urban For. Urban Green. 17, 135–147 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
81.
Fairbrass, A. J. et al. CityNet—deep learning tools for urban ecoacoustic assessment. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 186–197 (2019).
Article Google Scholar
82.
Bohmann, K. et al. Environmental DNA for wildlife biology and biodiversity monitoring. Trends Ecol. Evol. 29, 358–367 (2014).
PubMed Article Google Scholar
83.
Ampatzidis, Y., De Bellis, L. & Luvisi, A.iPathology: robotic applications and management of plants and plant diseases. Sustainability 9, 1010 (2017).
Article Google Scholar
84.
Nasi, R. et al. Remote sensing of bark beetle damage in urban forests at individual tree level using a novel hyperspectral camera from UAV and aircraft. Urban For. Urban Green. 30, 72–83 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
85.
Smith, R. J., Verissimo, D., Isaac, N. J. B. & Jones, K. E. Identifying Cinderella species: uncovering mammals with conservation flagship appeal. Conserv. Lett. 5, 205–212 (2012).
Article Google Scholar
86.
Cooper, N., Brady, E., Steen, H. & Bryce, R. Aesthetic and spiritual values of ecosystems: recognising the ontological and axiological plurality of cultural ecosystem ‘services’. Ecosyst. Serv. 21, 218–229 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
87.
Colding, J., Colding, M. & Barthel, S.The smart city model: a new panacea for urban sustainability or unmanageable complexity? Environ. Plan. B Urban Anal. City Sci. 47, 179–187 (2020).
Article Google Scholar
88.
Cadotte, M. W., Yasui, S. L. E., Livingstone, S. & MacIvor, J. S. Are urban systems beneficial, detrimental, or indifferent for biological invasion? Biol. Invasions 19, 3489–3503 (2017).
Article Google Scholar
89.
Jurdak, R. et al. Autonomous surveillance for biosecurity. Trends Biotechnol. 33, 201–207 (2015).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
90.
Martinez, B. et al. Technology innovation: advancing capacities for the early detection of and rapid response to invasive species. Biol. Invasions 22, 75–100 (2020).
Article Google Scholar
91.
Mulero-Pazmany, M. et al. Unmanned aircraft systems as a new source of disturbance for wildlife: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 12, e0178448 (2017).
PubMed PubMed Central Article CAS Google Scholar
92.
Rush, G. P., Clarke, L. E., Stone, M. & Wood, M. J. Can drones count gulls? Minimal disturbance and semiautomated image processing with an unmanned aerial vehicle for colony-nesting seabirds. Ecol. Evol. 8, 12322–12334 (2018).
PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
93.
Ditmer, M. A. et al. Bears show a physiological but limited behavioral response to unmanned aerial vehicles. Curr. Biol. 25, 2278–2283 (2015).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
94.
Zvereva, E. L. & Kozlov, M. V. Responses of terrestrial arthropods to air pollution: a meta-analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 17, 297–311 (2010).
CAS Article Google Scholar
95.
Zvereva, E. L., Toivonen, E. & Kozlov, M. V. Changes in species richness of vascular plants under the impact of air pollution: a global perspective. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 17, 305–319 (2008).
Article Google Scholar
96.
Francis, C. D. & Barber, J. R. A framework for understanding noise impacts on wildlife: an urgent conservation priority. Front. Ecol. Environ. 11, 305–313 (2013).
Article Google Scholar
97.
Irwin, A. The dark side of light: how artificial lighting is harming the natural world. Nature 553, 268–270 (2018).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
98.
Knop, E. et al. Artificial light at night as a new threat to pollination. Nature 548, 206–209 (2017).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
99.
Cabrera-Cruz, S. A., Smolinsky, J. A. & Buler, J. J. Light pollution is greatest within migration passage areas for nocturnally-migrating birds around the world. Sci. Rep. 8, 3261 (2018).
PubMed PubMed Central Article CAS Google Scholar
100.
Cashikar, A., Li, J. & Biswas, P. Particulate matter sensors mounted on a robot for environmental aerosol measurements. J. Environ. Eng. 145, 04019057 (2019).
CAS Article Google Scholar
101.
Shah, M., Shah, S. K. & Shah, M. Autonomous robotic vehicle for oil spills cleaning with nano particles. In 2018 International Conference on Manipulation, Automation and Robotics at Small Scales (MARSS) 1–6 (IEEE, 2018).
102.
Alfeo, A. L. et al. Urban swarms: a new approach for autonomous waste management. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2019.8794020 (2019).
103.
Perkins, D. N., Brune Drisse, M.-N., Nxele, T. & Sly, P. D. E-waste: a global hazard. Ann. Glob. Health 80, 286–295 (2014).
PubMed Article Google Scholar
104.
Boyer, T. & Polasky, S. J.Valuing urban wetlands: a review of non-market valuation studies. Wetlands 24, 744–755 (2004).
Article Google Scholar
105.
Rouse, M. The worldwide urban water and wastewater infrastructure challenge. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 30, 20–27 (2014).
Article Google Scholar
106.
Yuan, Z. G. et al. Sweating the assets—the role of instrumentation, control and automation in urban water systems. Water Res. 155, 381–402 (2019).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
107.
Hall, S., Price, R. & Mandhani, N. Use of autonomous vehicles for drinking water monitoring and management in an urban environment. In Proc. ASAE Annual International Meeting 7855–7862 (American Society of Association Executives, 2004).
108.
Troutman, S. C., Love, N. G. & Kerkez, B. Balancing water quality and flows in combined sewer systems using real-time control. Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol. 6, 1357–1369 (2020).
CAS Article Google Scholar
109.
McDonald, W. Drones in urban stormwater management: a review and future perspectives. Urban Water J. 16, 505–518 (2019).
CAS Article Google Scholar
110.
Kerkez, B. et al. Smarter stormwater systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 7267–7273 (2016).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
111.
Chen, Y. & Han, D. Water quality monitoring in smart city: a pilot project. Autom. Constr. 89, 307–316 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
112.
Booth, D. B., Roy, A. H., Smith, B. & Capps, K. A. Global perspectives on the urban stream syndrome. Freshw. Sci. 35, 412–420 (2016).
Article Google Scholar
113.
Prudencio, L. & Null, S. E.Stormwater management and ecosystem services: a review. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 033002 (2018).
Article Google Scholar
114.
Sadler, G. R., Lee, H.-C., Lim, R. S.-H. & Fullerton, J. Research article: recruitment of hard-to-reach population subgroups via adaptations of the snowball sampling strategy. Nurs. Health Sci. 12, 369–374 (2010).
PubMed PubMed Central Article Google Scholar
115.
Mahler, A. G. Global South (Oxford Univ. Press, 2017); https://doi.org/10.1093/OBO/9780190221911-0055
116.
Ricciardi, A. et al. Invasion science: a horizon scan of emerging challenges and opportunities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 32, 464–474 (2017).
PubMed Article Google Scholar
117.
Danziger, S., Levav, J. & Avnaim-Pesso, L. Extraneous factors in judicial decisions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 6889–6892 (2011).
CAS PubMed Article Google Scholar
118.
Bryer, J. & Speerschneider, K. likert: Analysis and visualization likert items https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/likert/likert.pdf (2016).
119.
R Core Development Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020).
120.
Goddard, M. A. & Dallimer, M. University of Leeds Data Repository (Univ. Leeds, 2020); https://doi.org/10.5518/912
121.
Future Foresight (Dubai Future Foundation, 2018); https://www.dubaifuture.gov.ae/publications/ More